Homeland Security Discussion Rubric 5/10/2021 Response No Submission
Homeland Security Discussion Rubric 5102021response No Submission
Homeland Security Discussion Rubric 5/10/2021 Response No Submission O Points Emerging (F through D range) 60 Satisfactory (C Range) 70 Proficient (B Range) 85 Exemplary (A Range) 100 Criterion score
Quality of Initial Posting 50% No Initial Posting The Information provided is inaccurate not focused on the assignment topic. Does not answer the question fully, Response demonstrates incomplete understanding of the topic and /or inadequate preparation The information provided is accurate giving a basic understanding of the topic(s) covered. Despite this basic understanding, initial posting may nit include complete development of all aspects of the assignment. The information provided is accurate, displaying a good understanding of the topic(s) covered.
Initial posting demonstrates clear understanding and addresses most aspects of the assignment although all concepts may not be fully discussed. The information provided is accurate, providing an- in-depth, well thought- out understanding of the topic(s) covered. The initial post provides an analysis of the information learned from the course and/or assigned readings. Criteria No Submission Emerging (F through D range) Satisfactory (C Range) Proficient B Range Exemplary (A Range) Criterion score Participation in Discussion 30% Student did not submit the assignment. May include one or more of the following: Comments to only one other student’s post. Comments are not substantive, such as saying “good job” or comments are off topic. Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts but only on one day of the week. Comments are substantive and expand on what another student wrote. Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts but only on one day of the week. Comments are substantive and expand on what another student wrote. Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts and to the instructors’ comments (if applicable) on two or more days. Demonstrates an analysis of peer’s comments, building on previous posts. Criteria No Submission O Points Emerging (F through D range) Satisfactory (C Range) Proficient (B Range) Exemplary (A Range) Criterion score Homeland Security Discussion Rubric 5/10/2021 Writing Mechanics (Spelling, Grammar, Citation Style) and Information Literacy. 20% Student did not submit the assignment Numerous issues in any of the following: grammar, mechanics, spelling use of slang, an incomplete or missing citations and references Some spelling, grammatical, and/or structural errors are present. Some errors in formatting citations and references are present. Minor to no errors in grammar, mechanics, or spelling in the initial postings are present in both the initial post and comments to others. Utilizes sources to include text readings as well as outside sources. Assignment exceeds expectations with
exceptional depth; presents all requirements of the assignment; demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and synthesize key assignment concepts. Overall score No Submission There was no Submission for this assignment Emerging (F-D Range) Satisfactory progress has not been met on the competencies of this assignment Satisfactory (C Range) Satisfactory progress has been achieved on the competencies for this assignment Proficient (B Range) Proficiency has been achieved on the competencies for this assignment
Exemplary (A Range) The competencies for this assignment have been mastered.
Homeland Security Discussion Rubric 5/10/2021 Sample Discussion Board Post for Criminal Justice
Submitted by Melissia Anderson Effective writing is so important to criminal justice professionals for many reasons. According to Wallace and Roberson (2009), it is estimated that we use 70% of our time communicating. This may be accomplished either verbally or in writing. A verbal communication is considered less formal, while a written statement is lasting and given more significance. Because written statements are permanent, they are assessed as more significant.
A report filed by a law enforcement agent can be used for the prosecution or defense of a defendant in a court of law. Inaccuracies in a written report can result in the failure to convict an individual of a crime.
The legal ramifications of unclear or imprecise writing can be substantial. An officer must be able to explain the reasons a report is written and filed. They must be able to defend errors in their reports.
Under oath, they will have to testify from the contents of the report. Criminal justice professionals must be able to not only file written reports, but to draft narratives that are comprehensible and logical for others to grasp (Wallace & Roberson, 2009). Working in Pretrial Services I know that clarity is particularly essential. If our court officers do not precisely note the judge’s terms or conditions of release, a defendant may inadvertently violate their release. It could cost the individual their freedom.
Many times, the judiciary may be vague when defining terms of release. In this instance court communications must be sent to distinguish the original intent from the judge. It wastes valuable time and court resources to clear up ambiguous conditions. Plagiarism involves stealing another person’s ideas or works and using them as your own. Sometimes this can be blatant, like copying sentences word for word without using quotation marks.
In other situations, it may be less obvious, such as paraphrasing content from another source but not citing it. This; however, is still plagiarism because that content originated from someone else's ideas or research, not your own. This can be avoided by simply using an in-text citation at the beginning or the end of the
paraphrased content. It is always a good idea to cite a source rather than chance an allegation of plagiarism (Keiser University, n.d.). Stealing from another can destroy the credibility of any criminal justice professional.
Because they represent the law and courts, law enforcement agents need to be above reproach. Word Count: 401 References Keiser University. (n.d.). Plagiarism [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from Wallace, H., & Roberson, C. (2009). Written and interpersonal communication: Methods for law enforcement (4th ed.).
Pearson Education. Terrorist Strategies Against America First, begin by watching the following video: CCJ4934 Terrorism Tactics Over Time For your main post, answer this question : Pick one of the two discussion questions below to answer in your HS Chat; please be sure to present research to support your discussion and document that research in APA format. Your initial post should be in by 5:00 p.m. EST on Wednesday. 1.
Terrorism is not random. Like any good military force or covert agency, terrorist groups require the use of strategy. The advantage of strategy is that terrorists have the ability of striking in a seemingly random manner. The terrorists almost always take the initiative. Law enforcement and security forces tend to respond to the terrorists’ strategy.
If you know the strategies, however, you can better predict terrorists’ actions and take the initiative away. Discuss some of the most relevant characteristics of terrorist strategies. What does it mean to Adopt an Intelligence-Based Approach to Antiterrorism? 2. List some of the common Characteristics of Terrorist groups.
Please use a case example in your answer, as well as research to support your opinion. Requirements · Your main post should be 350+ words. Your main post should use APA format. Resources You may review the rubric by clicking here. here. - Alternative Formats You may review a sample discussion board post by clicking here here - Alternative Formats . image2.gif image.jpg image.gif