6 minute read
The Anderson Files: ‘Medicare Advantage’ plans are stealth rip-offs
Publisher, Fran Zankowski Circulation Manager, Cal Winn
EDITORIAL
Editor-in-Chief, Caitlin Rockett Arts & Culture Editor, Jezy J. Gray General Assignment Reporter, Will Matuska Food Editor, John Lehndorff Intern, Chad Robert Peterson
Contributing Writers: Dave Anderson, Emma Athena, Will Brendza, Rob Brezsny, Michael J. Casey, Angela K. Evans, Mark Fearer, Kaylee Harter, Nick Hutchinson, Dave Kirby, Ari LeVaux, Adam Perry, Dan Savage, Bart Schaneman, Alan Sculley, Toni Tresca, Gregory Wakeman, Colin Wrenn
SALES AND MARKETING Market Development Manager,
Kellie Robinson Account Executives, Matthew Fischer, Carter Ferryman, Chris Allred Mrs. Boulder Weekly, Mari Nevar
PRODUCTION
Art Director, Susan France Senior Graphic Designer, Mark Goodman
CIRCULATION TEAM
Sue Butcher, Ken Rott, Chris Bauer
BUSINESS OFFICE
Bookkeeper, Emily Weinberg
Founder/CEO, Stewart Sallo Editor-at-Large, Joel Dyer
Dec. 8, 2022
Volume XXX, number 17
Cover: Project Censored
As Boulder County's only independently owned newspaper, Boulder Weekly is dedicated to illuminating truth, advancing justice and protecting the First Amendment through ethical, no-holds-barred journalism, and thought-provoking opinion writing. Free every Thursday since 1993, the Weekly also offers the county's most comprehensive arts and entertainment coverage. Read the print version, or visit boulderweekly.com. Boulder Weekly does not accept unsolicited editorial submissions. If you're interested in writing for the paper, please send queries to: editorial@boulderweekly.com. Any materials sent to Boulder Weekly become the property of the newspaper.
690 South Lashley Lane, Boulder, CO, 80305 p 303.494.5511 f 303.494.2585 editorial@boulderweekly.com www.boulderweekly.com
Boulder Weekly is published every Thursday. No portion may be reproduced in any form without written permission from the publisher. © 2022 Boulder Weekly, Inc., all rights reserved.
Boulder Weekly
welcomes your correspondence via email (letters@boulderweekly.com). Preference will be given to short letters (under 300 words) that deal with recent stories or local issues, and letters may be edited for style, length and libel. Letters should include your name, address and telephone number for verifi cation. We do not publish anonymous letters or those signed with pseudonyms. Letters become the property of Boulder Weekly and will be published on our website.
by Dave Anderson
We are bombarded with countless TV commercials by private insurance companies claiming their “Medicare Advantage” plans are much better and more a ordable than traditional Medicare.
Is this too good to be true? e assertion contradicts the research and analysis of health care experts who testi ed before a recent House Oversight Committee hearing on creating a universal health care system. Rep. Katie Porter (D-California) summarized their conclusions: “ ey told us that Medicare is a far more e cient steward of taxpayer dollars. Private insurance companies spend 17% more on administrative costs than Medicare does. at’s because private insurance companies spend money on things like marketing, commercials, and stock buybacks.”
Medicare has been consistently very popular with both its bene ciaries and the population as a whole since it began in 1965. However, there are holes. It is limited to seniors and certain people with disabilities. It doesn’t cover vision, hearing, dental or long-term care. Bene ciaries are responsible for monthly premiums, deductibles and coinsurance (known as “cost-sharing”).
As a result, progressives support “Expanded and Improved Medicare for All” bills, which would cover everyone. Dental, vision and hearing aids are included. No premiums, deductibles or coinsurance.
A team from three University of California campuses looked at 22 studies on the projected cost impact for single-payer health insurance in the U.S. and found every study predicted Medicare for All would lead to savings. Even the
Blundstone, Dansko, Keen, Merrell & More!
Comfortableshoes.com
BOULDER On the Downtown Mall
at 1425 Pearl St. 303-449-5260
& in The Village
next to McGuckin 303-449-7440
DENVER Next to REI at 15th & Platte
at 2368 15th St. 720-532-1084
Go Out Local and Green
In The Natural Funeral’s Green Section of the beautiful Lyons Cemetery. Green burial means:
• No Vaults (grave coverings, usually cement or plastic)
• Only biodegradable caskets or shrouds • Ritual of hand-lowering • Natural care of the body
Other green options include body composting (natural reduction) and water cremation (alkaline hydrolysis). We also offer flame cremation.
Contact our Advance Planning Consultant, David Heckel for tea and a chat in our parlor to pre-plan to minimize your nal footprint.
720-515-2344 david@thenaturalfuneral.com info@thenaturalfuneral.com TheNaturalFuneral.com free market-oriented, Koch-funded Mercatus Center estimated $2 trillion in total savings over a decade. e grassroots movement for Medicare for All has been steadily growing across the country, including in Colorado.
But the Medicare Advantage plans are quite attractive — if you don’t read the ne print. ey are cheaper than traditional Medicare and can o er dental, vision, hearing aids and gym memberships.
However, as Barbara Caress reports in e American Prospect, “the plans o er less freedom of choice, with limited provider networks and prior-approval requirements in exchange for sharply reduced and capped out-of-pocket expenses...”
She notes that “most recent retirees do not nd the restrictions new or particularly burdensome. Anyone previously insured through an employer health plan dealt with very similar constraints.”
Caress mentions a crucial difference from traditional Medicare: “Medicare still pays, but with Medicare Advantage it turns over all parts of the insurance function, including enforcing the rules for medical necessity and deciding how much to pay providers to private companies.”
What could go wrong? Plenty. In April, the inspector general’s o ce of the U.S. Health and Human Services Department issued a report which concluded that tens of thousands people enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans are denied necessary care that should be covered under the program. e New York Times reported, “Advantage plans also refused to pay legitimate claims, according to the report. About 18% of payments were denied despite meeting Medicare coverage rules, an estimated 1.5 million payments for all of 2019. In some cases, plans ignored prior authorizations or other documentation necessary to support the payment.”
Rosemary Bartholomew, who led the team that worked on the Health and Human Services report, said this might delay or even prevent a Medicare Advantage bene ciary from getting necessary care. is can be literally a matter of life or death. She said only a small fraction of patients or providers try to appeal these decisions. e report echoes similar ndings from 2018. e American Hospital Association and the American Medical Association have criticized insurance companies’ tactics for years. A Times review found four of the ve largest Medicare Advantage insurers have A TEAM FROM THREE University of faced federal lawsuits accusing them of fraud. A recent report of the Majority California campuses looked Sta of the U.S. Senate Finance at 22 studies on the Committee found wideprojected cost impact for spread aggressive and deceptive single-payer health marketing practices such insurance in the U.S. and as people posing found every study predicted as agents of the IRS and other Medicare for All would lead government agencies, lying to savings. about the size of their networks and conning vulnerable people with dementia and cognitive impairment. e committee’s chairman, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) said, “It is unacceptable for this magnitude of fraudsters and scam artists to be running amok in Medicare.” A recent study found Medicare Advantage plans cost the government $106 billion in overspending from 2010 to 2019. e Biden administration has increased taxpayer funding of Medicare Advantage plans. U.S. Rep. Katie Porter (D-California) led a group of progressive Democrats protesting this. Dr. Je rey Sachs argues, “We are broken. We spend far more (than other rich nations) on health care; we get far less. Because we don’t even have a health care system. We have a hodgepodge of private overpriced monopolies, whether for-pro t or not-for-pro t.” Time for Medicare for All. is opinion column does not necessarily re ect the views of Boulder Weekly.
