2012-2013 Report Card for
Westerville City School District DISTRICT GRADE
Coming in
2015
Achievement This grade combines two results for students who took the state tests. The first result answers the question – How many students passed the state test? The second result answers the question – How well did students do on the state test?
This grade shows how well all students are doing in your district in reading, math, and graduation. It answers the question – Is every student succeeding, regardless of income, race, culture or disability?
2015
This grade answers the question – Are more students learning to read in kindergarten through third grade? The 2014 report card will report some results. The 2015 report card will display one grade for kindergarten through grade 3.
IRN: 045047
Coming in
2015
Value-Added A Overall...................................................................................................................
C Gifted................................................................................................................... A Students with Disabilities..................................................................................... A Lowest 20% in Achievement.............................................................................. Graduation Rate
COMPONENT GRADE
This grade answers the question – How many ninth graders graduate in four years or five years?
Coming in
2015
Annual Measurable Objectives 72.8% ............................................................................................... C ........
K-3 Literacy
COMPONENT GRADE
This is your district’s average progress for its students in math and reading, grades 4-8. It looks at how much each student learns in a year. Did the students get a year’s worth of growth? Did they get more? Did they get less?
Coming in
Performance Index 85.6% ............................................................................................... B ........ Indicators Met 100.0% ............................................................................................... A ........
Gap Closing
Progress
COMPONENT GRADE
COMPONENT GRADE
Coming in
2015
Graduation Rates B 92.1% of students graduated in 4 years................................................................................... B 92.5% of students graduated in 5 years.................................................................................
COMPONENT GRADE
Coming in
2015
Printed on August 26, 2013
Prepared for Success This grade answers the question – Are students who graduate from our district ready for college or a career? There are six ways to show that graduates are prepared. In the 2014 school year, the report card will show results for the six areas. The 2015 report card will display one grade combining the results of all six ways of showing graduates are prepared.
COMPONENT GRADE
Coming in
2015
Page 1 of 14
2012-2013 Report Card for Westerville City School District
Achievement This grade combines two results for students who took the state tests. The first result answers the question – How many students passed the state test? The second result answers the question – How well did students do on the state test?
COMPONENT GRADE
Coming in
2015 Performance Index
GRADE
The Performance Index measures the test results of every student, not just those who score proficient or higher. There are six levels on the index and districts receive points for every student in each of these levels. The higher the achievement level the more the points awarded in the district's index. This rewards schools and districts for improving performance.
B
Performance Index
40 20 0
60 80 100
Achievement Level Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Basic Limited Untested
Pct of Students 0.3 28.4 29.1 30.1 8.6 3.4 0.2
x x x x x x x
Points for this Level 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.0
= = = = = = =
Points Received 0.4 34.1 32.0 30.1 5.1 1.0 0.0 102.7
102.7 of a possible 120.0 90.0 - 100.0% 80.0 - 89.9% 70.0 - 79.9% 50.0 - 69.9% 0.0 - 49.9%
120 100
99.9
100.8
101.9
102.9
102.7
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
80 60 40
85.6% A= B= C= D= F=
Performance Index Trend
0.3 8.6 0.2 3.4
20
28.4 Advanced Plus Advanced Accelarated Proficient Limited Basic Untested
30.1
0
29.1 Untested
Limited
Basic
Proficient
Accelerated
Advanced
Advanced Plus
IRN: 045047
Printed on August 26, 2013
Page 2 of 14
2012-2013 Report Card for Westerville City School District
GRADE
A
Indicators Met Indicators Met measures how many students have passed the state tests at a minimum level, called proficient, or higher. Test results are reported for each student in a grade and subject. At least 75 percent of students must pass to get credit for the indicator. Starting in the 2013-14 school year, a district or school needs to have 80 percent of their students pass at a minimum level or higher in order to “meet� an indicator.
Indicators Met %
100.0% 24.0 out of 24.0
A= B= C= D= F=
Grades 3-5 Mathematics
Grades 6-8 88.6%
3rd Grade
20
90.0 - 100.0% 80.0 - 89.9% 70.0 - 79.9% 50.0 - 69.9% 0.0 - 49.9%
0
80 100
Ohio Graduation Test
Mathematics
84.5%
Mathematics
91.0%
Reading
90.6%
Reading
88.6%
Reading
92.9%
Mathematics
87.9%
Mathematics
85.7%
Science
84.2%
OGT, 10th Graders
7th Grade Reading
93.6%
Reading
88.3%
Social Studies
90.1%
Mathematics
85.9%
Mathematics
87.1%
Writing
90.7%
Reading
89.2%
Reading
92.0%
Mathematics
95.4%
Science
81.2%
Science
79.9%
Reading
97.0%
Science
93.3%
Social Studies
95.1%
Writing
96.4%
8th Grade
OGT, 11th Graders
IRN: 045047
60
6th Grade
4th Grade
5th Grade
40
Printed on August 26, 2013
Page 3 of 14
2012-2013 Report Card for Westerville City School District Proficiency Percent Comparison by Grade
Proficient Percent Trend by Grade
3rd Grade 92% 90%
90.6%
89.2%
3rd Grade 100% 98% 96% 94% 92% 90% 88% 86% 84%
88.6%
88%
86.6%
86% 84% 81.4%
82% 80%
78.5%
78%
Reading District
Mathematics Similar Districts
2009
State Average
2010 Reading
4th Grade 96% 94% 92% 90% 88% 86% 84% 82% 80% 78% 76%
93.6%
100% 98% 96% 94% 92% 90% 88% 86% 84%
87.9%
87.1%
77.7% Reading District
Mathematics Similar Districts
2009
State Average
2010 Reading
5th Grade 92% 88% 84%
84.4%
2011 Writing
2012
2013
Mathematics
96% 92%
81.2% 80.8%
80.9%
88% 84%
74.2% 68.7%
68% Reading District
IRN: 045047
Mathematics
100% 85.9%
72% 64%
2013
5th Grade
89.2%
80% 76%
2012
4th Grade
93.5% 87.7%
2011
Mathematics Similar Districts
80%
67.7%
76% 72%
Science State Average
2009 Reading
Printed on August 26, 2013
2010
2011
Mathematics
2012
Social Studies
2013 Science
Page 4 of 14
2012-2013 Report Card for Westerville City School District 6th Grade 92% 90% 88% 86% 84% 82% 80% 78% 76% 74%
88.6%
6th Grade 100%
90.3%
82.9%
84.5%
96%
85.5%
92% 88% 84%
75.1% Reading District
80%
Mathematics Similar Districts
2009
State Average
2010 Reading
7th Grade 90% 88% 86% 84% 82% 80% 78% 76% 74% 72%
88.3%
88%
85.7%
92%
81.0%
88% 84%
73.3% Reading
80%
Mathematics Similar Districts
2009
State Average
2010 Reading
85.8%
100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60%
87.1% 85.8% 77.0%
76%
79.9% 79.5%
72%
68.7% Reading District
2011 Writing
2012
2013
Mathematics
8th Grade
92.0% 92.1%
80%
IRN: 045047
Mathematics
96% 83.3%
84%
68%
2013
100%
8th Grade
92%
2012
7th Grade
88.8%
District
96%
2011
Mathematics Similar Districts
Science State Average
2009 Reading
Printed on August 26, 2013
2010
2011
Mathematics
2012
Social Studies
2013 Science
Page 5 of 14
2012-2013 Report Card for Westerville City School District 10th Grade OGT
10th Grade OGT
93.7% 96% 91.4% 94% 92.9% 91.8% 90.1% 91.0% 92% 90.7% 90.1% 90% 87.6% 88% 86.9% 86% 84.9% 84.2% 83.9% 84% 81.1% 82% 80% 77.3% 78% 76% Reading Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science District
Similar Districts
100% 98% 96% 94% 92% 90% 88% 86% 84% 82%
2009 Reading Science
State Average
11th Grade Cumulative OGT 97.0% 98% 97.0% 96% 94%
96.8% 96.4%
92.9%
92%
95.4% 95.4%
95.1% 95.1%
District
IRN: 045047
2013 Social Studies
98%
93.6% 93.3%
96% 92%
88.2%
90% 85.1%
Writing
2012
Mathematics
100%
86% Reading
2011
94% 89.2%
88% 84%
Writing
11th Grade Cumulative OGT
92.1%
90%
2010
Mathematics Social Studies Similar Districts
88%
Science
2009 Reading Science
State Average
Printed on August 26, 2013
2010 Writing
2011
2012
Mathematics
2013 Social Studies
Page 6 of 14
2012-2013 Report Card for Westerville City School District
Progress This is your district’s average progress for its students in math and reading, grades 4-8. It looks at how much each student learns in a year. It answers the question – Did the students get a year’s worth of growth? Did they get more? Did they get less?
GRADE
A GRADE
C GRADE
A GRADE
A GRADE
Coming in 2016
IRN: 045047
COMPONENT GRADE
Coming in
2015
Progress Details
Overall This measures the progress for all students in math and reading, grades 4-8.
This table shows the Progress scores by test grade and subject.
Gifted Students This measures the progress for students identified as gifted in reading, math, and/or superior cognitive ability.
Students in the Lowest 20% in Achievement This measures the progress for students identified as the lowest 20% statewide in reading and math achievement.
Students with Disabilities This measures the progress for students with disabilities.
High School A High School measure of progress will be implemented in the 2015-16 school year.
Reading
Progress Score Mathematics
All Tests
All Grades
5.5
12.4
11.2
4th Grade
2.8
1.3
2.7
5th Grade
6.0
8.6
9.3
6th Grade
-4.9
-11.7
-10.5
7th Grade
0.8
21.1
13.6
8th Grade
4.2
2.4
4.5
Test Grade
Although Progress scores are not assigned letter grades at this level of detail, the grading scale applied at the Overall (All Students, All Tests) level is:
Printed on August 26, 2013
A= B= C= D= F=
2.0 and up 1.0 to 1.9 -1.0 to 0.9 -2.0 to -1.1 below -2.0
Page 7 of 14
2012-2013 Report Card for Westerville City School District Progress vs. Performance Index This bubble chart shows the relationship between each subgroup's performance index results (horizontal axis) to the Value-Added letter grade (vertical axis). The size of the bubble represents the size of the student subgroup.
A
Grade
B
Overall Students w/ Disabilities Lowest 20% Gifted
C
D
F
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Performance Index
IRN: 045047
Printed on August 26, 2013
Page 8 of 14
2012-2013 Report Card for Westerville City School District
Gap Closing COMPONENT GRADE
This grade shows how well all students are doing in your district in reading, math, and graduation. It answers the question – Is every student succeeding, regardless of income, race, culture or disability?
Coming in
2015
Annual Measurable Objectives
GRADE
Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) compare the performance of all students to a state goal which is displayed as the red line in the following charts. These charts show how well each group achieves that goal in reading, math and graduation – and emphasize any achievement gaps that exist between groups. The ultimate goal is for all groups to achieve at high levels.
C
Reading
Graduation Rate
Math
AMO Points 94.6 40
60
20
97.2
91.8
91.8
94.6
80
0
100
90.7
87.2
90.0
87.0
72.8%
White All Students Hispanic African American Students w/ Disabilities
60
70.2 66.7
55.9
66.1
40
83.1
69.0
75.3
20
84.1
72.2
79.5
0
91.1
74.4
80.5
90.0 - 100.0% 80.0 - 89.9% 70.0 - 79.9% 60.0 - 69.9% 0.0 - 59.9%
92.1
80.8
88.3
73
A= B= C= D= F=
92.6
80
Multiracial Asian/Pacific Islander Econ Disadvantage Limited English
100
0
20
40
White All Students Hispanic African American Students w/ Disabilities
60
80
Asian/Pacific Islander Multiracial Econ Disadvantage Limited English
100
0
20
40
Multiracial All Students African American Students w/ Disabilities
60
80
100
White Hispanic Econ Disadvantage Limited English
The red line on each graph identifies the Annual Measurable Objective. The 2013 AMO for Reading is 83.4%, for Math is 78.5%, and for Graduation Rate is 75.9%. Subgroups with fewer than 30 students are not rated and do not appear on the graphs.
IRN: 045047
Printed on August 26, 2013
Page 9 of 14
2012-2013 Report Card for Westerville City School District
Graduation Rate COMPONENT GRADE
This grade represents the percentage of students whom entered the 9th grade and graduated 4 and 5 years later.
Coming in
2015
4-Year Graduation Rate The 4-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2012 who graduated within four years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 2009 and graduated by 2012.
GRADE
B
92.1% A= B= C= D= F=
93.0 - 100.0% 89.0 - 92.9% 84.0 - 88.9% 79.0 - 83.9% 0.0 - 78.9%
60
20 0
80
100
B
IRN: 045047
A= B= C= D= F=
95.0 - 100.0% 90.0 - 94.9% 85.0 - 89.9% 80.0 - 84.9% 0.0 - 79.9%
40 20 0
60 80 100
100 92.1
80
The 5-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2011 who graduated within five years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 2008 and graduated by 2012.
92.5%
5-Year Rate
100 40
5-Year Graduation Rate
GRADE
4-Year Rate
92.5
91.9 81.3
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
0 District State Average
Printed on August 26, 2013
Similar Districts
93.3 82.4
District State Average
Similar Districts
Page 10 of 14
2012-2013 Report Card for Westerville City School District
Graduation Rate Trend 93% 92.4% 92.1% 92%
91% 90.5% 90%
89%
88%
87%
86%
88.0%
86.7%
2010
2011 4Year
2012 5Year
Note: The 5-year graduation rate does not appear in the final year of this graph because the necessary data is not yet available to calculate the 5-year rate for that school year.
IRN: 045047
Printed on August 26, 2013
Page 11 of 14
2012-2013 Report Card for Westerville City School District Superintendent: John R. Kellogg Address: 936 Eastwind Dr Ste 200 Westerville OH 43081-3319
Phone: (614) 797-5700 County: Franklin
Directory information current as of the 2012-2013 Report Card publication date
Your District's Students Average Daily Enrollment:
Enrollment by Subgroup 70% Enrollment #
Enrollment %
60%
Am. Indian / Alaskan Native
33
0.2%
Asian or Pacific Islander
385
2.8%
50%
3,050
22.1%
40%
Hispanic
720
5.2%
30%
Multiracial
883
6.4%
White, Non-Hispanic
8,756
63.3%
Students with Disabilities
1,837
13.3%
Economically Disadvantaged
4,382
31.7%
Limited English Proficiency
1,430
10.3%
13,827
Number of Limited English Proficiency Students Excluded from Accountability Calculations: 30
Black, Non-Hispanic
Migrant
NC
NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group
20% 10% 0% American Indian or Alaska...
Asian or Pacific Islander
Black, Non-Hispanic
Hispanic
Multiracial
White, Non-Hispanic
Students with Disabilities
Economic Disadvantage
Limited English Proficiency
Migrant
Enrollments of less than 10 students are not shown.
IRN: 045047
Printed on August 26, 2013
Page 12 of 14
2012-2013 Report Card for Westerville City School District Mobility Rates by Subgroup District Mobility % All Students
7.8%
Am. Indian / Alaskan Native
20.5%
Asian or Pacific Islander
4.8%
Black, Non-Hispanic
12.3%
Hispanic
13.8%
Multiracial
8.7%
White, Non-Hispanic
5.6%
Students with Disabilities
11.6%
Economically Disadvantaged
14.0%
Limited English Proficiency
12.0%
Migrant
0.0%
NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group
24% 20% 16% 12% 8% 4% 0% All Students
American Indian or Alaska...
Asian or Pacific Islander
Black, Non-Hispanic
Hispanic
Multiracial
White, Non-Hispanic
Students with Disabilities
Economic Disadvantage
Limited English Proficiency
Migrant
This chart shows the percentage of students who, because they moved into or out of the district, did not spend a majority of the school year within the district.
IRN: 045047
Printed on August 26, 2013
Page 13 of 14
2012-2013 Report Card for Westerville City School District Your District's Teachers All Schools in the District
High Poverty Schools
Low Poverty Schools
Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelor's Degree
99.9
0.0
100.0
Percentage of teachers with at least a Master's Degree
66.6
0.0
66.5
Percentage of core academic subject and elementary classes not taught by Highly Qualified Teachers
0.1
--
0
Percentage of core academic subject and elementary classes taught by properly certified teachers
100
--
99.9
0
--
0
Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes taught by teachers with temporary, conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure
High-poverty schools are those ranked in the top quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. Low-poverty schools are those ranked in the bottom quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. A district may have buildings in both quartiles, in just one quartile or in neither quartile. NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group
Wellness and Physical Education The extent to which students are successful in meeting the benchmarks contained in Ohio's physical education standards
Compliance with the federal requirement for implementing a local wellness policy
Elected to administer BMI screening
Participation in Physical Activity Pilot Program
Moderate Success
IRN: 045047
Printed on August 26, 2013
Page 14 of 14