Fundamentals Studio II Portfolio -Cameron Parker

FUNDAMENTALS STUDIO II

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Dedication

This portfolio is dedicated to my family, who always happens to be by my side regardless of the circumstance.

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Table of Contents

Design Intent

Grid Analysis

Sections

Site Serial Sketches Initial Site Recordings

Conceptual Programming Concept Statement

Axonometric Views

Sketching Analysis

Centering Questions

Final Model Shots

Speculative Vignettes

Conceptual Landscape Development

Self Evaluation

Site Analysis: Addendum

Centering Questions

Client & Architect Letter’s

Sustainability Address

Architect Profile

Construction Detail

Concept Development: Sketching

Floor Plans

Concept Development: Modeling

Elevations

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Renderings

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Design Intent My concept for this project is one that is mainly focused in matching both the historic and industial context of buildings that surround our chosen site. I am interested in maintaining the language of the existing Factor’s Walk and Historic language of the building on the East side of our site. I want a continuity of these natural materials. It is also my goal to reflect the topography of the site directly in my building by mirroring the angle that the building hovers over the site, giving it an intimacy with the site and creating a strong plan to section relation. Another goal was to reflect the industrial manner that is north of the site, so that all of the vernacular of the area are included in my new proposed structure.

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Serial Sketches

Overall View of Site

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Close-Up to Focal Point

Fundamentals II

Focal Point of Site

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Initial Site Recordings East/West Topography

Human Height Origin

0

1

2

3

4

5

Constant Horizontal Distance

6

7

8

9

8

9

10

11

North/ South Topography

Human Height Origin

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

12

13

Constant Horizontal Distance

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Sketching Analysis

Cameron Parker

Link to Place

Mystery

Truncation

Arrival

Place (Exit)

Anticipation

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Sketching Analysis

Cameron Parker

Suprise

Infinity

Natural Texture

Detail

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Pause

Transition

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Speculative Vignettes Drainage

Noise

Views to Site

Existing Condition

Proposed Condition

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Speculative Vignettes Trees

Utilities

Sun-Path

Existing Condition

Proposed Condition

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Speculative Vignettes Trees

Utilities

Sun-Path

Existing Condition

Proposed Condition

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Site Analysis Neighborhood Context

Key Heavy Traffic

Vehicular Traffic

Medium Traffic Light Traffic

Neighborhood Zoning

Key Industrial Institutional Cameron Parker

Heavy Traffic

Commercial Retail

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Key

Pedestrian Traffic

Medium Traffic Light Traffic

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Site Analysis Climate

Average Temperatures Savannah, GA

Average Annual Rainfall

Inches

Temperature (Fareheit)

Average Annual High & Low Temperatures

Month

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Month

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Site Analysis Climate Wind Rose Chart Savannah, Ga

Sun- Path Diagrams Savannah, Ga 330

N 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

300

W

30

60

Average Temperatures 240

E

210

120 S

Key

.51-1.20 1.2-3.3

3.3-5.4

5.4-8.5

Key

8.5-11.1 > 11.1

Wind Speed (m/s) Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

150 Winter Solstice Summer Solstice

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Site Analysis Summer Solstice

10 AM

12 PM

Sun Path Diagrams

6 PM

Winter Solstice

10 AM Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

12 PM Fundamentals II

6 PM Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Site Analysis Sensory

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Site Analysis Noise & Visibility

W River St.

Fac

tors

W River St.

Fac

tors

Wal

k

Williamson St.

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

k

Williamson St.

Noise Diagram

Cameron Parker

Wal

Visibility Diagram

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Site Analysis Utilities

Utility Map- Vicinity Key Power

Water

Power Utility

Fire Hydrant

Traffic Light

Man Pole

Utility Map: Close-Up Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Project Letter’s Architect Letter

Client Letter

Cparke31@gmail.com (904) 651-8873 http://be.net/CamPark22 http://campark22.tumblr.com

C a m e r o nPlanning M i l l sCommission Pa r k e r Metropolitan January 21, 2014 Wright Architects Savannah, Georgia 31401 Dear Wright Architects, The city is currently looking into an urban renewal project at the end of Factors Walk across from the abandoned Georgia power plant. The site is between West River Street and Williamson Street, perpendicular to Montgomery Street. The intended program for this building is an international exhibition space to display art work of visiting artists, as well as to house them. The site that is proposed for this project is a very challenging one. The topography is such that there is a drastic incline going up the North south axis. The variance from the top to the bottom of the site is plus or minus 20 feet.

The city has proposed this project in conjunction with the Savannah College of Art and Design as an effort to foster the culture of the arts in the city and bring in multicultural perspectives of art into the city for exposure to both tourists and locals.

Please get back to us with a cost estimate and some initial drawing as soon as you can, so that we may move forward with the start of this project.

C a m e r o n M i l l s Pa r k e r January 24, 2014 Mrs. Judith Monroe 411 Seiler Avenue Savannah, Georgia 31401 Dear Judith Monroe, We here at Wright Architects have received your project submission for the site located at Williamson and West River Streets and are pleased to move forward with a proposal to further explore the extent and scope of the project. We have completed a more thorough investigation of the site and done an analysis on how the project may interact with its proposed location. We have begun some preliminary drawings and are working towards a schematic design to submit to you for further review. Please expect to hear back from us within two weeks with some of the initial drawings for the project. We will also be preparing a rough cost estimate for your review. Any further inquiries or information you have that may lend itself to our further understanding of the project would be greatly appreciated. We are looking forward to hearing back from you.

Sincerely,

Thank you so much. We look forward to hearing back from you on your ideas for the project.

Cameron Parker Principle Architect

Sincerely,

Judith Monroe Senior Vice President Savannah Metropolitan Planning Commission

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Architect Profile Daniel Origin

Libeskind Notable

Libeskind was born in post-war Poland and immigrated to America, becoming a citizen in 1964. He studied music in Israel and became a virtuoso performer in New York, before leaving music to study Architecture. He gained a professional degree in 1970 at the Cooper Union in New York. He followed this with a postgraduate degree in History and the Theory of Architecture at the Essex University in England in 1972. He established his first professional practice in Berlin in 1989. He later moved this practice to New York in 2003, where it exists today.

Projects

Section

Plan

Philosophy

Name: Jewish Museum

Location: Berlin Germany

Completed: 1999

Daniel Libeskind’s commitment to expanding the scope of architecture reflects his profound interest and involvement in philosophy, art, literature and music. Fundamental to Libeskind’s philosophy is the notion that building are crafted with the perceptible human energy, and that they address the greater cultural context in which they are built.

Distinctions

Cameron Parker

Name: Royal Ontario Museum

2012 AIA National Service Medal

Name: Run Run Shaw Creative Media Centre

2011 Medal of Honor

Location: Hong Kong, China

2008 Presidents Award

Completed: 2010

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Location: Toronto, Canada

Winter 2014

Completed: 2007

Professor Christine Wacta

Concept Development Sketching

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Concept Development Sketching

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Concept Development Sketching

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Concept Development Sketching

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Concept Development Modeling Proposed Plan 1

Cameron Parker

Proposed Plan 2

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Proposed Plan 3

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Concept Development Modeling- Isometrics

Proposed Model 1

Proposed Model 2

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Proposed Model 3

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Grid Analysis

Grid 1

Axis

Axis

Grid 2

View Through Site

Extracted Lines

Grid Composite

Grid 3

Cameron Parker

Pedestrian Circulation

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Pedestrian Circulation

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Programming Initial Proposal

Gallery Lobby

Cameron Parker

This proposal included two gallery wings of the international

schemes for the programming, there is a main vestibule

art gallery where one was elevated over the site and the

coming off of the Williamson Street sidethat leads to a

other was to delve into the ground to a passage that

gallery which is connected by a bridge, though this initial

lead to the bathroom space as well as

the residential

program had it placed under the existingFactors Walk

sector of the program. As included in other proposed

while other schemes have it hovering over this historic site.

Circulation

Gallery

Earth

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Lobby

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Circulation

Residential

Earth

Professor Christine Wacta

Programming Revised Proposal This

Gallery

initial

programming

included

a

sub-terranean

programming

of

be

single elevator shaft for universal circulation and one

two

spaces

the

staircase to act as a secondary mode of transportation.

gallery

building. that

were

There elevated

were

above

Circulation

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

to

Fundamentals II

international

the angle of the site, The program

of

the

the

mirroring

level which was intended to be used for the residential

Lobby

Cameron Parker

ground

art

gallery

Gallery

Circulation

Lobby

Restrooms

Winter 2014

also

included

a

Residential

Professor Christine Wacta

Landscape Development Process

Initial Landscape Plan

Cameron Parker

Second Landscape Plan

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Third Landscape Plan

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Final Landscape Scheme4

Conceptual Program Plan

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Final Landscape Rendering

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Concept Statement

Cameron Parker

The concept that I have chosen to govern

plane in the courtyard in the form of

my design is one that is based on the

a strong plan to section relation. There is

modified grid system that organized

also a loose concept that deals with the

the city of Savannah Georgia. The

expression of the building being abstracted

squares that are embedded within the

from the human anatomy. The wings of

grid exist as areas of escape from the

the gallery that hover and delve into the

urban sprawl of the city. They are areas

site are like arms exploring the site and

of rest and areas with an abundance of

interacting with it just as humans interact

greenery. I wanted to embed the same

with nature. There is also a concept that I

phenomena in the central portion of my

had of transparency and representing

site and create a green space that would

the history of the region by orienting

exist as a courtyard and a relaxation area

the building perpendicularly as well as

for tourist coming from the east side of

adjacent to the Factor’s Walk axis. My

River Street. My art gallery is a largely

whole structure is oriented along the

outdoor complex, where visitors are

grid derived directly from the axis of

able to view art in an overhead gallery,

this historic pathway. In essence, I am

a subterranean sculptures. My building

amending the unkempt aesthetic of this

connects to the site by mirroring the plan,

site to better speak the language the rest of

giving it gallery, as well as on the ground

Historic Downtown Savannah is speaking.

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Centering Questions What influence has the previous analysis played in your design scheme and what logical design process have you followed throughout this project?

My process has been mainly based on the research

the site context. I have designed logically during

that we conducted during the site analysis phase

the process by using the existing site plan with

of this project. The analysis made me aware of all

the recorded information and sketching directly

of the existing features of the site and gave me

over it, that way I am aware of the consequences

a true appreciation in attempting to preserve

my design have on the existing condition. I have

the current conditions that are existing there. I

cross-referenced most; if not all of my design

am now conducting design that is conscious of

decisions to ensure they are actually able to occur.

Factors Walk Grid

Cameron Parker

Composite Grid

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

What is the central idea or concept that drives your project and consequentially helps you make important design decisions?

The central concept that governs my project

Also, in order to connect the building to the

deals with the historic features of the site and

site I have firstly: conformed the building to

also with the current blight of the site which I am

mirror the site I have firstly: conformed the

proposing to improve in this project. Savannah is

building to mirror the site in its rising angle,

praised and recognized for its unique, modified

creating a strong plan to section relation and

grid system. The squares embedded within this

secondly: I have created a transparency in the

grid are places of life and culture and gathering.

building structure where the current Factor’s

It is my wish to mimic this phenomenon within

Walk axis exists in order to maintain this

the parameters of my site. The central portion

significant pathway to understanding the history

of my site contains an embedded green space

of the West River Street vicinity. My building

which has been cut out through excavation of

conforms to a grid that has been created parallel

the current sloped topography residing there.

and perpendicularly to the Factors walk axis.

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Centering Questions How have you needs, behavior,

gathered and applied information about human and aspirations to inform the design process?

I have actively observed the human traffic

order to connect the structure to this focal

and circulation of the current site to inform

point of the region. I have also compensated

decisions on where to place the current

my design to human needs and tendencies

circulation. I have actively observed peoples

by creating various seating/assembly spaces

fascination with and compulsion to explore

that are embedded centrally or in proximity

the factors walk region and have adjusted my

to my building. There are also many different

design to completely respond to this axis in

circulation possibilities within the project.

What

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

ecological

impact

does

your

project

have

on

this

site?

My proposed design does call for a large amount

exposed and will allow for rainfall absorption.

of excavating, but it is not something that

My project adds a large amount of foliage to

will negatively affect the region. If anything,

the site and revitalizes the currently lacking

my project contains a small footprint on the

landscape of the region. The building is not

site. There is a large amount of ground that is

obtrusive and caters to the condition of the site.

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Centering Questions What role does scale, distance and movement play in the perception of the site and the design in this urban environment? How do man, landscape and building relate?

How does your project address the organizational and spatial issues?

Spatial issues are addressed in the site

The building is organized along my central

My proposed design does call for a large amount

topography of the site and therefore be more

appropriately through a very evident hierarchy

chosen axis which is adjacent and perpendicular

of excavating, but it is not something that will

connected to the design. Scale is proportioned

in the organization of the landscape. The

to the Factor’s Walk axis. Some of the spatial

negatively affect the region. If anything, my project

to make man feel comfortable in the space.

building surrounds the central courtyard and

issues regarding the square footage are also

contains a small footprint on the site. There is a

The bridges which exist as arms that extends

is defined through the planar quality of the

solved through excavating into the site to

large amount of ground that is exposed and will

into and out from the site is not monumental.

building and the variance in material of the

allow for more room for human occupancy.

allow for rainfall absorption. My project adds a

The man should feel slightly compressed as

ground covering. The central space is heavily

This also gives a spatial hierarchy through

large amount of foliage to the site and revitalizes

they move through the space, but not so much

accessible by many different circulation routes.

both a depressed and overhead base plane.

the currently lacking landscape of the region.

so that they should become uncomfortable.

The building is not obtrusive and caters to the

The building relates to the landscape by mirroring

condition of the site. Movement is very strongly

and following the angles of the existing site and

considered in the movement through the site

man connects to the building in the sense that

and through the proposed building on the site.

the building exists as an armature that rests on

Movement is oriented mostly along an axis that

and over the site. Also the greenery and foliage

is perpendicular to the sites Factor’s Walk. Also

that exists on the site is used to relate to man

the topography is maintained in its basic essence

as it will be proportioned to a human scale to

to the existing site slope. Patrons and visitors to

better connect man to the green space of the site.

the exhibition space will get a true feel for the

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Centering Questions How does the design utilize vegetation (existing or proposed) as space making and character giving elements?

The design utilizes vegetation to frame the

keep man in the courtyard space grounded

courtyard and to compress the occupants of

with natural green elements. It exists on the

the site at moments in order to move them

central axis of circulation for the project in the

into the more hierarchical regions of the site,

courtyard space. The use of stone also keeps the

such as the courtyard, or onto the Factor’s Walk

proposed site true to the contextual materials

processional space. Grass is also used to always

that surround and exist in the current day site.

What role has the gestural sketch played in the design and representation of the project?

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

The gestural sketch has allowed me to freely

on my perception of the site and have been

express my design ideas and concepts and get

therefore able to work with my notes to create

down all of my premonitions of the site. I have

an effective and appropriate design. Gestural

drawn up many potential plans and have been

sketching has made it possible to get my ideas

therefore able to explore the range of possibilities

down quickly and have no guilt in moving on

in each. I have taken a series of visual notes of

to another idea. They are quick and intended

the important regions of the site and through

for exploration and I quite enjoy seeing the

sketching have recorded vital information

process develop into a well-reasoned design.

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Centering Questions How in

are your

handicapped codes and site design thinking and

restrictions building/site

manifested making?

I have addressed the handicapped codes by

ramp from the lobby to the gallery at the 12:1

providing an elevator shaft to allow for vertical

Foot provision . I have dealt with site restrictions

circulation by those that are impaired to the

by placing the building well away from the lot

gallery space. As far as the horizontal circulation

set-backs. I have also left plenty of room in the

is concerend I have met code restriction

front and back of the site for sidewalks and public

requirements by providing a slope on the

walkways. I have tweaked my design to be universal.

How are you dealing with the interface between vehicular (patron and emergency) and pedestrian circulation in your project? How are you addressing parking?

Parking is not being addressed as existing on the

to pull into this are and have direct access to main

current site that I am working with. There is an

circulation points of the building form this point.

emergency vehicular path that exists along the

Patron and vehicular circulation are separated

Factor’s Walk region. Emergency services are able

and do not exist in combination with one another.

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Centering Questions What aesthetic/theoretical issues have helped you determine your design?

The current, existing aesthetic conditions of the

through an extensive Landscape plan. I wanted

site are pretty bleak. The site is eroding down

to make the building and site surrounding it

the North South axis and the current foliage

appealing in order to attract visitors. I have dealt

and trash that lies on the site is a testament to

with erosion by both the planting and grass

the disrepair and neglect that the area has fallen

to root down the topsoil and by eliminating

into. My design has taken this condition and

the slope so that rainfall cannot wash away

dissolved it away to include a restored new look

this soil resting on the open region of the site.

What makes a good Art Gallery?

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

A good art gallery includes an organization

sculptures within and outside of the courtyard

of the work by type and also contains a wide

to give a wide array of art in the museum. I

array of different styles and artist. I also

think also that Art galleries must economize

think a gallery should host art that is varied

the design so that it doesn’t dwarf or distract

in its mediums and forms. For instance in

form the art. My design doesn’t do this as

this project, I have every intention of placing

it is minimal and uses natural materials.

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Centering Questions What has been the greatest site design challenge of this project?

The greatest challenge of this site has been designing a building that would span a long distance over an extensively varied topography.

What

What

technical

ideas

have

helped

you

determine

your

features of my design, such as the two towers

site and the existing topography of the site have

on the north side of the site which exist in order

forced me to consider how you navigate the site

to both support the hall that traverses the site

in extreme detail. I have calculated most of the

but also as means of circulation throughout

stairways and determined their length based on

the building. Other technical features that have

the required change in grade of the site. Required

affected my design have been the site setbacks

modes of navigation have also governed certain

and the requirement of ADA adherence.

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

values

have

helped

you

determine

your

design?

Ethical values that have affected my design

history that exists on and around the site.

have included my respect of the current

I

history that exists at the site. I have in

in my design, making it an even stronger

no way obstructed any element of the

focal point on the site than it already is.

have

actually

reinforced

Factor’s

walk

design?

Considering the implications of the slope of the

Cameron Parker

ethical

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Centering Questions What historical architectural precedents have helped you determine your design?

I have included the elements of Transparency

the fan of Frank Lloyd Wright and have instilled

in my design in order to better connect my

some of his building values into my own design.

building to the site and consequently man to

His ideas on raw material and transparency

Nature. Modernism is also a precedent that

exist within my design. Also his adherence

exists within this project through the sharp

and respect to the sites that he works on have

angled and use of modern materials such as

been targeted issues, as I have directly reflected

concrete. I am quite the fan of Frank Lloyd

and included the topography in my design.

What

conceptual

have

helped

squares

is

variance of the human form. There is a large

accomplished by using a courtyard in the central

aspect of movement in my design and I have

region of my design. This was a significant I also

therefore created a rough abstraction of arms

really paid close attention to the Factor’s Walk

existing as the various wings of the gallery space

axis and made the building perpendicular to this

of the building. Also the concept of Art and

to address the surrounding heritage and history

Nature was a strong one for me. I think that

of the region. Another concept of mine was

proximity of art to Nature better connects the

Simulation

of

the

ideas

Savannah

you

determine

your

design?

man to the art as man becomes connected to his

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Sustainability Address Sustainability Issues Claim

Savannah, GA Average Temps.

Summer Solstice Temperature (Fareheit)

The site being located in Savannah Georgia has an inherently humid nature with hot summers and moderate winters. There is also a good amount of rainfall here. The largest issue I am faced with is the issue of Keeping the heat, as well as the humidity out during the summer, while maintaining the heat during the winter.

Proposed Section

12 PM

Sustainable Proposal It is my intention to propose the addition of a green

Proposed Plan

Winter Solstice

Average Annual Rainfall

roof to my stucture, as well as a foliage wall on the North facade of the structure to act as an envelope buffer to modulate Temperature during the winter and summer months and to act as a rainfall collection

Inches

system . The roof will draw the humidity and moisture away from the ground level, providing a more pleasant experience and will act as a heat sink during the winter to maintain heat within the main structure.

12 PM Evidence

Statement Claim

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Proposal Drawings

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Sustainability Diagrams These diagrams take a look at the phenomena concerned with the proposed ventilation patterns as well as the sun path on the site at various times of the year. My main concerns are to compensate for the direct sunlight received on the west wall through a complex louvre system that will open and close during different times of the day to compensate for the direct light. I also have included a green roof on the structure to act as a heat sink in addition to the fountain located just underneath.

Transversal Section

Longitudinal Section

Isometric Diagram

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Construction Details

Foundation Slab Detail

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Floor To Wall Detail

Fundamentals II

Roof To Wall Section

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Floor Plans Plan Programming Courtyard Level

0

Cameron Parker

5

Residential Level

Gallery Level

20

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

0

5

Fundamentals II

0

20

Winter 2014

5

20

Professor Christine Wacta

Elevations North & South Views

0

5

Cameron Parker

South View

20

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

North View

Fundamentals II

0

Winter 2014

5

20

Professor Christine Wacta

Elevations East View

0

5

Cameron Parker

20

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Elevations West View

0

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

5

20

Professor Christine Wacta

Longitudinal Section Longitudinal Section-East

0

5

Cameron Parker

20

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Longitudinal Section Longitudinal Section-West

0

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

5

20

Professor Christine Wacta

Transversal Section North View

0

Cameron Parker

5

20

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Transversal Section South View

0

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

5

Winter 2014

20

Professor Christine Wacta

Site Section West View

0

Cameron Parker

5

20

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Site Section East View

0

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

5

20

Professor Christine Wacta

Axonometric Views

SW Isometric

Exploded Axonometric

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

NW Isometric

Fundamentals II

SE Isometric

NE Isometric

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Sun Studies Winter Solstice

10 AM

12 PM

3 PM

Summer Solstice

10 AM

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

12 PM

Fundamentals II

3 PM

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Renderings

Williamson Street Entry

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Residence Interior

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Renderings

Courtyard Entrance

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

View to Bridge

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Final Rendering

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta

Final Model Shot

Cameron Parker

B.F.A. Architecture Candidate 2016

Fundamentals II

Winter 2014

Professor Christine Wacta