changing tra ectories our journey to 2020
contents
Acronyms and abbreviations Glossary of terms
Foreword The vision of a better education system for all ... page 4 Introduction Joining forces to change South Africa’s educational trajectory ... page 8 The partnership model How it all fits together ... page 12 Spotlight on Covid-19 ... page 16
Programme statistics Learner Outcomes
... page 18
... page 20
Partnership Schools Message from Hon. FD Gade, Eastern Cape MEC for Education ... page 34
Axium Education
... page 38
School Development Partner: One World Network of Schools ... page 44
Collaboration Schools Message from Debbie Schäfer, Western Cape Minister of Education ... page 48
Common Good
... page 52
Initiative: The School Leadership Development Programme ... page 58
School Turnaround Foundation
... page 60
Spotlight on reading ... page 66
Acorn Education
... page 68
School Development Partner: Ark EPG South Africa ... page 74
Finances in context A pathway to sustainability ... page 76 Conclusion What next? Growing from pilot to evidence-based programme ... page 80
Frequently asked questions Endnotes
1
acronyms and abbreviations
CPD Continuous Professional Development CAPS Curriculum Assessment Policy Statements DBE
Department of Basic Education
DGMT
DG Murray Trust
ECDOE Eastern Cape Department of Education MEC Member of Executive Committee MOU Memorandum of Understanding NGO Non-governmental Organisation PD
Professional Development
PIRLS
Progress in Reading Literacy Study
PSO
Pilot Support Office
PSP
Public School Partnerships
ReSEP Research on Socio-Economic Policy SGB
School Governing Body
SLDP School Leadership Development Plan SLT
School Leadership Team
SMT School Management Team SOP
School Operating Partner
STF School Turnaround Foundation WCED
Western Cape Education Department
2
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Quintiles For the purposes of allocating and receiving different funding allocations, South African schools are divided into quintiles based on the socio-economic profile of the community in which they are located. Quintile 1 schools are located in the poorest communities, while Quintile 5 schools are found in the wealthiest. Learners in Quintiles 1-3 schools do not have to pay school fees, although Quintile 4 and even 5 may also be non-fee-paying schools.
Cohort A group of learners who works through a curriculum together; for example, a group of learners who begins Grade 1 in the same year and finishes school together in Grade 12, would be part of the same cohort. Collaboration Schools The name of the Public School Partnerships (PSP) project in the Western Cape.
School Leadership Team (SLT), also known as School Management Team (SMT)
Curriculum Assessment Policy Statements (CAPS) The national policy set out by the Department of Education stating what should be included in the curricula of schools for each grade in South Africa, as well as how it should be tested and assessed.
This is a senior team comprised of the principal, deputy principal(s) and heads of department within a school, who make important strategic decisions, oversee the quality of teaching and learning and/or who lead and coordinate school-improvement priorities.
Partnership Schools The name of the PSP project in the Eastern Cape.
School Operating Partner (SOP) A School Operating Partner (sometimes also referred to as an Operating Partner) is a non-profit civil society organisation that has been commissioned by donors and the provincial education department to work in partnership with a number of public schools to deliver high-quality education. The length of the partnership depends on the terms agreed upon in the service level agreement signed by the SOP and education department.
Pilot Support Office (PSO) This is the PSP project management office (housed within DGMT) responsible for coordination and implementation of the programme. Professional Development (PD) According to the Common Good model, Professional Development is made up of two main components: one-to-one coaching and group training. The coaching is classroom-based, time-tabled and happens weekly during term time. The aim is the professional growth of a teacher according to global best practices for effective classroom management and instruction. Group training happens regularly and sessions are focused on groups e.g. a phase or all staff who need to receive training based on teacher development priorities outlined in the School Improvement Plan.
School Governing Body (SGB) The South African Schools Act (1996) establishes that each school must have a School Governing Body (SGB), which is “a statutory body of parents, educators, non-teaching staff and learners (from Grade 8 or higher) who seek to work together to promote the well-being and effectiveness of the school community and thereby enhance learning and teaching. Democratic in nature, the SGB consists of the school principal; elected representatives (parents, educators, other staff members, and learners); and optional co-opted members who do not have the right to vote (for example, members of the community, or the owner of the school property). The majority of voting members of the SGB must be parents and SGB elections are held every three years.
Public School Partnerships (PSP) A collaborative approach to public school innovation that brings together government, funders, no-fee schools and non-profit education support organisations. PSP aims to bring additional expertise, resources, flexibility and greater accountability in school management into no-fee schools serving poorer communities in a bid to achieve greater equity in quality education in South Africa.
Transition or Turnaround School An existing public school that has joined the PSP project.
3
FOREWORD
The vision of a better education system for all David Harrison CEO, DG Murray Trust
“If
you want to support the public education system,
for better learner outcomes. These, we believe, are the
why don’t you just give money to the poorest
conditions under which effective learning and teaching
schools? Why do you want to run the show as well?” This is
can happen in schools that persistently under perform –
a common criticism directed at Public School Partnerships,
and which otherwise doubly disadvantage children who
and one that needs to be answered.
already enter school with learning deficits.
The problem with public education in South Africa is money.
Our simple diagnostic of the current problem in public
However, it is not only the lack of it, but also how it is
education is no revelation. Even though there have been
spent and what it achieves. To be clear, the funders of this
some improvements over the past 25 years, the patterns
initiative do not want to “run the show”, but as the response
of apartheid education prevail for three reasons:
to Covid-19 has illustrated, the days of strict ideological
*
divides between public and private investment and
too many children enter school unable to learn properly because of nutritional, socio-emotional and learning deficits;
provision of education are over. What matters is that all children have access to quality education – and that teachers and school leaders are able to provide it. At the same time, we recognise that universal access and quality can be compromised by commercial interests – not
*
too many teachers are either unable or unwilling to
*
too many school leaders (principals and SGBs) are
teach at the required level of competence; and unable or unwilling to lead well.
always, but sometimes. While each of the funders may be
Simply throwing money at an intractably inefficient
exploring different ways of achieving the goal of access
system does not work. This does not imply that govern-
and quality, this initiative unites the funder group around a
ment managers are not doing their work. Rather, it
common agenda, namely the non-profit and non-selective
acknowledges that, generally speaking, the vicious cycle
provision of high-quality education in public schools serving
of under-resourcing and underperformance cannot be
poor communities. It seeks to achieve this by strengthening
broken through top-down financing and management
the capacity of leaders and teachers within a more flexible
alone, for the following reasons: Firstly, the size of pro-
system of management and financing, permitted by the
poor subsidies that government can afford is inadequate to
education department in return for higher accountability
overcome the revenue differentials between wealthier and
4
poor schools. Secondly, with some amazing exceptions, it
socio-economic development. However, sustained scale-
is difficult for poorer schools to recruit and retain high-
up will require public resources. The hardest part – but
performing principals and teachers. The premise of Public
also the most critical – will be working with Government
School Partnerships is that bottom-up support to local
to ensure that the fiscal savings effected through fewer
networks of schools will have the greatest impact when
failures – not to mention the economic returns of higher-
the education managers – from head of department down
performing students – can be ring-fenced and channelled
and circuit level up – are supportive.
towards implementing the models in other low-performing schools. This will require us to work with the Department
Once participating schools start to function well, fewer
of Basic Education and National Treasury to gradually
children will fail, and the unit cost of educating a child
unlock public financing commensurate with the savings
through to Grade 12 will decrease. The State will not have
that we can demonstrate.
to pay to teach the same child the same content over again. If this partnership model became a new branch
Transforming a school – let alone the entire education
of public education, it could gradually be extended to
system – is a slow and resource-intensive process; we
perhaps the 5 000 schools that fail their children the most.
cannot expect major gains from year to year. However,
There are, of course, major operational constraints to
we can and we must show that children who participate
such scale-up, including the challenge of identifying and
in
capacitating high-quality school operators. Even at small
fundamentally different trajectory – because that will
scale, we struggled to find effective operators before
ultimately mean far better life prospects for them and for
concluding that commissioning new entities from scratch –
the children who follow them into formerly failing schools
built around a highly-competent, multi-skilled team – was
that are now primed for success.
the best way to go.
Partnership
or
Collaboration
Schools
are
on
a
While national Government and trade unions are currently
The other obvious constraint is the level of funding that
wary of the initiative, we believe that the tide will turn
would be required to scale up such support. Our view is
when we can show unequivocally that both the children
that funders will continue to invest in this initiative if its
in participating schools and children in the broader public
results show unequivocal improvement in the marks and
education system are better off as a result. We have this
lives of poor children. Its expectation of outcomes-based
confidence because we all share a common concern for our
accountability will become more and more attractive to
children, and have a constitutional mandate to put the
South African corporations looking to invest effectively in
interests of children first in all matters pertaining to them.
“The Collaboration Schools are making
a positive impact by giving quality education to learners from disadvantaged
communities at no cost to the learners and their families. The schools are equipping the learners for life through skills mastery and motivating them to compete against themselves, so they can be the best that they can be and reach their full potential.” Mrs Kugarakiripi, Acting HOD and Grade 1 teacher Jupiter Street Primary, Ocean View, Western Cape 5
“Collaboration opens new channels of communication for us as teachers. It helps us to find solutions
together with Common Good as our SOP. We learn from each other every day. It brings people in our organisations closer together. We create plans together that support and assist all of us to do better. It means a lot to most of the teachers because it provides extra work opportunities for the community and surroundings. Last but not least, we share the workload in order to provide quality work.” Siyanda Mrobo, Teacher Silikamva High School, Hout Bay, Western Cape
6
7
INTRODUCTION
Joining forces to change South Africa’s educational trajectory Khayakazi Namfu Programme Director, Public School Partnership
8
The
legacy
of
apartheid
means
that
more
in schooling that is attempting to change the fundamental
than 20 years after the first democratic
causes of national underperformance in the country. All
elections, education is still bisected by a sharp quality
other support initiatives seek to make change within
divide. Government schools in affluent areas serve the
the bounds of existing governance and management
richest 20% of children, while the remaining 80% of
paradigms. Venturing beyond ‘what is’ and charting a
children are served by poorer government schools with
different path for the public education system has naturally
minimal resources. The gulf only widens as children get
attracted interest from supporters and opponents.
older, despite South Africa’s high level of investment
Despite challenges in court and political pressure, our
in education – one of the highest in the world1. No
partners in provincial education departments remain
single intervention will have a transformative effect if
committed to our joint objective of improved educational
implemented without systemic changes to our education
outcomes through the provision of quality education.
system and the environments in which our children learn.
The Public School Partnership (PSP) Model
In an effort to respond to these structural challenges, a group of local and international funders – led by the 2
DG Murray Trust in partnership with the Western Cape government – began exploring legislative frameworks that
PSP’s intervention is uniquely positioned to tackle
would allow non-state providers to support the delivery
systemic reform through its model of shared governance
of education. As a result of engagements with senior
and accountability. The basic structure is a partnership
government officials and proposed legislative changes,
among parents, a public school, and a School Operating
a management team was established in 2016, known as
Partner (SOP). Together, their representatives constitute
the Pilot Support Office (PSO). The PSO was charged with driving an ambitious new initiative called
the School Governing Body (SGB). Through the SGB,
Public School
the SOP works with the school to create a vision and
Partnerships (PSP) – a five-year3 pilot programme launched
culture focused on achieving and sustaining high-quality
in five urban schools in the Western Cape as part of the
education outcomes. While the provincial education
Western Cape Education Department’s Collaboration
department continues its oversight of the public school
Schools programme. The Eastern Cape project, known as
and supports the SOP, additional technical capability is
Partnership Schools, began two years later, in 2018, and
provided or sourced by the support partner as needed.
operates under its own governance model.
Indeed, the core partnership is complemented by a
All participants of the PSP programme are driven by a
number of supporting funders, service providers, local
deeply-held belief that every child has the right to high-
community and advocacy organisations4 (see page 13).
quality education, regardless of their socio-economic
To participate in the programme, non-profit organisations
status, and that every parent and educator should be
are selected to be Operating Partners with no-fee public
empowered to provide it. We are committed to working
schools by the provincial department of education.
together in partnership with government and civil society
Partnership Schools are also identified by the government
to provide parents with the option of PSP to deliver high-
and can be existing public schools that are on a journey
quality education to their children as measured by learner
of ‘transition’ or brand new schools adding to their body
outcomes.
of learners each year. The type of school is important as
To our knowledge, PSP is the only sustained intervention
it has an impact on the way in which the SOP operates.
9
The pivotal role of parents, SOPs, teachers and leaders
Three key levers for change
Empowering parents Public School Partnerships are built around parents: although it may look like an external intervention, PSP’s aim is to empower parents to fulfil their governance role. The programme operates in a similar fashion to Quintile 5
Through the intervention of a SOP, Public School
ex-model C schools. In these schools, parents with financial
Partnerships is underpinned by three key levers
resources and expertise (such as lawyers, doctors and
for change:
accountants) are often part of the SGB and help to guide and run the school. Parents at no-fee schools seldom have
1
the same resources available to them and this is where
Greater capacity and support available to the
the additional funding provided by funders and the skills
SGB, school leadership, staff and teachers;
brought by SOPs to the SGB make a difference.
2
SOPs need to be flexible and sensitive partners
Accountability of each stakeholder – whether
SOP expertise, increased governance and the flexibility
it be the SOP, SGB, principal or teachers –
granted to them is critical to the success of the PSP
for ensuring that high-quality teaching and
model. We’ve learnt that the manner in which SOPs
learning is taking place in schools; and
partner with schools is crucial – there are sensitive power
3
dynamics that need to be navigated when introducing
Increased flexibility in the delivery of teaching
resourced and often under-performing school. How this
and learning to best fit the needs of the pupils
is done can either be the foundation for building trust and
within the schools.
sustained good relationships between all parties, or it can
an organisation and additional resources into an under-
set them up for failure.
This year, 2020, marks the final year of the initial five-year pilot phase for the three SOPs
Our approach to the selection of SOPs has evolved over
– common good, acorn educaTion
the duration of the pilot. Initially, SOPs were established
and school Turnaround FoundaTion
educational organisations with their own approach to
– working in 11 Collaboration Schools in the
school improvement. However, at times, these SOPs found
Western Cape. For the SOP in the Eastern Cape,
it difficult to adapt and innovate under the PSP model.
axium educaTion, working in eight Partnership
The outcome was withdrawal from the programme. To be
Schools, the pilot phase ends in 2021.
effective, PSP requires a level of flexibility and innovation combined with an entrepreneurial spirit. Additionally, the initiating PSO had difficulty finding blackled organisations and individuals to join the programme.
10
Are we on a different trajectory?
We believe this is largely due to the level of risk associated with a pilot project, as well as some of the negative press generated when the programme was launched. The
School improvement is a slow and incremental process
main criticism levelled at the pilot was that it represents
often preceded by early setbacks. Each year we have
privatisation of education, rather than partnership. This
learned new lessons and we are now starting to see what
despite the fact that the SOPs will always be non-profit
is possible, as well as the conditions required for school
organisations accountable to provincial government for
transformation. As we approach the end of the pilot
their performance.
phase, we have a deeper appreciation and understanding of the process. Our cautious optimism on the back of
Educators supported and empowered to teach
positive learner outcomes at the end of 2016 and 2017 Teachers are at the frontline of education. Every day, they
in the Collaboration Schools was subdued in 2018 when
face a myriad of challenges, ranging from overcrowded
results were slightly disappointing. The astounding 2019
classrooms to children with educational delays. As the
results are the early green shoots that have given us
Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS)
reason to believe that we are indeed on a different path
2016 revealed, 78% of Grade 4 children in South Africa
(see Learner Outcomes on page 20). The mission of PSP
cannot read for meaning in any language . PSP supports
is to give every child quality education. We have not
and empowers teachers to improve the quality of
yet achieved our goal, but we believe that as you page
teaching and learning through professional development,
through this report, you will see that our partnerships
classroom support and teaching materials. With a strong
have begun to make a difference. In the words of Nelson
focus on instructional leadership, principals, too, are
Mandela: “Education is the most powerful weapon which
given tools to navigate the challenge of managing under-
you can use to change the world.” That is why the gains
resourced schools to attain quality outcomes.
made by PSP are not only promising, they are vital.
5
THE IMPACT of Covid-19 Covid-19 shone a spotlight on the multitude of challenges that face the education sector. The pandemic has and will continue to impact and transform teaching and learning for some time to come. In addition to focusing Government’s response and support to poorer schools, our hope is that it should be embraced as an opportunity for innovation across the broader system and allow change to happen at a faster pace. In addition to highlighting the true value and role that schools play in society, the school closures increased the level of interest and involvement of parents in their children’s learning, where resources and circumstances allowed. The benefit of the PSP model was further evident through the steps taken to capacitate and support schools to respond and adapt (see Spotlight on Covid-19 on page 16). The impact of the pandemic on school performance remains to be seen.
11
the PARTNERSHIP MODEL
HOW it all fits together The Public School Partnerships model is based on a core partnership between parents, a public school and a School Operating Partner (SOP). Together, their representatives constitute the School Governing Body (SGB). A SOP is a non-profit civil society organisation that has been commissioned by the provincial education department to work in partnership with a number of public schools to deliver high-quality education. This core partnership is sanctioned by the Provincial Education Department. The provincial education department continues its oversight of the school, as it does with other public schools, but also manages and supports the SOPs. The core partnership is complemented by a number of supporting partnerships with funders, service providers, the local community and advocacy organisations.
12
funders
provincial education departments
Partnership SCHOOLS
Collaboration SCHOOLS school operating partners (SOPs)
Forest Village Leadership Academy Trevor Manuel Primary School Disa Primary School Boundary Primary School Jupiter Primary School Apex Primary School Langa High School Silikamva High School Zwelethemba High School Apex High School Kraaifontein High School
public schools
13
Dumalisile Primary School Ngadla Primary School Jongikwezi Primary School Zwelinzima Primary School Mgxabakazi Primary School Ntlahlane Junior Secondary School Hlabizulu Junior Secondary School Dumalisile Comprehensive High School
14
“Access to quality education
has long been a desire, but is now starting to become a reality. We are thankful for this partnership and hope it can continue to enable our children to reach their full potential in life, and to become contributors in our communities. Acorn Education can play a distinctive role in breaking the cycle of poverty and has given hope to our community.” K. Fredericks, Parent Apex Primary School, Eerste River, Western Cape
15
SPOTLIGHT ON COVID-19
keeping children learning during lockdown ANCO BOOYSEN CEO, ACORN EDUCATION
16
By 18 March 2020, the Covid-19 pandemic resulted in the abrupt closure of schools nationwide. As of August 2020, it was estimated that children will have lost between 30 and 59 days of school, depending on their grade6. While virtual learning was meant to help to keep children learning from home, the reality is that most learners outside of private and Quintile 5 schools in South Africa have limited or no access to interactive and internet-based learning; even if resources are open access or zero-rated, they may remain inaccessible due to connectivity issues or the lack of hardware in learners’ homes. For example, the main barrier to online learning for learners at Apex High School was access to data and for some, access to a basic smartphone. To respond to these challenges, Apex High School launched virtual teaching on 31 March 2020 via 55 Facebook groups – all linked to the Apex High Facebook page. The Apex High learners proved keen to continue their learning with average learner attendance close to 80% across all subjects. Educators recorded lessons on their phones or computers and uploaded these lessons onto the Facebook subject group daily. The Apex High Virtual School ran the full timetable in all grades from 8am-4pm four days a week. Forest Village Leadership Academy and Apex Primary School carried out their virtual learning by sending WhatsApp messages of video lessons and worksheets in maths, reading, home language and first additional language to learners. To ensure learners could access this content, Acorn Education pushed data to learners’ phones on a daily basis. We also launched our new Learner Management System (Moodle) at the beginning of June 2020 and through a partnership with our funders and BiNu - an interface that allows us to reverse bill the data costs to an external funder - our learners were able to access virtual schooling via an app on their phones or via a browser, completely data free. Where households didn’t have access to a basic smartphone or internet-enabled device, we loaned over 500 basic smartphones to learners. Educators defied the odds and empowered themselves to develop online lessons, compress videos and adopt innovative new ways of delivering lessons remotely. Thanks to these interventions and the educators’ commitment, by the time schools re-opened many high school educators had already covered the next term’s work. In addition to supporting their academic needs, we became increasingly concerned about learners’ general wellbeing, health and safety during lockdown. As such, our educators called learners on a regular basis to offer support and alert us to families that required additional assistance e.g. with food parcels or counselling. Educators completed a Google form after each call to keep track of learners who required additional support. We also appointed a part-time assistant social worker to help with the follow-up on these calls and act as an intermediary between households and our psycho-social wellness partner, Community Keepers. Community Keepers proactively switched to offer telephonic counselling and visited households to provide bereavement counselling when required during lockdown. Despite the challenges presented by the Covid-19 pandemic, school lockdown has helped to magnify the strengths of the PSP programme i.e. innovation, teamwork and the sustained support of educators so they feel equipped to teach learners - even in the most challenging of circumstances.
17
partnership schools
collaboration schools
2020 in numbers school operating partner
school
number of educators
number of learners
Acorn Education
Apex High School
22
909
Acorn Education
Apex Primary School
18
612
Acorn Education
Forest Village Leadership Academy
37
1 351
Acorn Education / PSO Transition
Trevor Manuel Primary School
38
1 557
Common Good
Boundary Primary School
18
519
Common Good
Disa Primary School
19
569
Common Good
Silikamva High School
29
780
School Turnaround Foundation
Jupiter Street Primary School
7
305
School Turnaround Foundation
Kraaifontein High School
8
333
School Turnaround Foundation
Langa High School
23
940
School Turnaround Foundation
Zwelethemba High School
16
608
school operating partner
school
number of educators
number of learners
Axium Education
Dumalisile Comprehensive High School
22
463
Axium Education
Ntlahlane JUNior Secondary School
41
251
Axium Education
Dumalisile Primary School
-
92
Axium Education
Mgxabakazi Primary School
-
61
Axium Education
Ngadla Primary School
-
240
Axium Education
Zwelinzima Primary School
-
157
Axium Education
Hlabizulu JUNior Secondary School
-
201
Axium Education
Jongikwezi Primary School
-
100
NOTES: 41 educators across all 7 Eastern Cape primary schools Number of learners extracted from Day 10 Numbers - dated 14 February 2020 Number of educators (excludes non-educators) extrated from the 2019 SOP Close Out Reports - dated 31 January 2020 18
4 school operating partners 19 schools 298 educators 10 048 learners
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
245
240
262
162
-
-
161
157
154
140
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
120
158
174
191
198
237
158
115
-
-
-
-
-
69
201
254
199
231
218
208
177
-
-
-
-
-
61
74
74
64
67
63
64
52
-
-
-
-
-
79
69
81
60
74
82
64
60
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
198
189
155
138
100
-
114
114
38
39
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
180
153
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224
205
213
170
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
149
166
165
128
-
R
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
34
75
125
141
88
12
27
23
30
23
26
23
23
24
40
-
-
-
8
16
11
13
8
9
13
14
-
-
-
-
-
9
8
8
10
5
5
9
7
-
-
-
-
-
28
44
23
27
24
41
29
24
-
-
-
-
-
7
22
19
18
20
30
24
17
-
-
-
-
-
13
9
14
14
20
13
24
23
41
30
-
-
-
12
13
9
9
12
18
20
7
-
-
-
-
-
19
eastern cape
1
western cape
R
learner
20
The Public School Partnerships programme
is dedicated to improving learner outcomes through increased school capacity, flexibility and accountability. The programme has a strong datadriven mandate and seeks to demonstrate success through multiple measures of learner and whole school performance.
21
learner outcomes
outcomes
learner outcomes
summary highlights *
A diverse range of project metrics provide insight into learner outcomes in numeracy and literacy across the Public School Partnership programme.
*
In the Western Cape, PSP schools (known as Collaboration Schools) achieved a 9% increase in the aggregated pass rates from 2018 to 2019 – the highest improvement to date.
*
Distribution of learners’ systemic test results in 2019 show a shift towards higher quality marks with more learners achieving 60% and above.
*
Early trends from the pilot appear to indicate that Turnaround Schools experience a decline in the first year as the school adjusts to new interventions and systems introduced by the School Operating Partner before showing improvements. This highlights the often complex and unexpected implementation patterns of school improvement interventions such as PSP.
*
Results from the first PSP cohort analysis in the Western Cape show a 22% point improvement in systemic pass rates and a 13% point improvement in average marks as learners moved from Grade 3 to Grade 6.
*
In the Eastern Cape, PSP schools (known as Partnership Schools) have shown a significant growth in early grade reading ability. After only two years in the programme, the number of developing readers increased from 6% to 66% as measured by the Early Grade Reading Assessments (EGRAs).
*
NSC matric results are closely linked to individual school contexts, but improvements in both quantity and quality are evident for two of the three high schools that wrote matric in 2019.
*
Ranking of PSP schools using external standardised assessments highlight the impact of home language on learner outcomes across the Eastern Cape and Western Cape. Future implementation of these assessments should enable the comparison of schools in more refined ways.
22
National
Senior results
(NSC)
implemented in 2017 at PSP schools and track numeracy
important
and literacy skills across all schools in the foundation
Certificate are
an
phase.
metric for Grade 12 learners across both the Eastern and Western Cape. However, because NSC results are
Efforts to obtain a project-wide objective measure of
available only at the end of learners’ school careers, the
learner performance in numeracy and literacy before
PSP programme has actively sought earlier indicators of
Grade 12 are underway. Standardised assessments
learner performance in these provinces.
provided
by
service
providers,
JumpTrak
and
In the Western Cape, these include systemic testing
Greenshoots, were implemented in 2018 and have
of numeracy and literacy skills in Grades 3, 6 and 9.
provided early insights into how PSP schools rank against
Numeracy and literacy are fundamental skills that
each other across grades and over time in both provinces.
unlock learning potential across all other subjects. The
The following section provides an overview of the
Western Cape Education Department (WCED) is the only
heterogeneity of learner outcomes across the PSP
provincial education department in South Africa currently
programme:
conducting systemic testing. The tests are internationally benchmarked and administered, marked and moderated
the Western Cape systemic results over time;
results are compared to 2011 baseline results7 and the
2
pass rate is based on the 50% mark.
3
In the Eastern Cape, measures of learner outcomes are
the Eastern Cape EGRA and EGMA results for foundation phase learners; the NSC matric results across both provinces;
based on Early Grade Reading and Maths Assessments (EGRA/EGMA) conducted by the local school operating
4
partner, Axium Education. These assessments were
the ranking of PSP schools using standardised assessments.
“The teachers at a Collaboration School
are true role models. We show our learners that we can also improve and learn from mistakes. Our teacher coaches are amazing, because they help us become better educators, better lesson planners and better class managers through a growth mindset and practical steps. So personal development is not just talking the talk, but we are also walking the walk. This is the future of education, because the learners, educators, SLT and Acorn Education share a common goal: striving for excellence – because just passing a grade or showing up is not evident of a growth mindset and won’t lead to our scholars’ success after school. Anneke C. Smit, Subject Head and Educator Apex High School, Eerste River, Western Cape 23
learner outcomes
1
externally to ensure objectivity and credibility. All existing
WESTERN CAPE outcomes
western cape systemic results Changes over time Complex social interventions, like the Public School Partnership programme, take time to demonstrate effect8. Despite early gains in 2017, the programme struggled to show improvements in learner outcomes in 2018. However, in 2019, Collaboration Schools in the Western Cape delivered their best systemic test results since the project’s inception. Learners in Grades 3, 6 and 9 achieved an aggregated pass rate across maths and language of 36% in 2019 compared to 27% in 2018. This is a 9% point year-onyear increase in pass rate, making it the highest improvement since 2016. Similarly, the average marks increased by 6% points from 37% in 2018 to 43% in 2019 (See Table 1, LHS)9. Comparatively, provincial systemic results indicated improvements of 2% and 1% in pass rates and average marks respectively.
TABLE 1 Percentage point movements 2016-2019: Western Cape Collaboration Schools Systemic RESULTS pass rates
average marks
Province
2%
1%
2%
0.5%
Province
9%
2019
6%
(vs 2018)
27% to 36%
37% to 43%
23% TO 22%
36% TO 34%
1%
2018
2%
6%
2017
2%
(vs 2017)
(vs 2016)
16% to 23%
33% to 36%
16% TO 12%
33% TO 30%
4%
2016 (vs 2015)
24
3%
1%
1%
1%
0%
When reviewing these results across primary and high
School. Turnaround Schools tend to experience a decline
schools for 2019, 27% of Grade 9 high school learners
in the first year of the programme as the whole school
passed the systemic assessments while 45% of primary
adjusts to new interventions and systems introduced by
schools learners (Grade 3 and 6 combined) passed
the SOP. For example, systemic results declined by 5% in
respectively. Overall, this is a 2% increase from 2018 for
Disa Primary between 2017 and 2018, but 2019 saw a 29%
high schools and a 16% increase for primary schools.
point improvement in their pass rate and an 15% point
Table 2 highlights these results for each Collaboration
improvement in their average marks.
School in 2019 . 10
The graphs overleaf show the distribution of marks scored
Zwelethemba High and Boundary Primary are the only
by learners in each grade11. In 2019, fewer students scored
schools where pass rates and average marks declined
under 30% and more students achieved quality marks of
between 2018 and 2019. Despite this, Zwelethemba High
over 60% across the board. The most pronounced shifts
continues to outperform its provincial quintile average. It
occurred in primary schools. Even though there is still a
is also worth noting that Boundary Primary only joined the
large number of learners who achieve a score of below
programme in the second term of 2019 and is a Turnaround
50%, the overall quality of marks improved in 2019. learner outcomes
TABLE 2 Percentage point movement 2018 vs 2019: Western Cape Collaboration Schools Systemic Results pass rates
6%
LANGA (14%)
5%
SILIKAMVA (31%)
5%
APEX (41%)
-6%
ZWELETHEMBA (22%)
30%
TREVOR MANUEL (44%)
29%
DISA (47%)
14%
FOREST VILLAGE (56%)
-7%
BOUNDARY (34%)
average marks
HIGH SCHOOL
2%
4%
25% to 27%
36% to 40%
PRIMARY SCHOOL
16%
8%
29% to 45%
38% to 46%
25
(34%) LANGA
7%
(40%) SILIKAMVA
5%
(47%) APEX
4%
(38%) ZWELETHEMBA
-1%
(47%) DISA
15%
(43%) TREVOR MANUEL
12%
(53%) FOREST VILLAGE
6%
(41%) BOUNDARY
-3%
WESTERN CAPE outcomes
GRAPH 1 Distribution of learners’ systemic marks by grade: 2018 vs 2019 30
GRADE
3
% of learners
25 20 15 10 5 0
0-19%
20-29%
30-39%
40-49%
learnErs scoring < 50%
50-59%
60-69%
70-79%
80-100%
learnErs scoring > 50%
30
GRADE
6
% of learners
25 20 15 10 5 0
0-19%
20-29%
30-39%
40-49%
learnErs scoring < 50%
50-59%
60-69%
70-79%
80-100%
learnErs scoring > 50%
30
GRADE
9
% of learners
25 20 15 10 5 0
0-19%
20-29%
30-39%
40-49%
learnErs scoring < 50%
26
50-59%
60-69%
70-79%
80-100%
learnErs scoring > 50%
Cohort evaluation One of the most compelling measures of progress is to track the same group of learners over time, as they move from Grade 3 to Grade 6 three years later12. Table 3 illustrates this for the group of learners at: Forest Village Leadership Academy, Trevor Manual Primary, Boundary Primary (which joined the programme in 2019), Disa Primary and Oranjekloof Primary (which exited the programme at the end of 2018). The table highlights the findings from this cohort analysis across school grades and subjects. Overall, learners in these schools showed a 22% point improvement in systemic pass rates and a 13% point improvement. For comparison, the average trend is for schools to show a slight decrease over this time. Learner improvements varied across subjects for each school. For example, 25% of learners from Forest Village Leadership Academy who were in Grade 3 in 2016 passed Grade 3 language, while 42% passed maths. In 2019, 64% of them, now Grade 6 learners, passed language, while 51% passed maths. This is a 39% and 8% point improvement respectively – a remarkable outcome when compared to the provincial partnerships between educators, learners and committed partners.
TABLE 3 Changes in pass rates and average marks for learners who moved from Grade 3 in 2016 to Grade 6 in 2019
pass rate GRADE
3
FOREST VILLAGE
oranjekloof
TREVOR MANUEl
BOUNDARY
DISA
average %
GRADE
6
Maths
42%
51%
Language
25%
64%
Maths
21%
36%
Language
7%
18%
Maths
15%
62%
Language
7%
18%
average marks
impact on cohort, 3 years later
8% 39% 15% 11% 47% 11% -2%
GRADE
3
GRADE
6
46%
51%
37%
54%
31%
43%
22%
34%
27%
55%
22%
32%
impact on cohort, 3 years later
5% 17% 12% 12% 28% 10% 3% 15%
Maths
34%
32%
40%
43%
Language
11%
40%
29%
28%
43%
Maths
28%
63%
36%
53%
Language
21%
44%
34% 23%
32%
46%
17% 14%
21%
43%
22%
32%
45%
13%
27
learner outcomes
improvement of only 3%. We believe these results are early indications of what is possible with strong
eaSTERN CAPE outcomes
eastern cape outcomes a tale of two years Partnership Schools in the Eastern Cape include seven comparatively smaller primary schools and one high school. These schools cater for over 1 700 learners in the Amajingqi area, near Willowvale, and have formed part of the broader Public School Partnership programme since 2018. The Early Grade Reading and Maths Assessments (EGRA/EGMA) conducted at regular intervals show promising results. Graph 2 below demonstrates improvements in reading skills for foundation phase learners as they moved from Grade 1 in 2017 to Grade 3 in 2019. After two years of participating in the PSP programme, there has been a significant reduction in the number of non-readers from 51% to 12%, and substantial growth of developing readers from 6% to 66%.
GRAPH 2 Student reading skills over time based on EGRA results for primary schools in the Eastern Cape 100%
6
90% 80%
0
6
16
10
13
31
70% 41
60%
66
50% 40% 30%
37
51
20
20%
13
10% 0%
16
14
may 17 grade 1 (0/73)
may 18 grade 2 (6/90)
NOV 18 grade 2 (13/88)
Non-readers
Basic readers
Developing readers
12
NOV 19 grade 3 (10/101) Competent readers
Partnership Schools in the Eastern Cape committed to the implementation of external standardised assessments across all grades for the first time in 2019. The results and ranking of these schools against other PSP schools is discussed opposite.
28
National Senior Certificate Performance The 2019 NSC matric results saw a decline in matric pass rates for the first time across PSP high schools (see Graph 3 below). While this is disappointing, these results should be viewed in the context of each school’s unique journey. For example, both Langa High (Western Cape) and Dumalisilie High (Eastern Cape) showed a nominal decline of 5-6% when compared to the more than 20% year-on-year improvements between 2017 and 2018. Moreover, the quality of results at these schools has improved with an 8% and 9% increase in learners achieving bachelor pass marks for Langa and Dumalisile respectively. These results indicate that more learners who pass matric at these schools are eligible for university entrance. The dramatic decline at Silikamva High also warrants further comment. This school is based in the informal settlement of Imizama Yethu in Hout Bay, Western Cape. In March 2017, a devastating fire swept through Imizama Yethu, destroying about 3 500 homes and displacing thousands, many of whom were learners at Silikamva. A joint recovery plan by the SOP, management staff and WCED learner outcomes
was kick-started in November 2019 to address learner outcomes in matric.
GRAPH 3 NSC pass rates for PSP high schools 2010-2019
100% 92%
school nsc pass %
90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40%
68%
70%
56%
55%
74% 63%
78%
75% 76% 68%
58%
71%
40%
72%
56%
78%
72%
71% 60%
66%
50% 42%
46% 36%
73%
81%
78%
44%
39% 40% 34%
30%
32%
27%
20% 10% 0% 2010
2011
national average
2012
2013
2014
dumalisile
2015
2016
langa
29
2017
2018
2019
silikamva
TABLE 4 Ranking of PSP schools across provinces for language assessments in Grade 3, 6 and 9 in 2019 = collaboration school (WC)
GRADE
3
2019
GRADE
6
2019
GRADE
9
2019
= partnership school (EC)
school
term 3 HL average score
relative rank
languages
FOREST VILLAGE
68
1
e,a
mgxabakazi
63
2
x
dumalisile
62
3
x
TREVOR MANUEl
58
4
a,x
ngadla
58
4
x
ntlahlane
55
5
x
BOUNDARY
53
6
e
jongikwezi
49
7
x
disa
46
8
e
hlabizulu
44
9
x
zwelinzima
44
9
x
disa
67
1
e,a
FOREST VILLAGE
67
1
e,a
BOUNDARY
61
2
e
TREVOR MANUEl
54
3
e,a
dumalisile
47
4
e
jongikwezi
46
5
e
ntlahlane
46
6
e
ngadla
43
7
e
hlabizulu
38
8
e
mgxabakazi
38
8
e
zwelinzima
-
-
-
apex
57
1
a,e
silikamva
45
2
e
zwelethemba
43
3
e
langa
38
4
e
dumalisile
35
5
e
ntlahlane
34
6
e
hlabizule
24
7
e
30
Standardised Assessment Results across PSP Schools In an effort to obtain objective measures of learner performance across PSP schools, two private providers were contracted to develop and administer standardised assessments across all grades for maths and language. Results from these assessments allow schools to be ranked and compared. To date, assessment implementation has improved with 18 out of 19 schools participating in term 3, 2019 assessments. Table 4 highlights the rankings across all PSP schools for language assessments conducted in term 3 for Grades 3, 6 and 9 in 2019. These assessments were conducted in English (E), Afrikaans (A) and isiXhosa (X). It is interesting to note how schools across both provinces are more evenly distributed when language assessments are conducted in the home language of students in Grade 3. However, these results differentiate for Grade 6 and Grade 9 as language assessments are predominantly conducted in English and Afrikaans. The impact of home language and diverse contexts on learner outcomes across the Eastern Cape and Western Cape should not be schools, there will be more opportunity for comparison of learner outcomes in the future.
Summary The PSP programme has documented a diverse range of learner outcomes across its schools in both the Eastern and Western Cape. In summary, Collaboration Schools in the Western Cape have demonstrated a significant 9% improvement between 2018 and 2019 across systemic results for Grades 3, 6 and 9. In the Eastern Cape, improvements in early grade reading and maths skills show that foundation phase learners at Partnership Schools are laying the groundwork for future achievements in literacy and numeracy. NSC matric results are closely linked to individual school contexts, but improvements in both quantity and quality are evident for two of the high schools that wrote matric in 2019. Finally, standardised assessments enabling the ranking of schools across provinces show the clear impact of home language on learner outcomes. Future implementation of these assessments should enable the comparison of schools in more refined ways. As the PSP programme looks to the next phase of implementation post pilot, it will continue to explore diverse measures of learner outcomes that are sensitive to the context and complexity of the Public School Partnerships environment.
31
learner outcomes
underestimated. As standardised assessments are implemented more uniformly across grades and
Partnership
32
Public School Partnership schools in the Eastern Cape are referred to as Partnership Schools and have formed part of the broader PSP programme since 2018. Axium Education is the SOP working with seven small primary schools and one high school, catering to about 1 600 learners in the Amajingqi area, a remote rural area near Willowvale.
33
partnership schools
schools
government
working together for a common goal Hon. FD Gade MEC for Education, Eastern Cape
34
Chapter 2
African
implement interventions to improve the quality of public
Constitution deals with
education for learners in eight public schools in the rural
of
the
South
area of Willowvale in the Eastern Cape.
the Bill of Rights; Section 29 guarantees every child a right to education and Government is responsible for
I had an opportunity to interact with our implementing
providing it. Chapter 9 (Improving Education, Training
partners recently for the first time since I came into
and Innovation) of the 2030 National Development Plan
office on 27 May 2019. I was quite pleased with the
(NDP) also calls for all stakeholders (private, public and
interventions they have implemented since January
NGO sectors) to work together in delivering improved
2018 when they started working with the schools. Whilst
education. As the Eastern Cape Department of Education
I would not hasten to say that the schools are on a
(ECDOE), our Provincial Development Plan is grounded in
different trajectory, the data they presented around early
the NDP, but it is shaped by critical priorities specific to
grade reading for the primary schools and the high school
the Eastern Cape. We have identified the following seven
matric results for the past two years is promising. The high
strategic goals:
*
school, Dumalisile Comprehensive’s matric pass rate has
Improved quality of teaching and learning through
improved from 32% in 2016 and 38% in 2017, to 70.7% in
timeous supply and effective utilisation and
2018 and 65.5% in 2019. Our implementing partner, Axium
*
Adequate quality infrastructure provided on the basis
*
Provision of quality Learning and Teaching Support
Education, reported that PSP schools’ foundation phase perform significantly better than an estimated “rural
of a data- driven infrastructure plan.
average” on Early Grade Reading Assessment (both on the percentage of children reading at Grade Level, and
Materials (LTSM) and furniture to all schools through
the percentage of children who cannot read a single
data-driven planning and provisioning.
* *
Improved assessment of learning.
*
Improved school functionality through effective
*
Improved learning outcomes through partnerships
word). They also highlighted some operational challenges such as debilitating infrastructure, learner transport and
Improved quality of Grade R teaching and learning
resource shortages, which have hindered the work that
through training of teachers and provision of readers.
they do with the schools. It is our intention to assist the project to achieve its objectives and, in this regard, a
governance, management and monitoring.
team of different directorates will visit the schools at the appropriate time to address the identified challenges.
and stakeholder engagement.
We are grateful to our PSP funding partners for the
The objective of improved learning outcomes through
resources they have invested to support our schools.
partnerships led to us signing a Memorandum of
The task of providing quality education to every child is
Understanding with the PSP project funders, represented
enormous and will only be realised when all stakeholders
by the DG Murray Trust. We decided to be involved
work collaboratively and in partnership towards a
precisely because of the understanding that education
common goal.
improvement in the province requires collaboration among different stakeholders. We decided to pilot PSP as
Hon. FD Gade MEC for Education, Eastern Cape
one of our tailored improvement initiatives to strengthen the quality of public schools, demonstrate effective models of public school improvement, strengthen public school governance models, develop educators, and
35
partnership schools
development of teachers.
36
“The Public School Partnership programme has had a positive impact in my school. It has
capacitated the SMT, the principal and Learner Representative Council (LRC) members to become better in terms of performing their duties. It has encouraged accountability in the school leadership and management. PSP has also supplied my school with different resources. It has improved our financial management systems and trained our SGB members.” Mr Siphenathi Ncebetha, Principal Dumalisile Comprehensive High School, Willowvale, Eastern Cape
37
school operating partner
innovating to unlock the potential IN rural schools CRAIG PAXTON Executive Director, AXIUM EDUCATION
“Axium Education’s mission is to raise learner achievement in rural South African communities. We believe there is a vast amount of untapped potential in every rural student, teacher, community and school. Our vision is to see that potential realised so that every rural student leaves school with purpose, agency and options. Axium was started in 2009 and is based in the village of Zithulele in the rural Eastern Cape.”
38
Why did you decide to join a pilot of this nature?
What are your key learnings from the pilot?
We were drawn by a combination of factors: the need,
We’ve been able to attract some high-quality people to
a recognition of the complex factors that have made
live and work in one of the most remote locations in the
rural schooling very challenging – and what this has
country. There is real appetite for this work, particularly
meant for the students and teachers ‘left behind’ in these
among people who call the Eastern Cape home.
schools; the fit, a sense that much of our previous work
When it comes to supporting and managing multiple
and research might find full expression in the context of
schools, learner numbers are not a sufficient consideration
a PSP school; and the opportunity to try something new,
when assessing how best to deploy resources and
challenging and different – something that might have
support. Our group of eight schools includes a number
significant impact if we can get to the ‘other side’ of the
of very small schools (fewer than 90 students), but still
learning curve!
require roughly equal amounts of time for those on our team working on school leadership and governance,
and investment can bring to an organisation. So, while
infrastructure, etc. In other words, there is some ‘magic
that growth has at times been uncomfortable, it has
formula’ for determining efficient investment in schools,
brought some great people into our team that we
which should include both learner numbers and number
would otherwise not have been able to attract. It has
of schools.
also brought us into a relationship with the One World
The research is clear: school leaders make a critical
Network of Schools13, which has been our development
difference to student learning. So, it should have come
partner. There is no doubt that we are a better, more
as no surprise to us that leadership is the number-one
professional organisation as a result.
determinant of the functionality of each of our schools; somehow, we continue to be struck by just how important this is.
How would you describe your journey with PSP?
For a number of years, we have helped senior school students apply for colleges and universities. The
Stimulating and challenging! Our particular community of
connection between purpose, agency and options – the
eight PSP schools is located three hours’ drive from our
three things we hope all our students leave school with
home office in Zithulele Village. This has meant added
– has proved vital in our PSP work, too. At Dumalisile
complexity in terms of travel, remote support and a new
Comprehensive High School, for example, as students
Axium team located on site. Additionally, our budget and
learn more about career options, their sense of purpose
staffing have grown rapidly in ways that put strain on
increases, which in turn increases their sense of agency
our operations and senior management capacity – and
and
all of this before one even contemplates the complex
performance. It’s not just about hammering home the
school improvement work itself. Two years in, we are now
need to pass matric; it’s about connecting the dots
beginning to understand what is required to shift student
and helping learners to see the bigger picture of their
learning – and are hopeful that results will follow.
educational journeys.
39
motivation,
which
increases
their
academic
partnership schools
We were also cognisant of the benefits that growth
What advice would you give to potential School Operating Partners?
What gives you hope for the future? Our conviction, based on our experiences working
South Africa needs entrepreneurs and innovative thinkers
with rural students and teachers prior to PSP, is that
in the education space – don’t let the size of the challenge
there is tremendous potential in rural communities.
put you off! Many of the hard lessons we’ve learnt were
What
built into the ‘deal’ we signed up for, but for new SOPs,
* *
often
lacking
–
for
reasons
marginalisation of rural schooling – is the enabling
chances for success:
*
most
related to our country’s history and the ongoing
we would recommend the following to increase their
*
is
environment
required
for
people
to
flourish.
Start with one or two schools.
For instance, we’ve found that when learners find
Ensure new school selection remains within the control
themselves in a high-support, high-expectations environ-
of the SOP, particularly when it comes to school
ment, where they are able to connect their work to a
leadership.
vision for themselves in a career, they thrive. Similarly, when teachers are valued, are able to connect with each
Give yourself a good six- to 12-month planning runway
other in communities of practice, and receive regular
before taking on your first school.
feedback on their teaching, not only does their practice
Where you can, grow and deploy your own talent into
improve, but they become exemplars for others to follow.
this new venture in order to seed your organisational
All of this gives us hope that the doom and gloom that so
values and culture into SOP and schools.
often accompanies discussion of public education, and
Ensure your own house is in order first when it comes to
rural education in particular, need not be the future for
things like policies, processes and operational capacity –
all our schools.
there is enough complexity in managing schools without needing to worry about your own environment.
“It’s a good project; it’s as if it was designed for our community. Previously, people were not so eager to
take their kids to school, but now everyone wants their child to be at PSP school. Most of their schools had been renovated. Support staff like clerks, teachers, tablet facilitators and career interns have been employed; it’s addressing the shortage of staff in the schools. PSP has created jobs in the community. We also benefit from PSP trainings and meetings.” Mr Malangeni, SGB Member Dumalisile Comprehensive High School, Willowvale, Eastern Cape
40
CASE STUDY
ESTABLISHING A CLEAR FRAMEWORK OF ACCOUNTABILITY Eighteen months into the pilot, Craig Paxton, Axium’s Executive Director was, very diplomatically, called into a meeting with the Dumalisile Comprehensive High School SMT. In the meeting, the principal tactfully explained that they didn’t know what to do with Axium. Did they report to us or did we report to them? Were we there solely to support implementation, or did we in fact have a stronger accountability role? And if so, what did this mean for their existing relationships with the Department of Education, such as the principal’s accountability line to the Circuit Manager? All of this felt uncomfortable and the SMT didn’t
Of course, what this meeting did was to highlight what is possibly the critical piece of this partnership, at least in the Eastern Cape version, where the accountability framework is more open to interpretation – even if partnerships look a little different from school to school, there needs to be agreement on who is responsible for what and to whom. We promised to come back to them after having done some more thinking and research. It turns out that in other contexts, when new and different schooling models were introduced, the question of reporting and accountability lines were not necessarily any clearer cut than in our situation, and that these lines need to be hammered out in the fire of everyday schooling, so that they make practical sense to all involved. Our first attempt at this refining process involved engaging our very receptive and proactive Circuit Manager with a first draft at an accountability framework. We suggested how Axium and the Department might play complementary roles in the support and accountability of schools, and how communication might flow in a way that would support this. With his input and blessing, Axium’s Mr Paxton returned to the high school some months later to present this framework for further comment. We now have a working document – the real test of which will come in the months ahead.
41
partnership schools
know what to make of it.
axium education’s school partnerships Ntlahlane Junior Secondary School Founded in around 1935, now the largest primary school in the area with about 250 learners.
Dumalisile primary School A small school of about 90 learners, Dumalisile has three teachers covering Grades 1-7, with no administrative support. The school, founded in 1917 by King Zwelinzima, is scheduled for merger with Zwelinzima Junior School, but there has been divided sentiment about this in the community.
Dumalisile Comprehensive High School Prior to Axium arriving at the school, Dumalisile High School had not had a principal for four years. The school has a technical stream that is taken by about 30% of the students – based on the vision of the Chief for comprehensive education when the school was opened in 1999. Matric pass rates have improved over the past two years.
Mgxabakazi primary School The smallest of our schools with only around 60 learners, Mgxabakazi has not had a principal for a number of years. While many of the teachers display immense commitment to the students and school, there are many factors that make it a tough teaching and learning environment.
42
Ngadla primary School Ngadla is the second largest primary school in the area with about 240 learners. Traditionally a well-run school, the retirement of the principal and loss of three senior teachers, have left the school short on staff and leadership.
Hlabizulu Junior Secondary School Hlabizulu is one of two junior secondary schools in the area that have retained their Grade 8s and 9s. It has around 200 learners and six teaching staff.
Jongikwezi primary School
more than one grade due to a lack of teachers). It has an excellent multi-grading exponent which, despite the strain, is working well in the foundation phase of this school.
Zwelinzima primary School The school was founded in 1994, and moved to its new ASIDI14 campus in mid-2018. The school has approximately 150 learners.
43
partnership schools
With only 100 learners, the school practises multi-grading (when one teacher is required to teach
school development partner
developing the next generation of school leaders Brian Sims Executive Director, one World Network of Schools
The One World Network of Schools is an education NPO whose objective is to improve student achievement by developing the next generation of school leaders in under-resourced communities. In 2019, it became the development partner for Partnership Schools in the Eastern Cape, supporting Axium Education.
44
One
World Network of Schools is an education
leading workshops and helping to create monitoring
non-profit whose mission is to improve
tools, as well as providing ongoing guidance.
student achievement by developing the next generation
*
of school leaders in under-resourced communities around the world. We currently operate in eight countries on four
Organisational health: supporting the leadership team with essential elements of a healthy organisation, including annual strategic priorities,
continents, supporting and training over 3 500 leaders
talent recruitment and development, team meeting
who serve more than 1 275 000 students.
purposes and patterns, and other operational necessities.
One World’s expertise is instructional leadership. We
*
believe that strong school leaders change lives – both the teachers and staff in their schools, and the students in
Strong schools: developing school leaders in the knowledge and skills necessary to run a great school,
their communities. Through tools and training, we focus
including school visits/inspections and classroom
on helping school leaders develop the capacity to elevate
observations, weekly/bi-weekly planning and data
learning, which in turn accelerates life opportunities
analysis meetings, ongoing coaching and training
for young people. We engage with educators in three
sessions, and the creation and ongoing usage of
different yet inter-related, ways: Leadership Training
implementation monitoring systems.
Programmes, School and Network Improvement Support,
We’ve also had a specific focus on:
and Scalable Tools. Our experience has shown that One
*
World can have the greatest impact on an educational ecosystem when we are able to work in all three areas
Matric & Beyond: creating a tracking tool that the school can use to help identify areas of strength/need
– and over many years. For example, we have been
among the current Grade 12 learners as they strive for
supporting the SER network of schools in Mexico since
successful matric passes. This project has included
2013. Last year their students outperformed national
engagements with local universities and colleges, as
averages in reading and maths by more than 3.5 times.
well as potential employers; it has also expanded down in grade levels to include learners in Grade 9 as they
One World has been working with local educators
select their matric subjects, as well as Grade 10s and
in South Africa for several years. In 2017, we helped
Grade 11s as they navigate the curricular expectations
launch the Instructional Leadership Institute (ILI), and
for matric coursework.
we coached the leaders of a high-performing low-cost
*
private school. In 2019, we became the development
Early Grade Literacy: providing training and
partner for Partnership Schools in the Eastern Cape,
coaching to Axium’s Nobalisa teachers15, as well as the
supporting Axium Education, and since then, we’ve added
Axium coaches and teachers who focus on Grades 1-3;
engagements with Western Cape Collaboration Schools
priorities have been on the shared understanding of
and more Johannesburg-based low-cost private schools.
key pedagogies and effective use of existing curricular resources.
Much of our work with Axium has focused on the following:
*
In 2020, with the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, One
Strategic planning: supporting the CEO/
World has taken on a leadership role in supporting the
Executive Director with their three- to five-year plans;
PSO as it helps SOPs respond to the current crisis.
45
Collaboration
46
The Public School Partnership pilot project was launched in the Western Cape in 2016 with both new and existing public schools. Referred to as the Collaboration Schools Project, the pilot is set to run for five years until the end of 2020. The three SOPs working with Collaboration Schools in the province are: Common Good, School Turnaround Foundation (STF) and Acorn Education.
47
collaboration schools
schools
government
working together to deliver quality education Debbie Schäfer Western Cape Minister of Education
48
The
Collaboration Schools model appears to
held accountable for education outcomes.
be on the right track, but its effectiveness
Not every school has worked out as planned, and there
depends on fully functioning partnerships and sound
is always work to be done to improve each school’s
management.
performance. But the signs so far have been encouraging.
The Western Cape sees an increase of around 18 000
In the WCED’s annual Systemic Testing for Grades 3, 6
learners in its schools each year. Unfortunately, the
and 9, Collaboration Schools have on average showed
budget we are allocated simply cannot keep up with
increases in performance above the provincial average
demand. This makes it increasingly difficult to deliver on
– an encouraging sign of improvement at these schools.
our mission to ensure quality education for every learner, in every classroom, in every school in the province.
Overall, I think PSP is on the right track. Some lessons learnt are that we need more operating partners with the
When I was approached early in my first term of office to
right attitude and experience to manage tough schools. It
test a model for schools similar to the academy schools in
is definitely more difficult in a Turnaround School, where
the United Kingdom, it offered the possibility of delivering
some teachers are employed by the School Governing
better education quality at schools in partnership with
Body and others by the Department, and requires
private donors and operating partners who govern and
ongoing management and close co-operation between
manage the schools.
the SOP and the Department. I think it is important that
We started the pilot programme with five schools. The
there should be a person in the Department who actively
model was developed by the Western Cape Education
manages the process, as there are many issues that need
Department (WCED) with the assistance of Ark Schools
to be dealt with, from financial to people management;
UK (see page 74), who established a Pilot Support
and if these are not dealt with speedily, they can fester
Office to manage the Public School Partnerships pilot
and cause further problems later on.
project. Co-operative partnerships have proved vital in
A very exciting ‘spin-off’ has been that, because we have
implementing the model, and we appreciate the support
developed a framework and legislation for these schools,
of all parties involved in the project.
a number of schools – which were not part of the initial
Key to the implementation of the model was establishing
group – want to adopt the model, with one having already
a mechanism within the law that would allow us to operate
done so.
this type of school. We did that. The next important step was the signing of a Memorandum of Agreement between the WCED and the PSP funding group. The signing of Service Level Agreements between the Head of the WCED and each School Operating Partner (SOP), of each Collaboration School, is important to ensure Debbie Schäfer Western Cape Minister of Education
accountability for all parties. Collaboration Schools remain public schools. In the traditional Collaboration model, i.e. when starting a new school, the School Governing Body appoints all teachers, and the operating partner comprises 50% of the SGB – since the partners are also
49
50
“For me this is something so good especially for schools in under-privileged communities because they
provide additional resources that government cannot provide such as teacher, learner, leadership support and training, and the community can see the difference that Common Good has made in the school. The parents want to send their children to this school.” Fazlin Riley, SGB Chair Disa Primary, Bonteheuwel, Western Cape
51
school operating partner
BUILDING capacity and accountability Sarah Binos Education Programme Director, common good
“Common Good is a faith-based NPO that creates opportunities for those marginalised by poverty and injustice to realise their full potential. Our Early Life, Education and Employment programmes focus on three critical stages of human development when the opportunity to nurture potential and shift trajectories is most significant. As a PSP School Operating Partner, we exist to ignite and nurture the God-given potential of EVERY child through excellent education. Our goal is to demonstrate that within a growing network of non-fee paying government schools, excellent educational outcomes are possible at a feasible cost per learner. Achieving this goal should result in 100% of the learners within our school network being able to achieve a bachelor pass for matric.”
52
Why did you decide to join a pilot of this nature?
academic outcomes (100% bachelor pass rates, children in primary school all being high school ready, etc.). We believe exposure to exemplars would catalyse hope and
The most vulnerable learners in South Africa are found in
possibility in the minds of the leaders and teachers who
no-fee public schools. It is a great injustice that learners
serve no-fee schools. We were drawn to PSP because we
attending these schools do not access the same quality
believe that it is crucial to firstly demonstrate that the
education as schools in the leafy suburbs. Common
provision of excellent education is not only possible, but
Good cares deeply about these children and shares
also feasible in no-fee public schools.
PSP’s desire to address this inequality in our education system. We were excited to work in this space because it resonated with our vision for a more equitable society
How would you describe your journey with PSP?
where all children have access to learning opportunities that enable them to realise their potential.
It has been exhilarating – an extraordinary roller Education equality will only be achieved if we can improve
coaster ride defined by wins and losses, fruit and failure, and lots of failing-forward to accomplish, four
of learners in South Africa attend. We were drawn to the
years later, some noteworthy gains. It has necessitated
pilot because of its bold systemic vision and potentially
deep humility, relentless grit, perseverance and an
scalable approach to driving school improvement in our
unwavering belief in the vision of high-performing no-fee
most under-resourced school communities. Successful
schools. It has involved working collaboratively across
school improvement, at scale, has been demonstrated in
multiple organisations and with multiple stakeholders
many parts of the world and there is plenty of research
in a bureaucratic environment that was not designed to
that points to what enables this change. However, in
foster innovation.
our most under-resourced school communities there are
But, progress has been made, partnerships forged
unique contextual constraints that must be addressed to
and relationships built and strengthened as we have
create the necessary environment and capacities to drive
collectively pursued this common goal with a remarkable
change. We could not resist the incredible opportunity to
partner
with
numerous
stakeholders,
group of stakeholders. We have gained invaluable
including
understanding and insights into what it really takes to
local school staff, to develop strategies and solutions
create the enabling environment necessary to build
that would be relevant to our context, and potentially
capacities and accountability structures vital for driving
applicable to a number of no-fee schools.
school improvement in the South African context. There is
We saw this as a chance to immerse ourselves in every
early evidence that our primary schools are on the right
functional area of no-fee schools, which would grant
trajectory. At the school that we have partnered with
us the privilege of more deeply understanding the
the longest (Disa Primary School in Bonteheuwel) results
very real constraints hampering improvement, and the
improved dramatically last year (see Learner Outcomes
existing opportunities that could be leveraged to enable
on page 20). However, we are only just out of the starting
change. Finally, we wanted to help write a story that
blocks. In the next phase it will be critical to build on what
could communicate great hope in our nation. There are
works and rapidly address the risks we have unearthed
very few examples of no-fee schools achieving excellent
that could undermine progress.
53
collaboration schools
educational outcomes in no-fee public schools, which 66%
What are your key learnings from the pilot?
Repurposing this time for focusing on the quality of teaching, monitoring school improvement, and team building is key. Weekly principal and SLT development
Alignment between key influencers on the vision,
and coaching sessions have been instrumental. Teacher
mission and strategy for school improvement is key - this
professional development is a non-negotiable – there
is a partnership model after all: The key influencers in
are no short cuts. If we are going to improve learning
this partnership – the chair of the SGB (who influences
outcomes in South Africa, strategies that increase
the community and parents), the principal (who leads
the
and influences the school community) and the School
motivation
and
opportunities
for
professional
advancement of teachers are crucial.
Operating Partner CEO (who leads and influences the SOP team) have to agree on what success looks like and how it will be achieved. This is the agreement on which
What advice would you give to potential School Operating Partners?
the partnership is forged. Working with no-fee schools that don’t have a vision for or commitment to driving school improvement in a manner that is aligned to the SOPs educational philosophy is futile. This necessitates a
Learn from the many mistakes we have made in this pilot
slow but rigorous selection, a matching and onboarding
and build on our collective failures and wins. Be very clear
process that highlights areas of disagreement and
on your theory of change for school improvement and
disconnect prior to contracting. This process creates
your non-negotiables within this. Define the type of no-
trust, establishes mutual expectations and surfaces
fee school you would be best positioned to partner with
potential areas of conflict, which can be addressed early
because, whilst there are thousands of no-fee schools,
on in the partnership.
they are not all are the same – each has different assets to work with to accomplish school improvement.
Buy-in and ownership of the strategy from the School Leadership Teams (SLTs) and majority of the teaching staff is critical for success: Excellent schools are created
What gives you hope for the future?
by SLTs and teachers who are committed to driving change and constant improvement. In no-fee schools, leaders and managers often spend the lion’s share of
We have seen improvement in our schools. We have a
their time teaching due to overcrowded classrooms and
little taste of what is possible, but our hope is intensified
insufficient teaching posts. Principals are often isolated
when our collaboration across communities, cultures,
and their leadership is reactive as they face numerous
organisations and teams results in shared wins. We have
daily challenges as community and social ills spill over
worked with many incredible leaders and teachers who
into school life. We have learnt that key to driving school
want the same change that we dream of.
improvement are interventions that create the time and develop the capacity of entire school leadership teams to
When we witness the positive impact of our shared
lead and manage well. The introduction of learning labs
plans on the lives of our learners; when we see children
run by community facilitators, centralised HR, finance
laughing, playing and enjoying and progressing in their
and infrastructure support, and the creation of one extra
learning at school, it helps us to keep our eyes on the
teaching post, create blocks of time in the timetable.
prize.
54
CASE STUDY
Creating space – and time – for instructional leadership School leaders’ greatest priority needs to be the constant monitoring and improvement of the quality of teaching and learning in the classroom – we call this instructional leadership. In no-fee schools, dwindling establishment posts, operational crises, community disruption from gang violence and politics, and low parental engagement are often the norm. These factors combine to work against our central belief that a school’s core business is teaching and learning. The principal and management team tend to spend most of their working hours in the classroom, leaving little room to lead or manage. Whatever precious time is left, is often school leader to immerse him/herself in classrooms to gather data to inform the development and support of improvement strategies focused on teaching and learning. After nine months in Boundary Primary we were able to take some small but significant steps of change, resulting in the principal Mr Stanford Allies becoming more available to focus on the school’s core business. Boundary Primary Principal, Mr Allies says: “Common Good has created an extra teaching post; freeing up some of my deputy principal’s time, which means I can delegate to him more easily. This, combined with Common Good’s centralisation of operational tasks, such as financial administration, data capturing and infrastructure upgrades, means I can now schedule time for school walks, classroom visits and a quarterly evaluation of the quality of teaching and learning in my school. I have a weekly meeting with Mark Williams, Common Good’s Head of Primary, who coaches me on how to implement these activities and collect and use the data to measure progress and drive improvement. I have greater insight now, more than ever before, on what is actually happening in the classroom, and it has been a rewarding and enlightening experience. I am growing as a leader, and am better equipped to lead, support and challenge my own teaching staff. I have never been exposed to activities and practices that support development at school as much as I have through the Collaboration Schools Project.”
55
collaboration schools
spent reacting to numerous daily disruptions and district deadlines. This rarely allows the
“The Common Good team has
supported the school and, as learners, we have benefited a lot
academically. The exceptional support and team behind us make us so much more comfortable about working towards completing and passing our matric exams.” Ongeziwe Jako, Grade 12 Learner Silikamva High School, Hout Bay, Western Cape
56
Common Good’s school collaborations boundary primary School
Town. It was founded in 1964 and today serves 518 learners. Boundary Primary became an official Collaboration School in April 2019.
DISA primary School Disa Primary, just down the road from Boundary Primary, is located in and serves the community of Bonteheuwel. Also founded in 1964, it currently serves 577 learners and was launched as a Collaboration School in January 2018.
SILIKAMVA HIGH School Silikamva High School serves the community of Imizamo Yethu in Hout Bay. Founded in 2013, it is a Quintile 3 school with 759 learners currently enrolled. The first matric class was in 2016, and in the latter part of 2017, the school entered into collaboration with Common Good. In 2019, Silikamva High School relocated to beautiful new school buildings constructed on the same site overlooking the Hout Bay valley.
57
collaboration schools
Boundary Primary is located in and serves the community of Bonteheuwel in Cape
initiative
the school leadership development programme Dr Abraham de Villiers Head of Education, ACORN EDUCATION
Outstanding schools emerge when outstanding leadership teams refuse to settle for the status quo. In our public schools there is an urgent need for support and leadership development from those who have been promoted into management positions with no prior leadership training or experience. Common Good and Acorn Education initiated the 2019 School Leadership Development Programme (SLDP), aimed at building strong, courageous School Leadership Teams (SLTs) committed to transforming education.
58
Leadership
in South African schools
The SLDP ran from July to December 2019 across five
is often an overwhelming
Collaboration Schools in the Western Cape: Forest Village
challenge that can result in discouragement, isolation,
Leadership Academy, Apex High School, Boundary
loneliness and at worst, burnout and resignation. Lack of
Primary, Disa Primary and Silikamva High.
staff and other constraints demand that most leaders still
In
spend large portions of their time teaching, leaving little
2019
School
Leadership
Leadership
Teams
(SLTs)
committed
school
leaders
attended
the
challenges and opportunities faced by leaders in South
Development
African education, gave participants the tools to help
Programme (SLDP), aimed at building strong, courageous School
25
over six months. These modules explored the specific
With this in mind, Common Good and Acorn Education the
around
programme, which comprised of six modules delivered
time for supporting and investing in the people they lead. initiated
total
them grow an awareness of themselves and others, and
to
promoted personal accountability.
transforming education in no-fee public schools.
The programme also focused on the essential ingredients
The SLDP was designed to equip SLTs (comprised of
needed to build strong teams and how to invest in and
principals, deputy principals and heads of department)
develop knowledge, skills and abilities. Furthermore, the
with increased capacity to lead and find the collective
modules highlighted self-care and how essential it is to
courage to dare greatly. A core idea of the SLDP was
lead out of a place of personal wellness and resilience.
to communicate that most often real change is only ever
Participants examined the impact of stress and trauma
accomplished by teams of diverse people leveraging
and developed skills in preventing and coping with
their collective strengths, skills, abilities and experience
circumstances that increase stress.
towards a single-minded goal.
Based on feedback surveys following the training, the To lead an entire community towards a vision of educa-
SLDP was highly appreciated and well-received. One
tional excellence within and through the complexities and
hundred percent of the of school leaders who attended
constraints of our education system, and the social ills
rated it as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’, and 97% “agreed” or
of the communities we serve, is difficult, and yet there
“strongly agreed” that they felt more confident in their
are schools in South Africa that have demonstrated
ability to set priorities and development goals with and
this is possible. The best chance of achieving this vision
for their staff than before the training. As one participant
is through the efforts of exceptional SLTs who are
noted: “I truly have grown. I feel empowered on a level
motivated, inspired, equipped, and supported to keep
way beyond any leadership and management training
leading towards the achievement of their vision, whilst
that I have received in the past. This programme equipped
enabling an entire school community – staff, learners and
us thoroughly.”
parents – to go on the journey with them.
Building on the positive response from the pilot SLDP
The SLDP provided the start to a journey that recognises
programme, our aim is to make the SLDP an annual series of
the immense value of SLTs and the impact of their ability to
events to engender even more bold and innovative school
lead and create high-performing schools. The SLDP aims
leaders. Whilst the Covid-19 pandemic has prevented
to increase the capacity of SLTs by providing them with
another SLDP programme from being implemented in
the opportunity to gain new skills, knowledge and personal
2020, the goal is to extend the programme to include all
insights to lead and manage their teams effectively, but
Western Cape Collaboration Schools over the course of a
also to be good team players within an existing team.
year.
59
school operating partner
working together to provide a recipe for learning Eugene Daniels CEO, School Turnaround Foundation
“School Turnaround Foundation (STF) was founded in 2015 to ensure that all our learners are successful in all our schools, every year in every grade, irrespective of their context. We are committed to demonstrating that excellent learner outcomes can be achieved, sustained and replicated in our public schools through public-private partnerships. We are committed to doing things differently and doing things better. Our School Turnaround Methodology (STM) represents a disruptive technology that focuses on individualised learner education plans, a focus on learning rather than teaching, applying datadriven decision-making and applying extended learning time.”
60
Why did you decide to join a pilot of this nature?
(Worcester, Western Cape) as a School of Excellence despite the poverty and challenges prevalent in the rural areas. STF quickly had to learn how to shift from being
We decided to join PSP because it represents a unique
a service provider to becoming a SOP, which is a whole
opportunity to showcase that public education can
new ball game.
deliver good results at a basic level and outstanding achievements if schools are given the necessary support
We partnered with Langa High (Cape Town, Western
and resources to become Schools of Excellence.
Cape) in 2018 and this represented a new challenge, as a Transition School is very different from partnering with
Collaboration Schools and the PSP model enables us
a new school. In 2019, we started working with two new
to work closely with schools and, in that way, impact
schools in Cape Town: Kraaifontein High and Jupiter
more directly and therefore more effectively. STF is
Primary. This was particularly challenging as we did not
transitioning from being a service provider to becoming
have sufficient time at our disposal to fully prepare for
an operating partner. As a service provider we were
the schools’ onboarding in January 2019. In spite of this,
contracted by funders to support schools in an indirect
Jupiter Primary hit the ground running; Kraaifontein High struggled initially but has since gone to a whole new level
get involved in SGB activities, the appointment and
in 2020.
coaching of teachers, enhancing teaching and learning in the classroom and the management of finances. Most
What is even more pivotal is that the PSP programme
of our staff members were left feeling frustrated working
provides funding to the school and SOP, as well as
in the public school system, which does not encourage
support – from both PSP and ARK (see page 74) – to
innovation or ‘thinking outside the box’.
enable us to deliver on our mandate.
The PSP programme facilitates direct involvement in the
Our involvement in PSP has challenged, strengthened
running of the school and holds us accountable to deliver.
and supported STF to enhance its own governance and
PSP is forging a new path for public education in that the
management structures, methodology and organisational
pilot is working closely at all levels of the system whilst
functionality.
being responsive, reflective and collaborative.
What are your key learnings from the pilot?
How would you describe your journey with PSP?
One of our most important learnings has been that
Our journey with PSP has been an adventurous one. We
the flaws in the public school system cannot be fixed
have had joys, successes and challenges as individuals
overnight. Structures need to be put into place to create
and as an organisation. We had to grow our team,
an environment conducive to effective teaching and
deeply reflect and learn from our challenges and
learning.
weaknesses, toughen our organisational functionality
The pilot provided STF with the opportunity to use
and enhance our leadership and governance. We started
the experience and expertise of our team to train and
off in 2017 with a mandate to develop Zwelethemba High
develop school staff and school leadership teams. These
61
collaboration schools
manner. This had numerous limitations as we could not
What advice would you give to potential School Operating Partners?
are shortcomings in the public school system that have been neglected for years. STF, at the outset, realised that the professional development of educators has been non-existent in
Firstly, the founding members of a new SOP must
the public school system. Educators have been left to
spend at least six months or more to develop and
cope on their own in often challenging situations. STF’s
refine a methodology that is relevant to the objectives
sessions are aimed at the clarification and consolidation
of the project and the needs of the school. This is best
of the unique STF methodology to improve curriculum
achieved by learning from successes and struggles of
development, results analysis and remediation. School
previous SOPs. Good governance and leadership must
leadership teams and SGBs also benefitted from the
be prioritised to ensure that the SOP functions optimally
STF team’s expansive knowledge of the policies and
within the framework of legislation, policies and the grant
procedures to ensure compliance.
agreement. Secondly, the SOP needs to carefully select its team members to complement one another’s strengths and
What gives you hope for the future?
weaknesses. Orientation, training and team-building must be prioritised.
The fact that, generally speaking, our learners, teachers,
Thirdly, ideally a new SOP should partner with new
parents, principals, districts and education department
schools rather than Transition Schools. Often Transition
are open to change and embracing innovation in our
Schools have to undo decades of dysfunction and this is
schools. They recognise that the wisdom is not in some of
challenging and very much a long-term process.
us, but in all of us. PSP has managed to unlock and forge a unity of purpose where all constituents, on the whole,
Fourthly, new SOPs should have a clear vision and all
want to do things differently and better.
activities and engagements should be aimed at achieving that vision, which should be explained and agreed upon
Our key priority over the next few months is to harness
with all stakeholders. Veering from that path to success
this momentum by showcasing that our schools are
should not be an option.
producing learners who not only excel in a range of assessments,
but
also
as
well-rounded
individuals
Fifthly, building good relationships with funders, the PSO,
capable of contributing meaningfully to society.
the WCED and schools is of the utmost importance. The SOP should become an integral part of the school community; it should serve and not dictate, but should also demand accountability in an assertive manner.
“PSP has managed to unlock
and forge a unity of purpose where all constituents, on the whole, want to do things differently and better.”
62
CASE STUDY
THE SCHOOL RISING LIKE A PHOENIX FROM THE ASHES Partnering with Langa High has been one of the most rewarding and challenging aspects of our PSP journey. This story is best understood through a historical lens where the school built up a proud history of excellence when it opened its doors in 1937. Many illustrious leaders were educated at Langa High and have strong ties with the school. All of this changed when Bantu education and apartheid impacted negatively on the school, causing a range of challenges from weak leadership and poor governance, to ongoing conflict amongst staff members and mediocre learner results. The school deteriorated to such an extent that the WCED began to contemplate its ‘closure’. This is what eventually led to Langa High
Negotiations between Langa High and STF took approximately five months as Langa High had struggles with two previous SOPs. This extended period of negotiation led by the funders and PSO was critical to avoid previous problems from rearing their heads again. By June 2018, the SGB, parents, teachers and learners agreed to partner with STF to participate in the PSP programme.
A key success factor was the decision of the principal and SGB to embrace STF as part of the school rather than it being considered a School Operating Partner coming in from the outside. This set the stage to work as a team rather than the separate entities of SOP and school. STF had to reflect very deeply about our approach and methodology as the dynamics in a Transition School are very different from those of a new school. Rather than entering, boots and all, we decided to build strong relationships, trust and respect. The first few months were not easy but we eventually forged synergy and this led to a combined effort to work together to ensure the school would once more become a School of Excellence that would make everyone proud. This new sense of purpose, team effort and synergy between the school and SOP manifested itself in a dramatic improvement in learner outcomes in the 2018 Grade 12 results (78.1%) compared with 2017 (49.7%).
63
collaboration schools
joining the PSP in an effort to stop the school from haemorrhaging completely.
“I feel so grateful
to be in Zwelethemba High School because we get the best education. I’m also happy to have the best teachers. They develop our knowledge and they also taught us how to speak English fluently.” Sisipho mposwa, Grade 8 Learner Zwelethemba High School, Worcester, Western Cape
64
school turnaround Foundation’s school collaborations zwelethemba high School Zwelethemba High, situated in Worcester, is a Quintile 1 school with 607 learners. It opened its doors in partnership with STF in January 2017. It has been growing year by year. Its first Grade 12 cohort will write the NSC (matric) exams in 2021.
LANGA high School Langa High is one the oldest high schools in South Africa. It opened its doors in 1937 and has been serving thousands of proud learners and alumni ever since. STF has partnered with the school since June 2018. The school has grown year on
KRAAIFONTEIN high School Kraaifontein High opened its doors in January 2019 in partnership with STF. It currently has 192 Grade 8 learners and 153 Grade 9 learners. It plans to introduce Agricultural Technology as a subject in Grade 10 in 2021 to enhance learners’ career prospects and motivate them to enter the economic growth area of agri-processing.
jupiter primary School Jupiter Primary is a thriving school situated in the Southern Suburbs that serves learners from Ocean View and Masiphumele. It is a growing school with 309 learners from Grades 1 to 4. It opened its doors in partnership with STF in January 2019.
65
collaboration schools
year to 1 012 learners in 2020.
SPOTLIGHT ON READING
discovering our own super powers School Turnaround Foundation (STF) western cape
66
Andre Pretorius, Principal of Jupiter Street Primary School says: “The most important strategy we have to support our learners is our own reading strategy that we developed through Professional Development (PD) sessions in 2019. We added phonology (oral language) and alphabetic principle (multilingualism) to the standard CAPS reading strategy (which comprises phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary and comprehension). We believe that CAPS is based on the assumption that all kids who enter school in Grade 1 come from middle-class homes. Hence, they start with phonemic awareness where teachers immediately get kids to unpack sounds and letters and to write, especially their names. This is not the reality in so many schools. Kids start Grade 1 without a Grade R background. Many cannot speak English because they do not do so at home. They speak Xhosa or Shona, etc. so we have to teach them how to speak and read English from the very beginning. We do not turn away kids who apply. We do not cherry pick them either. So, in term 1, especially in Grade 1, we focus on the oral language. Many of our kids do not write this term. It is all about phonology, the oral language – hearing the sound, looking at the teacher’s mouth when she speaks. Then we unpack blending, both building up and breaking down e.g. b – u – s is bus, bus is b/u/s. This is working for us. We have put our own reading strategy in place so we don’t have to wait for Superman to come and do this for us. We know what we are doing to ensure that each and every one of our Grade 4 learners will pass speaking, reading and writing with comprehension, and not become one of the 78% of Grade 4s nationally who are not unable to understand what they’re reading – in any language, including their home language – as the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) 2016 showed16.”
“I love teacher for teaching me sounds, like apple and bus, and to speak in English*. I love the safe playground. I love the food from the kitchen.” ShaNtel Garwi, Grade 1 Learner, Jupiter Street Primary School *Shantel couldn’t speak English when she joined the school.
67
school operating partner
enhancing education and educational development Anco Booysen CEO, ACORN EDUCATION
“Acorn Education was set up as a not-for-profit company in 2016 for the purpose of being a School Operating Partner in the PSP programme. Our mission is to transform the lives of each of our learners by providing a high-quality education that will help enable them to realise their potential. We have brought together a committed team of both education specialists, who train and support existing educators in our schools, and staff experienced in operations and finance to bolster the efficient running of each school. As a team, we work across all three of our schools, striving to consistently improve learner outcomes.”
68
Why did you decide to join a pilot of this nature?
subjects to set them up for success later on. Holistic Learner Development: Where possible, we ensure
The WCED supports no-fee schools by providing them
that extra-murals, sporting activities and counselling
with additional per learner funding. However, fee-paying
services are available to provide all-round development.
schools have access to benefits and opportunities that
Educator Continuous Professional Development (CPD):
do not exist for no-fee schools. Acorn Education was
Leadership and educator development are at the core
conceived to provide additional skills and resources
of our approach. Providing instructional coaching and
required to reduce the gap in learner outcomes between
regular professional development to our educators
fee-paying and non-fee paying schools.
ensures excellent learner results.
Acorn Education is the conduit for funding from donors
Our approach appears to be working as independent
who share our vision of providing schools in need with
learner data shows improvements. However, we feel
opportunities for growth – both educationally and
our journey has only just begun and we look forward to
operationally. Acorn Education facilitates a holistic
continuing finding innovative ways to address challenges as they arise.
as sports, enrichment and psycho-social programmes, are
now
available.
Consequently,
learners
from
disadvantaged backgrounds receive the same high-
What are your key learnings from the pilot?
quality, well-rounded education as learners in more affluent circumstances.
A key learning has been that deep engagement with schools, when they are experiencing a challenge,
How would you describe your journey with PSP?
has
consistently
led
to
superior
formulation
and
implementation of solutions to those challenges.
We believe in partnering with a school and collectively
Engaging schools collaboratively in problem-solving
design the School Improvement Plan for each school with
increases their investment in the solution. Ultimately, we
the School Leadership Team (SLT). Every year, this plan
have discovered that outcomes are far more favourable
is revised and new priorities are identified. Our approach
when reached during consultation than when a solution
typically focuses on the following areas:
is presented without initial engagement with the schools.
More time on task: We have extended school days at
Another vital lesson has been the importance of recruiting
our schools so that our educators have more time for
staff who are committed to the PSP vision and mission,
home languages and maths with our learners. All learners
particularly staff in the SLT – getting the right people
benefit from this extra time to improve their performance.
on board is a critical step for the effective running of the
Enrichment programmes: Our schools benefit from
school and improving learner results. A disciplined and
enrichment programmes that strengthen our learners’
consistent programme, supported by a strong SLT and
reading and maths skills. These enrichment programmes
competent, committed educators, are key ingredients for
ensure our learners build a strong foundation in core
bettering learner outcomes.
69
collaboration acorn education schools
method of schooling where additional programmes, such
What gives you hope for the future?
What advice would you give to potential School Operating Partners?
We presently have over 2 870 learners who have been given the opportunity to change the quality and/or level
A SOP should not be constrained by the way that things
of their own education. Many of our learners are starting
have been done in the past. The landscape of education
to take ownership of their own education and attend
is constantly changing; interventions must be based
after-school sessions and holiday programmes, working
on what solutions are available presently and what is
hard with their educators to improve their own outcomes.
appropriate in the current environment.
The data shows that the education support and
When facing a challenge, consider what you can
enrichment programmes are having a positive impact on
realistically influence. Implement a solution without
learner results. We are pleased that parents have noticed
waiting for the perfect conditions as they may never
the positive impact of the school on the learners, too,
arise. And when a challenge is not easily resolved,
such that applications have increased greatly: in 2020,
seek advice from other educators or partners in the
one of our schools received 1 200 applications for the
wider education sector outside of the organisation or
200 available spaces.
immediate school community. Outside points of view will only enhance your ability to resolve whatever conflict or
Finally, the scale of the interventions is only possible
challenge has surfaced. However, the final decision must
in the PSP programme due to the size of many of the
always be based on the specific conditions and available
schools, i.e. the large size of the schools allows us to
resources within the relevant school. This should guide
extend our enrichment programmes to more learners.
one’s response.
This bodes well for the positive impact of the programme on the education system in the future.
Lastly, be innovative with your methods for improving learner results, while staying mindful of the potential benefits as well as the risks. Engage with experienced experts with deep insights, but also with the educators within the school, who may have a better sense of the solution based on their experience and knowledge. A solution crafted together with the school’s input will ensure emotional and professional buy-in, will be easier to implement, and will have a greater chance of success.
“Many of our learners are starting to take ownership of their own education and attend afterschool
sessions and holiday programmes, working hard with their educators to improve their own outcomes.”
70
CASE STUDY
REAPING THE REWARDS OF INSTRUCTIONAL COACHING Instructional coaching is an essential part of our model. By improving the skills of educators, the model becomes more sustainable as a high level of teaching becomes embedded in the system. As learners are exposed to the best education from the moment they enter school, the necessity and cost of future interventions will diminish. The challenge of instructional coaching is that educators are not used to having outsiders watch their lessons and provide feedback for improvements. Teachers typically have well-entrenched habits and techniques for managing learners. When a SOP begins at school, teachers are faced with new, invasive expectations. Not only must they attend additional training and development sessions, but most of what they have done to date in their daily teaching may change. Every aspect, from the way lesson preparation is done, to how learners are taught and managed, is scrutinised. This increased support of teachers requires additional work,
change management process was multi-pronged and included:
*
Engagement, first with the principal, and then the SLT, on the benefits for the educators in terms of both
* *
Intensive practical development and mentorship in instructional coaching.
*
Data on individual learner results were shared with educators and strategies were discussed and agreed
*
Acorn teacher coaches modelled different behaviours within the classes, which included simple tools to
professional growth and improved learner results.
Acorn Education instructional coaches engaged one-on-one with educators and explained the process of instructional coaching as well as the benefits.
on to address individual learner challenges.
make educators’ lives easier. The immediate results served as a motivation for the educators to learn new skills and make them more effective in the classroom.
*
Over time, educators’ misconceptions and fears surrounding instructional coaching were addressed.
The result is that instructional coaching has been taken up by the principals and SLTs, who now coach the educators reporting to them. This has allowed for the increased frequency of instructional coaching sessions, which could not have been achieved if the Acorn Education coaches were the only coaches in the school.
71
collaboration schools
especially for the SLT who will need to observe and review lessons of educators who report to them. Our
“If I tell you what we achieve
with our learners, you simply wouldn’t believe me – and that is because we have the support from our School Operating Partner, Acorn Education. People often say it is because we have more funds, and yes, to have extra funds is definitely a benefit, but what I value more is the support and training we receive from Acorn Education. One day, I am sure, the extra money will no longer be available, but then we will still have the knowledge, skills and values. In short, I believe that the Collaboration Schools model is the only way to fix a broken education system, and fix the inequality that exists within our system” Renate Van Der Westhuizen, Principal Apex High School, Eerste River, Western Cape
72
acorn education’s school collaborations Apex High School
high school that opened in January 2018 and has partnered with Acorn Education since its inception. It currently has 920 learners. The school will have its first Grade 12 cohort by 2021.
Forest Village Leadership Academy Forest Village Leadership Academy (Eerste River, Western Cape) is a no-fee primary school comprising of around 1 350 learners. The school opened in 2016 and partnered with Acorn Education in April 2018.
Apex Primary School Apex Primary School (Eerste River, Western Cape) opened in January 2020, and has partnered with Acorn Education since it began, starting with Grades 1 to 4, and aiming to grow to Grade 7 by 2023.
73
collaboration schools
Apex High School (Eerste River, Western Cape) is a no-fee public
school development partner
BUILDING capacity in school operating partners Jonathan Molver Country Director, Ark EPG South Africa
Ark EPG South Africa has partnered with the WCED and local funders to identify and develop local SOPs who can effectively partner with and support schools in some of Cape Town’s most challenging communities. The objective is to develop strong organisations capable of running excellent schools.
74
Ark
is a UK-based charity that runs 38 schools
the ultimate goal being a number of operators capable of
in England and supports a range of
delivering highly-effective support to a number of schools.
educational ventures focused on curriculum and teacher
Our support offer is then a combination of workshops/
training. Ark has achieved recognised impact in the
programmes for all operators where there is significant
education sector both in the UK and internationally. Our
overlap in need – this has largely been the categories
goal at EPG (Ark’s International venture) is to make sure
of Leadership Development, Teacher Development and
that all children are able to go to school and learn. We
Governance, the spine of effective schooling – and then
do this by working with governments to help shape and
bespoke support to operators’ individual development
strengthen their education systems.
needs.
In South Africa, we have partnered with Government and
Our work in the UK on Leadership Development, Teacher
local funders to identify and develop local operators who
Training, and running highly-effective schools in some of
can effectively partner with and support schools in some
the most disadvantaged communities positions us well
of Cape Town’s most challenging communities.
to do this development work here. Great leadership, and great teaching, both hold universal principles applicable
The objective of our work here is to develop strong
regardless of context. There have, however, been some
organisations capable of running excellent schools –
contextual lessons to learn and challenges to overcome.
with a strong commitment to improving the quality of
We believe we have learned these lessons by immersing
teaching, leadership, and improving learner outcomes for
ourselves fully in the schools in which our operators work,
children. We build capacity in operators through intensive
by listening well to the people we work with, and then
support, so that they are able to provide intensive and
adapting what we believe to be universal best practice to
relevant support to teachers and principals.
some of the uniquely South African challenges.
We have developed a rubric to support the systematic
For example, the extent to which many schools are
and structured development of operators. It outlines
tremendously
the key functions of an organisation, the key aspects of
under-resourced
requires
thoughtful
creativity when reconsidering the role of a principal as
education delivery at a school level, and key operational
an instructional leader. With lean staff structures and
functions at a school level.
bloated responsibilities, it can be difficult for principals to
Within each of these categories, there are three phases
focus almost solely on improving the quality of teaching
of development – Planning, Execution and Scale. Each of
and learning by providing on-going training, support and
these phases of development consists of multiple criteria,
feedback to their teachers. Instead of repurposing the
which school operators self-assess on a six-month cycle.
role of the principal, we have had to train senior leaders and heads of departments to do this work as well.
The goal of the self-assessment process is to conduct a thorough review of the organisation and the support it
As a result of this adaptation, and others, we believe
currently provides, in order to determine the development
we are seeing the early signs of promising progress in
priorities for the next half of the year. Our role, once
learner outcomes - the fruit of improved teaching, which
development priorities have been agreed on, is to
is a result of strengthened school leadership, facilitated
provide bespoke support to each of the operators – with
by strong operator support.
75
financials
Finances in Context: A pathway to Sustainability Anthony Hall Finance and Operations Manager, Public School Partnership
Between 2016 and 2019, approximately R191 million was spent on the PSP programme. This equates to around R7 500 per learner, per year – or a 40% increase on a provincial department’s typical contribution to these schools over the same time frame 17 .
76
In
terms of overall expenditure, some of the costs
activities can unlock the potential in SA’s most challenged
incurred were in the Research and Development
schools, then it could be argued that PSP releases not
(R&D) phase of the programme; the investment in
only its own value, but could also unlock the financial
developing SOPs as new organisations; and the high
value of government’s much larger budget that is already
programme overheads attributed to only a small number
directed here. Van der Berg et al. outline how grade
of schools participating. However, much of the cost is
repetition costs the national government R20-R29 billion
attributable to the hands-on personnel costs that are
per annum, or 8%-12% of total national budget allocated
required on a school-by-school basis, irrespective of scale.
to basic education and the cost of dropout to a learner, in terms of lost earnings, sits around R90 000 by the time
There’s no denying then that this has been a resource-
they are 21 years old, or R1.7million over their lifetime20.
intensive exercise, with limitations to the scale at which
This excludes the government cost of welfare to these
either private philanthropy, or even government could
members of society, or the societal value of having youth
expand across 1 000+ schools or one million learners.
progress to meaningful pathways beyond school, and
Brian Levy et al. highlight how South Africa is somewhat
into rewarding and productive vocations.
of an outlier among developing countries, given the comparatively high budget expenditure on education as a
Let us be clear: If children do better at school and fail
percentage of GDP, and its comparatively poorer scores
fewer times, society is far better off. Those children
by learners in standardised assessments such as TIMMS
will contribute more to the economy, and the education
(Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study)
department will save money not having to re-teach the
and PIRLS (Progress in International Reading Literacy
same child the same curriculum more than once, because
Study)18. This raises the critical question of which factor
they keep failing. We may not be able to channel the
should be addressed first in underperforming schools:
broader economic benefit back into the system in the
quality or price?
short term, but if we are smart, we could redirect the
There is a case to be made for this level of expenditure:
shorter-term fiscal savings back into an ever-expanding
intervening in poorly performing schools that have
network of well-functioning schools serving poorer
been systematically underfunded for decades requires
children. While the goal is to create quality education
more funding than in functional schools, given the many
at a sustainable price point, we must not forget the
prerequisite building blocks, namely the remediation
huge differential between the ‘average’ and the poorest
of
governance
schools, and how the latter are constantly having to walk
requirements, as well as incentives to attract and
up a steeper gradient. The project’s commitment is to
motivate staff, and infrastructure improvements. If PSP’s
‘every child, regardless of socio-economic status’.
learners,
organisation
change
and
What then is the role of the philanthropic funder? Philanthropic contributions can often yield pockets of innovation and quality for identified sets of learners, but this on its own is less likely to improve a complete system for millions of learners. However, the role of philanthropy can also be to trial systemic change – the ‘R&D’ aspects of systems reform that is messy, untried, and even controversial. Philanthropy can inspire confidence in others to join in, particularly once evidence of success is demonstrated. Indeed, the PSP definition of success is true partnership – when government actors opt in, and chose to direct existing resources, personnel and infrastructure in new ways, and when communities are empowered to demand a new model, and make it their own.
77
financials
Public School Partnership’s pathway to sustainability 1 PSP’s work right now 2020’s works has focused on documenting key learnings
will need to cost the project, under a handful of forward-
to date in a format that is compelling and supports
looking scenarios and project configurations. We’ll need
advocacy. We will need to quantify the outcomes, both
to quantify in economic terms, the benefits to learners,
in terms of learning outcomes, as well as the objective
but also the fiscal savings to education departments, and
advances in the building blocks that sit behind the
the economic savings to Treasury over each learner’s
learner’s exam scores. Given the identified learnings, we
lifetime.
2 Widening the net by attracting third-party funders who value the ability to track progress and costs The two sets of audiences here are:
internally, whether it be from local landowners, businesses
1) Socio-Economic Development (SED) and Corporate
or individuals – either for free, or for figures that are often
Social Investment (CSI) funding from corporates, especially
a fraction of what is available to centralised procurement
those with a geographical base associated with particular
or tender processes. These avenues are traditionally the
schools that might participate.
domain of NGOs, localised fundraising initiatives and
2) The parents and community around every school
donations in kind, such as computers, books, or feeding
who have the social capital to raise a parcel of funding
scheme initiatives.
3 Adoption by mainstream governmental structures Given the work in Step 1, powerful advocacy work will be
accordingly, in the shared pursuit of increasingly efficient
required to capture the efficiencies, and to ensure these are
outcomes for learners. PSP’s work in 2020 has made
reinvested into provincial education budgets. The ultimate
headway in this journey, while staying true to the model of
collaboration will unfold when governmental actors are
new governance; supporting an increasingly refined set of
compelled to adopt new practices inside existing structures
collaborative activities implemented by SOPs; and pursuing
of school management, and redeploy existing budgets
the project’s next chapter of rollout at scale.
78
79
CONCLUSION
WHAT NEXT? Growing from pilot to evidence-based programme Khayakazi Namfu Programme Director, Public School Partnership
80
We’re
excited by what we have jointly
more. Beyond the reach of philanthropy and corporate
achieved at the end of year four
social investment, we need Government and Treasury to
of the pilot programme (2019), with learner outcomes
get behind the programme, both publicly and financially.
suggesting that the majority of partnership schools
Not only will this reinforce the sustainability of the model
are on a positive trajectory (see page 20). We are now
for improved learner outcomes, it will lead to significant
focusing on building the evidence base to underpin PSP’s
economic savings for Government, too: with an improved
next steps and future expansion, with the aim of making
education system, far fewer children are likely to repeat
Public School Partnerships one of the available options
grades – a situation that has costs us billions of rands
for school improvement across the country.
over the years19. There are also long-term benefits of having a more educated populace, with knock-on results
An independent monitoring and evaluation (M&E) process
for employment figures, democracy and the stability of
is currently underway to cap off the pilot and distil the
the country.
many lessons we’ve learnt to further refine the model and make it more effective. The evaluation seeks to address
We began this pilot based on the core belief that every
the following questions:
child has the right to high-quality education regardless of
*
Are PSP schools on a fundamentally different
socio-economic status, and every parent and educator
trajectory towards quality education relative to
should be empowered to provide it. We believe that PSP
comparable no-fee public schools, as measured by
is a viable option for provincial education departments
learner outcomes?
to address consistent underperformance in schools,
*
What are the key lessons that have been learned
*
How should these lessons inform programme design
provided the right structures are in place. Hearing from people like Miss Mgemane, a teacher at a Collaboration
over the initial pilot phase?
School in Cape Town, that PSP has given hope to the parents and learners who had lost hope cements our
post-2021?
conviction that a model of this kind delivers far more
Preparing for the next phase also requires unpacking
than just better-managed, higher-performing schools – it
the financial sustainability of the model. Ultimately,
can inspire a sense of optimism and ownership that has
there is a limit to the scalability of this programme with
long been lacking in communities when it comes to the
the current group of funders, and possibly one or two
schooling of their children.
“I think Collaboration Schools
is the best the thing that has come out of South Africa. It has a positive impact because our learners who come from poor backgrounds can have access to free quality education… It has given hope to the parents and learners who had lost hope.” Miss Mgemane, Grade 3 Teacher Jupiter Street Primary, Ocean View, Western Cape
81
Frequently ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the role of the funder group? The funder group is committed to using their philanthropic funds, networks and people strategically to help make the pilot a success. Their role includes: a. Assisting with the identification and development of SOPs; b. Providing strategic vision and oversight; c. Contributing financial support in terms of start-up costs, operational costs, etc.
Is PSP a way to privatise education?
Do parents really have a choice in terms of their school’s participation in the pilot?
No. Public school operators will always be non-profit organisations accountable to provincial government for their performance. Actually, both Government and Cosatu
Critics of the pilot project scoff at the idea that parents
have already accepted that some publicly-funded services
might turn down extra funding and suggest that there’s
can be provided by either employees of the State or the
really no choice being offered at all. That is a patronising
private sector. Over 70% of the work of the Department
view. After nearly five years of working in these schools,
of Social Development is contracted to NPOs, and low-fee
our experience is that parents know what they want and
independent schools may obtain a per capita subsidy of
agonise over the risk of their children being let down
up to 60% of the equivalent allocation in public schools.
yet again by empty promises. Interestingly, parents at
PSP is the opportunity to build genuine and sustainable
the most politicised schools have opted for a ‘fifty-fifty’
partnerships that bring new expertise into government
relationship on the SGB, making it clear to the School
schools without the profit motive distorting public
Operating Partners that they will be equally accountable
provision.
for the failure or success of the school. This process has involved parents more actively and given them more hope than exists in thousands of dysfunctional
Do teachers who work at PSP schools lose their benefits?
SGBs across the country. The national Department of Basic Education is currently considering amendments
No. If they’re already employed in existing schools, they
to the Schools Act to tackle these weaknesses. This
stay on the Departmental payroll. In new schools, the
experiment shows how SGB competence and democratic
provincial government pays the school the equivalent of
accountability can be built at the same time when
their salary and benefits.
provision is made for local flexibility.
82
83
endnotes
1. Cohen, M. 2017. SA spends higher proportion of budget on Education
few underperformers who achieve a score of below 30%, and a handful
than US, UK. Fin24, 5 January 2017. Available at: https://www.news24.
of top achievers who score above 70%, with most learners being
com/fin24/economy/sa-spends-more-on-education-than-us-uk-and-
concentrated in the middle.
germany-20170105
12. Newer schools don’t offer a 2016 comparison, and high schools only write the systemic assessments once in Grade 9.
2. Initial funders comprised the Michael and Susan Dell Foundation, the DG Murray Trust, Zenex, Millennium Trust, First Rand Empowerment
13. One World Network of Schools is a non-profit organisation working
Fund, Omidyar Network and Elma Philanthropies. Zenex exited in 2017,
to improve learner’s education by developing the next generation of
with the Maitri Trust joining the group in 2019.
school leaders.
3. PSP’s pilot phase runs from 2016 to 2020.
14. The Accelerated Schools Infrastructure Delivery Initiative (ASIDI) is
4. In the Collaboration Schools model in the Western Cape, SOP members
part of the DBE’s schooling 2025 plan, which aims to improve learning
sit on the SGB and have voting rights. In the Partnership Schools model
outcomes and bring better access to education by eliminating the
piloted in 2018 in rural schools in the Eastern Cape, the SOP is not part of the
backlogs in schools infrastructure. The programme includes provision of
SGB. However, there is a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between
basic services such as water, sanitation and electricity.
the provincial department of education, funder group and SOP, which gives
15. Axium created the Nobalisa programme so that local members of
the SOP increased access to the school and a sense of authority.
the community can provide literacy/numeracy support in Grade 1-3
5. Howie, S. et al. 2017. Progress in International Reading Literacy Study
classrooms. For more information visit: https://www.axiumeducation.
2016. South African Children’s Reading Literacy Achievement. Summary
org/nobalisa
Report. Pretoria: Centre for Evaluation and Assessment.
16. Howie, S. et al., 2017. Progress in International Reading Literacy
6. Van der Berg, S. 2020. COVID-19 school closures in South Africa
Study 2016. South African Children’s Reading Literacy Achievement.
and their impact on children. Available at: https://theconversation.
Summary Report., Pretoria: Centre for Evaluation and Assessment.
com/covid-19-school-closures-in-south-africa-and-their-impact-on-
17. DGMT/WCED. 2018. An illustrative analysis of expenditure across
children-141832
Collaboration Schools.
7. The tests were introduced in 2001 and later updated in 2011 with the
18. Levy, B., Cameron, R., Hoadley, U. & Naidoo, V. 2018. The Politics and
help of the Centre for Evaluation and Assessment (CEA).
Governance of Basic Education - A Tale of Two South African Provinces. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8. Moore, G.F. et al. 2019. From complex social interventions to interventions in complex social systems: Future directions and unresolved questions for intervention development and evaluation.
19. Van der Berg, S., Wills, G., Selkirk, R., Adams, C. & van Wyk, C.
Evaluation. Vol. 25(1), p23-45.
2019. The Cost of Repetition in South Africa. Working Papers 13/2019, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics.
9. It is important to note that the addition and removal of schools over the past four years resulted in a different basket of schools each year,
20. A ReSEP (Research on Socio-Economic Policy) report, published
and this must be considered when doing year-on-year comparisons at
in May 2019 by the Economic Department at Stellenbosch University,
a programme level.
puts a conservative estimate of the number of learners repeating in our public schools at over 1 million per year. “This implies that the cost of
10. New schools that joined the PSP programme in 2019 and wrote the
having repeaters in the public education system was around R20 billion
systemic tests for the first time were excluded from this table as there
(in 2018 prices and based on the official data). At these costs, repetition
is no previous baseline. New schools include Jupiter Primary, Apex
could absorb between 8% and 12% of the national budget allocated to
Primary and Kraaifontein High.
basic education in 2018/2019.” For the full report, visit: https://www. ekon.sun.ac.za/wpapers/2019/wp132019
11. Ideally, a distribution curve mimics the bell-curve where there are
Editorial project management: Daniella Horwitz Copy editor: Esther Etkin
Design and layout: Penny Waterkeyn
Front cover image (Disa Primary): Koa Photography Photographs provided by Acorn Education, Common Good, Axium Education and School Turnaround Foundation
KHAYAKAZI NAMFU, Programme Director khayakazi@publicschoolpartnerships.org +27 21 670 9870
84
Produced by DGMT / Cape Town / November 2020 DGMT is a South African foundation built on endowments from Douglas George Murray and his wife, Eleanor. DGMT is committed to developing South Africa’s potential through public innovation and strategic investment. Our goal for South Africa is a flourishing people, economy and society. Towards this end DGMT currently distributes about R160-million per year and leverages and manages a similar amount of funding through joint ventures with other investors. 1 Wodin Rd Newlands Cape Town 7735 +27 (0)21 670 9840 www.dgmt.co.za
www.dgmt.co.za/tag/public-school-partnership