Issue 147 22 August, 2018
Your independent community newspaper - Ph: 4325 7369
Parliament hears how truth, common sense and honour all failed in Kangy Angy selection M
ember for The Entrance, David Mehan, read a statement from the Kangy Angy Residents Action Group (KARAG) in the NSW Legislative Assembly on August 7, which included damning information about the role of the former Wyong Council in pushing the NSW Government towards building its facility at Kangy Angy, instead of Warnervale. “When Premier Berejiklian was Transport Minister, she shook hands on a deal with the Darkinjung Land Council, to site a new Rail Maintenance Facility at Warnervale,” Mehan told parliament. “For unknown reasons, Transport decided not to pursue this avenue. “A list of over 20 sites was established, whittled down to eight, with (Darkinjung land at) Warnervale being the now preferred site. “Warnervale fitted the criteria laid out for the proposal, Kangy Angy not even appearing on
David Mehan, Member for The Entrance, with Kangy Angy residents, during the campaign to stop the rail facility Whittaker said: was the previous Council of Wyong Council, the list. amalgamation Michael Whittaker, to Transport for NSW’s “We have documentary before site at Transport for NSW, on preferred evidence that threats with Gosford.” Warnervale had “for many KARAG has October 9, 2014. were made to Transport if copies of The email was copied years been identified they pursued the prefferd obtained correspondence by the to then Mayor of Wyong, by Council for the Warnervale option. construction of the Link “We hasten to add this former General Manager Doug Eaton. Road and development
of an education and business precinct.” The email said: The proposed TfNSW site for the rails tabling and maintenance yard has completely unacceptable implications on both of these strategic initiatives by Council. “Wyong Council would like to convey in the strongest possible terms its complete opposition to the TfNSW proposal for this facility on this site. “I also advise that Council will be taking action to initiate opposition to this proposal at a political level,” Whittaker said. According to David Mehan’s parliamentary statement: “Instead of continuing down the list of possible sites, Transport asked Wyong Council for their recommendations. “Wyong proffered the Kangy location, and without any onsite investigations into its suitability, Transport purchased what can only be called a lemon, in developmental terms. “Transport failed to learn that the land was valued at $422,000, and purchased it for $17m.
Office: 3 Amy Close, Wyong Phone: 4325 7369 Mail: PO Box 1056, Gosford 2250 E-mail: editorial@centralcoastnews.net Website: www.centralcoastnews.net
Continued P3