NGOs, including OGGN, are political instruments bent on disrupting our oil & gas sector

Dear Editor,

Numerous organisations in Guyana construct their identities under the label of “Non-Governmental Organisation” (NGO).

NGOs emerged out of two main dynamics, and the definition of an NGO is linked to the said sources. Firstly, there are NGOs developed by groups that are supposedly not under the control of governments, that is, they belong to that sphere called civil society. While these are private groups that push specific interests, they often depend on operating in the public sphere.

Secondly, NGOs have historical links to what po- litical scientists like to call “social movements.” Their aims and objectives are broad-based, and they are usually focused on social change. NGOs are, in many ways, parts of social movements.

Yet, many of the NGOs in Guyana in association with their international partners are deeply political. This is most easily proven by the direct links that exist among those who claim to be in an NGO, but who are widely and indisputably linked to political parties.

Many local NGOs have links with foreign NGOs and vice versa. Local NGOs get access to the international community when they link-up with International

Non-Governmental Organisations (INGOs), such as Green Peace. They also receive money, and senior members get invited to fully paid conference trips. This is a kind of NGO-sponsored tourism.

In turn, INGOs get access and legitimacy to countries, mostly in the Global South, where they can prosecute their interests, which often involve implanting foreign values and interests albeit under the rubric of furthering development and strengthening governance. Building capacity is a favourite expression with deep connections to the global technocratic class, themselves linked to the interests of dominant states.

Many INGOs that come here are staffed by lower grade academics and their students who are not among the highest academic achievers. These types see the Global South as “slim pickings,” meaning that they assume the Third World is backward and needs the same kind of civilising missions envisaged by Rudyard Kipling or Thomas Macaulay more than a century ago.

Many of these foreign entities recruit local collaborators to push their civilisational interests while forgetting the responsibility they should take based on the historical record of the countries they come from. Students in foreign univer- sities are taught to frame their NGO interference as learning from us.

There is a third category type of organisation. These are NGOs made up mostly of people in the diaspora.

The Oil & Gas Governance Network is the most relevant to our discussion here. It is made up of people who do not live here, as the list that follows shows.

Alfred Bhulai (Guyana), Dr. Andre Brandli (Switzerland), Dr Janette Bulkan (Canada), Dennis Henry (Canada), Darsh Khusial (Canada), Joe Persaud (Canada) Dr. Ganga Ramdass (USA), Mike Persaud (USA), Charles Sugrim (USA). Of the nine members of OGGN’s Board of

Directors, only one lives in Guyana.

OGGN is a hypocritical organisation because while members are living in countries that are massive producers of oil and gas, they want Guyana to desist from using our hydrocarbon resources for our own development.

Except for Mr. Bhulai, the Board of Directors are part of the populations that are the worst polluters in the world.

The US and Canada produce 25 million barrels of oil daily! Worse, is the fact that destructive processes such as fracking are prevalent in the countries where the members of the board

Continued on page 7