Skip to main content

This Was In The Syllabus For Last Week But Since You Have a

Page 1


This Was In The Syllabus For Last Week But Since You Have a Long Week

This was in the syllabus for last week, but since you have a long weekend coming up, I thought I'd save it for your weekend downtime. Your assignment this week is to watch one of the selected videos and write a brief response paper. Use the same format for article responses we've done, including: a summary of the movie, a summary of economic issues, analysis of economic issues—be sure to tie this in to what we've been doing in class, your opinion of the video—did they do a good job portraying the topic(s), did you leave with more questions you'd like to research (if so, what are they), and whether the film seemed objective or biased. Your response should be 2–3 pages, including any references other than the video. Please note that some of the videos contain strong language (Wall Street types are always swearing like sailors in films), so you might want to check them out before watching with family. The video options include:

Available on Netflix: Banking on Bitcoin , Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room (brief nudity)

Available on Amazon: The Big Short (some strong language)

Available streaming: Inside Job , Frontline: Breaking the Bank , Life and Debt

Paper For Above instruction

The selected video for this response paper is Inside Job

, a documentary that critically examines the causes and consequences of the 2008 global financial crisis. This film provides a comprehensive analysis of the systemic failures and regulatory oversights that led to one of the most severe economic downturns in recent history. In this paper, I will summarize the content of the film, analyze the economic issues presented, offer my opinion on its effectiveness in portraying the topics, and reflect on any questions or biases that emerged during my viewing.

“Inside Job” begins by setting the context of the 2008 financial collapse, highlighting the deregulation trends and risky financial practices that fostered a bubble in the housing market. The film details how financial institutions, driven by greed and a pursuit of profit, engaged in highly speculative activities such as mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations. These practices were facilitated by regulatory agencies, which failed to oversee or restrict such risky behaviors. The documentary emphasizes the role of Wall Street bankers, rating agencies, and policymakers in creating an environment prone to collapse. It underscores the interconnectedness of global finance and how the failure of key institutions precipitated an economic meltdown affecting millions worldwide.

Economically, the film raises issues related to moral hazard, regulatory failure, and the systemic risk posed by financial innovation. The housing bubble was inflated through lax lending standards and the widespread use of financial derivatives, which obscured risk and misled investors. This aligns with concepts discussed in class about the importance of effective regulation and the dangers of excessive speculation. The film also illustrates how the crisis led to massive government bailouts, highlighting the moral dilemma of socializing losses while privatizing profits. It prompts reflection on whether current regulatory frameworks are sufficient to prevent similar crises, especially with the advent of complex financial instruments.

In analyzing these issues, I found that the documentary provided compelling evidence of the interconnected causes of the crisis. However, it also portrayed certain actors, such as Wall Street executives and policymakers, in a highly critical light, which some might interpret as biased. Nonetheless, the film’s use of interviews, expert commentary, and detailed case studies effectively conveyed the systemic failures involved. I appreciated the clarity with which complex financial concepts were explained, making the economic issues accessible to viewers unfamiliar with the intricacies of financial

markets.

My opinion on the film is that it successfully highlights the importance of regulation and accountability in the financial sector. It left me with additional questions, particularly regarding the adequacy of current reforms, such as the Dodd-Frank Act, and how emerging financial innovations might pose new risks. I also wondered about the role of economic incentives and corporate culture in perpetuating risky behavior. While the documentary seemed to lean towards a critical perspective, it provided ample evidence to support its claims and did not seem overtly biased, though a more balanced account could include perspectives on the benefits of financial innovation and deregulation.

Overall, “Inside Job” is a powerful documentary that sheds light on the complex web of factors leading to the 2008 financial crisis. It underscores the need for vigilant regulation, ethical practices, and transparency within the financial industry to prevent future economic catastrophes. The film effectively combines narrative storytelling with expert analysis, making it a valuable educational resource for understanding systemic financial risks and economic policy failures.

References

Ritholtz, B. (2010).

Inside Job: The Global Financial Meltdown

. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Ferguson, N. (2010).

The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World . Penguin Books.

Lewis, M. (2010).

The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine

. W.W. Norton & Company.

Bartholomew, P. (2010). The Role of Regulation in Financial Crises.

Journal of Financial Regulation , 5(2), 125-138.

Shiller, R. J. (2012).

Finance and the Good Society . Princeton University Press.

Acharya, V. V., & Richardson, M. (2009).

Restoring Financial Stability: How to Repair a Failed System . Wiley.

Yin, R. K. (2014).

Case Study Research: Design and Methods . Sage Publications.

Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Neal, T. L. (2010). Fraud and Financial Statement Handling Failures: The Role of Auditors.

Journal of Accounting & Economics

, 50(4), 451-470.

Serban, A., & Lannoo, K. (2018). Financial Innovation and Systemic Risk.

European Financial Review

. Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. (2011).

The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report . U.S. Government Printing Office.

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
This Was In The Syllabus For Last Week But Since You Have a by Dr Jack Online - Issuu