Hobcaw Studio_Part 4

390

Housing Team 4 | Debordieu Hannah Carlton | John Murden | KathleenMcNinch | Yarely Martinez

391

Site Plan

Housing Team 4 | Masterplan Kathleen McNinch In the Pate Forest Path project, there was a focus on three main concepts: establishing, connecting, and balancing. To establish a connection for visitors from the Baruch Institute to Debordieu, to have people engaging the environment by interaction of built and unbuilt, and balancing the resources and impact with the present ecology.

392

HOUSE SIDING

1/2” STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS

5/4” DECKING

HOUSE FOUNDATION

(2) 2x10” P.T. PINE BEAM

2x6” P.T. PINE JOISTS

2x10” P.T. PINE BEAM

PILE CAP WITH GALVANIZED STEEL BRACKET

1” STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS

6x6” P.T. PINE POST

TUBULAR PILE COLUMN

2x10” P.T. PINE BEAMS

1/4”GALVANIZED BRACKET

COUPLING

(2) 2x10” P.T. PINE BEAMS

1/2”GALVANIZED SCREWS

HELICAL FLIGHTS

10” DIA. P.T. PINE PILE

8” DIA. CONCRETE SONOTUBE

QUERCUS LAURIFOLIA - LAUREL OAK

WATER LINE

PINUS TAEDA - LOBLOLLY PINE

JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA - RED CEDAR

ANDROPOGON VIRGINICUS - BROOMSEDGE

SETARIA GENICULATA - FOXTAIL GRASS

TAXODIUM DISTICHUM - BALD CYPRESS

CALAMAGROSTIS CINNOIDES - REED GRASS

20’

100’

SECTION - WEST-EAST

100’

Section: West-East

KEY: JOISTS BEAMS POSTS

N

STRUCTURAL PLAN 60’

0’

5’

10’

20’

1/2” STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS (2) 2x10” P.T. PINE BEAM PILE CAP WITH GALVANIZED STEEL BRACKET TUBULAR PILE COLUMN COUPLING HELICAL FLIGHTS

45’

30’

HELICAL PIER 15’ 5/4” DECKING 2x6” P.T. PINE JOISTS 1” STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS

PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

5’

2x10” P.T. PINE BEAMS

SECONDARY PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION 0’

BALD CYPRESS

LOBLOLLY PINE

LAUREL OAK

RED CEDAR

REED GRASS

FOXTAIL GRASS BROOMSEDGE

CIRCULATION

(2) 2x10” P.T. PINE BEAMS 10” DIA. P.T. PINE PILE

VEHICULAR CIRCULATION

WATER LINE

393

PILE HOUSE SIDING HOUSE FOUNDATION 2x10” P.T. PINE BEAM 6x6” P.T. PINE POST

1/4”GALVANIZED BRACKET

DImensIons total area- 5012

sqft

InterIor area- 2446

sqft

PIazza area- 1612

sqft

BeDroom area- 336

sqft x3 unIts

KItchen area- 375

sqft

utIlIty/WorK area- 1020

sqft

Housing Team 4 | Gate House IntersectIon

ProPortIons

JoInts

John Murden The Gate House works to incorporate the traditional ideas of circulation with the use of public and private spaces on the Clemson Pate Forest site through the hybridization of the public space and circulation spaces. By limiting circulation solely to the public spaces on the piazza, the building’s space becomes more efficient and links the three main structural elements.

394

Circulation

Storage

Timeline Plan

395

DImensIons total area- 5012

sqft

InterIor area- 2446

sqft

PIazza area- 1612

sqft

BeDroom area- 336

sqft x3 unIts

KItchen area- 375

sqft

utIlIty/WorK area- 1020

sqft

IntersectIon

Bedroom Perspective

396

ProPortIons

JoInts

Kitchen Perspective

Level 1

Level 2

397

Elevation 398

Section

399

Housing Team 4 | Single Tiny House Hannah Carlton The Single Tiny House uses wheelchair accessible ramped circulation as the focal point in the design.

The ramps provide both movement and moments of pause within a screened in porch, both between a community of tiny homes and as access from the ground level entrance of the community to the other end that is elevated an entire story.

400

private space 1 1 1 2 ft2 1 3 9 ft2 / p e r s o n

conditioned

communal 3 9 0 ft2

space

private entry 3 5 2 ft2 4 4 ft2 / p e r s o n

communal porch 1 8 6 6 ft2

ELY

YAR

N

JOH

Axonometric Diagram 401

Ramp Elevations

Interior Perspectives

402

13’8” 7’3”

6’5”

murphy bed 32” deep couch

4’7”

bathroom

1’

storage wall

12’

3’5”

laundry 3’

closet

desk

Floor Plan

Section

Section

403

Sitting vs Sleeping Space Usage pull out couch

4

transitions

Unit Diagram 3

screen

porch veil

Storage

2

modular house units

Storage Diagram 1

ramp

structure

pm

get home

Daily Usage

am

to work

am

wake pm

pm

socialize/ relax

bed am

bags am

wash up

pm

wash up

am

dress pm

dress

pm

laundry am

pm

boots/ jacket

boots/ jacket

am

eat

pm

go eat

elevation

section

404

circulation

p a t h = 4 5 0 ft2

Circulation DIagram

Drip Edge Fasia Screw Gutter Gypsum Board Siding Insulation

Wood Blocking Metal Flashing Purlin Bearing Quality (PBR) 1x4 Skip Sheeting Tar Paper Zip System Sheathing SimPLY Roof Connections Batt Insulation (Eco Batt)

CHANGES - From 0 slope to 1-12 BPR slope with parapet on 3 sides - Fastening easier to construct via top slide in roof joists into wall segments with help of gravity, rather thank need for horizontal movement - Additional extention to roof plates to alow for gutter attachment and keeping water off of the side of the building - Wall joints now exist within notches held together by wall boards to strengthen connection and avoid torsion

PHASE

2

PHASE

1

Wall Section & Details

405

Housing Team 4 | Floating Lodge 1/8 scale 0

5

Program Square Footage: 10

20

50

Total Area: 6,550 sqft Interior Area: 3,275 sqft Kichen/Dining: 555.84 sqft Utility: 298.98 sqft Living: 322.56 sqft Bedroom: 600 sqft Bathroom: 276 sqft Exterior Area: 3,275 sqft

Yarely Martinez

The floating lodge elevates the interior ocuppiable space to a level that uses the ramp structure.

The existing vertical ciruculation promotes fluid movement in and out of the house as well as below it. The living space below the house allows freedom of movement within the landscape.

406

Storage STORAGE

24- HR TIMELINE

PUBLIC v.s. PRIVATE

Timeline of Movement

Public vs. Private Space

407

Ground Level

408

Level 1

1/8 scale 0

5

Program Square Footage: 10

20

50

Total Area: 6,550 sqft Interior Area: 3,275 sqft Kichen/Dining: 555.84 sqft Utility: 298.98 sqft Living: 322.56 sqft Bedroom: 600 sqft Bathroom: 276 sqft Exterior Area: 3,275 sqft

Interior Perspectives

409

Lounging Area

Bed

134.4 sf

153.6 sf

Bed

153.6 sf

Bath

Bath

144 sf

144 sf

2

Bed

Bed

153.6 sf

153.6 sf

Laundry

Laundry

38.4 sf

38.4 sf

Kitchen 256 sf

1

Dining

Living Room

215 sf

268.8 sf

Mud Room 215 sf

3

Lounging Area

Bed

134.4 sf

153.6 sf

Bed

153.6 sf

Bath

Bath

144 sf

144 sf

2

Bed

Bed

153.6 sf

153.6 sf

Laundry

Laundry

38.4 sf

38.4 sf

Kitchen 256 sf

1

Dining

Living Room

215 sf

268.8 sf

Mud Room 215 sf

3

Lounging Area

Bed

134.4 sf

153.6 sf

Bed

153.6 sf

Bath

Bath

144 sf

144 sf

2

Bed

Bed

153.6 sf

153.6 sf

Laundry

Laundry

38.4 sf

38.4 sf

Kitchen 256 sf

1

Dining

Living Room

215 sf

268.8 sf

Mud Room 215 sf

3

Sections 410

Elevations

9’-3”

7’-6” 4’-0”

7’-6”

Detail 411

Site Model

412

Gate House

Single Tiny House

Floating Lodge 413

Hobcaw Studio | Final Reviews

414

The final reviews for Hobcaw studio took place on December 8, 2017. It was a full day of review, with the following schedule: 1 Introduction: Laboratory 9:00 - 9:10 2 Lab - Yin, Chen, Megan, Nicholas 9:10 - 9:45 3 Lab - Ian 9:50 - 10:15 4 Introduction: Housing 10:20 - 10:30 5 Housing Pate Forest - Baruch 10:30 - 11:30 6 Housing Pate Forest - Clemson 11:35 - 12:35 Lunch Break 7 Housing Entry 1:30 8 Lab - Chelsea, Allison, Emily 3:35 9 Lab - Josh, Eric, Robert, Mackenzie 4:15 10 Housing Pate Forest - DeBordieu 4:55 11 Lab - Logan, Serina, Austin, Summer, RJ 6:00

-

3:30 4:10 4:50 5:55 6:35

A large set of reviewers, from varying backgrounds and organizations, was present to observe and critique the presentations of the studio: Richard Charlesworth (architect from Bozeman, MT) Ulrike Heine (professor + associate chair, Clemson school of architecture) Byron Edwards (professor, Clemson school of architecture) David Franco (professor, Clemson school of architecture) B.D. Wortham-Galvin (professor + director, master of resilient urban design program) Mary Padua (professor, Clemson school of landscape architecture) Darren Meyer (landscape architect, MKSK - Greenville) Skip Van Bloem (professor + client, Baruch Institute of Coastal Ecology and Forest Science) Joseph Schott (professor, school of architecture) Margaret Owens (development officer, College of Agriculture, Forestry, and Life Sciences) Patricia Layton (professor + director, Clemson University Wood Utilization + Design Institute) The reviewers and students enjoyed getting to see all of the work produced during the semester and the showcase was accompanied by many insightful comments and great conversations between all assembled.

The December day was cloudy and cold, but the group was pleasantly surprised when snowflakes started to fall around midday.

415

Mingled students and reviewers watch the Housing Pate Forest - Clemson presentation.

Prof. Dan Harding talks with Prof. Patricia Layton (director, Wood Utilization + Design Institute).

416

Reviewers observe a laboratory group's presentation.

417

Students and reviewers observe Prof. Dustin Albright introduce the studio for the afternoon session.

Garris Killingsworth (undergraduate, landscape architecture) discusses a section of the site model.

418

Prof. B.D. Wortham-Galvin (director, Master of Resilient Urban Design Program) discusses site design.

Prof. Skip Van Bloem examines Kristen Cullen's model of her design, the Skeleton House.

419

Prof. David Franco (School of Architecture) discusses Maddie Ansley's model of her design, Between the Porches.

420

Members of a lab group move their model into the review space.

Prof. Skip Van Bloem discusses the design of the Housing Pate Forest - DeBordieu group.

421

Prof. Skip Van Bloem (acting client, Baruch Institute) comments on a presentation.

Reviewers observe the Housing Entry presentation.

422

Emily Heezen (graduate student, architecture) discusses the model of her group's laboratory design.

423

424

4

425

Winning Proposals | BICEFS 50th Anniversary

426

Following the final documentation and presentations of the Studio project, Dr. Van Bloem led the selection of the winning design proposals. This included a single Research Support proposal and three Housing proposals of note. The noteworthy Housing proposals, which were identified based on the merits of the designs in conjunction with specific BICEFS goals, included the Gate House, the Split House, and the Longleaf House.

Following the selection of the winning proposals, the faculty team and research assistants worked to integrate the designs into a cohesive solution. Among other things, this step involved focusing in on the Gate House design and modifying it for a location on the "Entry" site near the existing Harris Cottage in order to meet the most immediate housing needs. In addition to this editing, the design team collaborated with BICEFS and Clemson University staff to prepare a stimulating presentation of the work for BICEFS' 50th Anniversary event held on January 25th, 2018 at the Hobcaw Barony.

The 50th Anniversary commemoration celebrated BICEFS' remarkable history while also casting a vision for its future growth and flourishing. The site and facilities proposals from the Hobcaw Studio were unveiled at the event, thereby initiating a period of planning and support-raising. Ultimately, these designs will serve as a foundation once BICEFS is ready to engage professional designers and bring these new facilities and site features to fruition.

427

Chelsea Anderson, Clemson University President Jim Clements, and Chris Sandkouler.

Professor Dustin Albright (Arch) explaining the research support building proposal to attendees.

428

Members of BICEFS staff, faculty and board as well as Clemson University President, faculty and students.

Chelsea Anderson (graduate student, Arch) and BICEFS board members.

429

Winning Proposals

430

Research Support Building | Over the Water Chelsea Anderson | Emily Heezen | Allison Chan

Abstract The site for the new BICEFS Laboratory facility lies between the existing lab and the education building.

This site was chosen to keep the campus tight, to protect from fires, take less of the RCW habitat, and allow easy access between buildings. First, a back of house road was devised to allow easy access for scientists going and coming from their field work. This road doubles as a fire barrier. The form of the new building was lifted above the flood plain, leaving only program below that could withstand flooding. The floor plates are narrow to provide natural daylight and ventilation, and arranged linearly for most efficient circulation. The loading zone to the back provides a dirty work area as well as a transition for scientists and technicians to drop their gear and clean up before entering the clean labs above. Within the existing lab building, the Wildlife Lab was expanded and the Coliform Lab was opened up into a communal graduate and intern area. The structure of the new lab building is comprised of "massive timber" components and demonstrates BICEFS' commitment to sustainable forestry while standing as a positive example of lowcarbon construction to the community. The faรงade is covered with a rain screen system to filter light, while protecting from moisture and high winds. It is also intentionally designed to protect the surrounding birds. The new lab building and associated wetland site features are designed to support and enhance the research of the BICEFS scientists, while also respecting and highlighting the ecosystems these scientists call home. (See page 223 for full project).

431

Site Plan

432

Housing | Research Housing John Murden | Chris Sandkouhler | Chelsea Anderson | Allison Chan Abstract The selected site for new BICEFS housing is between the existing Harris Cottage and the Hobcaw Discovery Center. It is adjacent to Hobcaw Road to allow easy access from Highway 17 as well as from the BICEFS laboratories and education building. The house is comprised of three volumes connected by covered exterior circulation. This efficient design maximizes flexibility of usage, while also generating connections to the outdoors and the surrounding housing. The building is elevated off the ground and stairs, along with an accessible ramp, allow for access on all sides. The structure of the house is light wood framing and demonstrates BICEFS’ commitment to sustainable construction. The façade is covered with wood siding, wood slats, and screening, matching the materials and look of the proposed lab across the road. The new house is designed to supplement the existing Harris Cottage by providing a variety of new and necessary housing options, while also creating order and a sense of arrival at the larger housing community. Parking for the new house is located at its rear to the west, and the parking for the Harris Cottage is likewise moved to its rear in order to provide a better sense of connection between these two structures. Together they form a pair, directing occupants toward their work at the labs and beyond, while also receiving them home after a long day in the beautiful Hobcaw Barony.

433

12

10

5 11 9 T01

8 7 5

L01

6 5 5 1

3

2

4

N

SITE PLAN

434

1

Harris Cottage (Existing)

2

Harris Cottage Parking

3

Outdoor Social Space

4

Walking Path to Laboratory

5

USC Housing

6

Paver Crosswalk

7

Ground-Access

8

Proposed House

9

Proposed Parking

10

Discovery Center

11

Hobcaw Road

12

Proposed Bus Parking

1x

1x 4x

2nd Level

2x

1st Level

4x

USAGE DIAGRAM

sq.ft.

House Conditioned Space

sq.ft.

House Exterior Space

435

L01

8

9 10

11

7

T01

Mud Room

2

Ground Access Storage

3

Lounge

4

Laundry Room

5

6

2

1

5

Dining Room

6

Kitchen

7

Pantry

8

Bedroom #1

9 10

Accessible Bathroom Accessible Ramp

11 Screened-In Porch 3 1

4

N

1st LEVEL PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"

Section T01 436

L01

18

19

12 Bedroom #2 13 Bedroom #3 20

14 Bathroom 15 Study 16 Bedroom #4

16

17

17 Bathroom 18 Bedroom #5

13

19 Bathroom 20 Screened-In Porch

14

21 Storage 22 Balcony 15 12

21 22

N

SECOND LEVEL PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"

Section L01 437

Rear Perspective

Back Entrance Perspective

438

2nd Level Unconditioned

1st Level Unconditioned

SPACE DIVISION DIAGRAM

sq.ft. per bed person to toilet ratio person to shower ratio

+

2nd Level +

+

1st Level

PROGRAM DIAGRAM

439