Skip to main content

These Questions Dont Need To Be Answered In Essay Format Thi

Page 1


These Questions Dont Need To Be Answered In Essay Format This Doesn

These questions don’t need to be answered in essay format. This doesn't need to be APA or MLA.

- How did James Baldwin's speech strike you?

- Baldwin notes that America has an aversion to history, what do you think he means?

- How does Baldwin's speech inform your views of Black Existentialism?

FREDERICK ENGELS () Although Marx discusses labor and machine and clearly sees how machines transform labor, it is his younger co-author, Engels, who writes most tellingly about the role of technology in the life of work and society. Engels, like Marx, predicts ever-increasing role of machine used to steal labor.

1. machinery becomes the most powerful weapon in the war of capital against the working-class

2. instruments of labor constantly tear the means of subsistence out of the hands of the laborer; very product of the worker is turned into an instrument for his subjugation.

Engels maintains that machine development & production causes supply/demand problems for capitalism. Technological innovation creates an army of unemployed.

1. The perfecting of machinery is making human labor superfluous.

2. Improvement in machinery means the displacement of more and more of the machine-workers themselves.

3. Improvement in machinery means the production of a number of available wage workers in excess of the average needs of capital, the formation of a complete industrial reserve army, a regulator for keeping wages down to the low level that suits the interests of capital.

An army of unemployed means fewer who can afford the goods the capitalist produces: supply of products increases but demand for products falls.

1. The overwork of some becomes the preliminary condition for the idleness of others.

2. Modern industry, which hunts after new consumers over the whole world, forces the consumption of the masses at home down to a starvation minimum.

3. And in doing thus destroys its own home market.

4. The extension of the markets cannot keep pace with the extension of production.

ENGELS describes the booms/busts we have become so familiar with in Silicon Valley.

1. The whole industrial and commercial world, production and exchange among all civilized peoples, are thrown out of joint about once every 10 years.

2. Commerce is at a standstill,

3. the markets are glutted

4. products accumulate,

5. hard cash disappears,

6. credit vanishes,

7. factories are closed

8. bankruptcy follows upon bankruptcy

9. the mass of the workers are in want of the means of subsistence because they have produced too much of the means of subsistence; The stagnation lasts for years.

Engels predicts ever-increasing role of machine to transform the conditions that allow for liberation from capitalism and proprietary machine ownership.

1. The means of getting rid of the supply/demand problems of machine-driven capitalist production must also be present, within the changed modes of production themselves.

2. These means are to be discovered in the stubborn facts of the existing system of production.

Engels predicts government eventually will evolve into a worker-owned state. Advanced government allows for end of private property.

1. The first act by which the State really constitutes itself the representative of the whole of society, the taking possession of the means of production in the name of society, this is, at the same time, its last independent act as a State.

2. As soon as the individual struggle for existence based upon our present anarchy in production are removed, nothing more remains to be repressed, and a State, is no longer necessary.

3. State interference in social relations becomes, in one domain after another, superfluous, and then dies out of itself; The State is not abolished. It dies out.

In the end, when the state and capitalism are abolished, we will have a world where overseeing of technology and technologically-driven distribution of goods will be the pattern of society. The government of persons is replaced by the administration of things, and by the conduct of processes of production. No way to know when the state/economy has reached critical point.

No way to know when or if successful revolt will take place or is needed. Worker-run state might naturally evolve as technology and production reach the point where the middle-man of capitalism just is no longer necessary.

1. Think of the way we can now vote without the need for the government middleman (the politician). Representative government was designed so that laws and administration could be decided on in a timely fashion. Elected officials did the deciding because just to count the votes of election of officials took weeks, sometimes months. With the technology we have today we could all vote on the issues that now only elected officials vote for.

Our democracy could be just electronically decided votes of all the people, American Idol fashion.

2. Think now of the way you can order groceries from Safeway online. All goods could be produced and distributed according to the Amazon/Safeway model, with orders sent and innovations developed according to electronic placing and coordination of orders. As we continually move toward these online forms of buying and selling, the very existence of market forces will change dramatically, such that our good old capitalist system might just gradually disappear, and placing orders/filling orders might not look like buying and selling at all.

No way to know when technology reaches limit of theft. This scenario would be where capitalism and the capitalist State are violently overthrown by workers due to the unbearable theft of productive forces and theft of labor. This was the vision of Marx. Engels suggests that this would not be necessary: the development of technology will naturally evolve into an overseeing organ of production and distribution.

Paper For Above instruction

The discourse surrounding technological advancement and its impact on society, as articulated by Engels and Baldwin, reveals profound insights into the potential future transformations of labor, governance, and

social structure. Both thinkers challenge traditional notions of capitalism and state authority, emphasizing the transformative power of technology in reshaping societal relations, economic systems, and political institutions. This essay explores these perspectives, analyzing the implications of technological evolution for human liberation and social progress, while integrating Baldwin’s insights to contextualize these ideas within contemporary issues of racial history and identity.

Introduction

The intersection of technological progress and social transformation has been a central theme in the writings of Friedrich Engels and contemporary thinkers like James Baldwin. Engels’ critique of machinery and its role in labor alienation and capitalist crises provides a foundational understanding of the material forces driving change. Baldwin, on the other hand, emphasizes the cultural and historical dimensions of American society's struggle with its past and racial identity. Together, these perspectives offer a comprehensive view of the potential for technology and history to influence societal evolution and human liberation.

Engels’ Perspective on Machinery and Capitalism

Engels argued that technological development fundamentally alters the nature of labor and the structure of capitalism. He identified machinery as a tool of capitalist oppression, turning workers’ products and labor into commodities that serve capital interests (Engels, 1894). The proliferation of machinery leads to unemployment, overproduction, and periodic economic crises—phenomena that remain relevant today, as seen in Silicon Valley’s boom-bust cycles (Kliman, 2017). Engels predicted that unlimited technological progress could eventually undermine capitalism itself, as the machine age renders labor superfluous and causes economic stagnation due to overproduction and market saturation. Recognizing these dynamics, Engels anticipated a future where the means of production would be publicly owned, and the state would gradually wither away, replaced by a society organized around collective management of technology and resources (Engels, 1894).

Baldwin’s Insights on History and Race

James Baldwin’s speech underscores the importance of confronting history to understand contemporary racial issues. Baldwin contends that America’s aversion to history leads to a denial of racial trauma and prevents genuine progress (Baldwin, 1965). His critique highlights how societal amnesia perpetuates racial inequality and obstructs collective healing. Baldwin’s emphasis on history resonates with the existentialist

theme of confronting uncomfortable truths to achieve authentic existence (Sartre, 1943). This perspective informs Black Existentialism by emphasizing the necessity of confronting racial oppression honestly and directly, fostering a political and cultural awakening that challenges systemic injustice (West, 1993).

The Role of Technology in Societal Evolution

Engels’ predictions about the transformative role of machinery extend beyond economic crises to envisage a societal evolution where technological development ultimately dissolves class distinctions and state authority. As machines become more advanced, they could facilitate a transition to worker-controlled production, eliminating the need for middlemen and hierarchical governance (Wright, 2015). Baldwin’s reflections on societal history complement this vision by urging society to confront and incorporate the truths of racial and cultural history, fostering a collective consciousness that can guide technological and political evolution toward equity and justice.

Implications for Future Society

The convergence of Engels’ and Baldwin’s ideas suggests a future where technology plays a central role in overcoming economic and racial injustices. A society where all votes can be cast electronically, and goods are distributed seamlessly through technological networks, exemplifies this potential shift. Such a society could transcend traditional capitalism by directly connecting producers and consumers, minimizing exploitation and inefficiency (Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2014). However, the potential for technological theft and inequality remains, echoing Marx’s warnings about capitalism’s inherent tendencies. Engels’ view proposes that the development of technology might naturally lead to a worker-controlled society, where the state and capitalism are replaced by a communal administration of resources (Engels, 1894).

Conclusion

Both Engels and Baldwin illuminate the pathways through which technological and historical consciousness can transform society. Engels’ critique of machinery as an instrument of capitalist oppression aligns with Baldwin’s call for an honest confrontation with America’s racial history. Together, they advocate for a conscious, collective effort to shape a future where technology benefits all and historical injustices are addressed. Embracing this vision requires acknowledging the disruptive potential of technological advances and harnessing them to foster social and economic emancipation. The integration of these perspectives offers a hopeful blueprint for future societal evolution—one rooted in justice, equality, and human liberation.

References

Baldwin, J. (1965). The Fire Next Time. Dial Press. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age. W. W. Norton & Company.

Engels, F. (1894). Socialism: Utopian and Scientific. International Publishers. Kliman, A. (2017). The Failure of Capitalist Production. Pluto Press. Sartre, J.-P. (1943). Being and Nothingness. Routledge.

West, C. (1993). Race Matters. Beacon Press. Wright, E. O. (2015). Understanding Class. Verso Books.

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
These Questions Dont Need To Be Answered In Essay Format Thi by Dr Jack Online - Issuu