fissionline 41 copy

Issue 41

International Bulletin of Nuclear Veterans and Children Jan 2016

Damning letters home that prove it rained on Christmas Island after H-Bomb blasts

PAGE 2

COMPELLING new evidence that troops on Christmas Island were hit by radioactive rain after Hbomb tests on Christmas Island has come to light A series of letters from former Royal Engineer Corporal Ronald

FISSIONLINE 41

And two remarkable ‘before and after’ photographs he took at the time show the normally dry and dusty road outside his tent awash with floodwater.

The Ministry of Defence has always denied that it rained after

were caught in a torrential rainstorm after the cloud passed over head, had ‘fading memories’ of their time on the island.

But Mr Taylor’s contemporaneous accounts in letters to his parents provide proof that the men were right about the rainfall all along.

Mr Taylor on the island in 1958; some of his letters home; and the dramatic ‘before and after the bomb’ photos he took of the road outside his tent Taylor who was stationed on the Island in 1958 graphically describe ‘black storm clouds’ and ‘pitching rain’ after the blasts.

the bombs were detonated just a mile from the south east tip of the island.

And defence ministers accused exservicemen who claimed they

Lovingly preserved by his ‘mam and dad’, the letters from Corporal Taylor at first are full of patriotic enthusiasm for his ‘exciting’ posting on the sun-kissed tropical island.

PAGE 3

FISSIONLINE 41

But behind the endearments and the entreaties to his parents ‘not to worry’ about him, a darker narrative emerges.

One letter describes ‘a huge black storm cloud’ hovering overhead following a huge 3 -megaton blast, while another describes how it was ‘pitching with rain.’

Mr Taylor, from Newcastle, penned a dramatic account of the explosion for his parents: “When we turned the huge red and yellow fireball confronted us as though the sun had suddenly been moved in the sky. There was a terrific redness as the cloud moved around on itself and formed the huge mushroom. The huge, towering red cloud hung for about half an hour in the sky and then slowly it broke up and the glow from it died out. Then it grew to be like a huge black storm cloud as if there was to be a terrific down-pour of rain.”

Hundreds of men, mainly stationed at the port area of Christmas Island were later caught in a torrential downpour. They told how scientists in ‘moonsuits’ drove around urging everyone to get undercover.

At times it was so heavy that large areas

were flooded. Mr Taylor took dramatic ‘before and after’ photographs of the road outside his tent, showing the normally dry and dusty road now awash with flood waters.

“It’s really pitching it down outside,” he wrote to his mum and

his hospital bed. One describes a stay in the camp’s tented hospital on May 11, less than a fortnight after the Grapply Y blast. Army medical records confirm he was treated with penicillin after complaining of ‘lassitude and sore throat.’

Another describes a stay in hospital just after another H-Bomb explosion on September 2, 1958.

“I’m sorry I didn’t write to you straight after the fireworks, but I was feeling damned tired indeed…”

A letter dated Sunday 7th September, has Mr Taylor in isolation in a tent reserved for officers. “I’ve g o t t h e ‘screamers’ (diarrhoea) again! Don’t worry yourselves, it’s a fairly common complaint out here.”

Army records show he was treated for three days in the RAF hospital and that he received homogenised milk every day.

Mr Taylor later suffered a range of health complaints and after a long battle receives a war pension for hypothyroidism which was deemed ‘attributable to service.’

‘It’s pitching it down outside and it looks as if it will last for an hour or two yet...’

dad. “We are all more or less confined to our tents because it looks as if it’s going to last for an hour or two yet.”

Ominously later letters home from Mr Taylor are written from

PAGE 4

FISSIONLINE 41

UNDONE BY LETTERS TO MUM Slowly but surely the shameful cover-up by the Ministry of Defence over what really happened at Britain’s nuclear bomb tests is unravelling.

Ron Taylor’s letters, published here for the first time, are graphic proof that it rained on Christmas Island following H-Bomb blasts.

Other servicemen, who years later told of a huge rain storm following the Grapple Y blast, were rubbished by the MoD who said they were mistaken, or worse, making it all up.

Indeed when a Dispatches TV documentary first reported the servicemen’s claims in 1990, the then Tory defence minister Archie Hamilton was apoplectic with rage. “These are irresponsible and misleading allegations,” he raged in a Commons statement, adding: “The allegations (about rainfall) are based on a series of factual inaccuracies.”

Labour defence minister Dr Lewis Moonie was equally dismissive in a written answer in 2003 to an MP’s question about the rain: “Environmental monitoring for Main Camp on Christmas Island for the date of the trial showed….that there was no rainfall.”

These are now shown to be hollow statements indeed.

Ron Taylor’s eyewitness ac-

By Alan Rimmer counts cannot be rubbished because they were written on the very days that at least two of the H-bomb blasts took place.

At a stroke Mr Taylor has blasted apart a cover-up that began 60 years ago when the Grapple Y explosion (in the words of a secret Met Office

report obtained by fissionline) caused cumulonimbus (storm) clouds to form.

Those clouds caused a downpour and an untold number of troops were caught up in it. The MoD have known all along that that rain was contaminated with fallout, but correctly calculated that any ill effects on the men would take many years to manifest themselves.

Well many years have now

passed and the dire consequences for hundreds, if not thousands of servicemen and their children are plain for all to see.

Yet despite the weight of evidence now stacking up against it, the MoD has decided to tough it out and continue to deny any culpability. They have already spent millions of pounds in legal battles to keep a lid on the scandal. But they are planning to spend even more by rigorously fighting the claims of a handful of nuclear veterans who are demanding war pensions.

The two sides are due to go into battle in July of this year when a judge will finally decide who is right. And this time it is the MoD who are on shaky ground, for the evidence is against them and they will not be allowed to lie their way out as they have done so many times in the past.

And just to make sure, fissionline has more evidence to present which could tip the balance even more in the nuke vets favour.

But wouldn’t it be delicously ironic if it turned out that the mighty Ministry of Defence was finally undone by a simple letter home to mum?

FISSIONLINE 41

PAGE 5

In the Next Edition…

Inside Story Headline

“The codes for Grapple Y came in...something had gone wrong…”

A former RAF clerk with ‘Top Secret’ clearance tells of life at the heart of Grapple HQ...40 feet beneath the pavements of Whitehall with the scientists who made the H-bombs…

Inside the ‘Dungeon’ COME AND JOIN THE FIGHT FOR JUSTICE fissionline launches no evidence to prove nu- tainable as slowly but surely

TODAY

its ‘LET JUSTICE BE DONE’

cl ear

v et era ns

wer e

fissionline

and

other

fellow

campaign.

travelers expose the

It has a simple aim:

cover-ups

Justice and compen-

The

sation for the forgot-

mony of Mr Ron Tay-

ten

Brit-

lor in this edition is

ain’s nuclear weapons

but one example. But

programme.

there is much else to

More than 20,000 ser-

be done before the

vicemen

walls of deceit crum-

victims

of

were

sent

and

lies.

damning

testi-

overseas in the 1950s

ble.

to

The path to achiev-

witness nuclear

bomb tests in Austra-

ing

lia and Christmas Is-

begins in July when

land. Many have since

a senior judge will

died from cancers or

decide

are

crip-

handful of veterans

and

should get war pen-

other diseases linked

sions. Success there

to radiation exposure.

would

be

a

major

Generations

of their

milestone

in

our

children are suffering

campaign.

If

you

a similar fate.

want to join the fight

pling

The

suffering illnesses

British

and

govern-

ment refuses to accept any re-

harmed.

sponsibility, insisting there is

This defence is now unsus-

that

objective

whether

register

a

your

support contact:-

fissionline@gmail.com

PAGE 6

FISSIONLINE 41

An excoriating attack on the integrity of the Ministry of Defence by top New York advo The Ministry of Defence, (formerly Ministry of War), has a long history of employing deceitful practices in opposing former UK nuclear tests veterans’ claims for radiation induced cancers and illnesses.

During the proceedings before the former European Commission of Human Rights on access to documents under PAT Rule 6, in McGinley and Egan v. UK, the Commission asked the UK (i) whether contemporaneous radiation level records for Christmas Island were classified and (ii) if so why?

In denying the veterans were harmed by participating in the experimental nuclear tests, the UK (MOD) falsely replied that:- (i) such radiation records were not classified and that “no information was withheld from the applicants as there was, and is, no reason to do so.”; and further that; (ii) a summary of the information on the Christmas Island radiation level records was in fact contained in a “AWRE” (Atomic Weapons Research Establishment ) report which was placed in the Public domain in 1993. (Technical Note no.16/93- Environmental Monitoring at Christmas Island 19571958) But the so called “AWRE” report was not found to be an official AWRE report at all, but the private work of four AWRE employees whose expertise,

qualifications and experience were

BY IAN ANDERSON Attorney, New York not divulged. In fact the AWRE specifically denied the report’s author-

ship and distanced itself from the views and opinions contained therein. Nor did the so called “AWRE” report contain any details

of the original contemporaneous radiation levels on Christmas Island.

Instead it referred to 16 documents, mostly Government records, which the UK did not release to the Commission. (Many of which were in fact later found to be actually classified.)The Commission accordingly rejected the UK’s responses in this regard as “lacking in candour”. (Commission’s November 26th. 1996 report, para 96) It further found the UK’ s lack of candour was a factor to be considered to support other “sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences” that radiation level records had not been released into the public domain. (ibid para.

96). As a result, all 26 Commissioners found that the UK had violated the nuclear test veterans’ Article 6.1 rights under the European Convention of Human Rights by denying them access to material information in support of their PAT pension appeal claims.

The correctness of the Commission’s admonishment of the UK’s conduct as lacking in candour, was confirmed after the UK refused to settle the veterans’ claims and their cases were referred to the European Court of Human Rights.

FISSIONLINE 41

PAGE 7

ocate Ian Anderson who represented the Nuke Vets before the EU Commission in 1998 "During controversial proceedings before that Court, the UK released for the first time bits and pieces of some but not all of the 16 documents referred to in the so called “AWRE” report on radiation levels at Christmas Island. Contrary to the UK’s previous false statement to the Commission, it now admitted to the Court that radiation reference documents 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 to the so called “AWRE” report, were in fact classified. Radiation documents 15 and 16 were not classified but were “withheld” by the UK, making it impossible to trace them as classified documents through the Public Records Office or identifiable under a PAT Rule 6 request. The UK released bits and pieces of radiation documents 1 to 5. But only documents 6, 7 and 8 had in fact been placed in the public domain by publication in journal form.

John H. Large, a renowned international nuclear expert and former UK Atomic Energy Authority adviser, analyzed these radiation reference documents in extensive detail for the veterans in his report submitted to the Court. He stated that:- “Whereas I understood that all of the pertinent references cited in AWE 16/93 were to be released to the Court, the UK

Government has released only the first 5 references. References [10], [11], [12], [13] and [14] have not been released and remain unavailable, yet these references refer directly to the matter under consideration by the Court, namely the issue of film badges, [10] and [11], the radiation exposure of test participants [12] and [13], and the radiological condition of Christmas Island prior to and

“The UK Government has been disingenuous in making this submission (of no harm done) to the EU Court...in that it removed documents likely to contain data which could be of use in reconstructing the Applican’s radiation dose.”

Nuclear Expert Dr John Large following its final decontamination in 1964 [14].” Of the bits and pieces of the radiation reference documents actually released by the UK to the Court for the first time, nuclear expert Large found them to be so in-

complete with pertinent pages, graphs, figures and appendices deliberately removed, that it was impossible to reconstruct the veterans’ radiation dosage. “I am surprised that the UK Government should submit such scant and disconnected set of documents, some of which have text pages, graphs and figures intentionally removed” [that they]”do not provide sufficient information and data to enable these modes of radiation dose receipt to be assessed.” John Large concluded his extensive report by confirming the Commission’s finding of the UK’s lack of candour, by stating as a nuclear expert that:- “I would go so far as to state my opinion that the UK Government has been disingenuous in making this submission” [of no harm done] “to the Court, in that it must know that the information that it had chosen to place before the Court is of no real use.

Furthermore, I am very concerned that the UK Government has, apparently, selectively removed sections of the documents and chosen not to present other documents, all of which are likely to contain information and data which could be of use in reconstructing the Applicants’ radiation dose.” But how otherwise was the MOD to cover -up the most notorious peacetime mass violation of human rights by a Western democracy desperate to retain its political influence after the Second W o r l d W a r ? "

PAGE 8

FISSIONLINE 41

The guinea pig regiment that was ordered to get ‘up close and person THE SOFTENING up process began up in Maralinga, a dusty tented middle of the Australian Outback on 14 August 1956 when Sir Wil- township on a dusty plain in the along with about 250 other ranking liam Penney, Britain’s master servicemen from the UK, bomb-maker held a press conAustralia and New Zeaference in Australia to anland. A series of lectures nounce plans for a series of followed, personally suatomic bomb tests at pervised by Penney, and Maralinga. his willing deputy Sir Penney went to great lengths Ernest Titterton. It was to assure the public that the exiting stuff: they men tests would be safe and they had been chosen to be in posed no risk to military or the vanguard of Britain’s civilian personnel. Safety was nuclear deterrent. To this of “outstanding importance”, end they were about to he said. He spoke of “rigid be ‘indoctrinated’ into a safety requirements” and special force whose pri“quite harmless” increases in mary aim was to demonradiation. strate that ‘The Bomb’ At about the same time in the wasn’t necessarily the UK, hundreds of urgent signals monster of myth and legwent out to mainly middleend that had built up ranking officers in the Armed around it following the Forces telling them to report to horrors of Hiroshima and their commanding officers. On Nagasaki. turning up they were asked a It was their duty, they simple question: would you were told, to allay public like to go to Australia for disquiet by demonstrating while? it was possible to get ‘up Colonel Peter Lowe of REME close and personal’ with a gave a typical answer. He told series of kiloton-range an Australian Royal Commisatomic explosions. They sion convened in London in were assured by Penney 1985: “I told them, ‘Of course I and Titterton there was would. Who wouldn’t?’” no danger from radioacBush-hat bombers: William Penny & Ernest Titterton Colonel Lowe eventually ended tive fallout.

FISSIONLINE 41

PAGE 9

nal’ with the A-bomb to demonstrate to the publiuc that it was safe.

The full strength of the Indoctrinee Force consisted of 283 men; 178 from the UK (172 officers and six civilians); 100 from Australia (74, with 25 from other ranks and one civilian); and five officers from New Zealand. Their terms of reference was set out in a statement from the AWRE at Aldermaston:Serving officers from the armed forces of the UK, Australia and New Zealand will be exposed, at a safe distance, to the flash, heat and blast effects of an atomic explosion. A conducted tour of the firing area will be made before and after the event to enable indoctrinees to observe and appreciate the effects of the explosion on the ground and on items of service equipment, vehicles and structures exposed for the Target Response Trials.

The Australian Royal Commission later heard evidence that men were ordered to (among other things) to “walk, crawl and run” in contaminated dust to study the ef-

fects on their uniforms! No detailed tests of medical, health or psychological nature were carried out on the Indoctrinee Force.

According to Mr E.R. Drake Seager, the AWRE scientist, who coordinated the Force, the purpose of the whole exercise was:”To get service personnel accustomed to what nuclear war was all about. .

In addition to familiarizing with the effects of nuclear explosions, the aim was to ‘spread the word.’

The Indoctrinee Force was chosen from middle-ranking officers who were seen to have good career prospects and who could and would be expected to return to

their units to lecture from firsthand knowledge on the effects of the tests they had witnessed.”

Today there is universal agreement among scientists that the indoctrinees were experimental objects and were seen as valuable parts of the atomic ’experience.’

Their experiences provided valuable information for both the AWRE and the Army Operation Research Group which studied attitudes toward nuclear weapons. These, according to the military planners, were vital to issues relating to morale, the accumulation of personal knowledge about atomic blasts and the assertion that the tests were ‘safe.’ Drake Seager insisted: “These men were not being used as human guinea pigs to test the effects of explosions.”

But what has never been explained is why there was little monitoring of radiation levels, and scant heed paid to radiation risks.

These had been done at other tests at Bikini and elsewhere, why not at Maralinga?

PAGE 10

FISSIONLINE 41

Vincent Van Bomb! fissionline director Roy Sefton reveals his colourful past After fourteen years Royal New Zealand Naval service, Operation Grapple veteran Roy Sefton's failing health forced him to leave the Navy.

Roy then worked as a Marketing Executive and was involved also in painting, and as a rock and jazz drummer. It was his painting of landscape, still-life and abstraction that gained him recognition. Exhibitions of his paintings were being shown in Europe, USA, Australia, and NZ. However Roy's career was relatively short lived as his poor health increased dramatically. An un-diagnosed auto-immune system condition made life a daily struggle with pain and inability to move. He was forced to give up all social and work activities.

In the 1990's Roy received an Operation Grapple War Disability

Pension for his condition from Veterans Affairs New Zealand.

With fellow Grapple veteran Tere Tahi, they in 1996 set up the New Zealand Nuclear Test Veterans Association, (NZNTVA).

Since then Roy has used the periods of lesser pain and better mobility to continue his work as the NZNTVA Chairman.

The battles for nuclear test veterans recognition have been long, hard, and constant, but there have been some major successes.

During the past decades, despite the nuclear issues, Roy’s mind has also drifted to his love of painting.

In an effort to get some relief from the stresses and work-load of his nuclear veteran duties, in summer of this year he opened up his studio. It was a time capsule. On the wall was a year planner for

1988. There were exhibitions charted for the entire year. It was also his last year as a professional artist.

Cobwebs hung from the ceiling and everywhere else. Around the walls unfinished paintings and prepared blank boards were stacked. Roy decided to not only put the finishing touches to the uncompleted paintings but to also create new works, especially abstracts.

Too date 23 paintings have been either completed or being created. "I will continue to paint during periods of lesser pain and in between my NZNTVA duties" says Roy who concluded, "I wonder what my life may have been had I not served at Operation Grapple and carried the mark of the bomb with me for the rest of my life".

FISSIONLINE 41

PAGE 11

Welcome Aboard!

Presenting: Two valuable new additions to our Editorial Board as we ‘beef up’ for the coming battles

Getting to know you!

Our fantastic new directors reveal themselves.

ROBERT WELLS Born six months before the outbreak of World War 2, and raised first in Greater London and then the Home counties. I joined the RNVR aged 17, to guarantee callup into the Royal Navy for National Service. I was drafted to the Signal School at St Budeaux in Devonport, In early February 1958, I was drafted to HMS Scarborough, one of the latest anti-submarine frigates at the time. After 3 months of war games detached Scarborough from the Med Fleet to proceed to Christmas Island for nuclear weapons testing in the South Pacific.

Before we sailed, we had a rapid refit to accommodate several meteorologists who were required to perform weather-reporting duties on board as we patrolled the 600mile exclusion zone around the test sites. So, from the start we knew exactly where we were going, unlike many of our comrades in other services who, in the earlier tests, were never told the intended destination.

ALBERT ISAKSEN I was born in Hull in 1939. My mother was English and my father from the Faroe Islands just north of the UK – hence the name. I left school in 1955 to start an electrical apprenticeship. Faced with call-up for National Service, I volunteered for the Regular Army for the usual 22 years with the 3 year option. I

intended to join the RASC but recruiting sergeant lured me into the Royal Engineers to train as a vehicle mechanic. I joined 1 Training Regt Royal Engineers (1TRRE) on 26 Feb 1957 at Malvern and, after initial training, was posted on 20 March 1957 to 405 Party 4TRRE at Gibraltar Barracks, Aldershot for basic training.

We embarked on the HMT Dunera on 30 December 1957 bound for Christmas Island, arriving there on 31 January 1958. Service there saw the Grapple Y & Z series of tests.

We flew back to the UK, taking 5 days to do so, arriving 15 December 1958.

The remainder of my time was spent with 38 CER at various locations in the UK and I was discharged on 26 Feb 1960.

FISSIONLINE 41

Ken McGinley

JANUARY 2016

Roy Sefton

Derek Chappell

Barbara Penney

Dr Ian Gibson

Albert Isaksen

Robert Wells

fissionline is a crusading journal and sounding board for nuclear veterans everywhere. From nothing it has built up an extremely impressive circulation, and it is starting to make a real impact in the corridors of power. The forthcoming pension appeal tribunals (set up after our successful campaign) are vitally important. Success there could open the door to a full High Court trial as well as other advantages. We will be concentrating on that in the coming months. Any help/advice you can proffer would be appreciated. What do you get in return?: Nothing...except our blood, sweat and tears and the knowledge that you will have the friendship and support of some great people.

Contact: fissionline@gmail.com

CHARITY U-TURN ON ROWLAND It’s a funny old world.

The BNTVA Charity has asked for a £500,000 slice of the Aged Veterans Fund to carry out a Rowland-type study in the UK. This is the same study the organisation rejected out of hand when the Ministry of Defence offered to do it 10 years ago, for free!

Still, it’s good to see the Charity has decided to join (if somewhat belatedly) fissionline’s campaign to replicate the New Zealand Rowland study in the UK. We said two years ago that the publicity value alone of bringing the study to Brit-

ain would have an enormous impact. But at the time the charity was so busy pursuing it’s hopeless dream of a £25 million ex-gratia payment from the government that it wasn’t prepared to listen to advice from anyone. * Dr Chris Busby (pictured) is in dire straits. The green campaigner and advocate for nuclear veterans has struggled ever since environment and political blogger George Monbiot carried out a vicious hatchet job on him in the pages of the Guardian newspaper.

He has lost much work and prestige since the attack, and funding from several charities that supported him has dried up. He has had to sell his house so he can carry on with his work. On top of that, the Ministry of Defence has seized upon the comments and is using them to try to wrong-foot Busby in the War Pension Tribunals where he is representing the families of two nuclear veterans.

Dr Busby is an eccentric character but his heart is in the right place, and he knows what he is talking about. And for me, the fact the MoD fear him is good enough reason to give him our support.