A little rant

To whom it may concern Recently, I found the image-quote on Facebook, that is shown below. The phrase “At least don’t hurt them” got me thinking about the actions of various “public authority” figures in the Isle of Man, amongst them (and by no means is this even a comprehensive list) First Deemster David Doyle, Second Dingbat Deemster Adolf TK Maxx Corlett, and especially the former “Deputy Dingbat” Adolf Kalashnikov Williamson [“AK 47” – a weapon of destruction].

Deemsters are people in “public authority” and are NOT above the law; although they act as if they are.

Deputy Governor and (now) First Deemster issued a “statement” on 14/12/2011 – that contains “a view.” The view is recorded in a “judgement” on-line J1149.htm and it is the view that “no criticism” could be made of the former “Deputy Deemster,” (in my opinion) the “shit” AK47 Williamson.

On 5th November 2004, the Deputy Dingbat issued a “declaratory order” THAT HAD NO BASIS IN LAW – it had NO LEGAL STATUS the moment it was made, but because Williamson had been High Bailiff and was promoted to the “Family Division” of the High Court (turning the civil court into a kangaroo court of injustice) it appeared that what he had issued was “an order” – or “some kind of injunction empowering arrest.”

Did Doyle help me on 3rd September 2007? – No! Did Corlett help me in July 2011 or March 2013? – No! Did Williamson help me or my two children in 2004 and 2005? – No: his actions had no basis in law.

Has anyone in “public authority” in the Isle of Man actually “helped” Manx children Katarina and Benedict Holmes? – NO Not the Lt. Governor – in fact TWO Lt. Governors; despite pleas to two of the representatives of HM the Queen. Not TWO Attorneys General (one “real” and one Acting) – John Corlett and John Quinn have done nothing to help.

Not even the Bishop – the Lord Bishop of Sodor and Man – has used his power to assist “a family that has been hurt.”

On 18th May 2004, I made an Application to the Isle of Man “High” court for “the Court” to consider determining a question with regard to the future upbringing of my Manx children. Unbeknownst to me, in September 2002, the Lt. Governor, on the recommendation of the Deemsters (“The Two”) had appointed a person with an IQ of 68 to the position of Deputy Deemster, the imbecile I call AK47 Williamson. Whatever else this imbecile did, on 5 th November 2004 he issued a so-called “declaratory order” that had no basis in LAW and ordered that it be sent to the Police and a Head Teacher. He ordered his “private law” order be put in the public domain (contrary to Section 80 of the Children and Young Persons Act 2001 – the media got hold of the story soon after) and in the Isle of Man Constabulary, the so-called order (for it was not an order of the court at all – it had no legal status the moment it was made) was treated as some kind of injunction empowering arrest! It was a false instrument, and if any other person in the Isle of Man had issued it, they would have been charged under the Forgery Act 1952; but Williamson had been a judge in the Isle of Man since January 1988 so “his word was law” even when (in this case) his word had no basis in law – in the law that he had sworn to execute justly.

Then, in 2007, Peter Corkhill (“CR”) admitted that actions had been unlawful, but Williamson’s colleagues decided that no criticism could be made of the child-rights abusing bastard. And also, by October 2007, David Doyle had entered the fray and looked at … the Court file, not at proper statutory based evidence.

The new First Deemster, (in 2011), David Charlatan Doyle ignored the judgment of the High Court that there was “no legitimate basis” upon which the Deputy Deemster could have made the “order” which he did (on 5 th November 2004) and concentrated on the BIASED view that no fair criticism could have been made of the shit Williamson. The “no legitimate basis” view (or judgement) was CORRECT – the prelude to the section “The effect

of non registration” showed that; but the sudden view or comment that “no fair criticism can be made of the Deputy Deemster” was wrong. Also the view or opinion that the so-called “orders” from Lancaster County court had not been properly registered in the Isle of Man “High Court” was wrong – the so-called orders of the “County” court had NOT been registered in the Isle of Man High Court – not, not, not. Use of the words proper and properly in front of the word “registered” led to confusion – the so-called orders from a county court (inferior to the High Court) were NOT registered. Nor could they be registered because a county court cannot bind a High Court.

Deemsters swear an oath to “execute the laws of this Isle justly” but an ORDER cannot be just or fair if it has no legal status from the outset. The First Deemster and judge of appeal embarked on a “damage limitation” exercise on 20th October 2007 so put in their “judgment” of 26/10/2007 the phrase “no fair criticism can be made of the Deputy Deemster” – which Doyle referred to as “a view”. Criticism of the rights-abusing bastard Williamson was essential to maintain public confidence in the Isle of Man judiciary – essentially the first and second dingbats (now Doyle and Corlett) but the Deemster and “JA” showed partiality to the wrong-doing of their “brother Dingbat” Williamson – partiality to the wicked, which is prohibited by Oath and by Statute (section 45 of the Customary Laws Act 1422).

So what we have in the Isle of Man are “bent Deemsters” – biased and devious bastards who will do anything to try to cover-up their collective ignorance. The crucial phrases (in paragraph 47 of the POO [Piece of Ordure] in J1183.htm) are “when they had not been so registered” and “there was no legitimate basis upon which the Deputy Deemster could have made the order which he did”. All the rest of the 56 paragraphs is irrelevant nonsense because the so-called orders of the Lancaster County Court had no legal basis in ANY jurisdiction, and particularly not in the Isle of Man. I have said this many times: a trained chimpanzee would have made a better Deputy Deemster than AK47 Williamson – and Corlett admitted to learning a great deal from the shit Williamson; so Corlett is biased in favour of wrong-doing rather than executing the laws of the Isle of Man justly.

The “Holmes Affair” is a catalogue of wrong-doing; and the main miscreant is now the First Deemster, because he “looked at a file” rather than looking at what is called EVIDENCE! Doyle leapt into the fray on 3rd September 2007, when he described the children matter as “divorce proceedings”. Williamson instructed the Assistant Chief Registrar to “register” documents from England, and a so-called registration process was purported to have taken place on 28th May 2004, but did not take place – according to another assistant chief registrar (writing in February 2006) the “rules laid down” were not accorded to – then on 25 th July 2007, the Chief Registrar admitted that the action (on 28th May 2004) was unlawful. David Doyle alleged on 14/12/2011 that my “obsession” with showing that Williamson was wrong (and Williamson was wrong) had become irrational (!); yet Doyle did not know the difference between a divorce and a specific issue – the Cretin. Then he did not mention the “no legitimate basis” judgement, but the view that “no fair criticism” could be made of the child-rights abusing bastard Williamson.

Doyle also caused the rights abuse of the same two Manx children – from 10 th March 2008 another so-called court order “appeared to be in force” – made under an Application that had been dismissed on 1 st July 2004 – CASE CLOSED. Only in the Isle of Man can a case be closed and treated as DEAD, then resurrected with somebody else as the Applicant. Doyle even stated (in 2007) that Yvonne Holmes had applied to commence proceedings, but that the proceedings already had a “considerable history”. What is a “considerable history”? If the proceedings were on-going, then there was no need to apply to commence proceeding. A new case file should have been opened, but in the Isle of Man Kangaroo Court of Injustice, headed by El Presidenté David Charlatan Doyle, the Deemsters just make up the law as they go along, despite their (worthless) oath to execute the laws of “this Isle” justly – the useless shits. There are FIVE useless shits acting as High Court judges in the Isle of Man: Doyle, Corlett, Williamson (still a Part-Time Dingbat), O’Riordan (IQ of about 68, worse than moron), and Roberts; Needham occasionally acts as a Deemster in the civil court, but he is a criminal court judge; and it is my opinion that Judge of Appeal Tattersall is also biased and useless.

This is My Rant for week-commencing 16th August 2015 – and to summarise, in case you are in any doubt – First Deemster David Charlatan Doyle is a useless child-rights abusing shit in the civil court. In 1994, Doyle wrote about the rules of natural justice, but Doyle will judge in his own cause at the drop of a hat rather than execute a Manx law justly and do the right thing; in other words: Doyle does not follow the rules of natural justice.

So, I have great pleasure in informing the people of the Isle of Man that the Deemsters are charlatans who would rather abuse children (rights abuse against children IS child abuse) than help them. Ask the Isle of Man Kangaroo Court of Injustice (the high or civil court, domain of David Charlatan Doyle and AT Kalashnikov Corlett) to “HELP” and you will end up hurt because the Deemsters continue their 1040 year-old habit of “making it up as they go”.

Deemsters: abusing the rights of Manx children since April 1992: hurting people for 23 years (and counting). In fact, breaking the law since 1st April 1992 because of their collective hubris, ignorance and incompetence.

David Doyle began a dispute with me on 3 rd September 2007 and has permitted himself to judge that he did nothing wrong since then (coming-up for eight years of wrong-doing now), but he did not help me; he did not help children – he hurt everyone that became involved in the dispute – including the late grandmother of Katie and Ben – who had very few “dealings” with her grandchildren from April 2004 onwards, because AK47 Williamson had been made Deputy Deemster in September 2002; instead of a trained chimpanzee!

This is the “informed” voice of a Manxman: that the Deemsters are charlatans who abuse fundamental rights.