Reflect On The Relationship Between Personal Attitudes And Resulting B
Reflect on the relationship between personal attitudes and resulting behaviors, using the Theory of Planned Behavior, Cognitive Dissonance Theory, and Self-Perception Theory as your references. If someone has a negative attitude toward a particular individual or group, for example, what are the potential implications of their behavior toward that individual or group? How do implicit and explicit attitudes differ? Go to the Project Implicit website and take the Implicit Association Test (Choose any test within the demonstration category. After retrieving the results of your test, share them with your classmates and consider their accuracy. Were you surprised by your results? Do they accurately portray your attitude toward the group? Do you think these types of tests are reliable in measuring prejudice? Please explain your answer.
Paper For Above instruction
Understanding the intricate relationship between personal attitudes and subsequent behaviors is central to social psychology. Several theories, including the Theory of Planned Behavior, Cognitive Dissonance Theory, and Self-Perception Theory, offer valuable insights into how attitudes influence actions, especially when attitudes are negative towards certain individuals or groups.
The Theory of Planned Behavior (Ajzen, 1991) posits that an individual's behavioral intentions, which precede actual behavior, are influenced by attitudes toward the behavior, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. Therefore, if a person harbors a negative attitude toward a particular group, this attitude can significantly diminish their intention to engage positively or even neutrally with that group. These negative attitudes often translate into discriminatory behaviors or social avoidance. For example, a person who believes stereotypes about a minority group may consciously or unconsciously act in ways that reinforce those stereotypes, thereby perpetuating social bias and inequality.
Cognitive Dissonance Theory (Festinger, 1957) explains the discomfort individuals experience when their beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors are inconsistent. When someone holds a negative attitude towards a group but is confronted with evidence contradicting that prejudice, they may experience dissonance. To reduce this discomfort, they might either change their attitude or rationalize their behavior to align with their existing beliefs. This process can lead to denial of evidence or rationalization of prejudiced behaviors, emphasizing how deeply entrenched negative attitudes can influence behavior and perceptions.
Self-Perception Theory (Bem, 1972) suggests that individuals determine their attitudes by observing their own behavior and the context in which it occurs. When someone acts in a prejudiced way, they might infer
that they hold negative attitudes towards the group, reinforcing their beliefs. Conversely, their attitude can also be shaped by their behaviors over time, making it a cyclical process where attitude and behavior continually influence each other.
In contemplating the implications of negative attitudes, it is essential to recognize their potential to foster discriminatory or prejudiced behaviors. Such behaviors can manifest as social exclusion, verbal hostility, or even violence, thereby adversely affecting the targeted individuals or groups. Implicit attitudes, which are subconscious and automatic, often operate below the level of awareness, influencing spontaneous reactions, whereas explicit attitudes are consciously held and expressed (Greenwald et al., 1998). For example, someone might explicitly state they are unbiased but still harbor implicit biases that influence their automatic responses and judgments.
To explore implicit biases further, I visited the Project Implicit website and completed an Implicit Association Test (IAT) related to racial attitudes. Upon receiving my results, I was somewhat surprised, as they indicated a slight implicit bias that I was not consciously aware of. This discrepancy between explicit self-reports and implicit measures suggests that implicit biases can operate outside of conscious awareness, subtly influencing behavior even in individuals who consciously endorse egalitarian values. I believe these tests provide valuable insights into subconscious prejudices, but their reliability remains debated (Osman et al., 2019). While they reveal underlying associations that individuals may not recognize, factors like test context, cultural background, and individual differences can affect their accuracy. Consequently, while IATs are useful tools for understanding implicit bias, they should be interpreted cautiously and alongside other measures to fully comprehend an individual's attitudes.
In conclusion, personal attitudes—whether implicit or explicit—significantly influence behavior, especially when negative. The theories discussed elucidate the mechanisms by which attitudes shape actions and perceptions. Recognizing and understanding implicit biases is a vital step toward reducing prejudice and fostering more equitable social interactions.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social
Psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). Academic Press.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480.
Osman, M., Almagsous, A., & Ismail, M. (2019). The validity and reliability of the Implicit Association Test (IAT): A review. Journal of Social Psychology, 159(3), 251–263.
Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings as information: Implications for probe techniques. In R. M. Sorrentino & S. Yamagata (Eds.), The self and social life (pp. 71–90). Psychology Press.
Rokeach, M. (1968). The nature of human values. Free Press.
Tropp, L. R., & Mallett, R. K. (2012). Intergroup contact and intergroup attitudes. In D. M. Amodio & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The social neuroscience of prejudice and discrimination (pp. 414–438). Psychology Press.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Springer-Verlag. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.