“Cocaine Bear” disappoints with confusing tonal shifts

By GRIFFIN ARNOLD Staff Writer/Film

Editor's note: This review is spoiler-free.

Elizabeth Banks’ new film, “Cocaine Bear” is a glorified Reddit post that has finally seen its big day on theater screens. This film follows the real life events of Andrew Thornton, a drug dealer who dumped bags of cocaine out of a plane into the Chattahoochee National Forest back in 1985. Detectives found some of the cocaine next to a bear that had eaten it and died. The plot of this movie revolves around a simple question: What would happen if a bear ingested cocaine and ... survived, at least for long enough to start mauling people? This film has a few positive things going for it, one of which is the titular, computergenerated bear. Created by WetaFX, a digital effect company known for projects like “Avatar” and some of the “Avengers” movies, the bear in this movie looks surprisingly good – especially when you consider that the film only had $30 million to work with. Unfortunately, this cost cap seems to have hurt the chances of the bear being in more scenes. It’s a shame, because scenes involving the bear are far more compelling than the human characters. Indeed, the human characters is where the film fails. Each and every scene with the characters felt boring and unmotivated. There seemed to be no real reason to root or care about their relationships. In the film’s funny moments, momentum would be abruptly halted by flat and unseuccessful attempts to prolong the humor. Eventually, everyone resorted to screaming either “Run!” or “Bear!” which got tiring after repeatedly hearing it with the same inflection and response. It’s hard to tell whether the film’s monotony is a product of the dull script or the underserved actrors. Thankfully though, the cast didn’t take themselves too seriously, because if they did, the film would have been a total mess.

After watching the first trailer and seeing the poster, I had high hopes that this would be another mid-tier movie that didn’t take itself seriously and was just made for fun, similar to something like “Sharknado.” Unfortunately, the writers seemed be at odds tonally — the movie swings back and forth from a cheesy, gory romp to an emotionallydriven character study. I wish they would have sat down and focused on one or the other –preferably the former.

I had fun with this movie, but there is no reason to see it more than once. This a lot of the humor associated with Ghostface, “Scream VI” leaves a true cold-blooded psychopath in its wake. Despite this, the film has Ghostface remain just human enough for the audience to believe that a lunatic like that could chillingly exist in real life. could turn into a cult classic for some like “Halloween” or the previously mentioned “Sharknado,” but there isn’t much more that this film adds to the genre that previous movies haven’t already done with higher success. If you do see “Cocaine Bear,” I would recommend doing so with a group friends or family. The bigger the crowd to react to, the more fun it seems to be.

Long story short, “Scream VI” blows the sequel game out of the water with a fresh, inspired take on the franchise many know and love. The film easily leaves the door open for many more installments with the new killer cast, promising to take “Scream” fanatics down an exciting, uncharted path. Who knows, down the line we may even see the return of the iconic Stu Macher. For now, “Scream VI” is a master class in horror, sure to wow anyone who sees it.