Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2022 by City of Arvada

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents and Glossary....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... i-iv City Manager’s Transmittal Letter to City Council........................................................................................................................................................................................................1-4 Overview...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................5-11 Continuing Projects...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13-17 Combined 2013-2014 Plan Summary........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 19-21 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 Performance Based Budgeting........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 General Capital Project Administration.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 Opportunity Fund............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 Contingency Fund............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 WADSWORTH CORRIDOR............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 25 Wadsworth Corridor Sidewalks.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 26-27 Wadsworth Cultural Corridor Study.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28-29 Wadsworth (SH 121) Mulitmodal Study.................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30-31 Wadsworth Gateway Improvements........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32-33 Wadsworth Corridor Repayment Schedule............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34-35 TRANSPORTATION.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37 Bridge Maintenance...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38-39 Collector Street Improvements.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 40-41 ADA Ramps................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 42-43 Leyden Road Improvements........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 44-45 Adams County Transportation Projects..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46-47 W. 72nd Ave. and Indiana St. Intersection Improvements...................................................................................................................................................................................... 48-49 Ward Road Extension - W. 72nd Ave to W. 80th Ave. Preliminary Design........................................................................................................................................................... 50-51 Safe Routes to School Program.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 52-53 Bike/Ped Program......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 54-55 Missing Sidewalk Program........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 56-57 Union Pacific RR Quiet Zones .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 58-59 Intersection Safety Improvements............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 60-61 New Traffic Signal Construction................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 62-63 Long Life Pavement Markings Program..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 64-65 Video Detection Program ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 66-67

Sign Replacement; MUTCD Mandates...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 68-69 ATMS Completion and Upgrades............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 70-71 Signal Replacement....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 72-73 UPS at Major Intersections ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 74-75 Olde Town Bus Transfer Facility................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 76-77 FACILITIES.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 79 Park Maintenance Building/Wadsworth Shops........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 80-81 Fleet Maintenance Relocation to Culbertson Building............................................................................................................................................................................................ 82-83 Gold Line-related Parking Structures......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 84-85 PARKS................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 87 Irrigation System Renovation...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 88-89 Playground Renovation................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 90-91 Trail Renovation............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 92-93 Whisper Creek II Park.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 94-95 Candelas Mini-Park #1................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 96-97 Candelas Neighborhood Park #2................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 98-99 Stenger Sports Complex........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 100-101 Tree Replacement Program...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 102-103 Club Crest Trail.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 104-105 East Area Neighborhood Park................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 106-107 Adams County Open Space Projects...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 108-109 Lake Arbor Master Plan........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 110-111 GOLF.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 113 West Woods Golf Club Irrigation System Replacement...................................................................................................................................................................................... 114-115 West Woods Golf Club Pond Aeration Systems.................................................................................................................................................................................................... 116-117 Lake Arbor Golf Course Tee Construction............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 118-119 West Woods Golf Club Hole #8 - Sleeping Indian Remodel............................................................................................................................................................................... 120-121 Lake Arbor Golf Course Maintenance Building Remodel.................................................................................................................................................................................. 122-123 West Woods Golf Club Golf Shop and Rest Rooms Remodel............................................................................................................................................................................ 124-125 West Woods Restaurant Remodel, Offices and Storage....................................................................................................................................................................................... 126-127 Lake Arbor Golf Course Golf Shop/Restaurant Remodel................................................................................................................................................................................... 128-129 West Woods Golf Club Rain Shelters..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 130-131 West Woods Golf Club Entrance Landscaping and Lighting Improvements .................................................................................................................................................. 132-133 West Woods Golf Club Practice Areas Remodel/Expansion.............................................................................................................................................................................. 134-135 HOSPITALITY.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 137 Hospitality Taking Lasting Care Kitchen............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 138-139 TLC Banquet Equipment......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 140-141 Sound System Replacement..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 142-143 Refrigeration and Freezer Space Replacement...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 144-145

ARVADA CENTER........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 147 Arvada Center Capital Maintenance...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 148-149 Arvada Center Front Entry Renovation and Interior Wayfinding .................................................................................................................................................................... 150-151 Arvada Center Safety and Security Video Equipment (RM)............................................................................................................................................................................... 152-153 Arvada Center Exterior Lighting Improvements (RM)....................................................................................................................................................................................... 154-155 Arvada Center Outside Front Entry Plaza (RM).................................................................................................................................................................................................. 156-157 Public Art................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 158-159 PUBLIC SAFETY.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 161 Two Police Community Stations ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 162-163 WATER............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 165 Denver Water Moffat Project Participation........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 166-167 Water Main Replacement......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 168-169 Water Treatment Plant Improvements................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 170-171 Cathodic Protection.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 172-173 Leyden Storage Project............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 174-175 Northwest Water System - 18-inch Water Line .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 176-177 WASTE WATER................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 179 Sewer Main Replacement......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 180-181 North System Oversizing......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 182-183 Access Improvements............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 184-185 STORMWATER................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 187 Garrison Bridge Replacement................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 188-189 Gold Line Improvements/Estes Street Outfall....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 190-191 Quaker Street Storm Sewer...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 192-193 Yarrow Street Overflow............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 194-195 Allison St Outfall - Phase I ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 196-197 Little Dry Creek Bank Stabilization........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 198-199 White Gulch............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 200-201 Simms Street Outfall................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 202-203 Yankee Doodle Master Plan - Phase I..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 204-205 Unfunded Projects.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 207-209

iii

GLOSSARY GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ADCO Adams County Apex Apex Parks & Recreation District (formerly North JeffCo) ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials ATC Arvada Tennis Center ATMS Advanced Traffic Management System BDC Big Dry Creek BN/BNRR/BNSF Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad CCIPC [Arvada] Citizens' Capital Improvement Planning Committee CDOT Colorado Department of Transportation CMP Capital Maintenance Program COA City of Arvada CPSC Consumer Product Safety Commission CTF Conservation Trust Fund (state lottery funding) DRCOG Denver Regional Council of Governments Funding Advancements for Surface Transportation & Economic FASTER Recovery (state transportation project funding) GOCO Great Outdoors Colorado (state lottery funding) HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning IGA Intergovernmental Agreement JCMD Jefferson Center Metropolitan District JCOS Jefferson County Open Space JeffCo Jefferson County iv

LCT LDC LD LOC MUTCD NEPA O&M PCI PDFs POS PSC PUC RCT ROW RTD TIP

Leyden Creek Trail Little Dry Creek Lands Dedicated Letter of Credit Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices National Environmental Policy Act Operations and Maintenance Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council Park Development Fees Point‐of‐service Public Service Company (Xcel) Public Utilities Commission Ralston Creek Trail Right‐of‐way Regional Transportation District Transportation Improvement Program

TOD UDFCD UP/UPRR UPS WC TBD

Transit‐oriented Development Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Union Pacific Railroad Uninterruptible Power Supply Whisper Creek To Be Determined

OVERVIEW OVERVIEW

OVERVIEW Process

The following graphic outlines City of Arvada’s first ten-year Capital Improvement Plan process.

• Council reviews progress of past successes in first quarter of year. • Re-establishes priorities in context of new information, studies, surveys.

• Departments begin various legal processes to begin the construction processes. • Quarterly reporting on all progress.

Development of Strategic Plan

Develop ten-year capital maintenance and new projects to meet long-term strategic needs

Build and Measure

Council adopts both the two-year appropriations and the ten-year plans

• Analyze prior year expenditures. • Identify all possible sources of resources. • Develop prioritization methodology to meet Strategic Plan. • Analyze and select proposed projects for plan and for the ten-year planning horizon.

• Council reviews Proposed Plan. • Adopts two-year appropriations. • Prioritizes unfunded priorities and projects. • Adds operating costs into the operating budget.

In our first year of this new process, we met with each department and identified the progress of all projects. This process resulted in the recognition of a number of projects, allowing the identification of previously programmed monies of over $4.195 million. Among the resources identified was $1.9 million available from the Grandview Grade Separation costs, which came in far below the original budget. This provides the first monies we can allocate towards new capital needs. Each 2012 project (Continuing Projects) with funding decisions and available cash is provided on pages 13-16. The second step was to design allocation methodology, recognizing that the needs always outpace the available resources. Through discussions with Council, surveys, and citizen guidance, the priorities for the 2013 – 2014 allocation process were identified as: • Taking Lasting Care • Building our Base • Investing for the Future Departments then prepared their ten-year proposals. Discussions were then held with the City Manager on the highest priorities in each of these areas. This process resulted in the Capital Improvement Plan approved by City Council.

Ten-Year Plan

The following table identifies the Sources and Uses by Program expenditure for the Ten-Year Plan. SOURCES

§98‐101 $ Other City $ Restricted City $ External $ TBD $ Avail. Cash TOTAL SOURCES USES

General Admin Wads Corridor Transporation Facilities Parks Golf Hospitality Arvada Center Public Safety Water Wastewater Stormwater TOTAL USES

Existing

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

3,195,000

3,421,029

3,728,688

4,059,825

4,322,587

4,574,386

8,933,445

9,215,099

9,505,812

9,804,972

$60,760,843

12,303,942

51,493,852

10,595,286

16,998,619

12,128,669

14,111,758

17,080,838

21,752,652

24,181,564

11,984,441

8,210,698

$200,842,318

8,000,000

18,672

1,666,519

$9,685,191

1,325,000

87,550

2,290,177

92,882

95,668

6,998,538

101,494

104,539

107,675

110,906

$11,314,430

90,000

2,616,200

228,094

617,391

101,296

1,147,681

1,301,517

10,626,110

10,944,894

117,430

$27,790,612

12,303,942

4,195,537 68,299,389

16,720,065

23,245,577

16,898,767

18,631,309

29,801,443

32,089,109

44,127,313

32,561,494

19,910,524

$314,588,930

Existing

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

$4,195,537

TOTAL

1,075,000

1,000,000

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

500,000

3,500,000

1,000,000

$1,075,000 $9,000,000

515,212

3,368,608

2,924,170

6,454,860

1,845,616

1,844,709

2,770,050

9,727,349

1,954,270

2,012,898

2,073,285

$35,491,026

1,500,000

1,200,000

11,000,000

1,043,347

1,194,052

10,515,422

10,830,884

$37,283,705

1,016,102

2,996,020

455,480

544,793

2,126,011

811,938

583,074

596,568

610,447

2,488,374

2,305,923

$14,534,729 $3,333,811

40,000

181,280

83,334

2,615,988

180,081

57,964

29,517

38,003

107,644

135,000

139,050

371,315

109,273

112,551

150,706

155,227

159,884

164,680

169,621

$1,667,305

678,500

51,500

79,568

519,045

$1,328,613

8,000,000

$8,000,000

41,931,590

4,731,021

4,759,360

6,617,307

10,953,402

13,460,742

18,207,059

20,504,104

7,813,066

5,024,035

$134,001,687

2,054,762

2,116,405

2,285,987

2,354,567

2,425,203

2,497,960

2,513,195

2,588,592

2,666,250

2,746,237

$24,249,157

6,452,000 7,983,314

3,870,000

1,570,750

541,059

273,182

281,377

289,819

238,810

245,975

633,385

$14,396,357

66,649,480

13,869,656

26,120,275

17,460,989

18,109,262

21,353,660

36,132,262

37,608,209

26,647,540

12,426,743

$284,361,390

1,649,909 Preliminary Net ‐ 2013 Sources ‐ 2013 Uses; Uses include the $1,075,000 for PBB, Opportunity & Contingency

‐850,000 2013 Sources w/o 2013 Uses ‐ to account for funding for Stenger & 72nd & IN that'll be available in 2013 but not spent in 2013 2,320,628 Prior Sources to be Used in 2013 ‐ to account for funding that exists in 2012 still allocated for 72nd & IN, SWs, QZs, and East Area beyond 2012 $3,120,537 NET AVAILABLE CASH 6

The table has the following highlights: Sources • Total revenue needed over the next years is 314.59 million. • The assumptions for the “98-101” revenue – that revenue generated from 20 percent of the City’s base 3 percent sales tax – will total $60.8 million over the next ten years. • Other City dollars include the following sources: - Risk Management money in the amount of $573,500 will be used to meet security and safety needs at the Arvada Center. - Water, Wastewater and Stormwater rates will pay for the necessary capital projects in those Funds. - Golf and Hospitality revenue will meet all of the identified needs in their respective Funds. • Restricted monies are the Police Tax Increment Funds will be used to build two Police Community Stations. • External Dollars are identified grant dollars or monies from another intergovernmental agency. • TBD Dollars: This is “To Be Determined.” We know some of the projects are of a critical nature; we have some ideas on how to fund these needs, but at this time do not have dedicated dollars for particular projects. Uses • General Administration: The major projects in this category are the Performance-Based Budgeting project, the Opportunity “Fund” and Contingency “Fund.” • Transportation: The ten-year total for this category is $35.5 million. Many of the projects are for capital maintenance needs. One highlight is the completion of the West 72nd Avenue and Indiana Street intersection improvements, targeted for completion in 2014. This has a $2.4 million unidentified funding need. We will be looking for grants to cover the construction costs. • Facilities: The most significant near-term project in this category is identification of parking garages. $7.5 million of previously reserved funds for the Wadsworth Corridor, as well as $2.5 million of surplus revenues from 2012, will be utilized for two facilities that will serve the Gold Line and Olde Town. There is a recommendation to renovate the Culbertson Building to provide for an adequate east side vehicle maintenance facility. Vehicle Maintenance and Replacement Funds will be used for this purpose. This would create space at the Parks and Street facility to allow time to plan for the replacement of those buildings in 2020 and 2021. • Parks: There are four categories of Taking Lasting Care (TLC): irrigation systems, playground renovations, trail renovations, and tree replacements. Over $4 million is identified for these purposes in the ten-year plan. The CIP also recommends setting aside a total of $1.4 million over the ten-year plan from City sources and working with the Recreation District to improve the irrigation and parking situation at the Stenger-Lutz facility, which has over one million annual visitors. • Golf: At this time all the projects are for capital maintenance needs. One major expenditure is the replacement of the irrigation system in 2016 at West Woods, for a total of $2.6 million. The funding may be a “lease to own program” as we did at the Lake Arbor site some years ago. • Hospitality: Again, all the projects are for the replacement of the major capital requirements to operate a program that requires updated facilities in order to ensure it remains competitive. • Arvada Center: The most pressing needs are for safety and security. The Risk Management Fund will be used to meet lighting, plaza renovations and updated camera security replacement in the next two years. Future needs include remodeling the front counter area. • Public Safety: Currently, the plan identifies only the construction of two community stations. • Water: The major new project is, of course, the City’s obligation to complete the Gross Reservoir for a commitment of $88 million. There is one project to access water from the Leyden storage area. Other than these two, all other projects are capital maintenance related. • Wastewater: These projects are all capital maintenance related to ensure that infrastructure is maintained in a great condition that enables the system to 7

function safely, efficiently and effectively. • Stormwater: With the exception of completing the Garrison Street Bridge project, the remainder of the projects through the ten-year planning horizon all addresses spot flooding areas, including improvements related to the Gold Line. As you review the table with the sources and uses, you will note we have more sources than actual allocation. This is for a variety of reasons. In the short term, we will review this in the following section. In the long term, this is because the outstanding debt on our capital assets is retired by 2018, providing an additional $4 million for capital projects. Please see the Discussion Section at the end of this Overview for future issues.

Two-Year Appropriations

On pages 18-19 is a summary of the two-year recommended appropriations. The following are some of the highlights from both years. 2013 In 2013, the total appropriation request is $66.649 million. Of this total, $33 million is to make our first payment to Denver Water for the Gross Reservoir. Also embedded in this total is an appropriation to complete the Garrison Bridge of $2.2 million. Of this total expenditure requirement, the sales tax revenue dedication will meet $3.195 million of the requests. We are using utility rates to pay for $47.8 million of the associated major maintenance and capital improvement costs. The Risk Management Fund will be used for $573,500 of security costs at the Arvada Center. Developer fees will be responsible for the costs of completing parks in the west part of the City. The renovation costs of the Culbertson Building will be the obligation of the Vehicle Maintenance and Replacement Fund. The entirety of the 2013 recommendations have dedicated and known sources to meet the costs of the projects. The expenditures in 2013 focus on our three primary areas: Taking Lasting Care, Building on the Base, and then, Investing for the Future. There are a significant number of Taking Lasting Care projects. Examples include: bridge repair, replacement of traffic signals and signs, irrigation, playgrounds, trails, utility pipes and a host of small issues at the Arvada Center, Hospitality and golf courses. In the Building on the Base category, we have several exciting programs. First, we will continue working on the bike path master plan. In 2011 we purchased two large areas for parks in the South Central and East areas of our City. An additional $406,000 is added to the budget for the East Area Park to ensure it provides a very active environment for the neighborhood. The construction budget will be nearly $1.2 million dollars and the neighborhood engagement process will begin this fall. Investing for the Future projects include the major water project with Denver Water, a planning process for Lake Arbor, building new Police Community stations and designing new major transportation connections, such as 72nd Avenue and Indiana. 2014 The 2014 recommended appropriations have only one significant project where the funding is not secure. The City’s Public Works Department will be pursuing a $2.4 million grant to pay for the actual construction of the West 72nd and Indiana Street Improvements. The monies are dedicated for the design in 2013. The City’s history of grants for safe school routes is expected to continue. The total assumption is $92,700, and at this point, the City would be able to meet this 8

need, should that be necessary. The total request in 2014 is $15.2 million. Of that total, $2.4 million is the only outstanding issue. The plan contemplates utilizing $3.145 million of “98-101” dedicated sales tax revenue for capital uses. We realize this is a conservative assumption. We also know we have some pressing projects that should be significantly under construction for the Gold Line, and thus want to make certain we remain able to meet unknown needs in this area. Again, the rates will pay for $8.42 million of major maintenance and capital improvements to the City’s utilities. Appropriated new expenditures in 2014 focus on Taking Lasting Care projects. • • • •

72nd Avenue and Indiana improvements Construction on the Garrison and Ralston areas The new Wolff Park along Ralston Road Major construction on all rail stops

New investment will be occurring with both inter-local monies and City monies. The City funds have been reserved over the years for these major new projects. When putting together a CIP, one needs to balance not only the available monies, but also the capacity to accomplish the work. In 2013 and 2014 significant projects will be accomplished. Ensuring the work we do represents the quality construction that citizens deserve requires attention. We may have fewer projects in 2014 and 2015 as we focus on the priorities already identified. Finally, one of the major projects not identified here is additional money for street maintenance. The 2013/2014 Budget and ten-year General Fund plan demonstrates that we can add $2 million annually through 2018 from our operating revenues for a total of over $5 million in street capital maintenance. Of course, this will be annually reviewed with budget priority discussions. Over time, we may actually change the budget to have street capital maintenance in the capital plan. We continue to work on how to ensure transparency in our presentations and allocations.

Discussion of Priorities and Future Allocations

Once all the projects and resources have been identified in 2013, we have $3.12 million unallocated. We are also fortunate in that we thought we were going to have to pay for the costs of constructing W. 56th Avenue for the rail station. DRCOG provided the City with an additional $2 million to cover that cost, again releasing dedicated monies for other TOD improvements. The City of Arvada has the necessary resources to meet many of our basic needs. We realize that Taking Lasting Care is our first priority. We are working on completing the investments in the west as growth continues. We are reinvesting in the community with the Gold Line opportunities. Nonetheless, we have several pressing needs – referred to as Unfunded Priorities – as well as a list of Unfunded Projects. Many of the Unfunded Priorities, as well as the Unfunded Projects, will require us to have long-term strategic discussions in 2013. We have some incredible opportunities to partner with the Apex Recreational District, our public safety partners, Urban Renewal and others to meet some of these needs. Additionally, the City will make its final $4 million of annual bond payments in 2018. This will provide an opportunity to discuss the policy challenge of “pay as you go” and “generational equity” in meeting future new capital investment. 9

Unfunded Priorities Parking As stated previously herein, the City has many opportunities for parking projects. Currently, we have over $16.8 million already in reserve for a variety of projects associated with the Gold Line. Sales tax growth in the downtown area has increased by nearly 16 percent over last year. It is imperative that the area has parking so that people will continue to use this area as a social center and a revenue generator for the City. The next opportunity is to develop parking for commuters, residents and shoppers. While we have $11.5 million identified for parking facilities, we also know that this may not be sufficient to meet the parking requirements in the Olde Town and Kipling Ridge Station areas. Given this and the other funding opportunities and priorities, it may be necessary to discuss reallocation of funds from previously approved projects in order to meet the immediate need and then reallocate to those projects as we complete these priorities and have additional available funds in the second half of the ten year CIP. Ralston Urban Renewal Area We may have a great opportunity to build on the improvements already started in this area. If the commercial sector is finally returning to health, there may be a large retailer that will help start the redevelopment of the area. There are several challenges. First, while they will generate income, it is the question of “pay as you go” or using that money to pay some debt. The “pay as you go” methodology will not generate sufficient funds quickly enough to complete projects to meet identified community needs. A total investment of approximately $20 million has been identified. All of this will be repaid through sales tax growth in an area that is currently declining in retail sales. The question is timing. If the City would like to have significant changes more quickly in the area, we may need to consider investing in the short term. City Facilities As illustrated in the ten-year plan, the City needs to address the Parks and Street Maintenance facilities. They are not sustainable from an energy perspective, nor are they as safe, efficient or effective for staff. They are over fifty years old and were built for different purposes. The configuration makes it very difficult to keep it from freezing and causing employee risks in the winter. In addition, we also know that the Police Department has needed space for quite some time. We are currently reviewing long-term options to address their work needs. This analysis will build on the 2005 work and explore the positives and negatives of other locations, including the AURA area. We also know our Court facility requires modernization from a security standpoint. The current review will include the Court in the analysis. While we have no idea of the cost of such a facility, with property, it would not be surprising to be in the range of $25 million. Public Safety Communications The City, along with Westminster, operates a police radio system on very aged technology. Over the years, the City has been working in collaboration with the E-911 Board to determine the requirements of a system and the allocation of funding. In every case, the City’s obligation will be near a $4 million commitment.

Unfunded Projects

In the back of this document is a section listing all projects identified by departments within our planning horizon. While we began with a ten-year view of the CIP, these projects certainly illustrate the vision of the community within the next 25 to 50 years. Few of these projects, if any, should be a surprise. The expensive ones are associated with completing our transportation corridors: completion of Ward Road, 72nd Avenue as a four-lane thoroughfare from Kipling to Indiana, improvements along Indiana, railroad crossing separations on major arterials, completion of the bike and pedestrian transportation system, new parks such as the Gibbs West area, and significant improvements to some of our current facilities like Long Lake Ranch. 10

The total of all identified projects is $427 million – a significant amount even in 50 years. Nonetheless, we will have opportunities to meet some of the Unfunded Priorities and some of these Unfunded Projects with a long-term strategic plan guiding our allocation and prioritization.

Summary

The following sections of this document provide identification of all general outstanding projects – “Continuing Projects.” We also have a section describing every new project in summary and in detail. The Unfunded Projects are provided in the back of the document. This is the City’s first effort at a documented ten-year Capital Improvement Plan. We welcome any ideas on what might make it easier to understand. Many documents across the country were reviewed prior to creating the document provided here. The City of Arvada will be spending over $125 million in capital investments over the next three years, including the City’s investment in the Gold Line. The private sector actually accomplishes most of the capital work. This means the City is reinvesting into our economy the tax dollars received, providing jobs as well as a great community. The next five years will change our community more than it has been changed since the late 1990’s. We have a plan to address capital maintenance, our first priority. We have a plan to complete the projects we have started in the west and throughout the city. The investments in related Gold Line projects will change the look and feel of our City. We see new roads, more road maintenance, completion of sidewalks throughout our city, the purchase of property for future parks, a finished skate board park and investment in the Ralston Creek park and the new park along Ralston Road. The projects and plan in this Capital Improvement Plan continues this long and solid tradition of “Continuing to Build a Great Community.”

PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT DETAIL

Continuing Projects

CONTINUING PROJECTS The information shown on the following four pages lists all Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) that are currently active. During this CIP process, a detailed review of all CIP projects was performed. Staff determined the work and funding required to complete each project. In addition, the expected completion date for each project is also included. After reviewing all projects, staff determined that there was excess funding in some projects or that the original project was no longer necessary or feasible. The “available cash” column represents the excess funds that are now available for other CIP projects.

CONTINUING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Responsible Department Administration

Transportation

Project Name Garrison Complex Olde Town Station Improvements Wadsworth Corridor Plaza Enhancements Kipling Street Enhancements Gold Line Parking Property Section 16 Building Permit System Visitability Fee CIP Projects W. 64th Ave Improve Phase II Carr Street Improvements Kipling St Bridge Replacement W. 77th/Wads Right Lane W.72nd/Indiana Intersection Missing Sidewalks Guardrails-Revolving ADA Ramps-Revolving Irr.Ditch Reloc. Gold Line W.72nd Spot Widening Arvada Center Sidewalk W.86th Pkwy Bike Ln/Queen-88th Sheridan Bridge Replcmt. W 72nd Ave/Wads Landscaping Arvada Center Drive Relocation Ridge Road Bike/Ped TIP Ralston Rd/Olde Wads NE RT W. 64th/McIntyre Dbl LT W. 74th Bike/Ped Canal Bridge W. 56th Ave. Extension Design Sidewalks (South of BNRR) Arterial Fencing Collector Streets Improvmt.Rev W.74th Ave. On St. Bike Ln. Olde Wads Reconstruction Arterial St. Design & Con.-Rev

2012 2012 Additions Beg. Balance $ 5,115,167 $ $ 602,401 $ 500,000 $ 9,297,881 $ $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ 364,996 $ - $ 750,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ 66,300 $ 708,273 $ $ 1,249,696 $ $ 180,989 $ $ 2,824 $ $ 26,468 $ $ 554,801 $ 150,000 $ 116,003 $ 26,523 $ 50,923 $ 33,000 $ 101,427 $ 89,116 $ 600,000 $ 200,000 $ 335,000 $ 10,000 $ 51,463 $ 2,039 $ 845,000 $ $ 23,962 $ 100,000 $ 75,000 $ 25,000 $ 999,454 $ $ 90,000 $ $ 46,198 $ $ 360,000 $ $ 108,636 $ $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ 475,000 $ 52,252 $ 60,158 $ (15,000) $ 15,000 $ 940,574 $ $ 276,579 $ 181,090 14

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

2012 Transfers

Remaining to be spent - $ 5,115,167 - $ 1,102,401 - $ 9,297,881 - $ 900,000 - $ 364,996 - $ 750,000 - $ 300,000 - $ 250,000 - $ 66,300 345,000 $ - $ 274,696 15,000 $ 195,989 - $ 2,824 - $ 26,468 - $ 704,801 108,000 $ 250,526 - $ 83,923 - $ 190,543 (200,000) $ 600,000 (335,000) $ (10,000) $ - $ 8,502 - $ 845,000 - $ 123,962 - $ 100,000 - $ 999,454 - $ 90,000 - $ 3,756 - $ 360,000 - $ 108,636 - $ 250,000 - $ 475,000 (15,000) $ - $ - $ 940,574 (413,000) $ -

Available Cash

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,053,273 $ 975,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 45,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 42,442 $ $ $ $ $ 97,410 $ $ $ 44,669

Expected Completion Winter 2013 2015 TBD Summer 2013 2015 Winter 2012 Complete 2012 TBD NA 2012 2012 2012 Complete 2015 2013 2012 2012 2013 NA NA 2012 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2014 Fall 2014 2012 Complete 2012 2012 2012 TBD 2012 2012 Complete 2012

CONTINUING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Responsible Department Transportation cont.

Parks

Project Name City Share Arterial Sts.-Rev. W. 56th Ave. Ext. - Const. Wads 68th-76th (FASTER) 64th & Sheridan Int. (FASTER) Bridge Repairs Kipling Underpass/Van Bibber W. 72nd/UPRR Crossing EA Gold Line Light Rail Wadsworth Bypass Design/Constr Adams Co. Transportation Tax WW's McIntyre Sig. Lights-2 Kipling Trail (TIP) Long Life Pavement Markings Video Detection Program Traffic Calming Ralston Road Corridor Study Wadsworth Trail (TIP) W72nd Bike Ln/Kipling to Simms Traffic Signals ATMS School Flashers W. 64th/Oak Signal Replacement 2012 Traffic Signal Upgrades 64th/Miller Signal Replacement Intersection Safety Improvements Ralston Garrison Haz Elim grant Alkire 74th-80th SRTS (Grant) RR X-ing Warning Quiet Zones UPRR Quiet Zones Auto Signals Safe Routes Program Bike/Ped. Program 80th & Alkire Signal Leyden Lake Bridge 86th & Kipling Trailhead Trail Signs Indiana Equestrian/Croke Br

2012 2012 Additions Beg. Balance $ 223,000 $ 106,090 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ $ - $ $ $ 2,000,000 $ $ 350,000 $ $ 77,755 $ $ 1,901,444 $ $ 241,867 $ 9,938 $ 18,087 $ $ 89,496 $ $ 33,786 $ 42,436 $ 25,391 $ 21,218 $ - $ 250,000 $ (373) $ 300,000 $ 1,178,479 $ $ 84,402 $ $ 237,244 $ 106,090 $ - $ $ 27,247 $ $ 135,000 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 61,846 $ 53,045 $ 320,000 $ $ 143,500 $ $ 337,646 $ 350,000 $ 560,000 $ $ 60,600 $ 21,218 $ 58,500 $ $ $ 94,850 $ $ 97,398 $ $ 127,530 $ $ 244,676 $ 15

2012 Remaining Available Transfers to be spent Cash $ (315,109) $ 0 $ 13,981 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ $ 230,000 $ 230,000 $ $ 430,000 $ 430,000 $ $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ $ - $ 2,000,000 $ $ - $ 350,000 $ $ - $ 77,755 $ $ - $ - $ 1,901,444 $ - $ 251,805 $ $ - $ 18,087 $ $ - $ 89,496 $ $ - $ 76,222 $ $ - $ 46,609 $ $ - $ 250,000 $ $ - $ 299,627 $ $ - $ 1,178,479 $ $ - $ 84,402 $ $ (341,600) $ 1,734 $ $ 22,000 $ 22,000 $ $ - $ 27,247 $ $ - $ 135,000 $ $ 49,600 $ 49,600 $ $ 135,000 $ 135,000 $ $ (114,891) $ (0) $ $ - $ 320,000 $ $ 44,000 $ 187,500 $ $ - $ 687,646 $ $ - $ 560,000 $ $ (44,000) $ 15,500 $ 22,318 $ - $ 58,500 $ $ 135,000 $ 135,000 $ $ - $ 94,850 $ $ - $ 97,398 $ $ - $ 127,530 $ $ - $ 244,676 $ -

Expected Completion 2012 Fall 2014 Fall 2014 Spring 2015 2013 Fall 2014 Winter 2013 2012 NA 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 Winter 2013 Winter 2013 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 Fall 2013 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 Winter 2013 2012 2012 2012 2012 TBD Winter 2013 2012

CONTINUING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Responsible Department Parks cont.

Project Name 80th Avenue Medians Welton Reservoir Arvada Skate Park Saddlebrook Park Tennis Ct. Renovations Gold Strike Pk. Spring Mesa Adams Co. Open Space Sales Tax Sunrise Ridge Phase II Park Signs Project East Area Park South Central Park Irrigation Systems Parks Water Tap Fees Broad Lake Park I West Woods Park Playground Four Acre Lake Park Majestic View Park Playground Forest Springs Park Davis Lane Park Playground Oak Park Irrigation Ralston Creek Trail @ Tennis Ctr Thundercloud Park Hills at Standley Lake Park Restrooms @ Chase Dr 2011 Motorola Park Development Fees H2O Taps for Dev-Const Parks Long Lake Restrooms Parks Capital Maintenance Club Crest Playground Sunrise Pk Playground Columbine Pk Playground & Irr Michael Northey Park Playgrd Vol Firefighters Park Wolff Park

2012 2012 Additions Beg. Balance $ 607,773 $ 500,000 $ 60,000 $ $ 224,069 $ $ 287,103 $ $ 58,106 $ $ 282,124 $ $ 459,147 $ $ 120,186 $ $ 270,726 $ $ 1,379 $ $ 875,220 $ $ 522,279 $ 850,000 $ 25,478 $ 151,875 $ 59,716 $ 56,293 $ 63,171 $ $ 44,529 $ $ 247,966 $ $ 161,899 $ $ 399,622 $ 746,770 $ 163,151 $ $ 23,220 $ 278,630 $ 1,101 $ 100,000 $ 231,494 $ $ 244,649 $ 173,000 $ (4,100) $ 9,546 $ 65,000 $ $ 661,699 $ $ - $ 711,000 $ 232,640 $ 179,232 $ $ 215,234 $ $ 347,517 $ 1,400 $ 177,016 $ $ 596,331 $ $ 1,169,340 $ 16

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

2012 Transfers

Remaining to be spent - $ 1,107,773 - $ 60,000 - $ 224,069 - $ 287,103 - $ 58,106 - $ 282,124 - $ 459,147 - $ 120,186 - $ 270,726 - $ 1,379 - $ 875,220 - $ 1,372,279 - $ 177,353 (23,946) $ 92,063 - $ 63,171 - $ 44,529 - $ 247,966 - $ 161,899 - $ 1,146,392 - $ 163,151 - $ 301,850 - $ 101,101 - $ 231,494 - $ 417,649 - $ 5,446 - $ 65,000 - $ 661,699 23,946 $ 23,946 - $ 711,000 - $ 232,640 - $ 179,232 - $ 215,234 - $ 348,917 - $ 177,016 - $ 596,331 - $ 1,169,340

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

Available Cash

Expected Completion 2012 TBD 2012 2012 2013 TBD 2012 TBD 2012 2012 Winter 2013 Winter 2013 TBD TBD 2013 2012 2012 2012 Summer 2013 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 TBD 2012 Summer 2013 TBD 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012

CONTINUING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Responsible Department Parks cont.

Arvada Center

Project Name Bridgeside PG & Trails Club Crest Trls & Trl Bridges Harry S. Truman Trails Homestead PG & Trails Ladybug Park PG Lake Arbor Pkwy Irrigation Lew Walsh PG & Irrigation Leyden Creek PG & Irrigation Yankee Doodle Park PG A/C Capital Maintenance Public Art Project Arvada Center Monument Sign AC Maintenance Public Art Lighting Boards & BB Intercom Arvada Center Seats

2012 Beg. Balance $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 118,606 $ 141,275 $ 18,300 $ 10,000 $ 18,271 $ -

2012 Additions $ 275,000 $ 175,000 $ 120,000 $ 225,000 $ 175,000 $ 110,000 $ 275,000 $ 350,000 $ 175,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ 10,000 $ $ 200,000

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

Capital Improvement Projects Reserved for 2012 one time CIP Reserve (8% of 2011 expenditures) Total 2011 CIP Balance

$ $ $ $

40,915,810 2,191,500 1,128,373 44,235,683

13,766,770

2012 Transfers

Remaining to be spent $ 275,000 $ 175,000 $ 120,000 $ 225,000 $ 175,000 $ 110,000 $ 275,000 $ 350,000 $ 175,000 $ 168,606 $ 191,275 $ 18,300 $ 20,000 $ 18,271 $ 200,000

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

4,195,537

$ $ $ $

(500,000) (500,000) (75,000) 3,120,537

New projects: Performance Based Budgeting Opportunity Fund Contingency Fund Available to Spend

50,487,043

Available Cash

Expected Completion Summer 2013 Summer 2013 2012 Winter 2013 2012 2012 Winter 2013 2012 2012 TBD 2012 Complete TBD 2012 2012

2013-2014 Plan Summary

2013-2014 PLAN SUMMARY

2013 §98‐101

GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Performance Based Budgeting Opportunity Fund Contingency Fund WADSWORTH CORRIDOR Wadsworth Corridor Sidewalks Wadsworth Cultural Corridor Study Wadsworth (SH 121) Mulitmodal Study Wadsworth Gateway Improvements TRANSPORTATION Bridge Maintenance Collector Street Improvements ADA Ramps Adams County Transportation Projects W. 72nd Ave. and Indiana St. Intersection Improvements Ward Road Extension ‐ W. 72nd Ave to W. 80th Ave. Preliminary Design Safe Routes to School Program Bike/Ped Program Missing Sidewalk Program Union Pacific RR Quiet Zones Intersection Safety Improvements New Traffic Signal Construction Long Life Pavement Markings Program Video Detection Program Sign Replacement; MUTCD Mandates ATMS Completion and Upgrades Signal Replacement UPS at Major Intersections FACILITIES Gold Line‐related Parking Structures Fleet Maintenance Relocation to Culbertson Building PARKS Irrigation System Renovation Playground Renovation Trail Renovation Candelas Mini‐Park #1 Candelas Neighborhood Park #2 Stenger Sports Complex Tree Replacement Program East Area Neighborhood Park Adams County Open Space Projects Lake Arbor Master Plan

‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 50,000 50,000 ‐ 100,000 50,000 20,000 50,000 ‐ 350,000 75,000 275,000 80,000 20,000 50,000 50,000 780,000 39,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 200,000 50,000 ‐ ‐ 350,000 15,000 406,000 ‐ 30,000 20

Other City Other/TBD 2013 Total GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 500,000 ‐ 500,000 500,000 ‐ 500,000 75,000 ‐ 75,000 WADSWORTH CORRIDOR 880,000 ‐ 880,000 50,000 ‐ 50,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 70,000 ‐ 70,000 PW ‐ TRANSPORTATION 125,000 ‐ 125,000 ‐ ‐ 50,000 ‐ ‐ 50,000 ‐ 60,000 60,000 ‐ ‐ 100,000 ‐ ‐ 50,000 ‐ 90,000 110,000 ‐ ‐ 50,000 108,000 ‐ 108,000 ‐ ‐ 350,000 ‐ ‐ 75,000 ‐ ‐ 275,000 ‐ ‐ 80,000 ‐ ‐ 20,000 ‐ ‐ 50,000 ‐ ‐ 50,000 ‐ ‐ 780,000 ‐ ‐ 39,000 PW ‐ FACILITIES ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,500,000 ‐ 1,500,000 PG&H ‐ PARKS 156,000 ‐ 156,000 ‐ ‐ 200,000 ‐ ‐ 50,000 ‐ 300,000 300,000 ‐ 940,000 940,000 ‐ ‐ 350,000 ‐ ‐ 15,000 ‐ ‐ 406,000 ‐ 25,000 25,000 ‐ ‐ 30,000

2014 Other City Other/TBD 2014 Total GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

§98‐101

‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 51,500 51,500 ‐ 515,000 ‐ 20,600 51,500 ‐ 360,500 77,250 283,250 82,400 20,600 51,500 51,500 803,400 40,170 ‐ ‐ ‐ 206,000 51,500 ‐ ‐ 360,500 15,450 ‐ ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WADSWORTH CORRIDOR ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 500,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ PW ‐ TRANSPORTATION ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 61,800 ‐ 2,472,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 92,700 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ PW ‐ FACILITIES 1,200,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ PG&H ‐ PARKS 156,780 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 51,500 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 25,750 ‐ ‐

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 500,000 ‐ ‐ 51,500 51,500 61,800 2,987,000 ‐ 113,300 51,500 ‐ 360,500 77,250 283,250 82,400 20,600 51,500 51,500 803,400 40,170 1,200,000 ‐ 156,780 206,000 51,500 ‐ ‐ 412,000 15,450 ‐ 25,750 ‐

2013 §98‐101

GOLF West Woods Golf Club Golf Shop and Rest Rooms Remodel West Woods Restaurant Remodel, Offices and Storage HOSPITALITY Hospitality Taking Lasting Care Kitchen TLC Banquet Equipment ARVADA CENTER Arvada Center Capital Maintenance Arvada Center Safety and Security Video Equipment (RM) Arvada Center Exterior Lighting Improvements (RM) Arvada Center Outside Front Entry Plaza (RM) Public Art PUBLIC SAFETY Two Police Community Stations WATER Denver Water Moffat Project Participation Water Main Replacement Water Treatment Plant Improvements Cathodic Protection Leyden Storage Project WASTE WATER Sewer Main Replacement North System Oversizing Access Improvements STORMWATER Garrison Bridge Replacement Gold Line Improvements / Estes Street Outfall Quaker Street Storm Sewer Yarrow Street Overflow Allison St Outfall ‐ Phase I Little Dry Creek Bank Stabilization

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 55,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 50,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDING ALL DEPARTMENTS AND DIVISIONS 3,195,000

2014

Other City Other/TBD PG&H ‐ GOLF 40,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ PG&H ‐ HOSPITALITY 65,000 ‐ 70,000 ‐ ARVADA CENTER ‐ ‐ 123,000 ‐ 225,000 ‐ 225,500 ‐ ‐ ‐ PUBLIC SAFETY ‐ 8,000,000 UTILITIES ‐ WATER 37,331,086 ‐ 3,850,504 ‐ 500,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 250,000 ‐ UTILITIES ‐ WASTEWATER 1,904,762 ‐ 100,000 ‐ 50,000 ‐ UTILITIES ‐ STORMWATER 2,200,000 ‐ 620,000 ‐ 350,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 700,000 ‐

2013 Total

§98‐101

40,000 ‐

‐ ‐

65,000 70,000

‐ ‐

55,000 123,000 225,000 225,500 50,000

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 51,500

8,000,000

‐

37,331,086

3,850,504 500,000 ‐ 250,000

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

1,904,762 100,000 50,000

‐ ‐ ‐

2,200,000 620,000 350,000 ‐ ‐ 700,000

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

52,568,852

65,178,852 0 3,145,620 10,595,286

9,415,000

Net Projected §98‐101 per 6‐8‐12 Ten Year General Fund Model 3,183,558 Total §98‐101 Funding of Approved Projects 3,195,000 Total §98‐101 Funding of Approved Projects as % of Net Projected §98‐101 100.36%

3,421,029 3,145,620 91.95%

§98‐101 Remaining After Funding Approved Projects ‐$11,442

$275,409

Other City Other/TBD 2014 Total PG&H ‐ GOLF ‐ ‐ ‐ 181,280 ‐ 181,280 PG&H ‐ HOSPITALITY 27,810 ‐ 27,810 111,240 ‐ 111,240 ARVADA CENTER ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 51,500 PUBLIC SAFETY ‐ ‐ ‐ UTILITIES ‐ WATER 250,000 ‐ 250,000 3,966,021 ‐ 3,966,021 ‐ ‐ ‐ 257,500 ‐ 257,500 257,500 ‐ 257,500 UTILITIES ‐ WASTEWATER 1,961,905 ‐ 1,961,905 103,000 ‐ 103,000 51,500 ‐ 51,500 UTILITIES ‐ STORMWATER ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 206,000 ‐ 206,000 1,364,750 ‐ 1,364,750 ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,703,750

16,444,656

General Administration

GENERAL ADMINISTRATION PERFORMANCE-BASED BUDGETING: $500,000 In 2011, the City Council blessed an effort to integrate the City into a Performance-Based Budgeting system. For these efforts, the planned allocation totals $500,000. GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECT ADMINISTRATION As part of the Citizens’ Capital Improvement Planning Committee (CCIPC) recommendations made in 2008, a series of revolving project accounts were set up to receive annual appropriations. The revolving project accounts were designed to address, among other things, opportunities as they would arise and costly, unforeseen project complications as they arose. However, due to the sporadic nature of grant opportunities and the rare but occasional need to cover substantial contingencies, revolving project accounts set up to provide such resources began accumulating funding a levels greater than were necessary to provide the resources. Therefore, staff is recommending that two new financial facilities for capital projects - the Opportunity Fund and the Contingency Fund - be established. OPPORTUNITY FUND: $500,000 For various capital projects, the City periodically finds itself with collaborative funding opportunities from various sources, including the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). Recent examples include DRCOG grants representing 80% of the construction costs for a new pedestrian underpass along the Van Bibber Trail at Kipling Street and various TOD-related improvements on Ridge Road to help accommodate the Arvada Ridge Gold Line Station. Additionally, two CDOT grants providing 80% of the construction costs for projects on both Wadsworth Boulevard and Sheridan Boulevard funded with state FASTER program revenues were approved this year. While the vast majority of costs for such major projects are covered by external sources, the City still must provide substantial financial resources as part of the awarding of the grants, often in the six-figure range per project. The Opportunity Fund will ensure that resources necessary for such matches are readily available and that staff can move quickly to meet the commitments. However, in order to avoid the over-accumulation of capital dollars over time, additional funding will not be added unless and until the funding is tapped at the discretion of the City Manager for a capital opportunity. In other words, the $500,000 funding level is a ceiling. CONTINGENCY FUND: $75,000 While careful planning is a cornerstone of all City operations, the nature of capital projects lends itself to unforeseen difficulties during project work. Often-encountered issues with unidentified utilities infrastructure, including abandoned lines, complicate operations and lead to additional and substantial incurred costs that even the most diligent of planning cannot address. Therefore, the Contingency Fund will operate as a source of appropriated funds to guarantee readily-available financial resources to promptly alleviate problems as they arise. Like the Opportunity Fund, the Contingency Fund is designed to maintain a reasonable level of funding without unnecessarily accumulating funding over time. Unless and until the Contingency Fund is tapped for support (again, at the discretion of the City Manager), it would only be replenished at a level no higher than $75,000. 23

Wadsworth Corridor

WADSWORTH CORRIDOR Ten-Year Summary

In July of 2010, City Council designated $9.3 million of available funding for improvements along the Wadsworth Corridor. As the City’s pressing capital needs have become more clearly defined, uses for these funds per this plan have been split into two parts. The first is a series of projects, including the construction of new sidewalks along Wadsworth Boulevard, both cultural and multimodal studies to identify future improvements to the Corridor, and gateway improvements for both ends of the Corridor that lie within Arvada. The second use is for financing structured parking related to the Gold Line. A total of $7.5 million of the available funding will be used to finance these parking facilities, details for which are more expressly laid out in the Facilities section of this plan. In order to ensure a return of funding for Wadsworth Corridor purposes, a repayment schedule utilizing otherwise unallocated §98-101 funding is included in the plan.

SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

1,000,000

1,500,000

500,000

3,500,000

1,000,000

$7,500,000

Other City $

1,000,000

500,000

$1,500,000

Restricted City $

External $

1,000,000

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

500,000

3,500,000

1,000,000

$9,000,000

2013

2014

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

TBD $ Total $

USES

2015

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

50,000

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

500,000

3,500,000

1,000,000

$8,050,000

Design Costs

90,000

$90,000

Const. Costs

860,000

$860,000

1,000,000

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

500,000

3,500,000

1,000,000

$9,000,000

Total Proj Costs O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST:

$9,000,000 25

W 72ND AVE

t u

WADSWORTH BLVD

121 U V 93 U V

_ [

W 68TH AVE

§ ¨ ¦ 76

§ ¨ ¦ 70

72nd

Wadsworth

72nd

W 64TH AVE S WAD ASS BYP RTH WO

64th

Carr

121 U V

RALSTON CREEK

Ralston

58th

Ralston

WADSWORTH CORRIDOR SIDEWALKS WC-01 CITY OF ARVADA

DATE: 11/15/2012

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 26

The maps provided are graphical representations intended for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the most current information or conditions. THE CITY OF ARVADA MAKES NO WARRANTY OF MECHANTABILITY OR WARRANTY FOR FITNESS OF USE FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THESE GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATIONS OR THE UNDERLYING DATA. Any users of these graphical representations or map products accepts same AS IS, WITH ALL FAULTS, and assumes all responsibility for the use thereof, and further covenants to hold the City harmless from and against all damage, loss, or liability arising from the use of this map product, in consideration of the City's having made this information available. G:\GIS_Data\MXD\Finance\Administration\CIP\LocationMaps\Projects2013-2014\WC-01.mxd

PROJECT NAME: Wadsworth Corridor Sidewalks PROJECT LOCATION: Varied DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW/Engineering SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

880,000

$880,000

Restricted City $

External $

880,000

$880,000

TBD $ Total $ USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

20,000

$20,000

Const. Costs

860,000

$860,000

Total Proj Costs

880,000

$880,000

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$880,000 Yes

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

7 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project will install missing sidewalks and widen existing sidewalks at three locations to better accommodate pedestrian and bicycle

traffic along the corridor. The identified sites are along the west side of the Wadsworth By‐Pass from Ralston Creek to W. 64th Avenue, the west side of Wadsworth Boulevard from W. 64th Avenue to W. 68th Avenue, and the east side of Wadsworth Boulevard from W. 64th Avenue to W. 72nd Avenue. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Driveways, utility poles, landscaped boundaries, narrow, and discontinuous walkways, etc. will be eliminated, thus increasing the efficiency and ability for pedestrians and bicyclists to access the businesses and or travel along the corridor.

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Conversion of overhead utilities to underground will be explored to run concurrent with this project. Sections of narrow sidewalk INFORMATION: abutting the Fairlanes Shopping Center will not be addressed with this project due to a retaining wall that would need modification. This

project will complete several but not all sections of sidewalk in this corridor. Remaining missing/deficient sidewalks total +/‐$900,000. CONTINGENCIES: 27

PROJECT NAME: Wadsworth Cultural Corridor Study PROJECT LOCATION: TBD DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Community Development SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

50,000

$50,000

Restricted City $

External $

50,000

$50,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

50,000

$50,000

Design Costs

Const. Costs

50,000

$50,000

Total Proj Costs O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$50,000 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

6 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will involve a study of the potential for development of a culutral corridor along the Wadsworth corridor, focusing primarily

on the area between Olde Town and the Arvada Center.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Determine the feasibility and extent of a possible culutral corridor, as well as implementation steps and the extent of City involvement.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Wadsworth Corridor funding, while set aside prior to the term of this Capital Improvement Plan, is shown as sourced in the year of its SOURCES (if any): scheduled appropriation. There is also the possibility of a small grant and technical assistance in support of the effort from Colorado

Creative Industries (CCI). OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The study relates to furthering goals for arts, culture and heritage activities as outlined in the Community Cultural Master Plan INFORMATION: completed in 2003, as well as the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City has also applied for, but did not receive, Creative District

designation. CONTINGENCIES: As plans for cultural corridor continue to solidify, the exact scope of the project will evolve over the coming months. 29

PROJECT NAME: Wadsworth (SH 121) Mulitmodal Study PROJECT LOCATION: SH 121 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Public Works/Traffic SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

500,000

$500,000

Restricted City $

External $

500,000

$500,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

500,000

$500,000

Design Costs

Const. Costs

Total Proj Costs

500,000

$500,000

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$500,000 Yes

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

7 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a study of State Highway 121 from I‐70 to W. 88th Avenue and the Olde Wadsworth corridor from Olde Town to the Arvada

Center. Taking land usage into consideration, forecasts of all transportation modes will be developed. Mode split, which is the percent usage of transit, automobiles, bicyclists, and foot travel, will be part of the forecast. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

To determine the most efficient manner in which to meet the public's transportation needs in SH 121 corrridor.

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The mode split will determine the feasibility of transportation options, such as additional sidewalks and/or bike lanes, and transit (bus, INFORMATION: streetcar, bus rapid transit, light rail) to accommodate the corridor's future transportation needs. CONTINGENCIES: 31

PROJECT NAME: Wadsworth Gateway Improvements PROJECT LOCATION: Wadsworth Bypass From I‐70 north to 52nd avenue DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Golf and Hopitality Services SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

70,000

$70,000

Restricted City $

External $

70,000

$70,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

70,000

$70,000

Const. Costs

70,000

$70,000

Total Proj Costs O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$70,000 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

6 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project includes the allocation of funding for the design development, construction drawings and bid documents for the constuction

of new City gateways including the redesign of the median area landscape and irrigation on Wadsworth Boulevard from I‐70 North to 56th avenue. Additional funds would be allocated toward the design of an enhanced north City entrance on Wadsworth across from the Lake Arbor Golf course. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

This project would replace the existing medians : deteriorating concrete, declining landscape and and inoperable irrigation system for these highly visible entrances into the City.

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The current staff proposal includes entrance improvements to the south and north entrances into the City on Wadsworth Boulevard. INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Work on the north end of the Wadsworth Corridor is contingent on additional funding, with a source tentatively identified from existing

capital funding.

WADSWORTH BLVD

W 80TH AVE

W 64TH AVE

SHERIDAN BLVD

W 72ND AVE

W 58TH AVE

WADSWORTH CORRIDOR REPAYMENT WC-06 CITY OF ARVADA

DATE: 11/15/2012

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 34

PROJECT NAME: Wadsworth Corridor Repayment Schedule PROJECT LOCATION: N/A DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Finance/Treasury SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

1,000,000

1,500,000

500,000

3,500,000

1,000,000

2022 0

TOTAL 0

$7,500,000

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

1,000,000

1,500,000

500,000

3,500,000

1,000,000

$7,500,000

TBD $ Total $

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Prelim Costs

USES

2013 0

2014 0

1,000,000

1,500,000

500,000

3,500,000

1,000,000

$7,500,000

Design Costs

Const. Costs

Total Proj Costs

1,000,000

1,500,000

500,000

3,500,000

1,000,000

$7,500,000

O&M Costs

$7,500,000 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

2015

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

2021

2022

TOTAL

10 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: In order to meet the City's established capital obligations with RTD for available parking, $7.5 million of existing Wadsworth Corridor

funding shall be used to finance a majority of the City's structured parking plans. This schedule of repayment contemplates using projected §98‐101 funding not otherwise allocated within this Capital Improvement Plan to replenish resources identified for the Wadsworth Corridor. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

N/A

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 None SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT None INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: The potential for intervening circumstances and changes in Council priorities leave this repayment schedule subject to revision in the

future.

Transportation

TRANSPORTATION Ten-Year Summary

Its primary responsibilities being for both maintenance of and improvements to the City’s transportation infrastructure, Public Works sees to the prioritizations for and uses of Arvada capital improvement and major capital maintenance resources. In recent years and as reflected in the Capital Improvement Plan, its focus has been and shall continue to be the maintenance and care of hundreds of existing lane miles of roads, traffic signal system, and various routes for cyclists and pedestrians. However, as a new wave of development marches on, particularly in the northwest of the City, Public Works is highly mindful of the fast approaching needs for additional improvements to accommodate a growing citizenry spread over ever expanding areas. Moreover, the pending arrival of the Gold Line has commanded considerable attention as transportation infrastructure in the oldest parts of Arvada are preparing to fundamentally transform how both Arvada residents and visitors make their way to and through the City.

SOURCES

Existing

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

2,039,000

2,460,670

1,632,725

1,681,707

1,675,883

3,526,159

1,718,241

1,769,788

1,822,882

1,877,569

$20,204,624

3,961,820

233,000

$4,194,820

Restricted City $

External $

60,000

61,800

63,654

65,564

67,531

6,969,556

71,643

73,792

76,006

78,286

$7,587,833

90,000

2,564,700

95,481

98,345

101,296

104,335

107,465

110,689

114,009

117,430

$3,503,749

2,422,000

5,087,170

1,791,860

1,845,616

1,844,709

10,600,050

1,897,349

1,954,270

2,012,898

2,073,285

$35,491,026

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

304,081

257,500

266,300

$827,881

Design Costs

223,053

644,265

42,966

44,255

45,583

916,951

48,359

49,810

51,304

52,843

$2,119,390

Const. Costs

2,841,474

2,022,405

6,145,594

1,801,360

1,799,126

1,853,100

9,678,990

1,904,460

1,961,593

2,020,441

$32,028,543

3,368,608

2,924,170

6,454,860

1,845,616

1,844,709

2,770,050

9,727,349

1,954,270

2,012,898

2,073,285

$35,491,026

65,000

77,765

101,316

104,355

120,992

110,711

114,032

117,453

120,977

140,263

$1,072,864

§98‐101 $ Other City $

TBD $ Total $

3,961,820

USES

Total Proj Costs O&M Costs

515,212

TOTAL PROJECT COST:

$35,491,026 37

PROJECT NAME: Bridge Maintenance PROJECT LOCATION: Multiple Sites Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW/Engineering SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

Other City $

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

150,000

125,000

$275,000

Restricted City $

External $

125,000

$275,000

TBD $ Total $

150,000

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

12,500

$12,500

Const. Costs

112,500

$112,500

125,000

$275,000

Total Proj Costs

150,000

O&M Costs

$275,000 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

9 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project provides a designated source of funds to maintain the city's 67 bridges worth $62,000,000. The bridges are inspected every

two years and the deficiencies and maintenance needs are identified. The 2011 inspection noted maintenance needs totaling $1,475,000. This project will help to remedy these needs. Examples of the identified needs are repairing spalled concrete and replacing aged wing wall gaskets. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Currently, there is no designated fund and maintenance needs compete against all the other worthy street projects. Maintenance work is currently done on an emergency basis only.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 The additional $125,000 to be spent in 2013 will be supplied with residual prior capital funding. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The aging infrastructure is a reality and only through maintenance can the bridge assets be preserved. INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: N/A 39

PROJECT NAME: Collector Street Improvements PROJECT LOCATION: Varied Sites Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW/Engineering SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

50,000

2015

51,500

2016

53,045

2017

54,636

2018

56,275

2019

57,964

2020

59,703

2021

61,494

2022

63,339

TOTAL

65,239

$573,194

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

59,703

61,494

63,339

65,239

$573,194

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

2,500

2,575

2,652

2,732

2,814

2,898

2,985

3,075

3,167

3,262

$28,660

Const. Costs

47,500

48,925

50,393

51,905

53,462

55,066

56,717

58,419

60,172

61,977

$544,534

Total Proj Costs

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

59,703

61,494

63,339

65,239

$573,194

O&M Costs

$573,194 Maybe

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

9 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project completes isolated improvements along collector streets such as turn lanes, curb gutter sidewalk, etc. It may also supply the

City's match for outside funding on minor projects, fund preliminary engineering studies and design needed to apply for outside grants, and can eliminate‐reduce the funding gap between a budgeted project and actual costs. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

This project completes minor projects along collector streets to bring them into compliance with the city's collector street standards and to improve safety and capacity. The selected projects are usually too small for their own earmarked budget item.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 None SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT This project also completes minor projects to bring collector streets up to current standards and to improve safety and capacity. INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: This funding will be utilized as needs are identified. 41

PROJECT NAME: ADA Ramps PROJECT LOCATION: Varied Sites Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW/Engineering SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

50,000

2015

51,500

2016

53,045

2017

54,636

2018

56,275

2019

57,964

2020

59,703

2021

61,494

2022

63,339

TOTAL

65,239

$573,194

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

59,703

61,494

63,339

65,239

$573,194

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

59,703

61,494

63,339

65,239

$573,194

Total Proj Costs

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

59,703

61,494

63,339

65,239

$573,194

O&M Costs

$573,194 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

9 Yes

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project funds the Federal mandate to replace non‐compliant and or install new sidewalk handicaps ramps on streets with significant

construction. It also installs ramps along heavily used pedestrian corridors. Ramps are installed in neighborhoods where there are ADA Ramp deficiencies and known physically impaired individuals reside. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

These expenditures fulfill Federal mandate and reduce physical barriers to physically impaired individuals. The project also installs ramps in areas of high pedestrian traffic and in neighborhoods where there are ADA ramp deficiencies and known physically impaired residents live.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 None SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Each year, the ADA ramp installations are bid with the Streets Division’s Concrete Replacement contract. INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Particular project timing and locations are subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 43

t u 36

_ [

HIGHWAY 72

V U 121

§ ¨ ¦

H IG H

WAY 9

§ ¨ ¦

93 U V

Indiana

INDIANA ST

72 V U

d 82n

W 8 2 ND A V

_ [ Mcintyre

93 U V

72nd QUAKER ST

Quaker

74th

64th

LEYDEN ROAD (W. 82ND AVE) ST-08 CITY OF ARVADA

DATE: 5/7/2012

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 44

PROJECT NAME: Leyden Road Improvements PROJECT LOCATION: Leyden Road ‐ Indiana Street to CSH 93 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW/Engineering SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019

1,800,000

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

$1,800,000

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

6,900,000

$6,900,000

8,700,000

$8,700,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

870,000

$870,000

Const. Costs

7,830,000

$7,830,000

Total Proj Costs

870,000

7,830,000

$8,700,000

O&M Costs

$8,700,000 Yes

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

6 Yes

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Development of the Leyden Rock and Leyden Ranch Subdivisions will require improvements ($8.7 million) to Leyden Road to safely

accommodate the increased traffic and bring the road in to compliance with the City's major collector street standard.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

The City is responsible by development and annexation agreements to make road improvements to Leyden Road.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Developers will at pre‐determined milestones will do some construction totaling $2.5 million plus contribute $4.4 million in impact fees SOURCES (if any): to the City. The City is responsible to complete the required improvements not installed by the developers and pay for any fund

shortage currently estimated at $1.8 million. OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT None INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Timing of the construction is dependent on the rate of development. 45

PROJECT NAME: Adams County Transportation Projects PROJECT LOCATION: Varied Sites in Adams County DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Pw/Engineering SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

60,000

61,800

63,654

65,564

67,531

69,556

71,643

73,792

76,006

78,286

$687,833

60,000

61,800

63,654

65,564

67,531

69,556

71,643

73,792

76,006

78,286

$687,833

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

3,000

3,090

3,183

3,278

3,377

3,478

3,582

3,690

3,800

3,914

$34,392

Const. Costs

57,000

58,710

60,471

62,285

64,154

66,079

68,061

70,103

72,206

74,372

$653,441

Total Proj Costs

60,000

61,800

63,654

65,564

67,531

69,556

71,643

73,792

76,006

78,286

$687,833

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$687,833 Yes

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

7 Yes

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Each year the City receives about $60,000 in a Transportation Tax from Adams County that can only be used in Adams County for

Transportation related projects. The funds are captured in a holding account. The monies are used to complete missing sidewalks, upgrade street sections not meeting current city standards, and for the city match on jointly funded projects. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Examples: complete missing sidewalks or upgrade them to current standards, upgrade street sections not meeting current city standards, and fund City matches on joint projects.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Each year the City receives about $60,000 in its share of a transportation sales tax from ADCO that can only be used in ADCO for SOURCES (if any): transportation purposes.

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT In the past, the funding was used to pay for significant projects such as the City's portion to place sidewalks along Sheridan Blvd, in INFORMATION: conjunction with CDOT's bridge placement over the BN‐UP‐Gold Line Railroads, and minor projects like pedestrian improvements along a

school route to Tennyson Knolls Elementary School. CONTINGENCIES: This funding will be utilized as eligible needs are identified. 47

RS H

H LIN

t u 36

INDIANA ST

FA R

_ [

93 U V

A NA L

121 U V

§ ¨ ¦ 70

MO O N

GUL C H

§ ¨ ¦ 76

CROKE CANAL

Indiana 72

72nd GLADIOLA ST

V U _ [

W 71ST DR

INDIANA ST

74th

Mcintyre

W 72ND AVE

W 71ST AVE

W 70TH DR

W. 72ND AVE & INDIANA ST. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS : ST-19 CITY OF ARVADA

DATE: 5/7/2012

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 48

PROJECT NAME: W. 72nd Ave. and Indiana St. Intersection Improvements PROJECT LOCATION: W. 72nd Ave. and Indiana St. DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW/Engineering SOURCES

Existing

§98‐101 $ Other City $

2013

2014

2015

100,000

515,000

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

$615,000

704,081

$704,081

Restricted City $

External $

2,472,000

$2,472,000

100,000

2,987,000

$3,791,081

TBD $ Total $

704,081

2013

2014

2015

Prelim Costs

USES

304,081

257,500

266,300

$827,881

Design Costs

566,500

$566,500

Const. Costs

2,396,700

$2,396,700

304,081

824,000

2,663,000

$3,791,081

Total Proj Costs O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$3,791,081 Yes

2016

2017

2018

2019

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

3 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project installs new traffic signals, through lanes, turn lanes, sidewalks, on‐street bike lanes, and other items to improve the

intersection to its ultimate configuration and improve the intersection to arterial street standards. Safety and system capacity will also be enhanced. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Lack of sidewalks, bike lanes, adequate through lanes and turn lanes, antiquated traffic signals, and other deficiencies will be eliminated.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Federal funding is the usual source of funds for this type of project, but no funds have not been received to date. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT While substantial improvements are necessary, future growth trajectories, traffic demands in the northwest of the City, and arterial INFORMATION: development in the area shall dictate the scope of the project. All options are under consideration and both the project scope and

timetable will be under constant review by staff. CONTINGENCIES: Indiana Street is a state highway and all improvements will require CDOT approval. 49

UR CT BAN .

URBAN DR. UNION CT.

TA FT

PL.

AVE.

74TH

TABOR ST.

CR.

73RD DR.

PL.

E. AV

ROU

PL.

D 2N W. 7

TA FT ST .

SWADLEY

71 ST

SIMMS ST.

71 ST PL.

CR.

UN IO N

UNION

CT.

CT .

PL .

DR.

SWADLEY W.

DR .

W Y.

CT.

VIVIAN

WELCH

ROUTT ST

WY.

74TH W.

ROUTT LN.

QUEEN

TABOR ST.

AVE.

ST.

Arvada City Limits

71 PL.

N GORDON

CT.

CT. XENON

ECH

Project Location

WRIGHT

ST.

CT. BEECH

L E G E N D

ST. SWADLEY SIMMS CT. SIMMS CT.

TAFT ST.

TAFT

BE EC H AR BU C TU T. AL S KI RE CT. ST C T. .

BRAUN CT. BEECH CT.

Kipling

Alkire

Be ec h

Simms

Ward

DATE: 6/5/2012

74 WY.

DR.

CITY OF ARVADA

71 PL.

PL. PL. 68

WARD ROAD EXTENSION ST-31

74 PL.

. CT

TH 69

75TH

W. 72ND AVE.

AN URB WAY

Ra lst on

75TH DR.

ST.

CT.

URBAN

75TH CR.

74 DR .

PL. 69

CT .

TAFT CT.

LN.

FT TA

PL.

76 T

NAL

W. 75TH PL.

PL. 70

W .

UT T

73 . DR

72ND CR.

76 TH

W. 75TH PL.

N ST. URBA DON GOR VAN ST.

PL.

72 V U

PL.

Indi a n

64th

73 . E AV

72nd

. DR

DR .

R BO TA T. S

80th

76 TH

DR.

82nd

LA NE

W. 75TH AVE.

ITC W. H

C RO T.

H IG

UNION CT.

YO UN GF IEL D ST.

75T H

UR BA N WY .

W .7 6T H

W. 75TH AVE. W AY

RA UN ST CT. .

Kip lin g

Alkire

Indiana

AVE.

W. 77TH DR.

B RO T. C

U RC

W. 75TH PL.

86th

72 V U

ROAD

. W

96th

77 PL.

N BA . ST

§ ¨ ¦

E CANAL

DR.

77TH

CR .

§ ¨ ¦

78 TH

W. W A

LEYDEN C R EEK

ZANG

V U 93

74th

PL .

IA NN ZI . ST

ALKIRE ST.

H PL.

121 U V

_ [

W. 79T H

ST.

YANK CT.

t u

AVE.

PROJECT NAME: Ward Road Extension ‐ W. 72nd Ave to W. 80th Ave. Preliminary Design PROJECT LOCATION: Ward Road Extended; W. 72nd Ave to W. 80th Ave. DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW/Engineering SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

50,000

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

$50,000

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

50,000

$50,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

50,000

$50,000

Const. Costs

50,000

$50,000

Total Proj Costs O&M Costs

$50,000 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

5 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The final project will install a two lane road from W. 72nd Ave. to Double E Ranch Subdivision with on‐street bike lanes, detached

sidewalk on one side, and a four lane bridge over Leyden Creek. On Alkire St, sidewalks, minor widening, and bike lanes would be added. Construction would occur such that when additional funds become available sections or the entire reach could be improved to the ultimate arterial street standard. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

The project goal is to reduce traffic on Simms St. and Alkire St. south of W. 78th Ave. by providing an alternative travel route. Close alternative routes for north and southbound traffic are very limited. This funding will permit preliminary engineering as a foundation to proceed when a clearer funding picture is established.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 None SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The Transportation Master Plan identifies a four lane arterial street section be built in the above stated corridor. Due to limited funding INFORMATION: to build the ultimate section this project would construct a two lane section, which would help meet the goals of better traffic

distribution and increased safety. Additional ROW acquisition will accompany any final project. CONTINGENCIES: None 51

PROJECT NAME: Safe Routes to School Program PROJECT LOCATION: Various Sites Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW/Traffic SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

20,000

2015

20,600

2016

21,218

2017

21,855

2018

22,510

2019

23,185

2020

23,881

2021

24,597

2022

25,335

TOTAL

26,095

$229,278

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

90,000

92,700

95,481

98,345

101,296

104,335

107,465

110,689

114,009

117,430

$1,031,749

110,000

113,300

116,699

120,200

123,806

127,520

131,346

135,286

139,345

143,525

$1,261,027

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

TBD $ Total $

USES Prelim Costs

Design Costs

10,000

10,300

10,609

10,927

11,255

11,593

11,941

12,299

12,668

13,048

$114,639

Const. Costs

100,000

103,000

106,090

109,273

112,551

115,927

119,405

122,987

126,677

130,477

$1,146,388

Total Proj Costs

110,000

113,300

116,699

120,200

123,806

127,520

131,346

135,286

139,345

143,525

$1,261,027

515

530

546

563

580

597

615

633

652

$5,232

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$1,261,027 Yes

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

6 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Safe Routes to School program is handled by CDOT and grants are awarded based on a project's merit in proving increased safety

and education on the advantages to walking or biking to school. The City applies for at least one grant each year. There is a 20% local match for the project so the funds shown are to provide that match as well as to construct portions of projects that CDOT may not approve (such as drainage improvements in order to build a given sidewalk). NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

This project will provide increased safety for our elementary and middle school students who walk and bike to school.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Funding assumes a successful application for a SRTS grant. Being federal, a NEPA document is required. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT 98‐101 funds are needed for the local match and also for elements of projects that CDOT (who administers the Federal program) may INFORMATION: not pay for, such as drainage improvements for the Simms Street project. CONTINGENCIES: Federal approval 53

PROJECT NAME: Bike/Ped Program PROJECT LOCATION: Various Sites Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW/Traffic SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

50,000

2015

51,500

2016

53,045

2017

54,636

2018

56,275

2019

57,964

2020

59,703

2021

61,494

2022

63,339

TOTAL

65,239

$573,194

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

59,703

61,494

63,339

65,239

$573,194

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

59,703

61,494

63,339

65,239

$573,194

Total Proj Costs

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

59,703

61,494

63,339

65,239

$573,194

2,251

2,610

$4,861

O&M Costs

$573,194 Yes

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

4 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This fund is used for smaller bike/ped projects such as construction of handicapped ramps or addition of accessible pedestrian buttons at

signals.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

This project is crafted to increase safety and accessibility for cyclists and pedestrians. The funds cover several small scale projects (spot treatments at intersections) within a year or install a segment of temporary bike lanes (shared road designation) in conjunction with annual street re‐surfacing projects as an interim safety solution.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 None SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Near term needs have been identified at the intersections of 86th/Kipling, 86th/Alkire, 80th/Simms, 80th/Alkire, 72nd/ Simms, INFORMATION: 72nd/Oak, as well as and bike routes along Marshall/Lamar, Carr Street, and Oberon Road. CONTINGENCIES: Particular project timing and locations are subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 55

PROJECT NAME: Missing Sidewalk Program PROJECT LOCATION: Various Sites Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW/Traffic SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

Other City $

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

392,527

108,000

$500,527

Restricted City $

External $

108,000

$500,527

TBD $ Total $

392,527

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

25,053

$25,053

Const. Costs

225,474

$225,474

250,527

$500,527

Total Proj Costs

250,000

O&M Costs

$500,527 Yes

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

5 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a new program that can now begin with the data collected by the Transportation Committee. There are 25 miles of missing

sidewalks in the City. For 2012, $250,000 of one‐time money was appropriated for missing sidewalks. These funds are addressing missing sidewalks on Balsam Street and Lamar Street south of the BNRR in anticipation of the Gold Line. The remaining $250,527 will address needs prioritized by the Transportation Committee. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

The construction of missing sidewalks will offer greater safety of pedestrians.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 The additional $108,000 to be spent in 2013 will be supplied with residual prior capital funding. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Previous to the work by the Transportation Committee, portions of missing sidewalk were completed somewhat randomly because an INFORMATION: inventory of missing sidewalks did not exist. This inventory is now complete showing 25 miles of missing sidewalks currently being

prioritized by the Transportation Committee. Maintenance costs are minimal therefore they are not shown. CONTINGENCIES: None 57

WADSWORTH BLVD

t u 36

121 U V

_[ [ _[ _[ _ § ¨ ¦

93 U V

_ [

72nd

_ [

o n

Garrison

64th

58th

_ [

_ [ Ralston

121 V U

Kipling

52nd

_ [

RALSTON RD

§ ¨ ¦ 76

QUIET ZONES AT LAMAR ST, OLD WADS, CARR ST, AND W. 66TH AVE : TR-10 CITY OF ARVADA

BYP

_ [

RTH

72nd

Wadsworth

Carr

74th

SWO WAD

Kipling

DATE: 5/7/2012

L E G E N D

_ Project Location [ Arvada City Limits 58

PROJECT NAME: Union Pacific RR Quiet Zones PROJECT LOCATION: Lamar St; Olde Wadsworth Blvd; Carr St; W. 66th Ave at Oberon Rd DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW Traffic SOURCES

Existing

§98‐101 $ Other City $

2013

2014

2015

350,000

360,500

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

$710,500

715,212

$715,212

Restricted City $

External $

350,000

360,500

$1,425,712

2013

2014

TBD $ Total $

715,212

USES

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

95,000

36,050

$131,050

Const. Costs

855,000

324,450

$1,179,450

950,000

360,500

$1,425,712

50,000

61,800

84,872

87,418

90,041

92,742

95,524

98,390

101,342

104,382

$866,510

Total Proj Costs

115,212

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$1,425,712 Yes

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

9 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will design and construct 4 Quiet Zones along the UPRR at Lamar Street, Olde Wadsworth Boulevard, Carr Street, and W.

66th Avenue at Oberon Road. Quiet Zones are at‐grade road intersections with the railroad improved to federal standards to ensure that vehicles cannot enter the intersection while crossing signals are activated. With such improvements, trains do not have to blow their horns as they approach the intersections. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Quiet Zone completions will improve the quality of life for residents near the UPRR.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 The existing funding represents the prior commitments to the competion of Quiet Zones on the UPRR. This additional funding will see to SOURCES (if any): the completions of Quiet Zones throughout the City along the UPRR.

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The maintenance costs shown are for the 4 existing quiet zones which are $10,000 per year per zone. Eventually the costs will be INFORMATION: $80,000 per once all 8 are constructed. CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is contingent on collaboration with the Union Pacific Railroad. 59

PROJECT NAME: Intersection Safety Improvements PROJECT LOCATION: Various Sites Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW/Traffic SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

75,000

2015

77,250

2016

79,568

2017

81,955

2018

84,413

2019

86,946

2020

89,554

2021

92,241

2022

95,008

TOTAL

97,858

$859,791

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

75,000

77,250

79,568

81,955

84,413

86,946

89,554

92,241

95,008

97,858

$859,791

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

75,000

77,250

79,568

81,955

84,413

86,946

89,554

92,241

95,008

97,858

$859,791

Total Proj Costs

75,000

77,250

79,568

81,955

84,413

86,946

89,554

92,241

95,008

97,858

$859,791

O&M Costs

$859,791 Yes

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

6 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Traffic Division analyzes intersections annually and produces a critical intersection analysis report. If the crashes are correctable by

an intersection modification these funds will be used to design and construct those improvements. The project will be designed in‐ house, addressing traffic growth and increased collisions at 130 intersections within Arvada. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Reducing accidents will make Arvada a safer community.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 None SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT We have assumed one project per year at $75,000 based on recent intersection improvement project costs. Some may be more than INFORMATION: this amount in which case funds may be held for a year and a larger project built the following year. Intersection maintenance costs are

included in other CIP or operating budgets therefore no amount is shown here. CONTINGENCIES: Particular locations are contingent on continually evaluated needs and prioritizations reviewed by Public Works. 61

PROJECT NAME: New Traffic Signal Construction PROJECT LOCATION: Various Sites Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW/Traffic SOURCES

Existing

§98‐101 $

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

275,000

283,250

291,748

300,500

309,515

318,800

328,364

338,215

348,362

358,813

$3,152,567

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

275,000

283,250

291,748

300,500

309,515

318,800

328,364

338,215

348,362

358,813

$3,152,567

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

TBD $ Total $

USES Prelim Costs

Design Costs

25,000

25,750

26,523

27,318

28,138

28,982

29,851

30,747

31,669

32,619

$286,597

Const. Costs

250,000

257,500

265,225

273,182

281,377

289,819

298,513

307,468

316,693

326,193

$2,865,970

Total Proj Costs

275,000

283,250

291,748

300,500

309,515

318,800

328,364

338,215

348,362

358,813

$3,152,567

O&M Costs

$3,152,567 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

9 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Each year the Traffic Division prepares a Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis for unsignalized intersections on collectors, major collectors,

arterial parkways, and principal arterial parkways. For those intersections where warrants are met, those locations are prioritized and one signal is constructed with funds from this account. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Traffic safety and more efficient traffic operations.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 None SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Currently there are ten intersections throughout the City that are monitored each year as candidates for the installation of a traffic INFORMATION: signal, including W. 52nd Avenue and Garrison Street, W. 64th Avenue and Urban Street, W. 75th Avenue (Saddle Brook) and Indiana

Street (CDOT), W. 75th Avenue and Simms Street, and W. 56th Avenue and Ward Road. CONTINGENCIES: New traffic signal locations that include state highways are dependent on approval by CDOT. 63

PROJECT NAME: Long Life Pavement Markings Program PROJECT LOCATION: Various Sites Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW/Traffic SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

80,000

2015

82,400

2016

84,872

2017

87,418

2018

90,041

2019

92,742

2020

95,524

98,390

2021

2022

TOTAL

101,342

104,382

$917,110

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

80,000

82,400

84,872

87,418

90,041

92,742

95,524

98,390

101,342

104,382

$917,110

2021

2022

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

80,000

82,400

84,872

87,418

90,041

92,742

95,524

98,390

101,342

104,382

$917,110

Total Proj Costs

80,000

82,400

84,872

87,418

90,041

92,742

95,524

98,390

101,342

104,382

$917,110

O&M Costs

$917,110 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

8 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Long life markings are either plastic pre‐formed tape or thermoplastic pavement markings with a 5‐7 year useful life depending on the

traffic volumes and other conditions. These markings are also used for crosswalks, stop bars, and certain bicycle usage identification.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Provides high visibility, long lasting pavement markings for motorist and pedestrian guidance. The longer life of these materials saves the cost of repainting the pavement markings annually.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 None SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The previous $40,000 per year for this project has not met the current needs. INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Locations are contingent on where the Streets Division identifies roads in need of repaving. 65

PROJECT NAME: Video Detection Program PROJECT LOCATION: Various Sites Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW/Traffic SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

20,000

20,600

21,218

21,855

22,510

23,185

23,881

24,597

25,335

26,095

$229,278

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

20,000

20,600

21,218

21,855

22,510

23,185

23,881

24,597

25,335

26,095

$229,278

TBD $ Total $ USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

20,000

20,600

21,218

21,855

22,510

23,185

23,881

24,597

25,335

26,095

$229,278

Total Proj Costs

20,000

20,600

21,218

21,855

22,510

23,185

23,881

24,597

25,335

26,095

$229,278

O&M Costs

$229,278 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

8 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Video detection consists of small cameras used to detect vehicles in travel lanes to actuate a change in the signal cycle. Video detection

replaces the dated in‐pavement loop which is susceptible to weather and pavement damage.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Uninterrupted signal operations help to ensure an efficient flow of traffic.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 None SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Intersections on arterial roadways such as W.64th Avenue, W.72nd Avenue, and W.80th Avenue are the Division’s current priorities. INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: As in‐pavement vehicle detectors continue to fail throughout the City at existing signals, we will continue to replace them with video

detection. 67

PROJECT NAME: Sign Replacement; MUTCD Mandates PROJECT LOCATION: Various Sites Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW/Traffic SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

50,000

2015

51,500

2016

53,045

2017

54,636

2018

56,275

2019

57,964

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

$323,420

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

$323,420

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

$323,420

Total Proj Costs

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

$323,420

O&M Costs

$323,420 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

8 Yes

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), the latest edition, has been adopted by the Colorado Department of

Transportation. The MUTCD contains several changes to signs regarding lettering size and sign reflectivity, among other mandates. The MUTCD has compliance dates for the changes that all fall within the next 7 years. The Traffic Division has already met some requirements of the new mandates so the CIP request is for 6 years. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Better sign legibility for the aging population; New colors for signs will be easier to identify the type of sign by color as well as shape.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 None SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT This account will bring the City in compliance with MUTCD. Within 5 years, however, there will be signs that must be replaced due to INFORMATION: fading, knock‐downs, as well as pole replacement. The O&M figure then is for all City signs. CONTINGENCIES: None 69

PROJECT NAME: ATMS Completion and Upgrades PROJECT LOCATION: Various Sites Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW/Traffic SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

50,000

2015

51,500

2016

53,045

2017

54,636

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

$209,181

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

$209,181

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

$209,181

Total Proj Costs

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

$209,181

O&M Costs

15,000

15,450

15,914

16,391

16,883

17,389

17,911

18,448

19,002

19,572

$171,958

$209,181 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

7 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) is a network of technology used to manage traffic flow along roadways with the

ability to "watch" intersection flow and make adjustments or troubleshoot traffic signal problems from City Hall. This project completes the system by bringing all the primary corridors and signals "on‐line" in City Hall by 2016. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

The system saves staff time and provides for both better overall operation of our traffic signal system and congestion relief.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 None SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The timeframe can be shifted some but our plan is to bring the remaining corridors and signals "on‐line" in the next few years. INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Locations for other types of traffic signal work will affect the ordering of intersections to be brought into the system. 71

PROJECT NAME: Signal Replacement PROJECT LOCATION: Various Sites Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW/Traffic SOURCES

Existing

§98‐101 $

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

780,000

803,400

827,502

852,327

877,897

904,234

931,361

959,302

988,081

1,017,723

$8,941,826

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

780,000

803,400

827,502

852,327

877,897

904,234

931,361

959,302

988,081

1,017,723

$8,941,826

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

TBD $ Total $

USES Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

780,000

803,400

827,502

852,327

877,897

904,234

931,361

959,302

988,081

1,017,723

$8,941,826

Total Proj Costs

780,000

803,400

827,502

852,327

877,897

904,234

931,361

959,302

988,081

1,017,723

$8,941,826

O&M Costs

$8,941,826 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

8 Yes

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Roughly half of the City's traffic signals have been in use for nearly 30 years ‐ and some longer. Some of these signals are span wire;

mast arms are preferred today. Further, the underground wiring on many of these signals is going bad, along with dated control cabinets, also in poor condition. Some signal poles and mast arms are also in poor condition and must be replaced for safety reasons. Each year the City spends over $100,000 to keep the signals operational. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

This project will help to ensure safe, continued operation of traffic signals with no "downtime" due to needed repairs.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 None SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Replacing aging traffic signals are just as critical as the aging street infrastructure. The aging of signals is not something that can be seen INFORMATION: or is obvious to users. We cannot wait much longer to begin replacement of the signals in the worst condition and the Traffic Division

has a list of priorities for replacement. The costs above assume replacing 4 signals per year. CONTINGENCIES: Prioritizations of signals needing replacement will be driven by actual conditions. 73

PROJECT NAME: UPS at Major Intersections PROJECT LOCATION: Various Sites Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW/Traffic SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

39,000

2015

40,170

2016

41,375

2017

42,616

2018

43,895

2019

45,212

2020

46,568

2021

47,965

2022

49,404

TOTAL

50,886

$447,091

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

39,000

40,170

41,375

42,616

43,895

45,212

46,568

47,965

49,404

50,886

$447,091

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

39,000

40,170

41,375

42,616

43,895

45,212

46,568

47,965

49,404

50,886

$447,091

Total Proj Costs

39,000

40,170

41,375

42,616

43,895

45,212

46,568

47,965

49,404

50,886

$447,091

11,255

13,048

$24,303

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$447,091 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

8 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A UPS is an Uniterruptible Power Supply to maintain power to traffic signals during power outages. The cost estimate above assumes

providing UPS at the City's 40 major intersections at a rate of 4 per year.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Any signal at a RR crossing requires UPS by the MUTCD. To allow traffic operations to continue safely during power outages.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 The first four will be installed along arterial streets at the highest volume intersections such as W.64th & Simms, W.72nd & Kipling, SOURCES (if any): W.72nd & Simms, and W.72nd and Ward. Having UPSs in place frees up police personnel for other needed duties during power outages.

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT This could shift is needed. INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Locations for other types of traffic signal work may affect the ordering of intersections to be fitted with UPSs. 75

GRANT PL

t u

_ [ § ¨ ¦ 70

DVIEW GRAN

AVE

H PL W 56T

Ralston

121 V U

58th

R a lst

_ [ 52nd

§ ¨ ¦ § ¨ ¦

W 55TH AVE

Harlan

OLDE TOWN BUS TRANSFER FACILITY TR-28 CITY OF ARVADA

TELLER ST

VANCE ST

Carr

r swo Wad

Garrison

64th

WADSWORTH BYP

YUKON ST

93 U V

UPHAM ST

W 57TH AVE

WEBSTER ST

121 U V

OLDE WADSWORTH BLVD

DATE: 12/18/2012

W 55TH AVE

L E G E N D

Arvada City Limits

K The maps provided are graphical representations intended for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the most current information or conditions. THE CITY OF ARVADA MAKES NO WARRANTY OF MECHANTABILITY OR WARRANTY FOR FITNESS OF USE FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THESE GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATIONS OR THE UNDERLYING DATA. Any users of these graphical representations or map products accepts same AS IS, WITH ALL FAULTS, and assumes all responsibility for the use thereof, and further covenants to hold the City harmless from and against all damage, loss, or liability arising from the use of this map product, in consideration of the City's having made this information available. G:\GIS_Data\MXD\Finance\Administration\CIP\LocationMaps\Projects2013-2014\TR-28.mxd

PROJECT NAME: Olde Town Bus Transfer Facility PROJECT LOCATION: Olde Town TOD Station area, South of Grandview Avenue DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW/Traffic SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

Other City $

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

2,000,000

$2,000,000

Restricted City $

External $

$2,000,000

TBD $ Total $

2,000,000

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

2,000,000

$2,000,000

Total Proj Costs

2,000,000

$2,000,000

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$2,000,000 Maybe

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

7 Yes

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City will need to fund the improvements related to the bus transfer facility in the Olde Town TOD Station area .

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

These expenditures would represent part of the City's obligations for infrastructure related to the Gold Line.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Previous capital funding designated for Gold Line‐related improvements will supply the necessary resources for this project. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The cost of this project may be funded with money from RTD which represents money returned from the Gold Line contractor for INFORMATION: eliminating the surface parking, elevator and pedestrian bridge from the Olde Town station area plans. If this occurs, the funds will be

used for other TOD related improvements. CONTINGENCIES: Discussions related to this work are ongoing with RTD. 77

Facilities

FACILITIES

Ten-Year Summary While transportation needs comprise a bulk of the duties of Public Works, the City’s facilities are also under its purview. The Capital Improvement Plan has identified four specific facility projects: the replacement of the Parks Maintenance & Wadsworth Shops buildings, structured parking to meet available parking space mandates for the Gold Line, the consolidation of Fleet operations currently split between the Park Maintenance and Wadsworth Shops buildings to the Culbertson Building, and the construction of two new police community stations (separately addressed under Public Safety). Ever mindful of the substantial impacts on personnel and operations that accompany any major facility change, strategic considerations are the quintessential elements of any facilities planning.

SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

1,500,000

1,200,000

8,800,000

$11,500,000

Restricted City $

External $

2,200,000

$2,200,000

1,043,347

1,194,052

10,515,422

10,830,884

$23,583,705

1,500,000

1,200,000

11,000,000

1,043,347

1,194,052

10,515,422

10,830,884

$37,283,705

2013

2014

2015

2018

2019

2020

2021

TBD $ Total $

USES

2016

2017

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

50,000

1,200,000

1,043,347

1,194,052

$3,487,399

Const. Costs

1,450,000

11,000,000

10,515,422

10,830,884

$33,796,306

1,500,000

1,200,000

11,000,000

1,043,347

1,194,052

10,515,422

10,830,884

$37,283,705

100,000

135,061

143,286

152,012

161,270

266,099

416,369

$1,374,097

Total Proj Costs O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST:

$37,283,705 79

W 62ND WAY ALLISON ST

t u 36

121 U V 93 U V

_ [

W 62ND AVE

§ ¨ ¦

OBE R O

64th

58th

YARROW LN

52nd

W 60TH AVE

PARK MAINTENANCE BLDG/ WADSWORTH SHOPS : FC-03 CITY OF ARVADA

DATE: 5/7/2012

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 80

AVE

W 61ST AVE YARROW ST

121 V U

ALLISON ST

Carr

Ralston

W 6 1 ST

orth

_ [

sw Wad

be ro n Garrison

ON R

OLDE WADSWORTH BLVD

PROJECT NAME: Park Maintenance Building/Wadsworth Shops PROJECT LOCATION: 7800 w. 62nd Ave. DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Public Works/Facilities Management SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

1,043,347

1,194,052

10,515,422

10,830,884

$23,583,705

1,043,347

1,194,052

10,515,422

10,830,884

$23,583,705

2018

2019

2020

2021

TBD $ Total $ USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

1,043,347

1,194,052

$2,237,399

Const. Costs

10,515,422

10,830,884

$21,346,306

Total Proj Costs

1,043,347

1,194,052

10,515,422

10,830,884

$23,583,705

O&M Costs

95,008

234,859

$329,867

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$23,583,705 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

4 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project will provide a new Parks Maintenance facility to replace the old metal building and the Wadsworth Shops building currently

housing Parks, Streets, and Fleet.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

This project would replace a functionally & operationally obsolete structure, improving productivity and safety.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Potential sources for the financing of this project will be under constant review. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT This project schedule can float. INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: The ability of the City to maintain functionality of existing facilities will influence the timing and level of necessity for replacing these

buildings. 81

PROJECT NAME: Fleet Maintenance Relocation to Culbertson Building PROJECT LOCATION: 5555 W 56th Ave DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Utilities / Fleet Maintenance SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

1,500,000

$1,500,000

Restricted City $

External $

1,500,000

$1,500,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

50,000

$50,000

Const. Costs

1,450,000

$1,450,000

Total Proj Costs

1,500,000

$1,500,000

O&M Costs

$1,500,000 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

7 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City’s Vehicle Maintenance Division (often referred to simply as "Fleet") does not have adequate space, equipment, or working

conditions for efficient and effective vehicle maintenance efforts at the Wadsworth and Parks sub‐shops. The project is to consolidate the above Fleet facilities at the Culbertson Building. Extensive remodeling of the space will be required. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

The move will improved working conditions for Fleet employees and improved work flow.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 The sole source of financing for the move will be Vehicles Fund, an internal service fund with revenues derived from contributions by all SOURCES (if any): City departments and divisions that utilize motor vehicles and motorized equipment in their operations.

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT A 2011 study performed by the Design Maintenance Group consultant to look at improving the working conditions concluded that it INFORMATION: would be less expensive to move the Fleet operations to the Culbertson Building than remodeling the existing spaces. The move will also

free up existing space for use by both Streets and Park Maintenance. CONTINGENCIES: N/A 83

PROJECT NAME: Gold Line‐related Parking Structures PROJECT LOCATION: TBD DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Public Works/Facilities Management SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

1,200,000

8,800,000

$10,000,000

Restricted City $

External $

2,200,000

$2,200,000

1,200,000

11,000,000

$12,200,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

1,200,000

$1,200,000

Const. Costs

11,000,000

$11,000,000

Total Proj Costs

1,200,000

11,000,000

$12,200,000

O&M Costs

100,000

135,061

143,286

152,012

161,270

171,091

181,510

$1,044,230

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$12,200,000 Yes

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

4 Yes

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project entails the construction of parking structures for the Gold Line commuter rail stops in Olde Town north and south of the

Olde Town Gold Line station and at Arvada Ridge and replaces parking lost by the construction of Gold Line related facilities.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Provide parking for commuter rail passengers and customers in Olde Town and Arvada Ridge

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 The potential sources of the requisite funding are under constant review, however current plans contemplate $7.5M from funding SOURCES (if any): currently dedicated to the Wadsworth Corridor, $2.2M from RTD, and $2.5M in both expenditure savings and surplus revenues from

2012. Wadsworth Corridor funding and 2012 savings & surplus, while available prior to the term of this Capital Improvement Plan, is shown as sourced in the year of its scheduled appropriation. OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT O & M assumes City responsibility for the elevator, mechanical, electrical and security. To meet RTD EIS requirements, four hundred INFORMATION: spaces with an elevator to the plaza must be available for commuter rail passenger parking by opening day of the Gold Line in July 2016. CONTINGENCIES: As plans for structured parking continue to solidify, the exact scope of the project will evolve over the coming months. 85

Parks

PARKS

Ten-Year Summary As a further echo of the call for “taking care of what we have,” the backbone of planned activity for Parks is renovation in four areas: playgrounds, trails, irrigation systems, and trees. Ensuring both safety and ADA compliance for playgrounds, continued functionality of trails, the efficient use of water for maintaining park facilities, and maintaining the place of trees for the integrity of park designs will see to the continued health and vibrance of the Arvada park and trail systems. In addition, the plan will see to the full funding and completion of companion projects to bring two new neighborhood parks to currently underserved eastern portions of the City, as well as strategic funding for perhaps the greatest workhorse of our community parks, the Stenger Sports Complex.

SOURCES

Existing

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

1,051,000

633,450

732,021

753,982

624,657

394,153

405,978

418,157

335,694

443,623

$5,792,715

1,890,122

156,000

156,780

157,564

158,352

159,143

623,649

638,360

653,493

669,057

163,162

$5,425,681

Restricted City $

18,672

1,666,519

$1,685,191

External $

1,265,000

25,750

26,523

27,318

28,138

28,982

29,851

30,747

31,669

32,619

$1,526,597

51,500

53,045

$104,545

2,472,000

867,480

969,153

939,652

811,938

1,046,784

1,074,189

1,102,397

1,055,093

2,305,923

$14,534,729

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

§98‐101 $ Other City $

TBD $ Total $

1,890,122

USES Prelim Costs

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

59,703

61,494

87,588

65,239

$597,444

Design Costs

159,250

1,288

1,326

158,247

1,407

1,449

1,493

1,537

19,771

1,631

$347,399

Const. Costs

2,786,770

402,693

490,421

1,913,128

754,256

523,661

535,373

547,416

2,381,014

2,239,054

$12,573,785

2,996,020

455,480

544,793

2,126,011

811,938

583,074

596,568

610,447

2,488,374

2,305,923

$14,534,729

10,506

10,821

11,146

11,930

12,288

12,657

13,037

13,428

13,831

$109,644

Total Proj Costs O&M Costs

1,016,102

TOTAL PROJECT COST:

$14,534,729 87

PROJECT NAME: Irrigation System Renovation PROJECT LOCATION: Various Sites Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Golf and Hospitality Services/Park and Urban Design SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

156,000

156,780

157,564

158,352

159,143

159,939

160,739

161,543

162,350

163,162

$1,595,572

Restricted City $

External $

156,000

156,780

157,564

158,352

159,143

159,939

160,739

161,543

162,350

163,162

$1,595,572

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

TBD $ Total $ USES Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

156,000

156,780

157,564

158,352

159,143

159,939

160,739

161,543

162,350

163,162

$1,595,572

Total Proj Costs

156,000

156,780

157,564

158,352

159,143

159,939

160,739

161,543

162,350

163,162

$1,595,572

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$1,595,572 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

8 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Irrigation system renovation is evaluated and as prioritized by Parks Maintenance staff, including: Arvada Center, Wadsworth Medians, Jack B. Tomlinson Park, Tennyson Knolls Park, Club Crest Greenbelt, South Club Crest Greenbelt, Lake Arbor Rec. Center, Arvada Food Bank, Terrace Park, Alice Sweet Thomas Park, Ralston Valley Park, Newcombe Court Islands, Little Dry Creek Greenbelt, Ralston Road Medians, W. 58th Ave Medians, Pomona Dr Medians, Hillside Park, Lakecrest Park, W. 64th Ave Medians, Ralston Cove Park, Wadsworth Park, Lew Walsh Park, Danny Kendrick E Park, Danny Kendrick W Park and Majestic View Park.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Older, deteriorating irrigation systems become less water efficient, built in an era when the equipment was not nearly as efficient as current technology. Annual O&M costs increase as replacement parts are no longer available and repair frequencies increase. Saving money on water & specialized labor will eventually pay back the expense of this work.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Currently, the city has a 3‐cent revenue source intended for irrigation system upgrades, which ranges in value from $140,000 ‐ 170,000 SOURCES (if any): per year. As a conservative value, staff used $150,000 per year for revenues. Enterprise funds may be available at the Arvada Center

site and APEX funds may be available at the Lake Arbor Recreation Center. Since medians are listed, street maintenance monies may be available. OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Two high priority irrigation replacements are the Stenger Sports Complex and the Lutz Sports Complex, whose irrigation replacement INFORMATION: costs are included in separate budget sheets. Efficient water use, extensive staff maintenance time, unavailable replacement parts and

safety issues (where a cushiony turf is critical) all point to the need for these projects. CONTINGENCIES: If separate funding can be found for these renovations, staff recommends that the 3‐cent funding be added to accelerate the individual

system replacements. Enterprise funds and APEX funds may be available to supplement current funding. 89

Indiana

86th Simms

_ [

80th Kipling

Alki re

72 V U

t u 36

_ [

121 U V

Hillside Park

_ [

74th

Bee

_ [

Lake Arbor Community Park

Mcintyre

Farmstead Park

_ [

Lake Arbor Recreation Center

Wadsworth

82nd

_ [

Lakecrest Park

Westree Park

72nd

95 V U

72 64th Meadowlake V U

Park

Indiana

Jack B. Tomlinson Park

Terrace Park

_ [

PLAYGROUND RENOVATION PK-10 DATE: 5/7/2012

L E G E N D

_ [

Project Locations

_ [

58th

Ralston

§ ¨ ¦

121 V U

52nd

Gra y

Ki p

lin

52nd

CITY OF ARVADA

Ralston

_ [

Marshall

58th

McIlvoy Park

Creekside Park

ort h

72 U V

_ [

121 U V

Ralston Cove Park

W ad

_ [ Mc Intyre

64th

Garrison

_ [ Ward

In d i a

64th

Oak Park

Carr

Ob e

Sheridan

Ralston

_ Valley [ Park

PROJECT NAME: Playground Renovation PROJECT LOCATION: Various Sites Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Golf and Hospitality Services/Park and Urban Design SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

200,000

206,000

291,748

300,500

225,102

318,800

328,364

338,215

253,354

358,813

$2,820,896

Other City $

Restricted City $

18,672

$18,672

External $

200,000

206,000

291,748

300,500

225,102

318,800

328,364

338,215

272,026

358,813

$2,839,568

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

TBD $ Total $ USES Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

200,000

206,000

291,748

300,500

225,102

318,800

328,364

338,215

272,026

358,813

$2,839,568

Total Proj Costs

200,000

206,000

291,748

300,500

225,102

318,800

328,364

338,215

272,026

358,813

$2,839,568

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$2,839,568 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

8 Yes

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Playground renovation as evaluated and prioritized by Parks Maintenance staff includes the following sites: Hillside Park, Westree Park,

Creekside Park, Oak Park, Ralston Cove Park, Lake Arbor Recreation Center, McIlvoy Park, Jack B. Tomlinson Park, Farmstead Park, Meadowlake Park, Lakecrest Park, Ralston Valley Park and Terrace Park. Lake Arbor Park playground, a high priority, is part of a separate budget sheet. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Playgrounds receive intensive use at all parks and could represent the greatest potential risk for public use. Adding to use and risk issues, ongoing changes to ASTM Standards, CPSC Guidelines and ADA access requirements force manufacturers to update play equipment, making replacement of older equipment sometimes impossible after 15 years.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 If Park Development Fees and Lands Dedicated (Fees in Lieu of Land) are collected from developers near one of the playgrounds, those SOURCES (if any): funds may be available to supplement the renovation budget for each playground. As part of an IGA with the city, APEX funds may be

available for replacing the Lake Arbor Recreation Center playground. OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Many of these playgrounds are located within older parks with trail and/or irrigation systems that need to be renovated for safety, water INFORMATION: conservation, etc. An obvious cost efficiency would be to coordinate the playground renovation with trail and irrigation renovation at

the same site. CONTINGENCIES: Subject to public input (standard city practice) the actual cost of the playground renovation may vary, which explains the qualified

veracity of each cost estimate. 91

_ [

t u

Lake Arbor Community Park

_ [

80th

_ [

Little Dry Creek Park

Kipling

Alk ire

_ [

72 V U

Indiana

Sh eri

Westlake Park Wadsworth

Indiana

mms Si

Lakecrest Park

dan

Alkire

86th

82nd

121 V U

Club Crest South Park

_ 74th [

Bee

72nd

72nd Ob er

Ca rr

_ [

Ralston Cove Park

_ [

V 58th U 72

Ki p

Indian a

Ralston

_ _[ [ Wa d

DATE: 5/7/2012

L E G E N D

Olde Town Pavers

McIlvoy Park 58th

lin

TRAIL RENOVATION PK-11 CITY OF ARVADA

121 U V

ort h

_ [

Project Locations

R alston

Sheridan

_ [

64 t h

Allendale Park

64th Meadowlake Park Ward

V U 72

95 V U

Yankee Doodle Park

64th

95 V U

88th

§ ¨ ¦ 76

PROJECT NAME: Trail Renovation PROJECT LOCATION: Various Sites Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Golf and Hospitality Services/Park and Urban Design SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

59,703

61,494

63,339

65,239

$573,194

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

59,703

61,494

63,339

65,239

$573,194

TBD $ Total $ USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

59,703

61,494

63,339

65,239

$573,194

Design Costs

Const. Costs

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

59,703

61,494

63,339

65,239

$573,194

Total Proj Costs O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$573,194 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

8 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Trail renovation as evaluated and prioritized by Parks Maintenance staff includes the following sites: Westlake Park, Meadowlake Park,

Lakecrest Park, Yankee Doodle Park, South Club Crest Park, Little Dry Creek Trail (west), Ralston Cove Park, McIlvoy Park, Allendale Park and Old Town Pavers. #1 Lake Arbor Park is part of a separate budget item. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Trails receive an increasing amount of use and appreciation throughout the city and represent some potential safety issues for the public as the condition of the trails decline with age. Trail benefits are many and may represent the highest ratio of public use:cost of any recreational function.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Where PDF's and Lands Dedicated are available, they can be used to supplement CMP trail renovation funds, though they are SOURCES (if any): geographically limited to trail locations near the development that was the source of the PDF's.

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Typically, the prioritized trail locations best represent a snapshot of current conditions, most in need of trail renovation. With each new INFORMATION: spring thaw, the priorities may change. Also, it is typically cost‐effective to coordinate trail replacement with other CMP efforts, like

playground renovation, since one contractor can typically do both. CONTINGENCIES: Since other CMP projects may be needed at a park, timing between renovation projects may be interrelated. Combinations of this list

should be made with playground and irrigation renovation lists to avoid tearing up the same park year after year. 93

t u 36

_ [

DI T CH

§ ¨ ¦

W 91ST PL

W 91ST AVE

ELLIS WAY

§ ¨ ¦

FIG ST

93 U V

FLORA ST

GLADIOLA ST

121 U V

GARDENIA ST

W 91ST LN

TH E LL I S

h 86t

72 V U

WHISPER CREEK II PARK PK-13 CITY OF ARVADA

DATE: 5/7/2012

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 94

EL LIS ST

89 TH

LO O P

_ [

W 90 T H A

90 TH

Indiana

DEVINN EY CT

Alkire

96th

PROJECT NAME: Whisper Creek II Park PROJECT LOCATION: 90th and Gladiola Street DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Golf and Hospitality Services/Park and Urban Design SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

Restricted City $

1,666,519

$1,666,519

External $

1,666,519

$1,666,519

2022

TOTAL

TBD $ Total $ USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

1,666,519

$1,666,519

Total Proj Costs

1,666,519

$1,666,519

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$1,666,519 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

8 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Whisper Creek II Park is dedicated and designed for residents of Whisper Creek II Subdivision. The 1st developer completed phase one ‐

playground and trail ‐ to serve the immediate single family residents. The bulk of the park will be completed by a future developer/builder for multi‐family residential south of the park. The approved design includes basketball, roller hockey, informal play areas, ballfield areas, grassy amphitheater, trail and landscape. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

With the bulk of the residential population expected with a future multi‐family project, the need for and funding of the park should be concurrent. Completing this park is consistent with City Council's policy to complete neighborhood parks and make developer's "pay their way." The current IGA requires the Metro District to cover maintenance through the Increment Period.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 City approval of a multi‐family residential project will include approval of Park Development Fees approximating the cost of completing SOURCES (if any): the park. PDF's are typically obligated to a park dedicated for a new residential project or to a nearby park serving the new residential

population. If the city were to front the money, the cost would be $895,000 for park construction, plus the park water tap obligation ‐ an additional $328,568. OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT A church is proposed adjacent to the west side of the park and has already met with staff concerning their intentions to make use of the INFORMATION: recreational functions in the park. A separate section of the Big Dry Creek Trail is intended along the north end of the Arvada trail in this

park; when built it will connect west into Candelas and east to Standley Lake. CONTINGENCIES: The park land will remain undeveloped, if the multi‐family residential project does not occur ‐ for as many years. If WC I Park is

completed as proposed, it would provide an immediate neighborhood park option for WC II. 95

WAY

121 U V

9 5T

LOVELAND WAY

t u

ST TYRE MCIN

S MOS

_ [ 93 U V

LE NI

§ ¨ ¦

Y WA

§ ¨ ¦ 70

4TH AV E

W9 CT

NO BL

96th

Indiana

S ELA D N CA

PKW

72 V U

CANDELAS MINI PARK #1 PK-15 CITY OF ARVADA

NIL E

_ [

3RD

DATE: 5/7/2012

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 96

PROJECT NAME: Candelas Mini‐Park #1 PROJECT LOCATION: 94th Avenue and Nile Way DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Golf and Hospitality Services/Park and Urban Design SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

300,000

$300,000

300,000

$300,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

300,000

$300,000

Total Proj Costs

300,000

$300,000

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$300,000 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

8 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Candelas is a large residential area from Indiana St to S.H. 93, north of S.H. 72. In the first filing, the mini‐park is the first park that the

developer will build, starting in 2012. The park includes a shelter, a playground and small grassy amphitheater next to a private pool and recreation center, also by the developer. This cost estimate represents the cost to the city if the developer walks away from their obligation and represents a value for audit purposes. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

The first filing includes more than 400 residential units with an estimate population of 1,000 plus in a new area where there are no neighborhood parks. A second, more traditional neighborhood park, is approved with this same filing #1.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Developer funds will pay for this construction as part of an approved development agreement. City funds are not anticipated for this SOURCES (if any): construction and maintenance is covered as part of an agreement with the Metro District during the balance of the Increment Period (16

‐ 18 years.) OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The design was completed by the developer during the project review process. City approved neighborhood park standards were INFORMATION: partially satisfied with a playground. However, the developer felt that the shelter and open play ‐ public gathering space was important

to their Traditional Neighborhood Development functions. CONTINGENCIES: If the developer does not complete this project, the city will need to budget for this development and maintenance cost. 97

t u

ORIO N

121 U V 93 U V

W 94

§ ¨ ¦

TH D R

PI K EW AY

§ ¨ ¦ 70

ORCHAR D WAY

WAY

_ [

CA ND EL AS P

96th

KW Y

Indiana

_ [

NO BL

72 V U

CANDELAS NEIGHBORHOOD PARK #2 PK-16 CITY OF ARVADA

DATE: 5/7/2012

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 98

PROJECT NAME: Candelas Neighborhood Park #2 PROJECT LOCATION: 94th Drive between Noble Way and Pike Way DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Golf and Hospitality Services/Park and Urban Design SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

940,000

$940,000

940,000

$940,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

940,000

$940,000

Total Proj Costs

940,000

$940,000

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$940,000 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

9 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Candelas is a large residential area from Indiana St to S.H. 93, north of S.H. 72. In the first filing, neighborhood park #2 is the first active,

neighborhood park that the developer intends to build, in 2012 ‐ 2013. The park includes a big playground designed for younger and older ages, a ballfield with backstop and small bleacher, open play turf, a trail loop around the park with exercise stations, picnic units, signage, landscape and irrigation. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

With more than 1,000 new residents around this first neighborhood park, staff expects that this park will be heavily used.

‐ 18 years.) OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The design was completed by the developer during the project review process. City approved neighborhood park standards are INFORMATION: represented on the approved plan, though lacking a paved play pad (tennis or basketball.) CONTINGENCIES: If the developer does not complete this project, the city will need to budget for this development and maintenance cost. 99

93 U V

OWENS ST

PARFET ST

PARFET CT

QUAIL ST

QUEEN ST

TT S T

121 U V

PIERSON ST

ST R OU

RO BB

t u

W 58TH FRONTAGE RD W 58TH AVE

_ [ § ¨ ¦

§ ¨ ¦ 76

Ward

n to ls Ra

OAK ST

72 64th U V

58th 72 U V

_ [ CT

A I L ST

W 54

STENGER SPORT COMPLEX PK-21 CITY OF ARVADA

DATE: 5/7/2012

L E G E N D

5 5T

H PL

TH 55

T H LN

Project Location Arvada City Limits 100

ET RF A P

AI L

ip li n

PROJECT NAME: Stenger Sports Complex PROJECT LOCATION: 58th Avenue and Oak Street DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Golf & Hospitality Services SOURCES

Existing

§98‐101 $

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

350,000

360,500

371,315

382,454

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL 0

$1,464,269

Other City $

463,710

477,621

491,950

506,707

$1,939,987

Restricted City $

External $

51,500

53,045

$104,545

350,000

412,000

424,360

382,454

463,710

477,621

491,950

506,707

$3,508,802

2013

2014

2015

2016

2018

2019

2020

2021

TBD $ Total $

USES

2017

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

24,250

$24,250

Design Costs

156,881

18,187

$175,069

Const. Costs

1,411,933

1,897,551

$3,309,483

Total Proj Costs

1,568,814

1,939,988

$3,508,802

O&M Costs

$3,508,802 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

2 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The first phase will replace the existing irrigation system for approx. 78 acres of existing turf not including the existing pump system. The

piping and valves are at least 30 ‐ 40 years old and continually malfunction. The second phase includes the asphalt paving and new curb and gutter for most of the existing milling parking lots that are lacking both treatments. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

The proposed, new irrigation system will greatly reduce costly maintenance on the existing, deteriorating system. Parking is highly inefficient since the milling lots cannot be lined out for proper spacing. Demand for spaces is extremely high and wet weather conditions also make parking even more inefficient and difficult to maintain.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 This represents potential cost‐sharing with the Apex Recreation District. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT None INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Joint planning with the Apex Park & Recreation District will drive both scope and timing. 101

102

PROJECT NAME: Tree Replacement Program PROJECT LOCATION: Various Sites Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Golf & Hospitality Services SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

15,000

2015

15,450

2016

15,914

2017

16,391

2018

16,883

2019

17,389

2020

17,911

2021

18,448

2022

19,002

TOTAL

19,572

$171,958

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

15,000

15,450

15,914

16,391

16,883

17,389

17,911

18,448

19,002

19,572

$171,958

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

15,000

15,450

15,914

16,391

16,883

17,389

17,911

18,448

19,002

19,572

$171,958

Total Proj Costs

15,000

15,450

15,914

16,391

16,883

17,389

17,911

18,448

19,002

19,572

$171,958

O&M Costs

$171,958 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

1 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This program is necessary to purchase and install new trees on City Rights of Way, medians and parks that have died due to vandalism,

accidents, disease and/or storm damage.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

The program is necessary to maintain the integrity of the original design for the built environment in parks and R.O.W. throughout the City.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 None SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT None INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Particular locations are dependent on constantly reevaluated needs as identified by Park Maintenance. 103

t u 36

_U [ V

121

80T

H DR ES T E S S

93 U V

§ ¨ ¦ 76

§ ¨ ¦ 70

W 80TH AVE

Kip lin g

88th

W 79TH PL DUDLEY C T

h 86t

AV E

EV ER

74th

Carr

Wadsworth

Kipling

TH 79

_ [

121 V U

80th

W 79TH CT

CLUB CREST TRAIL PK-29 CITY OF ARVADA

DATE: 5/7/2012

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 104

ET T

WA Y

79T HA VE

PROJECT NAME: Club Crest Trail PROJECT LOCATION: Club Crest Park to 80th Avenue DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Golf & Hospitality Services SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018

326,398

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

$326,398

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

326,398

$326,398

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

326,398

$326,398

Total Proj Costs

326,398

$326,398

O&M Costs

450

464

478

492

507

522

$2,912

$326,398 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

2 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project completes two very valuable trail linkages along irrigation ditches just west of the Indian Tree Golf Course. The first trail

segment will be constructed along the Croke Canal which is currently inaccessible. The second segment will provide new 10' wide concrete trail and a new pedestrian bridge along the Church Ditch, connecting Robby Ferrufino Park with the subdivision to the west. Each segment is approximately 1,800 lineal feet long. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Access is available through these land parcels but not in the form of paved all‐weather trails. Both trails will complete the needed access through the adjoining residential areas with new 10' wide trails and connect to the existing neighborhood park.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 None SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT None INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Ditch company approval will be necessary for the construction of the pedestrian bridge. 105

t u 36

121 V U

_ [ § ¨ ¦ 76

§ ¨ ¦ 70

BENTON CT

GRAY DR

GRAY CIR

W 69TH AVE

W 68TH PL Sheridan

72nd

_ U [ V 95

EAST AREA NEIGHBORHOOD PARK PK-31 CITY OF ARVADA

DATE: 6/5/2012

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 106

AMES ST

BENTON ST

CHASE ST

DEPEW ST

EATON ST

64th

FENTON ST

GRAY ST

W 68TH AVE

PROJECT NAME: East Area Neighborhood Park PROJECT LOCATION: 5574 W. 69th Avenue DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks Golf and Hospitality Services/Urban and Park Design Division SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

406,000

Other City $

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

$406,000

1,890,122

$1,890,122

Restricted City $

External $

406,000

$2,296,122

TBD $ Total $

1,890,122

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

128,000

$128,000

Const. Costs

1,152,020

$1,152,020

1,280,020

$2,296,122

10,506

10,821

11,146

11,480

11,825

12,179

12,545

12,921

13,309

$106,732

Total Proj Costs

1,016,102

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$2,296,122 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

5 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project consists of the development of a recently acquired 7 acre parcel into a neighborhood park. The neighborhood meeting and

design process will occur in 2012. This will be followed by the preparation of construction documents and bidding. The construction will occur in 2013. Typical facilities that will be included in this neighborhood park site are a playground, a multi‐purpose court, walkways, shade structure, landscaping and irrigation. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

This project, along with the fully funded South Central Park, helps to fulfill the major project goal to complete the identified neighborhood park projects. The park masterplan targets this area of the city as an area deficient in neighborhood parks. The acquisition of this property and the development of this neighborhood park will help to complete this goal.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Prior capital funding represents the existing funding for the project. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The existing use of just over $1M prior to 2013 represents the costs of land acquisition. INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: As with all neighborhood parks, local resident input will influence final design. 107

108

PROJECT NAME: Adams County Open Space Projects PROJECT LOCATION: Varied Sites in Adams County DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Golf, & Hospitality/Parks & Urban Design SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

25,000

25,750

26,523

27,318

28,138

28,982

29,851

30,747

31,669

32,619

$286,597

25,000

25,750

26,523

27,318

28,138

28,982

29,851

30,747

31,669

32,619

$286,597

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

1,250

1,288

1,326

1,366

1,407

1,449

1,493

1,537

1,583

1,631

$14,330

Const. Costs

23,750

24,463

25,196

25,952

26,731

27,533

28,359

29,210

30,086

30,988

$272,267

Total Proj Costs

25,000

25,750

26,523

27,318

28,138

28,982

29,851

30,747

31,669

32,619

$286,597

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$286,597 Yes

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

7 Yes

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Each year the City receives about $25,000 in Open Space Sales Tax from Adams County that can only be used in Adams County for Open

Space‐related projects. The funds are held in a dedicated project.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Various needs in Adams County as they arise.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Each year the City receives about $25,000 in a Transportation Tax from Adams County that can only be used in Adams County for Open SOURCES (if any): Space purposes.

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Due to the significant geographic restraints for the expenditure of these funds, the resources are used as opportunities arise. INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: This funding will be utilized as eligible needs are identified. 109

110

PROJECT NAME: Lake Arbor Master Plan PROJECT LOCATION: Southeast of Pomona Drive and Vance Drive DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Golf, & Hospitality/Parks & Urban Design SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

30,000

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

$30,000

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

30,000

$30,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

30,000

$30,000

Const. Costs

30,000

$30,000

Total Proj Costs O&M Costs

$30,000 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

7 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The city owns the 28 acres of undeveloped property immediately west of Lake Arbor Community Park. Over the years, many suggestions

have been made about its potential use and development. At this time, no master plan exists to guide its future development.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

The purpose of doing a master plan is to identify stakeholders, solicit input and define what is wanted and needed, prioritized.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 None SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Funding this request would result in creating a land use plan for this site, a plan that would include costs for constructing identified INFORMATION: alternatives. CONTINGENCIES: Eventual execution of the Master Plan will be contingent on its findings and available resources. 111

Golf

GOLF

Ten-Year Summary Over the past many years, the Golf Courses have addressed various capital needs by identifying and executing one substantial project a year. Recent examples include bunker restoration and the construction of a new cart and equipment building at West Woods. This plan identifies nine similarly substantial projects between West Woods and Lake Arbor for the next decade, as well as complete irrigation system replacement at West Woods in 2016. These projects will help to maintain the courses at a proper level for the use and enjoyment by their respective markets.

SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

40,000

181,280

83,334

2,615,988

180,081

57,964

29,517

38,003

107,644

$3,333,811

Restricted City $

External $

40,000

181,280

83,334

2,615,988

180,081

57,964

29,517

38,003

107,644

$3,333,811

2016

2017

2022

TOTAL

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2018

2019

2020

2021

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

54,636

9,786

$64,422

Const. Costs

40,000

181,280

83,334

2,561,352

180,081

57,964

29,517

38,003

97,858

$3,269,389

40,000

181,280

83,334

2,615,988

180,081

57,964

29,517

38,003

107,644

$3,333,811

Total Proj Costs O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST:

$3,333,811 113

t u 36

121 U V

_ [ § ¨ ¦ 76

§ ¨ ¦

72nd

Quaker

74th

Mcintyre

QUAKER ST

93 U V

_ [

W 64TH PKWY

W 64TH AVE

64th Mc Intyre

WEST WOODS IRRIGATION REPLACEMENT : GC-01 CITY OF ARVADA

DATE: 5/7/2012

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 114

PROJECT NAME: West Woods Golf Club Irrigation System Replacement PROJECT LOCATION: West Woods Golf Club 6655 Quaker Street DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Golf & Hospitality / West Woods Golf SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

2,567,908

$2,567,908

Restricted City $

External $

2,567,908

$2,567,908

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

54,636

$54,636

Const. Costs

2,513,272

$2,513,272

Total Proj Costs

2,567,908

$2,567,908

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$2,567,908 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

9 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replacement of the irrigation system for all 27 holes, driving range, landscaping and other irrigated areas on the property. Includes

design costs, all labor and material for the new irrigation system including sprinklers, satellite controllers, central computer, pipe and fittings, gate valves, electrical wire and pump station. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Deliver water to golf course turf and landscaping in the most efficient manner while conserving water resources and providing quality playing conditions.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 This project will be financed by and within the Golf Fund. While O&M is shown as zero, substantial capital lease costs will likely be SOURCES (if any): incurred to finance the project.

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The useful life of a golf course irrigation system is estimated to be between 25 and 30 years by the US Golf Association. Installation of INFORMATION: the original 18 hole system started in 1992, making the age of parts of the system 22 to 24 years old in 2016. By then, repair and

maintenance costs to keep the system operating at peak capacity may outweigh replacement costs. CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 115

116

PROJECT NAME: West Woods Golf Club Pond Aeration Systems PROJECT LOCATION: West Woods Golf Club 6655 Quaker Street DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Golf and Hospitality / West Woods Golf SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

83,334

$83,334

Restricted City $

External $

83,334

$83,334

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

83,334

$83,334

Total Proj Costs

83,334

$83,334

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$83,334 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

9 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation of electrical service to sites, high volume air compressors, compressor cabinets, timers, fittings, tubing and membrane

diffusers in 11 of 16 golf course ponds. Five of the 11 golf course ponds currently have aerations systems or a water recirculating pump system. They have not required chemical control for aquatic weeds or algae. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Improvement of water quality and aesthetics. Most of the ponds are fed by stormwater and runoff from surrounding neighborhoods and may contain pesticides and nutrient loads. In months without precipitation, the ponds often become stagnant and smelly.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 This project will be financed by the Golf Fund. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Aeration will reduce aquatic weed and algae growth eliminating/reducing the need for chemical controls while enhancing habitat for INFORMATION: aquatic wildlife, eliminating odors and unsightly conditions. There have been complaints from golf course customers and neighbors

regarding pond conditions. CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 117

118

PROJECT NAME: Lake Arbor Golf Course Tee Construction PROJECT LOCATION: Lake Arbor Golf Course 8600 Wadsworth Blvd. DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Golf & Hospitality SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

42,070

$42,070

Restricted City $

External $

42,070

$42,070

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

42,070

$42,070

Total Proj Costs

42,070

$42,070

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$42,070 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

8 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Re‐design and expand tees on holes #3 and #5, add intermediate/ forward tees on holes # 2,#3,#5, #10, #11 #14, #16 and #17. Costs

include topsoil, shaping, leveling, sod and any necessary irrigation improvements. Average cost / 1,200 sq. ft. is $3,500.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Lake Arbor has very limited/inadequate teeing areas for the number of rounds played there annually. By remodeling and adding intermediate tees, player satisfaction will be improved due to improved tee conditions and variety of tee shots. Player safety will also be improved with shorter hole distances and strategically placed teeing grounds.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 This project will be financed by the Golf Fund. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Work on hole #8 at West Woods Golf Club can be completed by the same contractor/bid as this project. INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 119

120

PROJECT NAME: West Woods Golf Club Hole #8 ‐ Sleeping Indian Remodel PROJECT LOCATION: West Woods Golf Club 6655 Quaker Street DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Golf & Hospitality SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

6,010

$6,010

Restricted City $

External $

6,010

$6,010

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

6,010

$6,010

Total Proj Costs

6,010

$6,010

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$6,010 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

8 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Hole #8 Sleeping Indian: Move the left greenside bunker south, re‐grade / lower the approach and rough to make the green more

accessible to players on the forward tees south of Ralston Creek.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

The green on hole #8 was not constructed as designed. It should have been situated facing approximately 20 degrees south to be more open/favorable to shots from the forward tees by players who often cannot hit the ball far enough to carry the left bunker and stay on the green.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 This project will be financed by the Golf Fund. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Work on this project can be completed by the same contractor/ bid as the 2016 Lake Arbor Golf Course Tee Construction Project. INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 121

t u 36

_ [ V U

DR ER T S B WE

121

TELLER ST

W 88TH AVE

CH ASE D

93 U V

§ ¨ ¦

§ ¨ ¦ sw ad W th or

WADSWORTH BLVD

92nd

88th

_ [ W 84T H WA Y

121 V U

80th

LAKE ARBOR MAINTENANCE BUILDING REMODEL : GC-05 CITY OF ARVADA

DATE: 5/7/2012

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 122

PROJECT NAME: Lake Arbor Golf Course Maintenance Building Remodel PROJECT LOCATION: Lake Arbor Golf Course 8600 Wadsworth Blvd. DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: P G & H / Lake Arbor Golf SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

180,081

$180,081

Restricted City $

External $

180,081

$180,081

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

180,081

$180,081

Total Proj Costs

180,081

$180,081

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$180,081 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

7 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Remodel the maintenance building to include: replace roof and gutters, windows and doors, build ADA compliant restrooms and

amenities, add offices, staff lounge and lockers, replace HVAC, add insulation. Paint building and equipment storage sheds. Improve work spaces and efficiency. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

The maintenance building was constructed in the mid 1970's. It is a steel pre‐fabricated building that is not ADA compliant in access or amenities. It has one restroom and no formal office areas. It is heated with electric base board heaters, is poorly insulated and inefficient making it expensive to heat/cool.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 This project will be financed by the Golf Fund. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT An option would be to complete a site assessment plan for the design and replacement the existing buildings to include player INFORMATION: accessible restrooms. CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 123

124

PROJECT NAME: West Woods Golf Club Golf Shop and Rest Rooms Remodel PROJECT LOCATION: West Woods Golf Club 6655 Quaker Street DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: P G & H / West Woods Golf SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

40,000

$40,000

Restricted City $

External $

40,000

$40,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

40,000

$40,000

Total Proj Costs

40,000

$40,000

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$40,000 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

6 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Full remodel of Golf Shop, offices and fixtures. Full remodel of club house restrooms to include new fixtures, flooring, piping and

plumbing improvements.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Improved ADA accessibility to counter and amenities. Improved office and work space, enhanced merchandise and display areas. Replace fixtures, counters and flooring, improve piping and drains.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 This project will be financed by the Golf Fund. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The West Woods Club House opened in 1994. The building and amenities were constructed to serve the needs of an 18 hole golf course. INFORMATION: An additional nine holes were added in 1999. The original fixtures and plumbing continue to require costly maintenance and repair and

need to be replaced and brought up to current building codes. CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 125

126

PROJECT NAME: West Woods Restaurant Remodel, Offices and Storage PROJECT LOCATION: West Woods Golf Club 6655 Quaker Street DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: P G & H / West Woods Golf SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

181,280

$181,280

Restricted City $

External $

181,280

$181,280

TBD $ Total $ USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

181,280

$181,280

Total Proj Costs

181,280

$181,280

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$181,280 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

5 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Remodel West Woods Restaurant for office space, enlarged service areas and increased storage. Expand loading dock area by extending

the brick wall and paved areas to the parking lot to the west, and removing the existing landscaping. Remove the old scoreboard and storage shed by southwest doors, construct heated office and storage space. Remove current office space. Cover the stairwell to the clubhouse basement with flooring for new storage space. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Adding private office space will improve security for daily money related activities and secure work areas. Heated storage will keep equipment and supplies out of the weather and more accessible during business hours, while expanding the dock area will permit moving some of the walk‐in kitchen coolers and refrigerators outside to free up kitchen and seating space.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 This project will be financed by the Golf Fund. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The office area at the restaurant currently delineated by curtains and some shelving in a corner of the west dining room. Safes, INFORMATION: computers and desks where money is counted and disbursed are unsecured. Food, liquor and supplies are stored in a chain link cage in

the clubhouse basement. Currently, equipment is temporarily stored outdoors during peak hours. CONTINGENCIES: An alternate to remodeling and other clubhouse related projects would be to complete a site assessment plan for parking, a new

clubhouse and practice areas. Project timing is subject to change based on constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 127

128

PROJECT NAME: Lake Arbor Golf Course Golf Shop / Restaurant Remodel PROJECT LOCATION: Lake Arbor Golf Course 8600 Wadsworth Blvd. DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: P G & H / Lake Arbor Golf SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

57,964

$57,964

Restricted City $

External $

57,964

$57,964

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

57,964

$57,964

Total Proj Costs

57,964

$57,964

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$57,964 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

6 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Move the bar area to the kitchen (west) side of the restaurant, remodel the restrooms, replace fixtures. Move the golf shop counters to

the east side, expand storage and merchandise display areas.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Moving the bar area to the kitchen side of the restaurant improves efficiency in food ordering, service and communication with the kitchen while allowing a server to tend bar, place and pick up food orders directly from the kitchen rather than walking back and forth between the bar and kitchen.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 This project will be financed by the Golf Fund. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The bar area has had frozen pipe problems in its present location, as well as break‐ins through the service windows to steal liquor from INFORMATION: shelving behind the bar. The present layout of the golf shop makes it difficult staff to see the golf course, cart barn and players on the

tees from the counter. CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 129

TORREY STREET

121 U V

HOLE 23

AVE.

_ [ V [ U _ 93

IR C

69TH

9TH W. 6

CIR.

SECREST

HOLE 5

§ ¨ ¦ 76

HOLE 24

HOLE 2

T WES

PL. 68TH

. PL

HOLE 25

Quaker

Y WA

HOLE 4

HOLE 3

67T HP

L CIRC

67 LN.

T COUR

HOLE 22

Y TERR

_ [

DS WOO

OU RT

74th

SAL VIA C

§ ¨ ¦ 70

_ [

ST RE ET

t u

SA LV IA

COURT

HOLE 6

67 CR. . 67 CIR

AVE.

W. 67TH

TH 66 . RE ST CIR SE C

T 66

RC CI

LN .

66 TH

D OO

VIOLET

TW ES W

64th

WEST WOODS RAIN SHELTERS GC-09 CITY OF ARVADA

DATE: 5/7/2012

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 130

PROJECT NAME: West Woods Golf Club Rain Shelters PROJECT LOCATION: West Woods Golf Club 6655 Quaker Street DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: P G & H / West Woods Golf SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020

2021

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

29,517

$29,517

Restricted City $

External $

29,517

$29,517

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

29,517

$29,517

Total Proj Costs

29,517

$29,517

O&M Costs

$29,517 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

9 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct two rain shelters on the golf course. One located adjacent to the tee complexes of hole #4 tee Sleeping Indian and #26 Silo,

the second between holes #23 and #24 Silo.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Customer safety and protection from lightning and inclement weather.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 This project will be financed by the Golf Fund. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT None INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 131

132

PROJECT NAME: West Woods Golf Club Entrance Landscaping and Lighting Improvements PROJECT LOCATION: West Woods Golf Club 6655 Quaker Street DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: P G & H / West Woods Golf SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021

2022

TOTAL 0

Other City $

38,003

$38,003

Restricted City $

External $

38,003

$38,003

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

38,003

$38,003

Total Proj Costs

38,003

$38,003

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$38,003 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

5 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improve landscaping, signage and lighting at the West Woods Golf Club entrance on Quaker Street. By adding landscaping, views of the

equipment can be minimized and first impressions of the property enhanced. Improved signage for the restaurant and golf shop will allow for customer information and attraction. Improved lighting will provide for safety and customer attraction as well as for holiday decorations and special events. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Install native plants, grasses and trees at the entrance to screen switch cabinets, transformers and other utility equipment visible from the street and when entering the property. Install improved signage and lighting.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 This project will be financed by the Golf Fund. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The south side of the entrance has an easement for various public utilities and improvements which have grown in scope and size since INFORMATION: construction of the Silo nine. CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 133

134

PROJECT NAME: West Woods Golf Club Practice Areas Remodel/Expansion PROJECT LOCATION: West Woods Golf Club 6655 Quaker DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: P G & H / West Woods Golf SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

107,644

$107,644

Restricted City $

External $

107,644

$107,644

2022

TOTAL

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

9,786

$9,786

Const. Costs

97,858

$97,858

Total Proj Costs

107,644

$107,644

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$107,644 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

7 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upgrade/rebuild the practice areas at West Woods Golf Club. Downsize and move the 10,000 sq. ft. putting green. Construct a new

range tee south of the existing tees at the former putting green location. Add practice bunkers and a short game practice area at the north end of the range. Investigate the possibility of relocating /removing the south chipping green for expanded parking or a gazebo for weddings, special events. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

The existing putting green is larger than it needs to be and is not well received by golf course patrons due to severe slopes and limited cupping areas. A smaller, less severe green would allow more space for other amenities and provide a better place to practice.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 This project will be financed by the Golf Fund. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT In recent years, the golf course has had to utilize limited flight balls on the driving range to avoid patrons on opposite ends of the range INFORMATION: being hit by shots from the opposite tee. Constructing a new tee south of the existing tees would add yardage to the range to return to

use of high quality range balls and improve customer satisfaction, retention and attraction. CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 135

Hospitality

HOSPITALITY Ten-Year Summary

Based in the south side of the Arvada Center and periodically using both West Woods and Lake Arbor as event venues, the City’s Hospitality enterprise is training its eyes on ensuring its capacity to provide banquet and conference services to its customers for years to come. Difficult economic circumstances have compelled the deferral of necessary equipment maintenance and replacement. The plan includes a carefully balanced allocation of resources for both kitchen and banquet facilities in order to guarantee both continued worker safety and efficiency, as well as positive customer experiences.

SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

135,000

139,050

371,315

109,273

112,551

150,706

155,227

159,884

164,680

169,621

$1,667,305

Restricted City $

External $

135,000

139,050

371,315

109,273

112,551

150,706

155,227

159,884

164,680

169,621

$1,667,305

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

TBD $ Total $

USES Prelim Costs

Design Costs

31,827

8,742

$40,569

Const. Costs

135,000

139,050

339,488

100,531

112,551

150,706

155,227

159,884

164,680

169,621

$1,626,736

135,000

139,050

371,315

109,273

112,551

150,706

155,227

159,884

164,680

169,621

$1,667,305

Total Proj Costs O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST:

$1,667,305 137

138

PROJECT NAME: Hospitality Taking Lasting Care Kitchen PROJECT LOCATION: Arvada Center Banquet Facility DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Golf, Hospitality/Hospitality SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016 0

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

65,000

27,810

56,275

75,353

77,613

79,942

82,340

84,810

$549,144

Restricted City $

External $

65,000

27,810

56,275

75,353

77,613

79,942

82,340

84,810

$549,144

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

65,000

27,810

56,275

75,353

77,613

79,942

82,340

84,810

$549,144

Total Proj Costs

65,000

27,810

56,275

75,353

77,613

79,942

82,340

84,810

$549,144

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$549,144 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

4 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: These expenditures represent kitchen equipment replacement for Hospitality. Included for 2013 are oven and steamer replacements, as

well as "hot box" replacements in 2014.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

To provide our staff with the proper tools necessary for production and to provide our guests with up‐to‐date service and presentation. This equipment is (20) years old and some of the equipment surpassed industry standard of (15) years and continues to increase repair and maintenance as it breaks down more often.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 All money for these projects will come from the Hospitality Fund. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Examples of kitchen equipment marked for eventual replacement arestoves, steamers, grills, flat‐tops, food display units, ice machines INFORMATION: and lathes, portable broilers. CONTINGENCIES: The order and timing of projects are subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 139

140

PROJECT NAME: TLC Banquet Equipment PROJECT LOCATION: Arvada Center Banquet Facility DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Golf, Hospitality/Hospitality SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016 0

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

70,000

111,240

56,275

75,353

77,613

79,942

82,340

84,810

$637,574

Restricted City $

External $

70,000

111,240

56,275

75,353

77,613

79,942

82,340

84,810

$637,574

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

70,000

111,240

56,275

75,353

77,613

79,942

82,340

84,810

$637,574

Total Proj Costs

70,000

111,240

56,275

75,353

77,613

79,942

82,340

84,810

$637,574

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$637,574 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

4 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Planned 2013 maintenance includes refurbishing moveable walls and door replacement. In 2014, furniture replacement, podium

replacement, and lighting enhancements including wall sconces are planned.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

The Arvada Center Ballrooms have been in operation for 20 years and is showing apparent signs of being dated and is aging. Equipment need to be replaced to provide continued banquet service.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 All money for these projects will come from the Hospitality Fund. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Banquet service equipment to be replaced includes portable bars, concession service equipment, chafers, tents, coffee cart, tables, INFORMATION: skirting, audio/visual equipment such as LCD's, microphones, assisted listening devices, portable lighting, pipe and draping, etc. CONTINGENCIES: The timing of particular equipment replacements are subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 141

142

PROJECT NAME: Sound System Replacement PROJECT LOCATION: Arvada Center Banquet Facility DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Golf, Hospitality/Hospitality SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015

2016

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

371,315

$371,315

Restricted City $

External $

371,315

$371,315

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

31,827

$31,827

Const. Costs

339,488

$339,488

Total Proj Costs

371,315

$371,315

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$371,315 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

3 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will see the replacement of the existing sound system in 2015.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

The sound system is beginning to show signs of aging and will need to be replaced in 2015.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 All money for this project will come from the Hospitality Fund. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The events at the Arvada Center are dependent on proper sound technology. Should this project not be funded, the Arvada Center INFORMATION: Banquet Facility will be at risk of not being able to maintain repeat clients and guest satisfaction. CONTINGENCIES: The timing of particular equipment replacements are subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 143

144

PROJECT NAME: Refrigeration and Freezer Space Replacement PROJECT LOCATION: Arvada Center Banquets DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks Golf and Hospitality/Hospitality SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016

2017

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

109,273

$109,273

Restricted City $

External $

109,273

$109,273

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

8,742

$8,742

Const. Costs

100,531

$100,531

Total Proj Costs

109,273

$109,273

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$109,273 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

2 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replacement of Current refrigeration and Freezer Space. This project will replace 2 walk‐in coolers, 1 beer cooler, 1 waling freezer, and

1 reach‐in freezer.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

The current refrigeration and freezer space is 20 years old. Replacement of the coolers is necessary to maintain quality of product and safety for staff.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 All money for this project will come from the Hospitality Fund. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Replacement of the coolers is necessary to maintain quality of product and safety for staff. Additional cooler and freezer space will INFORMATION: make our buying opportunities worthwhile by providing more storage of inventory and longer windows of productivity. CONTINGENCIES: The timing of particular equipment replacements are subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 145

Arvada Center

ARVADA CENTER Ten-Year Summary

Concern for safety is paramount in capital improvement plans for the Arvada Center. As one of the City’s facilities most visited by the public, including thousands of children a year, a video monitoring system will greatly enhance the security of the building. The plan also contemplates mitigating trip hazards in the front entry plaza and needed lighting improvements for the parking lots. In addition, capital funding for public art will be maintained at current levels of $50,000 a year through 2014.

SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

105,000

51,500

$156,500

Other City $

573,500

$573,500

Restricted City $

External $

79,568

519,045

$598,613

678,500

51,500

79,568

519,045

$1,328,613

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

25,000

79,568

$104,568

Const. Costs

653,500

51,500

519,045

$1,224,045

678,500

51,500

79,568

519,045

$1,328,613

Total Proj Costs O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST:

$1,328,613 147

148

PROJECT NAME: Arvada Center Capital Maintenance PROJECT LOCATION: 6901 Wadsworth Blvd. DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Public Works/Facilities Management SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

55,000

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

$55,000

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

55,000

$55,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

55,000

$55,000

Total Proj Costs

55,000

$55,000

O&M Costs

$55,000 None

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

5 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project is designed to provide the Arvada Center with working capital to address relatively minor needs as they arise.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

As needs are identified for Performing Arts, Education, the Gallery & Museum, and all Arvada Center operations, this project ensures that they can be promptly addressed.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 None SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT None INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Particular work is contingent on the prioritization of needs by Arvada Center stafff. 149

150

PROJECT NAME: Arvada Center Front Entry Renovation and Interior Wayfinding PROJECT LOCATION: 6901 Wadsworth Blvd. DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 08‐1601 ‐ Arvada Center/Administration SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

79,568

519,045

$598,613

79,568

519,045

$598,613

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

79,568

$79,568

Const. Costs

519,045

$519,045

Total Proj Costs

79,568

519,045

$598,613

O&M Costs

$598,613 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

2 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Remodeling the Front Lobby will create a more exciting and accessible entrance, move the Box Office staff to a more secure location,

install a greeter/will call station, install ticketing kiosks, install several informational LED screens throughout the Center, install new automatic front door system and new doors to the Main Gallery, install new shades as required, and replace existing Donor Wall panels with digital elements. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Help meet PCI and ADA compliance, increase customer experience and convenience, address safety and security for Box Office staff and cash purposes, enhance communications and marketing for revenue potential, allow customers to purchase and/or pick up tickets and do on‐site donations, and provide program/site information.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 The exact sources and nature of the funding for this project are to be determined. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT None INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: The establishment of funding sources and the future needs of the Arvada Center will drive this project. 151

152

PROJECT NAME: Arvada Center Safety and Security Video Equipment (RM) PROJECT LOCATION: 6901 Wadsworth Blvd. DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 08.1608 Arvada Center/Facilities SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

123,000

$123,000

Restricted City $

External $

123,000

$123,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

10,000

$10,000

Const. Costs

113,000

$113,000

Total Proj Costs

123,000

$123,000

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$123,000 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

4 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This will replace outdated equipment for monitoring and recording of activity throughout the building to ensure staff, volunteer, patrons

(including many children) and property a safe, secure enviorment. Components include replacing outdated equipment along with adding camera's, servers or DVR's, classroom phones, radios, and door keypad readers. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

This will address PCI compliance needs, provide more systems/processes, including an identification system, and ensure that all property is protected. Staff and patrons should feel very secure within the building, even late at night, and meet the needs of the hundreds of children here on a weekly basis who require an even higher level of security.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Designed to ensure both safety and security, available funding from the Risk Management Fund will finance the project. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Includes servers for DVRs, IP Cameras inside and a few outside at doors, keypad readers, and video software INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Project particulars will be contingent on the professional assessment. 153

154

PROJECT NAME: Arvada Center Exterior Lighting Improvements (RM) PROJECT LOCATION: 6901 Wadsworth Blvd. DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 08‐1608 Arvada Center/Facilities SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

225,000

$225,000

Restricted City $

External $

225,000

$225,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

15,000

$15,000

Const. Costs

210,000

$210,000

Total Proj Costs

225,000

$225,000

O&M Costs

$225,000 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

3 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upgrade and replace Arvada Center exterior lighting for safety and security of the Arvada Center parking bays, including employee

parking on the east side of the building. Fifty poles will need to be updated to LED lighting with longer pole extensions to improve hided lights in the trees, along with adding 10 outside building mounted LED lights, and upgrading the other 40 to LED for sustainability, and efficiency, to industry standards. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

The project will replace & upgrade Arvada Center exterior lighting for safety and security of the Arvada Center parking bays. This will benefit patrons, employee's visibility for the Center grounds.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Designed to ensure safety and security for both patrons and employees alike, available funding from the Risk Management Fund will SOURCES (if any): finance the project.

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Project costs can be reduced if we do not change out existing building‐mounted lights to LED. INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: None 155

156

PROJECT NAME: Arvada Center Outside Front Entry Plaza (RM) PROJECT LOCATION: 6901 Wadsworth Blvd DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 08.1608 Arvada Center/Facilities SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

225,500

$225,500

Restricted City $

External $

225,500

$225,500

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

225,500

$225,500

Total Proj Costs

225,500

$225,500

O&M Costs

$225,500 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

5 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Front entrance to the Arvada Center, pavers and concerte removal with new materials construction

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

After 20 years the concrete pavers, and concrete have deteriorated to the point they are beginning to be a trip hazard. Some areas of concrete have been replaced but most have not.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Intended to ensure safety, available funding from the Risk Management Fund will finance the project. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Pavers 5,000 sq ft @ $17. Concrete 10,000 sq ft @$12 (10% for Others) INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: None 157

158

PROJECT NAME: Public Art PROJECT LOCATION: Various Locations DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Arvada Center/Administration SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

50,000

2015

51,500

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

$101,500

Other City $

Restricted City $

External $

50,000

51,500

$101,500

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

50,000

51,500

$101,500

Total Proj Costs

50,000

51,500

$101,500

O&M Costs

$101,500 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

8 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: In support of the City Art in Public Places Program, this project will fund the acquisition of public art for placement throughout the City.

The funds are used within the guidleines set forth by the program and purchases are approved by the City Council.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Established by City Counci in 2009, program goals are to enhance and enrich the lives of Arvada's residents, visitors, employees, and local businesses by incorporating works of art in public places, contribute to Arvada's civic pride and sense of identity, increase access to works of art, and enhance Arvada's reputation as a city which celebrates and supports the arts.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 None SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT None INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Project locations will be determined by staff. 159

Public Safety

PUBLIC SAFETY Ten-Year Summary

For the past couple of years, the Police Department has been planning for a fundamental change in how law enforcement resources are distributed in the City in the form of substations. Utilizing resources made available by the two police tax increments, this plan will see the construction of two new substations in Arvada, thus widely distributing resources to more quickly and efficiently address citizen needs. Additionally, the construction of the substations will provide much-needed space for the currently congested police department.

SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

Restricted City $

8,000,000

$8,000,000

External $

8,000,000

$8,000,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

800,000

$800,000

Const. Costs

7,200,000

$7,200,000

8,000,000

$8,000,000

90,000

92,700

95,482

98,346

101,296

104,334

107,464

110,688

114,010

$914,320

Total Proj Costs O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST:

$8,000,000 161

162

PROJECT NAME: Two Police Community Stations PROJECT LOCATION: 81st Ave. and Vance St. and TBD DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Public Safety SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

Restricted City $

8,000,000

$8,000,000

External $

8,000,000

$8,000,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

800,000

$800,000

Const. Costs

7,200,000

$7,200,000

Total Proj Costs

8,000,000

$8,000,000

90,000

92,700

95,482

98,346

101,296

104,334

107,464

110,688

114,010

$914,320

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$8,000,000 Maybe

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

8 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The above number is based upon a consultant's pro forma of each community station and reflects the upper end of the range

($3,764,575‐ 4,221,287). This number includes all furniture and fixtures necessary to make the community stations operational, including a 10% contingency. This quote does include all furniture, fixtures, computers, etc. necessary to open the building. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

The construction of the community stations is intended to provide better police services within our vision of decentralized policing, coupled with our need to address the severe space‐needs issues presently facing the police department.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 The Police Department is proposing cash financing using existing fund balances of the .21 and .25 tax increments to pay the costs SOURCES (if any): associated with building both community stations #1 and #2 (approximately 8 million dollars).

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Each is a 10,000 sq. ft building complete with community room. A consultant with many years experience completing governmental INFORMATION: buildings provided the Pro Forma. Construction costs may be reduced during the actual design phase. CONTINGENCIES: A 10% contingency was added to the overall cost of the buildings. 163

Water

WATER

Ten-Year Summary The Water Division is on the precipice of the most transformational project to which the City is a party besides the Gold Line. When completed per an agreement with Denver Water in the works for years, the Gross Reservoir Expansion will substantially increase the availability of water for the City, ensuring a stable and adequate supply for decades to come. Plans to further secure the City’s water supply with the continued acquisition of water rights and the Leyden Storage Project will supplement the availability of Colorado’s most precious resource. Other projects, including treatment plant improvements and continued water main replacements, will see to the continued provision of safe drinking water for the citizens of Arvada.

SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

41,931,590

4,731,021

4,759,360

6,617,307

10,953,402

13,460,742

18,207,059

20,504,104

7,813,066

5,024,035

$134,001,687

Restricted City $

External $

41,931,590

4,731,021

4,759,360

6,617,307

10,953,402

13,460,742

18,207,059

20,504,104

7,813,066

5,024,035

$134,001,687

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

TBD $ Total $

USES Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

41,931,590

4,731,021

4,759,360

6,617,307

10,953,402

13,460,742

18,207,059

20,504,104

7,813,066

5,024,035

$134,001,687

41,931,590

4,731,021

4,759,360

6,617,307

10,953,402

13,460,742

18,207,059

20,504,104

7,813,066

5,024,035

$134,001,687

2,407,278

$9,629,111

Total Proj Costs O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST:

$134,001,687 165

Gross Reservoir

DENVER WATER MOFFAT PROJECT PARTICIPATION : WA-01 CITY OF ARVADA

DATE: 5/8/2012

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 166

PROJECT NAME: Denver Water Moffat Project Participation PROJECT LOCATION: Gross Reservoir, Boulder County DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Utilities / Water Supply SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL 0

Other City $

37,331,086

250,000

2,409,757

6,619,626

8,996,952

13,609,356

15,768,470

2,935,362

$88,170,609

Restricted City $

External $

37,331,086

250,000

2,409,757

6,619,626

8,996,952

13,609,356

15,768,470

2,935,362

$88,170,609

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

37,331,086

250,000

2,409,757

6,619,626

8,996,952

13,609,356

15,768,470

2,935,362

$88,170,609

Total Proj Costs

37,331,086

250,000

2,409,757

6,619,626

8,996,952

13,609,356

15,768,470

2,935,362

$88,170,609

2,407,278

$9,629,111

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$88,170,609 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

3 Yes

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Arvada has a contract with Denver Water to participate in a project that will provide up to 3,000 acre feet of water per year. The $320

million project may start in 2014, with completion in 5 years; more exact cost figures will be generated when the required permits are issued. Arvada's portion is expected to be at least $89 million, which will likely require the issuance of debt. The timing of the bonding depends on the permits, speed of construction, tap sales, and financial market variables. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

This project will provide the majority of the water to meet the build‐out needs of the City.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Water Fund ‐ water tap fees, water fund reserves, and future debt. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT This project will require a financing agreement and distributor contract with Denver Water. Projected debt service related to the INFORMATION: project is reflected in O&M Costs. CONTINGENCIES: The project requires permits from federal and stage agencies. 167

168

PROJECT NAME: Water Main Replacement PROJECT LOCATION: Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Utilities / Water System Operations SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

3,850,504

3,966,021

4,085,000

4,207,550

4,333,777

4,463,790

4,597,703

4,735,635

4,877,704

5,024,035

$44,141,718

Restricted City $

External $

3,850,504

3,966,021

4,085,000

4,207,550

4,333,777

4,463,790

4,597,703

4,735,635

4,877,704

5,024,035

$44,141,718

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

TBD $ Total $

USES Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

3,850,504

3,966,021

4,085,000

4,207,550

4,333,777

4,463,790

4,597,703

4,735,635

4,877,704

5,024,035

$44,141,718

Total Proj Costs

3,850,504

3,966,021

4,085,000

4,207,550

4,333,777

4,463,790

4,597,703

4,735,635

4,877,704

5,024,035

$44,141,718

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$44,141,718 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

10 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Water pipeline infrastructure installed prior to 1980 has a 50‐year life cycle; as the lines reach the end of their life cycle they need to be

replaced. Replacement priority is based on leak history, age, and other factors. The program is designed to grow at 3% each year, keeping up with higher vendor costs and growing the program slowly over the years. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

A proactive main replacement program is key to maintaining the reliability of our water system, an expectation and responsibility to our rate payers. Projects are designed in‐house by the Engineering Division.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Funding is from water rates. The replacement of pipelines and other related infrastructure are ongoing maintenance and replacement SOURCES (if any): costs, which falls to the rate payers.

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Twenty years ago, the water system experienced 120 ‐ 125 main breaks a year. Replacing the worse condition piping has lower breaks INFORMATION: to 40 per year. CONTINGENCIES: Particular project timing and locations are subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 169

170

PROJECT NAME: Water Treatment Plant Improvements PROJECT LOCATION: Arvada Water Treatment Plant, 17935 W. 64th Parkway DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Utilities / Water Treatment SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

500,000

$500,000

Restricted City $

External $

500,000

$500,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

500,000

$500,000

Total Proj Costs

500,000

$500,000

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$500,000 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

3 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the water treatment process are needed for infrequent taste and odor events that affect the quality of the drinking

water supply. Based on experience of other front range water utilities, changes to the filter media is a cost effective means of controlling taste and odor events. During 2012 it will be determined if a granulated activated carbon (GAC) cap on the filters is a viable alternative. If yes then the project will be undertaken in 2013. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Taste and odor events that have occurred in August and September limit out ability to use the Arvada Reservoir supply. This project will help to maximize the use of Arvada Reservoir water.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Water Fund ‐ tap fees SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The project cost is based on others have spent for a GAC cap on the filters. The O&M cost are for removing a portion of the GAC each INFORMATION: year for regeneration (regeneration effectively redevelops the pore structure within the carbon to return its effectiveness to original

conditions); experience will dictate how much is removed each year. CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 171

172

PROJECT NAME: Cathodic Protection PROJECT LOCATION: Water Lines in the vicinity of the Arvada Reservoir DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Utilities / Water System Operations SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

257,500

$257,500

Restricted City $

External $

257,500

$257,500

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

257,500

$257,500

Total Proj Costs

257,500

$257,500

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$257,500 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

3 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: In order to extend the life of transmission lines and avoid catastrophic failures, the cathodic protection (CP) systems must be updated

and/or replaced from time to time. CP is a technique used to control the corrosion of a metal surface (pipe) by making the pipe the cathode of an electrochemical cell. By connecting the pipe to be protected with another more easily corroded "sacrificial metal" that acts as the anode of the electrochemical cell, the pipe is protected from corrosion. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Maintaining the 40 to 50 year old water transmission and distribution system. The City's drinking water supplies are conveyed from the WTP's to the distribution system via major transmission lines. The CP for these lines was installed 25 ‐ 40 years ago.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Water fund ‐ rates and tap fees SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT This work includes a major overhaul of a portion of the CP system. Part of the work is an enhancement of the CP system and will be paid INFORMATION: for by tap fees and part of the work is maintenance of the CP system and will be paid from rates. CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 173

t u

H 84T

§ ¨ ¦ 70

82ND

AVE.

83R

. DR

UMBER ST.

83R D

CT.

AVE.

GIL VIR ST.

YU L

PL .

93 U V

H 84T

84TH

W.8 5T

OL ET

WILKERS ON CT.

V U 121

WINDY CT.

84TH LN.

DR.

_ [

R WIE ST.

PL.

83RD CR.

WA Y

§ ¨ ¦

(A.K.A.

LEYDEN

. CT

L YU

TORREY

LEYDEN STORAGE WA-05 DATE: 1/25/2013

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 174

G IL

LE T CT .

VI O

V IR

CT .

UM BER

7 W.

H 7T

. DR

. CT

Y D IN . W CT

CITY OF ARVADA

CT.

_ [

W.77TH PL.

93 U V

N YA

YANKE CT.

UL YS S

78 DR. 77 DR.

d 82n

E KE

W.78TH DR.

78TH DR.

W.77TH LN.

ET OL VI . CT

W. 78TH DR.

CT.

VIRGIL

72 U V

PROJECT NAME: Leyden Storage Project PROJECT LOCATION: Hwy 93 and Leyden Flats DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Utilities / Water Supplies SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

250,000

257,500

$507,500

Restricted City $

External $

250,000

257,500

$507,500

2013

2014

TBD $ Total $

USES

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

250,000

257,500

$507,500

Total Proj Costs

250,000

257,500

$507,500

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$507,500 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

3 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Leyden Cavern, between 600 to 800 feet below ground, has been acquired by the City for water storage. This part of the overall

project is for the installation of wells. The wells will be drilled in 2013 and 2014 and the pumps set if we need the water. The water will be pumped into a pipe or surface ditch down to Arvada Reservoir and then to the Arvada Water Treatment Plant. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Should our surface water rights prove to be inadequate in a drought there is approximately 2,000 acre feet of water in Leyden cavern. While contracts with Denver Water and the completion of the Gross enlargement project should protect us from a severe drought, if we need the water we need the wells in place ahead of time.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Water Fund ‐ tap fees SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The water in the cavern was treated water purchased from Arvada by Xcel energy to displace the last of the gas in the cavern; this INFORMATION: process was part of the cavern gas storage decommission process. Even though the water was treated we can not pump it from the

cavern and place it directly into the distribution system but need to re‐treat the water. CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 175

t u 36

_ [

121 U V

93 U V

§ ¨ ¦ 72 V U

2ND AVE

§ ¨ ¦

3RD AVE

W 82

ND A

L EY

D EN GU

1ST AVE

LC H

_ [

82nd

Quaker

LEYDEN RD & QUAKER ST WA-06 CITY OF ARVADA

UA K

DATE: 6/12/2012

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 176

PROJECT NAME: Northwest Water System ‐ 18‐inch Water Line PROJECT LOCATION: Leyden Road and Quaker St. DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Utilities / Water Operations SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015

2016

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

424,360

$424,360

Restricted City $

External $

424,360

$424,360

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

424,360

$424,360

Total Proj Costs

424,360

$424,360

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$424,360 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

6 Yes

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Parallel an existing 12" water line with an 18" water line. The 12" water line is a critical component in the water transmission system to

the northwest system. The existing water line was installed in the 1970's and is undersized for the future needs at Candelas and Leyden Rock developments. Paralleling the existing line will add capacity and provide redundancy in this critical location. The length is 3,000 feet; the line traverses an open but steep field. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

This project will ensure a sufficient drinking water supply in the northwest of the City.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Water Fund SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Completion will be necessary before too many homes and businesses are dependent on the northwest system. INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 177

WasteWater

WASTEWATER Ten-Year Summary

The plan for the Wastewater Division, which operates and maintains the City’s sanitary sewer system and sees to the treatment of its collections by the Metro Wastewater Reclamation District, focuses primarily on the maintenance and replacement of sewer infrastructure throughout the City. The comprehensive inspections and proactive maintenance that have marked Wastewater operations for over a decade will continue in order to carry on its exemplary service record for its customers. In addition, the expansion of system capacity in the north of the City will meet rising demands as growth there continues in the coming years.

SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

2,054,762

2,116,405

2,285,987

2,354,567

2,425,203

2,497,960

2,513,195

2,588,592

2,666,250

2,746,237

$24,249,157

Restricted City $

External $

2,054,762

2,116,405

2,285,987

2,354,567

2,425,203

2,497,960

2,513,195

2,588,592

2,666,250

2,746,237

$24,249,157

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

TBD $ Total $

USES Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

2,054,762

2,116,405

2,285,987

2,354,567

2,425,203

2,497,960

2,513,195

2,588,592

2,666,250

2,746,237

$24,249,157

2,054,762

2,116,405

2,285,987

2,354,567

2,425,203

2,497,960

2,513,195

2,588,592

2,666,250

2,746,237

$24,249,157

Total Proj Costs O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST:

$24,249,157 179

180

PROJECT NAME: Sewer Main Replacement PROJECT LOCATION: Throughout the City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Utilities / Wastewater Operations or Public Works / Engineering SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

1,904,762

1,961,905

2,020,762

2,081,385

2,143,826

2,208,141

2,274,385

2,342,617

2,412,896

2,485,282

$21,835,961

Restricted City $

External $

1,904,762

1,961,905

2,020,762

2,081,385

2,143,826

2,208,141

2,274,385

2,342,617

2,412,896

2,485,282

$21,835,961

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

TBD $ Total $

USES Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

1,904,762

1,961,905

2,020,762

2,081,385

2,143,826

2,208,141

2,274,385

2,342,617

2,412,896

2,485,282

$21,835,961

Total Proj Costs

1,904,762

1,961,905

2,020,762

2,081,385

2,143,826

2,208,141

2,274,385

2,342,617

2,412,896

2,485,282

$21,835,961

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$21,835,961 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

10 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: About 60% of the sanitary sewer system was constructed before 1980. Materials from that time period had a 50‐year life cycle. Using a

relatively inexpensive process, these sewer lines are being rehabilitated, resulting in an extension of their life cycle by many decades. At the current rate of cured in place rehabilitation, the lining of all older sewer lines should be completed by 2025. Priorities are established from video inspections. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

A proactive main replacement program is key to maintaining the reliability of our wastewater collection system, an expectation and responsibility to our rate payers. In 2000 ‐ 2003 we averaged 9 sewer back‐ups / blockages a year; in the last four years we have average one back‐up / blockages per yr. This is a result of improved maintenance and main rehab.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Funding is from wastewater rates. The rehabilitation of sewer mains and manholes is a ongoing and long term maintenance and SOURCES (if any): replacement cost, which falls to the rate payers.

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT None INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Particular project timing and locations are subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 181

182

PROJECT NAME: North System Oversizing PROJECT LOCATION: North and East Arvada DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Utilities / Wastewater SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Other City $

100,000

103,000

212,180

218,545

225,102

231,855

238,810

245,975

253,354

260,955

$2,089,776

Restricted City $

External $

100,000

103,000

212,180

218,545

225,102

231,855

238,810

245,975

253,354

260,955

$2,089,776

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

TBD $ Total $

USES Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

100,000

103,000

212,180

218,545

225,102

231,855

238,810

245,975

253,354

260,955

$2,089,776

Total Proj Costs

100,000

103,000

212,180

218,545

225,102

231,855

238,810

245,975

253,354

260,955

$2,089,776

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$2,089,776 Maybe

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

6 Yes

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Arvada North Sanitary Sewer Collection pipeline is undersized for the ultimate build out of the northern portion of the City. As the

development continues in the Northwest sections where the flows are restricted the existing line will need to be replaced with larger diameter pipe or a parallel pipe installed. Some construction will begin in 2013 and there is an ongoing flow monitoring program to determine future locations. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

This project will increase capacity for future growth. Overall, the pipeline is in reasonably good condition and is many years away from replacement. The timing is driven by when development takes place.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 The oversizing or installation of new sewer line along the existing main will be paid by tap fees. SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The decision to replace existing pipe with larger diameter pipe or install new pipe along the existing pipe will be based on a number of INFORMATION: factors including cost, condition of the pipe and construction constraints. For example, at a major intersection it may be better to bore

and have two smaller pipes than to have one large pipe that requires an open cut installation. CONTINGENCIES: Particular project timing and locations are subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 183

184

PROJECT NAME: Access Improvements PROJECT LOCATION: Throughout City DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Utilities / Wastewater SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

$323,420

Restricted City $

External $

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

$323,420

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

$323,420

Total Proj Costs

50,000

51,500

53,045

54,636

56,275

57,964

$323,420

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$323,420 Maybe

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

6 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A number of sewer mains are located in easements or along drainage ways where ready access to the manholes doesn't exist. This

project will construct bridges and improved surfaces to allow vehicle access to these lines. While access constraints exist in the Ralston Creek and Little Dry Creek drainage basins and along the canals within the Two Ponds Wildlife Refuge, the Little Dry Creek basin is the highest priority as this is where the north collection system trunk runs. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

This project will improve ability to maintain the wastewater collection system in areas of poor accessibility, off road access points that are too steep, and areas along the easements with cross grades too steep to navigate with the large equipment.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Wastewater ‐ tap fees SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT The goal of this program is to work in unison with Stormwater Drainage projects to allow access for large equipment not only for INFORMATION: improved maintenance, but more importantly, for timely and effective response in the event of emergencies. CONTINGENCIES: Particular project timing and locations are subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 185

StormWater

STORMWATER Ten-Year Summary

The Stormwater Division is currently engaged in one of the most substantial projects since the inception of the Stormwater utility in 2001. While a vast majority of the Garrison Bridge Replacement and concurrent channelization work on Ralston Creek (financially and operationally distinct from the park improvements at the site) will be completed prior to the end of 2012, it completion will take place during the term of the ten year Capital Improvement Plan. However, a series of additional projects of varying scopes are planned over the next ten years. Among these projects is the Estes Street Outfall, which shall accompany initial Gold Line construction. In 2013, funding for minor and intermittent drainage projects will be captured in operations instead of capital project planning. These undertakings – joint projects, miscellaneous drainage projects, and stream bank stabilizations – are difficult to establish years ahead of time and opportunities for cooperation with entities like the Urban Drainage & Flood Control District intermittently arise.

SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

6,452,000

3,870,000

1,570,750

541,059

273,182

281,377

289,819

238,810

245,975

633,385

$14,396,357

Restricted City $

External $

3,870,000

1,570,750

541,059

273,182

281,377

289,819

238,810

245,975

633,385

$14,396,357

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

Other City $

TBD $ Total $

6,452,000

USES

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

83,500

78,538

27,053

14,069

11,941

31,669

$246,769

Design Costs

144,000

157,075

75,324

56,275

47,762

43,070

$523,507

Const. Costs

3,642,500

1,335,138

438,682

273,182

211,033

289,819

179,108

245,975

558,646

$7,174,081

3,870,000

1,570,750

541,059

273,182

281,377

289,819

238,810

245,975

633,385

$14,396,357

Total Proj Costs O&M Costs

6,452,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST:

$14,396,357 187

_ [ § ¨ ¦

ESTES CT

EVERETT ST

BROOKS DR

RALST

O N C RE E K

REE K

§ ¨ ¦

FIELD ST

93 U V

FLOWER ST

GARLAND ST

121 U V

GARRISON ST

BROOK S DR

HOYT ST

t u

VA N B

O be

64th

RALSTON RD

58th

ip lin g

W 57TH AVE

GARRISON BRIDGE REPLACEMENT SW-01 CITY OF ARVADA

DATE: 5/8/2012

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 188

EVERETT ST

FALK CT

_ [

FIELD ST

Carr

to ls Ra

Garrison

PROJECT NAME: Garrison Bridge Replacement PROJECT LOCATION: Garrison Street at Ralston Creek (Barbara Ann Drive) DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Public Works / Engineering SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

Other City $

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

6,452,000

2,200,000

$8,652,000

Restricted City $

External $

2,200,000

$8,652,000

TBD $ Total $

6,452,000

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

Design Costs

Const. Costs

2,200,000

$2,200,000

2,200,000

$8,652,000

Total Proj Costs

6,452,000

O&M Costs

$8,652,000 Yes

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

10 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Garrison St. crosses over Ralston Creek near Barbara Ann Drive. The existing bridge is in good condition but far too small to pass the 100‐

year storm event. In order for the Van Bibber outfall to function properly, the Garrison St. bridge needs to be replaced. Bridge design has been completed. Permit applications have been submitted to multiple agencies, replacement of the Apex structure immediately downstream of the bridge location will be completed in 2012. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Public health and Safety ‐ Remove residential and commercial properties out of the 100 year flood plain.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Stormwater Utility funds. Besides the bridge replacement there is a Park project to redo the park along Ralston Creek from Garrison SOURCES (if any): Street to Carr Street, 55% of the 2013 funds are for the Park and 45% to complete the bridge.

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Project has Council approval and is underway. INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: None 189

DATE: 6/12/2012

L E G E N D

_ [

Project Location Arvada City Limits 190

CODY ST

PL 4TH 5 W

W 54TH AVE

W 53RD AVE

CODY ST

DUDLEY ST

ESTES CIR

GOLD LINE (NEAR ESTES) SW-02

ESTES ST

W 53RD AVE

CITY OF ARVADA

R GE

DOVER ST

ESTES CT

_ [

FIELD ST

_ [

FIELD CIR

l in

EL AB

EVERETT ST

R CLA RID

Ralston

FLOWER CIR

58th

A GYD

Carr

Garrison

FIELD CT

EVERETT CT

§ ¨ ¦

_ § [ ¨ ¦

T DOVER C

93 U V

DUDLEY CT

121 U V

W 55TH DR

DY CO

H AVE W 55T

FIELD ST

FLOWER ST

t u

PROJECT NAME: Gold Line Improvements / Estes Street Outfall PROJECT LOCATION: Along Gold Line DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Public Works / Engineering SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

620,000

$620,000

Restricted City $

External $

620,000

$620,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

31,000

$31,000

Design Costs

62,000

$62,000

Const. Costs

527,000

$527,000

Total Proj Costs

620,000

$620,000

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$620,000 Maybe

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

1 Yes

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A variety of drainage improvements are needed for the Gold Line, however; until the final Gold Line Design is completed the exact

improvements cannot be designed, and therefore the cost estimate is very weak. Some of the construction cost will fulfill the City's Gold Line offset requirement. Design and construction will get underway once Gold Line design is completed. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Drainage improvements are needed along Gold Line route so Gold Line does not cause flooding. Project is likely to include enlargements of inlets, installation of new inlets enlarging storm sewer pipes, replacing deteriorating piping and improve surface channels.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Stormwater Fund SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Firm cost estimates will be established upon final Gold Line design. INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Final design and cooperation with RTD will dictate the project's execution. 191

t u

H CIR W 67T

NOBLE CT

LN W

TH 66

IR TH C W 66

W 66TH PL

_ [

TH 66

D AR CH OR

§ ¨ ¦ 76

W 6 5 T H PL 5TH

CI R

72nd

TZ C

W LL

CIR

QU AR

ER G

PL ORION

Quaker

OD S

LN ION OR

WEST WO

PIKE ST

O R

E SS

QUAKER CT

PIKE

POPPY S

§ ¨ ¦ 70

O RC HA RD

93 U V

121 U V

I LV SA

TH 66

O RI O

AY W

H 64 T WAY

L E G E N D

C HU R

C H D I T CH

Project Location Arvada City Limits 192

B LE C T

ORION CT

EC PIK

POPPY CT

2 ND

W 6 2 ND ORION CT

ROGERS ST

DATE: 6/12/2012

R D LN

W 62ND PL

BLE LN

QUAKER ST & 64TH TO WESTWOODS GOLF CLUB : SW-09

W 63RD PL

Mc Intyre

64th

CITY OF ARVADA

QUAKER ST

_ [

W 64TH AVE

PROJECT NAME: Quaker Street Storm Sewer PROJECT LOCATION: Quaker Street form 64th to entrance to West Wood Golf Course DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Public Works / engineering SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

350,000

$350,000

Restricted City $

External $

350,000

$350,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

17,500

$17,500

Design Costs

35,000

$35,000

Const. Costs

297,500

$297,500

Total Proj Costs

350,000

$350,000

O&M Costs

$350,000 No

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

8 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install 36" ‐ 42" storm sewer in Quaker street. With Boyd Pond Development and 64th Avenue Road improvements, storm flows have

increased to the point where intersections are flooded during significant rain events.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

The project will reduce the potential of localized flooding.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Stormwater Fund SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT None INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 193

93 U V

W 63RD AVE

_ [

YUKON ST

121 U V

ZEPHYR ST

ALLISON ST

YUKON CT

t u

YARROW ST

W 64TH AVE

§ ¨ ¦ 76

§ ¨ ¦ 70

Wadsworth

AMMONS DR

W 62ND PL

W 62ND WAY

64th

_ [ Carr

121 V U

58th

Ralston

YARROW STREET OVERFLOW SW-10 CITY OF ARVADA

DATE: 5/8/2012

W 62ND AVE

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 194

PROJECT NAME: Yarrow Street Overflow PROJECT LOCATION: Yarrow Street and 62nd Place DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Public Works / engineering SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

206,000

$206,000

Restricted City $

External $

206,000

$206,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

10,300

$10,300

Design Costs

20,600

$20,600

Const. Costs

175,100

$175,100

Total Proj Costs

206,000

$206,000

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$206,000 Maybe

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

5 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will increase the storm sewer capacity that captures flow on W. 62nd Place. A low point in the roadway exists at Yarrow

Street and the existing inlets and pipe do not have the capacity to convey frequent storm flows.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

This project will prevent future flooding of the houses and decrease the City’s liability associated with a recurring drainage issue causing damage to private property. While some improvements have lessened the flooding that was historically occurring, there was flooding 8 to 10 years ago that was just short of causing property damage.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Stormwater Fund SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT While this location is at the lower end of the system have not had the # of problems at this location as we have had at Quaker Street. INFORMATION: The cost estimate is based on the relative magnitude of the project; more design work is needed to improve the estimate. CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 195

W ND 62

t u 36

W AY

121 U V

_ [ § ¨ ¦

§ ¨ ¦

64th

Carr

wor

YARROW ST

s Wad

_ [

W 61ST AVE

YARROW LN

121 U V

W 61ST AVE

W 60TH AVE

Ralston

BARBARA ANN DR

ALLISON ST. OUTFALL AT OLD WADSWORTH : SW-11 CITY OF ARVADA

BYP

ON R

RTH

OBE R

OLDE WADSWORTH BLVD

SWO WAD

WEBSTER ST

93 U V

W 62ND AVE

DATE: 6/12/2012

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 196

RALS TON

C R E EK

PROJECT NAME: Allison St Outfall ‐ Phase I PROJECT LOCATION: Allison Street and Olde Wadsworth Blvd. DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Public Works / engineering SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014

2015

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

1,364,750

$1,364,750

Restricted City $

External $

1,364,750

$1,364,750

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

68,238

$68,238

Design Costs

136,475

$136,475

Const. Costs

1,160,038

$1,160,038

Total Proj Costs

1,364,750

$1,364,750

O&M Costs

$1,364,750 Maybe

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

5 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will address erosion issues by replacing undersized and aging culverts under the UP Railroad tracks and Olde Wadsworth

Blvd.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Prevent further damage; besides potential impact to railroad looking to prevent property damage to CDOT property on the west side of Wadsworth By‐Pass, can wait until 2014 to start.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Stormwater Fund SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT Entire project involves channel capacity improvements and outfall improvements (total project cost of $2,650,000) but have divided in INFORMATION: to Phases with Phase II to occur when sufficient funding is available (2022 with bonding?). CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 197

88th

K ip

li n

W 81ST L

W 81ST AV

EVERETT ST

LITTLE D RY CREEK

N SO

W 80TH

HOL

L AN DC

FLOWER

h 86t

GARLAND DR

W 81ST PL

FIELD CIR

§ ¨ ¦

ST PL

HOYT WAY

§ ¨ ¦ 70

FLOWER CT

W 81

CLUB CREST DR

93 U V

WAY

121

D CT

HOYT CT

_U [ V

R ET T EVE

F IE L D C T

AN HOLL

t u

W 80 TH PL

_ [

W 80TH AVE

FLOWER ST S TE ES

Kipling

80th

LITTLE DRY CREEK AT CLUB CREST : SW-12 CITY OF ARVADA

DATE: 6/12/2012

L E G E N D

Project Location Arvada City Limits 198

PROJECT NAME: Little Dry Creek Bank Stabilization PROJECT LOCATION: Along Little Dry Creek from Club Crest to W. 80th Avenue DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Public Works / engineering SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

700,000

$700,000

Restricted City $

External $

700,000

$700,000

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

35,000

$35,000

Design Costs

47,000

$47,000

Const. Costs

618,000

$618,000

Total Proj Costs

700,000

$700,000

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$700,000 No

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

5 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will address bank erosion issues in Little Dry Creek from Club Crest to W. 80th Avenue. Drop structures will be constructed

and boulders will be placed along the bank edges to prevent further erosion of the channel.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

Over time the stream has undercut the banks and is now causing erosion. The project will prevent erosion from damaging the Pomona Lake dam. A recently State dam inspection noted that corrective measure needed to be undertaken to prevent damage to the dam, private property, trails, and park land.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Stormwater Fund SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT This program will also assist in keeping the water in the streams cleaner. INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 199

_ [

93 U V

XENON DR

ZANG

ZINNIA ST

121 U V

WAY

ZANG

ZANG CT

YANK

YOUNGFIELD

t u

CIR

6 6 TH PL

§ ¨ ¦ 76

§ ¨ ¦ 70

72nd

Ward

ZINNIA ST

ZANG ST

W 65

TH A

_ [ 72 V U

W 64TH PL

DATE: 5/8/2012

Project Location Arvada City Limits 200

N GFIELD ST

CITY OF ARVADA

L E G E N D

U YO

WHITE GULCH SW-13

G N

72 U V

W 65TH WAY

ST YA

ZANG CT

64th

PROJECT NAME: White Gulch PROJECT LOCATION: Yankee Doodle Drainage, near Yank St. DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Public Works / engineering SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015 0

2016 0

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021

2022

TOTAL 0

Other City $

633,385

$633,385

Restricted City $

External $

633,385

$633,385

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

31,669

$31,669

Design Costs

43,070

$43,070

Const. Costs

558,646

$558,646

Total Proj Costs

633,385

$633,385

O&M Costs

$633,385 Maybe

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

5 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will construct identified items in the Yankee Doodle Outfall Systems Plan, completed in 2006. A combination of detention

and water quality ponds, new storm sewer piping and the separation of the Juchem Irrigation ditch from storm flows are identified.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

This project will eliminate nuisance flooding from an elementary school, residences and commercial businesses as well as improve water quality for storm runoff entering Ralston Creek.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Stormwater Fund SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT None INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 201

202

PROJECT NAME: Simms Street Outfall PROJECT LOCATION: Simms Street from 75th to 78th Avenue DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Public Works / engineering SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015

2016

2017 0

2018 0

2019 0

2020 0

2021 0

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

328,879

$328,879

Restricted City $

External $

328,879

$328,879

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

16,444

$16,444

Design Costs

32,888

$32,888

Const. Costs

279,547

$279,547

Total Proj Costs

328,879

$328,879

O&M Costs

$328,879 Maybe

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

5 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project is to install stormwater piping and make above‐ground drainage improvements along Simms Street from 75th to 78th

Avenue.

NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

The project will eliminate local flooding along Simms Street and thereby prevent hazardous driving conditions.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Stormwater Fund SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT None INFORMATION: CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 203

ST.

QU A

RO WY B B .

QUAIL

PAR FET

NELSON ST.

CT.

ST. ST.

ST.

ST. OAK

WA Y

ST.

MILLER

NELSON

NEW MAN

CT. OWENS

PIERSON ST.

CT. NEWCOMBE

ST .

MILLER NELSON

CR. ST.

ST.

CT.

ST.

W.62ND AV

ST.

MILLER

LEWIS

ST.

ALLENDALE ST.

CT. NEWCOMBE

ST.

NEWCOMBE

62ND AVE.

MOORE

DR.

OWENS

AVE.

60TH PL.

CT.

AVE.

MILLER

58TH F.R.

ST.

56TH PL.

NEWCOMBE

CT.

OAK NELSON

PARFET ST.

63 AVE.

62ND

W.61ST AVE.

OWENS

PARFET

ST.

PA RFET CT.

ST.

NEWCOMBE

ST.

OAK

ST.

PARFET ST. CT.

PARFET

MOORE

ST. OWENS

PARFET ST.

CT.

ST.

OAK

PARFET

PIERSON ST. ST. PIERSON CT.

ST. PIERSON

63RD PL.

W. 58TH AVE.

TABOR ST.

MOORE

ST.

NEWCOMBE ST.

OAK

OWENS

PARFET

CT.

63 DR. AVE.

63 AVE

ST.

ST. QUEEN

QUAIL

64TH

63 WY. 63 PL.

PL.

PIERSON

QUAIL

CT.

ROBB

RO BB

AV E.

ST.

ROUTT

59TH

W.65

PL.

NELSON

QUEEN ST.

QUAIL ST.

ST.

CT. QUAIL

QUEEN ST.

QUEEN CT.

64 PL.

W. 62ND PL. 62ND AVE.

59TH 59

PL.

OAK

UNION ST.

ST.

58TH F.R.

57TH AV.

CT.

SWAD LEY

PL.

58TH F.R.

WARD WAY

CT.

PIERSON

QUAIL ST. ST. QUAIL

PL . ST. TAFT

58TH

60TH PL.

W.65TH

CT.

ST.

MS SIM

TAFT CT.

CT. TAFT

UNION

URBAN

VAN GORDON

PIERSON CT. PIERSON ST.

QUAIL

QUEEN CR.

ROBB CT. ST.

SWADLEY ST.

TAFT ST. ST.

ST. ST.

ST.

CT.

ST.

UNION

URBAN ST. UNION CT.

URBAN

CT.

URBAN CT. URBAN ST. UNION

CT. VIVIAN ST. VAN GORDON ST.

ST.

VIVIAN

W. 56TH PL.

. LN

W. 55TH DR. 55 PL.

CT.

WIS

. ST

AK CT.

55TH

W. UA IL CT.

DR. CT.

FT T.

56TH

55T

56T

CT.

ST.

(CSH 72)

VIVIAN

CT.

ST.

WELCH

WRIGHT

WARD RD.

AVE.

60TH

MILLER ST.

ST.

ST. ROUTT

QUEEN

ST.

TAFT ST.

TAFT CT.

ROBB ST.

ROUTT

SIMMS ST. CT.

CT. SIMMS CT.

SWADLEY

CR.

CT.

TAFT

CT. TABOR

TABOR TABOR CT. ST. SWADLEY

CR. TAFT CR.

TAFT CT. ST.

TABOR

ST.

UNION

URBAN

VAN GORDON

QUEEN

ROUTT ST. ST. ROBB

SIMMS C

SWADL

TABOR ST.

ST.

IO N

CR.

ST.

CT.

ST. VIVIAN

QU EEN ST.

UNION CT.

URBAN DR.

UNION

CT.

URBAN

ST. URBAN

UNION

ST. VAN GORDON

VIVIAN

CT.

VAN GORDON

VIVIAN

WELCH WELCH CT.

WARD ROAD WELCH ST.

WELCH CT.

WRIGHT ST.

ST. XENOPHON ST. XENON

YANK YANK ST.

YOUNGFIELD ST.

AVE.

65 PL.

LEW

Arvada City Limits

PL.

66TH

WY.

63RD

63 AVE.

65TH AVE.

PL.

ALLENDALE

. W

Project Location

204

CT.

CT. XENON

WRIGHT CT.

ST. WELCH

WELCH WRIGHT ST.

YOUNGFIELD

WY.

YAN K

CT.

YANK

DR.

CT.

CT. YOUNGFIELD ST.

ZINNIA

ST.

PL.

ST .

ZANG CT. ZA NG ALKIRE CT.

BRAUN CT.

CT.

WRIGHT

XENON ST.

WRIGHT CT.

CR .

YOUNG

ZAN G

YNFL

ST.

XENON

ST.

CT.

ZANG

ZINNIA

ST.

ALKIRE CT.

ZINNIA

ARBUTUS ST.

BRAUN WY. BEECH CT.

AU N BR

CT.

. DR

ZINNIA CT.

WAY

BRAUN WY.

ALKIRE ST.

COLE CT

DEVINNEY CT

ZANG CT.

DATE: 6/12/2012

L E G E N D

TABOR ST

ST. TAFT

BE EC H AR BU C TU T. AL S KI C RE T. ST CT . . ST.

CT. BEECH

BEECH

BR AU N B EE C CH ARBUTUS T. ARBUTUS CT CT. . ALKIRE

W .

COORS ST. COLE CT. COORS ST.

COORS LN. COLE LN. BRAUN LN.

E. AV CT.

DEFRAME CT.

WY.

COOR S CT. COLE

NNEY

CR .

CT.

ELDRIDGE ST.

DEVINNEY

DE VI ELLIS CT.

FIG CT.

WY.

ALKIRE

BRAUN

COORS ST.

CT. DEFRAME

WY.

DEFRAME

ST.

BEECH DR.

C ON

WA Y

AVE.

61ST 60TH

59TH

YANKEE DOODLE DRAINAGE SW-15

TA FT ST .

ST .

BR AU N BRAUN

CT. COORS CT.

WY. CT.

COORS

DEVINNEY

DEFR AM E

CT. DEVINNEY

DEVINNEY CT.

DEVINNEY

ELDRIDGE ST.

W AY

DEFRAME

V IN

DEFRAME CT.

DEVINNEY CT.

ST.

ELDRIDGE

CT. ST. FIG FIG ST.

GARDENIA ST.

Ward

CT. BEECH CT.

CT. BRA UN

CT.

DE N EY CT. FR AM E

COOR

ELLIS ST.

ST.

ST. ELLIS

ELDRIDGE CT.

ST. ST. FIG

FLORA CT.

FIG

Simms

h ec Be

CT.

XEN

57 DR

XEN

FIG CT.

6TH PL.

64TH

AV E

68TH

57TH PL.

61 W.

PL.

W. 58TH AVE.

PL.

67TH

PL.

L CO

PL.

W.62ND PL.

W. W.

60TH AVE.

PL.

68TH

AVE.

62ND AVE.

. B ST

W.61ST PL. 61ST W.

66TH

(RALSTON ROAD)

W. 64TH AVE.

ST.

58 DR.

PL.

WAY

67TH

PL.

ST.

58TH PL.

PL.

CR.

65TH

CT.

59TH

W.65TH

W 0T

PL.

AVE.

CR. 65TH

TT RO U

PL.

W .7

69TH

PL.

66TH

PL.

LN.

RO B

CR Y.

66TH

WY.

AVE.

66TH

W. 67TH AVE.

67TH

SIMM

ZA N

PL.

W. 70TH PL.

. W

62ND AVE

61 ST

W.72ND

AVE.

69TH WY.

WY. W. 67TH PL.

PL.

66 PL.

PL.

70T

AVE .

W. 63RD

AVE.

70 PL.

T ROU

60 PL.

AVE.

WEST 71ST PL.

PL.

W. 62

67th PL.

W. 72ND AVE.

AV E.

67TH PL.

66 AVE.

AV E.

TAFT

67 PL.

. DR

PL.

. ST

AVE.

68TH

RALSTON PL.

59TH AVE.

74 PL.

PL.

AVE. PL.

W.68TH

W. 65TH W.64T H PL .

64 PL.

CR.

CR. 63

CT.

PL.

. CT . ST

60 PL.

AVE.

67TH

. PL.

WY.

YANK

63 PL. 63

PL.

64 DR.

ZANG ZINNIA

. CT

PL. TH 59 H 59T E. AV

FIG

58th

. CT

65 AV

PAR

V U 72

61ST

AM WYNDH

W. 59TH DR.

W. 58TH

CR. 66

ST.

(CSH 72)

62 DR.

DR.

W. 59TH PL.

. WY

62N D

DR.

N DEV IN

Ralston

D EL

64th

62 L

XE NO N

CR.

62 PL.

67 PL.

71 S

ZANG

BRAUN PL. CR.

AR LECT. P

63RD AVE.

ZANG

N YA

63 WY. 63 PL.

63 . LN. CR W Y 63 63 N D . HA R M C

WY.

DR.

WY.

FIELD CT.

64 DR.

ST .

AVE.

W. 65TH

PL. 64

PL.

DE FR A W M Y. E 63 RD

W. N

_ [

CITY OF ARVADA

65 PL.

N YA

64TH DR.

YAN

WAY

T. NC AU LE CO CT.

64 PL.

65 AVE.

65 PL.

COLE CT. 65TH DR.

DR.

W. 65TH

W. 63RD PL.

72 V U

66 PL.

T. ES

TH 66

TH 67 YA NK

WY.

WAY

. CR

68TH AVE. . DR

. ST

CT . 71 ST PL.

73 AVE.

DR. ROBB

W.70TH PL.

AVE.

68 AVE.

PL.

LE CO

72nd

. PL

W.69T

67TH

67TH PL. CO O 67 R S CR. CT .

H 6T

67 WY.

N 72

AVE.

ROUTT

PL.

SWADLEY W.

DR .

PL .

UNIO ST.

TH AVE.

AVE.

E AV

70 PL.

PL.

E AV

DR.

WY.

ST.

67TH

PL. 68

PL.

68TH

67 CT.

66TH AVE.

PL. 69

TH 69

PL. 70

PL.

71 PL.

U RB

§ ¨ ¦

68TH

PL.

H BEEC CT.

§ ¨ ¦

68TH

PL.

E. AV

69TH

DR.

PL.

AN URB WAY

_ [

71 AV.

71ST

N AU BR T. C LE CO T. C

AVE. TH

93 U V

PL.

72ND CR.

PL.

T. TC

N ST. URBA DON GOR VA N ST.

121 V U

DR.

73RD DR.

PL.

73R D

75TH

WY. AVE.

F TA

AVE.

72ND

PL.

74TH

73 . DR

73 . E AV

73 AVE. 72 PL.

74TH W.

74 DR .

DR.

DR .

74 PL.

74 WY.

R BO TA T. S

W. 75TH AVE.

74 TH

t u

73 PL.

COOR

74 AVE.

. PL

CR.

74TH PL.

DEV INNEY

74 WAY

74 PL.

PROJECT NAME: Yankee Doodle Master Plan ‐ Phase I PROJECT LOCATION: Yankee Doodle drainage from Indiana to Miller at 64th (Ralston) DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Public Works / engineering SOURCES

Existing

2013

§98‐101 $

2014 0

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022 0

TOTAL 0

Other City $

212,180

273,182

281,377

289,819

238,810

245,975

$1,541,343

Restricted City $

External $

212,180

273,182

281,377

289,819

238,810

245,975

$1,541,343

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

TBD $ Total $

USES

2013

2014

2021

2022

TOTAL

Prelim Costs

10,609

14,069

11,941

$36,618

Design Costs

42,436

56,275

47,762

$146,474

Const. Costs

159,135

273,182

211,033

289,819

179,108

245,975

$1,358,251

Total Proj Costs

212,180

273,182

281,377

289,819

238,810

245,975

$1,541,343

O&M Costs

TOTAL PROJECT COST: LAND/ROW ACQUISITION?:

$1,541,343 Maybe

VERACITY OF COST ESTIMATE: LEGAL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE?:

3 No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Total project improvements include detention pond at Yankee Doodle Park, bank stabilization, a detention pond at Arvada West High

School, outfall installation, and road crossings. Phase I includes improvements at Yankee Doodle Park, bank stabilization and channel improvement to prevent flooding of 10675 Ralston Road. Phase II will begin when UDFCD and or funds bonding are available. NEEDS INTENDED TO FILL:

This project will reduce flooding potential and improve system reliability.

EXPLANATION OF NON §98‐101 Stormwater Utility and UDFCD funds SOURCES (if any):

OTHER RELEVANT PROJECT This is an Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Master plan project. In order to get into the UDFCD funding queue, the City needs INFORMATION: to show we have funding. However, without UDFCD participation, we can still make progress. CONTINGENCIES: Project timing is subject to change based on need and constantly reevaluated prioritizations. 205

UNFUNDED PROJECTS UNFUNDED PROJECTS

unfunded project list TRANSPORATION Utility Undergrounding Guardrails W. 64th Ave. ‐ McIntyre Pkwy to McIntyre St.; North Side Completion W. 72nd Ave. Spot Widening Arvada Center Sidewalk W. 72nd Ave. Improvements ‐ Kipling St. to Simms St. W. 72nd Ave. Improvements ‐ Simms St. to Indiana St. W. 72nd Ave. Improvements ‐ Indiana St. to McIntyre St. Alkire St. ‐ W. 86th Pkwy to W. 88th Ave. Eldridge Street ‐ W. 64th Ave. to Ralston Creek Indiana Street / UP Bridge Replacement Indiana Street Widening ‐W. 64th Ave. to W. 86th Pkwy Kendrick Dr. Extension ‐ W. 64th Ave. to Indiana St. Quaker St. Improvements ‐ W. 72nd Ave. to Leyden Road W. 80th Ave. Improvements ‐ Kipling St. to Simms St. W. 80th Ave. Improvements ‐ Simms St. to Alkire St. Ward Rd Extension ‐ Double E Ranch Frontage Ward Road Improvements ‐ W. 64th Ave. to W. 72nd Ave. Ward Rd. Extension ‐ W. 72nd Ave. to W. 86th Pkwy. 4‐lane section Ward Road Extension ‐ W. 72nd Ave to W. 80th Ave. (Two Lane Section) W. 80th Avenue UP Railroad Grade Separation W. 72nd Ave. UP Railroad Grade Separation Simms St. Improvements ‐ W. 64th Ave. to W. 72nd Ave. Simms St. Improvements ‐ W. 72nd Ave. to W. 86th Pkwy Alkire St. Improvements ‐ W. 80th Ave. to W. 86th Pkwy. Bicycle / Pedestrian Overpass at Alkire St. and Union Pacific Railroad Bike Master Plan ‐ Build Out (w/o) bridges) Bike Master Plan ‐ Ped Bridges/Underpasses Ralston Rd Sidewalks Retrofit Projects per TOD Bike/Ped Access Plan Traffic Calming Ralston Road Corridor Long Term Plan Automated Traffic Count Program

$340,535,000 $750,000 $1,000,000 $450,000 $350,000 $50,000 $16,000,000 $28,000,000 $6,000,000 $700,000 $1,000,000 $8,000,000 $45,000,000 $9,300,000 $13,100,000 $13,100,000 $13,100,000 $1,000,000 $24,500,000 $36,600,000 $15,000,000 $8,100,000 $9,520,000 $4,000,000 $10,000,000 $12,000,000 $3,360,000 $8,800,000 $8,730,000 $2,860,000 $10,080,000 $750,000 $16,200,000 $750,000 207

unfunded project list Signal Replacement Fiber Backbone Street Lights Pole Replacement ‐ Wood Poles Street Light Pole Replacement ‐ Ornamental Poles OT Parking Kiosk Installment FACILITIES Arvada Center 69th Ave. Entry Drive Central Stores Relocation / Records Archival Storage City Hall Space Needs Study PARKS Broad Lake Park and Trails Saddlebrook Park Completion Quaker Acres Park Expansion Spring Mesa Trail Extensions Arvada Tennis Center Completion Leyden Lake Open Space and Trails Indiana Equestrian Center Completion Jack B. Tomlinson Park Renovation Leyden Creek Trail Pioneer Park Long Lake Regional Park Lake Arbor Park Kipling Street Entrance Signage The Hills at Standley Lake Park Lutz Sports Complex Double E Park/ Ph2 Gibbs West Community Park Churches Ranch National Historic District Gold Strike Park Historic Gardens at McIlvoy Park Moore Brothers Farm and Agricultural Center Hyatt Lake Park Preserve Majestic View Community Park and Nature Center Arvada Blunn Reservoir

$7,800,000 $500,000 $200,000 $585,000 $3,300,000 $3,620,000 $1,020,000 $2,500,000 $100,000 $73,014,231 $613,171 $535,000 $450,000 $800,000 $2,875,000 $3,340,000 $785,000 $540,000 $1,000,000 $355,000 $4,950,000 $3,325,000 $420,000 $725,000 $3,250,000 $325,000 $28,912,000 $1,710,000 $1,725,060 $70,000 $1,525,000 $3,620,000 $7,927,000 $1,075,000 208

unfunded project list Welton Reservoir Median Renovation/Completion project HOSPITALITY Outdoor Concessions Building Additions Delivery Trucks Sound System Replacement [2022] Smart Lighting Guest Services Center Replacement of Ballroom Doors Electronic Marquees Ballroom Enhancements TLC Chair Replacement ARVADA CENTER Arvada Center Amphitheater Roof and Seating Arvada Center Amphitheater Renovation Arvada Center Amphitheater Plaza Renovation Arvada Center Main Stage and Blackbox Theater Renovations Arvada Center Education Classroom Renovation and Upgrades Arvada Center Interior Lighting Renovation and Improvements Arvada Center Basement Finish Arvada Center Gathering Area and Cafe Arvada Center VIP Space Arvada Center On‐site Storage Arvada Center Main Stage Theater Expansion Arvada Center Black Box Theater Acoustics Arvada Center Wayfinding Exterior Signage Arvada Center Display of Outdoor Art Pathway Arvada Center Ceramics Expansion and Remodel Arvada Center Galley Areas Remodel Arvada Center Patron additional Bay Parking

$662,000 $1,500,000 $2,245,000 $170,000 $900,000 $80,000 $350,000 $350,000 $100,000 $40,000 $100,000 $55,000 $100,000 $7,987,100 $3,300,000 $565,000 $95,000 $64,000 $130,000 $205,000 $230,000 $75,000 $25,000 $120,000 $2,500,000 $75,000 $45,000 $100,000 $171,100 $185,000 $102,000

TOTAL

$427,401,331 209