The federal government has assumed responsibility for educating children living on federal property since the 1800s by paying those children’s school tuition
The federal government has assumed responsibility for educating children living on federal property since the 1800s by paying those children’s school tuition. The advent of the Korean War led to a significant increase in military housing. Military installations began building schools on federal properties in the southern states in the early 1950s. There are several reasons why military children began attending schools on military installations rather than the local public schools, also known as Local Education Activities (LEAs). One significant reason is related to desegregation.
Desegregation in the U.S. Military occurred prior to desegregation in public education. To support its own desegregation policies and foster the type of community these policies encouraged, the government established desegregated schools for the children of military personnel. Additionally, state law prohibited the expenditure of tax revenues for the education of children living on federal property. Consequently, the military decided to build its own schools for the children of military personnel rather than paying for these children to attend local public schools.
Currently, all stateside Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) schools operate under the responsibility of the Department of Defense Title 10, directed by the Secretary of Defense. Overseas schools, or Department of Defense Dependents Schools (DoDDS), fall under Title 20, Department of Education. Over the years, there have been many changes, shifts, and efforts to reintegrate military children into local education authorities (LEAs). Support and funding for these schools remain topics of debate.
Furthermore, when a military installation closes, its associated school typically closes too. Not all military children attend military installation schools; many receive education through LEAs that serve the local community. Regardless of the school type, it is vital for helping professionals to understand the education options available to military children, how to support their unique needs, and the laws protecting their social, emotional, and academic well-being.
Paper For Above instruction
The following paper explores the educational landscape of military children, focusing on how military culture influences their schooling experiences and the role educators and social workers can play in supporting these students. It discusses a hypothetical scenario based on the Wilkinson video, clarifies how
the DoDEA system could assist the family, compares military education circumstances with civilian settings, proposes social work strategies, and examines the influence of military culture on these experiences.
**Scenario Description: The Wilkinson Family as a Client**
In the Wilkinson video, Kristin and Michael Wilkinson share their experiences raising children within the military. They are a military family stationed overseas, with their two children attending Department of Defense Dependents Schools (DoDDS). Kristin describes the challenges their family faces due to frequent relocations, societal isolation, and adjusting to different cultural environments. Michael, a service member deployed multiple times, highlights the emotional strain on his children and the importance of stable support systems during their transitions. Their circumstances mirror common issues faced by military families: mobility, uncertainty, and maintaining social stability while adapting to military life.
**Utilization of the DoDEA School System**
The DoDEA system provides a structured, consistent, and culturally sensitive educational environment tailored for military children. For the Wilkinson family, DoDDS offers several advantages, including consistency in curriculum, trained teachers familiar with military-specific challenges, and programs that address the social and emotional needs of military students. For instance, DoDEA schools often implement support groups, counseling services, and transition programs that help children adapt to new environments and cope with the stresses of military life.
In their case, the DoDEA schools could facilitate orientation programs that ease transitions between postings, provide access to mental health resources, and foster a community among military families. These supports help mitigate the negative impact of mobility and foster resilience. Additionally, the schools’ emphasis on cultural competency ensures that military children’s diverse backgrounds and experiences are recognized and respected, promoting inclusivity and emotional safety.
**Differences in Circumstances in Civilian Schools**
If the Wilkinson children attended a civilian school, their experience might differ significantly. Civilian schools are often less equipped to handle the unique needs of military families, such as frequent moves and parental deployments. These schools typically lack dedicated transition programs or counselors trained in military culture. Moreover, civilian schools may struggle with consistency in curriculum and policies,
leading to educational disruptions and social instability for students like the Wilkinsons.
Research indicates that military-connected students in civilian schools report feelings of social isolation, academic disruptions, and difficulty establishing peer relationships (Card et al., 2011). Without specialized programs, these children may encounter more significant barriers to academic success and emotional well-being. Civilian schools may also lack awareness of military family challenges, further impairing their ability to support these students effectively.
**Social Work Strategies for Supporting Military Families**
As a social worker, several strategies can be employed to support the Wilkinson family effectively. First, establishing a trusting relationship is crucial, providing a safe space for children and parents to express their concerns. Implementing strengths-based approaches empowers families by recognizing their resilience and resourcefulness. For example, facilitating peer support groups among military families can reduce social isolation and promote shared coping strategies.
Providing psychoeducation about the normalcy of emotional responses to frequent relocations and deployments can normalize their experiences. Additionally, connecting families with community resources, such as counseling services, recreational activities, and military support programs, enhances their social support network. Advocating for school-based interventions, including individualized support plans and transition assistance, ensures that the children’s academic and emotional needs are met.
Finally, cultural competence is vital. Understanding military culture helps tailor interventions that respect family values, military norms, and the importance of patriotism and service. Recognizing the significance of deployment ceremonies, family days, and other military traditions allows social workers to engage families more meaningfully and reinforce their resilience.
**Impact of Military Culture on the Family Scenario**
Military culture profoundly influences families like the Wilkinsons. Values such as discipline, patriotism, and duty are central, shaping family dynamics and coping mechanisms. The military’s emphasis on resilience, perseverance, and adaptability fosters a sense of pride but can also impose stress and pressure on family members to conform to these ideals.
Deployment, a hallmark of military service, introduces prolonged separations, which can strain familial relationships and affect children's emotional health. The culture’s emphasis on readiness often leads to
frequent relocations, disrupting social networks and educational continuity. Such experiences require families to develop advanced resilience and adaptability—traits that are cultivated within military culture but can also generate unique stressors.
Moreover, the camaraderie and collective identity ingrained in military culture serve as support systems but can also create pressures to conform and suppress emotional expressions. For example, children may internalize stress or feelings of isolation to align with expectations of strength and resilience. Understanding these cultural nuances allows social workers and educators to provide culturally sensitive support tailored to the family’s values and experiences.
**Conclusion**
The education of military children occupies a unique space within the broader educational system, shaped by historical policies, military culture, and legislative frameworks. The DoDEA system plays a critical role in providing stability, consistency, and culturally competent education tailored to military families’ needs. Comparing military and civilian educational experiences highlights the importance of specialized programs that address mobility, emotional health, and cultural differences.
Social workers can significantly impact military families by employing culturally competent, strengths-based strategies that foster resilience, social support, and emotional well-being. Recognizing the profound influence of military culture ensures interventions are respectful, relevant, and effective. As the military community continues to adapt to changing policies and environments, the role of interdisciplinary support remains vital to promoting positive educational and social outcomes for military children.
References
Blaisure, K. R., Saathoff-Wells, T., Pereira, A., MacDermid Wadsworth, S., & Dombro, A. L. (2016).
Serving military families (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Card, N. A., Bosch, L., Casper, D. M., Wiggs, C. B., Hawkins, S. A., Schlomer, G. L., & Borden, L. M. (2011). A meta-analytic review of internalizing, externalizing, and academic adjustment among children of deployed military service members.
Journal of Family Psychology
, 25(4), 508–520.
Moore, K. D., Fairchild, A. J., Ng, Z. J., & Wooten, N. R. (2017). Evaluating behavioral health interventions for military-connected youth: A systematic review.
Military Medicine
, 182(1), 11-12.
U.S. Department of Defense Education Activity. (n.d.).
About DoDEA: History
. Retrieved from https://www.dodea.edu/aboutDODEA/index.cfm
U.S. Department of Defense Education Activity. (n.d.).
DDESS history
. Retrieved from https://www.dodea.edu/contingency/History.cfm
Wilson, E. (2010, September 21). DOD supports military children in public schools.
American Forces Press Service
Retrieved from https://www.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/295163/dod-supports-military-children-in-public-schools/ Laureate Education. (2013).
Military children and adolescents [Video file]
School Boards for Department of Defense Domestic Schools Training Materials. (2012).
Chapter 4: Serving Military Families
. Wadsworth, S. M., & Dombro, A. (2016). Supporting military families through education and social services.
Journal of Military & Government Counseling
Scholarly articles and resources on military family resilience and educational policy.