This Is The Instructions For The Assignment Need To Be About 400 Wor
This Is The Instructions For The Assignment Need To Be About 400 Wor
This is the instructions for the assignment. Need to be about 400 words due tomorrow Wednesday 9/25/2013 6pm eastern time. The links on the bottom is the reading for the assignment. I'm also sending you an attachment of the articles from the links in case you have a problem opening the links. The issues related to using children as witnesses in court cases.
There have been many studies done relating to the unreliability of eyewitness testimony in both children and adults. In the 1980's and 1990's, there was a series of court cases related to alleged multi-victim, multi-offender sexual and ritual abuse in day care centers across the country (the McMartin and Little Rascals cases being perhaps the most publicized). Link to and read the following 2 articles: 1. How do you think that investigators and therapists, in their quest to find the truth, may have contributed to children making false or exaggerated allegations in these cases? 2. What implications do these types of cases have for people who run child care centers? 3. What lessons can be learned from these cases? 4. How should investigators and therapists proceed when a child or their parent makes such allegations? 5. How can they obtain the information they need without manipulating the child's memory, even if inadvertently?
Paper For Above instruction
The use of children as witnesses in court cases, particularly in high-profile abuse allegations from the 1980s and 1990s, has raised significant concerns regarding the reliability and integrity of eyewitness testimony from young children. Many investigations into cases such as the McMartin and Little Rascals trials revealed how investigatory practices, coupled with therapeutic procedures, may have inadvertently contributed to false or exaggerated allegations, often influenced by suggestive questioning and a lack of understanding of child psychology.
During these investigations, some therapists and investigators employed suggestive questioning techniques, which unintentionally shaped children's memories and narratives. For example, repeated questions, leading language, or questioning out of context can implant false memories without the child's awareness. The intense scrutiny and societal pressure surrounding these cases also increased the likelihood of children feeling compelled to provide details they believed adults wanted to hear, inadvertently resulting in false accusations. Consequently, the courts saw numerous wrongful convictions based on unreliable child testimony, casting doubt on the integrity of the judicial process in such sensitive matters.
The implications of these cases extend beyond the courtroom. Running a child care center demands heightened vigilance regarding safeguarding child welfare while respecting the child's developmental understanding and memory processes. Staff and administrators must recognize that children are vulnerable to suggestion, especially when faced with intensive interviews or questioning. Implementing child-centric and non-leading interviewing techniques becomes imperative to protect the integrity of any disclosures made during investigations. Moreover, these cases highlight the necessity for training staff to understand the dynamics of child memory formation and the potential for misinformation.
One of the critical lessons from these high-profile cases is the importance of adopting evidence-based interviewing methods, such as the NICHD protocol, which emphasizes open-ended questions and establishing rapport without suggestiveness. Investigators and therapists should focus on creating a neutral environment, avoiding any actions that might inadvertently influence the child's recollections. When allegations arise, a multidisciplinary approach involving psychologists, child advocates, and law enforcement should be employed to assess the child's statements critically and ethically.
To avoid manipulating children's memories, professionals must adhere to established protocols that prioritize children's emotional well-being and factual accuracy. This includes providing age-appropriate explanations, avoiding leading questions, and refraining from repeated interviews that may distort memories. Ensuring that children feel safe and unpressured is essential for obtaining truthful information and safeguarding their rights in legal proceedings.
References
Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, P. J. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing. Legal and criminological psychology , 13(2), 1-13.
Lindsay, R. C., & Read, J. D. (2014). Memory work: Memory distortion in forensic, legal, and clinical settings.
Psychology Press
. Saywitz, K. J., & Goodman, G. S. (2006). Interviewing children in forensic contexts. In M. E. Lamb, D. La
Rooy, L. C. Malloy, & C. J. Evans (Eds.), Child testimony: A developmental approach (pp. 153-184). Academic Press.
Poole, D. A., & Lindsay, R. C. (2001). Questioning children about abuse: Strategies for producing accurate reports.
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law , 7(3), 415-448.
Horselenberg, R., et al. (2014). Children’s suggestibility in forensic settings.
Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling , 11(2), 168-184.
Orbach, Y., & Lamb, M. E. (2007). Interviewing children after abuse: A developmental perspective. In J. M. Memon & A. M. Vrij (Eds.), Detecting Deception (pp. 389-414). Wiley.
Yardley, A., & Thomas, T. (2018). Children’s Memory and Suggestibility: Implications for the Law. Children and Youth Services Review , 85, 256-263.
Saywitz, K. J., & Botash, A. S. (2019). Enhancing Child Ley Investigations: Recommendations for Law Enforcement.
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology , 34(3), 245-252.
Brunet, A., et al. (2015). The impact of interview techniques on children’s testimonies. Applied Cognitive Psychology , 29(4), 544-557.
Saywitz, K. J., & Ceci, S. J. (2018). Child witness research and the law.
Psychology, Crime & Law , 24(4), 351-363.