Feature

Reshetnikov_art / Shutterstock.com

Climate of Fear

Texas study shows how abortion bans put high-risk patients in jeopardy

BY SANFORD NOWLIN

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, a new study suggests dangerous medical outcomes under Texas’ six-week abortion ban could become the norm in the nearly half of states in the nation expected to ban the procedure.

Before the high court’s monumental decision throwing out a nearly 50-yearold abortion-rights precedent, Texas last year implemented Senate Bill 8. The state’s so-called “heartbeat law” eff ectively banned all abortions after fetal cardiac activity can be detected — around six weeks.

A recent New England Journal of Medicine study found that Texas’ law endangered the lives of patients with high-risk pregnancies and created confusion for clinicians trying to provide for their care.

Even though the law included provisions allowing for medical emergencies, researchers found that some patients needed to be in danger of death before medical providers were willing to terminate the pregnancies pu ing their lives at risk.

“With an increasingly narrow exemption and medical professionals learning about them as they go, [SB 8] increased a climate of fear in the state,” said Whitney Arey, the paper’s lead author and a researcher with the Texas Policy Evaluation Project, which studies reproductive health policies.

“We saw that Texas, unfortunately, gave a preview of what a lot of states will likely see with increasingly narrow exemptions for when abortions are allowed.”

Under SB 8, Texas patients with complicated pregnancies or preexisting conditions are being forced to delay abortions until their medical conditions become life threatening or until the fetus’ cardiac activity can no longer be detected, Arey and her colleagues found in interviews with 25 clinicians and 20 patients carrying high-risk pregnancies.

That raises concerns that SB 8 and Texas’ so-called trigger law, which bans almost all abortions and goes into eff ect on Aug. 25, could increase maternal death rates in the state, which already exceeds the national average, according to federal data. Even before the trigger law goes into eff ect, abortion is illegal in the state due to a 1925 law Texas A orney General Ken Paxton resurrected after the Supreme Court decision.

“People have to be on death’s door to qualify for maternal exemptions to SB 8,” one maternal fetal medicine specialist told researchers for the NEJM study.

Vague exemption

Last month, the Biden administration issued guidance advising doctors they’re protected under federal law if they terminate a pregnancy as part of an emergency treatment. The order even threatens to defund hospitals that refuse to perform those procedures.

However, Texas AG Paxton almost immediately sued to challenge the guidance in federal court. Paxton argues in his legal brief that the White

House’s guidance interferes with the state’s “sovereign interest in the power to create and enforce a legal code.”

Abortion rights advocates also caution that the White House guidance needs strong enforcement if it’s to be meaningful, and it’s too early to know how aggressively the feds plan to pursue such action.

Further, study author Arey said the vague language of SB 8 led medical institutions and clinicians to have widely varying interpretations of what is allowable under the law’s medical exemption.

“It aff ected continuity of patient care because some clinicians were uncertain if they could counsel patients about abortion or if they could refer patients elsewhere or if they could transfer their medical records out of state,” she said. “Or if they were still doing this, some people acknowledged that this still might put them at risk for being viewed as aiding and abe ing under SB 8. These diff erent interpretations of the laws are going to create uneven care as people interpret them diff erently in diff erent places.”

Concerns about the nebulous language allowing for medical exemptions have also surrounded Indiana’s newly passed abortion law, again suggesting that the Texas research hints at problems that soon will come to patients in other states.

Doctors have complained about the confusion they face as they try to care for patients facing conditions such as incomplete miscarriages, premature membrane ruptures and ectopic pregnancies, in which a fetus develops outside of the uterus.

“It’s terrible,” Dr. Alan Peaceman, a professor of maternal-fetal medicine at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine, told the Texas Tribune earlier this month. “The care providers are treading on eggshells. They don’t want to get sucked into a legal morass. And so, they don’t even know what the rules are.”

Chilling eff ect

Adding to the experts’ concern, Texas’ SB 8 — which off ers no exception for rape, incest or severe fetal abnormality — allows virtually anyone to sue an abortion provider or someone else who helps a person obtain an abortion deemed illegal. The potential fi nancial damages start at $10,000, and clinicians also stand to lose their licenses.

That provision has a chilling eff ect that’s pressuring medical professionals not to perform the procedure or even discuss it with patients — even when dealing with a high-risk pregnancy, according to the study.

After a 39-year-old woman in the NEJM study discovered that her fetus had spina bifi da and another severe abnormality, her doctor refused to even discuss abortion options, according to the paper.

“When you already have received news like that and can barely function, the thought of having to do your own investigating to determine where to get this medical care, to arrange going out of state feels additionally overwhelming,” she told researchers.

The chilling eff ect of SB 8 and the state’s trigger ban are likely to have the most profound eff ect on people of color and those with limited incomes, Arey argues. With Texas doctors unwilling or unable to take the risk of performing medically necessary abortions, many patients will have no choice but to seek one in a state such as Colorado or New Mexico, which haven’t banned the procedure. Traveling that distance is an expensive proposition, especially for the uninsured and those struggling with poverty.

Rural residents are also likely to fi nd it harder to obtain care if they develop risky pregnancies, according to Arey. Doctors who perform abortions are already considering relocating out of state, according to the study, and those moves are likely to diminish access in rural areas where options are already limited.

Mental and emotional toll

The study also points out that outof-state travel can exacerbate problems for women carrying risky pregnancies. One woman who suff ered a membrane rupture during her pregnancy told researchers that she was informed she couldn’t get an abortion in Texas but was also warned that leaving the state put her at further risk.

“I knew how dangerous it was for me to get on a plane and go get an abortion, but I knew that it was still the safer option for me than si ing in Texas and waiting, and I could potentially get sicker,” she said.

The woman also shared her obstetrician’s travel advice: “If you labor on the plane, leave the placenta inside of you. You’re going to have to deal with a 19week fetus outside of your body until you land.”

Beyond the medical risks SB 8 created for pregnant women, Arey said the study also illustrates the mental and emotional health toll of the Texas law — a toll that’s liable to be repeated as other state legislators implement their own abortion bans.

“The patients talked about feeling hurt and confused, overwhelmed when they realized that they had to fi gure out on their own where to go and get care,” she said. “And, so, some people who don’t have the resources aren’t going to be able to leave Texas, so they’re going to have to continue pregnancies until they develop life-threatening complications in order to receive care for these conditions.”

UnSplash / Taylor Wilcox

Seven in 10 Texas teachers say they’re thinking about quitting

BY MICHAEL KARLIS

Blaming low pay, burnout and the politicization of their jobs, a record 70% of Texas teachers said in a new survey that they’re seriously considering leaving the profession.

According to a poll conducted by the Texas State Teachers Association, the number of educators thinking of calling it quits is the highest in the survey’s history and a 17% increase since it was last conducted in 2018.

“Lingering stress from the pandemic is a factor, but it isn’t the only one,” TSTA President Ovidia Molina said in a press release. “Inadequate pay, political a acks on educators and the failure of state leaders to protect the health and safety of students and school employees also have combined to drive down the morale of teachers to the lowest level in recent memory and endanger our public school system.”

Of those surveyed, 85% said they don’t feel state leaders and legislators had positive opinions of teachers. What’s more, 65% of those surveyed didn’t believe the public viewed teachers in a positive light.

Those feelings likely stem from politically charged state legislation such as Senate Bill 3, which bars educators from discussing “widely debated and currently controversial issues of public policy or social aff airs.” Further, Gov. Greg Abbo announced a criminal investigation last fall into “pornography” in school libraries.

On the pay front, Texas teachers make $7,000 less on average than their counterparts in other states, according to the TSTA. Low pay has forced four of every 10 teachers in the state to take a second job to make ends meet. In the survey, 79% of teachers said moonlighting negatively impacts their teaching performance.

Molina also cited Abbo ’s banning of mask mandates during the previous school year and his refusal to address gun reform following the massacre at Robb Elementary School as factors in teachers’ low morale.

Several rural Texas districts already feel the eff ects of the great teacher resignation, opting for four-day school weeks due to a lack of available staff , the Texas Tribune recently reported.

CORRECTIONS

In the print edition of the Current’s July 27 Best of San Antonio issue, we inadvertently left out the runners up in the Best CBD Shop category. Those are:

2. Cloud Craft Vape+Smoke

15139 Bulverde Road #101 (210) 951-8273 facebook.com/cloudcraftsa

3. CBD Relief

11627 Bandera Road (210) 366-4380 cbdrelief.care

We also printed the wrong address for Bandera Market, located at 11851 Bandera Road in Helotes.

Additionally, we included the incorrect address for Bambinos, located at 4940 Broadway, Suite 120.

The Current regrets the errors.

EXPLORE YOUR FUTURE

The Alamo Colleges District offers clear, concise career pathways with your own personal success team from start to finish.

We make learning accessible, with loaner laptops and no-cost textbooks. And we make transportation easy, with free bus passes.

You won’t just get a degree or certificate, but an in-demand skill set. Not just an education, but a learning experience that leads to a real career, all with flexible course schedules and affordable tuition.

Ambassadors will be available at community events throughout the summer to give career assessments, share information on available programs, and help you get started on the path to your future.

That’s college made for you and your brightest future. Register now for fall classes.

Visit alamo.edu/explore for a complete schedule of events.

AT ALAMO.EDU OR CALL 21-ALAMO