Skip to main content

David Lozano Portfolio

Page 1

DAVID LOZANO

SIMPLE COMPLEXITY


INDEX ARC 1011L (Fall 2018) 01A Addition - Surface Models 01B Addition - Surface to Volume Models 01C Addition - Aggregate Model 02 Subtraction 04A Final Project - Multiplication 04B Final Project ARC 2011L (Fall 2019) 01 Connecting 02 Choreographies in Context 04 Final Project ARC 2021L (Spring 2020) 01 Deriving, Interpolating, Dividing, Editing, Re-Assessing 02 Converting, Site/Program, Midterm 04 Final Project ARC 3011L (Fall 2020) 01 Tower 02 Bridge 03 Cantilever 04 Final Project - Vetter Mountain Scientists Retreat ARC 3021L (Spring 2021) 01 Accessory Dwelling Unit 02A Final Project - Mixed Use Housing 02B Final Project - Design Developement


FIRST YEAR

ARC 1011L (Fall 2018)

The project for this semester revolved around introducing students to the most fundamental elements of architecture and design, including massing, circulation, and space, as well showing techniques for form production like additon, subraction, and division. It began with creating folded planar models which were then transformed selected versions into volumetric models. These were later combined to combined into one aggregate model. From that, a subtraction was made which was later combined with elements of a case study to produce the final model.


EXERCISE 01A: ADDITION - SURFACE MODELS

FIRST YEAR ARC1011L | FALL 2018

5


EXERCISE 01A: ADDITION - SURFACE MODELS

The initial excecise for this project explored the spacial possibilities that could be created through folding surfaces into three dimensional orthogonal forms that lacked volume. After this, multiple orientations were tested in order to find a combination of three models that demonstrated a set of qualities that could be expanded upon once made volumetric. The selection of models above were chosen primarily because of the way they each differently expressed their domain. The first (left) acts the most discreetly by rising above occupants and acting almost completely as an overhead canopy without claiming the space below. The second (middle) does the opposite, expanding and overtaking all parts of the ground as territory that belongs to the folded plane. Finally, the last (right) acts as a combination of the two, clearly claiming more space than the first, but also not fully dominating the ground beneath it.

6


EXERCISE 01B: ADDITION - SURFACE TO VOLUME MODELS

7

FIRST YEAR ARC1011L | FALL 2018


EXERCISE 01B: ADDITION - SURFACE TO VOLUME MODELS

8


EXERCISE 01B: ADDITION - SURFACE TO VOLUME MODELS

9

FIRST YEAR ARC1011L | FALL 2018


EXERCISE 01B: ADDITION - SURFACE TO VOLUME MODELS

10


EXERCISE 01B: ADDITION - SURFACE TO VOLUME MODELS

11

FIRST YEAR ARC1011L | FALL 2018


EXERCISE 01B: ADDITION - SURFACE TO VOLUME MODELS

12


EXERCISE 01C: ADDITION - AGGREGATE MODEL

FIRST YEAR ARC1011L | FALL 2018

13


EXERCISE 01C: ADDITION - AGGREGATE MODEL

14


EXERCISE 02: SUBTRACTION

FIRST YEAR ARC1011L | FALL 2018

This excercise in the project focused on demonstrating subtraction as a technique to extract specific geometry from a larger mass in order crop the project into a more manageable smaller scale entity. During this process, multiple locations in the project were subtracted and tested in four different orientations to find a version that best showcased a dynamic set of multilevel spaces with the potential of creating clear vertical circulation. The specific subtraction and orientation that was chosen in this case was selected for its variety of multilevel space as well as the language it created of mass extruding and then falling back into itself. It also presented clear opportunities for implementing vertical circulation paths that other versions lacked.

15


EXERCISE 02: SUBTRACTION

16


EXERCISE 02: SUBTRACTION

FIRST YEAR ARC1011L | FALL 2018

17


EXERCISE 02: SUBTRACTION

AXONOMETRIC CIRCULATION DIAGRAM

18


EXERCISE 04A: FINAL PROJECT - MULTIPLICATION

FIRST YEAR ARC1011L | FALL 2018

The final excercise for this project was completed through detailed in-depth analysis of a chosen case study. After that analysis, specific elements of the case study were extracted and further analyzed in order to implement them and transform the subtraction model into a finalized version of the project. The case study for this project was Richard Neutra’s Lovell Health House. The elements of the house that were chosen for further analysis included the facade, the transitions between interior and exterior, and the methods for creating public and private space. Of those, the facade and interior-exterior transitions became the primary elements of focus of this final project.

19


EXERCISE 04B: FINAL PROJECT

20


EXERCISE 04B: FINAL PROJECT

FIRST YEAR ARC1011L | FALL 2018

Project Description The main focus of this final was to adhere to and emphasize the abstract form and massing of the previous excercises in combination with the fully developed ideas of the Lovell Health House. The specific use of the black mullions from the analysis of the Health House facade is a demonstration this focus. The choice of black for the mullions allows them to fade into the background and push the white geometry forward. It creates a layering effect that demonstrates the practicality of the project and its first step out of abstraction, while still allowing the form of the building to remain the focus. It also allows for the project to create moments of density and release. The experience of the first floor demonstrates this with its heavy walls, pillars, and solid ceiling that surround the occupants. This then culminates in the moment of threshold from the first floor to the second where you are squeezed through an opening between the top floor and the balcony before being released into a moment of complete lack of massing where the walls and ceiling become completely transparent. These moments give further emphasis to the uncompromising raw geometrical form of the project. Another aspect that was heavily focused on was circulation, and the way it could be used to emphasize the transitions between interior and exterior, and public and private spaces. When you enter the project from the base, you remain in an exterior public space which allows for comfortable interaction due to the overhead protection from the weather, while still giving the occupant the experience of being outside. The primary stair then provides the first transition in space, as you move from the public open air space of the first floor into a more condensed balcony space. The balcony remains remains as public exterior space, but forces the occupant to understand that it is itself the transition to a clearly private space above with its smaller square footage and lower roof. Finally, once you move from the balcony to the the second floor you enter fully interior private space. The sense of privacy is created through full separation from the floor below and through the transition from the balcony to the top floor which forces occupants to enter one at a time. These aspects were heavily influenced by the methods used by Neutra in the Lovell Health House to address similar features, and allows in-depth integration of those methods through the already similar language of the project.

21


EXERCISE 04B: FINAL PROJECT

22


EXERCISE 04B: FINAL PROJECT

FIRST YEAR ARC1011L | FALL 2018

23


EXERCISE 04B: FINAL PROJECT

24


EXERCISE 04B: FINAL PROJECT

FIRST YEAR ARC1011L | FALL 2018

UP

A UP

B

A

1

2

5

UP

B

1

25

2

5


EXERCISE 04B: FINAL PROJECT

A

1

2

5

B 1

26

2

5


EXERCISE 04B: FINAL PROJECT

FIRST YEAR ARC1011L | FALL 2018

The diagrams above show the two essential aspects of this project, the circulation and the transition from public exterior to private interior space. The first diagram (left) highlights the primary circulation route up the project from the first floor to the connected balcony space to the final top floor. The second diagram (right) shows the different functions of the spaces, as the first floor acts as an exterior public gathering space, the balcony acts as a transitional semi-public semi-exterior space, and the final top floor acts as an interior private space.

27


28


SECOND YEAR

ARC 2011L (Fall 2019)

The project for this semester was introduced as an art museum in the urban heart of L.A. The form generation began with the creation of a box which was then punctured with various sized square holes that then connected with through tubes within the envelope. After multiple refinements and changes, the abstract model was eventually transformed into a building with small considerations for program which created the opportunity to develop more in-depth thought process behind the work. Then, the project introduced site, context, and full program which were heavily developed for the initial draft in the form of the midterm. After the midterm, any necessary changes were made for the final project.


EXERCISE 01: CONNECTING

The main goal of this project is to create a level of spatial complexity through shifts in focus. This was done in two primary ways. The first way was achieved by changing what grabs your attention in the project with the envelope on and the envelope off. So, with the envelope on the two central rhombus tubes draw focus because of the uniqueness of their shape as well as the large space they occupy. However, when the envelope is removed your focus shifts from the large rhombus tubes to the numerous small tubes created by the square connections which create an interlocking web and structure for the project that goes unseen with the envelope concealing it. The second way I tried to achieve my goal was by creating a for a person occupying and travelling through the space. To do this I allowed the smaller tubes to cut into the larger tube and create apertures that shift ones view away from the opposite end of the tunnel and towards the holes created.

30


EXERCISE 01: CONNECTING

SECOND YEAR ARC 2011L | FALL 2019

31


EXERCISE 01: CONNECTING

32


EXERCISE 02: CHOREOGRAPHIES IN CONTEXT

SECOND YEAR ARC 2011L | FALL 2019

The primary focus of this projects design is the creation of direct and clear circulation through visual indication. To do this, the building was designed so that at each floor level of the project you’re allowed a view up into the next floor that you circulate to, and as you move up each successive floor provides a view of the previous floor. For example, as you enter the building the primary front aperture frames a view of a large portion of the second floor, and once you’re on the second floor you can look out back towards the entrance where you came from as well as up over a ledge to get a partial view of the third floor. A secondary focus of this project is the creation of a cohesive experience as you travel through the spaces by allowing a series of smaller visually contrasting tubes to pierce and interact with every space in pivotal moments. Experiencing them at every level allows the viewer to relate each interaction with these tubes to a previous moment of interaction earlier in the project which connects every space to each other.

33


EXERCISE 02: CHOREOGRAPHIES IN CONTEXT

SHORT ELEVATION

LONG ELEVATION

ROOF PLAN

34


EXERCISE 02: CHOREOGRAPHIES IN CONTEXT

SECOND YEAR ARC 2011L | FALL 2019

SHORT SECTION 1

FLOOR PLAN

SHORT SECTION 2

LONG SECTION

35


EXERCISE 02: CHOREOGRAPHIES IN CONTEXT

36


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

SECOND YEAR ARC 2011L | FALL 2019

37


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

Project Description The primary goal of my project is to create a museum that is welcoming and engaging to people of all levels of experience and knowledge regarding modern art. I did this because in my opinion far too many art museums cater towards those with experience at the cost of those without it, and that was something I wanted to avoid. I did this was by dividing my project into three very distinct portions through the use of large angled slabs that cut all the way through the building. The first portion on the bottom is an entirely public and exterior space meant for gathering and engagement with the city around it. This portion contains the bookstore, cafe, sculpture garden, and an abundance of different scaled space for sitting, observing, relaxing, for any kind of gathering. The second portion of the project begins once you enter the building as you immediately begin to be introduced to the artwork of Kenny Scharf. Scharf’s artwork is very much about public engagement and bringing the street into his artwork. In his words, “The guiding principle to my work is to reach out beyond the elitist boundaries of fine art and connect to popular culture through my art.” This principal manifests itself in artwork that many would find remarkably similar to street art and graffiti, artwork that is approachable and seen continuously throughout the city of Los Angeles. This approachable nature allows the second portion to act as a smooth transition from the city into the museum, and introduce anyone to a formal setting and condition for displaying artwork. The final portion is where you would experience both the auditorium, and the artwork of Carmen Argote. According to her, her “…artistic practice is a response and conversation brought about through the process of inhabiting a space and responding”. Following this idea, her artwork is much more interpretive and tradition for modern art. This allows for the top portion to act as a much more formal and meditative experience for the visitor, that builds off of the experience created by the second portion to fully engage and occupy the mind of those who come in. Another extremely important element of my project are the series of pillars that were introduced to help bind but at the same time delineate spaces. In the first portion the pillars are expanded and almost entirely extruded vertically, to create the sensation of overwhelming mass rising above you. However, the pillars also create different scaled pockets of space both inside and outside of them to allow for many types of gatherings, from small to large. Once the pillars move into the second portion, they begin to filter into much smaller angular beams that direct circulation, morph into walls, and emulate the chaotic and wild nature of Scharf’s artwork. Then, finally at the top the pillars dissipate and become pure uninterrupted volume to prevent distraction and allow for full immersion in the Argote’s artwork.

38


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

SECOND YEAR ARC 2011L | FALL 2019

39


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

40


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

SECOND YEAR ARC 2011L | FALL 2019

41


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

42


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

SECOND YEAR ARC 2011L | FALL 2019

43


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

44


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

SECOND YEAR ARC 2011L | FALL 2019

45


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

46


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

SECOND YEAR ARC 2011L | FALL 2019

47


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

48


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

SECOND YEAR ARC 2011L | FALL 2019

49


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

50


SECOND YEAR ARC 2021L | SPRING 2020

SECOND YEAR

ARC 2021L (Spring 2020)

The project for this semester was introduced as a school of architecture in a tower designed to replace Cal Poly Pomona’s old CLA building. Form generation started with the creation of a field drawing that was later adapted as a guide to create folds on a surface in order to develop a 3D form. From the form that was created, the field condition was then extracted and developed into a framing system following the geometry of the previously created form. At that point, the site, context and program were introduced into the project for developement towards the mideterm. After the midterm any adjustments were made for the production of the final model.

51


PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

EXERCISE 01: DERIVING, INTERPOLATING, ETC.

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

The primary goal of this initial exercise was to create a field condition that acted as a guiding element and organizing grid to aspects of your project. At this stage, it first acted as practice in composition and linework. This field condition was chosen because of its balance of densities and specific combination of line types and points. Later this field was used as a set of seams that were followed in a folding exercise in order to generate an enclosed geometry through planar elements. During this process, this design was selected out of several versions because of its relatively compact massing and slim footprint. It was also chosen because of the way it created a quality of expansion in response to compression 2 facades.

52


EXERCISE 01: DERIVING, INTERPOLATING, ETC.

SECOND YEAR ARC 2021L | SPRING 2020

53


EXERCISE 02: CONVERTING, SITE/PROGRAM, MIDTERM

After the creation of the selected enclosed geometry, the field condition that guided the creation of the form was then extracted off of the geometry to create a framework system. The goal of this design was to create a system that closely followed the original field condition that was created, without exactly copying every line. This was done by responding to a majority of the linework but never allowing for lines to continue uninterrupted in the frame. This allowed for a majority of the original grid to be represented in the framework without the density and chaos that would be produced with representation of every line. Another goal was to create solidity in the silhouette while maintaining a lightness in the overall structure. This was done by preventing key transitional locations in which the geometry bends or folds from having a continuous spine the denotes as one such location.

54


EXERCISE 02: CONVERTING, SITE/PROGRAM, MIDTERM

55

SECOND YEAR ARC 2021L | SPRING 2020


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

56


SECOND YEAR ARC 2021L | SPRING 2020

Project Description This project is best described as a combination of systems used to organize every aspect of the tower from the facade to the interior program and circulation. The facade itself is composed of two systems; the framing system and shading system. The framing system is directly derived from the field condition generated in the previous excercise. It went through multiple iterations, but generally it remained faithful to the original framing that was designed. However, during an analysis of the facade it was doubled and delaminated in specific locations on the East and West elevations. This process produced pockets of space between the two systems of framing which produced occupiable exterior balconies as well as space to house the shading devices that were designed for the project. The concept for the shading system was derived from a project called the Hanking Center Tower by Morphosis Studios. This tower utilized a modular shading system placed in between two panels of glazing which responded to program and shading necessities. Similarly, this project utilizes a modular shading system which responds and shifts based on shading and program needs. On the West and East facades the module in a series of vertical 45 degree angled fins. On the South it becomes horizontal 15 degree tilted fins. In exterior spaces the module doubles in scale reducing the density of the shading system and creating occupiable spaces in between the shading fins. Finally, to provide rooftop shading the module is placed on specific rooftops for outdoor areas and angled 45 degrees Southeast where the spaces receive the most sunlight. For the interior program, the project is arranged using a system of offset floorplates. These floorplates provide many of the most important features for the operation of the interior. Most importantly, they allow for related spaces to bleed into one another. For example, these floorplates create a rhythm of studio space, connected review space, and studio space. This rhythm allows for easy access to review spaces from studio spaces and vice versa as well as viewing mezzanines down into the space below. This connection of offset spaces also provides a secondary method of vertical circulation up the tower. Finally, in order to provide release from the interior program as well as spaces that can act as informal review spaces, a series of outdoor spaces were created throughout the tower. These spaces stem from the core which has itself been removed from the tower. In order to connect the core to the interior space of the project a system of balconies and small courtyards were designed. Also, in certain locations, these spaces continue into the tower to create carved out exterior spaces which can be seen in the heart of the building as well as the rooftop space.

57


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

58


SECOND YEAR ARC 2021L | SPRING 2020

59


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

60


SECOND YEAR ARC 2021L | SPRING 2020

61


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

62


SECOND YEAR ARC 2021L | SPRING 2020

63


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

64


SECOND YEAR ARC 2021L | SPRING 2020

65


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

66


SECOND YEAR ARC 2021L | SPRING 2020

67


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

DIAGRAMMATIC PLANS 68

PROGRAMMED SPACE CORE INFORMAL REV. SPACE


SECOND YEAR ARC 2021L | SPRING 2020

69


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

70


SECOND YEAR ARC 2021L | SPRING 2020

71


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

72


SECOND YEAR ARC 2021L | SPRING 2020

6/21

9/21

9 AM

12 PM

3 PM

SUNPATH DIAGRAM 73

12/21


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT

74


THIRD YEAR ARC 3011L | FALL 2020

THIRD YEAR

ARC 3011L (FALL 2020)

The project for this semester was introduced as a scientists retreat in the California mountains. Specifically a location called Vetter Mountain. The excercises for this semester heavily focused on structural systems to allow students to more intuitively understand how buildings are built. The systems applied weren’t bound by expense and were allowed to use any method that could realistically allow the building to operate and stand. Before introducing the final project, the studio had three mini-projects that were meant to allow students to begin to introduce realistic structural systems to their designs.

75


EXERCISE 01-03: STRUCTURE EXCERCISE MODELS

01 - Tower The tower is an excercise in pushing the limits of a single centralized structure and an exploration in the ways blocking someones line of sight can create a dynamic viewing experience. 02 - Bridge The bridge continues the same concepts explored by the tower, except uses two structural cores rather than one, and limits views in a way that also guides circulation. 03 - Cantiliver The cantilever again follows the concepts explored in the previous excercises with a large cable supported center structure that lifts the two occupiable volumes. The structure also allows the roof to continue seamlessly off the site.

76


EXERCISE 01: TOWER

THIRD YEAR ARC 3011L | FALL 2020

Top Left: Rendered Axonometric, Top Right: Perspective View, Bottom Left: Ground Floor Plan, Bottom Right: Section A

77


EXERCISE 02: BRIDGE

Top Left: Rendered Axonometric, Top Right: Perspective View, Bottom: Section A

78


EXERCISE 03: CANTILEVER

THIRD YEAR ARC 3011L | FALL 2020

Top Left: Rendered Axonometric, Top Right: Perspective View, Bottom Left: Floor Plan, Bottom Right: Roof Assembly Diagram

79


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT - VETTER MOUNTAIN SCIENTIST RETREAT

80


THIRD YEAR ARC 3011L | FALL 2020

Top Left: Site Plan, Top Right: Concept Diagram, Bottom: Structure Diagram

81


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT - VETTER MOUNTAIN SCIENTIST RETREAT

Top Left: Dayroom Deck View, Bottom Left: Floor Plan Lv.1, Bottom Right: Floor Plan Lv.2

82


THIRD YEAR ARC 3011L | FALL 2020

Top: Section A, Bottom: Section B

83


EXERCISE 04: FINAL PROJECT - VETTER MOUNTAIN SCIENTIST RETREAT

Top Left: Dayroom View, Top Right: Meeting Deck View, Bottom: East Elevation

84


THIRD YEAR ARC 3011L | FALL 2020

Top: Exterior View, Bottom Left: Assembly Section, Bottom Right: Assembly Axonometric

85


THIRD YEAR

ARC 3011L (Spring 2021)

The project for this semester was introduced as a mixed use housing complex. Specifically a location called Vetter Mountain. The excercises for this semester heavily focused on structural systems to allow students to more intuitively understand how buildings are built. The systems applied weren’t bound by expense and were allowed to use any method that could realistically allow the building to operate and stand. Before introducing the final project, the studio had three mini-projects that were meant to allow students to begin to introduce realistic structural systems to their designs.

86


EXERCISE 01: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT

1

THIRD YEAR ARC 3011L | SPRING 2021

Southeast Axonometric

01 - LUKEN’S RESIDENCE ADU An Accessory Dwelling unit was designed on the current property of the Luken’s Residence in Los Angeles, California. The design revolved around a clear organization of the plan along three vertical bands. One for private use and sleeping, one for movement and water features, and one for public gathering and dining. Each band has a separate connection to an outdoor environment allowing the residents to maximize the use of the connected garden attatched to the Luken’s Residence.

87


EXERCISE 01: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT

1

Level 1 1/4" = 1'-0"

0'

First Floor Plan

88

2'

4'

8'

16'


THIRD YEAR ARC 3011L | SPRING 2021

1

Section 1 1/4" = 1'-0"

2

Section 2 1/4" = 1'-0"

0'

Top: North-South Section, Bottom: East-West Section

89

2'

4'

8'

16'


EXERCISE 01: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT

1

2

East 1/4" North = 1'-0" 1 1/4" = 1'-0"

West 1/4" = 1'-0" 2

South 1/4" = 1'-0"

0' 0'

Top: North Elevation, Bottom: West Elevation

90

2' 2'

4' 4'

8' 8'

16' 16'


THIRD YEAR ARC 3011L | SPRING 2021

Western Band View

1

1

Middle Band View

Top: Backyard Dining Area, Bottom: Backyard Lounge Area

91


EXERCISE 02A: FINAL PROJECT - MIXED USE HOUSING

02A - CLARITY APARTMENTS The primary goal of this project was to create a housing project that promotes outdoor living and interacts with the public by providing dynamic commercial and courtyard environments. This was done throught the use of serpentine massing that opens directly to Vermont and funnels the public off the sidewalk and from the triangle into the directly connected courtyard. This provides a lounging space for anyone in the project shopping in the retail spaces. Large green communal spaces are also designed for residential use on the roofs and encapsulated space on the end of the serpentine volume. Smaller green spaces are created throughout the entire project with alternating subtracted floor plates that extend up the primary circulation core. This allows every floor to have access to some kind of green space. In order to help maintain some affordability, the project helps to sustain itself by allowing for two stories of commercial space, where the second story acts as the working floor of live-work units above. It also does this through the strategic use of luxury units and larger two bedroom apartments on the corners and bends of the project. Unit Break Down: Unit Type Quantity Size Studio 22 700 sqft 1 Bed, 1 Bath

15

1050 sqft

2 Bed, 2 Bath

7

1450 sqft

92


THIRD YEAR ARC 3011L | SPRING 2021

Figure 4: Massing/ Movement Diagram

4

Circulation/Outdoor Commercial

Studio

1 Bedroom

2 Bedroom

Parking

Circulation/Outdoor Commercial

Studio

Top: Massing Diagram, Bottom: Unit Organization Diagram 1 Bedroom

2 Bedroom

Parking

93


EXERCISE 02A: FINAL PROJECT - MIXED USE HOUSING

Top: Northwest Axonometric, Bottom: Southwest Axonometric

94


THIRD YEAR ARC 3011L | SPRING 2021

1

Site Plan

0'

Site Plan

95

16'

32'

64'

128'


EXERCISE 2A: FINAL PROJECT - MIXED USE HOUSING

Floor Plan Lv.1

96


THIRD YEAR ARC 3011L | SPRING 2021

Top Left: Parking Plan, Top Right: Floor Plan Lv.2, Bottom Left: Floor Plan Lv.4, Bottom Right: Floor Plan Lv.5

97


EXERCISE 02A: FINAL PROJECT - MIXED USE HOUSING

Unit Plans

98


THIRD YEAR ARC 3011L | SPRING 2021

1

Section 1 1/16" = 1'-0"

2

Section 2 1/16" = 1'-0"

Top: Section 1, Bottom: Section 2

0'

99

16'

32'

64'

128'


EXERCISE 02A: FINAL PROJECT - MIXED USE HOUSING

1

Prospect Elevation 1/16" = 1'-0"

2

Hollywood Elevation 1/16" = 1'-0"

Top: Prospect Elevation, Bottom: Hollywood Elevation

0'

100

16'

32'

64'

128'


THIRD YEAR ARC 3011L | SPRING 2021

Aerial Perspective from corner of Vermont and Prospect

101


EXERCISE 02A: FINAL PROJECT - MIXED USE HOUSING

Elevated Perspective from Hollywood Blvd.

102


THIRD YEAR ARC 3011L | SPRING 2021

Top: Courtyard Entry View, Bottom: Courtyard View from 4th Floor

103


EXERCISE 02A: FINAL PROJECT - MIXED USE HOUSING

Top: Double Height Green Space View from 4th Floor, Bottom: Private Courtyard View

104


THIRD YEAR ARC 3011L | SPRING 2021

Top: 5th Floor Rooftop Green Space View, 6th Floor Rooftop Green Space View

105


EXERCISE 02A: FINAL PROJECT - MIXED USE HOUSING

Top: Corner 1-Bed Unit View, Bottom: 1-Bed Unit View along Prospect

106


EXERCISE 02B: FINAL PROJECT - DESIGN DEVELOPEMENT

THIRD YEAR ARC 3011L | SPRING 2021

02B - DESIGN DEVELOPEMENT In these excercises the project was analyzed on a deeper level in order to begin to understand the systems and requirements for a building to be created in real life. Elevations, materiality and structure were developed along side with lighting, plumbing, and HVAC systems to allow for design changes to be made for the necessary operations of the building to properly function. Diagrams and detailed plans, sections and elevations were developed in order to express how each of these things would potentially work. Top Left: Structure Diagram, Top Right: HVAC Diagram, Bottom Left: Plumbing Diagram, Bottom Right: Electrical Diagram

107


EXERCISE 02B: FINAL PROJECT - DESIGN DEVELOPEMENT

Detail Section of Project along Prospect

108


THIRD YEAR ARC 3011L | SPRING 2021

Detail Elevation of Project Along Prospect

109


EXERCISE 02B: FINAL PROJECT - DESIGN DEVELOPEMENT

Detail Section Axonometric of Two Story Green Space and Corner Units

110


THIRD YEAR ARC 3011L | SPRING 2021

Detail Section Axonometric of Single Unit and Rooftop Green Space

111


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
David Lozano Portfolio by davidlozano413 - Issuu