Thesis Statementcurrently Elementary Schools In My Community Do Not I Thesis statement: Currently elementary schools in my community do not include cursive handwriting as part of the curriculum. Cursive handwriting even though not used on a daily bases should be part of the learning curriculum because it can impact children learning in positive ways. For this Assignment, I will need to create an Annotated Bibliography with four sources related to an argument for change that I listed above. One of the sources should address an opposing viewpoint or misconception related to your topic. Attached is an sample assignment to show correct formate and what is needed. Annotation for each source, which must include each of the following in a full paragraph: Brief summary of the source (no direct quotes from the source) and a parenthetical citation after the summary, e.g., (Smith, 2014). Evaluation of the source’s credibility, including the author’s credentials and the verifiability of the source’s information; this should include where you found the source (KU Library, Google search engine, government website, etc.) Discussion about the source’s usefulness to your argument for change in your community or workplace All writing must be in Standard American English. Use APA manuscript format throughout the Assignment.
Paper For Above instruction The importance of including cursive handwriting in elementary education has been a topic of increasing interest among educators, parents, and policymakers. Despite the decline in its use in favor of keyboarding skills, research suggests that cursive writing offers unique benefits that can positively influence children’s cognitive and motor development. For example, a study by Grabowski (2018) highlights how cursive handwriting can enhance fine motor skills, improve neural connections, and aid in literacy development. Grabowski, an educational psychologist with extensive experience in childhood development and literacy, bases his findings on a wide review of neurological and educational research, making his work a credible source. This article was accessed through the KU Library database, ensuring access to peer-reviewed and verified information. Its relevance to my argument lies in its detailed analysis of the developmental benefits of cursive, supporting the idea that its inclusion could bolster children’s learning outcomes. By emphasizing neurological benefits, this source underscores the educational value that might be overlooked when cursive is excluded from school curricula. It therefore serves as a compelling foundation for advocating curriculum changes to reintroduce cursive handwriting. Counterarguments against the reintroduction of cursive handwriting often focus on the decline of its