Issuu

Design Code Revision 02 Hawkins\Brown & Studio Egret West EC.PA.C-02 October 2026

We are creating a place the world will watch with wonder, on London’s iconic site of human ingenuity. Through our masterplan, we will reimagine the very fabric of living, working and urban wellbeing for London and future spaces. Attracting the world’s most inventive, imaginative and extraordinary minds. That place is Earls Court.

Nature

Innovation

A celebration of nature and its ability to connect and revive.

A showcase for climate and clean innovation and skills.

Our four place pillars underpin our vision and set the ambitions for the place we want to create.

Culture

Neighbourhood

A cultural ecosystem for the future of talent.

An inspiring neighbourhood designed for all stages of life.

Discover Wonder

Foreword After four years of deep consideration and collaboration with stakeholders and local people, The Earls Court Development Company (ECDC) is delighted to present the ambitious future plans for this iconic Site. We formed in 2021 during the lockdown imposed by the first global pandemic in a century, an era which was both disruptive and formative, demanding that we reflect and reassess how we will be living in the future. There could be no more engaging mission for a team specifically assembled to design a place fit for the 22nd century. As a team, ECDC shares a passion for transformational inner-city projects, and collectively have wide-ranging experiences from diverse international projects. Together, we are driven to fulfil the opportunities of this complex strategic site for London and rightfully put Earls Court as a place back on the global map. Our intent from the very beginning, was to take a different approach to community involvement in shaping design. Setting up as a local business and being right next to Site everyday, working closely with both local authorities, the Mayor’s office, local businesses and our neighbours has been fundamental in shaping our plans for the Site, which we believe are more relevant and exciting for it. We have listened and taken huge inspiration from Earls Court’s heritage, as a place that dared — to showcase, to entertain and celebrate the spectacular. A place that was so clearly cherished for being bold and brave, welcoming people from across the globe.

us to create a global exemplar of sustainability. We understand our responsibility to deliver much needed homes and employment opportunities for London. Critical to achieving these aims is creating a place with personality, a place that once again becomes a destination with a broad cultural appeal and is fully inclusive to all that come to experience it. The masterplan has been created to prioritise urban wellbeing and includes a network of Exhibition Gardens that will be open and accessible for everyone to enjoy. We’re creating a pedestrian-first environment alive with daytime and evening active uses. This generosity of open space is evident at key arrival points as well as the unique Table Park and Lillie Sidings. Our commitment to create a better piece of city has been evidenced over the last three years as we have welcomed over 500,000 people back onto Site to enjoy a programme of events that nod to the past and point to the future of Earls Court. ECDC began with a mantra ‘to make haste slowly’ and ensure we took the time to both listen and appreciate the world of Earls Court, which helped to establish the early vision to bring the wonder back to Earls Court. Now, after over four years of consideration, we are proud to present our hybrid planning submission to the authorities for determination — a key milestone to enable the future of Earls Court as a place, once again, to discover wonder.

Rob Heasman Our plans retain that innovative spirit that CEO embraces future thinking — an approach we The Earls Court believe has become more important now than Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026 ever before. An approach that continues to drive Development Company

Contents 1. Introduction [IN]

As a panel of built environment experts, our peer review of the Earls Court Design Code aimed to ensure alignment with the National Model Design Code guidance and national best practice. The process has been highly collaborative with recommendations incorporated into this document. We will continue to monitor the delivery of the project and feel confident that this Design Code can become a benchmark for major brownfield developments in the future.

2. Vision [VI]

3. Sitewide [SW]

Parameter Plans Landscape Built Form Built Form

54 102 194 194

4. West Brompton [WB]

259

Overview Landscape Built Form 5. Warwick Crescent [WC]

Matthew Carmona Professor of Planning and Urban Design at The Bartlett School of Planning, University College London

Vicky Payne Co-author of the National Model Design Code

6. The Table [TT]

385

Overview Landscape Built Form

386 388 426

8. Aisgill Gardens [AG]

Description

July 2024 July 2025 September 2026

Issued for Planning Issued for Planning Issued for Planning

441 442 444 458 487

Overview Landscape Built Form

488 490 500

9. Lillie Sidings [LS]

521

Overview Landscape Built Form

522 524 552

10. West Kensington [WK] Date Issued

321 322 324 352

Overview Landscape Built Form

P01 P02 P03

260 262 294

Overview Landscape Built Form

7. Empress Place [EP]

Revision No.

Overview Landscape Built Form

581 582 584 622 Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

1. Introduction [IN]

Earls Court Development I Design Code I September 2026

Introduction This Design Code has been prepared by Hawkins\Brown and Studio Egret West to replace EC.PA.C-01, September 2025. It has been updated to take account of amendments to the Proposed Development.

In July 2024, two Hybrid Planning Applications were submitted, one to RBKC (Reference: PP/24/05187) and one to LBHF (Reference: 2024/01942/ COMB) in relation to the redevelopment of land bounded by West Cromwell Road, Warwick Road, Philbeach Gardens, Eardley Crescent, Lillie Road, Old Brompton Road, the West London Railway Line (“WLL”), and 1 Cluny Mews in RBKC (the “RBKC Site”) and North End Road, Beaumont Avenue, West Cromwell Road, the WLL, land comprising the Empress State Building (“ESB”), Aisgill Avenue, the former Gibbs Green School properties fronting Gibbs Green Close, and properties fronting Dieppe Close (the ‘LBHF Site) which straddle the boundary between the two boroughs (together forming “the Site”). The Proposed Development will form the new Earls Court Development. The Hybrid Planning Applications are submitted on behalf of Earls Court Partnership Limited (“ECPL”) (“The Applicant”).

The RBKC Hybrid Application is formed of detailed development proposals in respect of Development Plots EC05 and EC06 for which no matters are reserved (“RBKC Detailed Component”),

and outline development proposals for the remainder of the RBKC Site, with all matters reserved (“RBKC Outline Component”). The RBKC Detailed Component and RBKC Outline Component together are referred to as the “RBKC Proposed Development”.

The LBHF Hybrid Application is formed of detailed development proposals in respect of Development Plots WB03, WB04 and WB05-T2 for which no matters are reserved (“LBHF Detailed Component”), and outline development proposals for the remainder of the Site, with all matters reserved (“LBHF Outline Component”). LBHF Detailed Component and LBHF Outline Component together are referred to as the “LBHF Proposed Development”.

Together the RBKC and LBHF Proposed Developments form the Earls Court Development which comprises the redevelopment of the Site. The Earls Court Development will provide residential dwellings, purpose-built student accommodation, assisted living, workspace, culture, community, retail and leisure facilities alongside high quality public realm and open spaces.

The Proposed Development is currently anticipated to be delivered in eight main phases and over an estimated programme of approximately 19 years. The eight main phases encompass the full build out of the Proposed Development.

Therefore, for the purpose of the indicative development programme, the Proposed Development works are anticipated to be undertaken over 13 years for the Early Phases (Phases 1-4) and 19 years for All Phases.

This report considers each of these scenarios. For further information in relation to phasing and development scenarios, refer to the submitted Planning Statement and Environmental Statement.

No significant delay is anticipated between the phases. However, realising vacant possession of the Lillie Bridge Depot is complex and whilst an indicative programme has been agreed with London Underground Limited (“LUL”), it is subject to ongoing review, detailed preparation and design, and securing the planning permission for the Hybrid Applications and additional consents.

Due to the above, the Hybrid Applications consider and assess two different scenarios. These are:

1. All Phases: comprising the entirety of the Proposed Development.

2. Early Phases: Phases 1-4 (the ‘Early Phases’) are completed, but the Depot remains operational and is delivered to a different programme from that currently anticipated in the All Phases scenario.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

Post Planning Application Submission Amendments and Response to Consultation Feedback Following the submission of the Hybrid Planning Applications, an update was submitted in July 2025 for both Hybrid Applications to make minor changes to the design and composition of the Proposed Development follow consultation undertaken with LBHF, RBKC and relevant statutory and nonstatutory consultees. The LBHF Hybrid Application was considered by the LBHF Planning Committee in November 2025 and the RBKC Hybrid Application was considered by the RBKC Planning Committee in December 2025. Both Hybrid Applications received a resolution to grant permission, subject to referral to the Mayor of London and completion of a Section 106 Agreement. Since that time, the Applicant has explored opportunities to secure public sector grant funding and subsidies and progressed detailed discussions with LBHF, RBKC, GLA and TfL officers in relation Section 106 obligations to move towards the grant of planning permission. However, a combination of worsening macro economic conditions during 2026 (that have led to value stagnation and reduced growth forecasts), increasing development costs and a lack of available public subsidy have required the Applicant to review the composition of the development to ensure it can be funded and delivered. This context has led to the following proposed changes to the Proposed Development (which are set out

/ F&B / Commercial / Culture (Use Classes E(a)/(b)/(c), F / Sui Generis), Leisure (Use Class E(d) / Sui Generis), Community / Social Infrastructure (Use Class F/E(g)), Ancillary (Sui Generis) proposed at ground floor.

and discussed in more detail in the accompanying Planning Statement Addendum 02): •

Reduction of affordable housing and change to affordable housing tenure split.

•

Part of Development Plot WB05 (referred to as ‘WB05-T1’) is proposed as a new Development Zone ‘H[O]’ and changes from being proposed as part of the Detailed Component of the LBHF Hybrid Application (now Development Zone ‘H[D]’) to form part of the Outline Component. It is proposed for the following flexible range of ‘predominant’ potential land uses: Residential (Use Class C3), PurposeBuilt Student Accommodation (Use Class Sui Generis), Older Persons Accommodation (UseClass C2), Co-Living (Sui Generis) or a mix of these uses, along with the following ‘other’ uses: Flexible Retail / F&B / Commercial / Culture (Use Classes E(a)/(b)/(c) / F / Sui Generis), Leisure (Use Class E(d) / Sui Generis), Ancillary (Sui Generis).

•

The remainder of Plot WB05 (referred to as ‘WB05-T2’) will remain part of the Detailed Component within what is now titled Development Zone ‘H[D]’ and is now proposed to accommodate social rent affordable housing on upper floors with Flexible Retail

No changes are proposed to the overall quantum of residential units, development or excavation proposed by the Hybrid Applications.

•

Minor design changes (internal and external) to Development Plot WB05-T2 to accommodate revised proposed affordable residential use (as shown on amended plans and updated Design and Access Statement).

•

Minor design changes to basement, ground and mezzanine levels of Development Plots WB03 and WB04 within the LBHF Detailed Component (Development Zone H[D]) to reduce cycle parking, increase flexible commercial floorspace and relocate plant rooms.

•

Minor increase in below ground parameters within Development Zone B1 and WB05-T1.

•

Reduction in site wide cycle parking to reflect latest planning guidance and emerging planning policy

•

Associated updates have been made to replacement Control Documents (i.e. Development Specification Revision 02, revised Parameter Plans and Design Code Revision 02) to reflect the above changes to the Proposed Development.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

Format of the Application The Hybrid Planning Application includes a large number of documents and drawings including: Control Documents (for approval) The Control Documents are those seeking approval from the local authorities on the character, appearance, quality and quantum of development. These include the Development Specification, the Parameter Plans, and the Design Code. The Design Code has been written to be read in conjunction with these other Control Documents.

The Supporting Documents are not for approval and include the Design and Access Statement, as well as all supporting statements and technical assessments which form part of the Environmental Impact Assessment. The Design and Access Statement describes how the design has been developed and how it has responded to considerations, public and stakeholder consultation and other inputs to develop the principles for land-use, amount, scale, layout, landscape and an overarching approach to character and appearance.

HYBRID PLANNING APPLICATION

Detailed Component Documents The Hybrid Planning Application also comprises further applications which are submitted as Detailed Component. Information for these components are not covered as part of this Design Code explicitly, but the Detailed Component conforms with the relevant sitewide design guidance.

OUTLINE

DETAIL

For approval (the Control Documents*)

For approval

PARAMETER PLANS

DEVELOPMENT SPECIFICATION

DESIGN CODE

APPLICATION DRAWINGS

For information

DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT VOL. 1

DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT VOL.2&3

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS

Supporting Documents (for information)

An Illustrative Masterplan (as described within the Design and Access Statement) has been developed to show one way in which the Parameter Plans and Design Code can be interpreted.

*Future RMAs will need to demonstrate compliance with the Control Documents.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

NPPF and NMDC

An Integrated Approach

The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) establishes the requirements and guidance for the assessment and production of design codes. It states that deign codes should respond to local character and design context to produce frameworks for creating highquality places. It also identifies that the production of the codes should be developed following an approach that is consistent with the principles as set out in the National Model Design Code.

appropriate to the specific characteristics and opportunity, and balances a level of prescriptive control and degree of variety and change over time to deliver design quality over the long-term.

The Design Code for the Earls Court Development has developed an integrated approach that reconciles the 10 Characteristics into three clearly defined sections: Vision, Landscape, Built form.

Central to the national policy guidance are the principles identified as the 10 Characteristics of Well Designed Places (National Design Guide). These characteristics define the key topics that should be considered in the production of design codes (where appropriate). This approach has continued to evolve with the “Seven features of well designed places” outlined in the draft publication of the Design and Placemaking Planning Practice Guidance (2026).

By distilling the characteristics in to these three central themes, this Design Code is able to succinctly emphasise the overarching vision for the Site as

National Planning Policy Framework and National Model Design Code

The National Model Design Code (2021), develops more detailed guidance for the production of design codes. This proposal provides a specific response for the Earls Court Development in this national policy context. It tailors a response that is most

e c

ntegrated.

gs – functional, healthy

Pu sp blic ace s

Nat

t en

Built form

Enhanced and optimised

Built form

Lifespan

Accessible and easy to move around

Safe, social and inclusive

Resources

Homes and buildings

Cli

e, social and inclusive.

B u il t fo r m

A coherent pattern of development

Landscape

Movement

Attractive and distinctive

Functional, healthy and sustainable

Nature

Efficient and resilient

and optimised.

Enhances the surroundings

Made to last

Mixed and integrated

sible and easy to

Public Space

ext

ity

rent pattern of

Cont

e and distinctive.

s the surroundings.

esp

Identity

stics set out in Part 2

Lif

Overview

ces have individual work together to racter. The ten nurture and sustain a They work to positively issues affecting bute towards the or good design set out g Policy Framework.

Earls Court Design Code key sections

Context

signed p ell-de lac w e A

aracteristics

NMDC ‘10 Characteristics’

a response to the existing context and identity of the place. It then develops specific design guidance for both Landscape and Built form (at both a comprehensive sitewide scale and in response to more local Character Area conditions) to maximise a clarity in the design priorities and usability of the design guidance (whilst still reflecting the full range of policy characteristics).

ure

m m u nit

Uses

Homes and buildings

The ten characteristics of well-designed places, National Model Design Guide

nt and resilient.

The ten characteristics of well-designed places

last.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

14 8

Structure of the Document The Design Code has been organised into the following chapters: •

•

Introduction (IN) - An introduction to the Hybrid Planning Application, related documents, and a guide to using the Design Code. Vision (VI) - A summary of the vision as described in the Design and Access Statement. Sitewide (SW) – Design codes applicable to all areas of the strategic

framework (both Landscape and Built form) to define coherent strategic design guidance and clarity of documentation. •

Character Areas (CA) - Design codes applicable to each specific area of the strategic framework (both Landscape and Built form) to reinforce specific characteristics, constraints and design aspirations of interpretation and control.

Chapter 1

Introduction

Chapter 2

Vision

Chapter 3

Sitewide

Chapter 4

West Brompton

Chapter 5

Warwick Crescent

Chapter 6

The Table

Chapter 7

Empress Place

Chapter 8

Aisgill Gardens

Chapter 9

Lillie Sidings

Chapter 10

West Kensington

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

How to Read the Design Code This Design Code is organised in to Sitewide and Character Area scales. This approach enables the document to provide design guidance that will ensure a coherence in strategic principles across the development as well as respond to distinctive design opportunities in response to more local conditions. In order to use the Design Code in developing design responses for particular spaces or buildings within the development, it is therefore necessary to both read the Sitewide chapter and the relevant Character Area chapter (or chapters). Sitewide codes apply to the whole Site and establish the general strategic principles and guidance that is relevant to all spaces, plots and buildings. These define the key principles for the development and provide guidance for both Landscape and Built form topics. These codes should be read first to understand the key principles for the development.

Character Area codes then provide further specific guidance for particular spaces or plots in response to the particular character of an area of the Site. This guidance again develops with Landscape and Built form topics and enables more specific and distinctive design guidance. Codes at this level could include topics such as more specific landscape requirements, urban character properties, building typologies and material appearance or composition etc. In addition, Character Area guidance also enables the sitewide principles to be further developed in response to the immediate neighbouring context.

EC21

EC20 WK05

WK03

WK04 WK06 EC19 WK07

WK02 WK01

EC08 WK12 WK08

EC18

EC16

EC17

For an understanding of guidance for a Plot or an area of public realm, both the Sitewide and relevant Character Area chapter should be read (see diagram on opposite page for Character Area extents). For Plots and areas of public realm on the edge of a Character Area, the neighbouring Character Area should be read for context.

WK11

WK09

EC15 EC09

EC06

EC04

EC05

EC14

WK10

WK06

EC10 EC03 WB10

EC11

WB04 WB05 WB03

Character Areas Key

EC01

[TT] The Table [EP] Empress Place [WB] West Brompton [WC] Warwick Crescent [AG] Aisgill Gardens [LS] Lillie Sidings [WK] West Kensington Plot name (as defined by Parameter Plans)

EC02

WB09

EC12 EC01

WB08

EC13 EC22

WB02 WB07 WB01

Earls Court Development Character Areas

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

DRAFT

How to Use the Design Codes EP.L.4 Cycle of route Codes are formed 6 components that both articulate the The boulevardspecific must provide a central approved guidance requirements asand movement route for cyclists pedestrians. The cycle route could be well as providing additional referencing demarcated. information, rationale and illustrative material to support interpretation. To connect into the sitewide cycle

The Design Code adopts a consistent hierarchy of status throughout that is emphasised in bold letters for each code. This is a critical component of the guidance - identifying the strength of the design guidance, level of commitment and the implications for how designers respond and future RMAs are assessed.

network and promote cyclist and

These components are identified below: pedestrian safety.

► refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Access

EP.L.5

Spill-out

Terminology and Status

2and movement.

Mandatory

Designs should allow for spill-out space in front of active ground floor uses.

“must”

Principles that are approved requirements for a compliant RMA

“should”

Principles that are strongly encouraged (but also allow for alternative scenarios to be proposed within a RMA submission that meet equivalent objectives)

“could”

Principles that are suggestions or workable options (to be explored, considered and tested through the RMA submission)

To allow space for active ground floor uses to spill-out into the street.

► refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Spill-out space.

Non-Mandatory

vard

EP.L.6

3 4

Planting

Planting and trees must be located on either side of the Empress Place Boulevard. To create a two sided tree-lined street that references local street typologies and extends the character of Empress ReferencePlace.

Including Chapter [EP] - Empress Place Section [L] - Landscape Number [5]

2 Title Summarising the key aspect of the code 3

Text with status identified in bold

The approach taken is through the use of “must”, “should” and “could” statements. The specific definition of the respective code status is described in the diagram below:

(provides a summary of the 4 Rationale purpose of the principle, identified in italic)

(cross-reference to 5 Cross-reference other sections of the Design Code and Earls Court Development I Design Code I June 2024

301

other documents in the submission)

graphics (a range of forms 6 Supporting of illustrative material and corresponding caption that help interpret the code)

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

Approach to Design Code The codes have been developed through close engagement with the relevant statutory bodies and technical consultant input to provide an effective basis for future design development. This process has ensured that they most accurately reflect the vision and ambition for the Earls Court Development. The Design Code has considered four key strategic themes. These themes are set out below:

Public Realm Inclusivity Panel (PRIP) workshop

Access and inclusion

Sustainability

Engagement

Stewardship

The ambition is for exemplary accessibility combined with social and economic inclusion to create a place that everyone, regardless of their age or disability, can enjoy and participate comfortably and independently.

Sustainability is central to the Earls Court Development, with an ambition to create a better piece of city for existing and future communities that are socially, economically and environmentally sustainable.

Extensive consultation has formed part of the design process. This has included a wide range of engagement with the public, Local Planning Authorities and other statutory bodies.

Long term stewardship will be critical for the delivery and maintenance of Earls Court Development.

The Design Code’s approach to sustainability establishes guidance and objectives emerging from the Sustainability Strategy to ensure that the documents remain relevant with changing policy and technology. Striking the balance between flexibility and commitment will foster creativity and innovation to allow the Earls Court Development to meet its ambition.

The Public Realm Inclusivity Panel (PRIP) have reviewed sections of the Design Code, providing detailed feedback to help ensure designs are ‘people-first’. The PRIP focused on the public realm sections of the Sitewide, West Brompton and Aisgill Gardens chapters.

Specialist access consultants David Bonnet Associates (DBA), have contributed to the Design Code to ensure that the Proposal’s ambitions are captured in the Control Documents. In addition, the Public Realm Inclusivity Panel (PRIP) have contributed to the Design Code, ensuring a variety of perspectives are captured.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and Movement. Specific codes can also be found through relevant sections and spaces.

► Refer to Design and Access Statement:

Masterplan (EC.PA.08) and other relevant documents.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape /

Sustainability. Specific codes can also be found through relevant sections and spaces.

► Refer to Sustainability Strategy (EC.PA.21), Environmental Statement (EC.PA.12) and other relevant documents.

In addition to the PRIP, feedback from public consultation events has also been incorporated into the Design Code and Illustrative Masterplan.

► Refer to Statement of Community

Involvement (EC.PA.43) and other relevant documents.

Maintenance of landscape and the public realm will ensure that plants, trees and green spaces thrive and continue to contribute to local biodiversity. The Estate Management Strategy outlines how Earls Court will be a clean, safe and secure environment for all users into the future. In addition to stewardship of the Site, the Control Documents, including the Design Code, establishes objectives and in some cases, processes to ensure that guidance remains relevant in the future.

► Refer to Estate Management Framework (EC.PA.35), Indicative Phasing Strategy (EC.PA.48), Temporary Uses Strategy (EC.PA.49) and other relevant documents.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

User Guidance The Control Documents guide different parts of the design, as outlined below. The user guidance diagrams below represent a reference for clarity and are not for approval. This is supported by the Illustrative Masterplan, which is used throughout the Design Code to assist with interpretation of the Design Code. Parameter Plans

Development Specification

Design Code

Design and Access Statement

WK12

WK11 WK10

Public Realm, Development Zones and Maximum Building Lines

Plot Plan

Maximum heights

Quantum of Development

Character, landscape and architectural expression and quality

Illustrative Masterplan

•

Definition of the public realm and Development Zone boundaries and Limits of Deviation.

•

Break down of the Development Zones into smaller units of development (Plots).

•

Definition of Maximum Building Lines (Maximum building footprint).

Introduction of public routes through Development Zones and Limits of Deviation for these routes.

•

Definition of areas where balconies can project beyond the Maximum Envelope.

•

The Quantum of Development has been informed by an Illustrative Masterplan and for specific areas, it includes the ability to combine uses in more than one way.

Consideration of a number of topics providing further definition and guidance to the detailed design and implementation of landscape and built form.

•

Definition of the Maximum Quantum of Development per Development Zone and per Land use.

•

Definition of the Maximum Heights for Development - with distinction between horizontal sloped planes - and resulting Maximum Envelope.

•

Qualitative controls operate at both a Sitewide and Character Area scale - and range from mandatory requirements to design guidance.

An illustration of one way in which the development could come forward following the Control Documents.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

2. Vision [VI]

Earls Court Development I Design Code I September 2026

2.1 A Global Legacy For 150 years Earls Court has been known as a global showcase for innovation, entertainment and excitement. A place known for wonder. A source of entertainment, employment and excitement, the Earls Court Exhibition Centres were alive with activity. It started when a cabbage patch was transformed into the America Fair, a grand exhibition that brought the Wild West to West London. In the following decades the Exhibition Centres welcomed thousands to global exhibitions and fairs, held seminal rock concerts and global events, and twice played host to events for the Olympic Games.

Historical events and activities that were held at the Exhibition Centres

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

2.2 How the Vision Has Developed The vision has been informed by the requirements of the Planning Policy Framework, alongside a detailed character assessment and growth strategy for the Site, following the approach set out by the Characterisation and Growth LPG (2023) and as demonstrated in Chapter 3 of theDAS.

Masterplanning Workshops – developing a framework Masterplanning Masterplanning Workshops Workshops developing developing framework framework Masterplanning MasterplanningWorkshops Workshops––– –developing developingaaa aframework framework

Through early engagement, an understanding of what the Earls Court Site and its history meant to people was established. The days of Buffalo Bill and the Great Wheel at the World Fair Exhibitions, and Pink Floyd at the Exhibition Centres have passed but the legacy and memories of those times live on. Through a series of collaborative workshops with local residents, community organisations and amenity groups, alongside round-tables with arts, cultural and stakeholder groups—hundreds of people have shared their stories, recollections of the past, thoughts of the present and hopes for the future.

Photographs from masterplan workshops 30

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

2.2 How the Vision Has Developed The overwhelming feedback was clear — that Earls Court had been a place of excitement, spontaneity and diversity. The myriad of shows and concerts at the Exhibition Centres brought a buzz to the area that is greatly missed. As important were the skills and training opportunities and the economic impact which the Exhibition Centres had on the local area. For younger people, for whom the Exhibition Centres had not been part of their past, the conversations focused on what the Site could become in future. One word came up again and again – wonder.

Community listening: Wonder emerges Responses gathered during the February and March 2022 masterplan workshops. Words have been scaled to be indicative of the level of importance given at the events.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

2.3 The Vision: To Bring the Wonder Back Reinstating the wonder Earls Court was known for will reflect its rich cultural heritage and the sense of excitement which so many experienced. The vision to bring the wonder back is based on four priorities which emerged through early public consultation during 2021. These set out the ambition and helped shape the emerging masterplan approach.

To bring the wonder back to Earls Court

Priority 1

Priority 2

Open up the former Exhibition Centres Site for the first time in 150 years — giving back to local communities.

A showground of world-class ingenuity — celebrating its legacy and history.

Priority 3

Priority 4

Create a better piece of city — a blueprint for future generations.

Addressing the climate emergency — an ambition to go beyond net zero.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

2.4 The Four Place Pillars of Earls Court Setting the standard for future urban development, Earls Court will re-emerge as London’s place to discover wonder. During consultation, the question ‘why would you come here’ was repeatedly asked. This led to the evolution of four place pillars which will create the identity for Earls Court. These formed a core part of the consultation material since early 2023 and underpin a unique proposition for the future development.

The vision evolved into a masterplan based around four place pillars:

Nature

Innovation

A celebration of nature and its ability to connect and revive

A showcase for climate and clean innovation and skills

Culture

Neighbourhood

A cultural ecosystem for the future of talent

An inspiring neighbourhood designed for all stages of life

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

2.4 The Four Place Pillars of Earls Court

West C

romw ell R

Bea

oad

End Roa d

umo

nt A ven u

rth

West Cromwell Road

A celebration of nature’s ability to connect and revive

Mund Stre

W ar w

ick C

en Av ill

Connecting biodiversity east-west and north-south for planting and wildlife

c. 2.75 acres of new play space for all ages

Climate resilient planting for all seasons in landscapes and buildings

Reusing water to irrigate, interact and cool

Accessible landscapes to navigate the 8 metre level change

Includes a c. 4.5 acre urban park at the centre

Improved air quality within and around the Site

ard ens

a ne

res cen t

on pt om r B

nt ce es Cr

m ro

L on pt

W es

W es t

ss Plac Empre

Over 1,000 new trees will be planted throughout the Site

ick L

e an

ey dl ar

es Cr

nt ce

Road

c. 20 acres of public realm and green space for all to enjoy

k Warwic

Lillie

ilb e

Table Park

Road

Nature presents untold benefits to the health and wellbeing of ourselves and our planet. Amplifying its presence and fostering better connections with nature is our golden thread - creating diverse and generous spaces to play, meet, relax and for sanctuary, whatever the season.

k Warwic

Road

Old Brompto

n Road

Place Pillar axonometric: A network of Exhibition Gardens

View of the Cascades linking the Table Park, Empress Place, Aisgill Gardens and Lillie Sidings 38

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

2.4 The Four Place Pillars of Earls Court End Roa d

Bea

umo

nt A ven u

rth

West Cromwell Road

A showcase for climate and clean innovation and skills

Mund Stre

k Warwic

W ar wi ck

an e

nt ce es Cr

m ro

L on pt

W es

ss Plac

ard ens

e an

ey dl ar

nt ce es Cr

Road

Empre

on pt om r B

k Warwic

Lillie

ick L

Table Park

en Av

ilb e

Cr esc ent

W es t

l gil

W ar w

Road

A new destination offering the scale, location and connectivity to create a home for a green economy, accelerating opportunities in a smart campus environment that supports start ups, scale ups and multi nationals to collaborate and tackle humanity’s challenges.

Road

Old Brompto

n Road

Place Pillar axonometric: A network of innovation clusters

Co-working space enabling start up and scale up businesses

Up to 2.5 million sq ft of workspace across three locations

Working with partners to equip the next generation with vital skills bringing c. 12,000 jobs

A sustainable development improving air quality and water management on the site

Bespoke lab / office / research and development space, to meet high demand

Zero carbon low cost energy provided by the 5th generation energy sharing network Section through Empress Place workspace buildings

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

2.4 The Four Place Pillars of Earls Court

West C

romw ell R

End Roa d

Bea

oad

umo

nt A ven u

rth

West Cromwell Road

A cultural ecosystem for the future of talent Mund Stre

W ar wi ck C

ilb e

a ne

res cen t

on pt om r B

nt ce es Cr

m ro

L on pt

W es

ss Plac

ard ens

e an

ey dl ar

es Cr

nt ce

Road

Empre

k Warwic

Lillie

ick L

Table Park

en Av

W es t

l gil

W ar w

Road

Earls Court is synonymous with the power of culture, creativity and performance with a magnificent heritage of spectacle dating back to the 19th Century. The spirit of delight and discovery is re-emerging as the site once again is proudly stitched back into London’s cultural map.

k Warwic

Road

Old Brompto

n Road

Place Pillar axonometric: A cultural ecosystem

10 acres of outdoor space which can be transformed and used for seasonal events

A carefully curated mix of c. 100 places to eat, drink or shop

A variety of flexible spaces of all sizes to produce, rehearse and create

3 main cultural venues, around which culture and creatives can cluster

Repurposing the existing Train Shed into an immersive food and cultural destination

A new flower amphitheatre at Warwick Square to celebrate the historic entrance from the east View of a flexible music venue within Phase 1

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

2.4 The Four Place Pillars of Earls Court

West C

romw ell R

End Roa d

oad

rth

West Cromwell Road

An inspiring neighbourhood designed for all stages of life.

Mund Stre

Ph W ar w

Road

The future of city living, creating a new urban fabric, a place where people want to visit but also stay and grow, whether to live or work. Reflecting the brilliance of London, Earls Court will be inclusive and accessible, allowing families, communities, businesses and social connections to take root and thrive.

k Warwic

ilb e

ick L

ard ens

a ne

l gil

Table Park

Up to 2 childcare facilities

A new Community Hub and 8,000 sq ft of additional community and healthcare facilities

c. 100 retail, dining and leisure spaces

Lively streets with local amenities for residents

An 850m long active boulevard (the length of Regent Street, from Piccadilly Circus to Oxford Circus)

Zero carbon, low cost energy for all homes

W es

Empre

Homes for sale, for rent, for older people, for students and for post-graduates

m ro

e an

ey dl ar

es Cr

nt ce

Road

Targeting 35% affordable homes across all tenures

L on pt

k Warwic

ss Plac

en Av

Lillie

c. 4,000 new homes

Road

Old Brompto

n Road

Place Pillar axonometric: An inspiring neighbourhood with a wide variety of housing types and tenures

Lillie Sidings Square will form the heart of the neighbourhood to the north of the development 44

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

2.5 A Commitment to Design Excellence Building on the place pillars, ECDC has set out design principles to guide the development of the first buildings and deliver on a commitment to design excellence.

A New West Side Story

To celebrate the heritage of a place that has always embraced the opportunity to be different and made a strategic contribution to the future of this great city through innovation and entertainment; creating a new destination which puts Earls Court confidently back on the map and changes perceptions of West London.

Be Good Ancestors

Constantly thinking beyond today, working collaboratively to leave a better piece of city for existing and future communities, delivering the ambition to create the heritage of the future through exemplary design and sustainability.

An Earls Court for Everyone

The opportunity, privilege and responsibility of designing this new neighbourhood, one with people at its heart. A neighbourhood that brings people together, where they feel welcome, safe and included, a sense that this is truly for everyone.

ECDC is focussed on enabling future trends and delivering a positive legacy. The Design Team’s role is to design a solution for the Site which delivers a global exemplar of sustainable development. The ambition is to create a place with personality which is accessible and welcome to all, a blueprint for future generations. This will be ensured by applying these design principles throughout the evolution of the development.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

2.6 The Sustainable Development Charter ECDC is committed to delivering an exemplar development at Earls Court, a blueprint for future living, creating a resilient masterplan, considering the future, through sustainability and exceptional design. This means delivering innovative buildings and spaces, enhancing the environment, producing economic benefits for the widest number of people, and creating significant social and economic value for the local area. The development aspires to have a positive sustainable impact not just within the Proposed Development but beyond the boundaries of the Site. The focus on sustainability has run through and informed all aspects of the development proposals and processes. From day-one to in use, across ECDC’s own internal operations to meanwhile uses, and the way in which the team works with all stakeholders – from suppliers and contractors, to tenants, occupiers, partners and neighbours. These are ECDC’s principles for future living: to be people-centric and planet-conscious.

The Sustainable Development Charter (SDC), ‘Principles for Future Living’ sets out goals and objectives for three focus areas: social value, economic inclusion and environmental wellbeing. The goals underpin the vision and key priorities. Each goal has a clear set of metrics and targets that will allow measurement of performance and support continuous improvement, all with the aim of driving the best sustainable outcomes for all.

PRINCIPLES FOR

The purpose of the Charter is to: • Show how ECDC intends to build a sustainable Earls Court from meanwhile activities through development and during occupancy. • Provide the basis for the way ECDC will measure and report on progress. • As a result, establish the means to improve performance year-on-year for the good of the Earls Court community. • Provide a mechanism by which those who live, work, and visit Earls Court can assess the extent to which ECDC has delivered.

A Sustainability Charter for Earls Court

FUTURE LIVING 1

The Sustainable Development Charter, ‘Principles for Future Living’

It is not intended to be a ‘fixed‘ statement, but a Charter that will adapt and develop over time to suit the shifting programme of the development, and to better suit the changing needs of the communities and stakeholders.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

2.6 The Sustainable Development Charter

The goals are as follows:

Social Value The generation of social value is, and will continue to be, a core driver in everything ECDC does. In the context of Earls Court, social value is defined as ‘the importance that people (and society) place on changes to their lives caused by the actions and activities of ECDC.’ The social value created will be measured and reported on a regular basis. This measurement will be governed by the 11 OECD Dimensions of Wellbeing, and the guidelines set out for Social Return on Investment.

A safe, inclusive and supportive place for everyone

Involving local people

A wonderful place to live, work and visit

Maximise appropriate economic growth in the local area

Provide access to economic opportunities for all

Create an affordable community

Beyond net zero carbon

Water neutral

Celebrating and enhancing our natural environment

Delivering cleaner air

Circular resource use

Healthy living

Economic Inclusion ECDC’s mission is to deliver the very highest standards of economic inclusivity, to involve and benefit the widest number of people and local communities in and around Earls Court who are directly and indirectly affected by the project throughout its lifetime. Economic inclusion will be achieved when the widest range of people benefit from the advantages created by the development. This commitment will apply during design and construction as well as in the longer-term; through postoccupation and operation. Environmental Wellbeing ECDC’s aim is clear – to ensure impacts are climate positive, to respect and live within collective environmental limits, now and for tomorrow. One of the goals is to go beyond net zero carbon: simply put, to remove more carbon emissions from the atmosphere over the lifetime of the development than are emitted during the design, construction and operation of the scheme. To ensure this is verifiable, ECDC will measure progress against independent and internationally recognised environmental assessment methodologies to evidence and validate the outcome. For a first step ECDC has signed up to the UN Race to Zero campaign, aligned with Science Based Targets to guide and validate this ambition. ► For more information on the sustainability strategy refer to Sustainability Strategy (EC.PA.21). ► For more information on sustainability within the Illustrative Masterplan refer to Design and Access Statement Volume 1: Outline Component / Spatial Strategies / Sustainability (EC.PA.08). ► For more information on the socials values of the project refer to Social Value Statement (EC.PA.45). 50

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

3. Sitewide [SW]

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS Sitewide \ Landscape

Parameter Plans

Wa rw

Passage (Street type 3)

Community Green

Walk

MUGA

Place

Rev. P01 P02 P03

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Description

Me ws

PCV

Nevern Square

Rev. P01 P02 P03

PCV

Wa rw

A4 / West

Cromw

Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

Detailed Component (above Ground Level) Indicative Locations of Access to Site

Ro ad

Crescent

Ro ad we rn ny Pe

ill en Av ue

Project

Earls Court Development

ad Ro

n pto

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK Drawing

WEST BROMPTON STATION

Star Road

WEST BROMPTON STATION

Scale @ A1

on nd

l Bo

ro of

Ch am

d Fu lh

For Planning

a se el

ith

Purpose of Issue

Rev

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-007

P03

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-008

P03

Description

Me ws y

Nevern Square

No implied licence exists. This drawing should not be used to calculate areas for the purposes of valuation. Do not scale this drawing. All dimensions to be checked on the site by the contractor and such dimensions to be their responsibility. All work must comply with relevant British Standards and Building Regulations requirements. Drawing errors and omissions to be reported to the architect. To be read in conjunction with Architect's specification and other consultant information.

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Rev. P01 P02 P03

Wa rw

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

ell Road

Cromw

Cl un

ws Me y un Cl

Rev. P01 P02 P03

A4 / West

DG Status

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

Drawing No.

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25

Ro ad

Checked By

Job Number

Nevern Square

ell Road

27/06/24

008 - Proposed Access & Movement

Date

Drawn By

lie

m Ha

a se el

Lil

in ns Ke

h ug

ad Ro

ith

PC BV

ad e Ro rav ag Se

m Ha

For Information

in ns Ke

h ug

Purpose of Issue

1 : 1250

h ug

Status

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

008 - Proposed Access & Movement

Job Number

007 - Proposed Public Realm Typologies

Description

Drawing EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

ya Ro

Checked By

27/06/24

h ug

ad Ro

lie

Date

Drawn By

Roa

Lil

Scale @ A1

1 : 1250

h End

Earls Court Development

ad Ro

n pto

Old

PCV

007 - Proposed Public Realm Typologies

Nort

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

om Br

Aisgill Avenue

om Br Old

on nd

Me ws

D E

Star Road

50m

G1 H[D]

H[O]

l Bo

un y

eet

Str

sg Ai

H[D]

H[O]

+2.5 ick

Eardley

ya Ro

Cromw

0 @ 1:1250

ad e Ro rav ag Se

A4 / West

Bus Route

Wa rw Ro ad

ell Road

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

en Av

Rev. P01 P02

Vehicular Access to Detailed Components

eet

Vehicular Route undercroft or below Ground Floor (includes service access)

M PC

ill

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25

50m

Cycle Route undercroft or below Ground Floor

Service Route undercroft or below Ground Floor

Eardley

Str

sg Ai

Me ws

N Mu

Nevern Square

Gibb

Roa

un y

h End

Nort

Description

0 @ 1:1250

n Clos s Gree

Bus & Vehicle Access

Indicative Movement Routes

P PCV

d Roa

In order to guide the interpretation of the Parameter Plans, this chapter sets out a number of detail codes devised to clarify the rationale behind key parameters and principles.

Potential Pedestrian Access - location to be determined through detail design

Crescent

Potential Pedestrian and Cycle Access - location and type to be determined through detail design

PCV nue PCV nt Ave umo Bea

Pedestrian, Cycle & Vehicle Access

PC BV

EARL'S COURT STATION

Pedestrian and Cycle Access

PCV

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

th End Nor

Gibb

n Clos s Gree

we rn

Ro ad

Pedestrian Access

eb ov ir

Ph ilb ea ch

Ro ad eb ov ir Tr

Emergency Vehicular Access

* X

Ga rd en s

nue nt Ave umo Bea

Development Zone name

PC Area where pavilions of corresponding Development Zones (G1/G2 or P) are permitted. Pavillions must be sited within adjacent dashdotted line.

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Development Zone (above Ground Level) (limits of deviation apply, refer to Parameter Plan 004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm)

Ga rd en s

EARL'S COURT STATION

Description

Planning Application Boundary Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

Ro ad

ell Road

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name

Existing condition at the edge of the site or on railway land. May be subject to works to integrate existing and newly proposed Public Realm.

Ph ilb ea ch

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

ick

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Additional specific guidance on movement strategies can be found in Design Codes (EC.PA.C) and should be read in parallel with this Parameter Plan 4. Routes includes those on public realm, and within Development Zone Boundaries. 5. Development Zone flexibility and limits of deviation are described in the Parameter Plan 004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm, and apply to this plan.

PCV

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Planning Application Boundary Square & Bioline Square & Lane

Rev. P01 P02

ick

Square

Development Zone (above Ground Floor)

Wa rw

Crescent (Street type 1) Lane (Street type 2)

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Nevern Square

Cromw

Ro ad

ell Road

Boulevard

Table Park Destination Square

The Design Code should be read in conjunction with the Parameter Plans and the Development Specification as the full suite of Control Documents.

A4 / West

Cromw

Routes

The Table

The Bioline

ick

S A4 / West

Spaces

Cl un

Me ws

Nevern Square

y Cl un

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Description

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Planning Application Boundary ick Ro ad

Cromw

A4 / West

+2.7

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries) Development Zone (below Ground Floor, any permitted use as defined in the Development Specification)

ell Road

Development Zone (below Ground Floor) name

Detailed Component (below Ground Floor)

+6.5

+10

n Clos

+8.5

+10.5

+8.5

Str

ny Pe

ws Me y un Cl

ad Ro

Student housing use

ad Ro rn we ny

EC16

M U

Frontage combining active ground floor uses - combining 'Predominant' and 'Other' uses as defined by the Development Specification

EC15

EC17

Star Road

Aisgill Avenue

Crescent

Ro h

ro l Bo

Scale @ A1

ith

el Ch

an Fu lh

Drawing No.

Rev

P03

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-012

P03

+49.8 +36.5

+28.3

+54.2

+20.6

EC04

Aisgill Avenue

ws Me un y Cl

ad Ro ir ov

ad Ro rn we ny Pe

ad Ro ir ov eb Tr

Star Road

Scale @ A1

Checked By

ith

Drawn By

lie

Lil

27/06/24

h ug

Fu am

013 - Proposed Land Use Below Ground Floor

For Planning

Date

1 : 1250

l Bo

P03

Purpose of Issue

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-006

Status

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

e Ro

ith

Rev

Job Number

rav

For Planning

Checked By

Purpose of Issue

ith

Status

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

ag Se

Drawn By

Job Number

Drawing No.

Date

27/06/24

Drawing

014 - Urban Design Plan WEST BROMPTON STATION

l Bo

Scale @ A1

1 : 1250

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

pto

d Br

B2 EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

Roa

lie

Lil

e Ro

27/06/24

rav

Checked By

ag Se

Date

Project

Earls Court Development

n Ro

013 - Proposed Land Use Below Ground Floor

WEST BROMPTON STATION

h End

Aisgill Avenue

Drawing

Scale @ A1

Drawn By

1 : 1250

006 - Proposed Maximum Heights

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

d Br

Roa

006 - Proposed Maximum Heights

l Bo

P03

Star Road

Drawing

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-005

H[O]

Nort

+35.8

Rev

E G2

I ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

pto

h End

+26.4

e Ro

lie

Lil

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

pto

d Br

Nort

+18.6

rav

For Planning

50m

O G1 H[D]

Project

WEST BROMPTON STATION

+44.3

Str

Earls Court Development

n Ro

+49.1

Earls Court Development

n Ro

+48.0

ag Se

ith

e Ro

Purpose of Issue

H[O]

Project

+18.7 +9.6 +26.0 +28.3 +21.3 +19.2 +7.7 +30.5 +22.3 +21.3 +38.1 +29.6 +26.0

3301

rav

Status

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

+60.0

eet

+35.6

+41.1

+66.4

+61.6

005 - Proposed Plot Plan

Job Number

B2 +69.5

+35.2

+73.6

N F

+14.5

+32.1

Drawing No.

0 @ 1:1250

+24.9

+58.3

+41.0

Checked By

H[D]

+31.7

+51.7

Roa

l Bo

Roa

lie

Lil

Date

27/06/24

Drawn By

h End

Star Road

Scale @ A1

1 : 1250

Str

D +16.2

+27.7

+37.9

+51.7

+39.9

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

Nort

h End

+31.7

+12.5

+56.0

WEST BROMPTON STATION

WB01

G2 +16.5

H[D]

+52.2 +11.3 +16.5

+47.1

005 - Proposed Plot Plan

WB07

M U

eet

ill sg Ai

d Br

50m

Indicative Public Route through Development Zone

n Clos

s Gree

Gibb

pto

EC22

nt Ave

umo

Bea

Extent of potential Public Realm pertaining to the area above existing West London Railway line, the area of land next to West Kensington Station and North End Road, and the Aisgill Avenue MUGA

EC01

0 @ 1:1250

+43.0

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

n Ro

Drawing WB02

+62.4

+12.5

Project

Earls Court Development

B2 EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

Nort

Star Road

EC13

WB08

+52.2

H[O]

EC12 EC02

+35.0

+67.8

P+11.7

WB09 WB03

+64.5

EC11

+48.9

+28.1

WB10

WB04

+19.3

+55.0

+58.1

WB05-T1

+49.7

K +81.4

G1 H[D]

H[O] WB05-T2

L +98.3

+106.4

ill sg

+87.2

+51.1

+35.1

Str

ill

WB13

WB12

+90.7

+28.8

+44.5

+72.3

+35.1

eet

EC14

EC03

nue

50m

+16.3

ill sg Ai

0 @ 1:1250

+19.3

+61.1

+37.2

E EC07 WB11

Community Green Key Route

EARL'S COURT STATION

+13.0 +41.1 +59.0

+67.6

+15.5

EC10

WB06

Str

n Clos

s Gree

Gibb

Destination Public Realm Square

+41.7

+37.9 +58.3

+82.1

Eardley

L N

WK10 eet

+61.5

+34.6

+26.8

Crescent

EC05

+16.3

+21.5

T +40.7

EC06

+39.2

+19.5

+33.8

+26.1 +21.5

+28.8 +46.0 +26.8

+20.7

+24.0 +17.0

+17.1

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

n Clos

s Gree

Gibb

Crescent

+39.0 +39.0

+17.9 +12.9

EC09

Eardley

+17.4

+13.6

+44.2

+21.6

WK11

WK09

+21.6 +17.0

+52.3

50m

+42.6 +38.1

ilb

Crescent

we ny

+26.9

+16.6

nt Ave

Facade addressing key destination Public Realm

Area of deviation within which break in basement extent should be located

umo

Bea

Development Zone name

Facade addressing key routes and spaces

Roa

Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

th End

umo

Bea

+24.4

Roa

0 @ 1:1250

th End

Roa

EC15

EC17

nue

nt Ave

All heights shown are >0, AOD and in metres Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Maximum AODs expressed by a horizontal plane are noted with with blue text on the drawing. Where slopes exist red text descibes the lower edge of the plane. 4. Blue tones are for visual reference only. Heights are defined by annotations. 5. Structures associated with stairs, lifts and ventilation located within the public realm are not specified within the Development Specification area and are not specified within the Parameter Plans. Any structures within the public realm should be in line with the principles as set out in the Design Codes.

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) Minimum Landscape Extent

Indicative location of break in basement extents. Minimum width = 15m.

Roa

EC16

M T

EARL'S COURT STATION

nue

Description

Planning Application Boundary

Prominent Corner

Level change within Development Zone (below Ground Floor)

EARL'S COURT STATION

+24.90 Maximum AOD on lower edge of plane in metres

+56.6

+28.3

+18.5

Nor

th End Nor

EC18

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

Area below ground pertaining to the former Earls Court Station ticket hall and escalator barrel excluded from Planning Applications

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

th End

WK08

n Clos

s Gree

Gibb

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) boundary

+24.90 Maximum AOD on horizontal plane in metres

+55.1

+24.4

+23.2 Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Development Zone flexibility and limits of deviation are described in the Parameter Plan 004, and apply to this plan. 4. Structures associated with stairs, lifts and ventilation located within the public realm are not specified within the Development Specification area and are not specified within the Parameter Plans. Any structures within the public realm should be in line with the principles as set out in the Design Codes.

+54.7

+29.2

Development Zone (below Ground Floor) name

ell Road

Cromw

Detailed Component (below Ground Floor)

Sloped Plane 2 (towards Eardley Crescent)

+61.6 +28.1

ilb

Maximum Balcony Envelope

EC08

WK12

A4 / West

Nor

+31.4

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

A[O] The Outline Component of a hybrid plot

Z WK01

A[D] The Detailed Component of a hybrid plot

EARL'S COURT STATION

ilb

Development Zone (below Ground Floor, any permitted use as defined in the Development Specification)

Nor

nt Ave

+47.6 +40.0 +33.9

Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

+26.6

+50.6 +48.3

EC19

+85.5

+53.6

WK05

Y +12.5

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name

Horizontal Plane

+74.5

+55.9

Area of deviation for Public Route through Development Zone

ell Road

Cromw

Sloped Plane 1

+23.0

Description

Nevern Square

Planning Application Boundary

Area where pavilions of corresponding Development Zones (G1/G2 or P) are permitted. Pavillions must be sited within adjacent dashdotted line.

+50.1

ilb

A4 / West

Detailed Component A

V1 +57.3 +82.2 Ro

Ro ov

nue

Bea

WK07

WK02

umo

WK04

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

+60.9

+11.7 +38.5 +66.0 +71.2

Description

Planning Application Boundary

ell Road

Cromw

Indicative plot boundary Public route through Development Zone (location is indicative)

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Development Zone 'O' is underground. See PL10 4. Development Zone's with the suffix '1' lie within LBHF, those with suffix '2' lie within RBKC 5. This plan summarises information captured in the other Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) and Design Codes (EC.PA.C). The information on this plan does not take precedence over that shown on any of the other Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) or within the Design Codes (EC.PA.C) but combines the key indicative proposals of the development constraints, routes, land use frontages and public realm typologies as an Urban Design summary for clarity. 6. Development Zone flexibility and limits of deviation are described in the Parameter Plan 004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm, and apply to this plan. 7. Structures associated with stairs, lifts and ventilation located within the public realm are not captured within the Development Specification area and are not specified within the Parameter Plans. Any structures within the public realm should be in line with the principles as set out in the Design Codes.

Eardley

A4 / West

Plot beneath Public Realm

Aisgill Avenue

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name

EC01 Plot name EC07 Plot name (below Ground Floor only)

WK03

Rev. P01 P02 P03

+28

For Planning

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-011

Aisgill Avenue

+40.4

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) A

+68

+48

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

WK06

Nevern Square

Purpose of Issue

ws Me y un

R +21.9

+25.0

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Description

ell Road

Cromw

A4 / West

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Planning Application Boundary

+88

Status

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

012 - Proposed Land Use Upper Levels

Nevern Square

Crescent

Rev. P01 P02 P03

+28.0

Eardley

Nevern Square

EC21

EC20

+108

ws Me un y Cl

See note 4

Job Number

Drawing No.

Checked By

lie

Lil

For Planning

Drawn By

Purpose of Issue

27/06/24

am lh Fu

Status

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

Date

1 : 1250

d an

se el

ith

Job Number

011 - Proposed Land Use Ground Level

004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm

012 - Proposed Land Use Upper Levels

e Ro rav

P03

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-004

Checked By

gt in

Drawing No.

P02

WB01

ag Se

Drawn By

ea els

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-003

Drawing

27/06/24

ith sm

e Ro rav

d Br

WEST BROMPTON STATION

h ug ro

l Bo

ag Se

Lil

Date

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

pto

EC22

WB07

Roa

Scale @ A1

Project

n Ro

EC01

B2 WB02

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

Earls Court Development

WB08

Aisgill Avenue

011 - Proposed Land Use Ground Level

1 : 1250

EC13

EC02

WB03

Drawing

er m m Ha

lie

Purpose of Issue

For Planning

Eardley

d Br

WEST BROMPTON STATION

Roa

in ns Ke

h ug

WB09

Project

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

pto

EC22

Checked By

Status

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

EC12

h End

WB05-T2

F WB10

WB04

Earls Court Development

n Ro

EC01

WB07

WB01

Job Number

EC14

H[O] WB05-T1

EC11

EC03

G1 H[D]

EC13

EC02

E WB11

WB13

WB12

Nort

Star Road

Str

B2 WB02

27/06/24

Drawn By

50m

0 @ 1:1250

EC10

eet

EC12

WB08

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

EC04

WK10

EC11

EC03

WB04

EC05

L WB06

WB05-T1

WB05-T2

EC06

WK09

Retail / F&B / Flexible Commercial Station interface / Plant (N.B.: All Development Zones also have an allowance for ancillary use as Other Uses) Alternative residential use (Co-living and/or Older Persons Housing)

EC18

+/-

Educational use Hotel use

WK08

n Clos

Gibb

Eardley

Crescent Eardley

+/-

Health use

EC08

WK12

WK01

Leisure use

EARL'S COURT STATION

Crescent

+/- 2m

12 m

- 2m

+/-

Storage and Distribution use Community use

ill

Commercial use Cultural use

Aisgill Avenue

Indicative Plot boundary within Development Zone Residential use

s Gree

50m

0 @ 1:1250

ad Ro rn we

Frontage combining active ground floor uses - combining 'Predominant' and 'Other' uses as defined by the Development Specification

Public route through Development Zone (location is indicative)

ad Ro ir ov eb

we rn

Ro ad

Ro ad eb ov ir Tr

Aisgill Avenue

ws Me y un Cl

Me ws y Cl un + 2m

11 m

Bea

Station interface / Plant (N.B.: All Development Zones also have an allowance for ancillary use as Other Uses)

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

Tr eb

Crescent Eardley

Aisgill Avenue

Ro ad

Pe ny we rn

Ro ad

eb ov ir

ea els

Crescent

d an

Eardley

ith sm

Me ws

un y

nt Ave

umo

Retail / F&B / Flexible Commercial

ilb

WK07

WK02 nue

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Development Zone (above Ground Floor)

EC01 Plot Name

EC19

WK05 WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Description

Borough Boundary (outside site Planning Application Boundaries)

Other uses (in addition to predominant uses) within Development Zone (see Development Specification for other use(s)) Development Zone

6. Where multiple uses are permitted by the Development Specification, this flexibility applies to all plots contained within the Development Zone. 7. Structures associated with stairs, lifts and ventilation located within the public realm are not specified within the Development Specification area and are not specified within the Parameter Plans. Any structures within the public realm should be in line with the principles as set out in the Design Codes.

WK04

H[O]

h End

ad Ro

er m m Ha

WK03

Community use Student housing use

lie

in ns Ke

h ug

Storage and Distribution use

Plot Predominant Use of Development Zone

Residential use Commercial use

EC14

Aisgill Avenue

WB10

Date

1 : 1250

h ug

Lil

XXXX

Indicative Plot boundary within Development Zone

WB11

Nort

on nd

l Bo

Scale @ A1

Drawing No.

003 - Existing Site Levels

Public route through Development Zone (location is indicative)

Cultural use

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Planning Application Boundary

V2 WK06

EC01 Plot Name

Leisure use

WB03

004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm

ya Ro

For Information

Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

ell Road

Cromw

EC10

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

ad e Ro rav ag Se

Purpose of Issue

A4 / West

EC09

EC04

WB09

DG Status

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

EC20

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name

Educational use

H[D]

Earls Court Development

ad Ro

n pto

Old

Checked By

Job Number

EC05

Project

om Br - 2m

27/06/24

Drawn By

W Planning Application Boundary

EC15

WB13

WEST BROMPTON STATION

C 2m

1 : 1250

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

EC21

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Borough Boundary (outside site Planning Application Boundaries)

Drawing

+/-

ad Ro

d Roa

+4.7

ad e Ro rav ag Se

lie

a se el am Ch lh d Fu an d on an gt ith in sm ns er Ke m of m h Ha ug of ro h ug l Bo ro ya Bo Ro on nd Lo

ce s Pla es pr Em

d Roa Lil

Date

EC06

WK10 Str

WB12

h End

Star Road

Scale @ A1

Description

Nevern Square

Hotel use

EC17

eet

+/-

WEST BROMPTON STATION

Copyright Hawkins\Brown - Studio Egret West Architects Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Development Zone flexibility and limits of deviation are described in the Parameter Plan 004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm, and apply to this plan. 4. Other uses as outlined in the Development Specification (EC.PA.A) per Development Zone are permitted at upper levels in place of or in addition to the predominant uses identified on this plan. 5. The diagram below identifies the proposed uses per Development Zone. The permitted uses are described as either Predominant Use(s) or Other Uses as defined by the Development Specification. The types of use annotated by the coloured squares are listed in the key. Different configurations of use are possible consistent with the range of uses and Development Zone floorspace caps as permitted by the Development Specification

WK11

+/-4 m

h End Nort

Nort

+3.7

Drawing

003 - Existing Site Levels

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Alternative residential use (Co-living and/or Older Persons Housing)

WB06

+/-4 m

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

Rev. P01 P02 P03

EC08

Earls Court Development

ad n Ro pto om

d Br

P03

WK11

B2 +/-

+7.5

For Planning

50m

- 2m

I +8.75 +8.5

Purpose of Issue

Rev

DG Status

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-010

EC16

Project

+9.5

+3.8

h ug

EC18

Checked By

Job Number

Drawing No.

Plot Predominant Use of Development Zone Other uses (in addition to predominant uses) within Development Zone (see Development Specification for other use(s)) Development Zone

WK08

n Clos

s Gree

27/06/24

Drawn By

P03

10 m

ad Ro

Rev

Health use

H[D]

H[O]

+10

+1.5

+4.1

ill

en Av

+11.9

Star Road

+10

lie

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-009

EARL'S COURT STATION

- 2m

+4.2

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

Gibb

- 2m

P +5.5

Lil

Date

1 : 1250

Drawing No.

7. Where multiple uses are permitted by the Development Specification, different configurations of the ground floor uses of the plots are possible across the Development Zone - consistent with the floorspace capacity defined by the Development Specification and the frontage priority defined by this plan (and corresponding Design Code frontage strategy). 8. Structures associated with stairs, lifts and ventilation located within the public realm are not specified within the Development Specification area and are not specified within the Parameter Plans. Any structures within the public realm should be in line with the principles as set out in the Design Codes.

WK12

WK01

eet

+4.3

For Planning

Roa

Str

+11.9 +4.1

ill

ue en Av

+7.4

sg Ai

ill sg Ai

+/- 2m

+5.5 +4

+4 +4.2

Purpose of Issue

th End

+5.5

+11.9

+2.6

eet

Str

nd Mu

L +/-

ilb

WK09

12 m

Status

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

Nor

+1.4

EC19

15 m

- 2m

Job Number

EC09 +4m

Roa

0 @ 1:1250

on nd

nt Ave

umo

Bea

th End

l Bo

WK04

WK07 nue

M U

XXXX

WK02

Nor

12 m

Area where pavilions of corresponding Development Zones (G1/G2 or P) are permitted. Pavillions must be sited within adjacent dash-dotted line.

- 4m

ya Ro

WK05 WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Extent of potential Public Realm pertaining to the area above existing West London Railway line, the area of land next to West Kensington Station and North End Road, and the Aisgill Avenue MUGA Existing condition at the edge of the site or on railway land. May be subject to works to integrate existing and newly proposed Public Realm.

Scale @ A1

ad e Ro rav ag Se

- 4m

Ro ad

Minimum dimension between Maximum Building Line

eb ov ir

en Av

Minimum distance between existing Empress Place buildings (excluding basement stairwells)

WEST BROMPTON STATION

d Roa

- 2m

+/-

50m

0 @ 1:1250

Gibb

n Clos s Gree

d Roa

+2.5

+/-Xm Maximum permitted Limit of Deviation of Development

+/-

th End

+0.8

- 2m

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. Survey is to be confirmed at detailed stages of design.

+7.2

+4.3

- 2m

Existing Level in metres Above Ordinance Datum (AOD)

+6.4

+/-

WK03

Minimum dimension of Public Realm

Zone

- 2m

+7.5

Minimum extent of Public Realm

EARL'S COURT STATION

nue nt Ave umo Bea

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

+/- 2m

Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

Ga rd en s

+/- 2m - 2m

th End Nor

Nor

e n Clos s Gree Gibb

V2 WK06

Maximum Balcony Envelope

Ph ilb ea ch

- 2m

Planning Application Boundary

+8.5

ell Road

Cromw

Maximum Building Line (except balconies where indicated)

- 2m

+10

ith

EC20

A4 / West

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name

- 2m

+4.1

nue nt Ave umo Bea

+7.5

- 2m

16 m

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

18 m

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Planning Application Boundary

(see 'Proposed Site Levels Below Ground Floor Plan' for O Below Ground Floor Development Zone extent)

+/-

Drawing

010 - Proposed Site Levels Below Ground Floor

+1.8

EC21

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

- 2m

19 m

+/- 2m

EARL'S COURT STATION

Nevern Square

Development Zone (below Ground Floor) name

27 m

h End Nort

Description

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

010 - Proposed Site Levels Below Ground Floor

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Development Zone flexibility and limits of deviation are described in the Parameter Plan 004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm, and apply to this plan. 4. Ground level uses are at the perceived ground floor. Ground floor levels vary across the site. 5. Other uses as outlined in the Development Specification (EC.PA.A) per Development Zone are permitted in place of or in addition to the predominant uses identified on this plan (including ground floor mixed-uses of Retail / F&B / Flexible Commercial / Culture / Leisure / Community / Social Infrastructure / Storage and Distribution / Ancillary and/or access and ground level floorspace associated with predominant upper level uses as identified on P12). 6. The diagram below identifies the proposed uses per Development Zone. The permitted uses are described as either Predominant Use(s) or Other Uses as defined by the Development Specification. The types of use annotated by the coloured squares are listed in the key. Different configurations of use are possible consistent with the range of uses and Development Zone floorspace caps as permitted by the Development Specification.

Development Zone (above Ground Floor)

- 2m

X Y

Ga rd en s

Cromw

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Ro ad

A4 / West

Rev. P01 P02 P03

ick

- 2m

+1.2

- 2m

ell Road

Checked By

Earls Court Development

ad Ro

n pto

Old

Maximum Building Line (Ground Floor only)

+0.4

Wa rw

- 2m

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Nevern Square

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25

Ro ad

27/06/24

Drawn By

+2.5

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Development Zone's with the suffix '1' lie within LBHF, those with suffix '2' lie within RBKC. Suffix [O] and [D] also denote where part of a DZ is in Outline and part in Detail. 4. Dimensions of the street widths and offsets from the application boundary shown on this plan are minimum dimensions. 5. Maximum Building Line (Ground Floor) are included when required by key infrastructure in Development Zones C and X in response to Ground Floor constraints. 6. Structures associated with stairs, lifts and ventilation located within the public realm are not specified within the Development Specification area and are not specified within the Parameter Plans. Any structures within the public realm should be in line with the principles as set out in the Design Codes

+3.9

Ph ilb ea ch

lie

Lil

Date

1 : 1250

009 - Proposed Site Levels Ground Floor

P02

+2.7

+3.7

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-002

ell Road

l Bo

ick

Wa rw

+2.5

Drawing No.

Description

P02

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

For Planning

Purpose of Issue

e Ro

Status

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

Rev

Rev. P01 P02

Scale @ A1

rav

Job Number

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-001

Nevern Square

Cromw

002 - Demolition Plan

A4 / West

+4.8

om Br

B1 +1.2

C Star Road

+3.7

27/06/24

Drawing No.

001 - Site Location Plan

+1.8

Drawing

009 - Proposed Site Levels Ground Floor

ad Ro

Project

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

WEST BROMPTON STATION

lie

ill

Lil

+7.5

Earls Court Development

n Ro

pto

d Br

+8.5

For Planning

Project

+9.5

Roa

Purpose of Issue

Checked By

+10.5

h End

Status

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

Date

+4.8

B2 EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

Nort

Job Number

Scale @ A1

Drawn By

1 : 1250

H[D]

H[O]

+7.8 Star Road

a se el am Ch lh d Fu an d on an gt ith in sm ns er Ke m of m h Ha ug of ro h ug l Bo ro ya Bo Ro on nd Lo

eet

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

WEST BROMPTON STATION

27/06/24 ad e Ro rav ag Se

ad Ro

lie

Checked By

d Roa

ad e Ro rav ag Se

Lil

Date

Str

-0.5

Earls Court Development

ad n Ro pto om

h End

d Roa

ce s Pla es pr Em

h End

Star Road

Scale @ A1

Drawn By

1 : 1250

d Br

Drawing

Nort

WEST BROMPTON STATION

+11.5

+12.5

002 - Demolition Plan

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

N Mu

001 - Site Location Plan

+7.5

+4.8

Project

Drawing

Nort

Star Road

+2.3

50m

+3.9

Project

Earls Court Development

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

0 @ 1:1250

+4.8

G1 H[D]

H[O]

ad n Ro pto om

sg Ai

ill

ue en Av

d Br

+5.8

+0.5

Crescent

Crescent Eardley

+12.5

N nd

London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham Hybrid Planning Application

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

+11.5

+3.5

eet

Str

ill sg Ai

nd Mu

eet

ill sg Ai

Str

nd Mu

Area within Development Zone O for additional excavation for an area 300sqm to a maximum level of +1.6m (AOD).

+0.5

+9 +12.5

+10

+3.3

50m

0 @ 1:1250

+11

Area of deviation within which break in basement extent should be located Proposed below ground finished floor level (AOD). Additional 1m allowed for excavation

Gibb

n Clos s Gree

d Roa

50m

Change of level within Development Zone Indicative location of break in basement extents. Minimum width = 15m.

Z +0.5

Eardley

th End

Gibb

nue nt Ave umo Bea

th End Nor

s Gree

+X.X Proposed site level in metres Above Ordinance Datum (AOD) Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Proposed site levels can deviate +/-1.0m. 4. Development Zone flexibility and limits of deviation are described in the Parameter Plan 004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm, and apply to this plan.

Crescent

+7.5

+8.2

EARL'S COURT STATION

+0.5

Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

Area below ground pertaining to the former Earls Court Station ticket hall and escalator barrel excluded from Planning Applications

Ga rd en s

we rn

+11

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name

Ph ilb ea ch

nt Ave

X X

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Development Zone (above Ground Floor)

umo

Bea

EARL'S COURT STATION

+7.5

+0.5

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Hybrid Planning Application

+0.5

Planning Application Boundary

Ro ad

Pe ny we rn

Ro ad

nue

Potential Demolition Of existing buildings, and/or structures

0 @ 1:1250

eb ov ir

Pe ny we rn

Ro ad Pe ny we rn

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A).

ilb

Partial Demolition Of existing buildings, and/or structures

d Roa

50m

0 @ 1:1250

th End

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A).

e n Clos s Gree Gibb

Nor

Area below ground pertaining to the former Earls Court Station ticket hall and escalator barrel excluded from Planning Applications

Nor

e n Clos s Gree Gibb

nue nt Ave umo Bea

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) boundary

+2.8

+4 WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Full or Partial Demolition Of existing buildings, and/or structures

Planning Application Boundary

nue nt Ave umo Bea

Full Demolition Of existing buildings, and/or structures

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

EARL'S COURT STATION

Ro ad

+4 Planning Application Boundary

Ga rd en s

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

EARL'S COURT STATION

Eardley

eb ov ir

Ph ilb ea ch

Ga rd en s

Ro ad

Ph ilb ea ch

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

Drawing No.

Rev

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-013

P03

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-014

P03

014 - Urban Design Plan

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm Sitewide \ Landscape

Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm The proposed Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm Parameter Plan sets out the maximum extent of development,

SW.P.1

guiding the siting and alignment of built development against a minimum extent of public realm provision.

The minimum extent of the public realm is shown on the Parameter Plan. Development must deliver at least the minimum extent of public realm. To ensure the minimum public realm quantum is delivered within the Planning Application Boundary.

Clu ny

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Development Zone's with the suffix '1' lie within LBHF, those with suffix '2' lie within RBKC. Suffix [O] and [D] also denote where part of a DZ is in Outline and part in Detail. 4. Dimensions of the street widths and offsets from the application boundary shown on this plan are minimum dimensions. 5. Maximum Building Line (Ground Floor) are included when required by key infrastructure in Development Zones C and X in response to Ground Floor constraints. 6. Structures associated with stairs, lifts and ventilation located within the public realm are not specified within the Development Specification area and are not specified within the Parameter Plans. Any structures within the public realm should be in line with the principles as set out in the Design Codes

R Nevern Square

W arw

- 2m

st Cro A4 / We

mw ell

Rev. P01 P02 P03

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Description

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Planning Application Boundary

ic k

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

Ro ad

Development Zone (above Ground Floor)

Road

+ 2m

- 2m

Minimum public realm extent

- 2m

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name Development Zone (below Ground Floor) name

(see 'Proposed Site Levels Below Ground Floor Plan' for O Below Ground Floor Development Zone extent)

Maximum Building Line (except balconies where indicated)

- 2m

Maximum Building Line (Ground Floor only) - 2m

Ro ad

27 m

19 m

- 2m

+/- 2m

Minimum extent of Public Realm

EARL'S COURT STATION

Minimum dimension of Public Realm

Minimum distance between existing Empress Place buildings (excluding basement stairwells)

Minimum dimension between Maximum Building Line

- 2m

+/-Xm Maximum permitted Limit of Deviation of Development Zone

+/- 2m

Fixed Development Zone boundary

Existing condition at the edge of the site or on railway land. May be subject to works to integrate existing and newly proposed Public Realm.

12 m

ose

+/ - 2m

Cl een s Gr

- 2m

North

Gibb

Pe ny w

11 m

- 2m

Extent of potential Public Realm pertaining to the area above existing West London Railway line, the area of land next to West Kensington Station and North End Road, and the Aisgill Avenue MUGA

Ro ad

- 2m

ern

- 2m

enue t Av

Minimum Public Realm

Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

G ard en s

+/-

18 m

16 m

- 2m

mon Beau

Ph ilb ea ch

+/- 2m

- 2m

Maximum Balcony Envelope

Tre bo vir

X Y

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

+/-

Area where pavilions of corresponding Development Zones (G1/G2 or P) are permitted. Pavillions must be sited within adjacent dash-dotted line.

- 4m

Ro End

M T

+/ - 2m

0 @ 1:1250

50m

- 4m

- 2m

m - 2m

- 2m +/

- 2m

H[O]

F 10 m

SW.P.2

H[D]

+/ - 2m

m Project

-4 m

+/ - 2m

Aisgill Avenue

Old

- 2m

n to mp Bro

ad Ro

Earls Court Development ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK Drawing

004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm

+/2m

North

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

Development Zones

- 2m

O P

WEST BROMPTON STATION

End

ad Star Ro

ee Str

e nu ve lA gil Ais

+/- 2m

N Mu

12 m

L +/-

Eardley Crescent

+/- 2m

15 m

- 2m

+4m

n do

ou or B

n Lo

al oy R

+/-

Road

Date

27/06/24

Drawn By

Checked By

ou or B

gh of

ea ls he am C lh d Fu an d n an gto ith m ers m am H

sin en K

d oa eR

ad Ro ve ra ag Se

li Lil

Scale @ A1

1 : 1250

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-004

P03

Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm Parameter Plan This image is for illustration purposes only. Please refer to updated, full scale Parameter Plan drawings.

Development Zones define the area for built development. Development must sit within Development Zones except where otherwise indicated on the Parameter Plan.

To respond to existing Site conditions, and constraints and to safeguard the minimum public realm provision across the Site.

Development Zone name Development Zone boundary

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm Sitewide \ Landscape

Fixed Development Zone boundaries

SW.P.5

Development Zone boundaries are fixed and must not deviate from their shown location, except if they are annotated with a limit of deviation.

To respond to Site conditions such as infrastructure and property boundaries, and proposed public realm.

To safeguard the movement network, ensuring sufficient space is available to accommodate the movement network.

Flexible Development Zone line Fixed Development Zone line

Flexible Development Zone boundaries

SW.P.6

Development Zone boundaries annotated with a limit of deviation (+ outward / - inward) are flexible and could shift parallel from the shown location by up to the distance indicated.

Shifted Development Zone boundaries must remain within the Planning Application boundaries.

+/- Xm

SW.P.4

+/- Xm

To adapt to potentially unforeseen site conditions. +/- Xm

Flexible Development Zone line Limit of deviation

If they are not identified on this Parameter Plan, additional information can be found in this Design Code in the section Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and Movement.

+/- Xm

Public realm minimum widths Minimum dimensions of the Public Realm must be maintained as annotated on the Parameter Plan. This is shown between two Development Zone boundaries in blue.

+/- Xm

SW.P.3

Minimum width of Public Realm Development Zone boundary

Maintaining minimum public realm widths Minimum dimensions of the Public Realm must be maintained as annotated on the Parameter Plan. Where flexible Development Zone boundaries are relocated, the boundaries of adjacent Development Zones must move in parallel to preserve this minimum.

B Xm

If they are not identified on this Parameter Plan, additional information can be found in this Design Code in the section Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and Movement. To safeguard the movement network, ensuring sufficient space is available to accommodate the movement network.

Minimum width of Public Realm Flexible Development Zone boundary Relocated Development Zone boundary

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm Sitewide \ Landscape

SW.P.7

Maximum Building Line The Maximum Building Line defines the area within which buildings must sit above ground. This is aligned with the Development Zone boundary in most, but not all, cases. When they coincide, the Maximum Building Line is shown within the Development Zone boundary. Built form can be set back from this maximum building line (provided this is consistent with other design guidance regarding building alignment and street character) and this boundary describes the maximum condition within which buildings can be located.

SW.P.9

To safeguard routes through development in relation to existing buildings.

Development Zone boundary Maximum Building Line Xm

Development Zone boundary Maximum Building Line

SW.P.10

Areas between Maximum Building Lines

Minimum width of Public Realm

Maximum Building Line (Ground Floor) The Maximum Building Line (Ground Floor) defines the area within which development must sit at Ground Floor only.

Where more than one Maximum Building Line is shown within a Development Zone, this defines the area within which development must sit, and breaks in the massing are required.

This Ground Floor condition only applies to Development Zones C and X in response to Ground Floor constraints. To address specific conditions affecting development at ground level only, such as key infrastructure.

To safeguard routes through development in relation to existing buildings.

Minimum distances between maximum building lines are shown in orange and must be maintained as annotated on the Parameter Plan.

To define the maximum extent of the built form.

SW.P.8

Minimum widths of public realm

Development Zone line/ Maximum Building Line Maximum Building Line (Ground ﬂoor) Internal face of Maximum Building Line (Ground ﬂoor)

Development Zone boundary Maximum Building Line

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

5. Maximum Building Line (Ground Floor) are included when required by key infrastructure in Development Zones C and X in response to Ground Floor constraints. 6. Structures associated with stairs, lifts and ventilation located within the public realm are not specified within the Development Specification area and are not specified within the Parameter Plans. Any structures within the public realm should be in line with the principles as set out in the Design Codes

Nevern Square

SW V1 PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm

Sitewide \ Landscape - 2m

Description

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Planning Application Boundary

ic k

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

Ro ad

Development Zone (above Ground Floor)

oa d

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name

Development Zone (below Ground Floor) name

G/P

Maximum Balcony Envelope

Areas shown with no colour (white) Detailed Componenton (above Ground Floor) extent of Public Realm the Parameter Plan consistMinimum of existing dimension of Public Realm public realm. Design mustMinimum integrate Minimum distance between existing Empress Place the existing and proposed public buildings (excluding basement stairwells) realm. Minimum dimension between Maximum Building Line

oa d m

m -2

Ph ilb Q ea ch G Development Zones G and P must be ar de ns located within the area shown on the Parameter Plan.

Ro ad

Pe ny w

12 m

+/ -2

-2

+/ m

+/ -2

B2 +/ 2m

B2 H[D]

Zone of deviation

H[O]

+/ -

d Ol

m -2

ad Ro

WEST BROMPTON STATION

Ro er n

10 m

004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm m 18 2m

Scale @ A1

n do

ou or B

n Lo

al oy R

+/ -

Date

1 : 1250

27/06/24 +/ -4 m Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

ou or B

ls he C d an n a to ng ith si sm en er K m am H

a Ro ve ra ag Se

d oa eR

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

62 venue

on pt om Br

Drawing

+/ -2

+/ -4 m

Earls Court Development

Aisgill Avenue

Public realm

scent

Project

+/ -4 m

-2

10 m

- 2m

-2 m +/

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

+/- 2m

To assist Ithe reading of the Parameter Plan.

- 2m

ue en Av ill sg Ai

-2

- 2m

-2 m

+/- 2m

The location of Development Zone G could result in it straddling P the borough boundary, or sitting entirely within the Royal Borough ofH[D] H[O] Kensington and Chelsea. -2

Eardley Crescen t

12 m

-2 m +/

12 m

- 2m

ue en Av ill sg Ai

+/ -

15 m

+4m

Eardley Cre

15 m

m -2

12 m

- 4m

+/- 2m

Development Zone G and N Borough boundary -2

50m

-2 m

-2

Development Zones and Public Realm Parameter Plan)

+/- 2m

0 @ 1:1250

- 4m

m -2

SW.P.12

development is permitted

12 m

Area where pavilions of corresponding Development Zones (G1/G2 or P) are permitted. Pavillions must be edge condition where no Existing sited within adjacent dash-dotted line.

T Development Zone G/P (Refer to +4m

+/ -

Existing condition at the edge of the site or on railway land. May be subject to works to integrate existing and newly proposed Public Realm.

- 4m

Development Zones G and P

Road, and the Aisgill Avenue MUGA

12 m

m -2

11 m

Pe ny w

Zone

- 4m

+/-Xm Maximum permitted Limit of Deviation of Development

To ensure a gentle transition between Extent of potential Public Realm pertaining to the area above existing West London Railway line, the area of existing and new public realm. land next to West Kensington Station and North End er n

m -2

G/P

Flexibility for Pavilion location on M

EARL'S COURT STATION

2 +/-

To provide flexibility for the situation of a Pavilion with the landscape design.

m 18

EARL'S COURT STATION

-2

Tr eb ov i

Maximum Building Line (Ground Floor only)

2 +/-

+/- 2 m

Maximum Building Line (except balconies where indicated)

G ar de ns

+/- 2 m

-2

4m +/-

Existing edge condition

SW.P.13

- 2m

-2

Flexibility for Pavilion location on Development Zones G and P

Tr eb ov i

V1 19 m SW.P.11

'Proposed Site Levels Below Ground Floor Plan' for O (see Below Ground Floor Development Zone extent)

Ph ilb ea ch

4 +/-

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Drawn By

Checked By +/ -4 m

-2

W ar w

Rev. P01 P02 P03

+/ -2

m -2

+2 m

m -2

omissions to be reported to the architect. To be read in conjunction with Architect's specification and other consultant information.

m -2

d Ol

n to mp o Br

SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Proposed Plot Parameter Plan Sitewide \ Landscape

Proposed Plot Parameter Plan SW.P.14 The Proposed Plot Parameter Plan identifies the Development Plots within Development Zones, and the public routes through them.

Plots Plots break down Development Zones and are defined through public routes within Development Zones or Plot boundaries. Information for the use of the Parameter Plan.

Clu ny

ew s

R Nevern Square

EC21

Rev. P01 P02 P03

arw

EC20

mwell

st Cro

A4 / We

Road

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Description

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Planning Application Boundary Ro

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

Development Zone (above Ground Floor)

WK06

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name

EC01 Plot name EC07 Plot name (below Ground Floor only) Plot beneath Public Realm Indicative plot boundary

vir

EC19

ard

Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

WK01

A[O] The Outline Component of a hybrid plot

EC08

WK12

w Pe

WK08

Clos

EC18

EC16

End

Road

EC15

EC17

Indicative location of Plot boundary

North

een

s Gr

Gibb

Indicative location of public route

A[D] The Detailed Component of a hybrid plot

EARL'S COURT STATION

Aven

Development Zone boundary

Area of deviation for Public Route through Development Zone

ont

WK05

ilb

WK07

WK02

m Beau

WK04

Tre

WK03

ern

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Public route through Development Zone (location is indicative)

0 @ 1:1250

50m

WK11 EC09 EC05

EC04

Eardley

Crescent

EC06

WK09

WB06

gil nu

EC07 WB13

G1 H[D]

H[O]

WB12

EC14

EC03

WB11

WB05-T1

Ais

Str

EC10

WK10 nd

SW.P.15

EC11

WB10

WB04

EC12

WB05-T2 WB09

EC13

EC02

Project

WB03 Aisgill Avenue

WB08

North

Old

Bro

Earls Court Development

EC22

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK Drawing

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

WB02

005 - Proposed Plot Plan

WB07

WEST BROMPTON STATION

End

Star Ro

EC01

Public routes within Development Zones

Road

Scale @ A1

ou or

al gh

en K

Drawn By

Checked By

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

ith

sm er

gto

sin

rav ag

27/06/24

or B

lie

Lil

Date

1 : 1250

WB01

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-005

P03

Proposed Plot Parameter Plan This image is for illustration purposes only. Please refer to updated, full scale Parameter Plan drawings.

Where indicated - with a dashed line within a hatched area - a public route within Development Zones must be provided. To create smaller parcels of development and a balanced movement network across the Site.

Indicative public route Zone for public route Proposed public route Indicative public route 64

Zone for publicCode routeI October 2026 Earls Court Development I Design Proposed public route

SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Proposed Plot Parameter Plan Sitewide \ Landscape

SW.P.16

Location of public routes within Development Zones

SW.P.18

Public routes must be located within the hatched zones shown on the Parameter Plan. The locations of public routes shown on the Parameter Plan are indicative.

Plot boundary within Development Zones Plot boundaries occur where indicated with a dotted line. The locations shown on the Parameter Plan are indicative. Information for the use of the Parameter Plan.

To define a balanced movement network across the Site. Indicative public route Zone for public route Indicative Indicative public route Proposed public public route route

SW.P.17

Zone for for public public route route Zone

Development Zone boundary

Proposed Proposed public public route route

Indicative location of plot boundary

Additional public routes within Development Zones

SW.P.19

Plot names are shown with a four character code comprising of two letters followed by two numbers. For example this could be EC01. These are referenced in relation to Verified Views.

Additional public routes could be located within the Development Zone, but only when a route has been provided in the indicated location. To define a balanced movement network across the Site. Indicative public route Zone for public route

A EC01

EC02

EC03

Information for the use of the Parameter Plan.

Proposed public public route route Indicative

Zone for public route

EC01

Development Zone name Plot name

Indicative Proposed public public route route

Development Zone boundary

Zone for public route

Indicative location of public route

Proposed public route

Plot name

Indicative location of Plot boundary

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Proposed Plot Parameter Plan Sitewide \ Landscape

SW.P.20

Plot alignment Plot boundaries along key areas of public realm must keep alignment (see diagram for reference). In the event of one of the Plot boundaries being adjusted following the Limits of Deviation set out by the Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm Parameter Plan, the adjacent Plot boundaries must follow this re-alignment. Where existing building retention is prioritised at Empress Place, adjacent plot alignment must be determined by the existing building frontage.

EC01

EC02

EC03

EC01

EC02

EC03

Plot boundary that must be re-aligned (see control diagram) Re-alignment

To define clear public realm edges.

SW.P.21

Hybrid Development Zones Some Development Zones contain both outline and detailed components. Where this occurs the development zone will appear as Development Zone X[D] to refer to the Detailed Componenet and Development Zone X[O] to refer to the Outline Componenet. Outline Components will need to respond to the Detailed Component within the development zone and other adjacencies. Additional guidance is provided in the character areas

Areas where Development Zones must be re-aligned if adjusted following the level of deviation set out in the Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm Parameter Plan.

Information for the use of the Parameter Plan.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Proposed Maximum Heights Sitewide \ Landscape

Proposed Maximum Heights SW.P.22 The Proposed Maximum Heights Parameter Plan defines the Maximum Envelope within which development is permitted.

Maximum heights The Maximum Building Heights are set as a vertical extrusion of the Maximum Building Line, not the Development Zone boundary. Information for the use of the Parameter Plan.

+108

+28.0

Clu ny

ew s

See note 4

+88

R +21.9

+25.0

Nevern Square

+68

+48

arw

Road

+47.6 +40.0 +33.9

Sloped Plane 1 ad

Sloped Plane 2 (towards Eardley Crescent)

ilb

vir

+54.7

Maximum Balcony Envelope

+26.6

+50.6 +48.3

+53.6

+31.4

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

ard

+29.2

+24.90 Maximum AOD on lower edge of plane in metres

+56.6

EARL'S COURT STATION

+17.0

+52.3

+44.2 +36.5

+28.3

North

s Gibb

+54.2

+20.6

ose

+49.8

+39.0 +39.0

+17.9 +12.9

ern

+17.4

+24.0 +17.0

n Cl

Gree

+21.6

All heights shown are >0, AOD and in metres

+17.1

+28.8

End Road

+61.5

+13.0 +41.7 +41.1

+58.3

+90.7

+28.8

+44.5

+61.1

+37.2

+49.7

+98.3

+81.4

+35.1 +48.9

+106.4

+35.1

+19.3

+55.0

Str

Ais

D +16.2

+64.5

+28.1

+35.0

+58.1

gil

+16.3

+72.3

+87.2

+51.1

+67.8

P+11.7

+52.2 +62.4

G2 +16.5

+31.7

+37.9

+51.7 +51.7

+52.2 +11.3 +16.5

SW.P.23

+27.7 +31.7

H[D]

H[O]

+35.6

+24.9

+58.3

+12.5

+14.5

+12.5

Project

+43.0

+39.9

B2 +69.5

+35.2

+73.6

+60.0

+61.6 +49.1

Drawing

+26.4

ou or

+44.3

gh of

Date

Checked By

27/06/24

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

ith

sm er

rav ag

gto

sin

en K

lie

d oa

Scale @ A1

Drawn By

or B

+32.1

1 : 1250

+18.6

Maximum height defined as by AOD (Above Ordnance Datum)

006 - Proposed Maximum Heights

Road

WEST BROMPTON STATION

+41.0

Lil

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

+35.8

+48.0

End

Earls Court Development

North

Bro

Old

+41.1

+66.4 +56.0

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

+18.7 +9.6 +26.0 +28.3 +21.3 +19.2 +7.7 +30.5 +22.3 +21.3 +38.1 +29.6 +26.0

Aisgill Avenue

+47.1

Star Ro

50m

+19.3

+59.0

+82.1 +15.5

0 @ 1:1250

+37.9

+67.6

+34.6

+26.8

+16.3

+21.5

T +40.7

+20.7

+39.2

+19.5

+33.8

+26.1 +21.5

+46.0 +26.8

+13.6 ad

+16.6

+42.6 +38.1

+24.4

t Av

mon

enue

+21.6

Crescent

+28.3

+18.5

+26.9

Eardley

+23.2

Beau

+55.1

+24.4

Maximum Building Height (AOD)

+24.90 Maximum AOD on horizontal plane in metres

+61.6 +28.1

Maximum Building Line

Horizontal Plane +23.0

+85.5

Tre

Development Zone boundary

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name Area where pavilions of corresponding Development Zones (G1/G2 or P) are permitted. Pavillions must be sited within adjacent dashdotted line.

+82.2

+12.5

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Detailed Component A

+50.1

+74.5

+55.9

Description

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

V1 +57.3

+38.5 +66.0 +71.2

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Planning Application Boundary

+60.9

+11.7

Rev. P01 P02 P03

+28

+40.4

mwell

st Cro

A4 / We

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-006

P03

Proposed Maximum Heights Parameter Plan This image is for illustration purposes only. Please refer to updated, full scale Parameter Plan drawings.

The Maximum Building Heights are set as distances Above Ordnance Datum (AOD), the mean sea level defined by the Ordnance Survey as Ordnance Datum Newlyn. They are NOT set according to the local ground level. Information for the use of the Parameter Plan. Maximum Building Height (AOD) Ground Level Ordnance Datum Newlyn

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

+38.5 +57.3 +50.1 +66.0 SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Proposed Maximum Heights +71.2 Sitewide \ Landscape +82.2 Ro

+54.7

Maximum Envelope +29.2

ar SW.P.26 de

+61.6

Where the Parameter Plan indicates a slope, the slope is established through a straight line connecting the indicated AODs. Maximum Building Heights are expressed with blue and red text on the drawing. Shades of blue are only for illustrative visual reference.

+17.0

+52.3 Plan

+49.8 +54.2

+24.0 +17.0

+17.1 +46.0

+39.2

+19.5

Iso View

+21.5

Horizontal plane

+61.5

+40.7

+15.5

Permanent features in relation to Maximum Envelope

+90.7

+41.1 +19.3

+59.0 Iso View

+87.2

+49.7

+81.4

+35.1

+19.3

+55.0

Maximum Envelope

+16.3

+28.8

+44.5

+61.1

+72.3

+98.3

+48.9

+106.4 +58.1

+28.1

+35.0

D +16.2

+64.5

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts

ill sg

To limit the impact on surrounding buildings and townscape.

+41.7

+37.2

+51.1

+67.8

P+11.7

on heritage and townscape.

Permanent features and the maximum envelope

+12.5

+52.2 +62.4

H[O] +52.2 +11.3 +16.5

G2 +16.5

+31.7

H[D]

+27.7

+37.9

+35.6

+51.7 AOD on ﬂat plane +XXm Maximum

+XXm Maximum AOD +51.7 on edge of slope +12.5

+24.9

Height range +58.3 Sloped plane 1

+14.5 +43.0 +47.1

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026 ill Avenue

tre

+16.3

Elements such as communications aerials and flues could extend beyond the Maximum Envelope.

+33.8

+13.0

how the massing should come forward within the slopes.

+58.3

Flue/ aerials

m 00 +26.1 4. 2 +

Information for the use of the M Parameter Plan.

+82.1

SW.P.25

Plan

+67.6

+34.6

+26.8

+21.6

+13.6

► Refer to the following +37.9 codes to understand

Sloped plane +20.7

EARL'S STA

+21.5

+28.8

+26.8

Interpreting a sloped Maximum Building Envelope

+55.1

+36.5

Information for the use of the +20.6 Parameter Plan.

+56.6

The Maximum Building Heights define the Maximum Envelope through a series of horizontal+26.9 and sloped planes. +42.6 Sloped planes provide flexibility within +38.1 the parameter to step down massing.

Tr eb

ilb

+12.00m

SW.P.24

+26.6

+50.6 +48.3

+23.0

+85.5

+24.00m

+74.5

+39.9

+18.7 +9.6 +21.3 73 +19.2 +21.3

+54.7 +29.2

SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Proposed Maximum Heights Sitewide \ Landscape+56.6

EARL'S COURT STATION

+61.6

+55.1 +42.6 +38.1

+21.6 +17.0

+52.3

+13.6

+26.9

+46.0

To ensure visibility, +15.5townscape and microclimate requirements are met.

er n

+16.3

+21.5

+28.8

Where a Maximum Envelope is sloped, built form must not project +26.8 the U beyond the sloped envelope. With exclusions as defined by the code +40.7 ‘Permanent Features in relation to +34.6 +26.8 Envelope’. Maximum +20.7

Stepped massing adjacent +33.8 +26.1 to Eardley Crescent

+39.2

+19.5

+21.5

T +61.5

The built form within the Maximum Envelope of Development Zone B +41.7 could be sloped towards Eardley Crescent.

+37.9 +58.3

+13.0 +41.1 +19.3

+59.0

To address the grain created by existing buildings and +44.5 +61.1mitigate impact +37.2 of new buildings.

+67.6 +82.1 +90.7

+28.8

+72.3

+87.2

+51.1

+98.3

+49.7

+81.4

+35.1 +48.9

+106.4

+35.1 sg

Ai ill Av

+28.1

Where a Maximum Envelope is sloped, the built form should predominantly adopt an articulated massing of I orthogonal planes.

+67.8

+52.2 +62.4

G2 +16.5

+31.7

H[O]

+31.7

H[D]

+37.9

+51.7 +51.7

+52.2 +11.3 +16.5

+35.6

+24.9

+58.3

+12.5

+27.7

Permanent features and the maximum +14.5 envelope

+12.5

+43.0

To ensure the composition of the massing of the buildings forms a coherent whole.

Sloped Plane 2

Aisgill Avenue

+47.1 +39.9

B2 +69.5

+35.2

+73.6 EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

+61.6 +49.1

+48.0

+35.8

WEST BROMPTON STATION

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026 al

oy ou

+44.3

+26.4

o nR

o Br

+60.0

+18.7 +9.6 +26.0 +28.3 +21.3 +19.2 +7.7 +30.5 +22.3 +21.3 +38.1 +29.6 +26.0 +41.1

+66.4 +56.0

D +16.2

+64.5

P+11.7

+35.0

+58.1

Massing articulation within sloped Maximum Envelope

+19.3

+55.0

SW.P.28

+16.3

Crescen t

+17.1

SW.P.29

+24.0 +17.0

Pe ny w

+54.2 Projecting beyond the sloped Maximum Envelope

Eardley

SW.P.27 +20.6

+49.8 +36.5

SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Proposed Maximum Heights Sitewide \ Landscape

SW.P.30

Balconies projecting beyond the Maximum Envelope

2m 2m

Balconies must not project beyond the Maximum Envelope, except where indicated on the diagram below. Balconies could project beyond the Maximum Parameter Envelope up to 2m Balconies could project beyond the Maximum Parameter Envelope up to 2m, limited to 3.4m below Maximum Parameter Height. To define a clear permissible limit for the oversailing of the public realm.

Maximum Building Line

Maximum Balcony Envelope

The diagrams illustrate the different balcony conditions including within, and beyond, the Maximum Parameter Envelope.

3.4m

Maximum Building Line

Control diagram is illustrative, refer to Proposed Maximum Heights Parameter Plan.

Maximum Balcony Envelope

Maximum Building Line

Maximum Balcony Envelope

The diagrams illustrate the specific conditions where balconies project beyond the Maximum Parameter Envelope.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Proposed Maximum Heights Sitewide \ Landscape

SW.P.31

Balcony minimum height from ground over public realm

SW.P.33

Projecting balconies oversailing public realm should be at a sufficient height measured from the ground to the underside of soffit.

Ancillary Building Structures subordinate to building lines The grouping and detailing of Ancillary Building Structures should be subordinate to a building’s predominant mass, and not distract from it.

To avoid headroom conflict at the ground level and provide privacy to residents.

To ensure that the public realm is enclosed by the predominant face of buildings and not by Ancillary Building Structures. Balconies above public realm

SW.P.32

Balconies over adopted highway Projecting balconies must not oversail any part of adopted highways. To avoid creating conflicts with passage and use of adopted highways.

Adopted highway Balconies above adopted highways

Examples of acceptable and unacceptable Ancillary Building Structures

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

er Pe ny w

se Clo

en Gre SWGibbs PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Proposed Public Realm Typologies

Sitewide \ Landscape

Proposed Public Realm Typologies

s ew M

Place

Rev. P01 P02 P03

Ro ad

Area where pavilions of corresponding Development Zones (G1/G2 or P) are permitted. Pavillions must be sited within adjacent dashdotted line.

Y Ro ad ern Pe ny w

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

nue Ave ont um Bea

D E

G1 H[O]

bs G Gib

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

ad Ro

007 - Proposed Public Realm Typologies

Cl un y

STATION

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-007

P03

ad Ro

et tr e dS

Design must achieve the minimum extents of the Table Park as shown on the Parameter Plan. P ue en Av ill sg Ai

ue en Av ill sg Ai

Minimum size of Table Park e illi

SW.P.36

To ensure a minimum provision of a park in the public realm.I

H[O] F

H[D]

H[O]

ad Ro ve ra ag Se

lh Fu

For Information

d an

Purpose of Issue

ith

ea ls he C

m ers

d an

n gto

am H

DG Status

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

E G1 H[D]

d Fu an d n an to ith ng si sm en er K m am H

Checked By

Job Number

sin en K

Drawn By

0 @ 1:1250

Public Realm Typologies Plan (excerpt)

ou or B

ad Ro ve ra ag Se

ou or B

n do

ou or B

n Lo

al oy R

Road

Date

27/06/24

n do

End

d oa eR

Scale @ A1

1 : 1250

ad Ro

Notes: n toParameter 1. pAll om Design Code ( r (EC.PA.A). B d 2. This plan does Ol theEARL'S DetailedCO C 3. Refer to Deve STATIO the minimum e 4. Further inform the Design Co 5. Development in the Parame Building Lines 6. Structures ass the public real Specification a Plans. Any stru WEST BROMPTON the principles

ou or B

Proposed Public Realm Typologies Parameter Plan This image is for illustration purposes only. Please refer to updated, full scale Parameter Plan drawings. Mu

li Lil

et tr e dS

G ar de ns

and routes.

Drawing

WEST BROMPTON STATION

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

EARL'S COURT STATION

M C / Landscape / Spaces ► Refer to Sitewide

Project

Earls Court Development

Ph ilb ea ch

al oy R

n to mp Bro

se Clo reen

Existing railway la existing

Area whe Developm Pavillion dotted lin

n Lo

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

d Roa nd

Old

Developm Detailed

Square & Bioline

Information for the use of the Parameter Plan.

Ro ad

Square & Lane

Public realm typologies overlap in some locations.

50m

The Bioline

H[D]

North

ad Star Ro

se Clo

th E No r

oad Star R

d Roa End

d Roa nd

th Nor

th E No r

bs G G ib

reen

Aisgill Avenue

t e nu ve lA gil Ais

tree dS

0 @ 1:1250

ic k

Developm

Eardle

MUGA

Eardley Crescen t

Ro End

Eardley Crescent

North

Community Green

Public realm typology mix

Borough Boundar

Square

W ar w

H[D]

G ar SW.P.35 de

Existing condition at the edge of the site or on railway land. May be subject to works to integrate existing and newly proposed Public Realm.

ose

nue Ave ont um a e B

Destination Square

oa d

Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

Cl een s Gr

ad ell Ro

Ph ilb ea ch

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name

G ard en s

Planning

Table Park

Nevern Square

er n

Tre bo vir

Ph ilb ea ch

The Table

Pe ny w

W Q

Spaces

Square & Bioline

Development Zone (above Ground Floor)

Gibb

H[O]

romw est C A4 / W

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

EARL'S COURT STATION

enue t Av

Description

Planning Application Boundary

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

mon Beau

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Square & Bioline Square & Lane

Place

Issued to ALL Fo ALL Fo ALL Fo

Walk

MUGA

The Bioline

The Bioline Ro ad

Rev. P01 P02 P03

Tr eb ov i

Community Green

Walk

Ro ad

Passage (Street type 3)

Community Green

oa d

Lane (Street type 2)

Square

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Crescent (Street type 1)

Destination Square

Square

MUGA

Aisgill Avenue

Boulevard

Table Park

Lane (Street type 2)

Tr eb ov i

ic k

The Table

Destination Square

and movement. G2

W arw

Routes

Crescent (Street type 1)

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity

Nevern Square

Spaces

Boulevard

Table Park

Square & Lane

M Clu ny

Road

mw ell

Information for ithe use of the R ck Ro Parameter Plan. ad W ar w

ad ell Ro romw est C A4 / W

Routes

The Table

tr e dS

st Cro A4 / We

The public realm typologies in the Nevern Square Proposed Public Realm Typologies Plan are defined in the Design Code.

Spaces

Eardley Crescen t

Cl un y

ue en Av ill sg Ai

Public realm typologies L K

SW.P.34

The Proposed Public Realm Typologies Parameter Plan defines the location of public realm typologies across the Site. et Mu

No implied lic not be used t of valuation. D dimensions to contractor an responsibility. relevant Britis Regulations r omissions to read in conjun and other con

G2 F

Aisgill Avenue

Project

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

Earls Co A

d oa

B2 R Public Realm Typologies Plan (excerpt) on EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

d Roa End

th Nor

oad Star R

th Nor

Aisgill Avenue

d Ol

pt om Br

A Code I October 2026 Earls I Design B2 Court Development C B1 WEST BROMPTON STATION

ECPL and Earls Cou London, U Drawing

007 - Pro Typologie

V1 SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Proposed Access & Movement Sitewide \ Landscape PC

Proposed Access & Y Q Movement WEST

KENSINGTON The Proposed Access and Movement STATION Parameter Plan shows the access points between the existing and proposed movement network. Key nue PCV routes are shown withinnthe AvePlanning t o P um Application Boundary. Bea

SW.P.37

G ar de ns

s ew M

bs G G ib

PCV

Nevern Square

st Cro A4 / We

Development Zone (above Ground Level) (limits of deviation apply, refer to Parameter Plan 004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm) A

Ro ad G ard en s

T Cl een s Gr

PC BV

Bus & Vehicle Access

Potential Pedestrian and Cycle Access - location and type to be determined through detail design

PCV

T Access and Movement Parameter Plan (excerpt)

Potential Pedestrian Access - location to be determined through detail design

Cycle Route undercroft or below Ground Floor Vehicular Route undercroft or below Ground Floor (includes service access) Service Route undercroft or below Ground Floor Vehicular Access to Detailed Components

Ro End

Bus Route

0 @ 1:1250

ee Str

50m

e nu ve lA gil Ais

G1 H[O]

SW.P.38

G2 F

H[D]

Aisgill Avenue

Project

Old

n to mp Bro

Earls Court Development

ad Ro

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK Drawing

PCV EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

North

n do

gh of

Date

27/06/24

Drawn By

ith d an

ea ls he C

m ers

lh Fu am

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

et tr e S d

Information for the use of the Parameter Plan.

Rev

Drawing No.

NMPlan Proposed Access and Movement Parameter un EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-008

The location of movement routes within the Site is indicative only.

Checked By

d an

n gto

am H

sin en K

d oa eR

Scale @ A1

1 : 1250

Location of routes within the Site

ou or B

li Lil

PC BV

ad Ro ve ra ag Se

ou or B

n Lo

al oy R

Road

008 - Proposed Access & Movement

WEST BROMPTON STATION

End

ad Star Ro

P03

ue en Av ill sg Ai

This image is for illustration purposes only. Please refer to updated, full scale Parameter Plan drawings.

ue en Av ill sg Ai

E P

G1 H[O]

PC 82

Indicative Movement Routes

ose

Pedestrian, Cycle & Vehicle Access

Pedestrian and Cycle Access

scent

North

Gibb

Pedestrian Access

PCV

Ro ad

EARL'S COURT STATION

PCV

Emergency Vehicular Access

ern

m Beau

PCV

Pe ny w

Tre bo vir

Ph ilb ea ch

Eardley Crescent

Development Zone name Detailed Component (above Ground Level)

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Indicative Locations of Access to Site

ue Aven ont

Description

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

Ro ad

PCV

Planning Application Boundary ic k

d ell Roa

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Eardley Cre

d Roa nd

W arw

Rev. P01 P02 P03

PCV

Clu ny

th E No r

PCV

se Clo reen

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Additional specific guidance on movement strategies can be found in Design Codes (EC.PA.C) and should be read in parallel with this Parameter Plan 4. Routes includes those on public realm, and within Development Zone Boundaries. 5. Development Zone flexibility and limits of deviation are described in the Parameter Plan 004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm, and apply to this plan.

G ar de ns

EARL'S COURT STATION

Information for the use of the Parameter Plan.

P PCV

Location of access Locations of access points into the Site are illustrated with a coloured circle. Their location is indicative only.

W Ph ilb ea ch

Ph ilb ea ch

Tr eb ov i

oa d

H[D]

G2 F

H[O]

Access and Movement Parameter Plan (excerpt)

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Proposed Access & Movement Q Sitewide \ Landscape PCV

Vehicle routes can also accommodate servicing routes. Where Service route omwell Road Cr West is shown, only service vehicles A4 /are M permitted.

Information for the usePC of the

Cycle route/undercroft or below Ground Floor

Vehicular route/undercroft or below Ground Floor (including service access)

Service route/undercroft or below Ground Floor

PC BV

Bus & Vehicle Access

Potential Pedestrian and Cycle Access - location and type to be determined through detail design Potential Pedestrian Access - location to be determined through detail design

W ar w

oa Vehicular Route undercroft or below Ground d Floor (includes service access) Service Route undercroft or below Ground Floor Vehicular Access to Detailed Components Bus Route

0 @ 1:1250

50m

To ensure access to the Detailed Component of the Planning Ph Application. ilb

ea ch

Access and Movement Parameter Plan (excerpt)

G ar de ns

E Project

Z routes P Pedestrian

SW.P.40

d SW.P.42 oa

G2 G1

H[D] Pedestrian access routes are not H[O]

shown within the Planning Application e I Boundary.

s Clo reen

gh of

Movement 27/06/24

WEST BROMPTON

1 : 1250

Pedestrian, cycle and vehicle access STATION

Access and Movement Parameter Plan (excerpt)

Checked By

DG 1 : 1250

on nd Lo

am H

Drawn By

ea ls he C d F an d n an to ith ng si sm en er K m of am H gh ou of or gh B ou or B

Potential pedestrian and cycle access - Location and type to be determined through detail design al oy R

li Lil

ea ls he am C lh d Fu an d n an to ith ng si sm en er K m

ad Ro ve ra ag Se

Drawing oad w ell Rroute/undercroft or below Ground Floor Vehicular m PCV o r C t es (includingScale service access) @ A1 Date 008 - Proposed Access & A4 / W

ou or B

PC d oa eR

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites PC Earls Court London, UK

o Br

Cycle route/undercroft or below Ground Floor

ou or B

d Ol

B2 n do

PCV

al oy R

PC BV

Project

n toMews. Cuthbert’s Lane and Cluny Movement mp

WEST BROMPTON STATION

Access and Movement Parameter Plan (excerpt)

ad Ro ve ra ag Se

li Lil

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court Design should include enhanced London, UK with and/or focussed consultation PCV PC Earls d St Access - Proposed & Court Development To pursue a 008 connection between oa

Earls Court Development Cluny Mews

residential neighbours and/or St Cuthbert’s Church. Drawing

n Lo

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

P PC

d oa eR

on pt m ro

PCV

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

d Ol

bs Information Gib for the use of the Parameter Plan. Aisgill Avenue

Pedestrian, Cycle & Vehicle Access

Cycle Route undercroft or below Ground Floor ic

Where shown on the Parameter Plan, vehicular access to the Detailed Components must be provided. Vehicular access is not shown within the Detailed Component boundary. Further detail can be found in the Detailed Component of the Planning Application.

Parameter Plan.

PCV

Indicative Movement Routes

Vehicular access to Detailed PCV Components

V2 D

Pedestrian and Cycle Access

Ro ad

JSW.P.41

Pedestrian Access

er n

scent

Service routes

PCV

50m

EARL'S COURT STATION

Eardley Cre

PCV

SW.P.39

0 @ 1:1250

Emergency Vehicular Access

Pe ny w

G ar de ns

PCV

Eardley Crescen t

Ph ilb ea ch

Bus Route

Tr eb ov ir Ro ad

Job Number

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

Scale @ A1

Date

L27/06/24

Status

Drawn Checked By Purpose of By Issue I Design Code Earls Court Development I October 2026

TH For Planning

W N Job Number

DG Status

Purpose of Issue

SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Proposed Site Levels Ground Floor Sitewide \ Landscape

Proposed Site Levels Ground Floor

SW.P.43

The Proposed Site Levels Ground Floor Parameter Plan indicates proposed Site levels within the public realm.

Spot levels indicate Proposed Ground Finished Floor Levels (AOD) of the public realm, within a tolerance of +/1m.

ew s

Clu ny

+6 Nevern Square

Rev. P01 P02 P03

+2.5

mwell

st Cro

arw

Road

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Description

Information for the use of the Parameter Plan.

A +X

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

A4 / We

Proposed Site levels in the public realm

+2.7

ilb

vir

+2.8

X +4

Tre

Planning Application Boundary

ard

+4 North

een

s Gr

Gibb

End Road

+8.5

+10.5

+8.5

0 @ 1:1250

+11

+11.5

Eardley

+12.5

Crescent

+3.3 +4

+12.5

Str

+3.5 Ais

50m

+10

gil

+7.5

+8.2

+10

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

+11 +6.5

ose

+X Proposed site level

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) A

ern

enue

t Av

mon

Beau

EARL'S COURT STATION

+7.5

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

G1 H[O]

H[D]

+11.5

+12.5

+9 +10.5

Project

+9.5

Aisgill Avenue

Old

Bro

Earls Court Development

+8.5

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK Drawing

009 - Proposed Site Levels Ground Floor

+7.8 North

End

Star Ro

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

WEST BROMPTON STATION

ou or

Road

+3.7

gh of

Checked By

27/06/24

sm er

gto

sin

en K

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

ith

rav ag

lie

Lil

Date

or B

d oa

Scale @ A1

Drawn By

1 : 1250

+4.8

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-009

P03

Proposed Site Levels Ground Floor Parameter Plan This image is for illustration purposes only. Please refer to updated, full scale Parameter Plan drawings.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Proposed Site Levels Below Ground Floor Sitewide \ Landscape

Proposed Site Levels Below Ground Floor

oad w ell R Crom t s e A4 / W

SW.P.44

The Proposed Site Levels Below Ground Floor Parameter Plan indicates proposed Site levels below Ground Floor, Development Zones at lower ground level and possible areas of basement.

+0.5

In the event of basement or lower Ground Floor development being X provided within a Development Zone, then the spot levels indicated must be interpreted as Finished Floor Level (FFL). A further 1m of slab build up will exist below this level. Below Ground levels are fixed and no limit of deviation is possible.

+0.5

X Copyright Hawkins\Brown - Studio Egret West Architects

Clu ny

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Nevern Square

W arw

st Cro A4 / We

mw ell

ic k

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

+0.5

Ro ad

Description

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Planning Application Boundary Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries) Development Zone (below Ground Floor, any permitted use as defined in the Development Specification)

Road

Development Zone (below Ground Floor) name Detailed Component (below Ground Floor)

nue Ave t n o um Bea

Ro ad

+0.5

Ph ilb ea ch

Tre bo vir

+0.5

G ard en s

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

EARL'S COURT STATION

Information for the use of the Parameter Plan.

Area below ground pertaining to the former Earls Court Station ticket hall and escalator barrel excluded from Planning Applications Change of level within Development Zone Indicative location of break in basement extents. Minimum width = 15m. Area of deviation within which break in basement extent should be located

+0.5

Maximum excavation level = 1m below FFL +X Proposed site level (Finished ﬂoor level/FFL)

Area within Development Zone O for additional excavation for an area 300sqm to a maximum level of +1.6m (AOD).

Ro ad

enue t Av

North

Gibb

Cl een s Gr

Pe ny w

ern

+0.5

ose

M +5.8

Ro End

+0.5

0 @ 1:1250

+4 +2.3

+3.9

th E No r

+0.5

ee Str

-0.5

H[O]

Eardley Crescent

+4.8

H[D]

re bs G G ib

+7.5

d Roa nd

e nu ve lA gil Ais

50m

+4.8

+3.9

+0.5

+7.5

SW.P.45

+4.8

Project

Aisgill Avenue

+1.8 +3

Old

+2.5

n to mp Bro

ad Ro

+1.2

Earls Court Development ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK Drawing

C EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

North

Indicative break in Development Zone below Ground Floor

010 - Proposed Site Levels Below Ground Floor

WEST BROMPTON STATION

n do

ou or B

n Lo

al oy R

Road

Date

27/06/24

ou or B

gh of

ea ls he am C lh d Fu an d n an gto ith m ers m am H

sin en K

d oa eR

ad Ro ve ra ag Se

li Lil

Scale @ A1

1 : 1250 Drawn By

Checked By

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

T +0.5

+1.8

End

ad Star Ro

lose en C

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-010

P03

Proposed Site Levels Below Ground Floor Parameter Plan This image is for illustration purposes only. Please refer to updated, full scale Parameter Plan drawings.

Where indicated, development at below Ground Floor level must provide breaks. This break must leave a distance of at least 15m where indicated with a dashed line, and within the hatched zone. To safeguard environmental conditions, such as water infiltration. n

et tr e S d

Breaks in below Ground Floor Development Zones

ue en Av ill sg Ai

+0.5

Proposed below ground finished floor level (AOD). Additional 1m allowed for excavation

+0.5

mon Beau

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) boundary

Indicated level of Lower Ground and possible areas of basement

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

Nevern Square

omissions to be reported to the architect. To be Additional 1m allowed for excavation read in conjunction with (AOD). Architect's specification and other consultant information.

the public realm should be in line with the principles as set out in the Design Codes.

er n ic k

Ro ad

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

+0.5

Development Zone (below Ground Floor, any permitted use as defined in the Development Specification)

Change in level

Development Zone (below Ground Floor) name Detailed Component (below Ground Floor) 0 @ 1:1250

Area below ground pertaining to the former Earls Court Station ticket hall and escalator barrel excluded from Planning Applications

Area of deviation within which break in basement extent should be located

EARL'S COURT STATION

Proposed below ground finished floor level (AOD). Additional 1m allowed for excavation Area within Development Zone O for additional excavation for an area 300sqm to a maximum level of +1.6m (AOD).

Ro ad

Indicative location of break in basement extents. Minimum width = 15m.

Eardley Cre

Change of level within Development Zone

scent

+7.5

+4.8

G ar d

Information for the use of the ens +3.9 Parameter Plan.

+3.9

oa d

A thin black line within a Development +4a change in the Zone indicates Finished Floor Level (FFL), such as Ph ilb shown in Development Zone K. +2.3 ea ch

50m

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) boundary

Tr eb ov i

Pe ny w

er n

Change in level below Ground Floor

M +7.5 +5.8

+0.5

+4.8

0.5

-0.5

0 @ 1:1250

+4.8 +3.9

H[D]

H[O]Development Zone O SW.P.47

+2.3

+7.5

+4.8

Development Zone O is located below Ground Floor, and appears only on the Below Ground Floor Parameter Plans.

+3.9

Project

e nu ve lA

Information for the use of the Parameter Plan.

+1.8

+1.2 -0.5

EMPRESS STATE H[O] BUILDING

B1 H[D]

E +7.5

d Ol

+2.5

on pt m ro

Earls Court Development

ad Ro

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

+4.8

Drawing

+4.8

010 - Proposed Site Levels Below Ground Floor

WEST BROMPTON STATION Development Zone O below Ground Floor

F+1.8

Earls Court Development Scale @ A1

Date

ECPL and Lillie 1 :Bridge 1250 Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK Drawn By

27/06/24 Checked By

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

Drawing

n to d an

010 - Proposed Site Levels Below Ground Floor

ea ls he C

WEST BROMPTON STATION

ith sm

illi

d oa eR

er m am H

C EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

ad Ro ve ra ag Se

+1.2

ng si en K

Aisgill Avenue

+2.5

n to mp o Br

ou or B

d Ol

ad Ro

ou or B

n do

Project

al oy R

n Lo

+1.8

50m

E Eardley Crescen t

Planning Application Boundary

+5.8

SW.P.46

Area within Development Zone O for additional Description Date 27.06.24 excavation for an area 300sqm to a maximum 01.08.25 level of +1.6m (AOD). 01.09.26

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Pe ny w

W ar w

Rev. P01 P02 P03

Ro ad

SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Proposed Site Levels Below Ground Floor Sitewide \ Landscape

Job Number

Status

DG Purpose of Issue

X X

+0.5

SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Proposed Land Use Below Ground Floor X Sitewide \ Landscape +0.5

oad daRd no ER nd rth NhoE Nort

Proposed Land Use Below Ground Floor

ilb Peh aicl bhe Gac ahr dGe nars de ns

Z Z +0.5 se Clo reen se bs G Clo reen G s b Gib

Gib

U U

L +3.9

Str

et tr e dS

Development Zones B1 and B2 include the section highlighted. This sits beneath the public realm, and beneath H[O] the indicated location of Development H[O] Zone G.

n Mu

Information for the use of the Parameter Plan.

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

ew s M Clu ny

arw

oad

Star R

oad Star R

E +7.5

+4.8 +4.8

H[D] H[D]

+1.8

B1 B2 B2 B1 EMPRESS STATE BUILDING EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

Development C Zone below public realm

WEST BROMPTON STATION WEST BROMPTO STATION

+1.8

ah o Bgh uHg oof oaul or ooyr Bgh RB onu odro oBn oLn nd

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) boundary

vir

Area below ground pertaining to the former Earls Court Station ticket hall and escalator barrel excluded from Planning Applications Level change within Development Zone (below Ground Floor)

Tre

ard

Indicative location of break in basement extents. Minimum width = 15m.

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

ad Ro w Pe

Clos

End

Str

N F

gil

Ais

50m

Crescent

0 @ 1:1250

Eardley

Road

SW.P.49

H[O]

H[D] F Project

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

Old

Bro

Earls Court Development

Aisgill Avenue

North

Quantum of below ground development

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK Drawing

013 - Proposed Land Use Below Ground Floor

WEST BROMPTON STATION

End

Star Ro

Road

Scale @ A1

ou or

27/06/24

en K

or B

Drawn By

Checked By

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

ith

sm er

gto

sin

rav ag

Date

1 : 1250

lie

Lil

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-013

P03

Proposed Land Use Below Ground Floor Parameter Plan This image is for illustration purposes only. Please refer to updated, full scale Parameter Plan drawings.

The Parameter Plan indicates the areas where below Ground Floor development is allowed. However, the maximum extent of below Ground Floor development is smaller than the footprint shown and the quantum of development is controlled by the Development Specification. Information for the use of the Parameter Plan.

ad Ro llie

North

een

s Gr

Gibb

Z ern

enue

t Av

mon

Beau

lie

Lil

Area of deviation within which break in basement extent should be located

EARL'S COURT STATION

ad Ro ve ra ad agRo Se e rav

ilb

+1.2

Detailed Component (below Ground Floor)

+2.5

Ground floor Development Zone (below Ground Floor) Indicative below Ground Floor development

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

Development Zone (below Ground Floor) name

Development Zone (below Ground Floor, any permitted use as defined in the Development Specification) A

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

Road

mwell

st Cro

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Planning Application Boundary

A4 / We

Description

oad dR En oad dR ornth hN E

Rev. P01 P02 P03

Nort

Aisgill Avenue Aisgill Avenue

-0.5

+7.5

+4.8

e nu vee nAu iell Agv llis giA

+2.3

s Ai

The Proposed Land Use Below Ground Floor Parameter Plan indicates land use below Ground Floor.

+3.9

Development Zone below public realm

SW.P.48

+5.8

+0.5

Nevern Square

EARL'S COURT STATION EARL'S COURT STATION

nue Ave ont nue um Ave Bea ont m u Bea

+0.5

W W

Eardley Crescent Eardley Crescent

WEST KENSINGTON WEST STATION KENSINGTON STATION

+0.5

Tr eb ov Tr ir eb ov ir Ro a

Y Y

not be used to calculate areas for the purposes of valuation. Do not scale this drawing. All dimensions to be checked on the site by the contractor and such dimensions to be their Ground Floor SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Proposed Land Use Below Sitewide \ Landscape responsibility. All work must comply with relevant British Standards and Building Regulations requirements. Drawing errors and omissions to be reported to the architect. To be read in conjunction with Architect's specification and other consultant information.

SW.P.50

‘Any permitted use’ When specified as ‘any permitted use’, further information is included in detail in the Development Specification. This document defines the maximum quantum per use per Development Zone.

Information for the use of the Parameter Plan.

Rev. P01 P02 P03

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Description

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Planning Application Boundary Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries) Development Zone (below Ground Floor, any permitted use as defined in the Development Specification) A

Development Zone (below Ground Floor) name Detailed Component (below Ground Floor) Development Zone (above Ground Floor) boundary Area below ground pertaining to the former Earls Court Station ticket hall and escalator barrel excluded from Planning Applications

Level change within Development Zone (below Ground Floor) Indicative location of break in basement extents. Minimum width = 15m. Area of deviation within which break in basement extent should be located

EARL'S COURT STATION

50m

Eardley

Crescen

0 @ 1:1250

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Proposed Land Use Ground Level and Upper Levels Sitewide \ Landscape

Proposed Land Use Ground Level and Upper Levels

SW.P.51

Areas of coloured fill on the top line of the Parameter Plan call out identify the envisaged predominant uses of the Development Zone.

The Proposed Ground Floor and Upper Levels Land Use Parameter Plans indicate the predominant land use within Development Zone boundaries.

Areas of coloured fill on the bottom line identify the envisaged other uses to be considered in additional to predominant uses.

s M ew Clu ny

R Nevern Square

EC21

arw

EC20

ell Roa

t Cromw

A4 / Wes

XXXX

WK04

vir

EC19

ard

Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

Indicative Plot boundary within Development Zone Residential use Commercial use Cultural use

Community use Student housing use Leisure use

Educational use

Hotel use

Retail / F&B / Flexible Commercial

Station interface / Plant (N.B.: All Development Zones also have an allowance for ancillary use as Other Uses)

WK08

Clo

North

EC18

End Road

Alternative residential use (Co-living and/or Older Persons Housing)

EC16

M U

Frontage combining active ground floor uses - combining 'Predominant' and 'Other' uses as defined by the Development Specification

EC15

EC17

50m

0 @ 1:1250

WK11

SW.P.52

EC09 EC05

EC04

Eardley

Crescent

EC06

WK09

WB06

EC10

WK10 t

tree

gil

Ais

Mun

EC14

H[D]

H[O]

EC11

EC03

WB12

WB10

WB04

EC12

WB05-T1

WB05-T2

WB09

EC13

EC02

Project

WB03 Aisgill Avenue

WB08

EC01

WB02

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

Bro

Earls Court Development

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK Drawing

WB07

End

Old

oad

EC22

North

011 - Proposed Land Use Ground Level

WEST BROMPTON STATION

Checked By

27/06/24

sin

ers

Status

Purpose of Issue

Job Number 200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

ith

gto

Date

oro

Sea

R llie

Scale @ A1

Drawn By

1 : 1250

oro

Road

WB01

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-011

P03

Clu

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Development Zone flexibility and limits of deviation are described in the Parameter Plan 004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm, and apply to this plan. 4. Other uses as outlined in the Development Specification (EC.PA.A) per Development Zone are permitted at upper levels in place of or in addition to the predominant uses identified on this plan. 5. The diagram below identifies the proposed uses per Development Zone. The permitted uses are described as either Predominant Use(s) or Other Uses as defined by the Development Specification. The types of use annotated by the coloured squares are listed in the key. Different configurations of use are possible consistent with the range of uses and Development Zone floorspace caps as permitted by the Development Specification

R Nevern Square

EC21

ell Roa

t Cromw

XXXX

WK03

WK04

Public route through Development Zone (location is indicative) Indicative Plot boundary within Development Zone Residential use

Ro ad

Commercial use

EC19

Cultural use

vir

ilb

Storage and Distribution use

Community use

ard

Student housing use

Leisure use

EARL'S COURT STATION

Health use Educational use Hotel use Retail / F&B / Flexible Commercial

WK12

EC08 ad

Station interface / Plant (N.B.: All Development Zones also have an allowance for ancillary use as Other Uses)

ern

WK01

ny Pe

WK08

North

n Clo

s Gr

Gibb

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

enue

Development Zone (above Ground Floor)

WK07

nt Av

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

EC01 Plot Name 6. Where multiple uses are permitted by the Development Specification, this flexibility applies to all plots contained within the Development Zone. 7. Structures associated with stairs, lifts and ventilation located within the public realm are not specified within the Development Specification area and are not specified within the Parameter Plans. Any structures within the public realm should be in line with the principles as set out in the Design Codes.

WK02

aumo

Other uses (in addition to predominant uses) within Development Zone (see Development Specification for other use(s)) Development Zone

WK06

WK05 WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Description

Borough Boundary (outside site Planning Application Boundaries)

Tre

Plot Predominant Use of Development Zone

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Planning Application Boundary

arw

EC20

A4 / Wes

Alternative residential use (Co-living and/or Older Persons Housing)

EC18

EC16

End

Road

Frontage combining active ground floor uses - combining 'Predominant' and 'Other' uses as defined by the Development Specification

EC15

EC17

0 @ 1:1250

50m

WK11

EC05

EC04

Eardley

Crescent

EC06

WK09

WB06

EC10

WK10 t

gil

Ais

tree

EC14 WB11

WB13

H[D]

H[O]

WB12

WB05-T2

EC11

EC03

F WB10

WB04

EC12

WB05-T1 WB09

EC13

EC02

Project

WB03 Aisgill Avenue

WB08

North

End

Star Roa

EC01

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

WB02

Bro

Earls Court Development

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK Drawing

WB07

Old

oad

EC22

012 - Proposed Land Use Upper Levels

WEST BROMPTON STATION

Road

Scale @ A1

To animate the public realm and reinforce the character of the place.

Frontages prioritising active ground floor uses - combining ‘Predominant’ and ‘Other’ uses as defined by the Development Specification

27/06/24

Drawn By

of H

Checked By

m ers

gto

sin ith an d

ea ls he

C lh

Fu am

An “active frontage” refers to buildings that have ground (and sometimes upper) floors with windows and doors facing onto the street, creating interest and activity. Related uses might include shops, cafés, community and cultural uses, commercial premises or services but can also include residential uses and providing access to upper levels.

oro

oa eR

Roa

gr Sea

e Lilli

Date

1 : 1250

oro

al oy

WB01

Where indicated with a single thick line, active uses must be prioritised at ground level drawn from the range of uses and floorspace capacity permitted by the Development Specification for this Development Zone.

Where the frontage is not highlighted with a single thick line, these areas are envisaged to be less active and/or areas that provide ancillary space / access for upper levels.

EC09

Mun

Other permitted uses along frontages at Ground Floor

WB11

WB13

Star Roa

PA.A) with specific reference to the terminology as defined by Section 4.

Storage and Distribution use

ny een

s Gr

Gibb

► Refer to Development Specification (EC.

Public route through Development Zone (location is indicative)

EC08

Other uses (in addition to predominant uses)

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name

Health use

WK12

Predominant use

EC01 Plot Name

EARL'S COURT STATION

Z WK01

Development Zone (above Ground Floor)

Information for the use of the Parameter Plan

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Borough Boundary (outside site Planning Application Boundaries)

ern

enue

nt Av

Description

Planning Application Boundary

WK07

WK02

Beau

ilb

WK05 WEST KENSINGTON STATION

WK03

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Tre

Rev. P01 P02 P03

Plot Predominant Use of Development Zone Other uses (in addition to predominant uses) within Development Zone (see Development Specification for other use(s)) Development Zone

WK06

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Development Zone flexibility and limits of deviation are described in the Parameter Plan 004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm, and apply to this plan. 4. Ground level uses are at the perceived ground floor. Ground floor levels vary across the site. 5. Other uses as outlined in the Development Specification (EC.PA.A) per Development Zone are permitted in place of or in addition to the predominant uses identified on this plan (including ground floor mixed-uses of Retail / F&B / Flexible Commercial / Culture / Leisure / Community / Social Infrastructure / Storage and Distribution / Ancillary and/or access and ground level floorspace associated with predominant upper level uses as identified on P12). 6. The diagram below identifies the proposed uses per Development Zone. The permitted uses are described as either Predominant Use(s) or Other Uses as defined by the Development Specification. The types of use annotated by the coloured squares are listed in the key. Different configurations of use are possible consistent with the range of uses and Development Zone floorspace caps as permitted by the Development Specification.

Predominant Use(s) and Other Uses

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-012

P03

Proposed Lane Use Ground Floor (top) and Upper Levels (bottom) Parameter Plans These images are for illustration purposes only. Please refer to updated, full scale Parameter Plan drawings.

► Refer to Development Specification (EC.PA.A). Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Proposed Land Use Ground Level and Upper Levels Sitewide \ Landscape

SW.P.53

Cultural uses Where indicated within the list of ‘Other Uses’ in Development Zones B1, B2, K and T, Culture use must be provided. This may be in combination with other uses.

X Cultural use

To ensure alignment with the Cultural Strategy.

► Refer to Development Specification (EC.PA.A).

SW.P.54

Flexibility for residential predominant uses Residential uses could also incorporate alternative residential uses of Older Persons Housing and/ or Co-Living where permitted by the Development Specification use allocation.

Alternative Residential Use (Co-living and/or Older Persons Housing)

Information for the use of the Parameter Plan.

► Refer to Development Specification (EC.PA.A).

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

SW PARAMETER PLAN DETAILS | Urban Design Plan Sitewide \ Landscape

Urban Design Plan The Urban Design Plan indicates different routes, areas of public realm and open space as well as key urban design principles (as described by Sitewide landscape and built form codes).

Clu ny

ew s

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction with the Design Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A). 2. This plan does not present information for approval for areas within the Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Development Zone 'O' is underground. See PL10 4. Development Zone's with the suffix '1' lie within LBHF, those with suffix '2' lie within RBKC 5. This plan summarises information captured in the other Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) and Design Codes (EC.PA.C). The information on this plan does not take precedence over that shown on any of the other Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) or within the Design Codes (EC.PA.C) but combines the key indicative proposals of the development constraints, routes, land use frontages and public realm typologies as an Urban Design summary for clarity. 6. Development Zone flexibility and limits of deviation are described in the Parameter Plan 004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm, and apply to this plan. 7. Structures associated with stairs, lifts and ventilation located within the public realm are not captured within the Development Specification area and are not specified within the Parameter Plans. Any structures within the public realm should be in line with the principles as set out in the Design Codes.

R Nevern Square

arw

mwell

st Cro

A4 / We

Road

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Description

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Planning Application Boundary Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) Minimum Landscape Extent Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

Development Zone name Prominent Corner Facade addressing key destination Public Realm Facade addressing key routes and spaces

Destination Public Realm

ilb

Square

vir

Tre

Community Green

ard

Key Route

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

Indicative Public Route through Development Zone

EARL'S COURT STATION

Extent of potential Public Realm pertaining to the area above existing West London Railway line, the area of land next to West Kensington Station and North End Road, and the Aisgill Avenue MUGA

Clos

End

Road

0 @ 1:1250

Eardley

50m

Crescent

North

een

s Gr

Gibb

ern

ont

m Beau

enue

Str

gil

Ais

O P

G1 H[O]

H[D]

I Project

Aisgill Avenue

North

End

Star Ro

B2 EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

Bro

Earls Court Development

Old

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK Drawing

014 - Urban Design Plan

WEST BROMPTON STATION

ou or

Road

gh of

Checked By

27/06/24

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW)

For Planning

ith

sm er

gto

sin

en K

rav ag

Date

or B

lie

Lil

d oa

Scale @ A1

Drawn By

1 : 1250

Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-014

P03

Urban Design Plan. This image is for illustration purposes only. Please refer to updated, full scale Parameter Plan drawings.

100

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

101

SW LANDSCAPE | Overview

Landscape Overview

A celebration of nature’s ability to connect and revive. Inspired by Earls Court’s history of horticulture, pleasure gardens and showcase, a series of Exhibition Gardens creates a landscape full of discovery and surprise. Each public open space has an important role to play within the landscaped network. Conceived as a series of Exhibition Gardens, the different spaces respond to their location and context, whilst allowing people to move through the Site intuitively. The unique character and identity of each space informs the approach to biodiversity but also demonstrates the numerous ways in which people and nature can coexist.

Illustrative landscape plan

102

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

103

SW LANDSCAPE | Spaces and Routes

Spaces and Routes SW.L.1

Spaces

SW.L.2

The Table The Table must create a multi-layered area of public realm, encouraging a variety of activities and comprised of different zones with their own unique characteristics.

The design of the key open spaces forming the public realm must align with the typologies illustrated in the diagram below. To ensure the public realm is diverse and legible.

► Refer to relevant Character Areas for additional information on these

To support the public realm hierarchy and offer a variety of spaces with unique characteristics.

spaces.

► Refer to Proposed Public Realm Typologies Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B)

► Refer to The Table / Landscape.

SW.L.3

Illustrative view, the Table

Table Park The Table Park is a component of the Table and must combine amenity for users with biodiverse green spaces. To support the public realm hierarchy and offer a variety of spaces with unique characteristics.

Key

► Refer to The Table / Landscape.

The Table

Illustrative view, Table Park

Table Park Destination square Square Community green The Bioline Square and The Bioline Square and lane

Key open spaces

104

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

105

SW LANDSCAPE | Spaces and Routes

SW.L.4

Destination square

SW.L.6

The destination square must provide a generous area with a flexible design suitable for events. It should offer a balance of hardscape with generous planting that incorporates play. It is a destination for visitors and is informed by its industrial heritage. To support the public realm hierarchy and offer a variety of spaces with unique characteristics.

Community green The community green must provide a welcoming space to the west of the Site. It is a community focused, richly planted, playful landscape. To support the public realm hierarchy and offer a variety of spaces with unique characteristics.

► Refer to Aisgill Gardens / Landscape.

Illustrative view, Lillie Sidings Square

Illustrative view, Aisgill Gardens

► Refer to Lillie Sidings / Landscape.

SW.L.5

Squares

SW.L.7

The squares must create a sense of welcome and arrival. They should integrate and respond to the adjacent context.

The Bioline must provide a richly planted, biodiverse connection that prioritises nature. To connect to existing areas of ecological value.

To support the public realm hierarchy and offer a variety of spaces with unique characteristics.

► Refer to West Brompton / Landscape.

106

The Bioline

► Refer to The Table / Landscape. Illustrative view, Warwick Square

Illustrative view, the Bioline

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

107

SW LANDSCAPE | Spaces and Routes

Routes

SW.L.9

The design of the streets forming the public realm must align with the typologies illustrated in the diagram below.

Boulevard Boulevards must have pedestrian footpaths on either side of a central movement route, supported by planting on at least one side.

To ensure the public realm has a clear hierarchy that makes it diverse and legible.

To support the public realm hierarchy and offer a variety of street types with unique characteristics.

► Refer to relevant Character Areas for additional information on streets. ► Refer to Proposed Public Realm Typologies Parameter Plan (EC.PA.B).

► Refer to relevant Character Areas for additional information on

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

streets, including illustrative and control dimensions.

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

SW.L.8

Key Boulevard Crescent (Street type 1) Crescent and Walk Lane (Street type 2)

Illustrative street section, Boulevard

Passage (Street type 3) Place Walk Square and lane

Street types

108

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

109

SW LANDSCAPE | Spaces and Routes

Crescent (Street type 1)

SW.L.11

Crescents must have pedestrian footpaths and planting on either side of a central movement route. It should be reflective of local traditional tree-lined streets.

Lanes must have a pedestrian footpath on at least one side of a central movement route. Lanes should have planting, where possible.

To support the public realm hierarchy and offer a variety of street types with unique characteristics.

► Refer to relevant Character Areas for additional information on

Illustrative street section, Crescent

SITE BOUNDARY

streets, including illustrative and control dimensions.

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

streets, including illustrative and control dimensions.

110

Lane (Street type 2)

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

SW.L.10

Illustrative street section, Lane

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

111

SW LANDSCAPE | Spaces and Routes

SW.L.12

Passage (Street type 3)

Place

SW.L.13

Passages must have a pedestrian footpath on at least one side of a central movement route. The central movement route should enable access to adjacent plots. Passages should include planting, where possible.

Places should maximise planting, include pedestrian footpath(s) and explore opportunities for play and habitat creation. To support the public realm hierarchy and offer a variety of street types with unique characteristics.

To support the public realm hierarchy and offer a variety of street types with unique characteristics.

► Refer to relevant Character Areas for additional information on

streets, including illustrative and control dimensions.

Illustrative street section, Passage

112

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

streets, including illustrative and control dimensions.

Illustrative street section, Place

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

113

SW LANDSCAPE | Spaces and Routes

SW.L.14

Walks Walks must be vehicle-free, except for emergency vehicles, maintenance and controlled servicing. They must have space for pedestrians, cyclists and planting, where possible. To support the public realm hierarchy and offer a variety of street types with unique characteristics.

► Refer to relevant Character Areas for additional information on streets, including illustrative and control dimensions.

Illustrative street section, Walk

114

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

115

SW LANDSCAPE | Inclusivity and Movement

Inclusivity and Movement SW.L.15

Inclusive design

SW.L.17

Design must be inclusive, placing people at the heart of the process, acknowledging diversity and difference and considering the needs of different groups, including older people, children or people who experience sensory/neurological processing differences.

Inclusive and navigable The pedestrian network must be designed as inclusive as possible providing easy navigation throughout the Site, short and direct routes to facilities and services, and offering a sense of safety to all users of the public realm. To ensure the Site is easily navigable for all users.

To ensure the design is inclusive for all users. Public Realm Inclusivity Panel (PRIP) workshop

SW.L.16

A focus on active travel Design must prioritise active travel. Where different forms of movement -i.e. pedestrian, cycling and vehicular - coincide, priority should be given to pedestrians over cyclists and both over vehicles. To create an environment that fosters active travel.

Pedestrians

Cyclists

Vehicles Order of priority

116

SW.L.18

Maximise access Design – including vertical circulation – must provide comfortable access to all parts of the Site, its facilities, and services for visitors, residents and other users with a wide range of different requirements, in accordance with best practice guidance for inclusive design. To ensure that the Site is accessible to all.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

117

SW LANDSCAPE | Inclusivity and Movement

SW.L.19

Catering for different needs

SW.L.22

The public realm must provide a variety of spaces for rest, play, gathering or connecting with nature.

Accessible connections within the public realm Accessible connections must be provided between different levels in the public realm. These connections should include lifts. Lifts could be located as suggested in the diagram below.

To ensure the public realm caters to a wide range of needs.

To facilitate connection between the different levels.

► Refer to The Table / Landscape, The Table / Built form / Pavilion and Empress Place / Built form / Table Edge.

SW.L.20

Meet standards and be responsive to evolving good practice Design must ensure that required standards for accessibility are met and respond to the evolving good practice guidance and social expectations about meeting the needs of disabled people. To ensure that the proposal meets today’s standards and is responsive to future good practice.

SW.L.21

Public Realm Inclusivity Panel (PRIP) workshop

Provision of public toilet facilities Public toilet facilities should be provided. These should be easily accessible from key areas of public realm. To provide public toilet amenities and ensure it is accessible. Indicative location of lifts including Detailed and Outline Components

118

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

119

SW LANDSCAPE | Inclusivity and Movement

SW.L.23

Key routes

SW.L.24

North - south route The public realm must provide a clear and legible north-south route through Empress Place and the Table Character Areas linking with the east-west route at all phases of the development. Legibility and wayfinding across the different Character Areas could be achieved through design coherence, signage as well as hierarchies on building façades.

The public realm must deliver the key routes and ensure they are legible. To provide meaningful connections through and around the Site.

To connect West Brompton station and Lillie Road with the east-west route. Illustrative view, Empress Place Boulevard

SW.L.25

East - west route The public realm must provide a clear and legible east-west route through West Brompton, the Table and Aisgill Gardens Character Areas. Legibility and wayfinding across the different Character Areas could be achieved through design coherence, signage as well as hierarchies on building façades. To connect Earls Court with West Kensington Estate and North End Road, via the Table.

Key North - south route

Illustrative view, the Cascades

East - west route

Movement strategy

120

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

121

SW LANDSCAPE | Inclusivity and Movement

SW.L.26

Pedestrian network

SW.L.27

The public realm must deliver the key pedestrian routes.

Vehicle-free Vehicle-free routes must not support any vehicle access except emergency vehicles, maintenance and controlled servicing.

To create a connected pedestrian network.

To ensure limited vehicles access Vehicle-free streets.

► Refer to Spatial Strategies chapter in the

Design and Access Statement: Masterplan (EC.PA.08).

Vehicle-free route

SW.L.28

Pedestrian priority routes with vehicular access Routes must prioritise pedestrians with comfortable, safe and green streets. Vehicle movement is allowed but should be reduced where possible. To ensure pedestrians are prioritised across the Site. Comfortable pedestrian routes

Key Vehicle-free Pedestrian priority routes with vehicular access

Pedestrian network

122

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

123

SW LANDSCAPE | Inclusivity and Movement

Bjørvika Masterplan and Urban Spaces, Oslo - SLA

SW.L.29

Cycle network

SW.L.30

The public realm must deliver the key cycle routes.

Shared access roads Cyclists must be able to ride safely on shared access roads. Types of delineation should be dictated by road safety considerations, such as signage or markings on central movement routes.

To create a connected cycle network.

► Refer to Spatial Strategies chapter in the

Design and Access Statement: Masterplan (EC.PA.08).

To prioritise cyclist safety. Cycle safety on shared access routes

SW.L.31

Shared or demarcated cycle route Routes must provide sufficient space for pedestrians and cyclists to move comfortably. Pedestrian safety must be ensured. Demarcation could be indicated for example by a change in material size or texture. To provide a safe environment that prioritises pedestrian movement.

Cyclist on shared cycle route

Key Cyclists share access roads with vehicles Cyclists on shared or demarcated cycle route (to be confirmed at detailed design) Cyclists on pedestrian-priority public realm

Cycle network

124

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

125

SW LANDSCAPE | Inclusivity and Movement

VIA Vika & Ruseløkkveien - SLA

SW.L.32

Cyclists on pedestrianpriority public realm

SW.L.35

Vehicle network

Where cycle routes are located on pedestrian-priority public realm, pedestrians must be prioritised. This could be achieved through the arrangement of planting and/or appropriate levels of lighting.

The public realm must deliver key private vehicle and taxi routes, beyond which there should be no private vehicle access.

To encourage active travel throughout the public realm.

► Refer to Spatial Strategies chapter in the

To prioritise a people-first public realm. Design and Access Statement: Masterplan (EC.PA.08).

Cyclists on pedestrian led public realm

SW.L.33

Cycle parking Cycle parking in the public realm must be visible, conveniently located and minimise impact on pedestrian desire lines. To create safe and convenient cycle parking.

SW.L.34

Cycle-share parking Where provided, cycle-share parking (such as Santander Cycles) in the public realm must be located at Site entrances and wellintegrated into the public realm. Locations could include Warwick Square, West Brompton Square and West Kensington. The arrangement and size of parking should minimise disruption to pedestrian flows. To create safe and convenient cycle parking.

126

Key Vehicle route Controlled access vehicle route

Cycle-share parking

Ground Floor vehicle network

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

127

SW LANDSCAPE | Inclusivity and Movement

SW.L.36

Servicing and waste network

SW.L.37

Parking free areas The location of parking must prioritise a vehicle-free public realm. Parking should be avoided where indicated in the diagram below.

The public realm must deliver key servicing and waste routes beyond which there should be no servicing vehicle access.

To prioritise a people-first public realm.

Key Servicing route Servicing route, controlled access

Key

Servicing route, controlled access (undercroft) Out of hours servicing route, controlled access

No parking on destination public realm

Servicing and waste network

128

Parking diagram

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

129

SW LANDSCAPE | Inclusivity and Movement

SW.L.38

Controlled access design

SW.L.40

Accessible parking A footpath must be provided adjacent to Blue Badge parking spaces.

Controlled access, preventing unauthorised vehicle movement, must be integrated into the public realm.

To ensure safety in the use of accessible parking spaces.

To ensure a holistic landscape design including functional elements.

Illustrative landscape plan

SW.L.41

Clustered parking spaces Large clusters of parking and loading bays should be avoided on streets. To manage impacts of parking in the public realm.

SW.L.39

Slow-traffic measures Slow-traffic measures, such as horizontal or vertical deflection (such as speed humps or sweeping layouts), could occur in the crescents or other streets, where appropriate. To control vehicle speeds and reinforce pedestrian-priority places.

SW.L.42

Location of on-street parking and loading bays On-street parking and loading bays must be located to maximise planting zones and promote ease of pedestrian movement. This could be achieved between spaces or considering alignment to building entrances. To prioritise a people-first public realm. Planting between parking bays

130

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

131

SW LANDSCAPE | Spill-out Space

Spill-out Space SW.L.43

Spill-out zone beyond Development Zones

SW.L.45

Spill-out zones could occur in appropriate locations to be in front of ‘active uses’ and prioritised in areas identified for active frontages.

Distinction of spill-out zones and footpaths There should be a distinction between spill-out space and pedestrian zones. This could be achieved through materiality, planting, or lighting.

To ensure the integrity of the public realm.

To ensure clear pedestrian zones and free movement of pedestrians.

► Refer to relevant Character Areas for

additional information on spill-out spaces.

Development Zone boundary Maximum Building Line Spill-out space

SW.L.44

Welcoming and open Spill-out space must be designed as an integral part of the public realm. This could be achieved through the use of permeable features and/or avoiding the use of barriers or fences. To ensure spill-out feels inclusive and welcoming. Welcoming spill-out space

132

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

133

SW LANDSCAPE | Defensible Space

Defensible Space SW.L.46

Defensible space inside Development Zones Habitable rooms located at grade must have defensible space. Defensible space should be located within the Development Zone. Where this is not possible, other solutions could be acceptable such as planting in the public realm, provided it is carefully coordinated and privacy is ensured. To safeguard the public realm and provide amenity for Ground Floor residents.

Development Zone boundary Maximum Building Line Defensible space area

Key Development Zone boundary Habitable room Defensible space within Development Zone Public realm

Defensible space adjacent to habitable rooms

134

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

135

SW LANDSCAPE | Defensible Space

SW.L.47

Planting

SW.L.49

Planting should form a part of defensible space, where there are suitable environmental conditions.

Level changes Level changes could be used to create defensible space. Access to primary entrances must be inclusive and accessible.

To maximise greening and reinforce the landscape led scheme.

To provide a variety of solutions for the design of defensible space.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Planting.

Planting in defensible space

SW.L.48

Edges of defensible space

Level difference between ground floor units and Public Realm creating defensible space

SW.L.50

Well maintained

Edges of defensible space should allow for passive surveillance of the public realm. Edges could be limited in height and not exceed 1.2m above ground.

Defensible space must be accessible for maintenance. Defensible space could be maintained by residents to encourage a sense of ownership and community.

To activate the public realm and encourage passive surveillance.

To ensure well maintained planted zones.

Visually permeable defensible space

Maintenance of defensible space

136

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

137

SW LANDSCAPE | Boundary Conditions

Boundary Conditions SW.L.51

Areas adjacent to existing highways Landscape adjacent to existing public highways must consider and respond to the existing character, materiality, signage strategy, planting, etc. Appropriate responses could include extending the existing character or positively differentiating from it. To ensure a carefully considered transition between existing and newly proposed landscape. Key plan of areas adjacent to existing highways

SW.L.52

Boundaries to existing houses Any proposed treatment of boundary conditions adjacent to existing houses could include enhanced consultation with neighbours. To facilitate consensus.

Key plan of boundaries to existing properties

Aerial image of the existing Site condition

138

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

139

SW LANDSCAPE | Boundary Conditions

SW.L.53

Areas adjacent to existing houses

SW.L.55

Cluny Mews Design could include enhanced consultation with residential neighbours and/or St Cuthbert’s Church, enabling level access connection.

Any proposed landscape adjacent to existing houses should include areas of planting. To buffer noise to existing gardens or houses where possible.

To pursue a connection between St Cuthbert’s Lane and Cluny Mews.

Key plan of boundaries to existing properties

SW.L.54

Areas adjacent to Network Rail/LUL land

SW.L.56

Landscape adjacent to Network Rail or London Underground Limited (LUL) land must follow Network Rail guidance and access requirements and/or LUL proximity obligations accordingly.

Areas adjacent to West Cromwell Road Landscape adjacent to West Cromwell Road should enable future potential connections to the existing road. This could be achieved through the integration of levels or enabling connections through bridges or other light structures.

To ensure Network Rail and LUL requirements are met.

To safeguard potential future connections to the existing highway. Key plan of areas adjacent to Network Rail land

140

Key plan of residential neighbours of Cluny Mews

Key plan of areas adjacent to West Cromwell Road

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

141

SW LANDSCAPE | Sustainability

Sustainability SW.L.57

Landscape-led, enhancing nature

SW.L.60

Circular resource use

The design must promote the principles of a landscape-led proposal through metrics such as Biodiversity Net Gain and Urban Greening Factor as well as inclusive access to nature for all.

The principles of durability, disassembly, re-use and adaptability must be explored in designs.

To ensure a landscape-led proposal.

► Refer to Sustainability Strategy (EC.PA.21), Environmental

To promote circular resource use in the proposal. Statement (EC.PA.12) and other relevant documents.

► Refer to Sustainability Strategy (EC.PA.21), Environmental Statement (EC.PA.12) and other relevant documents.

SW.L.58

Healthy community

SW.L.61

The design must support a healthy community with comfortable homes, a green, connected and activated public realm and a supporting mix of uses.

Air quality The design must consider air quality and implement strategies for improving air quality for on-site and neighbours.

To support a healthy community.

To ensure improvement of air quality is part of the design.

► Refer to Sustainability Strategy (EC.PA.21), Environmental Statement (EC.PA.12) and other relevant documents.

SW.L.59

Energy and Net Zero The design must implement strategies to align with Net Zero ambitions outlined in the Sustainability Strategy. To reduce the upfront and ongoing impacts of the proposal.

► Refer to Sustainability Strategy (EC.PA.21), Environmental

SW.L.62

Water management The design must include water management strategies for the capture, storage, use and generation of water. To promote sustainable water management.

► Refer to Sustainability Strategy (EC.PA.21), Environmental Statement (EC.PA.12) and other relevant documents.

Statement (EC.PA.12) and other relevant documents.

142

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

143

SW LANDSCAPE | Green/blue Infrastructure

Green/blue Infrastructure SW.L.63

Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) strategy

SW.L.64

The design must adopt an integrated approach to managing water across the Site. The description on how this could be achieved is outlined throughout this section.

Reduce run-off and improve water quality SuDS features must be incorporated within the public realm. To reduce the quantity of water run-off and improve water quality.

To create a sustainable environment. SuDS features

SW.L.65

Natural drainage features SuDS, including rain gardens, detention ponds, retention ponds or swales, should be integrated into soft landscaping. To improve water quality and reduce quantity of run-off.

SuDS integrated into soft landscaping

SW.L.66

Permeable surfaces Permeable surfaces should be included as part of the drainage strategy.

Key

To assist in managing rainwater and reducing the volume of run-off.

Integrated landscape SuDS features on structure Integrated landscape SuDS features at grade Street rain gardens at grade Street rain gardens on structure

SuDS

144

Permeable surfaces

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

145

SW LANDSCAPE | Green/blue Infrastructure

SW.L.67

SuDS integration

SW.L.70

The public realm must deliver a range of habitats as defined by the landscape characters described in the following codes.

SuDS features could be integrated with other public realm strategies where they enhance the use of the landscape for play, sensory benefits, learning about nature, and social interaction.

To create a diverse, interconnected green network whilst providing habitat conditions to support life throughout all lifecycles.

To improve the quality of the public realm.

► Refer to Environmental Statement (EC.PA.12).

Play space enhanced with SuDS

SW.L.68

Biodiversity strategy

Biodiversity and habitat creation Where natural drainage features are used, these must be designed to maximise biodiversity and habitat creation. To encourage biodiversity and create varied habitats. SuDS as a biodiversity asset

SW.L.69

146

Maintenance

Key

The design of SuDS features must take into account future maintenance needs. This could include access for servicing and repairs, or maintenance of planting.

Urban Meadow

To ensure they continue to function as designed and assist in accordance with the flood risk strategy.

Ecological Stepping Stone

The Bioline Post-industrial Remediation Gardens Climate Resilient Streetscapes Community Orchards The Flower Amphitheatre The Cascades Undisturbed habitats

SuDS accessible for maintenance

Diagram showing sitewide biodiversity

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

147

SW LANDSCAPE | Green/blue Infrastructure

SW.L.71

Urban Meadow

SW.L.73

The Urban Meadow should maximise diversity of species that reflect a meadow character, amenity areas and surrounding patches of low flowering grass. Both should include a wide variety of trees. Meadow planting character could be created using wildflower meadow mixes with various management regimes, species rich grasses, and/or herbaceous planting.

The Bioline must provide an area of biodiverse habitat of equal or greater value than the existing SINC. This could be created through a dense woodland corridor including deadwood. To maintain and enhance a link with habitats along the rail line to the north and south (including to Brompton Cemetery).

To ensure there is ecological value year-round, creating undisturbed nature pockets in an otherwise highly active urban landscape, providing habitat structures for a range of species including foraging areas for insects (wildflowers) and roosting areas for nesting birds (trees). SW.L.72

Trees • Acer campestre - Field maple • Betula pendula - Silver birch • Carpinus betulus - Hornbeam • Fagus sylvatica - Common beech • Malus sylvestris - European crabapple • Pinus sylvestris - Scots pine • Prunus avium - Wild cherry • Prunus padus - Bird cherry • Quercus petraea - Sessile oak • Quercus robur - English oak • Sorbus aucuparia - Mountain ash • Sorbus torminalis - Wild service tree Shrubs • Cornus sanguinea - Dogwood • Crataegus laevigata - Midland hawthorn 148

SW.L.74

Example species: Urban Meadow

Example species Planting design for the Urban Meadow should include some of the species outlined below:

The Bioline

• • • •

Crataegus monogyna - Hawthorn Euonymus europaeus - Spindle Prunus spinosa - Blackthorn Viburnum lantana - Common wayfaring tree

Groundcovers • Achillea fillipendulina - Yarrow • Aster cordifolius - Common blue wood aster • Astrantia major - Great masterwort • Calamintha nepata - Lesser calamint • Centranthus ruber ‘Albus’ - White valerian • Deschampsia flexuosa - Wavy hair-grass • Echinacea purpurea - Purple coneflower • Knautia arvensis - Field scabious • Nepata faassenii - Catmint • Perovskia atriplicifolia - Russian sage • Salvia nemorosa - Woodland sage • Sesleria autumnalis - Autumn moor grass

Example species Planting design for The Bioline should include some of the species outlined below:

Example species: The Bioline

Trees • Acer campestre - Field maple • Malus sylvestris - European crabapple • Pinus sylvestris - Scots pine • Prunus avium - Wild cherry • Prunus padus - Bird cherry • Quercus petraea - Sessile oak • Quercus robur - English oak • Sorbus aucuparia - Mountain ash • Sorbus torminalis - Wild service tree Shrubs • Cornus sanguinea - Dogwood • Crataegus laevigata - Midland hawthorn • Prunus spinosa - Blackthorn • Rhamnus cathartica - Purging buckthorn • Viburnum opulus - Guelder rose Groundcovers • Ajuga reptans - Bugle • Brunnera macrophylla - Siberian bugloss

• • • • • • • • • • • • • •

Campanula latifolia ‘Alba’ - White giant bellflower Digitalis grandiflora - Yellow foxglove Dryopteris filix-mas - Male fern Epimedium youngianum ‘Niveum’ Snowy barrenwort Fragaria vesca - Wild strawberry Galium odoratum - Sweet woodruff Geranium magnificum - Purple cranesbill Polypodium vulgare - Common polypody Pulmonaria angustiflorum - Creeping comfrey Symphytum grandiflorum - Bigflower tellima Trachystemon orientalis - AbrahamIsaac-Jacob Liriope spicata - Creeping lilyturf Luzula nivea - Snowy wood-rush Luzula sylvatica - Greater wood-rush

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

149

SW LANDSCAPE | Green/blue Infrastructure

SW.L.75

SW.L.76

Post-industrial Remediation Gardens

Climate Resilient Streetscapes

Post-industrial Remediation Gardens should reflect the industrial character of the area. This could include species that can withstand high user activity and larger tree species with high canopy clearance.

Climate resilient streetscapes should be tree-lined and include tall vegetation and nature-based solutions for rainwater management, with SUDS designed to support urban scrub habitats.

To support a landscape in challenging conditions that celebrates the industrial character of the area.

To create temporary wetland habitat during rainy seasons, which provides habitat and foraging places for local biodiversity.

Example species Planting design for Post-industrial Remediation Gardens should include some of the species outlined below: Trees • Betula pubescens - Downy birch • Betula pendula - Silver birch • Pinus sylvestris - Scots pine • Populus tremula - Common aspen • Prunus avium - Wild cherry • Prunus cerasifera - Cherry plum • Prunus mahaleb - Mahaleb cherry • Prunus padus - Bird cherry • Quercus robur - English oak • Salix caprea - Goat willow • Sorbus aucuparia- Rowan Shrubs • Crataegus monogyna - Common hawthorn • Crataegus laevigata - Hawthorn • Prunus spinosa - Sloe Groundcovers • Achillea millefolium - Yarrow • Ajuga reptans - Bugle • Aquilegia vulgaris - Columbine

150

SW.L.77

Example species: Post-industrial Remediation Gardens

SW.L.78

Example species

Example species: Climate Resilient Streetscapes

Planting design for Climate Resilient Streetscapes should include some of the species outlined below: • • • • • • • • • • • • •

Artemisia absinthium - Common worm wood Artemisia ludoviciana - Silver worm wood Aster divaricatus - White wood aster Deschampsia flexuosa - Wavy hairgrass Fragaria vesca - Wild strawberry Geranium cantabrigiense - Cranesbill Meconopsis cambrica - Welsh poppy Origanum vulgare - Origano Sesleria autumnalis - Autumn moor grass Sedum spurium ‘Album Superbum’ White flowering spurium Thymus serpyllum - Breckland thyme Verbascum thapsus - Common mullein Viola odorata - Sweet violet

Trees • Acer campestre - Field maple • Acer platanoides - Norway maple • Alnus glutinosa - Common alder • Alnus spaethii - Spaetha alder • Betula pubescens - Downy birch • Fraxinus pensylvanica - Green ash • Quercus robur - English oak • Salix alba - White willow • Ulmus laevis - European white elm Shrubs • Cornus sanguinea - Common dogwood • Euonymus europaeus - European spindle • Ribes nigrum - Black currant • Viburnum opulus - Guelder rose

Groundcovers • Alchemilla mollis - Lady’s mantle • Aquilegia vulgaris - Columbine • Aster cordifolius ‘Little Carlow’ Common blue wood aster • Astrantia major - Great masterwort • Bistorta officinalis - European bistort • Calamagrostis acutiflora - Feather reed-grass • Carex pendula - Pendulous sedge • Deschampsia cespitosa - Tufted hair grass • Filipendula vulgaris - Dropwort • Geranium magnificum - Purple cranesbill • Geranium sanguineum - Bloody cranesbill • Iris sibirica - Siberian iris • Phlomis russeliana - Jerusalem sage • Primula florindae - Giant cowslip • Veronica spicata - Spiked speedwell

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

151

SW LANDSCAPE | Green/blue Infrastructure

SW.L.79

Community Orchard

SW.L.81

The Community Orchard should include fruiting species and areas with dense vegetation. Other elements including dead wood, boulders and taller trees should be provided. The proposal could include open water features or rain gardens.

The Flower Amphitheatre must be characterised by flower-rich species. This should include spring flowering shrubs and trees, late blooming herbs and night-flowering species. To support pollinators, foraging birds and bats while creating a seasonal aesthetic experience at the station square.

To create foraging habitat for, birds, bats and insects, refuge areas for small mammals and reptiles and nesting areas for insects and birds. SW.L.82 SW.L.80

Example species Planting design for Community Orchard should include some of the species outlined below: Trees • Castanea sativa - Sweet chestnut • Cydonia oblonga - Quince • Juglans ailanthifolia cordiformis Heart nut • Juglans nigra - Black walnut • Juglans regia - English walnut • Malus domestica - Common apple tree • Malus sylvestris - European crabapple • Mespilus germanica - Common medlar • Morus alba - White mulberry • Morus nigra - Black mulberry • Prunus avium - Wild cherry • Prunus cerasus - Sour cherry • Prunus domestica - Common plum • Pyrus communis - Common pear • Pyrus cordata - Plymouth pear Shrubs • Aronia melanocarpa - Black chokeberry • Cornus mas - Cornelian cherry

152

The Flower Amphitheatre

Example species: Community Orchard

• • • • •

Corylus avellana - Hazelnut Elaeagnus umbellata - Autumn olive Prunus cerasifera - Cherry plum Ribes nigrum - Blackcurrant Ribes rubrum - Redcurrant

Groundcovers • Agastache foeniculum - Anise hyssop • Deschampsia flexuosa - Wavy hairgrass • Fragaria vesca - Wild strawberry • Myrrhis odorata - Sweet cicely • Origanum vulgare - Oregano • Salvia nemorosa - Woodland sage • Satureja montana - Winter savory • Thymus vulgaris - Common thyme • Pulmonaria officinalis - Blue lungwort

Example species Planting design for the Flower Amphitheatre should include some of the species outlined below: Trees • Betula pendula - Silver birch • Betula pubescens - Downy birch • Malus sylvestris - European crabapple • Pinus sylvestris - Scots pine • Prunus avium - Sweet cherry • Prunus mahaleb - Mahaleb cherry • Prunus padus - Bird cherry • Quercus robur - English oak • Sorbus aucuparia - Mountain ash Shrubs • Crataegus monogyna - Common hawthorn • Crataegus laevigata - Hawthorn • Prunus spinosa - Sloe

Example species: The Flower Amphitheatre

• • • • • • •

Groundcovers • Achillea millefolium - Yarrow • Achillea filipendulina - Fernleaf yarrow • Artemisia ludoviciana - White sage • Aster cordifolius - Common blue wood aster • Aster divaricatus - White wood aster

• • • • • • •

Calamagrostis acutiflora - Feather reed-grass Calamintha nepata - Lesser calamint Deschampsia cespitosa - Tufted hairgrass Deschampsia flexuosa - Wavy hairgrass Echineacea purpurea - Purple coneflower Geranium renardii - Caucasian geranium Kalimeris incisa ‘Alba’ - Japanese aster Nepeta faassenii - Catmint Perovskia atriplicifolia - Russian sage Phlomis russeliana - Turkish sage Salvia nemorosa - Woodland sage Sesleria autumnalis - Autumn moor grass Sesleria nitida - Shining moor grass Veronica spicata - Spiked speedwell

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

153

SW LANDSCAPE | Green/blue Infrastructure

SW.L.83

Ecological Stepping Stone

SW.L.85

The Ecological Stepping Stone must utilise planting to create a vegetation barrier. Variation of planting should be considered, including the height, width and porosity of the planting scheme.

The Cascades should create a terraced terrain which include rainwater filtration pools. Plant selection should be resilient to both moist and drier seasons, and adapt to different climate conditions. Naturalistic water (non chlorinated) should be included within the design.

To ensure a vegetation barrier facilitating the deposition of pollutant particles while also providing a range of habitats.

SW.L.84

To provide open water features which are hotspots for biodiversity.

Example species

SW.L.86

Planting design for Ecological Stepping Stone should include some of the species outlined below: Trees • Acer campestre - Field maple • Acer platanoides - Norway maple • Acer pseudoplatanus - Sycamore maple • Alnus spaethii - Spaetha alder • Carpinus betulus - Hornbeam • Prunus avium - Wild cherry • Quercus cerris - Turkey oak • Quercus petraea - Sessile oak • Quercus robur - English oak • Salix alba - White willow • Sorbus aria - Whitebeam • Ulmus laevis - European white elm Shrubs • Crataegus laevigata - Hawthorn • Prunus spinosa - Sloe • Prunus incititia - Damson plum Groundcovers • Achillea filipendulina - Fernleaf yarrow • Aster cordifolius ‘Little Carlow’ Common blue wood aster

154

The Cascades

Example species: Ecological Stepping Stone

• • • • • • • • • • • •

Aster divaricatus - White wood aster Aster macrophyllus ‘Twilight’ - Big-leaf aster Astrantia major - Great masterwort Calamintha nepata - Lesser calamint Centranthus ruber ‘Albus’ - White valerian Deschampsia flexuosa - Wavy hairgrass Nepata faassenii - Catmint Salvia nemorosa - Woodland sage Sesleria autumnalis - Autumn moor grass Sesleria heufleriana - Blue moor grass Sesleria nitida - Shining moor grass Verbena bonariensis - Purpletop vervain

Example species Planting design for the Cascades should include some of the species outlined below: Trees • Alnus glutinosa - Common alder • Alnus incana - Grey alder • Betula pendula - Silver birch • Betula pebescens - Downy birch • Fraxinus pennsylvanica - Green ash • Pinus sylvestris - Scots pine • Prunus padus - European birdcherry • Salix caprea - Goat willow • Sorbus aucuparia - Rowan Shrubs • Cornus sanguinea - Common dogwood • Euonymus europaeus - Common spindle • Ribes nigrum - Black currant • Prunus padus - Bird cherry • Sambucus nigra - Black elder • Viburnum opulus - Guelder rosebuckthorn • Salix caprea - Goat willow • Sambucus nigra - Elderberry

Example species: the Cascades

Groundcovers • Alchemilla mollis - Lady’s mantle • Aquilegia vulgaris - Columbine • Aster cordifolius - Common blue wood aster • Astrantia major - Great masterwort • Bistorta officinalis - European bistort • Calamagrostis acutiflora - Feather reed-grass • Carex pendula - Pendulous sedge • Corydalis lutea - Yellow fumitory • Deschampsia cespitosa - Tufted hair grass • Filipendula vulgaris - Dropwort • Geranium magnificum - Purple cranesbill • Iris pseudacorus - Yellow iris • Phlomis russeliana - Jerusalem sage • Primula florindae - Giant cowslip • Veronica spicata - Spiked speedwell

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

155

SW LANDSCAPE | Green/blue Infrastructure

SW.L.87

Adjacent habitats

SW.L.90

The public realm must include a range of habitat typologies drawing from nearby habitats.

Existing habitats and trees should be retained and enhanced where possible, and dead wood must be retained on Site. Where this is not possible, replacement of similar or higher ecological value and trees of similar size should be made.

To connect to existing habitats.

To comply with CIEEM guidance for mitigation: first avoid harm, then mitigate and lastly compensate negative impacts with enhancement as an additional step.

Adjacent habitat, Brompton Cemetery

SW.L.88

Existing habitats and trees

Linking habitats

SW.L.91

Construction phasing

Landscaped areas must link with habitats along the existing railway corridors, street trees and other existing vegetated areas.

Planting should be included in early phases of the development, particularly for habitats which take longer to reach maturity such as trees.

To strengthen, maintain and create new green corridors across the Site and link to wider habitats beyond the Site boundary.

To ensure the Site enhances biodiversity sooner, so that later phases of development are able to score higher in BNG assessments. Street trees, Old Brompton Road

SUND Nature Park - SLA

SW.L.89

Green Corridor

SW.L.92

Support pollination

Railway lines running through the Site form a “Green Corridor”, connecting areas of ecological value. The design must provide equal or greater value than the existing Green Corridor. This could include native tree planting, scrub and wildflower planting.

Landscape proposals should include fruiting species or other pollinator friendly plants.

To ensure the green corridor continues to provide routes along which wildlife can travel.

► Refer to RBKC’s Biodiversity Action Plan.

To support foraging and nesting birds.

Pollinator friendly plants

156

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

157

SW LANDSCAPE | Green/blue Infrastructure

Silkeborg Pedestrian Streets and Søndertorv - SLA

SW.L.93

Native species

SW.L.96

A wide range of native species should be prioritised in all planting mixes. The selection of plants should provide food resources throughout the year. This could include spring flowering shrubs and trees as well as late blooming herbs. To support biodiversity throughout all seasons and halt extinction of rare and specialized species.

SW.L.94

Invasive species

Green ladders Balconies could integrate planting. This could be achieved with planter boxes on balconies, subject to fire safety. For insects and birds to find and pollinate green terraces and roof gardens, creating a vertical corridor.

Native species

Planting feature on façades

SW.L.97

Invasive non-native species should be removed and appropriate ongoing management undertaken to improve the soil conditions of the Site.

Wildlife refuges Landscape designs must provide wildlife refuges. To ensure the ecological value of the Herlev Hospital - SLA existing local wildlife sites (SINC) partly incorporated into the project Site.

To stop invasive species from spreading, and re-establish native plant species.

Opportunities for wildlife refuges

SW.L.95

Night-flowering species Night-flowering species should be included in the proposal. To attract moths and in turn support foraging bats.

SW.L.98

Features for insects Landscape designs must include features of benefit to insects such as standing dead wood, metal features, insect homes and rock piles. To ensure the creation of habitats for invertebrates and in turn provide food for small mammals and birds. Features for insects

158

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

159

SW LANDSCAPE | Green/blue Infrastructure

SW.L.99

Habitats for target species Landscape designs must aim to create habitats for local target species in all habitat typologies, and in some cases on rooftops. This includes the following target species: Common swift and peregrine falcon: undisturbed nesting places should be created on green rooftops in higher buildings.

SW.L.100

Urban greening Urban greening strategies must be provided in Development Zones and public realm to achieve the target for the Urban Greening Factor (UGF). The diagram below is a demonstration of one way to achieve the overall Site UGF based on the Illustrative Masterplan. Other opportunities to enhance the UGF should be explored. To ensure sitewide UGF is achieved.

► Refer to Spatial Strategies chapter in the Design and Access Statement: Masterplan (EC.PA.08).

House sparrows: Dense hedgerows and native scrub vegetation should be included in designs. Stag beetles: Mixed woodland and rotting wood logs must be included in the designs. Solitary bees: Open spaces ranging from bare mineral soil to partly covered by vegetation must be provided. An accurate selection of native flowering plants should also be considered. To contribute to biodiversity preservation efforts attracting target species.

Intensive green roof Flower-rich perennial planting Residential podium intensive green roof (60% planted) Commercial podium intensive green roof (60% planted) Semi-natural vegetation Climbing plants Amenity grassland Permeable paving Urban Greening Factor

160

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

161

SW LANDSCAPE | Green/blue Infrastructure

SW.L.101

Green roofs

SW.L.103

Where suitable, green roof substrate depth should be undulating in order to create varied growing conditions and visual interest.

Green and brown roofs (including Intensive Green Roofs) should be provided on buildings and maintained to support the long-term success of the roofing. Provision of green and brown roofs is subject to coordination with other sustainability, amenity and technical requirements. To create varied growing conditions and visual interest.

SW.L.102

Blue roofs Blue roofs could be included, either as part of a green roof structure or as a standalone blue roof. Provision of green and brown roofs is subject to coordination with other sustainability, amenity and technical requirements.

Undulating soil depths

To create varied growing conditions and visual interest.

Green roof

Varied depth of Green Roofs

SW.L.104

Green roof maintenance Green roofs must be adequately maintained throughout an establishment phase (5 years) and beyond. To ensure ongoing quality and longevity of green roofs.

To explore opportunities for the provision of blue roofs within the Earls Court Development.

162

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

163

SW LANDSCAPE | Planting

Planting SW.L.105

Microclimate

SW.L.108

Technical coordination The detailed planting scheme must be developed with input from a Suitably Qualified Ecologist (SQE).

The plant selection must be suitable for the specific microclimate of the areas in which species are located, such as shaded, sunnier and windier environments.

To ensure resilient planting selection and that the Biodiversity Net Gain requirements are met.

To ensure planting thrives in suitable conditions. Shade tolerant planting selection

Skt Kjeld’s Square - SLA

SW.L.106

Climate resilience

SW.L.109

Robust planting

The plant selection must consider the effects of climate change and favour climate resilient planting.

Planting should be designed with consideration for maintenance and irrigation requirements.

To enable planting to thrive in a changing climate.

To ensure design quality can be maintained over time.

Robust planting selection

Søndervold Nature Park in Fredericia - SLA

SW.L.107

Seasonality

SW.L.110

Planting should include a ground cover layer with a mix of species.

The plant selection should provide year-round interest and consider seasonality.

To suppress weeds.

To ensure interest is maintained throughout seasons.

Seasonality in tree species

164

Ground cover

Species mix in groundcover

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

165

SW LANDSCAPE | Planting

SW.L.111

Planting adjacent to Network Rail premises

SW.L.114

Drainage layer Tree planting must have a drainage layer.

Planting adjacent to Network Rail land must follow Network Rail guidance.

To ensure trees thrive.

To ensure Network Rail requirements are met.

SW.L.112

Trees defining Character Areas Trees must contribute to distinct landscape Character Areas. Tree species selection must reflect the themes defined in the planting and biodiversity sitewide plan. To create a character driven public realm.

SW.L.113

Distinctive tree species

Tree variety A variety of tree sizes, forms and species must be used in each landscape Character Area to offer a variety of different colours, forms and seasonal interest. To highlight seasonality and create visual interest. Varied tree planting

166

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

167

SW LANDSCAPE | Planting

SW.L.115

Planting on structure

SW.L.117

Mounded soil TREE

Where practical, soil depth must be a minimum of 400mm below the FFL of the public realm. Mounded soil should be minimised.

Where a minimum soil depth of 1200mm is not achievable for large tree planting, soil must be mounded or retained to reach a depth of 1200mm.

To ensure all of the planting has an adequate soil depth.

To enable trees to thrive and ensure their long term success.

SW.L.118

1200MM MIN. SOIL BUILD UP STRUCTURE

Illustrative section of tree planting with mounded soil

Tree planting and soil volume Tree planting must ensure sufficient soil volume for plants to thrive. Tree pits should be connected to maximise soil volume. To promote tree health and longevity.

Illustrative section

SW.L.116

Tree planting on structure

SW.L.119 TREE

Where practical, large trees must be planted in a minimum soil depth of 1200mm. This applies for both planting on ground and on structure. To enable trees to thrive and ensure their long term success.

168

1200MM MIN. SOIL BUILD UP STRUCTURE

Illustrative section of tree planting on structure

Coordination of services and tree planting Utility zones must be coordinated to allow for planted zones and trees and also reduce future maintenance requirements for proposed material surfaces. To maximise planting and maximise potential growth of trees. Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

169

SW LANDSCAPE | Microclimate

Microclimate SW.L.120

Daylight/sunlight in the public realm - Uses

SW.L.122

The distribution of spill-out areas should consider access to light throughout the year.

Wind mitigation Designs of the public realm must consider wind mitigation. This could include siting of trees and planting, or manipulation of topography.

To support a comfortable public realm that encourages animation.

To mitigate the impact of wind in to the public realm.

► Refer to Environmental Statement (EC.PA.12).

SW.L.121

Daylight/sunlight in the public realm - Planting The distribution of planting in the public realm must consider access to light throughout the year and day to optimise comfort and usability. This could include arrangement of planting or selection of deciduous or evergreen tree species. To support a comfortable public realm that encourages use of the outdoors throughout the year and day.

170

SW.L.123

Location of seating The distribution of seating in the public realm must consider wind mitigation. This could include locating seating between trees or in areas suitable as identified in the Wind Microclimate Assessment. To provide comfortable places to rest.

► Refer to Environmental Statement (EC.PA.12).

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

171

SW LANDSCAPE | Materiality

Materiality SW.L.124

Coherence across different areas

SW.L.125

The material palette of the public realm must prioritise simplicity and develop a clear strategic response across Character Areas to ensure a coherence and material quality across the Site.

Accessible and inclusive materials Materials and design of surfaces must be accessible and comfortable for all users. To ensure an equitable, inclusive and welcoming public realm.

To ensure clarity of wayfinding across the different Character Areas, and a design that will age well over time.

Inclusive and safe surfaces

► Refer to relevant Character Areas for additional information on spaces and streets.

SW.L.126

Durability Materials must be durable, robust and suitable for their intended use. To minimise maintenance and remain attractive throughout the life of the public realm.

Durable materials

SW.L.127

Local character Materials should respond to materials used in the surrounding context and on the existing streets either by drawing from their palette or by positively differentiating from them.

Key The Table and The Bioline Destination square Square & Community green

To ensure that the public realm ties into local character.

Boulevard & Crescent Lane, Place, Passage Walk

Materials strategy

172

Contextual materials

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

173

SW LANDSCAPE | Materiality

SW.L.128

Variation in paving sizes

SW.L.131

Variation in paving sizes should be used to demarcate pedestrian, cyclist and vehicle zones.

Squares - extent of material The materiality of squares should appear as a consistent surface. The primary materiality of the Squares could extend up to the primary building line.

To create a clear definition between surfaces for different users.

To define the extent of the Squares. Distinguishing use through paving

SW.L.129

On-street parking and loading bays

Consistency of materiality in Squares

SW.L.132

Squares - contextual materials

Materiality of on-street parking and loading bays should be coherent with the material of the central movement route.

Materiality of the Squares should respond to local character either by drawing from their palette or by positively differentiating from them.

To ensure a continuous public realm.

To create a coherent public realm that ties into the local character. Budolfi Plads - SLA

Parking bay surfaces

SW.L.130

Intersections & junctions

SW.L.133

Paving and materiality must contribute to legibility and wayfinding, particularly at key intersections and junctions. The design of junctions and intersections should prioritise the safety and convenience of pedestrians and cyclists.

Contextual materials

Squares - shared surface The Squares could include shared surface materials for vehicular areas. To ensure a people-first public realm within the Squares.

To ensure a people-first public realm. Materiality assisting safety

174

Shared surface

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

175

SW LANDSCAPE | Street Furniture

Street Furniture SW.L.134

Familiar design

SW.L.136

Resting places Furniture within streetscapes and pedestrian-priority routes should be designed to provide resting places along key desire lines. A diverse range of seating should be provided, for a wider range of users.

Furniture within the public realm should be selected or designed to ensure a familiar design language within each Character Area. To allow for cohesion of street furniture in the public realm.

To align furniture placement with key desire lines. Resting places

Furniture materials

SW.L.135

Local context

SW.L.137

Regular distribution

Where street furniture is provided, it could tie into the local context. This could be achieved by drawing from existing borough guidance.

Seating should be provided at intervals no greater than 50m throughout public realm and on pedestrian routes.

To stitch into the local context and provide familiar street furniture.

To create a functional and comfortable public realm.

Seating distribution

176

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

177

SW LANDSCAPE | Street Furniture

SW.L.138

Seating and microclimate

SW.L.140

Seating should be located to optimise their use throughout the year, considering sunlight and microclimate conditions.

Durability Design or selection of furniture must consider its durability and maintenance requirements. To maintain a comfortable and durable public realm.

To maximise comfort of users.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Microclimate.

Durable street furniture

Usable seating

SW.L.139

Designed for a range of abilities

SW.L.141

Furniture within the public realm must have a simple and coherent material palette. This could include wood, metal, and concrete.

Seating areas should provide space for wheelchair users, prams or pushchairs to be positioned adjacent to seating. The design of a proportion of seating should allow wheelchair users to transfer onto seating, without impeding features such as armrests. To ensure a wide range of users can comfortably rest in the public realm.

178

Material palette

To ensure a cohesive material palette in the public realm. Accessibility provision

Simple, coherent material palette

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

179

SW LANDSCAPE | Lighting

Lighting SW.L.142

Accessible and inclusive lighting

SW.L.145

Lighting strategy and design should be utilised for wayfinding.

The lighting strategy and design must create usable, comfortable environments for a wide range of end users. To ensure an equitable and inclusive public realm, suitable for people with a range of abilities.

SW.L.143

Safe and welcoming

Wayfinding

To strengthen the wayfinding strategy and improve wayfinding after dark.

Lighting supporting wayfinding

Inclusive lighting

Ladegårdsparken - SLA

SW.L.146

Human scale lighting The location of lighting should consider a human scale. This should include a consistent mounting height for pedestrian routes and could include integration of lighting in street furniture.

Where external lighting is provided, it must be designed to help create a safe and welcoming environment. This could include vertical illumination. To create a safe, welcoming public realm.

To support placemaking and a pedestrian-friendly environment. Welcoming lighting

Pedestrian-focused lighting

The Oasis at Roskilde Festival - SLA

SW.L.144

Enhance character

SW.L.147

Landmarks Lighting to landmarks should be selective and consider human scale.

Where external lighting is provided, it must be used to enhance the character and quality of the public realm.

To aid wayfinding and overall legibility through highlighting critical vistas.

To create a high-quality public realm.

Characterful lighting

180

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

181

SW LANDSCAPE | Lighting

SW.L.148

Impacts on ecology

SW.L.151

Reducing glare and contrast The design of lighting must minimise contrast and glare. This could include selection of luminaires with low glare, concealed light sources or the spacing of luminaires.

Where external lighting is provided, it should minimise impacts on biodiversity, particularly along the ecological corridors. Spill light into sensitive ecological areas should be limited.

To maintain visibility and deliver a successful lit environment.

To minimise impacts on biodiversity.

Lighting minimising glare and contrast

SW.L.149

Light pollution

SW.L.152

The design of lighting must avoid unwanted light pollution.

Landscape lighting and glare Fixtures located adjacent to landscape areas must minimise obtrusive light. This could be through fitted louvres, lenses or other glare control accessories.

To reduce light pollution and it’s negative impact on the wellbeing of residents and local wildlife.

To prevent direct views of the light sources.

SW.L.150

Potential conflict between users

SW.L.153

Areas where users may conflict - such as vehicles, cyclists or pedestriansshould have an increased light uniformity.

Colour temperature The colour temperature along routes should be warm white. To support wellbeing of people.

To help increase visibility and safety for all.

Uniform lighting at conflict area

182

Warm white colour temperature

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

183

SW LANDSCAPE | Wayfinding

Wayfinding SW.L.154

Accessible and inclusive signage

SW.L.157

Integrated signage Signage could be incorporated into landscape elements such as paving, lighting columns and seating.

Where signage is provided, it must be inclusive, and considerate of the position, lighting, visual contrast and legibility.

To reduce clutter in the public realm.

To create a welcoming and inclusive public realm for all users. Legible signage

SW.L.155

Simple, legible and consistent

Integrated signage

SW.L.158

Signage should tie into the local context. This could include local street signs and the Legible London wayfinding totems.

Signage must be highly legible and uncomplicated. Signage must use a consistent design language of materials, character and quality across the Site.

To stitch into the local context and provide familiar wayfinding.

To create an cohesive, navigable public realm.

SW.L.156

Wayfinding totem

Durable and robust

SW.L.159

Signage must be made of durable materials and designed to minimise the impacts of weathering and vandalism.

Habitat and biodiversity awareness Interpretation boards should be placed explaining the habitats present on Site and target species. This could be integrated with general wayfinding and directional signage.

To ensure the quality of the public realm is maintained in the future.

Durable signage

184

Local context

To enable appreciation and understanding of nature. Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

185

SW LANDSCAPE | Play

Play SW.L.160

Silkeborg Pedestrian Streets and Søndertorv - SLA Silkeborg Pedestrian Streets and Søndertorv - SLA

Playground areas

SW.L.161

Dedicated play areas must be located in the public realm. They should be accessible, welcoming and open. The diagram below illustrates indicative locations of dedicated playground areas within the Earls Court Development.

Nature play Where play spaces are provided, they must facilitate opportunities for engagement with nature. This could include soft landscaping and planting within play areas.

To create a connected, vibrant network of play space.

To support the overall landscape strategy.

► Refer to Spatial Strategies chapter in the Design and Access Statement: Masterplan (EC.PA.08).

Nature play

SW.L.162

Inclusive play Play spaces must offer appropriate, usable provision for a wide range of age groups and to meet the requirements of a diverse range of end users. To ensure play is accessible and inclusive to all. Inclusive play spaces

Gellerup New Nature Park - SLA

SW.L.163

Sensory stimulation The design of play spaces should provide sensory stimulation as part of the design using colour, texture, smell, animation etc. To create a varied and interesting play experience.

Key Key Dedicated playground areas Detailed Component

Illustrative play strategy diagram

186

Multi-sensory play

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

187

SW LANDSCAPE | Play

Ladegårdsparken - SLA

Charlotte Garden - SLA SW.L.164

Natural surveillance

SW.L.167

Play spaces must have natural surveillance from buildings and movement routes.

Clear sight lines in play areas Landscape design must facilitate visibility throughout play areas. This could be achieved through stem clearance of at least 2.5m, or arrangement and heights of lower planting.

To ensure safety and security.

To promote safety in play areas. Tree stem clearance to enable sight lines

Natural surveillance

Køge Kyst Søndre Havn - SLA SW.L.165

The Oasis at Roskilde Festival - SLA

Carer provision

SW.L.168

Biodiversity value in playscapes

Play spaces must provide seating within view of play equipment for parents and carers to use.

The arrangement of planting within playscapes should be configured in a way that retains biodiversity value.

To increase usability and comfort.

To ensure planting in play spaces have high biodiversity value.

Planting in play space is clearly defined and has high ecological value.

Seating for carers

SW.L.166

Materiality and play

SW.L.169

Fredericia - SLA Materials used within C play space must be appropriate for safe play. These could be soft materials such as recycled rubber, sand and grass.

Play spaces should integrate accessible equipment that allows wheelchair users and individuals with mobility issues, sensory needs and hidden disabilities to have equitable access to play.

To create a safe environment for users of all ages.

The Social Spine - SLAA

To ensure play is accessible and inclusive to all. Recycled rubber used within a play space

188

Accessible play

Accessible play equipment included in play spaces

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

189

SW LANDSCAPE | Public Art

Public Art SW.L.170

Place-specific

SW.L.172

Public art should be place-specific and enhance the overall place-making and public realm strategy.

Accessible Public art should be accessible to all users and consider the different needs of people when accessing and enjoying public art.

To create a vibrant, place-specific public realm.

To ensure public art is accessible and inclusive to all.

► Refer to Spatial Strategies chapter in the

Design and Access Statement: Masterplan (EC.PA.08).

Contextual public artwork

SW.L.173

Integrated Opportunities for the integration of public art with architecture should be explored.

SW.L.171

To embed greater flexibility and creativity in the location and form of public art.

Opportunities for local engagement Public art should provide opportunities for engagement with the local community. This could include consultation with the community or engagement of local artists.

Integrating public artworks

SW.L.174

To ensure public art has a distinct local character.

Weathering and durability Public art must be suitable for exposure to the environment if located in the public realm. This should be through the use of durable materials.

► Refer to Spatial Strategies chapter in the

Design and Access Statement: Masterplan (EC.PA.08). Public artwork

To ensure the public realm is maintained in the future.

Durable public artwork

190

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

191

SW LANDSCAPE | Communal Amenity

Communal Amenity SW.L.175

Podiums and roof terraces

SW.L.178

Soft landscaping

Podiums and roof terraces should be accessible and usable by residents, subject to coordination with other uses or requirements.

Private amenity spaces including courtyards, usable rooftops and usable podiums must include areas of soft landscaping.

To maximise communal amenity for residents.

To maximise planting and biodiversity within plots.

Accessible roof terrace

SW.L.176

Soft landscaping

Courtyards Where buildings are designed to have internal central courtyards they should be accessible and usable to residents, where possible. To create spaces that serve as communal areas and contribute to the life of the neighbourhood.

SW.L.179

Useable, planted courtyards

SW.L.177

Minimise compartmentalisation

Doorstep play The design and layout of residential courtyards and usable podium landscapes should include doorstep play. To maximise play opportunities for resident children and contribute to the sitewide play strategy.

Communal spaces should minimise compartmentalisation and be accessible and usable to residents. To create shared generous communal spaces.

192

Doorstep play

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

193

SW BUILT FORM | Overview

Built Form Overview

West Kensington

Earls Court will be transformed into a landscape-led neighbourhood. It will include a diverse mix of spaces, buildings, and uses that holistically create a new vibrant part of West London, a place where people of all ages and backgrounds can come together.

Earls Court

West Brompton 194

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

195

SW BUILT FORM | Building Typologies

Building Typologies SW.B.1

Building typologies

SW.B.2

Design should align with the Building typologies described in the diagram below. A description of the contributing role of these typologies to the Earls Court Development is included on the following pages.

Emerging from local context The design must reflect the approach to heights and massing as described in the Design and Access Statement and summarised in the diagram below. To facilitate a holistic approach to design across different buildings and typologies.

To balance a familiar approach to design with individual design expression.

► Refer to Strategic Framework chapter in the Design and

► Refer to relevant Character Areas for additional information on

Access Statement: Masterplan (EC.PA.08).

building typologies.

Key Mid-scale Smaller-scale Large-footprint Pivot Common base Perimeter block

Key

Transition block Standalone

Extend

Table Edge

Transition

Pavilion

Reinvent

Detailed Component

Building typologies

196

Urban approach

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

197

SW BUILT FORM | Building Typologies

SW.B.3

Mid-scale

SW.B.4

• Transitions from the scale of the surrounding buildings

• Defines the character of lanes

• Reinterprets characteristics of local typologies such as mansion blocks

• Responds to neighbouring scale and character

• Adopts a materiality that responds to the local context

• Includes front doors or active entrances

• Responds to the grain of the adjacent buildings

• Provides a façade rhythm and composition that reinforces a consistent character for the crescents

To provide fine-grain residential and non-residential uses on lanes.

To frame West Brompton and Warwick Crescents and contribute to the West Kensington boulevard.

Illustrative diagram, Mid-scale

Mid-scale block

198

Smaller-scale

Illustrative diagram, Smaller-scale

Smaller-scale buildings

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

199

SW BUILT FORM | Building Typologies

SW.B.5

Large-footprint

SW.B.6

• Uses massing and architectural expression to create a sense of arrival into the Site

• Considers all façades given the increased visibility from all angles

• Expresses use through the order and composition of façades

• Integrates with the surrounding landscape • Explores the importance of the relationship with the ground

• Activates the boulevards through visually permeable frontages

• Considers greater design experimentation or uniqueness

• Provides flexible, larger floorplates for commercial uses • The massing illustrated shows these plots as a commercial form, but they could be configured as residential plots in accordance with the Development Specification and Parameter Plan allocation To frame West Kensington and Empress Place Boulevards.

To provide a marker building which can be viewed in the round and is strongly integrated with the landscape. Illustrative diagram, Large-footprint

Large-footprint building

200

Pivot

Illustrative diagram, Pivot

Pivot building

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

201

SW BUILT FORM | Building Typologies

SW.B.7

Common base

SW.B.8

• Considers a distinctive base condition that responds to the character of the public realm

• Considers the immediate context of each side of the urban block and adopts a form, scale and character that responds to it

• Provides an open and visually connected façade

• Provides a well-defined and enclosed communal courtyard

• Adopts a materiality that responds to the local context • Creates opportunities for podiums to be accessible and usable

• Creates a coherent and legible urban grain that responds to the local context

To create a common base or building that has multiple elements, creating a set piece.

• Provides a degree of variation in the massing To frame the edge of Lillie Sidings Square and provide a transition to the existing Estate. Illustrative diagram, Common base

Common base

202

Perimeter block

Illustrative diagram, Perimeter block

Perimeter block

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

203

SW BUILT FORM | Building Typologies

SW.B.9

Transition block

SW.B.10

• Defines the boulevard edges

Standalone • Considers all façades given the increased visibility from all angles

• Establishes activated and visually permeable frontages to the boulevard

• Integrates with the surrounding landscape

• Forms well-defined and enclosed communal courtyards

• Considers greater design experimentation or uniqueness

• Creates a degree of variation in the massing, with varying heights expressed

• Considers the interfaces with adjacent boundaries including the rail corridor and West Cromwell Road

To create the curvature of the boulevard and transition between Lillie Sidings Square and West Kensington.

To provide a marker at the northern edge of the Site.

Illustrative diagram, Transition block

Transition block

204

Illustrative diagram, Standalone

Standalone building

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

205

SW BUILT FORM | Building Typologies

SW.B.11

Table Edge

SW.B.12

Pavilion

• Activates Empress Place with a visually permeable and engaging frontage

• Integrates with the surrounding landscape

• Manages a level change

• Explores massing and façades that activate the public realm

• Promotes visually permeable and welcoming frontages

To frame and activate the eastern edge of Empress Place

• Contributes to wayfinding • Opens the opportunity for architectural expression To animate key public realm including Aisgill Gardens, the Table and Warwick Square.

Illustrative diagram, Table Edge

Table Edge

206

Illustrative diagram, Pavilion

Pavilion

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

207

SW BUILT FORM | Layout and Massing

Layout and Massing SW.B.13

Defining the edge of the public realm

SW.B.14

Hold corners Building façades should avoid setting in at corners at upper levels on primary routes. Exceptions could include recessed entrances and/or setbacks at the top of buildings.

Where indicated in the control diagram below, buildings must predominantly align to the Maximum Building Line. To reinforce the edge of the public realm and frame key routes.

To reinforce the sense of enclosure on primary routes.

► Refer to relevant Character Areas for

Plan

additional information on frontages addressing key spaces.

Plan

Maximum Building Line

SW.B.15

Meaningful steps in massing Massing steps should be consolidated, avoiding steps of less than 2 storeys. Single storey massing steps could be acceptable on the top floor, provided there is a legible approach to the design. To ensure clarity and hierarchy of massing.

Maximum building line control diagram

208

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

209

SW BUILT FORM | Layout and Massing

SW.B.16

Massing breaks

SW.B.18

Massing could be split, for instance when land use changes result in less deep floorplates. All other guidance must be followed, such as façade hierarchies or appearance.

Different ground strategies are permitted depending on the character and context of the building. Building expression must contribute to the legibility of the massing through the ways in which each building lands onto the ground, in relation to its particular location and role in the proposal. The following codes outline three approaches.

To retain the principles set out for the proposal whilst allowing flexibility.

SW.B.17

210

Block articulation

Landing on ground

To allow variety of expression whilst reinforcing the legibility of the proposal as a whole.

SW.B.19

Building base

Massing within a Plot must be clearly articulated. This could be achieved through variation in heights, architectural expression, tone or materiality.

The building base or podium could read as continuous and take precedent over the buildings sitting ‘on top’.

To encourage variety along the length of a building façades.

To create a continuous street wall and unify the ground plane.

This could include the Large-format and Common base building typologies.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

211

SW BUILT FORM | Layout and Massing

SW.B.20

Buildings to ground

SW.B.22

Taller elements of buildings could be expressed as reaching the ground. This could be achieved through architectural expression including openings, tone or materiality.

Parapet treatment Parapet treatment to accessible podiums or terraces must read as integral to the façade. This could be achieved through extending the same treatment or through consistent tone or materiality.

This could include the Standalone building typology and sitewide key corners identified in Sitewide / Built form.

To ensure parapet detailing is integrated into the façade. Parapet treatment integrated with façade

To express the verticality of taller building elements.

SW.B.23

SW.B.21

Combination of approaches The previous two approaches to expression of building bases and vertical elements could be combined, where indicated in the control diagram.

212

Length of façades Where development zones contain multiple connected plots or where plot frontages are exceptionally long compared to the existing urban grain, these should be carefully articulated to break up the bulk and massing of the block.

This could include the Transition block and Perimeter block building typologies.

This could be achieved through composition and architectural expression such as articulating breaks between the plots (full or partial height), introducing steps or setbacks in the built form, change in materiality or vertical façade articulation.

To create harmony in expression in specific parts of the proposal.

To enhance the local character and urban grain.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

213

SW BUILT FORM | Frontages and Façades

Frontages and Façades SW.B.24

Frontages and façade hierarchy

SW.B.25

Active frontages Active uses, such as retail and food and beverage, must be predominantly concentrated on frontages addressing key routes and spaces.

Building façades should respond to the façade hierarchy outlined in the control diagram below. The description of how this could be achieved is outlined throughout this section.

To encourage an activated and vibrant public realm.

To reinforce the hierarchy of the public realm, with particular attention given to key routes and spaces.

Active frontage with food and beverage

SW.B.26

Ground Floor permeability Active uses addressing the public realm must contribute to its animation by maximising proportion of openings, transparency and visibility. To maximise activation and animation of buildings addressing the public realm. Permeable Ground Floor

Key Façades addressing key routes and spaces Façades addressing existing Estates Detailed Component

Building frontages

214

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

215

SW BUILT FORM | Frontages and Façades

SW.B.27

Entrances

SW.B.29

Building entrances should look to activate the public realm, particularly in locations where residential is the predominant or only use.

Expression of façades addressing existing Estates Façades addressing the existing Estates on the western edge of the Site, should carefully respond to their immediate context. This could be achieved through tone, materiality, grain and/or scale of their components (windows, recesses, etc.)

To animate the public realm.

To ensure that the design of façades addressing the existing Estates consider their unique context. Entrance on public realm

SW.B.28

Expression of façades addressing key routes and spaces

Illustrative view, architectural style reflecting finer scale and grain

SW.B.30

Expression of other façades Other façades could take a less formal approach than primary façades and be of smaller scale and grain.

Façades addressing key routes and spaces should express a more formal approach. This could be achieved through detailing, façade expression, tone or materiality.

To reinforce the hierarchy of the public realm.

Façades along main routes

216

Smaller scale grain

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

217

SW BUILT FORM | Frontages and Façades

SW.B.31

Prominent corners

SW.B.32

Prominent corners front or terminate important routes and views within the proposal. They should be designed with particular importance and/or incorporate prominent features. Other corners could also be considered.

Façades addressing areas of destination public realm as highlighted below could include special features. Suggested features are outlined on the following page ‘Treatment of Specials’.

To assist with legibility, orientation, wayfinding and spatial hierarchy.

To define a clear spatial hierarchy around the destination public realm.

► Refer to relevant Character Areas for additional information on

► Refer to relevant Character Areas for additional information on particularly prominent frontages.

particularly prominent frontages.

Key

Key vistas

Façades addressing destination public realm Detailed Component

Prominent corners Detailed Component

Vista façades and prominent corners

218

Opportunity for specials

Façades addressing destination public realm

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

219

SW BUILT FORM | Frontages and Façades

SW.B.33

Treatment of specials Buildings facing key public open spaces as shown on the diagrams below could include special features, such as prominent Ground Floor entrances, special building tops or distinctive design in the middle. To reinforce the spatial hierarchy highlighting the frontage to key open spaces.

Special entrance treatment

220

Special corners

Distinctive façade detail

Special Ground Floor

Special top

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

221

SW BUILT FORM | Frontages and Façades

SW.B.34

Balance between sitewide familiarity and definition of Character Areas

SW.B.37

Service area treatment

Building façades should build on the identity of the Earls Court Development while defining the uniqueness of each Character Area.

Service areas must be integrated into the design of buildings façades. They should add visual interest to the streetscene.

To reinforce both the identity of the Earls Court Development and each Character Area.

To ensure good streetscape throughout the Site.

► Refer to relevant Character Areas for additional information. Integrated service area

SW.B.35

Expression of use

SW.B.38

Service area extent

Building uses should be expressed and considered in the design. This could be achieved through details of variation such as transparency, size of apertures, colour, contrast, materiality or articulation.

Service areas must be minimised on Ground Floor frontages addressing key routes and spaces. On all other frontages, they should be minimised to avoid large extents of inactive and blank frontages.

To reinforce legibility, amplify activity and celebrate diversity of use.

To minimise large extents of inactive and blank frontages. Use expressed through scale of openings

SW.B.36

Order in the composition Buildings façades should have a considered approach to order in the composition. This could be achieved through vertical alignment in the overall composition. To respond to local character and create a calm environment. Examples of different approaches to order in the composition

222

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

223

SW BUILT FORM | Tone and Materiality

Tone and Materiality SW.B.39

Complementary materials

SW.B.40

Care and consideration must be given to each building to ensure that chosen materials are complementary to but subtly different from the existing context and surrounding buildings.

A family of buildings Buildings comprising a shared courtyard or shared base should read as a family of buildings with related materials and detailing. Where detailed and outline plots form part of the same Development Zone or adjacencies, particular attention should be paid to the design of the Outline Component at RMA in response to the Detailed Component.

To ensure a visually calm, coherent, yet characterful neighbourhood.

To ensure a refined approach to material application and distribution across the Site.

Varied, yet complementary façade treatments, materiality and colour Buildings with related materials and detailing

224

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

225

SW BUILT FORM | Tone and Materiality

SW.B.41

Familiarity through tone Design responses must ensure a coherent response to tone that reinforces the identity of the Earls Court Development. To ensure that future designs contribute to a coherent palette across the Site.

SW.B.42

Primary material palette Primary material selection across the Site should form a coherent and recognisable palette. (Adjacent precedents are an illustrative reference palette). To respond and reinterpret to the materiality of the local context.

SW.B.43

Secondary materials Secondary or tertiary materials should contribute a sense of richness and depth to the palette. To provide variety and visual interest to building façades.

Illustrative reference palette

226

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

227

SW BUILT FORM | Tone and Materiality

SW.B.44

Robustness

SW.B.46

Reflective materials Designs should avoid highly reflective materials.

Building materials and treatment must be robust and have enduring qualities.

To ensure designs and materiality respond to the local context and incorporate bird-friendly building design principles.

To create durable buildings.

► Refer to Environmental Statement (EC. PA.12).

Robust building materials

SW.B.45

Weathering and durability Materials that are prone to discolour, require frequent maintenance or weather poorly must not be used. To retain the appearance and functionality of buildings.

228

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

229

SW BUILT FORM | Tall Buildings

Tall Buildings SW.B.47

A distinct cluster

SW.B.48

Cluster legibility Tall buildings must be designed in relation to other tall buildings within the cluster, responding to their massing and architectural expression.

The tall building clusters as shown in the below diagram should form a distinct identity for Earls Court. To make Earls Court recognisable from a distance and as a regionally important destination.

To create a harmonious and coherent cluster at Earls Court when seen in relation to existing townscape and its designated heritage assets.

SW.B.49

Addressing 360 degrees All façades should be designed so that they are considered attractive from all angles. Façades could differ as they must be informed by environmental performance requirements and orientation of the building fabric. To ensure buildings are designed with consideration to all vantage points.

SW.B.50

Relationship to Ground Floor The design must contribute positively to its surroundings at street level. This could be achieved through integration with the landscape design or a high level of visual permeability.

Key

To strengthen the Ground Floor experience.

Location of tall building cluster Detailed Component

Illustrative view, the Cascades

Tall building clusters

230

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

231

SW BUILT FORM | Tall Buildings

SW.B.51

Tall building top design

SW.B.53

The design of the top of a tall building must be clearly articulated, well considered and integrate rooftop elements into a coherent overall form. This could include tops that are lighter in tone.

Consideration of microclimate effects at Ground Floor The design of tall buildings must consider the microclimate at Ground Floor, and incorporate massing strategies and design details to mitigate downdraught and wind funnelling.

To improve the impact on the skyline.

To safeguard pedestrian comfort at street level. Illustrative view, WB04

SW.B.52

Top, middle, base

SW.B.54

Tripartite expression is not mandatory where good design is evident.

Consideration of microclimate for amenity The design of tall buildings must consider the microclimate of private and communal amenity.

To allow for flexibility in the tall building form.

To safeguard the comfort and use of private and communal amenity.

Illustrative view, WB03 and WB04

232

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

233

SW BUILT FORM | Heritage Assets

Heritage Assets Preserving or enhancing designated heritage assets

Non-designated heritage assets

Proposals seek to preserve or enhance the significance of heritage assets, in line with statutory and policy requirements, or to minimise or mitigate the potential for harm to their significance. The Design Code focuses on particular views for both boroughs as described in the ‘Impacts on heritage and townscape in RBKC/ LBHF’ sections and the corresponding Character Area chapters referred to for each view.

The effect of the proposals also takes into consideration the significance of non-designated heritage assets.

Philbeach Gardens with St Cuthbert’s Church

234

Non-designated heritage assets

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

235

SW BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape in RBKC

Impacts on Heritage and Townscape in RBKC

The following information, and codes, relate to selected heritage assets in RBKC which will experience setting change in specified views. There is further specific guidance on the management of these impacts in the accompanying Character Area chapters of the Design Code.

View 25 - Philbeach Gardens

View A17 - Earl’s Court Square, North

Plot(s): WK08/09 Development Zone(s): T Character Area(s): Lillie Sidings

Plot(s): WB03/04, EC03/10, Development Zone(s): E, F, H Character Area(s): West Brompton

View A14 - Philbeach Gardens

View 29 - Penywern Road

Plot(s): WK07/08/09, EC06 Development Zone(s): L, N, T Character Area(s): Lillie Sidings

Plot(s): EC03/04/05/09/10, WB03/04 Development Zone(s): E, F, H, K, L Character Area(s): West Brompton, Warwick Crescent

View 24 - Trebovir Road

View 8 - Brompton Cemetery

Plot(s): WB04/06, EC04/05/06 Development Zone(s): H, K, L, N Character Area(s): Warwick Crescent

Plot(s): EC02/03/04/05/09/10, WB01/02/03/04/06/07 Development Zone(s): B1/B2, C, E, F, H, K, L, N Character Area(s): Sitewide

EC21

EC20

WK06

WK04 WK03

WK05

EC19

A17

WK07

WK02

EC08

WK01 WK12 EC18

WK08

EC16

EC17

EC15 EC09

WK11 EC06

WK10

EC04

EC05

WK09

WB06 EC10

EC14

EC03

WB10

EC11

WB04 WB05

EC02

EC12

WB09

EC13

WB03 EC01

WB08

WB02

WB07

WB01

RBKC key views

236

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

237

SW BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape in RBKC

Philbeach Gardens (View 25)

WK09

WK08

Trebovir Road (View 24)

WB04 EC04 EC05

WB06 EC06

Plots WB04, WB06, EC04, EC05, EC06

Plots WK08 and WK09 Development Zone T

Development Zones H, K, L and N

► Refer to Lillie Sidings / Built form /

► Refer to Warwick Crescent / Built form /

Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Trebovir Road - View 24

Philbeach Gardens - View 25

EC06 WK09

WK08

WK07

Philbeach Gardens (View A14)

Earl’s Court Square North (View A17)

Plots WK07, WK08, WK09, EC06

Plots WB03, WB04, EC03 and EC10

Development Zones L, N, T

EC03 EC10 WB03 WB04

Development Zones E, F and H

► Refer to Lillie Sidings / Built form /

► Refer to West Brompton / Built form /

Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Philbeach Gardens - View A14

238

Earl’s Court Square North - View A17

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

239

SW BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape in RBKC

EC10

EC03

WB03

EC09

WB04

EC04

EC05

Penywern Road (View 29)

SW.B.55

WB02 WB07 WB06 EC03 WB04 EC05 EC10 EC09 WB01 WB03 EC02 EC04

Skyline Buildings in Plots WB01/02/03/04/06/07/08, EC02/03/04/05/09/10, (Development Zones B1/B2, C, E, F, H, K, L, N) must contribute to the formation of a clearly defined skyline. This could be achieved through varied architectural expression between plots, such as variety in colour or materiality.

Plots EC03, EC04, EC05, EC09, EC10, WB03 and WB04 Development Zones E, F, H, K and L

► Refer to West Brompton / Built form /

Impacts on heritage and townscape, and Warwick Crescent / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape

To ensure an appreciation of depth in the massing and reduce its visual impact on heritage assets and their setting.

► Refer to other references to View 8 within this section

Penywern Road - View 29

Brompton Cemetery (View 8)

WB02 WB07 WB06 EC03 WB04 EC05 EC10 EC09 WB01 WB03 EC02 EC04

Brompton Cemetery - View 8 WB02 WB07 WB06 EC03 WB04 EC05 EC10 EC09 WB01 WB03 EC02 EC04

SW.B.56

Calmed background Buildings in Plots WB01/02/03/04/06/07/08, EC02/03/04/05/09/10, (Development Zones B1/B2, C, E, F, H, K, L, N) should mitigate distraction from the setting and features of the historic cemetery.

Plots EC02, EC03, EC04, EC05, EC09, EC10, WB01, WB02, WB03, WB04, WB06 and WB07 Development Zones B1/B2, C, E, F, H, K, L and N

► Refer to other references to View 8 within this section

To minimise the visual impact on heritage assets and their setting.

► Refer to other references to View 8 within this section

Brompton Cemetery - View 8

240

Brompton Cemetery - View 8

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

241

SW BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape in RBKC

SW.B.57

Expression of building top

WB02 WB07 WB06 EC03 WB04 EC05 EC10 EC09 WB01 WB03 EC02 EC04

SW.B.59

WB02 WB07 WB06 EC03 WB04 EC05 EC10 EC09 WB01 WB03 EC02 EC04

Vertical expression Buildings in Plots WB01/02/03/04/06/07/08, EC02/03/04/05/09/10, (Development Zones B1/B2, C, E, F, H, K, L, N) should mediate between the existing context and taller proposed buildings behind. This could be achieved through vertical expression.

Buildings tops in Plots WB01/02/03/04/06/07/08, EC02/03/04/05/09/10, (Development Zones B1/B2, C, E, F, H, K, L, N) should be clearly legible. This could be achieved by introducing a different rhythm of composition, or changes in tone or materiality. To create a clearly defined skyline which also minimises visual impact on heritage assets and their setting.

To minimise the perceived scale of the buildings.

► Refer to other references to View 8 within

this section

Brompton Cemetery - View 8

SW.B.58

Tripart composition

WB02 WB07 WB06 EC03 WB04 EC05 EC10 EC09 WB01 WB03 EC02 EC04

SW.B.60

Colour Buildings in Plots WB01/02/03/04/06/07/08, EC02/03/04/05/09/10, (Development Zones B1/B2, C, E, F, H, K, L, N) should have regard to the effect of colour (including tone and reflectivity) as seen in relation to the historic features in the view, and having regard to the earlier codes, for example layering.

Buildings in Plots WB01/02/03/04/06/07/08, EC02/03/04/05/09/10, (Development Zones B1/B2, C, E, F, H, K, L, N) should be based on a tripart composition. This could be achieved through a clear top, middle and base which contribute to a sense of layering in the view. To contribute to a sense of layering and legibility of the massing.

To separate the foreground and background and contribute to a sense of layering.

► Refer to other references to View 8 within this section

Brompton Cemetery - View 8

242

WB02 WB07 WB06 EC03 WB04 EC05 EC10 EC09 WB01 WB03 EC02 EC04

Brompton Cemetery - View 8

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

243

SW BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape in RBKC

EC10

SW.B.61

EC09

Distinguishable from foreground (EC09/10) Buildings within Plots EC09/10 (Development Zone E) should be distinguishable from the foreground, contrasting the bell tower and safeguarding its legibility in the view. This could be achieved by using a darker tone that reads closer to the treeline, contrasting with the lighter stone of the cemetery. To separate the foreground and background, contribute to a sense of layering and reduce visual impact on heritage assets and their setting.

► Refer to other references to View 8 within this section

244

Brompton Cemetery - View 8

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

245

SW BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape in LBHF

Impacts on Heritage and Townscape in LBHF

The following information relates to key verified views in LBHF that building designs must respond to. Further information relating to key design considerations are discussed further in the relevant Character Area chapters. View 39 - King’s Road

View A30 - Charleville Road

Plot(s): EC02/04/05/06, WB02/03/04/07/08 Development Zone(s): B1/B2, C, F, H, K, L Character Area(s): West Brompton, Empress Place, Warwick Crescent

Plot(s): WK07/08/11 Development Zone(s): U, T, W Character Area(s): Lillie Sidings

View 59 - Ongar Road

View 45 - Talgarth Road

Plot(s): EC05, WB01/02/03/04, WK07/08/09 Development Zone(s): C, H, T, W Character Area(s): Empress Place, Lillie Sidings

Plot(s): EC20, WK03/04/08 Development Zone(s): R, V1/V2, X Character Area(s): West Kensington

View 47 - Comeragh Road

View 41 - Mornington Avenue

Plot(s): WK01/03/04/05 Development Zone(s): X, Z Character Area(s): Lillie Sidings, West Kensington

Plot(s): WK03/04 (WB03/04/05) Development Zone(s): X (H) Character Area(s): West Kensington

EC21

EC20 WK06

WK04 WK03

WK05

EC19

WK07

WK02

EC08

WK01 WK12 EC18

WK08

EC16

EC17

EC15 EC09

WK11 EC06

WK10

EC04

EC05

WK09

WB06 EC10

47 A30

EC14

EC03

WB10

EC11

WB04 WB05

EC02

EC12

WB09

EC13

WB03 EC01

WB08

WB02

WB07

WB01

LBHF Key views

246

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

247

SW BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape in LBHF

Kings Road (View 39)

WB03 WB04

WB02 WB07/08 EC06 EC02 EC05 EC04

WK03

Comeragh Road (View 47)

WK04 WK05 WK01

Plots WK01, WK03, WK04 and WK05.

Plots EC02, EC04, EC05, EC06, WB02, WB03, WB04, WB07, and WB08

Development Zones W, X and Z

Development Zones B1/B2, C, F, H, K, L

► Refer to Lillie Sidings / Built form /

Impacts on heritage and townscape, and West Kensington / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

► Refer to Empress Place / Built form /

Impacts on heritage and townscape, West Brompton / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape, and Warwick Crescent / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape

Kings Road - View 39

Ongar Road (View 59)

WK08 WB04 WB02 EC05 WK07 WK09 WB03 WB01

Comeragh Road - View 47

Charleville Road (View A30)

WK07

WK11

WK08

Plots WK07, WK08 and WK11

Plots EC05, WB01, WB02, WB03, WB04, WK07, WK08 and WK09

Development Zones U, T and W

Development Zones C, H, L, T, W

► Refer to Lillie Sidings / Built form /

► Refer to Empress Place / Built form /

Impacts on heritage and townscape.

View A30

Ongar Road - View 59

248

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

249

SW BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape in LBHF

Talgarth Road (View 45)

EC20 WK06

WK03

WK04

WK05 WK02

Plots EC20, WK03, WK04 and WK08 Development Zones R, V1/V2 and X

► Refer to West Kensington / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Mornington Avenue (View 41)

WB03 WK04 WB04 WB05

WK03

Plots WK03 and WK04 (and WB03/04/05) Development Zone X (and Development Zone H)

► Refer to West Kensington / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

250

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

251

SW BUILT FORM | Servicing and Maintenance

Servicing and Maintenance SW.B.62

Integrated services

SW.B.64

The location and integration of services, drainage and ventilation grilles and louvres must be carefully considered. Grilles and louvres should be treated as part of the overall façade composition. Where practical, they should be avoided on the primary façade. To refine the appearance of the building addressing the public realm.

SW.B.63

BMU storage location Building Maintenance Units (BMU) in storage should be hidden from street view. To improve the architectural quality and appearance of buildings.

Services integrated into façade

Integrated plant

SW.B.65

Maintenance Consideration must be given to the long term maintenance of building façades, and this must be considered early in the design stages.

Rooftop plant and other services should read as an integral part of the design. This could be achieved through extending the façade or setting back plant so that it is not visible from the street.

To ensure architectural quality of buildings is retained and maintenance solutions are integrated within the design.

To create ordered and considered roofscapes. Integrated plant

252

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

253

SW BUILT FORM | Microclimate and Neighbourhood

Microclimate and Neighbourhood Future RMAs will need to continue to respond to microclimate considerations. This section identifies some key considerations.

SW.B.66

SW.B.68

Impact on public realm and private amenity Consideration to daylight to the public realm and private amenity spaces including courtyards and podiums.

Impact on homes

To maximise the quality of the public realm and private amenity.

Consideration of the daylight and sunlight amenity to homes. To safeguard access to natural light and create comfortable homes.

SW.B.67

254

Consideration of neighbours

SW.B.69

Microclimate mitigation

Consideration of the daylight and sunlight amenity to existing buildings in the Site and existing properties adjoining the Site. The degree of impact should be appropriate to the context of a Site, in consideration of their proximity to a Site that is undergoing significant transformation.

Where microclimate mitigation measures such as canopies are located on buildings, they must be carefully integrated with architecture.

To ensure the impact of existing neighbours is given due consideration in designs.

► Refer to Environmental Statement (EC.

To ensure that mitigation measures positively contribute to the architectural design. PA.12).

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

255

SW BUILT FORM | Microclimate and Neighbourhood

SW.B.70

Building layout and air quality Building layouts should be designed so that habitable rooms are located away from pollution sources. Non-habitable rooms and less sensitive building uses could be located on façades nearest to pollution sources. To reduce the impact of air pollution on habitable rooms.

SW.B.71

Orientation of internal layouts for air quality

Outdoor spaces and air quality Outdoor spaces such as balconies, gardens and playgrounds should be located away from pollution sources. To reduce the impact of air pollution on outdoor spaces.

Layout of amenity spaces with consideration of air quality

256

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2025

257

4. West Brompton [WB]

258

Character Area extent

Overview West Brompton is a lively quarter that connects Earl’s Court station to West Brompton station. It is anchored by a leafy crescent lined with shops, cafés and restaurants that ensure it is active during the day and into the evening. Key principles that characterise West Brompton include: •

A tree-lined crescent that connects two stations and associated squares.

•

Two inviting squares opposite each of the stations that stitch into the surrounding context.

•

A mix of active uses at Ground Floor complemented by a mix of homes above.

•

A pair of workspace buildings, responding to each other and the existing context, create a legible gateway into the Site.

•

Building typologies that are contextual and accentuate the geometry of the crescent.

► Refer to Illustrative Masterplan chapter in the Design and Access Statement: Masterplan (EC.PA.08).

Illustrative view, West Brompton Crescent

260

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

261

WB LANDSCAPE | Spaces

Landscape W ar

W ar

Warwick Square (1)

re s

6 3

Warwick Square

West Brompton Square (2) A welcoming square opposite West Brompton Station where the Bioline and West Brompton Crescent meet, including space for gathering and sitting, planting and spill-out space in front of active frontages.

es Cr

ro m

Table Park

Crescent

West Brompton Crescent (3)

A lively retail street connecting Warwick and West Brompton Squares. It includes a tree-lined, pedestrian-first public realm and active frontages. Place

Place and Lane

West Brompton Place (4)

Square and Lane

An intimate pocket space that blends the character of the crescent and the lane. Lanes

262

W es

An inviting square opposite Earls Court Station, including a Flower Amphitheatre, space for gathering, pedestrian and vehicle movement and trees on its edges.

oad ck R

Squares

i Warw

Spaces

West Brompton Lane (5)

West Brompton Lane West (6)

A quiet residential street framed by townhouses and workspaces, accommodating pedestrian and vehicle movement.

A quiet landscaped street, accommodating pedestrian and vehicle movement.

es W

om Br

West Brompton Square

Old Brom

pton Roa

Illustrative sketch showing Ground Floor cutaway

WB LANDSCAPE | Warwick Square

Warwick Square WB.L.1

An inviting square opposite Earls Court Station, including a Flower Amphitheatre, space for gathering, pedestrian and vehicle movement and trees on its edges.

Framed by trees Where loading restrictions allow, the design of Warwick Square must be framed by trees. If the loading constraints do not support sufficient soil depth for trees, other forms of soft landscaping should be used. To create a planted edge to the square.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Planting.

Key plan

WB.L.2

Defining the threshold and the edge to the road The design of Warwick Square must have a clearly defined edge adjacent to Warwick Road. To create a clear edge condition to Warwick Road and define a clear threshold into the Earls Court Development.

WB.L.3

Permeability of the edge The design of the edge of Warwick Road must be permeable and inviting with clear spaces to walk through, responding to pedestrian desire lines such as the traffic crossing. To welcome people into the Site.

Illustrative landscape plan

264

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

265

WB LANDSCAPE | Warwick Square

WB.L.4

WB.L.5

Visual permeability of the edge

WB.L.7

Permeability through the steps

The design of the edge of Warwick Road must be visually permeable with planting and trees arranged to ensure a visual connection.

The design of the steps should allow access for people to sit and walk through the Flower Amphitheatre habitat.

To welcome people into the square.

To provide seating and increase usability of the square.

Space for gathering

WB.L.8

The design of Warwick Square must have a central gathering zone, free from seating and planting, and large enough for small scale events.

Celebrate Site history The design of the steps could draw inspiration from the steps of the former Exhibition Centres. To celebrate the character of the Site.

To encourage people to dwell in the square and to provide an area for programmed events.

Photograph of former Earls Court Exhibition Centres

WB.L.6

Receiving steps The design of Warwick Square should include concave steps to manage the level difference. To provide a space for sitting and dwelling and create a sense of enclosure to the square.

WB.L.9

The Flower Amphitheatre The design of the steps must include flower-rich species, as described in the sitewide biodiversity strategy. To align with the sitewide biodiversity strategy and create a Flower Amphitheatre habitat on Warwick Square.

► Refer to biodiversity strategy within Sitewide / Landscape / Green/blue infrastructure.

266

Illustrative view, Warwick Square

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

267

WB LANDSCAPE | Warwick Square

WB.L.10

Pedestrian access

WB.L.13

Planting list must prioritise a plant mix that can perform throughout all seasons, with species that blossom at different times of the year.

The design of Warwick Square must provide usable, comfortable routes suitable for a range of user requirements and at least 3m wide through the square from Earl’s Court Station to West Brompton Crescent.

To maintain characteristic features during autumn and winter.

To ensure equity for all users at a key arrival space.

WB.L.11

Planting for seasons

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Green/ blue infrastructure.

Vehicular routes

WB.L.14

Vehicular movement must be kept to the edge of the square and provide vehicle access from Warwick Road to West Brompton Lane and Warwick Lane.

Reading as one space The design and selection of materials should have a complementary and coherent approach between building façades. To reinforce the legibility of the square as a single space

To ensure pedestrian priority space.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Materiality.

WB.L.12

Flowering species

Paving material extending to building façade

Flowering species Planting must include flowering species. Species should include spring flowering shrubs and trees, late blooming herbs and night-flowering. To reinforce the character of a flower display and to ensure suitable species for pollinators.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Green/ blue infrastructure.

268

Flowering species included in planting

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

269

WB LANDSCAPE | West Brompton Square

West Brompton Square A welcoming square opposite West Brompton Station where the Bioline* and West Brompton Crescent meet, including space for gathering and sitting, planting and spill-out space in front of active frontages.

01.

A composite space Big Moves A Framed Entrance into Earls Court

WB.L.15

The design of West Brompton Square must include elements of the three overlapping functions - The Bioline, the crescent and activity space.

*Decking over the West London Railway Line (the Bioline) is subject to agreement with third party land owners. In the event that the bioline does not come forward and the existing SINC is retained, the design codes included in this section will still apply.

Framing

Decking over the WLL poses an opportunity to create an active urban space defined by building frontages

Identity and Character

To address the different spaces and needs converging on this space

Redefined square

Roads and Access

Biodiversity Convergence

Foca

A key strategic location to bring together the ecological value of the Cemetery, railway SINC, the Table and Bioline. W LL

A define routes c and urb

Defining the edge Framing

Redefined square

Road

Decking over the WLL poses an The design of West Brompton Square opportunity to create an active urban space must have a clearly defined edge defined by building adjacent to Oldfrontages Brompton Road. The

Reading the square as a whole, overlapping with the Bioline to create a new, generous urban space

A statio Old Bro Brompt the site coming

WB.L.16 Unified character Reading the square as a whole, overlapping A station square framed by the existing with the Bioline to create a new, generous Old Brompton Road that links to West The design of West Brompton Square should be clear read asroad a single urban space Brompton and and an access into 1 Station, 3 space, managing the three overlapping the site, with the crescent and lane routes functions. coming south. This could be achieved through a consistent approach to materiality, planting and / or street furniture. Key plan

To create a unified character for the square.

WB.L.17

edge should be predominantly planting and allow for pedestrian permeability. To create a clear edge condition to Old Brompton Road and define a clear entrance into the Site.

Illustrative landscape plan

270

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

271

WB LANDSCAPE | West Brompton Square

WB.L.18

Green corridor

WB.L.20

The design of West Brompton Square must support a green corridor from Brompton Cemetery to the Bioline. The character of the green corridor along the Bioline should be extended into the square. This could be achieved through an extension of the planting.

The design of planted zones should support a sense of enclosure and frame West Brompton Square. This could be achieved through undulating layouts where seating faces the centre of the square.

Identity and Character

eating Conversation esigning seating to pause, sit and stay If the Bioline does not come forward in the form of a deck over the West London Line, additional railside planting should be introduced to enhance ecological value of the existing railway SINC.

WB.L.19

The arrangement and selection of

ide frequent opportunities and adjacent caregiverstotothe sit edge offor thechildren crescent, pause along sidewalks and routes. carriageway.

idual seating is important for adolescents, who sometimes Tonew extend the that character a tree-lined er more privacy, and parents need tooffeed an infant.

to Old Brompton Road.routes, d individual seatingcrescent is a key element along day-to-day t while taking a phone call, waiting for somebody, eat your take y sandwich.

Seating The design of planted zones should include fixed seating at the edges. To create an intimate space fostering social interaction.

Extending tree-lined crescent

Types of seating d Individualtrees Seating should extend the eastern

To create a well-defined and contained central space.

WB.L.21

To ensure ecological connections are made to Brompton Cemetery and the railway SINC.

Planting to support enclosure

5 Fixed Social Seating

Flexible Seating: Social and Individual

• When placed to create corners, concave shapes, or small “rooms,” fixed seating can allow for larger groups of children or families to sit together or invite social interaction among strangers. WB.L.22 Space for gathering

• Ideal for larger pedestrian spaces where a mix of activities occur.

• Place social seating near key destinations with large groups of pedestrians

• Flexible configurations allow people to move and shift seating to suit their needs, accommodate groups or individuals, access sun or shade, and pick a viewpoint from which to observe other activities or watch kids playing.

The design of West Brompton Square • Provide seats for a variety of heights and sizes, to accommodate must provide a central gathering the needs of children of various ages. zone, free from seating and planting and large enough for small scale events. This should read as a clearing. To create an intimate space fostering social interaction.

272

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

273

WB LANDSCAPE | West Brompton Square

WB.L.23

Spill-out The design of West Brompton Square should provide spill-out spaces adjacent to Ground Floor active uses, in particular the zone in front of EC01.

WB.L.25

EC01

The design of West Brompton Square should include a generous southfacing spill out space at the base of EC01.

EC22

To animate the public realm.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Spill-out

South-facing spill out space

To animate the public realm.

WB07

space.

Illustrative view, EC01 south-facing terrace

WB.L.24

Visibility of active uses

WB.L.26

Desire lines The design of planting and furniture should facilitate movement along desire lines.

The design of planting and furniture should allow good visibility of active Ground Floor uses from within the square.

To promote ease of pedestrian movement and access from West Brompton Station.

To animate the public realm.

Illustrative view, 344-350 Old Brompton Road and West Brompton Square

274

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

275

WB LANDSCAPE | West Brompton Square

WB.L.27

Pedestrian connections

WB.L.29

The design of West Brompton Square must support pedestrian movement and contribute to the sitewide movement strategy.

The design of West Brompton Square must create an Ecological Stepping Stone habitat, as described in the sitewide biodiversity strategy.

To support a pedestrian-first public realm.

To align with the sitewide biodiversity strategy.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity

► Refer to biodiversity strategy within Sitewide / Landscape / Green/blue infrastructure.

and movement.

WB.L.28

Ecological Stepping Stone

Vehicle access A vehicular route must be provided to the eastern edge of the square. This provides access from West Brompton Lane and controlled access from West Brompton Crescent.

WB.L.30

Planting selection to improve air quality

Treatment of vehicle route The design and material selection for the vehicle route should respond to the design of the crescent and lane. To create a unified Character Area.

To encourage a low-traffic neighbourhood.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

276

Illustrative view, West Brompton Crescent

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

277

WB LANDSCAPE | West Brompton Square

WB.L.31

Drawing from the local context - the cemetery

WB.L.34

The design of West Brompton Square should respond to the context of the cemetery, including its wall on to Old Brompton Road. This could include material selection, tree species or planting. To create ties with the surrounding context.

WB.L.32

Lighting design within West Brompton Square should be considerate of bird and bat routes to Brompton Cemetery. To align with the sitewide biodiversity strategy. Old Brompton Road, Brompton Cemetery wall

Low-intensity lighting at low-level

Tree species selection Selection of the tree species in West Brompton Square must relate to those in Brompton Cemetery.

WB.L.35

Maintenance access Access to flat roofs on EC13 and EC15 should be considered and integrated within the design proposals to allow maintenance of adjacent trees.

To create ties with the surrounding context and biodiversity

Brompton Cemetery tree species

WB.L.33

Lighting design

To allow tree canopies to be maintained without accessing private gardens.

Semi-mature tree planting Semi mature trees should be specified in suitable locations to create connectivity for birds and bats from Brompton Cemetery. To align with the sitewide biodiversity strategy.

Semi-mature trees

278

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

279

WB LANDSCAPE | Squares

Squares WB.L.38

Warwick Square and West Brompton Square.

Improving air quality The design of the squares should include plants and tree species that improve air quality. To improve air quality on the edges of the Site.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Green/ blue infrastructure.

Key plan

WB.L.36

Contextual materials

WB.L.39

The design of the squares must demonstrate consideration of the loading limitations of below ground tunnels.

To support continuity of local context in the public realm.

To ensure materials do not compromise below ground infrastructure. Materiality of local context

Shared surfaces

► Refer to Spatial Strategies chapter in the

Design and Access Statement: Masterplan (EC.PA.08).

Min 1200mm soil for large tree planting Min 450mm soil for grasses, perennials, shrubs

The design of the squares could include shared surface materials for vehicle routes. Shared surfaces should be recognisable. This could be achieved through tactile edges or a small upstand.

Min 1200mm soil for large tree planting Min 450mm soil for grasses, perennials, shrubs

To ensure pedestrian priority within squares. Materials used on shared surfaces

280

Material loading

The design of the squares must respond to existing local context and reference the RBKC Streetscape guidance.

Budolfi Plads - SLA

WB.L.37

Planting selection to improve air quality

Indicative diagram showing considerations for soil depth.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

281

WB.L.41

A lively retail street connecting Warwick and West Brompton Squares. It includes a tree-lined, pedestrian-first public realm and active frontages.

Spill-out zones

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

West Brompton Crescent

The design of West Brompton Crescent should allow for spill-out space in front of active Ground Floor uses. Spill-out zones should include breaks.

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

WB LANDSCAPE | West Brompton Crescent

To animate the public realm and create a vibrant crescent.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Spill-out

Key plan

The design of West Brompton Crescent must provide a footpath on both sides of the central movement route. To encourage pedestrian movement on both sides of the crescent.

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

18.0m min.

WB.L.43

Central movement route The design of West Brompton Crescent must provide a central movement route, allowing for cyclists and controlled access vehicle movement.

282

SPILL-OUT

FOOTPATH

PLANTING

CENTRAL MOVEMENT ROUTE

PLANTING

FOOTPATH

SPILL-OUT

2.5m

2.0m min.

5.0m

2.0m min.

2.5m

Illustrative street section, West Brompton Crescent

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

Spatial arrangement, setting out and key dimensions for this typical street section are set out in the diagram below. At the eastern end of the crescent the character should also respond to Warwick Square.

Footpaths

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

WB.L.42

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

Typical street section

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

WB.L.40

space.

To contribute to the sitewide movement strategy and provide vehicular and cyclist access. Control dimension Illustrative dimension

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

283

WB LANDSCAPE | West Brompton Crescent

WB.L.44

Radial grid

WB.L.47

The design of planting and paving should be set out on a radial grid.

Parking / planting The design of Warwick Crescent should accommodate planted zones in between car parking and/or loading bays. Car parking and/or loading bays should not be located in front of main building entrances.

To match the setting out of the adjacent plots.

Planting The design of West Brompton Crescent should provide planted zones on both sides of the crescent.

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

WB.L.45

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

To ensure parking is integrated planting and Spaces, does not obstruct Bjørvika within Masterplan and Urban Oslo - SLA entrances.

WB.L.48

The design of cycle parking should be distributed evenly along the crescent. Cycle parking should not be arranged in long rows to allow for ease of pedestrian movement.

To create a tree-lined crescent that references local street typologies.

WB.L.46

284

Arrangement of planting

Cycle parking

To ensure that cycle stands do not obstruct building frontages or clutter the public realm.

WB.L.49

Materiality

The design of West Brompton Crescent should maximise planted zones. Planted zones should introduce breaks and not obstruct building entrances.

The design and selection of materials should demarcate pedestrian footpaths and the central movement route. This could be achieved through variation in paving size.

To allow clear access and visibility from the crescent to building entrance and to promote ease of pedestrian movement.

To create a clear definition between surfaces for different users. Treatment of vehicle route

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

285

WB LANDSCAPE | West Brompton Place

West Brompton Place

WB.L.50

An intimate pocket space that blends the character of the crescent and the lane.

Transition The design of West Brompton Place must create a transition between the three adjacent spaces - the square, the crescent and the lane- by drawing key characteristics from each, such as the formal tree alignment of the crescent or material palettes. To provide a continuous public realm experience.

Key plan

WB.L.51

Illustrative view, West Brompton Place

Define areas of use from areas of movement The design of West Brompton Place should contribute to the legibility of the use of each particular area. This could be achieved through selection of materiality or planting arrangement. To create a legible and varied public realm.

Illustrative landscape plan

286

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

287

WB LANDSCAPE | West Brompton Lane

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

The design of West Brompton Lane must provide a central movement route, allowing for cyclists and vehicle movement.

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

Central movement zone DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

WB.L.53

A quiet residential street framed by townhouses and workspaces, accommodating pedestrian and vehicle movement.

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

West Brompton Lane

To contribute to the sitewide movement strategy and provide vehicular and cyclist access.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity

Key plan

WB.L.52

and movement.

Typical street section Spatial arrangement, setting out and key dimensions for this typical street section are set out in the diagram below. DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

10.0-11.0m min.

WB.L.54

Footpath The design of West Brompton Lane must provide a footpath adjacent to the central movement route. To ensure safe pedestrian movement.

FOOTPATH

PARKING

CENTRAL MOVEMENT ROUTE

FOOTPATH

1.0m

3.0m

5.0m

2.0m

Control dimension Illustrative dimension

Illustrative street section, West Brompton Lane

288

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

289

WB LANDSCAPE | West Brompton Lane

Parking / loading bays DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

The design of parking and/or loading bays should avoid locations in front of residential entrances.

WB.L.57 DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

WB.L.55

Sense of enclosure The design of the threshold between the squares and the lane should create a sense of enclosure. This could be achieved through an arch or planting.

To ensure car parking and loading bays do not obstruct access to homes.

To reflect local style of mews lanes and reinforce change in nature of street. Mews arch typology in RBKC

Budolfi Plads - SLA

WB.L.56

Parking / planting

WB.L.58

The design of West Brompton Lane should accommodate planted zones in between parking.

Uniform materiality The design and selection of paving must be uniform, avoiding contrasting materials. It should reflect the local character of similar streets.

To ensure parking is integrated within planting.

To ensure that the lane reflects the local character and material palette of lanes. Uniform materiality

Illustrative view, planted zone

290

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

291

WB.L.60

A quiet landscaped street, accommodating pedestrian and vehicle movement.

Central movement zone The design of West Brompton Lane West must provide a central movement route, allowing for cyclists and controlled access vehicle movement.

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

West Brompton Lane West

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

WB LANDSCAPE | West Brompton Lane West

To contribute to the sitewide movement strategy and provide vehicular and cyclist access.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity

Spatial arrangement, setting out and key dimensions for this typical street section are set out in the diagram below.

The design of West Brompton Lane West must provide a footpath adjacent to the central movement route.

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

12.0m min. MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

Footpath

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

WB.L.61

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

Typical street section

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

WB.L.59

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

and movement.

Key plan

To ensure safe pedestrian movement.

WB.L.62

Planted zone The design of West Brompton Lane West must provide a planted zone with trees on at least one side of the lane. To maximise planting within the lanes.

FOOTPATH

CENTRAL MOVEMENT ROUTE

FOOTPATH

PLANTING

2.0m

5.0m

2.0m

3.0m min.

Control dimension Illustrative dimension

292

Illustrative street section, West Brompton Lane West

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

293

WB BUILT FORM | Building Typologies

Built Form

oad ck R

i Warw

Building Typologies Mid-scale (Development Zones A, E, F, M) Mid-scale buildings frame West Brompton and Warwick Crescents. Buildings adopt a massing, layout, composition and materiality that is informed by the local character and local typologies.

Warwick Square M D

Table Park

Smaller-scale (Development Zone D) Smaller-scale buildings are located on West Brompton Lane and define the street’s character, responding to its immediate context and scale.

Pavilion

(Development Zone J) The Pavilion is located on the northern edge of Warwick Square. It provides active frontages which contribute to the animation of the square.

F A

West Brompton Square

Old Brom

pton Roa

294

Illustrative sketch showing built form typologies

WB BUILT FORM | Mid-scale

Mid-scale WB.B.1

(Development Zones A, E, F, M) Mid-scale buildings frame West Brompton and Warwick Crescents. Buildings adopt a massing, layout, composition and materiality that is informed by the local character and local typologies.

Expressing curves Building façades addressing the crescents should contribute to the legibility of the curve. Large facets should be avoided. To reinforce the legibility, character and sweeping geometry of the crescents.

Key plan

WB.B.2

Continuity along the crescent Building façades addressing the crescents should have a consistent approach to order in the composition. This could include horizontal expression or datums. To reinforce the geometry of the crescent.

Illustrative view, West Brompton Crescent

296

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

297

WB BUILT FORM | Mid-scale

WB.B.3

Consistent horizontal datum

WB.B.5

Buildings façades addressing the crescents should maintain a consistent horizontal datum. This could be expressed through set backs, change of tone or materiality, or rhythm and composition

Ground Floor datum Ground Floor façades addressing the crescents should express a clearly defined horizontal datum. To reinforce a Ground Floor horizontal datum and reflect local character.

To reinforce the reading of the crescent form and safeguard a formal architectural expression.

WB.B.4

Ground Floor datum of local street

Grain

WB.B.6

The design of buildings along the crescent should provide harmonising architectural features to read the crescent as a continuous façade. This could be achieved through similar composition, architectural detailing or complementary materials. To express buildings along the crescent as a set piece.

298

Ground Floor façade rhythm Ground Floor façades addressing the crescents should express a consistent vertical rhythm. To reflect the rhythm, grain and expression of local, West London shopping street.

Façade expression and material selection expressing grain

Ground Floor façade rhythm of local street

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

299

WB BUILT FORM | Mid-scale

WB.B.7

Balconies along the crescent

WB.B.9

Balconies should not project beyond the maximum building line along West Brompton Crescent. If inset balconies are impractical in this location, projecting or semi-projecting balconies should not compromise the reading of the geometry and/or environmental conditions. To reinforce the legibility of West Brompton Crescent as a shopping street typology.

WB.B.8

Where buildings with different uses face each other along West Brompton Crescent their architectural expression must establish a familiar design relationship to one another. For example through common horizontal datums, façade rhythms, tone or materials.

Illustrative view, West Brompton Crescent

To create a harmonious streetscape.

Façade articulation

WB.B.10

Building façades must respond to the character of the local context. This could be achieved through the expression of architectural components, façade depths and hierarchy, detail, composition or contrast in materiality.

Familiarity through tone The tone and materiality of the built form across the Character Area should draw from an earthy palette and be complementary to the local context. To reinforce a cohesive and familiar palette.

To integrate with the local character by interpreting architectural expression in a contemporary approach.

Façade articulation in contemporary and local buildings

300

Coherent architectural response

Palette of materials with an earthy tone

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

301

WB BUILT FORM | Mid-scale

WB.B.11

Relationship between EC09 and EC16 Buildings on EC09 and EC16 should respond both to each other and to the existing context. This could be achieved through composition, tone or materiality, or consistent datums. To reinforce the legibility of a gateway into the Site. Illustrative view, Warwick Square

WB.B.12

Active frontages to the squares Land uses at the Ground Floor should create active frontages facing the squares. This could include retail frontages, food and beverage frontages and residential front doors.

EC16 EC09

To animate the public realm.

EC01

302

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

303

WB BUILT FORM | Smaller-scale

Smaller-scale WB.B.13

(Development Zone D) Smaller-scale buildings are located on West Brompton Lane and defines a street character, responding to its immediate context and scale.

Articulation of the building line Smaller-scale buildings must predominantly align to the maximum building line. Designs could offset inwards from the building line within the lane. To create flexibility for entrances and defensible space adjacent to the lane.

Key plan

WB.B.14

Activation of Warwick Square Ground Floor frontages addressing Warwick Square should be visually connected and transparent, where possible. To animate Warwick Square and to allow the building’s interior functions to foster a connection with the surroundings.

Illustrative view, Warwick Square

Illustrative view, West Brompton Lane

304

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

305

WB BUILT FORM | Smaller-scale

WB.B.15

Expressive roofscapes

WB.B.17

Smaller-scale buildings could have an expressive roofscape. This could include a pitched roof or shaped parapet. Flat roofs are also acceptable.

Continuity along the lane Building façades addressing the lane should have a consistent approach to order in the composition. To reflect the order of local streets.

To create a characterful roof form adjacent to existing neighbours. Illustrative view, West Brompton Lane

WB.B.16

Individual expression

WB.B.18

Design of Smaller-scale buildings should express their individuality. This could be achieved through the rhythm and composition of the massing or façade, variances in tone and materiality or detail.

Relationship of public realm and private spaces The design of Smaller-scale buildings, in particular residential habitable rooms at grade, must safeguard privacy. This could be achieved through detailing or arrangement of openings.

To reinforce the intimate scale of the lane, referencing local character.

To safeguard privacy of Ground Floor units.

Privacy measures for windows addressing street

Expression of individual townhouses massing and form

306

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

307

WB BUILT FORM | Smaller-scale

WB.B.19

Coherent architectural response Where buildings with different uses face each other across the lane their architectural expression must establish a familiar design relationship. This could include common horizontal datums, façade rhythms or materials. To create a harmonious streetscape.

WB.B.20

Illustrative view, West Brompton Lane

Interface with trees Architectural responses must consider existing trees along the Site’s eastern boundary. This could include features such as gutter guards, rain water pipe locations to reduce maintenance requirements, avoidance of valley gutters, waterproofing design to avoid potential for damp ingress to façades and structure. To ensure impacts to existing trees are minimised and pressure to fell is mitigated.

308

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

309

WB BUILT FORM | Pavilion

Pavilion WB.B.22

(Development Zone J) The Pavilion is located on the northern edge of Warwick Square. It provides active frontages which contribute to the animation of the square.

Permeable, open and welcoming frontages Ground Floor façades should be visually connected and transparent, where possible. To create a strong visual connection and activate the public realm. Glazing on Ground Floor façades to create transparency

Key plan

WB.B.21

Contribution to the public realm

WB.B.23

Ground Floor uses should contribute to the activation of the public realm. This could include cafés, exhibition space or creative commercial spaces.

Integrated with landscape design The design of the Pavilion could be integrated with the landscape. It could include planting within the architecture, or reference the landscape in the architectural expression.

To create a vibrant and engaging environment. Cafe encourages uses of the public realm

To allow for integration of the landscape design within the architecture.

Architecture featuring planting

► Refer to West Brompton / Landscape.

310

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

311

WB BUILT FORM | Pavilion

WB.B.24

Roof articulation

WB.B.26

The Pavilion could have a distinct roof articulation.

Integration of art The Pavilion could provide opportunities for integrated art. The artwork could be developed through consultation with the existing local community or engagement of a local artist.

To create visual interest and a distinct architectural character.

To integrate the community’s identity with the architectural design.

► Refer to Spatial Strategies chapter in the

Integration of art within the Pavilion

Design and Access Statement: Masterplan (EC.PA.08).

WB.B.25

Playfulness The Pavilion could explore opportunities for diverse architectural expression. This could be achieved through the use of colour or interactive elements. To create a dynamic and engaging space that inspires creativity.

Use of colour creates a sense of playfulness

312

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

313

WB BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape

Impacts on Heritage and Townscape EC02

WB.B.27

EC02

Intermediate layering

WB.B.29

Buildings within Plot EC02 (Development Zone F) should provide an intermediate layer between the existing buildings in the foreground, and the proposed taller buildings behind. This could be achieved through the use of colour, materiality, or architectural expression.

Distinguishable from foreground Buildings within Plot EC02 (Development Zone F) should have a distinctive rhythm and composition that differ from other buildings in the view. To avoid coalescence in the massing and reduce visual impact on heritage assets and their setting.

To minimise distraction and impact of the change in scale between the existing townscape in the foreground, and the proposed higher development.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Earl’s Court Square North - View A17

Kings Road - View 39

EC02

WB.B.28

EC10

Vertical expression

WB.B.30

Complement local character Buildings within Plots EC09/10 (Development Zone E) should reflect and complement the grain and typologies of existing buildings in the foreground. They should avoid creating a visual distraction and mediate between shorter buildings in the foreground, and taller buildings behind.

Buildings within Plot EC02 (Development Zone F) should mediate between the existing context and taller proposed building behind. This could be achieved through vertical expression. To minimise the perceived scale of the buildings.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on

EC09

Rectilinear terraced form anticipated within sloped parameter

To complement the existing grain and typologies.

heritage and townscape.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Kings Road - View 39

314

Penywern Road - View 29

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

315

WB BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape

EC10

WB.B.31

EC03

EC09

Expression of building top

WB.B.32

Building tops in Plots EC03/09/10 (Development Zones E and F) should be clearly legible. This could be achieved by introducing a different rhythm of composition, or changes in tone or materiality.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Intermediate layer of EC09/10

EC09

Rectilinear terraced form anticipated within sloped parameter

Buildings within Plots EC09/10 (Development Zone E) should provide an intermediate layer between the existing buildings in the foreground, and the proposed taller buildings behind.

Proposed buildings particularly in the foreground of the view (Plot EC10) should also be further refined to create a sense of vertical rhythm and massing variation. A visual break should be introduced, which could be achieved by set backs, cut backs or change in articulation at the top of the perceived building volume. To create an appropriate relationship with the existing townscape, reducing impact on heritage assets and their setting.

EC10

To minimise distraction and impact of the change in scale between the existing townscape in the foreground, and the proposed higher development, and to avoid coalescence of massing.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Penywern Road - View 29

Penywern Road - View 29 EC03 EC10

WB.B.33

Distinguishable from foreground Buildings within Plots EC03/10 (Development Zones E and F), should be distinguishable from the foreground, other buildings, and each other. Their design should mediate between the foreground and the background, breaking down the massing and avoiding coalescence. To create distinguishable buildings within a broader composition of new and old architecture.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Earl’s Court Square North - View A17

316

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

317

WB BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape

EC10

WB.B.34

Vertical expression of Plot EC10 Buildings within Plot EC10 (Development Zones E) should mediate between the existing context and taller proposed building behind. This could be achieved through vertical expression. To minimise the perceived scale of the buildings.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Earl’s Court Square North - View A17 EC10

WB.B.35

Complement local character Buildings within Plot EC10 (Development Zone E) should reflect and complement the grain and typologies of existing buildings in the foreground. They should avoid creating a visual distraction and mediate between shorter buildings in the foreground, and taller buildings behind. To complement the existing grain and typologies.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Earl’s Court Square North - View A17

318

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

319

5. Warwick Crescent [WC]

320

Character Area extent

Overview Warwick Crescent is a quiet and contemporary residential area centred around a landscaped crescent that draws on local character and prioritises pedestrians. Key principles that characterise Warwick Crescent include: •

Creating a quiet residential area with a tree-lined crescent and lanes.

•

Providing a range of housing typologies responding to the context of the local area.

•

Developing a transition in scale from the edge of the Site to the Table.

•

Creating a prescence along West Cromwell Road and a key access route to the Site.

► Refer to Illustrative Masterplan chapter in the Design and Access Statement: Masterplan (EC.PA.08).

Illustrative view, Warwick Crescent

322

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

323

WC LANDSCAPE | Spaces Wes t

Landscape

Cro

mw ell R oad

Spaces

St C

uthb

ert’s

Lan

4 1

Warwick Crescent (1) A tree-lined contemporary residential crescent.

An extension of Warwick Lane accommodating pedestrian and vehicle movement and connecting the Site to the north.

Lane

Warwick Lane (East and West) (4,5)

Warwick Lane (2) An intimate lane that runs along the Site’s edge to Philbeach Gardens, accommodating pedestrian and vehicle movement.

A quiet landscaped street, accommodating pedestrian and vehicle movement.

W ar

The Casca des

re s

St Cuthbert’s Lane (3)

i Warw

Crescent

W ar

Warwick Square

Place Warwick Place (6)

t en

Table Park

W es

ro m

pt o

An intimate pocket space that terminates Warwick Crescent.

c es Cr

324 ulevar

Illustrative sketch showing Ground Floor cutaway

WC LANDSCAPE | Warwick Crescent

WC.L.1

A tree-lined contemporary residential crescent.

Typical street section Spatial arrangement, setting out and key dimensions for this typical street section are set out in the diagram below.

FOOTPATH

PLANTING

CENTRAL MOVEMENT ROUTE

PLANTING

FOOTPATH

2.0m

3.0m min.

5.0m

3.0m min.

2.0m

Control dimension Illustrative dimension

WC.L.2

Illustrative street section, Warwick Crescent

Footpaths The design of Warwick Crescent must provide a footpath on both sides of the central movement route.

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

Key plan

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

15.0m min.

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

Warwick Crescent

To ensure safe pedestrian movement.

Illustrative view, Warwick Crescent

326

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

327

WC LANDSCAPE | Warwick Crescent

The design of Warwick Crescent must provide a central movement route, allowing for cycle and vehicle movement.

WC.L.6

15.0m min. DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

Central movement route

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

WC.L.3

Radial grid The design of planting and paving should be set out on a radial grid. To match the setting out of the adjacent plots.

To contribute to the sitewide movement strategy and provide cycle and vehicle access.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

The design of Warwick Crescent should accommodate planted zones in between parking.

WC.L.7 DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

Parking / planting

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

WC.L.4

The design of parking and planted zones must not obstruct entrances to lanes and walks.

To ensure parking is integrated within planting.

The design of Warwick Crescent should provide planted zones on both sides of the crescent. To create a tree-lined crescent that references local street typologies.

328

WC.L.8 DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

Planting

To allow clear access and visibility from the crescent to other routes.

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

WC.L.5

Alignment with lanes and walks

Alignment with main entrances The design of car parking and planted zones should not be located in front of residential entrances. To allow clear access and visibility from the crescent to building entrances.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

329

WC LANDSCAPE | Warwick Lane

Warwick Lane WC.L.9

An intimate lane that runs along the Site’s edge to Philbeach Gardens, accommodating pedestrian and vehicle movement.

Typical street section Spatial arrangement, setting out and key dimensions for this typical street section are set out in the diagram below. DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

SITE BOUNDARY

12.0m min.

Key plan

Control dimension Illustrative dimension

PARKING/ PLANTING

2.0m

2.8m min.

CENTRAL MOVEMENT ROUTE

PLANTING

6.0m

1.2m

Footpaths The design of Warwick Lane must provide a footpath on at least one side of the central movement route.

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

Illustrative street section, Warwick Lane

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

WC.L.10

FOOTPATH

To ensure safe pedestrian movement.

Illustrative view, Warwick Lane

330

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

331

WC LANDSCAPE | Warwick Lane

The design of Warwick Lane must provide a central movement route, allowing for cycle and vehicle movement.

WC.L.14 DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

Central movement route

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

WC.L.11

The design of boundary treatments must minimise impact on existing trees in adjoining properties, such as potential negative impacts of wall treatment or lighting.

To contribute to the sitewide movement strategy and provide cycle and vehicle access.

To promote retention of trees and minimise impact on adjoining properties.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

The design of Warwick Lane should accommodate planted zones in between car parking. Loading bays should be avoided in front of residential entrances, where possible.

WC.L.15 DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

Parking / planting

Aerial imagery of existing trees in adjoining properties

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

WC.L.12

conditions.

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

The design of Warwick Lane must provide a planted zone adjacent to the boundary adjoining Philbeach Gardens properties. This should be maximised inasmuch as other competing needs would allow.

The design of boundary treatments must respond to the outcomes of consultation with neighbours.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Boundary

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

Planting edge treatment

Boundary treatment

To foster the participation of the neighbouring communities.

To ensure parking is integrated within planting.

WC.L.13

Neighbouring trees

To create an edge condition and create a buffer with neighbouring properties.

332

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

333

WC LANDSCAPE | St Cuthbert’s Lane

St Cuthbert’s Lane

WC.L.16

An extension of Warwick Lane accommodating pedestrian and vehicle movement and connecting the Site to the north.

Consistency of character The design of St Cuthbert’s Lane and Warwick Lane should have a consistent character, movement and hierarchy. This could be achieved through the choice of materiality or planting. To provide a consistent character of the lanes.

Key plan

WC.L.17

St Cuthbert’s Church setting The design of St Cuthbert’s Lane must consider the adjacent St Cuthbert’s Church. This could be achieved through the arrangement of new planting or responding to materiality. To celebrate local heritage and support the setting of Grade 1 listed St Cuthbert’s Church.

WC.L.18

St Cuthbert’s Lane, Philbeach Gardens

Tree retention The design of St Cuthbert’s Lane must retain existing trees adjacent to St Cuthbert’s Church. If this is not possible, planting of equivalent character should be provided. To frame the setting of the Church and promote retention of the Site’s natural assets.

Illustrative view, St Cuthbert’s Lane

► Refer to the Arboricultural Impact Assessment (EC.PA.09).

334

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

335

WC LANDSCAPE | St Cuthbert’s Lane

WC.L.19

Typical street section A - Adjacent to St Cuthbert’s Church Spatial arrangement, setting out and key dimensions for this typical street section are set out in the diagram below.

WC.L.20

Typical street section B - Adjacent to EC19 Spatial arrangement, setting out and key dimensions for this typical street section are set out in the diagram below.

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

SITE BOUNDARY

13.0m min.

RAILWAY CORRIDOR

20.0m min.

PLANTING

FOOTPATH

CENTRAL MOVEMENT ROUTE

CYCLE ROUTE

PLANTING

FOOTPATH

CENTRAL MOVEMENT ROUTE

CYCLE ROUTE

PLANTING

3.0m

2.0m

7.0m

3.0m

5.0m

2.0m

7.0m

3.0m

1.0m

Control dimension Illustrative dimension

Illustrative street section, St Cuthbert’s Lane

Control dimension Illustrative dimension

Illustrative street section, St Cuthbert’s Lane

Key plan

336

Key plan

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

337

The design of St Cuthbert’s Lane must provide a cycle route. It could be located on the north-eastern side of the lane. The cycle route could be demarcated.

To encourage safe pedestrian movement.

SITE BOUNDARY

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

Cycle route

RAILWAY CORRIDOR

SITE BOUNDARY

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

The design of St Cuthbert’s Lane must provide a footpath on the southern-western side of the lane.

WC.L.23 SITE BOUNDARY

Footpath

RAILWAY CORRIDOR

WC.L.21

SITE BOUNDARY

WC LANDSCAPE | St Cuthbert’s Lane

To connect into the sitewide cycle network and promote cyclist and pedestrian safety.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

To contribute to the sitewide movement strategy and provide vehicle access.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

SITE BOUNDARY

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

The design of St Cuthbert’s Lane must provide a central movement route, allowing for vehicle movement.

WC.L.24 SITE BOUNDARY

Central movement route

RAILWAY CORRIDOR

WC.L.22

Controlled access Vehicular access to St Cuthbert’s Lane from the north and south must be controlled (extent of controlled access is indicated in the diagram). To contribute to the sitewide movement strategy and provide vehicular access.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

Extract of sitewide diagram

Key Vehicle route Controlled access vehicle route

338

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

339

WC LANDSCAPE | St Cuthbert’s Lane

WC.L.25

Interface with St Cuthbert’s Church

WC.L.27

Cluny Mews alternative access

The design of St Cuthbert’s Lane must give consideration to the current design and use of potential curtilage around the Church.

As an alternative to the Cluny Mews pedestrian and cycle connection, a lift and stair connection could be provided within EC20.

To have an integrated approach to landscape design that incorporates the neighbouring conditions.

To ensure future pedestrian and cycle connectivity.

lift

Illustrative masterplan diagram of connection location.

Planted buffer at rear of St Cuthbert’s Church

WC.L.26

Cluny Mews access

WC.L.28

The design of St Cuthbert’s Lane must enable a future pedestrian and cycle connection to Cluny Mews. Any future proposals to be resolved at later stages of design should be informed by consultation with neighbours, including St Cuthbert’s Church.

The design and materiality of St Cuthbert’s Lane should contribute to traffic calming and pedestrian safety. This could include banding within the road surface, wall mounted lighting and bollards and vegetated buffers to front doors.

To safeguard a potential future connection to Cluny Mews. Illustrative masterplan diagram of connection locations.

340

Public realm design

To ensure the continuity of safe pedestrian movement.

Vegetated buffer planting and road paving banding

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

341

WC LANDSCAPE | St Cuthbert’s Lane

WC.L.29

Removal of acoustic barrier

WC.L.31

The design of St Cuthbert’s Lane should include the removal of the existing acoustic barrier.

The design of St Cuthbert’s Lane must ensure the safety of pedestrians crossing where the Northern Access Road continues alongside the rail corridor.

To create a more permeable landscape design

WC.L.30

Access point for railway maintenance The design of St Cuthbert’s Lane must ensure access points for railway maintenance. They should be integrated with the rest of the design. To ensure railway maintenance functionality is retained.

Safe pedestrian crossing

To ensure the continuity of safe pedestrian movement.

WC.L.32

Planting supporting wayfinding The design of land south of EC19 must contribute to wayfinding directing movement from Warwick Lane on to St Cuthbert’s Lane - north and south. This could be achieved through denser planting or the use of level differentiation, making it clear where people should and shouldn’t walk. To provide a clear design that contributes to wayfinding.

342

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

343

WC LANDSCAPE | St Cuthbert’s Lane

WC.L.33

Opportunities for additional nature-based landscaped areas The design of land south of EC19 could be treated as a nature-based landscape or as additional amenity space for residents such as a community garden.

Søndervold Nature Park in Fredericia - SLA

To explore opportunities to amplify nature.

Illustrative view, St Cuthbert’s Lane

WC.L.34

Planting along railway Planting adjacent to the railway corridor must be scrub habitat. To provide a planted buffer between the railway corridor and the Site.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Green/ blue infrastructure.

Planted buffer of scrub habitat

Ørestad City - SLA (habitat types, crub and meadow)

344

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

345

WC LANDSCAPE | Warwick Lane (East and West)

Warwick Lane (East and West)

WC.L.35

Typical street section Spatial arrangement, setting out and key dimensions for this typical street section are set out in the diagram below.

A quiet landscaped street, accommodating pedestrian and vehicle movement.

15.0m min.

Key plan

FOOTPATH

PLANTED ZONE

CENTRAL MOVEMENT ROUTE

PLANTED ZONE

FOOTPATH

2.0m

3.0m min.

5.0m

3.0m min.

2.0m

Control dimension Illustrative dimension

The design of Warwick Lane (East and West) must provide a footpath on both sides of the central movement route.

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

Footpaths MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

WC.L.36

Illustrative street section, Warwick Lane (East and West)

To ensure safe pedestrian movement.

Illustrative landscape plan

346

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

347

WC LANDSCAPE | Warwick Lane (East and West)

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

Warwick Lane (East and West) must provide a central movement route, allowing for cycle and vehicle movement.

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

Central movement route

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

WC.L.37

To contribute to the sitewide movement strategy and provide cycle and vehicle access.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

WC.L.38

Planting Warwick Lane (East and West) should provide a planted zones on both sides of the central movement route. To create a tree-lined lane.

348

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

349

WC LANDSCAPE | Warwick Place

Warwick Place WC.L.39

An intimate pocket space that terminates Warwick Crescent.

Termination of the Warwick Crescent The design of Warwick Place should terminate the route at the western end of the crescent. This could be achieved through a landscape or a building base creating a frontage on to the crescent. To terminate the vista of the crescent.

Key plan

Illustrative views, Warwick Crescent

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Spaces and routes.

WC.L.40

Community feel If the design of Warwick Place includes a landscaped area, it should be inviting and contribute to creating a community feel and character To invite the local community to use the space.

WC.L.41

Shared surface The design of the carriageway at the end of the crescent could be treated as a shared surface with parking bays located outside of this zone. To create the perception of a wider space and express the pedestrian priority.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

Illustrative landscape plan

350

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

351

WC BUILT FORM | Building Typologies

Built Form

Mid-scale buildings frame Warwick Crescent. Buildings adopt a massing, layout, composition and materiality that is informed by the local character and local typologies.

Standalone buildings create a presence along West Cromwell Road. The façades are designed in the round and assist with orientation and way finding.

Common base

Detailed Component

(Development Zone K)

(Development Zone L)

Common base combines taller elements to read as a set piece.

These plots form part of the Detailed Component and will serve as a further level of resolution to communicate the quality and ambition of the later phases.

A Smaller-scale building is located on St Cuthbert’s Lane and defines the street character, responding to its immediate context and scale.

uthb

ert’s

(Development Zones R and S)

oad ck R

(Development Zone M)

i Warw

Key plan

Standalone

(Development Zone Q)

St C

Mid-scale

Smaller-scale

352

Lan

Building Typologies

W ar

re s

Warwick Square

Table Park

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 353 Illustrative sketch showing Built 2026 form typologies

WC BUILT FORM | Mid-scale

Mid-scale WC.B.1

(Development Zone M)

Mid-scale buildings frame Warwick Crescent. Buildings adopt a massing, layout, composition and materiality that is informed by the local character and local typologies.

Emerging from local typologies Building façades must reflect and/or include contemporary interpretations of local mansion block typologies. This could be achieved through an ordered composition, massing variations, horizontal datums, or façade details. To integrate with the local character by reinterpreting the architectural expression of a typical local typology.

Key plan

WC.B.2

Local mansion block, Nevern Mansions

Articulation of building line Massing could introduce set backs or inset façades on Warwick Crescent. To add variation and character that is typical to local typologies.

Articulated building line on Warwick Crescent

Illustrative view, Warwick Crescent L ick arw W

354

ane

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

355

WC BUILT FORM | Mid-scale

WC.B.3

Articulation of building Where the Maximum Building Envelope is sloped, the proposed massing response must not be sloped but should incorporate legible horizontal and vertical steps.

WC.B.5

► Refer to Sitewide / Parameter Plan details.

WC.B.4

Meaningful stepping Massing should be articulated to avoid abrupt set backs or tiered forms. Where possible, steps in massing greater than 2 storeys should be avoided. To support the legibility and clarity of massing steps.

The treatment of façades facing onto Warwick Crescent should be broken down, introducing hierarchy and rhythm. This could be achieved through a change in façade composition or expression.

e Lan ick w ar W

To ensure meaningful massing legibility, transition in scale and to minimise impact to the adjacent properties on Philbeach Gardens.

Façade hierarchy

To reinforce façade hierarchy and create visual interest. Façade hierarchy of local mansion block, Nevern Mansions ick arw W

e Lan

WC.B.6

A layered composition

Top

The overall composition of eastern elevations should include layering and reinforce legibility. This could be achieved through massing steps or façade articulation to define a bottom, middle and top. To soften the development edge and aid the transition in scale.

Middle

Bottom Layered composition of local mansion block, Nevern Mansions

356

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

357

WC BUILT FORM | Mid-scale

WC.B.7

Horizontal expression

WC.B.9

Building façades adjacent to Warwick Crescent could establish clear and identifiable horizontal expression. This could be achieved by articulation of the architectural elements to reinforce horizontal expression such as incorporating banding; or divisions through features such as string courses, cornices or balconies. Stepping out entrances from the primary building line can further emphasise the sense of horizontality.

Primary and secondary materials Primary materials should be of a consistent tone. The tone of secondary components of the facade could be contrasting, to break up the primary façade, providing variation in the articulation of architectural elements such as window reveals and parapet details. To reveal a contemporary interpretation of a West London mansion block.

Horizontal expression of local mansion block, Nevern Mansions

Use of secondary materials on lintels

To reinforce the geometry of the crescent and a human, residential scale.

WC.B.8

Definition of a mid rise shoulder height A mid rise shoulder height should be defined along the length of Warwick Crescent. This could also tie in with the mid rise datum defined by the buildings on the other side of the crescent. The shoulder height datum could be articulated through steps in the massing and further defined through differentiation in façade rhythm and composition. To reinforce the reading of the crescent form along with a quiet residential character and street scale.

358

WC.B.10

Material tonality Tonality of materials should reflect the character and quality of the Philbeach conservation area. Material tones could reference gault brick, red brick, stucco, stone and stock brick. Some examples are shown in adjacent images.

Illustrative view, Warwick Crescent

To ensure a neighbourhood that is sensitive to local context.

Existing material tonality in Philbeach conservation area

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

359

WC BUILT FORM | Mid-scale

WC.B.11

Activation of Warwick Crescent

WC.B.13

Homes located on Warwick Lane could have individual front doors onto the lane. Alternatively, the Lane could be activated with residential amenity or shared residential entrances.

Homes located on Warwick Crescent could have individual front doors onto the street. The street could also be activated with residential amenity or shared residential entrances. To create a quiet but active residential neighbourhood.

WC.B.12

To create an intimate residential neighbourhood facing towards existing properties on Philbeach Gardens. Illustrative view, Warwick Crescent

Termination of the Warwick Crescent

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Spaces

Entrances addressing the street

WC.B.14

Warwick Lane datum A continuous horizontal datum should be expressed along Warwick Lane. This could be achieved through massing setbacks or building expression.

Design on Plot EC18 should terminate the route at the western end of the crescent. This could be achieved through a landscape or a building base creating a frontage on to the crescent. To terminate the vista of the crescent.

Activation of Warwick Lane

To create a uniform expression of scale on Warwick Lane that reflects its intimate character. Illustrative views, Warwick Crescent

Illustrative view, Warwick Lane

and routes.

360

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

361

WC BUILT FORM | Common Base

Common Base WC.B.15

(Development Zone K) Common base combine taller elements that reads as a set piece.

Reference to Detailed Component design Massing, articulation, architectural expression and façade rhythm must read coherently with the detailed design of the adjacent Plot (Development Zone L). To ensure a harmonious streetscape.

► Refer to Detailed Component of the Hybrid Planning Application.

Key plan

WC.B.16

Illustrative view, From left, EC06, EC05 and EC04

Relationship to ground Buildings should be expressed as ‘buildings to ground’, ‘building base’ or a ‘combined approach’, as described in the Sitewide chapter. To have a well-defined public realm through a common base whilst reading as a street.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Layout and massing.

WC.B.17

Integration of building base Where buildings share a continuous frontage with a Detailed Component, there must be careful coordination of the Ground Floor plane and podium levels to maintain a well considered visual integration between plots.

Illustrative view, Warwick Square towards West Brompton Crescent

362

To ensure integrated and visually connected building bases, regardless of phasing.

Continuation of horizontal datum

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

363

WC BUILT FORM | Common Base

WC.B.18

Visibility of active uses

WC.B.21

The Ground Floor frontages addressing West Brompton Crescent must be designed to maximise visibility of the Ground Floor active uses. This could be achieved through signage, lighting or maximising permeability of the façade.

Where buildings with different uses face each other across the crescent, their architectural expression must establish a familiar design relationship with one another. This could be achieved through horizontal datums, façade rhythms, tone or materials.

To ensure active uses in this location will be visible on the routes from Earl’s Court and West Brompton Stations.

WC.B.19

Coherent architectural response

To ensure a harmonious streetscape.

Prominent corners

WC.B.22

Prominent corners should be designed with particular importance and should be richer in detail. This could be achieved through chamfered or rounded corners.

Illustrative view, West Brompton Crescent

Activation of the Table frontage Frontages addressing the Table should be active. To animate the public realm within the Table.

To ensure the corner responds to its role from Earl’s Court station.

► Refer to The Table / Built form / Table

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / frontages

frontages.

and façades.

WC.B.20

Entrances for cultural uses

WC.B.23

Entrances for cultural uses must be open, visible and welcoming. They could be double height or expressed with distinct architectural details.

Main building entrances, including for cultural uses, should explore the opportunity for feature signage which should be integrated into the architecture of the building.

To create welcoming entrances that create visual interest.

Illustrative view showing the presence of the cultural use addressing the Table Park

364

Integration of feature signage

To activate the façade along the route from Earl’s Court and West Brompton Stations and assist with wayfinding.

Feature signage

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

365

WC BUILT FORM | Smaller-scale

Smaller-scale WC.B.24

(Development Zone Q)

A Smaller-scale building is located on St Cuthbert’s Lane and defines the street character, responding to its immediate context and scale.

Responding to context Façade expression should respond to the immediate context. This could include the industrial heritage of the railway and the Train Shed to the west or St. Cuthbert’s Church to the east. To make reference to the building’s distinct location.

Key plan

St Cuthbert’s Lane, Philbeach Gardens

WC.B.25

Activation of St Cuthbert’s Lane Building façades addressing St. Cuthbert’s Lane should contribute to and animate the street scape. This should seek to provide façade continuity and reduce the gap between plots where possible, whilst responding to technical Site constraints. Design proposals could include balconies, front entrances and /or amenity that address the lane. To contribute to activating St Cuthbert’s Lane.

Illustrative view, St Cuthbert’s Lane

366

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

367

WC BUILT FORM | Smaller-scale

WC.B.26

South-western façade treatment Design and treatment of south-west facing façades should consider mitigation of noise and pollution from the rail corridor. To address existing environmental conditions.

WC.B.27

Ground Floor activation Ground Floor frontages onto St. Cuthbert’s Lane should be activated. This could be achieved through residential entrances, non-residential entrances or a visually permeable Ground Floor frontage. To contribute to activating the public realm. Entrances addressing the street

368

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

369

WC BUILT FORM | Standalone (S)

Standalone (S) WC.B.28

(Development Zone S) Standalone buildings create a presence along West Cromwell Road. The façades are designed in the round and assist with orientation and way finding.

Access to Site from the north The design must safeguard the vehicular access route running under it from the north. To ensure the building is designed in line with the sitewide inclusivity and movement strategy.

Key plan

WC.B.29

Assist with wayfinding The design of the building should assist with wayfinding. This could be achieved through the use of distinct architectural features or selection of materials. To mark the access route in and out of the Site via St. Cuthbert’s Lane. Illustrative view, distinct materials to assist with wayfinding

Illustrative view, St Cuthbert’s Lane

370

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

371

WC BUILT FORM | Standalone (S)

WC.B.30

North façade expression

WC.B.33

South facing façades should form a continuation of the Cluny Mews development. This could be achieved through applying a similar materiality and tone and / or mirroring the rhythm of fenestration or architectural language.

North facing façades, onto West Cromwell Road could be expressive in relation to their setting along a main arterial route. This could be achieved through distinctive façade articulation or use of materials. To create a marker building visible from West Cromwell Road.

WC.B.31

To ensure sensitivity to the setting of Cluny Mews.

North façade treatment Design and treatment of north facing façades should consider mitigation of noise and pollution from West Cromwell Road. Particular consideration should be given to noise and vibration control. To mitigate noise and air impacts from West Cromwell Road.

WC.B.32

South façades

Access from West Cromwell Road Building layout and design should enable a future pedestrian and/or cycle access from West Cromwell Road.

WC.B.34

Plot definition Buildings should consider using architectural expression to respond to the adjacent Cluny Mews development. This could be achieved by responding to datums set by the Cluny Mews development and / or allowing for setbacks in the massing to articulate the building.

EC20

Cluny Mews

EC20

Cluny Mews

To ensure a considered response to the setting of Cluny Mews.

To enable the transformation of West Cromwell Road into a more pedestrian and cycle friendly environment. 372

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

373

WC BUILT FORM | Standalone (S)

WC.B.35

Projecting façades Projecting façades visible from Cluny Mews must be given equal consideration to the articulation and composition as primary façades. This could be achieved through high contrast materials or levels of articulation. To ensure that projecting façades are designed to be visible from Cluny Mews.

WC.B.36

Relationship to St. Cuthbert’s Church North and south facing façades should respond to the architectural language of St. Cuthbert’s Church. This could be achieved through applying a distinctive articulation to the parapet and/ or window surrounds, continuation of the brick materiality or by applying a horizontal banding to articulate datums and / or floor levels.

St Cuthbert’s Church, Philbeach Gardens

To celebrate and enhance the setting of a Grade 1 listed building.

374

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

375

WC BUILT FORM | Standalone (R)

Standalone (R) WC.B.37

(Development Zone R) Standalone buildings create a presence along West Cromwell Road and the corner of Cluny Mews with Warwick Road. The façades are designed in the round and assist with orientation and way finding.

Entrance location The positioning of building entrances should prioritise privacy and minimise impact to neighbouring residences. To protect privacy to the homes backing on to Cluny Mews.

Key plan

WC.B.38

South façade treatment The southern façade should adopt a residential scale. This could be achieved through the use of single storey openings and building elements. To respect the residential setting of Cluny Mews.

WC.B.39

North façade treatment North facing façades, onto West Cromwell Road could be expressive in relation to its setting on a main arterial route. This could be achieved through distinctive façade articulation or innovative use of materials. To create a distinct elevation, visible from West Cromwell Road.

Illustrative view, St Cuthbert’s Lane towards Warwick Lane

376

Illustrative view, West Cromwell Road

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

377

WC BUILT FORM | Standalone (R)

WC.B.40

Transition in scale

WC.B.43

The massing should take into account the shift in scale as it transitions from West Cromwell Road to the residences along Philbeach Gardens.

The expression of the building top must be recognisably different to the principal lower mass of the building and create a more recessive feel to the top floor and plant enclosure.

To respect the residential setting of Cluny Mews.

WC.B.41

Recessive top

To reflect the adjacent building on West Cromwell Road, and mitigate impact on neighbouring properties along Philbeach Gardens.

Illustrative view, West Cromwell Road

Ground Floor activation Ground Floor frontages onto Cluny Mews and Warwick Road should be activated. This could be achieved through residential entrances, nonresidential entrances or a visually permeable Ground Floor frontage. To contribute to activating the public realm. Entrances addressing the street

WC.B.42

Illustrative view, Warwick Road

Treatment to balconies Material selection and design of balconies should support privacy. This could include treatments with reduced permeability. To allow for privacy for residents.

Treatment of balconies

378

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

379

WC BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape

Impacts on Heritage and Townscape WC.B.44

Skyline

EC04

EC05

EC04

EC06

WC.B.46

Buildings in Plots EC04/05/06(Development Zones K, L and M) must contribute to the formation of a clearly defined skyline. This could be achieved through varied architectural expression between plots, variety in colour or materiality.

EC05

Distinguishable from foreground Buildings in Plots EC04/05 (in Development Zones K and L) should have a distinctive rhythm and composition that differ from other buildings in the view. To avoid coalescence in the massing and reduce visual impact on heritage assets and their setting, and achieve a high standard of urban design.

To ensure an appreciation of depth in the massing and reduce its visual impact on heritage assets and their setting, and avoid coalescence of building massing and façades.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Trebovir Road - View 24

EC04

WC.B.45

Penywern Road - View 29 EC06 EC05 EC04

EC05

Complement local character

WC.B.47

Buildings in Plots EC04/05 (in Development Zones K and L) should reflect and complement the grain and typologies of existing buildings in the foreground. They should avoid creating a visual distraction and mediate between shorter buildings in the foreground, and taller buildings behind.

Calmed background Buildings in Plots EC04/05/06 (in Development Zones K and L) should avoid distracting from the setting and features of the existing buildings in the foreground. To minimise visual impact on heritage assets and their setting.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

To complement the existing grain and typologies.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Penywern Road - View 29

380

Kings Road - View 39

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

381

WC BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape

WC.B.48

Complement local character

EC06 EC05 EC04

WC.B.50

EC06 EC05 EC04

Tripart composition

Buildings in Plots EC04/05/06 (in Development Zones K and L) should reflect and complement the grain and typologies of existing buildings in the foreground. They should avoid creating a visual distraction and mediate between shorter buildings in the foreground, and taller buildings behind.

Buildings in Plots EC04/05/06 (in Development Zones K and L) should be based on a tripart composition. This could be achieved through a clear top, middle and base which contribute to a sense of layering in the view.

To complement the existing grain and typologies.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on

To contribute to a sense of layering and legibility of the massing. heritage and townscape.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Kings Road - View 39

WC.B.49

Distinguishable from foreground

Kings Road - View 39

EC06 EC05 EC04

Buildings in Plots EC04/05/06 (in Development Zones K and L) should have a distinctive rhythm and composition that differ from other buildings in the view. To avoid coalescence in the massing and reduce visual impact on heritage assets and their setting, and achieve a high standard of urban design.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Kings Road - View 39

382

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

383

6. The Table [TT]

384

Character Area extent

Overview The Table is the centrepiece of the Site around which all the Character Areas converge. It contains the central public open space - the Table Park - and unfolds as a sequence of Exhibition Gardens that enhance biodiversity and showcase a variety of planting characters and outdoor uses. Key principles that characterise the Table include: •

A destination public open space located at the confluence of key routes.

•

An urban park with a variety of natural landscaped spaces and gardens.

•

Framing the edges of the public realm with active frontages.

•

A Pivot building strategically located for wayfinding.

•

Embracing Site conditions and celebrating the level change through the landscape.

•

Exploring opportunities to strengthen biodiversity links through the Site.

► Refer to Illustrative Masterplan chapter in the Design and Access Statement: Masterplan (EC.PA.08).

Illustrative view, the Table

386

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026 view387 Illustrative of the Table

LANDSCAPE | Spaces

Landscape Spaces

W ar

Aisgill Gardens

Central Zone (1) A destination urban park defined as a recreational lawn. It is framed by a densely planted area along the western edge of the Table, and active frontages which spill out onto the public realm.

W ar

re s

2 3

The Casca des

North of Table (2) An open space with play space and community use.

Table Park

The Cascades (3)

Empr ess P lace B

The Bioline extends the Brompton Cemetery ecological habitats into the Site and helps create green areas along the West London Line Railway corridor. Empress Place (5) Codes related to Empress Place are located in the Empress Place Character Area. However, Empress Place is highlighted in the diagram due to spatial continuity.

West Bromp to

ouleva

The Bioline (4)

nC res

An accessible and inclusive landscape with water features that manage and celebrate the Site’s level change.

Lillie Road

West Brompton Square

388

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026 389 Illustrative sketch showing Ground Floor cutaway

LANDSCAPE | The Table

The Table TT.L.4

A multi layered public open space, inviting a variety of activities to happen at its heart. Comprised of four key spaces with their own unique characteristics.

Predominantly soft landscape The Table must be predominantly soft landscape. To reflect the role of the Table as a green centrepiece to the Site.

Key plan

Skt Kjeld’s Square - SLA Illustrative view, the Table

Landscape-led

TT.L.1

TT.L.2

Distinct zones

The landscape design must reinforce the Table as the largest green, publicly accessible open space at the centre of the Site.

The Table must be composed of distinct zones, accommodating various activities and/or with different characters.

To ensure that designs contribute to the landscape-led vision for the Site.

To provide a varied, thriving public realm.

TT.L.3

Familiar design The distinct zones of the Table must maintain a familiar design language. This could be achieved by materiality or selection of planting species. To allow visual and functional cohesion in support of the Table’s character as a whole.

A variety of uses within the public realm

390

Illustrative landscape plan

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

391

TT.L.5

LANDSCAPE | The Table

Amenity and biodiversity

TT.L.8

Design must seek a balance between amenity and biodiversity. ThisSUND couldNature Park - SLA be achieved through zoning or through overlapping uses where compatible.

East-west route The Table must form part of the eastwest route connecting Aisgill Gardens with Warwick Square. It must provide a clear and legible route through the Site.

To create a new public open space that contributes to both local amenity and biodiversity.

To contribute to the sitewide inclusivity and movement strategy.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity

Balancing amenity and biodiversity

and movement.

TT.L.6

Design and microclimate The designs must consider microclimate, in particular daylight/ sunlight exposure and overshadowing, when programming uses for the Table. To promote a comfortable public realm.

TT.L.9

Designing with consideration for microclimate

TT.L.7

Vehicle-free The Table must be vehicle-free. Only emergency vehicle access and controlled servicing are permitted.

North-south route The Table must provide a clear and legible north-south route through Empress Place and the Table Character Areas linking with the east-west route at all phases of the development. The north-south route connects to the Central Zone through the Cascades. To connect West Brompton station and Lillie Road with the East-west route.

To support a vehicle-free public realm.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

Pedestrian priority and cycle-friendly route

392

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

393

TT.L.10

LANDSCAPE | The Table

Interface with other Character Areas

TT.L.12

Integration of lifts Lifts should be integrated within a Pavilion structure where this is located along the Table edge. Where a pavilion is not positioned along the edge of the Table, lift access should continue to be integrated into the Empress Boulevard edge condition or landscape.

Designs for the Table must be carefully integrated with adjacent Character Areas and their public realm. This should include interfaces of materials, planting and general arrangement of spaces.

To ensure lifts are integrated within the landscape or a pavilion structure.

To ensure that the Table fulfils its role at the centre of the Site and brings together the surrounding Character Areas.

Lift integrated into the edge condition

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement, and The Table / Built form / Pavilion.

► Refer to relevant adjacent Character Areas for additional information.

TT.L.11

Pavilion location A Pavilion or Pavilions may be provided and must be carefully integrated with the landscape. The locations should be easily accessible and should not adversely impact other uses such as play or informal sports. To create a point of interest and gathering place within the Table and enhance access between levels within the development.

► Refer to Sitewide / Parameter Plan details

TT.L.13

Sheltered areas within the Table Areas for shelter must be provided within the Table. These could include the Pavilion, standalone structures, awnings of adjacent buildings or tree canopies. To provide comfort in adverse weather conditions. Shelters provided on edge of play areas

and The Table / Built form / Pavilion

394

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

395

TT.L.14

LANDSCAPE | The Table

Retention of the Table structure

TT.L.16

The Table Structure must be retained. Re-profiling the existing structure could be acceptable. Further studies will need to be undertaken to understand the degree and extent to which this is necessary. To retain the Table structure as much as possible.

Secondary routes within the Table should be semi-permeable. This could be achieved with materials such as resin-bonded gravel or semipermeable paving. Loose permeable materials such as wood chips should be avoided. To create an accessible and durable public realm.

Aerial image of existing Site condition, including the Table structure

► Refer to Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B).

TT.L.15

396

Materiality of secondary routes

Materiality of primary routes and perimeter

TT.L.17

Resin-bonded gravel on secondary route

Cycle parking

Materiality of primary routes and spill-out zones adjacent to buildings should be hard wearing and attractive. This could be a natural material such as stone.

Cycle parking must be provided, and it should be strategically located, such as at key entrances. Cycle parking should offer a range of options for different types. This could include micro-mobility such as reclined cycles, handcycles, and cycle trailers.

To create a durable and cohesive public realm.

To encourage visiting cyclists to park and enter the Table on foot.

Stone paving on perimeter of public realm

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

397

LANDSCAPE | The Table

Indicative diagram of the Table landscape components

Illustrative landscape design

showing one possible arrangement of the Table components

4 5

3 1

es pr

lac

Areas thatthat can accommodate spill-out and pedestrian Areas can accommodate spill-outmovement zones and pedestrian movement Recreational lawn, with nature play and edgesplay of meadow Recreational lawn, with nature and planting edges of meadow planting Focus on events, art and community size and location) Focus on events, art and (indicative community (indicative size and location) Green corridor, focus on biodiversity and planting and planting The Bioline, focus on biodiversity North of Table, with destination play North of Table, with destination play

Cascades, managing level changes and integrating water and integrating water The Cascades, managing level changes

398

1. Recreational lawn 2. Meadow planting on edges of recreational lawn 3. Opportunity for events, art and community 4. Indicative play areas 5. Areas that can accommodate spill-out spaces and pedestrian movement 6. Cyclists on shared or demarcated east-west cycle route 7. Green corridor, focus on biodiversity and planting 8. The Cascades, level change integrating water and flat plateaus Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

399

LANDSCAPE | Central Zone

Central Zone TT.L.18

A destination urban garden defined as a recreational lawn. It is framed by a densely planted area along the western edge of the Table, and active frontages spill out onto the public realm.

Destination urban gardens The design of the Central Zone must reflect its role as destination urban park, providing usable green areas, open to everyone. To ensure that designs contribute to the landscape-led vision.

Key plan

Illustrative view, Central Zone

TT.L.19

A variety of functions The design of the Central Zone should accommodate a variety of uses including those shown on the diagram. To provide a balanced range of open space types that support public use and biodiversity.

Key Areas that can accommodate spill-out space and pedestrian movement Recreational lawn, low-ﬂowering grass mix planting Meadow planting (indicative size and location) Nature play (indicative size and location) Focus on events, art and community (indicative size and location) Zone for a dedicated E-W cycle lane Zone for a dedicated cycle lane outside of Central Zone Empress Place (not part of this Character Area) Illustrative sketch, Central Zone

400

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

401

TT.L.21

LANDSCAPE | Central Zone

Recreational lawn

TT.L.23

A meadow lawn must be provided. Meadow planting should be arranged on the perimeter of the recreational lawn. Meadow planting could include patches within the recreational lawn.

The design of the Central Zone must provide an open lawn area. The recreational lawn should be the predominant treatment of the Central Zone and support spontaneous everyday use such as informal sports or picnicking.

To provide alternative areas for recreation and increased biodiversity.

To ensure a dedicated area for informal sports is provided in the Table.

► Refer to Estate Management Framework (EC.PA.35) TT.L.22

Events space

Meadow lawn

► Refer to Estate Management Strategy and

biodiversity strategy within Sitewide / Landscape / Green/blue infrastructure.

Recreational lawn area

TT.L.24

Meadow planting framing recreational lawn

Biodiversity contribution The meadow must contribute to the natural benefits of the Table. This could be through a concentration of diverse planting.

The design of the recreational lawn could allow space for small events and other temporary uses. To provide an area within the Table that is to be used for events and other temporary uses such as markets.

To maximise variation of planting attracting diverse types of insects and therefore pollinators.

► Refer to biodiversity strategy within Sitewide / Landscape / Green/blue infrastructure.

TT.L.20

Events space seating Seating could be provided in proximity to event spaces. It should be arranged to enable viewing, resting and allow for temporary seating. To support viewing and activation of events.

402

TT.L.25

Edges of the Central Zone

Meadow planting

CENTRAL ZONE

The design of the Central Zone should allow space for spill-out zones and pedestrian movement on the edges. It should be wide enough to enable emergency vehicle access. To maximise green space in the centre of the Central Zone.

Illustrative sections of edges of Central Zone

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

403

TT.L.26

LANDSCAPE | Central Zone

Cyclists on shared or demarcated cycle route

TT.L.27

Additional footpaths The design of the Central Zone should provide additional footpaths to connect desire lines and spaces. The location of footpaths should not impact the function or use of spaces.

A shared or demarcated cycle route must be provided on the northern side of the Central Zone. This could be separated from the spill-out zone with a planted buffer.

To provide additional pedestrian connections that do not impact on function of spaces.

To contribute to the sitewide movement strategy.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

Silkeborg Pedestrian Streets and Søndertorv - SLA

TT.L.28

Natural play The design of the Central Zone should provide natural play. This could be achieved through choice of materials and play equipment such as logs, stepping stones and bespoke play equipment.

SPILL-OUT

FOOTPATH

PLANTING

CYCLE

PLANTING

LAWN

PLANTING

FOOTPATH

SPILL-OUT

3.0m

VARIES

3.0m

VARIES

3.0m

Control dimension Illustrative dimension

404

Illustrative sections, edges of public realm and cycle route

To contribute to the sitewide play strategy and provide variety in play types.

Play features natural materials and interaction with nature

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

405

TT.L.29

LANDSCAPE | Central Zone

Variety of trees

TT.L.31

The tree planting within the Central Zone must be composed of trees which vary in maturity, size and species.

Tree planting on the recreational lawn should be composed of deciduous species and should include trees of a range of species, sizes and maturity.

To create a rich and varied landscape that works for all seasons.

To ensure as much daylight as possible reaches the lawn. Variation of tree species and form of trees

TT.L.30

Tree planting on recreational lawn

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Planting.

Tree planting as markers Where tree planting is used to mark significant locations, it could consist of standalone trees or groups of trees. To create a visual hierarchy within the tree planting and assist with wayfinding. Standalone tree as marker of location

406

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

407

LANDSCAPE | North of Table

North of Table TT.L.33

An open space with play space and community use.

The design of North of Table should contribute to a sense of enclosure. This could be achieved through the arrangement of street furniture, planting and materiality. Key plan

TT.L.32

Sense of enclosure

Local play

To frame the play area, define the extents of North of Table and to provide a more intimate character to support its use as a local play space.

TT.L.34

The design of North of Table should provide local play.

Movement concentrated on edges The design of North of Table should provide movement routes to the edges. Movement routes should consider spill-out spaces in front of buildings.

To contribute to the sitewide play strategy.

To concentrate local play at the centre of the space. Illustrative view, North of Table

408

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

409

TT.L.36

LANDSCAPE | North of Table

Edge of ‘North of Table’ treatment Treatment of the edge of North of Table should be integrated into the public realm. This could include public art, a green wall, integration of play or visibility of the railway. To incorporate existing structures into the public realm.

TT.L.35

TT.L.37

Playful street furniture The design of furniture must facilitate play. This could include furniture designed as much for lying, running, and climbing as it is for sitting. To contribute to the character of North of Table as a local play space. Interactive playful elements as part of the street

Integration with Warwick Crescent Passage The design of North of Table must be integrated with Warwick Walk. This should include integration of materiality. To reinforce change of character between key public space and a passage.

410

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

411

LANDSCAPE | The Cascades

The Cascades

Gellerup New Nature Park - SLA

TT.L.38

An accessible and inclusive landscape with water features that mediate and celebrate the Site’s level change.

Celebrate the level changes The design of the Cascades should celebrate the level change. This could be achieved through a terraced landscape or integrated cascading elements that naturally flow with the landscape.

Key plan

To embrace Site conditions and contribute to the unique character of the Cascades.

Level changes celebrated with water element

TT.L.39

Integrated with buildings Landscape levels must align with building entrances. Interfaces should be carefully considered while ensuring spaces remain accessible to people of all abilities. To ensure integration of the public realm with building entrances.

► Refer to The Table / Built form / Pivot.

Illustrative view, the Cascades

Illustrative sketch, the Cascades

412

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

413

TT.L.40

LANDSCAPE | The Cascades

Pedestrian priority

TT.L.44

The design of the Cascades must put pedestrians first. This could include design interventions to slow down cyclists while enabling step-free pedestrian access throughout.

Pedestrian and cycle connectivity A shared path to be used by both cyclists and pedestrians must be provided. Shared paths should be wide enough to support all wheelusers, including prams, cargo bikes and children on bicycles.

To create a comfortable and safe environment for pedestrians.

To integrate connections across the Site whilst supporting a regulation of speed. TT.L.41

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity

North-south movement route

and movement.

The Cascades must be designed as part of the north-south movement route, which is a key linkage within the Site and beyond. To contribute to the sitewide movement strategy and primary movement routes.

TT.L.42

East-west movement route

TT.L.43

The Cascades must be designed as part of the east-west movement route, which which is a key linkage within the Site and beyond.

The Table

+12.5 Aisgill Gardens

Pla

To ensure that the public realm is connected and accessible.

pre

414

The design of the Cascades must provide an accessible connection between the levels of the Table (+12.5m AOD), Empress Place (+8m AOD) and Aisgill Gardens (+4m AOD).

To contribute to the sitewide movement strategy and primary movement routes.

Accessible level change

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

415

TT.L.45

LANDSCAPE | The Cascades

Interacting with water

TT.L.46

The design of the Cascades must include water. This could be achieved through water play or water features. (Subject to future technical testing / design development)

SuDS / Filtration pools The design of the Cascades should include SuDS features. This could be achieved through a series of connected filtration pools. (Subject to future technical testing / design development)

To provide a public realm that contributes to the unique character of the Cascades.

To contribute to the sitewide SuDS strategy.

► Sitewide / Landscape / Green/blue infrastructure.

Illustrative view of the Cascades

416

Illustrative view of the Cascades

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

417

TT.L.47

LANDSCAPE | The Cascades

Seating and furniture

TT.L.49

The design of seating and furniture could be integrated into the level changes and planting beds.

Planting selection must be suitable for the wet and dry conditions of the Cascades.

To encourage people to dwell in the Cascades and use street furniture to contribute to its unique character.

To ensure the planting within the Cascades can grow successfully in the micro-climatic conditions. Illustrative view of the Cascades

TT.L.48

Planting in wet and dry conditions

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Green/ blue infrastructure.

Planting in wet conditions

The Cascades habitat The design of the Cascades must create the Cascades habitat, as described in the sitewide biodiversity strategy. To align with the sitewide biodiversity strategy and provide a diverse and connected green network.

► Refer to biodiversity strategy within Sitewide / Landscape / Green/blue infrastructure.

418

Planting selection suitable for Cascades habitat

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

419

LANDSCAPE | The Bioline

The Bioline TT.L.51

The Bioline extends the Brompton Cemetery ecological habitats into the Site and helps create green areas along the West London Line Railway.

Exploring options for development The design of the Bioline must create habitat and biodiversity links through the Site. Subject to agreement with third parties, the design should explore decking over the existing railway structure and providing nature-based zones. If decking over cannot be achieved, the existing SINC must be retained.

Key plan

To contribute to biodiversity networks

Herlev Hospital - SLA

TT.L.50

Maximise biodiversity The design of the Bioline must maximise biodiversity. If the design includes a structure decking over the existing railway, new habitat should be created to maximise biodiversity. To contribute to the sitewide biodiversity strategy.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Green/

Dense planting and natural features maximising biodiversity

blue infrastructure.

Illustrative sketch, the Bioline

420

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

421

TT.L.52

LANDSCAPE | The Bioline

Soft landscape and planting

TT.L.54

If the design includes a structure decking over the existing railway, the predominant feature of the Bioline must be a central soft landscaped and planted zone.

Continuity of green environment If the design includes a structure decking over the existing railway, pedestrian connections through the soft landscape should allow continuous green corridors. This could be achieved through elevated walkways or discontinuous paths such as stepping stones.

To support a thriving ecological corridor.

Stepping stones within planting

To safeguard continuous green corridors for insects and species.

Søndervold Nature Park in Fredericia - SLA TT.L.53

Access through soft landscape If the design includes a structure decking over the existing railway, pedestrian connections through the soft landscape could be included. They must not impact on minimum habitat areas. To provide additional pedestrian connections contributing to a sense of safety whilst walking along the Bioline.

422

TT.L.55

Planting for reduced disturbance If the design includes a structure decking over the existing railway, the design and selection of planting must allow for some areas of reduced disturbance by humans. This could be through a concentration of native thorny species, including hawthorn, blackthorn and bramble.

Dense planting for reduced disturbance

To support areas of refuge for local fauna and increase local scrub habitat.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

423

LANDSCAPE | The Bioline

Ørestad City - SLA (habitat types, crub and meadow)

TT.L.56

Planting openings on edges

TT.L.58

If the design includes a structure decking over the existing railway, denser planting should be located along the centre with openings on the edges.

If the design includes a structure decking over the existing railway, tree planting must be provided on the Bioline. This should include a range of tree sizes, species and maturity

To promote a sense of safety by avoiding areas for people to hide.

To support the variety of planting on The Bioline.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Planting.

Planting openings on edges

TT.L.59

TT.L.57

Tree planting on The Bioline

Tree planting with a range of sizes

Nature-based lighting The design and selection of external lighting should minimise impact on flora and fauna. This could be through direction and distribution of lighting, colour temperature and light intensity.

The Bioline habitat

To support a thriving ecological corridor.

The design of the Bioline must create The Bioline habitat, as described in the sitewide biodiversity strategy.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Lighting

To align with the sitewide biodiversity strategy and provide a diverse and connected green network.

► Refer to biodiversity strategy within Sitewide / Landscape / Green/blue infrastructure.

Unshielded light sources attract insects, bats and disturbs birds’ migration

Shielding light sources and aiming the light downwards can help reduce attraction

Using warm colour temperature further reduces the attraction

Dimming the light reduces attraction even more

Lights off wherever possible, when there is no activity to completely stop attraction

Illustrative diagram demonstrating nature-based lighting principles Example species: the Bioline

424

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

425

BUILT FORM | Building Typologies

Built Form Building Typologies W ar

W ar

Aisgill Gardens

re s

The Casca des

The Pavilion has a flexible location within the Central Zone. It acts as a marker and meeting point and provides active, animated frontages.

NB. This section includes codes in relation to the frontages within Development Zones B, F , K and N. This codes only refer to the façades facing on to the Table. For more codes in relation to these Development Zones in full, refer to ‘West Brompton’, ‘Warwick Crescent’ and ‘Empress Place’ design codes.

West Bromp to

Pavilion (Development Zone G)

ouleva

The Pivot building marks the central node at the junction of the east-west and north-south routes.

Table facing frontages (Development Zone B, F, K, N)

Empr ess P lace B

Pivot (Development Zone N)

nC res

Table Park

Lillie Road

West Brompton Square

426

Earls Court Development I Design Code I OctoberIllustrative 2026 sketch 427

BUILT FORM | Pivot

Pivot TT.B.2

(Development Zone N) The Pivot building marks the central node at the junction of the east-west and north-south routes.

Ground Floor frontages addressing destination public realm Ground Floor frontages addressing areas of destination public realm should consider opportunities for special features. This could include façades designed with transparency providing a visual connection between the building uses and public realm.

Key plan

Key

To ensure façades are treated appropriately for their key location within the destination public realm.

Façades addressing destination public realm Destination public realm Detailed Component

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Frontages and façades.

Prominent corners

TT.B.1

TT.B.3

Prominent corners should be designed with particular importance and should be richer in detail. This could be achieved by distinct balcony details or use of contrasting materials or textures to highlight corners along the length of the building’s façade. To reinforce spatial hierarchy and assist with wayfinding.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Frontages and façades.

428

Inviting after dark Appearance of building façades should be considered at night. This could include the use of creative lighting designs to highlight architectural features or create a distinct ambiance. To ensure an attractive and inviting destination, at different times of day. Illustrative sketch, Pivot building

Key Key corners Detailed Component

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

429

TT.B.4

BUILT FORM | Pivot

Expression of Ground Floor

TT.B.6

The building should be designed with architectural elements or features to give the impression of a light touch to the Ground Floor plane. This could be achieved through elevating the building with columns, allowing for a cantilever at Ground Floor or incorporating extensive glazing. To foster a feeling of openness and connection with the adjacent public realm.

Integrated with landscape Ground Floor layout and entrances must be integrated with the stepped landscape while ensuring spaces remain accessible to people of all abilities. To ensure careful and considered integration of the public realm with the Ground Floor layout and maximise the feeling of a blurred threshold between interior / exterior.

Illustrative view, Pivot building

Illustrative plan, the Cascades and Pivot building

► Refer to The Table / Landscape / The Cascades.

TT.B.5

Access and entrances Entrances must be located adjacent to the main public realm. To ensure activation of the key façades facing destination public realm.

TT.B.7

Servicing constraints There will be a safeguarded service route running below the public realm and the building must allow for service access via the basement. To enable maximisation of active frontages onto the primary route at Ground Floor and ensure a vehicle-free destination pubic realm.

► Refer to Detailed Component of the Hybrid Planning Application.

430

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

431

BUILT FORM | Pavilion Cl un y

M ew

Pavilion

Nevern Square

-2

l Road

mwel

est Cro

A4 / W

TT.B.11

The Pavilion has a flexible location within the Central Zone. It acts as a marker and meeting point and Q provides Wactive, animated frontages.

27 m

Development Zone (above Ground Floor) name

Development Zone (below Ground Floor) name (see 'Proposed Site Levels Below Ground Floor Plan' for Below Ground Floor Development Zone extent)

Maximum Building Line (Ground Floor only)

ilb

-2

+/- 2m

Detailed Component (above Ground Floor)

Minimum extent of Public Realm

+/-

18 m

EARL'S COURT STATION

-2

- 2m

Minimum distance between existing Empress Place buildings (excluding basement stairwells)

Minimum dimension between Maximum Building Line

Extent of potential Public Realm pertaining to the area above existing West London Railway line, the area of land next to West Kensington Station and North End Road, and the Aisgill Avenue MUGA

w er

Key plan

Existing condition at the edge of the site or on railway land. May be subject to works to integrate existing and newly proposed Public Realm.

11 m

lose

+/-

12 m

m -2 2m

Area where pavilions of corresponding Development Zones (G1/G2 or P) are permitted. Pavillions must be sited within adjacent dash-dotted line.

- 4m

To ensure the frontage is integrated with the extent of Table Edge.

M T

+/-

- 4m

+/- 2m

15 m

► Refer to Empress Place / Built form /

Pavilion location

- 2m

H[D] B1

10 m

B2 +/-

To allow flexible location of a Pavilion in the Table.

TT.B.10

B2 Plan Extract of Parameter

lB of

o or

gh ou or

on nd

a oy

+/-

oad

d an l he

ith

a se

d an

sm er

rav

o gt

H of

s en

li Lil

h ug

l Fu

432

If a lift is located within the Pavilion, as part of the lift access strategy to/from Empress Place, it should be integrated into the design of the Pavilion, 27/06/24 be identifiable and provide 1 : 1250 weather protection. Drawing

004 - Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm

WEST BROMPTON STATION

nd R

th E

A focal point

To contribute to the identity and significance of the Pavilion and making it a key feature in the urban landscape.

ECPL and Lillie Bridge Depot Sites Earls Court London, UK

-2

+/-

Nor

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

The Pavilion should be easily identifiable from different routes. This could be achieved by bold forms, distinctive materials, vibrant colours, integrating signage or lighting.

o nR

+/-

Lift access to/from Empress Place Earls Court Development Project

+/-

► Refer to Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B). TT.B.9

ill

+/-

oad

-2

Star R

- 2m

+/- 2m

Table Edge.

Eardley

2m +/-

If a Pavilion is provided, it must be located in the zone indicated by the Parameter Plan. The location of the Pavilion must not impact clear lines P of sight along the key east-west route into the Table H[O]

e tre

S nd

+/-

m 40

12 m

+/-

TT.B.8

Crescent

-2

+4m

Illustrative view, Table Edge

50m

0 @ 1:1250

Aisgill Avenue

Gib

-2

en C

Minimum dimension of Public Realm

Zone

re bs G

+/-Xm Maximum permitted Limit of Deviation of Development

+/- 2m

Subject to its location, the Pavilion could be integrated with Table Edge. If so then the frontage facing onto the Empress Boulevard should take into consideration the rhythm, composition, architectural expression and treatment of the extent of the Table Edge.

Maximum Balcony Envelope

19 m

+/- 2m

Integration with Table Edge

Development Zone (above Ground Floor)

rR oa d

+/-

Date 27.06.24 01.08.25 01.09.26

Maximum Building Line (except balconies where indicated)

Tr eb ov i

-2

Description

- 2m

Issued to ALL For Planning ALL For Planning ALL For Planning

Borough Boundary (outside Planning Application Boundaries)

(Development Zone G) - 2m

Rev. P01 P02 P03

Planning Application Boundary

+2 m

-2

Scale @ A1

Date

Drawn By

Checked By

To ensure that level changes are S5 For Planning inclusive and accessible.

Job Number

Status

Purpose of Issue

200012 (HB) / 0394 (SEW) Drawing No.

Rev

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-004

P03

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape /

Inclusivity and movement, and The Table / Landscape

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

433

TT.B.14

BUILT FORM | Pavilion

Free standing in the Table

TT.B.16

Playfulness

Subject to its final location, the Pavilion could be free standing within the Table. If so then all frontages must be designed in the round and take into consideration their prominent location within the destination public realm.

The Pavilion could explore opportunities for diverse architectural expression. This could be achieved through the use of colour or interactive elements.

To ensure all frontages respond to the destination public realm.

To create a dynamic and engaging space that inspires creativity. Use of colour creates a sense of playfulness

TT.B.13

Flexibility for uses

TT.B.15

The Pavilion could provide opportunities for integrated art. The artwork could be developed through consultation with the existing local community or engagement of a local artist.

The internal layout of the Pavilion should allow for flexibility of uses. An open plan layout could be used to create open, adaptable areas. To encourage flexible uses to evolve over the building’s life span.

To integrate the community’s identity with the architectural design. Pavilion with flexibility for uses

TT.B.12

Integration of art

► Refer to Public Art Strategy.

Integration of art within the Pavilion

Roof articulation The Pavilion could have a distinct roof articulation. To create visual interest and a distinct architectural character.

434

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

435

BUILT FORM | Table Frontages

Table Frontages TT.B.18

NB. This section includes codes in relation to the frontages within Development Zones B, F, K and N that face onto the Table only.

Spill-out space Designs should allow for spill-out space adjacent to Ground Floor active uses whilst always ensuring adequate space is provided for pedestrian movement.

► Refer to ‘West Brompton’, ‘Warwick

Crescent’ and ‘Empress Place’ Character Areas for additional information on these Development Zones.

To encourage activation of the Ground Floor frontages overlooking open space.

Key plan

Illustrative sections of edges of Central Zone

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Spill-out space.

TT.B.17

Visual connection to the public realm

TT.B.19

Ground Floor frontages could include elements such as canopies or awnings.

Ground Floor frontages should be designed to provide a visual connection to the public realm. This could be achieved through openings, transparency and active uses. To contribute to the activity and the visual interest of the public realm.

436

Weather protection

To provide shelter from the sun, rain or wind and allow people to enjoy the outdoor space in various weather conditions.

Transparency of Ground Floor frontage

Awning provides weather protection

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

437

TT.B.21

BUILT FORM | Table Frontages

Contribution to the public realm

TT.B.22

Prominent corners Prominent corners should be designed with particular importance and should be richer in detail. This could be achieved by distinct balcony details or use of contrasting materials or textures to highlight corners along the length of the building’s façade.

Ground Floor uses should contribute to the activation of the public realm. These could include cafés, culture or community uses. To create a vibrant and engaging environment.

To reinforce spatial hierarchy and assist with wayfinding.

Illustrative view, the Table

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Frontages

Key Key corners

and façades.

TT.B.20

Safe and secure frontages

TT.B.23

Ground Floor frontages facing onto the Table must be well lit, secure and offer uninterrupted visual connection between interior and exterior spaces.

Detailed Component

Façades addressing destination public realm Façades addressing the Table as a destination public realm should consider the opportunity for special features.

To ensure a safe and secure neighbourhood.

Frontages with lighting and visibility at night

To frame destination public realm and create an opportunity for special features.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Frontages and façades.

Key Façades addressing destination public realm Destination public realm Detailed Component

438

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

439

7. Empress Place [EP]

Character Area extent

Overview Adjacent to West Brompton station, Empress Place is a key gateway to the Site and includes one of three innovation clusters, a cultural venue and a mix of new homes. Key principles that characterise Empress Place include: •

Creating an innovation cluster with a new commercial address along Lillie Road.

•

Extending a vehicle-free, landscaped boulevard with local character into the Site.

•

Integrating old and new architectural elements creating a coherent and layered family of buildings.

•

Locating a cultural venue with entrances from Empress Place and the Table Park and animating the public realm.

•

Framing the boulevard with residential buildings that step up towards the centre of the Site.

► Refer to Illustrative Masterplan chapter in the Design and Access Statement: Masterplan (EC.PA.08).

Illustrative view, Empress Place Boulevard

442

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

443

LANDSCAPE | Spaces

Landscape Spaces

W ar

Aisgill Gardens

Boulevard (1)

re s

Empress Place Boulevard A landscaped, mixed-use street, creating a vibrant environment that accommodates pedestrian and cyclist movement.

The Casca d

Passage (2) Empress Place Passage

3 ce

Lillie Road provides two access points to the site, with an enhanced pedestrian zone.

rd Empr ess P lace B ouleva

Lillie Road

444

Cr es

mpton

Lillie Road Edge (3)

Table Park

West Bro

Empress Place Passage allows for taxi drop-off and servicing whilst enabling safe movement of pedestrians.

West Brompton Square

Illustrative sketch showing Ground Floor cutaway

LANDSCAPE | Empress Place Boulevard

Empress Place Boulevard

EP.L.1

A landscaped, mixed-use street, creating a vibrant environment that accommodates pedestrian and cyclist movement.

Contributing to the northsouth route The design of Empress Place Boulevard must provide a clear and legible north-south route through Empress Place and the Table Character Areas linking with the east-west route at all phases of the development. To connect West Brompton station and Lillie Road with the East-west route.

Key plan

North-south route

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

Silkeborg Pedestrian Streets and Søndertorv - SLA

EP.L.2

Vehicle-free The design of Empress Place Boulevard must be vehicle-free, except for emergency vehicles, maintenance and controlled servicing. To ensure a pedestrian-first public realm.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

Vehicle-free route

Illustrative view, Empress Place

446

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

447

EP.L.3

LANDSCAPE | Empress Place Boulevard

Typical street section

EP.L.4

Cycle route The design of Empress Place Boulevard must provide a central movement route for cyclists. The cycle route could be demarcated.

Spatial arrangement, setting out and key dimensions for this typical street section are set out in the diagram below.

To connect into the sitewide cycle network and promote cyclist and pedestrian safety. DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

19.5m min. (distance between existing terraces)

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

EP.L.5

Spill-out The design of Empress Place Boulevard should allow for spill-out space in front of active Ground Floor uses. To allow space for active Ground Floor uses to spill-out into the street.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Spill-out FOOTPATH

PLANTING

CENTRAL MOVEMENT ROUTE

PLANTING

FOOTPATH

4.25m

3.0m min

5.0m

3.0m min

4.25m

Control dimension Illustrative dimension

Illustrative street section, Empress Place Boulevard (dimensions shown are indicative, subject to min. distances between existing buildings)

space.

EP.L.6

Planting The design of Empress Place Boulevard must provide planted zones and trees on either side of the Empress Place Boulevard. To create a two sided tree-lined street that references local street typologies and extends the character of Empress Place.

448

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

449

EP.L.7

LANDSCAPE | Empress Place Boulevard

Arrangement of planting

EP.L.10

The curtilage elements of the existing buildings - such as lightwells, railings and steps - contribute to the character of Empress Place. Design of the public realm should consider retention or re-purpose of these elements.

The design of Empress Place Boulevard should maximise planted zones. Planted zones should introduce breaks and not obstruct building entrances. To allow clear access and visibility from the boulevard to building entrance and to promote ease of pedestrian movement.

EP.L.8

SuDS features

Curtilage Zone

To retain the existing character of Empress Place without undermining a generous and accessible public realm.

EP.L.11

The design of Empress Place Boulevard should incorporate SuDS features. They should be integrated in the planted zones.

Illustrative view, Empress Place

Level change along Empress Place Where changes in levels are required, these must be designed to as shallow a gradient as possible, with appropriate level landings throughout.

To reduce the quantity of water run-off and improve water quality.

To ensure accessibility and continuity of the public realm.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Green/ blue infrastructure.

EP.L.9

450

Existing street levels

EP.L.12

Levels adjacent to the Table

The Proposed Site levels should align to existing levels where they meet.

The design of Empress Place Boulevard should be level for the section west of the Table.

To tie into retained elements buildings, façades and / or curtilage, and surrounding streets.

To ensure a level interface with adjacent active Ground Floor uses and potential for spill-out.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

451

EP.L.13

LANDSCAPE | Empress Place Boulevard

Access to the Table

EP.L.15

The design of Empress Place Boulevard should provide pedestrian access to the Table adjacent to the cultural venue in WB08.

Extending local character The design of Empress Place Boulevard should consider materials that are sympathetic to the local context of LBHF and the existing street (Lillie Road).

To strengthen the connection of the cultural venue to the public realm.

To ensure that the public realm ties into local character. Illustrative view, Empress Place

EP.L.14

Climate resilient streetscapes

EP.L.16

The design of Empress Place Boulevard must create a climate resilient streetscape habitat, characterised by tree-lined streets and incorporating SuDS features, as described in the sitewide biodiversity strategy.

Integration with the Cascades The design of Empress Place Boulevard must be carefully integrated with the Cascades. Materiality at thresholds should be continuous. To support a transition between Character Areas and reinforce the legibility of the north-south route.

To align with the sitewide biodiversity strategy and create a climate resilient streetscape habitat on the boulevard.

Illustrative landscape plan

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / The Cascades.

► Refer to biodiversity strategy within Sitewide / Landscape / Green/blue infrastructure.

Example species: Climate Resilient Streetscapes

452

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

453

LANDSCAPE | Empress Place Passage

Empress Place Passage

EP.L.19

Empress Place Passage allows for taxi drop-off and servicing whilst enabling safe movement of pedestrians.

Demarcating zones The design and selection of materials should demarcate pedestrian and vehicle zones. This could be achieved through variation in paving size. To create a clear definition between surfaces for different users.

Key plan

EP.L.17

Facilitate vehicle access

EP.L.20

Controlled traffic

The design of Empress Place Passage must provide vehicle access. The design should enable vehicles to turn around.

The design of Empress Place Passage must provide traffic control measures at the end of the street to limit access to Empress Place Boulevard.

To allow for vehicle access to service key pedestrian priority spaces.

To reinforce the pedestrian priority environment of Empress Place.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

EP.L.18

Variation in paving size

Illustrative landscape plan

Ensure pedestrian safety The design of Empress Place Passage must provide a footpath on at least one side of the movement route. To prioritise pedestrian safety in the public realm.

Delineation through materiality for pedestrian safety

454

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

455

LANDSCAPE | Lillie Road Edge

Lillie Road Edge EP.L.23

Lillie Road provides two access points to the site, with an enhanced pedestrian zone.

Materials The design and selection of paving must integrate with both the existing materiality and guidance, and the newly proposed materials within the Site. To ensure the emerging material palette integrates with existing or future highways works.

Key plan

EP.L.21

Wayfinding

Existing condition, Empress Place and Lillie Road

EP.L.24

The design of Lillie Road Edge must prioritise the movement from West Brompton station to Empress Place Boulevard. This could include tone and materiality strategies, layout principles or signage.

The design of Lillie Road Edge could provide spill-out space, adjacent to active Ground Floor uses, where practical. To allow space for active Ground Floor uses to spill-out into the street.

To assist with orientation and wayfinding from the edges of the Site into the Earls Court Development.

EP.L.22

Spill-out

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Spill-out

Existing condition, The Prince

space.

Signage

EP.L.25

Unobstructed public realm

The design of signage must be visible and legible, drawing pedestrians into Empress Place Boulevard.

The design of spill-out spaces must maintain usability of the public realm without unreasonable obstruction.

To assist with orientation and wayfinding.

To safeguard the movement and use of the public realm.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Wayfinding.

Visible and legible signage

456

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

457

BUILT FORM | Building Typologies

Built Form Building Typologies Large-footprint (Development Zone B and C) Located on either side of Empress Place Boulevard, Large-footprint buildings create a sense of arrival into the Site. A stepped massing, common datums as well as rhythm, composition and expression provide a familiar approach to other building typologies. The diagrammatic layout and massing illustrated in this Design Code for Development Zone C shows these plots as a commercial form, but they could also be configured as residential plots (or mixed use including hotel / education uses) in accordance with the Development Specification and Parameter Plan allocation.

W ar

Aisgill Gardens

re s

The Casca d

B C

Table Park

Detailed Component (Development Zone H) Development Zone H predominantly consists of detailed components and will serve as a further level of resolution to communicate the quality and ambition of the later phases.

458

Lillie Road

West Bro

The Table Edge addresses Empress Place Boulevard, providing active frontage and managing a level change to the Table.

mpton

Empr ess P lace B ouleva

(Development Zone B)

Cr es

Table Edge

West Brompton Square

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 459 Illustrative sketch showing Built 2026 form typologies

BUILT FORM | Large-footprint

Large-footprint EP.B.1

(Development Zone B and C) Located on either side of Empress Place Boulevard, Large-footprint buildings create a sense of arrival into the Site.

Existing buildings The character of the existing buildings should be reflected and celebrated in the designs for Empress Place. This could include their character, scale, expression, materiality, detail and proportion. To celebrate the existing character of Empress Place.

Key plan

Existing condition of Empress Place

Solid, continuous parapets

Illustrative image of Empress Place Boulevard

460

Order, composition and scale of openings

Materiality and ornamental details

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

461

EP.B.2

BUILT FORM | Large-footprint

Partial retention of existing buildings The design must prioritise the retention of existing buildings or façades and incorporate them into the proposal in a coherent approach. There are other elements of the building that should not be considered suitable for retention, such as mansard roofs and alterations/extensions. Where technical design development demonstrates that a retention option is not possible, then reduced retention or demolition are acceptable outcomes in the sequence identified in the adjacent diagram.

EP.B.4 Retention

Prioritising active frontages Buildings must contribute to the activation of the public realm. Existing light wells could be either retained or covered.

Partial retention

To prioritise active frontages and interaction between internal and external spaces. Façade retention

► Refer to Empress Place / Landscape.

Demolition Order of priority

To retain and build on the Site history and architectural character of Empress Place. EP.B.5

EP.B.3

Enhancing active frontages Extending the public realm to the front of the existing building line along Empress Place should be explored.

Façade alteration to existing façades Alterations to existing façades are acceptable, but they must retain a legible composition that relates to the original façade character. For example, existing window and door heights could be altered to provide level access and views from the inside. To retain the recognisable character of the existing buildings

To enhance active frontages and interaction between internal and external spaces.

► Refer to Empress Place / Landscape. 462

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

463

EP.B.6

BUILT FORM | Large-footprint

Additional openings to existing façades

EP.B.8

Additional or widened openings should be limited to ensure general composition and legibility of the existing façades.

Integration of historic / proposed volumes The volume of the historic building must be legible in the overall massing composition where integrated with a new building. A single floor with set back or mansard roof could be introduced if it does not compromise the legibility of the existing façade.

To avoid erosion of the existing façade character legibility.

To build on the Site history by retaining the character the existing buildings.

EP.B.7

464

Legibility of the existing façades

EP.B.9

Integration of existing façades and new building

The massing of proposed buildings must be set back or sloped so that they are subservient to the existing terraces. This does not include existing mansard roofs (as outlined in EP.B.2).

Where new buildings and spaces are proposed behind any retained façade, they should provide an appropriate transition in the scale and rhythm of the new elements when seen in relation to the existing condition.

To reinforce a familiar street scale along Empress Place.

To reinforce the integration of the historic elements into the new design and avoid retained façades reading as external planes.

Existing condition, Empress Place

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

465

EP.B.10

BUILT FORM | Large-footprint

Define the edge of the boulevard

EP.B.12

Vertical rhythm The building façade should express a rhythm that responds to the proportions of the existing Empress Place terraces. This could be achieved through a regularity in vertical articulation or building element composition.

Large-footprint buildings must define the edge of the boulevard and predominantly align to the maximum building line or the existing building façade line. To define the edge of a key route and align to existing street.

To create cohesive and familiar rhythm along Empress Place.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Layout

Illustrative view, Empress Place Boulevard

and massing.

Maximum Building Line

EP.B.11

Integrated façades

EP.B.13

Large-footprint buildings should read coherently in relation to other Largefootprint and Smaller-scale buildings. This could be achieved through detailed articulation, consistent composition or associated datums.

Where façades are retained, façade design for the upper levels must consider their relationship with the retained elements of the existing buildings through tone, materiality, composition or other forms of expression. To create a sense of coherence between existing and newly proposed buildings.

466

Coherent architecture

Existing condition, Empress Place

To create cohesive and balanced architectural composition. Coherent architectural expression

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

467

EP.B.14

EP.B.15

BUILT FORM | Large-footprint

Complementing local character

EP.B.16

Buildings within plots WB07/08 (Development Zone B) should respond to and complement the grain, materiality and typologies of existing buildings in the immediate street context. They should avoid creating a visual distraction and mediate between shorter buildings in the foreground, and taller buildings behind.

Prominent corners are façades fronting or terminating important routes and views within Empress Place Boulevard. They should be designed with particular importance and incorporate prominent features.

To complement the existing grain, break down the massing of the large combined plots and enhance legibility of the built form.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Frontages

To reinforce spatial hierarchy and assist with wayfinding. and façades.

Prominent corners

Complementary grain and materiality to site context

A family of buildings

To ensure buildings along Empress Place Boulevard are read as a cluster.

Key Detailed Component

EP.B.17

Lillie Road corners Building corners addressing Lillie Road could consider chamfering to reflect the existing built form.

The design of Large-footprint buildings should provide harmonising architectural features to allow them to be read as part of the same cluster of buildings. This could be achieved through similar composition, architectural detailing or complementary materials.

468

Prominent corners

To highlight entrances to the Site and reflect existing buildings.

A family of buildings

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

469

EP.B.18

BUILT FORM | Large-footprint

Cultural venue

EP.B.20

The design of WB08 should reflect the cultural use within the building. This should include an open and welcoming entrance which is integrated with the public realm.

Where a building has an address on the Table, the design of the building must contribute to the experience of the destination public realm. This could be achieved through expressed entrances, animated façades or a change in expression.

To reflect the cultural use within the building and allow it to contribute to the public realm.

To create an architectural composition that contributes to the public realm through transparency that integrates interior and exterior space, and general character.

Illustrative view, WB08 from the Table

EP.B.19

Entrances The design of WB08 should provide a pedestrian entrance to the building from both boroughs. To provide access to the cultural venue across both boroughs and different directions in the Site.

Addressing the Table

EP.B.21

Illustrative view, WB07 from the Table

Relationship to ground Large-footprint buildings should have a clear response to meeting the ground as a well-defined base. It could read as continuous and take precedent over the buildings sitting ‘on top’. To create a continuous street frontage and unify the ground plane.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Layout and massing.

470

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

471

EP.B.22

BUILT FORM | Large-footprint

Legibility of the base

EP.B.24

Active frontages

The design of the base must respond to the heights established by the scale of the existing buildings on Empress Place.

Façades facing key routes should include active frontages. These could include doors and / or a degree of transparency.

To reinforce the existing datum levels and create a familiar street scale extending through the Site.

To contribute to the animation of the public realm.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Frontages and façades.

EP.B.23

472

Expressed entrances

EP.B.25

Active uses on the Ground Floor

Parallel building lines

Entrances along Empress Place Boulevard should be clearly expressed and easily identifiable. This could be achieved through changes in tone or materiality or recessed entrances.

Proposed building façades addressing Empress Place Boulevard and Lillie Road should be arranged at upper levels to be predominantly parallel to the existing building façades and / or street edges line.

To create legibility in building façades and improve wayfinding.

To reinforce the spatial condition of the existing streets.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

473

EP.B.26

BUILT FORM | Large-footprint

Accessible roof terraces

EP.B.28

The provision of a publicly accessible roof terrace should be prioritised where technical, spatial and operational considerations can be met. Where a publicly accessible roof terrace is delivered it should provide access to good sunlight and views towards the river. Views north onto the Table Park should also be explored. Accessible roof terraces should include greening where possible.

Tone of new buildings The tone of new building façades should be informed by the existing façades. To reinforce a cohesive and familiar palette that responds to the predominant tone of the local context. Tones informed by existing buildings

Planted zones on accessible terrace

To enable publicly accessible amenity space on upper levels of the masterplan. Tone of existing buildings on Empress Place

EP.B.27

Planting at upper levels Setbacks or roof terraces at upper levels should include green roofs or planting. To increase planting across the Site.

EP.B.29

Materials showcasing innovation Material choices should showcase innovation. This could include materials that incorporate technological advancements. To create buildings that reflect the innovative nature of the uses and activities that happen inside them.

474

Innovative materials visible from street

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

475

EP.B.30

BUILT FORM | Large-footprint

Façades facing the bus facility Façades facing the bus facility are prominent and visible from Lillie Road. They should reflect their role as key frontages in the context of being seen from Lillie Road and addressing the bus facility. Façades should also consider integration of a bus standing facility that should be safe and well-lit. To address the different streets buildings are facing.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Frontages and façades.

476

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

477

BUILT FORM | Table Edge

Table Edge EP.B.31

(Development Zone B) The Table Edge addresses Empress Place Boulevard, providing active frontage and managing a level change to the Table.

Define the edge of the boulevard The design of the Table Edge must define the edge of the boulevard and predominantly align to the maximum building line. To define the edge of a key route and align to existing street.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Layout and massing.

Key plan

EP.B.32

Arches used to define the edge of the boulevard

Extend the Table The design of the Table Edge must extend the character of the Table over to the edge of Empress Place Boulevard. To extend the Table and connect it to Empress Place.

EP.B.33

Visual connection to the Table The design of the Table Edge should provide a connection indicating that the Table is present and accessible above. This could be achieved through planting visible from the Ground Floor public realm.

Illustrative image of Empress Place Boulevard

478

To create a visual connection between Empress Place Boulevard and the Table.

Illustrative image of Empress Place Boulevard

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

479

EP.B.34

BUILT FORM | Table Edge

Animate the public realm

EP.B.37

Ground Floor frontages must be permeable and support visual connection with the public realm.

Integration of buildings on the edge of the Table Where buildings/structures are located on the edge of the Table, such as the Pavilion, the design of the Table Edge could be integrated with the design of those buildings.

To animate the public realm.

To ensure that the relationship of the built form is considered.

► Refer to The Table / Built form / Pavilion. EP.B.35

Reference to Detailed Component design

EP.B.38

A level access and lift connection must be provided between Empress Place Boulevard and the Table. This should be visible from key surrounding routes.

Massing, articulation, architectural expression and façade rhythm should respond to the detailed design of the adjacent Plot (Development Zone H). To ensure a harmonious streetscape.

To provide an accessible and inclusive public realm.

► Refer to Detailed Component of the

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity

Hybrid Planning Application.

EP.B.36

and movement, The Table / Landscape and The Table / Built form / Pavilion.

Vertical rhythm

EP.B.39

The building façade must express a vertical rhythm that responds to the proportions of the existing Empress Place terrace buildings. This could be achieved through a regularity in vertical articulation or building element composition. To create a cohesive and familiar rhythm along Empress Place Boulevard. 480

Accessible connection between levels

Unique typology The design of the Table Edge must celebrate the unique typology and setting underneath the Table. This could be achieved through façade composition, entrances, tone or materiality. To animate the public realm.

Railway arches

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

481

BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape

Impacts on Heritage and Townscape WB02 WB07/08

EP.B.40

Intermediate layering

EP.B.42

Buildings within Plots WB02, WB07/08 (Development Zones B1,B2 and C) should provide an intermediate layer between the existing buildings in the foreground, and the proposed taller buildings behind. This could be achieved through the use of colour, materiality, or architectural expression.

WB02 WB07/08

Distinguishable from foreground Buildings within Plots WB02, WB07/08 (Development Zones B1,B2 and C) should have a distinctive rhythm and composition that differ from other buildings in the view. To avoid coalescence in the massing and reduce visual impact on heritage assets and their setting.

To minimise distraction and impact of the change in scale between the existing townscape in the foreground, and the proposed higher development.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Kings Road - View 39

WB02 WB07/08

EP.B.41

Vertical expression

EP.B.43

Marker Design of WB01/02 (Development Zone C) should appear as a marker. It should be distinguishable from other buildings in the view. This could be achieved through the use of colour, materiality, or architectural expression.

Buildings within Plots WB02, WB07/08 (Development Zones B1,B2 and C) should mediate between the existing context and taller proposed building behind. This could be achieved through vertical expression.

To reflect the role of the buildings as a marker.

To minimise the perceived scale of the buildings.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on

heritage and townscape.

Kings Road - View 39

482

WB02 WB01

Ongar Road - View 59

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

483

EP.B.44

BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape

Greenery on terraces

WB02 WB01

Landscape could be introduced on south facing terraces of WB01/02 (Development Zone C).

EP.B.46

WB02 WB01

Distinguishable from foreground Building design within Plots WB01/02 (Development Zone C) should have a distinctive rhythm and composition that differ from other buildings in the view.

To reinforce the stepping of the massing.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on

To avoid coalescence in the massing and reduce visual impact on heritage assets and their setting, and achieve a high standard of urban design.

heritage and townscape.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Ongar Road - View 59

EP.B.45

Expressing of stepping

Ongar Road - View 59

WB02 WB01

Design of WB01/02 (Development Zone C) could incorporate variation in heights of set backs and proportions of different sections of the façade. To reinforce a sense of layering, and reduce coalescence, and make the building distinguishable from the foreground.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Ongar Road - View 59

484

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

485

8. Aisgill Gardens [AG]

486

Character Area 2026 extent Earls Court Development I Design Code I October

487

Overview Aisgill Gardens is a community green that includes amenities for all ages and connects to the neighbouring Gibbs Green and West Kensington Estates. It plays an important role as the primary arrival point from the west and as a destination play space. Key principles that characterise Aisgill Gardens include: •

Creating a community green stitching together the adjacent residential Estates with the new community in an intimate, natural environment.

•

Providing a destination play space with sensory landscapes and adventure play.

•

Activating building frontages that spill-out into the landscape.

•

Providing a community hall with animated frontages and community uses.

•

Creating a prominent location along the key northsouth and east-west routes.

► Refer to Illustrative Masterplan chapter in the Design and Access Statement: Masterplan (EC.PA.08).

Illustrative view, Aisgill Gardens

488

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

489

LANDSCAPE | Spaces

Landscape

Aisgil

l Lane

Spaces Community green

Lillie Siding s Squar e

Aisgill Gardens (1) A generous, inclusive and communityoriented green open space that brings residents together and welcomes people into the Site.

1 Aisgill Gardens

The Casca des

Potential MUGA usage

Key plan

Table Park

490

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026 491 Illustrative sketch showing Ground Floor cutaway

LANDSCAPE | Aisgill Gardens

Aisgill Gardens AG.L.1

A generous, inclusive and communityoriented green open space that brings residents together and welcomes people into the Site.

Community green The design of Aisgill Gardens should be a centre for the local community, and should have a distinctive identity. To ensure Aisgill Gardens meets the needs and reflects the identity of the local community. Illustrative view, Aisgill Gardens

Key plan

AG.L.2

Complete at every stage The design of Aisgill Gardens must ensure the public realm is usable and comfortable at every stage as the proposal comes forward. To deliver a public realm that can be used at all stages of delivery.

AG.L.3

Ensuring East-west connection The design of Aisgill Gardens must ensure an east-west cycle and pedestrian connection at every delivery stage. The connection must tie into the wider Site cycle network. To ensure there is east-west connectivity at all stages of delivery.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement. Illustrative landscape plan

492

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

493

LANDSCAPE | Aisgill Gardens

City Dune - SLA

AG.L.4

Northern boundary edge treatment

AG.L.7

The design of Aisgill Gardens should facilitate a sense of enclosure and intimacy. This could be achieved through the arrangement of street furniture, planting or materiality.

The design of the northern boundary edge treatment must be integrated with the public realm and contribute to the activation of the space. This could be achieved through interactive play elements, public art or planting. To support well integrated interim edge treatments that contribute to the public realm.

Intimate spaces

To frame and define the extent of Aisgill Gardens from adjacent key open spaces.

Edge treatment with integrated play, on Site

Planting used to facilitate a sense of enclosure

Skt Kjeld’s Square - SLA

AG.L.5

Definition of the public realm

AG.L.8

Variety of uses

The design of Aisgill Gardens must include a permeable edge. This could be achieved through planting and landscape design, or include a Pavilion.

The design of Aisgill Gardens should accommodate a variety of uses. These could include a sensory forest, picnic lawns, quiet spaces and nature trails.

To provide a sense of enclosure on the western boundary.

To create a welcoming and varied public open space, designed around inclusivity and varied needs of different age groups and abilities.

► Refer to Aisgill Gardens / Built form / Pavilion (P).

AG.L.6

Transition in character The eastern boundary should define a notional boundary between Lillie Sidings Square and the Cascades with the community garden. To provide a legible and varied public realm

Public realm with a variety of uses including sitting and play

AG.L.9

Destination play space The design of Aisgill Gardens must offer a destination play space. To create a zone within Aisgill Gardens that plays a key role in promoting its playful and open character.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Play. Play feature as part of destination play space

494

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

495

AG.L.10

LANDSCAPE | Aisgill Gardens

Variety of play

AG.L.13

The design of Aisgill Gardens must accommodate different types of play. This could include formal and informal play.

Vehicle-free The design of Aisgill Gardens must be vehicle-free. Only emergency vehicle access is permitted. To enhance safety for pedestrians and cyclists of all ages.

To create a welcoming and varied public open space, designed around inclusivity and varied needs of different age groups and abilities. Nature trails providing variety of play

AG.L.11

Adventure play

AG.L.14

The design of Aisgill Gardens should provide adventure play. This could be through large scale climbing apparatus, tunnels, slides or water play.

The design of Aisgill Gardens should enable pedestrian movement along the edges. This should take into consideration spill-out spaces in front of buildings. Pedestrian movement could also be through the landscaped areas.

To contribute towards establishing Aisgill Garden’s identity as a destination play space.

To safeguard space at the heart of the community green for the uses described.

Play structures that incorporate climbing, tunnels and slides

AG.L.12

Spill-out zone The design of Aisgill Gardens should have spill-out zones adjacent to buildings for active Ground Floor uses. They should not conflict with building entrances and movement routes. To allow space for active Ground Floor uses to spill-out into Aisgill Gardens.

496

Allowing pedestrian movement on the edges

AG.L.15

Cycle movement The design of Aisgill Gardens should provide a visible cycle route supporting an east-west connection. This could be located on the southern edge of Aisgill Gardens. To contribute to the sitewide cycling strategy and connect into the local network.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

497

AG.L.16

LANDSCAPE | Aisgill Gardens

Cycle parking

AG.L.19

The design of Aisgill Gardens should provide cycle parking adjacent to the cycle route through Aisgill Gardens. Cycle parking should be wellintegrated with the public realm.

Community Orchard The design of Aisgill Gardens must create a Community Orchard habitat, as described in the sitewide biodiversity strategy. To align with the sitewide biodiversity strategy and provide a diverse and connected green network.

To facilitate cycling and change of means between cycling and walking.

► Refer to biodiversity strategy within Sitewide / Landscape / Green/blue infrastructure.

AG.L.17

Playful street furniture The design of street furniture could facilitate play. This could include furniture designed for play as well as sitting or include playful elements.

Example species: Community Orchard

To contribute to the character of Aisgill Gardens as a play-led, community recreational space.

AG.L.20

Interactive playful elements as part of the street

AG.L.18

Integration of materials

498

Plant species selection must include a selection of flowering and fruiting species. To support the character of play and stay orchards.

The design and selection of materials should provide an appropriate interface with the neighbouring Estate and adjacent key spaces. This could be achieved by adopting particular characteristics of tone, or through either considered transition or differentiation of materials. To create cohesion and legibility of way-finding across Site, whilst also knitting into its context.

Planting supporting flowering & fruiting species

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Planting. Flowering and fruiting species

Local materials are used in the new public realm

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

499

BUILT FORM | Building Typologies

Built Form

Drawing modified.

Aisgil

l Lane

Building Typologies

Lillie Siding s Squar e

Perimeter block façade (Development Zone U) NB. This section includes codes in relation to the southern façade along Aisgill Gardens only. For more detail on the treatment of regular perimeter blocks, refer to ‘Lillie Sidings, Built form’ Pavilion

P H[O]

H[D]

Aisgill Gardens

(Development Zones I and P) The Pavilions frame the western edge of Aisgill Gardens and provide active, animated frontages and communityfocused uses. Detailed Component (Development Zone H) Development Zone H is made up of Detailed Components (Development Zone H[D]) and Outline Components (Development Zone H[O]) and will serve as a further level of resolution to communicate the quality and ambition of the later phases.

500

The Casca des

Common Base (Development Zone H) Common Base plot supports the framing of the edges of Aisgill Gardens. Its frontages activate the public realm and the massing contributes to the mediating transition in scale and character.

Table Park

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 501 Illustrative sketch showing built 2026 form typologies

BUILT FORM | Perimeter Block

Perimeter Block (Development Zone U)

AG.B.2

Southern façades along Aisgill Gardens only.

Supporting a community ecosystem Buildings should be designed to accommodate spill-out space to support community and cultural uses. To create a vibrant community ecosystem supported by a variety of services. Supporting a community ecosystem

AG.B.1

Permeable Ground Floor frontages Ground Floor façades facing onto Aisgill Gardens should be visually permeable, clearly legible and inviting. To create a connection between exterior and interior spaces, encouraging people to engage with their surroundings and others, fostering a sense of community.

502

AG.B.3

Rhythm and human scale Façades should adopt a human scale. This could be achieved through grain, rhythm, differentiating lower levels, or façade articulation. To enhance the pedestrian experience.

Illustrative view, Aisgill Lane towards Development Zone U

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

503

AG.B.4

BUILT FORM | Perimeter Block

Prominent corners

AG.B.6

Prominent corners should be designed with particular importance and should be richer in detail.

Reference to Detailed Component design

To reinforce spatial hierarchy and assist with wayfinding.

Massing, articulation, architectural expression and façade rhythm should respond to the detailed design of the adjacent Plot (Development Zone H[D]), facing onto Aisgill Gardens.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Frontages

To ensure a harmonious streetscape.

and façades.

► Refer to Detailed Component of the Hybrid Planning Application.

AG.B.5

Integration of artwork Façades facing onto Aisgill Gardens could provide opportunities for integrated community art. The artwork could be developed through consultation with the existing local community. To integrate the architecture in the cultural identity of the local community and develop a distinct ‘local’ character to this area.

Artwork integrated into the building façade

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Public Art.

504

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

505

BUILT FORM | Pavilions

Pavilions AG.B.7

(Development Zones I and P) The Pavilions frame the western edge of Aisgill Gardens and provide active, animated frontages and communityfocused uses.

Contribution to the public realm Ground Floor uses should contribute to the activation of the public realm. This could include cafés, culture or community uses. To create a vibrant and engaging environment. Cafe encourages uses of the public realm

AG.B.8

AG.B.9

Integrated with landscape design The design of the Pavilion must be integrated with the landscape. It could include referencing a similar material palette and integration of planting. To allow for integration of the landscape design.

Illustrative view, Aisgill Gardens towards Development Zone I

506

► Refer to Aisgill Gardens / Landscape.

Illustrative view, Aisgill Gardens towards Development Zone I

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

507

AG.B.10

BUILT FORM | Pavilions

Roof articulation

AG.B.12

Integration of art The design of the Pavilion could provide opportunities for integrated art. The artwork could be developed through consultation with the existing local community or engagement of a local artist.

The design of the Pavilion could have a distinct roof articulation. To create visual interest and a distinct architectural character.

To integrate the community’s identity with the architectural design. Integration of art within the Pavilion

► Refer to Public Art Strategy.

AG.B.11

Weather protection

AG.B.13

Playfulness

The design of the Pavilion should provide areas for shelter from the weather. This could be achieved through incorporating elements such as canopies or awnings.

The design of the Pavilion could explore opportunities for diverse architectural expression. This could be achieved through the use of colour or interactive elements.

To provide comfort in adverse weather conditions.

To create a dynamic and engaging space that inspires creativity. Awning provides weather protection

Use of colour creates a sense of playfulness

508

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

509

BUILT FORM | Pavilion (I)

Pavilion (I) AG.B.14

(Development Zone I) The Pavilions frames the western edge of Aisgill Gardens and provide active, animated frontages and communityfocused uses.

Reference to Detailed Component design Massing, articulation, architectural expression and façade rhythm should respond to the detailed design elements of the adjacent Plot (Development Zone H[D]). To ensure a harmonious streetscape.

► Refer to Detailed Component of the Hybrid Planning Application.

AG.B.15

Responding to the public realm The Pavilion should allow for flexible ground floor community uses and respond to the public realm as well as allowing for improvements to the existing MUGA. To ensure the Pavilion and ground floor uses are integrated with the public realm of Aisgill Gardens.

Illustrative view, Aisgill Avenue towards the Pavilion

Illustrative view, Aisgill Gardens towards Development Zone I

510

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

511

-2 m

BUILT FORM | Pavilion (P) +/-

Pavilion (P) M

If a Pavilion is proposed, it must be located within the zone of allowable movement in Aisgill Gardens.

The Pavilion frames the western edge of Aisgill Gardens and provide active, animated frontages and communityfocused uses.

-2

u en Av

Pavilion location

AG.B.17

(Development Zone P)

Str

i sg Ai

d un

-2

H[D]

H[O]

To allow flexible location of a Pavilion in Aisgill Gardens.

► Refer to Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B).

Aisgill Avenue

Extract of Parameter Plan

Nor

EMPRESS STATE BUILDING

oad

AG.B.16

Pavilion within Aisgill Gardens Design of Aisgill Gardens must include a permeable edge. This could be achieved through planting and landscape design, or include a Pavilion. The Pavilion should form one possible option of design exploration for defining the edge condition of Aisgill Gardens.

AG.B.18

oad

nd R

th E

Star R

Flexibility for uses The internal layout of the Pavilion could allow for flexibility of uses. An open plan layout could be used to create open, adaptable areas. To encourage flexible uses to evolve over the building’s life span.

Illustrative view, Aisgill Gardens

Pavilion with flexibility for uses

To create welcoming and identifiable points of entry to the Site and transition between the scale of the existing houses and street and that of the gardens and buildings defining it.

► Refer to Aisgill Gardens / Landscape. 512

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

513

BUILT FORM | Common Base

Common Base (Development Zone H[O])

AG.B.20

Common Base plot supports the framing of the edges of Aisgill Gardens. Its frontages activate the public realm and the massing contributes to the mediating transition in scale and character.

Coherent architectural response Where buildings with different uses are adjacent to each other, their architectural expression must establish a familiar design relationship with one another. This could be achieved through horizontal datums, façade rhythms, horizontal or vertical emphasis, corner expression, tone or materials.

To ensure a consistent streetscape surrounding Aisgill Gardens.

To ensure a coherent family of buildigs come forward.

AG.B.19

Reference to Detailed Component design Massing, articulation, architectural expression and façade rhythm should respond to the detailed design of the adjacent Plot (Development Zone H[D]), facing onto Aisgill Gardens.

AG.B.21

Activation of the Aisgill Gardens frontage Frontages addressing Aisgill Gardens should be active. To animate the public realm within Aisgill Gardens.

To ensure a harmonious streetscape.

► Refer to Detailed Component of the Hybrid Planning Application.

514

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

515

AG.B.22

BUILT FORM | Common Base

Visibility of active uses

AG.B.24

Treatment of specials

The Ground Floor frontages addressing Aisgill Gardens must be designed to maximise visibility of the Ground Floor active uses. This could be achieved through signage, lighting or maximising permeability of the façade.

Buildings facing key public open spaces as shown on the diagrams could include special features, such as prominent Ground Floor entrances, special building tops or distinctive design in the middle.

To ensure active uses in this location will be visible along the strategically important east-west route.

To reinforce the spatial hierarchy highlighting the frontage to key open spaces.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / frontages and façades.

AG.B.23

Prominent corners Prominent corners should be designed with particular importance and should be richer in detail. This could be achieved through chamfered or rounded corners. To ensure the corner responds to its role approaching from the Cascades.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / frontages and façades.

AG.B.25

Ground floor continuity Where buildings face Aisgill Gardens, there must be careful coordination of the Ground Floor plane and any podium levels to maintain a well considered visual integration between plots. This could be achieved by complementary material treatment of lower levels. To ensure integrated and visually connected building bases, regardless of phasing.

Continuation of horizontal datum

516

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

517

AG.B.26

BUILT FORM | Common Base

A family of buildings The design of the common base block should provide some harmonising architectural features to allow them to be read as part of the same cluster of buildings. The harmony could be reflected through similar composition, architectural detailing or complementary materials. To ensure coherence between adjacent buildings.

AG.B.27

A family of buildings

Integration with the shared courtyard The shared courtyard is part of Development Zone H[D]. The building within Development Zone H[O] should respond sensitively to the courtyard that connects the two buildings. To ensure the courtyard carefully integrates with both buildings.

518

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

519

9. Lillie Sidings [LS]

520

Character Area extent

Overview Lillie Sidings celebrates the Site’s industrial heritage with a new mixed- use destination square, framed by the reimagined Train Shed, hosting dining, events and cultural activities. Key principles that characterise Lillie Sidings include: •

Creating a vehicle-free destination square at the centre connected by a network of lanes, walks and the boulevard.

•

Exploring the creative reuse of the historic Lillie Bridge Depot (The Train Shed) with a cultural destination at Ground Floor.

•

Allowing active uses to spill-out onto the square bringing the public realm to life.

•

Stitching in and stepping down in scale to meet existing streets and the adjacent Estates.

•

Creating a mix of housing typologies, catering for multi-generational living across multiple tenures.

► Refer to Illustrative Masterplan chapter in the Design and Access Statement: Masterplan (EC.PA.08).

Illustrative view, Lillie Sidings Square

522

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

523

LANDSCAPE | Spaces

Landscape Spaces

We st

Destination Square Lillie Sidings Square (1) A destination square, celebrating the Site’s industrial heritage and embedding flexibility for events. Boulevard

Ken s

ingt

Cro

mw ell

Ro ad

on B

oule vard

7 2

West Kensington Boulevard Link (2)

e Lan

ert’s

Aisgill Lane (3)

1 5

uthb

Lane

Aisgil

l Lane

Aisgill Lane provides a linear landscape on the edge of the Site and accommodates pedestrian and vehicle movement. Lillie Sidings Lane (4) Lillie Sidings Lane provides access and servicing alongside the railway.

St C

West Kensington Boulevard Link connects the north-south route from Lillie Sidings Square toward West Kensington station with an active treelined pedestrian and cycle route.

Key plan

Lillie Siding s Squar e

Walk Lillie Sidings South Walk and Lillie Sidings North Walk (5, 6) The walks provide intimate, pedestrian priority connections that support a transition from destination public realm to quiet residential areas.

Aisgill Gardens

West Kensington Walk (7) The walk provides a quiet, pedestrian priority connection. 524

The Casca des Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026 525 Illustrative sketch showing Ground Floor cutaway

LANDSCAPE | Lillie Sidings Square

Lillie Sidings Square

LS.L.2

A destination square, celebrating the Site’s industrial heritage and embedding flexibility for events.

Destination square The design of Lillie Sidings Square should reflect its role as a destination square. This could be achieved through selection of materials, furniture, or lighting. To align with the public realm hierarchy and reinforce the role of Lillie Sidings Square as a destination square. Destination square

Key plan

LS.L.1

Celebrate industrial heritage The design of Lillie Sidings Square should celebrate the industrial heritage of the Site. This could be achieved through the re-use of industrial elements in the public realm or referencing industrial materials. To celebrate the history and former uses of the Site.

Celebrating existing industrial elements

Illustrative landscape plan

526

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

527

LS.L.3

LANDSCAPE | Lillie Sidings Square

Sense of enclosure

LS.L.6

The design of Lillie Sidings Square must facilitate a sense of enclosure. This could be achieved through the visibility of the edges or the distribution of planting, street furniture and lighting.

Tree planting must be aligned adjacent to the north-south route. Tree planting in other parts of the square should also be considered to further enhance the pedestrian routes.

To frame the square and define the extent of a key space.

LS.L.4

Trees adjacent to northsouth route

To extend the boulevard character of the north-south route through the square.

Encourage spill-out

LS.L.7

Indicative location

SuDS features The design of Lillie Sidings Square should provide SuDS features such as rain gardens or bio-swales. They could be located adjacent to the north-south route.

The design of Lillie Sidings Square must incorporate spill-out space. Spill-out space on the eastern edge adjacent to the Train Shed should be generous. This could enable activities such as outdoor seating for food & beverage.

To align with the Sitewide SuDS strategy and encourage SuDS features in the public realm.

To activate the square.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Green and blue infrastructure.

LS.L.5

North-south route provision

LS.L.8

The design of Lillie Sidings Square must provide a north-south pedestrian and cycle route. This should form part of the wider north-south route connecting West Brompton to West Kensington stations. To connect the north-south route and reinforce the sitewide movement strategy. 528

Indicative location

Planting in the square The design of plant beds could be arranged to align with the former railway tracks. To celebrate the history and former uses of the Site through arrangement of planting and trees.

Indicative location

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

529

LS.L.11

LANDSCAPE | Lillie Sidings Square

Maximise flexibility

LS.L.12

Street furniture The design of street furniture should celebrate the industrial heritage of the Character Area. This could be achieved through the choice of materiality and form.

The design of Lillie Sidings Square should allow for areas that remain free of planting and furniture. To create a square that supports events and other temporary uses.

To celebrate the history and former uses of the Site. Flexibility in the arrangement of planting

LS.L.9

Post-industrial Remediation Gardens

LS.L.13

The design of Lillie Sidings Square must create Post-industrial Remediation Gardens habitat, as described in the sitewide biodiversity strategy.

To build from the history of the Site.

► Refer to biodiversity strategy within Sitewide /

LS.L.10

Re-use of found objects or materials The design of Lillie Sidings Square should explore the potential re-use of found objects, materials or signage, for example, former train tracks.

To align with the sitewide biodiversity strategy and provide a diverse and connected green network. Landscape / Green/blue infrastructure. City Dune - SLA

Street furniture with industrial heritage character

Example species: Post-industrial Remediation Gardens

Found material on Earls Court Site

Maturity of planting Tree selection should include a variety of trees with a range of maturity. To reflect the destination square character of Lillie Sidings Square.

A range of maturity of trees

530

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

531

LANDSCAPE | West Kensington Boulevard Link

West Kensington Boulevard Link

Bjørvika Masterplan and Urban Spaces, Oslo - SLA

LS.L.14

Vehicle-free The design of West Kensington Boulevard Link must be vehiclefree, except for emergency vehicles, maintenance and controlled servicing.

West Kensington Boulevard Link connects the north-south route from Lillie Sidings Square toward West Kensington station with an active treelined pedestrian and cycle route.

To support a pedestrian-first public realm.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

Key plan

LS.L.15

Vehicle-free route

Contributing to the northsouth route The design of West Kensington Boulevard Link must form part of the north-south route connecting West Brompton with West Kensington stations. It should be an extension of the boulevard and strengthen wayfinding. North-south route

To connect West Kensington station with West Brompton station and Lillie Road in a legible, north-south route.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

Illustrative view, West Kensington Boulevard Link towards West Kensington

532

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

533

To connect into the sitewide cycle network and promote cyclist and pedestrian safety.

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

18.0m min. DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

The design of West Kensington Boulevard Link must provide a cycle route connecting West Kensington Boulevard to Lillie Sidings Square. The cycle route could be shared or demarcated.

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

Spatial arrangement, setting out and key dimensions for this typical street section are set out in the diagram below.

Cycle route

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

LS.L.17

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

Typical street section

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

LS.L.16

LANDSCAPE | West Kensington Boulevard Link

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

LS.L.18

Spill-out space location The design of West Kensington Boulevard Link could include spill-out space in front of active Ground Floor uses. To allow space for active Ground Floor uses to spill-out into the street.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Spill-out FOOTPATH/ SPILL-OUT

CYCLE ROUTE

PLANTING

FOOTPATH/ SPILL-OUT

5.0m

3.0m

5.0m min.

6.0m

Control dimension Illustrative dimension

Illustrative street section, West Kensington Boulevard Link

space.

LS.L.19

Planting The design of West Kensington Boulevard Link must provide a planted zone on at least one side of the cycle route. To create a landscaped public realm.

534

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

535

LS.L.20

LANDSCAPE | West Kensington Boulevard Link

Arrangement of planting

LS.L.22

The design of West Kensington Boulevard Link should maximise planted zones. Planted zones should introduce breaks and not obstruct building entrances.

The design of West Kensington Boulevard Link must be carefully integrated with West Kensington Boulevard. This should be through a continuation of materials and street furniture.

To allow clear access and visibility from the boulevard to building entrance and to promote ease of pedestrian movement.

LS.L.21

Formal line of trees The design of West Kensington Boulevard Link should provide a formal line of trees on at least one side of the boulevard. To enhance the character of the boulevard.

536

Integration with West Kensington

To create a continuous boulevard typology.

LS.L.23

Transition into Lillie Sidings Square The design and selection of materials at thresholds should provide a distinction between the boulevard and the square. To support a transition between the boulevard and the square.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

537

LANDSCAPE | Aisgill Lane

Aisgill Lane LS.L.24

Aisgill Lane provides a linear landscape on the edge of the Site and accommodates pedestrian and vehicle movement.

Interface with existing edge The design of Aisgill Lane must consider the interface with the existing boundary edge. To ensure sensitive integration of the new lane with the existing neighbourhood.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Boundary conditions.

Key plan

LS.L.25

Aerial imagery of existing condition of Estate edge

Alignment of levels The design of Aisgill Lane should align proposed levels with the existing adjoining public realm, where practical. To promote connectivity and access.

Illustrative view, Aisgill Lane

538

Illustrative street section

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

539

LANDSCAPE | Aisgill Lane

Silkeborg Pedestrian Streets and Søndertorv - SLA

LS.L.27

Permeable edge The design of Aisgill Lane should explore increasing the permeability of the existing boundary condition. Proposals could include opening appropriate breaks through the existing wall, replacing it with a hedge or a planted linear landscape with SuDS feature.

LS.L.28

Planting heights The design of planting should allow for visual permeability across the edge condition. To maintain lines of sight across the across the Site boundary.

Illustrative street section

The Design of boundary treatment should respond to the outcome of consultation with neighbours. To provide a landscaped and wellintegrated edge to the Site and interface with neighbours.

LS.L.29

Opportunity for SuDS The design of planted zones should include SuDS features. This could include bio-swales and/or rain gardens.

Illustrative street section

To contribute to the Sitewide SuDS strategy.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Green/ blue infrastructure.

Illustrative street section

LS.L.26

Planting

LS.L.30

Sun tolerant plant selection

The design of Aisgill Lane must provide generous planted zones with trees adjacent to the boundary.

The plant selection should favour species that can tolerate exposure to sunlight.

To support biodiversity in the Site and green interface with adjoining properties.

To enable planting to thrive.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Planting. Planted zone

540

SuDS features along street

Sun tolerant planting selection

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

541

LS.L.31

LANDSCAPE | Aisgill Lane

Vehicular route

LS.L.33

The design of Aisgill Lane must provide vehicular and cycling access route to plots within Development Zone U. To ensure functional requirements are met.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement and Lillie Sidings / Built form / Perimeter block.

LS.L.32

Play on the way The design of Aisgill Lane must explore incidental play opportunities that are integrated into the public realm for all ages. This could include landscaping, furniture or play equipment.

Vehicular access Traffic control measure indicative location

To maximise opportunities for play in Lillie Sidings and contribute to the sitewide play strategy.

Incidental play opportunities along street

Controlled traffic The design of Aisgill Lane must provide traffic control measures at the end of the lane. They should be wellintegrated with the public realm and landscape features. To ensure pedestrian safety at the termination of the lane. Landscape features used as traffic control measure

542

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

543

LANDSCAPE | Lillie Sidings Lane

Lillie Sidings Lane

Kanalbyen in Fredericia - SLA

LS.L.35

Lillie Sidings Lane provides access and servicing alongside the railway.

Semi-natural vegetation Where there is planting adjacent to the railway corridor, it must be seminatural vegetation. This could include woodland and flower-rich grassland. To promote biodiversity in the Site and contribute to the sitewide UGF strategy.

Key plan

LS.L.34

Landscape buffer

LS.L.36

The design of Lillie Sidings Lane should include planting adjacent to the railway.

Boundary with railway The design of the boundary treatment adjacent to the rail corridor must be coordinated with Network Rail and follow Network Rail guidance.

To create a landscape buffer for noise and improve air quality from the railway corridor.

To ensure the boundary with the railway is safe and secure.

Planted buffer

544

Semi-natural vegetation

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Boundary conditions.

Illustrative landscape plan

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

545

LANDSCAPE | Lillie Sidings Walks (North & South)

Lillie Sidings Walks (North & South)

LS.L.38

Intimate character The design of Lillie Sidings Walks (North & South) must reflect their residential character. This could be achieved through arrangement and selection of planting, defensible space and shared surface.

The walks provide intimate, pedestrian priority connections that support a transition from destination public realm to quiet residential areas. The northern link also enables potential future links with Mund Street and the Gibbs Green estate.

To create a quiet, residential walk with amenity for residents. Key plan

LS.L.37

Illustrative view, Lillie Sidings Walk (South)

Typical street section Spatial arrangement, setting out and key dimensions for this typical street section are set out in the diagram below.

BUILDING LINE

9.0m min.

LS.L.39

Pedestrian priority The design of Lillie Sidings Walks (North & South) should prioritise pedestrians. Controlled access points for vehicles could be provided at the south-western end of the walks. To support a pedestrian-first public realm.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

Control dimension Illustrative dimension

546

DEFENSIBLE SPACE

PLANTED ZONE

CENTRAL MOVEMENT ROUTE

PLANTED ZONE

DEFENSIBLE SPACE

1.5m

3.0m

5.0m

3.0m

1.5m

Illustrative view, Lillie Sidings Walk (South)

Illustrative street section, Lillie Sidings Walks (North and South)

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

547

Planting BUILDING LINE

The design of Lillie Sidings Walks should provide planted zones adjacent to defensible space. Where there is no defensible space, it should be located adjacent to the building line.

LS.L.42 BUILDING LINE

LS.L.40

LANDSCAPE | Lillie Sidings Walks (North & South)

Tree planting Planting should include trees. Trees should not be planted in immediate proximity to projecting balconies or the building line. This could be through staggering planting or alternating planting with balconies.

To reinforce the intimate character of the walks.

To support the green and leafy character of the walks. Planted zone with trees

Illustrative street section, planting

Defensible space BUILDING LINE

The design of Lillie Sidings Walks (North & South) should allow for planted defensible space adjacent to habitable rooms located at grade.

LS.L.43 BUILDING LINE

LS.L.41

To create amenity and privacy for Ground Floor residents.

Variation of tree planting The selection of trees should provide variation of species and form. This could be achieved through a variety of single and multi-stemmed trees. To reinforce the residential character of the walks.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Defensible space.

Variation of tree species and form of trees

Illustrative street section, defensible space

548

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

549

LANDSCAPE | West Kensington Walk

West Kensington Walk

Budolfi Plads - SLA

LS.L.45

Vehicle-free The design of West Kensington Walk should be vehicle-free. This includes private vehicles, servicing and waste collection.

The walks provides intimate, pedestrian priority connection.

To support a pedestrian-first public realm.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

Key plan

LS.L.44

Typical street section

LS.L.46

Spatial arrangement, setting out and key dimensions for this typical street section are set out in the diagram below.

VIA Vika & Ruseløkkveien - SLA Pedestrian and cycle route

Planted walk The design of West Kensington Walk should include a zone for planting and trees.

12.0m min.

To support the green and leafy character of West Kensington Walk. VIA Vika & Ruseløkkveien - SLA Planted zone in walk

LS.L.47

Dwelling space The design of West Kensington Walk should reinforce its character as a dwelling space. This could be achieved through arrangement of informal seating.

12.0m varies (inclusive of planting and pedestrian movement) Control dimension Illustrative dimension

550

To support a comfortable dwelling space. Informal seating within planted areas

Illustrative street section, West Kensington Walk

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

551

BUILT FORM | Building Typologies

Built Form We st

Building Typologies

We st

Ken s

ingt

Cro

mw ell

Ro ad

on B

oule vard

Common base (Development Zone T) W W U

Perimeter block

e Lan ert’s uthb

Transition block (Development Zone U & W)

St C

Perimeter blocks are located on the western edge of Lillie Sidings Square. They consider their immediate context on each side of their block and adopt a form, scale and character that responds to it.

l Lane

(Development Zone U)

Aisgil

Common base combines taller elements to read as a set piece. The design explores the retention and extension of the existing Train Shed and its industrial character.

Key plan

Lillie Siding s Squar e

Transition blocks frame the edges of the boulevard link connecting Lillie Sidings Square with West Kensington Boulevard. They activate a key route and mediate the transition in scale and character. Aisgill Gardens

The Casca des 552

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 553 Illustrative sketch showing built 2026 form typologies

BUILT FORM | Common Base

Common Base LS.B.1

(Development Zone T) Common base combines taller elements to read as a set piece. The design explores the retention and extension of the existing Train Shed and its industrial character.

Activation of Lillie Sidings Square Ground Floor frontages facing Lillie Sidings Square should be designed to maximise opportunities for active and publicly accessible uses. This could be achieved by designing permeable façades, avoiding blank walls and enabling spill-out space. To create dynamic Ground Floor uses that contribute towards activation of the destination square.

Key plan

Activation of square

► Refer to Lillie Sidings / Landscape / Lillie Sidings Square.

LS.B.2

Distinct industrial identity Buildings should have a distinct architectural identity, responding to their immediate context and history of the Site. This could include building expression, materiality and details responding to the industrial features of the historic Train Shed. To contribute to the identity of Lillie Sidings Square as an important cultural destination.

Illustrative view, Lillie Sidings Square

Illustrative view, Lillie Sidings Walk towards Lillie Sidings Square

554

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

555

LS.B.3

BUILT FORM | Common Base

A family of buildings

LS.B.5

Buildings over the existing Train Shed should read as a set piece. This could be achieved through a common approach to façade expression including rhythm and composition, tone and materiality, and/or openings.

The design should explore extending the footprint of the existing Train Shed building southwards. The extension could respond to the existing rhythm, composition and materiality. However, the new element should be distinct in its appearance.

To reinforce the legibility of these buildings as a coherent set.

LS.B.4

To frame Lillie Sidings Square and provide a sense of enclosure and contribute to retaining the industrial character of Lillie Sidings.

Partial retention of Train Shed Design should seek to retain elements of the existing Train Shed and incorporate them into the new design through an integrated approach. Where technical design development demonstrates that a retention option is not possible, reduced retention through to demolition are acceptable outcomes in the sequence identified in the adjacent diagram To retain and build on the Site history and architectural character of the Train Shed.

Extension of the existing Train Shed footprint

Façade and structure partial retention

Façade partial retention

Full demolition Order of priority

LS.B.6

Façade rhythm of existing bays The buildings fronting onto Lillie Sidings must make reference to the rhythm of bays of the existing Train Shed. To evoke the memory of the historic Train Shed building.

Existing condition of the Train Shed

556

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

557

LS.B.7

BUILT FORM | Common Base

Maximise internal flexibility

LS.B.10

Balcony expression Balcony fronts or balustrades should be permeable and constructed from lightweight industrial materials such as steel, or coated aluminium.

Where the existing structure is retained, interventions or reconfiguration to its internal fabric should be designed to allow for maximum internal flexibility.

To make reference to the industrial character of Lillie Sidings.

To allow for the creative reuse of the existing Train Shed building for a range of culture and event spaces. Flexibility in the adaptive re-use of existing structure

LS.B.8

Residential entrances

Balcony expression

LS.B.11

Industrial materials

Where residential entrances do not address Lillie Sidings Square, they must be visible, well lit, secure and provide a reasonable buffer from the railway.

New building materials and features should respond to the Site’s industrial past as a railway depot. This could be achieved through material selection or tone or other references.

To ensure a safe and secure residential neighbourhood.

To make reference to the industrial character of Lillie Sidings. Residential entrance that is visible and secure

LS.B.9

Prominent corners Prominent corners should be designed with particular consideration and should be richer in detail. The prominent corner should feature on the taller element. To reinforce spatial hierarchy and assist with wayfinding to create visual interest on the taller element.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Frontages and façades.

558

Industrial materials on Earls Court Site

LS.B.12

Re-use of found objects or materials Designs should explore the potential re-use of found objects, materials or signage. To build from the history of the Site.

Found material on Earls Court Site

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

559

BUILT FORM | Perimeter Block

Perimeter Block LS.B.13

(Development Zone U) Perimeter blocks are located on the western edge of Lillie Sidings Square. They consider the immediate context on each side and adopt a form, scale and character that responds to it.

Define the edge of the public realm Perimeter blocks must define the edges of the public realm, including Lillie Sidings Square and Aisgill Gardens. They should predominantly align to the Maximum Building Line. To define the edge of the public realm.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Layout

Key plan

and massing.

Maximum Building Line

LS.B.14

Responding to existing context Perimeter blocks addressing Aisgill Lane should consider the context of the scale and grain of the facing buildings. This could be achieved through the stepping and/or articulation of the massing, or façade expression. To ensure a scale that is responsive to the existing context.

Stepping of building massing

Illustrative view, Aisgill Lane

560

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

561

LS.B.16

BUILT FORM | Perimeter Block

Urban grain

LS.B.17

Perimeter blocks could be broken down as a series of individual buildings. This could be achieved through change in façade expression or tone and materiality.

Active frontages Ground Floor frontages onto Lillie Sidings Square must be active, welcoming and visible. This could involve using large areas of glazed façades. Back of house entrances should be avoided in this location.

To break down the overall massing of plots lending them a more comfortable, human scale sensitive to its context.

To support the character of Lillie Sidings Square as a vibrant destination square.

Active frontages along street

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Frontages and façades.

Illustrative view, Lillie Sidings Walk South

LS.B.15

Façades onto Lillie Sidings Square

LS.B.18

Where practical, the Ground Floor frontage addressing Aisgill Lane should maximise residential frontages with front doors to individual homes or shared entrances.

Façades facing onto Lillie Sidings Square should have an industrial character that responds to the Train Shed. This could be achieved through material selection or tone or other references. To build a character that responds to the existing industrial character.

562

Residential frontage on to Aisgill Lane

Illustrative view, Lillie Sidings Square

To provide individual homes that respond the grain and rhythm of West Kensington Estate.

Residential entrances addressing the street

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

563

Location of vehicular entrances of WK10

Balconies staggered in plan

Location of vehicular entrances to WK10 from Aisgill Lane should be located as far north as practical.

BUILDING LINE

LS.B.19

BUILT FORM | Perimeter Block

BUILDING LINE

To extend the landscape area with controlled vehicular access.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement and Lillie Sidings / Landscape / Aisgill Lane.

Balconies inset on one side

Plan

Balconies along Lillie Sidings Walks (North and South)

Section

BUILDING LINE

Plan

BUILDING LINE

LS.B.20

Partially inset balconies

Proposals should consider distances between balconies where they are positioned on both sides along Lillie Sidings Walks (North and South). Balconies could explore options where they are staggered in plan to increase clearance distances.

BUILDING LINE

Section

BUILDING LINE

Alternative options could explore combining projecting, with inset or partially inset balconies. Designs should consider daylight / sunlight levels to private amenity and north facing fully inset balconies should be avoided. To increase clearance between balconies where they are positioned on both sides of the walks.

► Refer to Lillie Sidings / Landscape / Lillie Sidings Walks (North and South).

Plan

564

Section

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

565

LS.B.21

BUILT FORM | Perimeter Block

Treatment to balconies onto destination public realm

LS.B.23

The design of perimeter blocks should provide some harmonising architectural features to allow them to be read as part of the same cluster of buildings. The harmony could be reflected through similar composition, architectural detailing or complementary materials.

Where balconies are projecting onto Lillie Sidings Square and Aisgill Gardens, the balustrades should be permeable. To animate the public realm. Treatment of balconies

LS.B.22

A family of buildings

To ensure coherence between adjacent buildings.

A family of buildings

Treatment to other balconies Material selection and design of balconies not addressing destination public realm including Lillie Sidings Walks and internal courtyards should support privacy. This could include treatments with reduced permeability. To allow for privacy for residents.

566

Treatment of balconies

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

567

BUILT FORM | Transition Block

Transition Block LS.B.24

(Development Zone U & W) Transition blocks frame the edges of the boulevard link connecting Lillie Sidings Square with West Kensington Boulevard. They activate a key route and mediate the transition in scale and character.

Define the edge of the public realm Transition blocks must define the edge of West Kensington Boulevard Link. They should predominantly align to the Maximum Building Line. To define the edge of the public realm.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Layout

Plan

and massing.

Key plan

LS.B.25

Maximum Building Line

Activation of the northsouth route Ground Floor frontages facing onto West Kensington Boulevard Link should be open, active and inviting. To activate the north-south route to West Kensington Boulevard Link.

LS.B.26

Prominent corners Prominent corners should be designed with particular importance and should be richer in detail. To reinforce spatial hierarchy and assist with wayfinding.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Frontages and façades.

Illustrative view, Lillie Sidings Square towards West Kensington

568

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

569

LS.B.27

BUILT FORM | Transition Block

Treatment of northern façades

Predominant residential use The following codes expand on the design of transition blocks with a predominant residential use.

Design and treatment of north facing façades should consider mitigation of environmental conditions from West Cromwell Road and the railway lines. To mitigate noise and air impacts from West Cromwell Road. Northern façades

LS.B.28

Expression of Ground Floor frontages

LS.B.30

Massing should be broken down into clear, legible volumes. This could include a series of volumes arranged around a central courtyard.

Ground Floor frontages along the West Kensington Boulevard Link should establish a compatible rhythm and expression. To reinforce the continuous curve and rhythm of the crescent forming the route to West Kensington station.

LS.B.29

To ensure a scale suitable for a residential typology. Ground Floor frontages with a consistent expression

A family of buildings

Illustrative view, WK07

LS.B.31

Transition blocks should provide harmonising architectural features. This could be achieved through composition, architectural detailing or complementary materials.

Fine urban grain for residential use The articulation of each building volume should contribute to the reading of the massing as a series of individual volumes. This could be achieved through changes in façade treatment or subtle variation of tonality.

To ensure coherence between adjacent buildings and to allow them to be read as part of a cluster of buildings. A family of buildings

570

A residential scale

To ensure the urban grain is of a human scale suited to residential typology.

Fine urban grain

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

571

LS.B.32

BUILT FORM | Transition Block

Treatment of internal façades

LS.B.34

Vertical expression, for commercial use Façade design could emphasise verticality. This could be achieved through slimmer proportions of fenestrations or diminishing patterns of decreasing scale of façade elements towards the top of the building.

The treatment of internal (courtyard facing) façades should be considered for visibility from Lillie Sidings Square. To ensure all façades are treated appropriately to their visibility from key open spaces.

To make the building appear slender and create the impression of lightness.

Internal façades visible from Lillie Sidings Square

Predominant commercial use

LS.B.35

Vertical façade expression

Distinctive top, for commercial use Building tops should be distinct. This could be achieved through materiality or articulation.

The following codes expand on the design of transition blocks with a predominant non-residential use.

To draw create the feeling of a more slender silhouette. Distinctive building top

LS.B.33

572

Articulation of building base, for commercial use

LS.B.36

Visible entrances, for commercial uses

Building expression should contribute to the legibility of the building base along West Kensington Boulevard link. This could be achieved through set backs or facade expression.

Ground Floor entrances must be open, visible and welcoming. Entrances could be double height or expressed with distinct architectural details. Signage and lighting could be used to ensure the entrance is prominent and well lit.

To reinforce a datum fronting onto the Boulevard Link.

To create welcoming entrances, inviting public use of the Ground Floor spaces.

Articulation of building base

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

573

BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape

Impacts on Heritage and Townscape LS.B.37

Expression of building tops

WK09

WK08

LS.B.39

Buildings tops in Plots WK07/08/09 (Development Zones T and W) should be clearly legible. This could be achieved by introducing a different rhythm of composition, or changes in tone or materiality. To create an appropriate relationship with the existing townscape, reducing impact on heritage assets and their setting.

WK09

Visual richness

WK08

The façade design of buildings in Plots WK08/09 (Development Zone T) should include enhanced visual richness. This could be achieved by contrasting tones between building components, or adding detailing. Philbeach Gardens - View 25 WK09

WK08

To distinguish from the existing buildings at the foreground of the view.

WK07

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Philbeach Gardens - View 25

Philbeach Gardens - View A14

LS.B.38

Distinguishable from foreground

WK09

WK08

LS.B.40

WK08

Breaks or steps in massing Massing of buildings within Plots WK08/09 (Development Zone T) should be distinguishable in this view. This could be achieved by breaks or stepping in the massing.

Buildings within Plots WK08/09 (Development Zone T) should be distinguishable from the existing buildings in the foreground, safeguarding their legibility in the view. This could be achieved through the use of colour, materials and architectural expression.

To avoid coalescence.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

To separate foreground and background and contribute to a sense of layering and reduce visual impact on heritage assets and their setting.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

574

Philbeach Gardens - View 25

Philbeach Gardens - View A14

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

575

BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape

WK11

LS.B.41

Complement local character

LS.B.43

Complement local character

Building design within Plot WK11 (Development Zone U) should reflect and complement the grain and typologies of existing buildings seen from Charleville Road. They should avoid creating a visual distraction and mediate between shorter buildings in the foreground, and taller buildings behind.

Buildings in Plots WK07/08/09 (Development Zones T and W) should reflect and complement the grain and typologies of existing buildings in the foreground. They should avoid creating a visual distraction and mediate between shorter buildings in the foreground, and taller buildings behind.

To complement the existing grain and typologies.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on

heritage and townscape.

WK08 WK07 WK09

heritage and townscape.

Ongar Road - View 59

Charleville Road - View A30

LS.B.42

Distinguishable from foreground

WK07

WK08

LS.B.44

Complement local character

Buildings within Plots WK07/08 (Development Zones T and W) should be distinguishable from the existing buildings in the foreground. This could be achieved through a distinctive rhythm and composition, the use of colour, materials or architectural expression.

Buildings in Plots WK05 (Development Zone W) should reflect and complement the grain and typologies of existing buildings in the foreground. They should avoid creating a visual distraction and mediate between shorter buildings in the foreground, and taller buildings behind.

To separate foreground and background and contribute to a sense of layering and reduce visual impact on heritage assets and their setting.

To complement the existing grain and typologies.

WK05

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Charleville Road - View A30

576

Comeragh Road - View 47

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

577

LS.B.45

BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape

Distinguishable from foreground

WK05

LS.B.47

WK05

Expression of building top Buildings tops in Plot WK05 (Development Zone W) should be clearly legible. This could be achieved by introducing a different rhythm of composition, or changes in tone or materiality.

Buildings in Plots WK05 (Development Zone W) should be distinguishable from the existing buildings in the foreground. This could be achieved through a distinctive rhythm and composition, the use of colour, materials or architectural expression.

To create an appropriate relationship with the existing townscape, reducing impact on heritage assets and their setting.

To separate foreground and background and contribute to a sense of layering and reduce visual impact on heritage assets and their setting.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

LS.B.46

Calmed background

Comeragh Road - View 47

WK05

Buildings in Plot WK05 (Development Zone W) should avoid distracting from the setting and features of Comeragh Road. To minimise visual impact on heritage assets and their setting.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Comeragh Road - View 47

578

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

579

10. West Kensington [WK]

580

Character Area extent

Overview The West Kensington Character Area helps open up the Site and extends the neighbourhood towards West Cromwell Road. Its proximity to the station and key arterial road provides an opportunity for a new mixed-use gateway along the route into central London. Key principles that characterise West Kensington include: •

Creating a gateway to the Earls Court Site from West Kensington station.

•

Extending Beaumont Avenue into a tree-lined Boulevard.

•

Generous landscaping of the boulevard as an extension of the Exhibition Garden concept.

•

Using a range of commercial typologies that support an ecosystem of innovative uses.

•

Integrating a mix of cafés, shops and workspaces that create an active street.

► Refer to Illustrative Masterplan chapter in the Design and Access Statement: Masterplan (EC.PA.08).

Illustrative view, West Kensington Boulevard

582

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

583

WK LANDSCAPE | Spaces

Landscape Spaces 8

6 2

We st

Boulevard

Place

West Kensington Boulevard (1)

West Kensington Place North (5)

A landscaped, mixed-use street, accommodating pedestrian and vehicle movement.

A landscaped open space, accommodating vehicle access to plots and pedestrian movement.

Walk

West Kensington Place South (6)

Gibbs Walk (2)

A pocket of landscaped open space, providing opportunities for play.

West Kensington Passage West (3)

An area of public realm, accommodating pedestrian and vehicle access.

A landscaped open space, accommodating vehicle access to plots and pedestrian movement.

ton

Bou

leva

West Cromwell Road Interface (8) Safeguarded areas for public realm and potential future provision of pedestrian access at the interface with West Cromwell Road

l Lane

West Kensington Deck-over (7)

West Kensington Passage East (4)

ing

Other

Passage A landscaped open space, accommodating vehicle access to plots and pedestrian movement.

Ken s

Aisgil

A pedestrian-only, intimate planted walk with a connection to Gibbs Green Close.

584

romw ell R oad

Wes tC

Lillie Siding s Squar e

West Kensington Station Square (9) An intimate local Square that addresses the station and forms a gateway into the Boulevard

Illustrative sketch showing Ground Floor cutaway

WK LANDSCAPE | West Kensington Boulevard

West Kensington Boulevard

WK.L.1

VIA Vika & Ruseløkkveien - SLA

A landscaped, mixed-use street, accommodating pedestrian and vehicle movement.

Contributing to the northsouth route The design of West Kensington Boulevard must form part of the north-south route connecting West Brompton with West Kensington stations. It should be an extension of the boulevard and strengthen wayfinding.

Key plan

To connect West Kensington station with West Brompton station and Lillie Road in a legible, north-south route.

North-south route

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

WK.L.2

Extending nature The design of West Kensington Boulevard should extend nature along the north-south route and should include tree-lined streets, biodiverse planting strategies and SuDS features. To promote biodiversity and extend nature along the north-south route. Planted zone with biodiverse planting and SuDS features

Illustrative view, West Kensington Boulevard

586

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

587

WK LANDSCAPE | West Kensington Boulevard

WK.L.3

Typical street section A - Adjacent to WK02 and WK03 Spatial arrangement, setting out and key dimensions for this typical street section are set out in the diagram below.

WK.L.4

Typical street section B - Adjacent to WK01 and WK02 Spatial arrangement, setting out and key dimensions for this typical street section are set out in the diagram below.

FOOTPATH

PLANTING

CENTRAL MOVEMENT ROUTE

PARKING / PLANTING

FOOTPATH

PLANTING/ ENTRANCES

FOOTPATH

PARKING / PLANTING

CENTRAL MOVEMENT ROUTE

PLANTING

FOOTPATH

2.0m

7.0m

3.0m

2.0m

3.0m

7.0m

2.0m

Control dimension Illustrative dimension

Illustrative street section, West Kensington Boulevard

Key plan

588

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

16.0m min.

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

18.0m min.

Control dimension Illustrative dimension

Illustrative street section, West Kensington Boulevard

Key plan

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

589

WK LANDSCAPE | West Kensington Boulevard

The design of West Kensington Boulevard must provide a footpath on both sides of the central movement route.

Spatial arrangement, setting out and key dimensions for this typical street section are set out in the diagram below.

PARKING

CENTRAL MOVEMENT ROUTE

EXISTING PARKING

FOOTPATH

2.5m

5.0m

2.1m

2.5m

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

Central movement route The design of West Kensington Boulevard must provide a central movement route, allowing for cyclist and vehicle movement.

Illustrative street section, Beaumont Avenue

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

FOOTPATH

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

EXISTING BUILDING LINE - KENSINGTON HALL GARDENS

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

WK.L.7

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

To ensure safe pedestrian movement. 14.6m min.

Control dimension Illustrative dimension

Footpaths DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

WK.L.6

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

Typical street section C - Adjacent to WK02 and Kensington Hall Gardens

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

WK.L.5

To contribute to the sitewide movement strategy and provide vehicular and cyclist access.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

Key plan

590

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

591

WK LANDSCAPE | West Kensington Boulevard

Parking / planting DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

The design of West Kensington Boulevard should accommodate planted zones in between parking.

WK.L.10 DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

WK.L.8

The design of the eastern end of West Kensington Boulevard must include provision for vehicle turning. To create a vehicle-free public realm along the extent of the West Kensington Boulevard Link and beyond.

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

To ensure parking is integrated within planting.

Illustrative landscape plan

WK.L.11

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

The design of planting in the public realm adjacent to Development Zones must allow access to building entrances.

Pedestrian-priority design The design of the eastern end of West Kensington Boulevard must put people first. This should be achieved by a raised street surface or other layout configurations and material treatment that signals the end of a carriageway and space that is shared.

Planting / entrances DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

WK.L.9

No through road for vehicles

To create a people-first public realm. Illustrative view, West Kensington Boulevard

To encourage planting in the public realm that does not impact building access. DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

DEVELOPMENT ZONE LINE

WK.L.12

Climate Resilient Streetscapes The design of the end of West Kensington Boulevard must create Climate Resilient Streetscapes habitat, as described in the sitewide biodiversity strategy. To align with the sitewide biodiversity strategy and provide a diverse and connected green network.

592

► Refer to biodiversity strategy within Sitewide / Landscape / Green/blue infrastructure.

Example species: Climate Resilient Streetscapes

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

593

WK LANDSCAPE | West Kensington Boulevard

WK.L.13

Opportunity for SuDS

WK.L.16

The design of the planted zone should include SuDS features. This could include bio-swales and rain gardens.

The design of West Kensington Boulevard must be carefully integrated with the existing Beaumont Avenue. Materiality at thresholds should be continuous.

To contribute to the sitewide SuDS strategy.

To support a transition between the existing Beaumont Avenue and the Boulevard.

SuDS features along street

WK.L.14

Play on the way

WK.L.17

The design of West Kensington Boulevard should include incidental play opportunities that are integrated into the public realm for all ages. This could include landscaping, furniture or play equipment. To maximise opportunities for play in West Kensington and contribute to the sitewide play strategy.

WK.L.15

Integration with Beaumont Avenue

Integration with West Kensington Boulevard Link The design of West Kensington Boulevard must be carefully integrated with West Kensington Boulevard Link. This should be through a continuation of paving materials and street furniture. To create a continuous boulevard typology.

► Refer to Lillie Sidings / Landscape / West

Incidental play opportunities along street

Extending local character

Kensington Boulevard Link.

WK.L.18

The design and selection of materials should integrate with both the existing and emerging character of North End Road and Beaumont Avenue.

Integration with West Kensington Boulevard Link

Paving continuity Where building façades are set back from the primary building line, materials should be continuous. To provide uniformity and to support the flow of movement.

To ensure that the new public realm ties into existing local character. Existing condition of Beaumont Avenue

594

Integration with Beaumont Avenue

Footpath materiality extending beyond colonnade

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

595

WK LANDSCAPE | Gibbs Walk

Road mwell est Cro A4 / W

Gibbs Walk WK.L.20

A pedestrian-only, intimate planted walk with a connection to Gibbs Green Close.

Safeguarding pedestrian access

WEST KENSINGTON STATION

nue PCV Ave ont um Bea

The interface with Gibbs Green P Close in Development Zone Z must be safeguarded as a future potential pedestrian access route.

d Roa End

To support future provision for pedestrian access and future connections to Gibbs Green Close.

se Clo reen bs G ib G

th Nor

Key plan

Extract of Parameter Plan

► Refer to Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B). WK.L.19

Typical street section

t ree St nd Mu

12.0m min.

WK.L.21

Intimate character

To create a quiet, residential walk with amenity for residents.

d Roa End

oad Star R

th Nor

The design of Gibbs Walk must reflect its residential character. This could be achieved through arrangement and selection of planting, defensible space and materials.

Illustrative street section, West Kensington Boulevard towards Gibbs Walk

12.0m varies (inclusive of planting and pedestrian movement)

Control dimension Illustrative dimension

596

Illustrative street section, Gibbs Walk

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

597

WK LANDSCAPE | Gibbs Walk

WK.L.22

Animation of the public realm The design of Gibbs Walk should encourage animation of the public realm. This could be achieved through provision of front doors, spill-out or public art. To support an activate and animated walk.

► Refer to West Kensington / Built form /

Illustrative landscape plan

Mid-scale (Z).

WK.L.23

Planted walk The design of Gibbs Walk should include a zone for planting and trees. To support the green and leafy character of Gibbs Walk.

Planted zone on pedestrianised route

598

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

599

WK LANDSCAPE | West Kensington Passage West

West Kensington Passage West

WK.L.24

Servicing access to WK02 The design of West Kensington Passage West must enable servicing access to WK02. The materiality should be a shared surface that prioritises pedestrian movement.

A landscaped open space, accommodating vehicle access to plots and pedestrian movement. Key plan

To ensure service access requirements for plots minimise impact on a pedestrian-first public realm.

WK.L.25

Play feature within planted zone

Safeguarding for future station capacity enhancement The design of West Kensington Passage West must safeguard sufficient space for a potential entrance to West Kensington Station. Should the new station entrance come forward, the character of the passage could reflect that of a station square. To ensure an adaptable public realm should a new station entrance come forward in future proposals.

Illustrative landscape plan

600

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

601

WK LANDSCAPE | West Kensington Place North

The design of West Kensington Place North must provide a footpath adjacent to the Maximum Building Line on both sides of the Place.

A landscaped open space, accommodating vehicle access to plots and pedestrian movement.

To encourage pedestrian movement on both sides of the boulevard.

Key plan

WK.L.26

Footpaths MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

WK.L.27

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

West Kensington Place North

Typical street section Spatial arrangement, setting out and key dimensions for this typical street section are set out in the diagram below.

Central movement route The design of West Kensington Place North must provide a central movement route, allowing for cyclist and vehicle movement.

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

WK.L.28

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

27.0m min.

To contribute to the sitewide movement strategy and provide vehicular and cyclist access.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

FOOTPATH

PARKING

CENTRAL MOVEMENT ROUTE

PLANTING

FOOTPATH

2.5m

3.0m

5.0m

14.0m varies

2.5m

Control dimension Illustrative dimension

602

Illustrative street section, West Kensington Place North

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

603

WK LANDSCAPE | West Kensington Place North

Parking MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

Where parking is provided, it should be located on the western edge of the central movement route.

WK.L.31 MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

WK.L.29

Opportunities for play The design of West Kensington Place North should include opportunities for play. This should be located in the planted zone.

To ensure parking is not located adjacent to play, where practical.

To maximise play opportunities and contribute to the sitewide play strategy. Play feature within planted zone

Planting

To encourage planting and amenity in the public realm.

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

The design of West Kensington Place North should provide a generous planted zone.

WK.L.32 MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

WK.L.30

Playful street furniture The design of street furniture could facilitate play. This could include furniture designed for play as well as sitting or include playful elements. To contribute to the character of West Kensington Place as a local play space. Street furniture which enables incidental play

604

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

605

WK LANDSCAPE | West Kensington Place South

West Kensington Place South

WK.L.33

Densely planted The design of West Kensington Place South must be densely planted and reflect a forested character.

A pocket of landscaped open space, providing opportunities for play.

To maximise planting along the northsouth route and provide a buffer to the Estate edge.

Key plan

Dense planted zone with trees

Silkeborg Pedestrian Streets and Søndertorv - SLA

WK.L.34

Opportunities for play The design of West Kensington Place South must include opportunities for play. To maximise play opportunities and contribute to the sitewide play strategy.

Playful elements within the planted zones

Illustrative landscape plan

606

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

607

WK LANDSCAPE | West Kensington Place South

WK.L.35

Naturalistic play equipment

WK.L.37

The design of play equipment should contribute to the naturalistic character of West Kensington Place South. This could include logs, stepping stones and bespoke play equipment.

Opportunity for SuDS The design of West Kensington Place South should incorporate SuDS features. They should be integrated in the planted zones. The design should explore the opportunities to link the SuDS with the continuous zone of SuDS along the southern edge of the West Kensington Boulevard.

To support the forested, naturalistic character of West Kensington.

To create a continuous zone of SuDS in West Kensington.

Naturalistic play equipment

SuDS features along street

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Green/ blue infrastructure.

WK.L.36

Safe and protected play spaces Where play space is provided, it should be protected from the service routes along West Kensington Boulevard and be located along the eastern edge of the place. This could include implementing traffic control measure to create a separation. To ensure play space is safe and protected from vehicle movement.

608

WK.L.38

Landscape buffer The design of West Kensington Place South must provide a buffer to the existing residential properties along Gibbs Green Close. To minimise the impact to neighbouring properties.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Boundary conditions.

Planted buffer

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

609

WK LANDSCAPE | West Kensington Passage East

The design of West Kensington Passage East must provide a footpath on both sides of the central movement route.

A landscaped open space, accommodating vehicle access to plots and pedestrian movement.

To ensure safe pedestrian movement.

Key plan

Typical street section

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

The design of West Kensington Passage East must provide a central movement route, allowing for cyclist and vehicle movement.

18.0m min. MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

Central movement route

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

WK.L.41

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

Spatial arrangement, setting out and key dimensions for this typical street section are set out in the diagram below.

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

WK.L.39

Footpaths MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

WK.L.40

MAXIMUM BUILDING LINE

West Kensington Passage East

To contribute to the sitewide movement strategy and provide access.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Inclusivity and movement.

WK.L.42

Parking / planting The design of West Kensington Passage East should accommodate planted zones in between parking.

FOOTPATH

PARKING / PLANTING

CENTRAL MOVEMENT ROUTE

PARKING / PLANTING

FOOTPATH

3.0m

6.0m

3.0m

Control dimension Illustrative dimension

610

To ensure parking is integrated within planting.

Illustrative street section, West Kensington Passage East

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

611

WK LANDSCAPE | West Kensington Square

West Kensington Square

WK.L.45

An intimate local Square that addresses the station and forms a gateway into the Boulevard that will also provide a local transport interchange that is well-lit and welcoming.

Spill-out and building entrance The design of West Kensington Square should accommodate an entrance to WK02 and associated spill-out space onto the square whilst maintaining an appropriate scale of space for pedestrian movement and planting.

Key plan

To animate the public realm.

WK.L.43

New station entrance

WK.L.46

The design of West Kensington Square should be able to accommodate a new entrance to West Kensington Station from the south.

To create an enclosed public square.

Location of new station entrance

Maintaining key pedestrian routes

WK.L.47

Suggested locations of buffer planting

Street Furniture

The design of West Kensington Square should accommodate and amplify main pedestrian routes to and from the station.

The design of West Kensington Square should provide seating elements for people using West Kensington Station and arranged with due consideration of existing pedestrian crossings and bus stop location.

To improve connectivity to and from West Kensington Station.

To provide places to dwell or wait within the square. Key pedestrian routes

612

Arrangement of planting The arrangement of planting should create separation from adjacent roads and define a central zone. Planting should be arranged to enable flexible space for small pop-ups where possible and arranged with due consideration of existing pedestrian crossings and bus stop location.

To improve connectivity to and from West Kensington Station.

WK.L.44

WK02 entrance location

Suggested location of street furniture

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

613

WK LANDSCAPE | West Kensington Square

WK.L.48

Public art The design of the new entrance to West Kensington Square could incorporate public art that references the local context. To create ties with the surrounding context. Wall mural

WK.L.49

Planting The planting within West Kensington Square should be located within raised containers due to below ground constraints. To mitigate disruption to below ground services. Planting in raised containers

WK.L.50

Feature paving The design of West Kensington Square could include feature paving that highlights flexible zones or direction of travel. To differentiate the square from the surrounding public realm and highlight key spaces and routes. Example of feature paving

614

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

615

WK LANDSCAPE | West Kensington Deck-over

West Kensington Deck-over

WK.L.51

Vehicle-free The design of West Kensington Deckover should safeguard vehicle-free areas, where access is not required.

An area of public realm, accommodating pedestrian and vehicle access.

To provide a pedestrian-first public realm that provides meaningful amenity for residents.

Key plan

Landscaped public realm

WK.L.52

Service access The design of West Kensington Deck-over must provide service and emergency vehicle access to Development Zone V1/V2. This could be on the eastern side away from the public realm connection. To align with the sitewide movement strategy and ensure access and servicing requirement to the Development Zone.

Illustrative landscape plan

616

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

617

WK LANDSCAPE | West Kensington Deck-over

WK.L.53

Preservation of existing trees and vegetation

WK.L.55

Deck edge treatment The design of fall protection measures and treatment to the deck edges should be well integrated into the public realm. This could include integration of artwork, a green wall, or integration of play.

Existing trees and vegetation in this area should be preserved, where possible. To support protection of the SINC.

To ensure safe and animated public realm.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Boundary conditions.

Aerial photography of existing condition

WK.L.54

Landscape buffer The design of West Kensington Deckover must consider planting adjacent to the railway. To create a landscape buffer for noise and to improve air quality from the railway corridor.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Boundary conditions.

618

Planted buffer

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

619

WK LANDSCAPE | Interface with West Cromwell Road

Interface with West Cromwell Road

WK.L.57

The existing area to the south of West Cromwell Road is not required for access to building entrances to support the framework plan proposals.

Should a new pedestrianised route come forward in this location, then it must be integrated with the levels of the existing pedestrian footway along the southern side of West Cromwell Road. Opportunities to enhance the pedestrian environment should also be explored.

Key plan

Should traffic calming and highway improvements to West Cromwell Road come forward in the future, this area has the potential to be developed to provide a pedestrianised interface accessible from the main public realm.

Integration with existing pathway on West Cromwell Road

Existing condition of West Cromwell Road

To ensure new proposals are integrated with existing public realm. Cl un y

Notes: 1. All Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B) to be read in conjunction w Code (EC.PA.C) and Development Specification (EC.PA.A 2. This plan does not present information for approval for are Detailed Component Boundary. 3. Additional specific guidance on movement strategies can Design Codes (EC.PA.C) and should be read in parallel w Parameter Plan 4. Routes includes those on public realm, and within Develo Boundaries. 5. Development Zone flexibility and limits of deviation are de Parameter Plan 004 - Development Zones, Maximum Buil Public Realm, and apply to this plan.

R PCV

To support future provision for WEST pedestrian access and futureKENSINGTON STATION connections should improvement works to West Cromwell Road come forward. nt Avenue PCV

W ar w

Preservation of existing trees and vegetation

ic k

Ro ad

Existing trees and vegetation in this area should be preserved, where possible. Q

Ph ilb ea ch

To support protectionGardof the SINC. en s

EARL'S COURT STATION

Vehicular route

th Nor d Roa End

Service route

PCV

Aerial photography of existing condition P

Extract of Parameter Plan

PCV

se Clo reen bs G ib G

Potential access - Location and type to be determined through detail design

M U

I Design Code I October 2026 L Earls Court Development K

620

* t

er n

* Cycle route

Pe ny w

► Refer to Parameter Plans (EC.PA.B).

o um Bea

PCV

Eardley Crescen t

The area interfacing with West Cromwell Road in Development Zone X must be safeguarded as a future potential pedestrian access route.

Road mwell est Cro A4 / W

Nevern Square

rR oa d

Safeguarding pedestrian access

WK.L.58 S

Tr eb ov i

WK.L.56

PCV

621

WK BUILT FORM | Building Typologies

Built Form Building Typologies V

Wes tC

romw ell R oad

X X

X Z

We st

Large-footprint

Standalone

(Development Zone X)

(Development Zone V)

Located on West Kensington Boulevard, Large-footprint buildings create a sense of arrival into the Site. A stepped massing, common datums as well as rhythm, composition and expression provide a familiar approach to other building typologies.

A Standalone building creates a presence along West Cromwell Road. The façades are designed in the round and assist with orientation and way finding.

Ken s

ing

ton

Bou

leva

Mid-scale buildings frame West Kensington Boulevard. Buildings adopt a massing, layout, composition and materiality that is informed by the local character and local typologies.

622

Aisgil

(Development Zones X and Z)

l Lane

Mid-scale Lillie Siding s Squar e

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 623 Illustrative sketch showing built 2026 form typologies

WK BUILT FORM | Large-footprint

Large-footprint WK.B.2 (Development Zone X) Located on West Kensington Boulevard, Large-footprint buildings create a sense of arrival into the Site. A stepped massing, common datums as well as rhythm, composition and expression provide a familiar approach to other building typologies.

Key plan

To create welcoming entrances, inviting public use of the Ground Floor spaces.

The diagrammatic layout and massing illustrated in this Design Code shows these plots as a commercial form, but they could be configured as residential plots in accordance with the Development Specification and Parameter Plan allocation.

WK.B.1

High level of transparency on the Ground Floor

WK.B.3

Location of commercial entrances Primary commercial Ground Floor entrances could be located on prominent parts of the façade such as building corners. Entrances could be set back from the main route and protected by a colonnade structure.

Express uses

To create open and welcoming Ground Floor commercial frontages with visible entrances.

Building uses should be visible from primary frontages. This could be achieved through providing glazing at street level. Consideration of programming to locate a diverse range of uses towards the front of the building could also contribute to active and interesting frontages. To amplify activity and celebrate diversity of uses.

Visible entrances

WK.B.4

Expression of uses on the Ground Floor

Entrance located on primary frontage

Location of back of house entrances Entrances to back of house areas should be located on rear or side elevations. To reduce areas of inactive frontage on primary façades. Potential location for back of house entrances

624

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

625

WK BUILT FORM | Large-footprint

WK.B.5

Set back Ground Floor frontages

WK.B.7

Façade design could emphasise verticality. This could be achieved through the use of slimmer proportions of fenestration, cladding elements or balcony proportions. Façade composition could also use variations in rhythm and composition towards the top of the building.

Ground Floor frontages could consider set backs from the primary building line. This could be achieved with the introduction of a colonnade where the Ground Floor frontage is set back to create a sheltered walkway in front of building entrances. To maximise pedestrian movement and ensure buildings work with the public realm to create a sense of place.

WK.B.6

Vertical expression

Colonnade and sheltered walkway

To make the building appear slender and create the impression of lightness.

Set back entrance

Articulation of building base

WK.B.8

Vertical façade expression

Façade composition Façade design could introduce breaks to interrupt a regular façade rhythm such as larger aperture sizes and windows with deeper reveals.

Façade treatment should be used to reinforce legibility of a horizontal datum along West Kensington Boulevard. This could include setting back the massing or through subtle differentiated expression.

To break up and mitigate the width of the massing.

To reinforce a continuous 2 storey datum.

Articulation of building base Façade composition with a regular façade rhythm

626

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

627

WK BUILT FORM | Large-footprint

WK.B.9

Expression of corners

WK.B.11

Façade design could explore expression of corners. This could include creating projections, or a change in the facade rhythm, composition or expression.

Alignment addressing townscape view from Mornington Avenue A visual separation between the buildings in Development Zone X should be clearly legible from Mornington Avenue to avoid coalescence. Consideration of the building alignment is essential paying particular attention to the view from Mornington Avenue.

To break up and mitigate the width and perceived flatness of the façade. Expression of corner on primary route

Alignment addressing townscape view

To reinforce the continuation of Mornington Avenue as a visual link.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts to heritage and townspace in LBHF.

WK.B.10

Façades and amenity spaces facing onto West Cromwell Road Façades and amenity spaces facing north towards West Cromwell Road should consider environmental conditions - such as access to light or mitigation to noise or air pollution- as well as the visibility and expression of the façade. This could be achieved through landscaping, massing articulation, façade composition and openings, or changes in materiality. To consider the particular environmental conditions whilst creating visual interest on to West Cromwell Road as a key gateway.

628

WK.B.12

Articulation of a continuous intermediate datum Building articulation should contribute towards the reading of an intermediate datum along the length of West Kensington Boulevard.

Façade responding to environmental conditions

To establish an intermediate scale responding to local context and providing a sense of balance and proportion to larger blocks.

Intermediate datum

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

629

WK BUILT FORM | Large-footprint

WK.B.13

A distinctive building top

WK.B.15

Building tops should be distinct. This could be achieved through materiality or articulation.

Material choices should showcase innovation relevant to its predominant use. This could include materials that incorporate technological advancements.

To draw create the feeling of a more slender silhouette.

To create buildings that reflect the innovative nature of the uses and activities that happen inside them.

Distinctive building top

WK.B.14

Green roof to intermediate set backs

WK.B.16

Innovative materials visible from street

A family of buildings The design should provide some harmonising architectural features to allow them to be read as part of the same cluster of buildings. This could be achieved through composition, architectural detailing or complementary materials.

Where possible, set backs at roof level should consider the location of a green roof or green accessible rooftop. To contribute to amplifying nature and biodiversity.

► Refer to Sitewide / Landscape / Green/

Materials showcasing innovation

Planted zones on accessible terrace

To ensure coherence between adjacent buildings.

A family of buildings

blue infrastructure.

630

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

631

WK BUILT FORM | Mid-scale (X)

Mid-scale (X) WK.B.18 (Development Zone X) Mid-scale buildings frame West Kensington Boulevard. Buildings adopt a massing, layout, composition and materiality that is informed by the local character and local typologies.

Façade onto Beaumont Avenue The façade design could introduce a rhythm and / or introduce breaks. To create visual interest on to the streetscape.

Key plan

Façades addressing Beaumont Avenue

WK.B.17

Articulation of building base

WK.B.19

Continuous datum

632

Façades facing onto West Cromwell Road Façade design facing north towards West Cromwell Road should consider environmental conditions such as access to light or mitigation to noise or air pollution- as well as the visibility and expression of the façade. This could be achieved through massing articulation, façade composition and openings, or changes in materiality.

Illustrative view, West Cromwell Road

To consider the particular environmental conditions whilst creating visual interest on to West Cromwell Road as a key gateway.

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

633

WK BUILT FORM | Mid-scale (X)

WK.B.20

Location of entrances

WK.B.22

Primary Ground Floor entrances should be visible. They could be set back from the main route and protected by a colonnade structure, or introduce a change of tonality or material.

Safeguarding for future station capacity enhancement The design must safeguard a step free access route to the northern edge for the West Kensington station enhancement works. Improvements to the existing entrance should be considered where practical.

To create open and welcoming Ground Floor commercial frontages with visible entrances. Location of entrances

To ensure the building design is responsive should a new station entrance come forward in future proposals.

Safeguarding future station capacity enhancement

► Refer to West Kensington / Landscape / West Kensington Passage West.

WK.B.21

Safeguarding access to existing TfL assets If a second station entrance is required, the Plot design should allow for retention of and access to the existing TfL outbuildings including the Connect Hub and TfL substation. The TfL Welfare Facility could be relocated to benefit the building layout. Engagement with TfL will be necessary to agree access and relocation requirements.

Connect Hub Substation Welfare Facility

Aerial photography of existing condition

To ensure safeguarding of access to and retention of TfL assets.

634

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

635

WK BUILT FORM | Mid-scale (Z)

Mid-scale (Z) WK.B.23 (Development Zone Z) Mid-scale buildings frame West Kensington Boulevard. Buildings adopt a massing, layout, composition and materiality that is informed by the local character and local typologies.

Emerging from local typologies Building façades must reflect and/or include contemporary interpretations of local mansion block typologies, in particular those of Kensington Hall Gardens along Beaumont Avenue. This could be achieved through an ordered composition, massing variations, horizontal datums, or façade details.

Key plan

To integrate with the local character by reinterpreting the architectural expression of a typical local typology.

WK.B.24

Kensington Hall Gardens

Expression of entrances Entrances should be clear and legible. Architectural expression such as high contrasting materials could be used to frame the entrances. To reference the clarity of entrances and framing seen in the existing mansion blocks along Beaumont Avenue.

Kensington Hall Gardens

Illustrative view, West Kensington Boulevard

636

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

637

WK BUILT FORM | Mid-scale (Z)

WK.B.25

A layered composition

WK.B.27

Top

Façade composition of the northern elevation should include layering and reinforce legibility. This could be achieved through massing steps or façade articulation to define a bottom, middle and top.

Façades facing the Gibbs Green Estate Façades facing Gibbs Green Close should not be considered back of house, but be designed in the round.

Middle

To contribute positively to the neighbouring Estate.

To soften the development edge and aid the transition in scale.

Bottom

Façades facing the Gibbs Green Estate

Kensington Hall Gardens

WK.B.26

Extending existing datums Façade expression should contribute towards the reading of a continuous intermediate datum established by the mansion blocks at Kensington Hall Gardens. This could be defined in the massing steps or a clear datum established in the façade treatment. To establish an intermediate scale responding to local context and providing a sense of balance and proportion along the length of the Boulevard.

638

WK.B.28

Development Zone B

DEVELOPMENT ZONE Z

Kensington Hall Gardens

KENSINGTON HALL GARDENS

Illustrative section of height datums

Façades facing Gibbs Walk Façades facing the walk should incorporate front doors, habitable rooms and active frontage. If back of house uses are to be accommodated onto the Ground Floor frontage, consideration should be given to their clustering. To contribute to the streetscape of the connection from the Gibbs Green Estate and avoid long blank façades.

Façades facing Gibbs Walk

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

639

WK BUILT FORM | Standalone

Standalone WK.B.31 (Development Zone V) A Standalone building creates a presence along West Cromwell Road. The façades are designed in the round and assist with orientation and way finding.

North façade treatment North facing façades, onto West Cromwell Road could be expressive in relation to its setting on a main arterial route. This could be through distinctive façade articulation or use of materials.

Key plan

To create a marker building visible from West Cromwell Road. Expressive façade through selection of materials

WK.B.29

Safeguarding Road to Rail vehicle access

WK.B.32

Addressing the public realm West facing frontages should address the new public realm. Back of house entrances should not be located on west facing frontages.

Access to a Road to Rail Facility which is required for service access to TfL assets must be safeguarded for and integrated into the design of this Plot.

To ensure west facing frontages respond to and are integrated with the public realm.

To ensure access to TfL assets is retained.

► Refer to EC.PA.44 - LBD Preliminary Relocation Station.

WK.B.30

Assist with wayfinding North and south building façades should be designed to assist with wayfinding. This could be achieved by using distinct architectural features or applying experimental materials or colours to the façade. To enable the building to be identifiable from West Cromwell Road and from Lillie Sidings Square.

640

West Kensington Deck-over

WK.B.33

Response to existing and emerging character of West Cromwell Road Building treatment could respond to the character of emerging proposals along West Cromwell Road. To create proposals with a relationship to existing and emerging character. Existing character of West Cromwell Road

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

641

WK BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape

Impacts on Heritage and Townscape WK.B.34

Skyline

WK03 WK04

WK01

WK.B.36

Buildings within Plots WK01/03/04 (Development Zones X and Z) visible along Comeragh Road must form a clearly defined and articulated skyline, and contain differentiation.

WK03 WK04

Distinguishable from one another

WK01

Buildings in plots WK01, WK03 and WK04 (Development Zones Z and X) should have a distinctive rhythm and composition that differ from other buildings in the view.

To avoid coalescence of building massing and façade, and reduce visual impact on heritage assets and their setting along Comeragh Road.

To avoid coalescence in the massing and reduce visual impact on heritage assets and their setting, and achieve a high standard of urban design.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts

heritage and townscape.

on heritage and townscape.

Comeragh Road - View 47

WK.B.35

Distinguishable from foreground

WK03 WK04

Comeragh Road - View 47

WK01

WK.B.37

WK04

Façade breaks Expression within Plot WK04 (Development Zone X) could express a regular grain, broken down with features such as double height openings, and/or materiality.

Buildings in plots WK01/03/04 (Development Zones X and Z) should be complementary but distinguishable from the existing buildings in the foreground, safeguarding their legibility in the view. This could be achieved through the use of colour, materials and architectural expression.

To break up the width of the massing, and reinforce the grain established by the existing buildings in the foreground, thereby minimising distraction from the existing buildings in the foreground.

To separate foreground and background and contribute to a sense of layering and reduce visual impact on heritage assets and their setting.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

642

Comeragh Road - View 47

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

643

WK BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape

WK.B.38

Meaningful stepping

WK04

WK03

WK.B.40

Façade expression within Plots WK03/04 (Development Zone X) should contain meaningful stepping of 2 storeys or more.

WK03

Façade breaks

WK04

Façade expression within Plots WK03/04 (Development Zone X) should express a regular grain, broken down with features such as expression of architectural componentry and/or articulation of datums, setback and buildings tops, and/or contrasts in materiality.

To ensure clarity and hierarchy of massing, and provide a mediation in scale from Mornington Avenue

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on

To break up the width of the massing, and mitigate the scale of buildings as seen from a distance.

heritage and townscape.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Mornington Avenue - View 41

WK.B.39

Distinguishable from foreground

WK04

Talgarth Road - View 45

WK03

WK.B.41

WK03

Meaningful stepping

WK04

Façade expression within Plots WK03/04 (Development Zone X) should contain massing steps of 2 storeys or more.

Design of buildings within Plots WK03/04 (Development Zone X) should have a distinctive rhythm and composition that differ from other buildings in the view.

To ensure clarity and hierarchy of massing, and provide a mediation in scale from the A4/Talgarth Road.

To avoid coalescence in the massing and reduce visual impact on heritage assets and their setting, and achieve a high standard of urban design.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Mornington Avenue - View 41

644

Talgarth Road - View 45

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

645

WK BUILT FORM | Impacts on Heritage and Townscape

WK.B.42

Expression for speed

WK03

WK04

Expression within Plots WK03/04 (Development Zone X) should allow for façades to be read from a walking pace, to that of a moving vehicle. To recognise the range of speeds at which these façades will be viewed along a prominent route in and out of London.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Talgarth Road - View 45

WK.B.43

Marker

WK03

WK04

Design of WK03/04 (Development Zone X) should appear as a marker. They should be distinguishable from other buildings in the view. This could be achieved through the use of colour, materiality, or architectural expression. To reflect the role of the buildings as a gateway marker.

► Refer to Sitewide / Built form / Impacts on heritage and townscape.

Talgarth Road - View 45

646

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

647

Image Credits Every effort has been made to trace the copyright holders, but if any have been inadvertently overlooked, the necessary arrangements will be made at the first opportunity. Vision 35 The Architects’ Journal 35 Alamy Stock Photo (multiple) 35 SLA / Mikkel Eye Sitewide Landscape 116 Hawkins\Brown 118 Hawkins\Brown 123 Alamy Stock Photo 123 Hawkins Brown 125 SLA / Øystein Haara 125 Alamy Stock Photo 126 SLA 126 Alamy Stock Photo 130 Alamy Stock Photo (multiple) 131 Alamy Stock Photo (multiple) 132 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker 136 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker 136 Hawkins\Brown 137 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker 145 Studio Egret West (multiple) 146 SLA / Mikkel Eye 146 SLA (multiple) 148 SLA 148 SLA / Sigrid Bjorbekkmo 148 Studio Egret West (multiple) 149 SLA / Sigrid Bjorbekkmo (multiple) 149 SLA 150 SLA / Magnus Klitten 150 SLA / Mikkel Eye 150 SLA / Rasmus Hjortshøj 151 SLA / Jon Bjarni Hjartarson 151 SLA / Aspelin Ramm and Åasmund Holien Mo 151 SLA

648

152 SLA / Mikkel Eye 152 SLA (multiple) 153 SLA / Jon Bjarni Hjartarson 153 SLA / Sigrid Bjorbekkmo (multiple) 154 SLA / Sigrid Bjorbekkmo (multiple) 154 SLA / Jens Lindhe 155 SLA 155 SLA / Mikkel Eye 155 SLA / Rasmus Hjortshøj 156 Studio Egret West 157 SLA / Laura Stamer 158 Studio Egret West 159 SLA / Mikkel Eye 159 SLA 159 SLA / Laura Stamer 162 Alamy Stock Photo 163 Alamy Stock Photo 164 Maccreanor Lavington / David Grandorge 165 SLA 165 SLA / Mikkel Eye 166 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker 166 Studio Egret West 173 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker 173 Alamy Stock Photo (multiple) 174 Maccreanor Lavington / Alex Upton 174 Alamy Stock Photo 174 Studio Egret West 175 Alamy Stock Photo (multiple) 175 SLA / Mikkel Eye 176 Hawkins\Brown 177 Studio Egret West 177 Maccreanor Lavington / Fiona Smallshaw Fenman 178 Alamy Stock Photo (multiple) 179 Studio Egret West 179 Alamy Stock Photo

180 Speirs Major (multiple) 180 SLA 181 Speirs Major (multiple) 182 Speirs Major 183 Speirs Major (multiple) 184 Alamy Stock Photo (multiple) 185 Haworth Tompkins / Fred Howarth 185 Alamy Stock Photo 187 SLA / Mikkel Eye (multiple) 187 SLA / Rasmus Hjortshøj 188 Studio Egret West 188 Hawkins\Brown (multiple) 189 SLA 189 Studio Egret West (multiple) 190 Studio Egret West 190 Alamy Stock Photo 191 Hawkins\Brown 191 Alamy Stock Photo 192 Studio Egret West 192 Hawkins\Brown 193 Studio Egret West 193 Hawkins\Brown Built form 199 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker 203 Maccreanor Lavington / Fiona Smallshaw Fenman 206 Alamy Stock Photo (multiple) 207 Alamy Stock Photo (multiple) 213 Maccreanor Lavington / Fiona Smallshaw Fenman 215 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker 215 Hawkins\Brown 216 Hawkins\Brown (multiple) 216 Maccreanor Lavington / Fiona Smallshaw Fenman 217 Maccreanor Lavington / Fiona Smallshaw Fenman 222 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker (multiple) 222 Hawkins\Brown

224 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker 224 Haworth Tompkins / Fred Howarth 224 Alamy Stock Photo 225 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker 226 Hawkins\Brown (multiple) 226 Maccreanor Lavington / Fiona Smallshaw Fenman 226 Maccreanor Lavington / John Sturrock 227 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker (multiple) 227 Hawkins Brown (multiple) 228 Maccreanor Lavington / Fiona Smallshaw Fenman 252 Studio Egret West 252 Maccreanor Lavington / David Grandorge 256 Haworth Tompkins / Fred Howarth 256 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker

223 Studio Egret West

311 Hawkins\Brown 311 Alamy Stock Photo

West Brompton Landscape 267 Alamy Stock Photo 268 SLA 269 SLA /Sigrid Bjorbekkmo 269 Alamy Stock Photo 277 SLA / Laura Stamer 277 SLA /Sigrid Bjorbekkmo 278 Studio Egret West (multiple) 279 Studio Egret West 280 SLA / Mikkel Eye 285 SLA 285 SLA / Øystein Haara 291 SLA / Mikkel Eye Built form 298 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker 299 Alamy Stock Photo (multiple) 300 Maccreanor Lavington / John Sturrock 306 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker 307 Hawkins\Brown 310 Alamy Stock Photo

Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

649

312 Alamy Stock Photo 313 Alamy Stock Photo Warwick Crescent Landscape 340 Hawkins\Brown 341 - SLA 344- SLA / Mikkel Eye Built form 359 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker 361 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker 363 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker 365 Haworth Tompkins / Philip Vile 368 Hawkins\Brown 378 Hawkins\Brown 378 Maccreanor Lavington / Alex Upton The Table Landscape 390 SLA 390 Alamy Stock Photo 390 Studio Egret West 392 Studio Egret West (multiple) 392 SLA / Emilie Koefod 395 Hawkins Brown 395 Alamy Stock Photo 398 Maccreanor Lavington / Fiona Smallshaw Fenman 397 Studio Egret West 402 Studio Egret West 403 Studio Egret West (multiple) 405 SLA / Mikkel Eye 406 Studio Egret West (multiple) 411 Alamy Stock Photo 413 SLA / Rasmus Hjortshøj 418 SLA / Rasmus Hjortshøj 419 Studio Egret West 421 SLA / Laura Stamer 423 SLA 423 SLA / Mikkel Eye 424 SLA / Sigrid Bjorbekkmo (multiple)

650

424 SLA 425 SLA Built form 434 Alamy Stock Photo 435 Alamy Stock Photo (multiple) 436 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker 437 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker 438 Hawkins\Brown Empress Place Landscape 447 SLA / Mikkel Eye 452 SLA / Jon Bjarni Hjartarson 452 SLA / Aspelin Ramm and Åasmund Holien Mo 452 SLA 454 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker 455 SLA / Øystein Haara 456 Alamy Stock Photo 457 Unknown Built form 467 Hawkins\Brown 468 Hawkins\Brown 468 Alamy Stock Photo 473 Hawkins\Brown 474 Studio Egret West 475 Hawkins\Brown (multiple) 475 Alamy Stock Photo 479 Alamy Stock Photo 480 Alamy Stock Photo Aisgill Gardens Landscape 494 Studio Egret West 495 SLA / Mikkel Eye 495 SLA 495 SLA / Jens Lindhe 495 Studio Egret West 496 SLA / Mikkel Eye 496 Studio Egret West 498 Alamy Stock Photo

498 Studio Egret West 499 SLA / Mikkel Eye 499 SLA (multiple) Built form 503 Hawkins\Brown 504 Hawkins\Brown 507 Alamy Stock Photo (multiple) 507 Hawkins\Brown 508 Alamy Stock Photo 509 Alamy Stock Photo (multiple) 513 Alamy Stock Photo 516 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker Lillie Sidings Landscape 527 Alamy Stock Photo (multiple) 530 SLA / Mikkel Eye 530 SLA / Magnus Klitten 530 SLA / Rasmus Hjortshøj 530 SLA / Jens Lindhe 531 Studio Egret West 533 SLA / Øystein Haara 540 Studio Egret West 541 SLA / Mikkel Eye 541 Studio Egret West 542 Studio Egret West 543 SLA / Mikkel Eye 544 Studio Egret West 545 SLA / Mikkel Eye 549 Hawkins\Brown & Studio Egret West 549 Studio Egret West 551 SLA / Mikkel Eye 551 SLA (multiple) Built form 555 Alamy Stock Photo 556 Alamy Stock Photo 558 Hawkins\Brown 559 Hawkins\Brown 559 Studio Egret West 561 Haworth Tompkins / Philip Vile

Smallshaw Fenman 566 Maccreanor Lavington / Alex Upton 567 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker 570 Haworth Tompkins / Fred Howarth 571 Studio Egret West 573 Hawkins\Brown (multiple) West Kensington Landscape 587 SLA 593 SLA / Aspelin Ramm and Åasmund Holien Mo 594 SLA 594 Alamy Stock Photo 595 Alamy Stock Photo 598 Hawkins\Brown 605 SLA / Mikkel Eye 605 Alamy Stock Photo 607 SLA 607 SLA / Mikkel Eye 608 SLA / Mikkel Eye 609 SLA / Mikkel Eye 609 Studio Egret West 614 Studio Egret West (multiple) 617 SLA / Jens Lindhe 618 Studio Egret West Built form 624 Hawkins\Brown 625 Hawkins\Brown (multiple) 626 Alamy Stock Photo 626 Hawkins\Brown 627 Hawkins\Brown (multiple) 628 Hawkins\Brown (multiple) 628 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Croker 630 Hawkins Brown 630 Studio Egret West 631 Alamy Stock Photo (multiple) 637 Kinleigh Folkard & Hayward (multiple) 638 Kinleigh Folkard & Hayward 641 Studio Egret West

563 Maccreanor Lavington / Tim Crocker (multiple) 566 Maccreanor Lavington / Fiona Earls Court Development I Design Code I October 2026

651

Thank you Hawkins\Brown & Studio Egret West EC.PA.C-02 October 2026