6 minute read
Comment
A disconcerting lack of vision
Get the latest construction news! Follow us on Twitter @OnSiteMag When engineers in Toronto were laying out plans for the Prince Edward Viaduct in the early 1910s, the subway line that would eventually carry trains along the lower deck of the bridge was little more than a far-flung possibility. For about five years, designers and politicians battled over whether or not the added deck was worth the expense. In the end, supporters of the subway won out.
It was a display of vision rare in Canadian infrastructure planning, then or now.
In 1918, when construction finished on the bridge that spans the Don Valley, its top level connected Bloor Street with Danforth Avenue, while the lower deck sat ready to support a rail line. Supporters would wait nearly 50 years for the Bloor-Danforth subway to become a reality, but the foresight in double-decking the viaduct played no small part in the milestone.
In turn, these two pieces of infrastructure have shaped the way Toronto has developed over the past century.
City building is a complex and, at times, unpredictable process, but more often than not our governments focus on addressing immediate concerns at the expense of longer-term planning. Today, Toronto is paying the price for what’s widely seen as decades of chronic under-investment in its infrastructure, particularly in its transit network. The latest provincial push to spend nearly $30 billion on four new or expanded transit lines will belatedly address some of the problems, assuming the plan moves forward.
Still, in nearby Hamilton, Ont., the province’s recent decision to pull the plug on a new light rail transit project threatens to lead the historically industrial city down the same meandering path.
A more complete post-mortem on the Hamilton LRT over the coming months will likely unpack further details about why the project was mothballed, but Transportation Minister Caroline Mulroney cited costs that had ballooned from $1 billion to $5.5 billion. The Ontario PCs also blamed the former Liberal government for misleading the public about the real cost of the transit project. Both claims likely have at least some grounding in reality, but the cost being higher than initially pitched doesn’t change the fact that Hamilton needs the light rail line.
The city of more than half a million people continues to grow as affordability issues across Toronto and what have traditionally been its more popular suburbs drive people to Hamilton. The Ontario government still plans to spend $1 billion on transit in Hamilton and has created a task force to decide how to spend the money. If the province is unwilling to fund permanent infrastructure, however, it seems likely the funds will go toward stopgap solutions.
While fiscal realities can’t be overlooked and governments have a responsibility to minimize expenditures, investing in infrastructure is a proven long-term benefit. Major projects typically pay for themselves many times over through the economic opportunities they create. At the same time, more and more people are moving to urban areas – a trend that shows no signs of slowing. Our governments need to have the vision to create cities Canadians want to live in, and accessible transit is a big step in the right direction. Of course, this also means spending money on infrastructure projects, even when they’re costly. Choosing to avoid picking up the tab today will only compound costs when playing catch-up tomorrow.
As the old proverb goes, the best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago, the second best time is now.
David Kennedy / Editor dkennedy@on-sitemag.com
MEET OUR CONTRIBUTORS FOR THIS ISSUE
ANIL SAWHNEY / Director of the Infrastructure Sector for the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors
On looking at whole life-cycle value: “The construction market is responding to an increase in demand for more sustainable buildings and infrastructure. Project owners as well, see value in considering life-cycle costs as part of the financial management of building projects.”
NATE HENDLEY / Freelance Writer & Author
On the rise of vacuum excavators: “Traditionally, vacuum excavators were used by construction firms for potholing purposes… Increasingly, contractors are using vacuum excavators for applications beyond potholing, such as slot-trenching and foundation excavation.”
JACOB STOLLER / Principal, StollerStrategies
On technology for safer job sites: “There’s no substitute for the underlying thought processes that form the foundation of a successful safety program. While technology can’t ensure that people think, it can increase the overall level of awareness by making safety risks highly visible and difficult to ignore.”
DAVID BOWCOTT / Global Director – Growth, Innovation & Insight, Global Construction and Infrastructure Group at Aon Risk Solutions
On how to address risk allocation through collaboration: “Some of the key criticisms of the current procurement model include: it offers poor communication between separate phases of the asset’s life; it stifles innovation; it limits some stakeholders’ ability to provide input; and it focuses on low bid construction.”
GRANT MAYOVSKY AND SIOBHAN SMALL / Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
On spoilation and the risk of remediation: “Spoliation is a defense raised in litigation when a plaintiff has intentionally destroyed evidence, depriving the defendant of support for its position.”
www.on-sitemag.com / Fax: 416-442-2230
PUBLISHER | Peter Leonard ( 416) 510-6847 pLeonard@on-sitemag.com EDITOR | David Kennedy ( 416) 510-6821 dkennedy@on-sitemag.com ASSOCIATE EDITOR | Megan Hoegler ( 416) 510-5201 mhoegler@on-sitemag.com MEDIA DESIGNER | Brooke Shaw bshaw@annexbusinessmedia.com ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER | David Skene ( 416) 510-6884 dskene@on-sitemag.com ACCOUNT COORDINATOR | Kim Rossiter ( 416) 510-6794 krossiter@on-sitemag.com AUDIENCE DEVELOPMENT MANAGER | Urszula Grzyb (416) 510-5180 ugrzyb@annexbusinessmedia.com Vice President | Tim Dimopoulos (416) 510-5100 tdimopoulos@annexbusinessmedia.com COO | Scott Jamieson sjamieson@annexbusinessmedia.com
Established in 1957, On-Site is published by Annex Business Media 111 Gordon Baker Road, Suite 400, Toronto, ON M2H 3R1 Publications Mail Agreement No. 40065710 ISSN: 1910-118X (Print) ISSN 2371-8544 (Online)
Circulation email: ugrzyb@annexbusinessmedia.com Tel: 416-510-5180 Fax: 416-510-6875 or 416-442-2191 Mail: 111 Gordon Baker Road, Suite 400, Toronto, ON M2H 3R1
SUBSCRIPTION RATES 1 Year Canada $49.50(CDN), 1 Year US $113.00(CDN), 1 Year Foreign $136.50(CDN), Single Issue $13.50(CDN). On-Site is published 7 times per year except for occasional combined, expanded or premium issues, which count as two subscription issues.
Occasionally, On-Site will mail information on behalf of industry-related groups whose products and services we believe may be of interest to you. If you prefer not to receive this information, please contact our circulation department in any of the four ways listed above.
Annex Privacy Officer privacy@annexbusinessmedia.com Tel: 800-668-2374
Content copyright ©2020 by Annex Publishing & Printing Inc may not be reprinted without permission.
On-Site receives unsolicited materials (including letters to the editor, press releases, promotional items and images) from time to time. On-Site, its affiliates and assignees may use, reproduce, publish, re-publish, distribute, store and archive such unsolicited submissions in whole or in part in any form or medium whatsoever, without compensation of any sort.
DISCLAIMER This publication is for informational purposes only The content and “expert” advice presented are not intended as a substitute for informed professional engineering advice. You should not act on information contained in this publication without seeking specific advice from qualified engineering professionals.
MEMBER OF
March 10-14, 2020 Las Vegas Convention Center
Booth N10001
