ERSAT - ERTMS + Satellite

ERSAT ERTMS + Satellite Fabio Senesi Head of Control Command System and Telecom Rome – 12 February 2016

Roadmap

1. The Italian Rail Network 2. Interoperability and Intraoperability 3. From ETCS to ERTMS 4. ERTMS in Italy : Application Portfolio 5. Last December Results 6. RFI Needs 7. The ERTMS Technology Evolution 8. ERSAT Project 9. ERSAT Sardinia Trial Site Architecture 10. ERSAT User Requirements – PHA 11. ERSAT and ERTMS Regional

The Italian Rail Network Lines classification related to the traffic development (6%)

~ 1000 km

High Speed Network

Command Control System : ERTMS/ETCS L2 Train spacing with radio block

(5%)

(18%)

(23%)

(48%)

~ 950 km

Metropolitan Traffic Lines

Command Control System : CTC, SCC, SCC-M Train spacing with short block sections (High Capacity)

~ 2.900 km

Fast Lines

Command Control System : CTC, SCC Train spacing with SCMT

~ 3.900 km

Middle performances + Freight lines

Command Control System : CTCev, SCC Train spacing with block sections: SSC,SCMT

~ 7.950 km

Subsidiary + Low Traffic Lines

Command Control System : CTC Train spacing with block sections: SSC

Economic Sustainability

Interoperability and Intraoperability

Regional Lines 7500km

Trk SSC Trackside SCMT & GSM-R

2005-2006 4000km

2003-2008 11000km SSB SCMT 5000 Equipped Trains

SSB ETCS BL2+STM 200 HS Equipped Trains

SSB SCMT/SSC 1000 Equipped Trains

SSB ETCS BL3+STM

SSB ETCS BL3+STM

Trackside ETCS BL2 2005-2020 1100km High Speed Network To-Mi-Na Ro-Fi Tr-Brescia

CNs and EU/TEN-T Network High Density by ERTMS on Urban Nodes New High Speed Lines from 2020

SSB ETCS BL3

Trackside ETCS BL3 from 2016

Trk ETCS BL3 Other IM Network 2019

From ETCS to ERTMS ETCS Development 2000  ………

Operation 2005  ………

Optimization 2013  ………

ERTMS Reduction Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

ATO Indication to Driver

Traffic Management

Optimizing Lenght section

Optimizing Speed profile and track condition

ERTMS in Italy : application portfolio ERTMS (ETCS+ GSM-R)

High Speed Network Level 2 (Baseline 2) Without fallback

10 years In Operation (Turin - Salerno) and always in Evolution 2016 UpGrading 230d Ro Na 2016 Milan - Brescia 2018 Rome - Florence 2020 Brescia - Verona 2025 Milan - Genoa 2025 Naples - Bari

High Density Urban Nodes Level2 /Level 3 (Baseline 3) Overlapped to National CCS

In realization 2018 : HD Rome (tender in June 2016), Milan and Florence Node (headway 2’30 s) Virtual Section by Train Integrrty Detection

Freight & Passenger Tent-T Corridors Level 1/Level 2 (Baseline 3) Overlapped to National CCS

In realization

Low density Lines Level2 /Level 3 (Baseline 3) Satellite & Public Bearer

In realization

2015 Pilot Line Corr D (1st BL3 overlapped on Light signal)

Pilot Line in Sardinia

2017 2016:Ranzo - Luino, Domo ERSAT - Iselle (2015 Pilot L1Ls + Radio Infill)

2017: Domo - Novara 2018: Milan - Chiasso 2020: Novara –Villa Opicina; Fortezza -Verona; Milan - Genoa

merging two EU projects (Galileo and ERTMS) for Interoperable Virtual Balise concept

First ETCS Baseline 3 on RFI Conventional Line: Last Results December 2015 ETCS Level 2 on Pilot line Corridor D Pioltello Treviglio

Train Icon on ETCS level 2 RBC Display Movement Authority In Milano Greco On train DMI ETCS Level 1 Limited Supervision on Cross Border IT CH line Domodossola Iselle

L1LS

DMI ETCS level 1 Limited Supervision and Radio Infill Movement Authority with management of release speed by Radio Infill

RFI Needs 1. Reduction of investment costs (CAPEX) and maintenance costs (Opex) for the simplification of the technological infrastructure; 2. Guarantee a standard level of the European rail safety (SIL4);

3. Improved safety and capacity of transport networks through the application of moving block on secondary lines; 4. Modernise signalling system at lower costs to ensure the sustainability; 5. Ensure the interoperability of the fleet; 6. Minimum Impact on Operational Rules (e.g. All the update and transmission functions for digital map have to be executed automatically without train driver intervention or verification during the normal operation).

The ERTMS Technology Evolution TLC for signalling : NEXT CHALLENGES

ENHANCE SPEED ENHANCE CAPACITY



up to 350 Km/h 

by packet switching

COEXISTENCE WITH UMTS

PREPARE MIGRATION



by technical-legal bindings and costs  over 2025 : UMTS, LTE, WiMax, clouding

INTEGRATE WITH OTHER TECH.



satellite

RFI partner of ERSAT EAV Project

RFI - DB Netz - ASSTRA accounting for large number of European local lines Supporting partner

Roadmap 2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

3InSat Development & Test Satellite Technology

ERSAT ERTMS over Satellite

Signalling System with Satellite technology

Pilot Line

2018

ERSAT Sardinia Trial Site Architecture DMI Virtual Balise

GNSS Antenna Virtual Balise Reader

Radio I/F

ERTMS/ETCS (EVC, Odometry, Radio Mng)

SSB

Radio Communication Network

SST

Radio I/F

TALS & RBC Functions Peripheral Post I/F GNSS Antenna

Reference Station

IXL Functions Communication Network

Existing CTC

12

User Requirements - PHA RFI Coordinator of Technical Committee – Railway Risk Management Preliminary Hazard Analisys User Requirements CE 402/2013 Regulation

Team : RFI, Ansaldo STS, Radiolabs, Sogei and Telespazio.

Output : Final Report for Railway Risk Management Next step: Request of certification to ANSF with NoBo assessment

ERSAT and ERTMS Regional ERSAT (ERTMS Satellite) - Pilot Line in Sardinia: Trackside: ETCS L2 (by Virtual balise - GNSS Satellite application) + Euroradio over Public Bearer Overlapping existing Class B and existing signalling system

Trainborne: ETCS L2 +STM, Class B

Match ERTMS Evolution: Management of New CR ERTMS Regional (Only ETCS L3) in a Low density Line but using Virtual Balise Trackside: Interlocking+ CTC+ ETCS L3 (By Virtual balise - GNSS Satellite application) + Euroradio over Public Bearer

Trainborne ETCS L3 + STM (optional)

Economical Sustainability for Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) of the regional lines

Thanks for your attention