OPEN 2023

OPEN 2023

O OPEN 2023

ISBN 978-1-8383870-2-0 Cover image Hamza Khan Designed & produced Clare Hamman First published June 2023 Printed London

© University of Westminster

OPEN 2023

Contents

4

Introduction

Beyond the Studio 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Introduction

Dissertation

74

Technical Studies

76

AED Technical Environmental Studies

78

AED Second Year

82

AED Third Year

Digital Design Fabrication Lab Academy Foundation in Architecture and Design

BA Interior Architecture 22 26 32 38

BSc Architecture & Environmental Design

Cultural Context

Introduction and Process Interior Architecture First Year Interior Architecture Second Year

BA Architecture [RIBA Part 1] 88 92 106 134

46

Introduction and Process

50 54

Architectural Technology Second Year Architectural Technology Third Year

BA Designing Cities 60

Introduction and Process

64

Designing Cities Second Year

68

Designing Cities Third Year

First Year Second Year Design Studios Third Year Design Studios

MArch Architecture [RIBA Part 2]

Interior Architecture Third Year

BSc Architectural Technology

Introduction and Process

170 174

Introduction and Process MArch Design Studios

Department of Architecture 234 236

Staff Sponsors

WELCOME TO OPEN 2023 and to our celebration of our students’ work from the past year. We hope you will enjoy the range and inventiveness of the projects on show, and that, exploring the studios and the various courses, you will pick up the creative serendipity that characterises the day-to-day life of the School. As is now our practice, you can move between the physical exhibition and its digital twin openwestminster.london to look at individual student work in more detail; and through this online platform, we are delighted to be able to share our students’ work with a global audience.

The School is committed to its Polytechnic inheritance; its aim remains to offer ‘a transformative higher education for all’. We view the diversity of our students drawn from across London and the world as key to our success, and we see difference – and a mix of experiences and views – as critical to our exploration of architecture and place. The impact of our studentstaff initiatives, such as our Equity Forum and climate action taskforce, ArCCAT, can be seen increasingly in how the School’s projects contribute to meeting our societal and planetary challenges. We embed London practitioners in our core teaching teams to keep us alive to the dynamism of contemporary practice, and continue to develop cross-disciplinary collaborations, such as with Imperial College Medical School and Westminster Council, and our Live Design Practice – currently on show at Cody Dock. That, in turn, our students are so valued by practices is hugely gratifying.

2022-23 has been quite a year for the School. Highs have included an RIBA Visiting Board in November that gave a ringing endorsement to all our validated Part 1, 2 and 3 architecture programmes; a hugely positive assessment of the School’s research in the Research Excellence Framework REF; hosting the Shape to Fabrication conference; as well as our colleague Peter Barber being elected RA and awarded the Soane Medal. We thanked long-standing colleagues Bill Erickson, Christine Wall, Kester Rattenbury and Roudaina Alkhani who retired after having given so much to the School and to the disciplines of architecture and planning. And we grieved the sudden death of our colleague Benson Lau, Reader, and founding course leader of our BSc Architecture & Environmental Design. He and his contribution are much missed.

OPEN 2023 is only a reality because of the endeavour of many. Our thanks go to our campus team led by Amaniel Gebreyesus, Kow Abadoo and Chris Meloy for their help mounting the show; François Girardin, David Scott and the Fabrication Laboratory staff who helped build the physical and curate the digital exhibition; Mirna Pedalo who curates our online presence through openstudiowestminster.org and social media; Clare Hamman who designed and produced the catalogue and film; and Daniel Scroggins who organised (seemingly) everything. But above all, thanks to all our students and the staff.

Please enjoy the show.

Harry Charrington Head of the School of Architecture + Cities

4

Welcome to OPEN 2023

Beyond the Studio | Cultural Context

Cultural Context Nick Beech (module leader CC1) is an architectural historian and teaches history as part of a wide range of material cultural practices.

Kate Jordan (module leader CC2) is an architectural historian with research interests in gender, heritage and faith architecture.

Ben Stringer (module leader CC3) teaches design and cultural context. His recent publications focus on ideas about the rural.

ON THE BA Cultural Context programme students progress through one module per year: CC1 – A History of Architecture; CC2 – Architectural History and Urbanism; and CC3 – Dissertation.

CC1 continued with its programme exploring the history of architecture, this year with a particular emphasis on the history of London. From the remains of Londinium to the architecture of late 20th-century financial institutions in the City, students were introduced to the rich diversity of architectural production, including ancient temples, churches, villas, ordinary houses, offices, hotels, railway stations and civic arts centres. As in previous years, students tested different perspectives on the diversity of architectural cultures throughout history and across the globe, presenting their own interpretations in written essays and verbal presentations based on evidence – buildings, drawings, photographs and texts – sensitive to specific cultural and environmental conditions.

This year CC2 comprised a series of walks, lectures and seminars, examining themes that included gender, environmental sustainability, heritage, regeneration and gentrification, and cultural identity. The curated lecture series introduced active research in architecture and

urban studies being conducted by staff within the School and students produced group workbooks that reviewed and analysed these lectures. The live guest lecture series introduced students to cross-disciplinary research into the built environment from practitioners and academics in the fields of history, archival studies, the arts, and English literature. Students had guided visits to sites and selected their own case studies to explore independently for the presentation assessment.

In CC3, students choose, research and write about their own topics for their dissertation. This is done with the support of seminars, presentations and weekly tutorials. The dissertation is a major opportunity for students to begin shaping the trajectory of their own academic and professional careers. This year the topics chosen by students were as diverse as ever. Among the many notable ones were: Julie Krafft Bruland’s analysis of architectural heritage issues on the island of Lyngør; Faye Ayroso’s study of spatial memorials; Magdalena Swiech’s examination of domestic space and mental health in the COVID era; Gabriel Troisi’s research into the use of machine learning and neural networks in design; and Victoria Pearce’s study of migrant integration and village revitalisation programmes in southern Italy.

CC1 Tutors: Susanne Bauer, Nick Beech, Maja Jovic, Diana Periton, Mirna Pedalo, Matthew Stewart, Alessandro Toti CC2 Tutors: Susanne Bauer, Paolo Cascone, Davide Deriu, François Girardin, Clare Hamman, Kate Jordan, Maja Jovic, Constance Lau, Gwyn Lloyd Jones, Luz Navarro, Diana Periton, Michael Rose, Alessandro Toti CC3 Tutors: Susanne Bauer, Nick Beech, Davide Deriu, François Girardin, Kate Jordan, Constance Lau, Gwyn Lloyd Jones, Diana Periton, Michael Rose, Ben Stringer, Mireille Tchapi, Victoria Watson, John Zhang 6

(top l eft) CC1: St Paul's Cathedral, London [photo © Clare Hamman] (top r ight) CC2: Exploring The Barbican Centre [photo © Clare Hamman] (bott om left) CC3 – Victoria Pearce: Aerial View of Orrizontale's Civico Civico, Riesi, 2020 [photo © Orizzontale] (bott om right) CC3 – Faye Ayroso: Princess Diana Memorial, Hyde Park [photo © CGP Grey, CC by 2.0]

Beyond the Studio | MArch Dissertation

Dissertation Richard Difford, Nick Beech, Lindsay Bremner, Davide Deriu, Kate Jordan, Diana Periton, Shahed Saleem, Ro Spankie, Ben Stringer

THE AIM OF the MArch dissertation is to encourage students to develop their ability to reflect critically, and with a degree of self-consciousness and confidence, on a topic relevant to architecture or urbanism. Each student chooses their own subject but the interests explored emerge out of research that begins almost a year earlier in the first year History & Theory seminar groups. Within these groups the students are guided by tutors well versed in a broad range of interests and research methods, and committed to supporting the individual specialisms and scholarship of each student. A range of topics and a plurality of approaches is therefore encouraged. Ultimately, the ambition is that these dissertations will be distinguished, not by their adherence to any particular methodology, dogma or style, but by their high quality.

This year was no exception and there were many outstanding dissertations produced. Highlights include Guy Sinclair’s analysis of the Met Office headquarters building, Computing Climate. Drawing on the work of theorists including Bruno Latour, the role of the climate scientist and the predictive knowledge generated through computer simulation are critically examined. Equally

(left) Chada Elalami: Emmanuel Maignan’s catoptric astrolabe, Trinita dei Monti convent, Rome [Photo: Chada Elalami] 8

insightful, Chada Elalami’s The Cosmos in a Mirror uses analysis of the catoptric astrolabe made by Emmanuel Maignan and traced on the vaulted ceiling of Trinita dei Monti convent in Rome to explore the nature of seventeenth-century scientific method.

Also in Italy, Charles Plet’s Materan Conservation looks at the Sassi neighbourhood of Matera with its remarkable cave dwellings carved out of the rock, and considers the significance of this built heritage. Also on the theme of traditional forms of housing, Manuela Manjarrez investigates the timber framed Maya house found in the Yucatán region of Mexico in her dissertation, Trials and Tribulation of the Maya House. For Sian Sliwinska the focus was on her own family heritage and the experience of post-Second World War Polish Refugees. Her study, Home in the Refugee Camp, looks at the community established in Northwick Park Polish Displaced Persons Camp in Gloucestershire.

These engaging and carefully researched dissertations are just the latest in a long line of successes in the history of the University of Westminster’s MArch dissertation.

(right) Manuela Manjarrez: Maya House [Photo: Manuela Manjarrez]

Beyond the Studio | Technical Studies

Technical Studies Pete Silver, Will McLean, Simon Banfield, Scott Batty, Aleksandra Cannock, François Girardin, Chris Leung & Andrew Whiting Simon Banfield is an architect, educator and entrepreneur working on projects across the UK. Simon is interested in the hands-on act of construction within the building process. Scott Batty is an architect with 30 years' experience making, building, designing and shaping the profession of architecture. He devised the University of Westminster's Sustainable Design Principles, and his work has been presented at the Architect’s Climate Action Network (ACAN). Aleksandra Cannock founded architecture firm TAK Architecture and Design. She teaches students to create architecture grounded in sustainable practices. François Girardin is an architect and educator, teaching design, technical studies and cultural context. His specialist interests are material technologies and digital fabrication. Chris Leung is an architect and associate professor at The Bartlett (UCL). He tutors environmental design and fabrication strategy for final year degree and MArch students.

Will McLean lectures, writes and publishes about the technology of architecture. With Pete Silver, he has been commissioned to write a book due out in 2024: Sustainable and Regenerative Materials for Architecture: A Handbook (Laurence King). Pete Silver is an architect and former building contractor, with many years of teaching experience. Pete has recently successfully registered a patent for his invention, Helical Structural Framework with Torsional Integrity. Andrew Whiting is the director of HÛT Architecture. He has a particular interest in education and practice and teaches at Degree and MArch level. He is an RIBA Awards judge, and RIBA Part III Professional examiner.

THE TECHNICAL STUDIES teaching in the School of Architecture + Cities has been designed as a linear progression from first year Undergraduate through to final year MArch. For each year of study, a lecture series underpins the structure of the teaching. In first year, Pete Silver delivers a lecture series that sets out an approach to the structure, form, material and environmental principles that constitute the ‘technologies’ of the built environment. Students were challenged to build a onemetre-high support structure for a rose, which could not bend, buckle, twist or sway.

In second year, Scott Batty runs the Site Diary assignment that affords many students their first experience of a construction site and introduces students to the Sustainable Design Principles. In third year, Will McLean delivers a lecture series on environmental design, highlighting sustainable approaches to construction, material choices, heating, cooling and remediation.

Consultant Surgeries

Consultant Surgeries are organised for our final year Degree and Masters students of architecture. This provides students' access to professionals including architects (with specialist construction/fabrication knowledge), structural engineering, environmental engineering and materials science.

Visiting Lecture Series

Will McLean organises the Thursday evening ‘open’ lecture series, which highlights new technological developments in the fields of architecture, engineering and environmental design. This year, talks covered contemporary earth, stone, bamboo and natural polymer construction, as well as talks on camouflage, DfMA and fire safety. The talks were simultaneously streamed and recorded.

Guest Lecturers and Visiting Consultants: Ian Abley (Fire Protection Association), Jan Balbaligo (FACIT Homes), Pooja Basnett, Rhiain Bower (Waind Gohil Potter Architects), Henry Burling (Elliot Wood Engineers), Amira Damji (Morph Structures), Carlo Gagliani (Morph Structures), Kate Glensman (Hoare Lea), Fotis Grammatikopoulos, Cath Hassell (ech2o), Tom Hesslenberg (Elliot Wood Engineers), Emma Hilton Grange (Bryden Wood), George Jamieson (Hût Architecture), Michael Jones (Foster + Partners), Steven Johnson (The Architecture Ensemble), Mubarak (Asif ) Khan (EWS Façades), James Killeavy (Adjaye Associates), Carolina Lameiras (Morph Structures), Gnanli Landrou (Oxara), Tim Macfarlane (GL&SS), Panagiota Papadopoulou (Elliot Wood Engineers), Ian Seabrook (Laing O’Rourke), Nikolay Shahpazov (Bennetts Associates), Urna Sodnomjamts (dMFK), John Spittle (Wiehag), Ozan Toksoz-Blauel (Hopkins Architects), Andy Whiting (Hût Architecture), Eleana Savvidi (Morph Structures), Deborah Saunt (DSDHA), László Tálas, Steve Webb (Webb Yates) 10

We would also like to specially thank Teo Cruz who films the evening lectures which are available on the Technical Studies website:

technicalstudies.tumblr.com

(top) First year BA Architecture students challenge: Build a one-metre-high support structure for a rose that doesn't bend, buckle, twist or sway; (bottom) Technical Studies lecture posters

Beyond the Studio | MArch Digital Design

Digital Design Richard Difford, Miriam Dall’Igna, Thomas Hopkins, Michael Kloihofer, Ed Lancaster, David Scott

UNDERTAKEN IN THE first semester of the first year on the MArch, Digital Design is a key component of the Architectural Reflections module. It provides the opportunity to learn valuable computer skills and to reflect critically on the use of digital media in architecture.

The programme begins with an intense week of handson activity in the Fabrication Lab. Working in groups, the students learn essential digital fabrication skills and familiarise themselves with all the lab has to offer. This is followed by eleven weeks’ of classes each focusing on one particular set of digital tools and techniques.

Students select from a choice of five different groups, each with a different focus and set of interests.

The tutors for these groups are drawn from both practice and academia, providing critical reflection on the role of digital technology in architecture along with practical experience and technical expertise. Each group combines technical instruction with related theory and precedents. In this way everyone gets a chance to learn something new and to build on their existing knowledge and experience. The programme culminates in an exhibition of the work hosted by the Fabrication Lab and celebrating the students’ achievements.

The five groups this year were as follows:

GROUP A: Coding Nature and Movement

GROUP D: (Robotic-) Extruded Reality

Inspired by nature, this group utilises graphic coding and physical computing to investigate the formal and expressive potential of movement in natural systems.

Utilising the Fabrication Lab’s industrial robots, this group engages in the 3D printing of ceramics and the potential of mass customisation.

GROUP B: Digital Craft

GROUP E: Procedural Modelling

Employing contemporary digital fabrication tools, this group looks at adapting traditional forms of making to the digital age.

Building on the power of procedural modelling, this group employs simulation and animation in pursuit of intricacy and formal complexity.

Richard Difford

Michael Kloihofer

Ed Lancaster and David Scott

Thomas Hopkins

GROUP C: Computational Design Miriam Dall’Igna

Drawing on contemporary scripting and parametric modelling techniques, this group explores the potential for geometrically driven and environmentally responsive computational design.

12

(top left) Josh Mooney: (Group A); (top right) James Langlois: (Group B); (bottom right) Aikaterini Pechynaki: (Group E); (bottom left) Naomi Punnett, Max Blyth & Luke La Thangue: (Group D)

Beyond the Studio | Fabrication Lab

Fabrication Lab

OUR YEAR IN the Fabrication Lab began with an added touch of glamour this year as incoming MArch students began their course by recreating the casino in a new architectural form. We were fortunate to be joined by our Vice-Chancellor, Professor Peter Bonfield accompanied by his wife, Dawn Bonfield FREng as our ‘high roller’ special guests. No money exchanged hands, only laser-etched acrylic chips as the project again pushed the boundaries of exploring making through the creation of architecture as event, inspired by the work of Bernard Tschumi and Marshall McLuhan.

Having rebuilt our dedicated team of student Lab Assistants, we are again up to full strength and have benefited enormously as a consequence. We’ve seen everyone, colleagues and students alike, enthused again by working with physical materials and being in each other’s company in a creative and dynamic environment; we’ve missed it greatly. This inspired a new workshop developed with Natalie Newey from BA Architecture providing an introduction to more speculative making using fabric-formed plaster casting, free-form timber and metal experimentation, and 3D printing.

The resulting Material Speculations exhibition formed part of a new experimental venture for the Fabrication

Lab called The Exchange. We explored the potential for a weekly series of events to serve as a new platform for sharing ideas, networking and knowledge sharing, open to colleagues from academia and students from across our and other universities, as well as professionals from practice and industry. The Exchange events included an academic book launch by Alessandro Ayuso, student-led workshops from the Art Society and weekly contributions from the Computer Games Society, a very lively collaboration with students from The Bartlett, UCL, organised by Paolo Zaide and Tom Budd, and our exhibition launches featuring projects created in workshops and through coursework in the Lab. We will be expanding and promoting The Exchange more widely next academic year – keep an eye on our Instagram page and website and do please join us for various events and knowledge exchange activities taking place every Thursday between 17:30 and 22:30 during the two semesters. We will also be opening more widely our Maker Days at the University undergraduate Open Days, as well as introducing a new series of regular outreach events for secondary school students interested in architecture, making and digital technologies. There are plenty of opportunities to join us for some creative inspiration in the Fabrication Lab. .

David Scott Director fabricationlab.london

14

(clockwise from top left) Model from the Micro-Architecture Workshop; Material Speculations Exhibition; MArch Digital Design Exhibition; Micro-Architecture Workshop Models

Beyond the Studio | Political & Cultural Empowerment

Political & Cultural Empowerment THE SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE + CITIES is committed to bringing about the cultural shift in education necessary to challenge and address some of the deeply-rooted cultural, political and environmental issues that we face as a society.

Staff and students from across the School are coming together to learn from each other, develop a politically-conscious curriculum, and actively engage with the broader architectural and built environment community beyond academia.

Equity THE SCHOOL’S EQUITY FORUM seeks to evolve policy and practice towards an increasingly inclusive and compassionate School. Forum members include students, academics and external Practice Advocates working together to improve environments, experience, curriculum and pedagogy.

This year saw the launch of the Forum’s project Urban Equity, an Open Access online site which provides resources and inspiration to those within built environment disciplines wishing to

respond to the challenge of equity.

The inaugural Equity Forum Symposium: Pursuing Urban Equity, was conceived to critically reflect – through student and practitioner projects – and consider the skills, cultural approaches and forms of intelligence required for greater equity.

The Forum also launched two new awards, at under- and post-graduate level, to recognise, celebrate and disseminate the excellent work undertaken to address issues of equity through student projects. With the aim of advocating

widely, the Forum and its members supported, shaped and contributed to a number of discrete projects and events, including: the panel discussion event Neurodiversity, Architecture and Cities; The Festival of Decolonial Learning (organised by the Pedagogies for Social Justice Project); and through active membership of the SCOSA EDI Working Group. The latter represents all recognised Schools of Architecture in the UK and is thus in a position to have a wide and transformative impact. urban-equity.net

16

ArCCAT FOUNDED IN 2021, and comprised of staff and students from across the School, The School of Architecture + Cities Climate Action Task Force is driven by the desire and need to fight climate change from within education. It is building collaborative relations to develop a more climate-conscious curriculum, and aims to establish links between disciplines with shared focuses on climate topics, to raise levels of climate literacy in the school, and promote climate conscious practice externally.

From specific projects to broader Schoolwide policies, ArCCAT looks to challenge the status quo. Student reps have been appointed from all courses at both under- and post-graduate level, ensuring the plurality of student voices is heard; and the School Climate Action Strategy encourages discipline-specific curriculum change across all courses in the School.

ArCCAT's been made visible through social media and branding, and more so with the Hydroponic Wall we built on campus, growing micro-salads which are harvested regularly. The monthly ArCCAT reading group deepens understanding and conversations about climate, and the screening of After the Oil Machine at the Regent Street Cinema exposed the impact of industry, construction and the finance of multinational oil companies in Britain.

Beyond the Studio | Political & Cultural Empowerment

Mental Health, Design and Wellbeing: A co-design workshop in two parts THE SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE + CITIES has been working with the Medical School at Imperial College London to explore the relationship between design, mental health and well-being. The collaboration includes 650 students from across five courses namely: BSc Medicine, BA Architecture, BA Interior Architecture, BSc Architectural Technology, and BSc Architecture & Environmental Design, as well as 40+ members of staff.

Now in its third year, this innovative two-day workshop involves students working in interdisciplinary teams with patients, clinicians, architects and other key stake holders on pre-defined mental health conditions, to identify problems and propose solutions for the design of existing NHS mental healthcare sites.

The workshop has won an Association for the Study of Medical Education/GMC ‘Excellence in Medicine Award’ and a National ‘Research and Education Award’, in addition to a University of Westminster ‘Learning and Teaching Excellence Award for Collaboration’.

Team leads University of Westminster Ro Spankie, Alastair Blyth, Diony Kypraiou Imperial College London Wing May Kong and Fiorenza Shepherd

18

[Photos: Claudia Cantarini]

Beyond the Studio | Foundation in Architecture and Design

Julian Williams, Sabina Blasiotti, Alex Fox, Luz Navarro, Roman Pardon, Catherine Phillips Sabina Blasiotti is a graduate of the University of Westminster. She founded Sabi Space, an architecture and design studio. Alex Fox is an artist who works in multiple media, including painting and site specific works. Luz Navarro is an architect and planner, and a member of the Emerging Territories Research Group. She teaches across undergraduate and postgraduate planning courses. Roman Pardon is an architect and director of Pardon Chambers Architects. He is particularly interested in the symbiotic relationship between thinking and making.

Catherine Phillips studied architecture at The Bartlett and Manchester University, and art at City and Guilds of London Art School. Her practice combines architecture, teaching and art. Julian Williams is an architect and Principal Lecturer, currently researching post-WWII housing and the idea of the estate.

The Foundation in Architecture and Design Students: Maryama Abdi, Nujood Almoayed, Pritika Arora, Kivinoto Awomi, Andrea Bonilla, Denisa Ciobanu, Rojda Comooglu, Marija Denisko, Arek di Giacinto, Iris Fani, Hajar Fouad, Flavia Furnica, Fatemeh Ghalichehbaf Vosoughi, Faith Graham, Rose Haliwell, Olivia Hillidge, Farhim Islam,

Zaynab Khan, Mikela Likocaj, Thessica Lohanathan, Dhani Lynch, Magdalini Merkaj, Balkis Mortier, Amna Ola, Keli Prenga, Kashish Puri, Rahman Mehnaz, Tanawat Raveng, Salma Rhazi, Noor Rizk, Ahmad Sajwani,Yna Sanchez, Keith Sasikumar, Sana Shafique, Maira Shahid, Marjona Tosheva, Kaif Uddin

THE FOUNDATION IN Architecture and Design is a new course, established to support students who have a passion for architecture and design but may not have had the opportunity for art or design study at school. It's an intensive year of basic drawing, making and creative skills, aiming to equip students for further degree study in the field.

They reflected on what it is to feel ‘in’ and conversely ‘outof-place’ within a setting, and observed urban life through on-site sketchbook studies.

The course is also valuable for students who are unsure about their choice of degree path. During the year, they are introduced to the various courses offered at the University of Westminster in Architecture, Interior Architecture, Architectural Technology, Planning and Urban Design, and through practical projects able to find their best fit.

There are four studio based projects, each offering a taster of the various degree routes. In the first project, students examined urban places and learned about the importance of design in shaping new cityscapes.

Guest Critics: Rose Nag, Sue Phillips 20

The second project, based in the campus’s Fabrication Lab, introduced students to the material and constructional challenges of making new buildings and structures. The work this year involved designing and making a series of science demonstrators for year 4 children of Torriano and Brecknock Schools in Kentish Town, Camden.

In the third project, students explored creative approaches to the adaptation of an existing architectural space through model-making and collage. The year's final project asked the students to design a folly for the University’s Cavendish Campus. In search of inspiration to begin to develop their own designs, they visited the Victoria and Albert Museum to see the Ramadan Pavilion designed and created by architect and tutor Shahed Saleem.

Special Thanks: Miranda Montagu, Shahed Saleem The students and staff of Torriano and Brecknock Schools, Kentish Town ( from top) Tanawat Raveng; Maira Shahid; Andrea Bonilla; Arek Di Giacinto; Arek Di Giacinto; Arek Di Giacinto

(clockwise from top left) Group model + Amna Ola; Amna Ola; group model; group model; Mehnaz Rahman; Denisa Ciobanu; Amna Ola; Pritika Arora; Thessica Lohanathan; Balkis Mortier; Balkis Mortier; group model; Yna Sanchez; Yna Sanchez

INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE SETS a balancing act between place-making and experience design.

Ranging from the scale of the building to that of the room, and to the interiorities of the urban context of London within which we operate, the course encourages students to study and design spaces from a user perspective. It challenges them to reimagine existing buildings and relate them back to the community in critical and creative ways.

To understand how complex interior environments can be re-imagined, sustainably adapted and re-inhabited, we investigate new typologies that support the emerging life, work and design patterns. Students experiment by drawing out atmospheres, testing innovative material applications and by exploring immersive technologies, to deliver novel experiences using both traditional and multidisciplinary methods.

Across the three years of the BA, a range of themes are explored including retail, exhibition, performance, narrative, and circular design, all driven by the course’s regenerative ethos that promotes climate awareness and action. Students engaged in craft, making, fabricating and upcycling ‘hands-on’ workshops, and participated in ‘live-projects’ with real clients. Firstand second-year interior students collaborated in a week-long competition to design Body Contraptions; bespoke wearable devices that operate in unison to collectively perform a dedicated act, while third-year

22

students won a ‘live-competition’ to design a studentcentred social hub for our university campus, in Marylebone.

The course has set up strong links to practice, which manifest in our Interior Matters open lecture series. Delivered by invited guest practitioners and a list of esteemed critics, it is the realisation of our subject-specific Employability Week that offers intensive workshops that coach and prepare students for practice. All the above were made possible through contributions from numerous international and London-based leading practices that among others, included: Perkins + Will, TB Bennetts, Stufish, Haptic, Gensler and Heatherwick Studio.

Cross-disciplinary in its outlook, the course participated for the third year in the Co-Production Workshop: Mental Health, Design and Well-being, held with medical students from Imperial College. With guidance from practitioners, clinicians, experts and patient advocates, our group considered how design affects our health and proposed small-scale healthcare interventions in the public realm. This ‘live-project’ and transformative learning experience enabled our students to reflect on their own practice, while highlighting the importance of listening and working collaboratively in order to meaningfully contribute to real-world issues.

Diony Kypraiou Course Leader

BA INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE

BA Interior Architecture | Process

24

BA Interior Architecture | First Year

Liz Ellston, Inan Gokcek, Jo Hagan, Jo Meehan, Sylwia Poltorak, Henning Stummel, Anastasia Tsamitrou

Liz Ellston is fascinated in the psychology of spatial environments, people : place, process : pattern. Her many years of practice experience feeds into development of pedagogy and learning methods. Inan Gokcek is an interior and architectural designer running Studio Anares.

He collects cultural artefacts which he upcycles for various design projects. Jo Hagan is principal of USE Architecture, driven by the fine line between pragmatism and pretension. 30 years’ of teaching adds passionate engagement with contemporary culture. Jo Meehan is an architect interested in the interface of domestic and civic space; large-scale public housing retrofit projects and small-scale sustainable interventions. She is an associate of MAS_architecture and co-founder of Audible OKR. Sylwia Poltorak is a set/installation designer.

Cheerfulness, vitality and longevity drive her practice. As ‘Lobster Architect’ she investigates atypical design methods that sustain well-being.

Henning Stummel is an architect with extensive international teaching experience. His work explores innovative and sustainable solutions, while simultaneously seeking tranquillity and poetry. Anastasia Tsamitrou is an archaeologist and architectural designer at Pilbrow & Partners.

Her research in Material Studies emphasises biomaterials and sustainability.

YEAR 1: Design Fundamentals & Strategies for Interior Architecture Students: Nouf Al Jeraisy, Tala Al-Hiyarat, Aida Maisarah Ali Bakri, Tamara Alireza, Amal Alkhaja, Nouf Alsadoun, Helin (Mina) Altinatmaz, Mariam Amin Sadek, Demet Asam, Caitlin Beaumont, Mahfuza Begum, Carla Canestro, Liliya Chylikina, Anamaria Ciobotaru, Angelina Constantinides, Aashman Danewalia, Fatema Dashti, Patrycja Debowska, Iro Delidimitri, Lua Dimmock, Aaron Dunne, Grace Fallows, Laysa Fernandes Bertoldo Da Costa, Ann-Sophie Frosch, Merjen Geldiyeva, Kathrine Giacomini, Nour Hassawi, Talia Hepburn, Sophia Hesse, Avleen Hunjan, Hyejeong Hwang,

Fariha Jabeen, Sabrina Kad Bay Rodriguez, Victoria (Nehir) Kaya, Krystian Kowalczyk, Siying (Anastasia) Li, Tong Lian, Tsz (Emma) Liang, Veronica Lopez, Alexandra Marston, Njane Mccleary-Savage, Viktorija Minseviciute, Shierryn Batrisyea Mohamed Faroz, Keiran Moore, Sajerthan Murali, Iman Myatt, Blessing Nzau, Jo-Anne Obi, Tuana Ozuren, Isabella Pacelli, Humaira Pervin, Anna Samoenko, Dara Simoes, Cameron Sin, Daijonae Stewart, Olivia Stylianou, Lara Thompson, Lily Thompson, Rayhan Uddin, Jenny Vasani, Jessica Vatamaniuc, Audrey Wistehuff, Kaiwen Zheng

IN FIRST YEAR students on the BA Interior Architecture course are introduced to underlying concepts and principles associated with the discipline and learn fundamental processes, skills and techniques relevant to conceive, develop, resolve and communicate spatial design proposals.

transformable piece of Unitecture (architectural furniture) for students to inhabit and use as a standalone spatial environment within a selected area on campus.

In the first semester, students are set a range of short projects to develop techniques and spatial understanding, including: personal collage and timelines; constructs to investigate qualities of light and drawing conventions; group precedent study to understand intent and architectural representation; measuring and surveying of people and spaces. Building on these skills they are then asked to design their first piece of interior architecture.

This year, they were challenged to address the idea of Balance, in terms of student well-being. Beginning by surveying Regent Street campus, they then designed a Guest critics: Catherine Byrne, Sue Phillips Peer-Assisted Learning Assistants: Nylda Hamchaoui, Qubbie Hai Yuan, Saima Rouf 26

In the second semester, students individually re-ordered the interiors of Bradbury Works, Dalston, for a specified Maker with a critically relevant programme of specialised repair, re-purposing, modification and upcycling of ‘stuff, waste, existing buildings and lifestyles’.

An inspiring visit to the Museum of the Home, and immersion in the environs and community of Dalston – burdened by consumer waste, but with a strong community potential – fuelled students’ site and context investigations. While developing an understanding of re-making, reuse practices and circular design, they iteratively investigated materials and techniques to create spaces aimed at engaging and interacting with the local community.

Many thanks: Alex Smith and the Bradbury Works team (YN Studio), Louisa Clark and team (Makerversity), Charlotte Rudkin-Wilson (Mûll Club), David Scott, Giada Gonzalez, Erika Boguckaite, Krista Zvirgzda-Zvirgzdina (Fabrication Lab) (top to bottom) Lily Thompson; Liliya Chylikina; Anna Samoenko; Lily Thompson; Merjen Glediyeva

(clockwise from top left) Carla Canestro; Merjen Glediyeva; Viktorija Minseviciute; Anna Samoenko; Mariam Amin Sadek; Olivia Stylianou; Shierryn Batrisyea; Cameron Sin

BA Interior Architecture | First Year

28

(clockwise from top left) Avleen Hunjan; Tamara Alireza; Jo-Anne Obi; Isabella Pacelli

(top) Lily Thompson:Regrooved; (middle) Kathrine Giacomini: Speaking Tubes; (bottom) Hyejeong Wang: Eternal

BA Interior Architecture | First Year

30

(clockwise from top left) Ann-Sophie Frosch; Olivia Stylianou; Liliya Chylikina

(clockwise from top left) Anastasia Siying Li; Carla Canestro; Audrey Wistehuff; Angelina Constantinides

BA Interior Architecture | Second Year

Era Savvides, Alessandro Ayuso, Jake Parkin & Sylwia Poltorak Era Savvides is founding director of creative collective Urban Radicals. Her design philosophy centres around a materially-driven, crafted approach to digital design and the creative use of robotic fabrication within the built environment. Alessandro Ayuso is Senior Lecturer whose studio-based practice and research focus on the intersection of representation, architecture and the body. Jake Parkin is a designer and tutor based in London. Alongside teaching, his work focuses on exhibition, set and architectural design. Sylwia Poltorak is a set and installation designer. Her creative practice is driven by cheerfulness, vitality and longevity to investigate atypical design methods for well-being.

YEAR 2: Culture, Alteration, Material and Detail Students: Sara Abdi, Halima Abubaker, Manal Ali, Ella Bedir, Ana Bolintineanu, Faye Buela Anyayahan, Hollie Champion, Rama Chams Bacha, Shu Ting Chang, Robertas Cizas, Yuqing Dai, Patriece Daroux Young, Melissa Dinc, Yawen Ding, Lei Feng, Laiba Gohar, Charlie Hawkins, Masuma Hussain, Alexandra Hutanu, Assem Izatullayeva, Pantea Javdan, Junjian Kang,

Fateme Khaleghi, Nadia Khatun, Jasmine Koomson-Gyasi, Zakia Lessak, Anna Lopes Giacomazzi, Alicia McKenzie, Marta Nuevalos Camacho, Humeyra Onut, Chin Kit Pan, Emma Roescu, Fatma Sarikaya, Roksana Sobelska, Heidi Solis Hidalgo, Sara Vannella, Amy Viana Moreno, Yiyang Wang.

THIS YEAR, OUR year 2 students looked for the materially sensuous and the impeccably crafted. Our studio focused on poetic, transformational spaces and interiors that have the potential to become catalysts for change. The year unfolded into two inter-related semesters, aiming to engage students with material experimentation and craft as drivers for sustainable design thinking. This allowed students to explore how small-scale processes can influence large-scale spaces and helped develop a deeper understanding of environmentally-conscious material and crafted modes of operating within interior architecture.

gathering information directly from the urban realm and applying this to the design of meaningful spatial proposals, responding of the South Bank mooring community.

In the first semester, we ventured across London in search of material and immaterial observations of ‘time’. Through a series of rigorous and playful design processes, the students tested themselves as architectural flâneurs,

Guest Critics: Alex Borrell, Ashley Caruso, Sindi Dojaka, Hanna Hendrickson-Rebizant, Mary Konstantopoulou, Olivia Neves Marra, Alex Vafeiadis 32

The second semester was an opportunity to interact with real clients, focus on constructing spatial experiences and designing atmospheres for flagship concept stores in the retail sector. Through a series of process-driven material experimentation workshops, students were given the opportunity to develop a personal understanding of a set of seemingly incompatible materials. Using this, they were tasked to construct innovative material applications and assemblages that would inform the production of immersive, atmospheric spatial proposals, responding to the creative agendas of four emerging fashion brands establishing shops in New Bond Street.

Special thanks: Serhan Ahmet Tekbas (Haptic), Mahallah Attwell Thomas (Unknown Works), Eleni Diana Elia (Green Matt Workshop), Chris Kokarev (Material Cultures), Theo Jones (Green Matt Workshop) Hollie Champion

BA Interior Architecture | Second Year

34

Charlie Hopkins

(top) Melissa Dinc; (middle & bottom) Alexandra Hutanu

BA Interior Architecture | Second Year

36

(top) Daniela Nagel; (bottom left) Ana Bolintineanu; (bottom right) Chang Shu Ting

(top left) Emma Roescu; (bottom Fatma Sarikaya; (right) Humeyra Onut Interior View from the Frontleft) Entrance

You are here

Interior View of the Entrance

BA Interior Architecture | Third Year

Diony Kypraiou, Sam Aitkenhead, Dusan Decermic, Zoe Diakaki, Ro Spankie & Allan Sylvester Diony Kypraiou is Senior Lecturer, an architect and researcher. Her work explores practices of polyvocalism and performativity in design, exploring analogies staged across theatre, psychoanalysis, interiors and architecture. She is a member of the Interior Educators network. Sam Aitkenhead is a designer, researcher and maker working across architecture, interiors, graphics and product design. His work explores ways to reduce environmental impact through design and material innovation. Dusan Decermic is an architect and experienced educator who engages with both theoretical and design practices in architecture and interior design. He set up his own practice, arclab, in 1999. Zoe Diakaki is an architect and interaction designer whose work sits at the intersection of architecture, scenography and immersive technologies.

Ro Spankie is Assistant Head of School and Subject Lead for Interior Architecture. Fascinated by the role of the drawing in the design process, she has exhibited and published work related to the interior in the UK and abroad. Allan Sylvester is Visiting Lecturer, a practicing architect, and founding partner of Ullmayer Sylvester Architects, a design-led multidisciplinary collaborative practice.

YEAR 3: The Cli-Lab Students: Dalal Alabdulhadi, Deema Alrumayyan, Nada Attar, Naima Augsburger-Salmen, Melisa Aydemir, Reyhaneh Babaei, Nafeesa Banaras, Ruqayyah Baqir, Nida’a Barakat, Madison Barter, Julie Beech, Gabriela Boloz, Mine Bozkurt, Valentina Cazacu, Melissa Comber, Charlianne Constantin, Emily Davey, Aswin Ferdinand, Atanas Ganev, Daniella Hakim, Barakah Haried, Mohammadamin Hoseiniyekta, Rwzhan Kader, Nur Kozan,

Shromiya Kulendiran, Quynh Le, Xiyuan Li, Oluwatoni MacGregor, Eliana Mankel, Valeriya Martyanova, Niusha Mobasheri, Eda Morina, Zoe Onatoye, Bianca Paiu, Jayni Pindoria, Hiu Pun, Evita Puraite, Sairah Rahman, Danil Ripnar, Hala Riyad Al Saie, Ella Sears-Pocock, Gyuldzhan Shyukryuoglu, Tanicia Silva, Naira Sobrevilla Quiton, Ilona Tzompova, Justina Veiksraite, Anisia Verdes, Yuhao Wen, Mian Wu, Dilber Yesildal, Hatice Zorpineci

DRIVEN BY THE global climatic discourse, students were challenged to consider design as a promoter of climate awareness and enabler for climate action. Prompted by a fictional collective of Sci-Formers (Scientists + Performers) who collaborate to challenge wasteful practice and raise awareness through art, students speculated on novel typologies and hybrid environments emerging from the study of scientific laboratories and performance spaces.

This concluded with innovative proposals to transform the London Canal Museum into a prototype Cli-Lab, as a spatial manifesto towards a more sustainable London.

for Year 3 students. Each student identifies a host building and devises a programme based on analysis and personal design interests. Ideas are explored through an array of techniques that include material research/testing and immersive technologies. The diversity of schemes and depth of speculation is indicated by a sampling of project descriptions and locations: The Comfort Food Project: Transforming the disused Stamford Hill Bus Garage into an urban farm and homeless women’s centre; Comfort Beyond Dreams: A Hydroponic cannabis farm for CBD-infused treatments at 33 Brook Street; Congregate: Transforming food mindsets for the Fulham community; Umbra Habitat: an immersive shadow-world experience for children with autism at Koko Camden Theatre; MirroR: a Mixed Reality centre training players for their journey to reach earth’s future Digital Copy; Kultur: an inclusive Turkish Community Centre in Haggerston Baths.

This year’s Co-Production Workshop, held with medical students from Imperial College, provided guidance from practitioners, clinicians, experts and patient advocates for our group to consider how design affects our health and propose small-scale interventions in the public realm. This fed into the Thesis Project, the main pursuit

Guest Critics: Special Thanks: Abdi Ai (Ruimte Design), Tatiana Akhmetova (Anoushka Hempel Ltd), Jonathon Anderson, Laura Aylen (Hassell Studio), Conor Clarke, Seda Eldek Sergio Cavadas (TP Bennetts), Omar Ghazal (Studio Ghazal), Inan Gokcek (Perkins&Will), Nylda Hamchaoui, Jack Hoe (Studio Sutton), (Studio Anares), Mijail Gutierrez (Perkins + Will), Catarina Kohut ( Jonathan David Littlefield, Anoushka Pacquette (WILL+Partners), Roman Pardon Tuckey Design), Charlotte McCarthy (Heatherwick Studio), Nina Musgrave (Pardon Chambers Architects), Jake Parkin, Aaron Perry (Kennedy Woods), (Nina & Co), Roman Pardon (Pardon Chamber Architects), Catherine Phillips, Adam Phillips (Gensler), Anastasia Tsamitrou (Pilbrow&Partners) John Scott (Drawing Board), Ullmayer Sylvester Architects, Alicia Tkacz (Stufish) 38

Eliana Mankel: Equilibrium

BA Interior Architecture | Third Year

40

Yuhao Wen: Science Laboratory

Julie Beech: The Comfort Food Project

BA Interior Architecture | Third Year

42

Eda Morina: Umbra Habitat

Eda Morina: Umbra Habitat

BA Interior Architecture | Third Year

44

Deema Al-Rumayyan: Millenium Mills

Deema Al-Rumayyan: Millenium Mills

BSC ARCHITECTURAL TECHNOLOGY combines specialisms in the technological, environmental, material and detailing decisions necessary to solve architectural design problems from conception to completion. It requires complex understanding of design processes, architectural composition, design development, construction technology and management tools, and the effective communication of design information.

1st year students were introduced to the design development process through a live project for a Caretaker residence at a Forest School in Lewisham.

2nd year students engaged to reduce food waste in Deptford, south-east London, with airtightness a driving focus; and 3rd year students won a successful bid to the University’s ArCCAT Green Fund grant to work on a recycled plastic furniture design collaboration with Brazilian social enterprise Pedra Furada Transformation Workshop, imagining a set of multi-functional, largescale buildings for research, development and retail, on a complex urban block site in Bermondsey, south London.

2nd year comprises modules in design process (including site analysis, research of precedents and sketch development); and technical report (digital software skills and technical resolutions to building components). These work in synopsis with the Technologies of Architecture module, which encourages experimental model making and understanding of passive design theory construction.

3rd Year is broken into three stages: research, development and realisation.

46

Research Initial research is key in order to understand any constraints that might follow from the site, building use, and client. As the year progresses, technical aspects of the design are investigated, including construction materials and structural considerations.

Development With a clear understanding of the design task, students go on to develop individual designs and/or technical solutions. Sketches, models, 3D visualisations and BIM models are produced to progress ideas and as an aid to weekly discussions with lecturers, visiting architectural technologists, architects and other students.

Realisation Architectural design and construction are collaborative endeavours, even more so as new technologies are introduced and as building requirements for greater energy efficiency result in greater complexity. Adopting and embedding the Westminster Climate Action Network’s strategy guidelines, communication through sketches, models and technical drawings is of the utmost importance.

Architectural Technology students have benefitted from a range of extra-curricular activities over this academic year, including Co-production workshops with medical students from Imperial College, work experience in architectural practices, technical studies lectures and a field trip to Oxford – all of which have enriched a thoroughly busy and productive year to be celebrated!

Tabatha Mills Course Leader

BSc ARCHITECTURAL TECHNOLOGY

BSc Architectural Technology | Process

48

THE PROCESS OF understanding and demonstrating excellence in Architectural Technology begins with understanding the brief, the site and wider implications.

Throughout this year, Architectural Technology students have meaningfully engaged with this process.

AT3 visited their site for a research, development and manufacturing development with an emphasis on recycled plastic, in Bermondsey.

The whole course visited Oxford and spent time considering historical and contemporary buildings through sketching, including Herzog & de Meuron’s Blavatnik School of Government and Public Policy.

AT1 undertook presentations of their design work for a Forest School Caretaker in Lewisham.

AT3 built prototypes and 1:1 scale furniture in the Fabrication Laboratory and we welcomed AT1 with a sketching trip along London’s South Bank.

AT2 continued their model-making journey, through the Technologies of Architecture 2 module, constructing and testing airtight scaled models.

BSc Architectural Technology | Second Year

Tabatha Mills, Adam Thwaites, Ian Casey & Wajiha Dadabhoy Tabatha Mills is Senior Lecturer and Course Leader at Westminster where she has taught for 16 years. With a plethora of industry experience as a practicing Architectural Technologist, she established her own studio in 2005. Her research interests include passive design, technical design solutions and embedding inclusivity into AT education and practice.

Adam Thwaites is a passionate advocate of architectural technology as a distinct profession. Adam is a Senior Lecturer and worked for a series of small architectural practices prior to moving into education. His research interests include the use of CLT timber in medium and highrise building construction, energy efficiency and sustainable construction methods.

Ian Casey With 25 years’ experience post-RIBA qualification, Ian is a practicing architect and master planner with Pick Everard, working on large-scale projects, contributing technical detailing expertise and a robust knowledge of technical design requirements to his studio teaching.

Wajiha Dadabhoy is a practicing architect at Rock Townsend within the Higher Education team, working on a variety of education and commercial schemes. Waj is a Part III Champion, and Visiting Lecturer at University of Westminster.

YEAR 2: Deptford Community Fridge: Food Waste Reduction + Community Facilities Students: Zainab Ajaz, Amar Alamir, Hamad Alhinti, Nida Ashraf, Yousra Awad, Hamzah Awni, Jeremy Blake, Zoez Chaudhry, Jabir Chowdhury, Harry Cox, Jamie Davis, Basit Fajarul Rahman, Rath (Alex) Leang,

Ramtin Mahmoudifar, Levi Oddoye, Sidrit Selmani, Mohammed Shorkar, Rajvir Sondh, Ishaq Uddin, Maariyah Youb.

THE DESIGN BRIEF for AT2 this year involved a local community fridge project, aiming to reduce food waste and support community initiatives. An initial meeting with the founder of Hawkhurst Community Fridge allowed students to expand their brief to meet stakeholder needs and design a medium-scale project to house flexible spaces for community use on a former industrial site in Deptford, south-east London.

In synopsis with the Technologies of Architecture 2 module, students sought to understand the principles of airtightness within their designs, building on a series of theory lectures delivered by Research Associate Krista Zvirgzda, and a practical workshop from a manufacturer of air- and wind-tight building envelope materials. Physical models were then tested to analyse performance in line with the passive design strategy employed.

50

(above) Jeremy Blake; facing page: (top left) Hamada Alhinti; (top right) Levi Oddoye; (bottom) Sidrit Selmani

BSc Architectural Technology | Second Year

52

(top left) Nida Ashraf; (top right) Jeremy Blake; (bottom left) Ramtin Mahmoudifar; (bottom right) Hamad Al Hinti

(right) Harry Cox

BSc Architectural Technology | Third Year

Adam Thwaites, Sam Sam Hui, Jamie Ogilvie & Paul Smith Adam Thwaites is a passionate advocate of architectural technology as a distinct profession and route into a career in architectural design.

Adam is Senior Lecturer and worked for a series of small architectural practices prior to moving into education. His research interests include the use of timber (CLT) in construction, regenerative design and demountable structures.

Sam Sam Hui is a lecturer and architect with 20 years’ industry experience. His research focus lies in architectural illustration, detailing and technology.

Jamie Ogilvie is a practising architectural technologist and alumni of University of Westminster. Jamie has worked for a number of years within the residential design sector in the UK and received the CIAT Gold Medal Award for London 2018.

Paul Smith is an experienced architect and partner at Foster + Partners. Paul has taught on the Architectural Technology BSc for a number of years and brings technical knowledge, experience of many and various projects, and insights into the latest materials and technology.

YEAR 3: Transformation Workshop Students: Fariya Abdul, Monisha Abu, Fatma Abubakar, Zeianab Ahmed Shoble, Sumiya Ali, Nasma Amrane, Waris Baryali, T’sean Blake, Amjad Butt, Nimra Butt, Velina Drakalieva, Chantel Forrester, Pascal Golda, Mustafa Habibyar, Casey Hendricks, Muzzammil Jiwabhai,

Zuzanna Jodlowska, Lorenc Lasku, Lewis Lautier, Alana Mendes De Oliveira, Yasamin Moshirabadi, Richard Mulamootil, Intisar Nadeem, Emma Rawlings, Fariba Taherkhani, Kristian Ulan, Juan Vera Verduga, Kit Webster

THIS YEAR, STUDENTS focused on how to sustainably manage the problem of plastic pollution and recycling, and the opportunities of recycling and the circular economy.

The Workshop is a pilot social enterprise, collecting and processing waste polypropylene plastic into furniture for sale. Crucially, this work is undertaken by and for the benefit of this economically disadvantaged community. The Transformation Workshop meets ten of the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals, encompassing environmental conservation and social and global justice and equality.

With reference to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (consideration of peoples and communities at a global scale, as well as the environment), students were asked to design three objects in ascending scale to facilitate the transformation of an economically valueless material into something of high value, and in so doing mitigating damage to the environment and promote social and global justice: an item of furniture; a temporary/demountable structure; and a research, development and manufacturing facility where products utilising recycled materials could be developed, produced and sold.

We were fortunate to work with Professor Paulo Gomes and learn about his project, the Transformation Workshop, recycling Polypropylene plastic in Pedra Furada, Brazil.

One of the poorest villages in Brazil, it was originally established as a Quilombo (encampment of escaped slaves) among the (environmentally precious) Mangrove forests.

Students first developed designs for production at the Workshop, with the intention that their designs could be sold internationally, thereby meeting an additional UNSDG, No. 17 ‘Partnerships for the Goals’. They went on to design a demountable structure for deployment to a remote location, and to house a Transformation Workshop or similar. Finally, Students designed a building or buildings for a large and complex site in Bermondsey, south London to house a research, development and manufacturing facility to design and produce items from recycled materials.

Special Thanks: Professor Paulo Gomes.

Transformation Workshop: Maria Domigas da Conceicao Sousa, Ana Paula dos Santos Conceicao, Maria Jose Conceicao Santos, Foster + Partners: Staff at the Materials Research Centre 54

) Velina Drakalieva

BSc Architectural Technology | Third Year

56

(top & middle left) Zuzanna Jodlowska; (bottom left) Sumiya Ali; (top & middle centre) Velina Drakalieva; (bottom centre) Pascal Golda

(top) Velina Drakalieva; (bottom) Pascal Golda

BSc Architectural Technology | Third Year

58

(top) Emma Rawlings; (bottom left) Emma Rawlings; (bottom right) Velina Drakalieva;

(top) Zuzanna Jodlowska; (bottom left & centre) Velina Drakalieva; (bottom right) Zuzanna Jodlowska

BA DESIGNING CITIES (BADC) is an integrated course between planning and architecture that equips students with the necessary skills and competences to tackle together the multiple challenges of city sustainability, inclusion and resiliency. Over the last years, the BADC teaching team gathered together with students and alumni to discuss the future of the course, in the context of an evolving job market and new emerging challenges. The result has been the redesign of a new course focused on the method of inquiry by design, as an explorative tool to test creatively ideas of sustainable urban futures.

The course will be re-launched in the coming months with more emphasis on the relationship between climate emergency and cities, aligned with the on-going work of ArCCAT, the Architecture and Cities Climate Action Taskforce. Cities are understood as both problems and opportunities in the transition towards net-zero emission. At the same time, cities are places in which to experience new ways of living, linked to new emerging narratives of happiness, well-being and diversity.

60

Our teaching focuses on solving emerging urban problems such as the increasing demand of quality green space in London, as we have experienced in the context of year 2 ‘Climate Studio’. Students had the possibility to visit urban transformation projects in Manchester and east London, observing the tensions of urban regeneration projects in relation to diverse migrants communities, such as those in Elephant & Castle and Seven Sisters. As in the past, we have organised industry projects with our key partners (including Jacobs, Grosvenor, WSP), exposing students to new problems to solve, and providing an opportunity to explore new solutions. The best students’ works are generously awarded by JCDecaux.

The course is accredited by the Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI).

Giulio Verdini & Luz Navarro Course Leaders

BA DESIGNING CITIES

BA Designing Cities | Process

62

DESIGNING CITIES’ STUDENTS visiting different sites in London for their Year 2 Climate Urbanism studio; and presentation of the findings of their research and site analysis. This year the area of study was along the River Lea in east London. Students had the opportunity to

visit other urban regeneration sites in Elephant & Castle and Seven Sisters. Guided by David McEwen from Unit 38 and visiting lecturer at University of Westminster, these precedents helped them to gain further understanding of their site and project.

BA Designing Cities | Second Year

Giulio Verdini & Luz Navarro Giulio Verdini is Reader in Urban Planning and Course Leader of the BA Designing Cities. He is the Co-convener of the Emerging Territories Research Group.

Luz Navarro is Lecturer in Urban Planning and Design. She is a member of the Emerging Territories Research Group.

YEAR 2: Climate Urbanism Studio Students: Hesna Abraha, Salma Alanazi, Ibby Aleem, Natalie Atalla, Muhammad Bin Mohammad, Lina Derbouchi, Ioana Flore, Ashleigh Gill,

Britishe Karakushi, Matija Kopricanec, Zufra Mohamed, Marcelo Murillo Smith, Nicola Perry, Piranavaraj Sivashanmugam, Dilan Thethy

THE CLIMATE URBANISM STUDIO investigates how to build up climate-resilient local areas, exploring ways to improve the provision and quality of green urban spaces in contemporary cities. Our Climate Urbanism Studio employs an integrated analytical and design framework to understand and map city vulnerabilities to address collaboratively complex urban challenges, and produces meanwhile scenarios of resilience and inclusive design explorations at the local level.

to its location between the boroughs of Tower Hamlets and Newham, the area has been considered a ‘backyard’ historically, without being politically relevant. However, nowadays this area has been reconsidered as an important ecological resource with the potential to reinforce its role as a key social and environmental infrastructure for the surrounding residential areas.

The case study selected this year is located in the Lower Lea Valley, in east London. Due to its very fragmented nature, being comprised of mixed residential areas, with some problems of social deprivation, and largescale industrial areas, the area has remained relatively untouched by the large property developments of the London Docks, but equally has been affected by the Olympic Games regeneration project to the north. Since then, a framework for a new linear park along the river Lea was proposed but never fully implemented. Owing

Guest Critics: Mike Deveraux (University of West England) 64

Students have therefore worked on proposals to provide resilient and green solutions for the future of the river area. In particular, they have referred to the Newham Citizens Assembly report ‘Greening the Borough’ aiming to: encourage physical and digital access to green space; implement community projects around green space and well-being; support the development of green infrastructures networks, pockets of green, and the rewilding of existing areas. Students’ work gives voices to local people and explores transformative strategic interventions while providing concrete solutions for greening the borough.

Special thanks to our studio PALs: Adrian-Calin Paul, Zixin Yao (top) Group 2 – Natalie Atalla: Historical Land Use and Environmental Site Analysis; (bottom) Lower Lea Valley Site

Scale 1:143

Scale 1:143

Private road

Residential road

Buildings

Open land

Public road

Transport Links

Street Hierarchy

Urban Form

https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1w6fxP1NiruGQv7FgivNLxu0Da46LIfFj

1900 Delivering coal to industries

1935 Fishing was banned

1930s

1950s

Demolished

Rebuilt

1968 Classified as a British Waterway

1970s

1/1

2012 Olympics was hosted

1980s

2016 Lee tunnel was built

Nowadays Bringing back the value of the river

1990s

Nowadays

BA Designing Cities | Second Year

JUST...LAND USE 1

2

3

4

5

6

8

7

9

11

10

12

Current land Use

n1

n2

Site allocations Ailsa Street Leven Road gas works Local Industrial Location

n3 Aberfeldy in progress

Ailsa Street proposed

Poplar East Riverside in progress

15 min access by bike 15 min access by foot

n4

Regeneration phases 1-4

Regeneration 5 with actors

15 minute city

Current land Use

Farm

Road: TFL, council, residents, business

Green space

Industrial

Marsh/farmland

River: Councils, Canal River Trust, Cody Docks, residents, TFL

Shops

Housing

Industrial land

Housing: HARCA/EcoWorld, residents, business, TFL

School

Community use

Victorian housing

Industrial: Business, council, residents, Canal River Trust, TFL

GP / Hospital

Green space

Social housing 1950 and later

Green space: Council, Cody Dock, Residents business, TFL

Worship

Shops, pub, cafes

River Lea

Development: Mixed use housing Berkeley Group, residents, TFL

Work space / office

Work space

A12 / A13 artery roads

Community: faith groups, council, residents, business, TFL

Gym

Shops/housing: HARCA/EcoWorld, residents, business, TFL

Industrial

und of regeneration in 160 years ted Actors

2023 Master Plans Poplar East Riverside: Private/affordable housing, emphasis on housing with limited shops and workspace. Berkeley Group.

Ailsa Street: Tower Hamlets site allocation, emphasis on work space with some affordable and social housing.

Aberfeldy Regeneration: In progress, emphasis on housing private, affordable and social with work space, community space and shops.

Some residents support regeneration and some oppose a proposal to green an underpass that would prevent easy car access to the area.

THE SIX PARKS AND THE LEAWAY 2023 Master Plans Proposed and in progress

map.edina.ac.uk, additions authors own. Photography: authors own. Land use data: authors observations, google maps. Master plan insight Aberfeldy: futureaberfeldy.co.uk, Ailsa Street: democracy.towerhamlets.gov.uk, Poplar East Riverside: berkeleygroup-mea.com. 15 min city bike distance: bikemap.net/en/routeplanner/ walk distance: digimap.edina.ac.uk 15 min city: Carlos Moreno ted.com/talks/carlos_moreno_the_15_minute_city Site allocation: local plan, towerhamlets.gov.uk

The strategic approaches to developing the Lea River Park are contained in the Lea River Park Design Framework produced for the London Thames Gateway Development Corporation; a document published in May 2008 and developed to explore the character of the park and its delivery methods. This document has informed the local planning context through its integration into local borough and London-wide planning policies.

The establishment of a phased approach to delivering the park is necessary to respond to the availability of land and funding, with initial investments focussed on the creation of the riverside route, the Leaway. The Leaway acts both as a strategic walking and cycling route and as an armature for the later development of the six core park areas: each delivered in accordance with the completion of construction or decommissioning of infrastructure.

Wildlife connectivity chain along the riverside

THE SIX PARKS AND THE LEAWAY The strategic approaches to developing the Lea River Park are contained in the Lea River Park Design Framework produced for the London Thames Gateway Development Corporation; a document published in May 2008 and developed to explore the character of the park and its delivery methods. This document has informed the local planning context through its integration into local borough and London-wide planning policies.

1

2

3

4The establishment of a phased approach to delivering the park is necessary to respond to the availability of land and funding,

with initial investments focussed on the creation of the riverside route, the Leaway. The Leaway acts both as a strategic walking and cycling route and as an armature for the later development of the six core park areas: each delivered in accordance with

This connecting network near the riverbank will serve as a little habitat and be accessible to animals for its own purposes. the completion of construction or decommissioning of infrastructure.

1

2

Three Mills Green, completed in 2012, the reinvention of the Green included the new Wild Kingdom playground and the first section of the Leaway along the canal edge.

Mill Meads parkland aims to reframe the natural fluvial marshlands and the lushness of the allotment gardens as a foreground to the infrastructural compounds of Thames Water’s operations and the historic Abbey Mills pumping station.,

Twelvetrees Park is created from the ongoing decommissioning of the largest group of listed gas holders in the UK, offering a unique opportunity for a new destination for London, incorporating industrial heritage, events and botanical collections.

Poplar River Park responds to the critical need for additional recreational and open space in Poplar. The park will combine sports provisions with renewable energy demonstration structures which continue the site’s history of power generation.

1

4

3

N

1 Three Mills Green, completed in 2012, the reinvention of the Green included the new Wild Kingdom playground and the first section of the Leaway along the canal edge.

4 Mill Meads parkland aims to reframe the natural fluvial marshlands and the lushness of the allotment gardens as a foreground to the infrastructural compounds of Thames Water’s operations and the historic Abbey Mills pumping station.,

2

3

4

Twelvetrees Park is created from the ongoing decommissioning of the largest group of listed gas holders in the UK, offering a unique opportunity for a new destination for London, incorporating industrial heritage, events and botanical collections.

Poplar River Park responds to the critical need for additional recreational and open space in Poplar. The park will combine sports provisions with renewable energy demonstration structures which continue the site’s history of power generation.

16

66

5

6

The Exotic Wild is a new kind of park space, resulting from the aggregation of a series of landscapes currently fragmented by largescale transport infrastructure to form a coherent and connected whole. A set of extraordinary colonised estuarine landscapes will emerge, allowing access to the River Lea as it prepares to meet the Thames.

East India Dock Basin acts as a gateway to the journey up the River Lea: in time, a place to hire bikes, buy a picnic or prepare for a day out.

This provisioning for a day in the park is aligned with the docks’ own history of global trade, and its role in providing London with exotic plants, from spices to tea.

5

6

The Exotic Wild is a new kind of park space, resulting from the aggregation of a series of landscapes currently fragmented by largescale transport infrastructure to form a coherent and connected whole. A set of extraordinary colonised estuarine landscapes will emerge, allowing access to the River Lea as it prepares to meet the Thames.

East India Dock Basin acts as a gateway to the journey up the River Lea: in time, a place to hire bikes, buy a picnic or prepare for a day out.

This provisioning for a day in the park is aligned with the docks’ own history of global trade, and its role in providing London with exotic plants, from spices to tea.

Lea River Park - Primer

Lea River Park - Primer (left top-bottom) Group 163 – Ashley Gill: Mental Map Analysis of study area; Group 1 – Nicola Perry: Mental Map Analysis of study area; Piranavaraj Sivashanmugam: Wildlife connectivity chain along the riverside; Matija Kopricanec: Individual proposal – Lee River greening strategy

Collage Of The Exit Of The Bridge

Collage Of The Garage Collage Of The Exit Of The Bridge

Collage Of The Garage

Colla

Collage Of Powerday And Its Extension

Collage Of Uni 8 Electra

Collage Of Powerday And Its Extension Close Up Collage Of People Using The Bridge

Collage Of Uni 8 Electra

Close Up Collage Of People Using The Bridge

(left) Marcelo Murillo Smith: Proposed solution projects and SWOT map analysis; (top right) Nicola Perry: Creating people friendly Streets greenOfnetworks; The Garage 12 & Collage (bottom centre) Natalie Atalla: Elevated Connectivity in Newham; (bottom right) Dilan Thethy: Pocket Parks redefined

12

BA Designing Cities | Third Year

David Mathewson, Abubokkar Siddiki & David Seex David Mathewson is Senior Lecturer and MA Urban Design Course Leader. He studied at the AA, the University of Texas and Westminster, and has more than 20 years’ urban design and architecture practice experience in the UK, USA, south-east Asia, Africa, and the Middle East.

Abubokkar Siddiki is an architect and community planning specialist currently working on international development projects in Bangladesh, and with the NHS to deliver improved social and cultural outcomes in Greenwich in partnership with the council. He is also a graduate of the MA International Planning and Sustainable Development course at Westminster.

David Seex is a part-time Visiting Lecturer in Urban Design and Planning, and was previously Senior Lecturer at Westminster for over 30 years.

YEAR 3: Planning Policy + Design Intervention Students: Miriam Aluede, Lucia Canaii, Mahdis Hosseini, Assel Irmenova, Halime Kamber, Ali Khalifah, Marco Mantega, Nicole Pietrucha,

Marisoul Rofail, Edward Rumary, Kurosh Shabani Shahir, Amelia Wilson

THIS YEAR’S PROJECT is set within the Thamesmead and Abbey Wood Opportunity Area Planning Framework, one of the Greater London Authority’s strategic development sites situated within the larger River Thames Opportunity Area in east London. The current opportunity area seeks to respond to many of the challenges of one of the largest urban regeneration areas in London. Prepared in consultation with a number of stakeholders, it calls for the extension of the DLR train to Thamesmead and beyond, 15,000 new homes and 8,000 new jobs in the area.

The lack of adequate outdoor lighting exacerbated the isolation, and social problems which beset many estates had already started to emerge by the end of the 1960s.

The area dates back to 1178, when the nearby Lesnes Abbey was founded, an important local institution and landlord up to the Reformation in the 16th century, and was responsible for draining much of the marshland that had covered the area in Mediaeval times.

Thanks to the area’s location in a bend of the river, Thamesmead and Abbey Wood remain isolated from the rest of London. The only local railway station opened at Abbey Wood in 1849, and the area is not sufficiently served by local buses. This impacts on the economic generation and job-creation potential for the area, and reinforces poverty and deprivation in Thamesmead and Abbey Wood.

The first social housing in the area was built by the Royal Arsenal Co-operative Society from 1900-1930, a precursor to the London County Council housing which would be built later in the mid-1960s when communities uprooted from close-knit, working-class neighbourhoods of inner London were sent to the urban periphery. However, the design of new estates increased the sense of isolation of residents, most of whom did not know anyone in the area.

Guest Critics: Isabel McCagg (Urban Initiatives Studio), Karan Bakre (Grimshaw), Negar Ahmadpoor, Simona Palmieri (AECOM) 68

Architectural design reflected then-futuristic ideologies, including elevated pedestrian walkways, buildings and plazas built on pilotis and other raised structures, partly to provide spaces for car parking, as well as to reduce flood risk. However, many of these walkways and open spaces became neglected and quickly deteriorated.

Working in groups, students undertook an urban design analysis and three-dimensional design framework to assess the spatial challenges and highlight potential solutions, before going on to design individual architectural and public realm proposals for smaller development sites.

Special Thanks: Jane Connor (Head of Public Health Development) and Alain Lodge (Senior Public Health Manager) at Greenwich Council for liaising with the studio and providing lectures and other information.

Studio PAL: Reesha Sudra Marisoul Rofail

BA Designing Cities | Third Year

70

Ali Khalifah

(top) Assel Irmenova; (middle & bottom left) Lucia Canaii; (bottom centre & right) Kourosh Shabani Shahir; (middle right) Amelia Wilson

BA Designing Cities | Third Year

72

Edward Rumary facing page: Mahdis Hosseini

CLIMATE CHANGE IS one of today’s most pressing issues and, in the past decades, global policies and research institutions have acknowledged the urgency of addressing it through higher education. The BSc AED offers students a combined architecture and environmental design education at undergraduate level to form a new generation of architects who are both environmentally aware and able to quantify the environmental impact of their design.

The BSc AED engages climate change and design practice with an emphasis on physical ecologies of building, numeracy and computation, as well as the wider principles of social sustainability. Over three years, BSc AED students are equipped with knowledge and skills in predicting and assessing building performance from both qualitative and quantitative perspectives, learning both the poetic and scientific aspects of the design process.

In the first year, students share the design studios with the BA Arch programme to acquire basic architectural design knowledge – observational and drawing skills through design projects and study trips. An evidenceinformed design approach is introduced to students through lectures, hands-on workshops, group seminars and individual study sessions.

In second year, through four design briefs, BSc AED students explore the urban dimension by investigating social, economic and building-related environmental and energy issues. The four briefs are written in

collaboration with Technical Studies to ensure that students acquire an understanding of digital environmental simulations at different scales and learn to develop environmental design strategies based on an evidence-based approach to design.

The third year is structured around the Final Thesis Project; a research-by-design studio investigating innovative forms of performative architecture, negotiating social and environmental dynamics. Three separate modules allow students to enrich their projects by studying the relation between the geometry, the material system, and the performances of their architectural proposals.

A significant part of the challenge of educating the Environmental Architect consists in the ability to move between disciplines. To facilitate a multidisciplinary learning experience, BSc AED students are encouraged to participate in interdisciplinary activities, such as the co-production workshop organised with Imperial College. Over two days, students work alongside designers from other courses and medics from Imperial College to redesign healthcare spaces for the NHS. Students also take part in lectures and workshops organised by specialists from different fields, such as the lecture delivered by marine biologists involved in the largest coral reef restoration in the world. Similarly, a workshop on biomaterials run by material scientists allowed student to experiment with new sustainable materials.

Stefania Boccaletti Course Leader

74

BSc ARCHITECTURE & ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN

BSc Architectural & Environmental Design | Technical Environmental Studies

Mehrdad Borna Mehrdad Borna has more than 17 years of experience in architecture, sustainability, and environmental design, gained through professional practice, higher education and the public sector. In addition to teaching, Mehrdad provides consultation and advice on various air quality, NZC, retrofit and environmental design projects in both the private and public sectors.

AED Technical Environmental Studies

TES MODULES OFFER a multi-scale approach to the study and practice of environmental design and its integration to the architectural design process.

TES 1 module introduces the notion of environmental performance of buildings in relation to the principles of building physics, highlighting their direct link to choice of materials and construction. In TES 2 students are challenged to develop their technological vocabulary and apply different energy systems for the passive (or low energy) heating and cooling of buildings and their principle technologies. TES 3 introduces the concepts and methodologies for the environmental performance predictions and evaluations (i.e. simplified steady-state calculation to more sophisticated energy modelling and simulation) of existing buildings and new designs.

TES modules are structured as a combination of theoretical lectures immediately followed by applicative workshops ranging from climate to microclimate analysis of a site to building analysis and human comfort. Talks by guest practitioners and researchers complete the students’ learning experience.

Marion Baeli (PDP London), Jan Balbaligo (Facit Homes), Luisa Brotas (Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames), Chris Coonik (Innovate UK), James Engwall (MAKE Structures), Julie Ann Futcher (Urban Generation), Cath Hassell (ech2o Consultants Ltd), Mohataz Hossain, Will McLean, Hazel Mealy (London Borough of Lambeth, Lewisham & Southwark), Hossein Sadeghi Movahed (Oxford Brookes University), Kyriakos Papanagiotou (KP Acoustics Ltd), Shahab Resalati (Oxford Brookes University), Rofayda Salem, Rosa Schiano-Phan 76

The importance of measurement, analysis and synthesis for environmental strategies: (above):1 st year students measuring environmental parameters; facing page: (top) Anastasia Suzdaltseva Kazakova: Bioclimatic section, highlighting stack ventilation and bio-photovoltaic moss for energy production; (bottom) Edoardo Ripamonti: Using the IES Virtual Environment software to evaluate the natural cross ventilation performance of the proposal

Summer 12 pm Angle: 69.93º

Equinox 12 pm Angle: 38.32º

Winter 12 pm

Bio-Photovoltaic moss for energy production

Angle: 15.11º

Triple glazed windows

Diffused light through Atrium in to social spaces

Summer

Stack Ventilation through openings in Atrium and external skin

m /s 12.27 11.22 10.17 9.12 8.07 7.02 5.97 4.92 3.87 2.82

1.77 0.72

Double skin and louvre

Winter

BSc Architectural & Environmental Design | Second Year

Stefania Boccaletti, Yota Adilenidou & Mohataz Hossain Stefania Boccaletti studied, practised and taught architecture in Italy, Canada and England. Throughout her carrier as a practitioner and academic she has developed an interest in the impact of digital tools on the design and fabrication process in the field of architecture.

Yota Adilenidou studied in Greece & USA and holds a PhD from The Bartlett, UCL. She has been teaching for 16 years in Greece & UK. Her practice focuses on the research of computational methodologies and digital fabrication for the evolution and activation of matter and form.

Mohataz Hossain is an architect, educator, sustainability expert and researcher in the field of integrated environmental design, digital technology and energy-efficient architecture with a special focus on users’ comfort, health and well-being.

YEAR 2: Spatial Poetics and Human Comfort in the Age of Climate Change Students: Nansi Antypa, Marwah Arshad, Federico Balbo, Hanaa BelarabAllen, Anna Breda, Yana Dzhatunarachchi, Rio Gonzales, Nicolas Guillot, Lauren Ibbot, Marwa Jait, Christian Li, Ricardo Lugo, Anastasia Lupo,

Kanaz Naji, Triantafyllia Panagopoulou, Yasmin Rana, Tugce Simsek, Anastasia Suzdaltseva Kazakova, Finlay Warwick, Lok Yiu, Pavel Zabarsky, Golnar Zolfi

BASED ON CONCEPTS of transformation and application, second year students developed skills to incorporate both intuitive and evidence-based tools into their design. This evidence-based approach equips students with tools to implement environmental design principles on top of which they could playfully develop their design proposals.

urban character and environmental parameters, including light/shadow, air pollution, wind, thermal (pattern of temperatures), and acoustic (noise pollution). The outcome was a meaningful environmental design strategy that informed the second brief design for an inhabitable interface for the.

Four briefs introduced students to increasingly complex scenarios and provided them with the opportunity to learn new digital and analogue tools for understanding, simulating and representing the urban and environmental context with analytical precision. The data underpinning these exercises constituted the foundation for the development of their design proposals.

Briefs 3 and 4 examined the effects of climate change on the performance of existing buildings, in particular on Marylebone Hall, a University of Westminster student accommodation tower in Marylebone Campus, London.

Students were encouraged to work towards the Net Zero Carbon building concept, developing performance-based designs to retrofit Marylebone Hall to make it resilient to the challenging climatic conditions that will exist between now and 2080.

The first brief required students to analyse an urban area around Piccadilly Circus and communicate both its

Guest Critics: Roberto Botazzi, Kyriakos Chatziparaskevas (Heatherwick), Alberto Fernandez Gonzalez, Nikoletta Karastathi, Nate Kolbe (Superfusionlab), Annarita Papeschi, Rofayda Salem, Emmanouil Vermisso 78

Special Thanks: Nikoletta Karastathi, Susanne Bauer

Nicolas Guillot, Anastasia Suzdaltseva Kazakova, Triantafyllia Panagopoulou, Golnar Zolfi: Regeneration of the Marylebone Hall Tower

BSc Architectural & Environmental Design | Second Year

Anastasia

0

2

10

24 26

SOLAR RADIATION ANALYSIS

80

(top) Anastasia Suzdaltseva Kazakova: Bioclimatic Section, Interior and Exterior Views; S P R I N G (bottom) E Q U I NNicolas OX SUMME R SO L S T I C E Analysis Guillot: Bioclimatic Section, Solar Radiation 21 MARCH

21 JUNE

Plan - Floor 20

N

(top) Hanaa Belarab-Allen, Anna Breda, Marwa Jait, Christian Li, Pavel Zabarsky: Solar Radiation Simulation, plan, exterior views; (bottom) Nicolas Guillot, Anastasia Suzdaltseva Kazakova, Triantafyllia Panagopoulou, Golnar Zolfi: Design Iterations – Bioclimatic section

BSc Architectural & Environmental Design | Third Year

John Zhang, Roberto Bottazzi, Paolo Cascone, Yota Adilenidou John Zhang is an architect and director of Studio JZ. He has a particular research interest in museums as spaces for climate action.

Roberto Bottazzi’s research analyses the impact of digital technologies on architecture and urbanism. He is the author of Digital Architecture beyond Computers: Fragments of a Cultural History of Computational Design.

Paolo Cascone is the founding director of CODESIGNLAB. His research on high/low tech design and performative architecture sits at the intersection of environmental engineering and sustainable architecture.

Yota Adilenidou is a researcher focusing on computational methodologies and digital fabrication for the evolution and activation of matter and form.

YEAR 3: Re-Imagining West Silvertown Students: Agathe Alexandre, Endrit Ajeti, Alanoud Alsudairy, Qiyi Cai, Samual Calkins, Mika Mor, Annabelle Morel-Jean, Julia Noiszewska,

Mette Pedersen, Anna Prideaux, Edoardo Ripamonti, Esma Sharif, Farhan Uddin, Victoria Van Reijn

FIFTY YEARS AGO the report Limits to Growth predicted dire consequences for the world if a more ecologically and economically sustainable balance could not be found.

We have sought to follow a process of evidence-informed research and design, anchored in the data and the reality of West Silvertown’s imminent development. Critical to the success of the students’ proposals is an evidence-informed and iterative methodology for developing research from ‘data’, be it environmental, ecological, typological, morphological, socio-economic or historical.

This year, we responded to the emerging masterplan for West Silvertown, and sought to re-imagine an alternative vision for this neighbourhood that considers the environmental challenges of this territory and suggests an alternative and radical model for re-making a piece of the city.

Through the design of a network of small-scale prototypes and a large-scale building, we have been exploring new ways in which communities and natural habitats can become symbiotic, resilient, adaptive and sustainable.

The design processes have also been rooted in the idea of thinking through doing, be it measuring, modelling, simulating, drawings, animating or filming. We have encouraged students to push the boundary and consider how the environment can be better communicated through systems of architectural representation.

A particular emphasis has been on how architectural responses and environmental strategies perform at an urban scale against the tide of ‘business-as-usual’ city making. We have considered if a series of interventions to ‘infill, connect, add and replace’, could be the catalyst for change and a clue to a more sustainable future.

Over the course of the year, successful proposals have emerged which offer original approaches to sustainable design: from sustainable methods of construction to building performance; from careful consideration of spatial tectonics to creating socio-economically sustainable communities; from human comfort to sustainable ecologies that address non-human inhabitants.

Guest Critics: Stefania Boccaletti, Ben Pollock, Nicola Read, Hugo Santos, Rofayada Salem

Special Thanks: Mehrdad Borna, Lindsay Bremner, Susanne Bauer, Mohataz Hossain

82

) Farhan Uddin

BSc Architectural & Environmental Design | Third Year

84

(top left-right) Alanoud Alsudairy; Annabelle Morel-Jean; Endrit Ajeti; (middle) Esma Sharif; (bottom) Agathe Alexandre; facing page: Samuel Calkin

BSc Architectural & Environmental Design | Third Year

86

(left) Mette Pedersen; facing page: Edoardo Ripamonti

Future Cities?

WHILST A 170-KILOMETRE-LONG mirrored mega-city in the Saudi desert made headlines last summer, global issues such as the housing crisis and climate change are galvanising ambitions for the creation of a new generation of hightech cities. In the race to become a new tech-, garden- or smart-city, our studios this year were challenged to slow down and reconsider the future of our urban – and natural – environments. What role do we as architects play in shaping these places and spaces, and how bright can we paint these futures?

For our First Year students, we started to re-imagine potential futures by exploring the past. The briefs ‘Seeding Memories’ and ‘Vernacular Investigations’ invited them to explore their personal memories of plants and their associations of local identity, materiality and tradition. These lessons were later translated into ways of caring, growing and reinvigorating a neighbourhood in east London.

In Years Two and Three, the design briefs for a Future City were also formed around one of our core principles of community, circularity and craft. How could architecture for the future city create meaning for the ‘Homeless’ [DS(2)6], be of ‘Public Service’ [DS(2)7] or be a catalyst for radical social change for the community [DS(3)1]? Considering the future city through an environmental lens, could design

88

develop novel ideas for ‘Urban Ecologies’ [DS(2)1], create a new relationship between dwelling and nature [DS(3)7], or form synergetic relationships with the wilded landscape [DS(3)2]? Studios explored new ways of grafting buildings [DS(2)5], crafting city fragments [DS(2)4], imagining the architectural future of a city through the lens of history [DS(2)3], and responding to material scarcity while developing social value through ways of engaging local communities [DS(2)2].

The year allowed us the time to explore how the 5th industrial revolution might impact our way of living [DS(3)5], how ‘Dialogical Cities’ [DS(3)3] could adapt as needs change, and how physical and digital boundaries might fundamentally change the very notion of cities [DS(3)4], where they might start and what they may evolve into. With over half of the world living in urban settings and with five billion people living in cities by 2030, we hope that the ideas developed in our studios this year will create the seeds for collective memory and desire, and places for fresh cultural and environmental imagination.

Thank you to all Studio Tutors and the Course Team for taking on this year’s challenge, and a bigger thanks to all students for their focus, dedication and continuous creative energy.

Paolo Zaide Course Leader

BA ARCHITECTURE RIBA Part 1

BA Architecture | Process

90

ARCHITECTURE IS A fascinating subject involving wide-ranging creative, academic and practical activities.

Our course explores the use of spatial design to interrogate the complexities of contemporary society and our built natural environment. We encourage our students to become creative and

critical thinkers with the ambition to develop forward thinking ideas for speculative futures. This requires risk and imagination, and exciting new ways of thinking about community, circularity and craft.

This year’s range of work very much reflects this ambition and hopefully opens up ideas ow to build better places and spaces in the future.

Welcome to BA Architecture!

BA Architecture | First Year

FIRST YEAR ARCHITECTURE STUDIOS FOR THE FIRST twelve weeks, the ten First Year studios shared the same briefs, exploring the relationship between humans and plants as a vehicle to investigate some of the biggest challenges we face today: climate change; food security; habitat and biodiversity loss; and the extinction of species.

Early investigations were framed by five sequential interconnected briefs: The Alternative Metric Handbook (investigating relationships between the body, objects and space); Seeding Memories (exploring and representing a personal memory associated with a plant); Ethnobotony (researching the physical and human aspects of the plant); and Vernacular

Investigations (learning from the past by critically analysing, drawing and modelling vernacular precedents).

The final design project was a collaboration with Chelsea Physic Garden where students designed a temporary outpost to celebrate and sustain interest in the CPG’s collections while the gardens are closed for refurbishment.

During Semester two we shared sites in Hackney Wick. Each studio developed their own briefs covering themes as diverse as wellness, thermal comfort, upcycling, food sustainability and leisure; described in more detail in the following pages.

Tutors Vasilija Abramović is an architect holding a PhD in the field of Interactive Architecture. She has published in leading scientific journals and has exhibited work internationally. Alongside UoW, she teaches MArch at The Bartlett, UCL.

Paol Kemp studied at CSM and Accademia di Architettura di Mendrisio, Switzerland. Working at OMMX, he has contributed to various projects from conception to completion including private homes, exhibition design and competitions.

Paresh Parmar is an architect and director of Studio PYP, a London-based architecture practice specialising in private residential projects with a strong emphasis on understanding people, spatial needs and sustainability.

Florian Brillet has worked in international practices for 16 years, including Dominique Perrault and Jean Nouvel. He has developed his own practice focused on public art commissions and furniture design.

Jenny Kingston is an architect and urban designer working mainly on public realm schemes in rapidly changing areas of London.

Alongside teaching at UoW, she works with muf architecture/art.

Rofayda Salem is a scholarship holder and PhD student at UoW. She is an author on the topic of Islamic architecture and passive solutions.

Yannick Guillen Sloma co-founded awardwinning practice Guillen Esteras Architects.

Interested in public and cultural projects, and sustainable building traditions, it recently won the award to design a kindergarten in Berlin.

Balveer Mankia is the founding director of BAL Architecture. Formerly a partner at MAKE, he was involved in the design and delivery of several award-winning schemes. He has taught at the Universities of Greenwich and Nottingham.

Rim Kalsoum is an architectural designer currently working at Weston Williamson & Partners and is a visiting lecturer at the University of Westminster. She is co-founder and creative director of Muslim Women in Architecture.

Bongani Muchemwa is an architect who has worked with RSHP, CZWG and Burwell Architects. He runs a small practice focusing on public realm, exhibition design, and housing projects, and is a trustee of arts charity BEAM.

Neil Kiernan is an experienced practicing architect and BA design tutor for 1st and 3rd year. He has a continued and developing interest in the research of gender, space and architecture.

Richa Mukhia is a director of award-winning architectural practice M.OS Architects. She has extensive experience in the private and public sector with a particular interest in housing design, public realm and community engagement.

Alison Gwynne is an architect who was formerly director at Edward Cullinan Architects.

Her practice focuses on producing beautifully crafted buildings, with a strong sense of concern for their environmental impact.

92

Natalie Newey is Senior Lecturer and SFHEA. She has extensive experience working in practice and is particularly interested in engaging students in community and environmental issues.

Conor Sheehan is the co-founder of Studio MASH, a design practice working across the fields of architecture, installation, interiors, graphics and events.

Matthew Stewart is an architect, researcher and writer. He has worked with architectural practices in the UK and internationally on projects across various scales and sectors.

Richard Watson is a tutor, artist and product designer who started teaching at UoW in 1999.

He has exhibited his handmade works at UoW and the Architectural Association.

Carine Woiezechoski is an architect and environmental consultant with experience in practice and academia. Her PhD was on building integrated hydroponic farms in Tropical Climates.

Mika Zacharias is an architect and educator who runs her own multi-disciplinary practice. Her work is playful and referential, a design approach that feeds into her work as an educator.

BA Architecture | First Year

GROUP A: Conor Sheehan & Richa Mukhia

Crafting Community

Students: Mona Abou Dahech, Hamza Alhomsi, Sayeda Ali, Samia Ar-Rumi, Aa’ishah Boutrig, Nicolas de la Flor Rey, Angela de la Vega Munoz, Danyaal Fox, Thomas Gilsenan-Best, Aleeza Hafeez, Aiza Iftikhar, Effie (Raf) King, Paul Mabalot, Narmeen Parvaiz, Marianthi Pitikari, Maximilian Rider, Nikita Sazonov, Ewa Tomiczek, Ermis Ioannis Tsolos

AS A STUDIO, we have been exploring the idea that by turning to a more local way of living, by working locally, using locally available resources and materials, communities can thrive while having a positive impact on the environment. The projects have been designed to strengthen an existing community, help start a new community or revive a lost community in the face of a turbulent present and future by increasing social connectedness.

Many thanks to our Peer Assisted Learners Rob Forsey and Suzana Meziad

GROUP B: R ichard Watson & Natalie Newey

Making Space to be Creative

Students: Matthew Adey, Labiba Ahmed, Moza Al Ghurair, Yahya Amanov, Daile Cerneckyte, Mehek Fatima Khan, Maria Gutierrez, Malak Hamid, Meryem Haydar, Vanessa Kwan, Eloise Morris, Aarohi Pathak, Bamdad Saghafi, Jazmine Wills

IN SEMESTER 2, the students looked at how they – and others – worked creatively. We then looked more specifically at the habits they employed to prepare themselves to do this. This was summarised in a series of drawings which described both the mental and physical spaces they needed for this to happen.

Many thanks to our Peer Assisted Learners Hana Alsaai and Hannah Hobhouse

Drawing from these studies, the students designed a work space for themselves, with a public area where one of the habits that they had identified earlier could be shared with the wider public of Hackney Wick.

GROUP C: Jenny Kingston & Florian Brillet

Leisureplex: The Third Place

Students: Manushiya Aruran, Deborah De Lima, Diana Fernandes, Yordan Kostadinov, Ayat Laymi, Chloe Masterson, Eleanor McSpadden, Zaina Nabi, Mufsy Rahman, Ceylin Sozer, Viktorija Voitechovic, Junhao Wang, Anak Wendha,Christian Wolff, Batuhan Zenginer, Edwin Zhou, Aderito Baptista Tran

THE STUDIO IS concerned with the role of architecture in building community through social integration. The students were asked to design a Third Place to encourage people to come together through shared interests and activity, and activate the surrounding neighbourhoods and streets.

Many thanks to our Peer Assisted Learners George Malliaropoulos and Riane Oukili

94

The projects are sited in Hackney Wick. Locally-led research finds existing residents, particularly young people, feeling excluded from the benefits development brings to an area.

The projects aim to combat loneliness and support new communities through well-designed and thoughtful architecture.

GROUP D: Alison Gwynne & Balveer Mankia

Upcycled Studios

Students: Avrora Afanaseva, Clarissa Alie, Fatema Alnajem, Max Artemenko, Esteban Bedoya Bedoya, Selen Bayraktar, Alisson Castillo Atiencia, Vich Raksey Dom, Omer Erginoglu, Carina Gusanu, Melek Hussein, Ines Idoulahiane, Samuel Kamara, Meryem Omerspahic, Nirmit Patel, Sarina Sheikh Mohammadi, Matias Sterian, Vania Talwar, Vanessa Yuksel, Saif Dino Sanoufe

WE HAVE BEEN critically appraising the value of waste material, and exploring the design possibilities of live/work/share studio spaces for 21st-century sculptors and makers who transform obsolete or waste materials into desirable works of art.

Many Thanks To Our Peer Assisted Learners Charlotte Chin And Roberto Lopato Ricorico

GROUP E: Neil Kiernan & Rim Kalsoum Students: Ingrid Almcrantz, Kevin Cahani, Rania Chebihi Hassani, Harriet Cosgrove, Elena Delli Colli, Emilia Falkiewicz, Francisco Fernandes Badona, Ombeline Garese, Zeynep Karaosmanoglu, Mehdi Kareemi, Nina Klodt, Iliana Pappa, Olha Petrachkova, Usman Rahman, Edward Rosson-Jones, Andrine Sivertsen, Jens StormGran, Natalie Warnawski Many thanks to our Peer Assisted Learners Carl Fletcher and Wing Wong

GROUP F: Y annick Guillen & Vasilija Abramović Students: Wajahat Ahmad, Rahin Ahmed, Khawla Ahmed, Vani Arora, Raquel Baah-Robertson, Rania Elkharim, Antoni Fernandez Canellas, Noah Hohbach, Aniseh Hoveizavi, Sana Amir Khan, Destiny Layokun, Josephine Low, Francheska Marcheggiani, Sabina Metaj, Dawid Panasiuk, Anthony Pavlidis, Berfin Saygili, Elina Taraldsoey Many thanks to our Peer Assisted Learners Estera Badelita and Saniat Chowdhury

Students researched a sculptor of their choice to understand the technical, social and scientific realities of their sculpting techniques. Through a series of modelling tasks, students developed a unique architectural language and new material approaches, infused with the spatial and material essence of their chosen sculptors’ work. The resultant designs and their contextual interventions embody the ideologies and sculptural effects of upcycled art and its place in the circular economy.

Food for Thought: C ultivating positive food practices in Hackney Wick LARGE SCALE FOOD production, intensive processing, consumption practices and waste are having noticeable impacts on the environment and our health. High quality, low processed, nutrient rich food has the potential to mitigate this. The brief asked the students to design a public building in Hackney Wick to house the production and operation of a sustainable food organisation, incorporating circular economy principles for the local community. Carefully researched site and food investigations helped each student generate an innovative and exciting client brief. Final proposals include an algae production plant and restaurant, a seaweed pie and mash shop, and an orange-infused hammam tea room.

Productive City THIS SEMESTER, STUDENTS looked at industry in the city. Students were tasked with designing a small space for making, testing, or repairing which will serve the community of residents and businesses of Hackney Wick and Fish Island. These imagined places of production aim to become an integral part of the community, offering a place to share knowledge, skills and resources. The proposals considered the circularity of materials, finding new uses to often overlooked or discarded objects, and in doing so seek to have a positive impact on the immediate and wider environment.

BA Architecture | First Year

GROUP G: Matthew Stewart & Paol Kemp

Students: Dimitrios Atsaves, Maria Boanta, Katie Chan, Mohamed Chemali, Emir Elcin, Malak Huseynova, Lina Miah, Jounaid Mungralie, Andreas Nicou, Maame Oppong, Sneha Sachin Shenoy, Umi SakaiStoute, Maheema Sataram, Leticia Siles Cupe, Nimrah Tariq Many thanks to our Peer Assisted Learners Nicholas Hasbani and Freya Kay

GROUP H: Carine Woiezechoski, Paresh Parmar & Rofayda Salem

Students: Aishah Ahad, Mohammad Akhtar, Hana Amin, Aliyah Aslam, Firdaws Badji, Amirkasra Dadbakhsh, Panteli Damai, Yasmine El-Hamri, Claudio Fagnani, Rea Fernandes, Valentin Gegaj, Brendon Gouveia, Zuleika Jaeeros, Askar Kudaibergenov, Azim Miah, Kuranage Perera, Elspeth Prowse, Parisay Safdar, Gaia Spinoso, Sara Stabiglieri, Suhan Appukutti Eduardo Bernardini Sanchez, Allanah Enti, Bilal Farooqui, John Herrera, Michelle Lai, Shivaan Naicker, Naqib Naser, Mikhail Nikolaev, Danny Palmer, Vivien Paszti, Tiphaine Pottier, Dharishna Reddy, Nour Said, Peter Skulski, Emrah Tahiri, Evelyn White, Nikola Zakrzewska

Discomfort OUR MAIN PROJECT this year was to design a community building based around the theme of ‘comfort’. The building had to work as a new space for Hub 67, a recently closed community centre in Hackney Wick. Proposals were to include a series of rooms for community groups in Hackney Wick, had to navigate scales, public and private functions and, crucially, temperatures. By doing so, the building was intended to provide a social use to the local community while demystifying our everyday relationships with heat, thermal comfort and energy use.

Hackney Wick Environmental Incubator THE STUDENTS WERE asked to design a sustainable research and development centre or environmental incubator that generates its own energy. The environmental incubator operates as both a private facility for pioneering academic research, and as a public facility that educates the local community on a specific field of sustainable design through a series of immersive activities. The brief focused on three unique sites in Hackney Wick, each with one of the following predefined themes: Recycling/Biomaterial Laboratory; Wellness/Rehabilitation Centre and NHS consultation space; and Food Production and Retail Space.

Many thanks to our Peer Assisted Learners Elizabeta Diakantonis, Aya Nasr, Nat Saligupta and Conrad Daniel Areta

GROUP J: Mika Zacharias & Bo Muchemwa

Off-Grid Wellness

Students: Veronia Abdelshehid, Sevval Acar, Rachele Airaghi, Malak Almalkawi, Ranim Alnouri, Inaaya Amer, Neda Domnori, Claudia Gomez-Perretta Esparza, Yasmine Houfani, Ozlem Incedal, Ken McParland, Namar Nazer, Umay Phildius, Ayesha Shahzad, Charles Sturdy

IN THE SECOND semester, students examined wellness in its broadest sense, exploring its meaning through different cultural, political, and religious lenses. Our designs aim to be personal in their articulation, yet acknowledge the existing built environment of the proposed site in Hackney Wick.

Many thanks to our Peer Assisted Learners Joyee Lee and Shyam Patel

The brief prioritised community spaces that facilitated mental health and well-being, and each building proposal interpreted this in a specific and whimsical way. Stipulating the proposals be energy-efficient and eco-friendly in response to the energy and living crises, we looked at designs that utilised locally-generated renewable energy. The building’s materials were sourced sustainably to have a minimal impact on the environment.

96

Yr1 A | BA Architecture

Isometric site render

(clockwise from top left) Angela de la Vega; Thomas Gilsenen; Aleeza Hafeez; Ermis Ioanassis Tsolos; Marianthi Pitikari; Ewa Tomiczek; Danyaal Fox; Maximillian Rider

BA Architecture | Yr1 B

98

(clockwise from top left) Matthew Adey; Daile Cerneckyte; Daile Cerneckyte; Moza Al Ghurair; Vanessa Kwan; Bamdad Saghafi

Yr1 C | BA Architecture

(clockwise from top left) Eunseo Lee; Jerrell Singh; Khadija Begum; Andre Grecu; Lakshmi Seeram; Oliver Harris; Gabrielle Ferreira Silva; Alex Gkvara; Sofia Najy Mezdagat

BA Architecture | Yr1 D

100

(clockwise from top left) Avrora Afanaseva; Selen Bayraktar; Esteban Bedoya Bedoya; Nirmit Patel;Meryem Omerspahic; Esteban Bedoya Bedoya; Saif Dino Sanoufe; Meryem Omerspahic; Avrora Afanaseva

Yr1 E | BA Architecture

(clockwise from top left) Andrine Sivertsen; Francisco Fernandez Badona; Ingrid Almcrantz; Hattie Cosgrove; Olha Petrachkova; Rania Chebihi Hassani; Olha Petrachkova; Elena Delli Colli

BA Architecture | Yr1 F

Section A-A

102

(Clockwise from top left) Khawla Ahmed; Sana Amir Khan; Aniseh Hoveizavi; Elina Taraldsoey; Rania Elkharim; Josephine Low; Antoni Fernandez Canellas Rania Elkharim

21

Yr1 G | BA Architecture

(clockwise from top left) Umi Sakai-Stoute; Nimrah Tariq; Sneha Sachin Shenoy; Maame Oppong; Lina Miah; Katie Chan; Malak Huseynova; Leticia Siles Cupe; Nimrah Tariq

BA Architecture | Yr 1 H

104

(top & middle) Naqib Naser; (bottom) Gaia Spinoso

Yr 1 J | BA Architecture

(clockwise from top left) Claudia Gomez; Ken McParland; Rachele Airaghi; Yasmine Houfani; Innaya Amer; Veronia Abdelshehid; Neda Domnori

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Two) One

Corinna Dean & Ursula Dimitriou Corinna Dean is a member of the Emerging Territories Research Group. She founded the Archive for Rural Contemporary Architecture, ARCA, and publishing Slacklands. Her current research looks at narratives around contamination in the River Lea, for which she is contributing to the British Council Gender Ecologies project in collaboration with a creative team from Pakistan. www.arca-projects.com Ursula Dimitriou is a practicing architect and researcher. Her fields of expertise are public space, commons, design and social sustainability, grassroots urban practices, theatrical and ephemeral practices in the urban space. She is the co-director of studio SYN. www.studiosyn.co.uk

DS(2)1: Urban Ecologies Students: Harry Clark, Maria Delgado, Amore Farrag, Ben Grafham, Andrei Grecu, Olly Harris, Ray Hung, Jamellah Hussein, Sedef Karayel, Maaria Khan,

Nicola Kociuba, Alexandre Mari, Pelin Polat, Jess Scotchmer, Camilla Suarez, Zsiriah Thomas, Fen Wright, Lisa Yoruk

STUDENTS WERE INVITED to respond to the proposition: How do we work with the natural environment in a way which will engage ideas of empathy and custodianship?

In Semester 2, we turned our focus to ecology and the relationship between nature and the urban. The students referenced The Word for World is Forest, (Ursula Le Guin, 1976), the sci-fi novel about a future environmental interplanetary struggle, which responds to a positive vision for Urban Ecologies. The students were inspired to create multi-programmatic designs around themes of governance for human and non-human agency.

In Semester 1, students mapped and observed the postindustrial areas around the Lea Bridge Road, Hackney Marsh. The former Thames Water Depot site provided an area in which to explore new relationships between urbanism, human and the environment.

Students created programmes to design a ‘Gatehouse’ or ‘Threshold’ building which incorporated a Zone/Room, inspired by the apocryphal film Stalker (A. Tarkovsky, 1979) as well as bridging two conditions on the site. Using a Tipper or Detonator, with reference to Anna Tsing’s Feral Atlas, students described an environmental shift against which they would respond with an imagined threshold condition.

In developing design strategies, the students focused on materials: how they are extracted, moulded, applied and broken down in the case of concrete and aggregates, and potentially put back into the landscape. They also investigated creating their own materials using Hogweed and other organic materials from the site.

Moving from the urban scale to the micro scale of material engagement, our methods included site mapping, analysis, modelling and casting.

Thanks to the following for making this project realisable: Marcus Lee, Lily Papadopoulos, Blessing Sulaiman 106

Yu Rui Hung

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Two) One

108

(left) Sedef Karayel; (top right) Harry Clarke; (middle right) Ben Grafham; (bottom right) Andrei Grecu

(top) Harry Clarke; (middle) Ben Grafham; (bottom) Jessica Scotchmer

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Two) Two

Natalie Newey & Richa Mukhia Natalie Newey is Senior Lecturer and SFHEA. She has considerable experience working in practice and is particularly interested in engaging students in community collaboration, localism and environmental issues.

Richa Mukhia is a director of award-winning architectural practice M.O.S Architects. She has extensive experience working in the private and public sector with a particular interest in housing design, public realm and community engagement.

DS(2)2: Shifting Tides Students: Akif Ahsan, Faisal Al Jalal, Alexandra Burnatowska, Oscar Chainey, Hannaan Eggay, Gabrielle Ferreira Silva, Emma Helvin, Maria Juardo Teran,

Eunseo Lee, Nabil Musa, Maisie Patterson, Linda Salihu, Islam Saoud, Alekyia Seeram, Rohit Sharma, Jessica Tofan, Abigail Williams, Ioana Zavoianu

THIS YEAR THE studio challenged students to reconsider the architect’s role in shaping our cities, and to imagine radical new ways to tackle the issues of our time. Our explorations began with student installations on site. Designed to engage the community in a dialogue, uncover local issues and generate ideas for re-imagining the built environment, each installation considered the environmental impact of their design and creation by responding to material scarcity while developing social value for the community.

Proposals in Semester 1 were in response to the theme ‘Provocation Pavilion’, designed to highlight and promote local issues identified through group installations the students made at the site.

City Island and the Leamouth peninsula was our area of exploration for the year. Recent local developments are changing the face of this forgotten backwater of London, transforming the character of the area and erasing its rich history as an industrial heartland.

Guest Critics: Amr Assaad, Joseph Cook, Martin Gledhill, Nancy Guest, Clare Hamman, Sofia Karim, William McLean, Josh Mooney, Laura Nica, Mike Rose, Afolabi Spence, Ozan Toksoz-Blauel, Patrick Ueberbacher 110

In Semester 2, the students’ proposals speculated about an alternative future to the generic housing developments sweeping the area. The students’ imagined communitycentred projects which combined Industry and Culture, resulting in a series of inventive propositions including: redesigning the Thames embankment to create a habitat for otters and an educational space for humans; a proposal to reclaim the 10,000 trees cut down in London each year; and a 24-hour oasis for the vast number of local night workers.

Special Thanks: John Burton (Trinity Buoy Wharf ), Anna Mansfield (Publica), Nancy Guest, Salah Elnour, Hamza Mughul Maisie Patterson: The Night Pier

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Two) Two

112

Axonometric 1:100 A1left) Emma Helvin: Plastic Fantastic; (top right) Nabil Musa: Mud Brick Wharf (top 0

1

3

6

(bottom left) Faisal Al-Jalal: Wabi Sabi; (bottom right) Ioana Zavoianu: First Person Plural 10

15

(left) Gabrielle Ferreira Silva: Wash Mend Repeat; (top right) Maria Jurado Teran: Community Orchard Wharf; (bottom right) Oscar Chainey: Otter Worldly Wharf

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Two) Three

Shahed Saleem & Bruce Irwin Shahed Saleem is a practising architect, teacher and author. His area of specialism is in researching under-represented architectural histories through participatory and other methods. His practice focuses on public and community buildings, and he writes on architecture, heritage, and cultural identity.

Bruce Irwin studied art and architecture at The Bartlett and Rhode Island School of Design. His practice combines design, teaching and curating. He is a founder and co-director of SCAN Projects, a not-for-profit initiative that supports emerging artists, which operated a project space in east London for five years Current projects include the restoration of a 13th century building in Granada, Spain.

DS(2)3: What Lies Beneath Students: Farzanna Aktaer, Raqiya Cali, Kieran Edgecock, Danielle Elefante, Marta Fernandes Contente, Diego Gallardo, Emily Guacho Espinosa, Ritan Khan, Breno Lourenco, Muhammed Manjra, Amar Mohammed,

Zahra Muhith, Sayyada Rezavi, Rania Saidi, Dawoud Sohail, Laam Wang Lam, Enida Xhaferaj

THIS STUDIO TAKES a slice of London and studies its layers – urban, architectural, cultural, economic – and explores the city through a range of research methods, looking at its built fabric, architectural histories, social and cultural stories and economic activity. By building up a complex and multi-layered narrative of the city, we consider this through inventive and vibrant visual and architectural methods.

process and how are these decisions made? In a city like London, we wonder, what does it mean to remember and what does it mean to forget.

We are interested in how cities are a collection of parts, each moving at different timescales – they exist in different temporal zones. Some parts of the city are about memorialisation; about the past, about enshrining a certain historical story. Other parts of the city are about rapid change; about the future, about envisioning and reshaping. Where do these temporally different parts of the city meet, and how do they coexist alongside each other? Where is the past remembered, where is it celebrated, where is it erased, and who controls this

Our site this year was Elephant and Castle, an area of London with many layers of buildings, history, cultures.

The Imperial War Museum to the north represents a site of memorialisation – or remembering – of memory, of histories and stories which are preserved and narrated. The south of Elephant and Castle is a zone of housing and retail that is continuously being remade; the Victorian city was replaced with post-war housing, commerce and a transport infrastructure. This is now being replaced with a new form of rapid development to a wholly different scale than what has come before.

The students responded to these urban histories and conditions through creating installations, and designing new architecture which is tied in with the existing.

Guest Critics: Hafsa Adan (Open City), Wizana Ahmed, Hana Alsaai, Sarah Anwar, Sarah Dawoudi, Fiona Dunn (Building Design Partnership), Rosie Gibbs-Stevens (Architecture Foundation), Aaron Green, Khuzema Hussein (Collective Works), Sofia Karim, Daniel Leon (Square Feet Architects), Rianne Oukili, Gabrielle Pauryte (muf architecture/art), Pat Woodward (Matthew Lloyd Architects) 114

Diego Gallardo: Can all brutalist buildings have art centres?

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Two) Three

116

(top left) Dawoud Sohail: Rehousing the ad hoc high street; (bottom left) Breno Lourenco: The multiversity – A new model for open learning

(top left) Marta Fernandes Contente; Welcoming Latin migration; (top right) Kieran Edgecock: Embedding multi-faith into the city; (bottom left) Emily Guacho Espinosa: Collecting displaced communities (bottom right) Eric Lam Laam Wang: Renegotiating spaces for art in existing housing

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Two) Four

Camilla Wilkinson & Christopher Bryant Camilla Wilkinson is an architect and lecturer. She has worked in high profile practices in Germany and the UK. Camilla makes research and lectures on the 1914-18 war camouflage system Dazzle Painting.

Chris Bryant is a founding director of London practice Alma-nac Collaborative Architecture.

DS(2)4: Fragments: Future Cities Students: Gabriella Abbott, Nehla Abdul Majeed, Elise Alexander, Mark Aoun, Joud Banna, Khadija Begum, Nathan Cheung, Lilianna Givanakis, Hamza Mohamed, Areebah Nagi, Sofia Najy Mezdagat, Nicole Nsubuga,

Pietro Sacchelli, Andrea Santos Barreto Betteridge, Shania Stephen-Paul, Denis Szczepanczyk, Andrei Terhes, Sena Yilmaz

THIS YEAR OUR approach explored thinking and making derived from fragments – knowledge, perception, history and imagination – to create layered concepts for architectural proposals in relation to the year-wide theme, Future Cities.

Brief 1 Working in pairs, the students constructed 1:1 fragments from redundant materials and photographed them on site in order to generate ideas for a sociallyfocused programme, and to develop concepts for an architectural proposition. The fragments had to be demountable (to travel by bus) and recyclable.

Fragment sites and redundant buildings are where small architectural innovations and new directions materialise. Somers Town is a residential area in London, sandwiched between its heavyweight neighbours: Euston, Kings Cross St Pancras and the Knowledge Quarter. It is the focus of Camden’s New Neighbourhoods initiatives and our site for student propositions. Considering local plans, initiatives and ambitious sustainability goals, we invited students to imagine practises and environments that would support local residents.

The current trajectory for sustainable practises in architecture is fragmented with multiple contradictory ideas formulating simultaneously. How do fragments influence our experience or understanding of environment? How do they form our understanding of site, context, programme and event?

Brief 2 Students were asked to design a building for a sustainable practise in Somers Town. This architectural proposal should act as a demonstration building that reduces the level of embodied carbon in construction and supports Camden Council’s aim for net zero carbon emissions by 2030. The building is to provide a venue for discussion and dissemination of the ideas it embodies within the borough – and further afield.

Students’ chosen sustainable practises range from a cat & counselling café to a theatre costume recycling facility. Alongside conventional construction materials, site and factory visits inspired student designs to include the use of London clay for unfired bricks and rammed earth construction; cardboard bales; and rice husk earth bags; all introducing a number of thoughtful and sometimes surprising architectural proposals to Somers Town.

Special Thanks: Harold Garner (Camden Council), Holly Creighton-Hird (Story Garden Manager), Steve Johnson, Mat Blackwell (Flimwell Park), Louisa O’Shaughnessy (Hastings Contemporary), Nikolay Shahpazov (Bennetts Associates), Rowland Keable, HG Matthews (above) Elise Alexander: Cat Café cat; facing page: (top left) Khadija Begum: Somers Town Radio Station; (top right) Sofia Najy-Mezdagat: Somers Town Creative Community Hub; (bottom) Elise Alexander: Cat Café and Counselling Services

Guest Critics: Estera Badelita, Maria Bahrim (AFK Studios), Scott Batty, George Bowell (Do Ho Suh Studio), Stanislava Boskovic (Imperial College), Josh Bulman, Sinead Fahey ( Jestico & Whiles), Eric Guibert, Nick Hayhurst (Hayhurst & Co), Phil Isaacs, (Simple Works), Steve Johnson (UCL), Maja Jovic, Lou Kelemen (W/OW Studio), Chris Leung (UCL), Constance Lau, Will McLean, Mirna Pedalo, Caspar Rodgers (Alma-nac), Urangua Sodnomjamts (dMFK), Paolo Zaide 118

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Two) Four

120

facing page: Khadija Begum & Sofia Najy-Mezdaga: Fragment; (above) Nathan Cheung: Central Somers Town market, eatery and community offices

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Two) Five

Nasios Varnavas & Christopher Daniel Nasios Varnavas is the co-founder of collaborative studio, Urban Radicals. UR was selected to design and curate the Cyprus Pavilion at the 17th Architecture Biennale in Venice, and in 2021 was named one of the Best New Architects by Archdaily. The studio was part of the Young Architects Residency 2021/22 at the Architecture Foundation.

Christopher Daniel is director of Polysemic, an architecture and experience design practice. His work focuses on the creation and evolution of unique and adaptable places of gathering, from permanent theatres to festivals and events. The practice works across diverse scales and forms, from long-term to temporary, and architectural to virtual.

DS(2)5: The New Local: Architectures Of The 1.5 Degrees Students: Fahad Almannai, Souleymane Avice, Alejandra Bustamante Guerra, Asya Caiado, Mikah Cassidy, Olga Christodoulou, Alexandros Gkavra, Rowan Isles, Abiola Olamousi, Evangelos Papoutis,

Magdalena Perez Verdini, Daniel Poshtovenko, Maciej Przasnyski, Yousouf Salamah, Alexandra Sturza, Alicja Zdanowicz

IT COMES AS no surprise that today, the majority of discussions around sustainability are filtered through urgent protocols aimed at swiftly implementing topdown, technocratic frameworks and regulations. These are certainly paramount, especially in large metropolitan contexts and in an age where globalisation and efficiency prevail in order to respond to rapid population growth and the climate emergency. On the other hand, when projecting into the future of our built environments and cities, certain questions cannot help but arise: How can an architecture of 1.5°C respond to local contexts?

What might locality even mean by 2050? What or who is the local? What might it look like and how will it feel?

the conceptual notions of: (un)earthing, carving, piling, (un)moulding, casting, salvaging, (cata)logging, grafting, scaling, gathering, activating.

This year, DS(2)5 explored counter proposals to megascale developments and engaged with questions of material and social sustainability through physical building acts and

We worked in the contested histories, territories and homes of migrant communities in Southwark, which sit in contrast to new developments and recurring waves of gentrification. In particular, we studied Walworth with its high street, East Street Market and large council estates, many of which are currently under threat of demolition.

Students were encouraged to engage with these complex social, political and material issues; to think, define and design public buildings for exchange and gathering; and to conceptualise their proposals as public rooms for the city in the spirit of equity and activism.

Guest Critics: Josh Bulman (CSM), Oliver Cooke (Cooke Fawcett), Pereen d’Avoine (Russian for Fish), Derin Fadina (Barr Gazetas), Chris Falla (BIG), Danielle Fountain (Space & Paper), Carl Fraser (Oxford Brookes), Nikolas Kourtis (Hawkins/Brown), Daniel Marmot (Artefact Studio), Mette Pedersen, Caspar Rodgers (Alma-nac), Androniki Strongioglou (Gillespies), Akari Takebayashi (CSM/LSA), Serhan Tekbas (Haptic), Lourenco Viveiros, Mika Zacharias (MZO), Paolo Zaide 122

Special thanks: Diana Cochrane (Walworth Society/UEL), Reece Murray (Foster & Partners), Alex Furunes (Furunes-Khadka), Mike Lim and James Pockson (IDK Office), Viktor Telecky (OMA), Ollie Finn and Mike Wilson (Pembroke House), Anastasia Tsamitrou (Pilbrow & Partners), Will McLean, Victoria Pearce ) Rowan Isles: East Street Market, Community Hub and Printworks

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Two) Five

124

(top) Alex Gkavra: RE:Grow, Test kitchen and Community farm – Isometric; (bottom) Mikah Cassidy: Oasis, Latin Community Centre on Maldonado Walk

1: 100 @ A2

17. ground floor plan

(top) Rowan Isles: Plan for a Community Space and Printworks; (bottom) Daniel Poshtovenko: Walworth Art Centre – Section

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Two) Six

Victoria Watson & Kirti Durelle Victoria Watson is Senior Lecturer. She is the director of Doctor Watson Architects who design and publish work about architecture.

Kirti Durelle is an architect and a PhD student in architectural history at The Bartlett, UCL, where he also teaches.

DS(2)6: Homeless Students: Ann-Melody Akanji, Tala Alomar, Gemma Daniel, Vitorino de Castro, Sidorela Draga, Merla Elakkad, Malak Habibi, Husni Hussein,

Munira Osman, Yuan Padilla, Kirra Pasco, Nyah Pinto-Martin, Raiyan Rizwan, Cherry Shen, Yi Shen, Leo Silva-Ritter, Katerina Zhelyaskova

…there is a truth that must be recognized…the entire cycle of modern architecture and of the new systems of visual communication came into being, developed, and entered into crisis as an enormous attempt…to resolve, on the always more outdated level of ideology, the imbalances, contradictions, and retardations characteristic of the capitalist reorganization of the world market and productive development…

This year DS(2)6 took the concept ‘homeless’ as its theme. The studio had no preconceptions about what homeless meant, neither did it have ready-made formal models for making ideological statements about architecture and homeless. Rather, it was expected the studio would develop an understanding of homeless across the year, as studio members set their minds to identifying, thinking and testing ideas around the theme of homeless.

Manfredo Tafuri

STUDIO (2)6 BELIEVES in the architectural project as a means of exploring and making statements about the world in which we live. In the context of the architecture school, the project also doubles-up as a unique, engaging and effective means for teaching and learning how to ‘do’ architecture. At second year level, this means building on skills that have already been introduced in first year. It is a place where ambitious students can equip themselves with a range of tools that will serve as useful and reliable means for imagining, exploring, modelling and drawing their design ideas, now and into the future.

Guest Critics: Tom McLucas, Joe Robinson, Will McLean 126

We worked on the Broadgate Station site that is currently being redeveloped. We appropriated the site for our projects, offering counter proposals that are critical of the developers’ commercial architecture.

In Semester 1 we designed a Sleep Structure to occupy just a part of the given site; and in Semester 2 we completed the total design with a Refectory and Garden.

Architecture and Utopia: Design and Capitalist Development

Special thanks to: To the former (2)6 students whose work continues to serve as a model and source of inspiration for the current cohort.

Ann-Melody Akanji: God’s House: A monastery of free education and a new Exchange for the City

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Two) Six

128

Leonardo Silva-Ritter: The Terminus: A sleep structure and skills factory for laid-off RMT workers

aterina Zhelyaskova: Liminale: A monolith & hideaway for the K city vampires of wealth

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Two) Seven

David McEwen & Alicia Pivaro David McEwen is a founding director of architecture and research practice Unit 38. They specialise in community-focused, socially-engaged projects.

Alicia Pivaro is an urbanist, community activist and artist working across disciplines and using participation and radical thinking to inform methods of urban and social change.

DS(2)7: The Public Design Service Students: Fajer Alasfour, Laura Alfararjeh, Rbiya Bashir, Lilia Beha, Alicia De Oliveira Nazareth, Saarah Hosseinian, Caroline Moisa, Zoe Ononye, Vladimir Ovsyannikov, Francisco Padilla Fierro, Bhakti Patel, Jerrell Singh,

Declan Slonim, Anne-Elizabeth Sowah, Shah-ree Tasaddiq, Rebecca Thompson, Eric Turner

THE STUDIO IS a site of experimentation and innovation, a laboratory of ideas underpinned by creative processes that can transform our environment for the common good. We believe architects should understand and engage with the political, economic and cultural processes that shape our cities, working within or against these in an informed and creative way. There is an urgent need for an alternative practice to meet the many challenges we face as a society – including the climate emergency, rising inequality, a cost-of-living crisis, unaffordable and inaccessible housing.

located at two different points within London, both sites represent forgotten spaces – undervalued and often under-recognised sites – that have provoked us to imagine projects that reveal, support and celebrate.

Our projects have navigated various contemporary urban themes to stimulate alternative urban narratives about what is important within the city, including housing, working, making, identity, culture, refuge, health and rights.

By engaging with communities in Islington and South Bermondsey, we have developed projects for clients that have included activists, local organisations. In Islington, our sites explored critical economic and cultural spaces within the borough. In South Bermondsey we investigated the rich collection of manufacturing, studio, making, performance and religious spaces present in the area, while reflecting on principles of retrofit (versus demolition) and the circular economy. While

The unit is guided by the philosophy that second year offers a unique opportunity to develop and grow our skills as designers – a chance to develop both a language and way of practising informed by our values, strengths and interests. We have made use of a variety of design and communication methods including collage, illustration, comics, performances, exhibitions, video, audio and model making – among others. We encourage students to use their own interests and lived experience to inform their projects to develop a powerful, sophisticated body of work that is both unique and radical.

Guest Critics: Annecy Attlee (Haworth Tompkins), Chiara Barrett (Camody Groarke), Ben Beach (Unit 38), Esther Escribano (Studio Weave), Cristina Gaidos (Croydon Council), Alice Hardy (Global Generation), Jamie Hignett (Unit 38), Shamiso Oneka (Haringey Council), Jane Tankard

Special thanks: Professor Mark Brearley

130

(top) Saarah Hossenian: The Rights of the Woman; (bottom left) Rebecca Thompson: Ormside Cat Hub; (bottom right) Declan Slonim: Squatting South Bermondsey

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Two) Seven

IMAGE

132

(top left) Lilia Beha: A Manifesto; (top right) Francisco Padilla: Bermondsey Fashion Academy; (bottom left) Fajer Alasfour: Ormside Street Press; (bottom right) Vladimir Ovsyannikov: Sustainable Light Industry

(top left) Jerrell Singh: Zombie Bodyshop; (top right) Alicia Nazareth: The Makers Theatre; (bottom left) Anne-Elizabeth Sowah: Ormside Codechive; (bottom right) Eric Turner: Deliverance

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Three) One

Jane Tankard & Thomas Grove Jane Tankard is the BA Architecture Year 3 Leader, Senior Lecturer, practising Architect and active researcher. Her work focuses on experimental pedagogy, praxis and the role of the architect in collaborative multidisciplinary contexts. Studio work embraces politics, film and feminism.

Thomas Grove studied at Liverpool John Moores University and the University of Westminster. He works for an architectural practice in London and is interested in film, ornament, traditional modes of representation and the socio-political ramifications of architecture.

DS(3)1: Future City? …In search of architectures of transformation and delight Students: Wizana Ahmed, Sara Anwar, Monica Basta, Salaheldeen Elnour, Amelia Gavina, Zahra Iben Khayat Zouggari, Vinya Kerai, Julia Lassota,

Harry Mellor, Victoria Pearce, Darya Prokopets, Yasmin Satter, Finola Simpson, Maryam Syed, Isabella Testolin, Sofia Whilby, Annie Williams

THIS YEAR, DS(3)1 has turned its attention to Limehouse, a part of London whose survival has been inextricably tied to global events outside of its control. Transformed from a small mediaeval village to bustling port by international trade, it was then virtually abandoned following the collapse of the British Empire before being resuscitated by international capital as part of the Docklands Regeneration Project.

under-served part of the community they had identified to come together for conversation and action.

In direct opposition to the ongoing neo-liberal regeneration of the area, we believe that we need to build communities that are proactive, sustainable and resilient.

If we are to reject convention and approach the city, not as a tabula rasa, but rather a palimpsest of history, narrative and meaning, then we need to demonstrate how we can adapt and reinvigorate our urban villages to create a Future City fit for the 21st century.

In response to this, in Semester 1 we asked our students to propose a ‘pop-up’ Parliament for a specific,

In Semester 2, and under the broad theme of ‘social condenser’, we asked the students to propose large scale interventions which would be catalysts for radical change within Limehouse. Some of these proposals deal with practical issues such as access to food, energy and housing, while others address issues surrounding education, industry and the emotional well-being of citizens; using the microcosm of Limehouse to investigate ways in which the wider city may be saved.

As a collective we are interested in processes that inform how we think about architecture, both as physical entity and as cultural construct. We explored these ideas through analysis of specific practitioners, the form and politics of event, and the radical technologies that promise to transform and liberate both our built forms and everyday lives.

Guest Critics: Maria Bahrim, Christopher Hartiss (Modulous), Cameron McKay, Henry Morgan, John Naylor (Grimshaw Architects), Alicia Pivaro, Hafsa Syed 134

Finola Simpson: Thames Choreography

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Three) One

136

Finola Simpson: (top) Bridge No.1; (bottom left) A New Life Awaits you in the Off-world Colonies; (bottom right) Limehouse 2050

Victoria Pearce: The Thames Machine Aglow with Collective Resolve

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Three) One

138

Salaheldeen Elnour: (top) A Tapestry of Refuge; (bottom left) A Seraphic Dwelling’s Embrace; (bottom right) Where Innocence Dances and Dreams Ascend

Isabella Testolin: (top left) High Tide; (bottom left) Sunset over Pier 54; (right) Exploded Axonometric

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Three) Two

Eric Guibert & Bruce Irwin Eric Guibert is a gardener architect and teacher. He researches through his built and grown architectural practice ways of co-creating with ecosystems and species regenerative architectures that nurture and express their emergence. This Architectural Animism investigates more equal relationships between humans and their habitats.

Bruce Irwin studied art and architecture at The Bartlett and Rhode Island School of Design. His practice combines design, teaching and curating. He is a founding director of SCAN Projects, a not-for-profit initiative that supports emerging artists.

DS(3)2: Architectural Animism Students: Nondita Abdul Matin, Alexandra Berculean, Ariane Canet, Dominik Figurski, Luke Harvey, Benjamin Leathes, Ioana Macovei, Farah Mazloum, Erphan Mohammadkhani, Yusufi Nimuchwala Aziz,

Florentine Rockenbauer, Kacper Sehnke, Saleh Shesha, Nikhil Shetty, Karen Silva Cardoso, Christian Thunick, Yohei Yamane

CONTINUING OUR INVESTIGATIONS in Feral Architectures, this year we have speculated on future ‘cosmopolitical’ cities (Stenger & Latour) that equally host, and give a voice to, other-than-humans and humans. The briefs form synergetic relationships between the wilded landscape and human communities, providing for a livelihood with a public-facing activity.

development has leant itself to densification, meaning the on-site ecological connectivity is provided more around the buildings than between them. The massing strategies have nonetheless a degree of fragmentation, associated with finger-like typologies and folded or layered edges where the plant, animal and human inhabitants meet. The buildings are located over areas of low biodiversity and often release covered ground for ecological processes to unfold through densification elsewhere on the site.

Our investigations were based in the periurban context of Epping Forest. This London location led to schemes that respond to the urban – such as the capital’s ecologies and conceiving the forest as a silent night club; or have a national or global context – a Council for the UN Decade on Restoration and research centres focused on genetic engineering for adaptation to climate change. The political dimension has increased through the year, with heated debates embodying the current culture wars between urban and rural communities on the question of ecologically necessary animal culling.

Many students have been working towards compostable buildings that source materials from the surrounding forest and suburb for both their construction and function: a renewable energy sport centre; a workshop recycling local organic and building waste to densify the suburb.

We aimed towards Biodiversity Net Gain. The available space of a periurban forest has led to smaller sites; and their edge-of-forest condition means the area’s

The designs all respond to the varied conditions of Epping Forest: the regenerative worldling approach has productively led to fractal connectivities; the periurban condition has led to denser, multiscale green infrastructures; while the systemic connections between landscape, communities and economies are more national and international.

Guest Critics: Guy Mannes Abbott, Jeremy Rye ( Jeremy Rye Studio), Keb Garavito Bruhn (Pilbrow and Partners Architects), Kester Rattenbury, Camilla Wilkinson

Special Thanks: John Phillips (Grazing and Landscape Project Officer, City of London) who introduced the history and cow care of Epping Forest Fabien Gantois (Fabien Gantois Architecture) for his guided tour of regenerative architecture around La Villette, Paris

140

Kacper Sehnke: Fusing Two Worlds – Entrance

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Three) Two

142

Kacper Sehnke: Fusing Two Worlds: (top) Isometric view; (bottom) Ecological section

Ben Leathes: The Silvaesium: (top) Ecological sampling drone view; (bottom left) Structural model; (bottom right) View of drone murmuration from the exhibition gallery

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Three) Two

144

(top) Yohei Yamane: Saproxylic Architecture – Perspectival ecological section; (bottom) Farah Mazloum: Earthy Hills– Evolution of cliff ecosystem façade overtime

Dominik Figurski: T he Silvaesium: (top) Seed Library – Composite ecological section/graphic speculative fabulation; (bottom) Accelerated Evolution Centre – Technical ecological section

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Three) Three

Constance Lau & Stephen Harty Constance Lau is an architect and teaches undergraduate to doctorate level at Westminster and the National University of Singapore (NUS).

Research interests are explored through the techniques of montage and notions of dialectical allegory. Narrative as an ongoing dialogue in architectural design is further articulated through publications, especially projects in the book Dialogical Designs (2016).

Stephen Harty is a practicing architect and director of Harty and Harty, an agency that specialises in arts sector projects including galleries and artist studios. He studied at The Mackintosh School Architecture, Glasgow School of Art, The Bartlett and the AA.

DS(3)3: Dialogical Cities: Adaptive Multi-Use Students: Patrycja Adamczuk, Melis Aysal, Mariana Blanco Nanez, Lorena Kwatchila Costa, Asal Fathi, Gabrielle Ferreira Dias, Aleksandra Gorlats, Kristiana Gulbe, Imran Haque, Anisha Iqbal, Vanessa Muamba,

Aaron Oshinmi, Laura Panaete, Selina Qureshi, Lydia Randall, Aida Rastegar Saadi, Valentina Rivera Olivares, Alefiya Shakir, Aurela Trezhnjeva

THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF the creative user to design discussions and the idea of a ‘questioning and incomplete’ approach is fundamental to the processdriven methodology of this studio. The idea of ‘open work’ (Umberto Eco, 1989) further enables personal interpretations and dialogues to establish the design proposals. Studio teaching encourages the student to assume authorship, and shape the reading and outcome of the design brief.

conditions, especially in the ‘counter-spaces’ that occur in the voids and/or peripheries of the existing Museum of Home, Shoreditch. The proposals are part-parasite/partcatalyst and serve to alter the function and meaning of the host institution. This changes the existing meaning and manners in which the Museum is perceived and used through creating, destroying and/or appropriating. These studies that run between the realms of private and public spaces respond to shifting site, cultural and social conditions.

This year, the projects involved urban ideas of rebuilding, renewal, adaptability and flexibility concerning the position of public institutions and the ability to adapt as needs change. Dialogical Cities adopt the technique of historiography to create new relationships between site, programme and individual research. These design conversations, where new readings and meanings are constantly shifting, are formed through individual narratives and experiences. Hence design practices are developed as sustainable processes that must first acknowledge and learn to pursue latent opportunities within the existing milieu.

Concierge Dwellings, Rethinking Habitation and Use

The Concierge Dwellings are accomplished through engaging with latent transitionary and intermediary

The Adaptive Multi-Use Museum of People and Places

Through interventions that alter existing understandings of ‘museum’, the new narratives hosted by the Concierge Dwellings now extend to the Museum of People and Places. Importantly, arguments for adaptive multi-use take on board the fact that many public buildings designed for limited programmes and purposes were unable to adapt during the pandemic. Hence the proposed designs need to accommodate vastly different programmes that acknowledge the retroactive past, site-specific present and speculative future. As such, notions of dialogue and user-centric multiple interpretations that allude to ideas of adaptive multi-use over a sustained period are used to formulate architectural proposals capable of adjusting to the needs of future cities. @uow_ds3.3 and @ds3.3_wip

Guest Critics: To team alumni: Neophytos Christou, Irgel Enkhsaikhan, Nada Maktari and Laura Nica. Your time with the studio is much appreciated.

146

Special Thanks: To Neophytos Christou, critic and assistant tutor. Thank you for your time and encouragement.

(top) Aurela Trezhnjeva: The Bazaar of Adaptive Architecture and Multisensory Experiences; (bottom) Aleksandra Gorlats: Open Site and Cinematic Experiences – Void metabolism, urban participants and the urban living room

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Three) Three

148

(top) Anisha Iqbal: Hackney Observatory – Celestial landscape; (bottom) Aida Rastegar-Saadi: The Bath House – Flowing between Persian mirrors

(top) Mariana Blanco-Nanez: The High-Rise Canopy – Ecotectural oasis of biodiversity; (bottom) Patrycja Adamczuk: Learning Through Playing : The allegorical school of development

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Three) Three

150

(top) Asal Fathi: The Art Therapy Institute – Political and hybrid spaces; (bottom) Alefiya Shakir: The Tower of Conflict – Fragments of historical figures

(left) Laura Panaete: The Lost Shoreditch Museum of Surrealism; (right) Imran Haque: The ‘Jhol’ Museum of Bengali Language

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Three) Four

Paolo Zaide & Tom Budd Paolo Zaide is an architect, academic and curator, and Course Leader for BA Architecture at the University of Westminster.

Tom Budd is an architect and visualiser based in London, specialising in the production of visualisations that look beyond the ‘photo real’ and strive to capture the feelings and atmospheric qualities an unbuilt space could embody.

DS(3)4: Island Cities: Reimagining the edges of the Thames Gateway Students: Oliver Benson, Ivan da Costa, Tsipporah Hannah Dollond, Adam El Hafedi, Layla El Wadnakssi, Zahra Elshams, Adelina-Elena Ivan, Dania Khayal, Natalia Konstantinidou, Laurens Koster, Julie Krafft-Bruland,

Nausheen Mahmood, Jack Morris, Pablo Pimentel, Blendi Rexhaj, Sofia Rota, Axelle Sibierski, Raoul Tomaselli

ON 1ST MARCH 2022, the Essex resort of Southendon-Sea was granted City Status, becoming England’s 52nd city. Located on the north side of the Thames Estuary, it forms part of the Thames Gateway – a cluster of cities, towns and villages, and the country’s largest regeneration project.

Southend’s city edge is defined by seven miles of coastline that is home to the longest pier in the world to the south, and the single 6,000-foot-long asphalt runway of London’s Southend Airport to the north. To the west, it bleeds out into farm and river marshlands by Leigh-onSea and Canvey Island – fragile ecologies defined by tidal flows and cultural shifts that continue to radically change this landscape. With Southend being raised to city status, where will the regeneration start and where might it perhaps end?

This year, DS(3)4 challenged traditional notions of boundaries, and explored analogue and digital strategies to plot, adapt and re-imagine unknown fields. In the race to become a new tech-, garden- or smart-city, the act of ‘building’ Southend City challenged what it means to create a city at all. Could one draw from a past wealth of culture and stories, captured in paintings of Constable or scenes in Dickens’ Great Expectations? Or could one be inspired by Canvey Island today – its backdrop of romantic creeks, intoxicating oil jetties and the blues music of Britain’s Mississippi delta? As we drifted along the estuary, we encountered sunbathers next to petrochemical plants, golf carts cruising past caravan fields, and youthful weekend anglers waiting for their catch of the day at the end of Southend’s Pier. The Studio offered a fresh angle on the Estuary and imagined a different type of city – and buildings full of drama and potential for Southend’s future.

Guest Critics: Dimitris Argyros (Haptic Architects), Anthony Boulanger (AY Architects), Stefan Lengen, Sara Martinez Zamora, Oliver Parkinson (AHMM), Emory Smith (SEAM Design), Henning Stummel (Henning Stummel Architects), Ozan Toksoz-Blauel (Fielden Clegg Bradley Studios)

Special Thanks: Anthony Tai, Cira Oller Tovar and Ron Tse for sharing their portfolios.

Sean Griffiths and DS15 for a memorable trip to Vienna; Studio 8 of the Landscape Architecture Course, The Bartlett for an exciting Exchange Evening.

152

) Adelina-Elena Ivan

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Three) Four

154

Sofia Rota

Pablo Pimentel

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Three) Four

156

Raoul Tomaselli

Axelle Sibierski

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Three) Five

Sho Ito & Neil Kiernan Sho Ito is founder of S-ITO (Studio-Interdisciplinary Thought Operations). He has a particular interest in architecture that seeks spatial reactions to unveil and trigger a discussion around the socio-political issues of today. Ito graduated from the Architectural Association and has worked for RSH+P, DRMM, and AHMM across the commercial and residential sectors. He teaches at the AA and the University of Cambridge.

Neil Kiernan is a practicing architect having worked at a number of award-winning practices. He is design tutor for 1st and 3rd Year BA Arch at Westminster. Neil has a continued and developing interest in the research of gender, space and architecture.

DS(3)5: The New Revolution Students: Aisha Abedin, Isabelle Achou, Dakshesh Bhattad, Evelyn Cheng, Michaela Chittussi, Mayra De Vasconcellos Barbosa, Andrei Dobrinescu, Dillon Dupre, Shahed Elfadil, Miruna Grigore, Azzam Hakim, Samuel Laoye,

Deividas Meroncikas, Laura Posada Tellez, Emir Sirkeci, Magdalena Swiech, Karolina Szymczak, Gabriel Troisi, Lourenco Viveiros

THIS YEAR, DS(3)5 explored the phenomenon of the New Revolution by investigating what is a necessity for human interaction, and mankind’s fundamental primary space: the community. As a studio we speculated how the 5th Industrial Revolution will impact how we might interact on a day-to-day basis while considering the impact and change to familiar city centres such as Soho.

institutions and technology. Fourth Revolution in which we currently exist is about the rapid change to technology, industries and societal patterns; increasing interconnectivity and smart automation in our daily life. The co-evolution of these four revolutions has dramatically altered human behaviour and its relationship to the whole planet.

The New Revolution will impact all parts of human life, thus inevitably shaping lifestyles, living conditions and shared systems in the complexities of today. It is understood that human behaviour emerged from what can be broadly categorised as four basic forms of evolutionary processes associated with human revolution.

First Revolution used water and steam power to mechanise production. Second Revolution used electric power to create mass production, and thus the division of labour. Third Revolution used electronics and information technology to automate production, generating ideologies and cultural artefacts through the creation of

The studio asked students to speculate on the next New Revolution. To think, develop and propose designs that speculated beyond the conventional meaning of what a community might mean in the 21st century. The studio boldly, yet sensitively, encouraged students to speculate and propose an alternative lifestyle and spatial condition manifested from the precarious urban living that has perpetuated over recent years. Through rigorous analysis, research and readings, we confronted contentious issues and constructed unorthodox proposals which challenged ideologies around alternative modes of ‘lifestyle’. The resulting projects provoke questions of community and modern lifestyles, while address what the New Revolution might entail.

Guest Critics: Miraj Ahmed, Kerry Dickinson, Michela Falcone, Boji Hu (RSH+P), Jisoo Hwang (Hopkins Architects), Alex Le-Duc, Sandy Lee, Patrica Mato-Mora, William McLean, Fearghus Rafery (Hopkins Architects), Youngbin Shin (Fosters+Partners) 158

Shahed Elfadil: The Performing Theatre

circulation withing the space users. To distrupt this is an important consideration. standard, the primary purpose The top five floors will include of the proposal is to encourage a system of ramps that and facilitate impromptu encourages people to cross the meetings and conversations communnity spaces in order tobetween ascend. While the vertical tenants. journey may take longer thanIfa this is the goal, then circulation withing the space simple stairwell, it is is an important consideration. conducive to these The top five floors will include communal moments as a system of ramps that people circulate through theencourages people to cross the communnity spaces in order to shared spaces; ascend. While the vertical always in view. journey may take longer than a Shown above is an simple stairwell, it is unwrapped section of the conducive to these journey through the communal moments as circulation. people circulate through the First the journey to the top; shared spaces; looking left, then the journey always in view.

Shown above is an down; unwrapped section of the looking right. The through the section cut follows the pathjourney of circulation. the ramp system.

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Three) Five

First the journey to the top; looking left, then the journey down; looking right. The section cut follows the path of the ramp system.

In plan, the solid red line follows the path of circulation through the upper floors.

In plan, the solid red line follows the path of circulation through the upper floors.

N

N

160

Gabriel Troisi: Deconstructed Tower

Living pods-design development DesignInternal progress view of the living pod (first floor)

Internal view of the living pod (ground floor)

9

3

Foldable legs

The stilts are designed to be adjustable, they will shrink or expand to lift the living pods off from the ground, once the pods are floating they will be pulled to the surface up by cables.

2

1

This allow the pods to dive in and reach the surface based on the occupiers needs.

3D PRINTED SHELL

1

The shell is 3D printed as 6 panels that fit snuggly around the entire structure. The shell is made of a custom ABS polymer which is glass fibre reinforced and UV stabilized to keep it’s colour in under the water.

2 Work station Here the occupiers can access all functions of the habitat. They can also monitor sensor data.

In this section.

8

Internal view of the living pod (first floor) 4 5 6

3

7

4 Beds

Workout equipment

The living pod has two 4 beds on the top floor. where one can get some privacy when needed.

It also has personal storage and the light is indirect, giving the illusion of natural daylight coming in from above.

Regular physical activity is one of the most important things a person can do for their health.

Being physically active can improve brain health, help manage weight, reduce the risk of disease, strengthen bones and muscles.

IN-HABIT Self-sufficient living pods 9

5

6 3D-printer

Table/chairs

A 3D printer is crucial in the living pod. The Dining table which allows the occupiers to gathability to quickly create any tool you need as the er for a meal. need arises is very handy. It allows flexibility and solutions to problems that may yet be unknown.

9

Foldable legs

The stilts are designed to be adjustable, they will shrink or expand to lift the living pods off from the ground, once the pods are floating they will be pulled to the surface up by cables.

This allow the pods to dive in and reach the surface based on the occupiers needs.

Internal view of the living pod (first floor)

Azzam Hakim: In-Habit

7

8 Bathroom

Ladder

The bathroom contains a shower unit, a sink, and a toilet. The water is provided from harvesting rainwater.

A custom manufactured ladder is the primary means of traversing the habitat. With cork pads on each step to have a good grip that is also not too harsh on the feet.

Internal view of the living pod (ground floor)

Internal

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Three) Five

162

Lourenco Viveiros: Targeted Architecture

SECTIONS

6

8

3

6

8

7

3

2

6

3

1

9

Concrete Wall

Section 1:25 In-situ Cast Concrete Wall to Roof 7

2

6

Short Perspective Section Scale 1:100 1m

5m

8

2

3 4

5

Section 1:10 Window Opening

1

1

(top left & right) Isabelle Achou: Chick-tropolis; (bottom left) Laura Posada: Multi-generational Housing

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Three) Seven

John Zhang & David Porter John Zhang is an architect and academic. He runs Studio JZ, was previously an associate at award-winning practice DSDHA, and holds a PhD from the RCA on the topic of contemporary Chinese architecture.

David Porter is an architect, urbanist and educator. He was a partner of David Porter Neave Brown Architects. He was Professor of Architecture at the Central Academy of Fine Art, Beijing (2012-18) and Head of the Mackintosh School of Architecture (2000-11).

DS(3)7: Poetics of Habitation and a 4th Nature?

Students: Edmund Alcock, Ana Astanasescu, Faye Marielle Ayroso, Ricardo Baez, Davide Ciaravola, Sarah El-Abed, Nedal Harris Ghosheh, Roza Hassan, Fani Hristova Petrova, Maria Ionava, Ana Ivaschescu, Lotta Jacobson,

Mahaa Janjua, Rabia Khalid, Husna Paruk, Yasmin Pathan, Emanuella Pellizzon, Roxan Sadrettin, Zeynep Sakarya, Stefana Straub

USING LONDON AND BEIJING as our test beds, DS(3)7 explores novel ideas of housing and poetics of habitation. We draw inspiration from the Smithson’s phrase ‘art of inhabitation’ and the Chinese philosophy of ‘poetics of habitat’. This embodies our comparative approach in search of new ideas that address increasingly shared global issues.

new forms of co-existence. A living laboratory of historic housing innovation, our prototypes drew inspiration from the urban morphology of Somers Town, as well as existing expressions of nature. Through these experimentations, we also questioned the definition of nature as it pertains to the poetics of living.

Our work this year constitutes a radical re-imagining of the relationship between dwelling and nature. We ask how this relationship can be reshaped in the age of the Anthropocene, where human dominion over nature has led to catastrophic consequences for both ourselves and the natural world we are a part of.

In Semester 1, we used Somers Town in London as the site for a new prototype for how nature and dwelling can find

In Semester 2, the prototypical ideas from London were adapted, expanded and tested in Beijing, in an area in the city centre where historic Hutong courtyards and utilitarian housing blocks meet Zaha Hadid’s futuristic office hub. Working remotely in a different cultural and aesthetic context, utilising calligraphy workshops and museum visits, the students developed a series of comprehensive housing proposals that offered both programmatic innovation and tectonic novelty, leading to new and radical resynchronisations between dwellings and nature.

Guest Critics: Keren He (CAFA), Matt Lindsay (Hampshire County Council Architects), Signe Pelne (Studio Multi) 164

) Lotta Jacobson

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Three) Seven

166

(top) Rabia Khalid; (bottom left) Emanuella Pellizzon; (bottom centre) Roza Hassan; (bottom right) Husna Paruk

(bottom centre) Davide Ciaravola; (bottom right) Maaria Ionova

BA Architecture | Design Studio (Three) Seven

168

(top) Nedal Harris-Ghosheh; (bottom) Yasmin Pathan

(top) Edmund Alcock; (bottom) Ana Atanasescu

THE MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE (MArch) has always been a forward-looking course; embracing emerging technologies and addressing the most pressing contemporary issues. At this moment, there is no more important issue than climate change and our students and staff have been engaging with this ongoing challenge for many years: incorporating it into their projects and studio agendas; analysing the technical parameters; and reflecting critically on the wider political, cultural and social implications. Over the past year a course review, and subsequently a successful RIBA revalidation, have provided an opportunity to formalise this and to integrate environmental issues and sustainable design more explicitly into the fabric of every aspect of the course. Some of these changes have already been adopted and are evident in the work displayed in this year’s exhibition.

Through the design studios, we pride ourselves on offering a diverse and challenging range of design methodologies. But the need to address the climate emergency and the ever-changing economic, social and professional context make it more important than ever that we carefully consider the range of studios we offer. This year saw the introduction of a new Live Design studio [DS20] run by Maria Kramer & Corinna Dean, with an emphasis on ecologically-led community regeneration.

Part of a wider programme of Live Design projects, it offers a chance to engage with the complex interplay of local issues through the microcosm of the design and creation of a community hub.

Another new initiative established this year was a school-wide exchange established as part of the ArCCAT agenda (the School’s climate action taskforce). This project, directed by Professor Lindsay Bremner, has put in place a crossdisciplinary pedagogical programme that enables staff and students to respond to climate and ecological emergencies in conversation with social communities and other academic disciplines. MArch studio [DS15], run by Sean Griffiths, has been part of this programme and their projects are situated within this context.

Once again, the work of our students has been recognised by success in several competitions this year. This includes the announcement that former DS22 student, Ruta Perminaite, has been selected as a finalist in the European Union Mies van der Rohe Awards for her project ‘Paradise on the Edge’. The project sets out to create productive connections between ecology and health. The success of this, and all the work displayed in the OPEN 2023 exhibition, is testament to the dedication of the staff and the talent of the MArch students.

Richard Difford Course Leader

170

MArch ARCHITECTURE RIBA Part 2

MArch Architecture | Process

172

There is no knowledge without experience […] we have to feel it, don’t we?

Paul Shepheard, The Cultivated Wilderness, 1997

FIRST HAND EXPERIENCE has once again been central to the learning process in MArch. Pictured here, DS23 enjoy the panoramic view from a vantage point in central Antwerp. DS20 get to work on their live project; and MArch students Hana Alsaai and Blessing Sulaiman help construct the Ramadan Pavilion, designed by Shahed Saleem for the Victoria & Albert Museum.

Also out and about while in search of an understanding and awareness of urban, rural and hybrid landscapes, DS22 explore Naples and the beauty of walled gardens, and DS20 canoe along the river Lea in urban east London, while DS16 embraced the relationship between technology and nature at harvest time at Grymsdyke Farm.

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Ten

Toby Burgess & Arthur Mamou-Mani Toby Burgess is the director of Toby Burgess Design Ltd. He has previously been design tutor on the Architectural Association’s Design and Make Course and taught the Advanced Digital Design Master’s at London Metropolitan University, with a focus on the funding and delivery of live student projects, designed and fabricated using digital design tools.

Arthur Mamou-Mani is an architect, and director of the award-winning practice Mamou-Mani, specialising in a new kind of digitally designed and fabricated architecture. Arthur is a lecturer at the University of Westminster. In 2020 the Architects’ Journal named Mamou-Mani one of its 100 ‘Disruptor’ practices. Alongside his architectural practice, Arthur founded the digital fabrication laboratory FabPub.

DS10: Eco-Parametric Architecture: Circular design & fabrication Yr1: Rada Daleva, Faustine Duboureau, Brikena Dunisha, William Kay, Shalini Nishad, Adam Primmer, Julian Raveendran, Ana-Maria Scutari, Kevin Wong

Yr2: Blu Affleck, Elizabeth Diakantonis, Victoria Hajduczenia, Roberto Lopato, Kazia Mac Sherry, Kat Stevens, Wincy Tung Wong, Hai Chiao Yuan

SUSTAINABILITY FIRST. DS10 looks for novel solutions to sustainability issues in all its forms. We value digital exploration on the threshold between structure and ornament, coupled with thorough material testing and are interested in realistic and efficient buildings that contribute to a more sustainable society.

Factors such as transport, material and manufacturing constraints were considered and understood in terms of the cost-profit margin, leading to the creation of sustainably powered, off grid proposals.

Brief 01: 3D Off-Grid Inhabited Pre-Fab Bio Machines Working with Artificial Intelligence tools such as Midjourney and Dall-e, students generated architectural prototypes which were expanded into parametric models using Grasshopper3D to create novel and inhabited spaces; fusing architecture with living elements such as plants, trees, soils etc.

They focused on using A.I. for design linked to a specific industrial manufacturing process, such as folding, extrusion or 3D printing, and through the process came to an understanding of how to realise a manufacturing-informed dream.

Armed with these tools, students embraced an entrepreneurial spirit, designing a small building as a product which they rendered in great detail, and developed a business plan for the product they created.

Guest Critics: Richard Difford, Sean Griffiths, Andrei Martin, Jean-Christian Whitehouse 174

We will continue to explore the relationship of living elements with architecture beyond food production, using plants for shade, thermal control, material production etc.

Brief 02: Derelict London In response to the compounded energy, cost of living, and housing crises, students explored refurbishing derelict buildings in London. They created novel and highly sustainable new buildings from old with innovative and forward thinking programmes; a real place in a greener future London designed as highly efficient, closed-loop buildings and systems, minimising energy wastage at all stages of design, construction and operation.

Students defined new and unexpected programmes of their choice. Creating sustainable closed loop communities from modular building systems, they exploited the full potential of off-site manufacturing, harvesting and efficiently managing energy and water to offer new economic opportunities to its inhabitants or users.

Special Thanks: Shape to Fabrication Conference, Simply Rhino, Speakers included David Rutten, Martin Self, Joseph Walsh Wincy Tung Wong: Clucktopia – Using chicken bones to 3D print

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Ten

176

Wincy Tung Wong: Clucktopia – Using chicken bones to 3D print

(top) Elizabeta Diakontis: Co-living + Working for entrepreneurs; (bottom) Hai Chiao Yuan: Oyster Shells to Bricks

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Ten

178

(top) Kevin Wong: AI to Reality – Scobby Leather Tower; (bottom) Rada Daleva: Interior features from AI to reality

Ana Maria Scutari: Modular Pre-Fab Co-living in a Derelict Building

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Twelve

Ben Stringer & Peter Barber Ben Stringer teaches design and cultural context studies at the University of Westminster. Recently he has been publishing articles about architecture and rurality.

Peter Barber has a practice noted for its social housing and urban design projects, mostly around London. He also teaches design studio at the University of Westminster.

DS12: Wantsumville Yr1: Ralph Clifton, Georgina Frankpitt, Jessica Hlavackova, Srujitha Jonnala, Denise Leung, Hana Mohammed, Glena Sabri, Enija Skeltona, Sophie Tilley

Yr2: Pietro Asti, Cristina Cazacu, Ally Ying Yu Fung, Hannah Hobhouse, Anthony Kourpas, Ian Lei, Ramzi Ramzi, Hyunwoo Shim

THIS YEAR DS12 imagined an experimental productive settlement on the Manston Airport site in Thanet, Kent.

Near the Wantsum channel, the airport’s 700 acres are mostly abandoned now; weeds are squeezing through the vast runway’s concrete slabs and the terminal building is derelict. An application for a commuter housing project was rejected. Often in the headlines, the site was used temporarily as a Brexit lorry park, and the Manston detention centre was at the centre of the ongoing row about the UK’s treatment of asylum seekers.

We asked everyone in the studio to identify a different area within the airfield site and to develop a distinct programme for it. Each project includes different programmes of agriculture, industry and housing. While everyone’s individual projects are distinct, relations between them and with the neighbourhood are co-ordinated too. So together they form a hybrid cluster of interacting projects within a group plan. The final scheme is the result of individual imaginations, a lot of creative interactions, group thinking and negotiations with the existing infrastructure.

After World War Two, town planner, writer and anarchist Colin Ward argued that former airbases should be used for alternative communities to develop. In a similar spirit, we argue that such sites could be used to explore ways of addressing the critical issues that we currently face.

Where should our food, water, energy and building materials come from? What kind of land ownership system would suit a more ecologically-minded society? What might a rural community look like in the future?

Our idea was to design a place where possibilities for alternative farming, manufacturing and social futures could be developed, using and making new sustainable technologies and materials: a zone of rural modernity.

We went on a series of day trips to the airport, to the wartime tunnels in Ramsgate, to the abandoned hoverport at Pegwell Bay and more besides. These visits raised important questions about local industry and infrastructure, our relations with Europe, refugee conditions and rural settlement form.

In March we travelled to Paris where our trip included visits to the Nature Urbaine and Ferme Suzanne city farms, the L’Etoiles d’Ivry housing project and the Salvation Army building.

Guest Critics: Pierre d’Avoine, Cyan Cheng, April Glasby, Sean Griffiths, Jane McAllister, Laura Nica, Alicia Pivaro Toby Shew, Rachel Stevenson, Andre Viljoen, Andrew Yau 180

Special Thanks: To everyone at Polar Helicopters at Manston Airport. Also to everyone at Nature Urbaine and Ferme Suzanne in Paris.

DS12: Wantsumville group plan

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Twelve

182

(top left) Hana Mohammed: Asylum Seeker’s Housing ; (top centre) Anthony Kourpas: Chalk quarry + Geothermal powerstation tower.; (top right) Pietro Asti: Brewery & Farm sketch design; (bottom) Jessica Hlavackova & Denise Leung: King Arthur Road Tomorrow

(top right) Ralph Clifton: Recycling Plant; (bottom) Georgina Frankpitt: Cotton Factory

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Twelve

184

(top) Ramzi Ramzi: Mycennovation Terminal Village; (bottom left) Hannah Hobhouse: Refugee Housing – Aerial view; (bottom centre) Ally Ying Yu Fung: Fish Farm; (bottom right) Enija Skeltona: Women’s Prison – Cell section

(right) Cristina Cazacu: Wantsum Citrus Farm

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Thirteen

Andrei Martin & Andrew Yau Andrei Martin is a partner at PLP Architecture, a London-based multidisciplinary design practice.

Andrew Yau is a design director at Urban Future Organisation, an international practice and design research collaborative.

DS13: Radical Reuse: Oxford Street Yr1: Isabel Alcock, Morgan Anderson, Laura Bull, Fannia Chung, Tara Dehghanpour, Katrina Geen, Nylda Hamchaoui, Shyam Patel, Maria Saraguro Paltin, Dilan Senocak, Jack Sivyer, Reesha Sudra

Yr2: Hicham Abari, Marwan Almeligy, Bilal El Figuigui, Wan Feng, Marco Ng, Justin Wang

JUST AS RETAIL transformed cities at the turn of the century, will its demise or reinvention be the contemporary catalyst for urban change?

tasked with the production of multivalent moods and atmospheres, as well as with inferring new scenarios for the inhabitation of the street. Through fluid typologies we speculated on new ways of being, acting, producing, and consuming.

This year, DS13 focused on Oxford Street, one of the oldest thoroughfares in London and Europe’s busiest shopping street. But despite these superlatives, Oxford Street is also in a moment of crisis. The shift to online shopping and the ensuing global retail apocalypse has changed the landscape of the street, choking this well-oiled machine that produces sensation and impulse by depriving it of its fuel – footfall. With a 50% reduction in pedestrian traffic, and the onslaught of digital consumerism, street shopping is rapidly becoming history. So, what’s next for Oxford Street?

We began the year by imagining an alternative, postretail Oxford Street through a series of interventions that operate across scales, from the scale of the body to that of architecture to finally that of urban infrastructure. Within the spatial container of the street itself, we proposed new connective civic tissues, bridges, layered public realms, infra-thin and ultra-long buildings to produce ecosystems

From the perspective of the architectural critic, the history of retail display can seem a bestiary of novel forms, a disordered field of possible worlds of fantasy, creativity, appropriation, emulation, and plagiarism. Retail presents an extraordinary sourcebook for the grammar of forms and techniques of communication that currently shape architectural thinking. 1

In the second part of the year, we mined this rich grammar of retail forms and techniques to establish new post-retail typologies able to reinvigorate the street. But a reinvention of Oxford Street also entails a reassessment of the act of building itself and its ecological impact, so instead of building novel realities from scratch, we refashioned the existing structures in a way that considered and expanded upon their inner anatomies.

Special Thanks: Jason Antony (Sam Hunters Architects), Sonya Batsova (APT), Monika Bochynska (ACA Studios), Marco Catena (Atkins), Mahmoud Chehab (Avison Young), Clive Fenwick (Studio IRIS), Simona Kuneva (Allies and Morrison), Mingyang Li (Foster + Partners), Francesco Montaguti (Hawkins\Brown), Evan Preuss (PLP Architecture), Keshav Ramaswami (PLP Architecture), Nick Strachan (Leslie Jones Architects), Xin Swift (Zaha Hadid Architects), Larisa Tsydenova (Foster + Partners), Alejandro Vincente Soto (AHMM), Dagmar Zvonickova (Identity Designers) 186

1

ischli, F., Olsen, N. and Jasper, A. F Retail Apocalypse, (Zürich: GTA Verlag, 2021) ) Wan Feng

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Thirteen

188

(top left) Hicham Abari; (top right) Wan Feng; (bottom left) Jack Sivyer; (bottom right) Wan Feng

(top left) Marco Ng; (bottom centre) Chung Fannia; (right) Reesha Sudra

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Thirteen

190

(top left) Tara Dehghanpour; (top centre) Shiyam Patel; (top right) Ziyang Wang; (bottom) Hicham Abari

(top) Bilal El Figuigu; (bottom) Marco Ng

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Fifteen

Sean Griffiths Sean Griffiths practices as an architect, artist and academic. He was a founder member of the art architecture practice, FAT, and now practices as Modern Architect.

DS15: Communist Utopia Oxford Street Yr1: Max Blythe, Mathew Collier, Tasha Greenfield, Maja Kurantowicz, Phoebe Lawrie, Hugo Hale, Josh Mooney

Yr2: Gizem Bulbul, Saniat Chowdhuey, Saima Rouf, Stefano Towli, Dharfin Shafwan Wirasugena

OUR PROJECT THIS year imagines what might happen to London’s world-famous consumer paradise, Oxford Street, in the event of a collapse of capitalism and the establishment of a new Eco-communist society. The project is motivated by the growing realisation that climate catastrophe cannot be averted without overturning an economic system that relies on perpetual economic growth and which in turn requires continuous increases in carbon emissions, resource extraction, exploitation of labour and growing inequality. So, what might an alternative look like?

society with a different ethos to the one in which we presently live. In doing so, we have been speculative but tried to maintain a degree of realism. In the spirit of creating a circular economy, we have worked mostly with the existing buildings, thinking of new uses for important sites in and around Oxford Street, such as Marble Arch, Selfridges, John Lewis and Soho Square, alongside the space of Oxford Street itself and some of the area’s more mundane buildings.

In exploring the possibilities, we have undertaken a wide variety of work ranging from the experimental material practices that have characterised the work created in DS15 over many years, combined with research into the concepts of de-growth and ‘half earth socialism’, the generation of political slogans, and the devising of very different kinds of programmes that might arise in a new

Students worked in teams to produce ideas for the new society, expressed in urban visions for different sections of the street, before developing individual projects within the group proposals. The project has also been carried out under the auspices of an educational experiment called Platform for Cross Disciplinary Exchange which has involved contributions from students and tutors from Architecture, Transport Studies, Urban Design, and Architecture and Environmental Design.

Guest Critics: Alessandro Ayuso, Anthony Boulanger (AY Architects), Lindsay Bremner, Tom Cohen, Bill Erickson, Sinead Fahey (5 th Studio), Sam Jacob (Sam Jacob Studio), Lou Kelemen (Populus), Arthur Mamou Mani, David Matthewson, Enrica Papa, Emily Posey (Eric Parry Architects), Kester Rattenbury, Matteo Sarno (Boito Sarno), Ben Stringer, Tom Teatum (Noiascape) 192

Mathew Collier: Anti-Haussmann Village, Oxford Street

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Fifteen

194

(top left) Josh Mooney: Composition for an interior; (top right) Gizem Bul Bul: View into Soho Square; (bottom) Saniat Chowdhury: Marble Arch Food Exchange Square

(top) Mathew Collier: Anti-Haussmann Village, Oxford Street; (bottom left) Gizem Bul Bul: Soho Vegan Production Centre; (bottom right) Stefano Towli: Museum of the Revolution, Oxford Street

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Fifteen

196

(clockwise from top left) Josh Mooney: Eco Communist Utopia Façade; Hugo Hale: Democratic Meeting Place, Oxford Circus; Maja Kurantowicz: Societal Values – Knowledge; Max Blyth: Barricades Map; Saima Rouf: Play Courtyard

(top) Phoebe Lawrie: The Oxford Street Commune; (bottom) Tasha Greenfield: Retrofit & Reuse Factory – Disrupting a monumental façade

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Sixteen

Anthony Boulanger & Stuart Piercy DS16 likes making physical things. The studio is run on a platform for students to experiment and invent architectural and spatial concepts initiated through in-depth investigations of material techniques and the making of physical artefacts, created both manually and digitally. The studio is taught by award-winning architects who are also award-winning academics, generating practice-based design research.

Anthony Boulanger is Senior Lecturer and co-founding partner of the design- and research-led practice AY Architects.

Stuart Piercy is a founding director of Piercy & Company. He is a fellow of the Royal Society of Arts and patron of the Yorkshire Sculpture Park and the Royal Academy.

DS16: Radical Re-Make Yr1: Tonia Constantinou, Sunghoon Jung, James Langlois, Ollie Longmore, Giovanni Musumeci, Mario Priore, Talah Siraj, Bo Yean Teng

Yr2: Oscar Brown, Rob Forsey, Megan Griffiths, Freya Kay, Joyee Lee, Wui Lin Lee, Simon Mclanaghan, Charles Plet, Isabelle Reid, Vilde Bakkeli Sand

THIS YEAR WE invited students to radically re-make; to re-invent, re-use, re-cycle and re-think, emphasising the relationships between technology and nature and directed at re-vitalising and/or re-inventing lost, marginalised and exploited communities. The challenge was to create more radical solutions, both large and small, that support communities affected by climate change and social-political injustices.

Our study trip transferred the themes to Puglia Italy, the general location of main individual projects. Despite an incredibly layered history, Puglia is today one of the most disadvantaged regions in the EU. After years of suffering from de-population as a result of de-industrialisation, the region has more recently been burdened by drought and a devastating blight that has killed 15% of its 150 million prized olive trees. Students developed their own research, wrote their own briefs, found their own sites and devised their own programmes to speculate critical (radical) and experimental interventions and unorthodox building typologies with a civic undertaking. Inherent were strategies of adaptation, re-use and resourcing, supported by attitudes of passive environmental design and how buildings can become vehicles for energy harvesting and exchange, whose morphology is shaped by the local climate.

We started the year with a 5-week project entitled CAST & RE-CAST where we collectively evaluated materials and techniques of artefacts (cast or otherwise) in the context of the natural and built landscape at Grymsdyke Farm, a test bed for a large community of makers, including DS16, over the past fifteen years. After carrying out a one-day audit of a huge number of pieces on location – in the workshop, house, library, orchard and fields – collaborations of three were asked to produce a new artefact to be re-evaluated in the cultural and environmental context of the farm. Six ambitious, engaging and joyful site-specific pieces emerged, employing different material processes: rammed-earth, paper, concrete, fabric and ceramic casting.

Design through making: 1-to-1 material studies and scaled maquettes for exploring spatial constructs was strongly encouraged along the way.

Guest Critics: Rob Beeny (PRP), Harry Bucknell (Piercy & Co), Rebecca Gardner (Grimshaws), Alex Haggart (Piercy & Co), Yannis Halkiopoulos (Piercy & Co), Guan Lee (Grymsdyke Farm), Will McLean, Fiona Neil (Piercy & Co), Al Scott (IF_DO), Lewis Toghill, Cathryn Walczyk (Piercy & Co), Victoria Watson (Dr Watson Architects), Paolo Zaide (clockwise from top left) Forsey, Longmore and Jung: Shelf – Fabric slip casting the workshop; Special Thanks: Kay, Griffiths and Musumeci: Endless Orchard – Fabric formed slip casts; To Guan Lee for another fabulous experience at Grymsdyke Farm and Yannis Halkiopoulos for Joyee Lee, Brown and Priore: The Haha Bridge – Rammed earth; his supporting teaching role throughout the year.

Wui Lin Lee, Reid and Constaninou: The Edible Brick – Cast-to-bake moulds; Plet, Langlois and Siraj: The Fire Pit – Recasting the forgotten well basin; 198 McLanaghan, Sand and Teng: Paper Casting Voronoi Patterns of Grymsdyke Farm

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Sixteen

200

(top left) Megan Griffiths: Margherita Di Sovoia Salt Exchange – View of the nave of the cathedral; (top right) Wui Lin Lee: Ginosa ‘Preserving the Revolt’ Food Bank – View of the olive oil mill; (bottom) Robert Forsey: The Hydro-Agricultural Tratturo Spinazzola – Long section

(top left) Oscar Brown: ‘Snctuary of Stone’ Botantical Research Centre and Retreat Polomba Quary, Matera – View from bedroom window; (top right) Freya Kay: ‘The Love Affair’ Re-inventing the Masseria del Duca de Martina –Perspective view of entrance courtyard

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Sixteen

202

(top left) James Langlois: Re-awakening Monteruga – View of hydroponic building and growing fields; (middle left) Charles Plet: Matera Music Conservatory – Site section/elevation through adjoing public squares; (bottom left) Vilde Bakkeli Sand: Taranto Musclecrete Regeneration Centre – View of connecting rooftop gardens; (right) Joyee Lee: The People’s Assembly of Taranto – Lower-ground floor plan

(top) Robert Forsey: The Hydro-Agricultural Tratturo Spinazzola – View from the livestock walkway during shearing season; (bottom) Oscar Brown: ‘Sanctuary of Stone’ Botantical Research Centre and Retreat Polomba Quary, Matera – Site section through one quarry, ecology research centre and lecture theatre

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Eighteen

Ben Pollock & Laura Nica Ben Pollock is an architect, research fellow, environmentalist and activist with an interest in regenerative development and climate adaptation. @4Disland / @ClimateCartographics / @ACAN Laura Nica is a practicing architect, digital designer & founder of Laura Nica Studio. Working on multiple interdisciplinary projects, her interests extend to material research, digital fabrication and assemblage processes. @LauraNicaStudio

designstudio18.com / @ds18_westminster

DS18: Air, Architecture + other Climates: Thermal Domains Yr1: Ollie Astley, Qingqing He, Wing Ting Keung, Farah Mussadiq, Alistair Orchard-Mitchell, Alice Own, Naomi Punnett, Ross Wilson, Zixin Yao

Yr2: Kirsten Davis, Chada Elalami, Carl Fletcher, Timea Kadar, Georgios Malliaropoulos, Nat Saligupta, Guy Sinclair, Sian Sliwinska, Yuechuan Xi

THE CONTEXT OF our global climate and ecological emergency provides the foundation for all DS18 investigations. We use the architectural project as a tool to test the effects of changing environmental processes upon life and design; to communicate and represent these intangible entangled global issues to new audiences in new ways. We aim to ground projects through directed, critical research using data, experimental diagrams, cartographic imaginations and computational tools in order to record, analyse and communicate the connections between the vast assemblage of project themes, scales, actors, processes and material.

year’s design explorations students endeavoured to test narratives for what future fluctuating thermal systems hold for local ecologies, communities and inhabitants; and what is architecture’s possible role within this - one of resistance, remediation, manipulations of energy or rebalancing?

The studio continues to explore these issues through the lens of air and its thermal domains; as a vehicle of energy, heat radiates, penetrates, destroys, reshapes and nourishes. Through temperature mapping across graphs and thermometers, our thermal comfort has modified both landscapes and urban environments, and it has become a tool for capturing, channelling, storing or accelerating energetic dissipation. Throughout this

In addition, and partly driven by geopolitics, socioeconomic transition and policy decisions, it is hard to ignore the relationship between the UK’s thermal needs and its entanglement with the current energy and climate crisis. Business as usual, driven by prospective seasonal demand, a lack of energy security and poor thermal management, look to have untold social consequences over the coming years. How might locally-driven communityminded architecture engage with the evolving thermal disturbances and realise a more regenerative or equitable future? To site these entangled and multiply scaled issues, we began with a collective UK-wide investigation to identify key territories, critical zones and pressing thematics, before each student scaled down to a specific site of intervention for their main design project.

Guest Critics: Constantina Avraamides (CA Architecture), Raul Bielsa (Prior+ Partners/AAVS Transborder), Roberto Bottazzi, Lindsay Bremner, Finbar Charleson (dRMM), Emma Colthurst, Fiona Grieve (Scott Browning Architects), Dhruv Gulabchande (Narrative Practice + HFM Architects), Kate Hosking (Squires & Partners), Omar Ibraz (Foster + Partners), Sho Ito, Fraser Morrison (Future Fields), Justin Nicholls (Fathom Architects), Rachel Wakelin (Buckley Grey Yeoman), Oscar Villareal (Lab 10 MX) 204

Chada Elalami: The Smouldering Interface

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Eighteen

206

Zixin Yao: Diatom – The interactive oceanic research and adventure hub

Kirsten Davis: A climate beacon at the periphery of the ferrel cell. The jet stream data inscription through 2030-60

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Eighteen

208

(top left) Sian Sliwinska: Algae bloom 3D models; (top centre) Nat Saligupta: HS2 Community heat hub; (top right) Yuechuan Xi: Solar voltaic prototype; (bottom) Carl Fletcher: Global methane emissions

Georgios Malliaropoulos: Lochness Thermal Exchange & Warm Theatre

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Twenty

Maria Kramer & Corinna Dean Maria Kramer co-founded the Live Design Practice, developing Live Projects and 1:1 Interventions. She is a tutor for the Professional Practice Part III Course and director at the architecture studio Room 102 with its main interest in and realm of community-driven projects.

Corinna Dean is a member of the Emerging Territories Research Group. She founded the Archive for Rural Contemporary Architecture and has carried out a series of co-production projects working with the Canal + Rivers Trust. Her current research looks at narratives around contamination in the River Lea as part of the British Council Gender Ecologies project. www.arca-projects.com

DS20: Ecologically-led Community Regeneration Yr1: Rachel Armstrong, Pranjal Bafna, Archie Brown, Galina Dimova, Adam Din, Sean Hamilton, William Lambert, Manu Mohan Mohandas, Aya Nasr, Chris Painter, Megan Rees, Blessing Sulaiman, Falguni Thakkar, Lucy Turner

Yr2: Hamza Khan, Nicholas Kousoulou, Julia Wladysiak

HOW IS THE practice of architecture responsibly formed in terms of creating new social and cultural relationships to our natural environment? This is the question DS20 students responded to in the context of the post-industrial landscape around Cody Dock. The abandoned former coke smelting dock is now a thriving ecological base adjacent to the River Lea, which is increasingly dwarfed by high rise housing and a river with high levels of toxicity.

practice learning. This means they are gaining direct, hands-on experience and able to be involved in all work stages, including the construction phase. We promote a bottom-up architectural approach, developing an indepth understanding of inhabitation and programmatic activity. Through this process students develop a deeper understanding of the complex relationships between spatial, political, economic and social factors.

Through field work, site analysis, experimental model making and drawing, DS20 students explored how to create neighbourhoods at this site which encourage social interactions and meaningful places while promoting ecological awareness and ‘civic-ness’, to strengthening local identity and culture.

In parallel to the Live Studio, which we hope will leave a legacy of learning in the community and augment the citizen science projects and social prescribing undertaken

by Cody Dock, the students developed ambitious individual investigative proposals as their principal thesis work. The projects explored dynamic interactions between the existing conditions and future biophysical forces explored with projects such as ‘Living Build Centre’, an ‘Inhalorium’ and ‘Ruderal Autopoiesis’. Each project formed a response to the creation of a multi-programmatic masterplan with ecological regenerative principals at its heart.

The locus for this analysis was the unique opportunity to work with a diverse set of clients who informed the studio’s Live Project, the QHT-funded (university) Therapeutic Horticultural Hub at Cody Dock. Here the students have been involved in context-based professional

Guest Critics: Wilfred Achilles, Scott Batty, Alastair Blyth, Anke Böhm, Harry Charrington, Tom Cohen, Tina Bergman, Marcus Lee, Roudaina Al Khani, Will McLean, Maryam Safe, Julian Williams, Issias Yohanes 210

beyond-studio/live-design-practice/

Special Thanks: Wilfred Achilles, Peter Bonfield, Harry Charrington, Tom Cohen, Nic Henninger, Will McLean, Chris Meloy, Simon Myers, Enrica Papa, Huan Rimington, Rodeca, Nick Runeckles, Ro Spankie, Ben Stringer, Steve Webb, Camilla Wilkinson, Julian Williams

) Hamza Khan: An Ecological Paradigm (top) Section through bumps and hills; (bottom) Site plan

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Twenty

212

(top) Will Lambert: Ruderal Autopoesis – Redevelopment of an existing storage building ; (bottom) Lucy Turner: Beds & Sheds: A Makers Community – Development of an Amazon warehouse along the River Lea

(top left) Will Lambert: Guerilla Botany – Labelling ‘weeds’; (top right) Will Lambert: Ruderal Autopoesis – Internal perspective of repurposed building ; (middle left) Lucy Turner: Leaf with disolving grid; (bottom) Julia Wladysiak: Wet+Wild+Farm Co-Existing – (left) Clay studies; (right) Artist’s impression

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Twenty

214

(top left) Will Lambert: Internal view of ‘The Growing Space’ Live Project; (bottom left) Construction of ‘The Growing Space’ Live Project at Cody Dock; (right) Adam Din: Exploded axonometric of ‘The Growing Space’

(top & centre right) Construction of ‘The Growing Space’ Live Project at Cody Dock; (bottom right) Cooking in ‘The Growing Space’ Live Project

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Twenty-Two

Nasser Golzari & Yara Sharif Nasser Golzari and Yara Sharif are award-winning architects and academics with an interest in design as a means to create resilient communities. Combining research with design, their work runs parallel between their architectural practice, NG Architects, their research team, PART, and their Design Studio, DS22, at the University of Westminster. Golzari and Sharif have won a number of prestigious awards including the 2013 Agha Khan Award, 2014 Holcim Award for Sustainable Construction, and 2013 & 2016 RIBA President’s Award for Research.

The way they run the studio is very similar to how they run the practice, with a combination of design, drawings, testing and making.

DS22: Revealing the Wonders of the Walled Garden Yr1: Petra Boreta, Ella Cohen, Simran Dehal, Loujayne Hadaya, Bahrah Mustafa, Riane Oukili, Adrian-Calin Paul, Aikaterini Pechynaki, Amelia Terry, Gulmeyrem Yaman

Yr2: Hanna Alsaai, Estera Lonela Badelita, Lucy Bambury, Sarah Daoudi, Suzana Meziad, Setareh Nosrati, Molly Sharps, Anna Tabacu, Roksana Wyrwa

IN DS22, WE continue our interest in social and environmental ecology and in decolonising the landscape – physically and culturally – to draw attention to invisible communities whose voice is left unheard.

The projects this year varied in their scope and location. The Mediterranean coastal cities with their charm and contradictions formed the basis of our investigation. The projects covered Napoli, Alexandria, Jaffa/Tel Aviv, Beirut and also looking at Przemysl/Poland and Gherdeal/ Transylvania.

This year, DS22 interrogated the notion of the Walled Garden as a symbolic space for collective acts with its social and environmental wonders. The students explored different architectural prototypes for the garden, focusing their attentions at the coastal edges of the Mediterranean.

Using a hybrid of drawings and conceptual models, the students ‘undressed’ and ‘reassembled’ the landscape to expose its hidden potentials. The garden was then proposed in its different forms to offer a space of care, production, collective act and experimentation.

All projects offered a social commentary on environmental, social and political inequalities. While celebrating the wonders of the unfamiliar, the garden became a tool to combine technical innovation with poetic narration. Tomatoes Mafia, Women’s Paradise, A Room of Her Own, Suspended Landscape, an Underwater Garden, reclaiming archaeological remains and Cultivating Architecture are some of the themes explored by the students while blurring boundaries between the scale of the city and the scale of the room. @ds22westmin

Guest Critics: Alessandro Ayuso, Angela Brady (Brady Mallalieu Architects), Philip Breese (Weston Williamson Architects), Toby Burgess, Andrew Carr (Brady Mallalieu Architects), Jake Cripwell (Fawn Studio), Minerva Fadel, Maria Kramer, Samir Pandya, Thomas Riddell-Webster (Barr Gazetas), Adriana Useche (NG Architects) Sun Yan Yee (Grimshaw Architects) 216

Special Thanks: Andrew Carr (Brady Mallalieu Architects) for his valuable input and ongoing support for the students throughout the year.

Qattan Foundation, Palestine for a year long research and collaboration that has been realised through Instant Modernism Exhibition which included some input from our students. .

Estera Lonela Badelita: Cultivating Architecture

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Twenty-Two

218

(left) Adrian-Calin Paul: Waste Matrix; (top & middle right) Sarah Daoudi: Suspended; (bottom right) Lucy Bambury: Al Mask Fishing Village

(top left) Hanna Alsaai: The Ipedermal Edge; (top & middle right) Riane Oukili: The Archological Garden; (bottom right) Ella Cohen: The Sunken Garden; (bottom left) Aikaterini Pechynaki: Suspended Garden; (centre left) Gulmeyrem Yaman: Protecting the Aqua Life

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Twenty-Two

220

(top) Suzannah Meziad: The City as a Room; (bottom) Molly Sharps: When the Earth Screamed

(top left) Roksana Wyrwa: The Hidden Legends; (bottom left) Loujayne Hadaya: Beirut Extended; (centre) Anna Tabacu: Floating Garden; (top right) Petra Boreta: Crystal Garden; (middle right) Amelia Terry: The Garden of Theatrical Porosity; (bottom right) Simran Dehal: Reclaimed Journeys

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Twenty-Three

Richard Difford, François Girardin & David Scott DS23 is led by three experienced tutors each of whom brings a different set of skills and knowledge to the studio.

Richard Difford is an academic with expertise both in creative technologies and architectural history. His teaching focuses on architectural representation, the history of science and mathematics, and the use of electronics and coding in architectural design.

François Girardin has extensive international experience in architecture and is currently involved in teaching design and cultural context. He has specialist interests in material technologies and digital fabrication.

David Scott is an academic and Director of the Fabrication Lab. His interests are in the transformative application of digital technologies to architectural design.

DS23: The Spatial Dynamics of Architecture Yr1: Max Arnold, Charlotte Chin, Lucas Crichton, Georgia Elba-Porter, Daniel Fay, Enrico Focardi, Diana Fox, Angeliki Giannakodimou, Laura Gioya Gil, Angelique Hoarau, Gyulhan Ibryamov, Micah Oak, Georgia Papadopoulou, Hamzah Rezq, Saba Torabi

Homogenous space and homogenous time […] express, in an abstract form, the double work of solidification and of division which we effect on the moving continuity of the real in order to obtain there a fulcrum for our action, in order to fix within it starting points for our operation, in short, to introduce into it real changes.

Henri Bergson, Matter and Memory, 1896

IT GOES WITHOUT saying that the activities that determine a building’s function also shape its design.

But the nature and form of those activities, seen in terms of movements and actions, can also be a source of inspiration and formal expression. Taking this as our starting point, this year DS23 explored the way the recording, representation and expression of movement could inspire new forms of architectural expression and programmatic response.

Our field trip was to the Flemish city of Antwerp.

Bordering the Dutch province of Zeeland, Antwerp sits in a unique wider landscape in which a fragile balance is

Yr2: Ecem Karaagac, Larisa Manga, Thomas Rowntree

struck between land and sea. But the diverse range of conditions of the Westerschelde estuary has also been commercially exploited. The mediaeval city centre makes visible the historic significance of this geography, which continues today; Antwerp is home to one of the largest ports in Europe, as well as being the centre of the world diamond trade.

A location rich in history and culture, we were able to investigate the landscape, social context and economics of this fascinating city. And although centred around the port, Antwerp has afforded a broad range of programmatic opportunities. Seeded by an analysis and investigation of movement in different spheres of human activity, nature and machines, projects have developed from the ground up and have responded directly to the vibrant cultural, commercial and industrial activities to which Antwerp plays host. In the face of climate change and rising sea levels in a city dominated by river and port, many of these projects also look at new ways in which architecture can address the water.

Guest Critics: Toby Burgess, Mariia Galiullina, Thomas Hopkins, Maria Kramer, Afolabi Spence, Ben Stringer 222

) Angelique Hoarau: Flame in Motion

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Twenty-Three

224

(top) Georgia Elba-Porter: Cocoa Plantation; (bottom left) Charlotte Chin: Façade detail; (bottom right) Saba Torabi: Kinetic studies; facing page: Thomas Rowntree: Logistic Market

(top) Mariia Galiullin: A TV studio in the park; (bottom) Volha Prus: Art Conservation Center And Landscape

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Twenty-Three

226

(top) Lucas Crichton: Sheldt Estuary Research & Education Centre; (bottom) Larissa Manga: Aquatic Centre; facing page: Diana Fox: Theatre District

(top) Molly May Harper: Searching the Skies; (bottom) Areesha Khalid: Refugee Transitional Facility and Cultural Retreat

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Twenty-Five

Alessandro Ayuso & Mary Konstantopoulou Alessandro Ayuso is a designer, author and teacher. His studio-based practice focuses on the intersection of representation, architecture and the alien body. His research is the subject of his book, Experiments with Body Agent Architecture, published by UCL Press.

Mary Konstantopoulou is an architectural designer and illustrator. Her work explores the theme of humans’ relationships with environments and culture, and invites a questioning of architecture’s role in sustainability and myth-making. She currently works with Jan Kattein Architects on community engagement and meanwhile projects.

DS25: Spectral Futures Yr1: Amabelle Aranas, Conrad Daniel Areta, Nicholas Hasbani, Cara Kinzelmann, Aleksandra Kwietniewska, Luke La Thangue, Alcina Lo, Billy Pollintine, Imogen Power, Zahraa Shaikh, Alannah Wilson, Cho Yan Joan Wong

Yr2: Filippo Cocca, Kevin Ferenzena, Clara-Romana Pop, Cristina Sarla, Soraia Alexandra De Abreu Viriato

THIS YEAR, DS25 confronted looming global environmental and social problems through the invention of particular architectural scenarios presenting alternative futures. We started the year by designing spectres we called Future Ghosts. These pan-temporal protagonists haunted the past, present and future, helping to provide situated points of view and provoking ideas about speculative narratives and architectural concepts.

The results were adventurous architectural proposals situated in narratives of Palermo’s possible futures. For instance, Filippo’s project follows ‘the Mutant Baddie’, a Future Ghost constructing their identity through augmented reality technology, proposing a parasitical augmentation of abandoned buildings that would give a presence and place for the local queer community.

Soraia’s project was told from the point of view of a clay ghost that navigates modernist and vernacular architecture, seeking to preserve cultural heritage; considering the proposed building as a continuous piece of the city fabric, the project proposes an accessible ceramics workshop where African and Palermian vernacular building methods could be researched and taught under a ceramic-clad canopy. Alcina’s allegorical project imagined genetically-modified human protagonists tasked with cleaning pollutants from Palermo’s surfaces; in the far-future these ‘Scalams’ curate a museum of human evolution, encouraging non-genetically-modified visitors to navigate nets and tensile membranes to experience exhibitions provoking a reconsideration of the presumed social hierarchy.

We visited Sicily, where we explored Palermo’s Danisinni neighbourhood, the ghost town Poggioreale Antica, the newly created towns of Poggioreale Nuova and Gibellina Nuova, and Alberto Burri’s Cretto Memorial, looking through the eyes of our Future Ghosts for clues about future possibilities in the traces and visions of the past.

Through drawings, storyboards, and materially-based models, we imagined how our Future Ghosts would haunt Palermo, and designed Shells-of-the-Ghosts, architectural fragments on chosen sites, as first forays into mediating the scale of the body and city.

In the second Semester, we expanded our initial ideas and the architectural seeds of the Shells-of-the-Ghosts.

Guest Critics: Amy Butt, Eleanor Evason (Piercy & Company), Egmontas Geras (Digital Poetics Ltd), Alex Haines (Burwell Architects), Lauriane Hewes (Patalab Architects), Asena Koksal (The Bourne Partnership), Isabel Mills Lyle (MAAPS), Ian Perrel (The Harris Partnership), Joel Saldeck, Marie Walker-Smith (Arup Foresight)

Special Thanks: The Harris Partnership Bourne Architects and Bourne Management & Building

228

Filippo Cocca: At the queue for the Baddieverse Rave

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Twenty-Five

230

(top) Soraia Viriato: Danisinni Circus Poster and view through the Argilla Culturale Living Museum; (bottom left) Cara Kinzelmann: Drawing process – Strangler tree cradle; (bottom right) Alcina Lo: Experimental model

(top) Kevin Ferenzena: Orphanage section; (bottom left) Cristina Sarla: APA Temple Bathhouse; (bottom right) Imogen Power: Construction of the Sridente Collective Community Project

MArch Architecture | Design Studio Twenty-Five

232

(top) Conrad Areta: Shell of the Ghost section; (bottom left) Joanne Wong: Material study model; (bottom right) Billy Pollintine: Arborscape construction study model

(top) Nicholas Hasbani: Primitivist monument construction; (bottom) Romana Pop: Berry in its studio designing the Laboratory for Hope

Department of Architecture | Staff

Staff

234

Vasilija Abramovic

Florian Brillet

Orsalia Dimitriou

Thomas Hopkins

Wilfred Achille

Stephen Brookhouse

Kirti Durelle

Md Mohataz Hossain

Panagiota Adilenidou

Christopher Bryant

Liz Ellston

Sam Sam Hui

Sam Aitkenhead

Tom Budd

James Engel

Zac Ibrihimi

Dimah Ajeeb

Toby Burgess

Bill Erickson

Clare Inkson

Rachel Aldred

Aleksandra Cannock

Elantha Evans

Bruce Irwin

Roudaina Alkhani

Mengqiu Cao

Helen Farrell

Sho Ito

Julian Allen

Paolo Cascone

Amr Fawzy

Caroline Jackson

Ian Arnott

Ian Casey

Tomas Fiszer

Josef Jammerbund

Alessandro Ayuso

Harry Charrington

Alex Fox

Kate Jordan

James Baldwin

Conor Clarke

François Girardin

Maja Jovic

Russel Bamber

Tom Cohen

Simone Gobber

Angela Kailisch

Simon Banfield

Stroma Cole

Inan Gokcek

Ripin Kalra

Mark Bannister

Jim Coleman

Nasser Golzari

Rim Kalsoum

Pete Barber

Mark Coles

Joana Soares Goncalves

Krystalia Kamvasinou

Tessa Barraclough

Andrew Cook

Anne Graham

Paol Kemp

Scott Batty

John Cook

Sean Griffiths

Neil Kiernan

Susanne Bauer

Jonathan Coventry

Thomas Grove

Jennifer Kingston

Nick Beech

Beth Cullen

Eric Guibert

Michael Kloihofer

Ross Bennett-Cook

Wajiha Dadabhoy

Yannick Guillen Sloma

Mary Konstantopoulou

Carine Berger Woiezechoski

Miriam Dall’Igna

Gérald Gurtner

Maria Kramer

Sabina Blasiotti

Christopher Daniel

Alison Gwynne

Frances Kremarik

Alastair Blyth

Corinna Dean

Johannes Hagan

Debbie Kuypers

Stefania Boccaletti

Dusan Decermic

Clare Hamman

Diony Kypraiou

Mehrdad Borna

Luis Delgado Munoz

Jeremy Hammant

Ed Lancaster

Roberto Bottazzi

Nigel Dennis

Lindsey Hanford

Constance Lau

Andrew Boughton

Davide Deriu

Stephen Harty

Chantal Laws

Anthony Boulanger

Zoe Diakaki

Ed Harty

Dirk Lellau

Lindsay Bremner

Richard Difford

Adam Holloway

Jacques Leonardi

Sebastien Leow

Luz Navarro

Kester Rattenbury

Nancy Stevenson

Christopher Leung

Suzy Nelson

Federico Redlin

Matthew Stewart

David Littlefield

Michael Neuman

Paul Richens

Carly Straughan

Tony Lloyd-Jones

Natalie Newey

Katy Roberts

Ben Stringer

Gwyn Lloyd-Jones

Andreea-Laura Nica

Toby Robins

Henning Stummel

Ian Lowden

Antonia Noussia

Michael Rose

Allan Sylvester

Maria Lozano Lara

Johannes Novy

Filomena Russo

Jane Tankard

Jayne Luscombe

John O’Shea

Shahed Saleem

Graham Tanner

Jane Madsen

Jamie Ogilvie

Rofayda Salem

Mireille Tchapi

Evangelia Magnisali

Chiara Orefice

Vera Sarioglu

Adam Thwaites

Arthur Mamou-Mani

Samir Pandya

Era Savvides

Alessandro Toti

Balveer Mankia

Enrica Papa

Rosa Schiano-Phan

Cristina-Alexandra Trifan

Anna Mansfield

Ilaria Pappalepore

Amedeo Scofone

Anastasia Tsamitrou

Andrei Martin

Roman Pardon

David Scott

Juan Vallejo

Max Martin

Jake Parkin

David Seex

Athanasios Varnavas

David Mathewson

Paresh Parmar

Yara Sharif

Giulio Verdini

David McEwen

Deborah Pearce

Geoffrey Shearcroft

Filip Visnjic

William McLean

Mirna Pedalo

Conor Sheehan

Christine Wall

Alison McLellan

Diana Periton

Abubokkar Siddiki

Richard Watson

Joanna Meehan

Catherine Phillips

Pete Silver

Victoria Watson

Marina Mersiadou

Maja Piecyk

Ian Simpson

Zhenzhou Weng

Tabatha Mills

Stuart Piercy

Andrew Smith

Andrew Whiting

Fatemeh Mohamadi

Marzena Piotrowska

Paul Smith

Camilla Wilkinson

Irene Roca Moracia

David Pitfield

Tsz Wai So

Julian Williams

Bongani Muchemwa

Alicia Pivaro

John Somers

Allan Woodburn

Richa Mukhia

Ben Pollock

Ro Spankie

Andrew Yau

Rutendo Musikavanhu

Sylwia Poltorak

Afolabi Spence

Mika Zacharias

Cheryl Mvula

David Porter

Robert Spooner

Paolo Zaide

Robert Nathan

Kartikeya Rajput

Kenneth Stevens

John Zhang

We wish to thank the following organisations for their support:

Bibliotheque McLean

N AT U R A L CO O L I N G LT D

T HE JA ME S P H I LLI P S FOUNDATI O N

OPEN 2023

SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE + CITIES

A+C

University of Westminster 35 Marylebone Road London NW1 5LS Tel 020 7911 5000 x3165

www.westminster.ac.uk