ÀàÌ×éâÂàßѸÌÊàÌÈ‹àÌÏíÌÁÜÃÀàÌ ÅáØÖ×ÈÑíÌÖßâÓìÜà ãÖß Ë¯ÔïŠÜàåÅåÌÎê 2005 An analysis based on the 2005 Population Census
The evaluator invites the staff member to talk about the evaluation. This is the most important part of the evaluation. If this meeting is conducted in the right way, better relations may be established and the present and future position of the staff member in the organisation may become clearer. The head of the department, or in small organisations, the executive director is responsible to make sure all staff members are appraised in time. The personnel advisor makes the evaluation sheets sends them with an explanatory letter to the evaluators. After the appraisals are realised the personnel advisor gathers the final sheets after the evaluation meeting and files them. The forms should be treated condfidencial.
Because these people work most closely with the staff members this is preferable that they do the appraisal. They know best the strengths and weaknesses as well as the performance results of the staff member. The evaluator receives the appraisal form from the Personnel department. She asks all persons concerned to fill the evaluation forms for this staff member independently. This means all direct colleagues of the staff member who has to be evaluated. This may as well be done immediately after a joint assignment. The evaluator, fills in her own evaluation form for the staff member and consults, the evaluated and direct colleagues, like team members via their evaluation forms. Whenever available, external evaluations done by clients or target group should be consulted.
Swiss National Centre of Competence in Reasearch North-South
9 783905 835038
LAO DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS
ßÅâÝìÜÌ ØàÀ–ÛàÇ Äß–Óê–Â×àÓ–ÅŠÞÖåÌ–ÀàÌ–ÁàÈãÂÌ–ÜàØàÌ–Éœ ãÖßâÎèÌ ãۊÖŋàÖÖàÇ–ÝèÍ ÁÜÖÆà×–ÀßÅéÀÜÌ ÜêÀ–È‹×Ç. Ê‹à–ÁßÙàÈ–ÅßâÖŠÇ–ÁÜÖÈéÌ–ÀßÅéÀá–É ¡–Âí×–âÝìÜÌ–Éœ–À×à1 âÝèÀÉà–Äß–âÎèÌ–ÉíזƸ–ÍÜ À–Üè̖ٱÖÂ×àÓ–Í¡–Ú´ÌÂíÖȋàÌ–Àà̖Ÿ ÎßÀèÌ–Åß ÍÞÖÜàØàÌ–ÖßÈèÍ–ãÁ×à ãÖß ÖßÈèÍ–ÆàÈ. ÜéÖÉàÓ ÏíÌ ÁÜà ÀàÌ–Åá–Û×È–ÑíÌÖßâÓìÜà ãÖߖ˯ÔÜà–åÅ, 2005 ÁßÙàÈ Å߬âÖŠÇ ÁÜà ÈéÌ–ÀßÅé¬Àá ˳זÎßâËÈ ãÓŠÌ 2.11 âÝèÀÉà. ÅèÃâÀÈ–ÄàÀ–ãÏÌ˯ âØè̖׊à ÍàÖãÁ×ÖÑàÀ–âÙìÜ Óê–ÁßÙàÈ–ÅßâÖŠÇ–ÈéÌ–ÀßÅÀá É¡–Âí×–âÝìÜÌ ÅïÖÀ׊à ÚïŠ ãÓŠÌ ãÁ×ÖÛ×ÖÑß–Íàà (2.26 âÝèÀ¬Éà) ãÖß–ãÁ×ÖÜîÈíÓ–æÆ (1.71 âÝèÀÉà). ãÉŠ–ÀíÃÀèÌÁ‹àÓ ÍàÖãÁ×à ÑàÀ–âÙìÜ Óê–ÁßÙàÈ–ÅßâÖŠÇ–ÁÜÖÈéÌ–ÀßÅéÀá Éœ–À׊à 1 âÝèÀÉà Âì ãÁ×à Øí×ÑèÌ (0.77 Ý.É) ãÖß ãÁ×à ϿÖÅàÖê (0.98 Ý.É). âØèÌ–æÈ‹–ÄßãÄ‹Ã È‹àÌ ËéÈÉàâ×èÌÉíÀ ÁÜà ÎßâËÈ ãÖß âÁȖѺ̖˯ ÖÞÍÉàÓ-Öá ãÓŠÌŸ ÁÜà ãÖß ÍàÖÅàÁà ÁÜà ãÓŠÌŸ–ÁÜà ãÉŠ–ãÁ×ÖæÆ–Çß–Íï–Öê ÖíÖÓà âÊéà ãÁ×à Äá–Îß–ÅèÀ Óê–ÁßÙàÈ–ÅßâÖŠÇ ÁÜÃÈéÌ-ÀßÅÀá ãÉŠ 2 âÝèÀÉà–ÁºÌ–æÎ. ãÉŠ Ê‹à–âͪÖȋàÌ–Éàâ×èÌ–ÜÜÀ ÁÜà ÎßâËÈ ÉéÈ–ÀèÍ–Î߬âËÈ–âѲÜÌ–Í‹àÌ–ÅŠ×Ì–åØÇŠ ÁßÙàÈ–ÅßâÖŠÇ–ÁÜÖÈéÌ–ÀßÅéÀá ãÓŠÌ Óê–Éœ–À׊à 1 âÝèÀÉà â̲ÜÖÄàÀ ׊à âÎè̖Ѻ̖˯ âÁÈ–Ñï, âÌêÌ–Ñï ãÖß–Óê–Ñï–ÑÞÖâÎèÌ–ÅŠ×Ì–åØÇŠ. ÅáÖèÍ–ÑàÀ–Ààà ãÖß–ÑàÀ–åÉ‹ É¿ÌÉç–ãÓŠÌ–ÑïÓ–ÅèÌÊàÌ–Ñï–ÑÞÖÀ׋àÃ, ÝàÍ–ÑÞÃÑç–ÅíÓÂ×Ì Æ² à – Å ßÈ×À– å Ø‹ – ã ÀŠ – À àÌ– Î ï À – Ñ ì È – â Îè Ì – Ë è Ì – Ç à– Ø àÌ– ä ÈÇ– Å ß– â Ñß– Î ï À – â Á¿ à âÑàßÅßÌ´Ì, ÜèÈÉà–ÅŠ×Ì–ÁÜÖÂí×–âÝìÜÌ–ÂÜÍ–ÂÜÖÈéÌ–ÀßÅéÀá ÅŠ×Ì–åØÇŠ Óê–ÁßÙàÈ–ÁÜÖÈéÌ–ÀßÅéÀá ÅïÖÀ׊à 2-3 âÝèÀÉà É¡–Âí×–âÝìÜÌ
Socio-Economic ATLAS of the Lao PDR
The evaluator and evaluated give the heads of department a proposal for training as follow-up for the appraisal meeting written down in a development plan. After approval the chief auditor sends the plan to the training advisor/ personnel department. Both head of department and training advisor agree upon the training program for each staff member.
ÁßÙàÈ–ÅßâÖŠÇ–ÁÜÖÈéÌ–ÀßÅéÀá–É¡–Âí×–âÝìÜÌ ÚàÇ–âÊéÖÁßÙàÈ–ÁÜ Ã–â̺Ü˯–Ö×Ó–ÁÜÖ˯–ÈéÌ–ËîÀ–ÉÜ̖˯–Ïï‹–ÂÜÍ–ÂÜÖÌá–åÆ‹–âÝ È–ÀßÅéÀá–ƲÖ˯–Èé̖Ȩà ÀŠà×–ÜàÈ–âÎèÌ ÁÜÖÉíÌ–âÜÃ, âƳà, Ûì âÝèÈ–Ö‹à–Í¡–âÅǖŠà ˯ ÈéÌ–ÅàËàÖßÌß/âÁȖѺ̖˯–ãÉŠ–Öß–ÎßâÑȖΊà Ûì ÁÜà Ïï‹ Ü²Ì ƒ À¡–æÈ‹. ãÏÌ˯–ȨÃÀŠàז̸ ͳÖÍÜÀ–åØ‹–Ýï‹ ×Šà ÜèÈÉà–ÅŠ×Ì–Ý‹ÜÇ–ÁÜÖÂí×–âÝìÜÌ–ÂÜÍ–ÂÜÖÈéÌ ÀßÅéÀá ãÉŠ–Öß ÁßÙàÈ âÆ¨Ì Éœ–À׊à 1 âÝèÀ-Éà–ÖíÖÓà, ÖßØ׊àà 1-2 Ý.É, 2-3 Ý.É, 3-4 ãÖß ÅïÖÀ׊à 4 âÝèÀÉà–ÁºÌ–æÎ Óê–Ù‹ÜÇ–ÛàÇ–â˳àåÈ. Ê‹à–ÁßÙàÈ–ÅßâÖŠÇ–ÁÜÖÈéÌ–À
κ–ãÏ̖˯ ÀŠ–Þ×ÀÍè ÅèÖÂíÓ-âÅÈ––ÊßÀéÈ ÁÜà ÅÎÎÖà×
κ–ãÏ̖˯ ÀŠ–Þ×ÀÍè ÅèÖÂíÓ-âÅÈ––ÊßÀéÈ ÁÜà ÅÎÎ Öà× Socio-Economic ATLAS of the Lao PDR
κ–ÓãÏ̖˯ ÀŠ–Þ×ÀèÍ ÅèÖÂíÓ-âÅÈ––ÊßÀéÈ ÁÜà ÅÎÎ Öà× Socio-Economic ATLAS of the Lao PDR ÀàÌ×éâÂàßѸÌÊàÌÈ‹àÌÏíÌÁÜÃÀàÌ ÅáØÖ×ÈÑíÌÖßâÓìÜà ãÖß Ë¯ÔïŠÜàåÅåÌÎê 2005 An analysis based on the 2005 Population Census