1-. What is .Angina Pectoris? 2~
Can heart disease be explained simply on a mechanical basis?
3 ? Have you considered posture as a neglected etiological factor i n heart disease? 4 c Do o steop athic lesi ons serve as primary.or seconda ry etiological f 8 c toro in he a rt dise a se? or both? 5 o 'JVhn t is t he most plausible explanation of sclerotic changes? C-. iVh -:;r d oes d i ab et e s cause he a rt disease?
Upon what grounds can a diagnosis of heart dise a se be made?
7 .,
8-. Upon nha t 9~
grounds do you consider that a he a rt is not diseased?
Is there any significance in the various relations between systolic, diastolic and pulse pressures?
~ 0 ~ Does the quality of the blood (~nemia-polycythemia)
influence oneis opinion as to the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of hcnrt disease?
ll - A.re the so called functional heart tests reliable?
1 2 . Is it possible to make an accurate diagnosis in the heart field without the bene.fit of complete and e::~acting history, physical examination and laboratory aids? ~3 .
Is electrocardiography of value in diagnosing. valve lesions?
:L4~ Ha s
electrocardiography ever any value without other diagnostic procedures?
~Sp
-~ . r-
Is it always possible for a specialist in cardiovascular disease to decide where .functional heart disease s t ops and organic begins?
路.路 Is soreness in the tissues o.f the precordium a symptom of heart disease?
17. Do es coronary pain always manifest itsel.f in the chest? 1 8 ~ ~bat is the usual location and nature of true coronary pain?
19,. What is "hea rt failure 11 7 20o What do murmurs mean?
2le Are you of t h e opini on that treatment of c a rdi a cs is useless? 22. Is i t n ec e s s ary to know the exact etiology and pathological lesion pre s e ~ t inn ; 1 r c n .case to efficiently treat a cardiac emergency? 23o 'v'ihat
n re the two principal \vayc of considering heart failure as f a r as t her apy is c oncerned?