Cregeen is a moron

A “photocopy� of the letter from S.R. Cregeen of 12th November 2014 Note that the Act is called the Bill of Right on this letter.

27th November 2014 To :

s_h_iom@yahoo.com

John Quinn; Jon Callister AG’s Chambers, Douglas; Human Resources, Douglas

With Prejudice

Dear Sirs, I received the following letter from Stephen R. Cregeen on Friday 14 th November 2014, and wish to complain ferociously about the moron who is Chief Registrar in the Isle of Man. This is a new complaint about “the moron” [I have the right to consider S.R. Cregeen “a moron” as I have the right to consider first Deemster David C. Doyle “an imbecile” and Second Deemster Corlett “an idiot”] raised as a result of the last two sentences in the letter (below).

Discarding the words “in effect,” the moron Cregeen alleges that the Petition is “a separate residual Crown prerogative right”. There is a heading in the Bill of Rights [1688] (note that it is called the Bill of RIGHTS not the Bill of Right; and that it does extend to the Isle of Man – see the Chronological Table of Acts of Parliament extending to the Isle of Man from July 2003) The Subject’s Rights and that Commitments against such (petitioning) are “illegal” or unlawful.

The moron Cregeen tells me that he is “directed” to return the documentation to me, but does not tell me who directed him: from my knowledge of the High Court Act 1991 (section 28) I know that the imbecile David C. Doyle (First Deemster) is responsible for direction and supervision of the Chief Registrar.

We have, in the General Registry, the blind and moronic leading the blind and stupid; rule of law has gone out the window and been replaced by rule of opinion, whether the opinion is legal or not – usually not. “No legitimate basis” upon which DD Williamson could have made the “order” of 5th November 2004 was what Dm Kerruish and Tattersall JA judged on 26th October 2007; the so-called order had no basis in Law! Chief Registrar

In the various levels of stupidity, we have idiots as judges and administrators (Coppell, Robertson &c); imbeciles as judges (Doyle in particular); a moron for Chief Registrar; and a cretin on the Panel of part-time Deemsters in “AK47” Williamson, former Deputy Deemster and child-rights abuser.

The fundamental rule of fairness is Nemo judex in causa sua (no-one can be a judge in his own cause) – but Doyle, Corlett, Cregeen and even the Acting Attorney General have breached this fundamental common law rule.

In the Isle of Man though, it is much more than a common law rule – it is a Statutory requirement for section 45 of the Customary Laws Act 1422 is headed Partiality (bias) and misgovernment prohibited. In order for a hearing to be fair, both sides must be heard and no-one can “judge in own cause”. Cregeen judged that in his opinion the right to Petition was a right of the CROWN, because he is a moron. He was probably directed by the imbecile David C. Doyle who, on 3rd September 2007, stated that “divorce proceedings 2004 stroke 144” had a “considerable history”. The matter given case file number Div 2004/144 was not a divorce, but started as an application for a section 11(1) CYPA 2001 “residence order” in a matter relating to children. Second Deemster David C. Doyle did not know the difference between a divorce order and a residence order in September 2007!

Corlett admitted, on 1st April 2011 to learning “a great deal” from AK47 Williamson, but what exactly he learned from the charlatan child-rights abusing bastard is unknown.

Deemster Kerruish and Tattersall JA were NOT entitled to the view that “no fair criticism” could be made of the bastard Williamson because that was showing partiality to a fellow “Deemster” and Partiality is prohibited by Statute and by the Deemster’s ridiculous oath. Note that the oath of allegiance which is sworn by MHKs and officers of the Crown is contained in the 1688 Bill of Rights – so the 1688 Act does indeed extend to the Isle of Man. And as stated above, a heading in this 1688 Act is The Subject’s Rights.

The upshot of the negligence and outlawry displayed (especially) by Doyle and Cregeen is that both should be suspended without pay until the matter of the General Registry versus Stephen Holmes (and Katie Holmes and Ben Holmes) has been resolved satisfactorily, and in resolving the matter no-one shall be a judge in own cause;