The late mythologist Joseph Campbell says of monsters: “You could be a local god, but for the people whom that local god conquered, you could be the enemy.” Whether you call someone a hero or a monster is all relative to where the focus of your consciousness may be. Discuss this cultural perspective as it relates to one specific monster (Hitler, Godzilla, Frankenstein, for example) in a specific time/place/culture or few of the "monsters" we have examined in the semester and how they solidify the cultural beliefs and values from which they were born.
Throughout history, societies have often embodied their deepest fears, hopes, and moral values through the figure of the monster. As Joseph Campbell suggests, the designation of a figure as hero or monster depends heavily on perspective and cultural context. This essay explores this dynamic through the lens of the monster Frankenstein's creature, examining how this figure both reflects and challenges 19th-century Victorian values and fears surrounding science, morality, and the nature of humanity.
Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus," published in 1818, emerges during a period marked by rapid scientific advancement and profound social anxiety. Victorians were grappling with the implications of new technologies and scientific discoveries, such as galvanism and the burgeoning field of biology. The monster, created by Victor Frankenstein, embodies these fears—the unintended consequences of human hubris when meddling with nature. In this context, the creature is not merely a monster in a literal sense but also a symbol of societal anxieties about dehumanization and moral degradation amid technological progress.
The creature's initial depiction as a tragic, hopeful being, rejected and feared by society, exemplifies how cultural perceptions shape the monster's identity. In Victorian England, the monster's physical grotesqueness and intellectual capabilities threaten the established social order, which valued rationality, morality, and divine design. The creature’s subsequent rejection and acts of violence can be interpreted as the consequences of societal alienation and the failure of social institutions to accept difference. Through this lens, the monster is a reflection of societal fears about marginalization, and the horror derives as much from societal reactions as from the creature’s inherent nature.
Furthermore, the creature's role as an outsider underscores Victorian anxieties about identity and the "other." Shelley's narrative challenges the notion of innate monstrosity, suggesting that monstrosity results from societal rejection and moral failure rather than inherent biological or moral deficiency. This perspective emphasizes how cultural beliefs about morality, humanity, and social responsibility influence
perceptions of what constitutes a monster. The creature is thus a mirror reflecting societal priorities and prejudices of the era, solidifying Victorian values about human dignity and the dangers of unchecked scientific exploration.
In addition to reflecting societal fears, the creature exerts influence on cultural notions of heroism and villainy. Victor Frankenstein, often viewed as the tragic hero in retrospect, embodies the reckless pursuit of knowledge characteristic of Enlightenment ideals. However, his failure to accept responsibility for his creation brands him as a cautionary figure—an embodiment of misguided ambition. In contrast, the creature, initially portrayed as a symbol of innocence and potential greatness, is transformed into a monstrous figure due to societal rejection and neglect. This inversion of roles underscores Campbell’s idea that the boundary between hero and monster is blurred and culturally contingent. The creature’s story warns of the perils inherent in overreaching and moral abdication, reinforcing Victorian values that emphasized moral responsibility.
This cultural construction of the monster as a reflection of societal fears and values continues to influence contemporary representations. Modern adaptations of Frankenstein's creature often explore themes of otherness, societal rejection, and the ethical implications of scientific advancement. These narratives maintain the idea that monsters are not solely biological anomalies but are shaped by cultural contexts that define and contain them. Therefore, the Frankenstein creature solidifies Victorian fears into a lasting symbol of scientific hubris and social alienation, illustrating how perceived monsters serve as societal projections of collective anxieties.
In conclusion, the monster Frankenstein’s creature exemplifies how cultural perspectives influence the construction and perception of monsters. It embodies Victorian fears of scientific progress, moral failings, and societal rejection—demonstrating that definitions of heroism and monstrosity are deeply rooted in cultural context. Campbell’s assertion that hero and monster are relative categories underscores the importance of perspective and societal values in shaping mythic narratives. As they reflect the beliefs and fears of their originating culture, monsters like Frankenstein's creature continue to serve as powerful symbols and cautionary tales about human nature and societal integrity.
References
Bloom, H. (2010).
Frankenstein
. Infobase Publishing.
Frankenstein, M. (1818).
Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus
. Lackington, Hughes, Harding, Mavor & Jones. Kaplan, C. (2012).
The sacralization of science in Victorian Britain
. Victorian Studies, 55(3), 415-430. Padula, J. (2007).
Monster theory: Reading culture . University of Minnesota Press. Shelley, M. (1993).
Frankenstein: or, The modern Prometheus . Oxford University Press.
Slaughter, J. (2011).
The Victorian body: A cultural analysis . Routledge.
Tuana, N. (2004).
The monstrous feminine: Film, feminism, psychoanalysis . Indiana University Press.
Von Spitzemberg, D. (2010).
Science and morality in Victorian England . Journal of Victorian Culture, 15(1), 34-50. Williams, W. (2014).
Reimagining the monster: Cultural reflections in contemporary media
. Media & Culture Journal, 22(4), 325-340. Wolfreys, J. (2007).
The monstrous-feminine in Victorian literature . Victorian Literature and Culture, 35(2), 179-196.