25 minute read
Study the Role of Media in Falsely Blaming the Government and Supporting Dr. Venugopal
ruin the social harmony, social welfare, social peace, social unity and finally the social stability of the nation resulting in permanent disaster!
2.3 Super Fuzzy Mixed FRM Model to Study the Role of Media in Falsely Blaming the Government and Supporting Dr. Venugopal
Advertisement
They have given the following attributes to work with this very extra ordinary situation. Each concept or attribute given by them is described in a line or two for the reader to understand in what direction or meaning these concepts / attributes are used in this super fuzzy model.
M1 - The Brahmin dominated media projected the government (Minister) as folly in the administrative work. M2 - The Brahmin dominated media projected Dr. Venugopal as a world level cardiologist and a man of repute and honesty. M3 - The Brahmin dominated media was neutral to both. M4 - The casteist media projected only upper caste as perfectionist. M5 - The authority Sudra was insulted beyond limits by the media. M6 - The subordinate Brahmin was portrayed as a man of virtue and renowned doctor. M7 - The media took sides on this issue by writing the support of BJP to Dr. Venugopal. M8 - The media failed to see the true problems in AIIMS as pointed out by the Health Minister who is the president of AIIMS. M9 - The media failed to project the protests carried out in the AIIMS campus which was backed by Dr.Venugopal and the Hindutva fanatics. M10 - The media failed to investigate the truth behind the issue with ulterior motives and selfish intensions prevailing in the admissions in AIIMS.
M11 - The protest carried out by youth for equality in the AIIMS amounting to disobedience of the High Court order was not properly projected by the Brahmin media. M12 - Till date the wrong and the unlawful ways in which the P.G medical seats are filled in AIIMS is not discussed by the media. M13 - The media failed to bring out the patients death caused by the striking doctors of AIIMS. No investigation about the death was carried out. M14 - Court gave the marvellous order that they should be paid for the period of strike which spread over 40 days. Their absence of work and that too agitating against the govt under which they were working was a blow to the norms of natural justice! The experts ask will ever any group from OBC get this sort of judgement. Even daily wagers when they go on strike they do not get their pay. The only reason is backed by Hindutva and religious leaders! M15 - The administrative frauds carried out by Dr. Venugopal is not brought out by the media or by the court openly.
These are the 15 attributes mainly agreed by all experts. Now as groups they will be used to construct the fuzzy super model. The four categories of experts are doctors, politicians, public and medical students. This is taken as the domain space attributes. Both the domain and range space attributes are super fuzzy row vectors.
The nodes of the domain space given by the doctors are
D1 - doctors belonging to SC/ST castes D2 - doctors belonging to OBC D3 - doctors belonging to Brahmin communities/upper castes D4 - doctors from minority religions D5 - doctors who are neither against nor favour reservation.
The nodes related with politicians. We had to take the opinion of the politicians for this case is the Union Cabinet Central Minister versus the Brahmin director and the move to give reservations for the OBC was only contemplated by the political leaders to socially uplift the OBC. So we are forced to interview and take their opinion also in this regard.
P1 - Political leaders belonging to OBC P2 - Political leaders belonging to SC/ST P3 - Political leaders from upper castes and Brahmins P4 - Political leaders from minority communities
We do not accept passive political leaders for they cannot stay neutral on a social issue. Because they have voted in both the houses no body ever said he/she was neutral in both the houses.
Next we give the list of public, who are experts to give their views
C1 - Educated public from the OBC C2 - Uneducated public from the OBC C3 - Educated public from SC/ST C4 - Uneducated public from SC/ST C5 - Public from the upper castes/Brahmins C6 - Educated public from the minorities C7 - Uneducated public from the minorities
Now the list of students who given their views about the occurrences in the AIIMS under director, Dr. Venugopal.
S1 - Medical OBC students from AIIMS and other medical institutes S2 - Medical upper caste and Brahmin students from AIIMS / other medical colleges S3 - OBC students other than medicine S4 - Upper caste/Brahmin students from other faculties other than medicine S5 - SC/ST students from all faculties S6 - Minority students from all faculties
Now we give choice for the four groups to select any number of attributes from the given 15 attributes. These 15 attributes were also formed using the experts from all the categories. Now we use fuzzy model in general and super fuzzy mixed FRM model in particular to analyze the problems which is given by the super fuzzy matrix M
M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12 M13 M14 M15 D1 1 1 0 1 1 10 1 01 1 1 1 1 1 D2 1 1 0 1 1 10 1 01 1 1 1 1 1 D3 0 0 1 0 0 01 0 10 0 -10 0 -1 D4 1 1 0 1 1 10 1 01 1 1 1 1 0 D5 1 1 0 1 1 10 1 01 0 0 1 1 1 P1 1 1 0 0 1 10 1 01 1 1 1 1 1 P2 1 1 -1 0 1 10 1 -11 1 1 1 1 1 P3 0 0 1 1 0 01 0 1-10 0 0 0 -1 P4 1 1 0 0 1 1-10 01 1 1 1 1 0 C1 1 1 0 0 1 10 1 01 1 1 1 1 1 C2 1 1 -1 0 1 10 1 -11 1 0 1 1 0 C3 1 1 0 -11 1-11 01 1 1 1 1 1 C4 1 1 0 -11 10 1 -10 -11 1 0 0 C5 0 0 1 1 0 01 0 10 0 0 -1-1 -1 C6 1 1 0 0 1 10 1 01 1 0 1 1 1 C7 1 0 0 1 1 10 1 00 1 1 1 1 1 S1 1 1 0 1 1 10 1 00 0 0 0 0 0 S2 0 0 1 0 0 01 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 S3 1 1 0 0 1 10 1 -10 0 0 0 0 0 S4 -1 0 1 0 -101 -110 0 0 0 0 0 S5 1 1 0 1 1 1-11 -10 0 0 0 0 0 S6 1 1 -1 0 1 00 1 00 0 0 0 0 0
Now having given the experts opinion in the form of a super fuzzy FRM connection matrix we find the super hidden pattern for one or two vectors given by the experts, here. However we have worked with several to derive the conclusion. Suppose one is interested in studying the situation when the node M3 alone of
the range space is in the on state and all other nodes are in the off state. To study the effect of the statement “The Brahmin dominated media was neutral to both”. Thus let
X = (0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) be the given state vector; to study the effect of X on the super fuzzy dynamical system.
We find
Y·M (0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0) = X1 (say). X1·MT (0 0 1 0 0 | 0 0 1 0 | 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 | 0 1 0 1 0 0)
after appropriate thresholding of the resultant we get Y1 which is nothing, but Y leading to the fixed binary pair (0 0 1 0 0 | 0 0 1 0 | 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 | 0 1 0 1 0 0), (0 0 1 0 0 0 1 01 0 0 0 0 0 0) . We see the on state of the node M3 – The media is neutral to both alone lead to a fixed point which makes only the nodes M7 and M9 to the on state in the range space i.e. the media was not neutral for it took sides on this issue by writing the support of BJP to Venugopal for the BJP asked Anbumani to resign for the post which shows the media was biased and was acting openly against Dr. Anbumani Ramadoss. Further the media was not neutral for it did not project the true fact that the protests carried out in the campus was backed by Dr.Venugopal and Dr.Venugopal was in turn protected and strongly backed by the Hindutva fanatics. On the other hand the resultant fixed point from the domain super space made only the nodes D3, P3, C5, S2 and S4 to the on state which clearly shows only the doctors belonging to upper caste or Brahmins dire say the media is neutral in both the cases. Also the political leaders from the upper castes and Brahmins claim the media has acted neutral in both the cases. The public from these sections also blindly say the media has acted neutral. Further only the upper castes and Brahmin medical students as well as the students from the other faculties accept that the medical has acted neutral in both the
cases. Consequently all these have made on the state that BJP is supporting Dr. Venugopal activities and the media has completely black out the fact that all protests made in the AIIMS is instigated at large but the director Dr. Venugopal and the Hindutva fanatics and certain Hindu religious heads form the south. Suppose only the node M5 alone in the range space is in the on state in the given state vector and all other nodes are in the off state. To find the super hidden pattern of the state vector using this super dynamical system. Let T = (0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) be the given state vector. The effect of T on MT is given by
where R is a super fuzzy mixed row vector.
Now we calculate
R·M (1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1) = T1. T1·MT (1 1 0 1 1 | 1 1 0 1 | 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 | 1 0 1 0 1 1) = R1(= R).
Thus super hidden pattern is given by the binary pair (1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1), (1 1 0 1 1 | 1 1 0 1 1 | 1 1 0 1 | 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 | 1 0 1 0 1 1) . Thus we see that when only the input the Brahmin media has treated Dr. Anbumani Ramadoss with bias by insulting him in every possible way all the nodes in the range space come to on state except M3 , M7 and M9 which implies that the Brahmin media was not neutral in the issue, media was partial by taking sides and reporting in support of Dr. Venugopal and above all the media failed to project the truth that Dr. Venugopal was behind all the anti reservation protests carried out in the AIIMS campus which was against the order of the high court, that such type of protests or agitations cannot be held with in the campus.
On the contrary the director had helped the anti reservations protestors by putting a Shamiana in the premises of AIIMS and the facility of air coolers that is why they could lie down in the shade reading novel / sleeping, playing cards, can carry the protests in a novel way ! Finally from the super fuzzy row vector given as the hidden pattern we see that only the Brahmin groups in all the four categories did not agree to the fact that the media had insulted the Sudra authority limitlessly. The authors have worked with several on state of the attributes and have given the consolidated analysis as observations. Observation derived from the super fuzzy mixed FRM model is as follows:
1. The media failed to be neutral while reporting the misunderstandings between Dr. Venugopal and Dr.
Anbumani Ramadoss. The Sudra authority was portrayed as an embodiment of faults and on the contrary the sub ordinate Brahmin Dr. Venugopal was pictured as a dutiful renowned professional. The media failed to show the nasty side of Dr. Venugopal who could instigate the students to protest and abstain from their duty for a long period of over 40 days. Is this a dutiful character of Dr.Venugopal or a selfish Brahmin casteist personality? The media has not only biased and blocked the facts but has given false perspective of the whole situation.
2.The media which should have acted in a way to educate people of the true situation has lied and not only made false propaganda against reservation but also against the president Dr. Anbumani Ramadoss of AIIMS. For instance only after 20 days of stir Dr. Anbumani Ramadoss went to AIIMS and was checking patients, this was reported in the first page of the ‘The New Indian Express’ dated 1-6-2003. This was very indecently brought out in the media saying he wanted cheap popularity so only he came to work in AIIMS. By chance a Brahmin Union Minister they would have said the simple nature of the Union Minister with a resolute duty conscience have come to serve the suffering people and the director would have been not only sacked
from the post but sent home and the courts would justify the acts. What is law? What is the power of Brahmins?
3.When AIIMS sacks Venugopal they said it was a blatant slap on medical profession – it is reported in the first page.
Sacked AIIMS chief moves to HC and in that he challenged
Dr. Anbumani Ramadoss to be holding an office of profit as
AIIMS President. With this sacking of Dr.Venugopal once again he instigated them to continue the strike which was never brought out in the Brahmin media. On 6th, he approaches the court and on 8th he returns to AIIMS as director. Immediately BJP advised Dr. Anbumani Ramadoss to stop meddling with AIIMS. So a sudra in power who is an authority not only for AIIMS but for Dr. Venugopal as a
President of AIIMS cannot question Venugopal says the
Brahmin monopolized BJP and is supported by the Brahmin media. This sub ordinate Brahmin is making a plea in the
Delhi high court to disqualify Dr. Anbumani and his authority. The reader here is requested to contemplate if at all can ever a non Brahmin subordinate go to court against the Brahmin authority. Will ever the court accept such a plea? The paper projected the lasting pain of Dr.Venugopal who said to the reporters that he joined as a 18 year old from a village in A.P Rajamundhry and his credentials were boosted to a very high degree. BJP openly sought the resignation for Dr. Anbumani. The H.C, Delhi on Aug 24 has warned the Union Minister Dr.Anbumani from acting as president of the AIIMS governing body if the centre failed to file a reply on his suitability for the post. So a Brahmin subordinate questions the suitability of the Sudra authority using the H.C, for always from good old days law had been their monopoly. Can a non Brahmin do all these acts?
4. It is an important factor to observe that when the opinions are taken from all categories of people, especially we see that the Brahmins and some of the upper castes always hold a view just in a diametrically opposite way. This only clearly shows that the Brahmins are highly concerned of themselves and their community. A small inconvenience or
to be more critical any form of encouragement especially in education given to the OBC (Sudra) they will revolt as if the govt and the nation are at heading towards disaster. This is mainly done by them for it is very clearly given in the laws of Manu that the Sudra, SC/ST should not be given education, so any act passed or practised in India which is against the laws of Manu will not only be condemned by them and they will also hand in hand be supported by high court and supreme court. So will they give stay by setting their own people to file a PIL (public interest litigation) and the H.C | SC will immediately admit their case and judgement would by all means be against the majority and against all norms of justice especially for the OBC/SC/ST. The important factor to be observed here is the Brahmins are very much scared that if the OBC/SC/ST by chance become educated they will certainly outshine them and this will not only make them shun also they (OBC/SC/ST) would start to think and question their atrocities. That is why all their opinions in case of reservations for OBC in education particularly in higher learning, is right opposite to the non Brahmins view. This has been observed by the facts spoken by them, but also this has been established mathematically using fuzzy super models from the data collected from them.
5. It is still important to mention that even while getting the data from them several of them told the authors that even if their views were against the public or majority or in particular non Brahmins it should be given as it is. To the best of authors’ knowledge none of their views have been ever touched or polished or formatted but given as it is only used in these models for solution. In fact we authors have in no way made any change in any views given by anyone for we want to get a true conclusion, a true vision by this scientific analysis. It is still important for the authors to record that their view or their opinion has not been given in any place. We authors have worked like computers to record analyse and give the solution. Most of the expert opinion if they were educated was obtained by writing only
for the uneducated technically trained experts / students filled in the questionnaire for them.
6.Only while discussing and getting the results about the stand of the media every one including movement and several non Brahmin Central Cabinet Ministers made it very clear that their views about OBC reservations in the higher education, that too the institutions run basically by the central govt was never recorded. Thus the media mainly dominated by the Brahmins have never done their duty or failed to do their duty by bias reporting about OBC reservations. The media which should have acted very responsible in the social issues have acted in a very irresponsible way. This they have done on selfish stand forgetting about the real development of the nation and above all about the true problems of the majority. How can the nation deny for over 60 years to the majority mass good higher education? If the Brahmin mass which is a paltry
Hindu minority with 3% population that too who are the foreigners of this nation have been not only denying the majority of their rights to get good education from the nation but on the top of it, they are continuously and ceaselessly exploited by the non Brahmins for their labour which is so poorly paid that they work for over 8 hours a day and yet cannot afford to have a square meal. Then why is the media supporting them and the court helping them as if they are the victims of reservation. This shows that the laws of Manu is still ruling the nation and nothing more that is why even now the court, the media and all the Brahmins are dead against reservation in higher education for OBC. If
Sudras become educated how will the legal dharma expounded in the laws of Manu be followed. That is why they are perfect in their dealing for a Sudra should not be educated! So almost all the models very clearly exhibit that the Brahmins and the Brahmin media are against reservation for the OBC in the higher learning that is why the Supreme
Court are giving stay in keeping with the laws of Manu.
7.The media has been very biased in protecting Dr. Venugopal who had done all acts against reservation, he is the root cause for all the protests in the north by the medicos. Without his instigation and the support the students would not have stepped out of the class room or the OP dept to carry out these types of strikes. Not only he instigated them but also gave them the essential protection to their leave, pay or brake in services. That is why the court (laws of Manu) gave them the support and under dealing work from the legal side. Can any section of the nation will pass as a special law and pay anyone who have fully abstained from work that too working in the very govt who have employed them and get pay for over a period of one month? Who is financing them? Whose tax money is it? They can behave and protest against the nation act as anti nationals, yet the nation should pay them with all benefit for over a month? What is this law? No law except laws of Manu alone can give this unjustifiable justice! So now the study makes clear that how the Brahmins can act when it is to their interest! The stand united to disintegrate the nation and ruin the majority. In this country even if a daily wager takes leave on account of his bad health or problems, he cannot get his pay; ‘no work no pay’ is the only rule in such a case how can the doctors get pay that too when they make protest against the govt under which they are employed for 40 day or so. What are the laws of Manu? Because Dr.Venugopal happens to be a Brahmin and the strike is also carried out by them (Brahmin) the court has given a new law? Did ever this Brahmin media make any criticism about the doctors paid in their period of absence from work, and they were agitating / protesting against the govt? Did the media analyse the move they were getting support from the courts for their striking period? Thus the media has failed miserably to be neutral even in this issue. The media should have written articles. When the media has been writing so many articles against reservation as if the move is a threat to nation where as in actuality it is the only means which can prevent nation from disintegration. But the media in reality knows the pros and cons of everything yet they are
projecting this false propaganda only out of selfish personal interest. So the media in the mater of reservation for OBC are only giving wrong signals and false propaganda. This act of media will in a long run ruin the nation and leave the nation bereft of any real progress.
8.The media has failed in its duty for it has not investigated the real admission process in the P.G medical seats in
AIIMS. On the contrary projected the stray protest with so many colourful photos.
9.All the non Brahmin experts uniformly agree on the basic fact that media has not acted neutral in the issues between
Dr. Anbumani Ramadoss and Dr. Venugopal. Further the study confirms that the BJP and the Hindutva force have backed Dr. Venugopal. They were against the Sudra Dr.
Anbumani. It is also important at this stage to mention that even the court has unnecessarily harassed Dr. Anbumani for it should have asked only the govt for clarification and not
Dr. Anbumani who held the office of the President of the
AIIMS on the basis, he was the Central Union Health
Minister. If at all a Brahmin would have held this post and if he was a qualified doctor both the media and the court would have written pages and pages about his performance as they (the Brahmin media) have done now in case of Dr.
Venugopal. For the only reason Dr. Anbumani is a Sudra and Dr.Venugopal a Brahmin who has more voice with them they are taking and projecting in this way. Here also the media has acted as a casteist, which fault should not be done by any good media with a balance mind and a true mission to contribute or work for the nation development.
10. The media has failed to be neutral in this issue for it has not given any thing about the seriousness of the death of the patients due to their strike. This is a very cruel neglect on the part of the striking doctors for they have not followed their very professional ethics so the media if it was not biased should have flayed the striking doctors, but on the other hand only their anti reservation protests were given
undue propaganda their failure in their professional ethics were not even mentioned. When Dr. Anbumani urged the doctors to get their work. Dr. Anbumani was portrayed as an inconsiderate person. Media should have given enough coverage and the courts should have ordered for some compensation for the deaths of the patients for the death was only due to the strike and nothing more. Why was the death of patients never found properly mentioned and investigation is only due to three factors :
a. Patients are poor from non Brahmin castes. b.No one is backing them like Hindutva force and media backing Dr.Venugopal. c.If the patients death was projected, the striking mass will loose sympathy on the other hand would be against their irresponsible and anti social activities. So the media tried its level best to mention properly about the death. Here only if at all the media tried to educate the public of the real issue no one would ever support the anti reservation activities. So the media tried to keep ignorant the public of the true facts and falsely projected as if, the doctors were affected by reservations for OBC even when not even a set of OBC students have joined under reservations in these institutions. This only clearly shows the extra careful nature of the comfort loving and selfish Brahmins. They are clearly unconcerned about the millions of people who are deprived of good higher education due to the social problems.
11. Once again the media has failed to be neutral for it said two have been consumed by fire of reservations. The news was given as if both were medical students. But on the proper enquiry it was clearly revealed that one who had some minor burns was only a gutka seller and the other did not set himself ablaze only was admitted for … Thus why a gutka seller was set ablaze? Was it done on his own? Was it for some propaganda that reservation is protested by student?
No proper report and the real brains behind the activities of the gutka seller was given by any media! Is this media dharma or Brahmin media policy to hide all true facts related to reservation and project only those false and cooked up anti reservation protests! Like a gutka seller portrayed as a medical student setting himself against reservation and so on. When will the Brahmin media speak the truth? The nation will become developed only when the media gives unbiased information to the people on any social issue!
12. Finally another biggest bias the Brahmin media did was to totally hide or block out all the pro reservation protests and project only the anti reservation protests. Even the pro reservation protests carried under the banner of medicos’ forum for equal opportunities in the AIIMS campus was totally blocked out by the media. None of the protests were ever projected or any importance or even a mere coverage was made. This is very unfortunate for the media failed to act justly in covering the issues of reservation, especially when the agitation or protests was organized in support of reservation. Only those anti reservation protests are covered with all great colours.
13. Another bias displayed by the media in the issue of Dr.Venugopal versus Dr.Anbumani is that when the President of AIIMS, Dr. Anbumani asked the people working in AIIMS to remove the shamiana put up by the anti reservation protestors no one removed it for this was the first visible, open disobedience of the subordinate Dr. Venugopal against Dr. Anbumani. By chance one of our non Brahmin Director had ever disobeyed the Brahmin president, the spot dismissal would have taken place. The media would have written pages about the arrogance of the Sudra subordinate. In this case as the subordinate happened to be Brahmin and the authority was a Sudra only reporting to show the powerlessness of Dr.Anbumani was clearly put out by the Brahmin media. No mention of insubordination of Dr. Venugopal was mentioned as if Dr. Venugopal was
