Jun Wei Chng (Chris), Portfolio 2022

PORTFOLIO

Jun Wei Chng (Chris)

Masters of Architecture & Bachelor of Design University of Melbourne

ABOUT ME As a Masters of Architecture graduate in the University of Melbourne, I have always had a passion for design. My interest in architecture and design started when I was a youth. Always wondering how buildings work and are designed. Especially while traveling, different styles of architecture that derive from different regions of the world has always fascinated my interest. Not just making something aesthetically pleasing but also functional and practical at the same time.

My particular interest in architecture derives in sustainable design.

Having to always included sustainable design options in parts of my projects. I have always had a passion towards a clean environment as we need to provide back towards the current environment that allows for technologies and other opportunities to arise. By taking a number of environmental sustainability electives in the bachelors and master’s degree in order to learn more about the impact that design could have towards our environment. Wishing that the future could be better than the current with the help of Architecture and Design.

The University of Melbourne course in Design helped me understand the real life implications of a project and allowed me to transfer those skills to the real world. I hope my vision and design thinking are conveyed through this portfolio, that I hope you very much enjoy.

E D U C AT I O N POST GRADUATE

July 2020 - July 2022

Master of Architecture, University of Melbourne Completed Master’s Degree (Avg. 76.67%) Focused on Environmental Sustainability and Urban Planning in Design Elective choices.

UNDER GRADUATE JUN WEI CHNG (CHRIS)

August 2017 - July 2020

Bachelor of Design, University of Melbourne Completed Bachelor’s Degree with a Specialisation in Environmental Sustainability (Avg. 71.7%)

COLLEGE

July 2016 - July 2017

Trinity College Foundation Studies, The Univeristy of Melbourne Completed Foundation Studies (Avg. 82%) English Language, English Literature, History of Ideas, Environment and Development, Economics and Mathematics.

Secondary School

January 2012 - June 2016

The International School of Penang (Uplands), Malaysia Completed IGCSE (Avg. 80%) English Language, English Literature, Mathematics, Economics, Geography, Art, Coordinated Science, & Malay Language.

PERSONAL INFO Melbourne, Australia Penang, Malaysia jwchris99@gmail.com +61 404 498 398

WORK EXPERIENCE BKC Construction Firm

December 2019 - Febuary 2020

In Penang, Malaysia Worked as an intern along side the Project Manager. Helping out as an CAD drafter. Assisting in S.P.Setia, Amansara South, King Fisher Bridge.

Design & Environment Student Society LANGUAGES English Mandarin

March 2018 - November 2019

Bachelor of Design, University of Melbourne A general committee member. Helped out with events that were held during the University’s semester.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Bahasa Melayu

POST GRADUATE EXHIBITIONS (MSDx) SKILLS Rhinoceros AutoCAD Revit Photoshop Indesign Illustrator QGIS V-Ray

July 2020 - December 2021

Masters of Architecture, University of Melbourne Studio 13: Embody Studio 32: Basin Thesis Studio 03: DIG

UNDER GRADUATE EXHIBITIONS (MSDx)

August 2017 - July 2020

Bachelor of Design, University of Melbourne Design Studio Beta Digital Design Foundations of Design

REFERENCES Virginia Mannering (Thesis Tutor)

Yiteng Chong (Tutor)

PhD candidate (University of Melbourne) Thesis Studio Tutor +61 407 262 086 virginia.mannering@unimelb.edu.au

Graduate of Architecture Kyriacou Architects +61 450 290 219 yiteng19@gmail.com

Contents

01

page 6-25

Re-imagining Weeds Masters Thesis Studio

Depicting the near future after climate change with the help of a Weeds Centre & a Seed Bank.

02

page 26-35

Re-establishing Connections

03

Masters Studio

The Basin’s Cultural Art Centre. page 36-45

Re-lux Bath Masters Studio

Embodying the practice of bathing in a Luxury Bathhouse.

04

page 46-55

CMG Tower Masters Construction Elective

Understanding the structural systems of a High-rise Tower.

01 Re-imagining Weeds Masters Thesis Studio, Thesis Studio 03: DIG Thesis Statement According to Goho, the rising temperature over the next 50 years will affect different native vegetation negatively and, the sole survivor in our ecosystem would be weeds.1 During the past 200 years of colonial intervention, the changes in the Australian landscapes and ecology has been destroyed and tarnished.2 As an example, the Royal Botanic Gardens in Melbourne, removed and relocated native Australian plants as foreign exotic species were taking over the ecosystem.3 How do humans plan on returning to nature or the past? A way to repair the current landscape and ecology. This thesis argues that the urban landscape can’t be fully repaired, however, movements to heal the current landscape can be done.

As the urban landscape currently is a layering on top the of the chaos caused by the past, imitating the ‘perfect’ version of a human made landscape.4 Therefore, weeds will be the basis of thriving in the current landscape. Even though they are commonly viewed as unwanted, maligned, and murderous, they nonetheless survive this harsh landscape and thrive in any environment.5 The hybridised landscape will accommodate the highly romanticized Seed Bank and a Weeds Centre. The Weed Centre will be located on 318 St Kilda Road, and the Seed Bank will be placed along the axis of The Shrine of Remembrance. The seed bank will act as a monument to the past. However, in the future, the roles of importance and hierarchy will be reversed as the weed centre will be the hopes in our reality.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Alexandra Goho, “ANTICIPATING CLIMATE CHANGE,” Landscape Architecture 94, no. 12 (2004): 48.

P. M. Kloot, “Plant introductions to South Australia prior to 1840,” Journal of the Adelaide Botanic Garden (1985): 217.

“Royal Botanic Gardens, MELBOURNE,” Historic Gardens Review, no. 16 (2006): 37. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/44791259.

Matthew Gandy, “Urban nature and the ecological imaginary.” In In the nature of cities, Routledge, 2006, 69.

Robert Gibson, “Weeds,” Alternative Journals 40, no. 4 (2014): 64.

1.1

Seed Bank Exterior Perspective

7

//

Re-imagining Weeds

8 // Re-imagining Weeds

R e g e nerat i on Int erv ent i on In the next 50-100 years, the vice regal colonial landscape that was created will be tarnished by the everlasting climate change. The colonial intervention that happened over the past 200 years with the help of climate change allowed the native landscape to tarnish. The façade of the current landscape is a cover up for the chaos and problems that happened beneath and before. The imagined landscape of 2072 will slowly heal the current landscape and allow for interventions to work towards a better and healthier environment. Thus, transformation of a hybrid/cyborg landscape will actively give back to the harsh environment to slowly repair its current state that humans have created. And using weeds as a catalyst that starts this process of renewal.

The word “weed” is something that is usually seen to have a negative connotation. Why is it viewed as a negative ideal? This is because humans have placed this ideology and construct upon themselves to automatically think that it is a problem. However, what if the only vegetation that survives climate change were weeds? Would we still view weeds as something that is a pest or a problem? Or should we embrace it and make use of it to further heal and repair the current environment.

The Weed Centre and Seed Bank acts as an anchorage and a symbol of hope for the future. With the weed center providing aid using the surrounding weeds and the seed bank acting as a monument to honor the seeds and culture that has pass through these lands. These typologies are accompanied by the action for removing the surrounding colonial buildings like government house. It further emphasizes the symbolic act that reminds the public about the more important goal and issue, which would be, embracing the current landscape and provide aid back into the environment.

This occurs with the inclusion of new infrastructure such as the carbon capturers laid along the path connecting the buildings and giant mulchers placed at areas where needs it the most.

9 // Re-imagining Weeds

1.2

Site Composition

1.3

Concept Parti

10 // Re-imagining Weeds

An Imagined Future Landscape for 2072

L 1.4 0

Site Plan 20

50

100

150m

11 // Re-imagining Weeds

The Current Landscape of 2022

After 50 years, the green spaces will slowly deteriorate at the surrounding landscapes. Trees will fall, plants will die. Some areas of soil or land will not be fertile enough to grow anything. The pathway will be a controlled path with a clear route despite the overgrowth of weeds. However, weeds will still take over the pathway but in a smaller scale compared to the rest of the greenery beside it.

In terms of the connection towards government house, demolishing Government House in the future allows for a symbolic meaning for the transition of hope. The government house site used to be an important meeting place and camping ground for the local Aboriginal People.

An abandonment and demolition would mean that we are going back towards the natives’ way of treating and accommodating to the current landscape. Whilst commemorating the past before colonialism. The materials and rubble that we get from government house will be used and implemented in the path.

12 // Re-imagining Weeds 1.5

Plant Nursery for the Seed Bank

13 // Re-imagining Weeds

Seed Bank The heavily romanticised seed bank is placed along the axis of the Shrine of Remembrance.

This was done as the monumentality of the axis helps reflect the importance of the monumentality of the seed bank. However, the seed bank will remain as a monument but the levels of hierarchy will shift towards the weed centre.

The seed bank will act as an a research and educational building that provides knowledge and the past to the visitors. With exhibitions portraying the journey of seeds to the culture behind cultivating crops.

This will further emphasise the importance of history and even though the worst may come from it but humans learn through it.

14 // Re-imagining Weeds

t kou Loo

ion

ibit

Exh

ce

Spa

Staff Resti

ng Room

Event Space

Informatio n Area

Rooftop Terrace

Offices

Resting Ar ea

Second Floor Plan 1.6

Floor Plans of Seed Bank

1.7

Section for the Seed Bank

First Floor Plan

15 // Re-imagining Weeds

Entry

ion

ibit

Exh

e Caf

ce

Spa

Staff Resti

ng Room

Changing Room Plant Nu

rsery

Entry

Seed Bank

Lab

Cold Lab

Ground Floor Plan

Basement Floor Plan

16 // Re-imagining Weeds 1.8

Looking Out Towards Government House

17 // Re-imagining Weeds

1.9

Plaster Cast Physical Model of Seed Bank

18 // Re-imagining Weeds 1.10

Weed Centre Exterior View

19 // Re-imagining Weeds

Weeds Centre The weeds centre will accommodate different types of programs that will help the surrounding community and environment to the fullest.

Visitors could bring their source of weeds and turn it to compost and even building materials for future construction uses.

The weeds centre provides a open and public workshop that teaches the public about the uses of weeds in the new environment. Furthermore, providing a safe space and environmentally friendly space for processing weeds and selling as commercial goods.

The building material of the weeds centre are weed aggregate and rammed earth. Areas where heavy machinery and high heating occurs, rammed earth will be used as the thermal properties and structural properties help with accommodating those needs.

20 // Re-imagining Weeds

Wood Working Area op

sh ork lic W

Pub e rag

om e Ro

Sto

chin

Ma

Staff Resting Room

Entry

Staff Resting Room

Drying & Preparation Room

Preparation Room

Market Area

Lab

Collection Area

Basement Floor Plan

1.11

Floor Plans for Weeds Centre

1.12

Sections for Weeds Centre

Compost Workshop Entry

Entry

Ground Floor Plan

21 //

Staff Resting Room

Re-imagining Weeds

ftop Roo ace Terr

ftop Roo ace Terr

VOID

Event Space

Control Room

VOID

Event Space

Offices

First Floor Plan

Second Floor Plan

22

//

Re-imagining Weeds

Weed Aggregate

1.13

23 // Re-imagining Weeds

Weed Aggregate 3 different types of ratios were tested out for the different types of aggregate. The casting experiment allowed us to understand the density of the brick is lowered every time the amount of dried weed leaves is placed instead of plaster.

This could potentially reduce the amount of concrete needed for a building and therefore, reduce the environmental impact that the creation of concrete blocks have towards the environment.

The weeds centre will be producing these materials for the public and allow for closed system in replacing the current building’s material in the long run.

Preferably, the bricks will be pigmented with different colours rather than having a greyish patina. Therefore, complimented with the rammed earth material at other aspects of the building.

24 // Re-imagining Weeds 1.14

Courtyard View of Weeds Centre

1.15

Machine Room of Weeds Centre

25 // Re-imagining Weeds

1.16

Plaster Cast Physical Model of Weeds Centre

02 Re-establishing Connections Masters of Architecture, Studio 32: Basin

Site location: The Basin, Victoria

Isolation. Disassociation. Both of these words were the epitome of site. The emotions that was evoking were all negatives from the perception of the overall Basin community.

This newly proposed project aims to abolish this negative perception Intersection 3 had and create something new for the overall Basin community to use and enjoy. Reintegrating intersection 3 back into society by having programs that will bring people together. Furthermore, having programs that are helpful towards the overall basin community. Connecting people together by creating a cultural hub and art gallery for the public while also having a purposeful function of water collection and filtration for the Basin itself.

By creating something new, does not mean disregarding the past. Respecting the history of the site is important. Therefore, reusing existing buildings and establishing order through the existing conditions of the site.

2.1

Courtyard towards existing building

27

//

Re-establishing Connections

28 // Re-establishing Connections

The natural aspect of site interests me while exploring and analysing the existing area. Exploring the water story of the basin in relation to the topography of the land. Furthermore, I looked into the aspects of bushfire that had happened in the past. Exploring the natural occurred bushfire and the planned bushfire in the basin context.

I’ve decided to focus on intersection 3 of the basin. This intersection was a rehabilitation centre and was a boys home in the past. Thus, the site is isolated from the basin community and is often looked down on. I further explored this by looking at the history of the site and found out about the terrors and horrible events that happened.

Since the site is isolated from these busy areas of the locality, I feel that it is appropriate to have an art gallery and cultural hub in this site as it is somewhat calm and quiet compared to the other sites. Furthermore, there’s a magnificent view that looks towards the west which is a huge farmland plain that can be very beautiful and also has a view of the Dandenong ranges further down the eastern side.

29

//

Re-establishing Connections

Historical Collage

2.2

30 // Re-establishing Connections 2.3 Site Analysis Legend Topography

2.4

Water Courses

Existing Buildings

Newly Proposed Building Masterplan

Legend Existing Buildings

Newly Proposed Buildings

31 // Re-establishing Connections

2.5

Site Plan Green Roof

BO

H

fo r

Ga

lle

ry

Legend Existing Buildings

Ar t

Ga

lle

ry

Event Space

Lobby

Event Space

Ar

tG

all er

y

Courtyard

Lobby

Cafe

Courtyard

2.6

Ground Floor Plan

32 // St or ag eR oo

m

s

Re-establishing Connections

Cafe

Ki

tc h

en

Courtyard

2.7

Basement Floor Plan. Showing existing building’s interior and the newly proposed at the lower level.

2.8

Ground Floor Plan. Event Spaces, Rentable Spaces & Art Gallery.

y all er tG Ar

Re nt ab le S

pa

ce

Event Spaces

33 // Re-establishing Connections

Renovated Art Gallery

First Floor Plan. Revitalising the existing building and renovating its internals to fit a art gallery that will be ran by locals.

2.10

First Floor Plan. Art Gallery.

Ar

tG

all er

y

2.9

34 // Re-establishing Connections

2.11

Long Section A. Showing the extremities of the site in terms of levels.

2.12

Long Section B. Showing how the newly prosposed compliment each other.

2.13

Short Section A

2.14

Short Section B. Showing the new and old co-existing.

35 // Re-establishing Connections

2.15

Exhibition Space

2.16

Looking out

03 Relux Bath Masters of Architecture, Studio 13: Embody

Site location: 129-135 Elgin Street, Carlton, Victoria We are embodied beings, our body is our instrument to experience and make sense of the world.

We were to choose a physical modality and have that base to design a space using our bodily perception and experience.

I chose bathing as my modality and this was because it is part of everyone’s lives and we practice everyday. By looking into different cultures and traditions like roman, Finnish, Turkish and Japanese bathing, I’ve decided that I would like to explore more of the Finnish and Japanese bathing culture.

From this I ask, what does luxury mean for people?

For me luxury means the aspect of time stopping.

The idea of being free of time and not constrained by it. This bathhouse wants to convey that idea of luxury.

3.1

Outdoor Bath

37

//

Relux Baths

38 // Relux Bath

I started experimenting with different types of bathing techniques and it has affected me positively throughout the semester. As an example, I now tend to take cold baths in the morning to start my day off and I’ll take warm and hot baths when I feel stressed or anxious to relieve those feelings.

Bathing differently really changed my way of doing things during the semester, I felt more productive and alert throughout the days. This helped improve my work flow and having a balance between work and rest.

The bath house is located in Carlton at the corner of Elgin and Rathdowne Street. I looked into the existing context and found multiple water-based programs near the vicinity of the site. From that I’ve discovered Carlton baths, Fitzroy baths and the Melbourne city baths.

The building’s form takes shape by having multiple planes intersecting and overlapping to create a layering effect that provides shade and lighting in and outside the building. The bath house has 3 levels, a basement, ground floor and first floor.

Due to the heavy and grounded nature of water, I’ve decided to have bathing areas on the ground and basement level.

39 // Relux Bath

3.2

Modality Collage

40 //

Waterfall VOID

Relux Bath

Spa Area

Foot Spa Resting Space

3.3

First Floor Plan. Showing the massage area and resting araea of the bathhouse.

Cold Bath Dry Room

Hot Bath

Kitchen Bathing Area

BOH

Cafe Locker Room

Sauna

Lobby Break Room

Changing Rooms

Shower Room Ice Bath

3.4

Ground Floor Plan. Showing changing rooms at the East and surrounded by outdoor baths with a combination of hot and cold.

Sound Bath

Break Room

Bathing Area

Bathing Area

BOH

Ice Bath

3.5

Fire Bath

Basement Floor Plan. Showing internal baths and the inclusion of sensory baths like sound, freeze and hot baths.

41 // Relux Bath

3.6

Isometric View

3.7

Exterior View

42 // Relux Bath 3.8

Long Section. The intersection of planes creates many different sensational lighting effects that changes while time pass.

3.9

Short Section

43 // Relux Bath

3.10

Entrance to Basement Resting Area

3.11

Indoor Bath

44 // Relux Bath 3.12

Reveal and Conceal

3.13

Rain Shower

3.14

Transparent Seating

3.15

Indoor Bath

45 // Relux Bath

3.16

Transition Space

3.17

Outdoor Rain Shower

04 CMG Tower Masters of Architecture, Applied Architectural Technology (Group work)

Site location: 215 Spring Street, Melbourne, Victoria The design development of skyscrapper was done to understand the overall complex building systems. Drafting skills and conveyance in technical drawings were important in the overall delivery of the project

The strategy in designing the highrise was to be as efficient as possible while design the building’s core. By having an efficiently placed core, it allows for creating efficient spaces, washrooms and storage rooms are placed within the core creating purposeful spaces between the hotel lifts on unserviced floors.

Regarding the position to the street, the tower is set close to Spring street with a setback of 5 meters. This design choice was due to two main factors. One factor was to not overshadow any of the buildings ajacent on the western facade. The tower sets back 20 meters from any adjacent building.

The second factor is for direct views into Parliament Gardens and even to Fitzroy Gardens.

4.1

Group members: Martin Trivieri, Gregory Wang & Jun Wei Chng (Chris) Individual work will be stated.

Corner Perspective

47

//

CMG Tower

48 // CMG Tower LIT

TL

EB O

UR

KE

ST

R SP

IN

G

ST

EXTRUSION

CORE

CHAMFER + ACCESS

STEPPED DESIGN

Maximise potential area covered on site.

Development of Core

To soften the edge of the tower corners that look out onto green areas and to reduce the wind load. Porte Cochère for Hotel access on Little Bourke St

Provide a larger setback against Little Bourke Palace

Concept Diagram

2 A1.1 View from South East

LITTLE BOURKE PL

T LS ON S

5m SETBACK

BE

T

IA PARL

14m SETBACK

S

RDEN

T GA

MEN

PORT COCHERE

RT AS

HO

14m SETBACK

AL

NIC

EXHIBITION ST

9m SETBACK

SPRING ST

LONSDALE ST

LITTLE BOURKE ST

N 0m

10m

20m

30m

40m

50m

Site Plan

1 A1.1 1:750 @ A1

MARTIN TRIVIERI JUN WEI CHNG GREGORY WANG

Group work

1065985 940445 1129812

SITE:

TUTORIAL GROUP

TUTOR

PAGE

SPRING STREET

01

MELISSA MALIK

A 1.1

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

A1.3

6000

6000

6000

4

6

3

6000 6000

7

49

6000 6000

1

5

1

8

A1.3

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

M 6000

N 6000

6000

7

6000

6000

6000

6000

J

I

H

G

6000

6000

K 6000

L 6000

M 6000

N 6000

6

A1.3

7 2

1

5

6 4 5

1

11 FLOORS TOTAL SKY UA: 12502.05m2 FLOOR TO FLOOR: 3.4m

A1.3

GFA: 1424.55m2 CORE AREA: 288m2 NLA: 1136.55m2 EFFICIENCY: 79.78%

3

SKYRISE FLOORPLAN (TYP. HOTEL) 4

4 A1.2 1:250 @ A1

B

C 6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

J

I

H

G

6000

6000

K 6000

L 6000

M 6000

N 6000

6000 6000

3

F

E

D

N

8 2

C

F

E

D

J

I

H

G

K

L

M

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000 6000

1

A1.3

6000

1

5 8

6000

A1.3

6000

N

6000

B 6

6000

7

6000 6000

4 7

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

K 6000

L 6000

M 6000

N 6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

K 6000

L 6000

M 6000

N 6000

8 3 6

1

A1.3

7 2 6

1

3 4

B

C

F

E

D

J

I

H

G

K

L

M

N

2 6000

9 FLOORS TOTAL MID NLA: 18004.95m2 FLOOR TO FLOOR: 4m

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000 6000

3 GFA: 2432.55m2 CORE AREA: 432m2 NLA: 2000.55m2 EFFICIENCY: 82.24%

8 2

7 MIDRISE FLOORPLAN (TYP. OFFICE)

2 A1.2 1:250 @ A1

B

C

F

E

D

J

I

H

G

K

L

M

N

N

6000

5

A1.3

4

1

6000

J

I

H

G

A1.3

6000

7

F

E

D

1

C

A1.3

B

4

5

N

1

6000

J

I

H

G

A1.3

6000

F

E

D

60006000 60006000 60006000 600060006000 600060006000 60006000

HIGHRISE FLOORPLAN (TYP. HOTEL)

3 A1.2 1:250 @ A1

C

1

2 5 8

B

A1.3

16 FLOORS TOTAL HIGH UA: 26632.8m2 FLOOR TO FLOOR: 3.4m

6000 6000

3 6 GFA: 1964.55m2 CORE AREA: 360m2 NLA: 1664.55m2 EFFICIENCY: 84.73%

6 6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

1 6000 6000

1

A1.3

6000

6000

6000

A1.3

6000

5 8

6000 6000

4 7

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

K 6000

L 6000

M 6000

N 6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

L 6000

M 6000

N 6000

8 3 6 7 2 5

LOWRISE FLOORPLAN (TYP. OFFICE)

1 A1.2 1:250 @ A1

1

9 FLOORS TOTAL LOW NLA: 18004.95m2 FLOOR TO FLOOR: 4m

A1.3

GFA: 2432.55m2 CORE AREA: 432m2 NLA: 2000.55m2 EFFICIENCY: 82.24%

6 4 5

1

Group work

1065985 940445 1129812

A1.3

MARTIN TRIVIERI JUN WEI CHNG GREGORY WANG

SITE:

TUTORIAL GROUP

TUTOR

SPRING STREET

01

MELISSA MALIK

3 4

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

1

6000

K

A1.3

6000

J

I

H

G

PAGE

A 1.2

1

6000

7

F

E

D

A1.3

C

N

B

4

06000 60006000 60006000 600060006000 600060006000 60006000

1

6000

J

I

H

G

1

6000

F

E

D

A1.3

C 6000

A1.3

2 5 8

B

6000 6000

3 6

CMG Tower

8 3

1

6000

F

E

D

A1.3

C

1

4

8

A1.3

B

60006000 60006000 60006000 600060006000 600060006000 60006000

1

6000

L

A1.3

6000

K

6000 6000

6000

J

I

H

G

1

A1.3

6000

F

E

D

//

5

C

50 //

3

4

5

6

7

8

9 B 6000

1

A1.3

CMG Tower

6000

C

TYPICAL SUITE

TYPICAL SUITE

6000

D

F

TYPICAL TWIN

TYPICAL SUITE

6000

E

6000

A

TYPICAL TWIN

+229.4

Level 51 - Roof

+222.6

Level 50

+219.2

Level 49

+215.8

Level 48

+212.4

Level 47

+209.0

Level 46

+205.6

Level 45

+202.2

Level 44

+198.8

Level 43

+195.4

Level 42

+192.0

Level 41

+188.6

Level 40

+185.2

Level 39

+178.4 +175.0

Level 38 - Mechanical Floor Level 37

+171.6

Level 36

+168.2

Level 35

+164.8

Level 34

+161.4

Level 33

+158.0

Level 32

+154.6

Level 31

+151.2

Level 30

+147.8

Level 29

+144.4

Level 28

+141.0

Level 27

+137.6

Level 26

+134.2

Level 25

+130.8

Level 24

+127.4

Typical Highrise

+124.0

Level 22

6000

D 6000

E 6000

G

F 6000

6000

H 6000

J

I 6000

6000

K 6000

L 6000

M 6000

TYPICAL TWIN

6000

30000

H

TYPICAL TWIN

+76.0

Level 13

+72.0

Level 12

+68.0

Level 11

+64.0

Level 10

+60.0

Level 9

+56.0

Level 8

+52.0

Level 7

+48.0

Level 6

+44.0

Level 5

+40.0

Level 4

+36.0

Level 3

+32.0

Level 2

+24.0

Level 1 Mechanical Floor

+20.0

Clerestory

+0.0

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

1

BUILDING SECTION

TYPICAL HOTEL HIGHRISE

1 A1.3 1:500 @ A1

2 A1.3 1:250 @ A1

Group work

6800

259400

4000

N

1

1065985 940445 1129812

4000

M

N

A1.3

MARTIN TRIVIERI JUN WEI CHNG GREGORY WANG

4000

K

6000

6000 6000

12000

J

TYPICAL TWIN

TYPICAL TWIN

M

TYPICAL SUITE

TYPICAL TWIN

TYPICAL TWIN

TYPICAL TWIN

TYPICAL TWIN

TYPICAL TWIN

6000

8000

I

N 6000

4000

H

L

Ground Floor TYPICAL SUITE

6000

L

6000

4000

6000

G

6000

TYPICAL SINGLE

TYPICAL SINGLE

K

4000

F 6000

1 1 A2.2

4000

6000

E

6000

6000 6000 6000 6000

Level 14

TYPICAL TWIN

TYPICAL SINGLE

Level 15

+80.0

6000

6000 TYPICAL SINGLE

Level 16

+84.0

TYPICAL TWIN

TYPICAL SINGLE

6000

TYPICAL SINGLE

+88.0

D

TYPICAL TWIN

TYPICAL SINGLE

6000

TYPICAL SINGLE

TYPICAL SINGLE

Level 17

TYPICAL TWIN

TYPICAL SINGLE

TYPICAL SINGLE

J

Level 18

+92.0

6000

TYPICAL SINGLE

TYPICAL SINGLE

I

Level 19

+96.0

TYPICAL TWIN

TYPICAL SINGLE

TYPICAL SINGLE

TYPICAL SINGLE

H

+100.0

C

TYPICAL TWIN

TYPICAL SINGLE

TYPICAL SINGLE

G

Level 20 - Mechanical Floor

TYPICAL SUITE

TYPICAL SINGLE

TYPICAL SINGLE

F

+104.0

TYPICAL SUITE

E

Level 21 - Sky Lobby

TYPICAL SUITE

TYPICAL TWIN

TYPICAL TWIN

TYPICAL TWIN

TYPICAL TWIN

TYPICAL TWIN

D

+112.0

6000

6000

C

37400XSKYRISE (11 FLOORS)

6800

B

1

A1.3

6800

3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400

9

54400XHIGHRISE (16 FLOORS)

6800

8

3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400

7

12000XSKY LOBBY

6

8000

5

40000XMIDRISE (9 FLOORS)

4

6000

B

3

4000

9

4000

8

4000

7

4000

6

4000

5

4000

4

4000

3

4000

A1.3

4000

1

32000XLOWRISE (9 FLOORS)

TYPICAL HOTEL SKYRISE

3 A1.3 1:250 @ A1

4000

1

A1.3

2 1 A2.2

4000

6000

20000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

6000

N

8000

6000

N

8000

6000 6000 TYPICAL TWIN

TYPICAL TWIN

TYPICAL SUITE

TYPICAL SUITE

M

4000

6000 TYPICAL TWIN

K

24000XPODIUM

TYPICAL TWIN

J

6000

6000

I

L

6000

30000

6000

G

Crown

C

B 6000

+259.4

6000

A1.3 KEY BUILDING INFORMATION

SITE INFORMATION

TOTAL OFFICE NLA: 36009.9m2 TOTAL HOTEL USABLE AREA: 35725.2m2 TOTAL BUILDING GFA excl. MECHANICAL FLOOR, PODIUM: 93321.3m2

SITE AREA: 95 x 55m = 5225m2 PLOT RATIO 18:1 MAX GFA = 94050m2

SITE:

TUTORIAL GROUP

TUTOR

PAGE

SPRING STREET

01

MELISSA MALIK

A 1.3

51 // CMG Tower

FLOORPLATE & CORE DIAGRAM

3 A2.1 View from South East

A

B

C

+3.40 +3.20

CEILING LEVEL

+2.55

650

UNDERSIDE OF SLAB

6000

D

E

6000

6000

6000

200

6000

STRUCTURAL & SERVICES ZONE

B3

B3

FLOOR TO FLOOR 3400

FLOOR TO NOTIONAL CEILING 2550

B3 B2

EB2 C2 BEHIND

W2 OUTSIDE

C5

C5

+0.00

INSIDE

C3

CORE

SL2 B3

B3

EB2

B3 B2 W2

CORE

C2 BEHIND C5

C5

C3

TYPICAL STRUCTURAL SECTION (HOTEL)

2 A2.1 1:50 @ A1

A

B

6000

C

D

6000

6000

6000

CEILING LEVEL

+2.80

900

+3.70

300

+4.00 UNDERSIDE OF SLAB

B2

STRUCTURAL & SERVICES ZONE

B2 B1

C1 BEHIND FLOOR TO NOTIONAL CEILING 2800

FLOOR TO FLOOR 4000

EB1

W1 OUTSIDE

INSIDE

C4

CORE

C4

SL1

+0.00

B2 EB1

B2

CORE

B1 C1 BEHIND

C4 C4

TYPICAL STRUCTURAL SECTION (OFFICE)

1 A2.1 1:50 @ A1

MARTIN TRIVIERI JUN WEI CHNG GREGORY WANG

Group work

1065985 940445 1129812

SITE:

TUTORIAL GROUP

TUTOR

PAGE

SPRING STREET

01

MELISSA MALIK

A 2.1

52 // CMG Tower 1 A2.3

BUILDING’S CENTRE CORE DESIGN

2 A2.3

OVERALL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

4 A2.3

3D OUTRIGGER SYSTEM ON MECHANICAL FLOOR

MARTIN TRIVIERI JUN WEI CHNG GREGORY WANG

Group work

1065985 940445 1129812

3 A2.3

OVERALL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM WITH PROGRAM ALLOCATION

5 A2.3

3D PODIUM STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

SITE:

TUTORIAL GROUP

TUTOR

PAGE

SPRING STREET

01

MELISSA MALIK

A 2.3

53 // CMG Tower

5 A3.3

OVERALL BUILDING

24o

The site of our building is 21o rotated from north towards the west. In Melbourne, a good design for western shading is vertical fins at 45o, 800mm deep, and 1500mm spacing.

Because our building is already rotated 21o off north, the vertical fins only need to be rotated an additional 24o to meet this criteria for western sun shading. Our modules are spaced at 1500mm so this criteria is also met.

WEST FACADE

2 A3.3 VERTICAL SHADE CONCEPT DIAGRAM

WEST FACADE

SPANDREL

950mm depth is determined using the Sun angle.

mm

950

d = 1350 tan 35o d = 950 mm

NORTH FACADE

1 A3.3 HORIZONTAL SHADE CONCEPT DIAGRAM

TRIVIERI GroupMARTIN work JUN WEI CHNG

GREGORY WANG

1065985 940445 1129812

1350mm

2700mm (FLOOR TO CEILING HEIGHT OFFICE AND HOTEL)

1350mm 1350mm

35o

1350mm

d

700mm - Hotel 1300mm - Office

4 A3.3 VERTICAL SOLAR SHADING STUDY

NORTH FACADE

3 A3.3 HORIZONTAL SOLAR SHADING STUDY

SITE:

TUTORIAL GROUP

TUTOR

PAGE

SPRING STREET

01

MELISSA MALIK

A3.3

54 // 5 900

A 1050

1500

CMG Tower

VG01

1500

2 A4.3

VG01

VG01

LEVEL 13 +76.0 A4.45

5 A4.4

300

SL1

B2

A4.4

SG01

SG01

EB1

+74.8

INSIDE

4000

OUTSIDE F01

TYP. FLOOR TO FLOOR 4000

SG01

F01. ALUCOBOND CLADDING WRAPPED AROUND STRUCTURAL COLUMN.

2800

VG01

VG01

C1

VG01

HORIZONTAL SHADING SYSTEM MULLION

FLOOR TO CEILING 2700

1200

1

SERVICE ZONE 900

INSULATION

DOUBLE GLAZED WINDOW 1 A4.3

VG01

VG01

LEVEL 12 +72.0 SL1

2

100

VG01

A4.4

1200

SPANDREL GLAZING WITH PV PANELS BEHIND.

SG01

SG01

B2

SG01

EB1 HORIZONTAL SHADING SYSTEM

3 A4.4

MULLION DOUBLE GLAZED WINDOW

VG01

VG01

C1

VG01

1 North Facade Elevation

2 Typical Office Floor to Floor Section

1 A4.3 1:20 @ A1

2 A4.3 1:20 @ A1 2 A4.3

MODULAR GRID

MODULAR GRID

MODULAR GRID

5 C1 2 A4.3

INSIDE

T03

RL 72.0

4

SL1

T03

A4.4

ALUCOBOND CLADDING.

LO2

C1. STEEL COLUMN EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE

EB1 UNDER FLOOR SLAB

EB1

LO2

FO1

T03

935

LO2

LO2

LO2

LO2 SL1 LO2

SPLIT MULLION 1 A4.3

INTERNAL LIGHTWEIGHT ALUMINIUM FRAMING TO FACADE.

EB1

INSULATION

OUTSIDE 900

1050

1500

DOUBLE GLAZED WINDOWS

2 A4.3

1500

ALUMINIUM FINS HOLDING HORIZONTAL SHADING SYSTEM IN PLACE.

Facade Floor Plan 3 Typical 1:20 @ A1

3 A4.3

JUN WEI CHNG

Individual work

940445

HORIZONTAL SHADING SYSTEM.

View of Typical Norther Office 4 Isometric Not to scale

4 A4.3

SITE:

TUTORIAL GROUP

TUTOR

PAGE

SPRING STREET

01

MELISSA MALIK

A4.3

55 //

C1

DOUBLE GLAZED WINDOWS

T03. STEEL CEMENTITIOUS PANEL

CMG Tower

5

REBATE IN CONCRETE SLAB TO CONCEAL FLOOR BRACKET BACFILLED WITH GROUT.

RL 72.0

SILL COVER. EXTRUDED ALUMINIUM ON BRACKETS OVER SKIRTING DUCT.

T03 5 A4.4

INSIDE

5 A4.4

RAISED ACCESS FLOOR SYSTEM FIRESTOP BETWEEN FLOOR SLAB AND INSULATION.

OFFICE

SL1

F01. ALUCOBOND CLADDING WRAPPED AROUND STRUCTURAL COLUMN.

SL1. COMPOSITE FLOOR SLAB.

C1. STEEL COLUMN EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE

EQUAL ANGLE SARKING. CSR BRADFORD ‘BREATHERFOIL ANTIGLARE’ VAPOUR PERMEABLE SARKING USED.

TOPHATS USED TO ATTACH CLADDING.

B2

STEEL BRACKET CONNECTING EDGE BEAM TO BEAM.

SARKING. CSR BRADFORD ‘BREATHERFOIL ANTIGLARE’ VAPOUR PERMEABLE SARKING USED.

STRUCTURAL & SERVICES

EB1 OUTSIDE

EB1. 700 WB 150 UNDER THE FLOOR SLAB

STEEL BRACKET ATTACHED TO MULLION BEHIND. SUSPENDED CEILING SYSTEM

DOUBLE GLAZED WINDOW

SUSPENSION CLIPS TOP CROSS RAIL EXTERNAL CLADDING TO BE FIXED TO SPLIT MULLION.

INSIDE

HORIZONTAL SHADING SYSTEM CONNECTED TO MULLION

C1

LO2

OFFICE

FURRING CHANNEL SHADING SYSTEM TO BE FIXED TO SPLIT MULLION

1 Service Zone Detail Section

1 A4.4 1:10 @ A1

CLADDING SYSTEM TO BE INSULATED.

INTERNAL LIGHT-WEIGHT ALUMINIUM FRAMING TO FACADE.

OUTSIDE OUTSIDE

ALUMINIUM CLADDING TO BE FIRE RATED PER FIRE ENGINEERS REPORT.

DOUBLE GLAZED WINDOWS STEEL CEMENTITIOUS PANEL

INSIDE

REBATE IN CONCRETE SLAB TO CONCEAL FLOOR BRACKET BACKFILLED WITH GROUT. SILL COVER. EXTRUDED ALUMINIUM ON BRACKETS OVER SKIRTING DUCT.

OFFICE

TRANSOM

T03

PRESSURE EQUALISATION CHAMBER. SMOKE FLASHING. TYP. 1MM THICK FOLDED GALVANISED STEEL SHEET.

5 A4.4

4 Fin Cladding Detail Plan

5 A4.4

4 A4.4 1:10 @ A1

FIXING BOLTS. FIX TO THE BACK OF MULLION AND THROUGH EXTRUDED ALUMINIUM STIFFENER INSIDE MULLION PACKERS TO LEVEL. IN CAST ANCHOR BOLT TO FLOOR SLAB.

SL1

50 MM ROCKWOOL FIRESTOP

CONCRETE REBATE TO ALLOW FOR STACK JOINT INSTALLATION. WILL BE FILLED WITH GROUT AFTER INSTALLATION.

Z FLASHING. TYP. 1MM THICK FOLDED GALVANISED STEEL SHEET. TO FIX FIRESTOP BLOCKING. SPANDREL GLAZING INSULATION

EB1

EQUAL ANGLE

SPANDREL GLAZING

SARKING. CSR BRADFORD ‘BREATHERFOIL ANTIGLARE’ VAPOUR PERMEABLE SARKING USED.

PV PANELS BEHIND SPANDREL GLAZING.

SARKING. CSR BRADFORD ‘BREATHERFOIL ANTIGLARE’ VAPOUR PERMEABLE SARKING USED. EDGE BEAM. STEEL VERMICULITE SPRAY FIRE RESISTANCE UP TO 4 HRS

Joint Detail Section Elevation 2 Stack 1:5 @ A1

RL 72.0

INSIDE

FIXING BOLTS. TYP. M12 WITH 5MM FLAT WASHER TO BACK OF MULLION AND THROUGH EXTRUDED ALUMIUM STIFFENER INSIDE MULLION.

OFFICE

CAST-IN INSERT. ROUGH SURFACE FOR GROUT TO BE SECURED IN PLACE AFTER APPLYING.

SMOKE FLASHING & FIRE STOP. 1MM THICK FOLDED GALVANISED STEEL SHEET.

2 A4.4

SPLIT MULLION. TO HOLD GLAZING AND FINS IN PLACE.

INSULATION

SPANDREL GLAZING. ALLOWING SUNLIGHT TO PENETRATE TO PV CELLS BEHIND.

ALUMINIUM FIN SHADING TO BE FIXED ON A SPLIT MULLION.

PV PANELS. STEEL BRACKET FIXED ON TO MULLION WITH AN EQUAL ANGLE ATTACHED TO A SHS. SARKING. CSR BRADFORD ‘BREATHERFOIL ANTIGLARE’ VAPOUR PERMEABLE SARKING USED.

ALUMINIUM SHADING TO BE FIXED TO ALUMINIUM FIN.

TIMBER BATTEN TO ALLOW FOR BLIND PELMET FIXING.

LO2

BLIND PELMET TO BE FIXED ON TIMBER BATTEN.

INSIDE

OUTSIDE TRANSOM

OFFICE

HORIZONTAL SHADING MANUFACTORED OFFSITE. ALUMINIUM TO BE FIXED ON TO SPLIT MULLION WITH STEEL BRACKET.

OUTSIDE

5 Stack Joint Detail Plan

5 A4.4 1:5 @ A1

SUSPENDED CEILING PANEL 89 x 89 x 6 Steel SHS

Detail Section 3 Transom 1:5 @ A1

3 A4.4

JUN WEI CHNG

Individual work

940445

SITE:

TUTORIAL GROUP

TUTOR

PAGE

SPRING STREET

01

MELISSA MALIK

A4.4