
2 minute read
Then Business ls Sofe
When you shake hands with your competitor and mean it, when you work hard in your business and love it-then business is safe.
When you advertise service and give it, when you build reputation and keep it-then business is safe. -
When you accept wise counsel and heed it, when you agree to what is best and stick to it-then business is safe.
When you can sense competition and not knock it, when you can fight competition and still boost it-then business is safe.
When you can recognize wrong and combat it, when you can believe in a right and shout it-then business is safe.
For The Ftnest Tn
Plywood Lumber Products
plywood specicrlties Including "Cut to Size"
REPRESENTING WAI.TON PTYWOOD IN THE NORTHERN CATIFORNIA AREA veneers
DRY cnd GREEN
"fhe Finest Nome in Veneers"
BINNITT VNNDDR$
An Editorial
When you can strive for an ideal and live it, when you can aim for what's right and hit it-then business is safe.
"Hol Corgott Glouses in Union Conlrncfs Held Unenforceqble
APPLICATION:
Supreme Court rules unions cannot enforce "Hot-Cargo" clauses in labor contracts.
"Hot Cargo" Clauses Legal But Unenforceable:
Section 8 (b) (4) (A) of the Labor-Management Relations Act (Taft-Hartley Law), forbids a union or its agents to urge anyone's employees to refuse to perform work for the purpoSe of compelling their employer to cease doing business with some other person. (Secondary Boycott provision.)
The Supreme Court, on writs of certiorari, resolved a conflict between two lower courts where the decisions in three cases* involved so-called "Hot-Cargo" provisions in union contracts, and the question of whether or not such a provision is a defense to a charge against a union of an unfair labor practice under the secondary boycott provision of the lalv.
The Court held that a "llot-Cargo" clause in a collective bargaining agreement, whereby the employer agrees that its employees will not be required to handle "unfair" goods, may not be used by the union as a defense to a charge of inducing employees to strike or refuse to handle goods for objectives proscribed by the secondary boycott provisions of the Taft-Hartley Law.
The Court said this was the sole concern in the present cases, and there was no occasion to consider the invalidity of hot-cargo provisions, stating, "All we need now say is that the contract cannot be enforced by the means specifically prohibited in Section 8 (b) (4) (A)."
Thus, while upholding the legality of such provisions, the decision of the Court, in effect, makes the hot-cargo clauses worthless by being unenforceable, reports tl-re National Retail I-umber Dealers Association.
*Citation: U. S. Supreme Court, Nos. 127, 273, and 324, June 16, i958-Local 1976, United Biotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL, et al. v. N.L.R.B.; N.L.R.B. v. General Drivers, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union Local No. 886, AFL-CIO; Local 850, International Association of Machinists. AFL-CIO v. N.L.R.B.
Anaheim-Wesley Methodist church will erect a $33,000 fellowship lrall-church on a 2.6-acre site at 1475 Romneya Dr. as first unit of its building program to also include two educational buildings with nine arrd 10 classrooms each, and a small chapel.