Crl section 127 consent groundwater monitoring (britomart to wyndham) 8 february 2017

Decision on an application to change/cancel consent conditions under the Resource Management Act 1991 Application number:

R-VCC-2014-5430-1 R/VCC/2014/5428/2 R/VCC/2014/5432/2 R/VCC/2014/5435/1 R/VCC/2014/5436/1 R/VCC/2014/5437/1

Applicant's name:

Auckland Transport

Site address:

Various locations in the legal road at Tyler Street, Galway Street, Queen Street, Customs Street, Albert Street, Wolfe Street, Swanson Street, Wyndham Street

Legal description:

Legal Road

Proposal: To change conditions (1, 107, 108, 109, 122, 125, 129, 130, 133, 142, 152 and 158 and Appendix 3) relating to the groundwater monitoring network associated with the construction of the CRL.

The discretionary activity under s127 of the Resource Management Act (RMA) is for the following changes of conditions of consents R/REG/2014/5430, R/LUC/2014/5428, R/REG/2014/5432, R/REG/2014/5435, R/REG/2014/5436 and R/REG/2014/5437 involving the following changes (with strikethrough for deletion, underlined bold for insertions): CHANGES TO CONDITION 1 Plan title and reference

Author

Rev

Dated

Britomart to Wyndham Proposed and Existing Groundwater Monitoring Locations (ref: CRLSYW-GEO-000-DRG-0046)

Aurecon New Zealand Limited

5.0

23/01/17

Other additional information

Author

Rev

Dated

Application for change of conditions of resource consent under section 127 of the resource management act 1991 – conditions 1, 107, 108, 109, 122, 125, 129, 130, 133, 142, 152 and 158 and appendix 2 and 3

Aurecon New Zealand Limited

1.0

23/09/2016

RVCC20145430

Page 1

Further information provided in support of application for change of conditions of resource consent under section 127 of the resource management act 1991 – conditions 1, 107, 108, 109, 122, 125, 129, 130, 133, 142, 152 and 158 and appendix 2 and 3

Aurecon New Zealand Limited

1.0

26/01/2017

CHANGES TO CONDITION 107 107. Within the settlement contours on drawings CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0

dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 attached to these conditions in Appendix 2 with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYW-GEO-000DRG-0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17, the Consent Holder must ensure that the damage to buildings from the Project does not exceed the “slight damage” category extent detailed in the table below.

CHANGES TO CONDITION 108 108. Beyond the settlement contours on drawings CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated

09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 attached to these conditions in Appendix 2 with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYW-GEO-000-DRG-0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17, the Consent Holder must ensure that the damage to buildings from the Project does not exceed the “negligible damage” extent detailed in the table below.

CHANGES TO CONDITION 109 109. The Consent Holder shall not exceed the maximum extent and magnitude of total settlement as

defined by the settlement contours presented on drawings CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYW-GEO-000-DRG-0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17 attached to these conditions in Appendix 2.

CHANGES TO CONDITION 122 122. The GSMCP, required by Condition 117, shall include the requirements of this

resource consent including, but not limited to, the following: a.

an “as built” survey plan of all monitoring locations based on approximate positions located on the plans entitled CRL-PAT-RME- 000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 (Appendix 2) with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17 and any further buildingspecific monitoring requirements determined from the detailed preconstruction building condition assessment;

RVCC20145430

Page 2

b.

full details of groundwater (including construction logs), ground surface, building, retaining wall, inclinometer monitoring programme and conditions surveys required by this consent;

c.

a bar chart, such as a Gantt chart, showing the timing and frequency of the condition surveys and monitoring required by this consent relative to the commencement of dewatering and the completion of dewatering;

d.

groundwater alert and alarm triggers, including methodology for their determination. The Consent Holder shall use existing groundwater level data and the groundwater levels measured as required by Condition 129, to establish seasonal low groundwater levels;

e.

details of all alert and alarm triggers for each ground, building and retaining wall deformation marks and inclinometers as determined by conditions of consent or as revised by further detailed design;

f.

details of the contingency measures to be implemented if alert or alarm triggers are exceeded including a Response Plan (required by Condition 158). In particular, in relation to groundwater alarm triggers, contingency measures must include actions to prevent further groundwater drawdowns or rise;

g.

identification of any adjacent services susceptible to damage and details of any pre and post construction monitoring or inspection;

h.

details of the monitoring proposed to be undertaken to protect 35 Albert Street (Consent No. 43669) and Downtown Precinct Development (Consent No. 43792) consent holders against cumulative settlement effects;

i.

identification of existing basements which could be subject to potential flooding from post-construction groundwater mounding. Details of monitoring of long-term groundwater mounding effects. Details of groundwater drain maintenance to prevent groundwater mounding; and

j.

review following the construction building condition surveys (required by Condition 133) the proposed alarm and alert trigger levels in Appendix 4 to confirm they are appropriately set to ensure the “slight� damage category will not be breached and whether monitoring frequency is adequate.

CHANGES TO CONDITION 125 125. Additional site investigations shall be carried out at the detailed design stage to confirm the preliminary design assumptions for soil stiffness affecting the upper Albert Street zone.

The additional site investigations will consist of a minimum of two additional Cone Penetrometer Tests on the eastern side of the upper Albert Street zone. The predicted total settlement contours shown on drawings CRL-PAT-RME-000- DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated RVCC20145430

Page 3

09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17 shall be modified to take the site specific data into account.

CHANGES TO CONDITION 129 129. The Consent Holder shall install, maintain and replace if necessary, groundwater

monitoring boreholes listed in Appendix 3 of this consent and shown on drawings CRLPAT-RME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYW-GEO-000-DRG-0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17of this consent, for the period required by the conditions of this consent.

CHANGES TO CONDITION 130 130. The Consent Holder shall measure and record groundwater levels at the monitoring

boreholes specified in drawings CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 (Appendix 2) with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYW-GEO-000-DRG-0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17: a. at a minimum of weekly intervals for a period of at least 3 months before commencing dewatering (to establish baseline groundwater variability), and then b. at least three times weekly for all monitoring boreholes during dewatering until either the completion of dewatering, or until such time following the completion of dewatering that stable measurements are demonstrated and certification is provided by the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit).

All water level data shall be recorded to an accuracy of at least Âą 10mm (to be calibrated by the instrument supplier). These records, reported in reduced level, shall be compiled and submitted to the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) at monthly intervals.

CHANGES TO CONDITION 133 133. Prior to the commencement of perimeter piling adjacent to the relevant structure and/or

commencement of dewatering (whichever is the sooner), the Consent Holder shall employ an independent senior qualified person to undertake a detailed pre-construction condition survey, of all buildings specified in Appendix 1 to confirm their existing condition, subject to the approval of the property owner.

The survey shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. any information about the type of foundations;

RVCC20145430

Page 4

b. existing levels of damage considered to be of an aesthetic or superficial nature; c. existing levels of damage considered to affect the serviceability of the building where visually apparent and without recourse to intrusive or destructive investigation; d. a professional opinion as to whether observed damage may or may not be associated with actual structural damage; e. susceptibility of the building or structure to further movement; f. specific assessment of building damage from the predicted total settlement contours showing on drawings CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRLSYW-GEO-000-DRG-0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17 and with reference to the trigger levels identified in Appendix 4; g. review of proposed alarm and alert trigger levels to confirm they are appropriately set and movement less than trigger levels set will not exacerbate damage, and whether the monitoring frequency and locations of monitoring points are adequate; and h. photographic evidence of (b) and (c).

CHANGES TO CONDITION 142 142. The Consent Holder shall establish and maintain a settlement monitoring network of

ground settlement monitoring marks and building movement monitoring marks to detect any deformation (vertical and/or horizontal movement) for the period required by the conditions of this consent, as follows: a. The minimum scope of settlement monitoring is shown on Drawings CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 (Appendix 2) with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYW-GEO-000-DRG-0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17; b. Subject to the owners’ approval, at least two sets of building movement monitoring marks shall be located on each building listed in Appendix 1; and c. The final location and number of building movement monitoring marks shall take into account the building type and size, accessibility to survey the marks and risk of damage from ground settlement and the effects of differential settlement from the predicted settlement contours on drawings CRL-PATRME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17.

CHANGES TO CONDITION 152 152. Inclinometers shall be installed along the excavation within the zones shown on the

drawings CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev RVCC20145430

Page 5

3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYW-GEO-000DRG-0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17 either within a retaining pile or immediately behind one and extending to the base of the retaining pile. The specific locations will be confirmed following detailed design and will be confirmed in the final GSMCP. Measurement accuracy shall be to best practice.

CHANGES TO CONDITION 158 158. The Response Plan, included in the GSMCP, shall be prepared in accordance with

drawings CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 (Appendix 2), with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17 and shall be implemented in the event that differential settlement between any two ground settlement monitoring marks exceeds the identified triggers, or total settlement exceeds the identified triggers in Appendix 4. The Appendix 4 trigger levels are to be revised, in accordance with Condition 133(g), if recommended by the building and structure condition surveys carried out in accordance with Conditions 133 and 138.

Appendix 2 Addition of plan CRL-SYW-GEO-000-DRG-0046, Rev 5.0 dated 23/01/17

Appendix 3 Groundwater Monitoring Bores:

Monitoring Bore Screen Geology Existing

Screen

New

Screen Geology

Borehole ID

Geology

BH34-1

(Fill/TL)1

Borehole ID BH415-1

Fill/TL

BH34-2

(ER /TA)1

BH415-2

ER/TA

BH34-3

(EU)1

BH415-3

EU

BH35-1

(Fill/TL)1

BH35-2

(ER /TA)1

BH35-3

(EU)1

QS1-1

(Fill/TL)1

QS1-2

(ER/TA)1

QS1-3

(EU)1

QS2-1

(Fill/TL)1

QS2-2

(ER /TA)1

QS2-3

(EU)1

BH32-1

(Fill/TL)1

BH32-2

(ER /TA)1

BH32-3

(EU)1

BH43-1

(Fill/TL)1

RVCC20145430

Page 6

BH43-2

(ER /TA)1

BH43-3

(EU)1

BH52-1

(Fill/TL)1

BH52-2

(ER /TA)1

BH52-3

(EU)1

BH45-1

(Fill/TL)1

BH45-2

(ER /TA)1

BH45-3

(EU)1 BH45R

EB301

(Fill/TL)

EB302

(Fill/TL/EU)

BH23

EB302

(Fill)

BH401-1

Fill/TL

BH401-2

ER /TA

BH401-3

EU

BH402

(EU)

(EU)1

BH202A

(EU)

BH202B

(EU)

BH251 - A

(EU)

BH251 - B

(EU)

GWBH3

Fill

BH403

Fill/TA

GWBH2

Fill

BH404

Fill/TA

BH405

Fill/TAEU

BH203

(EU)

BH255

EU

BH204-1

(ER/EW)

BH204-2

EU

EB305

ER/EW

EB306

ER/EW

EB307

ER/EW

BH205

ER

BH205

EU BH406 A

ER

BH406 B

Top of EU

BH407 A

Top of EU

BH407 B

ER

BH408 A

TA

BH408 B

ER

RVCC20145430

Page 7

BH409 A

TA

BH409 B

ER

BH409 C

Top of the EU

BH410

TA

BH411 A

TA

BH411 A

TA

BH411 B

ER

BH411 B

ER

BH411 C

Top of EU

BH411 C

Top of EU

BH412 A

Top of the TA

BH412 AA

Base of the TA

BH412 B

ER/EW

BH412 C

Top of EU

BH413 - A

Fill/TL

BH413 - B

TA/ER

BH413 - C

EU

BH414 - A

TA

BH414 - B

ER

BH Endeans

Base of TL

GWBH1

Fill/TL

Note 1: Installed as part of Britomart Station investigation and monitoring conditions. These historic holes proposed for monitoring have not yet been assessed for accessibility or functionality.

Note 2: Could be combined with Swanson Shaft-specific groundwater monitoring well.

I have read the applications, supporting documents, and the report and recommendations on the consent application. I am satisfied that I have sufficient information to consider the matters required by the RMA and make a decision under delegated authority on the application(s).

Acting under delegated authority, under sections 104, 104B, s127, 105 & 107 the application for variation is GRANTED.

1. Reasons The reasons for this decision are: 1.

The proposal is appropriately considered under s127 as the changes will not result in a fundamentally different activity or materially different effects.

2.

In accordance with an assessment under s104(1)(a) and s127(3) of the RMA the actual and potential effects from the variation will be acceptable as:

RVCC20145430

Page 8

o

o

o

The revised regime has been reviewed by a technical specialist on behalf of council and is considered capable of measuring any potential adverse effects and the Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plans (GSMCP) ( which have been previously assessed) will in turn manage these potential effects (i.e. consolidation settlement and any consequent adverse effects on buildings and structures).

The revised monitoring network and level of groundwater monitoring to be undertaken is considered to remain appropriate and consistent with the methodology included within the approved resource consent.

Any potential adverse effects resulting within the wider environment or to the adjacent properties are assessed as being less than minor.

3.

In accordance with an assessment under s104(1)(b) and s 127(3) of the RMA the variation is consistent with the relevant statutory documents. In particular those relevant to chapters E7 and E26 of the Auckland Unitary Plan: Operative in Part.

4.

In accordance with an assessment under s104(1)(c) of the RMA the following other matters are considered appropriate: o

The monitoring of conditions to ensure that any adverse effects are within the parameters of those considered under this consent.

5.

This variation achieves the sustainable management purpose of the RMA in Part 2 being the sustainable management of natural and physical resources. The proposal contributes to the social, economic and cultural wellbeing of people and their community by enabling further informed development of Auckland’s CRL project contributing to a more efficient public transport network throughout the city. Overall, it is considered the cumulative safeguards of section 5(2)(a) to (c) have been met and the proposal thereby meets the purpose of the RMA. The overall adverse effects on the environment are no more than minor. Subject to the imposition of conditions, the effects can be further avoided, remedied or mitigated.

6.

Overall the proposal is considered to have less than minor adverse effects on the environment and adjacent persons and properties. The development is consistent with all relevant national and regional policy statements, the Auckland Unitary Plan: Operative in Part, and Part 2 of the Resource Management Act 1991.

2. Conditions Under section 108 of the RMA, this variation is not subject to any additional conditions.

Advice notes 1.

A copy of the consolidated set of conditions of consent as amended is included as attachment 1 to this section 127 decision.

2.

Any reference to number of days within this decision refers to working days as defined in s2 of the RMA.

3.

For the purpose of compliance with the conditions of consent, “the council” refers to the council’s monitoring inspector unless otherwise specified. Please contact Team Leader Central Monitoring on 09 301 0101 or monitoring@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz to identify your allocated officer.

RVCC20145430

Page 9

4.

For more information on the resource consent process with Auckland Council see the council’s website www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz. General information on resource consents, including making an application to vary or cancel consent conditions can be found on the Ministry for the Environment’s website: www.mfe.govt.nz.

5.

If you disagree with any of the above conditions, or disagree with the additional charges relating to the processing of the application, you have a right of objection pursuant to sections 357A or 357B of the Resource Management Act 1991. Any objection must be made in writing to the council within 15 working days of notification of the decision.

6.

The consent holder is responsible for obtaining all other necessary consents, permits, and licences, including those under the Building Act 2004, and the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014. This consent does not remove the need to comply with all other applicable Acts (including the Property Law Act 2007 and the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 regulations, relevant Bylaws, and rules of law. This consent does not constitute building consent approval. Please check whether a building consent is required under the Building Act 2004.

Robert Scott Duty Commissioner 8 February 2017

RVCC20145430

Page 10

Attachment 1: Consolidated conditions of consent as amended.

Definitions AEE - Assessment of Environmental Effects prepared by Aurecon New Zealand Limited/ Golder Associates (NZ) Limited, dated 19 December 2014 AQMP - Air Quality Management Plan, based on the draft Air Quality Management Plan – Britomart to Wyndham dated December 2014 prepared by Golder Associates (NZ) Limited CCP - Communication and Consultation Plan CEMP - Construction Environmental Management Plan CLG - Community Liaison Group Commencement of construction – in all conditions which refer to ‘commencement of construction’, construction has the same meaning as the Construction Contracts Act 2002 and includes work such as site clearance, earthmoving and earthworks, excavation, tunnelling, and boring; and the construction, erection, installation, carrying out, alteration, repair, restoration, renewal, maintenance, extension, demolition, removal, or dismantling of any building or structure; and all other matters referred to in section 6 of that Act. CPO - Chief Post Office CRL – City Rail Link CSMP - Contaminated Soils Management Plan CTMP - Chemical Treatment Management Plan EMP - Industrial and Trade Activities Environmental Management Plan ESCP - Erosion and Sediment Control Management Plan ESC – Erosion and Sediment Control GSMCP - Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan IBA - Independent Building Assessor – The person engaged under Condition 120. The role of the Independent Building Assessor shall be to make recommendations to Council on building serviceability and damage matters.

Key contacts - are identified in the CEMP and are a “key contact” person representing the Consent Holder and a “key contact” person representing the contractor team to work with the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring). Refer Condition 29 Mana Whenua Groups - Ngati Maru, Ngati Paoa, Ngai Tai Ki Tamaki, Ngati Te Ata Waiohua, Te Kawerau a Maki, Ngati Whatua o Orakei, Te Akitai, and Ngati Tamaoho PCCP - Pre-Construction Communication and Consultation Plan Project – the City Rail Link Britomart Station to Wyndham Street Section Referee – the independent and appropriately qualified senior person to whom a dispute is referred under Condition 8 Senior qualified person - means a person with a post-graduate degree in environmental science, chemistry, biology, geology (including a Chartered Professional Engineer (CPEng)) or similar field; or sufficient technical experience that is a least equivalent and at least five years professional experience.

Services – includes including gas, water, sewerage, telecoms, stormwater, fibre optics and power

Upper Albert Street zone – the zone defined as that part of Albert Street between Swanson Street and Wyndham Street See also definitions specific to water permit R/REG/2014/5432 Take and Diversion of Groundwater.

1.

The scope and extent of works envisaged by this project shall be carried out in general accordance with the plans and all information submitted with the application, detailed below, and all referenced by the Council as consent numbers R/LUC/2014/5428, R/REG/2014/5430, R/REG/2014/5432, R/REG/2014/5435, R/REG/2014/5436 and R/REG/2014/5437. •

Application Form, and Assessment of Environmental Effects (AEE) prepared by Aurecon New Zealand Limited/Golder Associates (NZ) Limited, dated 19 December 2014, including the following: Report title and reference

Author

Design and Construction Report (Appendix B)

Aurecon New Zealand Limited

December 2014

Groundwater Effects Assessment (Appendix C)

Pattle Delamore Partners Limited

December 2014

Assessment of Settlement Effects (Appendix D) Contaminated Land Assessment (Appendix E) Water Quality Assessment (Appendix F)

Aurecon New Zealand Limited Golder Associates (NZ) Limited Golder Associates (NZ)

December 2014 December 2014 December 2014

Golder Associates (NZ) Limited Golder Associates (NZ) Limited Draft Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Aurecon New (Appendix I) Zealand Limited Heritage Impact Assessment Salmond Reed (Appendix J) Architects Limited

December 2014 December 2014 December 2014 December 2014

Industrial and Trade Activities Assessment (Appendix G) Air Quality Assessment (Appendix H)

Rev

Dated

Plan title and reference Britomart to Wyndham Proposed and Existing Groundwater Monitoring Locations CRL-SYW-GEO-000-DRG0046 LOCATION PLAN AND EXTENT OF WORKS CRL-BTM-RME-000-DRG0001

Author

Rev

Dated

Aurecon

5.0

23/01/17

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

DR6A ALIGNMENT CRL DOWN (MC20) Aurecon PLAN AND LONGSECTION SHEET 1 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0001

1.0

17/10/2014

DR6A ALIGNMENT CRL DOWN (MC30) Aurecon PLAN AND LONGSECTION SHEET 1 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0002

1.0

17/10/2014

CPO PLAN, DEMOLITION, SLAB PROPPING AND TEMPORARY DECK CRL-BTM-RME-000-DRG-1021 CPO PLAN, BASEMENT WITH UNDERPINNING CRL-BTM-RME-000-DRG-0123 CPO LONGSECTION CRL-BTM-RME-000-DRG-0191

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

CPO CROSS SECTION WITH UNDERPINNING GRID 1 CRL-BTM-RME-000-DRG-0231 CPO CROSS SECTION REINSTATEMENT WORKS GRID 1 CRL-BTM-RME-000-DRG-0241 CPO AND QUEEN ST TUNNEL BOX REINFORCEMENT AND WATERPROOFING DETAILS CRL-BTM-RME-000-DRG-0305

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

CPO MONITORING LOCATIONS AT COLUMN UNDERPINNING CRL-BTM-RME-000-DRG-0452 CPO FAÇADE MONITORING LOCATIONS CRL-BTM-RME-000-DRG0453

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

QUEEN ST AND QUEEN ELIZABETH SQUARE –QUEEN STREET - TYPICAL SECTIONS CRL-BTM-RME-000-DRG- 0535

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

QUEEN ST AND QUEEN ELIZABETH SQUARE QUEEN ST LONG SECTION UP TRACK CRL-BTM-RME-000-DRG-0551

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

QUEEN ST AND QUEEN ELIZABETH SQUARE- TYPICAL DETAILS GROUNDWATER DRAINAGE SHEET 1 OF 2

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

QUEEN ST AND QUEEN ELIZABETH SQUARE PUMP STATION SUMP AND CROSS PASSAGEWAY SECTIONS CRL-BTM-RME-000-DRG-0661

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

PRECINCT - OVERALL LAYOUT PLAN CRL-BTM-RME-000-DRG-0009

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

ENABLING WORKS CONTRACT 1 WORKSITES WITH PLANT BRITOMART TO QE SQUARE STAGE 2 OF 4 CRL-BTM-RME-000-DRG-0102

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

ENABLING WORKS CONTRACT 1 WORKSITES WITH PLANT BRITOMART TO QE SQUARE STAGE 3 OF 4 CRL-BTM-RME-000-DRG-0103

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

ENABLING WORKS CONTRACT 2 WORK SITE WITH PLANT AND TRAFFIC INTERFACE BETWEEN PRECINCT AND CONTRACT 2 IN LOWER ALBERT ST CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0114

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

CUSTOMS ST TUNNEL CROSS SECTION AND DETAIL OF TYPICAL TUNNEL IN CUSTOMS ST CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0171

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL PLAN SHEET 1 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0201 ALBERT ST TUNNEL PLAN SHEET 2 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0202 ALBERT ST TUNNEL PLAN SHEET 3 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0203

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL STRUCTURAL Aurecon LONGSECTION (MC30) SHEET 1 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0211

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL STRUCTURAL Aurecon LONGSECTION (MC30) SHEET 2 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0212

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL STRUCTURAL Aurecon LONGSECTION (MC30) SHEET 3 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0213

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL STRUCTURAL Aurecon LONGSECTION (MC30) SHEET 4 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0214

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL STRUCTURAL Aurecon LONGSECTION (MC30) SHEET 5 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0215

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL TYPICAL Aurecon SECTION – CH 440 TO CH 465 (MC20) CRL-BTM-RME-000-DRG-0661

1.0

17/10/2014

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL PLAN SHEET 4 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0204 ALBERT ST TUNNEL PLAN SHEET 5 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0205

PRECINCT - OVERALL LAYOUT PLAN CRL-BTM-RME000 DRG 0009 ENABLING WORKS CONTRACT 1 WORKSITES WITH PLANT BRITOMART TO QE SQUARE STAGE 2 OF 4 ENABLING WORKS CONTRACT 1 WORKSITES WITH PLANT BRITOMART TO QE SQUARE STAGE 3 OF 4 CRL-BTM-RME-000-DRG-0103 ENABLING WORKS CONTRACT 2 WORK SITE WITH PLANT AND TRAFFIC INTERFACE BETWEEN PRECINCT AND CONTRACT 2 IN LOWER ALBERT ST CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0114 CUSTOMS ST TUNNEL CROSS SECTION AND DETAIL OF TYPICAL TUNNEL IN CUSTOMS ST

ALBERT ST TUNNEL PLAN SHEET 1 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0201

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL PLAN SHEET 2 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0202

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL PLAN SHEET 3 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0203

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL PLAN SHEET 4 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0204

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL PLAN SHEET 5 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0205

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL STRUCTURAL Aurecon LONGSECTION (MC30) SHEET 1 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0211

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL STRUCTURAL Aurecon LONGSECTION (MC30) SHEET 2 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0212

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL STRUCTURAL Aurecon LONGSECTION (MC30) SHEET 3 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0213

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL STRUCTURAL Aurecon LONGSECTION (MC30) SHEET 4 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0214

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL STRUCTURAL Aurecon LONGSECTION (MC30) SHEET 5 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0215

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL TYPICAL Aurecon SECTION – CH 440 TO CH 465 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0252 (MC20)

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL TYPICAL Aurecon SECTION – CH 465 TO CH 580 (MC20) CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0253

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST TUNNEL TYPICAL DETAILS – PILE WALL SUPPORT STRUCTURE CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0301

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST WORKSITE AND TEMPORARY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCTION PHASING SHEET 2 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000DRG-0053

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST WORKSITE AND TEMPORARY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCTION PHASING SHEET 3 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0054

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST WORKSITE AND TEMPORARY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCTION PHASING SHEET 4 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0055

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

ALBERT ST WORKSITE AND TEMPORARY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCTION PHASING SHEET 5 OF 5 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0056

Aurecon

1.0

17/10/2014

ENABLING WORKS CONTRACT 2 CUSTOMS ST INTERSECTION CONSTRUCTION STAGING FOR CONSENTING SHEET 1 OF 3 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0111

Aurecon

1.0

19/12/2014

ENABLING WORKS CONTRACT 2 CUSTOMS ST INTERSECTION CONSTRUCTION STAGING FOR CONSENTING SHEET 2 OF 3 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0112

Aurecon

1.0

19/12/2014

ENABLING WORKS CONTRACT 2 CUSTOMS ST INTERSECTION CONSTRUCTION STAGING FOR CONSENTING SHEET 3 OF 3 CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0113

Aurecon

1.0

19/12/2014

ENABLING WORKS CONTRACT 2 ENVISAGED WORKSITE AND TRAFFIC INTERFACE ALBERT ST SOUTH FOR CONSENTING CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0104

Aurecon

1.0

19/12/2014

ENABLING WORKS PROPOSED AND EXISTING GROUNDWATER MONITORING LOCATIONS CRL-SYW-GEO-000-DRG-0007

Aurecon

1.0

17/12/2014

ALBERT STREET MONITORING LOCATIONS CRL-PAT-STR-000-DRG0401

Aurecon

3.0

19/12/2014

QUEEN STREET MONITORING LOCATIONS CRL-PAT-STR-000-DRG0404

Aurecon

1.0

01/11/2014

ENABLING WORKS MONITORING NOTES CRL-PAT-STR-000-DRG-0400 NOTES ON SCOPE AND METHOD SHEET 3 OF 4 CRL-SYW-STR-000-DRG-0053

Aurecon

5.0

02/07/2015

Aurecon

6.0

15/12/2014

NOTES ON SCOPE AND METHOD SHEET 4 OF 4 CRL-SYW-STR-000-DRG-0054

Aurecon

1.0

15/12/2014

GEOLOGICAL CROSS SECTION CUSTOMS STREET CRL-SYW-GEO-000-SKE-0021 GEOLOGICAL CROSS SECTION GALWAY STREET CRL-SYWGEO-000-SKE-0022

Aurecon

1.0

21/10/2014

Aurecon

2.0

20/05/2015

GEOLOGICAL CROSS SECTION TYLER STREET CRL-SYW-GEO000-SKE-0023 GEOLOGICAL LONG SECTION SHEET 0 EXTENSION OF MC20 LONG SECTION -300 TO 180M CRLSYW-GEO-000-SKE-0024

Aurecon

1.0

23/04/2015

Aurecon

1.0

23/04/2015

GEOLOGICAL AND HYDROGEOLOGICAL MODEL MC20 LONG SECTION SHEET 1 CRL-SYW-GEO-000-SKE-0025

Aurecon

1.0

23/04/2015

COMPARISON OF MC20 LONG SECTION (PART) WITH SECTION THROUGH MODFLOW MODEL AT ROW 26 CRL-SYW- GEO-000-SKE0026

Aurecon

1.0

23/04/2015

SETTLEMENT CONTOURS DUE TO CUT AND COVER AND PIPEJACK SHEET 1 OF 2 CRL-SYW-CIV-000-DRG-0030

Aurecon

2.0

17/11/2014

BRITOMART TO WYNDHAM GROUNDWATER AND SETTLEMENT MONITORING AND CONTINGENCY PLAN SHEET 1 OF 3 CRL- PAT- RME000- DRG- 0403

Aurecon

3.0

09/07/2015

BRITOMART TO WYNDHAM GROUNDWATER AND SETTLEMENT MONITORING AND CONTINGENCY PLAN SHEET 2 OF 3 CRL- PAT- RME000- DRG- 0404

Aurecon

3.0

09/07/2015

BRITOMART TO WYNDHAM GROUNDWATER AND SETTLEMENT MONITORING AND CONTINGENCY PLAN SHEET 3 OF 3 CRL- PAT- RME000- DRG- 0405

Aurecon

2.0

03/07/2015

Other additional information

Author

Rev

Dated

APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF CONDITIONS OF RESOURCE CONSENT UNDER SECTION 127 OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 – CONDITIONS 1, 107, 108, 109, 122, 125, 129, 130, 133, 142, 152 AND 158 AND APPENDIX 3

Aurecon New Zealand Limited

1.0

23/09/2016

FURTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED Aurecon New IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR Zealand Limited CHANGE OF CONDITIONS OF RESOURCE CONSENT UNDER SECTION 127 OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 – CONDITIONS 1, 107, 108, 109, 122, 125, 129, 130, 133, 142, 152 AND 158 AND APPENDIX 3

1.0

26/01/2017

Further Information Letter, including attachments (Attachments A-G) except for Attachment E

Damien McGahan Aurecon New Zealand Limited

1.0

06/05/2015

Further Information Addendum Letter, including attachments (Attachments A-C)

Damien McGahan Aurecon New Zealand Limited

1.0

22/05/2015

Further Information Addendum 2 Letter

Damien McGahan Aurecon New Zealand Limited

1.0

28/05/2015

Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan Resource Consent Package 1 Britomart Station to Wyndham Street Section

Aurecon

2.0

02/06/2015

Evidence provided prior to and at the Council hearing: Statement of Evidence of Sarah Louise Sutherland

Statement of Evidence of Richard Leslie Chilton

Statement of Evidence of Andrew Thomas Hart

Statement of Evidence of Bruce Mitchell Petry

Statement of Evidence of Colin Dean Ingoe

Author

Rev

Dated

Sarah Louise Sutherland of Golder Associates (NZ) Ltd

19 June 2015

Richard Leslie Chilton of Golder Associates (NZ) Ltd Andrew Thomas Hart of Golder Associates (NZ) Ltd

19 June 2015

Bruce Mitchell Petry of Reverb Consultancy Ltd

19 June 2015

Colin Dean Ingoe of Auckland Transport

19 June 2015

19 June 2015

Jennifer Marie Carvill of Golder Associates (NZ) Ltd William Russell Statement of Evidence of William Russell Newns of Aurecon Newns New Zealand William Russell Newns of Aurecon New Zealand Scott Elwarth of Statement of Evidence of Scott Elwarth Auckland Transport

19 June 2015

Alan David Pattle of PDP Ltd

19 June 2015

Eric Craig Stevenson of Aurecon New Zealand

19 June 2015

William Russell Newns of Aurecon New Zealand

6 July 2015

Statement of Evidence of Jennifer Marie Carvill

Statement of Evidence of Alan David Pattle Statement of Evidence of Eric Craig Stevenson

Supplementary Statement of Evidence of William Russell Newns

19 June 2015

19 June 2015

19 June 2015

Supplementary Statement of Evidence of Jennifer Marie Carvill

Supplementary Statement of Evidence of Eric Craig Stevenson

Jennifer Marie Carvill of Golder Associates (NZ) Ltd Eric Craig Stevenson of Aurecon New Zealand

6 July 2015

6 July 2015

If there is any conflict between the application documents and the specific conditions which follow, the specific conditions will prevail.

All Charges Paid 2.

These consents (or any part thereof) shall not commence until such time as the following charges, which are owing at the time the Council's decision is notified, have been paid in full: a. All fixed charges relating to the receiving, processing and granting of these resource consents under section 36(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA); and b. All additional charges imposed under section 36(3) of the RMA to enable the Council to recover its actual and reasonable costs in respect of this application, which are beyond challenge.

3.

The consent holder shall pay any subsequent further charges imposed under section 36 of the RMA relating to the receiving, processing and granting of these resource consents within 20 days of receipt of notification of a requirement to pay the same, provided that, in the case of any additional charges under section 36(3) of the RMA that are subject to challenge, the consent holder shall pay such amount as is determined by that process to be due and owing, within 20 days of receipt of the relevant decision.

Compliance Monitoring Charge 4.

The consent holder shall pay the Council an initial consent compliance monitoring charge of $8,000 (inclusive of GST), plus any further monitoring charge or charges to recover the actual and reasonable costs that have been incurred to ensure compliance with the conditions attached to these consents.

Advice Note: The initial monitoring charge is to cover the cost of inspecting the site, carrying out tests, reviewing conditions, updating files, etc, all being work to ensure compliance with resource consents. In order to recover actual and reasonable costs, inspections, in excess of those covered by the base fee paid, shall be charged at the relevant hourly rate applicable at the time. The consent holder will be advised of the further monitoring charge or charges as they fall due. Such further charges are to be paid within one month of the date of invoice. Only after all conditions of the resource consent have been met, will Council issue a letter confirming compliance on request of the consent holder.

Lapse Date 5.

Under section 125 of the RMA, these consents or any one of these consents lapse 10 years after the consent commences unless: a. The consent is given effect to; or b. The Council extends the period after which the consent lapses.

Copies of Resource Consent 6.

All personnel working on the project shall be made aware of, and have access to, at least one copy of these resource consents, associated reference documents and associated certified management plans.

Site Access 7.

Subject to compliance with the Consent Holder's health and safety requirements and provision of reasonable notice, servants or agents of Auckland Council shall be permitted to have access to relevant parts of the surface construction sites controlled by the Consent Holder at all reasonable times for the purpose of carrying out inspections, surveys, investigations, tests, measurements and/or to take samples.

Dispute Resolution 8.

In the event of any dispute, disagreement or inaction arising from the implementation of these consents, including • any Auckland Council certification required by these conditions, or • implementation of, or monitoring required by, the conditions,

the disputed matter shall be referred in the first instance to the Consent Holder and Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring), to determine a resolution process.

If a resolution process cannot be agreed, then the matter shall be referred to an independent and appropriate senior qualified person (‘the referee’), agreeable to both parties (such agreement not to be unreasonably withheld by either party). The referral shall set out in writing the details of the matter to be referred for determination and the reasons why the parties have not agreed.

The referee shall be appointed within 10 working days of the Consent Holder or the Council giving notice to the other of its intention to seek an expert determination. Following appointment, the referee shall issue a written decision on the matter, including the reasons for his or her decision. In making the decision, the referee shall be entitled to seek further information and to hear from the parties as he or she sees fit in his or her sole discretion. The reasonable fees of the referee shall be paid equally by both disputing parties.

Advice Note 1: The dispute resolution process provided for by this condition does not prejudice any parties’ right to take enforcement action in relation to implementation of these conditions. However, the dispute resolution process will be

applied before any formal enforcement action is taken by the Council, except in urgent situations.

Advice Note 2: The Auckland Transport contact for this resolution process is the Central and Joint Initiatives Team Lead, Property and Planning Team, Capital Development Division Pre-Constr uct ion Communication and Consult at ion Plan (“ PCCP” ) 9.

In order to set out a framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation is undertaken with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in-proximity parties prior to the commencement of construction, the Consent Holder shall prepare a PCCP.

10.

The PCCP shall be submitted to Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring), within 40 working days of the resource consent decision, for confirmation that the PCCP has been prepared in accordance with the conditions of consent.

11.

The PCCP shall be implemented and complied with within 60 working days from the resource consent decision until the commencement of construction.

12.

This PCCP shall set out recommendations and requirements (as applicable) that should be adopted by and/or inform the development of the Construction Environmental Management Plan (“CEMP”) and other management plans.

13.

The PCCP shall set out how the Consent Holder will: a. Inform the community of Project progress and the likely commencement of construction and the programme; b. Engage with the community in order to foster good relationships and to provide opportunities for learning about the Project; c. Obtain (and specify reasonable timeframes for) feedback and input from stakeholders, directly affected and affected in-proximity parties regarding the development of the CEMP and other management plans; d. Respond to queries and complaints by providing as a minimum the following information: i)

Who is responsible for responding to the query / complaint;

ii)

How responses will be provided;

iii)

The timeframes within which responses will be provided.

e. Where feedback (in accordance with this condition) is provided, the PCCP shall articulate how that feedback has informed the development of the CEMP and other management plans and where it has not, reasons why it has not.

14.

The PCCP shall be prepared in consultation with stakeholders, directly affected parties and affected in-proximity parties including, but not limited to: a. All property owners and occupiers of the sites that are identified at Appendix 5, adjacent to the Project’s construction sites (Britomart Station to Wyndham Street Section (as defined by the Britomart Transport Centre Designation 314 and CRL NoR 1));

b. Heritage New Zealand (Heritage NZ); c. Network Utility Operators; and d. The Community Liaison Group (refer Conditions 16 to 24).

15.

The PCCP shall, as a minimum, include: a. A communications framework that details the Consent Holder’s communication strategies, accountabilities, frequency of communications and consultation, the range of communication and consultation tools to be used (including any modern and relevant communication methods, newsletters or similar, advertising etc.), and any other relevant communication matters; b. Details of the Communication and Consultation Manager for the preconstruction period including contact details (phone, email and postal address); c. The 0800 CRL TALK phone number; d. The methods for identifying, communicating and consulting with stakeholders, directly affected parties and affected in-proximity parties and other interested parties. Such methods shall include but not be limited to: i) Newsletters; ii) Newspaper advertising; iii) Notification and targeted consultation with stakeholders, affected parties and affected in-proximity parties; and iv) The use of the project website for public information. e. The methods for communicating and consulting with the Community Liaison Group (refer Conditions 16 to 24); f. How communication and consultation activity will be recorded; and g. Methods for recording reasonably foreseeable future planned network utility works so that it can be considered and incorporated, where appropriate, into the Britomart Station to Wyndham Street Section design.

The PCCP will be publicly available once finalised for the duration of the Project’s pre- construction period.

Advice Note: At the time these resource consents were granted, the Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project was Carol Greensmith, phone 0800 CRL TALK. Community Liaison Group ( “ CLG ”) 16.

Within 60 working days of the resource consent decision the Consent Holder shall, in consultation with the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring), establish a Community Liaison Group in the construction area (Britomart Station to Wyndham Street Section, as defined by the Britomart Transport Centre Designation 314 and CRL NoR 1).

17.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that membership of the CLG shall include representative(s) of the Consent Holder and be open to all directly affected and affected

in-proximity parties to the Project including, but not limited to the following: a. Representative(s) for and/or directly affected and affected in-proximity property owners and occupiers; b. CBD Residents Advisory Group; c. Heart of the City; and d. Mana Whenua (any or all of Ngati Maru, Ngati Paoa, Ngai Tai Ki Tamaki, Ngati Te Ata Waiohua, Te Kawerau a Maki, Ngati Whatua o Orakei, Te Akitai and Ngati Tamaoho) unless any of those named advise the Consent Holder of a different liaison process.

18.

In addition to involvement in the PCCP (refer Conditions 9 to 15), the Consent Holder shall ensure that the CLG shall: a. Receive regular updates on Project progress; b. Enable the effects of constructing the Project on the community to be monitored by providing a regular forum through which information about the Project can be provided to the community; c. Enable opportunities for concerns and issues to be reported to and responded by the Consent Holder; and d. Be provided with feedback on the development of, and any material changes to the CEMP and other management plans.

19.

The Consent Holder shall consult with the CLG in respect of the development and review of the CEMP and other management plans.

20.

Prior to preparation of the PCCP under Condition 10, the Consent Holder shall appoint one or more persons appropriately qualified in community consultation as the Community Consultation Advisor(s) to: a. Provide administrative assistance to the CLG; b. Ensure the CLG is working effectively (including the development of a Code of Conduct and appropriate procedures for the CLG); and c. Act as a community consultation advisor to the CLG.

21.

The Consent Holder must use its best endeavours to ensure that the CLG meets at least annually until the commencement of construction and then at least once every three months or as otherwise required once construction commences.

22.

Once construction has commenced, the Consent Holder shall provide an update at least every three months (or as otherwise agreed) to the CLG on compliance with resource consent conditions, including the CEMP and other management plans, and any material changes to these plans.

23.

The Consent Holder shall provide reasonable administrative support for the CLG including organising meetings at a local venue, inviting all members of the CLG, and taking responsibility for keeping and disseminating meeting minutes.

24.

The CLG shall continue for the duration of the Project and for six months following completion of the Project.

Communication and Consult ation Plan ( “ CCP” ) 25.

In order to set out a framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in-proximity parties during the construction of the Project, the Consent Holder shall prepare a CCP which shall be implemented and complied with for the duration of the construction of the Project.

26.

The CCP shall set out how the Consent Holder will: a. Inform the community of construction progress and future construction activities and constraints that could affect them; b. Provide early information on key Project milestones; and c. Obtain and specify a reasonable timeframe (being not less than 10 working days), for feedback and inputs from directly affected and affected in-proximity parties regarding the implementation and review of the CEMP or other management plans. d. Respond to queries and complaints including but not limited to: i)

Who is responsible for responding;

ii) How responses will be provided; and iii) The timeframes within which responses will be provided.

27.

The CCP shall (as a minimum) include: a. A communications framework that details the Consent Holder’s communication strategies, accountabilities, frequency of communications and consultation, the range of communication and consultation tools to be used (including any modern and relevant communication methods, newsletters or similar, advertising etc.), and any other relevant communication matters; b. The Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project including contact details (phone, email and postal address); c. The 0800 CRL TALK phone number; d. The methods for identifying, communicating and consulting with persons affected by the project including but not limited to: i)

All property owners and occupiers of the sites that are identified at Appendix 5, adjacent to the Project’s construction sites (Britomart Station to Wyndham Street Section (as defined by the Britomart Transport Centre Designation 314 and CRL NoR 1));

ii)

Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga (Heritage NZ); and

iii) The Community Liaison Group (refer Conditions 16 to 24). e. How stakeholders and persons affected by the project will be notified of the commencement of construction, the expected duration of the activities and works, and who to contact for any queries, concerns and complaints; f. How stakeholders and persons affected by the project will be consulted in the development and review of the CEMP and other management plans, including specifying reasonable timeframes for feedback;

g. A list of stakeholders, directly affected and affected in-proximity parties to the construction works with whom the Consent Holder will communicate; h. A summary of communication and consultation undertaken between the Consent Holder and parties as required by the PCCP. The summary shall include any outstanding issues or disputes raised by parties; i.

How communication and consultation activity relating to construction activities and monitoring requirements will be recorded; and

j.

How opportunities to interpret and display archaeological finds within the project area will be identified and implemented, including how Heritage NZ will be involved in this process.

Advice Note: At the time this resource consent was granted, the Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project was Carol Greensmith, phone 0800 CRL TALK. 28.

The CCP shall also include (as relevant) linkages and cross-references to the CEMP and other management plans.

29.

The CCP shall be reviewed six monthly for the duration of construction and updated if required. Any updates to the CCP shall be provided to “key contacts” and the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for review and agreement on any further action to be undertaken.

30.

Any further action recommended as a result of the review under Condition 29 shall be undertaken by the Consent Holder’s Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project and confirmation of completion shall be provided to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

31.

If, in the course of amendments undertaken as part of the review process under Condition 29, a material change to the CCP is made, the Consent Holder shall notify those parties affected by the change within 20 working days of the material change occurring.

Pre-Construction Meetings and Notification 32.

Prior to commencement of any stage of construction, the Consent Holder shall arrange a pre-construction meeting with Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring in conjunction with the relevant technical specialists, as required) as well as the site contractor and shall invite the following Mana Whenua groups to attend: Ngati Maru, Ngati Paoa, Ngai Tai Ki Tamaki, Ngati Te Ata Waiohua, Te Kawerau a Maki, Ngati Whatua o Orakei, Te Akitai, and Ngati Tamaoho (“the Mana Whenua Groups”). a. The meeting shall be located on the Project site unless otherwise agreed; b. The meeting shall be scheduled no less than five working days before the anticipated commencement of construction; c. The meeting shall include representation from the contractor who will undertake the works; d. The following information shall be made available by the Consent Holder at the preconstruction meeting: i) Conditions of consent; ii) Approved (signed/stamped) construction plans for that stage;

iii) Timeframes for key stages of the works authorised under this consent; iv) Contact details of the site contractor, site stormwater engineer and other key contractors; v) All certified management plans; and Advice note: by this stage, all of the management plans referred to in Condition 33(i) should have been certified, given the plans are required to be lodged 20 working days prior to commencement of construction). vi) A copy of the Corridor Access Request from Auckland Transport. e. Appropriate provision to the extent sought by the Manu Whenua Groups, or their nominated representative(s), shall be made for a cultural induction of the contractor's staff.

Advice Note: To arrange the pre-start meeting required by Condition 32 please contact Steve Pearce, Team Leader Central Monitoring to arrange this meeting on steve.pearce@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz, or 09 301 01 01. The conditions of consent should be discussed at this meeting. All additional information required by the Council should be provided two days prior to the meeting.

Construction Management 33.

Prior to the commencement of construction authorised by these consents, the Consent Holder shall prepare a Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) including all certified Management Plans which form part of these conditions to ensure compliance with the resource consents.

The CEMP shall include details of: a. Final project details and staging of works to illustrate that the works remain within the limits and standards approved under these consents and that the construction activities avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on the environment. b. The site or Project Manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager, including their contact details (phone, email and physical address); c. the “key contacts� referred to in Condition 29; d. communication and consultation procedures for ensuring that residents, road users and businesses in the immediate vicinity of construction areas are given prior notice of the commencement of construction and are informed about the expected duration and effects of the work. In particular the procedures shall provide for the following in relation to residents, road users and businesses potentially affected by the construction works: i) consultation prior to the commencement of construction; ii) notice periods for changes to pedestrian and vehicle access; iii) regular updates on construction progress; iv) key dates for major milestones such as road closure and re-opening; and v) communication on any other matters potentially affecting residents or business

operations in the vicinity of the works. e. notice boards that clearly identify the Consent Holder and the Project name, together with the name, telephone number and email address of the Site or Project Manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager; f. general site layout and management; g. an outline of the Project’s construction programme, including construction hours of operation; h. means of ensuring the safety of the general public; i.

certified management plans which form part of these conditions, being: i)

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan;

ii) Chemical Treatment Management Plan; iii) Air Quality Management Plan; iv) Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan; v) Contaminated Soils Management Plan; and vi) Industrial and Trade Activity Environmental Management Plan. j.

Water Discharge Quality Monitoring Programme; and

k. identification of the suitably independent, qualified Chartered Professional Engineer, or member of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, who will be undertaking the condition surveys required by the conditions of consent.

34.

The CEMP shall be provided to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification at least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction. The Consent Holder shall request the Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination, in writing, as to whether the CEMP can be certified as per the requirements of the consent conditions within 10 working days of receipt of the CEMP.

Construction shall not commence until written certification is obtained from Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

Advice note: The Consent Holder may provide CEMPs in a staged manner to Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification.

35.

The CEMP required by Condition 33 shall be implemented and maintained throughout the entire construction period for the Project, or relevant Project stage, to manage potential adverse effects arising from the construction and shall be updated as necessary (or as required by Conditions 37 and 38).

Any change to the CEMP shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification and no activity reliant upon a change to the CEMP can be undertaken until the change has been certified. The Consent Holder shall request the Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination as to whether the proposed change can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days of submission of the change.

Construction Traffic 36.

The Consent Holder shall, so far as is it is reasonably practicable, avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on transport, parking and property access.

This is to be achieved through the following objectives: a. managing the road transport network for the duration of the construction by adopting the best practicable option to manage congestion; b. maintaining pedestrian access to private property at all times; and c. providing on-going vehicle access to private property to the greatest extent possible.

Advice Note 1: Condition 36 refers to objectives to be achieved. The requirement to provide mechanisms to achieve these objectives is included in the relevant CRL or Britomart Transport Centre designation conditions.

Advice Note 2: This resource consent does not provide approval to close or occupy temporarily Tyler or Galway Streets. If such actions are required they will be sought and managed under the CRL designation and / or an application to vary the Britomart Transport Centre designation.

Review Process for CEMP and other Management Plans 37.

The Consent Holder shall review the CEMP and other management plans at least annually or •

as a result of a material change to the Project; or

•

to address unforeseen adverse effects arising from construction or unresolved complaints.

Such a review may be initiated by either the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) or the Consent Holder and shall take into consideration: a. Compliance with resource consent conditions, the CEMP, other management plans and material changes to these plans; b. Any changes to construction methods; c. Key changes to roles and responsibilities relating to the Project; d. Changes in industry best practice standards; e. Changes in legal or other requirements; f. Results of monitoring and reporting procedures associated with the management of adverse effects during construction; g. Any comments or recommendations received from Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) or as a result of the CCP process regarding the CEMP and other management plans; and h. Any complaints and any response to complaints and remedial action taken to address the complaint as required under Conditions 39 to 42.

38.

A summary of the review process shall be kept by the Consent Holder, provided annually to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring), and made available to the

Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) upon request.

Concerns and Complaints Management 39.

Upon receiving a concern or complaint during construction, the Consent Holder shall instigate a process to address concerns or complaints received about adverse effects.

This shall: a. Identify of the nature of the concern or complaint, and the location, date and time of the alleged event(s); b. Acknowledge receipt of the concern or complaint within 24 hours of receipt; and c. Respond to the concern or complaint in accordance with the relevant management plan, which may include (for example) monitoring of the activity by a suitably qualified expert, and implementation of mitigation measures.

40.

A record of all concerns and / or complaints received shall be kept by the Consent Holder. This record shall include: a. The name and address of the person(s) who raised the concern or complaint (unless they elect not to provide this) and details of the concern or complaint; b. Where practicable and relevant, weather conditions at the time of the concern or complaint, including wind direction and cloud cover if the complaint relates to air quality; c. The relevant known construction activities being undertaken at the time and in the vicinity of the concern or complaint; d. Any other activities in the area unrelated to the Project that may have contributed to the concern or complaint such as non-related construction, fires, traffic accidents or unusually dusty conditions generally; and e. Remedial actions undertaken (if any) and the outcome of these, including monitoring of the activity.

41.

This record shall be maintained on site, be available for inspection upon request, and shall be provided every two months (or as otherwise agreed) to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

42.

Where a complaint remains unresolved or a dispute arises, the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) will be provided with a copy of all records of the complaint and advice as to •

how it has been dealt with and addressed; and

•

whether the Consent Holder considers that any other steps to resolve the complaint are required.

Upon receiving records of the complaint the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) may determine whether a review of the CEMP and/or management plans is required under Condition 37 to address the complaint. The Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) will be asked to advise the Consent Holder of its recommendation within 10 working days of receiving the records of complaint.

Specific conditions – land use consent R/LUC/2014/5428 Contaminated Land and Resource Management (National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health) Regulations 2011 43.

3.

Works shall cease immediately in the vicinity of any contamination not previously identified and the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) shall be advised immediately.

Specific conditions – land use consent R/REG/2014/5430 Earthworks

Consent Duration 44.

This resource consent shall expire 15 years after the consent commences unless it has been surrendered or been cancelled at an earlier date pursuant to the RMA.

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (“ ESCP”) 45.

At least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction, a finalised ESCP which provides for the management of all bulk earthworks to minimise any discharge of debris, soil, sediment or sediment-laden water beyond the site to either land and/ or stormwater drainage systems shall be prepared and submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification.

46.

No construction activity shall commence until certification from Council is provided.

47.

The Consent Holder shall request the Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination as to whether the ESCP can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days of receipt of the ESCP.

48.

The ESCP shall include, but not be limited to, the following matters: a. identification of construction zones and construction support areas; b. specific erosion and sediment control works for each Active Construction Zone (location, dimensions, capacity supporting calculations and design drawings), which should be in line with Industry Best Practice that will meet or exceed the performance of measures detailed in Auckland Council Technical Publication No. 90, Erosion & Sediment Control: Guidelines for Land Disturbing Activities in the Auckland Region (TP90); c. catchment boundaries; d. the timing and duration of construction and operation of control works (in relation to the staging and sequencing of bulk earthworks); e. details relating to the management of exposed areas; f. reference to the Chemical Treatment Management Plan and confirmation of ESC measures necessary to give effect to that plan; g. reference to the Contaminated Soils Management Plan and confirmation of ESC measures necessary to give effect to that plan; and

h. monitoring and maintenance requirements, including information on complaint investigation and response procedures, training, and roles and responsibilities.

49.

Any change to the ESCP shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification. No activity reliant upon a change to the ESCP can be undertaken until the change has been certified. The Consent Holder shall request the Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination as to whether the proposed change can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days of submission of the change.

Chemical Treatment Management Plan (“ CTMP” ) 50.

At least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction, a CTMP which confirms the measures that will be taken to ensure that construction of the Project or Project Stage will be generally consistent with the Water Quality Assessment and the Industrial and Trade Activities Assessment prepared by Golder Associates (NZ) Limited, both dated December 2014 shall be submitted to Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification.

51.

The Consent Holder shall request the Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination as to whether the CTMP can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days of receipt of the CTMP.

52.

The CTMP shall include, but not be limited to, the following matters: a. Specific design details of the chemical treatment system based on a batch dosing methodology for the site’s settlement tanks, including the potential for use of nonchemical flocculants (e.g. chitin based flocculants such as Haloklear); b. Monitoring, maintenance (including post-storm) and contingency programme (including a record sheet); c. Details of optimum dosage (including assumptions); d. Results of initial chemical treatment trial; e. A spill contingency plan; and f. details of the person or bodies that will hold responsibility for the long term operation and maintenance of the chemical treatment system and the organisational structure which will support this system.

53.

Any change to the CTMP shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification. No activity reliant upon a change to the CTMP can be undertaken until the change has been certified. The Consent Holder shall request the Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination as to whether the proposed change can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days of submission of the change.

As-built Certification 54.

Prior to construction (bulk earthworks) commencing, a certificate signed by a senior qualified person shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) to certify that the erosion and sediment controls have been constructed in accordance with the certified ESCP(s) as required by Condition 45 of this consent.

55.

Certified controls shall include diversion bunds, silt fences, and sumps. The certification for these subsequent measures shall be supplied immediately upon completion of construction of those measures. Information supplied, if applicable, shall include: a. contributing catchment area; b. shape of structure (dimensions of structure); c. position of inlets/outlets; and d. stabilisation of the structure.

General Performance Standards

56.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that there shall be no deposition of earth, mud, dirt or other debris on any road or footpath resulting from bulk earthworks on the subject site.

In the event that such deposition does occur, it shall immediately be removed. In no instance shall roads or footpaths be washed down with water without appropriate erosion and sediment control measures in place to prevent contamination of the stormwater drainage system, watercourses or receiving waters.

57.

The operational effectiveness and efficiency of all erosion and sediment control measures specifically required as a condition of resource consent, including the certified ESCP referred to in Condition 45, shall be maintained throughout the duration of bulk earthworks, or until the Project site is permanently stabilised against erosion.

58.

The site shall be progressively stabilised against erosion at all stages of earthworks activity, and shall be sequenced to minimise the discharge of contaminants to groundwater or surface water.

59.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that the erosion and sediment control measures shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with Auckland Council’s Technical Publication 90: Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Soil Disturbing Activities in the Auckland Region, and any amendments to this document, except where a higher standard is detailed in the documents referred to in conditions above, in which case the higher standard shall apply.

60.

Sediment control measures shall be inspected on a weekly basis and after a significant storm event to ensure effective operation. In the event that a discharge of debris, soil, silt, sediment or sediment-laden water occurs, the activity which resulted in the discharge shall cease immediately and the discharge shall be mitigated and/or rectified to the satisfaction of the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

61.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that all material removed from or delivered to the Project site shall be covered during transportation.

62.

Upon completion or abandonment of bulk earthworks on the Project site all areas of bare earth shall be permanently stabilised against erosion to the satisfaction of the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

Review Condition for land use consent R/REG/2014/5430 63.

Pursuant to section 128 of the RMA the conditions of this consent may be reviewed by the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) at the Consent Holder’s cost, by giving notice pursuant to section 129 of the Act, within six months after commencement of bulk earthworks and subsequently at intervals of not less than one year thereafter in order to achieve the following: a. To deal with any adverse effects on the environment which may arise or potentially arise from the exercise of this consent and which it is appropriate to deal with at a later stage; b. To alter erosion and sediment control requirements as a result of previous monitoring outcomes, and/or in response to changes to the environment and/or hydro-geological knowledge, and/or changes to industry best practice; c. If, at any time, it is found that the information made available to the Council in the application contained inaccuracies which materially influenced the decision and the effects of the exercise of the consent are such that it is necessary to apply more appropriate conditions; and d. If, at any time, CRL-related works being undertaken under a designation providing for aspects of the Project, or a separate resource consent, leads to an inconsistent approach to the management of effects.

Specific conditions – discharge permit R/REG/2014/5437 Discharge to Air

Consent Duration 64.

This resource consent shall expire 15 years after the consent commences unless it has been surrendered or been cancelled at an earlier date pursuant to the RMA.

65.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that all processes on the Project worksite shall be implemented, operated, maintained, supervised, monitored and controlled so that any emissions authorised by this consent are maintained at the minimum practicable level.

66.

Unless provided for by Condition 67, there shall be no dust or odour beyond the boundary of the Project worksite caused as a result of on-site processes which, in the opinion of Council, is noxious, offensive or objectionable.

67.

All offensive or objectionable dust or odours beyond the boundary of the Project worksite caused as a result of construction and earthworks activities associated with the Project shall be mitigated as soon as practicable in accordance with the requirements of the certified Air Quality Management Plan as required by Condition 69.

68.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that beyond the boundary of the Project worksite, there shall be no hazardous air pollutant, caused as a result of construction and earthworks activities associated with the Project that causes, or is likely to cause, adverse effects on human health, environment or property.

Air Quality Management Plan (“ AQMP” ) The Consent Holder shall review the draft Air Quality Management Plan – Britomart to Wyndham dated December 2014 (“draft AQMP”), prepared by Golder Associates (NZ) Limited and submit to Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) a final AQMP(s) which is (are) generally consistent with the draft AQMP provided in support of the application material.

69.

70.

The final AQMP(s) shall be prepared by a senior qualified person, provided to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification at least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction and shall include: a. a clear identification of the type and location of the controls proposed; b. a detailed framework for the management, mitigation and monitoring of construction and earthworks activities associated with the Project; c. a focus principally on the sources of dust discharges, and d. an assessment of the risk of discharges from each Active Construction Zone and the associated Construction Support Areas.

71.

The final AQMP(s) shall also provide detailed methods including, but not limited to, the following matters: a. methods to ensure the exposed surfaces remain dampened to minimise dust emissions (possible examples include a suspended water spray system or other suitable system, water carts and other suppression methods); b. a 20 km/hr vehicle speed limit within the Active Construction Zones and Construction Support Areas; c. installation of wheel washes; d. regular sweeping of public roads around the exit points of Active Construction Zones and Construction Support Areas and sealed vehicle accessways within these areas; e. measures for dampening any temporary stock piles (which are to be limited to no more than 24 m³ of spoil at any one time in each Active Construction Zone); f. measures for the handling of cement associated with forming of cement stabilised columns, including filter systems and high level alarms where a silo is used; g. covering of loads of material being delivered and removed from the site; h. instrumental monitoring of dust concentrations (identification of a monitoring methodology, monitoring network and appropriate alert thresholds) to ensure that any significant dust effects arising from the Active Construction Zones or Construction Support Areas are identified and remedied as soon as practicable throughout the Project; i.

the locations of instrumental dust monitoring sites, including one re-locatable monitor to be associated with Active Construction Zones A to D and fixed monitors associated with Active Construction Zone E;

j.

measures for responding to continuous instrumental dust monitoring trigger alarms,

including contingency measures to reduce measured concentrations below the trigger thresholds and provisions for responding after standard operating hours; k. measures for undertaking meteorological observations and visual inspections of dust or other air discharges from the Project, to be completed at least on a daily basis, with all relevant information logged; and l.

information regarding complaint logging, investigation and response procedures, training and roles and responsibilities.

72.

The Consent Holder shall request the Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) provides its determination as to whether the AQMP(s) can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days of receipt of the AQMP(s).

73.

Any change to the AQMP(s) shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification. No activity reliant upon a change to the AQMP can be undertaken until the change has been certified. The Consent Holder shall request the Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination as to whether the change can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days of submission of the change.

74.

All works shall be undertaken in accordance with the certified AQMP(s).

Monitoring Requirements 75.

Prior to construction commencing, and for the duration of excavation and construction associated with the Project which have the potential for significant dust emissions, the Consent Holder shall install, operate and maintain mobile instrumental continuous dust monitors for the purposes of monitoring Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) and/or fine particulate matter (PM10). The monitors shall be operated at locations and according to methods detailed in the certified AQMP(s) required by Condition 69.

76.

The instrumental dust monitoring equipment shall be fitted with an alarm system that, when dust concentrations exceed alert levels specified by the certified AQMP(s), send a warning to the responsible person identified by the AQMP(s). The Consent Holder shall ensure that the responsible person, or other nominated person, is available at all times to take immediate action to reduce dust emissions from the site.

Specific conditions – discharge permit R/REG/2014/5435 Contaminated Land Consent Duration

77.

This resource consent shall expire 15 years after the consent commences unless it has been surrendered or been cancelled at an earlier date pursuant to the RMA.

Contaminated Soils Management Plan (“ CSMP” ) 78.

At least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction, a final CSMP shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Earthworks and Contaminated Land,

Natural Resources and Specialist Input and Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification. The CSMP shall be prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced Contaminated Land Professional in accordance with Schedule 13 (A4) of the Auckland Council Regional Plan: Air, Land and Water (ACRP:ALW). The Consent Holder shall request the Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination as to whether the CSMP can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days of receipt of the CSMP. 79.

No construction shall commence until certification is provided from the Council (Team Leader Earthworks and Contaminated Land, Natural Resources and Specialist Input and Team Leader Central Monitoring) that the CSMP meets the requirements of Schedule 13 (A4) of the ACRP:ALW.

80.

All measures identified in that CSMP must be established prior to the commencement of bulk earthworks.

81.

The CSMP shall address the following matters: a. Identification of mitigation measures to ensure that discharges from the construction support areas to land or water are minimised, and to ensure that potential effects on the health of workers on the site and nearby sites can be appropriately managed b. The areas within the project site designated for the excavation works, including depths and extent of the proposed works, and an updated map showing the land disturbance activity areas; c. Excavation, management, and disposal procedures for soil, sediment, dust, surface run-off water, perched groundwater, and groundwater, if encountered; d. Temporary containment, treatment, and testing procedures for any water getting in contact with the contaminated material if disposal option to the stormwater system or marine environment is considered; e. Contingency measures for unexpected discovery of contamination; f. Proposed gas monitoring in the Lower Queen Street area, and any other proposed sampling and analysis, if applicable; and g. Proposed Works Summary Reporting.

Advice Note: The Council acknowledges that the CSMP is intended to provide flexibility of the management of the works and contaminant discharge. Accordingly, the plan may need to be further updated. Any updates must be limited to the scope of this consent and be consistent with the conditions of this consent. If you would like to confirm that any proposed updates are within scope, please contact the Council (Team Leader Earthworks and Contaminated Land, Natural Resources and Specialist Input) on (09) 301 0101.

82.

All disturbance of contaminated and potentially contaminated soil as part of the bulk earthworks activity shall be carried out in accordance with the certified CSMP required by Condition 78 and any changes to the plan shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Earthworks and Contaminated Land, Natural Resources and Specialist Input and Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification prior to the change being implemented. No activity reliant upon a change to the CSMP can be undertaken until the change has been

certified. The Consent Holder shall request the Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination as to whether the proposed change can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days of submission of the change.

Notification of Works 83.

The Consent Holder shall notify the Council (Team Leader Earthworks and Contaminated Land, Natural Resources and Specialist Input and Team Leader Central Monitoring) at least two working days prior to the commencement of bulk earthworks on the subject site.

Advice Note: Condition 83 requires the consent holder to notify the Council of their intention to begin works in contaminated areas a minimum of two working days prior to commencement of construction. Please contact the Team Leader, Earthworks and Contaminated Land, Natural Resources and Specialist Input at david.hampson@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz to advise of the start of works. The following details should also be provided: • Name and telephone number of the project manager and the site owner; • Site address to which the consents relate; • Activity to which the consents relate; and • Expected duration of the works.

84.

All disturbance of contaminated soil shall be supervised by a suitably qualified and experienced Contaminated Land Professional who shall ensure that soil management and disposal procedures, contingency measures outlined in the certified CSMP required by Condition 78, and all relevant consent conditions are adhered to.

Regular inspections of the works area shall be carried out by the Contaminated Land Professional.

These inspections shall be documented and the relevant records shall be retained and provided to Council (Team Leader Earthworks and Contaminated Land, Natural Resources and Specialist Input) as part of the Works Summary Report required by Condition 93.

85.

All land disturbance works shall be managed to avoid the potential for cross- contamination of materials to occur. In particular, movement of contaminated soil around the site and/or deposition of contaminated soil on other parts of the site shall be avoided. Soils that are identified for off-site disposal must be loaded directly for removal where possible, and all material shall be covered during transportation off- site.

86.

To minimise the spread of contaminated material, any temporary stockpiles of excavated contaminated material shall be located within the catchment of erosion and sediment controls for the site. All stockpiles shall be covered with either polythene or an equivalent impermeable material when the site is not being worked and during periods of heavy rain.

87.

Excess soil or waste materials removed from the Project worksite shall be deposited at a disposal site that holds a resource consent to accept the relevant level and type of contamination.

88.

Where it can be demonstrated that the soil has been fully characterised and meets the definition of ‘cleanfill’ in accordance with the Ministry for the Environment’s publication ‘A Guide to the Management of Cleanfills’ (2002), the removal of such material to a

consented disposal facility is not required. In such circumstances, a record of the location, depth, and volume of the material removed as ‘cleanfill’ shall be kept for the purpose of being included in the Works Summary Report required by Condition 93.

89.

Any perched groundwater or surface run-off water encountered within the excavation area requiring removal shall be considered as potentially contaminated, and shall either: a. be disposed of by a licensed liquid waste contractor; or b. pumped to sewer, providing relevant permits are obtained; or c. discharged to the stormwater system, provided testing demonstrates compliance with 50 times the Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council NZECC) Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality (2000) for the protection of 95 percent of marine water species.

90.

Where contaminants are identified that have not been anticipated by the application, works in the area containing the unexpected contamination shall cease until the contingency measures outlined in the certified CSMP required by Condition 78 have been implemented, and have been notified to the Council (Team Leader, Earthworks and Contaminated Land, Natural Resources and Specialist Input). Any unexpected contamination encountered during the works and contingency measures implemented shall be documented in the Works Summary Report required by Condition 93.

Advice Note: In accordance with Condition 90 any unexpected contamination may include separate phase hydrocarbons, contaminated soil, perched water or groundwater. The consent holder is advised that where unexpected contamination is significantly different in extent and concentration from that anticipated, handling the contamination may be outside the scope of this consent. Advice should be sought from the Council (Team Leader Earthworks and Contaminated Land, Natural Resources and Specialist Input) prior to carrying out any further work in the area of the unexpected contamination to ensure this is within the scope of this consent.

91.

All imported fill shall: a. comply with the definition of 'cleanfill' in the Ministry for the Environment publication 'A Guide to the Management of Cleanfills’ (2002); b. be solid material of an inert nature; and c. not contain hazardous substances or contaminants above recorded natural background levels of the receiving site.

Advice Note: Background contamination levels for the site receiving cleanfill can be found in the Technical Publication No. 153, Background concentrations of inorganic elements in soils from the Auckland Region, Auckland Regional Council (2001).

92.

All sampling and testing of contamination on the site shall be overseen by the Contaminated Land Professional and shall be undertaken in accordance with Contaminated Land Management Guidelines, No.5 – Site Investigation and Analysis of Soils, Ministry for the Environment (revised 2011).

Advice Note: All testing and analysis should be undertaken in a laboratory with suitable experience and ability to carry out the analysis. For more details on how to confirm the suitability of the laboratory please refer to Part 4: Laboratory Analysis, of Contaminated Land Management Guidelines No.5.

93.

Within three months of the completion of bulk earthworks on the site, a Works Summary Report shall be provided to the Council (Team Leader Earthworks and Contaminated Land, Natural Resources and Specialist Input and Team Leader Central Monitoring).

The Works Summary Report shall be prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced Contaminated Land Professional in accordance with Schedule 13 (A5) of the Auckland Council Regional Plan: Air, Land and Water and Contaminated Land Management Guidelines, No.1 - Reporting on Contaminated Sites in New Zealand, Ministry for the Environment (revised 2011).

94.

The Works Summary Report shall address the following matters: a. a summary of the works undertaken, including a statement confirming whether the excavation of the site has been completed in accordance with the certified CSMP required by Condition 78; b. the location and dimensions of the excavations carried out, including a site plan; c. a summary of soil, perched water and groundwater testing undertaken (if applicable) including tabulated analytical results, and interpretation of the results in the context of the Contaminated Land Rules of the Auckland Council Regional Plan: Air, Land and Water and the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan; d. copies of the disposal dockets for the contaminated soil and ‘cleanfill’ material removed from the site; e. records of any unexpected contamination encountered during the works and contingency measures undertaken (if applicable); f. details regarding any complaints and/or breaches of the procedures set out in the certified CSMP required by Condition 78 and the conditions of this consent; g. results of testing, if required, of any spoil disposed offsite; and h. results of testing of any imported fill material to ensure compliance with the definition of 'cleanfill', as per 'A Guide to the Management of Cleanfills’, Ministry for the Environment (2002).

Specific conditions – discharge permit R/REG/2014/5436 Washwater and Wastewater Discharges

Consent Duration 95.

This consent shall expire 15 years after the consent commences unless it has been surrendered or been cancelled at an earlier date pursuant to the Resource Management Act 1991.

Site Management 96.

At least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction, a final Industrial and Trade Activities Environmental Management Plan (“EMP”) shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification. The Consent Holder shall request the Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination as to whether the EMP can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days following receipt of the EMP.

The EMP shall be prepared by a senior qualified person and shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. identification of the specific activities conducted on the site; b. the identification of potential contaminants associated with these activities; c. methods used to prevent identified contaminants contacting stormwater runoff as far as practicable and methods to manage environmental risks from site activities; d. an Emergency Spill Response Plan (which includes the provision that all spills over 20 litres, or any spill of Environmentally Hazardous Substances that has entered the stormwater system, a water-body or has contacted unsealed ground, shall be reported immediately to the Auckland Council’s 24 Hour Pollution Hotline (09-377-3107)); e. an up-to-date and accurate site drainage plan showing the location of all site catchpits and the final discharge point(s) of the site stormwater system; f. an appropriate auditing programme to ensure site performance with all components of the sites EMP; g. methods for providing and recording staff training; and h. a monitoring programme as outlined in Condition 101.

97.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that the site is operated and managed in accordance with the certified EMP to ensure the risks from the site are managed appropriately.

98.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that a copy of the certified EMP is kept on site and accessible at all times.

Structural Controls 99.

The Consent Holder shall ensure that the following structural controls are constructed for the following catchment areas and design requirements and they are completed prior to discharges commencing from the site.

Works

Device catchment

Design requirements

Settlement Tanks (2x 12,000l tanks), located in

All ACZs

Discharge levels as per monitoring

Bunding of Environmentally

As required

110% of largest container

100. In the event that any minor modifications to the structural controls system are

required, the following information shall be provided to Council: a. Plans and drawings outlining the details of the modifications; and b. Supporting information that details how the proposal does not affect the capacity or performance of stormwater management system.

All information shall be submitted to, and the proposed modifications certified by the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring), prior to implementation.

Discharge Monitoring 101. Within 30 days of the installation of the water treatment system, and prior to operation,

a discharge monitoring programme, to assess the ongoing adequacy of all management practices, shall be developed and submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification. The monitoring programme shall include, but not be limited to: a. sampling location for final discharge from the site(s); b. sampling locations on site (i.e. swale inlets, outlets etc); c. methods and procedures for discharge sampling on a quarterly basis; d. monitoring parameters for analysis, which shall include: Daily • Turbidity (NTU) • pH Weekly • Total Suspended Solids mg/L • Copper (total) mg/L • Zinc (total) mg/L • Lead (total) mg/L • Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons mg/L e. identified trigger levels for each of the above parameters. These trigger levels shall be developed with reference to the ANZECC Guidelines for water quality where applicable; and f. the methods and procedures for investigating and reporting stormwater discharge monitoring results to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

102. The discharge monitoring programme shall be implemented upon completion of works

set out in Condition 99.

Reporting 103. Within five working days of receipt of sample results showing contaminants exceeding the

agreed trigger levels (Condition 101(e)): a. an investigation shall be undertaken to determine why exceedances were detected and to identify any additional source controls or treatment required; and

b. the results of the investigation shall be reported to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

104. Within eight weeks following the start of the monitoring required by Conditions 101 and 102,

a monitoring report shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

The monitoring report shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. a summary of the monitoring results to date; b. an interpretation of those results and suggestions for improvement to the site operations; c. a programme for ongoing monitoring including the reporting of results; and d. a programme for the ongoing maintenance of the discharge water management and treatment system.

Specific conditions – water permit R/REG/2014/5432 Take and Diversion of Groundwater

DEFINITIONS: Commencement of Dewatering:

Means commencement of bulk excavation and/or commencing taking any groundwater from the tunnel excavation and/or any dewatering prior to excavation.

Completion of Excavation:

When all bulk excavation has been completed

Completion of Dewatering:

Means when the tunnel has been constructed, all backfilling has been completed and effectively no further groundwater is being taken for the construction of the tunnel.

Completion of Construction

Means when the Certificate of Completion is issued

by AC.

Significant damage

When damage is considered to affect serviceability or structural integrity.

Damage

Includes aesthetic, serviceability and significant damage.

Alert Level

Alarm Level

Monitoring reaches a level close to, or equal to the design value, which is below the level where damage could occur unless movement continues unchecked, and requires review to assess the future trend.

Monitoring reaches the value, and/or level close to which damage could occur, and requires immediate action including the cessation of ground dewatering and other construction activities that may have an effect on ground deformation

Manager:

Means the Team Leader Water Allocation, NRSI, AC, or nominated AC staff acting on the Team Leader’s behalf.

RL:

Means Reduced Level.

Services:

Includes for example fibre optic cables, sanitary drainage, stormwater pipes, gas and water mains, power and telephone, road infrastructure assets such as footpaths, kerbs, catch-pits, pavements and street furniture, settlement monitoring stations and groundwater monitoring bores.

Consent Duration 105. This consent shall expire 35 years after the consent commences unless it has been

surrendered or been cancelled at an earlier date pursuant to the Resource Management Act 1991.

Performance Standards 106. The Consent Holder shall ensure that all excavations, dewatering systems,

retaining structures and associated works (including backfilling) for the tunnel construction and associated works shall be designed, constructed and maintained so as to avoid any damage that affects serviceability of structures and services.

107. Within the settlement contours on drawings CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0

dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 attached to these conditions in Appendix 2 with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYW-GEO-000-DRG0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17, the Consent Holder must ensure that the damage to buildings from the Project does not exceed the “slight damage” category extent detailed in the table below.

108. Beyond the settlement contours on drawings CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0403, Rev

3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 attached to these conditions in Appendix 2 with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYW-GEO-000-DRG0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17, the Consent Holder must ensure that the damage to buildings from the Project does not exceed the “negligible damage” extent detailed in the table below.

109. The Consent Holder shall not exceed the maximum extent and magnitude of total

settlement as defined by the settlement contours presented on drawings CRL-PATRME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYW-GEO-000-DRG0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17 attached to these conditions in Appendix 2.

110. The Consent Holder shall construct the CRL trench no deeper than 1.2m below the

base of tunnel design invert levels shown on Plan: CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG- 0001-1.0 dated 17 October 2014. The maximum excavation depth for the CRL trench is RL-8.5m.

111. The Consent Holder shall design, construct and continuously maintain the temporary

perimeter cut-off walls to achieve no more than 0.3m3/ day ingress (through the wall) of groundwater per 10m of wall for both the Chief Post Office Excavation Ch50m to Ch95m (“CPO�) and the CRL Trench Excavation Ch95m to Ch300m.

112. There shall be no visible seepage of water through the walls of the excavations at the

CPO and Lower Queen Street area throughout construction. Any visible leakage shall be caulked, or otherwise sealed, as soon as is practicable.

113. The Consent Holder shall ensure that the cut-off walls within the CPO shall be

installed a minimum of 2m into unweathered East Coast Bays Formation.

114. The cut off walls within the CRL trench excavation between Ch95 and Ch300 shall

be installed to the top of the unweathered East Coast Bays formation bedrock.

115. After completion of construction, groundwater levels adjacent to the tunnel alignment

shall not reduce below pre-existing seasonal low levels or rise above seasonal high levels measured during pre-construction monitoring in accordance with Condition 130.

116. The Consent Holder shall ensure that there is no long term ground settlement

caused by post construction dewatering or long term mounding by the tunnel alignment damming.

Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan ( “G SMC P” ) 117. At least 20 working days prior to the commencement of dewatering, the Consent Holder

shall prepare and submit a GSMCP to Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) for certification.

118. The Consent Holder shall request:

a. Certification by Council be undertaken by an independent peer reviewer; and b. Council’s (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) determination as to whether the GSMCP can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days following receipt of the GSMCP. 119. No dewatering on the subject site shall commence until certification from Council (Team

Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) is provided.

120. Prior to the Consent Holder submitting the GSMCP under Condition 117, the

Consent Holder shall request that Council engage, at the cost of the Consent Holder, a suitably qualified independent specialist, agreed to by the Consent Holder, to fill the role of Independent Building Assessor (“IBA”).

121. The Consent Holder shall ensure that the IBA, required by Condition 120, provides a

written report to Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) prior to commencement of construction and at no less than monthly intervals following commencement of construction and at key construction stages. The report may include recommendations to Council on building serviceability and damage matters, and how these matters may be addressed, having regard to the following: a. displacement and damage predictions of the affected buildings; b. monitoring methodology and the results of that monitoring; c. alert and alarm limits; and d. any monitoring reports prepared in accordance with Conditions 135, 136, 157, 158 and 159.

122. The GSMCP, required by Condition 117, shall include the requirements of this

resource consent including, but not limited to, the following: a. an “as built” survey plan of all monitoring locations based on approximate positions located on the plans entitled CRL-PAT-RME- 000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 (Appendix 2) with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYW-GEO-000-DRG-0046, Rev

5.0, dated 23/01/17 and any further building-specific monitoring requirements determined from the detailed pre-construction building condition assessment; b. full details of groundwater (including construction logs), ground surface, building, retaining wall, inclinometer monitoring programme and conditions surveys required by this consent; c. a bar chart, such as a Gantt chart, showing the timing and frequency of the condition surveys and monitoring required by this consent relative to the commencement of dewatering and the completion of dewatering; d. groundwater alert and alarm triggers, including methodology for their determination. The Consent Holder shall use existing groundwater level data and the groundwater levels measured as required by Condition 129, to establish seasonal low groundwater levels; e. details of all alert and alarm triggers for each ground, building and retaining wall deformation marks and inclinometers as determined by conditions of consent or as revised by further detailed design; f. details of the contingency measures to be implemented if alert or alarm triggers are exceeded including a Response Plan (required by Condition 158).

In particular, in relation to groundwater alarm triggers, contingency measures must include actions to prevent further groundwater drawdowns or rise; g. identification of any adjacent services susceptible to damage and details of any pre and post construction monitoring or inspection; h. details of the monitoring proposed to be undertaken to protect 35 Albert Street (Consent No. 43669) and Downtown Precinct Development (Consent No. 43792) consent holders against cumulative settlement effects; i.

identification of existing basements which could be subject to potential flooding from post-construction groundwater mounding. Details of monitoring of long-term groundwater mounding effects. Details of groundwater drain maintenance to prevent groundwater mounding; and review following the construction building condition surveys (required by Condition 133) the proposed alarm and alert trigger levels in Appendix 4 to confirm they are appropriately set to ensure the “slight� damage category will not be breached and whether monitoring frequency is adequate.

123. The GSMCP may be varied, including frequency of monitoring, subject to the

certification of the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit).

124. Once certified, the GSMCP shall be implemented for the periods specified in

conditions of this consent.

Upper Albert Street Building Assessment Conditions 125. Additional site investigations shall be carried out at the detailed design stage to

confirm the preliminary design assumptions for soil stiffness affecting the upper Albert

Street zone.

The additional site investigations will consist of a minimum of two additional Cone Penetrometer Tests on the eastern side of the upper Albert Street zone. The predicted total settlement contours shown on drawings CRL-PAT-RME-000- DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYW-GEO-000-DRG-0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17 shall be modified to take the site specific data into account.

126. Detailed building condition surveys shall be carried out, predesign and

preconstruction, to determine the existing damage category of each building in the upper Albert Street zone and their sensitivity to any further settlement.

127. Should the pre-construction building condition survey and assessment highlight greater

sensitivity of buildings to settlement than envisaged by the application, additional design measures ( that may include modifications to the design of the retention system or further geotechnical investigation) shall be undertaken.

128. The Consent Holder shall prepare a report which shall include the outcomes from the

assessment required to be undertaken by Conditions 125, 126 and 127 and any design modifications made. The Consent Holder shall submit the report to the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) for certification.

Certification must be obtained prior to commencement of dewatering within a minimum 30m chainage distance from any particular building.

Monitoring - Groundwater 129. The Consent Holder shall install, maintain and replace if necessary, groundwater

monitoring boreholes listed in Appendix 3 of this consent and shown on drawings CRLPAT-RME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYW-GEO-000-DRG-0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17 of this consent, for the period required by the conditions of this consent.

130. The Consent Holder shall measure and record groundwater levels at the monitoring

boreholes specified in drawings CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 (Appendix 2) with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYW-GEO-000-DRG-0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17: c. at a minimum of weekly intervals for a period of at least 3 months before commencing dewatering (to establish baseline groundwater variability), and then d. at least three times weekly for all monitoring boreholes during dewatering until either the completion of dewatering, or until such time following the completion of dewatering that stable measurements are demonstrated and certification is provided by the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit).

All water level data shall be recorded to an accuracy of at least Âą 10mm (to be calibrated by the instrument supplier). These records, reported in reduced level, shall be compiled and submitted

to the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) at monthly intervals.

131. The provisional groundwater alert trigger level criteria are listed in Schedule B and

Schedule B.1 below for the monitoring boreholes. The GSMCP, when lodged for certification by Council as required by Condition 117, may amend the provisional groundwater alert and alarm trigger levels below: Schedule B: Provisional Alert Trigger Level Criteria – Non Britomart1 Alert Trigger Low Level (from chainage 300 to 610) Alert Trigger High Level Alert Trigger Low Level – ECBF

0.5 metres below seasonal low in fill and Tauranga Alluvium Seasonal high level in fill, Tauranga marine 90% of predicted drawdown response in ECBF (EU

Note 1: Schedule B applies to the area from chainage 300 to 610, being the area other than that defined as “Britomart” in Schedule B.1.

Schedule B.1: Provisional Alert and Alarm Trigger Level Criteria – Britomart2 Alert Trigger Low Level Alert Trigger Low Level – ECBF Alarm Trigger Low Level Alarm Trigger High Level

0.8 metre below seasonal low in fill, Tauranga 90% of predicted drawdown response in ECBF 1.0 metre below seasonal low in fill, Tauranga marine sediments and Seasonal high level in fill, Tauranga marine

Note 2: Schedule B.1 applies to the Britomart area only, being that area from chainage 50 to 300.

132. Where groundwater alert and alarm trigger levels are exceeded, as identified from monitoring data obtained pursuant to Condition 130, the actions set out in the certified GSMCP shall be undertaken and the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) shall be notified within 2 working days and advised of the trigger exceedance, the risk of settlement causing damage to buildings, and details of the actions taken.

Building Inspection 133. Prior to the commencement of perimeter piling adjacent to the relevant structure and/or

commencement of dewatering (whichever is the sooner), the Consent Holder shall employ an independent senior qualified person to undertake a detailed pre-construction condition survey, of all buildings specified in Appendix 1 to confirm their existing condition, subject to the approval of the property owner.

The survey shall include, but not be limited to, the following: i.

any information about the type of foundations;

j.

existing levels of damage considered to be of an aesthetic or superficial nature;

k. existing levels of damage considered to affect the serviceability of the building where visually apparent and without recourse to intrusive or destructive investigation; l.

a professional opinion as to whether observed damage may or may not be associated with actual structural damage;

m. susceptibility of the building or structure to further movement; n. specific assessment of building damage from the predicted total settlement contours showing on drawings CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYWGEO-000-DRG-0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17 and with reference to the trigger levels identified in Appendix 4; o. review of proposed alarm and alert trigger levels to confirm they are appropriately set and movement less than trigger levels set will not exacerbate damage, and whether the monitoring frequency and locations of monitoring points are adequate; and p. photographic evidence of (b) and (c).

134. Where the Consent Holder is required to access property (including buildings or

structures) owned by a third party to undertake monitoring, surveys or inspections and that access is declined or subject to what the Consent Holder considers to be unreasonable terms, the Consent Holder shall notify the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) of that circumstance, and provide an alternative monitoring plan which includes the matters stated in Condition 122.

135. Any condition survey undertaken in accordance with Condition 133, or any other

condition surveys undertaken by the Consent Holder, shall be undertaken as follows: a. The Consent Holder shall employ an independent senior qualified person to undertake the condition surveys and that person shall be identified in the CEMP (required by Condition 33); b. The Consent Holder shall contact owners of those buildings and structures where a condition survey is to be undertaken to confirm the timing and methodology for undertaking a pre-construction condition survey; c. The Consent Holder shall record all contact, correspondence and communication with owners and this shall be available on request for the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit); d. The Consent Holder shall provide the building condition survey or structure condition survey report to the relevant property owner and the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) within 15 working days of the survey being undertaken; e. The Consent Holder shall undertake a visual inspection during construction if requested by the building or structure owner where a pre-construction condition survey has been undertaken. Where a condition survey has been undertaken by the building or structure

owner, the Consent Holder shall continue to undertake monthly visual inspections until the Completion of Dewatering of the project; and f. The Consent Holder shall develop a system of monitoring the condition of existing buildings or structures which is commensurate with the type of the existing building or structure and the proximity of the project works in order to assess whether or not construction activities are compromising the structural integrity of the building or structure.

136. The Consent Holder shall carry out a visual inspection of the surrounding ground and

external building facades of the listed buildings in Appendix 1 adjacent to the tunnel trench to monitor any deterioration or movement of any pre-existing cracks.

Unless otherwise agreed to by Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit), after consultation with the relevant building owner, this is to be carried out at least twice per week from the commencement of dewatering until completion of excavation and then at least weekly until completion of dewatering.

A record is to be kept of the time, date and any observations for each inspection. This record is to be maintained and submitted to the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) in accordance with Condition 159.

137. The Consent Holder shall ensure that no earlier than 6 months after completion of

dewatering and within 6 months of completion of construction, a post- construction condition survey covering the matters identified in Condition 133 be completed of any building that had a pre-construction survey as identified in Appendix 1.

The condition survey report shall include a determination of the cause of damage identified (if any) since the pre-construction condition survey or previous survey and steps to repair it as provided for in Condition 157.

The requirements of this condition need not be fulfilled for any particular building where the Consent Holder can provide written evidence to the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) that the current owner of that building has agreed they do not require such a condition survey.

138. The Consent Holder shall, without delay, at the reasonable request of the Council

(Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) undertake an additional condition survey on any building within the area defined by the groundwater monitoring, deformation monitoring and modelling undertaken pursuant to the conditions of this consent potentially affected by the excavation for the purpose of checking for damage and for following up on a report of damage to that building.

The requirement for any such condition survey will cease 6 months after the completion of construction unless the requirements of Condition 137 have not been met and subject to a consistent pattern of deformation records having been obtained in this period in which no evidence of adverse effects is apparent.

139. During construction the Consent Holder shall implement procedures that will

appropriately respond to the information received from the monitoring system,

including assessment at each excavation stage of the actual retention and building response against the predictions determined from the detailed design.

For the Albert Street excavations and in particular the upper Albert Street zone, should the actual response exceed those predicted for the first stages of excavation, contingency measures pre-determined from the detailed design and detailed in the Response Plan required

by Condition 158 shall be implemented to increase the effective stiffness of the retention system and reduce wall deflections during subsequent excavation stages.

140. The Consent Holder shall include potential cumulative settlement effects from the

basement excavation of the development at 35 Albert Street, Auckland Central, as authorised by Consent 42859 and from the Albert Street Stormwater Main Realignment Consent as authorised by Consent 43669, detailed in the respective consent conditions, for the assessment of ground and building settlement trigger levels on and adjacent to 12 to 26 Swanson Street and 41 Albert Street, Auckland Central until the completion of ground and building settlement monitoring at 35 Albert Street, Auckland Central.

141. The Consent Holder shall include potential cumulative settlement effects from the

basement excavation of the re-development of the Downtown Shopping Centre site, Auckland Central, as authorised by Consent 43792, and detailed in the respective consent conditions, for the assessment of ground and building settlement trigger levels on the Zurich Building (21 Queen Street), the HSBC building (1 Queen Street) and the Old Customs House building (12-32 Customs Street West) until the completion of ground and building settlement monitoring required by Resource Consent 43792.

Ground Surface and Building Monitoring 142. The Consent Holder shall establish and maintain a settlement monitoring network of

ground settlement monitoring marks and building movement monitoring marks to detect any deformation (vertical and/or horizontal movement) for the period required by the conditions of this consent, as follows: d. The minimum scope of settlement monitoring is shown on Drawings CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 (Appendix 2) with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYW-GEO-000-DRG-0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17; e. Subject to the owners’ approval, at least two sets of building movement monitoring marks shall be located on each building listed in Appendix 1; and f. The final location and number of building movement monitoring marks shall take into account the building type and size, accessibility to survey the marks and risk of damage from ground settlement and the effects of differential settlement from the predicted settlement contours on drawings CRL-PATRME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015.

143. The Consent Holder shall survey and record each ground settlement and

building movement monitoring mark at least three times prior to the

commencement of dewatering to establish a baseline elevation.

144. All settlement and building monitoring mark surveys shall be to a horizontal and vertical

accuracy of at least Âą 2mm or as otherwise achieved by precise levelling. These records shall be compiled and submitted to the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) prior to the commencement of dewatering.

145. The Consent Holder shall survey and record the readings at each ground settlement

and building monitoring mark on a monthly basis, until either the completion of dewatering, or until such time following the completion of excavation/ dewatering that stable measurements are demonstrated and certification is provided by the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit).

146. The Consent Holder shall survey and record the readings at each ground settlement

and building monitoring mark within 50m of trench excavations during excavations/dewatering on a daily basis, until either the completion of dewatering, or until such time following the completion of excavation that stable measurements are demonstrated and certification is provided by the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit).

Retaining Wall Monitoring 147. The Consent Holder shall ensure that retaining wall deformation pins are installed

along the top of the boundary walls of the tunnel excavation at a distance of approximately 6.0 metre intervals to monitor both vertical and lateral wall movement.

148. Baseline monitoring before commencement of dewatering shall be undertaken three

times to a horizontal and vertical accuracy of +/-2mm achieved by precise levelling and the results of monitoring shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit), prior to the commencement of dewatering.

149. Alert and Alarm trigger levels for retaining pin monitoring as required in Condition 147

shall be confirmed and/or revised following the completion of the pre- construction building surveys and assessments required in Conditions 125, 126, 127 and 128. The final trigger levels shall take into account the building type and potential risk of damage from ground settlement quantified from these surveys and assessments.

150. From the commencement of excavation to one month after completion of

excavation the Consent Holder shall measure the monitoring marks at an average of each 2 metres depth of excavation, at a maximum frequency of weekly intervals.

151. From one month after completion of excavation to the completion of dewatering,

monitoring shall be at fortnightly intervals. Monitoring carried out shall be reported and submitted to Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) in accordance with Condition 161.

152. Inclinometers shall be installed along the excavation within the zones shown on the

drawings CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYW-GEO-000-DRG-

0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17 either within a retaining pile or immediately behind one and extending to the base of the retaining pile. The specific locations will be confirmed following detailed design and will be confirmed in the final GSMCP. Measurement accuracy shall be to best practice.

153. The Consent Holder shall survey, record and report the readings of the

inclinometer as per Schedule C below: Schedule C: Inclinometer Surveys

Frequency:

Reporting:

Baseline: Pre Construction

Commencement of excavation to one month after Completion of Excavation unless otherwise agreed under Condition 123 Inclinometer

Best practice

Daily intervals unless a different frequency has been agreed to in writing by Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural As per Condition 161

Submitted to the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, NRSI) prior to the Commencement of Dewatering

154. The Inclinometer Deformation Alert Levels of deflection and the Inclinometer

Deformation Alarm levels of deflection are as follows: a. Adjacent to existing buildings – as specified in the GSMCP; and b. Precinct Properties Ltd building – Downtown Shopping Centre redevelopment - alarm levels are subject to cumulative effects and require consultation in accordance with Condition 141.

Services 155. The Consent Holder shall identify potentially affected services and, prior to the

commencement of dewatering, undertake a condition survey of all such services in consultation with the relevant service providers.

The monitoring of any settlement effects on those potentially affected services shall be in accordance with Conditions 142, 145 and 146. In the event that the services trigger levels listed in Appendix 4 are breached, remedial actions must be in accordance with Conditions 157 and 158.

156. A condition survey of potentially affected services shall be completed by the Consent Holder

no earlier than 6 months after completion of dewatering and no later than completion of construction, to confirm in writing to the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) and the asset owner the results of the survey.

The survey shall include a determination of the cause of any damage identified (if any) since the condition survey provided for in Condition 155. The post- condition survey need not be completed

where the Consent Holder has written evidence that a post-condition survey was not required by the service provider.

Contingency 157. If any damage to buildings, structures or services is caused wholly or in part by the

exercising of this consent, the consent holder shall: a. notify the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) and the asset owner as soon as practical; b. engage a senior qualified person to prepare a report as soon as practical describing the damage and identifying methods to avoid and mitigate the potential for further damage and to remedy any damage caused wholly or in part by the exercising of this consent and provide a copy of the report to the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) and the asset owner; and c. thereafter promptly undertake (at the entire cost of the Consent Holder) all necessary repairs to fully restore and remedy the damage caused by the exercise of this consent. “Entire cost� includes all design and consenting costs as well as all construction costs. This obligation as a condition of the resource consent shall enure until: i)

Two years after completion of dewatering, or

ii) In the case of the Lower Queen Street area, two years after extraction of sheet piles; iii) One year after groundwater levels have stabilised; and iv) Six months after any completion of any other works associated with the Project which have the potential to cause settlement.

158. The Response Plan, included in the GSMCP, shall be prepared in accordance with

drawings CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015 (Appendix 2), with the groundwater monitoring network updated and superseded by drawing CRL-SYW-GEO-000-DRG-0046, Rev 5.0, dated 23/01/17 and shall be implemented in the event that differential settlement between any two ground settlement monitoring marks exceeds the identified triggers, or total settlement exceeds the identified triggers in Appendix 4. The Appendix 4 trigger levels are to be revised, in accordance with Condition 133(g), if recommended by the building and structure condition surveys carried out in accordance with Conditions 133 and 138.

159. In the event of any Alert or Alarm trigger level exceedance at any of the ground surface

and building monitoring stations and/or trigger level exceedance of groundwater levels in the monitoring bores, associated with the construction works, then the Consent Holder shall undertake the following activities: a. Notify the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) and the Independent Building Assessor within 24 hours; b. If measurements exceed any of the alert values then a senior qualified person engaged by the Consent Holder or the Consent Holder’s Contractor shall re- assess

the works constructed up to that time to identify the reasons for higher movements and confirm whether measures (if any) are required to restrain further increases in movement and confirm that possible ensuing effects will not adversely impact building serviceability. Measures (if any) to be implemented are to be as identified in the GSMCP, and may include an increase in the frequency of monitoring, or additional support measures. c. The senior qualified person shall prepare and submit a written report to the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit), within one week of alert level exceedance, which provides analyses of all monitoring data, relating to the exceedance of any of the trigger levels and any actions taken; d. If measurements exceed any of the alarm values the Consent Holder shall: i)

Follow the process identified in Condition 159(b);

ii)

Commission and submit a written report, prepared by the senior qualified person engaged in accordance with Condition 159(b) to the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit), within one week of alarm level exceedance, which provides analyses of all monitoring data, relating to the exceedance of any of the trigger levels and any recommendations for remedial actions if required in order to complete construction so as to avoid damage that will affect building serviceability; and

iii) Implement the recommendations of the report. In the instance that the recommendation is to stop work pursuant to Conditions 159(b) and (d), the remedial action(s) that have been recommended shall be undertaken before the works recommence. e. In relation to alarm level exceedance, recommendations of the IBA (refer Condition 120), which may include remedial actions up to and including stopping the works if that is in the best interests of preventing building serviceability damage, shall be implemented (unless the building owner(s) request in writing that the construction works are to be completed in accordance with the report prepared under Condition 159(c)(ii)).

Advice Note: Condition 159 operates independently from and does not detract from, but may assist to inform, Council’s role in relation to monitoring, and ensuring compliance with conditions of consent, including Condition 106.

Reporting 160. The Consent Holder shall advise the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural

Resources and Specialist Input Unit), in writing, of the date of the proposed commencement of dewatering.

161. All data collected as required by conditions of this consent from commencement of

dewatering to completion of monitoring are to be compiled, compared with the relevant trigger levels and submitted to the Council (Team Leader Water Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) at two monthly intervals, unless otherwise specified in this consent, setting out the previous results, providing an explanation for any trends and providing a construction progress timeline.

Review Condition – Water Permit R/REG/2014/5432 162. The conditions of this consent may be reviewed by the Council (Team Leader Water

Allocation, Natural Resources and Specialist Input Unit) pursuant to Section 128 of the Resource Management Act 1991, by the giving of notice pursuant to Section 129 of the Act, within six months after commencement of dewatering and subsequently at intervals of not less than one year thereafter in order: a. to vary the monitoring and reporting requirements, and performance standards in order to take account of information, including the results of previous monitoring and changed environmental knowledge, on: i) ground conditions; ii) aquifer parameters; iii) groundwater levels; and iv) ground surface deformation. b. to deal with any adverse effect on the environment arising or potentially arising from the exercise of this consent, and in particular effects on buildings, structures and services.

Appendix 1 to Resource Consent Conditions Conditions 133 to 138 of this resource consent require building condition surveys to be undertaken prior to commencement of dewatering. In accordance with Conditions 133 to 138, at a minimum, building condition surveys shall be undertaken for the following buildings:

ID

Address

Property Known As

1

12 Queen Street

CPO

2

21 Queen Street

Zurich House

3

23-29 Albert Street

ANZ Centre

4

12-26 Swanson Street

Affco House Carpark

5

35 Albert Street

Price Buchanan Building

6

37 Albert Street

7

39 Albert Street

8

46-50 Albert Street

APN NZ Complex

9

52-56 Albert Street

APN NZ Complex

10

41 Albert Street

Prince Albert Apartments

11

51-53 Albert Street

12

55 Albert Street

13

57 Albert Street

14

61 Albert Street

Shakespeare Hotel Brewery

15

58 Albert Street

APN NZ Complex

16

38 Wyndham Street

Wyndham Towers

17

63 Albert Street

AMI House

18

2 Queen Street

Endeans Building

19

12-32 Customs Street West

Old Customs House

20

20 Customs Street East

Levy Building

21

14-18 Customs Street East

Former Sofrana House

22

10 Customs Street East

Barrington Building

23

13 Albert Street

Yates Building

24

3 Albert Street

West Plaza

25

148 Quay Street

26

152 Quay Street

Harbour View Building

27

2 – 8 Customs Street

Mercure Hotel

Appendix 2 to Resource Consent Conditions Plans (four in total): CRL-PAT-RME-000-DRG-0403, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0404, Rev 3.0 dated 09/07/2015 and 0405, Rev 2.0 dated 03/07/2015

N

IMAGE: COURTESY AUCKLAND COUNCIL. ALL COPYRIGHT IN THE MATERIAL IS OWNED BY OR LICENSED TO AUCKLAND COUNCIL.

BH32

QS2

BH52

BH415

QS1 BH35

GWBH1 BH401

BH413

BH202B

BH408

BH411

BH255

BH414

BH405

BH205

#

!

"

BH412 BH204

#

#

#

(

*

*

'

(

)

(

&

'

#

!

"

#

#

#

(

*

*

'

(

)

(

&

'

#

"

!

&

'

&

+

$

%

+

&

$

%

BH410

BH409

BH403

BH203

BH202A

GWBH3

LEGEND

ALIGNMENT (DR6)

The positions of the historic holes are approximate only and have been positioned based on existing location plan information.

FOR INFORMATION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE

SOUTHERN CORRIDOR CITYIMPROVEMENTS RAIL LINK

PROJECT

APPROVED TITLE

15.04.16

BRITOMART TO WYNDHAM PROPOSED AND EXISTING GROUNDWATER MONITORING LOCATIONS

B.NEWNS

PROJECT

ZONE

DISCIPLINE

ELEMENT

TYPE

SHEET

REVISION

CRL

SYW

GEO

000

DRG

0046

5.0

DOCUMENT

B.NEWNS

CHECKED A.PATTLE

SIZE A1

DRAWN A.NAGY DESIGNED P.KIRK

SCALE M.FAULK1:2000

B.N B.N

APPROVED

DATE REVISION DETAILS 15.04.16 FOR INFORMATION 22.06.16 FOR INFORMATION - REVISED 18.08.16 FOR INFORMATION - REVISED 20.09.16 FOR INFORMATION - REVISED 23.01.17 FOR INFORMATION - REVISED

1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0

REV

CLIENT

Path: P:\200000-BST\250310 - Northern Corridor Improvements\3. Project Delivery\Geotechnical\02. Technical\01. GIS\CRL-SYW-GEO-000-DRG-0046 GSCMP GW MONITORING_v5.mxd

Date Saved: 23/01/2017 9:34:27 AM

GWBH2

EB301

BH ENDEANS

BH43

LEGEND 5mmCONTOUR -10- 10mm CONTOUR -15 - 15mm CONTOUR -20 - 20mm CONTOUR -30 - 30mm CONTOUR -100- 100mm CONTOUR -150- 150mm CONTOUR -200 - 200mm CONTOUR

21

EJ 22 @

26

BUILDINGS REQUIRING CONDITION SURVEY (MINIMUM REQUIRED) PROPOSED CUT AND COVER TUNNEL TYPE 1· BUILDING/COLUMN MONITORING LOCATION MONITORING LOCATION

.. I TYPE 3·PILE INCLOMETER AND STRUT

1 ..

MONITORING ZONE. ·6 NO.INCLOMETERCASINGS

27

PER ZONE.

r-1

.,.., 71.

,..,

• 3 NO.SETS OF STRUTS/ANCHORS AT

•

..·

-$-

.......

ZONE. EXISTING CRL GROUNDWATER EXISTING CRL GROUNDWATER MONITORING BOREHOLE (300} PROPOSED CRL GROUNDWATER MONITORING BOREHOLE (400} INDIVIDUAL PIEZOMETER INTAKE ZONES

•

I.

HISTORIC HOLE· POSSIBLY AVAILABLE FOR GROUNDWATER MONITORING

MONITORING POINT

if

LEVEL ONE MONITOR HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT INPlANEWITH TilE COLUMN/FACADE.

!

MONI TORING POINT

TYPE 1MONITORING POINT LAYOUT

!

NTS

i ii

NOTES: 1. THIS DRAWING IS TO BE READ INCONJUNCTION WITH THE MONITORING NOTES ON DRG: CRL-PAT-ST R-000-DRG-0400 2. CPO BUILDING WILL BE MONITORED DURING UNDERPINNING. NO SPECIFIC SETTLEMENT MONITORING IS REQUIRED.REFER TO DRGS.CRL·BTM-STR-®DRG-0450 ,451,452 & 0453 FOR UNDERPINNING DETAILS. 3. REFER TO NOTES ON DRG CRL·SYW-STR-000-DRG-0054 FOR MONITORING OF ZURICH BUILDING. 4. MONITORING IS FOR CRL CONSTRUCTION ONLY. 5. SETTLEMENT DUE TO CUT AND COVER CONSTRUCTION IS BASED UPON PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF HORIZONTAL WALL DEFLECTION. 6. SETTLEMEN T SHOWN ASSUMES GOOD CONSTRUCTION PRACTICE BY AN EXPERIENCED CONTRACTOR.

,.,

,.,

J CONTINUES ON DRG CRL-PAT-RME-OOQ..DRG-0404

PLAN 1:500

a• urecon

13!1# i

1!7.\'ii)

REVISION DETAILS

1.0 28.05.15 ISSUED FOR RESOURCE CONSENT 03.07.15 ISSVEO FOR RESOURCE CONSENT

z,o

3.0 09.07.15 ISSUED FOR R SOURCE CONSENT

W·1QiJ;J•l93•1

SCALE

T.IREU\NO B.NEWNS B.NEWNS

1:500 DRAWN

N.HEXT

lim) A1

PRELIMINARY APPROVED

:.··' ,_

Mott MacDonald

GRIMSHAW

AUCKLAND CITY RAIL LINK

NOT FOR CONSTRUCT ION

ARUP

BRITOMART TO WYNDHAM GROUNDWATER AND SETTLEMENT MONITORING AND CONTINGENCY PLAN SHEET 1 OF 3

- i.ti- M.p3JQ I.!W MJ* HiaM -··d -

I,,

1..

1..

I..,

RALEA

B.NEWNS

MOlihM

M-l :t1P ·!i+

PAT - RME - 000 - DRG - 0403 -

1..

3.0

1...

LEGEND -5 - 5mm CONTOUR -10 - 10mm CONTOUR -15 - 15mm CONTOUR -20- 20mm CONTOUR -30 - 30mm CONTOUR

EJ

=·

..,

0

9

I ..

TYPE 1BUILDING/COLUMN MONITORING LOCATION

@

TYPE 2 - GROUND MONITORING LOCATION

... ,

0

w::E 0::

._!. <(

0. ._.:,

0:: <..) (!)

0::

0

:z:

0

"'::>w:z:

;::

z

0

COVER TUNNEL

@

0

8

BUILDINGS REQUIRING CONDITION SURVEY (MINIMUM REQUIRED)

•

TYPE 3 - PILE INCLOMETER AND STRUT MONITORING ZONE. - 6 NO.INCLOMETER CASINGS INSTALLED WITHIN PILE WALL PER ZONE. - 3 NO.SETS OF STRUTS/ANCHORS AT EACH STRUT/ANCHOR LEVEL PER ZONE. EXISTING CRL GROUNDWATER MONITORING BOREHOLE (200)

-$-

EXISTING CRL GROUNDWATER MONITORING BOREHOLE (300)

-$-

PROPOSED CRL GROUNDWATER MONITORING BOREHOLE (400)

<..)

•

HISTORIC HOLE- POSSIBLY AVA ILABLE FOR GROUNDWAT ER MONITORING

i

I

MONITORING POINT LEVEL ONE

1

MONITOR HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT INPlANE WITH THE COLUMN/FACADE .

MONITORING POINT GROUND LEVEL

PLAN

.\

TYPE 1MONITORING POINT LAYOUT

1:1000

NTS

NOTES:

10

1. THIS DRAWINGIS TO BE READ INCONJUNCTION WITH THE MONITORING NOTES ON DRG:CRL-PAT-STR-000-DRG-0400 2. CPO BUILDING W ILL BE MONITORED DURING UNDERPINNING. NO SPECIFIC SETTLEMENT MONITORING IS REQUIRED.REFER TO DRGS.CRL-BTM-STR-000-DRG-0450,45 1, 452 & 0453 FOR UNDERPINNING DETAILS. 3. REFER TO NOTES ON DRG CRL-SYW-STR-000-DRG-0054 FOR MONITORING OF ZURICH BUILDING. 4. MONITORING IS FOR CRL CONSTRUCTION ONLY. 5. SETTLEMENT DUE TO CUT AND COVER CONSTRUCTIO N IS BASED UPON PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF HORIZONTAL WALL DEFLECT ION. 6. SETTLEMENT SHOWN ASSUMES GOOD CONSTRUCTION PRACTICE BY AN EXPER IENCED CONTRACTOR.

20

SCALE 1 1000

a• urecon

lij!I:Jh

lm REVISION DETAILS

W·1ijij;JeliJ:UI

SCALE

l:'l!'l)

1.0 28.05.15 ISSU!iO FOR RESOURCE CONSENT

T.IRELAND

1:500

A1

3.1 09.07.15 ISSUED FoR

B.NEWNS

2.9 pj.07.1$ :.1§$\1FOR R®VRcE CON§ Nf RESOURCE CONSENT

.N $

DRAWN

PRELIMINARY APPROVED

N.HEXT

Mott MacDonald

GRIMSHAW

ARUP R.ALEA

j llllllllllilllllllj "' OF.'GI"f.ALS!ZE

'

1.,

[,

r,.,

AUCKLAND CITY RAIL LINK

NOT OR CONST UCJION

B.NEWNS

BRITOMARf TO WYNDHAM GROUNDWATER AND SETTLEMENT MONITORING ANP Q_QNTINl'ENCY P!._AN I;T 2 OE 3 .ME H!il!i:J--- +•RME ?i§l§i ·IIM .. §Jj3 • -M·l@f41•!

PAT - M3121r@ 000 •• - MM DRG -.WU 0404 3.0 M

$_

[,.,

M.

1..,

LEGEND -5 - 5mmCONTOUR -10 - 10mm CONTOUR -15 - 15mm CONTOUR -20 - 20mm CONTOUR -30 - 30mm CONTOUR -40 - 40mm CONTOUR

-so-SOmmCONTOUR

B

BUILDINGS REQUIRING CONDITION SURVEY (MINIMUM REQUIRED) PROPOSED CUT AND COVER TUNNEL

@)

TYPE 1· BUILDING/COLUMN MONITORING LOCATION

@)

TYPE 2 • GROUND MONITORING LOCATION

.. I TYPE 3 ·PILE INCLOMETER AND STRUT

1 --

MONITORING ZONE.

·6 NO. INCLOMETER CASINGS

•

-$-

INSTALLED WITHIN PILE WALL PER ZONE. - 3 NO SETS OF STRUTS/ANCHORS AT EACH STRUT/ANCHOR LEVEL PER ZONE. EXISTING CRL GROUNDWATER MONITORING BOREHOLE (200) EXISTING CRL GROUNDWATER MONITORING BOREHOLE (300) PROPOSED CRL GROUNDWATER MONITORING BOREHOLE (400) INDIVIDUAL PIEZOMETER INTAKE ZONES

•

I

HISTORIC HOLE - POSSIBLY AVAILABLE FOR GROUNDWATER MONITORING

MONITORING POINT

I

LEVEL ONE

I

MONITOR HORIZONTAl MOVEMENTIN PlANE WITH THE COLUMNJFACAOE.

;:

•

PLAN

I l

1:500

MONITORING POINT GROUND LEVEL

TYPE 1MONITORING POINT LAYOUT NTS

i

I

NOTES: 1. THIS DRAWING IS TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITHTHE

R

ii

l

10 SCAlE 11000

10

MONITORING NOTES ON DRG:CRL-PAT-STR-000-DRG-0400 2. CPO BUILDING WILL BE MONITORED DURING UNDERPINNING. NO SPECIFIC SETTLEMENT MONITORING IS REQUIRED.REFER TO DRGS.CRL-BTM-STR -000-DRG-0450, 451,452 & 0453 FOR UNDERPINNING DETAILS. 3. REFER TO NOTES ON DRG CRL-SYW-STR-000-DRG-0054 FOR MONITORING OF ZURICH BUILDING. 4. MONITORING IS FOR CRL CONSTR UCTION ONLY. 5. SETTLEMENT DUE TO CUT AND COVER CONSTRUCTION IS BASED UPON PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF HORIZONTAL WALL DEFLECTION. 6. SETTLEMENT SHOWN ASSUMES GOOD CONSTRUCTION PRACTICE BY AN EXPERIENCED CONTRACTOR

a• urecon

13!13h

lmi!II!1JD REVISION DETAILS

1.0 28.05.15 ISSUED FOR RESOURCECONSSNT .2.9 .!!3J!7-' 1ss\@ FoR esouR'Q.;¢¢NSENt

l 'llllllllmuml CfVG:NAL$tZE

1..,

SCALE

T.IRELAND

1:500

e.NEw!l$

Molt MacDonald

GRIMSHAW

1·144;!•l?3•*

PRELIMINARY A1

DRAWN N.HEXT

AUCKlAND CITY RAIL LINK-

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION APPROVED

DESIGNED

N.B'EDNAREK

ARUP 1..

1.,

w .J ,•.Hj.jl+

CHECKED

I,.,

I,

L.,

r..,

T.IRELAND

D.MCGAHAN

1..,

2.0

1..

Appendix 3 Groundwater Monitoring Bores:

Monitoring Bore Screen Geology Existing

Screen

New

Screen Geology

Borehole ID

Geology

BH34-1

(Fill/TL)1

Borehole ID BH415-1

Fill/TL

BH34-2

(ER /TA)1

BH415-2

ER/TA

BH34-3

(EU)1

BH415-3

EU

BH35-1

(Fill/TL)1

BH35-2

(ER /TA)1

BH35-3

(EU)1

QS1-1

(Fill/TL)1

QS1-2

(ER/TA)1

QS1-3

(EU)1

QS2-1

(Fill/TL)1

QS2-2

(ER /TA)1

QS2-3

(EU)1

BH32-1

(Fill/TL)1

BH32-2

(ER /TA)1

BH32-3

(EU)1

BH43-1

(Fill/TL)1

BH43-2

(ER /TA)1

BH43-3

(EU)1

BH52-1

(Fill/TL)1

BH52-2

(ER /TA)1

BH52-3

(EU)1

BH45-1

(Fill/TL)1

BH45-2

(ER /TA)1

BH45-3

(EU)1 BH45R

EB301

(Fill/TL)

EB302

(Fill/TL/EU)

BH23

BH202A

EB302

(Fill)

BH401-1

Fill/TL

BH401-2

ER /TA

BH401-3

EU

BH402

(EU)

(EU)1

(EU)

BH202B

(EU)

BH251 - A

(EU)

BH251 - B

(EU)

GWBH3

Fill

BH403

Fill/TA

GWBH2

Fill

BH404

Fill/TA

BH405

Fill/TAEU

BH203

(EU)

BH255

EU

BH204-1

(ER/EW)

BH204-2

EU

EB305

ER/EW

EB306

ER/EW

EB307

ER/EW

BH205

ER

BH205

EU BH406 A

ER

BH406 B

Top of EU

BH407 A

Top of EU

BH407 B

ER

BH408 A

TA

BH408 B

ER

BH409 A

TA

BH409 B

ER

BH409 C

Top of the EU

BH410

TA

BH411 A

TA

BH411 A

TA

BH411 B

ER

BH411 B

ER

BH411 C

Top of EU

BH411 C

Top of EU

BH412 A

Top of the TA

BH412 AA

Base of the TA

BH412 B

ER/EW

BH412 C

Top of EU

BH413 - A

Fill/TL

BH413 - B

TA/ER

BH413 - C

EU

BH414 - A

TA

BH414 - B

ER

BH Endeans

Base of TL

GWBH1

Fill/TL

Appendix 4 to Resource Consent Conditions Deformation Limits â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Buildings Note: Further detailed design may modify the trigger levels presented below.

Any revisions based on further design shall not increase the number of properties affected nor increase the potential building damage impacts above the aesthetic levels presented by the application. This appendix relates to Conditions 122(j), 133(f), 126, 155 and 158.

City Rail Link Application Nos.: R/REG/2014/5430, R/LUC/2014/5428, R/REG/2014/5432, R/REG/2014/5435, R/REG/2014/5436, R/REG/2014/5437

88

LOCATION

ID NO4

ADDRESS

1

12 QUEEN STREET

2

21 QUEEN STREET

3

23-29 ALBERT STREET

4

5

12-26 SWANSON STREET

35 ALBERT STREET

6

37 ALBERT STREET

7

39 ALBERT STREET

8

46-50 ALBERT STREET

1

ZONE 2 : GROUND SURFACE MOVEMENT ACROSS BUILDINGS (INCLUDING ROADS INTERSECTING ALBERT STREET)

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

52-56 ALBERT STREET

41 ALBERT STREET

51-53 ALBERT STREET

55 ALBERT STREET

57 ALBERT STREET

61 ALBERT STREET

58 ALBERT STREET

38 WYNDHAM STREET

MOVEMENT

TRIGGER LEVELS [+/-] ALERT

ALARM

REFER TO NOTE 6 ON DRAWING CRL-PAT-STR-000-DRG-0400 [5.0] DISPLACEMENT MONITORING TRIGGER LEVELS SPECIFIC TO ZURICH BUILDING ARE OUTLINED ON DRAWING CRL-SYW-STR-000-DRG-0054 HORIZONTAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 7mm 9mm VERTICAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL SLOPE ACROSS BUILDING2 (I.E. ACROSS ZONE 2) HORIZONTAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 VERTICAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL SLOPE ACROSS BUILDING2 (I.E. ACROSS ZONE 2) HORIZONTAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3

14mm

18mm

1/950

1/750

14mm

18mm

20mm

25mm

1/950

1/750

VERTICAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL SLOPE ACROSS BUILDING2 (I.E. ACROSS ZONE 2) HORIZONTAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 VERTICAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL SLOPE ACROSS BUILDING2 (I.E. ACROSS ZONE 2) HORIZONTAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3

BUILDINGS DEMOLISHED. LIMITS FOR NEW BUILDING TO BE CONFIRMED.

VERTICAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL SLOPE ACROSS BUILDING2 (I.E. ACROSS ZONE 2) HORIZONTAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3

7mm

9mm

VERTICAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3

17mm

21mm

1/900

1/700

7mm

9mm

17mm

21mm

1/900

1/700

DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL SLOPE ACROSS BUILDING2 (I.E. ACROSS ZONE 2) 3 HORIZONTAL AT FACE OF BUILDING VERTICAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL SLOPE ACROSS BUILDING2 (I.E. ACROSS ZONE 2) HORIZONTAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 VERTICAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL SLOPE ACROSS BUILDING2 (I.E. ACROSS ZONE 2) HORIZONTAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 VERTICAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL SLOPE ACROSS BUILDING2 (I.E. ACROSS ZONE 2) HORIZONTAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 VERTICAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL SLOPE ACROSS BUILDING2 (I.E. ACROSS ZONE 2) HORIZONTAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 VERTICAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL SLOPE ACROSS BUILDING2 (I.E. ACROSS ZONE 2) HORIZONTAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 VERTICAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL SLOPE ACROSS BUILDING2 (I.E. ACROSS ZONE 2) HORIZONTAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 VERTICAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL SLOPE ACROSS BUILDING2 (I.E. ACROSS ZONE 2) HORIZONTAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3

8mm

10mm

20mm

25mm

1/800

1/650

8mm

10mm

20mm

25mm

1/800

1/650

8mm

10mm

20mm

25mm

1/800

1/650

8mm

10mm

20mm

25mm

1/800

1/650

8mm

10mm

20mm

25mm

1/750

1/600

8mm

9mm

17mm

21mm

1/650

1/500

5mm

7mm

VERTICAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3

12mm

15mm

DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL SLOPE ACROSS BUILDING2 (I.E.

1/1050

1/850

City Rail Link Application Nos.: R/REG/2014/5430, R/LUC/2014/5428, R/REG/2014/5432, R/REG/2014/5435, R/REG/2014/5436, R/REG/2014/5437

89

ACROSS ZONE 2)

17

63 ALBERT STREET

HORIZONTAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3

6mm

8mm

VERTICAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3

14mm

18mm

1/950

1/750

8mm

10mm

8mm

10mm

DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL SLOPE ACROSS BUILDING (I.E. ACROSS ZONE 2)

1/900

1/700

DIFFERENTIAL HORIZONTAL IN PLANE WITH THE COLUMN/FACADE

8mm

10mm

HORIZONTAL AT FACE OF BUILDING

3mm

4mm

VERTICAL AT FACE OF BUILDING

5mm

8mm

DIFFERENTIAL HORIZONTAL IN PLANE WITH THE COLUMN/FACADE

N/A

N/A

DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL SLOPE ACROSS BUILDING2 (I.E. ACROSS ZONE 2) HORIZONTAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3 VERTICAL AT FACE OF BUILDING3

ALL OTHER PROPERTIES

EXISTING BUILDING EXTERNAL COLUMN/FACADE

ALL PROPERTIES

BUILDING MOVEMENT

148 QUAY STREET 152 QUAY STREET 2-8 CUSTOMS STREET EAST 10-12 CUSTOMS STREET EAST 14-18 CUSTOMS STREET EAST 20 CUSTOMS STREET EAST 2 QUEEN STREET

2

City Rail Link Application Nos.: R/REG/2014/5430, R/LUC/2014/5428, R/REG/2014/5432, R/REG/2014/5435, R/REG/2014/5436, R/REG/2014/5437

90

Deformation Limits â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Services and Infrastructure Trigger Levels Table Note: Applies to ground surface movement within Albert Street and Lower Albert Street and roads intersecting Albert Street (includes footpaths, verge and road), Customs Street West, Fanshawe Street, lower Queen Street, Tyler Street, Galway Street.

SERVICES

MOVEMENT

TRIGGER LEVELS [+/-] ALERT5 ALARM STOP

ALL SERVICES WITH A DIAMETER GREATER THAN 200mm1

DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL GROUND MOVEMENT WITHIN ALBERT STREET4

1/200

1/160

1/140

ALL RIGID SERVICES WITH A DIAMETER LESS THAN 200mm

DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL GROUND MOVEMENT WITHIN ALBERT STREET4

1/200

1/160

1/140

NON-RIGID2 SERVICES WITH A DIAMETER LESS THAN 200mm1

DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL GROUND MOVEMENT WITHIN ALBERT STREET4

1/75

1/60

1/50

IDENTIFIED CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTUR E3

DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL GROUND MOVEMENT WITHIN ALBERT STREET4

1/200

1/160

1/140

City Rail Link Application Nos.: R/REG/2014/5430, R/LUC/2014/5428, R/REG/2014/5432, R/REG/2014/5435, R/REG/2014/5436, R/REG/2014/5437

91

Appendix 5 to Resource Consent Conditions Plan: CRL-BTM-RME-000-DRG-0004, revision 1, titled: “Location Plan Showing Sites Adjacent to Construction Sites”, dated 18.08.2015

City Rail Link Application Nos.: R/REG/2014/5430, R/LUC/2014/5428, R/REG/2014/5432, R/REG/2014/5435, R/REG/2014/5436, R/REG/2014/5437

92

LEGEND

KEYPLAN DESIGNATION ALIGNMENT PROPOSEDWORKS BRITOMARTTRANSPORTCENTRE

COMMERCEST

VICTORIASTEAST

IDENTIFIEDSITES

COMMERCEST

EXTENTOFWORKS CPOANDLOWERQUEENSTRUNNINGTUNNELS

1

5250

20000

WELLESLEYSTWEST

VICTORIASTWEST

DURHAMSTREETWEST

WYNDHAMSTREET

SWANSONSTREET

ELLIOTST

TEMPORARYWORKSUPPORTAREA

2

QESANDPRECINCT TUNNELS

MILLSLANE

ALBERTSTTUNNEL

MILLSLANE

pw:\\designshare.au.aurecon.info:PW_PR OD_AU\Docum ents\Projects\23xxxx\239933-CityRailLink(CDE)\01- WIP\Drawings\CRL-BTM-RME-000-DRG-0004.dwg

CUSTOMSSTWEST

QUEENST

MILLSLANE

DARBYST

BRITOMART

15300 0V0ID

15300 0V0ID

ALBERTST

15300 0V0ID

16650

ALBERTST

ALBERTST

1500

3

2250

3000

3000

WELLESLEYSTWEST

KINGSTONSTREET

WYNDHAMSTREET

SWANSONSTREET

WOLFEST

CUSTOMSSTWEST

TEMPORARYWORKSUPPORTAREA

3

1500

BLUESTONEWALL

Auckland

VICTORIASTWEST

EXTENTOFTUNNELPHYSICALWORKS. REFERTOALIGNMENTANDCIVILDRAWINGS FOREXACTLOCATIONOFWORKEXTENTS.

1808201511:46:02a.m.

HOBSONST

12.5

0

25

50m

CLIENT

SCALE1:1250

REV DATE REVISIONDETAILS 1.0 18.08.15 ISSUEDFORCONSENT

APPROVED T.IRELAND

AUCKLANDCITYRAILLINK

SCALE

SIZE

PRELIMINARY

1:1250

A1

NOTFORCONSTRUCTION

DRAWN

PROJECT

LOCATIONPLANSHOWINGSITES ADJACENTTOCONSTRUCTIONSITES

APPROVED

B.HINGSTON

DATE

DESIGNED

TITLE

M.TAYLOR CHECKED

T.IRELAND

D.MCGAHAN 0

20mm ORIGINALSIZE

40

60

80

100

200

300

400

500

DOCUMENT 600

PROJECT

ZONE

CRL

BTM

DISCIPLIN E

RME

ELEMENT

TYPE

SHEET

REVISION

000

DRG

0004

1.0

700

800