portfolio Architecture | Sustainability Deepthi Ravi 2015- 2023
1 1
PROFESSIONAL CAREER | LONDON 1. SKIDMORE, OWINGS AND MERRILL ARCHITECTS June 2022- August 2022
2. WILKINSON EYRE ARCHITECTS PROJECTS: March 2023 - Present MOTORSPORT HOTEL, RIYADH DISCOVERY GARDENS, RIYADH PROJECTS: MINISTER COURT, LONDON LORDS STADIUM, LONDON LORDS CRICKETCRICKET STADIUM, LONDON MOTORSPORT HOTEL, RIYADH BAKMARO MOUNTAIN RESORT, GEORGIA BAKMARO MOUNTAIN RESORT, GEORGIA FACADES OF THE FUTURE COLOMBO PORT CITY, SRILANKA NEOM BAY AIRPORT, SAUDI ARABIA LOCATION: LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM GUIDANCE: Ar. MINA HASMAN, SOM GUIDANCE: Ar. HERMAN Ar. NUNO CORREIA CALLEJA, SOM Ar. MIRKO FARNETANI, SOM Ar. MELISSA CLINCH Ar. NUNO CORREIA, WEA MELISSA CLINCH, WEA WORK Ar. EXPERIENCE MARCH 2023- PRESENT The experience of Wilkinson has been tremendous learning The experience of Eyre Wilkinson Eyreaand SOM has beencurve with nuancesain tremendous projects whichlearning require greater attention to detail and development of curve with nuances in projects ideas withwhich greater depthgreater of technical knowledge. Creativity Technical Design require attention to detail andand developworking together from the early design stages has given greater opportunities to ment of ideas with greater depth of technical knowlmake informed design decisions using environmental analysis tools.
edge. Creativity and Technical Design working together from the early design stages has given greater opportunities to make informed design decisions using environmental analysis tools towards a sustainable design for the planet.
DISCOVERY GARDENS
overshadowing
capture cool breeze
Capture prevailing winds
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Passive strategies for the summer such as evaporative cooling and heat stratification, alongside night ventilation, and thermal insulation, thermal mass, thermal labyrinth along side overshadowing in winters achieves the intended goal.
Solar chimney stack effect
35-45 °C Solar control
15-25 °C Passive solar heating
Evaporative cooling through misting
Heat stratification Cooling via heat pumps
&
Discovery Gardens in Saudi Arabia is a proposal for bio domes with gardens flaunting different contexts and experiences along its masterplan. The ideal intension is to achieve an indoor-outdoor experience that does not heavily depend on cooling systems in a hot country, contributing to energy and carbon emissions.
PV panels
Evaporative cooling (misting)
20-25 Night ventilation
Thermal labyrinth
Solar control
5-10 °C
Thermal Mass
Thermal Insulation Thermal mass
Thermal Labyrinth Cooling via Heat pumps
The shape of the domes help in overshadowing and capturing cool breeze creating user comfort in a passive manner.
Sectional diagram showcasing the environmental strategies applicable through the domes. The various sizes of the domes allows strack effect and misting. The sizing of the exterior panels acts as a means to utilize and reduce solar gain accordingly.
kWh/m2
Design of the domes with metal frames, glass panels, PV panels and ridges with overlapping surfaces forming the biome masterplan.
(%)
Lux
2500
50
100000
2250
45
90000
2000
40
80000
1750
35
70000
1500
30
60000
1250
25
50000
1000
20
40000
750
15
30000
500
10
20000
250
5
10000
0
0
0
Solar Radiation test on the domes providing justification and positioning of the glass and PV panels.
Average Daylight Factor Analysis for the internal user spaces providing the necessary experience as per the dome’s concept.
Daylight Illuminance at 12.00pm on the 21st of June showcases the levels of outdoor illuminance filtered into the domes.
unitised curtain wall
OMNISHELL- FACADES OF THE FUTURE
189 kgC02e/m2 FSA
omni-shell
Competition Winner- WilkinsonEyre X Arup
unitised curtain wall 189 kgC02e/m2 FSA
152 kgC02e/m2 FSA
A monocoque design module for a facade panel providing structural support and forming a light weight design. The design achieves the following environmental benefits. 4m
3m 3m
4m
4m
Carbon Chassis
4m
3m
unitised curtai1m n wall
3m
+18% Useful Daylight -12% Heating Load
188
omni-shell
-40% Solar Gain
1m
189 kgC02e/m2 FSA
unitised curtain wall 189 kgC02e/m2 FSA
-20% Façade weight -40% System 152 kgC02e/m2 FSA Embodied Carbon -30% Operational Carbon
139
Renewable Energy Solar PV Panels
152 kgC02e/m2 FSA
kgCO2e/m2 FSA
shell
152 kgC02e/m2 FSA
-30% Embodied Carbon on the perimeter structure
3m 3m
4m 4m 3m
Typical
Biogenic Thermal Insulation Materials 4m
4m 3m
1m
Omni-shell Regular Embodied Carbon Calculation A1- A5 (20% Contingency)
1m
Urban Greening Facade Vegetation
6 5
Reflective Light Shelves Diffused Daylight
Solid
Planter 3 2
PV
Trickle Ventilation
4
1
1.
3mm Aluminium plate planter
2.
Greenery on wires
3.
3mm Aluminium optimised plate
4.
Dry-gasket D.G.U.
5.
Interior lining with light shelf
6.
Mycelium grown to geometric form with soft spot for future adaptation
Natural Ventilation through Perforated Solid Panels
Bakhmaro, Georgia
LORD’S CRICKET STADIUM - TAVERN AND ALLEN STANDS London, United Kingdom STADIUM - TAVERN AND ALLEN STANDS LORD’S CRICKET London, United Kingdom
55%
Bakhmaro Village proposes a mountain resort aiming to have high building performance, hence the test for a balance between useful daylight and solar gain are conducted. The results prove that there is a need to take consideration of the low daylight in some interior units and the high solar radiation on the exterior units by facade alterations.
BAKMARO MOUNTAIN RESORT OFF-SITE Bakhmaro, Georgia ENERGY
TAVERN BOUNDARY
21 SEPT
FIELD BOUNDARY 4000
21 JUNE
GENERATION 62% OFF-SITE THROUGH PV 21 ENERGY 21 JUNE Bakhmaro Village proposes a mountain resort aiming SEPT to have high GENERATION building performance, THROUGH PV hence the test for a balance between useful HIGH EFFICIENCY FABRICare conducted. The results prove that there is daylight and BUILDING solar gain
TAVERN BOUNDARY
55%
15000
FIELD BOUNDARY
4000
52%
61%
a need to take of the low daylight in some interior units HIGHconsideration EFFICIENCY BUILDING FABRIC and the high MIXEDsolar MODE radiation on the exterior units by facade alterations. VENTILATION 900
MIXED MODE VENTILATION
900
PROPOSED 7 ROWS UPPER TIER
C60
PROPOSED 7 ROWS UPPER TIER
62%
C60
THERMAL MASS THERMAL MASS VERTICAL FINS FOR SHADING
RECONFIGURED 13 ROWS MID UPPER TIER
61%
VERTICAL FINS FOR SHADING HIGH PERFORMANCE GLAZING HIGH PERFORMANCE GLAZING LOW CARBON AND CIRCULAR CONSTRUCTION LOW CARBON AND CIRCULAR CONSTRUCTION
RECONFIGURED 13 ROWS MID UPPER TIER UPGRADED 3 ROWS LOWER MID TIER
60%
15000
DIFFUSE LIGHT THROUGH FABRIC CLADDING DIFFUSE LIGHT THROUGH FABRIC CLADDING TARGETING BREEAM EXCELLENT TARGETING BREEAM EXCELLENT RAIN WATER HARVESTING RAIN WATER HARVESTING
62%
HIGH EFFICIENCY BUILDING SERVICES HIGH EFFICIENCY BUILDING SERVICES
(%) 100 90 80
UPGRADED RETAINED 3 ROWS 11 ROWS LOWER MID TIER LOWER TIER
70 60
RETAINED 11 ROWS LOWER TIER
55%
52%
50 40 30 20 10 0
Section of Environmental Performance of the building retrofit proposal with high performance fabric, services and passive strategies. Section of Environmental Performance of the building retrofit proposal with high performance fabric, services and passive strategies. 76% 81%
5.5
67%
5.3 74% - Section BB - Dependent 1 Tavern Stand
BB 1 : 100
W/m2 100
60%
5.7
71%
15
62%
90
Pe rep
80
30
70
1:100 1m
0
1m
0
60
Tavern Stand - Section BB - Dependent 1
BB 1 : 100
50 84%
85%
84%
55%
85%
84%
124 53
109
118
108
1:100
40 30 20 10
PASSIVE ACTIVE
0
Peak valuesvalues for the units notthat in balance with in thebalance daylight analysis. This Percentage of occupied hours when illuminance is within the UDIisband 100-3000 lux. It Percentage of occupied hours when illuminance withinof the UDI band Peakirradiation irradiation for that the are units are not with the with iterations of the facade design with regard to window size and charecteristics. represents areas which the threshold illumination leastthreshold 75% of the year. of 100-3000 lux. Itmeet represents areas whichtarget meetat the illumina- helps daylight analysis. This helps with iterations of the facade design with tionAverage target atsolar leastradiation 75% of the year. is 594kWh/m2 for the basecase with no fins. regard to window size and charecteristics.
Annual Solar Radiation Analysis of the Facade before the Retrofit proposal of the Design. The glazed facade attracts high amount of radiation on the south and peaks during the summer months. It is also affected by the lower angle sun in the winters. MOUNTAIN RESORT Annual Solar Radiation Analysis of the Facade before the Retrofit proposal of the Design. The glazed facade attracts high amount of radiation on the south and peaks during the BAKMARO Average solar radiation is 594kWh/m2 for the basecase with no fins. Bakhmaro, Georgia summer months. It is also affected by the lower angle sun in the winters.
Environmental analysis carried out for two buildings with different typologies and different locations, for different purposes illustrate kWh/m2that the simulation criteria allows architectural de1000 signs to be created in a more informed manner. kWh/m2
55%
Bakhmaro Village proposes a mountain resort aiming to have high building performance, hence the test for a balance between useful daylight and solar gain are conducted. The results prove that there is a need to take consideration of the low daylight in some interior units and the high solar radiation on the exterior units by facade alterations.
76% 81% 62%
900 1000 800RadiThe facade design analysis using Solar 52% 5.7 71% 900 61% ation, on the Lords Stadium stands gives 700 in5.3 800 formation regarding the right use of horizontal 74% 600 30 and vertical louvers in the right depth700 to em500 phasize on the architectural language600 with an 400 approach that results in a comfortable500 internal 300 atmosphere for viewers in the gallery spaces. 400 200 84% 85% 62% (%) 300 100 The daylight study for the Mountain 100 resort in 90 200 84% 60% 85% 84% 80 Georgia engages in Bioclimatic design 0 to53pro70 100 Average solar radiation is 175kWh/m2 for the proposed case of the facade with vertical fins. 60 vide comfort and wellbeing to the users of the 50 space. The detailed analysis provides 0an idea 55% 40 PASSIVE Average solar radiation is 175kWh/m2 for the proposed case of the facade with vertical fins. 30 of where an opportunity lies to enhance day67%
Annual Solar Radiation of the Facade of the proposed stands exhibit a reduction of 69% with addition of vertical louver fins and cantilevered roof design. The pattern of the fins brings dynamism onto the facade and further provides comfort by cutting down the harsh radiation. Annual Solar Radiation of the Facade of the proposed stands exhibit a reduction of 69% with addition of vertical louver fins and cantilevered roof design. The pattern of the fins brings dynamism onto the facade and further provides comfort by cutting down the harsh radiation.
ACTIVE 20 10
light or control glare potential in design.
109
Percentage of occupied hours when illuminance is within the UDI band of 100-3000 lux. It 0 Peak irradiation values for the units that are not in balance helps with iterations of the facade design with regard to wind represents areas which meet the threshold illumination target at least 75% of the year.
project aiming for net zero future high rise building construction Urban Sequoia is aa using absorption Urbancarbon Sequoia is research project aiming technologies.It provides a holistic research project aiming solution capable duplicating for zero future high for net net zerooffuture high itself cities construction across the rise building riseover building construction world for acarbon greener and greater using absorption using absorption environmental good. technologies.
technologies.
The scope of my contribution ItIt provides holistic provides towards the a holistic project solution solution capable of concentrated on createdof duplicating duplicating itself forover over passive design solutions a cities across the testing world cities world breathable building and for aa greener greater embodied carbonand reduction for greater over various design iterations. environmental good. environmental
can be reconfigured to achieve dramatic reductions in whole life carbon, reframing the built environment as a solution for the climate crisis. The central proposition of Urban Sequoia is that the built environment can absorb carbon. 80% 80% SOM’s proposal transforms buildings into solutions—radically rethinking how buildings and cities are designed and constructed. It is a viable approach that could have a far-reaching impact, with the potential to create a circular economy that absorbs carbon
↓ ↓
HOW? HOW? ↓ ↓90% 90%
To emphasize the idea of carbon capture, the inital appraoch is to reduce the emissions that are ineviatble in building constrcution. The internal floor and column details were designed with integration of various MEP, and an optioneering process was conducted based on embodied carbon results.
ENCLOSURE OPTIMIZATION
ENCLOSURE OPTIMIZATION
ENCLOSURE OPTIMIZATION
PUNCHED WINDOWS
CURTAIN WALL
CURTAIN WALL
ENCLOSURE OPTIMIZATION ENCLOSURE ENCLOSURE ENCLOSURE ENCLOSURE OPTIMIZATION OPTIMIZATION OPTIMIZATION OPTIMIZATION ENCLOSURE OPTIMIZATION 2.92 m
insulation
GFRC panel
PUNCHED WINDOW PUNCHED WINDOW PUNCHED PUNCHED PUNCHED WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW PUNCHED WINDOW
CURTAIN WALL CURTAIN WALL CURTAIN CURTAIN CURTAIN WALL WALL WALL WALL CURTAIN
Baseline Embodied Carbon: 215 kg CO2/m2 Baseline Embodied Baseline Carbon: Baseline Baseline Embodied 215 Embodied Embodied kgCarbon: CO2/m2 Carbon: Carbon: 215 kg CO2/m2 215 215 kg kgCO2/m2 CO2/m2 Baseline Embodied Carbon: 215 kg CO2/m2
Baseline Embodied Carbon: 245 kg CO2/m2 Baseline Embodied Baseline Carbon: Baseline Baseline Embodied 245 Embodied Embodied kgCarbon: CO2/m2 Carbon: Carbon: 245 kg CO2/m2 245 245 kg kgCO2/m2 CO2/m2 Baseline Embodied Carbon: 245 kg CO2/m2 operable
ALGAE CHAMBER
URBAN SEQUOIA
3.5 m
TIMBER SHADING
SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY
3.5 m
Research and Innovation
Urban Sequoia is a systems approach, a phi-
URBAN SEQUOIA losophy, It is a way of thinking about cities as URBAN Urban Sequoia is aSEQUOIA research ecologies, as living and breathing systems that
2.5 m
URBAN SEQUOIA
window
BIOPLASTIC CLADDING/
The use of collibri in the design tools was extremely handy to experiment and understand the best design iteration in terms of shape, window sizes, core positions, wall and window U values, which best fit the location of the building and provide the designer with the lowest Energy Use Index to move forward with an informed design decision for the proposal. The proposal is then tested for embodied carbon in Structural, Facade and architectural elements and MEP, to understand and bring out the best solution the promotes greater environmental good and occupant comfort and wellbeing. NON CONDITIONED SPACE
URBAN SEQUOIA 2.0 SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL
URBAN SEQUOIA 2.0
SEQUOIA 2.0 SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL SIMPLE PANEL ETFE BALCONY CURVED CORNER CHAMFER ALGAE SIMPLE PANEL SIMPLE PANEL SIMPLE SIMPLE ETFEURBAN PANEL BALCONY PANEL ETFE BALCONY ETFE ETFE CURVED BALCONY BALCONY CORNER CURVED CORNER CURVED CURVED CHAMFER CORNER CORNER CHAMFERCHAMFER CHAMFER ALGAE ALGAE PANEL ETFE BALCONY CURVED CORNER CHAMFER SKIDMORE,SIMPLE OWINGS & MERRILL
ALGAE ALGAE
ALGAE
WAVE
WAVE
WAVE
WAVE WAVE
WAVE
↓ 42% ↓↓ 35% ↓ 52% ↓↓ 55% ↓↓ XX% ↓ 31% ↓ 42% ↓ 42% ↓↓↓42% 42% 35% ↓ 35% ↓↓ ↓35% 35% 52% ↓ 52% ↓↓↓52% 52% 55% ↓ 55% ↓↓↓55% 55% XX% ↓ XX% ↓↓ XX% XX% ↓ 31% ↓ 31% ↓↓ 31% 31%↓ 31% 42% 35% 52% 55% ↓ XX%
42%
35%
52%
55%
67%
31%
Facades were studied in detail as well, with options in relation to glazing charecteristics, wiep ondow-to-wall ratios, materiality, and further helping conduct an embodied carbon analysis. Carbon capture through biogenic materials, biophilia and bio technology were explored in further detail. URBAN SEQUOIA 2.0 URBAN SEQUOIA URBAN 2.0 SEQUOIA URBAN URBANSEQUOIA SEQUOIA 2.0 2.0 2.0 URBAN SEQUOIA 2.0 SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL SKIDMORE, OWINGS SKIDMORE, & MERRILL SKIDMORE, SKIDMORE, OWINGS OWINGS &OWINGS MERRILL &&MERRILL MERRILL& MERRILL SKIDMORE, OWINGS
Comfort Percentage on the Outdoor Masterplan
Sun- hours Analysis on the facade of the building
Universal Thermal Comfort Index on the Outdoor Masterplan
MOTORSPORT MOTORSPORT HOTEL HOTEL Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
kWh/m2 Benefit 150
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
120
(%) 90 The Hotel Complex is adjoining the F1 racing track for the F1 race due to be held in Riyadh in 2026. The complex consists of a set of apartment complexes, 4 star and 5-star hotels. Environmental design analysis are conducted at very early stages to influence the design of the facade, especially for shading strategies to reduce cooling loads in the hot climate.
Early Stage Facade Parametric Analysis | https://bit.ly/46IGDkG
60 100 30 90 0 80 -30 70 -60 60 -90 50 -120 40 -150 30 Harmful 20 Skin Designer, Designer, a plugin on Grasshopper has be used facade on thetreatment basis of solar and of degree as a Skin a plugin on Grasshopper has tobetestused to treatment test facade onradiation the basis solardays radiation 10 combination. Harmful and beneficial radiation results as per orientation produce window panels of smallar and larger sizes respectively as and degree days as a combination. Harmful and beneficial radiation results as per orientation produce 0 per given dimensions, which is further iterated for the detailed facade design. window panels of Skysmallar larger respectively as per given dimensions, which is further iterated for the viewand analysis fromsizes the facade of the building
detailed facade design.
6m 0-0.6m
kWh/m2 (%)
4m
100
100
90
90
80
80
70
70
60
60
50
50
3m
Solar Radiation on the base massing of the building
The Motorsport Hotel- Facade Design Option-1
WWR: 40-60-80% g-value=0.3
Window sizing influenced by the amount of Solar Radiation
Parametric Box Model
Early Stage Facade Parametric Analysis | Sawtooth to the South-West | https://bit.ly/48WftZM 6m
Orientation based on the main facades for the proposed massing
0-0.3-0.6m E
Orientation
Window to Wall Ratio (glazing ratio) WWR 80%
50
45
45
40
40
1600 100 35
35
1400 90
30
30
25
25
1800 (%)
40
INPUTS
Shading devices tto provide additional solar protection Overhang Length 0.6m
Fin Length 0.6m
Target 35W/m2
3m
Solar Gain
0.5m
70
W
0.4m
0.4m
60
S
0.2m
0.2m
0.1m
0.1m
SW
5°-10°- 15°
40%
15 10 5 0
Target 80% Spatial Daylight Autonomy 100 90
Box models created with Honeybee for testing rooms with a set of parameters as inputs, in order to derive an output with the right balance for Solar Gain and Useful Daylight Illuminance. ‘Design Explorer’ tool helps to deduce the design as per the best building performance filteration. The inputs for the shoe box model in this case, 80 60% 0.3m 0.3m matching the design of the Motorsport Hotel is the Window-to-Wall Ratio,15° Orientation, Depth and type of Shading. Retracing the design based on the optimal building performance output, makes the architectural language abide by the best green practices. 5°-10°50
WWR: 40-60-80% g-value=0.3
20
OUTPUTS
0.5m
4m
C 50
80 20 1200 15 30 30 70 10 20 20 1000 10 10 60 50 0 0 800 50 Typical Spring Week Typical Spring Week UTCI Typical Spring Typical WeekSpring (March Week 3-9th) (March 3-9th) Comfort Analysis Typical Spring Typical WeekSpring (March Week 3-9th) (March 3-9th) Analysis 60040 Comfort Percentage Comfort Percentage on the Outdoor on the Masterplan Outdoor Masterplan Universal Thermal Universal Comfort Thermal Index Comfort on theIndex Outdoor on the Masterplan Outdoor Masterplan 40030 20020 Outdoor Microclimate Analysis was simulated further to understand the impact of the canopy design on the 10 external usable spaces. It was observed further with various iterations, to provide ideal comfort scenario. 0 Voids created in the massing for further iteration of fenestration influenced to reduce solar gain. 0 Views to the points of interest from the facade of the building 40
6m
2000 C
(%)
0.0m
0.0m
30
The Motorsport The HotelMotorsport Facade HotelDesign Facade Option-1 Design Option-1
Parametric Sawtooth Box Model
A dynamic parametric analysis was conducted to test the conditions of comfort, daylight autonomy and solar gain in the internal spaces of the building using a simple and saw tooth shaped shoe box. The study was conducted using Colibri and Design explorer, as plugins on grasshopper. The study resulted in providing a narrative to the design based on optimal input parameters based on orientation and best performance. OUTPUTS INPUTS Target
40
2
Target
Peak Solar Gain is measured in W/m2
70 60 Spatial Daylight Autonomy is measured for a threshold of 300lux
2 ACADEMIC CAREER | LONDON ARCHITECTURAL ASSOCIATION, LONDON M.Arch Sustainable Environmental Design September 2021- January 2023 PROJECTS: RE-IMAGINING THE GLASS BOX Targeting Net Zero in the Retrofit Design of a high-rise building in the tropics. GUIDANCE: Ar. PAULA CADIMA Ar. SIMOS YANNAS Ar. JORGE RODRIGUZ Ar. JOANA GONCALVES
Bioclimatic retrofit of a high-rise building targetting towards net-zero carbon emissions deals with a great challenge of achieving comfort for not only the occupants on the interiors, but also for the atmosphere struggling to find its way through climate change. Explorations of the building depth, its materiality, its potential and it’s performance in the given context having a stark variation towards comfort levels raises the need for a retrofit adressing climate considerate actions.
ORIE
NTA TION
90
P' 30
Shading devices are developed in a parametric and dynamic fashion with varying depths based on overhang studies and are positioned according solar radiationORIENTATION intensity. This translates as a vertical fin treatment on the facade on the east, north and west facades, with a folder plate horizontal louver NORTH-EAST facade on the south-west orientation. Applying this on the facade reduced the solar gain30approximately by 70%.
60 90
WEST ORIENTATION
30
HSA: 70o-80o, VSA: 50o-80o
9090
30
ORIE NTA TION
30
60
30
90
SOU 60
60SOUTH-WEST O
6060 60
30 30
EST
60
30
TATIO N
60 30 HSA: 30 -55 VSA: 50 -80 o
RIEN EST
60
o,
o
90
o
o
TO
TATIO N
30
60
NOR
TH-E
AST
90
30
30
90
NORTH-EAST ORIENTATION
60
AST
HSA: 70o-80o, VSA: 50o-80o
HSA: 30o-55o, VSA: 50o-80o
NOR
TH-E
AST
ORIE
NTA TION
90
90
30
90
30
90 WEST ORIENTATION
30
30
60
436kWh/m2
60 NTA TION
261kWh/m2
2 232kWh/mCORE
549kWh/m2
ORIE
90
60 830kWh/m2
WATERBODY NORTH-EAST ORIENTATIONo
WEST ORIENTATION SOUTH-WEST ORIENTATION
30 60 EAST ORIENTATION NORTH-EAST ORIENTATION HSA: 70o-80o, VSA: 50o-80o WEST WEST ORIENTATION ORIENTATION NORTH-EAST NORTH-EAST ORIENTATION ORIENTATION Sectional perspective of the office space on the south-west periphery of the building exhibiting the double height office area, with 90
7
90
60
60
30
549kWh/m2
90
2 2 232kWh/m 232kWh/m 60 2 1034kWh/m 2 2 30 436kWh/m 436kWh/m
723kWh/m2
TH-E
30
ORIE
NTA TION
NOR
60
RIEN
30
90
60
90
30
o
90
30
60
30
60
o,
60
90
90 30
WEST ORIENTATION
30
HSA: 70 -80 VSA: 50 -80 o
60
60
NTA TION
723kWh/m2
2 2 723kWh/m 723kWh/m
30
NTA TION
60 90
60
ORIE
549kWh/m2
2 2 549kWh/m 549kWh/m
60NTATIO
Variations in the facade panel
ORIE
90 Communal semi-open outdoor workspaces, 60 and double height environments created 90 30 2 2 232kWh/m 830kWh/m from voids enhance HSA: 30o-55o, VSA: 50o-80o 2 436kWh/m spatial quality
30
30
60 TH-W
90
ORIE
60
90 SOU
30
N 90
90
30
90
AST
90
30
WES
90
60
6060
TH-E
30
30
30
NOR
60
NTA TION
90
30
90
60
ORIE
TO
60
30
HSA: 30o-55o, VSA: 50o-80o
90 TH-W
3030
90
90
60 SOU
Triple height skygardens allows, enhance airflow, flooding of light and better spacial quality
60
o
30
60 90
9090
o
60
HSA: 40o, VSA: 30o
9090
SkyGardens
90
EAS
90
o,
30
90
60
o
SETASOT O RIEN RIEN TATTIO ATIO N N
TATIO N
EST
60
60
30
HSA: 30 -55 VSA: 50 -80
6060
NTA TION
30 o
030
A:050 -80-80
ORIE
30 90
o o
EST
TH-W
90
30
60 SOU
RIEN
90
o
TH-W
90
60
9090
90 60
30
30
30
90
90
60
EAS T
6060
TWH-W ESTEST ORO RIEN IEN TATTIO ATIO N N
30
90
60
P
60
60
3030
90
90
245kWh/m2
30
WATERBODY WEST ORIENTATION
HSA: 70 -80o, VSA: 50o-80o
Regenerative Design
HSA: 40o, VSA: 30o
90
Shading60 devices of varying depths based on overhang studies and are positioned according 1034kWh/m The envelope of the building now replaced with the new design informed by solar geometry studies, show PV Panels on the roof and 232kWh/m 90 549kWh/m a mazannine, and a triple height skygarden that may be used a semi-open workspace/outdoor gathering solar for30communal 30 radiationactivities. intensity. This translates as a parametric vertical fin treatment on the facade. 70% in the incident solar radiation levels 60 60 723kWh/m 261kWh/m facade are used for on-site 436kWh/m 60 60 60 30 30 Hence promoting health and well-being of the occupants. Additionally, south-west 60facade with varying shading device HSA: 30 VSA: parametric 50 90 90 power generation 90 panel heights from the periphery to the centre can also be observed 90 30 30 90 90 30 9090 60
TATIO N
o
900HSA: 30o, VSA: 50o
Sub-
90
30o
3000
30
873 30 HSA: 70 -80 VSA:873 50 -80 90
o
o,
o
60
ORIE NTA TION
o,
6060
Existing building 60 Embodied Carbon building
o
60
60
Retrofit Proposal 30 Proposal 90
60
HSA: 30o, VSA: 50o
90 TATIO N TO WES
90
30
EAST EASTORIENTATION ORIENTATION
3030 30 90 60
30 90
EAST ORIENTATION
kgCO2e/ yr
kgCO2e/ yr
745 Existing
envelope
200 Superstructure
150 Existing envelope
TATIO N
1034kWh/m2
250 2 232kWh/m 200 90 292
2 436kWh/m 81% 292
9000
81%
TO EAS
SOLAR GAIN (kWh/m2)
30
30
8000 8000
150
WATERBODY
245kWh/m2
The envelope of the building now replaced with the new design informed by solar geometry studies, showcases a reduction of almost 10000 70% in the incident solar radiation levels
300
250
Substructure
7000
90
261kWh/m2
7000
100
350 6000 60 350 6000 30 78% 57300 Existing 5000 0 Proposed 0 50 finishes 100 Sub300 Existing Retrofit envelope Consumption Reduction+ 57 5000 90 building Proposal 4000 Generation +finishes 90 60 2 2 Substructure 250 60 0 Proposed 0 Cooling Lighting Electricity Utilities structure 250 2 2 Existing Retrofit WATERBODY envelope WATERBODY Consumption Reduction+ EMBODIED CARBON 3000 350 OPERATIONAL ENERGY SuperEAST ORIENTATION SOUTH-WEST ORIENTATION o, 200 2 o, o building Proposal Super4000 HSA: 40 VSA: 30o 830kWh/m Generation HSA: 40 VSA: 30 350 +finishes structure 2 200 292 245kWh/m 81% 2000 Shading devices of varying depths based on overhang studies and are positioned Cooling according Lighting Electricity Utilities The envelope of the building now replaced with the new design informed by solar geometry studies, showcases a reduction of almost 300 structure 150 292 81% solar radiation intensity. This translatesExisting as a parametric vertical fin treatment on the facade. Sub70% in300 the incident radiationenergy levels Emissions = solar Total EMBODIED CARBON 3000 150 OPERATIONAL ENERGY 1000 consumption x Emission Sub- envelope Existing structure 250 60 Sub-structure Envelope 100 60 Factors structure 250 envelope 90 90 0 100 1034kWh/m2 Existing SuperBefore strategies 2000 Exisiting Building Retrofit Design 200 Super-structure 50 1182600kWh 0.7 = Super30 Existing finishes structure 30Finishes 200x 292 2 2 261kWh/m 81% Embodied Carbon Operational Carbon 57 50 2 structure finishes Emissions = 827820kgCO2e Total energy 292 150 After strategies 81% 60 57 60 Proposed 0 Existing 1000 259200kWh 0.7 = consumption x 150 Emission x Existing Proposed 0 envelope Consumption Reduction+ 144585kgCO2e envelope Factors 100 Generation envelope envelope Consumption Reduction+ +finishes 2 2 100 0 Existing Generation +finishes Cooling Lighting Electricity Utilities 50 Before strategies Exisiting Building Retrofit Design Lighting 90 Existing finishes 90 Cooling Electricity Utilities 57 50 OPERATIONAL ENERGY 1182600kWh x 0.7 = finishes 30 30 57 Embodied Carbon Operational Carbon OPERATIONAL ENERGY Proposed 0 827820kgCO2e Proposed 0 envelope Consumption Reduction+ After strategies WATERBODY WATERBODY envelope Consumption Reduction+ Generation +finishes 259200kWh x 0.7 = SOUTH-WEST ORIENTATION 830kWh/m2 300
200
60
100 Existing finishes
30
100
50
78%
830kWh/m 830kWh/m
245kWh/m 245kWh/m
1034kWh/m 1034kWh/m
WATERBODY
261kWh/m 261kWh/m
Section across the building depicting the elements from the retrofit design
Generation +finishes 245kWh/m2 Cooling Lighting Utilities 144585kgCO2e Emissions = Total energy 30 Electricity Shading devices of varying depths based on overhang studies and 30 are positioned according The envelope of the building now replaced with the new design informed by solar geometry studies, showcases a Lighting reduction of almost Cooling Electricity Utilities Emissions = Total Emission energy consumption x OPERATIONAL ENERGY solar radiation intensity. This translates as a parametric vertical fin treatment on the facade. 70% in the incident solar radiation levels 90 90 consumption x Emission Factors OPERATIONAL ENERGY Factors 1034kWh/m2 Before strategies Before strategies 1182600kW h x 0.7 = 60 60 Emissions = Total energy 261kWh/m2 1182600kW h Totalx 0.7 = 827820kgCO2e 30 Emissions = energy 30 consumption x Emission 827820kgCO2e After strategies consumption x Emission Factors After strategies 259200kW h x 0.7 = 90 Factors 90 60 60 259200kW h x 0.7 = 144585kgCO2e Before strategies 144585kgCO2e Before strategies 1182600kW h x 0.7 = o 1182600kW h x = HSA: 30o, VSA: 500.7 827820kgCO2e HSA: 30o, VSA: 50o 827820kgCO2e After strategies After strategies 259200kW h x 0.7 = WATERBODY WATERBODY SOUTH-WEST ORIENTATION 259200kW h x 0.7 = 144585kgCO2e 144585kgCO2e
EAST ORIENTATION
60
RIEN
9090
TO
RIEN
Operational Carbon 60
30
Retrofit Proposal Proposal
30
300
873
745
CARBON 30 Achievment of Near Zero Carbon Emissions from the Operational and Embodied CARBON 90 90 Retrofit Design Carbon reductions in the proposed retrofit design proposal. Retrofit
CARBON HSA: 40 VSA: 30 CARBON o,
60
745 745 Retrofit
90
30
3030 90
o
Plumping, Vertical Circulation
90 Cooling
WES
EAS T
ORIE ATIO NTA N TION
Existing building 30 building
30
30
60
745 HSA: 30 VSA: 50 745 Electical Equiptments
HSA: 40o, VSA: 30o
90
Reduction Generation Reduction Generation Electricity Utilities 90
Lighting
NORTH-EAST ORIENTATION
o
BODIED 0 30 BODIED Exisiting Building Existing
0
30
Consumption Consumption Cooling
90 60 WEST ORIENTATION
30 2000 873 60 9090 873 Existing 90
90 60
0
Lighting
60
ED ED
0
60
60
1000
30
500
873400
200
90
N 90
TATIO N
kgCO2e/ yr
4000
30
100
50
3030
0
TATIO N
90
100 30 LIFE NOCARBON 78% RTH-E AST 60 30 ORIE LIFE CARBON 50 NTA 5000 TIO 60
400
600
TO RIEN TATIO N
9090
90
150
700
90
WATERBODY
WES
6000
CARBON 60 150
WES TO RIEN
LE-LIFE 30
200
EUI (kWh/sqm.yr) EAS TO RIEN TATIO N
EUI (kWh/m2)
800
30
RIEN
300
solar radiation intensity. This translates 350 as a parametric vertical fin treatment on the facade. 9000
700 structure 51% 81% 60 30 60 200 90 90 90 600 549kWh/m2 Super30 LE-LIFE CARBON Solar the ideal vertical and horizontal shading angles, developing facade design.723kWh/m2 structure 60 Protractor Analysis to determine 30 500 7000 60
8000
10000830kWh/m2
SOUTH-WEST ORIENTATION
30 Shading devices of varying depths based on overhang studies and are positioned according
SOUTH-WEST SOUTH-WESTORIENTATION ORIENTATION
Shading Shadingdevices devicesofofvarying varyingdepths depthsbased basedononoverhang overhangstudies studiesand andare arepositioned positionedaccording according EAST ORIENTATION solar solarradiation radiationintensity. intensity.This Thistranslates translatesasasa aparametric parametricvertical verticalfinfintreatment treatmentononthethefacade. facade.
1000 900
WATERBODY WATERBODY
SOUTH-WEST ORIENTATION
Shading devices of varying depths based on overhang studies and are positioned according WATERBODY WATERBODY solar radiation intensity. This translates as a parametric vertical fin treatment on the facade.
1 1
800 2 1034kWh/m 700
600 500 400 300
kgCO2e/ kgCO2e/yr yr
HSA: 40 VSA: 30 o,
60
EAST ORIENTATION 350
TATIO N
250
18%
RIEN
60
WEST ORIENTATION
30
250
WHOLE-LIFE 30 CARBON
900 90 NORTH-EAST ORIENTATION 1000 800
TO
90
HSA: 70o-80o, VSA: 50o-80o
3030
30
60
90
90
60
60
WES
90
30
HSA: 30o-55o, VSA: 50o-80o
1000
60
kgCO2e/ yr
60
TATIO N
TO
90
90
30 WHOLE-LIFE CARBON
kgCO2e/ yr
60
2
2
EUIEUI(kW(h/kWsqh/m.sqym.r)yr)
300
NTA TION
300
30 90
30
ORIE
90
30
9000
AST
350
EUIEUI(kW(kh/Wsh/qm.sqym.r)yr)
10000 6060
TH-E
60
NTA TION
EUI (kWh/sqm.yr)
ORIE
EUI (kWh/sqm.yr)
60
NOR
RIEN
EST
WES
EAS
TATIO N
TH-W
30
60
60
SOU
2
TO
o
TO
o,
2
2
2
90
EAS
60
90
TATIO N
30
90
RIEN
30
RIEN
90
o o -80 0o-80
200
WATERBODY EAST ORIENTATION
100
Shading of devices of varying The envelope the building nowdepths replac solar radiation intensity. This translat 0 70% in the incident solar radiation levels
The Theenvelope envelopeofofthethebuilding buildingnow nowreplaced replacedwith withthethenew newdesign designinformed informedbybysolar solargeometry geometrystudies, studies,showcases showcasesa areduction reductionofofalmost almost 70% 70%in inthetheincident incidentsolar solarradiation radiationlevels levels
Building section representing the existing building case of 90% glazing and deep planning.
Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of the Wind Flow through the existing airtight building
Building section representing the retrofit design with the addition of shading devices
SKY G
ARDE
SKY G
N
ARDE
N
Natural wind flow through the building after retrofit design, promoting health and wellbeing.
Building section with shading devices and introduction of voids in the form of skygardens
WindSpeed (m/s)
Percentage (%) 0
10
20 30
WIND ANALYSIS PREVAILING WESTWARD WIND
40 50
60
70 80
90
100
Increase in Useful Daylight Illuminance levels with iterations involving shades to cut off the glare on peripheral region and skygardens bringing in more light into the deeper ends of the plan.
0
1
2
3
3 PROFESSIONAL CAREER | INDIA 1. SPACE MATRIX, BANGALORE Jan 2020- July 2021 2. MALIK ARCHITECTURE, MUMBAI June 2019- Jan 2020 PROJECTS: RADISSON RESORT, LONAVALA IIITDM, KURNOOL DNR RESIDENCES, BANGALORE GUIDANCE: Ar. KAMAL MALIK Ar. KETAN CHAUDHURY Ar. RAGHAVENDRA HEGDE Ar. KAVANA MAHADESH The experience of Space Matrix and Malik Architecture in India, has been the stepping stone towards Architectural detail. Obtaining a holistic experience of dealing with project from its ealry stage concepts unto construction detials has provided great insight in working with teams with a varied skillset. Churning the creative aspects of design alongside technical detailing provided were aspects I trained myself with to widen my knowledge further.
RADISSON RESORT Lonavala, India
Radissson Spa and Resort, Lonavala is a project that has completed construction today and my contibution towards this project was during the design development stages through 3D modelling and construction drawings of the common interior spaces such as the restaurant and bar. The homely, yet raw local cultural vibe of the space brings out the essence of the design. The material palette of exposed stone, concrete and wood was chosen in alignment with the exteriors and theme of the spaces.
TRANSVERSE SECTION TRHOUGH THE RESTAURANT
LONGITUDINAL SECTION TRHOUGH THE RESTAURANT
LONGITUDINAL SECTION TRHOUGH THE BAR
TRANSVERSE SECTION TRHOUGH THE BAR
The Indian Institute of Information Technology, Design and Manufacturing, in Kurnool is a Government aided project on a 40 acre site. It receives a LEED certification based on pre design reports. I was involved in the production of tender and construction drawings such as the plans, sections and elevations along with details such as the facades, staircases, basements, skylights, compounding, etc.,
IIITDM Kurnool, India
Landscape that integrates the campus as a community
Plaza following the natural countours on site
Landscape interaction with the built environment
The vast land parcel is strategically planned allowing a full fledged residential campus to have circulation along the site through different blocks which are zoned on the masterplan for easy access. The director’s bunglow is placed at the central portion of the site on the peak of the countours allowing a strategic view to all sides of the campus. The challenge of working along with an ever changing coutour site, trickles the mind to produce the most efficient design and hence allowing administration and seminar hall to be a unit undistrurbed from the rest of teh campus, which was my personal score of work in the course of the project.
DNR HOUSING Bangalore, India
TITLE
1. Main lobby 2. Games Room 3. Squash 4. Gym 5. Pool 6. Multipurpose hall 7. Management room
The clubhouse is a centre for recreation with amenities required for users of all age groups. The connect between the spaces along the three towers allows an inside-out space bringing in the natural landscape to the interiors of the building.
Facade design details were explored further with vertical and horizontal elements, along with change in materials as proposals towards specialized and iterative design approach..
4 ACADEMIC CAREER | INDIA RAMAIAH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, BANGALORE B.Arch | August 2015- May 2020 PROJECTS: TURNOVER | VII Semester High-rise mix use complex COLLOQUIAL DEED | VIII Semester Tourism hub GUIDANCE: Ar. PUSHPA DEVANATHAN Ar. RAJSHEKHAR RAO Ar. LAVANYA VIKRAM Ar. KUSUM SINGH The introduction to Architectural Design and creative exploration, beginning from a cottage to a masterplan, was dealt with, over the 5-years of the rigorous course. Learning the construction details, structural design, fixtures and further more integrated with architectural design was a the first foot into the industry.
TURNOVER Bangalore, India
SEZ development influences the urban fabric of the vicinity creating a ripple effect that dictates the surrounding development and promote urbanization. The development of the city inspires the design to create a heirarchy in terms of visual charecter which creates an edge to the road forming an inviting approach to the city as it adds to the formation of a gateway between two metropolitan cities with rapid urban development on either fronts. The design is an attempt to rejuvenate what the land has lost and create vertical urban green terraces tracing back to its history of the surroundings. The mixed used development on site has floor plates with a twist pattern that cascade green balconies as the building stands tall. The landscaping on site is a response to the privacy for the two user groups for recreational purposes which also strives to give back a cleaner atmosphere to its surrounding.
The pedestrian plaza provides grandeur in design which allows one to admire building with its twists and cascading landscape. This entrace plaza provides access to the podium that consists of recreational activities.
The indivitual floor balconies are divided by trellis separations per room and achieve views to the lake in the vicinity and its adjecent building. It provides additional recreational facities to the users of the hotel.
COLLOQIAL DEED Mysore, India
The tourism hub inteneded to be a icon of the arts and culture of Karnataka’s rich heritage has taken inspiration from the vernacular forms of architecture into the modern day style of design as factors driving the fore of design. Since the design is guided and crafted for 3 user groups, the design is originally dictated by elemts such that, a passerby at the site visually connects with the freestanding cantelever exhibition centre which is elevated over the ground. This forms a user to understand the interpretation of the culture of the state. Once intrigued, a visitor/tourist, may take a guided 2 day itinerary around the site engaging in activities in and around the site for a cultural tour of the state in a compised arrangement. Further, students willing to undergo vocational training achieve the educational aspects and inculcate the arts of the rich heritage and showcase them in the areas on site means for showcasing their skills and talent.
The site is located in the route towards Hassan from Mysore along the back waters of KRS. The site provide emplyment opportunity to the residents in the surrounding to enrich the rich culture. The macro level site analysis provides climatic impacts which dictate the orientation and materials of the buildings. The aim of the project is to achieve a single stop destination for students, tourists and labourers with a variety of skills and develop community culture.
Features on the site that allow a tourist/visitor to achieve the complete essence of the project’s intention is through the bridge that gradually meanders through the site allowing a user to visually connect with heritage aspect of vernacular designing that has been converted to modern architecture through buildings. The totem poles behaving as signages replicate the Channapatna toy making culture. The experience centre allows one to understand the history and envision the future of the state of Karnataka in its elevator experience. Aspects in building design and orientation also replicate the state’s culture The master plan is arranged such, that an entrance to the auditorium on the rear end and the amphitheatere are accessible separately and maintained privately. The journey through the site with its itinararies allow a user to achieve a wholesome and holistic experience with engaging spaces such as the central gathering area that consists of interactive installations for users of all age groups.
1. Parking -01 2. Admin block 3. Visitor’s centre 4. Craft’s centre 5. Heritage block 6. Cultural centre 7. Vocational centre 8. Library block 9. Experience centre 10. Parking-02 11. Recreation centre 12. Gathering space 13. Watch tower 14. Spill-out space 15. Amphitheatre 16. Pedestrian bridge 17. Parking-03 18. STP 19. RWH 20. Accomodation
Preparation of the mixture with the right consistancy and its application on the walls/ fabric in methods such as wattle and daub, cob etc., was interesting hands on experience apart from understanding soil testing procedures. The advantages of mud architecture in sustainable building is intriguing