

2026 MiAPPA SUMMER CONFERENCE MISSION CRITICAL






Innovating for Impact: Advancing Educational Facilities Through Infrastructure and Operational Excellence











Definitions

What is the difference between a NEEDS ASSESSMENT and a FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT?


From Reactive Needs to Strategic Facility Planning
Beyond the Clipboard: A Comprehensive Approach to Facility Planning



Needs Assessment
• Identify systems that are broken
• Needs assessments
• Walk the building
• Note deficiencies
• Determine cost of correction
• Done with a clipboard
• Provides a “single point” in time assessment
• Not getting “forward look”




Facility Condition Assessment
+ NEEDS – SHOULD BE A FACILITY
CONDITION ASSESSMENT
• EVALUATION OF ALL BUILDING AND SITE SYSTEMS
• LOOK AHEAD 10 – 20 YEARS
• BASED ON LIFE CYCLE
• COST – INDEXED FOR LOCATION AND INCREASES



Facility Condition Assessment Team




Import building & systems lists Integrate CMMS data
Field assessments with Prior Assessments

Industry data: BOMA, Uniformat
Funding and Condition
1.Roof $123,543
2.Lighting $75,000
3.Sewer $135,000 4.Access $83,000


Industry benchmark data – RS Means
Report / Measure
Prioritize/ Budget
1.Roof $123,543
2.Lighting $75,000
3.Sewer $135,000
4.Access $83,000




Collection
+ ASSESSMENT TEAM
• ARCHITECT(S)
• ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
• MECHANICAL ENGINEER
• CIVIL ENGINEERS/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
+ ASSESS ALL BUILDING AND SITE COMPONENTS
• QUANTITY
• PHOTOGRAPHS
• CONDITION
• LIFE-CYCLE YEARS REMAINING
+ QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW
+ DATABASE COMMITMENT



Collection







Facility Assessments: Consistent & Objective

FACILITY ASSESSMENTS: CONSISTENT AND OBJECTIVE


Enrichment
+ BOMA
• BUILDING OWNERS & MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
• LIFE-CYCLE OF EACH SYSTEM + RSMEANS
• INDUSTRY STANDARD CONSTRUCTION COST DATA
• ADJUSTED FOR REGIONAL COSTS
+ PROVIDES INFORMATION ON WHEN A SYSTEM NEEDS ATTENTION AND THE PROBABLE COST




Analysis
+ PRESENT DRAFT DATA FOR REVIEW
+ COACH ON EXPLORING “WHAT’S IN THE DATA?”
+ COACH ON TURNING DATA INTO A CAPITAL PLAN
+ FINAL PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS (POF)





Analysis




Dashboard



Dashboard



Work Plan Dashboard



Work Plan Dashboard



Facility Master Plan






Definitions

How can research and good planning save first-time costs and operational expenditures?


Planning Beyond First Cost
How Research and Strategy Reduce Long-Term Operational Expenses



Case Study

Using Research and Fire Modeling to Reduce First Cost and Long-Term Operational Expenses
• “No Mechanical Smoke Evacuation Required.”
• “Performance-Based Design Approach.”


Performance-Based Fire Modeling Strategy
Research and Simulation Replaced Assumptions




Visibility Study Animation at 6’-0” Research-Based Decisions Improved Safety AND Reduced Cost



Visibility Study Animation – 3D
Research-Based Decisions Improved Safety AND Reduced Cost



ASET vs. RSET
Proving Occupants Could Safely Egress Without Mechanical Smoke Evacuation
Key Definitions
• RSET = Required Safe Egress Time
• ASET = Available Safe Egress Time


Mission-Critical Planning Creates Long-Term Value
Research-Based Decisions Improved Safety AND Reduced Cost
Key Outcomes
✓ Maintained occupant safety
✓ Met NFPA 101 communicating space requirements
✓ Eliminated unnecessary mechanical smoke evacuation
✓ Reduced operational complexity
✓ Improved long-term maintainability
✓ Preserved architectural openness and student experience



Operational Simplicity = Long-Term Savings
The Best System May Be the One You Never Install


Comparison

Avoided Systems
Avoided Long-Term Burden
Roof smoke exhaust fans Maintenance
Smoke control dampers Testing
Dedicated controls Commissioning
Emergency power upgrades
Energy consumption
Smoke control sequences Failure risk
Firefighter override panels Lifecycle replacement




Definitions

How can the Owner get the most VALUE for the money they spend on capital projects and maintenance?


Maximizing Long-Term Value
Strategic Planning for Capital Investment and Maintenance



what are you buying


Balancing Expectations
Research-Based Decisions Increase Value
Key Project Components
money/budget
time/schedule
quality/design



Traditional Project Cost Control


Cost to Change



Design Value Matrix



Cost to Change



Typical Life Cycle Costs: 40 Years
Research-Based Decisions Increase Value
✓Construction Cost
✓Financing
✓Capital Expenditures
✓Operating Costs
✓




Typical Life Cycle Costs: 40 Years
Research-Based Decisions Increase Value
✓Construction Cost
✓Operating Costs
✓Personnel Costs
✓Students


Construction Operating Costs Personnel
✓Source: Joseph Romm, Lean and Clean Management, Kodansha International, 1994


Energy Star Target Finder
Target-Based Decisions Increase Value








Sample Operational Cost Goal: Utilities maximizing investment &
minimizing
life cycle costs
Annual Utility Costs Savings
New, High-performing, and ENERGY STAR Certified Building vs. 1960’s Building
ENERGY STAR certified buildings use about 35% less energy than typical peer buildings.





Definitions

How can educational facilities increase student ENGAGEMENT, improve recruitment and retention, and strengthen institutional identity?


Visioning & Stakeholder Engagement


Using Collaborative Visioning and Stakeholder Engagement to Create Mission-Critical Learning Environments



KRESA Visioning & Stakeholder Engagement
Lessons from the KRESA 4-Day Collaborative Design Process



Facility as a Statement of Value
Value of the New CTE Center:
• Signals value and relevance through strong curb appeal that attracts students, families, educators, and employers
• Flexible, future-ready spaces that adapt to evolving industries, equipment, and instructional models
• Strategically located to support efficient transportation, industry partnerships, and realworld work-based learning along the I-94 corridor
• A shared community asset, providing access and use during non-peak school hours
Designed to build 21st-century skills—for students and the broader community.





Delegate Leadership – Build Empathy





Visioning & Stakeholder Engagement - Choice
Recommendation:
Based on a group vote from the visioning and stakeholder engagement workshops, the recommendation is to select Visioning Option No. 3, “Discovery Trail,” is the preferred option to further develop during conceptual design.






New Career Center | Concept Design





New Career Connect Center | Concept Design




New Career Connect Center | Concept Design
First Floor Plan




New Career Connect Center | Concept Design
Second Floor Plan






Gound Breaking




Bridging Communities





Threshold Experience





Welcome






KRESA Opens, May 2025





KRESA Opens, May 2025

Opportunities!



KRESA CCC



