Skip to main content

The Value Chainp 7 Soft Spot Is A Manufacturer Of Futon Matt

Page 1


The Value Chainp 7 Soft Spot Is A Manufacturer Of Futon Mattresses

The Value Chainp 7 Soft Spot is a manufacturer of futon mattresses. Soft Spot’s mattresses are priced at $60, but competition forces the company to offer significant discounts and rebates. As a result, the average price of the futon mattress has dropped to around $50, and the company is losing money. Management is applying value chain analysis to the company’s operations in an effort to reduce costs and improve product quality.

A study by the company’s management accountant has determined the following per unit costs for primary processes and support services:

Research and development: $5.00

Design: $3.00

Supply: $4.00

Production: $16.00

Marketing: $6.00

Distribution: $7.00

Customer service: $1.00

Total cost per unit for primary processes: $42.00

Support Service Human resources: $2.00

Information services: $5.00

Management accounting: $1.00

Total support service cost per unit: $8.00

To generate a gross margin large enough to cover overhead costs and earn a profit, Soft Spot must lower its total cost per unit as follows:

Primary processes to no more than $32.00

Support services to no more than $5.00

Management has made the following conclusions about operations, proposing adjustments to meet these

targets:

Reduce costs of research and development and design by 20%.

Reduce supply costs by consolidating suppliers from ten to two, saving 15%.

Shift manufacturing from Mali to China to lower production costs by 40%.

Reduce marketing costs by 25% by selling to large retailers like Wal-Mart.

Reduce distribution costs by 10%.

Increase customer service costs by 20% to better serve key large customers.

Outsource support services to reduce support costs by 20%.

Paper For Above instruction

In this analysis, we explore how Soft Spot, a manufacturer of futon mattresses, can leverage value chain analysis and cost management strategies to improve its financial performance amidst competitive pressures. The core challenge is balancing cost reductions with quality maintenance to remain competitive and profitable in a price-sensitive market.

Current Cost Structure Analysis

Soft Spot’s current costs per unit span across primary processes and support services, totaling $50 per unit (primary $42 + support $8). These costs are obtained from management accountant data, serving as a baseline for evaluating targeted improvements. The ultimate goal is to bring the primary process costs down to $32 and support service costs to $5, aligning with profitability objectives.

Proposed Cost Reductions and Adjustments

Management’s proposals focus on specific operational efficiencies:

Research and Development (R&D) and Design: A 20% reduction from $5.00 and $3.00 respectively, to foster innovation while controlling costs.

Sourcing and Supply Chain Management: Transitioning to two strategic suppliers to cut costs by 15%, capitalizing on economies of scale.

Manufacturing: Moving production from Mali to China to realize a 40% reduction in unit costs, facilitated

by lower wages and operational costs.

Marketing: Focused on large retail partners, aiming to reduce expenses by 25%, leveraging bulk sales and promotional efficiencies.

Distribution: Targeted 10% cost reduction through logistic optimizations and consolidation.

Customer Service: Despite the goal to increase per unit costs by 20% by improving service quality support costs are simultaneously outsourced, expecting a net 20% decrease in expenses.

Projected Cost Calculations

Applying these strategies, the projected costs are as follows:

Research and Development: $5.00 x 80% = $4.00

Design: $3.00 x 80% = $2.40

Supply: $4.00 x (1-0.15) = $3.40

Production: $16.00 x (1-0.40) = $9.60

Marketing: $6.00 x (1-0.25) = $4.50

Distribution: $7.00 x (1-0.10) = $6.30

Customer Service: $1.00 x 1.20 = $1.20

Support Services (after outsourcing): $8.00 x 0.80 = $6.40

Total primary process cost after adjustments: $4.00 + $2.40 + $3.40 + $9.60 + $4.50 + $6.30 + $1.20 = $31.40

Total support service cost after adjustments: $6.40

Combined projected total cost per unit: $31.40 + $6.40 = $37.80

This falls short of the target $35.00, indicating additional cost-saving initiatives are necessary.

Assessment of Proposed Strategies

The calculations suggest that although significant savings are projected, the total cost per unit at approximately $37.80 remains above the target threshold. To bridge this gap, management should consider

further steps:

Enhance supply chain efficiency by negotiating better terms or exploring alternative suppliers.

Invest in process automation within manufacturing to further lower production costs.

Optimize logistics through better route planning and consolidating shipments.

Implement lean management principles to eliminate waste across primary processes.

Leverage technological advancements to automate R&D and design workflows, potentially reducing associated costs further.

Furthermore, the elevated support service costs may be mitigated through more comprehensive outsourcing contracts or shared service models, improving efficiency without compromising customer satisfaction.

Role of Support Services in Value Chain Analysis

Support services like human resources, information systems, and management accounting play a critical role in the firm's value chain. They provide the infrastructure and data necessary to make informed decisions about cost management and process improvements. Effective support services enable the primary processes to operate more efficiently, directly impacting the company's ability to reduce costs and enhance quality. In the context of value chain analysis, these support functions are not merely overhead but strategic enablers that can be optimized for competitive advantage, especially when outsourced or restructured to align with cost-cutting initiatives.

Conclusion

Soft Spot’s strategic focus on targeted cost reductions across its value chain components is vital for returning to profitability. While the proposed initiatives produce substantial savings, achieving the desired cost threshold requires additional measures such as process improvement, automation, and supplier negotiations. The effective management of support services is equally crucial, as they underpin operational efficiency and innovation. Ultimately, integrating these efforts into a cohesive strategic plan will help Soft Spot navigate competitive pressures and sustain long-term profitability.

References

Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Harvard Business School Press.

Slack, N., Chambers, S., & Johnston, R. (2010). Operations Management (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & Supply Chain Management (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2017). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases. Cengage Learning.

Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2008). Exploring Corporate Strategy. Pearson Education.

Hahn, C., & Misra, S. (2020). Supply Chain Cost Management: Strategies for Achieving Lean Operations. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 56(2), 67–79.

Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2017). Operations Management (12th ed.). Pearson.

Banker, R. D., & Kauffman, R. J. (2004). The Issue of Cost in E-Commerce. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(2), 41–73.

Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer. McGraw-Hill.

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
The Value Chainp 7 Soft Spot Is A Manufacturer Of Futon Matt by Dr Jack Online - Issuu