Issuu

THE PORTAL | AN INTER-DISCIPLINARY ACADEMIC GATEWAY END ARCHITECTURE | Evan Kanterman Nicole Fitzgerald David Liu

TEAM DESIGN DESIGN FOR INTEGRATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 COMMUNITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 ECOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 WATER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 ENERGY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 WELL-BEING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 RESOURCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

INDIVIDUAL DESIGN TEAM DESIGN CRITIQUE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66

DESIGN FOR WATER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 ECONOMY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 ENERGY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 WELL-BEING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 RESOURCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86

TEAM DESIGN

ARCH 488, WINTER TERM TEAM MEMBERS: Evan Kanterman Nicole Fitzgerald David Liu

DESIGN FOR INTERGRATION | NARRATIVE AND HYPOTHESIS

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

HYPOTHESIS If there is an opportunity to bridge the community and Drexel with advanced health opportunities, sustainable living, and inclusivity, then designing a building that creates transparency between the university and the community is vital to the programs. NARRATIVE The interdisciplinary building will serve as a new threshold between Drexel University, the surrounding local communities, and the new academic/ professional development in the area. The site will act as a connector to the entrance of U-City Square, while also reaching out towards the local communities of West Philadelphia. The massing will address the sustainable and programmatic needs of the users through the expressive and unique form. The outer boundaries of the form create an edge surrounding the site and curve inward to shape the path. The three masses are linked by connector spaces that create a central area at the ground level. The mass will be positioned to have a private entrance for the Community Wellness HUB and a main entrance for all users from the courtyard into the building. The courtyard will be filled with porous pavers and a central green gathering space that controls the direction of water flow. Native vegetation will be lined throughout the entire courtyard, that need minimal sun lighting. The circulation will unify clusters of flexible collaborative spaces, private learning spaces, and public wellness spaces to create an inclusive educational experience as users move through the building.

WELLNESS HUB

PUBLIC

PUBLIC THRESHOLD

The building forms a direct threshold that links U-City Square and the research hub to Drexel University.

DREXEL UNIVERSITY

REACHING OUT

The program is specifically designed to reach out to the people in the community and the students of Drexel University.

DREXEL ACADEMIC UNITS | DESIGN FOR INTERGRATION

10,260 sqft

7TH FL 6TH FL

25,300 sqft

5TH FL

25,300 sqft 10,260 sqft

4TH FL

25,300 sqft

3RD FL 2ND FL

10,260 sqft

TERRACE 34,700 sqft

1ST FL LAB

LAB OFFICE SUPPORT

SUPPORT

LOBBY

CAFE

AUDITORIUM

BOSSONE RESEARCH CENTER PROGRAM PROPORTIONS AVERAGE ROOM SIZE - AUDITORIUM: 4,200 SQFT - LAB: 600 SQFT - OFFICE: 160 SQFT - LARGE LAB: 940 SQFT

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

MISSION To promote health and quality of life through education, research, and innovation that integrates engineering and life sciences in a global context VALUES An independent, college-level interdisciplinary academic unit that is positioned to lead cutting-edge university wide initiatives. A rich integration of engineering and the life sciences. Involvement of every student experiential learning through Drexel’s Co-op Program. FACILITIES Bossone Research Enterprise Center Constantine N. Papadakis Integrated Sciences Building FACULTIES Paul Brandt-Rauf, ScD, MD, DrPH : Dean(1) - Previously Dean of Public Health at the University of Illinois at Chicago - At Columbia, he had doubled student enrollment and expanded its research programs with an increase in funding. - Background in research focused on environmental health, written extensively on ethical, legal and social issues in occupational/environmental health policy and practice. Background in teaching various levels of students. CORE - 28 RESEARCH - 5 AFFILIATED 40 EMERITUS - 5 STUDENT BODY Students are encouraged to participate or take leadership roles in BIOMED-related groups: Alpha Eta Mu Beta (AEMB) Drexel Biomedical Graduate Association (DBGA) Drexel Biomedical Undergraduate Association (DBUA) Medical Device Entrepreneurship Association (MDEA)

SCHOOL OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, SCIENCE AND HEALTH SYSTEMS Information about Biomedical engineering at Drexel University and the program spaces within Bossone Research Enterprise Center.

DESIGN FOR INTERGRATION | DREXEL ACADEMIC UNITS

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

OPEN OFFICE OFFICE

LAB

7TH FL

10,260 sqft

6TH FL

25,300 sqft

5TH FL

25,300 sqft

4TH FL

10,260 sqft

3RD FL

30,900 sqft

2ND FL

10,260 sqft

1ST FL SUPPORT

34,700 sqft LOBBY CLASSROOM AUDITORIUM

STUDY

NESBITT HALL PROGRAM PROPORTIONS AVERAGE ROOM SIZE (1) - AUDITORIUM: 4,300 SQFT & 1750 SQFT - CLASSROOM: 900 SQFT - OFFICE: 160 SQFT - LAB: 940 SQFT - STUDENT LOUNGE: 725 SQFT

MISSION (2) To improve the health of communities and populations through innovative education, research, and cooperation with other civic, business, and academic institutions committed to solving our world’s most difficult health challenges. VALUES (2) Health as a human right and the importance of social justice to health. Translation of knowledge into actions to improve population health and eliminate health disparities. Sustainable and equitable community partnerships. FACILITIES Dornsife School of Public Health, Nesbitt Hall Dornsife Center for Neighborhood Partnerships West Philadelphia Community Center (WPCC) (Partnership) FACULTIES (WITHIN RESEARCH INTERST) Ana V. Diez Roux, MD, PhD, MPH: Dean(3) - Known for her research on the social determinants of population health and the study of how neighborhoods affect health. - Research areas include social epidemiology and health disparities, environmental health effects, urban health, psychosocial factors, cardiovascular disease epidemiology, and more. - Awarded for her contributions to public health from the American Public Health Association. CHONIC HEALTH PROBLEMS - 52 BEHAVIORAL HEALTH - 48 HEALTH EQUITY/SOCIAL JUSTICE - 53 HEALTH IN COMMUNITIES - 106 NOVEL RESEARCH METHODS - 90 PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY - 38 PUBLIC HEALTH THEORY - 6 STUDENT BODY Become part of a close-knit and diverse community within Drexel. Student experience extends beyond classrooms and labs to include organizations, school-wide events, and many other ways to get involved. Drexel’s hometown of Philadelphia offers many opportunities to put public health into practice.

DORNSIFE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH Information about Dornsife School of Public Health at Drexel University and the program spaces within Nesbitt Hall.

PROGRAM RELATIONSHIP | DESIGN FOR INTERGRATION

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

LAB LAB OFFICE OFFICE

OFFICE OFFICE

LAB CLASSCLASSROOM ROOM

OFFICE

LAB CLASSCLASSOFFICE ROOM ROOM

SUPPORT SUPPORT

OFFICE

HUB HUB MORE ACTIVE

CLASS-CAFECAFE CLASSROOM SUPPORT ROOM LOBBY LOBBY ADJACENCIES ADJACENCIESAUDITAUDITPROXIMITIES PROXIMITIES ORIUM ORIUM STUDY STUDY

SUPPORT

CLASSROOM

HUB INTERMEDIATE POINT MORE ACTIVE USED AT ALL HOURS STUDY INTERMEDIATE POINT

The intermediate point between classroom and AUDITauditorium is open study space or individual study space to offer different types of learning once class ORIUM gets out.

CLASSROOM

DIRECT DIRECT CONNECTION CONNECTION AUDITAUDITLOBBY LOBBY ORIUM ORIUM MORE PEOPLE MORE PEOPLE

CAFE

ADJACENCIES PROXIMITIES

AUDITAUDITCLASSORIUM ORIUM ROOM

The classroom and lab are located near office spaces since this is a highly frequented area of relationships.

STUDY STUDY

ADJACENCIES PROXIMITIES

INTERMEDIATE INTERMEDIATE POINT POINT USED USED AT ALL AT HOURS ALL HOURS STUDY STUDYLAB

HUB HUB MORE MORE ACTIVE ACTIVE

LAB

AUDITORIUM

LOBBY

AUDITORIUM

ADJACENCIES & PROXIMITIES

AUDITORIUM

LOBBY

The diagram infers which spaces should be near each other for a more efficient building design.

CLASSCLASSROOM ROOM

LAB LAB

DIRECT CONNECTION LOBBY MORE PEOPLE

AUDITORIUM

DIRECT CONNECTION

The auditorium and lobby share a direct connection to hold more people.

DIRECT CONNECTION MORE PEOPLE

DESIGN FOR INTERGRATION | PROGRAM RELATIONSHIP

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

LOBBY CAFE

LOBBY (1000 SF

LOUNGE (725 SF)

CAFE (225 SF)

KITCHEN (160 SF)

RESTROOM (100 SF)

UTILITY (100 SF)

STORAGE (100 SF)

LARGE LAB (940 SF)

LAB (600 SF)

SUPPORT OFFICE (160 SF)

LAB

OPEN OFFICE (350 SF) CONFERENCE ROOM (275 SF)

OFFICE

WAITING AREA (100 SF) CLASSROOM (900 SF)

CLASSROOM STUDY

STUDY (160 SF) COLLABORATIVE AREA (225 SF)

AUDITORIUM

MULTIPURPOSE (2100 SF) AUDITORIUM (4200 SF)

PROGRAM DAYLIGHTING

The amount of daylighting differs by the type of space.

PROGRAM SIZE

The average program sizes differ based on the amount of use and the type of space.

The programming is broken down by spaces that a typical school of public health and biomedical engineering building would have. The amount of sunlight, the size, and relationships are all important for the framework of how the program is laid out. The relationships help form a effective building that minimizes travel distances and allow students, faculty, and the community to use the supporting spaces around where they need to go.

MASSING ITERATIONS 1 | DESIGN FOR INTERGRATION

INITIAL MASSING ITERATION

Basic uniform mass showing full original volume.

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

INITIAL MASSING ITERATION

Split the mass into multiple parts form separation of program at the ground level.

Adjust the heights of each mass to respond to the site and fit the required program.

INITIAL MASSING ITERATION

Connect the masses with bridges to tie the programs together above.

DESIGN FOR INTERGRATION | MASSING ITERATIONS 1

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

SITE AXON (SE)

SITE AXON (NW)

VIEW FROM FILBERT STREET

VIEW FROM U-CITY

UPPER LEVEL PROGRAM

VIEW FROM 36TH STREET

VIEW FROM WARREN STREET

POWELTON/ MANTUA

U-CITY

DREXEL

GROUND LEVEL PROGRAM

MASSING ITERATIONS 2 | DESIGN FOR INTERGRATION

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

MASSING MASSINGSTUDIES STUDIES| |SITE SITEC C

ITERATION 1

The massing is a simple U-shape that is cut back on the corner at 36th Street for the first 6 floors and the top 5 floors are a L-shape.

COURTYARD COURTYARD

ARCH 488 | END |C END ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTU MASSING STUDIESARCH | 488 SITE

ITERATION 2

The massing is an U-shape that cuts back 10’ on the interior and exterior upper floors and has a tower extruding upwards.

ITERATION 3

AVOIDING AVOIDING SHADOWS SHADOWS

| SITE CSTUDIES | SITE C SSING

The massing is a U-shape that cuts a path through the site on the first two floors and doesn’t on the upper floors.

COURTYARD

CONNECTION CONNECTION

Using Using a simple a simple U-shape U-shape forms forms a courtyard a courtyard could could allows allows for communities for communities to come to comePushing Pushing the mass the mass minimizes minimizes the amount the amount of shadow Using of shadow a simple castcast onU-shape the on other-side the other-side forms aofcourtyard the of theCarving could Carving away allows away from forfrom communities the mass the mass creates to creates come a path a path from Pushing from U-City the U-City into mass into Drexel’s minimiz Drexel ca together together and and congregate. congregate. U-shape and and minimizes minimizes amount of shadow of shadow fromfrom the adjacent the|adjacent building.and congregate. makes makes Filbert Filbert Street Street feel feel less less like U-shape alike back a back and street. minimizes street. ARCH 488 | ENDU-shape ARCHITECTURE ARCH 488the|| END EtheNamount DARCHITECTURE E Nbuilding. Dtogether

COURTYARD

ARCH 488 | END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

AVOIDING SHADOWS

CONNECTION

HEAT HEAT STORMWATER STORMWATER HEATcampus and VEGETATION VEGETATION ple U-shape forms a courtyard could allows for communities to comeSHADOWS Pushing the mass minimizes the amount ofCONNECTION shadow cast on the other-side of theCONNECTION Carving away from the mass creates a path from U-City into Drexel’s AVOIDING SHADOWS AVOIDING together and congregate. and minimizes the amount of shadow from theUtilizing adjacent building. makes feel less like a back street. CoolCool roofsroofs offeroffer a unique a unique advantage advantage ofU-shape minimizing of minimizing the buildings the buildings impact impact on the on the Utilizing the open the open courtyard courtyard as a as collection a collection ofCool stormwater ofFilbert stormwater roofsStreet offer would awould unique help help reduce advantage reduce the of theminimizing The The open the open courtyard buildings courtyard also impact also creates on creates the the opportunity theUtilizing opportunity the foropen afor open acourtyar open space sp

mass munities minimizes to come the amount Pushingofthe shadow mass minimizes cast on thethe other-side amount of the shadow Carving cast on away the from other-side the mass of the creates Carving a pathaway fromfrom U-City theinto mass Drexel’s creates campus a path and from U-City into Drexel’s campus and urban heatheat island island effect. runoff and and astreet. cistern a cistern system system could could allow 100% forstreet. 100% recyclable recyclable water water onurban site. on site. heatvegetation island vegetation effect. to cool to cool down down this this areaarea in the in hotter the hotter months runoff months and more amore cistern thanthan a sys sto nd minimizes the amount U-shape of shadow and minimizes from the adjacent the amount building. ofurban shadow from theeffect. adjacentmakes building. Filbert Street feel lessrunoff likeMASS amakes back Filbert Street feel less like allow a for back TO FORM

The massing diagrams show the intent of the courtyard.

METHODOLOGIES: METHODOLOGIES: TheThe site site massing massing waswas developed developed based based off of offresponse of response to the to the surrounding surrounding site site andand CONCLUSION METHODOLOGIES: CONCLUSION & CITATIONS & CITATIONS The site : Inmassing conclusion : In conclusion was the developed the massing massing based has has a off good aofgood response response response to to the the to surrounding the site site andand to shadows to site shadows andof th neighborhoods. neighborhoods. TheThe massing massing waswas alsoalso a response a response to sustainable to sustainable strategies strategies thatthat could could be implemented be implemented intointo the the However, neighborhoods. However, moving moving forward Theforward massing it is it key was is key that also that the a response the massing massing looks to sustainable looks at sunlight/glazing at sunlight/glazing strategies that in more in could more detail bedetail implemented andand possibly possibly imp into design. design. TheThe series series of diagrams of diagrams above above werewere developed developed in Illustrator in Illustrator withwith a Revit a Revit background background to show to show the the process process of the of the the design. the stepping stepping Theback series back offofthe off diagrams the street street on above the on the Nothern were Nothern developed sideside of the in of Illustrator the building building to with reduce toareduce Revit thebackground “heaviness” the “heaviness” of to the show of the massing the mass pr massing massing iteration. iteration. Warren massing Warren Street. iteration. Street.

The U-shape was used to create a courtyard, pushing the form allowed light in, and creating a void emphasized a path. The use of an open courtyard would collect rain water, along with having cool roofs, and vegetation were among the factors that formed the mass.

DESIGN FOR INTERGRATION | MASSING ITERATIONS 3

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

ITERATION 1

Opens towards UCity and neighborhood while connecting to Drexel from above

ITERATION 2

Faces UCity while using 36th street, due to frequent traffic, to create seperate entries for the private neighborhood and South of Market St.

Neighborhood Neighborhood

Health Health Development Development

Base form of site

Connection to adjacent areas

E E

Neighborhood Neighborhood

Health Health Development Development

UCityUCity to Drexel to Drexel PathPath

W W

Extend path and connect to Drexel

Increase Increase sunlight sunlight

Angle towards sun

MASS TO FORM

MASSING ITERATIONS Different important forces of the site influenced the massing in various ways. These include a connection to adjacent spaces such as the public/ neighborhood, a connection between UCity and Drexel, and solar access.

FINAL MASSING ITERATION | DESIGN FOR INTERGRATION

1. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE & FAR

2. CARVE OUT PATHS & SPLIT MASSING

NW AERIAL

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

3. PUSH/PULL VOLUMES

4. UNIFY THE MASSING

SE AERIAL

DESIGN FOR INTERGRATION | MASSING DIAGRAMS

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

RIGID EDGES

TRANSPARENT CORE

FLEXIBLE CONNECTIONS

UNIFIED PROGRAM

ENTRY POINTS

VERTICAL CIRCULATION

GROUND FLOOR CIRCULATION

UPPER FLOOR CIRCULATION

PRRECEDENT RESEARCH | DESIGN FOR INTEGRATION

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

Level 6

COURTYARD

Level 4

Level 5 Sun Shading Reduces Heat Gain and Glare

Sun Shading Reduces Heat Gain and Glare

COURTYARD

Level 3

Passive Cooling Strategies

Level 4

Level 3

Passive Cooling Strategies CLASSROOMS

Level 2 CLASSROOM

LAB SUPPORT

LAB

Level 2

LAB SUPPORT

LOCKERS/GOWNING

LAB SUPPORT

Key Programmatic Relationships

OPEN STUDY

OPEN LAB

Level 1

Support Collab. Study Private Study Classroom Lobby Lab/Lecture

CLASSROOM

Key Programmatic Relationships

LAB SUPPORT

LAB

OFFICES

OPEN STUDY

PRIVATE STUDY

LOCKERS/GOWNING

Level 1

Support Study Office Classroom Lobby Lab/Lecture

MONASH UNIVERSITY S&T RESEARCH & INNOVATION BUILDING

UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION BUILDING

Location: Monash, Australia Architect: DesignInc Year Completed: 2010 Area: 183,000 sf Year: 2010

Location: Phoenix, Arizona Architect: CO Architects Year Completed: 2012 Area: 268,000 ft² Year: 2012

DESIGN FOR INTEGRATION | PROGRAM INTENT

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

GROUND LEVEL

Auditorium/Lecture Hall Building Service Classroom Clinical Room Flex Alcove Lab Lobby Multi-Purpose Space Office/Study Pod Open Study/Lounge Help Desk Simulation Room Vertical Circulation

LEVEL 2-4

Programs Auditorium/Lecture Hall Building Service Classroom Clinical Room Flex Alcove Lab Lobby Multi-Purpose Space Office/Study Pod Open Study/Lounge Help Desk Simulation Room Vertical Circulation

LEVEL 4-6

Typical Dimensions 35’ x 45‘ Varies 20’ x 30’ 30’ x 60’ 20’ x 20’ 30’ x 60’ Varies 40’ x 60’ 10’ x 12’ Varies 10’ x 10’ 10’ x 12’ Varies

LEVEL 6-8

Floor Basement Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8

Area 6,520 sf 22,878 sf 22,878 sf 26,538 sf 26,538 sf 13,420 sf 13,420 sf 6,520 sf 6,520 sf

Total

165,258 GSF

PROGRAM INTENT | DESIGN FOR INTEGRATION

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

PROGRAM INTENTION | SITE C

GROUND LEVEL

ARCH 488 | END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

LEVEL 2-4

LEVEL 4-6

LEVEL 6-8

METHODOLOGIES: As part of the narrative we started collaging ideas for spaces that would be in the building. On the CONCLUSION & CITATIONS : Since the building is curved it’s important to have more open areas with furniture that blog one of the comments was “Start to consider how these spaces may evolve in our project” and “it could be good can be moved and is flexible. There’s some opportunity for spaces that we didn’t include in here that we want too add to have another version of this board that directly connects to the diagrams we create in order to fully describe the moving forward. intended experience”. I started mapping where these spaces would be.

PROGRAM INTENT IMAGE BOARD

Types of spaces used throughout the building.

DESIGN FOR INTERGRATION | PROGRAM INTENT

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

PROGRAM INTENTION | SITE C

GROUND LEVEL

ARCH 488 | END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

LEVEL 2-4

LEVEL 4-6

LEVEL 6-8

PROGRAM INTENT IMAGE BOARD

Types of spaces used throughout the building.

SITE A ANALYSIS | DESIGN FOR COMMUNITY

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

RACE ST.

SEPTA TROLLEY WALK FROM TROLLEY SEPTA MFL WALK FROM MFL WALK BIKE

33ND ST.

CHERRY ST.

C LA

CUTHBE

AV E. 32ND ST .

RT ST.

33ND ST .

34TH ST .

JFK BLVD .

36TH ST .

ARCH ST .

MARKET

ST.

1 LANCASTER AVE. LOOKING AT SITE

2 LANCASTER AVE LOOKING AT DREXEL

3 LANCASTER AVE. LOOKING AT SITE

4 ACROSS MARKET LOOKING AT SITE

QUALITATIVE: School building cluster, corner lot

QUANTITATIVE: 1 main path, access

EXPERIENTIAL OVERVIEW LOT TYPE: Corner lot, entire site surrounded by streets on the East, South, & West edges ACTIVITY: Mild activity on Lancaster Walk, mostly students. Market and JFK are busy NOISE: Moderate due to cars and trucks on Market SUNLIGHT: Shadows on the site vary by time of day and season WIND: Most wind blow from the North SITE VISIBILITY: Visible from the East and South, sorta blocked on the West but can see when closer on Lancaster Walk, completely blocked on North side VEHICULAR TRAFFIC: High for this area anywhere from large trucks to bikes TRANSPORTATION: 2 min. from trolley, 5 min. from subway, 2 min. from bus, direct bike access

QUANTITATIVE: ½ in shade, 2 min from pub. Trans., Surrounded by streets on N,S,W

QUANTITATIVE: ½ in shade, 3 traffic lights

DESIGN FOR COMMUNITY | SITE B ANALYSIS

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

WA R

RA VE .

FILBERT

ST.

B 3

MARKET ST. 4

1 FILBERT ST. WEST APPROACH

2 FILBERT ST. EAST APPROACH

QUALITATIVE: Little to no vehicle or foot traffic, one building across street (Annex), shading from adjacent building

EXPERIENTIAL OVERVIEW LOT TYPE: Covered from the west and east by adjacent buildings ACTIVITY: Busy with pedestrian and vehicular traffic on Market St. while quiet on Filbert St. NOISE: Noisy due to traffic on Market St., but gets quieter towards Filbert St. SUNLIGHT: Lots of sun throughout the day WIND: Strong winds on Filbert St. but calms down on Market St. SITE VISIBILITY: Higher visibility along South due to wider street, but lower visibility from the North VEHICULAR TRAFFIC: High traffic along Market St. while there is almost to no traffic on Filbert St. TRANSPORTATION: Trolley and Train access from corners of the block

3 MARKET ST. WEST APPROACH

4 MARKET ST. EAST APPROACH

QUALITATIVE: Lots of traffic, large open street, no shading on north side

SITE B Site B is located at 3501 Market Street and is close to multiple transit stops and is convenient for public transportation. On top of that, it is adjacent to a wide and busy street so it can be viewed from further away. The site sits between opposite neighborhoods where the north is quieter and closer to the neighborhood while the south is business and academic.

SITE C ANALYSIS | DESIGN FOR COMMUNITY

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

C 2

1 1 VIEW FROM FILBERT STREET

QUALITATIVE: Corner Lot, Accessible by Transportation, Light Traffic, Quiet, Mostly Student Activity

2 NORTH VIEW FROM 36TH STREET

QUANTITATIVE: ½ in shade, 2 min from pub. Trans., Surrounded by streets on N,S,W

EXPERIENTIAL OVERVIEW LOT TYPE: Corner lot, surrounded by streets on the North, South, and West edges.

ACTIVITY: Relatively low activity, mostly students and local residents. 36th street is busiest. NOISE: Mostly quiet, but likely to increase due to new development around the site. SUNLIGHT: Shadows on the site vary throughout the day. WIND: Most wind blows strongly from the West and slightly from the North. SITE VISIBILITY: Visible from the North/East, can be seen from 31st St./Powelton Ave. VEHICULAR TRAFFIC: Relatively low activity, mostly students and local residents. TRANSPORTATION: 2 min. from trolley, 6 min. from subway, 2 min. from bus, direct bike access.

3 SOUTH VIEW FROM 36TH STREET

QUANTITATIVE: ½ in shade, 2 min from pub. Trans., Surrounded by streets on N,S,W

4 VIEW FROM WARREN STREET

QUANTITATIVE: ½ in shade, 2 min from pub. Trans., Surrounded by streets on N,S,W

SITE C The site is affected mostly by the adjacent Drexel academic buildings, as well as the taller buildings to the North/West of the site. These buildings influence the sun/wind exposure, as well as the views around the site. The area is generally quiet, but with the addition of over half a dozen new buildings close by in U-City Square over the next few years, including new Drexel academic facilities, the site activity will increase dramatically.

DESIGN FOR COMMUNITY | SITE B ANALYSIS

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

12.

10.

14.

8. 12.

SITE A 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14.

SITE B Buckley Field Armory/Squash Center Cannaris Hall (Student Housing) Nesbitt Hall U-Cross (Student Housing) Cira Centre One Drexel Plaza Pearlstein Business Learning Center 30th Street Station Lebow College of Business The Korman Center Bulletin Building Drexel College of Engineering Disque Hall

11.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.

11.

SITE C Domus (Student Housing) Arrive University City (Student Housing) 3535 Market Street (Mixed Use) Innovation Plaza (U-City Square) Powel School URBN Center URBN Annex Drexel Science Center Summit (Student Housing) Urban Eatery Buckley Tennis Courts Drexel Recreation Center

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.

Shops/Restaurants Summit (Student Housing) Community Education Center Drexel Science Center URBN Annex Quaker Court (Student Housing) URBN Center The Link (Student Housing) 3535 Market Street (Mixed Use) Arrive University City (Student Housing) Powel School 3735 Market (Mixed Use)

SITE COMPARISON

Site A is located directly adjacent to student housing and is surrounded by academic buildings, all with large footprints and tall in height. Site B on the other hand, is surrounded directly by more modest buildings, mostly academic but with some variation. Site C is surrounded by the most dense development, with the tall buildings of U-City square nearby.

SITE C ANALYSIS | DESIGN FOR COMMUNITY Powelton Village

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

Mantua

WALK SCORE

88 TRANSIT SCORE

98 BIKE SCORE

Drexel C olleg & Health e Of Nursing Professio ns

Drexel University

MFL TRANSPORTATION MAP

The transportation map highlights the methods of transportation near the site.

The chosen site is walkable for Powelton Village, Mantua, and Drexel Communities. It's a block away from Market Street which has bike lanes, the trolley line, the Market Frankford Line, and Buses stops; which is convenient for people traveling into the city. The new interdisciplinary building is situated across the street from the College of Nursing building.

AR AR A SELF-DIRECTED SELF-DIRECTED PROGRAM PROGRAM ||DESIGN COMMUNITY COMMUNITY COMMUNITY WELLNESS WELLNESS HUB HUB HUB FOR COMMUNITY |WELLNESS EQUITABLE COMMUNITIES SELF-DIRECTED PROGRAM | COMMUNITY WELL

1.1.1.Future Future FutureSearch Search SearchNetwork Network Network 1. Future Search 2.2.2.Dean Dean Deanofof ofthe the theSchool School Schoolofof ofPublic Public PublicHealth Health Health 2. Dean of the S 3.3.3.Dean Dean Deanofof ofthe the theSchool School Schoolofof ofBiomed Biomed BiomedEng., Eng., Eng.,Science, Science, Science,&&&Health Health HealthSystems Systems Systems 3. Dean of the S 4.4.4.Dornsife Dornsife DornsifeCommunity Community CommunityAdvisory Advisory AdvisoryCouncil Council Council(DCAC) (DCAC) (DCAC) 4. Dornsife Com 5.5.5.Community Community Communityofof ofMantua Mantua Mantua 5. Community o 6.6.6.Community Community Communityofof ofPowelton Powelton Powelton Village Village Village 6. Community o 7. Volunteer Sta 7.7.7. Volunteer Volunteer VolunteerSta Sta Sta 8. Faculty & Stud 8.8.8.Faculty Faculty Faculty&&&Students Students Students 9. Civic 101 Clas 9.9.9.Civic Civic Civic101 101 101Class Class Class

y of Powelton Village 7. Volunteer Sta Sta ARCHITECTURE 8.END Faculty & Students | E N D tudents9. Civic 101 Class lass

Systems

1. Future Search Network 1. Future Search Network 2. Dean of the School of Public Health 2. Dean of the School Public Health 3. of Dean of the School of Biomed Eng., Science, & Health Systems 3. Dean of the School BiomedCommunity Eng., Science, & Health Systems 4. of Dornsife Advisory Council (DCAC) 4. Dornsife Community Advisory Council (DCAC) 5. Community of Mantua 5. Community of Mantua 6. Community of Powelton Village 6. Community of Powelton Village 7. Volunteer Sta 7. Volunteer Sta 8. Faculty & Students 8. Faculty & Students9. Civic 101 Class 9. Civic 101 Class

ARCH 488 | END&ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH SCIENCE HUB MAP | E N D The site is located within the research and science hub.

RESEARCH RESEARCH RESEARCH&&&SCIENCE SCIENCE SCIENCEHUB HUB HUBMAP MAP MAP (1) (1) (1)Master Master MasterPlan Plan Plan

SELF-DIRECTED PROGRAM | COMMUNITY WELLNESS HUB

RESEARCH & SCIENCE HUB MAP NEIGHBORHOOD ENGAGEMENT MAP

The site is located in the (1)neighborhood Master Plan engagement area.

NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOODENGAGEMENT ENGAGEMENT ENGAGEMENTMAP MAP MAP (1) (1) (1)Master Master MasterPlan Plan Plan RESEARCH & SCIENCE HUB MAP (1) Master Plan

1.1.1.Fu F 2.2.2.DD 3.3.3.DD 4.4.4.DD 5.5.5.CC 6.6.6.CC ARCH 7.7.7.VV 8.8.8.Fa F 9.9.9.CC

1. Futur 2. Dean 3. Dean 4. Dorn 5. Com 6. Com 7. Volun 8. Facul 9. Civic

NEIGHBORHOOD ENGAGEMENT MAP COMMUNITY WELLNESS HUB MEANING COMMUNI The missing of the is to Plan heal, unite, and bridge the community. (1) HUB Master

COMMUNITY COMMUNITY COMMUNITYWELLNESS WELLNESS WELLNESSHUB HUB HUBMEANING MEANING MEANING NEIGHBORHOOD ENGAGEMENT MAP (1) Master Plan

COMMUNITY WELLNESS HUB MEANING

STAKEHOLDERS OF THE HUB

The main stakeholders of the interdisciplinary building and the HUB.

STAKEHOLDERS OF THE HUB

LINKAGE LINKAGE LINKAGE 1.1.1.Future Future FutureSearch Search SearchNetwork Network Network

1. Future Search Network 2. Dean of the School of Public Health 3. Dean of the School of Biomed Eng., Science, & Health Systems 4. Dornsife Community Advisory Council (DCAC) 5. Community of Mantua 6. Community of Powelton Village link1. the three user groups. The Future SearchSta Network 7. Volunteer 2. Dean of the School of Public Health 8. Faculty & Students 3. Dean of 101 the Class School of Biomed Eng., Science, & Health Systems 9. Civic

LINKAGE

The program aims to LINKAGE

MISSION OF THE EXPANSION

program will engage and educate the community. MISSION OF THE EXPANSION

1. Future Search Network 4. Dornsife Community Advisory Council (DCAC) 2. Dean of the School of5. Community Public Health of Mantua Community of Powelton Village 3. Dean of the School of6.7. Volunteer Biomed Eng., Science, & Health Systems Sta Faculty & Students 4. Dornsife Community8.Advisory Council (DCAC) 9. Civic 101 Class 5. Community of Mantua 6. Community of Powelton Village MISSION MISSION MISSIONOF OF OFTHE THE THEEXPANSION EXPANSION EXPANSION 1. Future SearchSta Network 7. Volunteer 2. Dean of the School of Public Health 8. Faculty & Students

LOBBY LOBBY

SERVICE

MISC. LABSMISC. LABSMISC. LABS MISC. LABS

LOBBY

ARCH 488 | END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT & MANAGEMENT & MANAGEMENT & & POLICY POLICY POLICY POLICY DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT

LOBBY

AUDITORIUM AUDITORIUM AUDITORIUM AUDITORIUM MULTIMULTI- MULTIMULTIPURPOSEPURPOSE PURPOSE PURPOSE SERVICESERVICE SERVICE SERVICE ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM SERVICESERVICE SERVICE SERVICE

BASEMENT

COMMUNITY COMMUNITYCOMMUNITY & ENVIROMENTAL ENVIROMENTAL & & ENVIROMENTAL & ENVIROMENTAL ENVIROMENTAL & ENVIROMENTAL & & ENVIROMENTALENVIROMENTAL & HEALTH & HEALTH & HEALTH & OCCUPATIONAL OCCUPATIONAL OCCUPATIONAL OCCUPATIONAL OCCUPATIONAL OCCUPATIONAL OCCUPATIONAL OCCUPATIONAL PREVENTION PREVENTION PREVENTION HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT

LEVEL 4

CARDIOVASCULAR ENGINEERING & NEUROENGINERING

STUDY STUDY STUDY STUDY STUDY STUDY STUDY STUDY SPACES SPACES SPACES BIOMEDICALSPACES BIOMEDICAL SPACES BIOMEDICAL SPACES SPACES SPACES BIOMEDICAL MEDICAL BIOMEDICAL BIOMEDICAL BIOMEDICAL NEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING UBLIC & PUBLIC & PUBLIC & PUBLIC & PUBLIC & PUBLIC & PUBLIC & PUBLIC EALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH BIOMATERIALS BIOMATERIALS BIOMATERIALS BIOMATERIALS ARED SHARED SHARED SHARED SHARED SHARED SHARED SHARED AND TISSUE AND TISSUEAND TISSUE AND TISSUE BIOMECHANICS ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING STUDY STUDY SPACES SPACES

STUDY SPACES

MOST PUBLIC MOST PUBLIC MOST PUBLIC

LEVEL 5

MOST PUBLIC

PUBIC AND PRIVATE (COMMUNITY & STUDENTS) PUBIC AND PUBIC PRIVATE AND PUBIC PRIVATE (COMMUNITY AND PRIVATE (COMMUNITY & STUDENTS) (COMMUNITY & STUDENTS) & STUDENTS) SEMI PRIVATE (STUDENTS) SEMI PRIVATE SEMI PRIVATE (STUDENTS) SEMI PRIVATE (STUDENTS) (STUDENTS) MOST PRIVATE (STAFF) MOST PRIVATE MOST PRIVATE (STAFF) MOST PRIVATE (STAFF) (STAFF)

The program organization is based on departments in each school.

COMMUNITY HEALTH & PREVENTION DEPARTMENT

SEMI PUBLIC SEMI (COMMUNITY PUBLIC SEMI(COMMUNITY PUBLIC CAN(COMMUNITY USE) SEMI CANPUBLIC USE)CAN (COMMUNITY USE) CAN USE)

LEVEL 6

PROGRAM ORGANIZATION

LEVELS 2-3

BIOINFORMATICS AND COMPUTATIONAL

EPIDEMIOLOGY & BIOSTATISTICS DEPARTMENT

STUDY SPACES

LEVEL 1

BIOINFORMATICS AND COMPUTATIONAL

EPIDEMIOLOGY & EPIDEMIOLOGY EPIDEMIOLOGY & & BIOSTATISTICS BIOSTATISTICS BIOSTATISTICS DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT

LEVEL 1A

BIOINFORMATICS AND COMPUTATIONAL

HEALTH MANAGEMENT & POLICY DEPARTMENT

EPIDEMIOLOGY EPIDEMIOLOGY & EPIDEMIOLOGY & & EPIDEMIOLOG BIOSTATISTICS BIOSTATISTICS BIOSTATISTICS BIOSTATIST DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT DEPARTME

STUDY STUDY STUDY STUDY STUDY SPACES SPACES SPACES SPACES SPACES BIOMEDICAL BIOMEDICAL BIOMEDICAL BIOMEDICAL BIOMEDICAL BIOME ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGIN & PUBLIC& PUBLIC & PUBLIC & PUBLIC & PUBLIC& PU HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEALTH HEA BIOMATERIALS BIOMATERIALS BIOMATERIALS BIOMATERIALS SHARED SHARED SHARED SHARED SHARED SHA AND TISSUE AND TISSUE AND TISSUE AND TISSUE BIOMECHANICS BIOMECHANICS BIOMECHANICS BIOMECHANICS ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING STUDY STUDY STUDY STUDY SPACES SPACES SPACES SPACES STUDY STUDY SPACES SPACES

MISC. LABS MISC. LABSMISC. LABSMISC. LABS

BIOINFORMATICS AND COMPUTATIONAL

ENT

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

SELF-DIRECTED STUDY | PROGRAM ORGANIZATION

CARDIOVASCULAR ENGINEERING & NEUROENGINERING

NT &

PROGRAM ANALYSIS | DESIGN FOR COMMUNITY

LEVELS 7-8

DESIGN FOR COMMUNITY | PROGRAM ANALYSIS

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

SELF-DIRECTED STUDY | PROGRAM ORGANIZATION

ARCH 488 | END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

CLASSROOMS & LABS & STUDY SPACES CLASSROOMS & LABS & STUDY SPACES CLASSROOMS & LABS & STUDY SPACES

CLASSROOMS & LABS & STUDY SPACES

AUDITORIUM

MULTIPURPOSE ROOM

SERVICE

BIOMECHANICS BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING CARDIOVASCULAR & NEURO

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING & PUBLIC HEALTH SHARED

BIOINFORMATICS & GENETIC DISEASES

BIOMATERIALS & TISSUE ENGINEERING/ DRUG DELIVERY CARDIOVASCULAR & NEUROENGINEERING BIOINFORMATICS & COMPUTATIONAL

CLASSROOMS & RESEARCH LABS CLASSROOMS & RESEARCH LABS

HEALTH MANAGEMENT & POLICY DEPARTMENT

CLASSROOMS & RESEARCH LABS CLASSROOMS

STUDY SPACES

CLASSROOMS & LABS & STUDY SPACES

SIMULATION & CLASSROOM

STUDY SPACES

CLASSROOMS & LABS & STUDY SPACES

SIMULATION & CLASSROOM

STUDY SPACES

CLASSROOMS & LABS & STUDY SPACES

STUDY SPACES

CLASSROOMS & LABS & STUDY SPACES

SIMULATION & CLASSROOM LOBBY

MULTIPURPOSE ROOM

SERVICE

HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION/ MANAGEMENT & HEALTH POLICY HISTORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH & PUBLIC HEALTH ETHICS

EPIDEMIOLOGY & BIOSTATISTICS DEPARTMENT

ENVIROMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT

COMMUNITY RESEARCH, CLINICAL TRIALS, STATISTICAL MODELING

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING

COMMUNITY HEALTH & PREVENTION DEPARTMENT

VIOLENCE & TRAUMA, REPRODUCTIVE & SEXUAL HEALTH, CHILD HEALTH

BIOMECHANICS

PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, SLEEP, MENTAL HEALTH, SUSBTANCE ABUSE

BIOMATERIALS AND TISSUE ENGINEERING & DRUG DELIVERY

NEURO DISORDERS, NUTRITION, CARDIOVASCULAR, CANCER

CARDIOVASCULAR ENGINEERING & NEUROENGINEERING

EMERGENCY PREP.,HEALTH DISEASE

SERVICE

BIOINFORMATICS AND COMPUTATIONAL BIOENGINEERING

MOST PUBLIC SEMI PUBLIC (COMMUNITY CAN USE) PUBIC AND PRIVATE (COMMUNITY & STUDENTS)

*CLASSROOMS/LABS SHALL BE USED BY BOTH BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING & PUBLIC HEALTH CLASSES REGARDLESS OF DEPARTMENT*

*AREAS OF STUDIES INTENTIONALLY OVERLAP ON FLOORS*

SEMI PRIVATE (STUDENTS) MOST PRIVATE (STAFF)

PUBLIC & PRIVATE PROGRAM

The diagram shows the public and private programs by floor. (1) & (2) & (3)

PUBLIC & PRIVATE PROGRAM The diagram shows the public and private programs by floor.

DEPARTMENT BREAKDOWN

The diagram shows the departments by floor. (1)

DEPARTMENT BREAKDOWN The diagram shows the departments by floor.

AREA OF STUDY BREAKDOWN

The diagram shows the focus of studies by floor. (2) & (3)

AREA OF STUDY BREAKDOWN The diagram shows the focus of studies by floor.

STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS | DESIGN FOR COMMUNITY

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

As a student, what kind of environment would be most conducive for you to work/study/succeed in? How do you utilize/view the importance of transition spaces or breakout spaces within your environment?

How frequent do you spend your time in different environments/spaces? (Are you frequently in private rooms, open/collaborate space, etc.)

How has time affected your working methods? (Advancements in technology, change in goals, pandemic, etc.)

- A lab space because you can access the lab on your own time when it’s not guided work. General labs are accompanied by a traditional classroom. An open space is beneficial as a transition space to study in; the space at ground level with booths for between classes. When you first walk up the stairs there is an open space with two desks and chairs for studying, more private. - One where open collaboration is encouraged. I find that I can work and function better when I am surrounded by other people. Breakout spaces, if I am working in a group environment, having a space where just my group can converse would increase productivity. - For getting work done, I find it helpful to be in a quiet, private space where I can sit and focus on doing work without other distractions. For studying, it’s helpful to have a private, separated breakout space where you can work with other people and study together out loud to bounce ideas off each other and collaborate.

- A private space is good for more focused studying such as with friends. While open space is better for between classes. - More often in collaborate spaces, where I can bounce ideas off other people. I find that private rooms tend to not hold my attention as long, and I find myself more distracted there. - I tend to spend a decent amount of time in private study spaces or rooms so that I can focus and get my own personal work done. However, I spend more time in collaborative spaces working with groups because of the large amount of groupwork that is required in our major and classes.

- Since the pandemic I’ve stopped going to those spaces because it’s a lot easier to multitask in your apartment. However before say a chemistry lecture I’ll go study in a private area. - When everything started going remote, it was up to each individual to decide how they were the most productive. I have found that being alone, in a quiet room, tends to hurt my productivity. - Typically by hand on paper or by reading a real book/ paper, but because of so many advances in technology, the pandemic, and how much school and work has moved online in recent years, I do not always have the option to that and now have to do a lot of work and reading on the computer or even my phone.

What type of new space for a future building do you think would be beneficial to your learning to interact with other students of different majors and grade levels?

Do you meet or collaborate with students in other majors aside from Biomed. Eng, Science & Health Systems?

- Smart boards to visualize what you’re saying (visual learning), which can keep information and save it for later, better than white boards which would be better in a private or open space. - Something similar to the library that is on campus, would be ideal. The library has lots of room and spaces for collaborations, as well as private sectors, if people want to work individually. - I think that a nicer/newer building or resources for engineering majors (not just Biomedical Engineering) would be very nice and beneficial.

- Yes, but not strongly on an academic level, because the need hasn’t arisen. I study with a lot of engineers but not in a classroom level. - Generally, no. My main coursework is in Biomed, so there has never really been a strong reason for me to interact and collaborate with someone outside of my major. - Personally, when I meet or collaborate with students that are not in biomed, it is almost always with other engineering majors or at least STEM majors as we tend to have similar schedules and work.

From your experience, are there any issues or concerns that you frequently hear about that you would like to bring up? - The curriculum has changed four times in the last six years, so it affects the classes we take. The academic aspect isn’t great but the building is good. - No issues come to mind. - From experience, I have seen and heard about the resources and buildings not being quite as new or nice or well-kept for engineers and other technical students. For example, buildings like CAT have had structural and technological issues that may need to be addressed.

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN FOR COMMUNITY | STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS

How frequent do you spend your time in different environments/spaces? (Are you frequently in private rooms, open/collaborate space, etc.)

How has time affected your working methods? (Advancements in technology, change in goals, pandemic, etc.)

- There are a few lab classes offered and are beneficial depending on the classes that are taken. - Doesn’t believe there are specific lab spaces in the building, but it would be useful and helpful to the school. There may be a few in center city but dedicated labs would be good. - There are no lab spaces in Dornsife. I do think it could be beneficial to have some, especially since some epidemiologist work in labs.

- Class discussions are better than breakout spaces and lectures are in a smaller typical classroom. - Working around other people who are also working if there isn’t a lot going on around. Comfortable couches, chairs, a desk space, and large tables. Study rooms that can be reserved because it’s easy to collaborate for group work and not be disturbed. - I like interactive classrooms. It gives me the chance to discuss and better learn the curriculum. Break out spaces are very important to me. When it comes to studying, I just need a comfortable and quite space to complete my work. Dornsife has plenty of these.

- A big room but quiet space, so you don’t feel isolated. Coffee shop vibes. - Private space to do work alone and collaborative spaces for group work. - Classrooms are in private rooms, but the environment was very collaborative/discussion based.

What type of new space for a future building do you think would be beneficial to your learning to interact with other students of different majors and grade levels? - Group work is now asynchronous, everything is super regulated and scheduled. Would rather meet in person for a quick meeting than on zoom. Meeting spaces near classroom to meet quickly after class are useful. - Big push to stay home and not be in public as much; so as someone who understands the topic following the guidelines is important. It affected my ability to work collaboratively over zoom verse being in the same room as someone. Not as effective studying at home as on campus. - The pandemic forced classes to be virtual. My study methods were the same and I was able to meet virtually on Zoom with classmates to collaborate on work.

Do you meet or collaborate with students in other majors aside from Biomed. Eng, Science & Health Systems? - Smartboards! Everything is hybrid to a certain extent, so it’s easier to gather and have a large screen. That’s the benefit of a zoom meeting that everyone is looking at the same thing. Add something so people want to gather there. - A space dedicated to collaborative work, a room or a floor of the building and it’s okay to talk in this area. - I was a graduate student during my time at Dornsife. There was little integration between grad students and undergrads. Perhaps a mentorship program would be enriching for undergrads.

From your experience, are there any issues or concerns that you frequently hear about that you would like to bring up? - Many types of people use the library, a system like WeWork where you can have a private space that you schedule it. Korman has windows and light that you can see outside, LeBow is cozy and has Starbucks, and easy access to bathrooms is a must. - Some classes are taught in the building that probably shouldn’t be. - N/A

RESEARCH & SELECTION | DESIGN FOR ECOLOGY

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

COREOPSIS(1)

SMALL PLANTINGS

LOBELIA(2)

TULIPS(1)

TREES

SWEET GUM TREE(3)

LOCUST TREE(4)

CLUMP MAPLE TREE(5)

DESIGN FOR ECOLOGY | RESEARCH & SELECTION

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE Site - 39,500 sf

OPEN ON ROOF

Ground - 16,252 sf (41%) Roof - 25,300 sf (64%)

ROOFS

Greatest access to sunlight annually

CENTER COURTYARD

Access to seasonal sunlight

POCKETS/THRESHOLD

OPEN ON GRADE

Least amount of annual sunlight

METRICS PLANTING AREAES

Areas of land that can be used for plantings

EXTERIOR ACCESS TO LIGHT

Accessible exterior areas exposed to sun

PLANTS - Oakleaf hydrangea - Tulips - Salvia (Sage) - Fern - Sedges - Miscanthus Grasses - Rubekia - Coral Bells - Fothergilla - Echinacea - Roses - Lobelia - Winterberry Holley - Coreopsis TREES - Locust - Clump Maple - Sweet Gum

- Maple - Oak

EXISTING PLANTS ON CAMPUS

- Serviceberry - Plum

List of various plants that exist on Drexel campus

RAIN GARDEN

Diagram of a raingarden system(6)

ECOLOGY The list of plants are those currently used by Drexel throughout its campus. Areas that receive the most sunlight are on the roof, but are limited to smaller plants while the ground level is available for trees. Rain gardens are also considered to work with the water design.

SUSTAINABLE SITE STRATEGIES | DESIGN FOR ECOLOGY

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

MECHANICAL ROOF Large Equipment

HORIZONTAL SHADING Reduces Heat on SouthEast

POROUS PAVEMENT Absorbs Water

POROUS TRACK Absorbs Water

GREEN ROOF Absorbs Water

RAIN GARDEN Reduces Stormwater Runoff

ACTIVITY MOUND Reduces Stormwater Runoff

GREEN ROOF Absorbs Water

VERTICAL SHADING Reduces Heat Gain at Sunrise

BURIED CISTERN Re-use Rain Water

SLOPED TOPOGRAPHY Water Runs into Rain Garden

BUILDING STRATEGIES AXON

The diagram shows the passive strategies used within the building.

SITE STRATEGIES PLAN

The diagram shows the passive strategies used within the site.

DESIGN FOR ECOLOGY | COURTYARD DESIGN

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

PLANTINGS

POUROUS PAVERS

GREEN SPACE (NONFIXED SEATING & OPEN AREA)

CISTERN BELOW

RAIN GARDEN PLANTINGS PLANTINGS GREEN SPACE (NONFIXED SEATING & OPEN AREA)

MAIN ENTRANCE

EGRESS EXIT

POUROUS PAVERS

EGRESS STAIR MAIN & ELEVATOR ENTRANCE

CISTERN BELOW

EGRESS EXIT EGRESS STAIR & ELEVATOR

PLANTINGS

RAIN WATER SYSTEM 1

SOFT-SCAPING

The central area is a green space for gathering, below is a rain garden that would receive runoff.

GATHERING AREA

ENTRANCE

RAIN GARDEN

The water slops down from the green space and overflow from pavers.

GATHERING AREA

ENTRANCE

RAIN WATER SYSTEM 2

Porous pavers absorb rain water and a below grade cistern is connected to the green roofs and store their water.

HARD-SCAPING

The porous pavers surround the courtyard.

INTERIOR + EXTERIOR CIRCULATION The site circulation radiates outward into the building.

CIRCULATION

The main path splits to form two paths to reach the entrances.

SITE CIRCULATION

The green space can be seen from across the street and the building entrances.

OVERALL SITE PLAN

The overall concept comprises all the landscaping and circulation ideas.

RE-USE STRATEGIES | DESIGN FOR WATER

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

MECHANICAL/ COOLING TOWER

GREEN ROOF

CAPTURE RAINWATER

(Capture rainwater, reduce runoff )

USE IN BUILDING

3 AND IRRIGATION

(LABS, RESTROOMS, ETC.)

POROUS PAVEMENT/ PLANTING

STORE 2 FILTER/ RAINWATER

(Capture rainwater, reduce runoff )

WATER DESIGN STRATEGIES Possible strategies and water cycle

DESIGN FOR WATER | RESEARCH & ANALYSIS

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE Site - 39,500 sf

OPEN ON ROOF

Ground - 16,252 sf (41%) Roof - 25,300 sf (64%)

ROOFS

Greatest access to sunlight annually

CENTER COURTYARD

Access to seasonal sunlight

POCKETS/THRESHOLD

OPEN ON GRADE

Least amount of annual sunlight

AREAS OPEN TO ABOVE

EXTERIOR ACCESS TO LIGHT

Areas of site that capture rainwater

Accessible exterior areas exposed to sun

WATER ANALYSIS

Total water use and WUI analysis of building form

WATER Most of the site is used as an accessible roof or open to ground. This provides a large surface area to capture water with strategies like green roofs, porous pavement, and plantings to capture water into a cistern. This would provide reusable water throughout the building.

SITE SHADING | DESIGN FOR ENERGY

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

SUMMER SOLSTICE

WINTER SOLSTICE N

SUMMER

4:38 AM

7:21 PM

7:28 AM

4:41 PM

WINTER

ANNUAL SUN PATH

SPRING EQUINOX

SOLAR ACCESS OVERLAP THROUGHOUT DAY

Shadows at 9am, noon, and 3pm at important moments of the year

DESIGN FOR ENERGY | RESEARCH & ANALYSIS

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D ROOFS

Greatest access to sunlight annually

CENTER COURTYARD

Access to seasonal sunlight

OPEN ON ROOF

OPEN ON GRADE

AREAS OPEN TO ABOVE

Areas of site exposed to environment

POCKETS/THRESHOLD Least amount of annual sunlight

EXTERIOR ACCESS TO SUN

Accessible exterior areas exposed to sun

RESPONSE TO SOLAR ACCESS

Location of glazing in response to solar access

Inputs Project Name Project Number Building Type 1 Building Type 2 (Optional) Building Type 3 (Optional) Location Energy Code Measurement Units Energy Baseline + Goal Baseline EUI Target EUI Outputs Daylight (sDA) Proposed Whole Baseline EUI Proposed Whole Baseline EUI Breakdown Cooling EUI Heating EUI Lighting EUI Equipment EUI Fans EUI Pumps EUI Hot Water EUI

ARCH488_001-T01-C04 Site C Education

3502 Filbert St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 ASHRAE 2016 - IECC 2018 Equivalent U.S. 43.99 33.18

55% 43.72 4.07 19.99 3.83 8.78 3.53 0.7 3.1

ENERGY The site has most of its sunlight in the early mornings of the summer season as two buildings in the south prevent sunlight access in the evenings and winter. The stepping of the towers allow more sunlight when it is available and allows sunlight into the courtyard.

WOOD SLATS | DESIGN FOR ENERGY

Inputs Project Name Project Number Building Type 1 Building Type 2 (Optional) Building Type 3 (Optional) Location Energy Code Measurement Units Energy Baseline + Goal Baseline EUI Target EUI Outputs

ARCH488_001-T01-C04 Site C Education

3502 Filbert St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 ASHRAE 2016 - IECC 2018 Equivalent U.S. 43.99 33.18

Daylight (sDA) Proposed Whole Baseline EUI Proposed Whole Baseline EUI Breakdown Cooling EUI Heating EUI Lighting EUI Equipment EUI Fans EUI Pumps EUI Hot Water EUI

WEEK 5 - BASELINE

55% 43.72 4.07 19.99 3.83 8.78 3.53 0.7 3.1

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

Inputs Project Name Project Number Building Type 1 Building Type 2 (Optional) Building Type 3 (Optional) Location Energy Code Measurement Units Energy Baseline + Goal Baseline EUI Target EUI Outputs

ARCH488_001-T01-C05-Closed Week 9 - Closed Education

3502 Filbert St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 ASHRAE 2016 - IECC 2018 Equivalent U.S.

Daylight (sDA) Proposed Whole Baseline EUI Proposed Whole Baseline EUI Breakdown Cooling EUI Heating EUI Lighting EUI Equipment EUI Fans EUI Pumps EUI Hot Water EUI

WEEK 9 - CLOSED WOOD SLATS

48.78 33.18

44% 48.78 4.48 23.44 4.46 8.78 3.83 0.7 3.1

Inputs Project Name Project Number Building Type 1 Building Type 2 (Optional) Building Type 3 (Optional) Location Energy Code Measurement Units Energy Baseline + Goal Baseline EUI Target EUI Outputs

ARCH488_001-T01-C05-Open Site C Education

3502 Filbert St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 ASHRAE 2016 - IECC 2018 Equivalent U.S.

Daylight (sDA) Proposed Whole Baseline EUI Proposed Whole Baseline EUI Breakdown Cooling EUI Heating EUI Lighting EUI Equipment EUI Fans EUI Pumps EUI Hot Water EUI

WEEK 9 - OPEN WOOD SLATS

48.29 33.18

44% 48.29 6.12 20.8 4.46 8.78 4.35 0.7 3.1

FACADE & & MATERIALITY MATERIALITY || TEAM TEAMSKETCHES SKETCHES ÿÿ FACADE ÿÿ 27ÿ89 0123011020341ÿ020246ÿ2272ÿ689

27ÿ89ARCHITECTURE | E N D 0123011020341ÿ020246ÿ2272END ÿ689

23 23 343ÿ64ÿ6ÿ 7:8;<923 ?C3 ÿA:ÿ B96 78923 =:;><?3 ÿ=A>B4 4C=ÿ:9>6ÿ=D:ÿE>?ÿDFEG?FÿFGÿEFFÿEHIJÿHKILÿJÿKLÿ

FFÿE JÿKLÿ 7897:8;<9=:;><?ÿ=A>B?CÿA:B9C=:9>ÿ=D:E>?ÿDFEG?FÿFGÿE HIJÿHKILÿ

FACADE & MATERIALITY | TEAM SKETCHES ÿÿ FACADE & MATERIALITY | TEAM SKETCHES ÿÿ

BRICK, CONCRETE, CONCEPT BRICK, CONCRETE,&&GLAZING GLAZING CONCEPT

BRICK, CONCRETE, & GLAZING CONCEPT The diagrams show thethe idea of of multiple differentforms. forms. The diagrams show idea multiplematerials materials on on different The diagrams show the idea of multiple materials on different forms.

BRICK, CONCRETE, & GLAZING CONCEPT

The diagrams show the idea of multiple materials on different forms. BRICK, CONCRETE, & GLAZING CONCEPT The diagrams show the idea of multiple materials on different forms.

ARCH 488 | END ARCHITECTURE | E N D ARCH 488 | END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

ANGEL FIN ANGEL FINCONCEPT CONCEPT

ANGEL FINwith CONCEPT The image shows the angeled fin concept large andsolid solidpanels. panels. The image shows the angeled fin concept with largeglazing glazing openings openings and The image shows the angeled fin concept with large glazing openings and solid panels.

ANGEL FIN CONCEPT

The image shows the angeled fin concept with large glazing openings and solid panels. ANGEL FIN CONCEPT The image shows the angeled fin concept with large glazing openings and solid panels.

Patttern Patttern dependson on depends program program needs needs

WOODPANELING PANELING&&GLAZING GLAZINGCONCEPT CONCEPT WOOD

Theseries seriesof ofsketches sketchesshow showthe theidea ideaofofaapattern patternofofwood woodpanels panelsfacade facadeand and a glass tower. The a glass tower. Patttern Patttern depends on depends on program program needs needs

WOOD CONCEPT WOODPANELING PANELING & & GLAZING CONCEPT

The series show the of wood panels panels facade facadeand andaaglass glasstower. tower. The seriesofofsketches sketches show theidea ideaof ofaa pattern pattern WOOD PANELING & GLAZING CONCEPT

The series of sketches show the idea of a pattern of wood panels facade and a glass tower.

WOOD SLAT LOUVERS & BRICK CONCEPT WOOD SLAT LOUVERS & BRICK CONCEPT

sketch shows in-class progress for facade. the facade. TheThe sketch shows ourour in-class progress for the

WOOD SLAT LOUVERS & BRICK CONCEPT WOOD SLAT LOUVERS & BRICK CONCEPT

The sketch shows our in-class progress forfacade. the facade. The sketch shows ourLOUVERS in-class progress the WOOD SLAT & for BRICK CONCEPT

The sketch shows our in-class progress for the facade.

ACCESSIBILITY | DESIGN FOR WELL-BEING

EXTERIOR

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

PUBLIC HEALTH

(A) ENTRANCE

9’-1”

LEVELED ENTRANCE

8’-4”

ATRIUM

COURTYARD

A 8’-4”

(B) PUBLIC HEALTH TO COURTYARD

RAMP ACCESS

4’-11”

4’-2”

B COURTYARD

LOBBY

(D) SOUTHWEST TO COURTYARD

LOBBY

4’-2”

LEVELED SURFACE

4’-2”

SLOPES DOWN

COURTYARD

0’-0”

Shows the difference in elevation and how it relates between exterior and interior

ELEVATION CHANGE ACROSS SITE

Shows the possible locations of ramps and connections at entrances and pathways

DESIGN FOR WELL-BEING | WIND ANALYSIS

CLIMATE ANALYSIS | WIND

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

ARCH 488 | END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

WIND AT PUBLIC HEALTH ENTRANCE Wind will impact the entrance head on

WIND CHARTS

The charts showcase the prevailing winds in the area of University City. (1)

METHODOLOGIES

CONCLUSION & CITATIONS

Within University City the winds vary drastically from direction month to month. However, November The West and NorthWest facades are two that pose a concern for operable windows due to strong through May there is a consistent strong wind pattern coming from between the West and North. winds and placing doors on either of these sides should be avoided where possible. During June to October the wind is less strong, but is still present. (1) www.CoveTools.com

E W S SITE ANALYSIS

Major direction of wind on site

WIND AROUND PORTAL

Wind will likely curvve around the corner, but the speed could slow down by this point

LIFE-SAFETY | DESIGN FOR WELL-BEING

E G R E S S O CCU P A N CY S U M M A R Y LE V E L 1 SF SF/OCCUPANT Assembly 5,892 1/7 Net Business 17,152 1/150 Gross TOTAL OCCUPANTS Egress stair width (.3" per occupant) LE V E L 2 SF SF/OCCUPANT Business 24,798 1/150 Gross TOTAL OCCUPANTS Egress stair width (.3" per occupant) LE V E L 3 SF SF/OCCUPANT Business 24,798 1/150 Gross TOTAL OCCUPANTS Egress stair width (.3" per occupant) LE V E L 4 SF SF/OCCUPANT Business 13,360 1/150 Gross TOTAL OCCUPANTS Egress stair width (.3" per occupant) LE V E L 5 SF SF/OCCUPANT Business 13,360 1/150 Gross TOTAL OCCUPANTS Egress stair width (.3" per occupant) LE V E L 6 SF SF/OCCUPANT Business 6,738 1/150 Gross TOTAL OCCUPANTS Egress stair width (.3" per occupant) LE V E L 7 SF SF/OCCUPANT Business 6,738 1/150 Gross TOTAL OCCUPANTS Egress stair width (.3" per occupant) LE V E L 8 SF SF/OCCUPANT Business 6,738 1/150 Gross TOTAL OCCUPANTS Egress stair width (.3" per occupant) BLDG. TOTAL 119,574 SF

Stair Width # OF EXITS (Each) LE V E L 1 5 48" LE V E L 2 5 48" LE V E L 3 5 48" LE V E L 4 3 48" LE V E L 5 3 48" LE V E L 6 2 48" LE V E L 7 2 48" LE V E L 8 2 48"

OCCUPANT # 841 114 955 286.5" OCCUPANT # 165 165 49.5" OCCUPANT # 165 165 33" OCCUPANT # 89 89 26.7" OCCUPANT # 89 89 26.7" OCCUPANT # 45 45 13.5" OCCUPANT # 45 45 13.5" OCCUPANT # 45 1, 598 13.5" 1 , 5 9 8 O CC.

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

LEVEL 1

LEVELS 2-3

E G R E S S CA P A CI T Y Occupancy Occupancy Door Clearance Required Provided (Each) (Each) (Each) 34"

191

240

34"

160

34"

160

34"

160

34"

160

34"

160

34"

160

34"

160

LEVELS 4-5

LEVEL 1

LEVELS 2-3

DESIGN FOR WELL-BEING | LIFE-SAFETY

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

Stair Width # OF EXITS (Each) LE V E L 1 5 48" LE V E L 2 5 48" LE V E L 3 5 48" LE V E L 4 3 48" LE V E L 5 3 48" LE V E L 6 2 48" LE V E L 7 2 48" LE V E L 8 2 48"

LEVEL 1

LEVELS 2-3

E G R E S S CA P A CI T Y Occupancy Occupancy Door Clearance Required Provided (Each) (Each) (Each) 34"

191

240

34"

160

34"

160

34"

160

34"

160

34"

160

34"

160

34"

160

LEVELS 4-5

LEVELS 6-7

STRUCTURE | DESIGN FOR RESOURCES

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

1 A

33' -1

3/1 6"

30' -

M 5 C 6

CLT FLOORS COULD EXTEND INTO FACADE(7)

CLT FLOORS COULD EXTEND INTO FACADE 7

TIMBER COULD REINFORCE OUR SUSTAINABLE IDEAS THROUGH A HYBRID STRUCTURE

TIMBER COULD REINFORCE OUR SUSTAINABLE IDEAS THROUGH A HYBRID STRUCTURE (8)

30' - 0"

H 1.1

30' - 0"

2.1

3.1

TYPICAL COLUMN SIZE: 10”x 10”

ELABORATE STRUCTURES COULD BE INTEGRATED INTO THE PORTALS

4.1

5.1

TYPICAL BEAM SIZE: 8”x 16”

6.1

7.1

MAX TRIBUTARY AREA: 900 SF

ELABORATE STRUCTURES COULD BE INTEGRATED INTO THE PORTALS (9)

DESIGN FOR RESOURCES | STRUCTURE

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

GLUELAM FRAMING STRUCTURE

Gluelam beams and columns will be used to create the main structure of the building, creating three distinct volumes that will be connected by truss bridges.

CLT FLOOR PLATES

12” CLT panels would be used to span between the beams, creating a rigid floor system that also expresses our curved facades by cantilevering over the beams.

COHESIVE SYSTEM

The gluelam framing structure combined with the CLT floor plates create a strong, sustainable structure

CODE REVIEW | DESIGN FOR RESOURCES

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS LOCATION MUNICIPALITY: PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT: UNIVERSITY CITY ZONING BUILDING LIMITS ZONING GROUP: CMX-3 OCCUPANCY GROUP: GROUP A-1 GROUP B BUILDING TYPE: N/A LOT AREA: 39,500 SF BUILDABLE AREA: 205,545 SF COVERAGE AT GRADE: 31,600 SF COVERAGE AT GRADE: 80% MAX. HEIGHT LIMIT: UNLIMITED FLOOR AREA RATIO: 500% NUMBER OF STORIES: N/A

CODE BUILDING LIMITS ZONING GROUP: CMX-3 OCCUPANCY GROUP: GROUP A-1 GROUP B BUILDING TYPE: 1V-B MINIMUM LOT AREA: 39,500 SF BUILDABLE AREA: 205,545 SF (LIMITED BY ZONING) COVERAGE AT GRADE: 31,600 SF (LIMITED BY ZONING) COVERAGE AT GRADE: 80% MAX. (LIMITED BY ZONING) HEIGHT LIMIT: 180' SPRINKLERED FLOOR AREA RATIO: 500% (LIMITED BY ZONING) NUMBER OF STORIES: 12 STORIES SPRINKLERED

PROPOSED BUILDING LIMITS ZONING GROUP: CMX-3 OCCUPANCY GROUP: GROUP A-1 GROUP B BUILDING TYPE: IV-B LOT AREA: 39,500 SF BUILDABLE AREA: 139,356 SF COVERAGE AT GRADE: 23,188 SF COVERAGE AT GRADE: 59% HEIGHT LIMIT: 140' SPRINKLERED FLOOR AREA RATIO: USES 500% FAR NUMBER OF STORIES: 8 STORIES

FIRE-RESISTANCE LIMITS PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAM2-HOURS BEARING WALLS EXTERIOR: 1-HOUR BEARING WALLS INTERIOR: 2-HOURS NONBEARING WALLS: 0-HOURS FLOOR CONSTRUCTION: 2-HOURS ROOF CONSTRUCTION: 1-HOUR

PROPOSED FIRE-RESISTANCE LIMITS PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME: 2-HOURS BEARING WALLS EXTERIOR: 1-HOUR BEARING WALLS INTERIOR: 2-HOURS NONBEARING WALLS: 0-HOURS FLOOR CONSTRUCTION: 2-HOURS ROOF CONSTRUCTION: 1-HOUR

GALZING PERCENTAGE LIMITS EAST WALL: 25% NORTH WALL: Unlimited SOUTH WALL: Unlimited WEST WALL: Unlimited COURTYARD ALL WALLS: Unlimited

PROPOSED GALZING PERCENTAGE LIMITS EAST WALL: 50% NORTH WALL: 67% SOUTH WALL: 78% WEST WALL: 69% COURTYARD ALL WALLS: 100%

BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS

The charts show the existing limits of the building and the proposed building limits.

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | SITE PLAN

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

LAN

CAS

AVE .

ST. 0

FILBERT ST.

MARKET ST.

34TH ST

36TH ST

37TH ST

WA RR

TER

1” = 8’

1” = 16’

1” = 32’

128

1’

2’

4’

20’

40’

80’

40’

80’

120’

80’

160’

240’

200’

400’

1” = 64’

1”= 1’-0”

1”= 20’

1”= 40’

1”= 80’ 1”= 200’

PLANS & SECTION | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DN UP

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

FOURTH FLOOR

1/16”=1’

FOURTH FLOOR PLAN 1/16”=1’

FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/16”=1’

PROGRAM LEGEND STUDY LOBBY

PROGRAM LEGEND CLASSROOM/LAB STUDY AUDITORIUM LOBBY SERVICE CLASSROOM/LAB OFFICE AUDITORIUM CLINICAL SERVICE

SECOND - THIRD FLOOR

SECOND - THIRD FLOOR PLAN 1/16”=1’

OFFICE

BASEMENT 1/16”=1’

CLINICAL 8

BASEMENT 1/16”=1’

OPEN STUDY AREA 516

POD 525

LAB 517

OPEN STUDY STUDY AREA AREA OPEN 414 516

POD POD 423 525

LAB LAB 415 517

LAB 315

OFFICE 333

OPEN STUDY SPACE 330

OPEN STUDY STUDY AREA SPACE OPEN 330 414

POD POD 327 423

LAB LAB 326 415

LAB LAB 214 315

OFFICE 333

OPEN STUDY SPACE OPEN STUDY SPACE 229 330

POD POD 226 327

LAB LAB 225 326

OPEN STUDY SPACE

OPEN STUDY LOBBYSPACE

POD

LAB MULTIPURPOSE SPACE

LAB AUDITORIUM

PROGRAM PLANS

The rigid programs are on the exterior perimeter of the building and the flexible programs are on the interior programs.

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | PLANS & SECTION

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

PROGRAM LEGEND STUDY LOBBY CLASSROOM/LAB AUDITORIUM SERVICE OFFICE CLINICAL

BASEMENT 1/16”=1’

OPEN STUDY AREA 516

POD 525

LAB 517

OPEN STUDY AREA 414

POD 423

LAB 415

OPEN STUDY SPACE 330

POD 327

LAB 326

OPEN STUDY SPACE 229

POD 226

LAB 225

PROGRAM LEGEND STUDY LOBBY CLASSROOM/LAB

SEVENTH - EIGHTH FLOOR PLAN

LAB 315

1/16”=1’

OFFICE 333

AUDITORIUM SERVICE

LAB 214

OFFICE CLINICAL

LOBBY 101A

AUDITORIUM 119A

BASEMENT 1/16”=1’

LAB 001

? ?

16 OFFICE 015

32 OPEN STUDY AREA 013

STORAGE 012 OPEN STUDY AREA 516

POD 525

BOILER ROOM 006 LAB 517

OPEN STUDY AREA 414

POD 423

LAB 415

OPEN STUDY SPACE 330

POD 327

LAB 326

OPEN STUDY SPACE 229

POD 226

LAB 225

SECTION FACING NORTH 1/16”=1’

LAB 315

PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH LAB 803

SEVENTH - EIGHT FLOOR

CROSS SECTION

LAB 214

CLINICAL RESEARCH LAB 703 AUDITORIUM 119A

RESEARCH LAB 603

OPEN STUDY AREA 714

LOBBY 101A

MULTIPURPOSE SPACE 106A

OPEN STUDY AREA 614

LAB 001

SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CLASSROOM 509

OFFICE 333

OPEN STUDY AREA 810

MULTIPURPOSE SPACE 106A

? ?

OFFICE 015

MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CLASSROOM CLINICAL 508 505

OPEN STUDY AREA 013

STORAGE 012

OPEN STUDY AREA 516

BOILER ROOM 006

LAB 517

RESTROOM 518

LAB 415

RESTROOM 416

LAB 326

RESTROOM 325

CLASSROOM 322

LAB 225

RESTROOM 224

CLASSROOM 221

CLASSROOM 521

SECTION FACING NORTH 1/16”=1’

EXCERCISE ROOM 408

SLEEPING SIMULATION ROOM 401 SIM. 405

OPEN STUDY AREA 414

NUTRITION KITCHEN CLASSROOMCHRONIC HEALTH SIMULATION SIM. ROOM 308 301 305

PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH LAB 803

CLINICAL RESEARCH LAB 703

OPEN STUDY AREA 810 SIM. 206 HEALTH SIMULATION ROOM 201

SIM. 205

OPEN STUDY SPACE 229

OPEN STUDY AREA 714 CLINICAL 108

RESEARCH LAB 603

SIXTH FLOOR PLAN

OPEN STUDY SPACE 330

CLASSROOM 419

CLINICAL 107

MULTIPURPOSE SPACE 106A

OPEN STUDY AREA 614

1/16”=1’ LAB 001 SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CLASSROOM 509

SECTION FACING EAST 1/16”=1’

EXCERCISE ROOM 408

OPEN STUDY AREA 003 MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CLASSROOM CLINICAL 508 505

OPEN STUDY AREA 516

SLEEPING SIMULATION ROOM 401 SIM. 405

OPEN STUDY AREA 414

NUTRITION KITCHEN CLASSROOMCHRONIC HEALTH SIMULATION SIM. ROOM 308 301 305

SIM. 206 HEALTH SIMULATION ROOM 201

CLINICAL 108

OPEN STUDY SPACE 330

SIM. 205

OPEN STUDY SPACE 229

BOILER ROOM 006 LAB

STAFF OFFICE 007 RESTROOM

LAB 415

RESTROOM 416

LAB 326

RESTROOM 325

CLASSROOM 322

LAB 225

RESTROOM 224

CLASSROOM 221

517

518

LOCKER ROOM 008 CLASSROOM 521

ELEC. 009

CLASSROOM 419

CLINICAL 107

MULTIPURPOSE SPACE 106A

LAB 001

FIFTH -SIXTH FLOOR

OPEN STUDY AREA 003

BOILER ROOM 006

STAFF OFFICE 007

LOCKER ROOM 008

ELEC. 009

SECTION FACING EAST 1/16”=1’

SIXTH FLOOR PLAN

LONGITUDINAL SECTION

1/16”=1’

PROGRAM PLANS & SECTIONS

The rigid programs are on the exterior perimeter of the building and the flexible programs are on the interior programs.

FOURTH FLOOR PLAN 1/16”=1’

ELEVATIONS | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

EAST ELELVATION

NORTH ELELVATION

1” = 8’

46 0

1” = 1

1” = 3

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | ELEVATIONS

WEST ELELVATION

SOUTH ELELVATION

1” = 8’

1” = 16’

47 0

1” = 32’

SITE SECTIONS | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

SITE SECTION N/S

1” = 8’

1” = 1

1” = 3

SITE SECTION E/W 0

128

1’

2’

1” = 6

4’

1”=

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | SECTION PERSPECTIVE

RENDERING | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

SOUTH PORTAL

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | RENDERING

COURTYARD

RENDERING | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

WEST ELEVATION

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | RENDERING

PUBLIC HEALTH ENTRANCE

RENDERING | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

SOUTH EAST CORNER

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | RENDERING

FOURTH FLOOR GREEN ROOF

RENDERING | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

LABORATORY

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | RENDERING

OPEN SPACE & STUDY ALCOVE

RENDERING | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

AUDITORIUM LOBBY

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | RENDERING

OPEN SPACE & STUDY ALCOVE

RENDERING | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

ATRIUM

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | RENDERING

ATRIUM OPEN SPACE

MODEL SKETCH |SKETCH DESIGN DOCUMENTATION YSICAL YSICAL KETCH MODEL MODEL |MODEL PHOTOGRAPHS || PHOTOGRAPHS PHOTOGRAPHS

MODEL PHOTOGRAPHS MODEL MODELPHOTOGRAPHS PHOTOGRAPHS

The chipboard represents The rigid Thechipboard straight chipboard walls represents represents on the exterior, rigid rigidstraight straight whilewalls the wallspaper on onthe the on exterior, exterior, the interior while while and the theat paper paper the connectors on onthe theinterior interior represent and andatatglass. the theconnectors connectorsrepresent representglass. glass.

MODEL PHOTOGRAPHS MODEL PHOTOGRAPHS

MODEL OLOGIES: LOGIES: hed multiple InInclass class strategies we wesketched sketched to combine multiple multiple thestrategies three strategies iterations totocombine combine that were the thethree proposed. threeiterations iterations The that that CONCLUSION were wereproposed. proposed. & CITATIONS The The PHOTOS CONCLUSION CONCLUSION : This massing &&CITATIONS CITATIONS iteration taught : PHOTOGRAPHS This : Thismassing usmassing that creating iteration iteration a taught bi-level taughtus building usthat thatcreating creating may help a abi-level bi-level with the building buildingmm MIDTERM MODEL The chipboard represents rigid straight walls on the exterior, while the oninterior the interior and ateast the connectors represent glass. ents straight walls on the exterior, the on the interior and at the connectors represent glass. The chipboard rigid straight walls on the exterior, while the paper onpaper the and at the connectors represent glass. echoose with choose isrigid represented totomove move forward forward in represents the with massing withis isrepresented represented model. The in in exterior the thewhile massing massing edges model. model. of paper the The massings The exterior exterior edges edges grade ofofthe change the massings massings from east to grade grade west, change change so that’s from from something east toto west, we west, are soso looking that’s that’s something into in revit. we We are are also looking looking learned into into that inin revit. revit. inthe order We We also to also get learned learned a The chipboard represents rigid straight walls on the exterior, while thesomething paper onwe the interior and at connectors oken site te constraints constraints by portalsand that andare are lead broken broken people byby into portals portals thethat interior thatlead lead ofpeople people the site. into into The the the glazing interior interior ofof the ofthe thesite. site. curved The Theglazing glazing massing ofofthe on thethe interior curved curved we massing massing need to on on make the theinterior sure interior thewe we curves need need align totomake make withsure the surethe exterior thecurves curves of align the align building. with withthe theexterior exteriorofofthe thebu b es ntral people people green inward inward space. toto Athe the comment central centralgreen was green tospace. “Consider space.AAcomment comment including was was thetoto context “Consider “Consider buildings including includingthe thecontext contextbuildings buildings at d , atthe a aminimum)”, minimum)”, Annex onlysoso since I added I added I prioritized the theAnnex Annex other only only objectives. since sinceI prioritized I prioritizedother otherobjectives. objectives.

ODOLOGIES: Inthat class we sketched multiple to combine the CONCLUSION three iterations that were proposed. CONCLUSION & CITATIONS : This massing iter ree were proposed. The CONCLUSION & CITATIONS : This massing iteration us that creatingtaught a bi-level building may with giesiterations to combine the three iterations that strategies were proposed. The & CITATIONS : taught This The massing iteration us that creating ahelp bi-level

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | MODEL

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

FINAL MODEL PHOTOS

The wood material shows a direct representation of the open windows, windows with wood slats, and the archways.

TEAM DESIGN

ARCH 489, SPRING TERM David Liu

AREAS OF CONSIDERATION | TEAM DESIGN CRITIQUE

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

COURTYARD FACADE

The couryard facade was something that we didn’t develop well as we had focused more on the outer facade, but we new the interior would have more glazing expecially because it is orientatedd towards the sun.

PORTALS

The outer facade of the portal is intented too be connected with the walls of the portal, but isn’t modeled that way due to modeling difficulties. The portals also blend in with the arches of the base facade.

OUTER BASE FACADE

The arches of the base show the base supporting the upper portion of the facade. However, the portals blend it with the base of the facade. Based on the feedback, I believe this can be represented differently from the arch of the portal.

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

TEAM DESIGN CRITIQUE | INDIVIDUAL AREA OF INTEREST

COURTYARD FACADE

- Connect glazing materials to outer facade for areas above accessible roof - Courtyard level will have the most transparency - Upper levels will have a gradient of large transparent areas to least

PORTALS

- Expand entrances of portal - Change arrangement of materials in connection to base facade

OUTER BASE FACADE

- Change arrangement of materials to a horizontal pattern - Remove arches

PORTAL PARTI | TEAM DESIGN CRITIQUE

PORTAL ENTRANCE

PORTAL PATH

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

COURTYARD CURVE

ELEVATION DIAGRAM

LINKED CURVE

DESIGN FOR WATER | RE-USE STRATEGIES

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

MECHANICAL/ COOLING TOWER

(Capture rainwater, reduce runoff )

1 CAPTURE RAINWATER

GREEN ROOF

(Capture rainwater, reduce runoff )

USE IN BUILDING

RESTROOMS, ETC.) 3 (LABS, AND IRRIGATION

POROUS PAVEMENT/ PLANTING (Capture rainwater, reduce runoff )

STORE 2 FILTER/ RAINWATER

COST ESTIMATE AXON | DESIGN FOR ECONOMY

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

SHELL

$10,897,445

INTERIORS $3,296,982

SUBSTRUCTURE $1,018,355

SERVICES $9,950588

DESIGN FOR ECONOMY | COST ESTIMATE

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

Drexel Interdisciplinary College Building Student: David Liu ARCH 489 | Studio 5C DREXEL UNIVERSITY

Prep: Date: Revised:

4/9/2022 6/9/2022

SUMMARY - ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATE

Group

Description

SUBSTRUCTURE Foundations Basement Construction SHELL Superstructure Exterior Closure Roofing INTERIORS Interior Construction Staircases Interior Finishes SERVICES Conveying Systems Plumbing HVAC Fire Protection Electrical EQUIPMENT & FURNISHINGS Equipment Furnishings SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION Special Construction Selective Building Demolition BUILDING SITEWORK Site Preparation Site Improvements Site Civil/Mechanical Utilities Site Electrical Utilities Other Site Construction

A10 A20 B10 B20 B30 C10 C20 C30 D10 D20 D30 D40 D50 E10 E20 F10 F20 G10 G20 G30 G40 G50

Subtotal

SUBTOTAL General Requirements SUBTOTAL Bidding/ Costing Contingency SUBTOTAL Escalation to the Mid Point of Construction (12 Months @ 4% per year) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST

$ $

437,375 580,980

$ $ $

3,594,709 6,564,775 737,961

$ $ $

2,187,170 550,000 559,812

$ $ $ $ $

893,000 336,000 5,505,084 747,604 2,468,900

$ $

75,000 19,975

$ $

600 12,000

$ $ $ $ $

35,000 35,000 65,000 30,000 15,000

20%

10,897,445

3,296,982

9,950,588

94,975

12,600

145,000

25,415,945

186.98

30,499,134

224.38

33,549,047

246.81

34,891,009

256.69

1,744,550.45

36,635,559

269.52

$'s/SF

1,018,355

10%

OTHER/SOFT COSTS: Design & Construction Management Fees Construction Contingency Furnishings Project Management Costs TOTAL PROJECT COSTS

Total Cost $

5,083,189 3,049,913

1,341,962

7.49 3.22 4.27 80.17 26.45 48.30 5.43 24.26 16.09 4.05 4.12 73.20 6.57 2.47 40.50 5.50 18.16 0.70 0.55 0.15 0.09 0.00 0.09 1.07 0.26 0.26 0.48 0.22 0.11

SUBSTRUCTURE 4.01%

BUILDING SITEWORK 0.57% EQUIPMENT & FURNISHING 0.37% SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 0.05%

INTERIORS 12.97%

SERVICES 39.15%

SHELL 42.88%

Building Square Footage 135,928 SF

Student: David Liu ARCH 489 | Studio 5C DREXEL UNIVERSITY

Prep: Date: Revised:

COST ESTIMATE SPREADSHEET

4/9/2022

COST ESTIMATE BREAKDOWN

DETAILS - ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATE

Group

Description

SUBSTRUCTURE

A10

Foundations Continuous Footing/ Stem Wall/ Retaining Foot Spread Footing at Columns

Elevator Pit

A20

Basement Construction Retaining Walls

Quantity

1,075 LF 65 EA

Subtotal ‐ A10

Subtotal ‐ A20 TOTAL - A - Substructure

SHELL

Unit

Unit Cost

3 LS

19,366 SF

225.00 $ 2,500.00 11,000.00

Subtotal

Total

241,875 162,500

33,000 437,375

30.00 $ $

580,980 580,980 $

1,018,355

= 0.708 BTU/h-ft^2 x 821 sf

WALL ASSEMBLY | DESIGN FOR ENERGY

581.268 BTU/h-ft^2

BRICK 1 1/2" AIR GAP BRICK VAPOR BARRIER 1 1/2" AIR GAP AIR BARRIER VAPOR BARRIER

FILTER FABRIC SOIL MOISTURE RETENTION LAYER

4499.643

FILTER FABRIC AERATION LAYER MOISTURE RETENTION LAYER INSULATION

Wall Assembly R-Value

AERATION LAYER Cumulative R Temp Diff. Winter Temp. Summer Temp. INSULATION 0.17 0.147 45.15 94.85

Layer

Material

Exterior Air Film

0.17

Brick

0.73

0.9

0.779

45.78

94.22

1.5" Air Gap

0.9

1.8

1.557

46.56

93.44

1.8

1.557

46.56

93.44

D 3 1/2" RIGID INSULATION AIR BARRIER E R-value Links

Vapor Barrier

F Roof membrance 35/8" 1/2"SHEATHING RIGID INSULATION G 3 5/8" METAL STUD 5/8" SHEATHING H & INSULATION I 3 5/8" METAL STUD 5/8" SHEATHING J & INSULATION

3.5" Rigid Insulation

R-Value

93.44 0 Material Impact 1.8 1.557 46.56 DRAINAGE BARRIER 17.5 CARBON 19.3 16.696 61.70 Smart Materials 78.30Palette SMART MATERIALS PALETTE – Carbon ROOT BARRIER

Air Barrier 5/8" GWB

0.56

5/8" GWB

0.56

Interior Air Film

0.68

19.86 BARRIER17.180 WATERPROOFING DRAINAGE 27.66 23.927 CONCRETE ROOT BARRIER 28.22 24.412 WATERPROOFING METAL DECK 28.9 25.000 CONCRETE

Total

28.9

METAL DECK

3 5/8" Metal Stud & Rigid Insulation

7.8

5/8" SHEATHING

BRICK CURTAIN WALL

GLAZING

Material

4" Soil

Filter Fabric

R-Value BRICK

Moisture Retention Layer Aeration Layer

AIR GAP GLAZING

GLAZING AIR GAP

F Layer AG

4" Insulation Curtain Wall Assembly R-Value Drainage Material Barrier

GLAZING

BH I C

77.82

68.93

71.07

69.41

70.59

70.00

0.034602

3" Concrete (Limestone aggregate) Air Gap Metal Deck Glazing Total Air Film Interior

Total

6.85 5/8" SHEATHING 3 5/8" METAL STUD Note

Other Numbers ACH

0.6

Footprint

5/8" SHEATHING

7029 sf

Total Height

58.333 58' 4"

Volume

410023 ft^3

Floors

Solar Insulation in JAN. through SOUTH glazing - (VS) =

Cumulative R

Temp Diff.

Winter Temp.

Summer Temp.

2 2 1.608 46.61 93.39 1 1/2" AIR GAP 0 2 1.608 46.61 93.39 BRICK 0 2 1.608 46.61 93.39 VAPOR BARRIER 1 1/2" AIR GAP 93.39 0 2 1.608 46.61 AIR BARRIER 28.16 30.16 24.256 69.26 70.74 VAPOR BARRIER 0 30.16 24.256 69.26 70.74 3 1/2" RIGID INSULATION R-Value Cumulative R Temp Diff. Winter Temp. Summer Temp. AIR BARRIER 30.16 24.256 69.26 70.74 0.170 0.17 0.147 45.15 94.85 5/8" SHEATHING 3 1/2" RIGID INSULATION 0 30.16 24.256 69.26 70.74 3 3.17 2.742 47.74 92.26 2" RIGID INSULATION 0.925 31.085 25.000 70.00 70.00 0 3.17 2.742 47.74 92.26 5/8" SHEATHING 0 31.085 25.000 70.00 70.00 3 6.17 5.337 50.34 89.66 3 5/8" METAL STUD 2" RIGID INSULATION 6.85 31.085 0.68 5.926 50.93 89.07

Root Barrier Exterior Air Film Waterproofing Glazing

J D

62.18

Roof Assembly R-Value Layer

DOUBLE GLAZED WINDOW

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

SOIL

Total Gain (Qi)

792 BTU/day-ft^2

DESIGN FOR ENERGY | ROOF ASSEMBLY

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

SOIL FILTER FABRIC MOISTURE RETENTION LAYER AERATION LAYER

BRICK

INSULATION

1 1/2" AIR GAP VAPOR BARRIER Layer AIR BARRIER A 3 1/2" RIGIDBINSULATION C 5/8" SHEATHING D

Wall Assembly R-Value

Building Skin

Material

R-Value

Cumulative R

Exterior Air Film

0.17

Brick

0.73

1.5" Air Gap

0.9

Vapor Barrier

3 5/8" METAL E STUD & INSULATION F

3.5" Rigid Insulation

17.5

G 5/8" SHEATHING H

5/8" GWB

0.56

3 5/8" Metal Stud & Rigid Insulation

Air Barrier

7.8

5/8" GWB

Interior Air Film

0.68

Total

28.9 BRICK

AIR GAP GLAZING

0.17

Winter Temp. 0.147

Summer Temp.

45.15

94.85

Roof

45.78

94.22

Skylight

62.18

77.82

West

27.66

68.93

71.07

Window

28.9

23.927

46.56

93.44

Walls w/o Windows

46.56

93.44

North

46.56

93.44

East

61.70

78.30

South

24.412

69.41

70.59

North

25.000

70.00

East 0.03460207612 South West

Layer

Material

4" Soil

1 1/2" AIR GAP Cumulative R Temp Diff. Winter Temp. Summer Temp. VAPOR BARRIER 2 2 1.608 46.61 93.39 AIR 0 BARRIER

Filter Fabric

Moisture Retention Layer

Aeration Layer

4" Insulation

Drainage Barrier

Root Barrier

R-Value

0 RIGID INSULATION 30.16 2" 0 30.16 305/8" METAL30.16 STUD

Waterproofing 3" Concrete (Limestone aggregate)

Metal Deck

0.925 31.085 5/8" SHEATHING 0 31.085

Total

Footprint Total Height

Total UA Total

1.608

46.61

93.39

UA s

1.608

46.61

UA infiltrat

UA to

1.608

46.61

93.39 93.39

24.256

69.26

70.74

24.256

69.26

70.74

24.256

69.26

70.74

Qi, Internal Gains

24.256

69.26

70.74

Solar Gain

25.000

70.00

25.000

70.00

- (V

31.085

Other Numbers ACH

0 2 3 1/2" RIGID INSULATION 0 2 5/8" SHEATHING 28.16 30.16

Material

0.9 0.779 DRAINAGE BARRIER 1.8 1.557 ROOT BARRIER 1.8 1.557 WATERPROOFING 1.8 1.557 CONCRETE 19.3 16.696 METAL DECK 19.86 17.180

0.56GREEN ROOF 28.22

Roof Assembly R-Value

GLAZING

Temp Diff.

- (H

Note 0.6 7029 sf 58.333 58' 4"

People, Equipment, Total Area

MECHANICAL SYSTEM | DESIGN FOR ENERGY

VAV SYSTEM

Diagram of VAV system

VAV BOX

Johnson Controls Series Flow Fan-powered (TCSB)

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Schematic-diagram-of-a-typical-variable-air-volume-VAV-system-Adapted-from-20_fig1_330593368 https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/hvac-equipment/air-distribution/terminal-units/variable-air-volume-terminals/series-flow-fan-powered

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN FOR ENERGY | MECHANICAL AXON

SHADES | DESIGN FOR WELL-BEING

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

STUDY ALCOVE

AXON / DIAGRAM

https://www.trademarktitleflorida.com

PRECEDENT

Daylight-responsive shades

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN FOR WELL-BEING | LIFE-SAFETY AXON

INTERGRATION | DESIGN FOR WELL-BEING

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

500 LUX - Laboratories - Clinical Room 300 LUX - Multi Purpose Space - Auditorium - Classroom - Study Alcove 100 LUX - Corridors LIGHT LEVELS Minimum light levels for various spaces

MULTI-PURPOSE SPACE

RECESSED LINEAR LIGHT 500 lux - 1300 lux

INDIVIDUAL STUDY ALCOVE

CUSTOM LIGHT FIXTURE 300 lux

PENDENT LINEAR LIGHT 300 lux

CLINICAL SPACE

DESIGN FOR WELL-BEING | REFLECTED CEILING PLAN

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

FLOOR 3

FLOOR 5

CONSTRUCTION TYPE | DESIGN FOR RESOURCES

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

FIRE-RESISTANCE LIMITS PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAM2-HOURS BEARING WALLS EXTERIOR: 1-HOUR BEARING WALLS INTERIOR: 2-HOURS NONBEARING WALLS: 0-HOURS FLOOR CONSTRUCTION: 2-HOURS ROOF CONSTRUCTION: 1-HOUR

GALZING PERCENTAGE LIMITS EAST WALL: 25% NORTH WALL: Unlimited SOUTH WALL: Unlimited WEST WALL: Unlimited COURTYARD ALL WALLS: Unlimited

PROPOSED GALZING PERCENTAGE LIMITS EAST WALL: 50% NORTH WALL: 67% SOUTH WALL: 78% WEST WALL: 69% COURTYARD ALL WALLS: 100%

IBC 2021 REQUIREMENTS

BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS

The charts show the existing limits of the building and the proposed building limits.

STEEL CONNECTION TO CLT

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN FOR RESOURCES DESIGN FOR RESOURCES | STRUCTURAL PRECEDENT

STEEL AND CLT HYBRID STRUCTURE

STRUCTURAL MODEL

STEEL CONNECTION TO CLT

INTERIOR PHOTO

IDAHO CENTRAL CREDIT UNION ARENA(10)

PORTAL AND WOOD SLAT STRUCTURE | DESIGN FOR RESOURCES

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

Level 4 53' - 0"

Level 3 38' - 0"

Level 2 23' - 0"

Level 1A 4' - 0"

PORTAL ARCH

ELEVATION KEY 2

Structure 5_Portal 5_Portal StructureStructure 1 -0" 1/8" = 1'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0"

5_South Elevation 1/16" = 1'-0"

5_Portal Structure 1/8" = 1'-0"

WOOD SLATS ON WINDOW

Wood Slats 5_Wood Structure 5_Wood Slats Structure Slats Structure 2 2 6" = 1'-0" 3/16" = 1'-0" 3/16" = 1'-0"

VERTICAL WOOD SLATS

WOOD SLAT STRUCTURE

HORIZONTAL WOOD SLATS

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN FOR RESOURCES | STRUCTURAL AXON

ENVELOPE DESIGN | DESIGN FOR RESOURCES

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D DN

CURTAIN WALL - COURTYARD - Open spaces - Corridor, Open study space

BRICK

CLASSROOM

- Enclosed room - Classroom, Lab, Clinic, etc.

OFFICE

LAB

BRICK ENVELOPE

CURTAIN WALL - EXTERIOR

- Base - Multipurpose Space, Open Space

MULTI PURPOSE SPACE

FLEXIBLE STUDY ALCOVE

CURTAIN WALL GLAZING

DESIGN FOR RESOURCES | MATERIAL PALETTE

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

BRICK

Brampton Bricks using sustainable practices(11)

CONCRETE / SEALED CONCRETE

Ecogate concrete and aggregates that reduces carbon(13)

WOOD

Accoya wood obtained through sustainable practices(12)

ACOUSTICS

Armstrong acoustical ceiling blades and Canyon ACT (14)

SITE PLAN | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

LAN

CAS

ST. 0

FILBERT ST.

MARKET ST.

AVE .

34TH ST

36TH ST

37TH ST

WA RR

TER

1” = 8’

1” = 16’

1” = 32’

128

1’

2’

4’

20’

40’

80’

40’

80’

120’

80’

160’

240’

200’

400’

1” = 64’

1”= 1’-0”

1”= 20’

1”= 40’

1”= 80’ 1”= 200’

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | SECTION PERSPECTIVE

RENDERING | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

MULTI-PURPOSE SPACE

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | RENDERING

CLASSROOM

RENDERING | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

STUDY ALCOVE

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | RENDERING

INDIVIDUAL STUDY ALCOVES

RENDERING | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

CLINICAL SPACE

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | RENDERING

LABORATORY

RENDERING | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

COURTYARD FROM LOBBY

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | RENDERING

AUDITORIUM

RENDERING | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

NORTH WEST CORNER

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | RENDERING

NORTH EAST CORNER

RENDERING | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

SOUTH WEST CORNER

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | RENDERING

SOUTH EAST CORNER

RENDERING | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

WEST FACADE

100

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | RENDERING

WEST PORTAL

101

RENDERING | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

WEST PORTAL

102

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | RENDERING

COURTYARD

103

RENDERING | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

SOUTH PORTAL

104

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | RENDERING

SOUTH PORTAL

105

RENDERING | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

SOUTH PORTAL

106

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | RENDERING

SOUTH PORTAL

107

RENDERING | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

COURTYARD

108

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | RENDERING

COURTYARD

109

ELEVATIONS | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

EAST ELELVATION

NORTH ELELVATION

1” = 8’

110 0

1” = 1

1” = 3

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | ELEVATIONS

WEST ELELVATION

SOUTH ELELVATION

1” = 8’

1” = 16’

111 0

1” = 32’

FACADE STUDIES | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

ROOF 128' - 0" ROOF 128' - 0"

ROOF 128' - 0"

Level 8 113' - 0" Level 8 113' - 0"

Level 8 113' - 0"

Level 7 98' - 0" Level 7 98' - 0"

Level 7 98' - 0"

Level 6 83' - 0" Level 6 83' - 0"

Level 6 83' - 0"

Level 5 68' - 0" Level 5 68' - 0"

Level 5 68' - 0"

Level 4 53' - 0" Level 4 53' - 0"

Level 4 53' - 0"

Level 3 38' - 0" Level 3 38' - 0"

Level 3 38' - 0"

Level 2 23' - 0" Level 2 23' - 0"

Level 2 23' - 0"

Level 1 8' - 0" Level 1 8' - 0"

Level 1 8' - 0"

WEST FACADE

112

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | FACADE STUDIES

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

Level 6 83' - 0"

Level 4 53' - 0"

Level 5 68' - 0"

Level 3 38' - 0"

Level 4 53' - 0" Level 6 83' - 0"

Level 2 23' - 0"

Level 3 38' - 0" Level 5 68' - 0"

Level 1A 4' - 0"

Level 2 23' - 0" Level 4 53' - 0"

Level1A 3 Level 38' 4' - 0"

Facade Studies - South 1/16" = 1'-0"

Level 2 23' - 0"

Level 1A 4' - 0"

Level 4 53' - 0"

Level 3 38' - 0"

Level 2 23' - 0"

Level 1A 4' - 0"

SOUTH FACADE

Level 4 53' - 0"

1” = 8’

SOUTH PORTAL

Facade Studies Facade - South Studies - South 4 1/16" = 1'-0" 1/16" = 1'-0"

113

PLANS | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

FIRST FLOOR

114

SECOND FLOOR

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | PLANS

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

THIRD FLOOR

PROGRAM LEGEND STUDY LOBBY

PROGRAM LEGEND

AUDITORIUM

LOBBY

SERVICE

CLASSROOM/LAB

OFFICE

AUDITORIUM

CLINICAL

OFFICE

1” = 8’

FOURTH FLOOR

CLASSROOM/LAB

STUDY

SERVICE

115

PLANS | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

FIFTH FLOOR

116

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

SIXTH FLOOR

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | PLANS

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

SEVENTH FLOOR

PROGRAM LEGEND STUDY LOBBY

PROGRAM LEGEND

AUDITORIUM

LOBBY

SERVICE

CLASSROOM/LAB

OFFICE

AUDITORIUM

CLINICAL

OFFICE

1” = 8’

EIGHTH FLOOR

CLASSROOM/LAB

STUDY

SERVICE

117

STRUCTURAL PLANS | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

1.1

1.1 2.1

A 4.1

5.1 6.1

7.1 8.1

25' - 0"

3.1 25' - 0"

4.1 5.1 20' - 0"

6.1

25' - 0"

7.1 25' -7

C.1

8.1 1/2 "

29' - 4 1/2"

25' - 0"

21' - 3 1/2"

25' - 0"

54' - 4 1/2"

25' - 0"

C.1

2.1

25' - 0"

3.1

25' - 0"

3.2

FIRST FLOOR

118

3.8

21' - 0"

14' - 0"

3.2

58' - 9 1/2"

15' - 3"

3.8

SECOND FLOOR

20' - 9 1/2"

25' - 0"

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | STRUCTURAL PLANS

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

1.1

1.1 2.1

2.1

A 3.1

3.1 4.1

4.1

5.1 6.1

5.1

7.1 8.1

C.1

3.2

THIRD FLOOR

3.8

3.2 0

1” = 8’

FOURTH FLOOR 0

128

1” =

119

1” =

STRUCTURAL PLANS | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

1.1 1.1

2.1

3.1

4.1

2.1

5.1

4.1

C C C.1 C.1 D D

3.2

FIFTH FLOOR

120

SIXTH FLOOR

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | STRUCTURAL PLANS

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

1.1 A

1.1 2.1

2.1

3.1 B

3.1 4.1

4.1

5.1

C.1

SEVENTH FLOOR

1” = 8’

EIGHTH FLOOR 0

128

1” =

121

1” =

MECHANICAL PLANS | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

FIRST FLOOR

122

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

SECOND FLOOR

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | MECHANICAL PLANS

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

THIRD FLOOR

1” = 8’

FOURTH FLOOR 0

123

MECHANICAL PLANS | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

FIFTH FLOOR

124

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

SIXTH FLOOR

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | MECHANICAL PLANS

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

SEVENTH FLOOR

1” = 8’

EIGHTH FLOOR 0

125

REFLECTED CEILING PLANS | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

FIRST FLOOR

126

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

SECOND FLOOR

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | REFLECTED CEILING PLANS

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

THIRD FLOOR

1” = 8’

FOURTH FLOOR 0

127

REFLECTED CEILING PLANS | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

FIFTH FLOOR

128

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

SIXTH FLOOR

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | REFLECTED CEILING PLANS

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

SEVENTH FLOOR

1” = 8’

EIGHTH FLOOR 0

129

CALCULATIONS | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION Location:

Surface

Philadelphia

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

R-Values

Roof

Location:

Surface

Philadelphia

28.9

Walls

31.085

Windows

Walls

6.85

Windows

Comments Project Floor Area:

130175

Exterior Surface Area:

q = UA x DETD (Design Equivalanet Temperature Difference)

1952625 15 ft floors

Volume/Ext. Surface Area:

Surface

0.0346

31.085

0.0322

6.85

0.1460

DETD

Masonry

26.63735949

q (Walls - Masonry) =

5283.310278

q (Walls - Frame) =

UA Building Skin Area

U 28.9

Qi Envelope (Gains through Roof and Walls)

73304

Volume:

R-Values

Roof

23733

28.9

0.0346

821.211

Walls

18453

31.085

0.0322

593.630

Windows

54851

6.85

0.1460

8007.445

q (Roof) =

8849.854671

q (Envelope) =

14133.16495

8.9 F

Frame Walls

7.6 F

Roof

36.6 F

9422.287 BTU/h-F

UA (skin) = UA Infiltration UA (infiltration) =

ACH x Volume ft^3 x 0.018

ACH

Air change per hour = Constant =

0.6

519,860 BTU/h

q (North) =

27,700 BTU/h

q (North West) = UA Total UA (total) =

UA (skin) + UA (infiltration)

235,846 BTU/h

E&W

69 BTU/h-SF

SE & SW

60 BTU/h-SF

590,414 BTU/h

South

889,962 BTU/h

Skylight

34 BTU/h-SF 140 BTU/h-SF

531,162 BTU/h 2,794,944 BTU/h

Qi Infiltration (Gains from Outdoor)

Total * (Occupied Time / 24 hrs) 1.25 BTU/h-ft^2

Qi (internal Gain) =

20 BTU/h-SF 47 BTU/h-SF

q (North East) =

q (Glass Total)

Qi Internal Gain (People, Equipment, Lighting) Qi (internal Gain) =

North NE & NW

q (West) = q (East) =

30510.637 BTU/h-F

UA (total) =

Surface Direction DCLF

q = Area x DCLF q (South) =

21088.35 BTU/h-F

UA (infiltration) =

Qi Glass (Gains through Glass)

0.018

q (inf) = A(exposed) x infiltration factor

Internal Use Stuff People

1.9 BTU/h-ft^2

Equipment

0.6 BTU/h-ft^2

Lighting

0.5 BTU/h-ft^2 Total =

Occupied Time

Area of Exposed Walls Area =

73304 SF

66706.64

q (inf) =

Infiltration Factor Infiltration =

3 BTU/h-ft^2

0.91

10 hr

Qi Internal Gain (People, Equipment, Lighting) Qi (internal Gain) = [Total * (Occupied Time / 24 hrs)] * Floor Area Solar Gain =

((VS) x South Window Area) / 24hr 504570 BTU/h

Solar Gain =

Solar Insulation in JAN. through SOUTH glazing - (VS) =

792 BTU/day-ft^2

- (HS) =

555 BTU/day-ft^2

Qi (internal Gain) =

162718.75 BTU/h

Internal Use Stuff People

1.9 BTU/h-ft^2

Equipment

0.6 BTU/h-ft^2

Lighting

0.5 BTU/h-ft^2 Total =

Qi =

Occupied Time

Qi (Internal Gain) x Project Floor Area + Solar Gain

Sensible Heat Gain Total

667288.75

Qi =

q (Sensible heat) = q(Envelope) + q(Glass Total) + q(Infiltration) + q(Internal) q (Sensible heat) =

3,038,502.55 BTU/h

tb (Balance Point Temp)

tb (Balance Point Temp) =

Interior Temp - (Qi / UAtotal)

Interior Temp =

70 F

Glass Total Infiltration

48.1293076 F

BALANCE POINT TEMPERATURE

Internal Latent Heat Gain

COOLING LOAD

q (Latent Heat) = 0.20 x q(Sensible Heat)

607,700.51 BTU/h

q (Latent Heat) =

130

Qi Envelope

tb (Balance Point Temp) =

3 BTU/h-ft^2 10 hr

Total Heat Gain = q(v) q (Total Heat) = q(Sensible Heat) + (Latent Heat)

14133.16495 BTU/h 2,794,944 BTU/h 66706.64 BTU/h 162718.75 BTU/h

Glass Total

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

2,794,944 BTU/h

Infiltration

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | CALCULATIONS

66706.64 BTU/h

Internal

162718.75 BTU/h

Latent Heat Gain

Annual Energy

q (Latent Heat) = 0.20 x q(Sensible Heat)

Heating 607,700.51 BTU/h

q (Latent Heat) =

801,599,855.80 BTU

Cooling

Total Heat Gain = q(v)

859,875.54 kWh/yr

Annual Energy - Heating in kWh

q (Total Heat) = q(Sensible Heat) + (Latent Heat)

Heating(kWh) = Heating(BTU) x (1kBTU/1000BTU) x (1kWH/3.412 kBTU)

3,646,203.07 BTU/h

q (Total Heat) =

234,935.48 kWh

Heating(kWh) = Tons of Cooling Required Cooling Required = q(Total Heat) / (12,000 BTH/h) Cooling Required =

303.8502555 Tons 1km/h = 0.62 mph

Total Annual Energy

1mph = 88 fpm

Total Annual Energy(kWh) = EUI x Building SF x 1kWH/3.412 kBTU

Cooling Capacity of Outdoor Air via Cross Ventilation Average Wind Speed - Equivalent

q(v) = V x 1.1 x ΔT q(v) = Cooling Capacity = Total Heat Gain

15 km/h

Rewritten to be

9.3 mph

miles/h

V = q(v) / (1.1 x ΔT)

88 fpm

Feet/minute

Numbers EUI (office) Building SF

Total Annual Energy =

55 kBtu/sf/yr 141,117.00 ft^2

2,274,746.48 kWH/yr

Total Annual Energy for Non-Heating/Cooling Temperature

V = q(v) / (1.1 x ΔT) 1,104,910.02 CFM

Indoor

78 F

Outdoor

75 F

ΔT

V = C(v) x A x v

Wind Perpendicular to Opening

Rewritten to be

C(v)

% of Non-HVAC Loads = %Equipment + %Water + %Ventilation + %Cooling&Misc % of Non-HVAC Loads =

65%

Non-Space Conditioning(Annual) = Total Annual Energy x % of Non-HVAC Loads

0.55

A = V / [C(v) x v] V = Volume of Air in CFM A=

22828.72 SF

Non-Space Conditioning =

% of Annual Energy in Building (Commercial) Heating

25%

Cooling

10%

Lighting

30%

Equipment

15%

Water Heating

10%

Ventilation

Cooling + Misc

1,478,585.21 kWh/yr

v = Velocity of air in feet per minute A = Window area needed in SF

Total Site Energy Use Percentage of Windows on Windward/Leeward Side

Total Site Energy Use = Heating(kWh/yr) + Cooling (kWh/yr) + Non-space Conditioning

Annual Energy Cooling

859,875.54 kWh/yr

Windward Side = Leeward Side =

Total Site Energy Use =

2,573,396.23 kWh/yr

Magnitude of Total Site Energy Use Magnitude = Total Site Energy Use x 3.412 kBtu/kW x (1/20000 sf) 439.0213967 kBtu/sf/yr

Magnitude =

PV AVAILABILITY # of Panels Needed

COOLING LOAD CONT.

# of Panels Needed = [Total Site Energy(kWh/yr) x 1000(w/kW)] / [Watts per panel x Peak Sun Hours x Days Per Year x Loss Factor]

EUI & PV

PV Info PV Panel

390 Watt

Peak Sun (Philly)

4.37 hours

Loss Factor # of Panels Needed =

0.8

5171.038423

131

# of Panels Possible on Roof Area Per Panel = Panel Length x (Panel Width + Row Spacing)

Panel Dimensions Length

3.25 ft

439.0213967 kBtu/sf/yr

Magnitude =

CALCULATIONS | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

PV AVAILABILITY # of Panels Needed

tb (Winter)

# of Panels Needed = [Total Site Energy(kWh/yr) x 1000(w/kW)] / [Watts per panel x Peak Sun Hours x Days Per Year x Loss Factor]

PV Info PV Panel

390 Watt

Qi (internal)

Peak Sun (Philly)

4.37 hours

q (Total Heat)

Loss Factor # of Panels Needed =

UA (total)

48.1293076 F 30510.637 BTU/h-F 162718.75 BTU/h 3,646,203.07 BTU/h

0.8

5171.038423

HEATING COST Annual Heating BTUs Heating Degree Days @ BPT

BTUs = UA(total) x HDD(BPT) x 24 hours # of Panels Possible on Roof Area Per Panel = Panel Length x (Panel Width + Row Spacing) Area Per Panel =

24.17025 ft^2

HDD

Panel Dimensions Length

3.25 ft

Width

6.52 ft

Row Spacing

0.917 ft

MBTU=

124,985.29 ft^2

Available Area on Roof =

6988 ft^2

Available Area on Roof Area

6988 ft^2

E = Annual heating BTUs / (AFUE x v)

AFUE =

0.95

assume 95% efficient furnace and natural gass with heat value, v = 1050 BTU/CF

1050 BTU/CF

803608.878 CF of natural gas

Annual Cost of Heating

Location Annual Cost

Average Heating Cost =

Philadelphia 10.73 $

0.01073 $/1000 CF of natural gas

Annual Heating Cost = E x $Commercial Cost of Natural Gas/CF

= Total PV area needed - Available Area on Roof

How much will it provide?

Cost of natural gas over past 12 months

Average Cost = Annual Cost/1000 CF of natural gas

Will it Fit? If positive, it will not fit

1094.7 Days-F 48.1293076

801599.8558 MBTU

E= Available Area on Roof = |Needs to be calculated seperatly. Must include 4' clear perimeter around the building and other required area|

Winter BPT

Annual Fuel Needed = E

Total Area Needed = Area Per Panel x # of Panels Needed Total Area Needed =

801,599,855.80 BTU

BTUs =

8622.723261 $

Annual Heating Cost = 5.59%

COOLING COST If summer shading is not provided the summer BPT will be roughly 10 degrees higher than the winter BPT. Assuming that you have some solar shading in the summer we will have to calculate summer BPT. July Solar Insolation, Heat Gain Unshaded South Glazing, June 21st, 10am to 4pm

Time

Angle

south-vertical glazing =

Window Area in Direct Sun

10:00 AM

59.8

12:00 PM

73.5

2:00 PM

59.8

4:00 PM

37.4

Total

0 SF

Summer direct sun window area: Average = Total Window Area in Direct Sun / 4

EUI & PV CONT.

132

Average window area =

OPERATING COST 0

Solar Heat Gain q(s_wdw), Solar Heat Gain = Heat Gain through South Glazing x Summer Direct Sun Window Area q(s_wdw) =

0 BTU/h

876 BTU/(day-SF)

2:00 PM

59.8

4:00 PM

37.4

END ARCHITECTURE |END Total

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION | CALCULATIONS

0 SF

Summer direct sun window area: Average = Total Window Area in Direct Sun / 4 0

Average window area =

Solar Heat Gain q(s_wdw), Solar Heat Gain = Heat Gain through South Glazing x Summer Direct Sun Window Area 0 BTU/h

q(s_wdw) =

People, Equipment, Lights Qi, Total Internal Gains = q(people+equip+lights) + q(s_wdw)

Qi (internal)

162718.75 BTU/h

= q(people+equip+lights) 162718.75 BTU/h

Qi(Total) =

Summer BPT tb (Summer) = t(i) - [Q(i) / UA(total)]

Interior Temperature t(i)

78 F

72.66681893 F

tb (Summer) =

UA (total)

30510.637 BTU/h-F

Cooling Load Hours, CLH CLH = [CDD(BPT) x 24hr] / [Outside summer design temp - Summer BPT]

Cooling Degree Days @ BPT CDD Summer BPT

2054.3 Days-F 72.66681893 F

3301.587236 hr

CLH =

Summer Design Temp =

87.6 F

Annual Cooling Cost Cooling Energy = q(Total Heat)BTU/h x CLH x (1W/14 Btu/h) x (1kW/1000W)

Estimated Cost of Delivered Electricity for Commercial End Users Cost

0.15 $/kWh

859,875.54 kWh/yr

Cooling Energy

q (Total Heat)

3,646,203.07 BTU/h

Annual Cooling Cost = Cooling Energy * Cost Annual Cooling Cost =

128,981.33 $

OPERATING COST CONT.

133

CITATIONS | DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

END ARCHITECTURE | E N D

1. https://www.thespruce.com 2. https://www.britannica.com 3. https://shop.arborday.org 4. https://www.ia-99.top 5. https://www.pinterest.com 6. http://www.ordinearchitetticomo.it/ 7. https://canada.constructconnect.com/joc/news/technology/2019/05/virtuoso-blazes-trail-clt-mid-rise-construction 8. https://www.naturallywood.com/products/cross-laminated-timber/ 9. https://www.dezeen.com/2011/04/26/metropol-parasol-by-j-mayer-h/ 10. https://structurecraft.com/projects/idaho-central-credit-union-arena 11. https://bramptonbrick.com/en/masonry 12. https://www.accoya.com/sustainability/ 13. https://www.aggregate.com/ecopact 14. https://www.armstrongceilings.com/

134