PORTFOLIO

CHUL PARK

URBAN PLANNING + DESIGN + GIS PORTFOLIO

+65 93578613 chpark4087@gmail.com

INNOVATION DISTRICT NEW TASHKENT, UZBEKISTAN

Professional rendering developed by CGI company and my involvement was Sketchup base, camera angle, design mood and coordination.

HEALTH DISTRICT NEW TASHKENT, UZBEKISTAN

Professional rendering developed by CGI company and my involvement was Sketchup base, camera angle, design mood and coordination.

NEW TASHKENT, UZBEKISTAN

Professional rendering developed by CGI company and my involvement was Sketchup base, camera angle, design mood and coordination.

ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT NEW TASHKENT, UZBEKISTAN

Professional rendering developed by CGI company and my involvement was Sketchup base, camera angle, design mood and coordination.

DIGITAL NEW TASHKENT, UZBEKISTAN

STREETSCAPE IN NEW TASHKENT, UZBEKISTAN

MARINA SPORTS CITY, PAKISTAN

ACTVITY GENERATING E-WAY MARINA SPORTS CITY, PAKISTAN

In house aerial rendering developed from Sketchup and Vray illlustrating an urban simulation.

SINGAPORE - EXPLORATION OF AVAILABLE GIS LAYERS

Masterplan 2019 and its land use

Agriculture

Hotel

Beach

Open Space

Business 1

Park

Business 2

Place of Worship

Business Park

Port/Airport

Cemetery

Reserve Site

Civic and Community

Residential

Commercial

Residential/Institution

Commercial / Instiution

Residential with Commercial

Commercial & Residential

Road

Educational Institution

Special Use

Health & Medical Care

Waterbody

SINGAPORE - EXPLORATION OF AVAILABLE GIS LAYERS

Prelimanry observation of masterplan19 plot ratio distirbution in relation to 400m buffer around the masterplan MRT and LRT stations.

Masterplan Plot Ratio 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5<

SINGAPORE - EXPLORATION OF AVAILABLE GIS LAYERS Box Plot and Scatter Plot showing the distribution of land are in HA for dfferent land use in MP 19. Comparing the two different plot styles help layman with minimal statistics understanding to see the distribution.

SINGAPORE - EXPLORATION OF AVAILABLE GIS LAYERS 5.3

* Median Value

2.0 1.8 1.5

1.2

0.7 0.5 0.1

0.1

Box Plot of all the land use in MP19 as a benchmark study for future planning works

0.8 0.4

0.4 0.01

0.03

0.02

0.1

19.2

1.7

1.5

0.7 0.1

0.9

0.9 0.3

0.4

0.4 0.2

0.2 0.03

0.01

0.02

0.5

0.1

SINGAPORE - EXPLORATION OF AVAILABLE GIS LAYERS

1.5 °C Increase

2.0 °C Increase

2.9 m Global Sea Level Rise

4.7 m Global Sea Level Rise

Projected sea level rise scenarios utilizing the SRTM topo information based on the sea level scenario from Climate Central.

3.0 °C Increase

4.0 °C Increase

6.4 m Global Sea Level Rise

10.8m Global Sea Level Rise

Future at risk area from sea level rise by 2100

SINGAPORE - LOGISTICS PARK

There are a few logistics park estates in Singapore that are spread out across the island. The land area for these Logistic Parks ranges from 22AC (9HA) to 90 AC(37HA). Clementi West Logispark and Changi International Logispark are similar in size to the project site.

CLEMENTI WEST LOGISPARK- 38 AC (15 HA)

CHANGI INTERNATIONAL LOGISPARK (SOUTH) - 32 AC (13 HA)

TOPOGRAPHIC ANALYSES Topographic Elevation Map For A Site In Lahore,Pakistan

Topographic Slope Analysis Map For A Site In Lahore,Pakistan

Topographic Elevation Map For A Site In Sohar,Oman

Topographic Slope Anlysis Map For A Site In Sohar ,Oman

Topographic Elevation Map For A Site In Lahore,Pakistan

Topographic Elevation Map A Site In Lahore,Pakistan

Topographic Elevation Map For A Site In Ashanti,Ghana

Topographic Elevation Map A Site In Ashanti , Ghana

RENDERING OF LOGISTIC PARK IN PAKISTAN

In house aerial rendering developed from Sketchup and Vray illlustrating an urban simulation of the logisitc park in Lahore, Pakistan.

In house aerial rendering developed from Sketchup and Vray illlustrating an urban simulation of the logisitc park in Lahore, Pakistan.

QUANGTRI SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE

QUANGTRI SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE

ALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS

Existing Land Use Plan

Committed Projects

Existing Settlements

Waterlogged Land

Sea Level Rise Scenarios

Slope Analysis

Elevation

The following layers were taken into consideration during the master plan review process for a sustainable and resilient development..

QUANGTRI SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE PROPOSED PROPOSED STORMWATER STORMWATER AND AND DRAINAGE DRAINAGE STRATEGY STRATEGY

Urban Urban Edge Edge

Stormwater Stormwater collection collection in in Buildings Buildings

Naturalized Naturalized Edge Edge

Canal Canal Along Along Road Road Reserve Reserve

Section Section Profile Profile Not Not to Scale/ to Scale/ Based Based on open on open source source information information

TOURISM TOURISM

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL

HI-TECH HI-TECH AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURE

INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL

PARK PARK AND AND OPEN OPEN SPACE SPACE

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL

TOURISM TOURISM

SEASEA

QUANGTRI SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE

DALIAN DIAMOND BAY - SUSTAINABLE SYSTEM INTEGRATION MODEL

GIS analysis to assess the efficacy of the different land use plan options to determine the one with highest scoring.

DALIAN DIAMOND BAY - SUSTAINABLE SYSTEM INTEGRATION MODEL

DALIAN DIAMOND BAY - Sustainable System Integration Model GIS analysis breakdown in more detail for the original masterplan

N1

N2

PEDESTRIAN NETWORK

S1

G1

BICYCLE NETWORK

S2

MIXED USE PROPORTION

PUBLIC FACILITY ACCESSIBILITY

G2

WATERFRONT UTILIZATION

T1

RESIDENTIAL TRANSIT ACCESSIBILITY

G3

PARK ACCESSIBILITY

T2

PARK CONNECTIVITY

T3

WORKPLACE TRANSIT ACCESSIBILITY

TOD LAND USE TYPES

DALIAN DIAMOND BAY - Sustainable System Integration Model GIS analysis breakdown in more detail for the proposed option 2.

N1

N2

PEDESTRIAN NETWORK

S1

G1

BICYCLE NETWORK

S2

MIXED USE PROPORTION

PUBLIC FACILITY ACCESSIBILITY

G2

WATERFRONT UTILIZATION

T1

RESIDENTIAL TRANSIT ACCESSIBILITY

G3

PARK ACCESSIBILITY

T2

PARK CONNECTIVITY

T3

WORKPLACE TRANSIT ACCESSIBILITY

TOD LAND USE TYPES

DALIAN DIAMOND BAY - DESIGN STRATEGY

GREEN AXIS

GR

EE

N AX

GREE IS

Diagram illustrates some of the major projects along the green axis.

N

AX IS

DALIAN DIAMOND BAY- URBAN FORM STRATEGY

The height of the Dahua area gradually increase from the waterfront to inland. This maximizes the views all the buildings, and creates a layered skyline.

DALIAN DIAMOND BAY - VIBRANT WATERFRONT

To create a reputable waterfront the diagram proposes a variety of waterfront projects along the coastline of Dahua area.

DALIAN DIAMOND BAY- TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT

The dense transit oriented development around the MRT and water transportation promotes the use of public transit and minizes the travel of private vehicles.

EXPLORATION OF NETWORK ANALYST LibraryRoute 1 - in default library order with no optimization

LibraryRoute 2 - order optimize without start and end point

LibraryRoute 3 - library order in total optimization in distance

LibraryRoute 1 - route with restrictions applied

Service Area - library service area in one mile buffer

Closest Facility - closest library to each schools

Atlanta DRUNKEN MARTA Overview:

Methodology:

Our idea is to create a public transit network that will serve the premier nightlife and high density residential areas of Atlanta.

First, we identified the most popular bars and restaurants within the Atlanta city boundaries according to TripAdvisor suggestions. Then, using ARC population density data and college locations, we mapped residential hotspots where service demand would be high. We used geospatial analysis to create a service buffer of one quarter and one half mile around both origin and destination points. These were overlayed with existing transit routes and used to pinpoint potential stop locations for the proposed routes. Using network analysis functionality in GIS, we determined the optimal routes to safely and efficiently connect bar patrons to popular living destinations, in a way that integrates with existing public transportation options.

This resulted in two bus routes, one loop in central Atlanta, and a line servicing north Atlanta and Buckhead residents.

U

S

U B E R , TAX I

Bar and Restaurants

Residential

Quarter and half mile buffer

Existing Transit Service

Potential bus stops

Network analysis

Residential service area

Conceptual diagram:

B

Create road network

G

O

O

Bar and restaurant service area

Bar map

Restaurant map

Residential map

We geocoded the top 20 Atlanta nightlife destinations to locate these stops in a point layer.

Map above shows geolocated locations of top 20 Atlanta restaurants.

This map demarcates residential hot spots based on population density and college locations in Atlanta. These exist primarily in Midtown, Downtown, Buckhead, and Virginia Highlands.

D

NOT_CHEAP

This map shows the residential service areas identified by geospatial analysis. Buffers of one quarter mile and one half mile were identified for location of service stops.

The popular bars and restaurants that were identified in the previous step using TripAdvisor rakings were then given a service buffer of one quarter and one half mile.

DILMUNIA ISLAND LAND USE

Managed and modified the masterplan for Dilmunia Island. Also produced Design Control Guidelines for the plots for selling purposes.

DILMUNIA ISLAND - URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINE Plot Layout

Plot Plan

Schedule 1

HD MIX 16

Schedule 2

HD MIX 15

HD MIX 15 45.1

EL* + m CD

HD MIX 05

HD WELN 01

HD MIX 05

PARCEL AREA

HD MIX 16 Height: 7 Storey FAR 2.2

1,522.3 sqm PLOT REQUIREMENTS

NET FLOOR AREA RATIO (NET FAR) MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE GFA

38.4 Development Control Guidelines

MIXED USE PLOT DEFINITION

HD MIX 16 Plot Area: 1522.3 sqm

Dilmunia Health Island

ROW

LAND USE

20m

29.3

20m R

HD MIX 16

1 met er setb ack

OW

Keyplan

2.2 3,349.1 sqm

HD MIX 06

SITE COVERAGE

HD MIX 06

Max. Podium Footprint Maximum Tower Footprint

Note on Public Easement: 1. No boundary walls shall be allowed within public easements.

1. The setbacks shown in the Schedule 1 (Plot Layout) diagram represent setbacks for Podium ONLY. These are minimum setbacks and higher setbacks to allow fire turck access around the building are encouraged.

Wellness and Health, Medical Clinics

45.1

HD MIX 07

3. The setbacks are inclusive of public easements.

Legend

All dimensions are in meters

Setback line

Adjacent Plots

Indicative Open Space

Infrastructure Easement

* Note on Entry Level (EL):

5

10

Maximum Total building storeys above Ground (including Podium)

7 storeys total

Number of Podium Storeys

2 storeys

Maximum Overall Building Height (From entry level)

+28.9 m

PLOT ENTRY LEVEL

Public Easement

0

100% of Sellable GFA

BUILDING HEIGHT

HD MIX 17

2. In case of Basement construction, the setback for the basement shall be minimum of 2m from all hte plot boundaries. Except when the podium setback is 0m, then the basement setback shall be 0m.

Parcel

60%

DETAIL LAND-USE

Note on Setbacks:

Plot Boundary

90% of Plot Area

Max. Basement Footprint

20

Entry Level (EL)

+ m CD

1. The Plot Entry Level (EL) is stated as the nearest road centerline elevation and is approximate. Actual conditions to be verified on site by the developer.

HD MIX 17 HD MIX 07

2. The developer shall raise the level of the plot to be at least +250 mm higher than the existing plot entry level so as to avoid flooding of the plot.

Legend Plot Boundary

Low Density Residential

Vehicular Access

Adjacent Plots

Indicative Open Space

Infrastructure Easement

Public Easement

0

5

10

20

Plot Guidance

Plot Guidance

Schedule 3

Schedule 3 All roof structures shall not exceed maximum permissible building height

Maximum building height shall comply with the stipulations in the Schedule 2 table

Balconies to be located within recommended tower setback line

Development Control Guidelines

Dilmunia Health Island

Refer to Schedule 1 for mandatory minimum side setback requirement

“Jewel Box” facade feature allowed within Front Setback Zone

Height of “Jewel Box” Facade Feature shall not exceed the maximum permissible height of podium

Ma

in E

ntr

Ma

in E

yR oad

Length of “Jewel Box” Facade Feature shall not be more than 30% of the total length of the building’s front facade

Figure 5 - Building Envelope Diagram (indicative Example Only) Page 12 February 2018

Roof garden for podium encouraged.

Parking shall not be permitted on podium rooftop

ntr

yR oad

Above-ground parking to be covered and/or screened if visible from street

Residential or Commercial use allowed at podium street frontage Refer to Schedule 1 for mandatory minimum front setback requirement

Figure 6 - Example of development within Building Envelope. (indicative example only.)

Page 13 February 2018

M3M AEORPOLIS- CONCEPT DIAGRAM

Live

Live

Live Health

Socialize

Live

Play

Entertainment Learn Work

Shopping

F&B

Work

F&B

PROPOSED WORKS

M3M AEROPOLIS- AERIAL RENDERING

Largest iconic Smart City in the National Capital Region

Professional rendering developed by CGI company and my involvement was Sketchup base, camera angle, design mood and coordination.

M3M AEORPOLIS- EYE LEVEL RENDERING

Professional rendering developed by CGI company and my involvement was Sketchup base, camera angle, design mood and coordination.

M3M AEROPOLIS- AERIAL RENDERING

Professional rendering developed by CGI company and my involvement was Sketchup base, camera angle, design mood and coordination.

ASPEN CIVIC MASTERPLAN - CONTEXT Aspen Mountain

Maroon Creek Castle Creek

Roaring Fork River Highway 82

City Core Highway 82

MAIN S

T

Independence Pass Red Mountain Glenwood Springs

2014

2015

2017

Site Options

Zupancis Aspen Police Department

New building

CONCEPT

SCHEMATIC

SUITABILITY STUDY AND ANALYSIS

RECOMMEND SITE OPTIONS TO CITY COUNCIL Aspen City Offices

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS

CONSTRUCTION

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS

CONSTRUCTION

2017

Armory

INVENTORY OF CITY OWNED PROPERTIES

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

1. Existing

Galena

2. New city offices Armory + Galena

3. Existing + New

CONCEPT

Above map shows the context of city of Aspen and the diagram below shows the planning work flow for the civic office relocation project for the city of Aspen.

SCHEMATIC

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

ASPEN CIVIC MASTERPLAN - CURRENT FACILITIES 48% OF TOTAL SQFT PROPERTY LEASED

City Core Sites ST N

St

St

t

m

arch

isch

St

ve

Mon

3rd S t 2nd St 1st S t

Ha lla

n St

AI

Aspe

M

Garm

t

4th S

sA

in

ta Aspen Moun

5th S

in

Galena Plaza (ACRA) Rio Grande Building Mill Street Lot and Rio Grande Pl Mountain Rescue Property Armory (City Hall) Wheeler Opera House Zupancis Recycle Lot Electric Puppy Smith Aspen Parks Department Streets Department Ice Garden Ice Rink Lift 1A Property Yellow Brick Building Aspen Rec Center Aspen Golf and Nordic Center Truscott Housing Department City Hall Annex Aspen Police Department Old Power House Police Department Leased

Gal

ena

Hun Spri

ter S

pk

PROPERTY OWNED

St

Ho

52% OF TOTAL SQFT

t

ng S

t

Map showing existing city office facilities in Aspen. The offices are currently dispersed, resulting in operational inefficiency, and poor customer service.

NM

ill St

Roarin

r g Fork Rive

ASPEN CIVIC MASTERPLAN - PUBLIC OUTREACH

Design Criteria 1

Design Criteria 2

What level of building sustainability do you see as appropriate?

To implement a responsible building, how far into the future should the relocation solution be planned for?

Average Building

International Green Building Code/ City of Aspen Building Code

US Green Building Council’s LEED Gold Rating

World Class Model of Sustainable

What architectural character is most appropriate for these facilities?

Traditional Building Style

Forward-looking architecture style

“Aspen” office building Style

Important presence calling attention to a civic place

Infill to existing community buildings

Innovative and leading edge style

Community

Include a small public low key amenity space

30 Years

40 Years

50 Years

No community gathering space

Limited community interaction to facilitate key services

Interior space to facilitate greater police and community interaction

What level of community meeting space do you see as appropriate for the City Service Facility?

Significant landmark building appropriate to their function

Should public outdoor spaces be included?

No public outdoor space Only connections

20 Years

What level of community interaction do you see as appropriate for the Police Facility?

What level of architectural presence should the building create?

Humble and not calling attention to itself

10 Years

No community gathering space

Limited use for community gathering (Lobby)

Interior community meeting space

How interested are you in including a leasable space for an affordable restaurant?

Create a high level of public gathering and amenity space

Stakeholders

Collecting stakeholder and community input was vital in ensuring that the vision for the future facilities was aligned with community values.

Not at all interested these are not compatible uses

Interested enough to consider more information

Very interested - this is important to the community

ASPEN CIVIC MASTERPLAN - COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS COUNTY OFFICES

COURTHOUSE

EXISTING CITY HALL

RIO GRANDE BUILDING

PITKIN COUNTY LIBRARY

Aspen Mountain

CITY MARKET

GONDOLA

RC HS

PROPOSED CITY OFFICES PROPOSED POLICE STATION

RIO GRANDE PARK

The recommended development sites created the potential for a connected civic core, improving way finding, visibility of city services and customer service.

T

CIVIC CAMPUS

MAIN ST

Roaring Fork River

NA

PEDESTRIAN MALL

WAGNER PARK MO

ST

GALENA ST

ING

HUNTER ST

SPR

DOWNTOWN

RUBEY PARK

Bird’s eye view showing the vision of the road after reducing the automobile lanes and creating activation spaces.

SE PRIV TB A AC T E K

K W AL DE

BI

SI

PA BU INT FF ED ER

10’-22’

10’ TI ST VA RE TI E T O N

6’

AC

5.5’

KE

11’ IV

1.5’

DR

6’

AC

TI ST VA RE TI E T O N

K W AL DE SI

SE PRIV TB A AC T E K

10’

BI KE PA I BU NT FF ED ER

5’-11’

3’-22’

E

ASPEN MOBILITY LAB - BIRD’S EYE VIEW SECTION

WECYCLE INFORMATION BOOTH RIDE SHARE PICK UP/DROP OFF VALET

SEATING DINING

SEATING

DINING

SEATING

DINING MOTORCYCLE PARKING

SE PRIV TB A AC T E K

K W AL

BI

DE

PA BU INT FF ED ER

SI

E

10’-22’

10’ TI ST VA RE TI E T O N

6’ KE

5.5’

AC

AC

Bird’s eye view showing the types of individual activation spaces.

11’ IV

1.5’

DR

6’

BI KE PA I BU NT FF ED ER

10’ TI ST VA RE TI E T O N

DE

W AL

K

5’-11’

SI

SE PRIV TB A AC T E K

3’-22’

BICYCLE RACK