Socialist Cosmopolitanism, by Nicolai Volland (introduction)

SOCIALIST

COSMOPOLITANISM The Chinese Literary Universe, 1945 –1965

NICOLAI VOLLAND

INTRODUCTION

L

2

Introduction

Introduction 3

4

Introduction

Introduction 5

6

Introduction

Introduction 7

8

Introduction

Introduction 9

10

Introduction

Introduction 11

12

Introduction

Introduction 13

14

Introduction

Introduction 15

16

Introduction

Introduction 17

18

Introduction

Introduction 19

PRAISE FOR

SOCIALIST COSMOPOLITANISM

“Nicolai Volland has tackled one of the most provocative issues in modern Chinese and world literature. Chinese socialist literature from the 1940s to the eve of the Great Cultural Revolution has for decades been interpreted solely in terms of propaganda. Volland argues for a more comprehensive understanding of its conception, production, circulation, and reception. Through the prism of socialist cosmopolitanism, Volland offers a new look at issues from translation to transculturation, from the technology of media to the politics of world literature.”

DAVID DER-WEI WANG, HARVARD UNIVERSITY

“Socialist Cosmopolitanism should be required reading for anyone interested in the development of global literary systems in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.

Volland skillfully sketches the structure of a socialist literary world-system from the Chinese perspective, revealing exciting possibilities for world literature studies. As noteworthy for its sensitive readings of its texts as for its theoretical argument, Volland’s book breaks important new ground.”

ALEXANDER BEECROFT, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA

“Socialist Cosmopolitanism forcefully intervenes in the study of modernity, crosscultural circulation, and Communist cultural institutions. The book contributes new paradigms to the study of modern China, world literature, and literary history and criticism. Volland argues that the Maoist ‘red classics’ should be understood as part of the trajectory of literary development in China and abroad. Moreover, he shows that the Cold War ideological polarization was accompanied by a strong cosmopolitan impulse, one that has shaped literary works and the concept of literature itself.”

YOMI BRAESTER, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON

Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute, Columbia University

cup.columbia.edu

PRINTED IN THE U.S.A.