Appendix F Historical character

Auckland City Rail Link In association with:

NIKAU STREET STORMWATER REALIGNMENT HISTORIC CHARACTER DELIVERY WORK PLAN Archaeology Section

Document ref: Revision: 5 August 2017

COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE Historic Character Delivery Work Plan

August 2017

Version history Rev.

Date

Version details

Prepared by

Reviewed by

1

October 2016

Draft for AT Review

S. Macready, R. Clough

R. Clough

2

October 2016

For Consent

S. Macready, R. Clough

H. Hamilton (AT)

3

November 2016

Updated For Consent following CLG Review

S. Macready, R. Clough

J. Luty (Aurecon)

4

December 2016

Final for Consent

S. Macready, R. Clough

5

August 2017

Final for Consent

S. Macready, R. Clough

c:\users\james.luty\appdata\local\microsoft\windows\inetcache\content.outlook\kr638wg1\historic character dwp archaeology response to at comments (002) - at review.docx

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan - Archaeology

August 2017

Table of contents 1

2 3

4

5

6 7

Introduction 1.1 Project Works 1.2 Purpose of Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section) 1.3 Relevant Designation Conditions Historic Heritage Values - Archaeology 2.1 Archaeological Sites in the Project Area Roles and Responsibilities 3.1 Project Archaeologist roles and responsibilities 3.2 Contractor briefing 3.3 Contact details Training 4.1 Pre-Construction Briefing 4.2 Toolbox Talks 4.3 Training Records Archaeological Procedures and Mitigation Measures 5.1 Archaeological Discovery Protocols 5.2 Discovery of Archaeological or Cultural Remains 5.3 Mana Whenua protocols 5.3.1 Archaeological Remains 5.3.2 Koiwi Tangata (Human Remains) 5.3.3 Taonga (Maori Artefacts) 5.4 Recording of Features and Deposits 5.5 Artefact Management Plan 5.6 Stand Down Periods 5.7 Post Excavation Analysis and Archiving 5.8 Reporting Requirements Communication and Consultation Review and Updating of the DWP 7.1 DWP Review 7.2 DWP Updates

Appendix A :

HNZPTA Authority Requirements

Appendix B:

Record of CLG and Independent Peer Review Comments

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan - Archaeology

1 1 4 4 7 7 8 8 8 8 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 15 16 17 17 17

August 2017

Glossary of abbreviations Acronym

Definition

CEMP

Construction Environmental Management Plan

CRL

City Rail Link

DWP

Delivery Work Plan

EFC

East Facing Connection

HNZPT

Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Tāonga

HNZPTA

Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Tāonga Act 2014

NAL

North Auckland Line

RMA

Resource Management Act 1991

WFC

West Facing Connection

Glossary of terms Term

Definition

Koiwi tangata

Human skeletal remains

Taonga tūturu

Maori artefacts

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan - Archaeology

August 2017

1

1

Introduction

The City Rail Link (CRL) project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line (NAL) in the vicinity of Mt Eden Station.

The works relating to this Historic Character Delivery Works Plan (DWP) constitute part of the enabling work for CRL. The works include the realignment of a 1950mm stormwater main which runs (in part) along Nikau Street in Mt Eden. The Nikau Street Stormwater main currently conflicts with the CRL tunnel alignment at the intersection of Nikau Street and Flower Street. The main is owned and operated by AC.

1.1

Project Works

The Nikau Street Stormwater Diversion Project (the Project) proposes to divert the existing Nikau Street stormwater main between Water Street and Nikau Street to achieve a gravity diversion. It is proposed that the realigned stormwater main be installed using pipe-jacking that passes below the new East Facing Connection near Mount Eden Road. Pipe jacking is a trenchless construction technique where a Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) with a pressurised slurry system excavates material. As part of the stormwater main realignment works, three pipe jack shafts are proposed at Water Street, Nikau Street and Mount Eden The shafts and associated construction support areas are shown in Figure 1.2 to Figure 1.4, and will consist of: •

•

•

A reception shaft at Nikau Street (approximately 6.1m to 10.9m in diameter and 15.4m deep) known as the ‘Nikau Street Shaft’, located within the footpath on the corner of Nikau Street and Ruru Street (Figure 1.2). It is proposed to be supported by a construction support area of 900m2 at 16 Ruru Street.

A launch shaft adjacent to Mount Eden Road (approximately 12.5m long, 9.5m wide and 14.6m deep), known as the ‘Mount Eden Road Shaft’, located between Mount Eden Road and the NAL (Figure 1.3). By constructing the launch shaft in this location, near the middle of the alignment, it is enabling the construction work to take place in two stages (Mount Eden Road to Nikau Street and Mount Eden Road to Water Street). The construction activities shall be supported by a CSA of approximately 1200m2 (plus an additional 350m2 for a temporary vehicle access ramp) surrounding the shaft.

A reception shaft at Water Street (approximately 8.5m diameter and 16.7m deep), known as the ‘Water Street Shaft’, located within a currently vacant site between the end of Water Street and the existing NAL lines (Figure 1.4). It is proposed to be supported by a construction support area of 1500m2 surrounding the shaft.

Construction support areas around the proposed shafts will need to be cleared and levelled, and minor excavation up to 0.5m may be required for spoil storage pits. The buildings at 26 Mt Eden Road, 28 Mt Eden Road and 16 Ruru Street will need to be demolished to enable the works.

Additionally, three new Gross Pollutant Traps (GPTs) are proposed to be installed on Boston Road (two) and Normanby Road (one). These works will require excavating pits of approximately 6 m wide, 6 m long and 7.9 m deep to install new 2.5 m wide GPTs and manholes (Figure 1.5).

2

Figure 1.1: Route of Nikau Street Stormwater Realignment and location of entry shaft east of Mt Eden Road (centre) and retrieval shafts at Ruru/Nikau Street (right) and Water Street (left)

Figure 1.2: Proposed Nikau Street Shaft and construction support area

3

Figure 1.3: Proposed Mt Eden Road Shaft and construction support area

Figure 1.4: Proposed Water Street Shaft and construction support area

4

Figure 1.5: Approximate GPT locations

1.2

Purpose of Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Archaeology Section)

The Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (DWP) (Archaeology Section) has been prepared to manage adverse effects on archaeology that may result during the construction of the Project. The objective of the Archaeology section is to provide a framework for the avoidance, remediation or mitigation of adverse effects on archaeological remains during construction, as far as reasonably practicable.

The Historic Character DWP (Archaeology Section) (referred to as ‘this DWP’) is required under CRL Designation Condition 42. It has been prepared by Clough & Associates Ltd and will form part of the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) for the Project. Collectively, the CEMP and Historic Character DWP will support the Outline Plan for the Project.

A Built Heritage section is not required as the affected buildings at 26 Mt Eden Road and 16 Ruru Street are late 20th century buildings with no built heritage values. The nearest building registered as having heritage values is approximately 100m away from the proposed works. As such there are considered to be no effects on historic character. This DWP will therefore only cover archaeology and will not include historic heritage as it is irrelevant to the works.

1.3

Relevant Designation Conditions

Table 1.1 identifies the designation conditions relevant to this DWP and where they are addressed in the document.

5 Table 1.1: Condition No.

Historic Character - Archaeology conditions and DWP Section where addressed Condition

Relevant section of DWP City Rail Link Designation

42.1

A Historic Character DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects on built heritage and archaeology that may result during construction of the City Rail Link or any part of it.

42.2

The objective of the Archaeology section of the Historic Character DWP is to This document avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on archaeological remains during construction, as far as reasonably practicable.

To achieve the above objective the following matters shall be included in the Archaeology section of the Historic Character DWP: (a) Constructor roles and responsibilities, stand-down periods and reporting Sections 3.1, requirements are to be clearly identified; 5.6, 5.8 (b) How procedures for archaeological investigations and monitoring of Sections 5, 5.1, preliminary earthworks are to be implemented in areas where there is 5.2 and 5.3 potential for archaeological remains to be discovered; (c) Procedures for the discovery of, including accidental discovery of archaeological remains including: (i) The ceasing of all physical construction works in the immediate vicinity of Sections 5.1, the discovery; 5.2, 5.3, 5.6 (ii) Practices for dealing with the uncovering of cultural or archaeological Sections 5.1, remains and the parties to be notified (including, but not limited to, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.8 appropriate iwi authorities, the Auckland Council Consents Monitoring officer, the New Zealand Historic Places Trust [now Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga - HNZPT], and the New Zealand Police (if koiwi (human skeletal remains) are discovered); (iii) Procedures to be undertaken before physical works in the area of Sections 5.2, discovery can start again, including any iwi protocols, recording of sites and 5.4, 5.6 material, recovery of any artefacts, and consultation to be undertaken with iwi, Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer and Heritage Unit, and with the New Zealand Historic Places Trust [now HNZPT]; and (iv) Procedures for recording any archaeological remains or evidence before Sections 5.4, it is modified or destroyed, including opportunities for the conservation and 5.5, 5.7, 5.8, preservation of artefacts and ecofacts (biological material) that are 5.10 discovered. Consideration shall be given to the incorporation of in-situ material or artefacts into the design of stations and / or public places associated with the City Rail Link project. Consideration shall also be given to the provision for ‘post-excavation’ assessment analysis and publication of material within 24 months of completion of construction. (v) Provision for ‘post-excavation’ archiving, assessment and analysis of the Sections 5.7, archaeological records and materials; publication of results of that work 5.8 within 24 months of completion of construction assessment analysis and publication of material within 24 months of completion of construction. (d) Training procedures for all contractors are to be undertaken in advance Section 4 of construction, regarding the possible presence of cultural or archaeological sites or material, what these sites or material may look like, and the relevant provisions of the Historic Places Act 1993 [now the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014] if any sites or material are discovered;

42.3

This document

6

Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

(e) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which details how the Auckland Council Heritage Department, the New Zealand Historic Places Trust [now HNZPT], mana whenua (see condition 8) are consulted, and the communication with the general public on the management of the adverse effects relating to archaeology.

Section 6

7

2

Historic Heritage Values - Archaeology

2.1

Archaeological Sites in the Project Area

There are no known archaeological sites in the areas affected by surface works; the car park at the end of Water Street; 26 and 28 Mt Eden Road and the adjacent driveway; 16 Ruru Street and the adjacent road reserve at the corner of Ruru and Nikau Streets; and the three GPT locations.

There is a limited possibility of subsurface archaeological remains relating to pre-European Maori occupation or 19th and early 20th century residential occupation. However, any surviving archaeological remains exposed by project works would have the potential to provide information relating to the history of the area.

The possibility of exposing archaeological remains will be managed through this DWP and an Archaeological Authority issued by HNZPT (see Appendix A).

8

3

Roles and Responsibilities

3.1

Project Archaeologist roles and responsibilities

The Project Archaeologist will be responsible for ensuring that the archaeological requirements set out in this DWP and in the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 (HNZPTA) authority are fulfilled. This includes ensuring that an archaeologist is available to carry out spot checks while surface earthworks are being carried out, to respond to call-in by the construction contractor, and to investigate and record any archaeological remains exposed. It also includes ensuring that the archaeological team adheres to the contractor’s site safety requirements.

The Project Archaeologist will also be responsible for reporting to the relevant parties regarding the archaeological work.

3.2

Contractor briefing

Prior to the start of earthworks, the Project Archaeologist and Mana Whenua representatives will meet with the construction contractor on site to brief them on the archaeological and cultural requirements for the Project.

The Project Archaeologist and Mana Whenua representatives must be given at least 2 weeks’ notice by the construction contractor that works are about to begin. The construction contractor will keep the Project Archaeologist and Mana Whenua representatives informed as to the work schedule and any changes that may arise.

As set out in sections 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 of this DWP, the construction contractor will temporarily cease works and call-in the Project Archaeologist if suspected archaeological remains are exposed when an archaeologist is not present, so that the remains can be assessed and recorded.

As set out in sections 5.2 and 5.6 of this DWP, the construction contractor will give the Project Archaeologist sufficient time and opportunity for the recording and sampling of any archaeological features or deposits encountered, and will not resume works in the immediate vicinity until the archaeological work is completed. If requested to do so by the Project Archaeologist, the contractor will place excavated material to one side for further examination by the Archaeologist.

3.3

Contact details

Table 3.1 outlines the contact details of the Project Archaeologist, Mana Whenua, Auckland Council Heritage and HNZPT. Table 3.1:

Contact details

Title

Name

Contact Details

Project Archaeologist (and Approved Archaeologist under the HNZPT Authority for the Project) Auckland Council Cultural Heritage Implementation Team Leader

Rod Clough Clough & Associates Ltd

Phone: (09) 814 1946 or 0274850059;

Chris Mallows

Phone: 021807348, Email: Chris.Mallows@aucklandcouncil.co.nz

Auckland Council Compliance and Monitoring Officer

Fiona Harte

Phone: 021 828 369, Email: Fiona.Harte@aucklandcouncil.co.nz

Email: heritage@clough.co.nz

9

Title

Name

Contact Details

HNZPT Mid-Northern Regional Archaeologist

Bev Parslow:

Phone (09) 307 9923 or 021 060 3424, Email: ArchaeologistMN@heritage.org.nz Phone: (09) 307 9924

Mana Whenua representatives (if remains relating to Maori occupation are found)

Greg Walter -

To be contacted via: Tipa Compain (Maori Relationships Manager, Stakeholder Management – Mana Whenua/Mataawaka), Auckland Transport: (09) 447 4661; tipa.compain@aucklandtransport.govt.nz

10

4

Training

4.1

Pre-Construction Briefing

Prior to the start of Project earthworks, the Project Archaeologist will provide a briefing on the Project’s archaeological requirements as contained within this section of this DWP to the construction contractor and all staff working on the Project. These requirements include but are not limited to: •

Statutory requirements under the HNZPTA;

•

How to recognise archaeological material if exposed during earthworks;

•

What actions need to be taken should any archaeological material or remains be exposed or encountered during earthworks; and

•

Who to contact in the event of archaeological material being exposed, if the Project Archaeologist is not present on site at the time.

Mana Whenua representatives will also be invited to provide a briefing on cultural requirements in the event that archaeological remains relating to Maori occupation are exposed during the earthworks.

4.2

Toolbox Talks

The Project Archaeologist will also attend regular toolbox meetings during the course of the Project, the purpose of which will be to remind staff of the Project’s archaeological requirements and to ensure that any new staff joining the Project team are fully briefed prior to the commencement of works.

4.3

Training Records

A record of attendance at briefing and training sessions will be held by the Environmental and Sustainability Manager as part of the Project training record (refer to the CEMP for further detail in this regard).

11

5

Archaeological Procedures and Mitigation Measures

As noted in section 2, there is only limited potential for subsurface archaeological remains to be exposed during project works. However, any effects on archaeological features and deposits present in the Project works areas will be managed and mitigated by archaeological monitoring of works based on a combination of spot checks by the Project Archaeologists and call-in by the construction contractor; the recording of any remains exposed; and the recovery of samples of archaeological material for further analysis.

Archaeological monitoring will apply to excavation of the receiving and entry shafts at Water Street, Ruru Street and Mt Eden Road as shown in Figure 1.1, and any associated earthworks required within the construction support areas.

5.1

Archaeological Discovery Protocols

If suspected archaeological remains are encountered and the Project Archaeologist is not present, works will stop in the immediate vicinity of the find until the Project Archaeologist can assess the site.

5.2

Discovery of Archaeological or Cultural Remains

If in situ archaeological features or deposits are identified during earthworks, the Project Archaeologist will stop works in the immediate vicinity by notifying the Project Manager and will investigate and record the remains, in accordance with accepted archaeological practice as set out in this DWP and the requirements of the HNZPT Authority. If remains indicating Maori occupation are exposed the protocols outlined in section 5.3 will be followed.

If significant archaeological features or deposits are identified during earthworks the Auckland Council (Cultural Heritage Implementation Team Leader and Compliance and Monitoring Officer), HNZPT, and Mana Whenua will first be notified by the Project Archaeologist, and the remains will then be investigated and recorded in accordance with accepted archaeological practice and as directed by HNZPT, if of pre-1900 date. Any significant remains of 20th century date will also be investigated and recorded as directed by the Auckland Council Cultural Heritage Implementation Team Leader. If remains indicating Maori occupation are exposed the protocols outlined at 5.3 of this DWP will be followed.

5.3

Mana Whenua protocols

5.3.1

Archaeological Remains

If archaeological remains relating to Maori occupation are exposed, the Project Archaeologist will inform the appropriate Mana Whenua representatives (if not present).

5.3.2

Koiwi Tangata (Human Remains)

If bone material is identified that could potentially be human, the following protocol will be adopted: 1 2

Earthworks/investigation will cease in the immediate vicinity while an archaeologist establishes whether the bone is human.

If it is not clear whether the bone is human, work shall cease in the immediate vicinity until the Auckland University reference collection and/or a specialist can be consulted and a definite identification made.

12 3

4 5

6 7

8

5.3.3

If bone is confirmed as human (koiwi tangata), the archaeologist will immediately contact the Mana Whenua representatives, HNZPT, the NZ Police and Auckland Council Cultural Heritage Implementation Team Leader and Compliance and Monitoring officer.

The site will be secured in a way that protects the koiwi as far as possible from further damage.

Once the NZ Police and HNZPT are satisfied that the remains are archaeological, consultation will be undertaken between the Mana Whenua representatives, the HNZPT Regional Archaeologist, the Auckland Council Cultural Heritage Implementation Team and AT to determine and advise the most appropriate course of action. No further action will be taken until responses have been received from all parties, and the koiwi will not be removed until advised by HNZPT. The Mana Whenua representatives will advise on appropriate tikanga and be given the opportunity to conduct any cultural ceremonies that are appropriate.

If the Mana Whenua representatives are in agreement and so request, the bones may be further analysed by a skilled bio-anthropological specialist prior to reburial, in line with the HNZPT Guidelines Koiwi Tangata Human Remains (2010).

Activity in that place can recommence as soon the bones have been reinterred or removed and authorisation has been obtained from HNZPT.

Taonga (Maori Artefacts)

Maori artefacts such as carvings, stone adzes, and greenstone objects are considered to be taonga (treasures). These are taonga tĹŤturu within the meaning of the Protected Objects Act 1975. Taonga may be discovered in isolated contexts, but are generally found within archaeological sites. If taonga are discovered the following protocols will be adopted: 1 2

3 4

5

5.4

The area containing the taonga will be secured in a way that protects the taonga as far as possible from further damage, consistent with conditions of the Archaeological Authority.

The Project Archaeologist will then inform HNZPT, Auckland Council and the nominated Mana Whenua representatives so that the appropriate actions (from cultural and archaeological perspectives) can be determined.

These actions will be carried out within the stand down period specified above, and work may resume at the end of this period or earlier if advised by HNZPT or the Project Archaeologist.

The Project Archaeologist will notify the Ministry for Culture and Heritage of the find within 28 days as required under the Protected Objects Act 1975. This can be done through the Auckland War Memorial Museum.

The Ministry for Culture and Heritage, in consultation with Mana Whenua, will decide on custodianship of the taonga. If the taonga requires conservation treatment (stabilisation), this can be carried out by the Department of Anthropology, University of Auckland (09-373-7999) and would be paid for by the Ministry. It would then be returned to the custodian or museum.

Recording of Features and Deposits

Any in situ pre-1900 or significant 20th century archaeological deposits or features exposed during earthworks will be investigated, recorded and sampled consistent with accepted archaeological practice as set out in this DWP and in accordance with the requirements of the HNZPT Authority.

Detailed notes of each feature and deposit will be made, photographs will be taken, and all subsurface features located will be detailed on the site plan. Stratigraphic drawings and photographs of features and deposits will be undertaken.

13 Sufficient time and opportunity will be allowed for the recording and sampling of any archaeological features or deposits encountered. The archaeologist(s) will record the archaeological feature(s) or deposit(s) as quickly as possible so that earthworks may resume without undue delay.

5.5

Artefact Management Plan

The locations of artefact deposits will be marked on the site plan and retained for analysis. If large numbers of artefacts relating to European occupation are exposed, a representative sample will be retained.

The process for storage, analysis and display shall be as follows: •

Artefacts will be bagged, labelled by date and context, and may initially be stored in a secure on-site lock-up facility provided by the contractor.

•

As soon as is feasible artefacts will be transferred to the Project Archaeologist’s offices for cleaning, recording and analysis.

•

Any significant artefacts and/or artefacts meriting public display, will be identified by the Project Archaeologist and, in consultation with the relevant stakeholders, will be considered either for display within the new Mt Eden Station or for donation to the Auckland War Memorial Museum, as appropriate.

•

Less significant finds will be disposed of following recording and analysis, subject to AT agreement, unless a museum is willing to accept the collection.

•

Any wooden or fibre artefacts of significance will be wrapped/contained as required for short term preservation and analysis.

Artefacts will be conserved by appropriate specialists if this is recommended by the Project Archaeologist based on the level of significance and suitability for display or addition to museum collections.

Any Maori artefacts will be managed as set out under the Mana Whenua Protocols (Section 5.3 of this DWP).

5.6

Stand Down Periods

Depending on what is revealed by the earthworks, stand down periods involving the ceasing of works in the immediate vicinity may be required at various stages to allow for archaeological work to be carried out or for consultation with the appropriate parties.

Stand down will require earthworks to cease only in the immediate vicinity of the feature or find, and work may proceed in other areas. The maximum stand down periods in Table 5.1 will apply but earthworks may be resumed earlier if the required work has been completed.

Timeframes need to be flexible enough to ensure that archaeological works are completed as necessary to ensure that the conditions of the Archaeological Authority are met.

Table 5.1:

Maximum Stand Down Periods

Trigger

Stand Down Period

Requirements

Release

Archaeological feature, deposit or artefacts

Maximum 2 days in each location, but work may continue in areas where no remains are identified.

Sufficient time must be allowed for the archaeologist to investigate and record the remains.

Work resumes when the Project Archaeologist advises the site foreman that work is completed.

14

Trigger

Stand Down Period

Requirements

Release

Significant archaeological feature, deposit or artefacts, or significant 20th century historic heritage remains, that were not anticipated

Up to 3 days for a response from HNZPT for pre-1900 remains, and in most circumstances up to 3 days for any detailed investigation required.

Up to 3 days for a response from Council if significant post-1900 historic heritage remains are found, and up to 3 days for any detailed investigation required.

The likely requirement is a mitigation investigation and/or recording by standard archaeological techniques, but this will be advised by HNZPT, or

by Auckland Council if the find is of 20th century date. Note that there may

Work resumes when the Project Archaeologist advises the site foreman that work is completed.

Human bone found

As agreed between the project manager, HNZPT, Auckland Council and Mana Whenua.

HNZPT and NZ Police to be satisfied that koiwi identification is correct.

Mana Whenua representative(s) to organise reinterment or removal of bones from site and appropriate cultural ceremonies.

Taonga or archaeological remains of Maori origin found

Up to 3 days

HNZPT and Mana Whenua representative(s) to be consulted on appropriate action. Archaeological recording as required.

5.7

be special circumstances in which a longer period of stand down for investigation is deemed necessary by either HNZPT or Auckland Council.

Work resumes following reinterment or removal of bones from site and when authorisation from HNZPT has been received.

Work resumes when the Project Archaeologist or HNZPT advises the site foreman that work is completed

Post Excavation Analysis and Archiving

Artefacts retained from the site will be analysed and recorded by the appropriate specialists with the results presented in the final archaeological report, which will be provided to the parties specified in Section 5.8 of this DWP for information and archiving.

Depending on what is exposed, consideration will be given to displaying archaeological material such as artefacts within the new Mt Eden Station.

Any artefacts of significance relating to European occupation of the area that are recovered from the site that are not required for display may be offered to the Auckland Museum in consultation with AT. Any Maori artefacts (taonga tuturu) will be dealt with in accordance with the Mana Whenua protocols outlined in Section 5.3 of this DWP and the requirements of the Protected Objects Act 1975.

Archaeological material identified by the Project Archaeologist as being appropriate for Carbon 14 dating will be sent to the University of Waikato’s Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory for age determination.

15

5.8

Reporting Requirements

During the course of the project, information on any archaeological discoveries will be provided to the Auckland Council Cultural Heritage Implementation Team and Consent Monitoring Officer, HNZPT and Mana Whenua.

Opportunities for provision of information to the public via on site and media releases will be taken in consultation with those parties, depending on whether any significant archaeology is exposed during earthworks.

A written summary report will be provided by the Project Archaeologist to AT, HNZPT, Auckland Council (Cultural Heritage Implementation Team and Consent Monitoring officer) and Mana Whenua within 20 days of the completion of monitoring work. A full and final monitoring report will be completed within 12 months of the end of the monitoring work, and will be provided to AT, HNZPT, the Auckland Council (for inclusion in the Cultural Heritage Inventory), the NZ Archaeological Association Central File, Mana Whenua and any other parties specified in the designation conditions and archaeological Authority.

On completion of the final report, the Project Archaeologist will update the archaeological site records on the NZAA Site Recording Scheme (ArchSite database) and Auckland Council Cultural Heritage Inventory with a summary of the results and reference to the final report.

Depending on the significance of the archaeological information recovered, articles may be submitted to academic journals for publication.

16

6

Communication and Consultation

Refer to the Project Communication and Consultation Plan attached as Appendix J of the CEMP with respect to consultation with the Auckland Council Cultural Heritage Implementation Team, HNZPT, Mana Whenua and the public in relation to archaeological aspects of the Project.

Matters to be discussed with Project stakeholders will include: •

Opportunities for public observation of excavations during the Project;

•

Opportunities and avenues for providing information to Project stakeholders and the public regarding archaeological discoveries during the Project; and

•

The display of archaeological material and artefacts within the new Mt Eden Station, if material meriting public display is recovered during the Project.

17

7

Review and Updating of the DWP

This DWP is subject to a review process with the Community Liaison Group (CLG) established for the Project and a suitably qualified independent peer reviewer (Appendix B).

7.1

DWP Review

The process for reviewing and updating this DWP as a result of a material change to the Project or the annual review is outlined in the Project CEMP. This DWP will be reviewed throughout the course of the Project or at least annually: •

To reflect material changes associated with changes to construction techniques, the natural environment or due to unresolved complaints;

•

Compliance with the designation or consent conditions, the CEMP, DWPs and EMPs (including site specific plans) and material changes to these plans;

•

Any significant changes to construction activities or methods;

•

Key changes to roles and responsibilities within the Project team;

•

Changes in industry best practice standards;

•

Changes in legal or other requirements (social and environmental legal requirements, consent conditions, AT objectives and relevant policies, plans, standards, specifications and guidelines);

•

Results of inspections, monitoring and reporting procedures associated with the management of adverse effects during construction;

•

Comments or recommendations from Auckland Council regarding the CEMP, DWPs and EMPs; and

•

Unresolved complaints and any response to complaints and remedial action taken to address the complaint.

7.2

DWP Updates

The process for reviewing and updating this DWP as a result of a material change to the Project or the annual review is outlined in section 5.7 of the CEMP. An original copy of this DWP document and subsequent versions will be kept for the Project records (earlier versions marked as obsolete). Each new / updated version of the Archaeology Section of the Historic Character DWP documentation will be issued with a version number and date to eliminate obsolete versions of this DWP documentation being used, and will be kept on site during works.

A summary of the review process will be provided to Auckland Council and otherwise be made available on request.

Appendix A:

HNZPTA Authority Requirements

In addition to the requirements of the CRL designation, and this DWP prepared in accordance with CRL designation Condition 42, all modification and investigation of pre-1900 archaeological remains are subject to the archaeological provisions of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 (HNZPTA) and must be carried out in accordance with the conditions of an Authority issued by HNZPT under that Act. A general Authority for the Aotea Station to Mt Eden Station/NAL works, including the Nikau Street Stormwater Realignment and other utilities relocation works, has been granted by HNZPT (Authority No. 2017/793). The Authority sets management procedures in place for archaeological discoveries.

Care has been taken to ensure that the archaeological procedures set out in this DWP are consistent with the conditions and requirements of the Authority issued by HNZPT.

Appendix B:

Record of CLG and Independent Peer Review Comments

CLG Comments No comments were received from the Community Liaison Group (CLG) regarding the Historic Character Delivery Work Plan.

Comment ID

Date

Time

Forum

Commenter

Comment

Resolution

IPRP Comments Peer Reviewer: Russell Foster Date: 22 November 2016

Full copy of Independent Peer Review provided below HCDWP Section

Comment

Resolution

3.3 Contact details

Title used for HNZPT should be “Mid-Northern Regional Archaeologist”

Change made in text.