Paper For Above instruction
Analysis of Behavioral Temperament and Leadership Style Assessment
Analysis of Behavioral Temperament and Leadership Style Assessment
Understanding one's behavioral temperament and leadership style is crucial for personal development and effective management. The assessments undertaken provide insights into fundamental personality traits and preferred methods of leading others. This reflection paper presents a detailed analysis of the results obtained from two assessments: one focusing on behavioral temperament and the other on leadership style. It then evaluates the accuracy of these results, discusses whether I agree with them, and considers my classification as a leader or manager, along with my current leadership level based on scholarly frameworks.
Results of the Assessments
The first assessment evaluated my behavioral temperament based on factors such as assertiveness, patience, analytical thinking, and sociability. My results indicated that I possess a sanguine temperament, characterized by enthusiasm, sociability, and an optimistic outlook. This temperament suggests that I am generally outgoing, energetic, and able to build strong interpersonal relationships. It also points to a predisposition toward adaptability, responsiveness to social stimuli, and a tendency to thrive in dynamic, interactive environments.
The second assessment focused on identifying my leadership style, categorizing it into common typologies such as transformational, transactional, laissez-faire, or servant leadership. The results identified my
predominant leadership style as transformational, highlighting qualities such as inspiring others, fostering innovation, and encouraging personal development among team members. The assessment reflected that I tend to motivate through vision and enthusiasm rather than through transactional or directive measures.
Agreement or Disagreement with Results
I generally agree with both assessments, as they resonate with my self-perception and past experiences. My sanguine temperament aligns with my natural tendency to be sociable, enthusiastic, and optimistic, especially in social and professional settings. These traits have historically helped me connect with colleagues and clients easily. Additionally, my inclination towards transformational leadership aligns with my values of inspiring others, promoting teamwork, and emphasizing personal growth, which I actively pursue in leadership roles.
However, I recognize that these results may reflect an idealized version of myself. At times, I can exhibit traits contrary to my assessed temperament, such as patience or analytical rigor, especially under stress or in complex situations. Likewise, although I primarily identify with transformational leadership, I acknowledge that situational demands sometimes require adopting transactional or more directive approaches. Therefore, I view these assessments as valuable guides but not definitive labels, understanding that personality and leadership styles can adapt to context.
Leader or Manager?
Based on my assessment results, I classify myself more as a leader than a manager. My transformational style emphasizes inspiring, motivating, and developing others, which are hallmarks of leadership rather than traditional managerial tasks focused on planning and controlling. While I understand the importance of managerial skills, my primary orientation toward vision-setting and individual empowerment aligns with leadership roles that foster change and innovation.
Leadership Level
According to the leadership levels outlined in the lecture—ranging from highly skilled individual contributors to strategic visionaries—I believe I currently operate within the development level of a team leader or emerging leader. I am actively developing my skills in strategic thinking and influence, but I still focus on inspiring and guiding team members toward shared goals. My intention is to evolve toward higher levels such as a strategic thinker or organizational leader by expanding my competencies and
demonstrating more influence at broader organizational levels.
Conclusion
The assessments provided valuable insights that align reasonably well with my self-perception and professional experiences. Recognizing my sanguine temperament and transformational leadership style allows me to leverage my strengths—such as enthusiasm, interpersonal skills, and motivational capacity—while remaining aware of areas for growth, including patience, analytical rigor, and strategic influence. As I continue to develop, I aim to progress through the leadership levels, expanding my influence and leadership efficacy.
References
Bass, B. M. (1995). *Transformational Leadership: Industry, Military, and Educational Impact*. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. *Harvard Business Review*, 78(2), 78-90.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (2011). *The Motivation to Work*. Transaction Publishers.
Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Leadership: Do traits matter? *Academy of Management Perspectives*, 5(2), 48-60.
Northouse, P. G. (2018). *Leadership: Theory and Practice* (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
Robinson, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). *Organizational Behavior* (18th ed.). Pearson.
Yukl, G. (2012). *Leadership in Organizations* (8th ed.). Pearson.
Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2019). *Organizational Behavior: Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace* (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2014). Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of transformational–transactional leadership theory. *The Leadership Quarterly*, 25(4), 543-562.
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). *Transformational Leadership* (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
