Museum staff cannot take for granted that they will always enjoy support from campus administrators

“We all want to talk about this.” A Study of Freedom of Artistic Expression in Academic Art Museums and Galleries

6.4 Museum staff cannot take for granted that they will always enjoy support from campus administrators.

Survey Questions Forty-Three and Forty-Four asked museum professionals how supported they felt by colleagues and supervisors when exhibiting artwork which might be controversial, and then asked what elements of their jobs contributed to feeling supported. A majority of decision-makers reported feeling very supported, with the top two answers attributing that to a shared commitment to freedom of artistic expression and “current supervisor is supportive.”

How supported by colleagues and supervisors do you feel to exhibit art that is potentially controversial on the basis of its content and/or viewpoints? (N=72)

60% 35%

6%

Very supported

Not very supported

Moderately supported, with conditions

Survey Question Forty-Three

40

35

o ndents R esp o f N u mber

30

25

20

15

10 15 If your answer was ‘very supported,’ which of the following would you say contributes to that feeling? (N=46; Choose all that apply)

32 34

21 20

18 23

14

9 14

5

0

o n c a mpus / o file f o r a rt L o w p r ’ a r ‘u nder the r ad o n space is exhibiti p ria t e p r o o f what is ap a red sense S h o rti v e vis o r is supp C u rrent supe r c a mpus R e gul a r meetings with o rs vis r t o rs/supe r a administ a r ency with sta k eholders about F ull t ra nsp a ns o ns a nd pl t o rial decisi ur a c 3

p r ov e o rs ap vis r t o rs / Supe A dminist r a p r oceeding f o r e ks be t ed w o r exhibi f o rts o n e� u c ati a nd ed Outreach o n c a mpus with f aculty f o rts with u c ati o n e� a nd ed Outreach ca mpus om m u nity members o �f c a red u nderst a nding that instituti o nal S h r eed o m a nd p u rpose supp o rt f missi o n p ressi o n in exhibiti o n p r og ra ms o f ex t ed l y upda o rs r e gul a r a rd o f advis B o 4

r acts a nd other binding doc u ments C o nt o n-making t o rial decisi upholding c ur a t o rial ur a o f c w o rk z ed net Or g a ni a r e l y sh u es who r e gul a r colleag o rt o n, advic e , a nd supp i n f o rmati 2

Other

Survey Question Forty-Four

Even though most research participants expressed a feeling of support from their current supervisors, several voiced concern that there was no guarantee that future supervisors would value their independence. Four interview subjects shared:

I would say most of the people that we would reach out to, they wouldn’t want a voice, I don’t think with what we do or anything like that. We do have a new university president that I haven’t met yet, and he’s a business-minded person. It’ll be interesting to see how much he is involved in the arts and in what we do.

The person who could put the kibosh on something would be the chancellor. We could do all the right things, engage all the right voices, make the case, and he could ultimately decide that’s not what he wants for the university. We haven’t faced that yet.

“We all want to talk about this.” A Study of Freedom of Artistic Expression in Academic Art Museums and Galleries

I’ve never once had anyone intervene or tell us no, or tell us you should present it this way. I’ve never had anyone. I’m not saying that that’s a luxury that I’m going to enjoy for the rest of my career necessarily, but so far I’ve had complete and total independence in terms of the creative content, and the content of the exhibits and the way we present them. . . We are a public institution and the institution that we’re then housed in is a state-run institution. I’ve seen things go south very quickly for a lot of counterparts in other parts of the country in these kinds of situations. That is the only thing that I was alluding to that one day this could go south and if I get the attention of the wrong person . . . who knows?

Now, I am thinking a little differently both with the new administration and with new issues and new complications that could arise in certain cases.

Many research participants further related that their freedom to curate as they liked relied on “benign neglect,” to put it nicely, or ignorance and isolation, including these four:

We just don’t get good enough publicity in part. I think some of that’s not a best practice, but I do think like some of that was that we were under the radar.

I think that the gallery could fly under the radar. I could just be like, ‘Oh, no one’s going to notice, no one’s going to see it.’ For the most part, I’ve felt like in the past anyway.

Honestly. I feel like a lot of times we work in a silo and we are left alone. We choose our exhibitions and no one really asks questions or questions why we’re doing something.

It’s interesting. I don’t actually think the highest-level administrators were unhappy with it because I don’t think they paid any attention to it. It generally wasn’t a very prominent space on campus.

And a survey respondent wrote in the open forum:

Art is not a focus or emphasis at my college, so our gallery strategy has largely consisted of remaining below the radar of higher administrators. If we consulted or otherwise brought up potential concerns, our freedoms would potentially be lowered if we asked questions or brought up ideas for consultation or support.