Corsair The Santa Monica College
Volume C, Issue 7
Informing Since 1929
www.thecorsaironline.com
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Expo line running a little off t By Miles Arnold Staff Writer
George Mikhail Corsair Derek Johnson (left) and “Willie Willie” (right) construction workers align the tracks for the new MTA Expo Line destined for Santa Monica. The whole project is currently $200 million over budget.
With the scheduled opening of the new Expo rail line already pushed back a year a new problem has risen with the labor agreement that is being proposed by the Exposition Metro Light Rail board for phase two of the project. The new project labor agreement being proposed by the board is a union-only agreement that would make the project unavailable to nonunion workers. Essentially, workers who don’t belong to a union would be unable to work on a project that is slated to open up thousands of construction jobs and create millions of dollars in work. It is a job that Eric Christen, executive director of the Coalition for Fair Employment in Construction feels should be open to all workers and not just workers that belong to a union. “Discrimination has no place in construction,” said Christen, “This is an agreement between union interests and no one else.” The best way to change something like this, according to Christen, is to “get the attention of the members of the community and the board.” What is puzzling to an organization like Christen’s is that phase one was handled with an open contract that has allowed a variety of personnel to receive work. This issue was the topic at the most recent Transit Business Advisory Council of the Metropolitan Transit Authority meeting held on Oct. 7. The estimated price tag of phase 2 has been set at $1.5 Billion dollars. Phase two is slated to run from Culver City to downtown Santa Monica with a couple of stops close to the SMC campus at Olympic and 26th street as well as Colorado and 17th street. Since the start of construction on the new Expo rail line in September things have also not stayed on schedule. The city has suffered setbacks since the start of construction on phase 1 which will run from Downtown L.A. to Culver City.
rack
[See Expo, page 3]
Jonathan Bue Corsair
Price of publicity Information released in the 2010-2011 annual contracts and consultants form shows that over $800,000 has been allocated for college advertising. By Nisha Anais Staff Writer As budgets, salaries and classes take hits under this difficult economy, education has had to cut corners in many places. This is no less the case with Santa Monica College. And one hot-button issue right now is the amount of money that Santa Monica College spends on advertising to both local and international students. According to the 2010-2011 annual contracts and consultants form (AC&C), as of July 6 this year, SMC is currently spending roughly $803,250 out of a total budget of $139,787,495 on places such as Facebook, Google, KPWR, KROQ, Santa Monica Daily Press, La Opinion newspaper, Los Angeles Sentinel, Korean Directory, Randy Bellous Productions, and Golden Cane Advertising. These are just a few of the local places where SMC spends thousands of dollars respectively to advertise. The number that is spent on marketing might be a little different as the administration works on finalizing budgetary issues and comes out with a more up-to-date number. Mitra Moassessi, head of the faculty association, made it clear that there are many sides to this matter. She said that the problem is that the college spends all this money on advertising and on printing out higher end college catalogs and schedules, but then there is no money to offer the classes that are being advertised. Don Girard, senior director of government relations & institutional communications said that it’s important to remember that recruiting students is a continuous and pertinent [See Adverts, page 3]
Disorganized organizing fee Ariana Masters Corsair Former AS President Cameron Henton at the weekly AS board meeting Monday, took the opportunity to inform the current AS board of the unconstitutionality of last week’s vote to rescind the $1.50 student organizing fee.
By Ariana Masters Staff Writer During the weekly Associated Students board meeting Monday, former AS President Cameron Henton threw a wrench into the works of last week’s vote to rescind the $1.50 student-organizing fee when he said that their decision was essentially an empty gesture. Henton said that no final decision could be made about whether or not to rescind the fee until it had been to the Joint Council, and that even after weeks of heated exchange their
decision was still “null and void.” 2008-09 SMC Chemistry Club At the same time he brought President and former member into question the efficiency of of the Constitution Committee, said that, “it does not make it the current AS board. “It was a decision made hastily, null in void. It just means that which happens with new board you have to go to joint council to members who are not here for get it approved. If anything you the whole discussion. It is the get greater representation.” authority of the Joint Council to In response to old arguments determine any and all changes resurfacing about the role of of student fees,” said Henton. CALPIRG in the fee’s decision, “Following the constitution Henton replied that the fee is the only way to ensure that was initially brought up to be there is a legitimate, organized a CALPIRG fee. “Yes, it did and representative student begin as a CALPIRG fee. We government,” Henton added. realized that it’s not fair to other In response to Henton’s organizations… That’s why the statement, Max Morgan, [See AS, page 3]