Berkeley application dossier Greg Castillo

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

安

孴

UPM POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF MADRID Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura

UC BERKELEY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Environmental College of Design

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

AFFECTION AND DISSENT

CALIFORNIAN QUEER SPATIALITIES AND URBAN INNOVATION 孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

* NATALIA MATESANZ VENTURA

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

DIRECTORS: FEDERICO SORIANO PELÁEZ JUAN MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ LEÓN

宊

Natalia Matesanz Ventura

Architect & PhD Candidate

c/ General DĂ­az Porlier 3, 5Âşb. 28001- Madrid-Spain.

0034 606713634

nmv.arq@gmail.com

Sello registro de entrada

UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID AYUDAS ESTANCIAS DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN BERKELEY CONVOCATORIA 2018-19 SOLICITUD - ALUMNOS DOCTORADO

FOTO ACTUAL

DATOS PERSONALES Apellidos: MATESANZ VENTURA Nombre: NATALIA D.N.I.: 50889947-D Fecha de nacimiento: 04-10-1984 Dirección permanente a efectos de comunicaciones: c/General Díaz Porlier 3, 5ºB Ciudad: Madrid Código Postal: 28001 Correo electrónico: nmv.arq@gmail.com n.matesanz@alumnos.upm.es Teléfono: 606 71 36 34 DATOS ACADÉMICOS Centro UPM donde realiza sus estudios: Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura Plan de Estudios: Programa de Doctorado 99/2011 Especialización: Proyectos Arquitectónicos Avanzados Curso actual: Tesis Doctoral DATOS REFERENTES AL PROYECTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN Resumen de las actividades y línea de investigación que se quieren realizar: Desarrollo de dos casos de estudio de la Tesis Doctoral en el Departamento de Proyectos de la Escuela de Arquitectura. Estos se centran en la influencia de la contracultura america, en concreto los movimientos y prácticas colectivas originadas en la costa oeste, en los espacios urbanos alternativos actuales. Por un lado, se quiere ampliar el estudio de las comunas hippies y sus formas alternativas de vivienda que se dieron y promocionaron desde el seno de la Universidad de Berkeley durante los años 60-70. Por otro lado, documentar y cartografíar los movimientos gay y transgénero así como su relación con las revueltas urbanas de San Francisco y Nueva York en torno al año 68.

Centro e investigador responsable en Berkeley: UC Berkeley Environmental Design Associate Professor Greg Castillo Fecha de salida: 1 de Septiembre 2018

2019 Fecha de regreso: 31 de Enero de 2018 En Madrid, a

2

de

febrero

de

2018

Firma del interesado/a LA SOLICITUD IMPRESA Y FIRMADA, JUNTO CON LA DOCUMENTACIÓN (Véase punto 4.2. de la convocatoria), SE ENTREGARÁ EN LA OFICINA INTERNACIONAL DEL CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS UPM AL QUE PERTENEZCA EL ALUMNO/A. UC BERKELEY ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 3

LETTER OF INTENT

COLLEGE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 230 WURSTER HALL #1820 BERKELEY, CA 94720–1820

UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID

VICERRECTORADO DE ESTRATEGIA ACADÉMICA E INTERNACIONALIZACIÓN SERVICIO DE RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES PASEO JUAN XXIII, 11. 28040 - MADRID

To whom it may concern,

My name is Natalia Matesanz Ventura, I am a PhD student in the Advanced Architectural Projects Doctoral Program of the Polytechnic University of Madrid. I am working on subversive architectural practices that generates innovation in urban space. I am contacting you because I would like to apply for a 5-month stay within the Department of architecture at the UC Berkeley College of Environmental Design to complete my studies on the hippie communes and queer collectives in the Bay Area. During my research process I´ve become interested in the technologies and practices they developed and visiting Berkeley would provide me with an insight it would be impossible to achieve otherwise.

I have been working on participative architectural practices since I graduated. In 2013, I received a grant from the Spanish government to complete a M.A. in Architectural Projects at the Polytechnic University of Madrid, ETSAM, specializing in relational architecture. My master thesis focused in the relation existing between affections, dissident behaviour and urban space.

My professional practice has been involved in the creation of informal and participative projects in Madrid such as the El Campo de Cebada project that has won several European awards. I have also enjoyed promoting different urban workshops and participative processes. I am a hard worker and do not easily give up. I really have a bond with dissident American movements, I have just published an article about Losaida community gardens in New York comparing them to Spanish ones.

My PhD project associates innovation with the capacity and even necessity of the society to build alternative spaces to inhabit. Creative techniques, codified and connected spaces are much more efficient as urban configurations than the orthodox and planned cities. The research links these forms of innovation with the events that took place in the end of the 60’s. Particularly, I have focused in the May ´68 revolts with its racial and gender fights and specially, the American counterculture.

The entrepreneurial spirit in the Californian hippie communes and collectives, along with the environmental movement and the LGBT fights is considered in the research as one of the most important cases of study.

UcBerkeley, the cradle of the environmental movement, represents the origin of the counterculture. In terms of construction, as observed in the hippie communes but also in political and social terms, as observed in the streets of El Castro. It would be impossible to properly complete my PhD without visiting the UC Environmental Design. I really want this opportunity to spend half a year in contact not only with all the first bibliographical resources that I need to accomplish the research, but also with the people in the university of California because it’s essential to enrich and finish my PhD.

That experience would not only enormously benefit my academic career, but also offer me a new perspective and knowledge about how to criticize and understand the research process and transdisciplinary projects that I am so interest in. I want to look at things from the Berkeley perspective, forcing myself to operate outside of my “comfort zone”. This is an opportunity to improve my methods within the College of Environmental Design, learn and collaborate closely with my host Professor Greg Castillo, a specialist in my field of research, aswell as the others professors and courses of the Architectural Department.

I believe it is time for me to broaden my academic experience and enrich the final state of my PhD research with this stay in Berkeley, one of the most important universities in the world. In order to move forward in my thesis and in my academic career, the UC Berkeley College of Environmental Design is definitely the place I need to go to.

Best regards, Natalia Matesanz. Madrid 5th January 2018

UC BERKELEY ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 7

INVITATION LETTER UC Berkeley Environmental Design invitation letter.

Professor: Greg Castillo

& & % , &'$ 2 . :6<<==9; 3

9 8<696 $ - "

89 "& $ 867;

$ &

! & " $& & ! $ & &'$ & & ! ! ( $! & % - " % &! ( & +!' % % & &' & % $ $ $! 7: ' '%& &! 7: $ 867</ ) +!'$ ' &+ !%&/ % ( % & ) "$!( !""!$&' &+ !$ +!' &! ! +!'$ ! &!$ $ % $ ! +!'$ %% $& & ! -

!

"

% &!$% &! & & & & % '%& & & ' ' $ #' $ &% % ) % ( #' & & %'$ !( $ / % ) !& "$!( + +!'$ !%& %& &'& ! / !$ !$ !$ & ! - " % ! %' &. &&".00(%" / $ +/ ' % ) % &&"%.00' %/ $ +/ '0 %'$ 0 !$ & ! 1( % & 1% ! $%1"!%& ! %

& $ ) !& + &' & ! $ - & " $& & ! ) !& "$!( + ' '$ +!'$ ( % &/ % !$ &$ ( - ! ! & ! %- ( !) %- %'$ - & - '%& !( $ + +!' !$ +!'$ % ! $% "%/

!! !$) $ &! "!% & ( )% !'& +!'$ ' +!'$ ( % & '$ & *& + $/

& %&-

$ %& ! %%! & $! %%!$ " $& & ! $ & &'$ - ! ! ( $! & % ( $% &+ ! !$ - $ + $ %& !4 $ +/ '

http://arch.ced.berkeley.edu

UC BERKELEY ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 9

REFERENCES

FEDERICO SORIANO PELÁEZ Director

Federico Soriano is an Architect from the E.T.S.A.M. in 1986 and Doctor architect by the E.T.S.A.M. in 2002. Chair of the Department of Architectural Projects from 2012 to 2016, he is a tenured professor of Projects at the School of Architecture of Madrid.

Director and editor of the magazine “Fisuras de la Cultura Contemporánea”.

He alternates his professional work with dedication to research and criticism, writing in different books and specialized magazines, as well as participating in various courses and conferences. He has been director of the magazine “Arquitectura” of the Official College of Architects of Madrid.

He regularly teaches conferences both in Spain and in various other countries. He has also been a visiting professor at several universities. He has been a jury in various contests and prizes.

Federico Soriano.

PhD Full professor UPM-ETSAM Madrid, January 25th 2018

To whom it may concern, My name is Federico Soriano Peláez, professor at the Architecture School in Madrid and Head of the Architectural Project Department from 2012 to 2017. I met Natalia while she was undertaking her post-graduate studies at the ETSAM. She joined the Assistant Teaching Program of my department, where she collaborated for 4 years.

As the Director of the Architectural Projects Department, I personally selected Natalia in 2013 to work as the Coordinator of all the ETSAM Undergraduate Final Thesis of the school. This position involved collaboration across multiple areas, demonstrating her capacity to interact with students, professors and different disciplines within the academic and institutional environment. She did an outstanding job.

Natalia has all the qualities necessary to be an inspiring teacher and researcher. Her enthusiasm, work capacity, good judgment, empathy with the students and ability to blend in with the faculty have clearly helped to improve the performance of the students.

Currently, and while driving her own architectural practice, she is working on her PhD thesis, that I am supervising.

Her ongoing research is primarily involved in the investigation of emotional and dissident spatial configurations, and of the relationship between contemporary urban landscape, physical bodies and space. A relevant field of study within contemporary architecture framework and in line with her professional activity.

Natalia is interested in investigating the spatial configurations of the “out of the land” movement, its instrumental innovations and involvement with architects such as Bunkminster Füller, Steve Baer or Stewart Brand in the California of the 60´s and 70’s. These Do it yourself practices, informal and based in the affection and dissent parameters, are one of the contemporary topics that we must deal with in urban studies, in academic and professional terms, in the contemporary city.

Besides working since 2006 for architectural firms such as Carlos Arroyo or Angel Verdasco Architects (whose work I personally follow) she collaborates with different spanish relevant architecture collectives such as Basurama, Zuloark or Paisaje Transversal participating in numerous design projects, workshops and competitions. Particularly, she is a co-founder of “El Campo de Cebada” a social and multidisciplinary awarded and published project in Madrid.

In my opinion Natalia has the adequate intellectual capacity and emotional maturity to undertake whichever academic or professional endeavor she may wish to pursue. She is a source of creative ideas, always willing to take initiative and an outstanding professional. In my opinion, she would make a great asset for any prospective organization. It was a privilege to have her as a member of our team. Therefore I highly recommend Ms. Natalia Matesanz Ventura for the international grant of the UPM to go to UCBerkeley Environmental College Design.

Sincerely, Federico Soriano Peláez

UC BERKELEY ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 11

REFERENCES

JUAN MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ LEÓN Director

Juan Miguel Hernández León is Professor of Composition at the School of Architecture of Madrid (ETSAM). He is currently President of the Círculo de Bellas Artes.

Director of the journals Passage of Architecture and Criticism (Prize Santiago of the architectural diffusion) and Illuminations, collaborates habitually in specialized publications in architecture, art or thought, like International Architect, Lotus, Casabella, Domus, Living Architecture, AV, Architecture and Magazine of the West.

He is the scientific director of the collections Textos de Arquitectura (AKAL) and Arte y Arquitectura (ABADA). Among his latest projects are the Cultural Foundation in Salamanca (next to Alvaro Siza), the Congress Palace in the Labor University of Zamora (next to Francisco Mangado) and the Museum of Contemporary Art in Vélez Málaga.

Of his bibliography deserve to stand out the following titles: Special Plan Villa of Madrid (1986), Barcelona Olympic. The renewed city (1992), Madrid Madrid project (1983-1987) (1987), Spanish architecture. Century XX (1997), Guide of architecture Spain (1920-2000) (1997), Architecture of the XX century (2004), Un-Volumetric Architecture (2005)

UC BERKELEY ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 13

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

安

孴

UPM POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF MADRID Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura

UC BERKELEY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Environmental College of Design

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

H C R EA CT S E R OJE PR

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

* NATALIA MATESANZ VENTURA

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

宊

Women March in 1968

The Digers The Death of money

宄

孴

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

CALIFORNIAN QUEER SPATIALITIES AND URBAN INNOVATION

孵

孶

AFFECTION AND DISSENT

孷

* GENERAL FRAMEWORK

學

CALIFORNIAN QUEER SPATIALITIES AND URBAN INNOVATION

This research project is an important part of the PhD dissertation entitled: AFFECT AND DISSENT IN THE RE-CONFIGURATION OF URBAN SPACE (ARCHITECTURAL ALTERNATIVES PARAMETERS IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF HETHERODOX ENVIRONMENTS). The PhD aims to prove how some non-physical and socially-based parameters such as affection and dissent are keystones in the production of contemporary urban space. This is, how some alternative, ilegal, informal constructions and community practices leads to specific innovations and urban improvements that traditional planned city is not able to produce.

孹

* CASE OF STUDY 孺

孻

In order to understand these forms of innovation, the PhD presents some cases of study mostly linked to what the research understand as the cradle of the post-modern western society: the subversive movements of the 60’s and 70’s. May 68’ revolts, gender, LGBT and civil rights fights but above all, the influence of the American counterculture and the environmental movement.

The role of dissident organized communities and events such as the Kaliflower commune and newsletter, the Angels of light, the Cockettes or the Diggers collectifs in San Francisco or USCO collectif in New York are in the core of the dissertation.

孼

* CONTEXT

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

In 2000, the Harvard Project on the City, directed by Rem Koolhaas, presented Shopping, a research that highlighted the unstoppable transfer to the private of the public activity. Globalization, commercial strategies and the media were already contributing to “colonize” squares, streets, museums, churches and hospitals, benefiting consumerism1.

Today the disciplinary and control society2 is being surpassed by a performance society, as Byung-Chul Han3 puts. Architecture is no longer a tool for controlling bodies and reproduction.

Emotional capitalism goes beyond Guy Debord’s worst expectations4. Today, people are are controlled by social networks and personal data, supervising our ways of living and relating to the Polis. Public space seems to disappear5.

However, understanding the public as a relational and political space of the common6, we could state like Stefano Boeri did, that public space is not disappearing but just mutating its shape, 孴孶

孴孷

1 KOOLHAAS, Rem, et al. Mutations. Actar, 2000.p.124 2 FOUCAULT, Michel. Discipline & punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage, 2012.

3 HAN, Byung-Chul. La sociedad de la transparencia. Herder Editorial, 2013.

4 GUY, Debord. La sociedad del espectáculo. Valencia: Editorial Pre-textos, 2003 5 INABA, Jeffrey; KOOLHAAS, Rem; LEONG, Sze Tsung. Harvard Design School guide to shopping. Edited by Chuihua Judy Chung. Kln: Taschen, 2001.

6 SCHMITT, Carl. The concept of the political: Expanded edition. University of Chicago Press, 2008 UC BERKELEY ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 17

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

安

孴

孵

孶

into a diffuse net of emergent “molecular” capitalism of small actors who are taking the lead7.

Certain citizen dynamics demonstrate that public space remains alive, although restructured and in a diffuse form. It no longer has to do with the traditional representation or monumentality, but with relational qualities framed by the affective spatial and critical turn of the 1990s8.

*NEW SPATIAL CATEGORIES IN THE CITY MEANS NEW ARCHITECTURAL TOOLS 孷

Following the epistemics changes of the second half of the twentieth century that links emotions to the configuration of social space, several new spatial categories have appeared. Some of them come from the transformation of the day to day living, in today’s society. 學

孹

孺

For example, a lot of self-managed or provided by the government spaces can be seen in the city of Madrid9, as well as orchard groups, productive spaces for citizen initiatives, spaces for self-expression and collaboration, co-workings, etc. These projects entail the active participation of the citizens in the construction of their own city.

Likewise, phenomena such as Facebook, Rbnb, Surf packers, or even Tinder are altering the traditional characteristics (perimeter, volume, measure) of urban and domestic spaces. Nowadays, a space can have no physical perimeter anymore, being spread in a lot of different locations at the same time like for example a space for an ephemeral love encounter.

孻

Thus, new meanings and parameters are being created. They are different from the classic disciplines and especially linked to spatial parameters of affection and dissidence. These parameters need a better understanding, management and application as architectural design tools.

孼

Affects and dissidence are leading to the transformation of what we understand today by urban space and even more, public space. Streets can be perceived from our rooms and a private bathroom can be public and seen from a pub thanks to new technologies.

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

Beatriz Preciado posed in 2014, that we are facing a pharmacopornographic society. Throught different techniques of subjectivation, tools and dispositifs our bodies are monitorised throught architecture. A “ new kind of capitalism that is hot, psycotropic, and punk” manifests, a post-democratic space where public and private categories are being alterated.10

“The apartment is now a peepshow and a gallery, where inhabiting means broadcasting a fiction of interiority that is publicly construdted as intimate and private”11

These new situations reveal the impossibility to apply traditional definitions of space. At this moment it can be considered that the architectural theories and practices need to establish 7 BOERI, Stefano; LANZANI, Arturo. Gli orizzonti della città diffusa. Casabella, 1992, vol. 588, p.

44-59.

8 SOJA, Edward W. Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory.

New York: Verso, 1989. ISBN: 9780860919360.

9 The Urban project El Campo de Cebada is a good example and can be seen in the CV. Mayo 2012-Septiembre 2013. In it, citizen participation and negotiation processes have been applied as generators of a truly utilitarian, evolutionary architecture adapted to the needs of today’s society.

10 PRECIADO, Beatriz. Architecture as a Practice of Biopolitical Disobedience. Log, 2012, no 25, p.

121-134.

11 ibid.

18

宊

宄

孴

孵

孶

孷

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

CALIFORNIAN QUEER SPATIALITIES AND URBAN INNOVATION

new tools, concepts and methods to understand what urban space exactly is.

Social needs and changing desires of the inhabitants of the current city are generated around affective-dissident spaces, which diverge from those generated in the planned and unmovable city derived from modern zoning and Corbusier urban planning model.

This study will be directed towards those relational processes located mostly in urban centres.

Specifically, in those streets, plots or terrain-vague, in which property is confusing, being neither public nor private, but shared, assigned, or co-managed among different users.

*PRECEDENTS: A DIFFERENT CITY 學

孹

孺

孻

Current urban dynamics need a more expert approach in alternative spatial design. A more adaptable, evolutionary city that facilitates urban growth or de-growth freely and indeterminacy. The ineffectiveness or inadequacy of urban parameters and methodologies established from the modern movement, within the framework of Spanish urban planning, oblige to rethink most of the urban processes of the 20th century, but also to retake into account some of the countercultural events and practices that originally opposed to this methods in order to outline a new concept of city.

May 68 revolts and the statements of the countercultural movement must be rethinked in architectural terms. This is, re.drawing, re-mapping them. These phenomena embraced the flexible and indeterminate, almost improvised practices. They allowed the incorporation of contingent thinking and collective learning in the production of space12, basing their design tools in people / bodies, communication and a critic attitude. The Kaliflower coomune in San Francisco or the Drop city in Colorado, for example are physical results of this affective-dissident based spaces, the from now on so called Affecdent spaces.

孼

* AFFECDENT SPACES

孴孳

This PHD research aims to define and understand Affectdence as an architectural concept resulting from the combination of two specific and usually independent conditions: affect and dissidence within a spatial framework. The concept, as if it were the result of an alloy, does not represent the addition of the characteristics of both affect and dissidence separately, but acquires new special properties which don’t exist in either affective or in dissident spaces.

孴孴

孴孵

Naturally, in the PhD we clarify first the meaning of affective space, which evolution and transformations depends on users interactions, and secondly what is meant by dissident space, a delocalised, unplanned and normally hided space. However, the specific parameters and potential of Affectdent spaces is what the PHD mostly develops.

Affectdent spaces are inter-connected in a net, physically or vitually de-localised, and generate their own technical and technological innovations and tools. 孴孶

12 LEFEBVRE, Henri. 1991. The production of space. Trans. N. Donaldson-Smith. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974. 孴孷

UC BERKELEY ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 19

Many bars kept extra liquor in a secret panel behind the bar, or in a car down the block, to facilitate resuming business as quickly as possible if alcohol was seized.

the only bar for gay men in New York City where dancing was allowed

The Snake Pit Greenwich

Bar Restaurant Hotel Shop Disco Sauna Cinema Jan Kapsenberg Erotic Maneuvres

The Stonewall Inn Greenwich 1968 police Raids

宄

孴

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

CALIFORNIAN QUEER SPATIALITIES AND URBAN INNOVATION

The origin of these affective-dissident spaces lies in empathic informal processes and relational social-based dynamics starting in outlaw, anti-hegemonic, and even private territories. The main point of the Affectdent spaces is their capacity to canalise innovation while transforming the concept of public space.

As already stated, some ordinary, organised informal spatial practices, based on affects and dissidence, are already generating a parallel architecture that creates a neo-public space, “where rules are set according to its users”13 and that contributes to practical innovation from a displaced, virtual or physical space through a connected interdependent communication network.

The community gardens net in the Low-East side of Manhattan, promoted by the counterculture and the environmental movement, but also the distribution and sale system of the top manta in Barcelona, the network of self-organized urban orchards in Madrid or the new cybernetic forms of relation, production and learning, are examples that are redrawing public space, by relocating it, reconnecting it, reframing it.

In some of these examples, architects such as Bunkminster Fuller, Gordon Matta-Clarck and others, got involved in the process, playing an essential role in the construction of these apaces.

Architecture is not disappearing but public space, at least as we know it traditionally, may be. ¿How architectural thinking and practice should adapt to those new circumstances? The research presents a series of examples that are permanently adapting to the fluxes of a liquid society14, and that can contribute to prove that Affectdent spaces are the ones that nowadays are regenerating the public and leading architectural innovation.

孻

*WHY UC BERKELEY: THE CALIFORNIA CASE OF STUDY 孼

孴孳

孴孴

The importance of counterculture and its spatial consecuences in the research, from the 70’s hippie communes and alternatives movements in San Francisco and New York, to the current punk, DIY and queer struggles, demands a more detailed study and deep bibliographic development from an architectural perspective in an American university such as UC Berkeley and specially the College of Environmental Design.

What can be learned about the Stonewall revolts of 1968 in New York, hence what can be learned about the LGTB community in El Castro, San Francisco? Ironically it seems that what has been repressed is now what architecture should learn from, instead of keeping ignoring it, as all the others queer, transgender or creep movements.

孴孵

The research aims to define differents forms os application and alternative spatial tools that allows the architect to take part in the generation and design of these spaces. Finding out how this kind of space works and how to aplly it within an academic or professional framework represents an important goal to achieve.

孴孶

Two cases are related to Berkeley College of Design:

- The alternative LGTB community and spaces like saunas, dark rooms, bars in San Francisco, 孴孷

13 14

MUMFORD, Lewis. The Case Against” modern Architecture.”. 1962.

BAUMAN, Zygmunt. Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

UC BERKELEY ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 21

The Drop-city site in Southern Colorado

The Drop-city, Colorado

宄

孴

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

CALIFORNIAN QUEER SPATIALITIES AND URBAN INNOVATION

孵

once oppressed movements. The performances that took place in the streets of the city powered by collectifs such as The Diggers or the Hibiscus Drag Theater project.

孶

-The “out of the land” movement, orginated in Califfornia in the 70’s and the hippie comunes.

These practices are considered a fundamental engine of the DIY philosophy and are seen as generators of innovation and critical thinking.

孷

Those two cases of study are in the centre of this research project. The study of these two study cases is the reason why visiting the College of Environmental Design will be so enriching. The visit is the perfect opprotuniy to deep into the details, and to be able to map these spaces rigorously.

學

孹

孺

* STATE OF DEVELOPMENT: The dissertation has a defined state of the question an theoretical framework, introducing and describing the concepts of affective space and dissident space. The study of 68’s revolts in Paris has led to deepening in the events and mobilizations of the 60s with those related to the American counterculture, the struggle for sexual equality, gender, against racism and violence of these years focused on the cities of New York and San Francisco.

Four work scenarios are being developed and mapped to illustrate the phenomenon of affected affective spaces. Two of them require to go to Berkeley to do a proper Fieldwork. The four cases of study produce cross-references and address transversal lines of reflection and thought, such as gender, queer, urban regeneration or the body.

孻

* RELATION WITH THE WORK OF THE HOST GREG CASTILLO 孼

Professor Gerg Castillo endorses this stay. He is actually one of the leading specialists in “hippie modernity”15. His works and research on the counterculture in the Bay Area and his papers on the hippie communes of the 70s are very noteworthy. His work inspirates part of the PhD. 孴孳

孴孴

He is also a Research Associate at the United States Studies Centre at the University of Sydney in Australia, specializes in the architectural history of Interwar and Postwar America and Europe. His course offerings include seminars on spaces of consumption, countercultural design in the ‘60s, transatlantic transfers of architectural practices, a global survey of modernist architecture, architectural history research methods, and a writing and publication workshop. Greg received his Doctoral degree in architectural history (2000) and a Master’s degree in architecture from the University of California at Berkeley (1995). He also holds a Bachelor of Fine Arts degree in photography from the Rochester Institute of Technology.

孴孵

The interest of defining, drawing, mapping these affective-dissident processes is contributing to the operative evolution in the current project processes, favoring a construction more committed to the user, what is located, and the unforeseen in the public space. 孴孶

15 CASTILLO, Greg; CHOI, Esther. Hippie Modernism: The Struggle for Utopia. Minneapolis, MN: Walker Art Center, 2015. 孴孷

UC BERKELEY ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 23

The strobo

Whiz Bang Quick City 1971, New York

Kaliflower commune, San Francisco

Exploding Plastic Inevitable

USCO Colllectif, New York

宄

孴

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

CALIFORNIAN QUEER SPATIALITIES AND URBAN INNOVATION

孵

* RELEVANCE AND PURPOSE OF THE STAY:

孶

The research aims to define different forms of application and alternative spatial tools that allows the architect to take part in the generation and design of these spaces. Finding out how this kind of space works and how to apply it within an academic or professional framework represents an important goal to achieve.

孷

The purpose of the stay is on the one hand, to deepen the study of the relationships between the hippie community of the movement originated in Berkeley with the ways of understanding the freedom of bodies and the incorporation of queer identities, and their consequences nowadays.

學

In order to do this, it is necessary to generate an exhaustive fieldwork, which will allows to identify and map the network of affective-dissident spaces in San Francisco.

孹

The goal is to catalogue the different devices and spatial technologies generated from the population. Therefore, it is essential to go to the archives of the University of Berkeley and in particular, the Environmental College of Design where this movement mainly originates, as well as to the city of San Francisco to carry out an in situ monitoring of the affective-dissident space and environmental ideology and meet the LGBT community.

孺

*METHODOLOGY 孻

Drawing as a tool and research method:

孼

The investigation of the case studies is confronted with a practical production: based on the drawing and construction of some maps, prototypes or models that allow to understand the alternative and invisible landscapes normally in the city.

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

Thus, it will be deepened on the one hand in the process of bibliographic documentation, on the other hand different frames or experimental means will be generated through the cartography of the different cases of study.

*EXPECTED RESULT AND IMPACT: The potential application of these models is of undeniable value for a large number of groups that live in the city. These models of capturing subjectivities, properly financed and oriented, would provide reliable and high quality diagnoses to start thinking about the city from the perception of its users, wich means data.

孴孶

The final objective of this research project is to relate the innovative capacity and entrepreneurial drive of the California environment of Silicon Valley with this capacity for instrumental innovation and critical thinking or independent thinking of the first hippies communities of the counterculture.

孴孷

These created their own tools and new forms of conviction that nowadays are again necessary UC BERKELEY ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 25

14 .0

77.2

17

.4

5.0

10.9

10.2

8.6

Autogerated gardens in New York

TOP MANTA Nomad sellers

宄

孴

孵

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

CALIFORNIAN QUEER SPATIALITIES AND URBAN INNOVATION

in European and Spanish society. As it has been demonstrated in the amount of collective spaces that are emerging in the city since the 11M phenomenon. Collective spaces such as the Campo de Cebada, or the network of urban gardens, when coming into contact with American networks can generate very important collaborations with each other

孶

*ADVANTAGES FOR THE UPM & UC BERKELEY 孷

學

Making this stay possible in Berkeley, the UPM, one of the leading agencies of national research, could help to weave common research links between the two Universities.

It is essential to make from a spatial approach the study of this counterculture and its reflection in European culture through the media, music and also the expansion of drugs. Giving place to new spaces and models of coexistence as well as new forms of communication, relationship and technological innovation that today still serve as a reference in European cities such as Berlin, Paris, Madrid or Barcelona.

孹

The institutional tools developed in New York, as is the case after the historical exoerience with community gardens, as well as the law of homosexual marriage and the already established gay and transsexual culture in California since the 1960s show the progress with respect to Spain. 孺

孻

孼

孴孳

However, not only Spain has to learn from the US but also from there it can be useful to create a relationship on these issues with the UPM, since Spain is one of the European countries where the culture of collective ls has developed more. Especially on the part of the effervescent post-crisis generation that is generating social innovation systems and new urban models and alternative ways of understanding the collective urban space. The academy has to absorb and channel through research the relational dynamics that are taking place today in the streets

If the university adopts an active role in this awareness of the global epistemic change, hosting and funding research from its facilities, contributing to the realization, prototyping and configuration of tools to address these new spatial models among which the object of Study of this project, would adopt a leading role in a field of study that is beginning to be addressed already in European universities such as Berkeley, Columbia, AA or schools such as Barlett School through its classes and research groups.

*DURATION OF THE STAY: 孴孴

A five-month stay is proposed, given the double combination of objectives, on the one hand, to explore the Berkeley bibliographic archive, on the other hand, to map the aforementioned affected network. 孴孵

Lastly, it can only be added that the final results of the stay will also depend on the considerations and guidance of the professor who will direct the work of the doctoral student, which will only enrich the research. 孴孶

孴孷

UC BERKELEY ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 27

宄

宅

宆

宇

孴

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

28

守

安

宊

宄

孴

孵

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

CALIFORNIAN QUEER SPATIALITIES AND URBAN INNOVATION

*BIBLIOGRAPHY BAUMAN, Zygmunt. Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

孶

BOERI, Stefano; LANZANI, Arturo. Gli orizzonti della città diffusa. Casabella, 1992, vol. 588, p. 44-59.

ISBN 00087181 孷

BOAL, Iain, et al. (ed.). West of Eden: communes and utopia in northern California. PM press, 2012.

BOURRIAUD, Nicolas. Esthétique relationelle. Les presses du réel, 2001. 學

BOURRIAUD, Nicolas. Post-producción. Buenos Aires, 2004, Adriana Hidalgo Editora. ISBN: 9789871156054 孹

BRAND, Stewart. Apocalypse Juggernaut Hello. Whole Earth Catalog. January 1970, http://www.spatialagency.net/database/whole.earth.catalog

孺

孻

孼

CASTILLO, Greg; CHOI, Esther. Hippie Modernism: The Struggle for Utopia. Minneapolis, MN: Walker Art Center, 2015.

CASTILLO, Greg. Hippie Modernism: How Bay Area design radicals tried to save the planet. Places Journal, 2015.

CLOUGH, Patricia T. y HALLEY, Jean. (Eds.). The affective turn: theorizing the social. Durham, N. C. 2007. Duke University Press Books.

DÍAZ, Eva. Dome Culture in the Twenty-first Century. Grey Room, 2011, p. 80-105. 孴孳

DOUTHIT, Peter, KHAN, Lloyd, ‘Drop City Revisited’, in Lloyd Khan (ed.) Shelter (Shelter Publications Inc., 1973).

孴孴

DURAND,Régis;STERNFELD,Joel:Sweetearth:ExperimentalutopiasinAmerica.Architectured’aujourd’hui, 2012, no 388, p. 134-143.

孴孵

FINN, Donovan. DIY urbanism: implications for cities. Journal of Urbanism: International research on placemaking and urban sustainability. [En línea] Edited F. Taylor. 2014, vol. 7, no 4, pp. 381-398. [Consulta 13/5/2017] Disponible en http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rjou20/current#.

FOUCAULT, Michel. Discipline & punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage, 2012. 孴孶

GUY, Debord. La sociedad del espectáculo. Valencia: Editorial Pre-textos, 2003

孴孷

HAN, Byung-Chul. La sociedad de la transparencia. Barcelona: Herder Editorial, 2013. ISBN: UC BERKELEY ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 29

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

孴

孵

9788425432521

KOOLHAAS, Rem, et al. Mutations. Actar, 2000. p.124 孶

LARA, Ali. Vintage affective theories: Notes on Deleuze, Bergson and Whitehead. 2015.

LEFEBVRE, Henri. La revolución urbana. Madrid: Alianza. 1983. 孷

LEFEBVRE,Henri.Theproductionofspace.Trans.N.Donaldson-Smith.Oxford:BasilBlackwell,1991.

學

孹

LEVINSON, David; CHRISTENSEN, Karen. Encyclopedia of community: From the village to the virtual world. Sage, 2003.

MATTHEWS, Mark. Droppers. America’s first hippie commune, Drop City. University of Oklahoma Press, 2012.

MILLER, John Stuart. It’s hip to unzip: open land communes and their neighbours in northern California, 1966-1979. 2016. Tesis Doctoral. University of British Columbia. 孺

MILLER, Timothy. The 60s communes: Hippies and beyond. Syracuse University Press, 1999. 孻

孼

MUMFORD, Lewis. The Case Against” modern Architecture.”. 1962.

PRECIADO, Beatriz. Architecture as a Practice of Biopolitical Disobedience. Log, 2012, no 25, p. 121134.

ROTH, Matthew. Coming Together. Ten Years That Shook the City: San Francisco 1968-1978, 2011, p.

192. 孴孳

SADLER, Simon. Drop City Revisited. Journal of Architectural Education, January 2006, vol. 59, no 3, p. 5-14. 孴孴

孴孵

SCHMITT, Carl. The concept of the political: Expanded edition. University of Chicago Press, 2008

SCOTT,FelicityD.OutlawTerritories:EnvironmentsofInsecurity/ArchitecturesofCounterinsurgency.

New York: MIT Press, 2016. ISBN: 1935408739

SCOTT, Felicity D. Acid Visions. Grey Room, 2006, no 23, p. 22-39 [En línea] Ed. por A. Zeynep Çelik y al.

[Consulta 1/2/2017] Disponible en https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/10.1162/grey.2006.1.23.22 孴孶

SOJA, Edward W. Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. New York: Verso, 1989. ISBN: 9780860919360. 孴孷

30

宄

孴

孵

孶

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

CALIFORNIAN QUEER SPATIALITIES AND URBAN INNOVATION

SOJA, Edward. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places (p.

53). Oxford: Blackwell.

SOJA, Edward. W. Lessons in Spatial Justice. Hunch: the Berlage Institute Report, 1999, vol. 1, p. 98107.

TURNER, Fred. From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise fo Digitial Utopianism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006) 孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

UC BERKELEY ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 31

CV Natalia Matesanz Ventura

Natalia Matesanz Ventura - AKA @cumulolimbo_- is an architect graduated from the Alcalá de Henares School of Architecture.

She has worked for architectural firms such as Carlos Arroyo, Jaramillo & Kreisler, Ángel Verdasco Architects and EAS Estudio Alvarez-Sala.

She has also collaborated on punctual occasions with different Spanish collectives such as Basurama, Zuloark or Paisaje Transversal in participative urban projects. She is one of the co-founders of “Campo de Cebada” social and multidisciplinary urban project in Madrid born in 2011.

She was a teaching assistant in ching Unit directed by professor course in Advanced Architectural tecture, ETSAM, specialising in

2013 at the Architectural Projects TeaJosé Gallegos, while completing an MA Projects at the Madrid School of Archilandscape architecture and urbanism.

From 2013 to 2015 she worked at the Architectural Projects Department as coordinator of the ETSAM Undergraduate Final Projects.

In May 2014 she started working as a teaching assistant at Unit19 directed by Professor Federico Soriano, Pedro Urzaiz and Eva Gil. While driving her own architectural practice,Natalia is currently completing her PhD thesis supervised by Professor Juan Miguel Hernández León and Federico Soriano Peláez, (ETSAM). Her ongoing research focuses on the emotional relationship between contemporary landscape, bodies, and urban space.

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

孴

孵

孶

孷

學

CURRICULUM VITAE Natalia Matesanz Ventura nmv.arq@gmail.com www.cumulolimbo.com Arquitecta y Doctoranda en Proyectos Arquitectónicos Avanzados Departamento de Proyectos Arquitectónicos DPA Escuela técnica Superior de Arquitectura de Madrid ETSAM de la UPM. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.

* 孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

..EDUCATION & RESEARCH

Phd candidate. Currently completing her PhD thesis supervised by Professor Juan Miguel Hernández León and Federico Soriano Peláez, (ETSAM) The ongoing research focuses on the emotional relationship between contemporary landscape, bodies, and the design of urban space..Feb 2018.

Master´degree in Advanced Architectural Projects : MPAA. School of Architecture of Madrid ( ETSAM ). UPM . Polytechnic University of Madrid. Specialization Line “ Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning “ . General Scholarship from Ministry of Education..Sep 2012-Sep 2013.

Architecture degree from the Alcalá de Henares School of Architecture in Madrid ( ETSAG ). Specialties : “Urban Heritage monuments and joint rehabilitation “ and “ Planning and Urban Design “ with honor standing..Sep 2002-Sep 2011.

French studies in the Lycée Français de Madrid. Scientific Baccalaureate. Bachalauréat French and selectivity test . ( PAU ) .Sep1988-Jul 2002.

孴孴

孴孵

..AWARDS 2017-2018. INJUVE YOUNG TALENT AWARDS. Government of Spain.

2014-2016. UPM Scolarship to collaborate in the Architectural Departamentof the ETSAM. Madrid.

2013-2015. UPM Scolarship to collaborate in the Architectural Departamentof the ETSAM. Madrid.

孴孶

2012-2013. UPM Scolarship from the Ministry to complete the MA of Architectural Projects. Madrid.

2011.DESIGN WITH AIR 2 [MAD] Scholarship from the EPS university CEU San Pablo. Matadero de Madrid.

孴孷

孴學

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

孴

..TEACHING & ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE 孵

-Occupy unit, Cork, Irlanda. Escuela de Arquitectura. Proyecto cebada. junto a prof. Stephen Foley. 2016 -X-cenas. Coordinación, ideación y producción de curso de verano experimental. Instituto de Arquitectura de Madrid del Departamento de Proyectos Arquitectónicos de la ETS de Arquitectura. UPM. 2015

孶

-Assistant professor for undergraduate at the Architectural Projects Teaching Unit19 directed by Professor Federico Soriano. School of Architecture ( ETSAM ) Polytechnic University of Madrid. .2013-May2015.

-Coordinator at Architectural Projects Department of all the ETSAM Undergraduate Final Projects, Polytechnic University of Madrid while driving her own architectural practice and research activity. .Sep2013-May2015.

孷

-Jury session Review Undergraduate Projects course in Architectural Projects University of Madrid, invited by Professor Carlos García to the Architectural Projects Teaching Unit directed by Professor José Ignacio Linazasoro. .Mar 2015.

-Editorial board member and co-founder of the Displacements Journal, ISSN 2386-9089, developed within the Cultural Landscape Research Group (GIP) ETSAM and now independent. Currently working on its second issue #REFI [Reality/Fiction]. .2012-May2015.

學

-Collaboration in “Cultural Landscape research group” in School of Architecture of Madrid ( ETSAM ) Project called: Experience and knowledge. -Project approach and strategies in contemporary landscape..2012-2013.

-Assistant professor at the Architectural Projects Teaching Unit directed by Professor José Gonzalez Gallegos. School of Architecture ETSAM. Polytechnic University of Madrid..2012-2013.

孹

-Jury sessions Reviews Projects course in Architecture IE University of Segovia, invited by Dr. architect José Juan Barba..Nov 2011.

-Support teaching practices of the subject “ Technological Innovations “ coordinated by Professors Alberto Alarcón and Rafael Hernando in the seminar for the implementation of temporary pavilion at Alcalá de Henares School of Architecture in Madrid ( ETSAG ) ..2009-2010.

孺

孻

.. SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS -Undercover: Biennale di Venezia. Seminario junto al Politécnico di Milano. 2016 -Curso bokashi IED. Construcción de prototipos auto-eficientes. Colaboración con Pez Estudio. 2015

孼

孴孳

-Pizza-tízate: Workshop en espacio Tetuán. Construcción de un proceso colectivo a través del evento. Colaboradores: Paaq (Franciso Fernández) y Laura Zaratrusta .

-Agrotablao: Coordinación de taller de construcción participativa y ecológica en colaboración con la oficina de arquitectura Pez Estudio, en el marco del Certamen de Activación Socio Cultural del Centro Histórico El Casc 2014, Villena, Alicante. 2014 -Hand Made Urbanism3: Taller de construcción con los estudiantes de PEI, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, colaboración con el colectivo de arquitectura Zuloark.2013 -Sonorama Festival: Taller DIY . Auto-construcción de intumentos. Colaboración con Basurama. 2013

孴孴

孴孵

-Eme3: Bottom-Up. International Architecture Festival Barcelona. Workshop. Urban Rights. Colaboración con el colectivo de arquitectura Zuloark. 2012 -Taller de Gradas: Coordinación del equipo, co-supervisión y co-ejecución. Junto a Manuel (Colectivo Basurama) e Iñaqui (Paisaje Transversal). Campo de Cebada. Madrid. 2012

.. ACADEMICAL ACTIVITY -COCA | Congreso internacional en comunicación arquitectónica: Selección de artículo.2017

孴孶

-ARCHIPRIX International: Asistente workshops Internacionales Archiprix 2015 “Towards a middle-out Urbanism” ETSAM/UPM.2015 -Congreso Critic-All. International conference on Architectural Design and criticism.2015

孴孷

Articulo seleccionado: Instruments to face the cosmos. Learning from the dissident landscape of May’68.EDITA: critic|all PRESS. ISBN: 978-84-697-0424-0. © 2014criticall. © Textos y fotografías de los autores Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Genérica -Displacements an x’scape journal : Revista de investigación. Miembro del Consejo Editorial y co-fundadora, ISSN 2386-9089. Proyecto

孴學

宄

孴

孵

孶

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

editorial desarrollado dentro del Grupo de Investigación Paisaje Cultural de (GIP) de la ETSAM. Seleccionado para ser presentado en la Bienal de Venecia 2018. Grupo de Investigación Paisaje Cultural de (GIP) de la Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura (ETSAM) 2014-2018.

-Be human_presentación del Máster Habilitante, línea de Paisaje Urbano. Universidad Alcalá de Henares.2014 -Conferencia en Alcalá de Henares de Madrid, “Intervenciones urbanas y proyectos en torno al Reina Sofía” invitado por el profesor José Juan Barba. Master Habilitante Departamento de Urbanismo.2015 -Jurado de curso de grado de Proyectos arquitectónicos de la Universidad de Madrid, invitado por el profesor Carlos García de los Proyectos Arquitectónicos. Unidad dirigida por el profesor José Ignacio Linazasoro.2015 -MAYO68 TFM: Conferencia en el ciclo de presentaciones de las TFM (Tesis fin de Master) en el Máster de proyectos arquitectónicos.

2014

孷

-Jurado en las sesiones críticas de Proyectos de curso. IE Universidad de Arquitectura de Segovia.2012

.. PROFESSIONAL 學

/

EXPERIENCE

collaborative works and comissions:

-UP o cómo colocarse arriba. Proyecto de reforma para vivienda, un bajo con un patio, separados por un invernadero. Madrid. Cliente particular..2017-2018 孹

-Traces: Proyecto de reforma de piso interior de 60m2 y 6 ventanas en Madrid. Cliente particular. 2018 -Pozuelo dream. Project for a detached house in Pozuelo de Alarcon, Madrid. Private client..Sep2014-May 2015.

Ucrania workspace Architectural Project. Making an office for 26 people. .Jun-Dic 2013.

孺

Openbox Design and construction of two reusable and removable pavilions for FIGAN fair in Zaragoza..Dec 2012-Mar 2013.

The running stand: Collective building of Sport Furniture. Team and execution supervising and co-coordination at Campo de Cebada..

Aprl-May 2012.

孻

“A 60m2 dream” Design for a Madrid apartment in Madrid. Private client..Jan 2009.

/ 孼

e p h e m e r a l, i n s t a l l a t i o n s, p e r f o r m a n c e s:

-Los Paseos de Jane. Matadero Madrid. Intermediae. Mapa 3D y gráfica. Colaboración para visibilización situacionista del paseo.

-ZU. La caja de los afectos. Escenografía interactiva para obra teatral infantil. Compañía Movearteparatodos.

-Atlas: Instalación #BésameMucho Proyecto artístico para la Resad, Esc. Arte dramático.Madrid.Comisarios:Jacobo García/Marta Hernán.

孴孳

-#Bésame Mucho: Exposición bajo el comisariado de la galería de Magdalena. Colectivo dedicado a realizar exposiciones en la calle.

-Agrotablao Workshop leader team, in collaboration with Pez Studio. Architectural office in Madrid-Bilbao. Architectural Workshop within El Casc Festival framework. .Jun 2014.

孴孴

-Hand Made Urbanism3: Co-coordinator in the leader team at the Building workshop with PEI students, Pontifical Xavierian University, organized by Zuloark collective...Jul-Aug 2013.

-Co-founder of “Campo de Cebada” social and multidisciplinary urban project in Madrid. . 2011-2015.

孴孵

-Collaborator with different Spanish collectives such as Basurama, Zuloark or Paisaje Transversal in participative urban projects. .20102013.

-Ephemeral setting in a store for a performance at Huertas street in Madrid from Actuah Collective..Feb 2007.

孴孶

/ 孴孷

A r q u i t e c t u r e o f f i c e s:

Estudio EAS . Internacional Salón de Reinos competition, Museo del Prado y otros proyectos básicos y de ejecución. .2016- 2017 Junior architect at Ángel Verdasco Architects. .Dec 2009.

孴學

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

孴

Junior architect at Jaramillo & Kreisler Architecture. .Mar-Sep 2008.

Junior architect at Carlos Arroyo Architects. .Jun 2006. 孵

[R]ACTIVA 04´ Interaction with the city. Workshop at Alcalá de Henares. Madrid. Proposal called PARKEING. Ecosistema Urbano team.

Coordinated by Miguel Moradillos and ETSAG. .Jul-Sep 2004.

孶

..PUBLICATIONS AND 孷

EXHIBITIONS

-Revista Diagonal Número 41 Artículo y portada. Representar espais. ISSN 2013-651X. Artículo: Instrumentos para afrontar el cosmos. Aprendiendo del Mayo 68 parisino.2016.

-#positions, Edición META¬LOCUS, 2016 Madrid, ISBN 978-84-608-6613-8, pgs. 194 2016.

學

-Arquine; concurso n. 18 Pabellón Mextrópolis 2016. Arquine. S.A. de C.v. México. 2015.

-Letter from Ireland: 15 projects to celebrate 2015, the Irish Year of Design Architecture. Nicola Fox Hill, 19

孹

Art, Architecture and Place, The lake isle of Innisfree, Yeats international Architecture Competition, Edited Clio¬na Brady, Bernardette Donohoe, Marianne O´Kane and Cléa van der Grijn, The Western Development Commission, 2015, Sligo Ireland, ISBN-10: 0957664044 y ISBN-13: 978-0957664043, pgs. 53 -Mayo del 68: La revolución de la revolución, Jacques Baynac, Ediciones Acuarela y Machado, 2016 Madrid, ISBN 978-84-7774345-3

孺

-Portada revista Diagonal, número 40, 2015, Barcelona, ISSN 2013-651X, pgs. 64 -TRATADO DE ARQUITECTURA SALVO ALGUNA COSA, Dos Cinco Cinco, Arquitectura Edito¬rial Experimental de la ETSAM, 2016, Madrid.

孻

-Atlas of emulations of the Informal III, IV y V: Exceptional Areas Ud 19 2014-2015 , 5º , 6º y 7º International Design Seminar, N 6, Editorial Fisuras de la Cultura Contemporanea, 2014-2015 Madrid.

-Displacements an x-scape journal. Crime as an act of univeiling: Learning from the dissident landscape of may ´68, Displacements an x´scape journal, Criminal displacements, 2014, Madrid, D. Legal M-12252-2014, pgs 178 .Jan 2014.

孼

-Ugly 19, Dichotomy Journal, University of Detroit Mercy School of Architecture. 2013. Michigan. Editors: Jennifer Richards, Michael Sklenka. Facul¬ty advisors: Tadd Heidgerken, Noah Resnick. ISSN #0276-5748. P 136-138. Jan 2013.

-APPENDIX index fundamental.ismo kool-who? Cortinas y rodapiés, Dos Cinco Cinco, Arquitectura Editorial ..Jan 2013.

-Contemporary Architecture Guide Madrid (1975-2005) published by the EMV : psycho-perceptual Tour of Madrid..Jan 2006.

孴孳

-Biennale International competition 2006: “Southpoint: from Ruin to Rejuvenation, Publication of The Roosevelt Island Universal Arts Center”, hosted by The Emerging New York Architects Committee, AIA New York Chapter..Sep 2005.

-Museo del Prado. Salón de Reinos Competition. Madrid. 2017

孴孴

-The New Pavilion UAH: Exhibition and winning proposal of a temporary pavilion for the university of Alcala de Henares..Oct 2009-Feb 2010.

-Inhabited landscapes ‘pH06 ‘ Exhibition installation at Ateneo Cultural Center ‘El Albéitar’, León University School of Architecture..Sep 2009.

孴孵

-UAH Book 2009. Project proposal in Bonaval Monastery..Mar 2009.

-UAH Book 2008. Project proposal in Complutum. .Apr 2008.

孴孶

孴孷

..LANGUAGES Bilingual: Spanish and French: Official title of the European framework: Diplôme de Langue Française approfondi, DALF C1. .Feb 2012. and Official title of Senior Cycle of French at the Official Language School of Madrid..Jul 2009.

English: Fluent in reading, writing and speaking. Stays in London. Cambridge Certificate Institute. .Jul 2013. Toefl 2017

孴學

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

安

孴

UPM POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF MADRID Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura

UC BERKELEY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Environmental College of Design

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

K O O B

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

* NATALIA MATESANZ VENTURA

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

宊

宄

宅

宆

孴

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

UHVHDUFK DFWLYLWLHV

孺

SDSHUV RWKHUV

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

宇

守

安

宊

宄

孴

*

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

LOISAIDA COMMUNITY GARDENS Affective space, dissent in contemporary urban space 2017-2018 77.2

Given the abandonment by the public sector and the lack of private investment in the Loisaida neighborhood, a network of community sites has, since the 60s, presented a model of appropriation and reorientation of public space. This spontaneous and diffuse infrastructure of the common attacks from marginalization against the lack of equipment and green areas of the neighborhood. Its parameters no longer have to do with European representativeness or traditional monumentality; instead, they are relational, they are based on conditions of affection and dissent. These, framed in the affective and spatial turn of the 90s make up what we call affecdent spaces.

14

.0

孵

5.0

孶 17 .4

10.9

10.2

8.6

孷

6. Jaula para proteger plantas

The gardens of Loisaida are shaped by the relationships of affection exposed, and being in a situation of dissent they present the characteristics of the affecdent spaces: they operate with independent technologies, their own codes and D UHGH¿QHG RUJDQL]DWLRQ $IIHFWLYH VSDFHV SURYH WR EH PRUH HIIHFWLYH LQ WKHLU programmatic and material adaptation, their creativity and constructive innovation, but above all in their ability to reinvent the public through the common and from a critical distance from the status quo, closer to the user.

4. La Casita / kiosko / resguardo

學

3. Muebles maceta / huertos

12. Escenario/ tablado/ ambiente

9. Grada colectiva / eventos

孹

1. Valla/ cerramiento/ control/ limite

7. Altar / virgencita

8. Playground / juegos / niños

10. Estructura para colgar plantas/ macetas

孺

5. Bidones/ almacenaje

2. Letrero / información / horario

10. Pérgola / Elemento de sombra

13. Mural / Identidad

The interest of studying an example like this, with such a journey and great experience on participatory and social processes, is to be able to copy it to other younger spaces and collective dynamics like the Cebada Square or This is a square, or processes like the recent Imagina Madrid that begin today in Madrid and Barcelona or Valencia to become relevant and generate network. We can undoubtedly learn to move from the case study of Loisaida’s gardens and of all New York in general to the current contemporary situation of Spanish cities, where there is lower experience, both at the legal and at the urban awareness OHYHO DQG ZKHUH WRROV DQG RI¿FLDO SURFHVVHV KDYH \HW WR EH HVWDEOLVKHG WR EH able to regulate this type of spaces and dynamics of the common in urban environments.

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

孴孵

å®&#x201E;

å­´

å®&#x2026;

å®&#x2020;

å®&#x2021;

å®&#x2C6;

å®&#x2030;

å®&#x160;

/RLVDLGD FRPPXQLW\ *DUGHQV

å­µ

å­¶

å­·

å­¸

å­¹

å­º

å­»

å­¼

å­´å­³

å­´å­´

å­´å­µ

å­´å­¶

å­´å­·

å­´å­¸

PC \Q U? = C

NN UK

ĺŽ&#x201E;

ĺ­´

*

ĺŽ&#x2026;

ĺŽ&#x2020;

ĺŽ&#x2021;

ĺŽ&#x2C6;

ĺŽ&#x2030;

ĺŽ&#x160;

LOISAIDA COMMUNITY GARDENS Affective space, dissent in contemporary urban space 2017-2018

ĺ­ľ

ĺ­ś

/RLVDLGD FRPPXQLW\ *DUGHQV

ĺ­ˇ

Felicity Scott analyses in Outlaw territories types of architectures that arose in territories outside the law, taking up the term of Steward Brand, which linked the non-normative with the power to â&#x20AC;&#x153;test and test and testâ&#x20AC;?. While Brand conceived geographical distancing as necessary, the gardens of Loisaida are GH ORFDOL]HG HYHQ ZKLOH LPPHUVHG LQ WKH PLGGOH RI WKH FLW\ 7KH\ DUH FRQÂżJXUHG as a spontaneous and molecular emergence, as Stefano Boeri would say, of small actors taking initiatives in this de-localized network.

ĺ­¸

ĺ­š

As in the Californian communes, in the Loisaida sites were also experimented construction methods and alternative technologies, developing instrumental innovations independent from authority.

ĺ­ş

The Charas group, then The Great Real Society, â&#x20AC;&#x153;a self-managed and procreative community development movementâ&#x20AC;? according to Shapins, encouraged these neighborhood actions. In 1965, its founders, Chino GarcĂ­a and Angelo GonzĂĄlez, shifted the model of the street gangs, their human and organizational strength, to community management. This, added to the existence of empty sites in Loisaida, generated an identity and urban self-management system.

ĺ­ť

In 1967, before Matta-Clark met them, Charas contacted Buckminster Fuller, who provided instructions for the construction of a geodesic dome in La Plaza Cultural as detailed by Syeus Mottel. Its low cost, its resistance, its rapid construction and its ability to adapt, allowed its expansion to more sites and rooftops, including Harlem and the Bronx. (Fig. 6 and 7)

ĺ­ź

Whereas Scott, in his Acid Visions, assimilated the use of the dome in the Drop-city to a commercial strategy suitable for Fuller, in Loisaida the domes were seen as symbols of the effort and achievements of the community, rather than as environments in which to experiment the psychedelia. (Fig. 8 and 9)

ĺ­´ĺ­ł

With this background, users have continued to build small buildings, which make up an inventory of appropriation of space. Understanding that the dome in 1967 served to appropriate the space, currently other geometries and specialized elements are necessary to establish a dialog with what exists in the garden. The casitas or the cages of protection of vegetal species, the stands and urban pots or the community huts are affordable technologies that conform FLUFXLWV RI VHOI OHDUQLQJ DQG VHOI VXIÂżFLHQF\ RI WKH QHLJKERUKRRG 7KHLU HFOHFWLF forms of construction, vernacular and somewhat chic, are among the popular ornament and sophisticated optimization of the material.

ĺ­´ĺ­´

ĺ­´ĺ­ľ

These, generated by heterodox architects, by members of Charas and by neighbors, are based on their experience and their Nuyorican culture and weave D ÂżHOG RI UHODWLRQV LQ WKH QHWZRUN RI JDUGHQV JLYLQJ FKDUDFWHU DQG LGHQWLW\ WR WKH neighborhood. The philosophy of â&#x20AC;&#x153;make your own cityâ&#x20AC;? or DIY offers since the 60s a dissident model whose instrumental capacity is of vital importance for the development of Loisaida and constitutes a characteristic of the affecdent space

ĺ­´ĺ­ś

ĺ­´ĺ­ˇ

ĺ­´ĺ­¸

* www.cumulolimbo.com

宄

孴

宅

宆

7KH JUHDW ZHVWHUQ H[SUHVV )HVWLYDO

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

宇

+LSSLH &RPPXQHV DQG WKH 'URS F,W\

守

安

宊

ĺŽ&#x201E;

ĺŽ&#x2026;

ĺŽ&#x2020;

ĺŽ&#x2021;

ĺŽ&#x2C6;

0D\ Âś

ĺ­´

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Materiality cannot be reduced to the objectiveâ&#x20AC;?.[1] ĺ­ľ

ĺ­ś

10 ĺ­ˇ

ĺ­¸

ĺ­š

ĺ­ş

ĺ­ť

ĺ­ź

ĺ­´ĺ­ł

ĺ­´ĺ­´

Urban space cannot be solely understood as the series of physical elements that configure the visible tissue of streets, buildings, parks and boulevards.

It cannot be understood from the Euclidian perspective that uses cartesian geometry as the only means to measure it.

Martin Heidegger defined space as a place of interaction that deserves our attention.[2] From his perspective, space is determined by the moments of closeness and distance that are characteristic of our relationship to the world, rather than being simply conformed by a geometric structure. For example, he argues that the distance between pieces of furniture does not occur according to measuring principles, but, rather, is established as a result of our relationship to them (whether they can be reached with our arm, or whether they can be moved around, etc). [2] This definition of space is both magical and liberating: if space can be defined as â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;the possibility to draw attention to somethingâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;, it would follow that, from an individual perspective, the elements excluded from such attention would then cease to exist.

The aim of this mobile model is to generate a research usefull device that allows for experimenting and visualizing the affective space that generated during the revolts.

It does not seek to elaborately elucidate the concrete characteristics of the event, but, rather, it functions as a preliminary approach to the nature of emergent affectiveemotional landscapes. This approach could in turn allow us to both establish and modify its connections and nerve centres. The device constitutes a mise en scène, an experimental strategy, rather than a model seeking to be replicated or a faithful representation in dimensional terms.

Along with other works and experiences, this should be a determining factor that could help improve the understanding of urban practice from a perspective that is based on contingent thought. Undoubtedly, such an approach entails thinking about city making from the perspective of the social fabric, allowing the city to â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;build itselfâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; from these emergent, affective spaces.

ĺ­´ĺ­ľ

ĺ­´ĺ­ś

2006 - 2016 Natalia Matesanz Ventura ĺ­´ĺ­ˇ

Ĺ?ĹśÇ&#x20AC;Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć&#x;Ĺ?Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ĺ?ſŜ

I03 ĺ­´ĺ­¸

* www.cumulolimbo.com

ĺŽ&#x2030;

ĺŽ&#x160;

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

孴

孵

3DULV D໤HFWLYH VSDFH Modelling: Opening up the field of the possible.

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

Thus, in the first place, modelling May ‘68 in Paris means being rid of the measuring burden, of geometrical and physical distance, and focusing instead on urban spaces where the protests took place as well as on the spacetime relationships that were formed between these spacesbetween streets and building sites, between squares and parks, between all of the above and the people whom occupied them.

Complementing the research, a model is made that physically explores the dissident landscape of #M68 through a detailed assembling of rigorously studied, multiple relational situations that occurred during the protests. These were placed either next to each other, on top of each other, or overlapping.

The device, which is made of cardboard, flexible thread, and magnets is rudimentary in essence: however, it broadens the commonplace context of research, conferring the concept of ‘the model’ with a degree of movement and freedom that opens up the spectrum of possible solutions and leaves room for the unexpected. [See Model #M68]

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

* www.cumulolimbo.com

安

宊

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

孴

孵

ESPACIO DISIDENTE DE MAYO 68 孶

孷

1

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

2006 Natalia Matesanz V 孴學

ŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂ

I0

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

孴

Profanación del espacio público en Mayo68.

Detectando lugares en las fotografías históricas del bulevard. 孵

Case Study: MAY68: Spatial affects and effects of the disident revolted body.

The relational field that emerged in the City of Paris during May ‘68 [from now on #M68] was made of a dynamic myriad of invisible bonds and spatial layers of communication and empathy. The complexity of this emotional environment translated into physical, urban space through the act of taking to the streets and appropriating urban furniture, building barricades, and, most fundamentally, through the constant appearance of written testimonies on the walls of Paris in the form of grafitti, spontaneous slogans or urban calligrams. Streets gave up their predominant role as transit sites in order to become dissident spaces of discussion, appropriation, transformation and debate. Normative, Euclidean space was imbued with countless layers of affectivity, social conflict, use, activity, energy, as well as the expansion of bodies in space.

孶

孷

學

孹

Because these intangible layers transform space, they interfere with the spatial response that may be provided by any architectural project. Thus, dealing with such subjective spaces within an urban environment entails the challenge of creating new unveiling devices that can unmask the interactions between emotional and physical bodies. Arguably, through the act of unmasking and revealing relational space, these could provide an insightful approach to the possibilities of the invisible in the field of contemporary architecture and urban space.

孺

孻

Indeed, there comes a moment when, in Bachelard’s words, ‘lived space transcends the geometric’. [3]

孼

In the urban realm, these affective spheres generate an urban landscape. The latter emerges through the materialisation of a common space made of related meanings, 孴孳 both physical and otherwise, that generate between people who are bonded or linked in different ways. The affective understanding of space is in turn conceived once and again in a constant fluctuation that has consequences 孴孴 in individual space. The translation of emotional space into physical space is sustained by an array of intangible affective and topological relationships.

[1] LATOUR, Bruno; YANEVA, Albena. Give me a gun and I will make all buildings move: An ANT’s view of architecture. Explorations in architecture: Teaching, design, research, 2008, p. 82.

[2] HEIDEGGER, Martin. Tiempo e historia. Editorial Trotta, SA, 2009. 孴孶 [3] BACHELARD, Gaston. The poetics of space. Beacon Press, 1994.

[4] SLOTERDIJK, P. (2009). Spheres theory: Talking to myself about the poetics of space. Harvard Design 孴孷 Magazine, 30, 126-137. / Sloterdijk, Peter. “Foreword to the Theory of Spheres.” Cosmograms (2005):23-41 2016 Matesanz Ventura 孴孵

ƐƟŐĂĐŝſŶ

孴學

3

宄

宅

宆

宇

孴

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

3XEOLFDWLRQV DFWLYLWLHV

孺

SDSHUV RWKHUV

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

守

安

宊

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

孴

孵

$UWLFOHV

%RRNV

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

* www.cumulolimbo.com

安

宊

宄

宅

宆

孴

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

38%/,&$7,216

宇

守

安

宊

宄

宅

宆

孴

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

(SKHPHUDO ZRUNVKRSV

孺

XUEDQ DFWLRQV RWKHUV

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

宇

守

安

宊

ĺŽ&#x201E;

ĺ­´

*

ĺŽ&#x2026;

ĺŽ&#x2020;

ĺŽ&#x2021;

Campo de Cebada Social and multidisciplinary urban project in Madrid 2011-2015

Citizen participation processes and negotiation dynamics can be seen as truly utilitarian space generator, evolutionary and adapted to the needs of todayâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s society micro architectures that represents an heterodox image of the city. The active participation of citizens in the construction of their city, of their everyday life in the lefebvrian sense [1], turns into one of the motor of the production of an eloquent space in cities, endowed with a â&#x20AC;&#x153;value of useâ&#x20AC;?, a lived space that is ĺ­ś confronted to â&#x20AC;&#x153; social and political forces that raze urban running â&#x20AC;&#x153; . ĺ­ľ

ĺŽ&#x2C6;

*

The running stand Collective building of Sport Furniture at El Campo de Cebada. .Apr-May 2012.

ĺ­¸

ĺ­š

ĺ­ş

ĺ­ť

ĺ­ź

ĺ­´ĺ­ł

Campo de Cebada: DiseĂąo de la imagen del grupo usada en el blog y en las distintas redes sociales. .nov 2010.

ĺ­´ĺ­´

ĺ­´ĺ­ľ

ĺ­´ĺ­ś

ĺ­´ĺ­ˇ

ĺ­´ĺ­¸

portofolio nmv cumulolimbo.tumblr.com @CumuloLimbo_

ĺŽ&#x160;

The opening of channels of negotiation and communication with management is one of the important ideas that is being developed theoretically in my Thesis and is currently putting in practice in this important initiative. In different participative workshops - and with the great collective work , neighbors and individuals, collective construction have been built with support and municipal EXGJHW JLDQW Ă&#x20AC;RZHUSRWV VWRUDJH FRQWDLQHUV DQG PRELOH VWDQGV IRU QHLJKERUhood event [1] LEFEBVRE, Henri. The Production of Space. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991

ĺ­ˇ

*

ĺŽ&#x2030;

*

www.cumulolimbo.com

宄

宅

宆

宇

孴

守

*

安

宊

Agrotablao Workshop leader team, in collaboration with Pez 6WXGLR $UFKLWHFWXUDO RI¿FH LQ 0DGULG %LOEDR $UFKLWHFWXUDO :RUNVhop within El Casc Festival framework. .Jun 2014.

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

el c Agrota ción p con la el mar tural d Alicant .Jun 20

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

Natalia 孴孷

孴學

p

Campo de Cebada: Diseño de la imagen del grupo usada en el blog y en las distintas redes sociales. .nov 2010.

ĺŽ&#x201E;

ĺŽ&#x2026;

ĺŽ&#x2020;

ĺŽ&#x2021;

ĺŽ&#x2C6;

ĺŽ&#x2030;

ĺŽ&#x160;

2016 -Undercover: Biennale di Venezia. Seminario junto al PolitĂŠcnico di Milano.

ĺ­´

2015 &XUVR ERNDVKL ,(' &RQVWUXFFLyQ GH SURWRWLSRV DXWR HÂżcientes. ColaboraciĂłn con Pez Estudio.

-Pizza-tĂ­zate: Workshop en espacio TetuĂĄn. ConstrucciĂłn de un proceso colectivo a travĂŠs del evento. Colaboradores: Paaq (Franciso FernĂĄndez) y Laura Zaratrusta .

ĺ­ľ

ĺ­ś

2014 -Agrotablao: CoordinaciĂłn de taller de construcciĂłn SDUWLFLSDWLYD \ HFROyJLFD HQ FRODERUDFLyQ FRQ OD RÂżFLQD GH arquitectura Pez Estudio, en el marco del Certamen de ActivaciĂłn Socio Cultural del Centro HistĂłrico El Casc 2014, Villena, Alicante.

ĺ­ˇ

2013 -Hand Made Urbanism3: Taller de construcciĂłn con los esWXGLDQWHV GH 3(, 3RQWLÂżFLD 8QLYHUVLGDG -DYHULDQD FRODERraciĂłn con el colectivo de arquitectura Zuloark.

-Sonorama Festival: Taller DIY . Auto-construcciĂłn de intumentos DIY. ColaboraciĂłn con Basurama.

ĺ­¸

2012 -Eme3: Bottom-Up. International Architecture Festival Barcelona. Workshop. Urban Rights. ColaboraciĂłn con el colectivo de arquitectura Zuloark.tt -Taller de Gradas: CoorGLQDFLyQ GHO HTXLSR FR VXSHUYLVLyQ \ FR HMHFXFLyQ -XQWR D Manuel (Colectivo Basurama) e IĂąaqui (Paisaje Transversal). Campo de Cebada. Madrid

ĺ­š

ĺ­ş

ĹŻ Ć&#x2030;Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ä?Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ĺ˝ Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E; Ä?ŽŜĆ?Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;ĆľÄ?Ä?Ĺ?ſŜ Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E; ĹŻÄ&#x201A;Ć? Ĺ?Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ć? Ć?Ä&#x17E; Ĺ&#x161;Ĺ?Ç&#x152;Ĺ˝ Ä&#x201A; Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;Ç&#x20AC;Ä Ć? Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E; ƾŜ Ç Ĺ˝Ć&#x152;ĹŹĆ?Ĺ&#x161;Ĺ˝Ć&#x2030; Ä?ŽŜŊƾŜĆ&#x161;Ĺ˝ Ä?ŽŽĆ&#x152;Ä&#x161;Ĺ?ĹśÄ&#x201A;Ä&#x161;Ĺ˝ Ć&#x2030;Ĺ˝Ć&#x152; Ä&#x161;Ĺ?Ć?Ć&#x;ĹśĆ&#x161;Ĺ˝Ć? Ä?ŽůÄ&#x17E;Ä?Ć&#x;Ç&#x20AC;Ĺ˝Ć? Ç&#x2021; Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x2039;ĆľĹ?Ć&#x2030;Ĺ˝Ć? Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E; Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x152;Ć&#x2039;ĆľĹ?Ć&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä?Ć&#x161;ĆľĆ&#x152;Ä&#x201A; Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;ĹŻ Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x201A;ŜŽĆ&#x152;Ä&#x201A;ĹľÄ&#x201A; ĹľÄ&#x201A;Ä&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?ĹŻÄ&#x17E;ŚŽÍ&#x2DC; ^Ä&#x17E; Ć?Ĺ?Ĺ?ĆľĹ?Ĺż ƾŜ ĹľÄ Ć&#x161;Ĺ˝Ä&#x161;Ĺ˝ Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E; Ä?Ć&#x152;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ĺ?ſŜ Ä?ŽůÄ&#x17E;Ä?Ć&#x;Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x201A; Ä&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x17E; Ä&#x161;Ĺ?Ć?Ć&#x;ĹśĆ&#x161;Ĺ˝Ć? Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x2039;ĆľĹ?Ć&#x2030;Ĺ˝Ć? Ä?ŽŽĆ&#x152;Ä&#x161;Ĺ?ĹśÄ&#x201A;Ä&#x161;Ĺ˝Ć? Ć&#x2030;Ĺ˝Ć&#x152; ƾŜÄ&#x201A; Ĺ˝ Ä&#x161;Ĺ˝Ć? Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ć?ŽŜÄ&#x201A;Ć?Í&#x2DC;

ĺ­ť

ĺ­ź

ĺ­´ĺ­ł

ĺ­´ĺ­´

ĺ­´ĺ­ľ

ĺ­´ĺ­ś

ĺ­´ĺ­ˇ

016 atesanz Ventura

sional

ĺ­´ĺ­¸

Ĺ?Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ć? Ä?ŽůÄ&#x17E;Ä?Ć&#x;Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x201A;Ć?

Resultados del TALLER DE GRADAS organizados por los colectivos de Madrid: PKMN, Zuloark, Basurama, Paisaje transversal, Todo por la Praxis, Taller de CasquerĂ­a. y realizado en equipos junto a vecinos del barrio.

宄

孴

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

2012

宅

宆

宇

守

g s a l

安

宊

s a d ra >Ă ŐƌĂĚĂͲĂůŵĞũĂ

La Gran Grada Almeja: Construcción de una Grada de 3x3x3. Mobiliario urbano deportivo a partir de una estructura de andamios y una cubierta de caña reutilizada, para dar servicio a las actividades deportivas y culturales del espacio.

Coordinación del equipo, co-supervisión y co-ejecución. Participación activa y coordinación junto a Manuel (Colectivo Basurama) e Iñaqui (Paisaje Transversal).

Campo de Cebada. Madrid. .Abr-May 2012.

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

Natalia M 孴學

p

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

孴

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

* www.cumulolimbo.com

安

宊

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

孴

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

* www.cumulolimbo.com

安

宊

宄

孴

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

宄

孴

宅

宆

宇

守

X-CENAS protocolos de exploración urbana

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

* www.cumulolimbo.com

安

宊

宄

孴

宅

*

宆

宇

守

安

宊

TEACHNG STATEMENT .Cuirso 2012-2013

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

Collective session . Collectivizing Bruce Mau Manifesto Unit 18 [1]

孻

Colective action in the main covered patio of the shool . Unit 19 [2]

孼

孴孳

孴孴

Public critical exhibition in the main hall of the school. Unit 18 [1]

Colective action in the corridors of the shool . Unit 19 [2] 孴孵

Assistant professor for undergraduate at the School of Architecture ( ETSAM ) Polytechnic University of Madrid. 孴孶

Architectural Projects Teaching Unit19 directed by Professor Federico Soriano. .2013-2015. http://unidadfedericosoriano.dpa-etsam.com/equipo/ Architectural Projects Teaching Unit directed by Professor José Gonzalez Gallegos..2012-2013. http://unidadgallegos.dpa-etsam.com/blog/

孴孷

孴學

Jury . Unit 18 [2]

* www.cumulolimbo.com

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

孴

* 孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

* www.cumulolimbo.com

Jane’s Walk Proyect in collaboration with Intermediae Madrid. ce in Madrid-Bilbao. Architectural ¿ Workshop within El Casc Festival framework. .Ene2016 - Mar 2017.

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

孴

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

3URIHVVLRQDO H[SHULHQFH EXLOW

孺

FRODERUDWLRQV HSKHPHUDO

孻

XUEDQ DFWLRQV RWKHUV

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

安

宊

å®&#x201E;

å®&#x2026;

å®&#x2020;

å®&#x2021;

å®&#x2C6;

å®&#x2030;

å­´

Renovación completa de vivienda unifamiliar. 2015-2016.

Pozuelo de Alacórn

å®&#x160;

UP o cómo colocarse arriba

Brea de Aragón

Reforma de vivienda, cliente particular. 2017-2018.

å­µ

å­¶

å­·

å­¸

å­¹

å­º

_ 2

å­»

H2

H1

å­¼

4a 4b 4c 4d 5a

5b 1a

1b

2a

2b

3a

3b

å­´å­³

5c

å­´å­´

å­´å­µ

å­´å­¶

å­´å­·

å­´å­¸

* www.cumulolimbo.com

宄

孴

宅

*

宆

宇

守

Ucrania workspace Architectural Project.

0DNLQJ DQ RI¿FH IRU LQWHUHVWHG SHRSOH .Jun-Dec 2013.

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

* www.cumulolimbo.com

安

宊

*

宄 宆 Openbox Design and construction 宅of two reusable and removable pavilions for FIGAN fair in Zaragoza. .Dec-Mar 2013.

孴

宇

守

ƉŝĞŶƐŽ ůƵĞŐŽ ĞdžŝƐƚŽ

El pienso sevisibilizaba en cajas de metacrilato transparente, 孵 56

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

2016 Matesanz Ventura

孴孷

sional

6 孴學

* www.cumulolimbo.com

安

宊

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

孴

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

ZU la caja de los afectos

安

宊

宄

孴

宅

宆

宇

守

EAS estudio Colaboración estudio Alvarez -Sala. 2016-2017.

Madrid

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

安

Promenade building First price. 256 housinfgin El Cuquillo, Spain.

* www.cumulolimbo.com

宊

宄

孴

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

孴

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

SURMHFWV FRPSHWLWLRQV XUEDQ

孺

SDUWLFLSDWLYH WHFKQRORJLFDO

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

安

宊

ŵďŝĞŶƚĞůĂƐ 孴

Regiones de 宄 de intimidad: propuesta 宅 mobiliario empático-afectivo Mar 2016

宆

宇

守

安 Una plaza es muchas plazas

宊

Birmingham competition: A day to remember & the activity cronotopos . Nov 2014.

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

Natalia

p

孼

孴孳 孴孳

孴孴 孴孴

孴孵 孴 孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

*

6 esanz Ventura

onal

www.cumulolimbo.com

宄

孴

宅

*

宆

宇

守

*

WYNWOOD Gateway Park International Competition: Finalist. .Jun 2014.

安

宊

INNISFREE International Competition: Yeats Pavilion. .Mar 2015.

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

*

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

* www.cumulolimbo.com

BULLHORN Competition: Cembrit Design, public furniture proposal for Malmi station. Helsinki, Finland. .Mar 2011.

宄

孴

孵

*

宅

宆

宇

守

*

The Empathic Base “ Conservative alternative to revitalize a troubled tissue in Madrid. Urban reform in the Lavapies. “ 2009-2011 DIrectors.

Javier Fresneda (MTM ) & Dr. architect José Juan Barba.

2011-2015

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

portofolio nmv cumulolimbo.tumblr.com @CumuloLimbo_

*

www.cumulolimbo.com

安

宊

PFC _ Degree Final Proyect more information here http://issuu.co aquím/cumulolimbo/docs/120330__pfc_nmv_issuu?mode=window&printButtonEnabled=false&backgroundColor=%23222222

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

孴

孵

孶

孷

Arquine ŽŶĐƵƌƐŽ ƉĂƌĂ Ğů ƉĂďĞůůſŶ DĞdžƚƌſƉŽůŝ ϮϬϭϲ

Concurso Internacional de Arquitectura Arquine . Ene 2016.

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

Natalia M 孴孷

孴學

p

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

孴

宊

^ŚƵŋŝŶŐ ŚĂƌĚƚ

Propuesta urbana para antiguo tejido industrial .Jun 2015.

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳 孴孳

孴 孴孴

孴孵 孴 孵

孴 孴孶

anz Ventura

nal 孴孷 孴孷

孴學

安

* www.cumulolimbo.com

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

孴

DŝƐƚĞƌLJ Ždž 孵

Recuperar el interior de manzana .Jun 2015.

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

entura 孴學

* www.cumulolimbo.com

Natalia Ma

pr

宄

孴

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

016 atesanz Ventura 孴學

sional

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

2009

ů njſĐĂůŽ ĞŵƉĄƟĐŽ ĚŝƐĞŹĂ ƌĞůĂĐŝŽŶĞƐ ĞƐƉĂĐŝŽͲƚĞŵƉŽƌĂůĞƐ LJ ŶŽ ĨŽƌŵĂƐ ƐſůŝĚĂƐ Ƶ ŽďũĞƚŽƐ ĂĐĂďĂĚŽƐ͘ WĂƌĂ ĞůůŽ͕ ƐĞ ƌĞŝŶƚĞƌƉƌĞƚĂ ƵŶ ƉůĂŶ ƵƌďĂŶŽ ĐŽŶǀĞŶĐŝŽŶĂů͕ ƋƵĞ ƌĞͲĞŶƟĞŶĚĞ ůŽƐ ƉĂƌĄŵĞƚƌŽƐ LJ ƉƌŽƚŽĐŽůŽƐ ƵƐƵĂůĞƐ ĚĞ ƚƌĂďĂũŽ ĞŶ ůĂ ĐŝƵĚĂĚ͕ LJ ƐĞ ƐƵ ĐĂƉĂĐŝĚĂĚ ĚĞ ĂĚĂƉƚĂƌƐĞ Ă ůŽƐ ĞƐƉĂĐŝŽƐ Ă ůŽƐ ƋƵĞ ĚŝƐĞŹĂ ƵŶĂ ĞƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĂ ƋƵĞ ŐƵşĂ͕ ƉĞƌŽ ŶŽ ƵůƚƌĂͲĚĞĮŶĞ͕ ůĂ ĂĐĐŝſŶ ĂƌƋƵŝƚĞĐƚſŶŝĐĂ͘ ƐŝƌǀĞ LJ Ă ůŽƐ ƵƐŽƐ LJ ƟĞŵƉŽƐ ĐĂŵďŝĂŶƚĞƐ ƋƵĞ ĚĞ ůĂƐ ĐĂůůĞƐ ŚĂĐĞŶ ůŽƐ ǀĞĐŝŶŽƐ ĞŶ >ĂǀĂƉŝĠƐ͘ Ɛş͕ ƐĞ ĂŵƉůşĂŶ LJ ĂĐƚƵĂůŝnjĂŶ ůŽƐ ƵƐŽƐ ƵƌďĂŶŽƐ͕ ĐĂŶĂůŝnjĂŶĚŽ ĂĚĞĐƵĂĚĂŵĞŶƚĞ ƚŽĚĂ ůĂ WŽƐŝďŝůŝĚĂĚĞƐ͕ LJ ĐŽŶĚŝĐŝŽŶĞƐ ĚĞ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůŝĚĂĚ͕ ŐƌĂĚĂĐŝŽŶĞƐ ĚĞ ĂĐĐŝſŶ ĞŶ ůŽ ŝŶƚĞŶƐŝĚĂĚ ĞƐƉĂĐŝŽƚĞŵƉŽƌĂů ĞdžŝƐƚĞŶƚĞ͕ ƉƌŽĨƵŶĚŝĚĂĚĞƐ LJ ĂŶĐŚŽƐ ĚĞ ĨĂĐŚĂĚĂ͕ ŶŝǀĞůĞƐ ĚĞ ĞůĞĐƚƌŝĮĐĂĐŝſŶ LJ ƚĂŶ ĐĂƌĂĐƚĞƌşƐƟĐĂ ĚĞů ďĂƌƌŝŽ͘ ŽŵŽ ŽďũĞƟǀŽ͖ ŽƉƟŵŝnjĂƌ ƐƵƐ ƌĞĐƵƌƐŽƐ ƉƌŽƉŝŽƐ͕ ŽĨƌĞĐĞƌ ƐŽĐŽŶĞdžŝſŶ͘​͘ĞƚĐ ƌĞĐŽƌƌĞŶ ĚĞƐĚĞ ůĂ ŵŝĐƌŽͲĞƐĐĂůĂ y^ ĚĞ ƵŶĂ ƉĂƉĞůĞƌĂ ĞŶ ůĂ ĐĂůůĞ ŚĂƐƚĂ ůĂ ŵĂŐŶŝƚƵĚ > ĚĞů ĐŝƌĐƵŝƚŽ ŐůŽďĂů ĚĞ ĂŐƵĂ LJ ĞŶĞƌպà ůƵĐŝŽŶĞƐ Ă ƐƵƐ ŝŶŶĞŐĂďůĞƐ ƉƌŽďůĞŵĂƐ ƵƌďĂŶŽƐ ĐŽŶĐƌĞƚŽƐ͕ LJ ĂůĞũĂƌ Ăů ďĂƌƌŝŽ ĚĞů ĐĂŵŝŶŽ ĚĞ ƋƵĞ ƌĞĐŽƌƌĞ Ğů ďĂƌƌŝŽ͘ >Ă ĂůŝŶĞĂĐŝſŶ ĚĞ ĐĂůůĞ ƐĞ ŇĞdžŝďŝůŝnjĂ͕ Ğů ůşŵŝƚĞ ĚĞů ĄŵďŝƚŽ ůĂ ĚĞŐƌĂĚĂĐŝſŶ LJ Ğů ĂďĂŶĚŽŶŽ ŝŶƐƟƚƵĐŝŽŶĂů Ăů ƋƵĞ ŚĂ ƉĂƌĞĐŝĚŽ ĐŽŶĚĞŶĂĚŽ ĚƵƌĂŶƚĞ ĂŹŽƐ͘ 孵 ƉƷďůŝĐŽ LJ Ğů ƉƌŝǀĂĚŽ ĂĐĞƉƚĂ ŶĞŐŽĐŝĂĐŝŽŶĞƐ LJ ƉĂĐƚŽƐ͕ ĂďƌŝĞŶĚŽ Ğů ĚŝĂůŽŐŽ ĞŶƚƌĞ ů njſĐĂůŽ ĞŵƉĄƟĐŽ͕ ƉƌĞƚĞŶĚĞ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůŝnjĂƌ ƵŶĂ ĂĐƟƚƵĚ ĂƌƋƵŝƚĞĐƚſŶŝĐĂ ĚĞ ůĞĐƚƵƌĂ Ğ ŝŶƚĞƌǀĞŶĐŝſŶ ƵƌďĂŶĂ͕ ƋƵĞ ĚĞƐĚĞ ůĂ ĞƐĐĂůĂ ĚĞ ƵŶĂ ƌĞĚ ĞŵƉĄƟĐĂ͕ ƌĞĐƵƉĞƌĂ LJ ƉƌĞƉĂƌĂ Ăů ďĂƌƌŝŽ ǀĞĐŝŶŽƐ͕ ĐŽŵĞƌĐŝĂŶƚĞƐ͕ ƉƌŽƉŝĞƚĂƌŝŽƐ LJ ĂĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂĐŝſŶ͘ ŽŶĮĂŶĚŽ ŵĄƐ ĞŶ ůĂ ŝĚĞĂ ĚĞ ƌĞĚͲŝŶĨƌĂĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂ͕ Ž ŵĄƐ ďŝĞŶ ŵŝĐƌŽͲĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂ͕ ƋƵĞ ĞŶ ůĂ ŐƌĂŶ ƉŝĞnjĂ ƉĂƌĂ ĞŶĨƌĞŶƚĂƌ ƵŶĂ ĐŽŶƚĞŵƉŽƌĂŶĞŝĚĂĚ ĂĐƵĐŝĂŶƚĞ ĞŶ Ğů ƵƐŽ ĚĞ ůĂ ĐŝƵĚĂĚ͕ ƋƵĞ ŚŽLJ ĞŶ ̺à ̎ƚĂĐŝŽŶĂů͕ ƐĞ ĐŽŵƉŽŶĞ ƵŶ ƉůĂŶͲƌĞĚ ĂŶŝƐſƚƌŽƉŽ ĚĞ ůşŶĞĂƐ ŝŶƚĞůŝŐĞŶƚĞƐ LJ ŶŽĚŽƐͬ ƐŝŐƵĞ ŶĞĐĞƐŝƚĂŶĚŽ ĚĞ ƵŶĂ ƌĞŇĞdžŝſŶ ĐƌşƟĐĂ͕ ĐŽŶũƵŶƚĂ LJ ƉƌŽƉŽƐŝƟǀĂ ƉŽƌ ƉĂƌƚĞ Ă ůĂƐ ĞƐĨĞƌĂƐ 2 ƐŽƉŽƌƚĞƐ ĐĂŵďŝĂŶƚĞƐ Ğ ŝŶƚĞƌͲĐŽŶĞĐƚĂĚŽƐ ĞŶƚƌĞ Ɛş͘ >Ž ůůĂŵĂƌĞŵŽƐ ĞŵƉĄƟĐŽ͕ ƉŽƌ ŝŶƐƟƚƵĐŝŽŶĂůĞƐ͕ LJ ůŽƐ ĚŝƐƟŶƚŽƐ ĂŐĞŶƚĞƐ ĚĞ ŝŶƚĞƌǀĞŶĐŝſŶ ƵƌďĂŶĂ͘ 孴

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

2016 Matesanz Ventura

esional

孴學

6

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

Us des for adhus; C. Graecus, orum mum oris, quius ade quere, caetion sulium larta ne opopula bemente mulius clum il 孴 horuntristu que tatimore, que crum, viverioricam ubliis halica; nihil hinc vivides satiac menteatus haed sedem nordinatiam publicisul tero tiaeque mulicientum ium mo erei peropul tortatu me ta in dem. mende in huit; Casdam ia? Qi cae publius sicaus hae vive, publibunum acit, con inte tem inatus, iam 孵 elussoltum, et patia nessiliae ta demque idiementere patid C.

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷016

atesanz Ventura

sional 孴學

---------------

安

宊

宄

孴

孵

2009

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

ƉĂďĞůůſŶ ĐĂĨĞƚĞƌşĂ h ,

Proyecto de ejecución para pabellón temporal de cafetería para la escuela de arquitectura de la UAH tras resultar ganadora la propuesta realizada en el curso 2008-2009.

Alberto Alarcón y Rafael Hernando: coordinadores del seminario. .curso 2009-2010.

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

Natalia Ma 孴學

pr

孴

孵

孶

6

宄

宅

宆

宇

守

安

宊

WŽďůĂĚŽ ĞİŵĞƌŽ Ocupación temporal de un espacio histórico protegido.

Territorio de las ruinas de la antigua ciudad romana de Complutum. ¿Cómo colocarse encima de la trama romana? viviendas transportables, aumontables, crecientes, fluctuantes. Generar un sobre-terreno, una topografía variable que modula los accesos al poblado, sobre el que estas se apoyan y enchufan a la nueva red de infrestructura 95 de emergencia, agua, electricdad etc

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

2006 Natalia Matesanz 孴學

profesi

P

宄

ZŝŶĐŽŶĞƐ ƐĞĐƌĞƚŽƐ

孴

宆

Concurso ARQUIA de la caja de arquitectos bajo el lema “Rincones secretos”. .abril 2009.

孵

2 孶

孷

學

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

2016 Matesanz Ventura 孴學

宅

esional

6

宇

守

安

宊

2009

宄

孴

*

宅

宆

宇

守

Talleres [R]ACTIVA 04´, Interacción con la ciudad. Alcalá de Henares. Coordinador: Miguel Moradillos. Propuesta: PARKEING con Ecosistema urbano. .Julio y Septiembre 2004.

*

安

宊

Concurso convocado por la revista s sta internacional de arquitectura 2G “Parque de la Laguna de Venecia” (Jurado: Iñaqui Ábalos, Francesco Careri, James Corner, Anne Lacaton, Philippe Rham y Equipo 2G). .septiembre 2008.

孵

孶

孷

學

*

Ejericio de interpretación de un territorio.

Mapas mentales: Interpretaciones sensoriales del territorio de la de la antigua ciudad romana de Complutum, sus juxtaposiciones, fricciones entre capas históricas, y iPELWR GH PD\RU LQWHQVLGDG VLJQL¿FDQWH

*

Proyecto y realización de la ambientación efímera para un local en la zona de huertas con motivo de la performance organizada por el colectivo Actuah_ de ETSAG. .febrero 2007.

孹

孺

孻

孼

孴孳

孴孴

孴孵

*

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

* www.cumulolimbo.com

Workshop DESIGN WITH AIR 2 [MAD] EPS universidad CEU San Pablo. .Diciembre 2010.

宄

孴

*

宅

宆

宇

守

*

Taller PAISAJES HABITADOS León – ph06. Selección por CV. de 50 arquitectos. Organizadores: GRUPO ARANEA, y SIC arquitectura. Jefe de equipo: Juan Socas. .Verano 2009.

安

宊

Selección y publicación en el libro UAH 2008 de proyecto de las Termas en Complutum. .Abril 2008.

孵

孶

孷

學

孹

孺

*

孻

孼

* 孴孳

Seminario cafeteríaUAH: ejecución del pabellón temporal cafetería de la ETSAG. Propuesta de curso ganadora. Coordinadores: Alberto Alarcón y Rafael Hernando. .curso 2009-2010.

孴孴

孴孵

孴孶

孴孷

孴學

* www.cumulolimbo.com

Propuesta para el concurso de ideas convocado por el gobierno de Lanzarote a estudiantes de todo el mundo. .enero 2011.