Examples of grading

from Teaching Portfolio Carol Pacheco

by carolpav

Topics Covered

Rubrics and grading Examples of grading

Feedback and Evaluations Report Fall 2019

ARC Instructor Pacheco,Carol Fatima, 14199, ARC311, Section - M003

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY Department: School of Architecture Term: Fall 2019 Form: School of Architecture Teaching Assistant Student Rating Form Instructor: Pacheco,Carol Fatima Class: ARC311 Section M003 (Structures II) Responses: 4 Enrollment: 17 Response Rate: 23.5%

1.What is your overall cumulative GPA? N % 4.0-3.5 2 50.0% 3.4-3.0 2 50.0% 2.9-2.5 0 0.0% 2.4-2.0 0 0.0%

Below 2.0 0 0.0%

Total 4

1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Agree Nor Disagree Agree Strongly Agree Summary Stats N % N % N % N % N % N Mean StD 2.I gained an understanding of major concepts in this field. 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 3 75.0% 0 0.0% 4 3.50 1.00 3.The TA helped groups work effectively. 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 4 3.00 1.41 4.The TA seemed well prepared for class. 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 4 3.75 0.96 5.The TA's presentations were clear and understandable. 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 4 3.75 0.96 6.The TA spent sufficient time and effort in assisting students 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 4 4.00 0.82 7.The TA was available outside class/lab/recitation 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 4 3.75 0.96 8.I was comfortable asking questions in this class. 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 4 4.75 0.50 9.The TA graded material and returned within a few days 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 4 4.25 0.96 10.The class activities prepared me for the exams. 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 4 4.50 0.58

11.Overall, I rate this TA as an excellent teaching assistant. N %

Strongly Disagree 0 0.0%

Disagree 1 25.0%

Neither Agree Nor Disagree 0 0.0%

Agree 3 75.0%

Strongly Agree 0 0.0%

Total n=4 Mean=3.5 StD=1.00

Please include any other comments you may have about the TA.

office hours. She knew the subject well and I felt good about asking her anything.

hours, she responds the email a few days after. She also could not answer many of the questions that I asked during the class.

Feedback and Evaluations Report Spring 2020

ARC Instructor Pacheco,Carol Fatima, 34602, ARC211, Section - M003

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY Department: School of Architecture Term: Spring 2020 Form: School of Architecture Teaching Assistant Student Rating Form Instructor: Pacheco,Carol Fatima Class: ARC211 Section M003 (Structures I) Responses: 9 Enrollment: 16 Response Rate: 56.3%

1.What is your overall cumulative GPA? N % 4.0-3.5 6 75.0% 3.4-3.0 2 25.0% 2.9-2.5 0 0.0% 2.4-2.0 0 0.0%

Below 2.0 0 0.0%

Total 8

1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Agree Nor Disagree Agree Strongly Agree Summary Stats

N % N % N % N % N % N Mean StD

2.I gained an understanding of major concepts in this field. 0 0.0% 3 33.3% 0 0.0% 5 55.6% 1 11.1% 9 3.44 1.13 3.The TA helped groups work effectively. 0 0.0% 4 44.4% 0 0.0% 4 44.4% 1 11.1% 9 3.22 1.20 4.The TA seemed well prepared for class. 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 44.4% 5 55.6% 9 4.56 0.53 5.The TA's presentations were clear and understandable. 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 33.3% 4 44.4% 2 22.2% 9 3.89 0.78 6.The TA spent sufficient time and effort in assisting students 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 2 22.2% 3 33.3% 3 33.3% 9 3.89 1.05 7.The TA was available outside class/lab/recitation 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 22.2% 3 33.3% 4 44.4% 9 4.22 0.83 8.I was comfortable asking questions in this class. 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 1 11.1% 3 33.3% 4 44.4% 9 4.11 1.05 9.The TA graded material and returned within a few days 0 0.0% 3 33.3% 0 0.0% 4 44.4% 2 22.2% 9 3.56 1.24 10.The class activities prepared me for the exams. 2 22.2% 1 11.1% 1 11.1% 4 44.4% 1 11.1% 9 3.11 1.45

11.Overall, I rate this TA as an excellent teaching assistant. N %

Strongly Disagree 0 0.0%

Disagree 2 22.2%

Neither Agree Nor Disagree 1 11.1%

Agree 3 33.3%

Strongly Agree 3 33.3%

Total n=9 Mean=3.8 StD=1.20

Please include any other comments you may have about the TA.

that the lectures failed to address, and it almost felt as if the discussion sections were more important than the lectures themselves.

class a lot easier by explaining problems

was difficult to follow along outside of class. But I also didn't get the chance to go to office hours.

ents by giving responses such as I did not grade this assignment so I cant help you. The TAs overall also donÂ¿t really explain concepts so much as solve the discussion material on the board and explain their process while also bringing in formulae that come put of nowhere. When questioned they respond with Â¿this is just how it isÂ¿ or even all of the planned lessons. There was always such an unbalanced allocation of time to pointless lessons, and the actual course content meant to be explained in these sessions was never done so. Her teaching style was distracting because of its monotony.