Issuu

Choose a building block.

In association with:

ENABLING WORKS CONTRACT 2 Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Separable Portion 1 â€“ Cut and Cover Works Document Ref: CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06

FINAL 30th October 2018

This page intentionally left blank.

Connectus 2719 Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Project: City Rail Link C2 Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Client: City Rail Link Limited Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

DOCUMENT INFORMATION Organisation:

Connectus

Document Title:

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement

Fulcrum Document Number:

CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018

Document based on iTWOcx No:

n/a

Client:

City Rail Link Limited

Project:

CRL Enabling Works: Contract Two

Location:

Auckland CBD

Project No:

2719

REVISION HISTORY Rev

Date

Details

Author

Approver

12/02/18

1st Draft for CRLL review

24/04/18

M. Kerr-Ridge

C Hind

M. Kerr-Ridge

C Hind

2 Draft for CLG review

19/07/18

3 Draft for IPR

M. Kerr-Ridge

C Hind

17/09/18

Final Draft for CRLL Review

M. Kerr-Ridge

C Hind

03/10/18

Final

M. Kerr-Ridge

C Hind

30/10/18

Final â€“ Programme Update and Council Comments Update

M. Kerr-Ridge

C Hind

This document remains the property of Connectus. Its contents are confidential and shall not be reproduced, destroyed or given away without the express, written permission of Connectus. The electronic version of this document in iTWOcx Database on designated server(s) is the Master Copy and is a controlled document. Unless specifically noted thereon, other copies of this document are uncontrolled.

Page 3

This page intentionally left blank

Page 4

Table of Contents Document information ............................................................................................................................. 3 Revision History ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1

Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 7 1.1

SIBD DWP Addendum Author

Project Description ................................................................................................................ 8 2.1

Construction Methodology Overview

2.2

Construction Programme Overview

Consultation ......................................................................................................................... 10 3.1

Consultation Process and Review

3.2

Albert Street from Customs Street West to Wyndham Street

3.3

Lower Albert Street from Quay Street to Customs Street West

Implementation Plan ............................................................................................................ 20 4.1

Noise and Vibration

4.2

Air Quality

4.3

Transport, Access and Parking Disruption

4.4

Disruption to Business Visibility

4.5

Amenity Impact

Ongoing Implementation ..................................................................................................... 23

Complaints ........................................................................................................................... 23

Reporting ............................................................................................................................. 23 Appendix A - Community Liaison Group Consultation

Appendix B - Independent Peer Review Comments

Appendix C â€“ Auckland Council Review Comments

Page 5

This page intentionally left blank

Page 6

1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Addendum to the City Rail Link (CRL) Enabling Works Contract 2 (C2) Social 1 Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan (SIBD DWP) is to ensure that activities associated with the CRL C2 Public Realm Reinstatement (PRR) works meet the requirements of the 2 conditions (designation and resource consent ) set out in Section 1.2 of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP . In achieving this outcome, this Addendum addresses the potential for social impacts and business disruption associated with the PRR phase of the construction works that are not covered in the CRL C2 SIBD DWP for C2. Where the impacts are already covered in the CRL C2 SIBD DWP, reference is made to the appropriate section(s) of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP.

1.1

SIBD DWP ADDENDUM AUTHOR

This addendum has been prepared by Matthew Kerr-Ridge Senior Planner at AECOM. Matthew has six years of experience as a planning practitioner. This includes providing consultation and stakeholder management, and/or social impact assessment for the projects including Ruatawhiri Park Sportsfield Lighting Upgrades, Fowlds Park Sportsfield Redevelopment, Brylee Drive Reserve Wetland Development and Central Interceptor (assisting Watercare Services Ltd) and CRL C2 (coauthorship of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP). This addendum was prepared with support from Alan Howard-Smith, Stakeholder Communications Manager for the CRL for Connectus (the Contractor responsible for Contract 2 works). Alan has ten years’ experience in communications and stakeholder management on construction projects and has a Doctorate in philosophy. Alan has been fundamental in implementing the consultation and stakeholder communications process specified within the CRL C2 SIBD DWP and CRL C2 Communication and Consultation Plan (CCP) (CRL-PAT-CST-CON-PLN-001282). This addendum has been technically reviewed by Craig Hind, Technical Practice Leader – Environmental Planning at AECOM. Craig has over 24 years of environmental and resource management planning experience. He is currently managing the planning and engineering inputs for the route protection of the Additional Waitemata Harbour Crossing project, is a member of the Technical Strategy Team for the Supporting Growth Alliance and was the planning and consultation lead on the Redoubt Road-Mill Road corridor designation. He has undertaken numerous stakeholder, community and Iwi consultation activities including for the Auckland Transport and NZ Transport Agency mana whenua forums and Iwi Liaison groups. On CRL C2 Craig is the Planning Integration Manager and has reviewed and approved all Outline Plan and associated Delivery Work Plan and Management Plan documents for the project to date. He was also the verifier and Project Director for the Burrumbeet to Beaufort Social Impact Assessment VicRoads which won a Consult Australia Awards of Excellence (2011).

Auckland City Rail Link Enabling Works Contract 2 Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan, Separable Portion 1 – Cut and Cover Works, CRL-PAT-ENV-CON-PLN-000901, Revision 05, 21-03-2016 2 Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in Part, Designation 2500, City Rail Link (CRL), City Rail Link Limited and Discharge Permit R/REG/2014/5437.

Page 7

2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This section presents a summary of the PRR works to provide context to the SIBD DWP Addendum. A detailed description of the PRR works is provided in the CRL C2 Construction Environment Management Plan (CEMP) â€“ PRR Addendum (CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033021).

2.1

CONSTRUCTION METHODOLOGY OVERVIEW

Following the completion of the cut and cover trenched section of the CRL tunnel along Albert Street between Customs Street and Wyndham Street, Connectus will progress with the reinstatement of the public realm along and around the physical works area. Connectus anticipate that the completion of the cut and cover trenched section will be achieved progressively from south to north along Albert Street. Accordingly, as the tunnel is progressively completed Connectus will undertake the PRR works in a staged manner along the works area, readying Albert Street and surrounding works area for full public access once again. The PRR works include the re-instatement of the road carriageway and footpaths, urban design enhancements, and landscaping within the CRL designation. The area for reinstatement expands beyond the works area for the cut and cover trenched section, reflecting a logical transition between the reinstated works area and surrounding public realm. Figure 2-1 provides an overview of the PRR works area. These works will be undertaken using standard methods for road reinstatement works, including the use of jackhammers and backhoes to remove old pavements, and rollers and compactors to prepare the base course/bedding for new paving. Pavers and curb stones will be cut as required using appropriate equipment. Note: Parts of the PRR works area are located outside the CRL designation. Any works outside the CRL designation are not specifically considered within this DWP. If required, separate resource consents will be applied for these areas.

Page 8

Figure 2-1 - Public Realm Plan

Page 9

2.2

CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMME OVERVIEW

The PRR works will progressively follow the completion of the cut and cover trenched section of the CRL tunnel along Albert Street between Customs Street and Wyndham Street. As completion of the cut and cover trenched section of the CRL tunnel will occur south to north along Albert Street so too will the PRR works. The exception is the Lower Albert Street works which will occur first to achieve parallel construction timeframes with the adjacent Commercial Bay Development at 7 Queen Street, Auckland. Table 2-1 provides an overview of the indicative construction staging as it relates to the PRR works. Within each area of works there will be multiple works phases (refer to the CRL C2 CEMP PRR Addendum for further detail regarding works phasing). Table 2-1 will be updated once the final sequencing for PRR works is known.

Table 2-1

Indicative Construction Staging Overview

Albert Street Area of works

Activity Start Date

Approximate Duration

Customs to Quay

February 2019

18 months

Wyndham to Swanson

May 2019

17 months

Swanson to Customs

January 2020

9 months

Wyndham to Mills

September 2020

2 months

Swanson to Mills

April 2020

8 months

Wolfe to Customs

January 2020

12 months

3 CONSULTATION 3.1

CONSULTATION PROCESS AND REVIEW

Extensive consultation was undertaken in 2015 as part of the preparation of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP (detailed in Section 4.0 of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP) in order to understand the specific access requirements and specific operational requirements to then develop methods to avoid, mitigate and/or remedy potential disruption issues for residents and individual businesses/services along the route and in the general area. A detailed review of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP was conducted by Matthew Kerr-Ridge in January 2018 to determine the applicability of the previous consultation process as it relates to the PRR works. The review of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP considered the physical and temporal scope of works already consulted on and the scale of potential and actual effects generated during works and the potential for new effects as a result of the PRR works. This review identified that: 

‘reinstatement works’ was included in the scope of works already consulted on for potentially affected parties associated with the Cut and Cover phase of works



in general, the PRR works would not introduce any new construction activities or scales of effects which would differ from the activities already consulted on



the physical extent of the PRR works will however extend further north along Albert Street than the Cut and Cover phase of works.

Page 10

Accordingly, as the Cut and Cover works area had been used to determine the extent of consultation for the CRL C2 SIBD DWP, it was identified that those parties located on Lower Albert Street (Customs Street to Quay Street) had not been specifically consulted with regards to the PRR works. Additional consultation with those parties would therefore be needed to understand their specific access requirements and specific operational requirements in order to develop methods to avoid, mitigate and/or remedy potential disruption issues for residents and individual businesses/services.

3.2

ALBERT STREET FROM CUSTOMS STREET WEST TO WYNDHAM STREET

As outlined in Section 3.1, the consultation undertaken as part of the preparation of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP included the scope of the PRR works. Accordingly, it was determined that the information gathered as part of the existing consultation would adequately support the preparation of this addendum as it relates to the works between Wyndham Street and Customs Street. This information is summarised in the ‘Key Points Raised’ outlined in Table 4 of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP and this information has been reconsidered in relation to the PRR works to direct the preparation of this Addendum. Broadly the key points relate to the following:      

Ensuring continued pedestrian access for business customers; Providing adequate sight lines and business visibility; Providing sufficient parking and loading availability to maintain business operations; Providing wayfinding to ensure that customers, employees and deliveries are able to navigate the area with relative ease; Managing construction related activities to ensure that construction effects (noise, vibration, dust, smell, etc.) are minimised; Understanding of key operational hours and functions of business to enable construction works to be planned in coordination with these existing requirements.

It is considered that the ‘Mitigation to address concerns’ outlined within Table 4 of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP in relation to the PRR for those works between Customs Street and Wyndham Street are adequate to mitigate these concerns. As such, no further specific consultation has been undertaken with these businesses for the purposes of preparing this Addendum.

3.3

LOWER ALBERT STREET FROM QUAY STREET TO CUSTOMS STREET WEST

As the key effects generated by the works are temporary and localised construction effects the key stakeholder potentially affected by the works are those parties located directly adjacent to the construction area. For those works occurring in Lower Albert Street between Quay Street and Customs Street a number of additional businesses (not currently affected by the cut and cover works phase) may be disrupted by the PRR works. As these stakeholders were not specifically engaged with as part of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP, these parties have now been consulted in order to understand their business, specific access requirements and any other potential disruption issues they may have. This process is detailed in the following sections. 3.3.1

Additional Affected Area For Construction Works

Table 3-1 identifies the buildings which are in direct proximity of the PRR works on Lower Albert Street. Consultation with the identified affected buildings on Lower Albert Street was not carried out

Page 11

as part of the preparation of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP. As such consultation in relation to the PRR works on Lower Albert Street was required.

Table 3-1

Identified affected buildings

Address / Building Name

Building Use

Building Owner/Manager

Commercial Bay 1-7 Lower Albert Street

Construction Site (Future Commercial, retail and food and beverage)

Precinct Property

PWC House 188 Quay Street

Commercial

Precinct Property

3.3.2

Community Liaison Group

The CLG consists of affected parties, interested parties and the wider community. Ongoing engagement with the CLG is required as part of planning for the PRR works and has been undertaken as part of the process of preparing the DWP addendums for the works. The CLG process requires that community members are given the opportunity to provide comment on any material change to a DWP. This opportunity is provided through the distribution of the document, and presentation of the content at a specified CLG meeting. Community members are provided with at least 10 working days to provide comment. Ongoing updates and information relating to the timing of the PRR works will also be provided via at least three-monthly CLG meetings that are scheduled throughout the duration of the Project. Table 3-2 outlines the CLG meetings which have been held in relation to the PRR works and includes a summary of the key outcomes to the DWP documents which have resulted from this process.

Table 3-2

PRR CLG Summary

CLG Date

CLG Topic

Key Outcomes

15/08/2017

- Presentation on the proposed design for the reinstatement of Albert Street

Further discussion regarding reinstatement design components that are dictated by public transport requirements

30/01/2018

- Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (SSCNVMP) - Air Quality Delivery Work Plan (AQ DWP)

No changes to documents.

19/06/2018

- Transport, Access and Parking (TAP) DWP Lower Albert Street Addendum - SIBD DWP Lower Albert Street Addendum

No changes to documents.

The comments received from the CLG which are specific to this Addendum have been documented in Appendix A. It is noted that there were no comments received during the CLG consultation process which necessitated changes to this addendum. 3.3.3

Consultation with Additional Affected Parties

Consultation with those parties owning / occupying the additional affected buildings identified in Table 3-1 above was undertaken by Alan Howard-Smith (Connectus Stakeholder Communications Manager) and Matthew Kerr-Ridge (AECOM Senior Environmental Planner) in February 2018. The purpose of the consultation was to understand their business, including to identify the type and scale of disruption, specific access and servicing requirements, and client and visitor behaviour and requirements. In order to ensure consistency across the consultation, a series of questions were asked:

Page 12

      

How many private vehicles do you estimate need daily access to your parking entrances? How many service vehicles need daily access to your freight parking areas? How many businesses and guests need daily access to your building entrances? How many bicycles need daily access to your building? Who might regularly need building access afterhours – e.g. security firms and cleaners? Are you planning a major fit out or alterations to your buildings between late 2018 and end2019? Are there any other matters that we need to have regard to in terms of your business’ operation?

These questions were posed in order to initiate meaningful conversation around specific issues that may be generated through the Project. As well as informing the SIBD DWP Addendum, these conversations provide a calibration with the Social Impact Assessment (SIA) that supported the original CRL Notice of Requirement, ensuring the potential social impacts identified back in 2013 when the SIA was prepared remains valid and relevant in the Project’s current social environment. Consultation was not limited to the above questions, but encompassed a range of access and other specific issues to the affected parties spoken with. The key issues raised by the affected parties in response to the questions are detailed in Table 3-3. This Table and responses will be updated as consultation continues.

Page 13

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Table 3-3

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

Key issues raised through consultation with affected and affected in proximity parties including mitigation

Property / Business

Affected Party

Key Points Raised

Mitigation to address concerns

Jade Centre at 188 Quay Street

Interview on site with Jina (Store Supervisor)

Concerned about the current construction site and noise at Commercial Bay deterring customers.

Noted - These matters relate to an adjacent project which is being undertaken separately to CRL. As such there are no direct actions available to address these concerns.

The current construction on Quay Street is stopping people passing by the shop.

However, the PRR works on Lower Albert Street have been designed to comply with the CRL conditions relating to construction effects. This includes the implementation of mitigation measures to maintain the pedestrian thoroughfare, support wayfinding and business visibility, and implementation of noise and vibration dampening construction methods and measures. Accordingly, the current concerns associated with the Commercial Bay works will be appropriately managed for the PRR works.

Opening hours: 10:00am to 6:00pm, with no pattern of business.

Noted - Business operating hours will be considered during planning of key construction activities to avoid conflict / impacts wherever possible.

Small deliveries are made monthly through the front entrance or courier.

Noted - Pedestrian access will be maintained to the entrance. Short Stay parking is currently provided at the rear of the building. This parking will be retained with existing access to the front of the building available also maintained.

PwC Tower

Interview onsite at Precinct Properties with Graham Kristiffor, Leon Hewertson and Paul.

2 employees

Noted â€“ employees will be able to access the main entrance to the shop.

A critical consideration is the utility point at the end of Lower Albert Street.

The utility point will remain accessible throughout construction no further mitigation required

The building is serviced from the rear laneway.

Access to the rear laneway will not be affected by CRL construction

In the event of an evacuation occupants are advised to make their way up Albert Street.

Lower Albert Street is understood to be used as an evacuation egress for those retailers located along the street front floors of the PWC and AMP buildings as well

Page 14

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Property / Business

Affected Party

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

Key Points Raised

Mitigation to address concerns

as from the stairwell located between the PWC and AMP buildings. The current evacuation plan directs flows south along Lower Albert Street towards Customs Street West. Pedestrian access will be maintained along Lower Albert Street throughout the entire construction process. This will be provided at a minimum width of 1.5m. This is sufficient to provide evacuation egress for retailers from which volumes are anticipated to be relatively low. The existing footpath located beneath the AMP buildings shall also be maintained providing a 2-3m width foot path which is anticipated to be sufficient for any larger volumes of traffic from the stairwell located between the PWC and AMP buildings. Connectus shall inform Precinct Property prior to undertaking any works in accordance with the protocols outlined within Sections 5 and 6 of the CCP enabling updates to emergency evacuation procedures if needed. Thinking about a supermarket fit out on Lower Albert Street (approx. August).

Noted - A supermarket fit out has not been confirmed. Continued liaison with businesses will be undertaken throughout construction through the established processes outlined in Sections 5 and 6 of the CRL C2 CCP. This will enable future projects to be identified and actively managed by Connectus.

Retail all have rear access laneway.

Noted - CRL construction does not affect the rear laneway.

A new retailer will be opening on the corner of Quay and Lower Albert Street.

Noted - Continued liaison with businesses will be undertaken through the established processes outlined in Sections 5 and 6 of the CRL C2 CCP.

Access to busses for building occupants is vital

Access to all bus stops will remain open throughout the entire construction process. The location of bus stops will change but they will still be in the general area and public bus stop relocation will be managed as per Auckland Transport communication protocols.

Page 15

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

Property / Business

Affected Party

Key Points Raised

Mitigation to address concerns

Aotea Gifts

Interview on site with May Yang (store Manager), Peter Hanson, Richard Hanson and Donald Hanson (Directors)

Opening Hours: 9:30am to 10-11:00pm. 7 days.

Noted - Business operating hours will be considered during planning of key construction activities to avoid conflict / impacts wherever possible.

Store accessed internally through PwC Tower or the store front.

Noted - Pedestrian access to shops will be maintained throughout the entire construction process.

Stock deliveries are made using the rear laneway.

CRL construction does not affect the rear laneway.

October to March is the busiest time of year. However store is always busy. Best time for construction in front of the store would be May to August.

Noted - Continued liaison with businesses will be undertaken through the established processes outlined in Sections 5 and 6 of the CRL C2 CCP to ensure Connectus is aware of busy/quiet periods and can schedule works to reduce disruption effects as far as practicable.

2:00pm to 8:00pm is the busiest time of the day.

Customers come from the northern and southern ends of Lower Albert Street.

Pedestrian access will be maintained from both ends of Lower Albert Street throughout the construction process.

Tour groups are always coming into the store at random intervals.

Noted - Pedestrian access will be maintained from both ends of Lower Albert Street throughout the construction process.

The store is reliant on bus drop offs.

Noted - The location of bus stops will change but they will still be in the general area. Public bus stop relocation will be managed as per Auckland Transport communication protocols.

Do not want a wall up in front of the business.

Noted - Hoardings and fencing will need to be utilised in some areas during construction for health and safety reasons. Way finding signage and advertising space on the construction hoardings and fencing will be provided. Examples of this can be seen further up the CRL route between Customs Street West and Wyndham Street.

Avoca

Page 16

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Property / Business

Affected Party

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

Key Points Raised

Mitigation to address concerns

Potential to stage the construction gradually from north to south (or vice versa)

Construction will be partially staged from north to south during Stage 1A – 2B. However, completely staging the works from north to south (or vice versa) is unachievable as pedestrian and vehicle traffic needs to be maintained throughout the construction process. Therefore staging works between east and west is required enabling traffic lanes to maintained along the length of Lower Albert Street and shifted from side to side. Business owners will be further consulted once the final staging configuration has been confirmed.

Sushi Pac

Interview at AECOM with Jay (Store Owner)

During construction, a crossing point under the existing overhead walkway would be ideal.

Consideration into an additional crossing point can be made.

Opening hours:

Noted - Business operating hours will be considered during planning of key construction activities to avoid conflict / impacts wherever possible.

Weekdays: 8:30am to 7:15pm (staff arrive from 8am) Weekends: 10:00am to 5:00pm. Busiest time is 12:00pm to 2:00pm. Before 12pm there are only 40-50 customers.

Busiest November to March. Winter is not as busy so hopes construction happens then.

Noted - As the works duration is 18 months the works cannot avoid the ‘busy season’ of November to March. Business owners will be further consulted once the final staging configuration has been confirmed.

700+ customers per day coming from surrounding office buildings and DFS. No customers from busses.

Pedestrian access will be maintained from both ends of Lower Albert Street throughout the construction period.

Business serviced using the rear laneway.

CRL construction does not affect the rear laneway.

Weekends are not busy (100-150 customers).

Noted - Continued liaison with businesses will be

Page 17

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Property / Business

Affected Party

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

Key Points Raised

Mitigation to address concerns

undertaken through the established processes outlined in Sections 5 and 6 of the CRL C2 CCP to ensure Connectus is aware of busy/quiet periods and can schedule works to reduce disruption effects as far as practicable. Would like perplex hoardings to allow sightlines to the business from Quay Street, as well as signage at the end of Lower Albert Street.

Hoardings and fencing will need to be utilised in some areas during construction for health and safety reasons. Perplex hoarding will be considered. Way finding signage and advertising space on the construction hoardings and fencing will be provided. Examples of this can be seen further up the CRL route between Customs Street West and Wyndham Street. Messaging to the effect that local businesses are operating as usual, including but not limited to:  

Global Culture

Interview on site with Kristina (Store Manager)

Cash up is required every day after hours. Normally done 9:00pm to 10:00pm – this time is flexible.

Noted

Opening hours:

Noted

As part of the ongoing communication campaign for CRL. Media such as the Project website, Facebook Page, Instagram and Linkedin

Weekdays: 9:00am to 6:00pm Weekends: 10:00am to 5:00pm Delivery vehicles park in the basement then walk around the block to the store front to access the store.

Noted - Pedestrian access will be maintained from both ends of Lower Albert Street throughout the construction period.

Busiest when cruise ships are docked – 11:00am to 5:00pm.

Any short term impacts will be worth it once

Noted

Page 18

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Property / Business

Affected Party

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

Key Points Raised

Mitigation to address concerns

construction has finished.

Page 19

4 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Social Impact and Business Disruption effects will be mitigated through the suite of Delivery Work Plans and Management Plans required under the CRL designation and resource consent conditions. These Plans have been updated, where necessary, to account for the PRR works. Section 5 of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP outlines the general mitigation measures that will be implemented for the duration of the Project. Specific mitigation of affected parties’ concerns are outlined in Table 3-2 above, while mitigation measures specific to the wider Albert Street construction area for the PRR works are outlined in the following sub-sections.

4.1

NOISE AND VIBRATION

Construction noise and vibration is managed, monitored and mitigated through the CRL C2 Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan (CNV DWP) (CRL-PAT-ENV-CON-PLN000903). In addition a Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (SSCNVMP) (CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033020) has been prepared for the PRR works phase. Key noise and vibration generating construction activities/plant of the PRR works, as established by the SSCNVMP, are outlined below: 

Saw Cutting



Excavator 5T



Hydro Excavation



Concrete Placement



Concrete Breaker



Crane



Cutting Pavers



Placing pavers



Small Tools

Mitigation and management measures will be utilised to minimise or avoid exceedances and are outlined in Section 7 of the CNV DWP and in Section 5 of the SSCNVMP. In summary the key mitigation measures which respond to the PRR works are detailed in Table 4-1. Table 4-1

Construction Noise and Vibration Business Disruption Mitigation

Equipment/process

Noise control measures

Noise Concrete cutting

Use a mobile acoustic enclosure where practicable. Use of a mobile acoustic enclosure may not be practicable when: 

Cutting within 300mm of a kerb or canopy structure



Saw cuts need to be made around an obstruction that protrudes above surface level, such as a light pole or street sign.



The road saw needs to be manoeuvred around in a tight space that would be obstructed by the acoustic enclosure

When use of a mobile acoustic enclosure is not practicable works should be planned so that saw cutting directly in front of a receiver / receivers is completed within a total of two working days. The building owner(s) will be contacted at least 10 working days prior to this occurring (in accordance with the Permit to Notify process outlined in Section 6.2.1 if the Communications and Consultation Plan) to see if the works can be scheduled for a time that least impacts them. Vacuum Excavation

Locate the vehicle so the pump is facing away from the closest noise

Page 20

sensitive properties Excavator

Grease tracks regularly

Crane

Use straps rather than chains unless a risk assessment deems the use of straps unsafe.

Vibration Excavator mounted rock breaker

4.2

Use lower vibration generating equipment such as a hand held jack hammer

AIR QUALITY

With the exception of cutting of pavers and curb stones, the CRL C2 Air Quality Delivery Work Plan (AQ DWP) (CRL-PAT-ENV-CON-PLN-000899) provides sufficient construction management protocols to manage the PRR. The AQ DWP Addendum (CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033017) provides the appropriate management protocol for the cutting of pavers and curb stones which are the only â€˜newâ€™ activities proposed as part of the PRR works phase. In summary the key mitigation measures which respond to the PRR works are detailed in Table 4-2. Table 4-2

Air Quality Business Disruption Mitigation

Sources of Dust

Control

Pavement Removal

Use water as necessary to control dust from extraction and any cutting operations. As far as practical load excavated material directly into trucks.

Placement of Bedding Material

Use water as necessary to control dust from the placement of fill and bedding material as well as during compaction.

Cutting of Pavers

As far as practicable all pavers and curb stones will be cut using equipment fitted with water dust suppression. Where it is not possible to use water suppression vacuum extraction systems shall be fitted to the cutting/grinding equipment. Solid barriers can also be placed around cutting activities to minimise wind effects.

4.3

TRANSPORT, ACCESS AND PARKING DISRUPTION

The CRL C2 Transport Access and Parking Delivery Works Plan (TAP DWP) (CRL-EWG-RME-ATRPT-005655) provides the general transport management protocol which is applicable to manage the PRR work. Specific details relating to the PRR works on Albert Street (between Wyndham Street and Customs Street) and Lower Albert Street (between Customs Street and Quay Street) are provided in the TAP DWP Albert Street Addendum (CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033015) and TAP DWP Lower Albert Street Addendum (CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033019), respectively. The key mitigation measures which respond to the PRR works are detailed in Table 4-3. Table 4-3

Traffic Business Disruption Mitigation

Transport Issue Pedestrian Access

Control Footpaths on both the western and eastern sides of both Albert Street and Lower Albert Street will be maintained at a minimum 1.5m clear width at all times. Generally, this would be maintained close to the building walls, with some localised diversions to complete the footpath works close to the buildings.

Page 21

Signage

Way Finding

4.4

Foot access to all properties will be maintained at all times as per the CRL C2 SIBD DWP and designation conditions 27.1 (h). All traffic access to properties and businesses on the western side of Lower Albert Street is provided by the service lane between the Precincts Property New Zealand (+5 others business on the road level) and M Social Hotel. The phasing configuration for the Lower Albert Street PRR works has been developed in collaboration with the developers of the Commercial Bay development. A key consideration has been the provision of access to future retailers along the eastern (Commercial Bay) street front of Lower Albert Street as these retail spaces are completed. Service vehicle access for future retailers shall be provided via the basement accessed from Lower Albert Street. The construction phasing has been developed to provide vehicle access to the basement area as the retail space becomes ready for occupation. Pedestrian access shall also be maintained to these retail spaces as they become operational. Crossings at the signalised intersection of Quay Street / Lower Albert Street and Lower Albert Street / Customs Street will be maintained and operated as in accordance with the existing condition described in section 3.0. Fixed signage with agreed messaging of the change in traffic layout will be placed on the approach of the Customs Street. Indicative key temporary works signs and messaging is noted in the summary diagram presented in Appendix C of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP; and will be confirmed in conjunction with the Auckland Transport Corridor Access Request team during submission of the Traffic Management Plan. Signs will be installed as described in the CRL C2 TAP DWP . Way finding signage and pamphlet will be distributed on the network to remind passengers the temporary changes during this construction period.

DISRUPTION TO BUSINESS VISIBILITY

It is a recognised potential impact that customers who cannot clearly negotiate their way to or see a business, assume that it is closed or seek a more readily accessible alternative, even if that alternative is further away. Therefore, where the visibility of or access to adjacent businesses is impacted by the Project works, signage advertising the location and ongoing operation of these businesses will be provided. The signage will be erected in conjunction with the Project site set up and be maintained for the duration of the works. Feedback will continue to be sought from affected businesses with regard to the particular visibility and access requirements of the business over the course of the Project. The Project Stakeholder Manager will liaise with the CRL Street Response Manager regarding the following CRL business support and business promotion initiatives to assist information provision between the CRL Street Response Manager and affected businesses as well as facilitate/participate in event planning and delivery: o Business Support Programme (Business Pac). A business support package is being offered to businesses in the PRR works area. The package consists of a range of free services (e.g. business mentor, advice hot line) available over the course of the CRL construction. This initiative is supported by Heart of the City, the Auckland Chamber of Commerce and Business Mentors New Zealand. o Albert Street Businesses Promotion (e.g. Cheap Eats / Restaurant Month). Both the Project Stakeholder Manager and the CRLL Street Response Manager will be liaising directly with businesses throughout PRR works to ensure any new ideas for developing business mitigation options are considered. CRLL is always looking for new and helpful ways to support businesses.

Page 22

Wayfinding will be used to direct pedestrian traffic along both Albert Street and Lower Albert Street.

4.5

AMENITY IMPACT

Amenity in relation to visual impacts for the Project pertains to the views of the construction from the surrounding properties and the local streets. The building typology of multi-storey units which directly adjoin Lower Albert Street, means that the construction site will be overlooked by activities located on the higher levels of these adjoining properties. The extent and appreciation of the visual effect of the construction area will vary between people. Some will find the view interesting while others will see it as visually unpleasing. An unsightly works site will impact on the amenity of the surrounding area and has the potential to impact on its vibrancy and the patronage of adjoining businesses. To manage any actual or potential visual amenity impact from the works, site cleanliness and upkeep needs to be managed and maintained, and interesting visual screening which promotes a consistent look and feel reinforcing a sense of place needs to be provided. To manage social impact and business disruption effects, with respect to amenity and sense of place in the Lower Albert Street area, the following mitigation will be implemented: a. Daily work site maintenance implemented, consisting of: I.

Rubbish cleared from works area.

II.

Construction materials appropriately stored / stockpiled.

Screening of works area with construction hoardings or scrim panels to fencing injecting colour, creating vibrancy and a sense of place. This will be in place from site mobilisation/set up and maintained for the duration of the works.

5 ONGOING IMPLEMENTATION There is no change to the method for ongoing implementation outlined in Section 6 of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP.

6 COMPLAINTS There is no change to the complaints procedures set out in Section 7 of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP.

7 REPORTING There is no change to the reporting procedures set out in Section 8 of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP.

Page 23

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

APPENDIX A - COMMUNITY LIAISON GROUP CONSULTATION Comment ID

Date

Time

Forum

Comment

Resolution

19/06/18

5.30pm

CLG

Will pavement reinstatement be undertaken in a single process?

19/06/18

5.30pm

CLG

When the hoardings were closer to the walkway, accumulation of rubbish and limited lighting became an issue so it may need to be considered when works start in Lower Albert Street

Pavement reinstatement will be undertaken in phases to enable access and traffic movements are maintained with minimal disruption. However, this will be undertaken in as few sequences as possible to enable efficiency of works. CRLL have worked with Auckland Council on extra clean ups for this area and that once the issues were raised, it was monitored. This includes graffiti management. These practises will be adopted for Lower Albert Street.

19/06/18

5.30pm

CLG

When will the next communication about these works would be received?

Page 24

The CLG meetings are at least every three months while in construction, but may be as regularly as every two weeks during critical stages. There will also be specific communication with businesses on a more regular basis through the Communications Manager during the development of the construction methodology.

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

APPENDIX B - INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW COMMENTS Comment ID

Reviewer

Date

Topic/Comment

Recommendation

Resolution

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.1, p.4. SIA expertise of SIBD team and author.

In order comply with Designation Condition 61.2, it is strongly recommended that CRLL engage a suitably qualified specialist (s) with immediate effect so that the CRL project meets the objectives and other requirements of the conditions.

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.1, p.5. CRLL’s intent, outlined in an email to me, “that upon finalisation of the staging and programme for the reinstatement works direct communication with stakeholders will occur to advise them of the timing of works, and ‘work with’ them as far as reasonably practicable to implement the reinstatement with as little disturbance as possible”.

When sequencing of the PRR works is known the SIBD and CCP Addendums must be updated to reflect this.

Matthew Kerr-Ridge and Alan Howard-Smith were co-authors of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP and Craig Hind provided technical review. Between Matthew, Alan and Craig there is sufficient experience in consultation and stakeholder management, and social impact assessment to fulfil condition 61.2. Section 1.1 has been updated to better reflect these credentials. The addendum to the SIBD shall be updated once sequencing of the PRR works is known. Additional text has been added to Section 2.2 to reinforce this process.

Page 25

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

This stated intent must necessarily be a wellplanned engagement process that is led or supported by a qualified SIA specialist. This intent and the process to be adopted should be outlined in the SIBD DWP Addendum, as well as the CCP PRR Addendum. This engagement process would also be a useful opportunity to specifically elicit all affected parties’ opinions regarding the social impact and business disruption effects of the proposed PRR works and sequencing. This would serve to verify previous consultation, providing enhanced rigour and risk management. The findings/ comments and feedback on potential impacts should be included as part of a publicly available ‘live’ control document (see recommendations 8, below) that describes concerns and issues raised by stakeholders, and how the project has addressed them or why not. It is suggested that either an appendix with the signage example is inserted as an Appendix to SIBD Addendum or the wording in the table on p.21 be altered to direct readers to where it does – Appendix C of the SIBD DWP

Page 26

Section 3.1 ‘Consultation Process and Review’ has been added to response to this comment.

Table 4-3 has been amended to direct readers to Appendix C of the SIBD DWP.

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.2, p.5. Section 3.2.3 of the SIBD DWP Addendum does not specifically mention, in the same way as consultation with CLG, that additional affected parties were consulted in PRR works.

Section 3.2.3 of the SIBD DWP Addendum should be amended to explain the purpose of the consultation was a concern to elicit affected parties’ opinions regarding the PRR works.

Section 3.3.1 of the report has been amended to address this comment.

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.2, p.5. Section 3.2.3 of the SIBD DWP Addendum does not specifically mention, in the same way as consultation with CLG, that additional affected parties were consulted in PRR works.

I also suggest that in ongoing consultation with parties a specific question should be included, such as ‘what do you consider are the social impact and business disruption impacts on you (and your staff, family and local community) as a result of the project”.

Noted. This point is being further investigated at a project wide basis by CRLL and may be included in consultation for future stages of the CRL project.

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.2, p.5. Updates to Table 3.2 in the SIBD DWP Addendum as a result of all PRR consultation.

It is recommended that Table 3.2 should provide cross-referencing to the consultation conducted by other DWP processes. Any specific, additional comments or issues raised by these affected parties on Lower Albert Street since February 2018 should be included.

An additional table (Table 3-2) has been added to the report in section 3.3.2.

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.2, p.5. All consultation as part of the PRR process (preparation and implementation and monitoring).

I suggest it would be both useful and good practice if all consultation, feedback and mitigation measures and responsibilities for managing the implementation and monitoring of effects, particularly those with any relation to SIBD, is documented in a live central point of reference, say in the CCP or project website, to enable cross-referencing and clear lines of management of effects. I understand that the Project manages a CRM database. It would be positive and welcome

Noted. This is being considered on a projectwide basis by CRLL.

Page 27

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

addition to openness and transparency if this was adapted via a web-link and made available for public view and reference.

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.3, p.6. review of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP

The Addendum needs to include further detail of what constitutes ‘a detailed review of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP’ – a) who it was conducted by; b) whether it was conducted by or had input from a suitably qualified specialist; c) when this occurred; d) its purpose - whether it was in relation to the PRR works or as part of the Annual Review of that plan in July 2017; e) what other information or evidence was referenced alongside it.

Section 3.1 of the report has been amended to address this comment.

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.3, pp.6-7. The decision to not specifically consult with affected parties south of Customs Street West to Wyndham Street

For brevity’s sake, for the reasons I have stated in this peer review, I don’t agree that the decision not to consult with affected parties south of Customs Street West to Wyndham Street reflects good SIA practice. There is no available evidence to suggest whether information specifically about the PRR stage was explicitly part of any earlier consultation activity that has informed the CRL C2 SIBD DWP.

The reinstatement works were part of the scope of works consulted on during the preparation of the CRL C2 SIBD DWP. The effect generated from the PRR works south of Albert Street are generally consistent with the effects generated from the cut and cover tunnel works, as well as the effect previously anticipated for the reinstatement works.

To remedy this lack of clarity and to ensure all affected parties (businesses, residents, property owners and other relevant stakeholders) receive the same information about the PRR works on which to identify and assess potential SIBD effects upon them, I

Page 28

It is considered that the existing engagement process provided via the CLG is sufficient as it

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

suggest that a very clear and well-planned engagement process is conducted specifically in relation to identifying SIBD effects or issues of concern as I have recommended in 3 above. This process and methods of engagement, including the comments, and measures to mitigate or address aspects raised, who is responsible, and where they have not been addressed, must be well documented. Such a process could be included in the proposed ‘live’ central point of reference I have outlined in 8 above. 11

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.4, p.7. Impacts on business revenue.

Whilst I agree with the comments made by James Baine’s regarding CRLL’s responsibility to assist affected businesses seek compensation for a loss of revenue, I will not repeat these sentiments here. I do, however, note that the establishment of a Street Response Manager for the CRL development and a series of business support initiatives (Business Pac/Cheap Eats/ Restaurant Month) are welcome, additional and supportive measures.

I recommend that these initiatives should be referenced in the SIBD and CCP Addendums as an update of both the CRL C2 SIBD DWP and CRL C2 CCP. This should include details regarding the roles and responsibilities, and the relationship with CRLL, Connectus, and CLG, as well as contact details of the Street Response Manager. I also suggest that the CRLL project website include information regarding these initiatives.

Page 29

provided consultation on the PRR works south of Albert Street. Further detail of the previous consultation has been added to Section 3.1.

Noted. These initiatives are project wide and are not just related to the PRR works. The SIBD DWP addendum is not the appropriate place to provide comments on these additional activities. These will be further investigated by CRLL for project wide implementation.

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.4, p.7. Impacts on business revenue.

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.4, p.7. Impacts on business revenue.

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.5, p.8. Role of the CLG

12) Given this public investment in additional resources it would be appropriate to monitor and evaluate their effect on SIBD impacts, including, but not limited to impacts on business revenue. This should also include an interrelated process of updating and reviewing the pedestrian counts so that actual changes in pedestrian behaviour are revealed. These data will be important and relevant indicators of the significance of actual effects and the measures to address them. 13) Section 4.4 â€˜Disruption to Business Visibilityâ€™, should be reworded to explain that these additional control and mitigation measures apply to all affected businesses along Albert Street within the PRR plan.

I question whether all affected businesses, residents and property owners have been provided with the same levels of information, and whether the intent, role and functions of the CLG (as set out in Condition 7) are being played effectively by the CLG. I suggest that a review of the role and functions of the CLG should be undertaken by the Requiring Authority that meaningfully engages its actual and potential members in an evaluation conducted by an independent specialist to ensure it is meeting its obligations under the designation conditions, and how it might improve on this purpose and function.

Page 30

Noted. The TAP DWP for the project provides information on pedestrian activity and routes during the works including ongoing pedestrian counts. No further changes are required.

Section 4.4 has been amended to reflect this comment. The text now makes reference to PRR works.

Noted. CRLL are currently reviewing the role and function of the CLG for future stages of the project.

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.6, pp.8-9. Crossreferencing to other DWPs and plans.

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.6, pp.8-9. Crossreferencing to other DWPs and plans.

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.7, pp. 9-11. Consultation and communications

It is recommended that the wording on p.19 of the SIBD Addendum, (“specific mitigation of affected parties’ concerns are outlined in Table 3-2 above, while mitigation measures specific to the wider Lower Albert Street construction area for the PRR works are outlined in the following sub-sections”) needs to be reworded to reflect that these implementation measures apply to the entire Albert Street PRR construction areas, and where they do not this should be noted. It is recommended that the SIBD Addendum reflects and appropriately crossreferences to other DWP and associated plans where social and business disruption-related effects are being managed by other DWP teams. In particular, and as far as I am aware from the available documentation, the issues relating to urban design, pedestrian access, traffic, and noise and vibration. Again, having a central control document that collates all environmental effects issues would be a useful addition. There is a need to clarify what is meant by ‘communication’ and ‘consultation’, particularly in the CRL C2 CCP, and in relation to defining the important difference between general public liaison/communication activities and specific SIA consultation with regard to engaging stakeholders and affected parties on the identification and management of potential social and business disruption impacts.

Page 31

The current wording reflects how the mitigation measures will be implemented. No change required.

The CRL C2 CEMP and associated PRR addendum are considered to be the central control documents which provide this role. All relevant documents are updated accordingly. No change required.

This comment does not relate to this document. CRLL will investigate where further updates are required as a separate process.

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.7, pp. 9-11. Consultation and communications

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.7, pp. 9-11. Consultation and communications

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.7, pp. 9-11. Consultation and communications

I recommend the opportunity for the CRL C2 CCP to adopt and implement international standards such as the IAP2â€™s Public Participation Framework to guide and define its consultation and communication activities for the CRL Project.

It is recommended that the results of the annual evaluation of the communications and consultation performance and the changes they effect to the CCP are made public, potentially on the CRL project website for purposes of openness and transparency on decisions relating to communications and consultation. It is recommended that the CCP (Revision 3 and the Addendum for the PRR works) should also be amended to include the five new, additional property/ business owners on Lower Albert Street that have been consulted in preparation of the SIBD DWP Addendum. To comply with Designation Condition 15.6, the CCP should also be amended to include a summary of the communication and consultation undertaken between the requiring Authority and parties, including any outstanding issues or disputes raised by parties. Again, I suggest this could be remedied by a central point of public reference that documents all consultation, feedback and mitigation measures and responsibilities for managing them.

Page 32

This comment does not relate to this document. CRLL will investigate where further updates are required as a separate process.

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.7, pp. 9-11. Consultation and communications

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.7, pp. 9-11. Consultation and communications

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.7, pp. 9-11. Consultation and communications

At the very least evidence should be provided explaining how all affected parties have been directly or indirectly notified/consulted/ informed specifically of the PRR works and the comments and inputs that have been received from affected parties about the PRR works. This information should be provided in the Addendum to satisfactorily meet the conditions set out in 61 of the CRL Designation Conditions. Table 2 of the CCP Addendum needs to be completed and/or updated to reflect CLG and Mana Whenua engagement regarding the PRR works and process, and further detail regarding what is meant by ‘more regular’ and ‘specific communication with businesses’ during this construction phase. I recommend that this engagement is specifically part of recommendations 3 and 10 above. The wording should be amended to reflect the need to engage with residents and property owners, not just businesses.

Appendices C and D of the CRL C2 CCP appear to be incomplete and provide no useful function in this state. These appendices need to be updated and used as decision making tools. I would suggest they might be better placed in the SIBD DWP, particularly Appendix D on risk mitigation. I suggest that such a tool is reinstated and properly used for the entirety of the Project in relation to, but not limited to SIBD impacts.

Page 33

This has been addressed in the update to Section 3.1.

This comment does not relate to this document. CRLL will investigate where further updates are required as a separate process.

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.8, p.11. CRL Project website

Dr Gillian Stewart

09/08/18

S.4.8, p.11. CRL roles and responsibilities

The CRL project website requires updating to a) include all CLG minutes since 2015/16; b) to comply with Designation 12, to include the updated 2017 versions of the CEMP, DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and CCP.

The July 2017 revision of the CRL C2 CCP should, in my mind, be updated to reflect the roles and responsibilities of CRLL, rather than AT CRL as it is now legally responsible for the CRL Project. Any changes in contacts, roles or responsibilities of relevant staff should also be updated to reflect their association with CRLL, AT, Connectus and other contractors.

Page 34

Noted. CRLL will address this matter.

This comment does not relate to this document. CRLL will investigate where further updates are required as a separate process.

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

APPENDIX C â€“ AUCKLAND COUNCIL REVIEW COMMENTS Comment ID

Reviewer

Date

Topic/Comment

Recommendation

Resolution

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Non required

N/A

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Non required

N/A

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Non required

N/A

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Recommendation fully addressed Recommendation fully addressed Recommendation addressed fully, consultation extended to additional affected parties not included in the earlier consultation Recommendation addressed, although inclusion of the signage example as an appendix within the addendum would be preferable

Include signage example as appendix to CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Non required

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Recommendation fully addressed Recommendation partly addressed

As outlined in Table 4-3 this is already provided in the CRL C2 SIBD DWP. As this Addendum is intended to be read in conjunction with the CRL C2 SIBD DWP the signage example is not required as an appendix to this addendum. N/A

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Recommendation fully addressed Recommendation fully addressed Recommendation fully addressed Recommendation fully addressed Recommendation addressed

Non required as the engagement has already been undertaken, this should definitely be considered going forward as the current questions limit full understanding of the impact on the community. Non required

N/A

Non required

N/A

Non required

N/A

Non required

N/A

Non required

N/A

Page 35

N/A

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Auckland Council

17/10/18

in the wider project context not within the PRR addendum Recommendation fully addressed Recommendation fully addressed Recommendation fully addressed Agree no further action required Agree no further action required Recommendation not relevant to PRR doc. Recommendation not addressed. The document should give regard to best practise laid out in IAP2’s Public participation framework.

Recommendation not relevant to PRR doc. Recommendation partly

Non required

N/A

Non required

N/A

Non required

N/A

Non required

N/A

Non required

N/A

Non required

N/A

A section should be added to the CRLPAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 documented detailing where the consultation reflected the recommendations in the IAP2’s PP framework.

Non required

The consultation process undertaken for the CRL C2 works is documented in the CRL C2 CCP (CRL-PAT-CST-CONPLN-001282) and CRL C2 SIDB DWP (CRL-PAT-ENV-CON-PLN000901). The PRR works are a component of the CRL C2 works and this addendum forms part of the CRL C2 management framework. Accordingly, the consultation process which was approved under the existing CRL C2 documents was applied for the PRR works. As outlined in the response to the IPR comment, CRLL will investigate where the IAP2’s PP framework can be adopted into future aspects of the wider CRL programme. N/A

Non required

N/A

Page 36

Connectus 2719 Project: City Rail Link C2 Client: City Rail Link Limited

Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Works Plan Addendum: Public Realm Reinstatement Doc. No. CRL-PAT-RME-AT-RPT-033018 Revision: 06, Date: 30th October 2018

addressed 21

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Auckland Council

17/10/18

Unable to cross reference the detailed description of the PRR due to access to CRLPAT-RME-AT-RPT-033021 Investigated under separate document Recommendation not relevant to PRR doc Recommendation fully addressed Recommendation not relevant to PRR doc

Please provide CRL-PAT-RME-ATRPT-033021

Document provided.

Non required

N/A

Non required

N/A

Non required

N/A

Non required

N/A

Page 37