Paper For Above instruction
Classified Balance Sheet and Asset Turnover Analysis of Alleg, Inc., 2012
Classified Balance Sheet and Asset Turnover Analysis of Alleg, Inc., 2012
Analyzing a company's financial health and efficiency requires a clear understanding of its assets and liabilities, as well as key performance metrics like the asset turnover rate. For Alleg, Inc., as of December 31, 2012, a detailed classified balance sheet offers insights into its financial position, while the asset turnover ratio reveals how effectively the company utilizes its assets to generate revenue. This paper provides a step-by-step approach to preparing Alleg’s classified balance sheet, calculates its asset turnover rate, and interprets its implications concerning asset management in comparison to its primary competitor.
Preparation of the Classified Balance Sheet
To construct a comprehensive classified balance sheet, assets and liabilities are categorized into relevant classifications, facilitating clearer financial analysis. Based on the provided balances, the classifications are as follows:
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash ($14,000), Marketable securities ($17,000), Accounts receivable ($26,000), Inventory ($33,000)
Plant and Equipment:
Land and buildings ($57,000), Machinery and equipment ($120,000), Less: Accumulated depreciation ($61,000)
Intangibles:
Goodwill ($13,000), Patents ($9,000)
Other Assets:
Other assets ($45,000), Deferred income taxes ($18,000)
Liabilities
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable ($16,000), Current maturities of long-term debt ($11,000)
Long-term Liabilities:
Mortgages payable ($80,000), Bonds payable ($65,000), Deferred income taxes ($18,000)
Note that deferred income taxes appear in both asset and liability sections; typically, long-term deferred taxes are liabilities, but for this case, they are included under long-term liabilities for simplicity.
Shareholders’ Equity
Common stock, $1 par value (12,000 shares issued) — $12,000
Additional paid-in capital — $38,000
Retained earnings — $33,000
Calculating Total Assets
To compute total assets, sum all asset classifications:
Current Assets: $14,000 + $17,000 + $26,000 + $33,000 = $90,000
Plant and Equipment: $57,000 + $120,000 - $61,000 (accumulated depreciation) = $116,000
Intangibles: $13,000 + $9,000 = $22,000
Other Assets: $45,000 + $18,000 (deferred income taxes) = $63,000
Total Assets = $90,000 + $116,000 + $22,000 + $63,000 = $291,000
Computing the Asset Turnover Rate
The asset turnover ratio measures how efficiently a company uses its assets to generate sales, calculated as:
Asset Turnover Ratio = Total Revenues / Average Total Assets
Total revenues in 2012 are: $682,500
Assuming that the total assets provided are the year-end assets, the ratio is:
Asset Turnover = $682,500 / $291,000 ≈ 2.35
Rounding to the nearest hundredth, the asset turnover ratio is 2.35.
Interpretation of the Asset Turnover Ratio
Comparing Alleg’s asset turnover ratio (2.35) with its primary competitor’s ratio (2.12) indicates that Alleg is managing its assets more efficiently in generating sales. A higher asset turnover ratio suggests that Alleg effectively utilizes its assets to produce revenue, potentially implying superior operational efficiency, better inventory and receivables management, or more productive use of fixed assets.
However, it is essential to consider industry norms and other contextual factors. For instance, higher asset turnover might sometimes be associated with lower profit margins, particularly in highly competitive or cost-sensitive industries. Despite this, in general, Alleg’s higher ratio provides a positive signal about its asset management compared to its primary competitor.
Conclusion
This analysis demonstrates how a classified balance sheet provides clarity on a company’s financial position, and how the asset turnover ratio offers insights into operational efficiency. Alleg’s favorable asset turnover ratio compared to its competitor suggests effective utilization of its assets to support revenue growth. Regular benchmarking and detailed analysis of asset management strategies can further enhance operational performance and financial health.
References
Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2018). Fundamentals of Financial Management (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Higgins, R. C. (2018). Analysis for Financial Management (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Wild, J. J., Subramanyam, K. R., & Halsey, R. F. (2014). Financial Statement Analysis (11th ed.). Pearson.
Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2019). Corporate Finance (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Gibson, C. H. (2014). Financial Reporting and Analysis (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Gombola, M. J., & Ketz, J. E. (2002). Financial Ratios for Small Business Management. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 1(1), 13-20.
Penman, S. H. (2013). Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation. McGraw-Hill Education.
White, G. I., Sondhi, A. C., & Fried, D. (2015). The Analysis and Use of Financial Statements. John Wiley & Sons.
Lee, T. A. (2017). Asset Management Metrics: Guide to Best Practices. Journal of Finance and Accountancy, 12(3), 45-60.
McKinney, J., & Rosnowski, N. (2019). Benchmarking Financial Ratios for Industry Comparison. Journal of Business Strategy, 40(4), 29-35.
