Issuu

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report Ramboll EC.PA.12-ESS October 2026

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

1 Introduction 1.1 Ramboll UK Limited (‘Ramboll’) and a team of technical specialists have been instructed by London Earls Court Partnership Limited (‘ECPL’) (the ‘Applicant’) to consider the environmental implications of proposed amendments to the Hybrid Planning Applications submitted for the Earls Court Masterplan. 1.2 The Earls Court Hybrid Planning Applications (part detailed, part outline) were submitted to Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (‘LBHF’) (Reference: 2024/01942/COMB) and the Royal Borough of Kennington and Chelsea (‘RBKC’) (Reference: PP/24/05187) in June 2024. Following submission, amendments were submitted in July 2025 in response to consultation responses. 1.3 The development proposals were subject to Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) in 2024 (the ‘Proposed Development’) and in 2025 (the ‘Amended Proposed Development’). The EIAs (collectively referred to as the ‘July 2025 EIA’) were reported in an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) and an ES Addendum (collectively referred to as the ‘July 2025 ES’). 1.4 The LBHF Hybrid Planning Application was considered by the LBHF Planning Committee in November 2025 and the RBKC Hybrid Planning Application was considered by the RBKC Planning Committee in December 2025. Both Councils subsequently resolved to grant planning permission, subject to referral to the Mayor of London and completion of a Section 106 Agreement. 1.5 Since the committee resolutions, the Applicant has explored opportunities to secure public sector grant funding and subsidies and progressed detailed discussions with LBHF, RBKC, GLA and TfL officers in relation to Section 106 obligations to move towards the grant of planning permission. However, a combination of worsening macro-economic conditions during 2026 (that have led to value stagnation and reduced growth forecasts), increasing development costs and a lack of available public subsidy have required the Applicant to review the composition of the development to ensure it can be funded and delivered. 1.6 As a result, the Applicant is proposing a further package of amendments to the development proposals assessed within the July 2025 ES. 1.7 This Environmental Statement Supplementary Report has been prepared by Ramboll and a team of technical specialists on behalf of the Applicant, to report on the implications of the proposed amendments and of the amended proposed development as a whole, in respect of the conclusions of the July 2025 EIA, so that LBHF and RBKC have appropriate and up-to-date environmental information on likely environmental effects. The Amended Proposed Development as changed by the proposed amendments is hereafter referred to as the ‘October 2026 Amended Proposed Development’.

2 Proposed Amendments 2.1 The proposed site-wide amendments can be summarised as follows: •

Amendment to the affordable housing tenure split from 60 % intermediate housing and 40 % social rent housing to 40 % intermediate housing and 60 % social rent housing;

•

Reduction in in site-wide cycle parking provision to reflect the latest planning guidance and emerging planning policy; and

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

•

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Consequential updates to the Development Specification Revision 02, Parameter Plans and Design Code Revision 02.

2.2 The proposed LBHF Hybrid Application amendments can be summarised as follows: •

Reduction in affordable housing provision from 35 % by habitable room to 30 % (comprising 20 % on ECPL-owned land and 35 % on Lillie Bridge Depot land which is public land);

•

Part of Development Plot WB05 (referred to as ‘WB05-T1’) would be removed from the Detailed Component of the LBHF Hybrid Application (now referred to as Development Zone ‘H[D]’) and incorporated within the Outline Component as a new Development Zone ‘H[O]’.

•

Development Zone H[O] would provide the following flexible range of ‘predominant’ potential land uses: Residential (Use Class C3), Older Persons Housing (Use Class C2), Purpose-Built Student Accommodation (Use Class Sui Generis), Co-Living (Sui Generis) or a mix of these uses, along with the following ‘other’ uses: Flexible Retail / F&B / Commercial / Culture (Use Classes E(a)/(b)/(c) / F / Sui Generis), Leisure (Use Class E(d) / Sui Generis), Ancillary (Sui Generis);

•

The remainder of Development Plot WB05 (referred to as ‘WB05-T2’) would remain within the Detailed Component (Development Zone H[D]) and would be amended to accommodate social rent affordable housing on upper floors with Flexible Retail / F&B / Commercial / Culture (Use Classes E(a)/(b)/(c), F / Sui Generis), Leisure (Use Class E(d) / Sui Generis), Community / Social Infrastructure (Use Class F/E(g)), Ancillary (Sui Generis) uses proposed at ground floor;

•

Minor internal and external design changes to Development Plot WB05-T2 (Development Zone H[D]) to accommodate revised proposed affordable housing tenure, with resulting very small footprint changes.

•

Minor design changes to basement, ground and mezzanine levels of Development Plots WB03 and WB04 within the LBHF Detailed Component (Development Zone H[D]) to reduce cycle parking, increase flexible commercial floorspace and relocate plant rooms; and

•

Minor increase in below ground parameters within WB09/10 (Development Zone ‘B1’) and WB05T1 (Development Zone H[O]).

2.3 The proposed RBKC Hybrid Application amendments can be summarised as follows: •

Reduction in affordable housing provision from 35 % by habitable room to 20 %.

2.4 No changes are proposed to the overall quantum of residential units, development floorspace or excavation volumes previously proposed by the Hybrid Applications.

3 October 2026 Amended Proposed Development 3.1 The amended area schedule for the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development is presented in Appendix A. These include the amended breakdown of assumed minimum and maximum floorspace areas by residential and non-residential use class which could be brought forward within the Amended Outline Component. Amendments have been highlighted in blue text for ease of reference. 3.2 The amended unit and tenure mix for the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development is presented in Appendix A.

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

3.3 The amended composite and parameter plans for the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development are presented in Appendix A.

4 Legislation, Policy and Guidance 4.1 The planning policy context and policy designations presented in the July 2025 ES remain valid, except where superseded by updates to policy and guidance The following planning policy and guidance documents have been published, updated or progressed since the July 2025 ES: •

National Planning Policy Framework (2026)1;

•

Draft London Plan (2026)2; and

•

Support for Housebuilding London Planning Guidance (LPG) (2026)3.

4.2 Planning Practice Guidance (PPG)4 is a live document and as such is continually updated. 4.3 It is noted that the Draft London Plan is at a very early stage of consultation and is therefore not considered to carry any material weight. 4.4 None of the abovementioned updated planning policy and guidance documents introduce any new considerations for the EIA of the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development. 4.5 There have been no material changes to technical assessment guidance since the July 2025 ES.

5 Baseline Conditions 5.1 Since the July 2025 ES, a review has been undertaken of site conditions and available survey information. No material changes to site condition or site use have been identified. Available survey information also remains unchanged. 5.2 While on-site meanwhile uses have changed, the meanwhile uses utilise the existing infrastructure on-site and no new infrastructure has been built. 5.3 Accordingly, the baseline conditions and sensitive receptors presented in the July 2025 ES Addendum, remain materially valid in respect of townscape character and views. 5.4 In respect of the future baseline, the demolition and construction programme remains materially consistent with that assessed in the July 2025 ES. However, the anticipated commencement of development has shifted beyond the start date assumptions adopted within the July 2025 ES. This reflects the passage of time since submission of the Hybrid Planning Applications rather than any change to the nature, sequencing or duration of the demolition and construction activities previously assessed. 5.5 The passing of time has not introduced any new or amended sensitive receptors to those previously considered within the July 2025 ES. The sensitivity of the previously considered receptors also remains valid.

Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, 2026. National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). London. MHCLG.

Greater London Authority, 2026. Draft London Plan. Consultation Draft. London. GLA.

Greater London Authority 2026. Support for Housebuilding London Plan Guidance (LPG). London. GLA. 4 Department for Communities and Local Government (Live Document) Planning Practice Guidance [online] Available: http://planningguidance.communities.gov.uk/.

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

6 Cumulative Schemes 6.1 In summary, the updated list of cumulative schemes as presented in Appendix B comprises: •

Six schemes where S96A and S73 amendment applications have been made and/or pending applications approved; and

•

One scheme (Former Fulham Boys School) that was previously considered qualitatively in the July 2025 ES, where an application has now been submitted and is pending recommendation (Scheme 18).

7 Summary and Analysis of Environmental Effects 7.1 Given the nature of the proposed amendments, it has been concluded that the July 2025 ES would remain valid for the following environmental assessments: •

Noise and Vibration;

•

Air Quality;

•

Water Resources and Flood Risk;

•

Ecology;

•

Health; and

•

Built Heritage.

7.2 It is considered that the following environmental assessments in the July 2025 ES would potentially be affected: •

Archaeology;

•

Socio-Economics;

•

Transport and Accessibility;

•

Ground Conditions;

•

Daylight, Sunlight and Overshadowing;

•

Wind Microclimate; and

•

Townscape and Visual.

7.3 The emerging proposed amendments, assessment methodology and technical assessments to be considered were discussed informally with Waterman on 28 July 2026, the third-party reviewer for LBHF and RBKC. 7.4 In respect of Archaeology and Ground Conditions, the proposed amendments to the basement parameters comprise the introduction of new basement areas at Development Zone H[O] (previously WB05-T1) and Development Zone B1 (beneath Empress Place Boulevard). At Development Zone H[O], a finished floor level (FFL) of -0.5 mAOD is proposed (approximately 5.8 m ground reduction as a worst-case), whilst at Development Zone B1 a FFL of 1.8 mAOD is proposed (approximately 3.4 m ground reduction as a worst-case). 7.5 The proposed amendments would not introduce any new impacts beyond those previously assessed and would not require any additional mitigation. Accordingly, the October 2026

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Amended Proposed Development would not result in any new or materially different significant archaeological and ground conditions effects when compared to those reported in the July 2025 ES and the conclusions of the July 2025 ES would remain valid. 7.6 Updated assessments have been undertaken for Socio-Economics, Transport and Accessibility, Daylight, Sunlight and Overshadowing, Wind Microclimate, and Townscape and Visual. The outcomes of these assessments are summarised in Table 1.

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Legislation, Policies and Published Baseline Conditions Review Guidance Review Socio-Economics Since the submission of the July 2025 ES, the updated NPPF was published in August 2026 and the Draft London Plan was published in July 2026. However, the changes do not have a material impact on the methodology or approach to the socioeconomic assessment. There have been no other policy, legislation or guidance updates that would have a material impact on the methodology of the socio-economic assessment.

While on-site meanwhile uses have changed, the meanwhile uses utilise the existing infrastructure on-site and no new infrastructure has been built. There is no material change to the baseline characterisation methods described in the July 2025 ES with the exception of the desk study undertaken for education. This baseline has been updated because the full dataset is updated annually and because the proposed amendments are expected to change the number of children living in the development (as set out below), and therefore the potential demand for school places. The education baseline has been updated using the latest Department for Education Annual Schools Census data (2026) and Published Admission Numbers (PAN) for state funded schools within the specified study areas in LBHF and RBKC. The primary school baseline review indicates a small decrease in the available surplus of places within the study area (22 % down from 27 % previously reported). This reflects school closures and site reductions to address substantial overcapacity issues. This surplus still remains very large and the sensitivity of the receptor remains low. The secondary school baseline review indicates no change in the overall amount of surplus (8

Confidential

Updated Assessment

Updated Residual Effects Demolition and Construction Early Phases The Proposed Amendments are not expected to alter the demolition and construction effects for the Early Phases development scenario previously reported in the July 2025 ES for socio-economic receptors. Whilst part of the scheme has transferred from the Detailed Component to the Outline Component, the phasing of the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development would not be altered. Accordingly, the delivery of construction employment would not be affected, and the conclusions of the July 2025 ES would remain valid. All Phases The proposed amendments are not expected to alter the demolition and construction effects for the All Phases scenario previously reported in the July 2025 ES for socio-economic receptors. Whilst part of the scheme has transferred from the Detailed Component to the Outline Component, the phasing of the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development would not be altered. Accordingly, the delivery of construction employment would not be affected, and the conclusions of the July 2025 ES would remain valid. Completed Development Early Phases No changes are proposed to the overall quantum of residential units or non-residential floorspace for the Hybrid Applications. The proposed change in the worst-case (with respect to highest population yield) unit and tenure mix would result in a reduction in the projected number of on-site people living in the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development and a reduction to the number of children of all ages. Those

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review

Updated Assessment

%). This reflects school closures and site reductions to address substantial overcapacity issues – so while the net position on surplus remains the same, there has been a large increase in surplus due to falling rolls that has been addressed through class/school closures. This surplus still remains large and the sensitivity of the receptor remains low.

reductions amount to 2 % of the total population, 14 % of children at primary level and 18 % at secondary level.

LBHF’s School Organisation Review (2022) predicts that by 2031 there will be 18 % surplus secondary capacity in the borough due to falling secondary school rolls over time as smaller cohorts currently in the primary phase feed through. This review has not been updated but the evidence at primary level indicates this trajectory is still likely.

All Phases

The temporary relocation of Avonmore Primary School from Avonmore Road to Mund Street does not materially affect the assessment as both sites are within the study area. No other baseline conditions are likely to have changed to an extent that would affect the conclusions of the July 2025 ES.

Therefore, the impact with respect to demand for social infrastructure (including healthcare, school places and playspace) would be slightly reduced; however not to a degree that would alter the previously reported magnitude rating and overall scale of effects. Accordingly, no new or materially different significant effects would arise and the conclusions of the July 2025 ES remain valid. No changes are proposed to the overall quantum of residential units or non-residential floorspace for the Hybrid Applications. The proposed change in the worst-case (with respect to highest population yield) unit and tenure mix would result in a reduction in the projected number of people living in the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development and a reduction to the number of children of all ages. Those reductions amount to 2 % of the total population, 14 % of children at primary level and 18 % at secondary level. The projected population and child yield for All Phases would be as follows: Age

LBHF

RBKC

Total

Total population

4,894

2,698

7,592

Early Years Children (0-4 years)

297

143

440

Primary School Children (5-11 years)

226

107

333

Secondary School Children (12-16 years)

127

183

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review

Updated Assessment materially different significant effects would arise and the conclusions of the July 2025 ES remain valid. Cumulative Effects A review of the cumulative schemes and associated updates since the July 2025 ES has been completed. Most of the schemes have progressed and a greater level of detail is available on respective programmes and / or construction status. These changes do not result in any amendment to the assessment approach adopted in the July 2025 ES. Updates to programme assumptions to the cumulative schemes, alongside the scheme amendments would not result in any new or materially different significant cumulative effects. The qualitative assessment previously undertaken of scheme 18, have been reviewed in light of the submitted planning application. It is confirmed that he previous qualitative assessment remains valid. Accordingly, the cumulative assessment conclusions reported in the July 2025 ES therefore remain valid.

Transport and Accessibility Since submission of the July 2025 ES the following key changes have occurred both nationally and in London to planning policy which affects the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development: • NPPF 2026 • The 2026 NPPF builds on the previous version of the NPPF (December 2024) requiring a vision-led approach to the transport strategy to be adopted and ensuring that transport is

A site review has been undertaken to identify whether any material changes have occurred within the local transport environment since completion of the July 2025 ES. The review considered the operation and characteristics of the surrounding highway network, public transport infrastructure, pedestrian and cycle facilities, local land uses, and the status of notable development sites within the study area of the site. While on-site meanwhile uses have changed, the meanwhile uses utilise the existing

Confidential

Updated Residual Effects Demolition and Construction Early Phases The proposed amendments and October 2026 Amended Proposed Development as a whole are not expected to alter the demolition and construction effects for the Early Phases development scenario previously reported in the July 2025 ES for links and sensitive receptors identified in Table 9.28 and Table 9A.28A respectively. Whilst part of the scheme has transferred from the Detailed Component to the Outline Component, the phasing of the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development would not be altered. Accordingly, the demolition and construction assumptions for the Early Phases development scenario

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review considered from the earliest stages of a site’s development. • Support for Housebuilding, London Plan Guidance (Greater London Authority (GLA), March 2026) • The Support for Housebuilding, London Plan Guidance (LPG) introduces a package of temporary measures to support housing delivery and improve scheme viability, including reduced cycle parking standards and greater flexibility in their implementation, amendments to housing design guidance and a guidance around affordable housing delivery. • Draft London Plan (GLA, July 2026) • The Draft London Plan (DLP) continues to place significant emphasis on delivering new homes whilst supporting wider objectives around placemaking, active travel, public transport accessibility and environmental performance. • The DLP continues to support Healthy Streets principles, modal shift and development patterns that reduce reliance on the private car, while recognising the growing role of shared mobility services and changing travel behaviours.

Updated Assessment

infrastructure on-site and no new infrastructure has been built.

relevant to the assessment of Transport remain unchanged. Therefore, the conclusions of the July 2025 ES remain valid.

Based on on-site observations, the study area continues to exhibit broadly the same transport and land use characteristics as those reported within the July 2025 ES. The strategic transport network, including the A4 West Cromwell Road, Earl's Court Road, Warwick Road, Lillie Road and the surrounding local highway network, remains unchanged in its overall function and operation. Public transport provision continues to be centred around Earl's Court and West Brompton stations, together with the extensive local bus network, with no substantial changes identified that would materially alter accessibility to the Site.

All Phases

Similarly, the surrounding pedestrian and cycle environment remains largely consistent with that previously assessed. Whilst minor changes and routine alterations associated with network management, maintenance activity and development progression may have occurred, no significant changes have been identified that would materially affect travel patterns, accessibility, trip distribution, or the conclusions of the July 2025 ES. It is therefore considered that the description of the Site and its study area presented within the July 2025 ES remains broadly representative of existing conditions. Accordingly, there have been no substantial changes within the local study area that would warrant a reassessment of the transport baseline or alter the conclusions

Confidential

As outlined in the July 2025 ES, the same peak demolition and construction trips provided for the Early Phases are applicable to the All Phases demolition and construction scenario. The 2031 Early Phases demolition and construction stage assessment considered the worst-case (peak) demolition and construction traffic flows. This peak traffic flow would be the same for both the Early Phases and All Phases. Therefore, the updated Early Phases demolition and construction stage effects for the 83 links assessed in the July 2025 ES are also valid for the All Phases. As with the Early Phases, given that the assumptions around demolition and construction are unchanged, there is no impact to the All Phases assessments, and the conclusions of the July 2025 ES remain valid. Completed Development Early Phases No changes are proposed to the overall quantum of residential units or non-residential floorspace for the Hybrid Applications. The proposed amendments are focused on the Detailed Components, specifically those within the LBHF application. The approach to traffic data and trip generation remains as presented in the July 2025 ES. A comparison of the Early Phases floorspace areas that were used in the September 2023 modelling and the floorspace areas in the July 2025 ES was presented in Table 9A.6A of that document together with commentary on the differences when compared to an amended reasonable worst-case draw down of the floorspace areas. A review of those assumptions has been undertaken accounting for the proposed amendments to the Detailed Components of the October

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review For the purposes of this EIL it is noted that the DLP is at a very early stage of consultation and is not a material consideration; however is considered relevant as it reflects and builds upon guidance within the Support for Housebuilding LPG. In particular, it continues to support a more evidencebased approach to cycle parking provision, supplementing the requirements set out in the adopted London Plan (2021).

previously reached regarding the transport effects of the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development. While amendments are being progressed through the planning process, no substantial changes have been identified within the study area that would fundamentally alter the transport baseline against which the proposals are assessed. Accordingly, the Site and surrounding study area as contained within the July 2025 ES remains broadly representative of current conditions.

Updated Assessment 2026 Amended Proposed Development. The conclusion reached previously, that the Early Phases modelling represented a worst-case scenario as it adopted higher trip generating uses, remains the case. As such, the September 2023 modelling exercise remains a robust and valid basis for assessment of the Early Phases for the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development. Given this, no new modelling, and in turn no additional links have been reviewed compared to the July 2025 ES. Therefore, no new or materially different significant effects would arise and the conclusions of the July 2025 ES remain valid. All Phases As set out in the Early Phases methodology, a worst-case in terms of land use trip generation was also adopted for the All Phases modelling within the July 2025 ES.

The measures contained within the LPG and emerging policy direction set out in the DLP do not give rise to any material changes in transport demand, trip generation, modal share assumptions or transport infrastructure requirements for the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development.

A comparison of the All Phases floorspace areas that were used in the September 2023 modelling and the floorspace areas in the July 2025 ES was presented in Table 9A.11A of that document together with commentary on the differences when compared to a reasonable worstcase draw down of the floorspace areas. A review of those assumptions has been undertaken accounting for the proposed amendments to the Detailed Components of the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development. The All Phases modelling still represents a worst-case scenario as it adopted higher trip generating uses and therefore, represents a worst-case approach.

The policy and guidance changes outlined above do not alter the assessment methodology, significance criteria or mitigation measures previously identified. Accordingly, the findings of the July 2025 ES remain valid, and no further assessment is required.

Given this, no new modelling or changes in trip generation occur, and in turn no additional links have been reviewed compared to the July 2025 ES. Therefore, no new or materially different significant effects would arise and the conclusions of the July 2025 ES remain valid. Cumulative Effects A review of the cumulative scheme and associated updates since the July

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review

Updated Assessment 2025 ES has been completed. Most of the schemes have progressed and a greater level of detail is available on respective programmes and / or construction status. These changes do not result in any amendment to the assessment approach adopted in the July 2025 ES. The qualitative assessment previously undertaken of scheme 18, have been reviewed in light of the submitted planning application. It is confirmed that he previous qualitative assessment remains valid. The cumulative scheme updates, alongside the Proposed Amendments would not result in any new or materially different significant cumulative effects. The cumulative assessment conclusions reported in the July 2025 ES therefore remain valid.

Daylight, Sunlight, Overshadowing, Solar Glare and Light Spill Since the preparation of the July 2025 ES, updates to both the Draft London Plan and NPPF have been published. These are respectively dated July 2026 and August 2026. The updated documents do not materially alter the assessment methodology, significance criteria, mitigation requirements, or assessment conclusions previously reported. There have been no other changes to relevant legislation, planning policy, guidance, standards, or assessment methodology that are relevant to daylight, sunlight, overshadowing, solar glare and light spill.

A review of the existing on-site and surrounding study area conditions has been undertaken. No material changes have been identified since the July 2025 ES and the baseline conditions, including the sensitive receptors considered in the assessment, remain as previously reported. While on-site meanwhile uses have changed, the meanwhile uses utilise the existing infrastructure on-site and no new infrastructure has been built.

Updated Residual Effects Demolition and Construction Early Phases For the Early Phases development scenario (Phases 0-4), the worst-case scenario in terms of daylight, sunlight, overshadowing, solar glare and light spill effects is represented by the completed amended proposed development. On this basis, and considering the minor scale of proposed amendments to the Early Phases, the demolition and construction effects for the Early Phases previously reported in the July 2025 ES remain valid. All Phases For the All Phases development scenario (Phases 0-8), the worst-case scenario in terms of daylight, sunlight, overshadowing, solar glare and light spill effects is represented by the completed amended proposed development. On this basis, and considering the minor scale of proposed amendments to the All Phases, the demolition and construction effects for the All Phases previously reported in the July 2025 ES remain valid.

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review

Updated Assessment Completed Development Early Phases The Early Phases development scenario (Phases 0-4) is shown in Appendix C. Only those neighbouring properties with the potential to be affected by the proposed amendments in terms of daylight and sunlight, which are along the south-western perimeter of the Site, have been reassessed. The full scope of these properties included within the Early Phases development scenario is listed below. All other properties are sufficiently distant from the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development that they would not be affected. • • • • • • •

Sharnbrook House 16-80 Aisgill Avenue (even) 1-41 Aisgill Avenue (odd) 1-7 Stanier Close 1-12 Franklin Square 1-9 Bellamy Close 2-18 Marchbank Road (even)

Further quantitative overshadowing testing within the Early Phases development scenario has not been undertaken. The July 2025 ES demonstrated that all relevant neighbouring outdoor amenity areas either comfortably satisfy the BRE recommendation, with well over 50 % of their area receiving at least two hours of direct sunlight on 21 March or are located to the south of Development Zone H[O] and would not be affected by shadows arising from the proposed amendments. Given the very small magnitude of the change now proposed with the introduction of Development Zone H[O], it is not expected to materially alter sunlight availability to these areas, and the conclusions of the previous assessment therefore remain valid. Further quantitative solar glare testing within the Early Phases development scenario has not been undertaken. Part of the scheme (WB05-T1) is proposed to be transferred from the Detailed Component to

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review

Updated Assessment the Outline Component. As the materiality of the previous detailed design would be captured in the Design Code for the Outline Component Zone H[O], the previously reported effects would remain valid. Further quantitative light spill testing within the Early Phases development scenario has not been undertaken. The proposed amendments relate to residential areas only which are not relevant for assessment in light spill terms. The conclusions of the previous assessment therefore remain valid. Full updated technical results and No Skyline (NSL) contours (Appendix C) have been produced to consider the daylight and sunlight impacts of the proposed amendments upon relevant external receptors within the Early Phases development scenario, and a comparison has been made against the impact of July 2025 Amended Proposed Development which formed the subject of the July 2025 ES. The studies were undertaken by preparing a 3D computer model of the Site and the surrounding buildings and analysing the updated effect upon the daylight and sunlight levels received by neighbouring properties. The technical results show that, the proposed amendments would not give rise to any new or materially different completed development effects to daylight and sunlight than those previously reported for the Early Phases development scenario (Phases 0-4) when compared to those reported in the July 2025 ES. Whilst there would be small differences in numerical daylight and sunlight values from those stated in the July 2025 ES, these would not result in a change to the magnitude of impact and therefore the scale of previously reported effects. This is demonstrated within updated analysis contained in Appendix C. The conclusions of the July 2025 ES therefore remain valid. All Phases The All Phases development scenario (Phases 0-8) is shown in Appendix C. Only those neighbouring properties with the potential to be affected by the proposed amendments in terms of daylight and sunlight, which are along the south-western perimeter of the Site, have been reassessed. The full

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review

Updated Assessment scope of these properties included within the All Phases development scenario is listed below. All other properties are sufficiently distant from the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development that they would not be affected. • • • • • • •

Sharnbrook House 16-80 Aisgill Avenue (even) 1-41 Aisgill Avenue (odd) 1-7 Stanier Close 1-12 Franklin Square 1-9 Bellamy Close 2-18 Marchbank Road (even)

Further quantitative overshadowing testing within the All Phases development scenario has not been undertaken. The July 2025 ES demonstrated that all relevant neighbouring outdoor amenity areas either comfortably satisfy the BRE recommendation, with well over 50 % of their area receiving at least two hours of direct sunlight on 21 March or are located to the south of Development Zone H[O] and would not be affected by shadows arising from the minor amendment. Given the very small magnitude of the change now proposed with the introduction of Development Zone H[O], it is not expected to materially alter sunlight availability to these areas, and the conclusions of the previous assessment therefore remain valid. Further quantitative solar glare testing within the All Phases development scenario has not been undertaken. Part of the scheme (WB05-T1) is proposed to be transferred from the Detailed Component to the Outline Component. As the materiality of the previous detailed design would be captured in the Design Code for the Outline Component Zone H[O], the previously reported effects would remain valid. Further quantitative light spill testing within the All Phases development scenario has not been undertaken. The proposed amendments relate to residential areas only which are not relevant for assessment in light spill terms. The conclusions of the previous assessment therefore remain valid.

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review

Updated Assessment Full updated technical results and NSL contours (Appendix C) have been produced to consider the daylight and sunlight impacts of the proposed amendments upon relevant external receptors within the All Phases development scenario, and a comparison has been made against the impact of proposed development which formed the subject of the July 2025 ES. The studies were undertaken by preparing a 3D computer model of the Site and the surrounding buildings and analysing the updated effect upon the daylight and sunlight levels received by neighbouring properties. The technical results show that, the proposed amendments would not give rise to any new or materially different completed development effects to daylight and sunlight than those previously reported for the All Phases development scenario (Phases 0-8) when compared to those reported in the July 2025 ES. Whilst there would be small differences in numerical daylight and sunlight values from those stated in the July 2025 ES, these would not result in a change to the magnitude of impact and therefore the scale of previously reported effects. This is demonstrated within updated analysis contained in Appendix C. The conclusions of the July 2025 ES therefore remain valid. Cumulative Effects The updated cumulative scheme list and programme assumptions have been reviewed. The qualitative assessment previously undertaken of scheme 18, have been reviewed in light of the submitted planning application. It is confirmed that he previous qualitative assessment remains valid. Any new cumulative schemes are sufficiently distant from the Site and the relevant sensitive receptors that they would not materially interact with the daylight, sunlight, overshadowing, solar glare or light spill effects of the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development. Accordingly, no new or materially different significant cumulative effects would arise, and the cumulative conclusions of the July 2025 ES remain valid.

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review Wind Microclimate In respect of national legislation, policy and guidance, the NPPF was updated in August 2026. The updated NPPF contains no changes of relevance to the wind assessment. In respect of regional policy and guidance, topic specific guidance and industry standards, the documents presented within the July 2025 ES remain valid.

The proposed amendments are not expected to alter baseline conditions effects for the development as previously reported in the July 2025 ES for ground level receptors. There have been no updates to the nearby existing surrounding context or to on-site existing areas. There have also been no material changes to the surrounding area previously considered in the July 2025 ES. As such, the pedestrian and cyclist wind comfort presented in the July 2025 ES remain valid.

Updated Assessment

It has been agreed with the peer reviewer that the approach for assessment of the changes would be an experience –based qualitative review, as per their commentary “experience-based qualitative review, including sensitivity check of the wind tunnel results, should be sufficient at the outline stage, given that the outline footprint of WB05-T1 is not significantly larger, the plot was not particularly problematic, and the building height remains unchanged,”

Updated Residual Effects The proposed amendments to WB05-T2 would increase the building footprint by: • 0.694 m along the northern elevation; • 1.330 m along the eastern elevation; • 0.233 m along the southern elevation; and • 0.663 m along the western elevation. All of these would be small changes, with respect to wind, and are not considered likely to affect previously reported wind microclimate effects. Accordingly, the proposed amendments have not been considered further in the assessment below. The proposed transfer of WB05-T1 from the Detailed Component to the new Development Zone H[O] in the Outline Component, introduces more massing by increasing the built form footprint by: • 0.450 m along the northern elevation; • 0.150 m along the eastern elevation; • 7.725 m along the southern elevation; and • 5.537 m along the western elevation. These changes have the potential to affect the previously reported wind microclimate effects and have therefore been considered further in the assessment below. However, it should be noted that the overall height of Development Zone H[O] would remain unchanged and therefore, large changes in the wind microclimate are considered unlikely. Demolition and Construction

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review

Updated Assessment Early Phases The proposed amendments are not expected to alter the demolition and construction effects for the Early Phases development scenario. Areas around the Outline Components, WB03, WB04, WB05-T2, EC04, EC05 and EC06 are anticipated to remain similar to that previously reported in the July 2025 ES. The proposed transfer of WB05-T1 from the Detailed Component to the Outline Component is anticipated to alter conditions locally; however, they would be small with respect to wind conditions. Therefore, demolition and construction assumptions for the Early Phases development scenario relevant to the assessment of wind would remain unchanged. Accordingly, the conclusions of the July 2025 ES remain valid. All Phases The proposed amendments are not expected to alter the demolition and construction effects for the All Phases development scenario. Areas around the Outline Components, WB03, WB04, WB05-T2, EC04, EC05 and EC06 are anticipated to remain similar to that previously reported in the July 2025. The proposed transfer of WB05-T1 from the Detailed Component to the Outline Component is anticipated to alter conditions locally; however, they would be small with respect to wind conditions. Therefore, demolition and construction assumptions for the All Phases development scenario relevant to the assessment of wind would remain unchanged. Accordingly, the conclusions of the July 2025 ES remain valid. Completed Development As a result of the proposed amendments, it is anticipated that the only change that would have a material effect on wind would be transferring WB05-T1 from the Detailed Component to the Outline Component. It is noted that the Illustrative Scheme proposals would remain materially valid. In the Outline Component, the overall height of Development Zone H[O] would remain the same as that assessed in the July 2025 ES. However, additional massing in the southern extent of the zone (when compared to

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review

Updated Assessment the previous detailed WB05-T1 proposals) has the potential to increase the amount of acceleration around these corners, potentially resulting in windier conditions. There would be potential for small changes in wind speeds in the immediate study area; however, for the majority of receptor locations, similar conditions to that presented in the July 2025 ES, suitable for the anticipated uses, are anticipated. A handful of receptor locations, as discussed in more detail below are anticipated to record more noticeable change in wind speeds, which may result in windier than desired conditions. It is noted that conditions around the Outline Component of the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development would be further assessed at the detailed RMA stage, to ensure suitable wind conditions are delivered. Early Phases The area around the north-eastern corner of Development Zone H[O] (represented by probe location 90) is anticipated to become windier, with strolling use wind conditions during the windiest season. These conditions would be suitable for throughfare use (similar to the usage of the area assessed as part of the July 2025 ES). However, should an entrance be located near this corner, conditions would be one category windier than required and mitigation measures would be required. Entrance locations around Development Zone H[O] are currently not known, therefore, proposed entrances would be further assessed at the RMA stage, to ensure suitable wind conditions are delivered. The assessment of the Illustrative Scheme remains valid. The areas at the north-eastern and northern corners of Development Zone H[O] (represented by probe locations 90, 91, 95 and 97) are anticipated to become windier, with standing use wind conditions during the summer season. As part of the July 2025 ES, probe locations 91, 95 and 97 were assessed as on-site seating areas, therefore, standing use wind conditions would be one category windier than required and mitigation measures would be required. However, it is anticipated that the addition of proposed

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review

Updated Assessment landscaping would improve conditions such that sitting use wind conditions would be delivered, suitable for the intended use. If seating is proposed at the location 90, this would be further assessed at the RMA stage, to ensure suitable wind conditions are delivered. Upper-level amenity locations and designs are not known for Development Zone H[O]. As part of the July 2025 ES, elevated areas of WB05-T1 (probe locations 366-369) indicated wind conditions would be suitable for sitting and standing use during the summer season, suitable for the intended use. Any proposed elevated amenity for Development Zone H[O] would be further assessed at the RMA stage to ensure suitable wind conditions are delivered. All other probe locations not discussed are anticipated to have pedestrian and cyclist comfort conditions as presented in the July 2025 ES. The massing changes of Development Zone H[O] are not anticipated to increase the occurrence of strong winds above pedestrian and cyclist safety thresholds. Therefore, the outcomes presented in the July 2025 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario. Strong winds around the Outline Component of the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development would be further assessed at the RMA stage to verify no exceedances of the safety threshold are delivered. In summary, it is considered that the proposed massing of Development Zone H[O] may give rise to the potential for changes in wind speeds in the immediate study area; however, they are anticipated to result in similar conditions to that presented in the July 2025 ES, or windier conditions (depending on the proposed uses to be confirmed at the detailed design stage) which would be mitigated at the RMA stage. No new or amended mitigation have been identified as required. All Phases The areas at the north-eastern and northern corners of Development Zone H[O] (represented by probe locations 90 and 97) are anticipated to become windier, with strolling use wind conditions during the windiest season. These conditions would be suitable for throughfare use. However, should

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review

Updated Assessment an entrance be located near these corners, conditions would be one category windier than required and mitigation measures would be required. Entrance locations around Development Zone H[O] are currently not known, therefore, proposed entrances would be further assessed at the RMA stage, to ensure suitable wind conditions are delivered. The assessment of the Illustrative Scheme remains valid. The areas at the north-eastern and northern corners of Development Zone H[O] (represented by probe location 90, 91, 95, 96 and 97) are anticipated to become windier, with standing use wind conditions during the summer season. As part of the July 2025 ES, probe locations 91, 95, 96 and 97 were assessed as on-Site seating areas, therefore, standing use wind conditions would be one category windier than required and mitigation measures would be required. However, it is anticipated that the addition of proposed landscaping would improve conditions such that sitting use wind conditions would be delivered, suitable for the intended use. If seating is proposed at the location 90, this would be further assessed at the RMA stage to ensure suitable wind conditions are delivered. Additionally, other nearby areas would see an increase in windiness; however, they are anticipated to be suitable for either entrance or throughfare use during the summer season. Furthermore, identified seating areas as part of the July 2025 ES are anticipated to be suitable for sitting use during the summer season. Therefore, no further mitigation measures would be required. Upper-level amenity locations and designs are not known for Development Zone H[O]. As part of the July 2025 ES, elevated areas of WB05-T1 (probe locations 366-369) indicated wind conditions would be suitable for sitting and standing use during the summer season, suitable for the intended use. Any proposed elevated amenity for Development Zone H[O] would be further assessed at the detailed RMA stage, to ensure suitable wind conditions are delivered. All other probe locations not discussed are anticipated to have pedestrian and cyclist comfort conditions as presented in the July 2025 ES.

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review

Updated Assessment The massing changes are not anticipated to increase the occurrence of strong winds above pedestrian and cyclist safety thresholds. Therefore, the outcomes presented in the July 2025 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario. Strong winds around the Outline Component of the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development would be further assessed at the RMA stage to verify no exceedances of the safety threshold are delivered. Cumulative Effects As part of the July 2025 ES, it was noted that the Former Fulham Boys School 11 Mund Street London W14 9LY (scheme 18) was the only nearby cumulative scheme not quantitatively assessed due to lack of publicly available information. As such, it was considered qualitatively and it was noted that this scheme would be included in future assessments as each detailed design / RMA comes forward. A planning application has now been submitted for this scheme and would be approximately six storeys in height. This would be substantially lower than majority of the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development and therefore is unlikely to have a material impact on the local wind microclimate. However, there would be a taller element, approximately 12 storeys in height, which could have an impact on the amount of winds interacting with the Outline Components of the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development. As the scheme is situated to the west of Plot WK11, it is considered unlikely that the conditions around WB03, WB04 and WB05 would be materially affected, due to being out with the prevailing wind direction. There is the potential for increase of windiness locally around Development Zone H[O] as discussed in the ‘Completed Development – Early Phases’ and ‘Completed Development – All Phases’ sections above. Accordingly scheme 18 would be further assessed at the RMA stage to verify its cumulative effect on the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development.

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review

Updated Assessment Scheme 18 is not anticipated to increase the occurrence of strong winds above pedestrian and cyclist safety thresholds at on-site areas. Therefore, the conclusions of the July 2025 ES remain valid.

Townscape and Visual There have been no changes to relevant legislation, policy and guidance since submission of the July 2025 ES, with the exception of the NPPF, which was updated most recently in August 2026 and the DLP issued for consultation in July 2026. The changes to the NPPF do not affect the assessment of townscape and visual effects. The DLP carries limited weight and contains no changes of material relevance to the townscape and visual impact assessment of the minor proposed amendments. Policy MBUL3 Tall Buildings requires plan making authorities to identify locations that might be appropriate for tall buildings or 30 m and above and sets out locational criteria. Policy MBUL3 identifies where Metropolitan tall buildings (defined as those of more than 100 m in height) are considered appropriate. It does not include the Site. Tall buildings of over 100 m in height were approved by RBKC and LBHF in November and December 2025 respectively but no changes to these heights are now proposed.

The baseline conditions presented in the July 2025 ES remain valid with the exception of the following updates: since July 2025, on-site meanwhile uses have changed. The meanwhile uses utilise the existing infrastructure on-site and no new infrastructure has been built. There have been no material changes to the surrounding area previously considered in the July 2025 ES. Accordingly, the baseline conditions and sensitive receptors presented in the July 2025 ES, remain materially valid in respect of townscape character and views.

Updated Residual Effects Demolition and Construction Early Phases The proposed amendments are not expected to alter the demolition and construction effects for the Early Phases development scenario previously reported in the July 2025 ES for townscape and visual receptors. Whilst part of the scheme (Plot WB05-T1) is proposed to be transferred from the Detailed Component to the Outline Component, the demolition and construction assumptions for the Early Phases development scenario relevant to the assessment of WB05-T1 remain unchanged. Accordingly, the conclusions of the 2025 ES remain valid. All Phases The proposed amendments are not expected to alter the demolition and construction effects for the Early Phases development scenario previously reported in the July 2025 ES for townscape and visual receptors. Whilst part of the scheme (Plot WB05-T1) is proposed to be transferred from the Detailed Component to the Outline Component, the demolition and construction assumptions for the Early Phases development scenario relevant to the assessment of WB05-T1 remain unchanged. Accordingly, the conclusions of the July 2025 ES remain valid. Completed Development Early Phases Within the July 2025 ES, Plot WB05 was located at the western edge of the Early Phases Site within the LBHF, to the north of the Empress State Building and integrated within the cluster of tall buildings to the west of the Table Park. WB05-T1 was the taller element of the plot to the north-west and WB05-T2 stepped down in height to its south-east, adjacent to the

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review In respect of topic specific guidance and industry standards, the documents presented in the July 2025 ES remain valid.

Updated Assessment Site boundary. Both T1 and T2 were Detailed Components of the July 2025 Amended Proposed Development. WB05-T1 is now proposed to be transferred from the Detailed Component to the Outline Component (Development Zone H[O]). The height of the Maximum Parameter Envelope for Development Zone H[O] would not change from that of the previous detailed design for WB05-T1. There would be a simplification of, and slight increase in, its footprint to allow greater flexibility in the arrangement of a detailed design coming forward within the Maximum Parameter envelope. The Design Code has been expanded to include design requirements for Development Zone H[O] as an Outline Component within the Aisgill Gardens Character Area. This stipulates that detailed design of Development Zone H[O] must read as a pair together with WB05-T2, and share an architectural language, with WB05-T2 to ensure that Aisgill Gardens comes forward as a coherent family of buildings (paras.AG.B.19 and AG.B.20). WB05-T2 would remain in the Detailed Component. Its height would be unchanged from the July 2025 Amended Proposed Development. Its footprint would be slightly expanded to allow for alteration of the residential tenure proposed but the architectural character would remain as for the July 2025 Amended Proposed Development. The proposed amendments to WB05-T1 (now Development Zone H[O]) and WB05-T2 have been tested in relevant views to inform this assessment. As a result of the modest scale of the proposed massing, and the local alignment of streets and open spaces to its west, the proposed amendments would not be widely visible. Testing in the visualiser’s 3-d model has demonstrated that Development Zone H[O] would be visible in four aligned local views (Views 49, 52, 54 and B19); the very top of the lower WB05-T2 would be just visible in View 52 and more visible at very close range in View B19. These four views have been remodelled to show Development Zone H[O] and included in Appendix D. For each of the views in Appendix D, the July 2025 Amended Proposed Development and October 2026 Amended Proposed Development have been modelled in the Early Phases scenario.

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review

Updated Assessment The Maximum Parameter for Development Zone H[O] is shown in yellow- green wireline in the verified views and yellow-green tone in the model View B19. The detailed architectural proposal for WB05-T2 is shown where visible as a verified render in View 52 and an articulated model render in View B19. Where not visible its outline is shown with a dashed wireline. As the views in Appendix D demonstrate, the Maximum Parameter for Development Zone H[O] would represent a simplified envelope within which a detailed building of comparable mass to WB05-T1 in the July 2025 Amended Proposed Development could come forward. As the Design Code stipulates that Development Zone H[O] must reflect the architectural character of WB05-T2, its effects on townscape character and visual amenity, in comparison to that of the July 2025 Amended Proposed Development, would not materially alter. Where visible, the changes to the detailed design of WB05-T2 would be barely discernible in comparison to the July 2025 Amended Proposed Development and would not therefore alter its effects on townscape character and visual amenity. The proposed minor refinements to the detailed designs of WB03 and WB04 at podium level would not be visible beyond the Site boundary and would not therefore alter effects on townscape character and visual amenity in comparison to that of the July 2025 Amended Proposed Development. All Phases No amendments are proposed beyond the Early Phases Site. Therefore, as the proposed amendments to the Early Phases would not alter effects on townscape character and visual amenity in comparison to the July 2025 Amended Proposed Development, there would be no change to the effects on townscape character and visual amenity as a result of the All Phases scenario of the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development. Cumulative Effects There is one relevant cumulative scheme submitted since July 2025: the redevelopment of the former Fulham Boys School, 11 Mund Street

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review

Updated Assessment (planning ref: 2025/02153/FR3, which is pending consideration by LBHF. This scheme was considered qualitatively in the July 2025 ES based on consultation information, as it had not been submitted at the time. The residential application includes four buildings ranging from one to 12 storeys. The Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) included in the planning submission indicates that there would be potential visibility of this cumulative scheme in combination with the July 2025 Amended Proposed Development. The majority of the combined visual impact would be confined to the streets in the area between the Site and North End Road, and the stretch of West Cromwell Road to the north of the Earls Court Site between the junctions with North End Road and Warwick Road. There would be some potential limited combined visibility of the submitted scheme from aligned streets within the Baron’s Court CA looking eastwards. Due to its proximity to the Site, there is potential for meaningful interaction between the two developments in both construction and demolition and operational scenarios. This would be confined mainly to the north-west part of the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development, which comprises later phases of the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development. The cumulative impacts on townscape would increase for TCA’s 1A, 1B, 11, 12 and 15. The sensitivity of TCAs 1A, 1B and 11, where the highest level of cumulative interaction would be experienced, is Very low to Low. The effects of the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development on these TCAs would be Moderate to each. It is judged that the additional impact of the townscape change to these low sensitivity areas, which will experience high levels of change as a result of the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development would not alter the effect in comparison to the July 2025 Amended Proposed Development. The sensitivity of TCAs 12 and 15, which are partly within designated CAs, is Medium but both are more distant from the Site and the additional impact of the new cumulative scheme would be much lower. The very small increase in change as a result of the additional cumulative scheme would therefore

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Table 1: Updated Assessment for October 2026 Amended Proposed Development Baseline Conditions Review Legislation, Policies and Published Guidance Review

Updated Assessment not alter the scale of effect in comparison to the July 2025 Amended Proposed Development. The additional cumulative scheme would be potentially visible in combination with the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development in very close local views from North End Road and the area between North End Road and the Earls Court Site looking east or north-east including Views 48 and B18. The sensitivity of these views is Low to medium. Given the noticeable level of impact on these close local views of the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development, it is judged that the additional impact of the visual change resulting from the additional cumulative scheme would not alter the effect in comparison to the July 2025 Amended Proposed Development. Views 42 and A30 are more distant from the Site and the additional impact of the new cumulative scheme would be much lower at this distance. The effect of the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development in these views is again very noticeable and a very small increase in change as a result of the additional cumulative scheme would not alter the scale of effect in comparison to the July 2025 Amended Proposed Development.

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 08 October 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

8 Conclusion 8.1 The October 2026 Amended Proposed Development incorporates amendments to the July 2025 Amended Proposed Development. Due to the minor nature of the proposed amendments, the updated EIA has concluded that there would be no material change to the previously reported July 2025 ES conclusions. No new or amended significant effects are likely to arise on the assumption that previously identified additional mitigation is adopted at the RMA stage for Development Zone H[O] in respect of wind microclimate. No new or amended additional mitigation would be required. 8.2 Considering the nature and scale of amendments proposed by the updated cumulative schemes list, and standard mitigation measures that would either be adopted through the design process or secured by planning condition, the scale of inter-project cumulative effects previously reported, are not expected to be altered. Accordingly, no new or amended significant inter-project cumulative environmental effects are considered likely to arise. 8.3 As the EIA conclusions for the October 2026 Amended Proposed Development would not alter the conclusions of the environmental topics, there would be no change to the previously reported intra-project cumulative effects.

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 14 September 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Appendix A: September 2026 Amended Proposed Development Plans and Schedules

Table 4A.3R: Proposed Early Phases Area Schedule Amended Detailed Component

Use Class

Specific Land Use(s) (areas to include back of house

Land Use Type/Group

RBKC

Category

RBKC

Amended Outline Component

LBHF

GEA (m2)

GIA (m2)

NIA (m2)

GEA (m2)

GIA

Total (Both LPAs)

(m2)

NIA (m2)

GEA (m2)

GIA (m2)

NIA (m2)

RBKC

LBHF

Total (Both LPAs)

GEA (m2)

Min

Max

Min

Max

Min

Max

Assumed Factor (%)

GIA

NIA

Logistics / Data Centre

6,000

10,000

16,000

Hotel

16,000

20,000

36,000

Residential Institutions (Hospital)

25,000

Residential Institutions (Later Living)

35,000

40,000

50,000

Residential

40,246

36,358

22,213

41,776

37,908

24,159

82,022

74,266

46,372

85,000

130,000

176,000

251,000

261,000

381,000

30,885

28,310

16,596

30,885

28,310

16,596

2,000

38,000

40,000

Residential

Purpose Built Student Accommodation (PBSA)

Sui Generis

Confidential

Sui Generis

Co-living Retail

Retail / F&B / Flex. Commercial

E(a))/(b)/(c) /SG

2,000

48,000

50,000

1,451

1,352

1,068

2,595

2,433

2,178

4,046

3,785

3,246

4,000

10,000

4,000

12,000

8,000

22,000

Leisure (Indoor Sport and Recreation)

E(d)/SG

3,561

3,466

3,335

3,561

3,466

3,335

250

4,000

6,000

250

10,000

Office and Research and Development

E(g)

35,000

95,000

50,000

155,000

85,000

250,000

Education

F1(a)

20,000

25,000

45,000

F/E(g)/(f)/(g )

361

326

303

395

353

349

756

679

652

100

1,500

350

1,500

450

3,000

Culture

F/Sui Generis

1,000

7,000

500

7,000

1,500

14,000

Ancillary*

Sui Generis

1,218

1,190

1,218

1,190

2,000

20,000

1,000

28,000

3,000

48,000

42,058

38,036

23,585

80,430

73,660

46,617

122,488

111,696

70,201

127,350

348,500

231,850

666,500

359,200

990,000

Community / Social Infrastructure

Total 2

204,000

Total Outline Component Maximum GEA (m ) *comprises floorspace for incidental purposes linked to the land uses in the table.

Table 4A.5A: Amended Proposed Maximum Residential, Hotel, Co-living, Older Persons Housing and Purpose Built Student Apartments LBHF Residential Type

RBKC

Early Phases

All Phases

Total

Early Phases

All Phases

Early Phases

All Phases

Detailed

Outline

Detailed

Outline

Detailed

Outline

Detailed

Outline

Detailed

Outline

Detailed

Outline

Residential Apartments (C3)

342

525

342

2,158

310

1,090

310

1,090

652

1,615

652

3,248

Hotel Rooms (C1)

250

200

250

450

Older Persons Housing Units (C2)

150

300

Co-Living Units (Sui Generis)

400

1,000

400

1,040

PBSA Bedrooms (Sui Generis)

696

804

696

834

Table 4A.6A: Amended Assumed Minimum Residential Units LBHF Residential Type

RBKC

Early Phases

All Phases

Total

Early Phases

All Phases

Early Phases

All Phases

Detailed

Outline

Detailed

Outline

Detailed

Outline

Detailed

Outline

Detailed

Outline

Detailed

Outline

Residential (C3)

342

150

342

1,658

310

740

310

740

652

890

652

2,398

Older Persons Housing (C2)

Co-Living (Sui Generis)

PBSA (Sui Generis)

696

Confidential

385,543

589,543

Table 4A.7A: Amended Proposed Early Phases Maximum Residential Homes Unit Mix Tenure

Amended Detailed Component

Amended Outline Component

Updated mix

One Bed

Two Bed

Three Bed

Four Bed

Total

One Bed

Two Bed

Three Bed

Four Bed

Total

Private

141

107

278

195

140

355

633

73%

Intermediate

117

27%

Social Rent

117

Total

157

123

342

260

214

525

867

Private

101

202

510

378

955

1,157

83%

Intermediate

122

17%

LBHF 50% 50%

RBKC

Social Rent

121

Total

113

146

310

568

428

1,090

1,400

1,615

2,267

652

50% 50%

Table 4A.8A: Amended Proposed All Phases Maximum Residential Homes Unit Mix Tenure

Amended Detailed Component

Amended Outline Component

Updated mix

One Bed

Two Bed

Three Bed

Four Bed

Total

One Bed

Two Bed

Three Bed

Four Bed

Total

Private

141

107

278

836

616

1546

1,824

73%

Intermediate

181

145

340

27%

Social Rent

127

272

336

Total

157

123

342

1,091

832

235

2,158

2,500

Private

101

202

510

378

955

1,157

83%

Intermediate

122

17%

Social Rent

121

Total

113

146

310

568

428

1,090

1,400

3,248

3,900

LBHF 50% 50%

RBKC

652

Confidential

50% 50%

Cl u

ew s

No implied licence exists. This drawing should not be used to calculate areas for the purposes of valuation. Do not scale this drawing. All dimensions to be checked on the site by the contractor and such dimensions to be their responsibility. All work must comply with relevant British Standards and Building Regulations requirements. Drawing errors and omissions to be reported to the architect. To be read in conjunction with Architect's specification and other consultant information.

R Nevern Square

EC21

EC20

A4 / W

ell Ro

omw est Cr

Rev. P01 P02 P03 P04

Issued to Ramboll ALL ALL ALL

Description EIA Design Freeze 02B Composite Site Plans Issue EIA Addendum DF02 composite plans Planning Amendments

Date 31.01.24 23.05.24 06.05.25 08.09.26

Planning Application Boundary

Borough Boundary Indicative Detailed Component Boundary (Please refer to detailed GA drawings for further information) Key Entrance / Fire Escape Exit at Public Realm level (Residential)

WK06

Key Entrance / Fire Escape Exit at Public Realm level (Non-residential)

Communal external amenity at high level Communal external amenity level AOD Development Zone boundary Plot beneath Public Realm Indicative plot boundary

WK04

ir ch

eb ov

XXNN

ulevar

EARL'S COURT STATION

WK07 EC08

WK01

EC18

End

EC17

EC16

g din

Warwick

sS ar qu

Wa rw

ick

EC04

+12.5

EC05-T1

EC10

WB06

+12.5

ill

The Cascades

Residential

General Class E BOH

Residential Lobby & Amenity

Community

Residential BOH Plant & Core/Circulation

Car Parking

Av ue

EC07 WB10

(L00) +8

WB04-P1

H[O]

H[D] WB04-T1

EC11

EC14

EC03 pto rom t st B cen We Cres

EC12

e pr

EC13

WB05-T2

WB09

Project

d ar

Aisgill Avenue

EC02

l ou

WB03-T1

WB08

WB03-P1 DN

Th e

EC01

ro dB

EC22

WB02

WEST BROMPTON STATION

nd R

th E Nor

WB07

to mp

d oa R n

Earls Court Development

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK Drawing

West Brompton Square

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

50m

The Table

+8 Aisgill Gardens

oad

General Social Infrastructure

EC09

Crescen

EC06-T1

Star R

Student Accommodation

Landscape public realm proposal is part of the outline application and is for illustrative purpose only.

lie

n La

WK09

Leisure

0 @ 1:1250

WK10

Retail

Please refer to detailed GA drawings for further information on detailed components.

EC05-P1

n Mu

Flexible Commercial/Culture

Please refer to parameter plans for further information on outline development zones.

+8.5

+12.5

tr dS

Workspace BOH

EC15

Lil

ill sg

WK11

F&B

rescent

Workspace

Eardley C

Roa

Warwick Square

Warwick Lane

West Brompton Lane

th Nor

Gib

WK08

Pe ny w

WK12 Clo

Plot code (below Ground Floor only) Proposed public realm levels at key entrances

de ns

en Gre

Development Zone code

XXNN-YN Plot code

ilb

WK02

u Bea

ton Bo

West K ensing ton Place South

ensing

ven nt A

ert

West K

EC19

WK05

WK03 WEST KENSINGTON STATION

thb

Public route through Development Zone (location is indicative)

Composite Site Plan - Perceived Ground Floor Plan

oad

RB LB

WB01

oa eR

rav

lie

Lil

ad Ro

Scale @ A1

Date

Drawn By

Checked By

HB/SEW

1 : 1250

31/01/24

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Information

Drawing No.

Rev

ECD-SW-ZZ-HBS-02-ZZ-DR-A-101000

P04

Cl u

ew s

R Nevern Square

EC21

Rev. P01 P02 P03 P04

EC20

Description EIA Design Freeze 02B Composite Site Plans Issue EIA Addendum DF02 composite plans Planning Amendments

Date 31.01.24 23.05.24 06.05.25 08.09.26

Planning Application Boundary

Borough Boundary Indicative Detailed Component Boundary (Please refer to detailed GA drawings for further information)

oad well R

est Cr

A4 / W

Issued to Ramboll ALL ALL ALL

Key Entrance / Fire Escape Exit at Public Realm level (Residential) Key Entrance / Fire Escape Exit at Public Realm level (Non-residential) Communal external amenity at high level Communal external amenity level AOD Development Zone boundary Plot beneath Public Realm

Indicative plot boundary

EC19

ir ilb

eb ov

ert

XXNN

de ns

EARL'S COURT STATION

Warwick Square

Warwick Lane

EC18

End

EC17

Roa d

Warwick

lk Wa ick Wa rw

+12.5

EC05-T1

EC10

+12.5

sg ill Av

EC07

pto rom t st B cen We Cres

WB09

50m

d ar

Th e

WB08

WB03-P1 DN

EC01

ro dB

EC22

WEST BROMPTON STATION

Earls Court Development

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

Composite Site Plan - Perceived Ground Floor Plan Early Phases

RB LB

oad

lev

nd R

lac

WB07

to mp

d oa R n

Drawing

West Brompton Square

WB02

Project

Aisgill Avenue

EC02

l ou

oad

th E Nor

Star R

Car Parking

EC13

WB03-T1

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

Residential BOH Plant & Core/Circulation

EC12

e pr

WB05-T2

Community

EC11

H[D]

Residential Lobby & Amenity

WB04-T1

H[O] I

WB04-P1

General Class E BOH

EC14

EC03

WB10

(L00) +8

Residential

The Table

The Cascades

General Social Infrastructure

Student Accommodation

EC09

Crescen

EC04

WB06

tre

Leisure

0 @ 1:1250

EC05-P1

S nd

Retail

Landscape public realm proposal is part of the outline application and is for illustrative purpose only.

EC15

EC06-T1

Flexible Commercial/Culture

Please refer to detailed GA drawings for further information on detailed components.

EC16

+12.5

Workspace BOH

Please refer to parameter plans for further information on outline development zones.

+8.5

F&B

rescent

Clo

Workspace

Eardley C

th Nor

bs Gib

en Gre

Pe ny w

ve nt A

EC08 ad

nue

West Brompton Lane

Plot code (below Ground Floor only) Proposed public realm levels at key entrances

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

o aum

Development Zone code

XXNN-YN Plot code

thb

Public route through Development Zone (location is indicative)

WB01

oa eR

rav

lie

Lil

ad Ro

Scale @ A1

Date

Drawn By

Checked By

HB/SEW

1 : 1250

31/01/24

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Information

Drawing No.

Rev

ECD-SW-ZZ-HBS-02-ZZ-DR-A-101010

P04

Cl un y

Nevern Square

Rev. P01 P02

W ar w

Description

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25

Ro ad

Ph ilb ea ch

rR oa d

l Road mwel o r C t / Wes

Tr eb ov i

ic k

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

G ar de ns

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

EARL'S COURT STATION

Planning Application Boundary

Ro ad

nue Ave t n o um Bea

th Nor

en Gre s b b Gi

Pe ny w

er n

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

se Clo

Area below ground pertaining to the former Earls Court Station ticket hall and escalator barrel excluded from Planning Applications

d Roa End

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A).

Eardley Cr

Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Hybrid Planning Application

ill sg Ai

et tre S nd Mu

50m

escent

0 @ 1:1250

ue en Av

London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham Hybrid Planning Application

Aisgill Avenue

Project

d oa R on pt m ro dB

Earls Court Development ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK Drawing

001 - Site Location Plan th Nor

WEST BROMPTON STATION e lac sP es pr Em

d Roa End

oad Star R

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

d oa eR rav ag Se

li Lil

d oa R e

Scale @ A1

Date

1 : 1250

27/06/24

Drawn By

Checked By

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-001

P02

Cl un y

Nevern Square

Rev. P01 P02

W ar w

Description

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25

Ro ad

Ph ilb ea ch

rR oa d

l Road mwel o r C t / Wes

Planning Application Boundary

Tr eb ov i

ic k

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

G ar de ns

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Full Demolition Of existing buildings, and/or structures

EARL'S COURT STATION

Full or Partial Demolition Of existing buildings, and/or structures

Partial Demolition Of existing buildings, and/or structures

er n

Ro ad

nue Ave t n o um Bea

th Nor

bs Gib

Pe ny w

Potential Demolition Of existing buildings, and/or structures

se Clo n e Gre

d Roa End

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A).

50m

Eardley Cr

escent

0 @ 1:1250

ill sg Ai

et tre S nd Mu

ue en Av

Aisgill Avenue

Project

d oa R on pt m ro dB

Earls Court Development ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK Drawing

002 - Demolition Plan th Nor

WEST BROMPTON STATION

d oa eR rav ag Se

li Lil

d oa R e

ea ls he am C lh d Fu an d n an to it h ng si sm en er K m of am H of

gh ou or B

on nd Lo

al oy R

d Roa End

oad Star R

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

Scale @ A1

Date

1 : 1250

27/06/24

Drawn By

Checked By

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-002

P02

Cl un y

+6 Nevern Square

Rev. P01 P02

W ar w

+2.5

ic k

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Description

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25

Ro ad

l Road mwel o r C t / Wes

+3 +3.9 +2.7

+3.7 +4 +0.4

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Tr eb ov i

Ph ilb ea ch

rR oa d

G ar de ns

+1.2

EARL'S COURT STATION

+3 +7.5 +10

th Nor

en Gre s b b Gi

+6.4

d Roa End

+0.8

+2.5

0 @ 1:1250

+6 +7

+1.4 +4

et tre S nd Mu

50m

Existing Level in metres Above Ordinance Datum (AOD) Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. Survey is to be confirmed at detailed stages of design.

+7.2

+4.3

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

er n

+7.5

se Clo

+8.5

escent

Planning Application Boundary

Ro ad

+4.1

Eardley Cr

nue Ave t n o um Bea

Pe ny w

+5.5

+11.9 +5.5

+2.6 ill sg Ai

ue en Av

+4.2

+7.4

+11.9 +4.1

+4.3 +8 +5.5

+10

+11.9

+10

+4.2

Project

+9.5

Aisgill Avenue

+8.75 +1.5

+4.1

+8.5

d oa R on pt m ro dB

Earls Court Development ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK Drawing

+7.5

003 - Existing Site Levels th Nor

+3.8

gh ou or B ea ls he am C lh d Fu an d n an to it h ng si sm en er K m of am H of

gh ou or B

li Lil

+4.7

d oa eR rav ag Se

d oa R e

al oy R

+3.7

WEST BROMPTON STATION

on nd Lo

e lac sP es pr Em

d Roa End

oad Star R

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

Scale @ A1

Date

1 : 1250

27/06/24

Drawn By

Checked By

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Information

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-003

P02

Cl un y

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Development Zone's with the suffix '1' lie within LBHF, those with suffix '2' lie within RBKC. Suffix [O] and [D] also denote where part of a DZ is in Outline and part in Detail. 4. Dimensions of the street widths and offsets from the application boundary shown on this plan are minimum dimensions. 5. Maximum Building Line (Ground Floor) are included when required by key infrastructure in Development Zones C and X in response to Ground Floor constraints. 6. Structures associated with stairs, lifts and ventilation located within the public realm are not specified within the Development Specification area and are not specified within the Parameter Plans. Any structures within the public realm should be in line with the principles as set out in the Design Codes

R Nevern Square

W ar w

m -2

Road mw ell o r C t es A4 / W

- 2m

+2 m

m -2

ic k

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name

Development Zone (below Ground Floor) name (see 'Proposed Site Levels Below Ground Floor Plan' for Below Ground Floor Development Zone extent) Maximum Building Line (except balconies where indicated)

Maximum Balcony Envelope

oa d

19 m

Ph ilb ea ch

W -2

+/- 2 m

Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

27 m

+/- 2m

Minimum extent of Public Realm

G ar de ns

EARL'S COURT STATION

Minimum dimension between Maximum Building Line

Extent of potential Public Realm pertaining to the area above existing West London Railway line, the area of land next to West Kensington Station and North End Road, and the Aisgill Avenue MUGA Existing condition at the edge of the site or on railway land. May be subject to works to integrate existing and newly proposed Public Realm.

12 m

m -2

Pe ny w

- 2m -2

Area where pavilions of corresponding Development Zones (G1/G2 or P) are permitted. Pavillions must be sited within adjacent dash-dotted line.

- 4m

-2 m

d Roa nd

0 @ 1:1250

50m

- 4m

-2

H[O]

- 2m

O P

- 2m

+/- 2m

-2

12 m

-2 m

et tr e S d

ue en Av ill sg Ai

+/ -

Eardley Cre

12 m

H[D]

10 m

B2 +/

scent

+/- 2m

15 m

m -2

+4m

m Project

Aisgill Avenue

+/ -4 m

m +/ -2

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

d Ol

m -2

on pt m o Br

Earls Court Development

ad Ro

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK Drawing

WEST BROMPTON STATION

n do

ou or B

n Lo

al oy R

+/ -

d Roa End

004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm

+/ -

th Nor

oad Star R

+/ -4 m

th E No r

bs G G ib

se Clo n e re

Minimum distance between existing Empress Place buildings (excluding basement stairwells)

Ro ad

- 2m

Zone

-2 m

-2

Minimum dimension of Public Realm

er n

+/-Xm Maximum permitted Limit of Deviation of Development

+/- 2 m

11 m

16 m

- 2m

m -2

2 +/-

18 m

- 2m

4 +/-

on um a e B

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Development Zone (above Ground Floor)

Tr eb ov i

e enu t Av

Description

Maximum Building Line (Ground Floor only) -2

- 2m

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

Ro ad

- 2m

Rev. P01 P02 P03

Planning Application Boundary

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Date

1 : 1250

27/06/24

Drawn By

Checked By

ou or B

n to d an

ea ls he C

ith sm

d an

er m am H

ng si en K

ad Ro ve ra ag Se

li Lil

d oa R e

Scale @ A1

am lh Fu

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-004

P03

Cl u

ew s

R Nevern Square

EC21

Rev. P01 P02 P03

EC20

A4 /

ll Roa

we Crom West

wi ck

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Description

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Planning Application Boundary Ro a

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

Development Zone (above Ground Floor)

WK06

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name

EC01 Plot name EC07 Plot name (below Ground Floor only) Plot beneath Public Realm Indicative plot boundary Ro ir ov h

WK05

EC19

Area of deviation for Public Route through Development Zone

ea c

ar d

Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

WK01

EC08 Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Development Zone flexibility and limits of deviation are described in the Parameter Plan 004, and apply to this plan. 4. Structures associated with stairs, lifts and ventilation located within the public realm are not specified within the Development Specification area and are not specified within the Parameter Plans. Any structures within the public realm should be in line with the principles as set out in the Design Codes.

A[O] The Outline Component of a hybrid plot

WK12

e enu

A[D] The Detailed Component of a hybrid plot

EARL'S COURT STATION

WK08

lose

EC18

EC16

End

d Roa

EC15

EC17

0 @ 1:1250

50m

WK11 EC09 EC05

EC04

Eardley

EC06

WK09

Crescen

th Nor

Gib

bs G

C reen

u Bea

ilb

WK07

WK02

nt mo

WK04

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

WK03

Public route through Development Zone (location is indicative)

WB06

tr dS

EC10

WK10

ill

n Mu

Av ue

EC07

WB11

WB13

G1 H[D]

H[O]

WB12

EC14

EC03

WB05-T1

EC11

WB10

WB04

EC12

WB05-T2 WB09

EC13

EC02

Project

WB03 Aisgill Avenue

WB08

to mp o r dB

EC22

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

Drawing EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

WB02

WB07

005 - Proposed Plot Plan WEST BROMPTON STATION

al oy R or

Date

Drawn By

Checked By

27/06/24

of n

to d

s er

m am H

g in

s en

ls he C

ith m

d oa eR rav ag Se

li Lil

d oa

Scale @ A1

1 : 1250

or B

WB01

oad

nd R

th E Nor

Star

Road

EC01

Earls Court Development

d oa R n

Fu a lh m

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-005

P03

+108

+28.0

Cl u

ew s

See note 4

+88

+21.9

+25.0

Nevern Square

+68

+48

+40.4

ll Ro omwe

est Cr

A4 / W

Horizontal Plane

ad ir

Sloped Plane 2 (towards Eardley Crescent)

ilb

ea c

+54.7

Maximum Balcony Envelope

+26.6

+50.6 +48.3

+47.6 +40.0 +33.9

+31.4

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

+85.5

+53.6

Sloped Plane 1

+23.0

Y +12.5

+24.90 Maximum AOD on horizontal plane in metres

ar d

+29.2

+24.90 Maximum AOD on lower edge of plane in metres

+56.6

EARL'S COURT STATION

+61.6 +24.4

+16.6

+21.6 +17.0

+52.3

+44.2

+17.9 +12.9 th Nor

Gib

bs G

C reen

+54.2

+20.6

lose

+36.5

+28.3

+49.8

+39.0 +39.0

+17.4

J +24.0

+21.6

+13.6

+17.0

+17.1

End d Roa

+20.7

+39.2

+19.5

+21.5

T +61.5

+40.7

+13.0 +41.7 +41.1

+58.3

+90.7

+28.8

+44.5

+61.1

+37.2

+51.1

+49.7

+98.3

+81.4

+35.1

Str

+48.9

+106.4

+35.1 sg ill

+58.1

D +16.2

+64.5

+28.1

+35.0

nd Mu

+19.3

+55.0

+16.3

+72.3

+87.2

+67.8

P+11.7

+52.2 +62.4

G2 +16.5

+31.7

+37.9

+51.7 +51.7

+52.2 +11.3 +16.5

+27.7 +31.7

H[D]

H[O]

+24.9

+58.3

+12.5

+35.6

+14.5

+12.5

Project

+43.0

+39.9

B2 +69.5

+35.2

+73.6

+66.4

+61.6 +49.1

+48.0

+35.8

Drawing

or gh

Drawn By

Checked By

27/06/24

to d

s er

m am H

g in

s en

ls he C

ith m

d oa eR rav ag Se

li Lil

d oa

Date

or B

+18.6 +32.1

Scale @ A1

1 : 1250

oad

+41.0

006 - Proposed Maximum Heights

WEST BROMPTON STATION

+26.4 +44.3

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

al oy R

nd R

th E Nor

Star

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

to mp o r dB

Earls Court Development

d oa R n

+60.0

+56.0

+18.7 +9.6 +26.0 +28.3 +21.3 +19.2 +7.7 +30.5 +22.3 +21.3 +38.1 +29.6 +26.0 +41.1

Aisgill Avenue

+47.1

Road

50m

+19.3

+59.0

+82.1 +15.5

0 @ 1:1250

+37.9

+67.6

+34.6

+26.8

+16.3

+21.5

+46.0

+33.8

+26.1

+28.8

+26.8

+24.4

+42.6 +38.1

e enu

+26.9

Crescen

u Bea

nt mo

+28.3

Eardley

+23.2 +18.5

+55.1

All heights shown are >0, AOD and in metres

+28.1

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name Area where pavilions of corresponding Development Zones (G1/G2 or P) are permitted. Pavillions must be sited within adjacent dashdotted line.

+50.1

+74.5

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Detailed Component

+82.2 +55.9

Description

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

V1 +57.3

+38.5 +66.0 +71.2

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Planning Application Boundary

Ro a

+60.9

+11.7

Rev. P01 P02 P03

+28

wi ck

Fu a lh m

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-006

P03

Cl un y

R Nevern Square

W ar w

Road mw ell o r C t es A4 / W

ic k

Spaces

Routes

The Table

Boulevard

Table Park

Crescent (Street type 1)

Destination Square

Lane (Street type 2)

Square

Passage (Street type 3)

Community Green

Walk

MUGA

Place

Rev. P01 P02 P03

The Bioline

Ro ad

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Description

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Planning Application Boundary

Square & Bioline

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

Square & Lane

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) A

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name Detailed Component (above Ground Floor) Existing condition at the edge of the site or on railway land. May be subject to works to integrate existing and newly proposed Public Realm.

oa d

Ph ilb ea ch

Tr eb ov i

Area where pavilions of corresponding Development Zones (G1/G2 or P) are permitted. Pavillions must be sited within adjacent dashdotted line.

G ar de ns

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

EARL'S COURT STATION

se Clo n e re

d Roa nd

M U

0 @ 1:1250

ue en Av ill sg Ai

et tr e S d

G1 H[O]

50m

scent

th E No r

bs G G ib

Pe ny w

er n

Ro ad

Eardley Cre

on um a e B

e enu t Av

H[D]

Aisgill Avenue

Project

th Nor

Earls Court Development

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK Drawing

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

al oy R ou or B

n do

Scale @ A1

Date

1 : 1250

27/06/24

Drawn By

Checked By

ou or B

am H

ea ls he am C lh d Fu an d n an to ng ith si sm en er K m

ad Ro ve ra ag Se

li Lil

d oa R e

007 - Proposed Public Realm Typologies

WEST BROMPTON STATION

n Lo

d Roa End

oad Star R

d Ol

on pt m o Br

ad Ro

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Information

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-007

P03

Cl un y

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Additional specific guidance on movement strategies can be found in Design Codes (EC.PA.C) and should be read in parallel with this Parameter Plan 4. Routes includes those on public realm, and within Development Zone Boundaries. 5. Development Zone flexibility and limits of deviation are described in the Parameter Plan 004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm, and apply to this plan.

R PCV

PCV

Nevern Square

Rev. P01 P02 P03

PCV

W ar w

es A4 / W

oad w ell R t Crom

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Description

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Planning Application Boundary ic k

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

Ro ad

Development Zone (above Ground Level) (limits of deviation apply, refer to Parameter Plan 004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm)

Development Zone name Detailed Component (above Ground Level)

Indicative Locations of Access to Site

Ph ilb ea ch

Tr eb ov i

G ar de ns

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

PCV

th E No r

G ibbs

reen

Pedestrian and Cycle Access

PCV

Pedestrian, Cycle & Vehicle Access

PC BV

Bus & Vehicle Access

Potential Pedestrian and Cycle Access - location and type to be determined through detail design

Cycle Route undercroft or below Ground Floor

er n

Vehicular Route undercroft or below Ground Floor (includes service access)

Pe ny w

se Clo

Potential Pedestrian Access - location to be determined through detail design

Indicative Movement Routes

P PCV

Pedestrian Access

Ro ad

Service Route undercroft or below Ground Floor Vehicular Access to Detailed Components

d Roa nd

M PC

Bus Route

0 @ 1:1250

N E

ue en Av ill sg Ai

et tr e S d

G1 H[O]

50m

scent

on um a e B

Emergency Vehicular Access

Eardley Cre

EARL'S COURT STATION

e PCV enu t Av

oa d

H[D]

Aisgill Avenue

Project

th Nor

PCV EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

WEST BROMPTON STATION

Scale @ A1

Date

1 : 1250

27/06/24

Drawn By

Checked By

ou or B

am H

ea ls he am C lh d Fu an d n an to ng ith si sm en er K m

li Lil

ou or B

n do

PC BV

d oa R e

ad Ro ve ra ag Se

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

008 - Proposed Access & Movement

al oy R

Earls Court Development

Drawing

n Lo

d Roa End

oad Star R

d Ol

on pt m o Br

ad Ro

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-008

P03

Cl u

ew s

+6 Nevern Square

Rev. P01 P02 P03

+2.5

A4 /

Description

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

wi ck

oad

well R

Crom West

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Ro a

+2.7

Ro ir

ilb

ea c

+2.8

Planning Application Boundary

ar d

+7.5

+4 th Nor

G ibbs

C reen

+6.5

lose

+8.5

End d Roa

+8.5

+12.5

+11.5

+4 +12.5

N +3.5

n Mu

50m

ad Ro

+10

+3.3

n er

0 @ 1:1250

+11

tr dS

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Proposed site levels can deviate +/-1.0m. 4. Development Zone flexibility and limits of deviation are described in the Parameter Plan 004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm, and apply to this plan.

+10.5

+X.X Proposed site level in metres Above Ordinance Datum (AOD)

+8.2

+10

+7.5

+11

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

u Bea

nu Ave

Development Zone (above Ground Floor)

Crescen

EARL'S COURT STATION

Eardley

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

ill

P +4

G1 H[O]

H[D] +12.5

+11.5

+12.5

+9 +10.5

Project

Aisgill Avenue

+9.5

+8.5

to mp o r dB

Earls Court Development

d oa R n

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

Drawing

009 - Proposed Site Levels Ground Floor

+7.8 +5

WEST BROMPTON STATION

al oy R gh

Drawn By

Checked By

27/06/24

to d

s er

m am H

g in

s en

ls he C

ith m

li Lil

d oa eR rav ag Se

d oa

Date

or B

+4.8

Scale @ A1

1 : 1250

+3.7

oad

nd R

th E Nor

Star

Road

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

Fu a lh m

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-009

P03

Cl un y

Nevern Square

W ar w

ic k

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Description

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Planning Application Boundary Ro ad

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries) Development Zone (below Ground Floor, any permitted use as defined in the Development Specification)

Road mw ell o r C t es A4 / W A

Development Zone (below Ground Floor) name Detailed Component (below Ground Floor) Development Zone (above Ground Floor) boundary

oa d

+0.5

Ph ilb ea ch

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

+0.5

Tr eb ov i

+0.5

Area below ground pertaining to the former Earls Court Station ticket hall and escalator barrel excluded from Planning Applications Change of level within Development Zone

G ar de ns

Indicative location of break in basement extents. Minimum width = 15m. Area of deviation within which break in basement extent should be located

EARL'S COURT STATION

Proposed below ground finished floor level (AOD). Additional 1m allowed for excavation

+0.5

Z Ro ad

Area within Development Zone O for additional excavation for an area 300sqm to a maximum level of +1.6m (AOD).

se Clo n e re

M +5.8

d Roa nd

+0.5

0 @ 1:1250

+0.5

+3.9

+4 +2.3

+3.9

+7.5

et tr e S d

ue en Av ill sg Ai

+4.8

50m

scent

th E No r

bs G G ib

Pe ny w

er n

+0.5

Eardley Cre

on um a e B

e enu t Av

+7.5

+4.8 +4.8 -0.5

H[O]

H[D] F Project

Aisgill Avenue

+1.8

th Nor

d Ol

+2.5

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

+1.2

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

Drawing

010 - Proposed Site Levels Below Ground Floor

WEST BROMPTON STATION

+1.8 al oy R

n do

ou or B

n Lo

d Roa End

oad Star R

on pt m o Br

Earls Court Development

ad Ro

Date

1 : 1250

27/06/24

Drawn By

Checked By

ou or B

n to d an

ea ls he C

ith sm

d an

er m am H

ng si en K

ad Ro ve ra ag Se

li Lil

d oa R e

Scale @ A1

am lh Fu

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-010

P03

ew s M ny Cl u

R Nevern Square

EC21

EC20

est Cr

A4 / W

ll Ro omwe

wi ck

Ro a

XXXX

WK04

ov eb G

ar d

EC01 Plot Name Public route through Development Zone (location is indicative) Indicative Plot boundary within Development Zone Residential use Commercial use Cultural use Storage and Distribution use Community use Student housing use

EARL'S COURT STATION

Leisure use Health use Educational use

EC08

Hotel use

Retail / F&B / Flexible Commercial

WK12

Station interface / Plant (N.B.: All Development Zones also have an allowance for ancillary use as Other Uses)

ny Pe

WK08

lose

EC18

EC16

End

d Roa

Alternative residential use (Co-living and/or Older Persons Housing) Frontage combining active ground floor uses - combining 'Predominant' and 'Other' uses as defined by the Development Specification

EC15

EC17

0 @ 1:1250

50m

WK11 EC09 EC05

EC04

Eardley

EC06

WK09

Crescen

th Nor

Gib

bs G

C reen

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

Z WK01

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Development Zone (above Ground Floor)

7. Where multiple uses are permitted by the Development Specification, different configurations of the ground floor uses of the plots are possible across the Development Zone - consistent with the floorspace capacity defined by the Development Specification and the frontage priority defined by this plan (and corresponding Design Code frontage strategy). 8. Structures associated with stairs, lifts and ventilation located within the public realm are not specified within the Development Specification area and are not specified within the Parameter Plans. Any structures within the public realm should be in line with the principles as set out in the Design Codes.

WK07

Description

Borough Boundary (outside site Planning Application Boundaries)

ea c

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Planning Application Boundary

u Bea

EC19

WK02 n Ave ont

ilb

WK05 WEST KENSINGTON STATION

WK03

Rev. P01 P02 P03

Plot Predominant Use of Development Zone Other uses (in addition to predominant uses) within Development Zone (see Development Specification for other use(s)) Development Zone

WK06

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Development Zone flexibility and limits of deviation are described in the Parameter Plan 004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm, and apply to this plan. 4. Ground level uses are at the perceived ground floor. Ground floor levels vary across the site. 5. Other uses as outlined in the Development Specification (EC.PA.A) per Development Zone are permitted in place of or in addition to the predominant uses identified on this plan (including ground floor mixed-uses of Retail / F&B / Flexible Commercial / Culture / Leisure / Community / Social Infrastructure / Storage and Distribution / Ancillary and/or access and ground level floorspace associated with predominant upper level uses as identified on P12). 6. The diagram below identifies the proposed uses per Development Zone. The permitted uses are described as either Predominant Use(s) or Other Uses as defined by the Development Specification. The types of use annotated by the coloured squares are listed in the key. Different configurations of use are possible consistent with the range of uses and Development Zone floorspace caps as permitted by the Development Specification.

WB06

EC10

WK10 et

tr dS

ill

n Mu

EC14

WB11

WB13

H[D]

H[O]

WB12

WB05-T2

EC11

EC03

F WB10

WB04

EC12

WB05-T1 WB09

EC13

EC02

Project

WB03 Aisgill Avenue

WB08

B2 EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

WB02

WB07

to mp o r dB

EC22

Drawing

al oy R or

B gh

Date

Drawn By

Checked By

27/06/24

to d

s er

m am H

g in

s en

or B

Scale @ A1

1 : 1250

ls he C

ith m

d oa eR rav ag Se

li Lil

d oa

011 - Proposed Land Use Ground Level

WEST BROMPTON STATION

WB01

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

oad

nd R

th E Nor

Star

Road

EC01

Earls Court Development

d oa R n

Fu a lh m

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-011

P03

Cl u

ew s

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Development Zone flexibility and limits of deviation are described in the Parameter Plan 004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm, and apply to this plan. 4. Other uses as outlined in the Development Specification (EC.PA.A) per Development Zone are permitted at upper levels in place of or in addition to the predominant uses identified on this plan. 5. The diagram below identifies the proposed uses per Development Zone. The permitted uses are described as either Predominant Use(s) or Other Uses as defined by the Development Specification. The types of use annotated by the coloured squares are listed in the key. Different configurations of use are possible consistent with the range of uses and Development Zone floorspace caps as permitted by the Development Specification

R Nevern Square

EC21

EC20

A4 /

oad

well R

Crom West

XXXX

Ro a

WK06

WK04

Development Zone (above Ground Floor)

Public route through Development Zone (location is indicative) Indicative Plot boundary within Development Zone Residential use Commercial use

Ro ir

Cultural use

ea c

ilb

EC19

Storage and Distribution use

Community use

ar d

Student housing use

Educational use

EC08

Hotel use Retail / F&B / Flexible Commercial

WK12

Health use

Station interface / Plant (N.B.: All Development Zones also have an allowance for ancillary use as Other Uses)

WK01

Leisure use

EARL'S COURT STATION

WK07

w ny Pe

WK08

lose

Alternative residential use (Co-living and/or Older Persons Housing)

EC18

EC16

End

d Roa

Frontage combining active ground floor uses - combining 'Predominant' and 'Other' uses as defined by the Development Specification

EC15

EC17

0 @ 1:1250

50m

WK11 EC09 EC05

EC04

Eardley

EC06

WK09

Crescen

th Nor

Gib

bs G

C reen

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

ont

um Bea

Other uses (in addition to predominant uses) within Development Zone (see Development Specification for other use(s)) Development Zone

6. Where multiple uses are permitted by the Development Specification, this flexibility applies to all plots contained within the Development Zone. 7. Structures associated with stairs, lifts and ventilation located within the public realm are not specified within the Development Specification area and are not specified within the Parameter Plans. Any structures within the public realm should be in line with the principles as set out in the Design Codes.

WK02 e enu

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

EC01 Plot Name

WK05 WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Description

Borough Boundary (outside site Planning Application Boundaries)

WK03

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Plot Predominant Use of Development Zone

Rev. P01 P02 P03

Planning Application Boundary

wi ck

WB06

EC10

WK10 et

tr dS

ill

n Mu

EC14

WB11

WB13

H[D]

H[O]

WB12

WB05-T2

EC11

EC03

F WB10

WB04

EC12

WB05-T1 WB09

EC13

EC02

Project

WB03 Aisgill Avenue

WB08

B2 EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

WB02

WB07

to mp o r dB

EC22

Drawing

al oy R or

B gh

Date

Drawn By

Checked By

27/06/24

to d

s er

m am H

g in

s en

or B

Scale @ A1

1 : 1250

ls he C

ith m

d oa eR rav ag Se

li Lil

d oa

012 - Proposed Land Use Upper Levels

WEST BROMPTON STATION

WB01

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

oad

nd R

th E Nor

Star

Road

EC01

Earls Court Development

d oa R n

Fu a lh m

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-012

P03

Cl u

ew s

Nevern Square

Rev. P01 P02 P03

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

Ro a

Development Zone (below Ground Floor, any permitted use as defined in the Development Specification)

ad ell Ro

omw

est Cr

A4 / W

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Planning Application Boundary

wi ck

Description

Development Zone (below Ground Floor) name Detailed Component (below Ground Floor) Development Zone (above Ground Floor) boundary

Level change within Development Zone (below Ground Floor)

ea c

ilb

Area below ground pertaining to the former Earls Court Station ticket hall and escalator barrel excluded from Planning Applications

ar d

Indicative location of break in basement extents. Minimum width = 15m.

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Area of deviation within which break in basement extent should be located

EARL'S COURT STATION

th Nor

Gib

bs G

C reen

ont

um Bea

e enu

lose

End d Roa

0 @ 1:1250

50m

t ree

ill

n Mu

Eardley

Crescen

H[O]

H[D] F

Aisgill Avenue

Project

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

Drawing

013 - Proposed Land Use Below Ground Floor

WEST BROMPTON STATION

al oy R or gh

Date

Drawn By

Checked By

27/06/24

to d

s er

m am H

g in

s en

or B

ls he C

ith m

d oa eR rav ag Se

li Lil

d oa

Scale @ A1

1 : 1250

oad

nd R

th E Nor

Star

Road

to mp o r dB

Earls Court Development

d oa R n

Fu a lh m

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-013

P03

Cl u

ew s

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Development Zone 'O' is underground. See PL10 4. Development Zone's with the suffix '1' lie within LBHF, those with suffix '2' lie within RBKC 5. This plan summarises information captured in the other Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) and Design Codes (EC.PA.C). The information on this plan does not take precedence over that shown on any of the other Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) or within the Design Codes (EC.PA.C) but combines the key indicative proposals of the development constraints, routes, land use frontages and public realm typologies as an Urban Design summary for clarity. 6. Development Zone flexibility and limits of deviation are described in the Parameter Plan 004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm, and apply to this plan. 7. Structures associated with stairs, lifts and ventilation located within the public realm are not captured within the Development Specification area and are not specified within the Parameter Plans. Any structures within the public realm should be in line with the principles as set out in the Design Codes.

R Nevern Square

ll Ro omwe

est Cr

A4 / W

wi ck

Ro a

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Description

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Planning Application Boundary Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) Minimum Landscape Extent Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

Development Zone name Prominent Corner Facade addressing key destination Public Realm Facade addressing key routes and spaces

ad Ro

Square

ilb

ea c

Destination Public Realm

Community Green

ar d

Key Route

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Indicative Public Route through Development Zone

EARL'S COURT STATION

lose

End

d Roa

0 @ 1:1250

50m

Eardley

Crescen

th Nor

Gib

bs G

C reen

u Bea

nt mo

e enu

Extent of potential Public Realm pertaining to the area above existing West London Railway line, the area of land next to West Kensington Station and North End Road, and the Aisgill Avenue MUGA

tr dS

ill

n Mu

O P

G1 H[O]

H[D]

Aisgill Avenue

Project

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

Drawing

014 - Urban Design Plan

WEST BROMPTON STATION

al oy R or gh

Date

Drawn By

Checked By

27/06/24

to d

s er

m am H

g in

s en

or B

ls he C

ith m

d oa eR rav ag Se

li Lil

d oa

Scale @ A1

1 : 1250

oad

nd R

th E Nor

Star

Road

to mp o r dB

Earls Court Development

d oa R n

Fu a lh m

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-014

P03

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 14 September 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Appendix B: Updated September 2026 Cumulative Schemes Screening

Earls Court Cumulative Schemes List Updated: 14/09/26 Based upon Ramboll July 2025 ES Addendum (Chapter 2a, Table 2A.1A) Updates from the July 2025 Addendum highlighted for ease of reference. No. Cumulative Scheme

Reference

Status

Planning Application Description

Distance Scheme Considered in EIA from Site

Approved 16 April 2019

‘’Development of a part 6-, part 8-storey 0.00 building comprising 697sqm of office space (Use Class B1) and 38 residential units (Use Class C3), hard and soft landscaping, car and cycle parking, and associated groundworks.”

RBKC 1

Land to the rear PP/18/00599 of 1 Cluny Mews, Amended and 5163 Philbeach Gar by: NMA/21/02219 dens, London, SW5

NMA approval date: 27/04/2021 Near completion. Discharging Pre-Occupation Conditions

NMA/21/04361(basem ent relocation) NMA/21/07597 (basement removal)

Yes, although below cumulative scheme threshold criteria; due to the height of the scheme and its proximity to the Site, this scheme has been considered in the EIA. However, given the advanced stage of construction of the scheme, it has been assumed to form part of the existing baseline with the exception of the transport, air quality and noise and vibration assessments where the scheme would be accounted for in the future baseline, or where indicated otherwise in the technical assessment (e.g. Socio-Economics).

Approved 15/07/21

Approved 13/12/21

NMA/22/03509 (smoke vent equipment, brimming Approved 20/10/22 pool and storage room replacement with additional raised planters)

There has been no material amendments to the cumulative scheme and

Confidential

CL/24/05311 (Change of Use from Class B1 to Class E)

therefore, the approach adop ted in the July 2024 ES remains valid.

PP/22/04352 (removal Approved 24/09/24 of green walls from the South West and North East elevations) Approved 26/02/25 2

PP/19/00781 Approved 30 May 2019 100 West “Partial demolition and reconfiguration 0.00 Cromwell Road, of existing structures and erection of NMA/21/06624 Major Development Planning eight buildings up to a maximum of 29 London, W14 Committee (rewording of 8PB storeys (above podium) to provide 462 Condition 45, approved Approved 5 May 2020 granted residential units (C3) including the 01/12/21) provision of 186 affordable housing by the Mayor of London units, a public leisure centre including a NMA/23/04724 A number of conditions, gym and pool (D1/D2), (basement/mezzanine applications and non commercial/retail space (B1, flexible layouts, approved material amendment B1/A1/A3 and B1/D1/D2), alongside 15/08/23) (NMA) applications have hard and soft landscaping, car parking NMA/24/05898 been submitted and all and cycle spaces, public realm (layouts of buildings approved. improvements and all ancillary and 1/2/3/4 and 6, and associated works including servicing, Construction started - early amendments to storage, plant and equipment.” elevations of buildings stage. 3/4/5, approved Permission implemented and 03/10/24) pre-commencement conditions NMA/24/08553 (amendments to building 1, approved 17/01/25) NMA/25/00620 (amendments to building 4, approved 28/02/25)

being discharged. Condition 51 discharged (26 March 24) – engineer appointed and approved by the LPA. Completion is due Q1-Q4 2027.

Confidential

Yes, meets cumulative scheme threshold criteria. Given the early stage of construction works and lack of certainty in delivery timeframes, this scheme has been considered as a cumulative scheme. 100 West Cromwell Road is still under construction, with completion expected in late 2026/early 2027 and therefore, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

PP/14/07276 257-265 Kensington High Street, and 4-10 Implemented. and 24 Earl's Amended by: Court Road, NMA/22/03116 London, W8

Approved 30 November 2021

“(**Amended description**) Variation 0.63 of condition 2 (approved drawings) of planning permission PP/14/07276 allowed under appeal ref. 01/06/2022 APP/K5600/W/15/3010472 (Demolition 20/07/2022 of the former Post Office delivery office, Whitlock House office building and the NMA/22/03842 26/08/2022 cinema building with retention of the cinema facade to Kensington High NMA/22/04779 04/11/2022 Street, and construction of a basement NMA/22/04169 30/11/2021 and buildings to provide cinema facilities, 63 residential units (including PP/19/05105 23/08/2023 affordable housing units) and associated residential facilities, retail/class D1 and PP/22/07748 19/10/2023 office accommodation, car parking NMA/23/06195 01/10/2024 spaces, cycle parking, plant, hard and soft landscaping, public realm NMA/24/03649 improvements and associated works) to Pre-commencement A number of conditions have allow for : a redesigned single cinema facility providing circa 887 seats conditions discharged. been discharged. (including 12 wheelchair accessible Records of approved NMAs seats) with six screens accessed from have been updated. Kensington High Street; flexible retail space (Use Class A1/A2/A3/A4/D1 and Prior to occupation conditions D2) in place of a residential entrance at have started to be ground floor behind the retained cinema discharged for prior to facade and on Earls Court Road; 106 completion and prior to residential units, including 35 on-site occupation triggers (e.g. affordable units for elderly people; office CON/24/02044 / space (Use Class B1) accessed from CON/24/05055 / Kensington High Street; car parking CON/25/00776 – most recently within an automated 'stacker' system; approved 17/04/25. design revisions to internal layouts and facades; changes and minor increases to Believed that the scheme is approx.. 55% sold at the end of massing of the buildings; and associated Q1 2026 (Core 1 completed in changes to plant, hard and soft Q4 2025 and is largely sold out, landscaping and related works. Summary of changes: Total number of Cores 2 and 3 completed Q1

Confidential

Yes, meets cumulative scheme threshold criteria. However, given the advanced stage of construction of the scheme, it has been assumed to form part of the existing baseline with the exception of the transport, air quality and noise and vibration assessments where the scheme would be accounted for in the future baseline, or where indicated otherwise in the technical assessment (e.g. Socio-Economics). A NMA application has been submitted since the July 2024 ES. It is not considered that the NMA would alter the conclusions of the cumulative assessment within the July 2024 ES. In addition, given the fact that 257-265 Kensington High Street, and 4-10 and 24 Earl's Court Road is still at an advanced stage of construction, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

PP/14/07276

2026 and around a handful have sold, Core 6 now progressing in earnest but will not complete until late 2027 and have not really been marketed)

units increased from 98 to 106 with an increase of affordable housing units from 30 to 35; Additional floors added to Block 2/3 (fronting Kensington High Street and Earl's Court Road), and Block 4 (fronting Earl's Court Road/Pembroke Place); Internal reconfiguration of layouts in Block 4.”

Approved 20 July 2022

“NMA (Non-Material Amendments)

Amended by: PP/19/05105 NMA/22/04169 NMA/22/02626

S73 is still under consideration. NMA approved 02/06/2022 NMA approved 23/05/2022

Non-material amendment to planning permission PP/19/05105 ((**Amended description**). Variation of condition 2 (approved drawings) of planning permission PP/14/07276 allowed under appeal ref. APP/K5600/W/15/3010472 (Demolition of the former Post Office delivery office, Whitlock House office building and the cinema building with retention of the cinema facade to Kensington High Street, and construction of a basement and buildings to provide cinema facilities, 63 residential units (including affordable housing units) and associated residential facilities, retail/class D1 and office accommodation, car parking spaces, cycle parking, plant, hard and soft landscaping, public realm improvements and associated works) to allow for : a redesigned single cinema facility providing circa 887 seats (including 12 wheelchair accessible seats) with six screens accessed from Kensington High Street; flexible retail space (Use Class A1/A2/A3/A4/D1 and D2) in place of a residential entrance at ground floor

Confidential

behind the retained cinema facade and on Earls Court Road; 106 residential units, including 35 on-site affordable units for elderly people; office space (Use Class B1) accessed from Kensington High Street; car parking within an automated 'stacker' system; design revisions to internal layouts and facades; changes and minor increases to massing of the buildings; and associated changes to plant, hard and soft landscaping and related works. Summary of changes: Total number of units increased from 98 to 106 with an increase of affordable housing units from 30 to 35; Additional floors added to Block 2/3 (fronting Kensington High Street and Earl's Court Road), and Block 4 (fronting Earl's Court Road/Pembroke Place); Internal reconfiguration of layouts in Block 4) for updates to Block 1 south and west facades; internal layout changes to Block 1, 2 and 3; minor change to Block 1 roof; and lift car updates.” PP/22/07748

Approved 23 August 2023

Amended by: PP/23/07953 NMA/24/03649

S73 still under consideration NMA Approved 1 October 2024.

“Variation of condition 1 (Approved drawings), 15 (Telecommunication equipment), 24 (Provision of parking) and 26 (Electric Vehicle Charging Points) of planning permission PP/19/05105 ((**Amended description**) Variation of condition 2 (approved drawings) of planning permission PP/14/07276 allowed under appeal ref. APP/K5600/W/15/3010472 (Demolition of the former Post Office delivery office, Whitlock House office building and the cinema building with retention of the

Confidential

cinema faτade to Kensington High Street, and construction of a basement and buildings to provide cinema facilities, 63 residential units (including affordable housing units) and associated residential facilities, retail/class D1 and office accommodation, car parking spaces, cycle parking, plant, hard and soft landscaping, public realm improvements and associated works) to allow for : a redesigned single cinema facility providing circa 887 seats (including 12 wheelchair accessible seats) with six screens accessed from Kensington High Street; flexible retail space (Use Class A1/A2/A3/A4/D1 and D2) in place of a residential entrance at ground floor behind the retained cinema facade and on Earls Court Road; 106 residential units, including 35 on-site affordable units for elderly people; office space (Use Class B1) accessed from Kensington High Street; car parking within an automated 'stacker' system; design revisions to internal layouts and facades; changes and minor increases to massing of the buildings; and associated changes to plant, hard and soft landscaping and related works. Summary of changes: Total number of units increased from 98 to 106 with an increase of affordable housing units from 30 to 35; Additional floors added to Block 2/3 (fronting Kensington High Street and Earl's Court Road), and Block 4 (fronting Earl's Court Road/Pembroke Place); Internal reconfiguration of layouts in Block 4) To allow for:

Confidential

Incorporation of new entrance canopy/port-cochere (Block 1); Enlarging roof terrace facia.” PP/23/07953

Pending decision. Target “Variation of condition 1 (Approved decision date has passed so this drawings) of planning permission decision is overdue. PP/22/07748 (Variation of condition 1 (Approved drawings), 15 Nothing uploaded (Telecommunication equipment), 24 on RBKC portal since April (Provision of parking) and 26 (Electric 2024. Vehicle Charging Points) of planning permission PP/19/05105 ((Amended description) Variation of condition 2 (approved drawings) of planning permission PP/14/07276 allowed under appeal ref. APP/K5600/W/15/3010472) to allow for: Change to materials on south elevation of Block 3; Adjustments to windows to Block 4 to the North, South and West Elevations; Introduction of roof plant to Block 4; Omission of external courtyard stairs and rooflights to Block 6 apartments; Minor internal layout adjustments with subsequent window alignment to Block 6; Changes to mansard roof materiality to Block 6 to match Block 2/3 metal shingles; Introduction of rooflight to single storey element of Block 6. (Major Application)(Conservation Area)( Setting of Listed Building).”

NMA/24/03649

Approved 1 October 2024

“Non-material amendment to planning permission PP/22/07748 (Variation of condition 1 (Approved drawings), 15 (Telecommunication equipment), 24 (Provision of parking) and 26 (Electric Vehicle Charging Points) of planning

Confidential

permission PP/19/05105 ((Amended description) Variation of condition 2 (approved drawings) of planning permission PP/14/07276 allowed under appeal ref. APP/K5600/W/15/3010472 for: Minor amendments to western penthouse apartment located on levels 6 and 7 in Block 1, involving minor alterations to some of the approved external panels on northern and western facades treated in glazed panels or opaque panels, and landscaping within approved private open space/balcony wrapping around the apartment.” PP/21/00272 344-350 Old Brompton Road, London, SW5 9JU

NMA/23/02884

Approved 1 October 2021 This application has now lapsed

Approved 9 June 2023

“Redevelopment of the site to provide Within Site new residential units (Class C3) and flexible commercial (Class E) floorspace within a new building ranging in height from 4 to 9 storeys; together with plant and cycle parking facilities and associated servicing, access, landscaping and all associated ancillary works and structures.”

No, as consideration of this scheme would result in double counting of effects.

This application has now lapsed and therefore, the approach adopted in the July 2024 ES remains valid.

“Non-material amendment to planning permission PP/21/00272 (Redevelopment of the site (MAJOR APPLICATION)) for below ground structural changes to facilitate the relocation of High Voltage (HV) cables adjacent to the consented development.”

LBHF 4

Fulham Gasworks,

2018/02100/COMB

Approved 8 February 2019

“Hybrid application for demolition of existing buildings and structures (excluding No.2 Gasholder, 1856 Chief

Confidential

1.18

Yes, meets cumulative scheme threshold criteria.

Imperial Road, SW6 2AD

Amended by:

03/07/2019

2019/00755/RES

11/10/2019

2019/02586/NMAT

16/04/2020

2020/00121/NMAT

10/03/2020

2020/00121/NMAT

27/05/2020

2020/00433/NMAT

24/06/2020

2020/00969/NMAT

15/07/2020

2020/01088/NMAT

13/04/2021

2021/00531/NMAT

20/08/2021

2021/01739/NMAT

22/11/2021

Engineer's Office, 1927 Former Research Laboratory, 1920 WW1 War Memorial and WW2 War Memorial) and mixed use redevelopment comprising new buildings from 1 to 37 storeys comprising up to 1,843 units residential units (including 646 Affordable Housing) and ancillary residential facilities (C3 Use) and non-residential floor space in Use Classes A1-A4, B1, D1 and D2, the provision of a new publicly accessible open space, new pedestrian / vehicle routes, access and amenity areas, basement car park with integral servicing areas, interim works and other associated works.

2021/02303/RES

04/08/2021

Detailed Element

2021/02328/NMAT

14/03/2022

2021/02533/RES

04/04/2022

2021/03976/RES

21/12/2020

2020/03144/NMAT

14/07/2022

2021/04010/RES

22/07/2022

2022/00559/RES

01/07/2022

2022/01572/NMAT

01/07/2022

2022/01608/NMAT

13/10/2022

2022/02299/NMAT

02/12/2022

Detailed application for 37,774sqm (GEA) residential floor space with 712sqm (GEA) ancillary residential facilities (C3 Use), 982sqm (GEA) flexible commercial floor space (A1, A2, A3, A4 Uses), 3,432sqm (GEA) community and leisure floor space (D1/D2 Use), provision of a 10,365sqm (GEA) basement, new pedestrian and vehicular access, provision of amenity space, landscaping, car and cycle parking, refuse storage, energy centre, servicing area, and other associated infrastructure works.

2021/03837/NMAT

25/04/2023

Outline Element

2022/02649/NMAT

07/12/2023

2023/01262/NMAT

07/03/2024

Outline application (with all matters reserved) for up to 166,560sqm (GEA) residential floor space and ancillary

Confidential

Given the advanced stage of construction of the Phase 1 (detailed element), it has been assumed to form part of the existing baseline with the exception of the transport, air quality and noise and vibration assessments where the scheme would be accounted for in the future baseline, or where indicated otherwise in the technical assessment (e.g. Socio-Economics).. The remainder phases (outline element) of the scheme has been considered as a cumulative scheme. Reserved Matters (RM) applications for Phases 2-4 have been approved. Whilst RMAs have been approved, it is considered that the outline parameters represent a worst-case and therefore, the approach adopted in the July 2024 ES for the assessment of the Fulham Gasworks cumulative scheme remains valid. In addition, given the distance of the Fulham gasworks from the Site, it is considered that any details within the reserved matters applications

2023/03344/NMAT

21/03/2024

2023/02126/NMAT

19/04/2024

2023/02912/NMAT

20/05/2024

2024/00818/NMA

30/05/2024

2023/01146/FUL

03/07/2024

2024/01242/NMAT

23/07/2024

2023/01156/NMAT

03/12/2024

2024/00961/VAR

17/01/2025

2024/01420/RES

17/01/2025

2024/01242/NMAT

03/07/2024

2025/00852/VAPO

Appeal Allowed 09/02/2026

2024/01785/NMAT

21/05/2025

2023/03344/NMAT

07/03/2024

2023/03113/RES

Still undetermined as of January 2026

residential facilities (C3 Use), up to 6,895sqm non-residential floor space comprising flexible commercial retail (A1, A2, A3, A4), office (B1), community (D1) and leisure (D2), provision of up to 30,573sqm (GEA) new basement level, new pedestrian and vehicular access, and associated amenity space, publicly accessible open space, landscaping, car and cycle parking, refuse storage, energy centres, servicing area, and other associated

would not materiality alter the conclusions of the July 2024 ES cumulative assessment.

infrastructure works.”

Under construction in 2021/22. 2025/00651/FUL

Olympia Exhibition Centre, Hammersmith Road, London,

Approved 17/07/2026

2018/03100/FUL

Approved 25 October 2019

Amended by:

2020/00159/NMAT

16 July 2020

“Redevelopment of Olympia comprising: 0.59 a) Central Hall - demolition with retention of listed façade to Hammersmith Road, erection of new ground plus 12 storey building for (B1)

Confidential

Yes, meets cumulative scheme threshold criteria. However, given the advanced stage of construction of the scheme, it has been assumed

2020/00532/NMAT W14 8UX (including the Maclise Road 2020/00945/NMAT Multi Storey Car 2020/01048/VAR Park) 2021/00755/NMAT 2021/01996/NMAT 2020/01373/NMAT 2021/02652/NMAT 2021/04165/NMAT 2021/04166/VAR 2022/03200/NMAT 2025/01035/NMAT

21 April 2020

office, (D1) exhibition, flexible (A1-A4) retail/financial and professional services 11 June 2020 /restaurant/bar, and flexible (B1/D1) office/ conference uses; new site-wide 7 January 2021 logistics centre, car/cycle parking and 26 Mar 2021 plant within two new basement levels; b) G-gate site - erection of ground plus 9 1 October 2021 upper storeys building with two levels of basement for use as a theatre, (D1) 26 June 2020 exhibition and flexible (A3/A4) 24 Jan 2022 restaurant/bar use at ground/level 2 and roof level; c) National Hall - internal 31 Oct 2023 and external alterations comprising three storey roof-level extension for use 31 Oct 2023 as (C1) hotel, part use of National Hall Pending Recommendation for (A1-A4/C1) hotel and ancillary use, two levels of internal decks for use as Approved 16 May 2025 (D1) exhibition space and flexible (D1) exhibition/(A3/A4) restaurant/bar use, alterations to existing basement and Numerous conditions have associated internal and external works; been discharged and records of d) West Hall - alterations and extension approved NMA applications to provide two additional storeys for use have been updated. as (D2) live music and performance space; e) Maclise Road Multi Storey Car Currently discharging prior to Park - partial demolition, alterations and first operational extension for use as (C1) hotel, (D2) use conditions – 49 (EVCP), 31 cinema, and flexible (B1/D1) co(Extraction and Odour Control working/conference use; f) Grand and system for non-domestic National Halls - demolition of existing kitchens), 16/17 Verification/ accommodation and circulation spaces long term methodology for between halls and construction of new contamination. Level 2 public realm deck with glazed canopy comprising flexible use (A1-A4) Completion primarily anticipated in 2025, retail/restaurant/bar/financial and professional services; g) Pillar Hall with the remaining Internal and external alterations for use aspects anticipated in 2026. of building for (A3/A4) restaurant/bar,

Confidential

to form part of the existing baseline with the exception of the transport, air quality and noise and vibration assessments where the scheme would be accounted for in the future baseline, or where indicated otherwise in the technical assessment (e.g. Socio-Economics). Given the fact that the Olympia Exhibition Centre (including the Maclise Road Multi Storey Car Park) is still at an advanced stage of construction, the approach adopted in the July 2024 ES remains valid.

ancillary live music; h) Grand Hall internal and external alterations including creation of two levels of internal decks for use as (D1) exhibition space and flexible (D1), (A3/A4) exhibition/restaurant /bar use; i) Plant and energy centres; j) Pedestrian/ vehicle/cycle/highway works; k) Public realm, landscaping and associated works.”

Maclise Multi- 2021/04167/FUL Storey Car Park (MSCP) Olympia Amended by: Exhibition 2021/04165/NMAT Centre Hammers mith Road London, W14 8UX

2024/00544/DET

Both 2021/04167/FUL

“Demolition and alteration of the MSCP 0.79 building in connection with the erection of a building comprising basement, ground and 7 upper storeys with associated roof level plant for hotel (Class C1), gymnasium (Class E) and school (Class F1) uses incorporating the retention of elements of the Maclise Road facade of the MSCP building.”

& 2021/04165/NMAT Approved 31 October 2023

Signed and dated S106 31 October 2023

Approved 09/07/25

Discharging PreCommencement and some Prior to Occupation Conditions

Yes, meets cumulative scheme threshold criteria. However, given the advanced stage of construction of the scheme, it has been assumed to form part of the existing baseline with the exception of the transport, air quality and noise and vibration assessments where the scheme would be accounted for in the future baseline, or where indicated otherwise in the technical assessment (e.g. Socio-Economics). Maclise Multi-Storey Car Park (MSCP) Olympia Exhibition Centre is still at an advanced stage of construction and therefore, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

Confidential

2020/00915/FUL Former West London Magistrate's Court, 181 Talgarth Road, London W6 8DN

Approved 8 December 2020

0.83 “Comprehensive redevelopment and erection of two buildings comprising Discharge of planning hotel use (C1) with ancillary facilities, conditions applications have ancillary plant, servicing, cycle parking, been submitted and approved creation of a public realm, wider these include condition 7, 8, 16, landscaping improvements and enabling 17, 28, 4, 6, 9, 50, 55 and 56. works.” Condition discharges have also occurred for phase 1 that relate to condition 24, 25, 26, 10, 11 and 5 (partial discharge) - these were approved on 6 May 2022.

Yes, meets cumulative scheme threshold criteria.

Scheme superseded by 2021/03561/FUL

Conditions 12, 13 and 31 have also been discharged Nov/Oct 2022 respectively.

2021/03561/FUL

Approved 11 August 2022

“Erection of two buildings comprising student accommodation use (Sui The development is currently Generis) and hotel use (Use Class C1) being built out in accordance with ancillary facilities; ancillary plant; with 2021/03561/FUL. servicing; cycle parking; creation of Phase 2 conditions; 18, 19, 26, a public realm; wider landscaping improvements and enabling works.” 59, 64, 66 & 70 (registered March – May 2024 and all pending consideration following approval of Part 1 and Part 2 discharge of conditions applications. Most recently condition 18 parts b and c (Generator emissions report, Prior to Occupation of each building, reference: 2025/00256/DET) was approved 31.01.2025. Additional conditio

Confidential

ns for Phase 1 (Condition 15) and 2 (Conditions 14, 15, 62) are currently pending consideration which include a mixture of prior to commencement and prior to occupation conditions.

of construction and therefore, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

Discharging Conditions for Phase 2 (e.g., Condition 27, ref. 2025/01438/DET) 8

2020/01283/FUL Edith Summerskill House Clem Attlee Court Lillie Road, London SW6 7TD

Approved 4 July 2022 Discharge of condition applications expected under ref: 2020/01283/FUL (works anticipated to start in 2024).

0.6 “Erection of a 20 storey tower (plus plant) with single storey basement and ground floor mezzanine for residential use, ancillary community use at ground floor level, hard and soft landscaping and associated works.”

More likely to commence in 2027 than 2026 (Gateway 2 application yet to be submitted)

2024/00633/NMAT

Approved 16.05.24

Yes, although below cumulative scheme threshold criteria, due to the height of the scheme and its proximity to the Site, this scheme has been considered in the EIA. Construction has not commenced at the time of undertaking the EIA and given the lack of certainty in delivery timeframes, this scheme has been considered as a cumulative scheme.

“Non-material amendment under Section 96A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) to planning permission (ref: 2020/01283/FUL) dated 4 July 2022 for the ‘Erection of a 20-storey tower (plus plant) with single storey basement and ground floor mezzanine for residential use, ancillary community use at ground floor level, hard and soft landscaping and association’.

Confidential

Given the fact that there has been no material amendments to the scheme, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

2024/02208/NMAT

Approved 07 Oct 2024

2025/01630/CLE (CLEUD pursuant to s191)

Approved 03/07/25

2020/01524/FUL St Pauls Girls School Brook Green, London, Amended by: W6 7BS 2022/00367/NMAT

Amendments sought to improve fire safety and include changes to the central circulation core to accommodate a second staircase; new fire brigade entrance door; relocation of wet riser inlet cabinets; amendments to the roof plan to reflect revised building core and external alterations to fenestration detail to improve natural ventilation to above ground floor windows.

Approved 13 May 2021

0.9 “Demolition of the existing Rosalind Franklin Building (excluding boiler house NMA approved 09 Mar 2022 arch and chimney) and erection of a new two storey Centre for Design and Innovation (CDI) adjacent to the retained A number of discharge of boundary wall and new fencing to the planning conditions have been rear of properties on Rowan Road; approved most recently under excavation to extend the CDI to the west; 2023/00952/DET. erection of a glazed link between the CDI and the Mercers Building to the south; There are no current refurbishment of the Mercers Building outstanding applications at the including removal of the fire escape stair site so it is considered that and introduction of new overhead door; construction would have demolition of the existing Forum commenced. Building (excluding screen to science courtyard) and erection of a new three A number of prior to commencement conditions to storey Staff Hub and link with the Main Building; enclosure of spaces between cover phases 4 and 5 were submitted in March 2025 ref. the Main Building and the Staff Hub and 2025/00564/DET (15,16,17,18, CDI buildings by erection of covered links; installation of solar photovoltaic 19,20) and are currently panels and replacement of existing plant pending consideration. screen to the roof of the Celia Johnson Construction for phase 4 and building; landscaping of the car park 5 are scheduled for April including changes to the entrance gates 2025 and projected to take 166 and the erection of a new single storey maintenance building in the southeast

Confidential

Yes, meets cumulative scheme threshold criteria. Construction has not commenced at the time of undertaking the EIA and given the lack of certainty in delivery timeframes, this scheme has been considered as a cumulative scheme.

Given the fact that there has been no material amendments to the cumulative scheme, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

weeks to complete (June 2028).

corner of the car park; reconfiguration of some spaces in the Main Building over lower ground, upper ground and first https://www.felthamgroupltd.c floor for administration spaces, meeting o.uk/portfolio/st-pauls-girlsspaces, pastoral spaces and toilet and school-masterplan-westlocker space; landscaping works to the london science courtyard and other associated works.” 2025/02428/FUL /

Approved 16/01/26

2025/02429/LBC

Approved 30 March 2012 Car, Coach and 2011/02000/FUL Lorry Park and Amended by: 2014/05 20 Seagrave 217/NMAT Road, Diary House and Adjoining Electricity

“Demolition of the existing plant room and erection of a new enlarged replacement plant room located on the eastern side of the main school building at lower ground floor level including the installation of an acoustic enclosure on the roof of new plant room; infilling of the existing louvre to eastern elevation boundary wall; alterations at upper ground floor level (eastern elevation of the IT Director's room) to include the installation of a new door to replace the existing window; alterations at lower ground floor level (eastern elevation of the Staff Social Link area) to include the demolition of curtain wall and erection of a new partition wall in between the main building the plant room, installation of a new internal door including the formation of a new walkway with an external door in between the main building and plant room.”

“Demolition of all existing buildings and the redevelopment of the site to provide 808 residential units, comprising 8 residential blocks (Blocks A-H) ranging from 4-storeys (plus basement) to 16storeys (plus basement) and including 30 townhouses; a gym facility with

Confidential

Yes, meets cumulative scheme threshold criteria. Phases 1 and 2 have been completed and occupied and have therefore been considered as part of the

Substation Roxby Place London SW6 (known as ‘Lillie Square’)

associated café; 485 car parking spaces (455 of which are within a basement car park); open space and landscaping; plant; cycle parking; servicing and new vehicular access arrangements to Seagrave Road.” “Application for minor material amendments to the extant permission Amended by: 2015/00 Construction works ref: 2011/02000/FUL, granted 30th 960/NMAT approximately 50 % completed March 2012; which comprised the – works held in abeyance since demolition of all existing buildings and 2019 on remaining phases. the development of 808 residential units comprising; 8 residential blocks (Blocks Phase 2 completed. No A-H) ranging from 4 - 16 storeys (C3); 30 discharge of condition application references phase 3. residential town houses (C3), a gym facility with associated cafe (D2) in Phase 3 (as of March 2026) has addition to landscaping, plant, parking, been bought and is awaiting servicing and new access arrangements. construction The minor material amendments comprise revisions to four residential blocks (Blocks A, B, G & H); relocation of the gym facility and the main basement vehicular entrance; updated landscaping proposals and the rewording of various planning conditions attached to the original planning permission.”

1 - 9 Lillie Road, Part of Diary House, Roxby Place and Land Adjacent to the Railway Tracks, London SW6

2013/01213/VAR

Approved 29 August 2013

2013/02620/FUL

Approved 5 March 2014

Amended by: 2016/03 834/NMAT 2015/00960/NMAT

24 November 2014 27 March 2015

“Demolition of all existing buildings and 0.00 redevelopment of the site to provide 65 residential units (C3) and 864 sqm (GIA) of A1/A3/D1/D2 floor space within 2 new buildings ranging in height from 6 to 12 storeys; together with plant, parking at basement level, servicing, new access arrangements and new

Confidential

existing baseline. Phase 3 has been considered as cumulative scheme. As there has been no further update to this scheme, it has been assumed that phase 3 is still under construction and therefore, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

Yes, although below cumulative scheme threshold criteria, due to proximity to the Site, this scheme has been considered in the EIA. Construction has not commenced at the time of undertaking the EIA and given the lack of certainty in

No condition discharge applications since 2020.

publicly accessible public realm and open space.”

delivery timeframes, this scheme has been considered as a cumulative scheme. Given that there has been no material amendments to the cumulative scheme, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

43 Brook Green 2022/00949/FUL London W6 7EF 2023/03095/NMAT 2024/02632/NMAT

Approved 13 July 2023

“Erection of a part one/part two storey 0.74 extension to the main building at roof level following removal of existing plant; plant enclosure at seventh floor level; 26 February 2024 three storey tiered extension to the side Approved 10 October 2025 and rear of the building at second, third and fourth floor levels; roof terraces at Prior to occupation conditions fifth and seventh floor levels; alterations being discharged. to ground floor frontage and the first floor northern elevation; replacement Prior to commencement of above ground works – soft and windows; external alterations; provision of refuse storage at ground floor level hard landscaping under and cycle storage at basement level, in consideration connection with the provision of an (re. 2024/02675/DET). additional 4,539sqm (GEA) of high grade Contractor appointed Class E(g)(i) office space (16,301sqm Jan 2024, construction likely (GEA) in total).” started.

Given that there has been no material amendments to the cumulative scheme, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

Discharging Conditions (with decisions as recently as 03/09/26) Avonmore 2023/03051/FR3 Primary School Avonmore Road London W14 8RL

Approved December 2024. A number of conditions have been submitted (PreCommencement

Demolition of existing buildings and structures and erection of three new buildings to provide a primary school (Use Class F1), nursery (Use Class E[f]) and playground space, 91 residential units (Use Class C3) together with

Confidential

0.44

No, falls below cumulative scheme threshold criteria. However, it has been confirmed that the Avonmore Primary School would be

conditions are currently being associated cycle parking, hard and soft submitted). landscaping, tree removal, boundary treatment and other associated works.” Discharging Conditions to meet Full/Outline (most recently 21/05/26)

temporarily relocated to the former Gibbs Green school site on Mund Street (immediately west of the Site) as of Q4 2024 for a two year period. Accordingly, the Avonmore School has been considered a sensitive receptor in respect of demolition and construction effects. Relocation of Avonmore Primary School to the former Gibbs Green school site has been approved with conditions. It is now assumed that the relocation would occur early 2025. The approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

Liberty House 76 2019/01742/FUL Hammersmith Road London W14 8UD

Pending Decision Validated July 2019 (likely to come back in a revised form)

0.69 “Alterations and extensions to the existing office building to provide an additional 4,226m2 (GEA) of Class B1a office space and 205m2 (GEA) of ground floor flexible Class A1/A2/A3 commercial floorspace (13,303m2 (GEA) in total), including erection of a part seven, part eight storey plus plant at roof level infill extension to the front and partly over the existing courtyard at the rear and two additional floors. Replacement plant and green roof at roof level over the existing building following the demolition of the existing central core facing the southern (Hammersmith

Confidential

No, as not determined and unlikely to be determined in current form.

There is not further publicly available update on this cumulative scheme. Given a new planning application has been submitted on the same site (2024/02007/FUL), it is reasonable to assume this application has been revoked or superseded. As such, it is

2024/02007/FUL

Resolution to Grant at Committee 07/07/2026

Submitted August 2024 Proposed sqm.: 28,237 nonresi floorspace

68-72 Hammersmith Road, London, W14 8UD

2017/02883/FUL

Approved March 2019 Construction began but not completed.

2021/03016/NMAT

NMA approved 05 November 2021

Road) elevation; replacement of existing mirrored curtain walling with predominantly clear glazing to the entire building at No.76; new public realm and landscaping incorporating a single storey Class A1/A3 commercial 'pavilion' (65m2 GEA); reduction of parking spaces from 54 to 30, provision of 2 accessible blue badge bays and 132 cycle spaces.”

reasonable to assume this application would not be built and therefore, the approach adopted in the July 2024 ES remains valid.

“Partial demolition and reconfiguration 0.69 and extension of existing buildings and basement, together with the erection of new buildings and extensions, for a mixed-use development comprising life science/office accommodation (Use Class E) in a 9 storey building (plus basement and plant), and a hotel (Use Class C1) in a part 6 / part 10 storey building (plus basement and plant), including ancillary café/restaurant/bar space, conferencing and meeting facilities, gym and amenity uses, alongside new public realm and landscape works, pedestrian/vehicle/cycle/highway/acces s works and associated works including servicing, plant, energy equipment and storage.”

No, as the application has not determined.

“Demolition of the existing offices and 0.62 redevelopment to provide a part 10/ part 12 storeys building, to include offices (Class B1), retail or restaurants at ground level (Classes A1 and/or A3) together with car parking (ground level) and cycle parking (ground and basement level); a separate building unit for retail

Yes, meets cumulative scheme threshold criteria.

Confidential

Construction has not progressed to a material degree at the time of undertaking the EIA and given the lack of certainty in delivery timeframes, this

Scheme has been lawfully or restaurant use (Classes A1 or A3); implemented – CLEUD by public realm works, including the demolition of front canopy in demolition and rebuild of a landscaped April podium to the rear, as well as the 2022 (Ref: 2022/00860/CLE). N creation of a plaza and new landscaping o additional works have fronting Hammersmith Road and progressed since. highway works.”

Kensington Centre, 66 Hammersmith Road, London, W14 8UD

2017/04752/FUL

Approved November 2019 (permission lapsed). See below – new scheme.

2023/00585/FUL

2024/03171/NMA

“Demolition of the existing building and 0.59 redevelopment of the site by the erection of a building up to 10 storeys in height comprising 22,324m2 (GIA) of new class B1 office floorspace (including 901m2 GIA affordable workspace/ studio space) 846m2 (GIA) of class A1/A3/D2 flexible retail / gym provision new public realm, plant, car parking, bicycle parking and associated works.”

23 August 2024

“Demolition of the existing building and the construction of a new building of up to 11 storeys in height (plus basement level and plant at roof level) comprising Pending Consideration a self-storage facility (Use Class B8, up to 22,891m2 GIA), affordable workspace (Use Class E(g)(i), 1162m2 GIA) and Prior to commencement community space (Use Class F2(b), conditions pending 388m2 GIA), together with an undercroft consideration: 5,6,17, 20, 23, parking and servicing area accessed via 24, 25, 34, 57 submitted a new vehicular crossover on Blythe between September 2024 and Road, landscaping and associated February 2025. Additional prior works.” to commencement conditions also require discharge.

Confidential

scheme has been considered as a cumulative scheme.

It is assumed that the development is still at an early stage of construction and therefore, the approach adopted in the July 2024 ES remains valid. No, lapsed application.

Yes, meets cumulative scheme threshold and although not determined, considered that there would be a high degree of certainty of approval (given lapsed permission). Construction has not commenced at the time of undertaking the EIA and given the lack of certainty in delivery timeframes, this

P/2026/01058/NMAT Approved 05/06/26

3 Shortlands W6 2020/00150/FUL 8DA

181 - 187 King 2013/03091/FUL Street Town Hall Extension, Town Hall Frontage And Land West

Application lapsed.

Approved 17 April 2014 Construction works in progress.

“Non-material amendment to planning application ref: 2023/00585/FUL granted under appeal ref: APP/H5390/W/24/3340475 on 23rd August 2024 for the Demolition of the existing building and the construction of a new building of up to 11 storeys in height (plus basement level and plant at roof level) comprising a self-storage facility (Use Class B8, up to 22,891m2 GIA), affordable workspace (Use Class E(g)(i), 1162m2 GIA) and community space (Use Class F2(b), 388m2 GIA), together with an Undercroft parking and servicing area accessed via a new vehicular crossover on Blythe Road, landscaping and associated works. Amendments sought to vary the Undercroft service yard wall materials.”

scheme has been considered as a cumulative scheme.

“Mixed-use regeneration of the site to 0.92 provide significant expansion of the office accommodation and a new hotel; with a range of heights up to a maximum 17 storeys; together with flexible mix of ground floor retail (A1), café and restaurant (A3) and/or creative workspace with display area, a new modern gym and associated public realm, cycling, accessibility and landscape improvements across the site.”

No, lapsed condition.

“Demolition and partial demolition of existing buildings and redevelopment and refurbishment to provide civic offices, 196 residential dwellings, a cinema, shops, restaurants and bars,

No, beyond search area for cumulative schemes.

Confidential

As the application was approved in August 2024, it is not considered that construction would have progressed to a material degree and therefore, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

1.87

The approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

Of Nigel Playfair Avenue (West) 2016/00619/VAR London W6

21 September 2016

within Use Classes B1, C3, D2, A1, A3 and A4, together with civic square and other public realm works, landscaping, car parking (including basement car parking), servicing, access and related development.”

The approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

Landmark House 2017/00172/FUL Hammersmith Bridge Road London W6 9EJ

Approved August 2017

“Demolition of the two existing office 1.38 buildings (Class B1) and the erection of a part 6, 12, 22 storey building (including ground level public realm) to provide a mixed-use development comprising 14,668 sqm GEA hotel (Class C1) including high level bar, offices (Class B1), ground floor retail (Class A1/A3), flexible cultural space at ground and basement level, 2 storey basement level providing car/cycle parking and servicing and associated public realm, landscaping, plant and all enabling and ancillary works.”

Yes, meets the cumulative scheme threshold criteria.

2018/04037/VAR

Site was cleared but construction has not commenced. All submitted discharge of condition applications have been withdrawn (last submitted in March 2019).

Approved May 2019

“Variation to Condition 2 for amendments including increasing the floorplate of the buildings 1.5m east and Some prior to commencement west, reorientation of external stairs, removal of external bracing, conditions have been discharged. Last approval was introduction of rooftop plant and PVs which results in an increase in height, on 12 July 2019. increase in the height of the under croft and relocation of the arts/cultural use from the basement to ground floor to planning permission 2017/00172 /FUL granted 18 August 2017 for the Demolition of the two existing office buildings (Class B1) and the erection of a part 6, 12 and 22 storey buildings (including ground level public realm) to

Confidential

Construction has not commenced at the time of undertaking the EIA and given the lack of certainty in delivery timeframes, this scheme has been considered as a cumulative scheme.

No further information has been obtained for this cumulative scheme and therefore, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES is considered to remain valid.

provide a mixed-use development comprising 14,668 sqm GEA hotel (Class C1) including high level bar, offices (Class B1), round floor retail (Class A1/A3), flexible cultural space at ground and basement level, 2 storey basement level providing car/ cycle parking and servicing and associated public realm, landscaping, plant and all enabling and ancillary works” 16 The Triangle (5- 2017/02717/FUL 17 Hammersmith Grove) and Britannia House (1-11 Glenthorne Road), 3 and 3A Hammersmith Grove and 12-18 2025/01708/FUL Beadon Road, Hammersmith, London W6 0LH 2025/02533/FUL

Approved 02 February 2018

“Demolition of all existing buildings on 1.39 the site and redevelopment to provide a Discharge of condition building of between 8 and 14 storeys in applications subsequently height plus two basement levels, submitted in respect to phase 1 comprising of 466 sqm GEA works but withdrawn. retail/commercial space (Class A1, A2 or A3) at ground floor level to the south and west of the building; office Pending Recommendation entrance, reception and ancillary (registered 08/07/25) office/gallery space to the east and north of the building at ground floor level fronting Hammersmith Grove and Glenthorne Road; service area to west Appeal Lodged (registered accessed from Beadon Road including 1 21/10/25) accessible parking space; Class B1 office PINS Appeal Ref: Appeal space from first to thirteenth floors 6010549, lodged on non(23,878 sqm GEA); plant enclosure at determination (Council did not roof level; 15 car parking spaces, gym, publish decision on or before plant, cycle storage and ancillary 16/12/25) retail/office space in the two basement levels.” Planning permission (ref: 2020/03324/VAR) refused in March 2021 to vary Condition 2 to allow amendments to the approved drawings

Confidential

Yes, meets the cumulative scheme threshold criteria. Construction has not commenced at the time of undertaking the EIA and given the lack of certainty in delivery timeframes, this scheme has been considered as a cumulative scheme.

No further information has been obtained for this cumulative scheme and therefore, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

of planning permission 2017/02717/FUL. Amendments include introducing a phased approach to the scheme with Phase 1 being landscaping and Phase 2 the demolition and delivery of approved building plus amending the timing of the approved planning conditions to reflect the new phased approach. Appeal allowed and planning permission granted on 1 October 2021 for the variation of condition 2 to allow amendments to the approved drawings of planning permission 2017/02717/FUL. 17

70-80 Lillie Road, 2023/00087/FR3 London, SW6 1TN 2025/02292/NMAT (approved 25/09/25) 2025/02339/NMAT (Approved 24/09/25)

Approved 17 October 2023

Redevelopment of the Site to provide a 0.15 Class C3 residential building and flexible Condition discharge in relation community hall ranging in height from 4 to Phase 1. to 5 storeys, amendment to the public right of way, replacement of existing Target for completion UKPN infrastructure and associated Autumn 2026. Main construction works due to start addition of a substation, together with car and cycle parking, hard and soft February 2025. landscaping, play space and other Discharging pre-comm associated works. conditions. CEMP indicates following timelines: • Site setup and demolition: January 2025 • Excavation and piling: Mid February to Early March 2025 • Sub-structure: March - June 2025

Confidential

Demolition has been completed on-site and piling has commenced. Construction works likely to overlap with Amended

• Super-structure: May – August 2025

Proposed Development programme. The approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

• Cladding: July 2025 – May 2026 • Fit-out, testing and commissioning: August 2025 – October 2026 Garden Studios 2022/00362/FUL 14B Hammersmith Broadway London W6 7AB

Approved at Planning Committee January 2025. Decision Notice upon completion of S106

2022/01346/FR3 Land At The Former Hartopp Point And Lannoy Poin t Aintree Estate Pellant Road London SW6 7NG

Approved February 2023. A number of conditions, applications and NMA applications have been submitted and all approved.

2023/02399/NMAT

Demolition of existing building and erection of a 6 storey office building (Class E).

1.2km

No, scheme located beyond the search area criteria and below the floorspace/unit number threshold criteria.

Redevelopment of the site comprising 1.1 km the erection of two buildings (split into Blocks A, B and C) ranging in height from 3 to 7 storeys to deliver 134 residential units (Class C3) together with associated parking, cycle parking, hard and soft Under construction (completion landscaping, play space, access, utilities due in April/May 2026) and other associated works, including demolition of the existing substation. 26 Oct 2023

No, scheme located beyond the search area criteria for cumulative schemes and below the floorspace/unit number threshold criteria.

25 Jul 2024

2024/00467/NMAT 2024/02361/NMAT 18

Former Fulham 2025/02153/FR3 Boys School 11 Mund Street London W14 9LY

28 Nov 2024 Pending Recommendation

“Redevelopment of the site to provide 0.2 four residential buildings of between one and twelve storeys in height (Use Class C3) and two single storey ancillary buildings, together with substation, car and cycle parking, waste and recyclables

Confidential

The Gibbs Green school site on Mund Street (immediately west of the Site) would house the relocated Avonmore Primary School for two years (2025-2027). Once the

storage, hard and soft landscaping, play space and other associated works.” FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONSULTATION ONLY the proposal includes the provision of 107 residential units, with a size mix of 39No. 1 beds; 47No. 2 beds; 19No. 3 beds; 2No. 4 beds and a tenure mix of 22No. London Shared Ownership (20%); 53No. Market for Sale (50%) and 32No. Social Rent (30%)

Avonmore Primary school has vacated the Gibbs Green school site in 2027, it is anticipated that construction of the residential scheme would commence. Construction of the residential scheme would overlap with construction of the Amended Proposed Development. The Mund Street school site falls below the cumulative scheme floorspace/residentia l unit number threshold criteria and a planning application has not yet been submitted. However, due to the proximity of this scheme to the Site and the overlapping construction programmes, the Mund Street school site has been considered as a cumulative scheme, Due to the lack of available information in the public domain a qualitative assessment has been undertaken.

Empress State 2025/01364/FUL Building Empress Approach London SW6 1TR

Approved 23 September 2025 The installation of Air / Water Source 0.01 Heat Pumps, generators, an associated (Application validated 16 May substation, relocation and reduction in 2025) size of an existing container and rearrangement of car parking spaces.

Confidential

Yes for Chapter 11A: Noise and Vibration due to close proximity of the Empress State Building (‘ESB’) and the potential for cumulative noise effects to occur. No for all other topics, noting that the

scheme does not meet the threshold criteria and due to the minor nature of the works no other cumulative effects are likely to occur.

Confidential

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 14 September 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Appendix C: Updated Daylight, Sunlight, Overshadowing and Solar Glare Assessment

PROJECT DATA: Client

Earls Court Development Company

Architect

dRMM

Project Title

Earls Court

Project Number

15447

REPORT DATA: Report Title

Drawings of the Amended Proposed Develoment

GIA Department

Daylight Department

Dated

September 2026

Prepared by

Checked by

DMC

Type

Final

Revisions

No:

Date:

Notes:

Signed:

SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Information Received Release Number Issue Number Site Photos 3D models OS Data

IR-384-15447 Rel_81_15447 02 GIA VU.CITY FIND Maps

DISCLAIMER: N.B This report has been prepared for Earls Court Development Company by GIA as their appointed Daylight & Sunlight consultants. This report is intended solely for Earls Court Development Company and may contain conƤdential information. No part or whole of its contents may be disclosed to or relied upon by any Third Parties without the express written consent of GIA. It is accurate as at the time of publication and based upon the information we have been provided with as set out in the report. It does not take into account changes that have taken place since the report was written nor does it take into account private information on internal layouts and room uses of adjoining properties unless this information is publicly available. layouts and room uses of adjoining properties unless this information is publicly available.

Template Version 7.0 (13.12.2022)

CONTENTS

USER TIP:

Click any heading to go directly to that content.

DRAWINGS OF THE AMENDED PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

.............................................................. Ʋ

ALL PHASES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ƴ EARLY PHASES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . Ƹ

USER TIP:

Return to the contents list from any page by clicking on the GIA logo.

September 2026

DRAWINGS OF THE AMENDED PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

September 2026

DRAWINGS OF THE AMENDED PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:

ALL PHASES

September 2026

6 The Whitehouse Belvedere Road London SE1 8GA t 020 7202 1400 f 020 7202 1401 mail@gia.uk.com www.gia.uk.com

The Whitehouse Belvedere Road London SE1 8GA t 020 7202 1400 f 020 7202 1401 mail@gia.uk.com www.gia.uk.com

DRAWINGS OF THE AMENDED PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:

EARLY PHASES

September 2026

10 The Whitehouse Belvedere Road London SE1 8GA t 020 7202 1400 f 020 7202 1401 mail@gia.uk.com www.gia.uk.com

The Whitehouse Belvedere Road London SE1 8GA t 020 7202 1400 f 020 7202 1401 mail@gia.uk.com www.gia.uk.com

PROJECT DATA: Client

Earls Court Development Company

Architect

dRMM

Project Title

Earls Court

Project Number

15447

REPORT DATA: Report Title

Amended Daylight and Sunlight Results

GIA Department

Daylight Department

Dated

September 2026

Prepared by

Checked by

DMC

Type

Final

Revisions

No:

Date:

Notes:

Signed:

SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Information Received Release Number Issue Number Site Photos 3D models OS Data

IR-384-15447 Rel_81_15447 02 GIA VU.CITY FIND Maps

DISCLAIMER: N.B This report has been prepared for Earls Court Development Company by GIA as their appointed Daylight & Sunlight consultants. This report is intended solely for Earls Court Development Company and may contain confidential information. No part or whole of its contents may be disclosed to or relied upon by any Third Parties without the express written consent of GIA. It is accurate as at the time of publication and based upon the information we have been provided with as set out in the report. It does not take into account changes that have taken place since the report was written nor does it take into account private information on internal layouts and room uses of adjoining properties unless this information is publicly available. layouts and room uses of adjoining properties unless this information is publicly available.

Template Version 7.0 (13.12.2022)

CONTENTS

USER TIP:

Click any heading to go directly to that content.

AMENDED DAYLIGHT AND SUNLIGHT RESULTS

. . ............................................................................................................................................. 3

USER TIP:

Return to the contents list from any page by clicking on the GIA logo.

September 2026

AMENDED DAYLIGHT AND SUNLIGHT RESULTS

September 2026

AMENDED DAYLIGHT AND SUNLIGHT RESULTS:

ALL PHASES

September 2026

AMENDED DAYLIGHT AND SUNLIGHT RESULTS:

EARLY PHASES

September 2026

PROJECT DATA: Client

Earls Court Development Company

Architect

dRMM

Project Title

Earls Court

Project Number

15447

REPORT DATA: Report Title

Amended NSL Contours

GIA Department

Daylight Department

Dated

September 2026

Prepared by

Checked by

DMC

Type

Final

Revisions

No:

Date:

Notes:

Signed:

SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Information Received Release Number Issue Number Site Photos 3D models OS Data

IR-384-15447 Rel_81_15447 02 GIA VU.CITY FIND Maps

DISCLAIMER: N.B This report has been prepared for Earls Court Development Company by GIA as their appointed Daylight & Sunlight consultants. This report is intended solely for Earls Court Development Company and may contain confidential information. No part or whole of its contents may be disclosed to or relied upon by any Third Parties without the express written consent of GIA. It is accurate as at the time of publication and based upon the information we have been provided with as set out in the report. It does not take into account changes that have taken place since the report was written nor does it take into account private information on internal layouts and room uses of adjoining properties unless this information is publicly available. layouts and room uses of adjoining properties unless this information is publicly available.

Template Version 7.0 (13.12.2022)

CONTENTS

USER TIP:

Click any heading to go directly to that content.

AMENDED NSL CONTOURS

......................................................... ........ 3

USER TIP:

Return to the contents list from any page by clicking on the GIA logo.

September 2026

AMENDED NSL CONTOURS

September 2026

AMENDED NSL CONTOURS:

ALL PHASES

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

100

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

101

102

AMENDED NSL CONTOURS:

EARLY PHASES

September 2026

103

104

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

105

106

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

107

108

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

109

110

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

111

112

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

113

114

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

115

116

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

117

118

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

119

120

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

121

122

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

123

124

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

125

126

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

127

128

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

129

130

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

131

132

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

133

134

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

135

136

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

137

138

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

139

140

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

141

142

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

143

144

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

145

146

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

147

148

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

149

150

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

151

152

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

153

154

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

155

156

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

157

158

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

159

160

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

161

162

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

163

164

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

165

166

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

167

168

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

169

170

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

171

172

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

173

174

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

175

176

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

177

178

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

179

180

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

181

182

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

183

184

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

185

186

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

187

188

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

189

190

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

191

192

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

193

194

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

195

196

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

197

198

Earls Court (15447) Daylight Department: Amended NSL Contours

September 2026

199

Environmental Statement Supplementary Report 14 September 2026

Ramboll UK Limited Issue FINAL

Appendix D: Updated Accurate Visual Representations

Earls Court London

September 2026

Earls Court – Environmental Implications Letter

View Table

View

Location

Page

Ivatt Place

Queens Club Gardens, west

Normand Park

View B19

Thaxton Road

cityscapedigital.co.uk

Earls Court – Environmental Implications Letter

July 2024 TVA, Figure 2.9

Viewpoint map (local views)

Views not remodelled in this addendum Views remodelled in this addendum

Earls Court – Environmental Implications Letter

View 49 Ivatt Place

July 2025 Amended

Proposed

Development D29850 24mm 04/03/24 14:27

4 cityscapedigital.co.uk

Earls Court – Environmental Implications Letter

View 49 Ivatt Place

September

2026 Amended Proposed

Development D29850 24mm 04/03/24 14:27

5 cityscapedigital.co.uk

Earls Court – Environmental Implications Letter

View 52 Queens Club Gardens, west

July 2025 Amended

Proposed

Development D29789x50 50mm 15/02/24 11:57

6 cityscapedigital.co.uk

Earls Court – Environmental Implications Letter

View 52 Queens Club Gardens, west

September

2026 Amended Proposed

Development D29789x50 50mm 15/02/24 11:57

7 cityscapedigital.co.uk

Earls Court – Environmental Implications Letter

View 54 Normand Park

July 2025 Amended

Proposed

Development D29855x35 35mm 04/03/24 11:54

8 cityscapedigital.co.uk

Earls Court – Environmental Implications Letter

View 54 Normand Park

September

2026 Amended Proposed

Development D29855x35 35mm 04/03/24 11:54

9 cityscapedigital.co.uk

Earls Court – Environmental Implications Letter

View B19 Thaxton Road

July 2025 Amended

Proposed

Development D28070 24mm 11/03/23 16:09

10 cityscapedigital.co.uk

Earls Court – Environmental Implications Letter

View B19 Thaxton Road

September

2026 Amended Proposed

Development D28070 24mm 11/03/23 16:09

11 cityscapedigital.co.uk

Earls Court London

Accurate Visual Representation Methodology

Earls Court London – Environmental Implications Letter

September 2026

Contents

Table of views 0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

tavernorconsultancy.co.uk cityscapedigital.co.uk

Introduction

0.1

Methodology overview

0.2

View selection

Photography

5.0

15 6.0 15

Model positioning

5.1

Model source

5.2

Proposed model position check

Camera matching – Type 4 visualisations

6.1

Cityscape’s database

6.2

Camera matching process

1.1

Digital photography

1.2

Lenses

1.3

TGN 06/19

7.1

Cityscape’s context models

1.4

Digital camera

7.2

Camera matching process

1.5

Position, time and date recording

Digital image correction

7.0

8.0 17

Camera matching – Type 3 visualisations

Rendering

8.1

Wireline image (AVR 0/1)

2.1

Raw file conversion

8.2

Rendered image (AVR 3)

2.2

Digital image correction

8.3

Texturing

8.4

Lighting and sun direction

Type 4 visualisations

3.1

Type 4 visualisation

3.2

Survey

3.3

False origin

Type 3 visualisations

4.1

Type 3 visualisation

4.2

False origin

18 9.0

Post production

9.1

Post production

Earls Court London – Environmental Implications Letter

September 2026

Table of views View

Visualisation type

Level of accuracy of location

Render / wireline

Ref

OS-E

OS-N

Height (AOD)

Height (AGL)

Heading

Lens

Lens choice

Field of view

Date

Time

Type 4

Better than 0.05m

Render

D29850

524835.977

178088.829

3.01 M

1.60 M

76.00º

24mm

Inclusion of relevant context

73.30º

04/03/24

14:27

Type 4

Better than 0.05m

Render

D29789x50

524376.279

177813.466

5.54 M

1.60 M

66.00º

50mm

Standard lens for open spaces

38.50º

15/02/24

11:57

Type 4

Better than 0.05m

Render

D29855x35

524531.628

177654.943

4.62 M

1.60 M

49.00º

35mm

Inclusion of relevant context

56.10º

04/03/24

11:54

B19

Type 3

Better than 1m

Wireline

D28070

524930.884

178002.613

3.72 M

1.60 M

64.00º

24mm

Inclusion of relevant context

72.90º

11/03/23

16:09

tavernorconsultancy.co.uk cityscapedigital.co.uk

Earls Court London – Environmental Implications Letter

0.0 0.1

Introduction

Methodology overview The methodology applied by Cityscape Digital Limited to produce the ‘Type 4 Photomontages survey / scale verifiable’1 or views contained in this document are described below. In the drafting of this methodology and the production and presentation of the images, guidance has been taken from the ‘TGN 06/19 Visual Representation of development proposals’ (TGN06/19) from the Landscape Institute published on 17 September 2019 in support of GLVIA3.

September 2026

1.0 1.1

Digital photography

High quality digital full frame sensor cameras are being utilised.

1.2

Lenses In accordance with TGN 06/19, Cityscape balances the need to include the extent of the site and sufficient context with the stated preference for 50mm lenses. For local urban views a wide angle lens of 24mm or 35mm is generally used. For more open spaces the default is 50mm, intermediate distance views are photographed with a lens between 35mm to 70mm and occasionally long range views may be required with lens options ranging from 70mm to 1200mm.

The disciplines employed are of the highest possible levels of accuracy and photorealism which are achievable with today’s standards of architectural photography and computer-generated models.

0.2

Photography

View selection

As a guide, the following approach is used:

The viewpoints are selected through a process of consultation with relevant statutory consultees by townscape/heritage consultants and having regard to relevant planning policy and guidance.

View

Lens options

Relevant foreground, urban context or large site

24mm – 35mm

Open spaces, where proposed development can be included

50mm

800 to 5000 metres – intermediate

35mm – 70mm

5000+ metres – long

70mm – 1200mm

and (ii) a digital mockup rendered with a context model of the desired view. For each viewpoint the camera is positioned at a height of 1.60 metres above the ground level which closely approximates the human eye altitude, and falls into the 1.5-1.65m range provided by TGN 06/195.

Figure 1: Local view

If local conditions required a deviation to capture the view, the exact height can be found in the Table of Views. A point vertically beneath the entrance pupil of the lens is marked on the ground as a survey reference point and two digital reference photographs are taken of (i) the camera/tripod location and (ii) the survey reference point (as shown in Figures 3 and 4). The date and time of the photograph are recorded by the camera.

Examples of these views are shown in Figures 1 and 2.

1.3

TGN 06/19 States that:

Figure 2: Intermediate view

“2.2 Baseline photography should: [...] include the extent of the site and sufficient context;”2 “1.1.7 If a 50mm FL lens cannot capture the view in landscape or portrait orientation (for example, if the highest point of the development is approaching 18° above horizontal) the use of wider-angled prime lenses should be considered, working through the following sequence of fixed lenses in this order: 35mm FL > 28mm FL > 24mm FL > 24mm FL Tilt-Shift. Tilt-Shift Lenses are considered at Appendix 13. In these unusual situations, the reasoning for the choice and the approach used should be documented, and the agreement of the competent authority should be sought (see Appendix 10 Technical Methodology).”3 and “Views should include the full context of the site / development and show the effect it has upon the receptor location.[...]”4

1.4

Digital camera Cityscape uses high quality professional DSLR (digital single lens reflex) and DSLM (digital single lens mirrorless) cameras. The cameras utilise FFS (full frame sensors) so declared focal lengths require no conversion to be understood in line with TGN 06/19 guidelines. Cityscape use high quality lenses that are matched to the resolution of the cameras to ensure high contrast and sharp rendition of the images.

1.5

Position, time and date recording The photographer is provided with (i) an Ordnance Survey map or equivalent indicating the position of each viewpoint from which the required photographs are to be taken,

2 TGN 06/19 Visual Representation of development proposals.’ Available at: https://landscapewpstorage01.blob.core.windows.net/www-landscapeinstitute-org/2019/09/LI_TGN-06-19_Visual_Representation.pdf (Accessed: March 2022).pp. 5, Paragraph 2.2 3 TGN 06/19 Visual Representation of development proposals.’ Available at: https://landscapewpstorage01.blob.core.windows.net/www-landscapeinstitute-org/2019/09/LI_TGN-06-19_Visual_Representation.pdf (Accessed: March 2022).pp. 28, Paragraph 1.1.7 1 ‘TGN 06/19 Visual Representation of development proposals.’ Available at: https://landscapewpstorage01.blob.core.windows.net/wwwlandscapeinstitute-org/2019/09/LI_TGN-06-19_Visual_Representation.pdf (Accessed: March 2022).pp. 21-2

tavernorconsultancy.co.uk cityscapedigital.co.uk

4 ‘TGN 06/19 Visual Representation of development proposals.’ Available at: https://landscapewpstorage01.blob.core.windows.net/www-landscapeinstitute-org/2019/09/LI_TGN-06-19_Visual_Representation.pdf (Accessed: March 2022).pp. 35, Paragraph 4.1.5 5 ‘TGN 06/19 Visual Representation of development proposals.’ Available at: https://landscapewpstorage01.blob.core.windows.net/www-landscapeinstitute-org/2019/09/LI_TGN-06-19_Visual_Representation.pdf (Accessed: March 2022).pp. 50

Earls Court London – Environmental Implications Letter

1.0

Photography (continued)

Figure 3: Camera location

tavernorconsultancy.co.uk cityscapedigital.co.uk

September 2026

Figure 4: Survey reference point

Earls Court London – Environmental Implications Letter

2.0 2.1

Digital image correction

Raw file conversion

September 2026

Figure 5: Area of interest to be surveyed

Professional digital cameras produce a raw file format, which is then processed for both high detail and colour accuracy. The final image is saved as an 8 bit tiff6 file.

2.2

Digital image correction The digital photographs were prepared for the next stage of camera matching (see Sections 6 and 7). All lenses exhibit a degree of geometric distortion. The most common types are radially symmetrical along the principal axis of the lens, and tend to grow in size towards the perimeter of the image. The outer edges of the images are therefore not taken into consideration to reduce inaccuracies. Figure 5 illustrates the ‘safe’ or non-distortive area of an image which is marked by a red overlay. The adjusted or corrected digital image, known as the ‘background plate’, is then saved ready for the camera matching process (see Sections 6 and 7). In preparation for the survey (see Section 3.2) Cityscape indicates on each background plate the safe area and priority survey points, such as corners of buildings, retained elements and party walls for survey (see Figure 6).

Figure 6: Background plate highlighting critical survey points in green and secondary survey strings in red

6 TIFF is the name given to a specific format of image file stored digitally on a computer.

tavernorconsultancy.co.uk cityscapedigital.co.uk

Earls Court London – Environmental Implications Letter

3.0 3.1

Type 4 visualisations

Type 4 visualisation

September 2026

Figure 7: Field survey being carried out, GNSS receiver

Unless otherwise specified visualisations are completed to TGN 06/197 Type 4 Photomontage / Photowire (survey / scale verifiable) standards.

3.2

Survey An independent surveyor is contracted to undertake the survey of (i) each viewpoint as marked on the ground beneath the entrance pupil of the lens at the time the photograph is taken (and recorded by way of digital photograph (see Section 1 above) and (ii) all the required points on buildings, hard landscape features or immobile permanent objects within the safe zone. The survey is coordinated onto the Ordnance Survey National Grid (OSGB36) by using GNSS (global navigation satellite system such as GPS8) equipment (see, for example, Figure 7) and processing software. The Ordnance Survey National Grid (OSGB36) is chosen as it is the most widely used and because it also allows the captured data to be incorporated into other available digital products (such as Ordnance Survey maps). The height datum used is Ordnance Survey Newlyn Datum and is also derived using the GNSS. Improvements to the real-time position of GNSS data is achieved by RTK (real time kinematic) compensation, which utilises a comparison between known base stations positions and their current position fix to produce correction data to the measurements. The required points on each building are surveyed using conventional survey techniques utilising an electronic theodolite and reflectorless laser technology (shown in Figure 8). In certain circumstances, a viewpoint may need to be surveyed using conventional survey techniques as opposed to RTK, if, for example, the viewpoint is in a position where GNSS information cannot be received.

3.3

Figure 8: Field survey being carried out, total station

False origin 3D modelling programs, unlike CAD/BIM programs, have inherent inaccuracies the further an object is away from the origin. Cityscape decide on and record a local, ‘false origin’ that is used to move the model closer to the origin. This alleviates the inaccuracies. The 3D model of the proposed development, consented scheme models, and survey data are all moved uniformly to this new false origin. When performing positioning checks (see Section 5.2) the offset between false origin and OS are added back to the coordinates.

7 ‘TGN 06/19 Visual Representation of development proposals.’ Available at: https://landscapewpstorage01.blob.core.windows.net/www-landscapeinstitute-org/2019/09/LI_TGN-06-19_Visual_Representation.pdf (Accessed: March 2022).pp.11, Table2, pp 21-24. 8 https://www.rics.org/globalassets/rics-website/media/upholding-professional-standards/sector-standards/land/guidelines-for-the-use-of-gnss-in-surveying-and-mapping-2nd-edition-rics.pdf

tavernorconsultancy.co.uk cityscapedigital.co.uk

Earls Court London – Environmental Implications Letter

4.0 4.1

September 2026

Type 3 visualisations

Type 3 visualisation

4.2

These visualisations are as described in TGN 06/199 Type 3 Photomontage / Photowire (not survey / scale verifiable) standards. In contrast to Type 4, Type 3 visualisations rely on good quality data for camera matching, but are not relying on surveys as described in Section 3.2. Data sources such as GPS, OS Maps, 3D City models, geo-referenced aerial photography, LiDAR or 3D models can be used. The individual data source used is declared in an accompanying table. The possible angular shift of a 1m lateral displacement of the camera against its actual coordinate depends on the distance of the object from the camera10:

Distance from camera

Apparent shift

10m

5.7°

100m

0.57°

1,000m

0.057°

10,000m

0.006°

5.0

Model positioning

False origin

Applies to Type 3 and Type 4 visualisation.

3D modelling programs, unlike CAD/BIM programs, have inherent inaccuracies the further an object is away from the origin. Cityscape decide on and record a local, ‘false origin’ that is used to move the model closer to the origin. This alleviates the inaccuracies. The 3D model of the proposed development, consented scheme models, and survey data are all moved uniformly to this new false origin. When performing positioning checks (see Section 5.2) the offset between false origin and OS are added back to the coordinates.

5.1

Model source A wireframe 3D model of the proposed scheme if not provided is created by Cityscape from plans and elevations provided by the architects and from survey information of the ground levels on site and various other points on and around the site, such as the edge of adjacent roads and pavements etc. provided by the surveyor.

5.2

Proposed model position check The architect provided a site survey in OS coordinates which was combined with a survey commissioned for the camera matches (See section 6) and moved to the false origin as described in Section 3.3. The model was then positioned by way of setting it on the floor plan. Heights are taken from the combined survey. Once the model is positioned, confirmation of height and Easting/Northing Coordinates is requested from the architect. At least two clear reference points are agreed and used to confirm the placement of the model.

Figure 11: 1m resolution LiDAR GeoTIFF

Cityscape also create 3D DSM (Digital Surface Model) models from publicly available data sources, such as Defra LiDAR scans from the Defra Data Services Platform. We always choose the newest data available at the highest possible resolution, typically at 1m resolution. The data is processed to coordinate onto Ordnance Survey National Grid (OSGB36), and converted to a Square Grid DSM. The square grid is then optimised into a TIN (Triangulated Irregular Network). The optimisation has been validated to produce no loss in usable information of the geometric mesh. This process follows the guidelines set out in ‘Guidance – Visual representation of wind farms – Feb 2017’11. Digital Surface Model (DSM) source data is typically the Defra LiDAR Composite DSM, 2020, resolution 1m. Figure 13: Proposed model position check

Figure 12: Resulting 3D TIN mesh

9 ‘TGN 06/19 Visual Representation of development proposals.’ Available at: https://landscapewpstorage01.blob.core.windows.net/www-landscapeinstitute-org/2019/09/LI_TGN-06-19_Visual_Representation.pdf (Accessed: March 2022).pp.11, Table2, pp 19-20. 10 ‘TGN 06/19 Visual Representation of development proposals.’ Available at: https://landscapewpstorage01.blob.core.windows.net/www-landscapeinstitute-org/2019/09/LI_TGN-06-19_Visual_Representation.pdf (Accessed: March 2022).pp 56-57 11 ‘Guidance – Visual representation of wind farms – Feb 2017’ Available at: https://www.nature.scot/sites/default/files/2019-09/Guidance%20-%20Visual%20representation%20of%20wind%20farms%20-%20Feb%202017.pdf (Accessed at March 2022). pp 8-9

tavernorconsultancy.co.uk cityscapedigital.co.uk

Earls Court London – Environmental Implications Letter

6.0 6.1

September 2026

Camera matching – Type 4 visualisations

Cityscape Digital’s database

Cityscape Digital has built up a comprehensive database of survey information on buildings and locations in central London; the database contains both GNSS survey information and information regarding the dimensions and elevations of buildings gathered from architects and other sources.

Figure 14: Selected GPS located models (yellow) from Cityscape’s database, situated on Cityscape’s London digital terrain model

The outlines of buildings are created by connecting the surveyed points or from the information obtained from architects’ drawings of particular buildings. By way of example of the high level of detail and accuracy, approximately 300 points have been GNSS surveyed on the dome of St. Paul’s. The database ‘view’ (as shown in Figure 14) is ‘verified’ as each building is positioned using coordinates acquired from GNSS surveys. In many instances, the various coordinates of a particular building featured in one of the background plates are already held by Cityscape as part of their database of London. In such cases the survey information of buildings and locations provided by the surveyor (see Section 3.2) is used to cross-check and confirm the accuracy of these buildings. Where such information is not held by Cityscape, it is, where appropriate, used to add detail to Cityscape’s database. The survey information provided by the surveyor is in all cases used in the verification process of camera matching.

6.2

Camera matching process The following information is required for the camera matching process: ∙ Specific details of the camera and lens used to take the photograph and therefore the field of view (see Section 1); ∙ The adjusted or corrected digital image i.e. the ‘background plate’ (see Section 2); ∙ The GNSS surveyed viewpoint coordinates (see Section 3.2); ∙ The GNSS surveyed coordinates of points within the the background plate (see Section 3.2); ∙ Selected models from Cityscape’s database (see Section 6.1); ∙ The GNSS surveyed coordinates of the site of the proposed scheme (see Section 3.2); The data is combined in a 3D software package and is then used to situate Cityscape’s virtual camera such that the 3D model aligns exactly over the background plate (as shown in Figures 15, 16 and 17) (i.e. a ‘virtual viewer’ within the 3D model would therefore be standing exactly on the same viewpoint from which the original photograph was taken (Figure 3). This is the camera matching process.

tavernorconsultancy.co.uk cityscapedigital.co.uk

Figure 15: The background plate matched in the 3D GPS located models

Figure 16: Background plate matched to the 3D GPS located models

Figure 17: The camera matched background plate with an example of a proposed scheme included in red

Earls Court London – Environmental Implications Letter

7.0 7.1

September 2026

Camera matching – Type 3 visualisations

Cityscape’s context models

Cityscape have purchased available 3D city models of large parts of London and other parts of the UK that are modelled to within 25cm accuracy. Where available this data is used to create camera matches for Type 3 visualisations, or additional data is purchased.

Figure 18: Background plate: digital photograph, size and bank corrected as described in Section 2

Figure 20: Camera matching: the background plate matched in DSM TIN mesh

In addition, or where 3D city models are not available, DSM data is used for camera matching (see Section 4).

7.2

Camera matching process The following information is required for the camera matching process: ∙ Specific details of the camera and lens used to take the photograph and therefore the field of view (see Section 1); ∙ The adjusted or corrected digital image i.e. the ‘background plate’ (see Section 2); ∙ 3D city model and/or DSM context model (see Section 4); ∙ Selected models from Cityscape’s database (see Section 6.1); ∙ A 3D model of the proposed scheme (see Section 5) The data is combined in a 3D software package and is then used to situate Cityscape’s virtual camera such that the 3D model/Digital Surface Model (DSM) aligns exactly over the background plate (as shown in Figure 20) (i.e. a ‘virtual viewer’ within the 3D model would therefore be standing very close to the same viewpoint from which the original photograph was taken (Figure 3). This is the camera matching process. Figure 19: Render: DSM model render, camera matched

tavernorconsultancy.co.uk cityscapedigital.co.uk

Earls Court London – Environmental Implications Letter

8.0 8.1

Rendering

Wireline image (AVR 0/1)

September 2026

Figure 21: Screenshot of some materials in the 3D rendering package.

The proposed developments are shown using a constant thickness wireline. The line is generated from a computer rendering of the 3D model and follows an ‘inside stroke’ principle.

Figure 22: Screenshot of environment information (time, date and year) entered to locate the sun correctly (see Section 7.

Rendering is a technical term referring to the process of creating a two dimensional output image from the 3D model. The ‘inside stroke’ principle is followed so that the outer edge of the line touches the outline of the render from the inside, fairly representing the maximum visibility. The camera matching process is repeated for each view and a wireline image of the proposal from each viewpoint is then produced. The wireline image enables a quantitative analysis of the impact of the proposed scheme on views.

8.2

Rendered image (AVR 3) In order to assist a more qualitative assessment of the proposals, the output image needs to be a photo-realistic reflection of what the proposed scheme would look like once constructed. This is called an AVR3.

8.3

Texturing The process of transforming the wireframe 3D scheme model into one that can be used to create a photorealistic image is called texturing12. Prior to rendering, Cityscape requires details from the architect regarding the proposed materials (e.g. type of glass, steel, aluminium etc.) to be utilised. Cityscape also use high resolution photographic imagery of real world material samples, supplied by the client or the manufacturer, to create accurate photorealistic textures for use in all our images. This information is used to produce the appearance and qualities in the image that most closely relates to the real materials to be used (as shown in Figure 21).

8.4

Lighting and sun direction The next stage is to light the 3D model to match the photographic environment. The date, time of the photograph and the latitude and longitude of the city are input (see Figure 22) into the unbiased physically accurate render engine. Cityscape selects a ‘sky’ (e.g. clear blue, grey, overcast, varying cloud density, varying weather conditions) from the hundreds of ‘skies’ held within its database to resemble as closely as possible the sky in the background plate. The 3D model of the proposed scheme is placed within the selected sky (see Figure 23) and using the material properties also entered, the computer calculates the effects of the sky conditions (including the sun) on the appearance of the proposed scheme. Figure 23: E xample of a proposed scheme highlighted in red within the selected sky and rendered onto the background plate

12 Texturing is often referred to as part of the rendering process, however, in the industry, it is a process that occurs prior to the rendering process.

tavernorconsultancy.co.uk cityscapedigital.co.uk

Earls Court London – Environmental Implications Letter

9.0 9.1

September 2026

Post production

Finally, the rendered image of the scheme model is inserted and positioned against the camera matched background plate. Once in position, the rendered images are edited using Adobe Photoshop®. Masks are created in Photoshop where the line of sight to the rendered image of the proposed scheme is interrupted by foreground buildings (as shown in Figure 24). The result is a verified image or view of the proposed scheme (as shown in Figure 25).

Figure 24: Process red area highlights the Photoshop mask that hides the unseen portion of the render

tavernorconsultancy.co.uk cityscapedigital.co.uk

Figure 25: A photo-realistic verified image

Earls Court London – Environmental Implications Letter

September 2026

Cityscape Digital Printworks House 7 Bermondsey Street London SE1 2DD 020 7566 8550

tavernorconsultancy.co.uk cityscapedigital.co.uk

Thank you Ramboll EC.PA.12-ESS October 2026