Just Economics: Looking through the lens of ‘The 1619 Project’

EDITORIAL

Editor-in-Chief, Caitlin Rockett Senior Editor, Emma Athena News Editor, Will Brendza Food Editor, John Lehndorff

Contributing Writers: Peter Alexander, Dave Anderson, Emma Athena, Rob Brezsny, Michael J. Casey, Angela K. Evans, Jim Hightower, Jodi Hausen, Karlie Huckels, Dave Kirby, John Lehndorff, Sara McCrea, Rico Moore, Amanda Moutinho, Katie Rhodes, Leland Rucker, Dan Savage, Alan Sculley, Tom Winter, Gary Zeidner

SALES AND MARKETING Market Development Manager,

Kellie Robinson Account Executives, Matthew Fischer, Carter Ferryman Advertising Coordinator, Corey Basciano Mrs. Boulder Weekly, Mari Nevar

PRODUCTION

Art Director, Susan France Senior Graphic Designer, Mark Goodman

CIRCULATION TEAM

Dave Hastie, Dan Hill, George LaRoe, Jeffrey Lohrius, Elizabeth Ouslie, Rick Slama

BUSINESS OFFICE

Bookkeeper, Regina Campanella

Founder/CEO, Stewart Sallo Editor-at-Large, Joel Dyer

January 27, 2022

Volume XXIX, Number 21

As Boulder County's only independently owned newspaper, Boulder Weekly is dedicated to illuminating truth, advancing justice and protecting the First Amendment through ethical, no-holds-barred journalism, and thought-provoking opinion writing. Free every Thursday since 1993, the Weekly also offers the county's most comprehensive arts and entertainment coverage. Read the print version, or visit boulderweekly.com. Boulder Weekly does not accept unsolicited editorial submissions. If you're interested in writing for the paper, please send queries to: editorial@boulderweekly.com. Any materials sent to Boulder Weekly become the property of the newspaper.

690 South Lashley Lane, Boulder, CO, 80305 p 303.494.5511 f 303.494.2585 editorial@boulderweekly.com www.boulderweekly.com

Boulder Weekly is published every Thursday. No portion may be reproduced in any form without written permission from the publisher. © 2021 Boulder Weekly, Inc., all rights reserved.

Boulder Weekly

welcomes your correspondence via email (letters@ boulderweekly.com) or the comments section of our website at www.boulderweekly.com. Preference will be given to short letters (under 300 words) that deal with recent stories or local issues, and letters may be edited for style, length and libel. Letters should include your name, address and telephone number for verification. We do not publish anonymous letters or those signed with pseudonyms. Letters become the property of Boulder Weekly and will be published on our website. 6 l

Looking through the Lens of ‘The 1619 Project’

by Tina Eden

In 2019, e New York Times published e 1619 Project, a collection of essays, short stories, and poems intended to revisit United States’ history through the lens of slavery and racism. e creators of e 1619 Project hoped that it would be used in public schools. is has happened in over 4,000 schools, mostly in urban areas such as Washington D.C., Newark, New Jersey and Chicago. However, use of the project has been sparse in other parts of the country, partly due to opposition by local school boards and state legislatures in places such as Arkansas, Iowa and Mississippi. Was such opposition entirely due to the rural-urban divide or was something else at work?

One must note that the original version of e 1619 Project was criticized on several fronts. Historical scholars criticized it for certain factual inaccuracies and for overreaching analyses. e World Socialist Web Site repudiated the project stating, “ e historical slogan of the socialist movement is ‘Workers of the World, Unite!’ not ‘Races of the World, Divide!’” (December 2019, wsws.org)

However, the economic divide between white households and African-American households remains extreme. A 2019 Survey of Consumer Finances sponsored by the Federal Reserve Board found that Black families’ median and mean wealth are both less than 15% those of white families, at $24,100 and $142,500, respectively. e famous historian Eric Williams ( rst prime minister of Trinidad and Tobago) writes in his book Capitalism and Slavery (1944), “Slavery was not born of racism: rather, racism was the consequence of slavery.” e 1619 Project details how racism has been used to

make the accumulation of wealth more di cult for African-Americans. Its nal chapter, titled “Justice,” presents a history of calls for reparations along with a renewed appeal for them. Nikole Hannah-Jones, originator of e 1619 Project, authored this chapter and in subsequent speaking engagements has advocated for Universal Basic Income (UBI). It is these positions that the Just Economics column would like to address.

Our current capitalist economic system, which Eric Williams and sociologist Matthew Desmond ( e 1619 Project) claim was founded on slavery, has become enormously unequal. us substantial wealth transfers in the form of reparations and UBI appear to be a necessity for economic justice. Unfortunately, the socialist movement and other progressive forces have been unable to prevent our economy from reaching one of the most unequal conditions since the Gilded Age of the late 19th century. Now we have reached a major fork in the road. is fork presents two alternatives: (1) leaving the current system in place; (2) structural changes that ensure a more egalitarian economic system.

Descendants of slaves have valid arguments for reparations. e labor of their ancestors was stolen, and they have been subjected to numerous racial injustices in many realms, including that of economics. e argument for UBI reveals how broken and unjust our economic system really is. e system used racism to prevent one sector of society from enjoying the economic fruits of its labors. But as that sector slowly gained more rights, the system found ways to suppress the economic lives of all citizens regardless of their ethnicity.

In lieu of slavery, nancial instruments such as payday loans, low-wages and student debt, to name a few, are now deployed to keep wealth in the hands of “successful” capitalists. ese modern day weapons of exploitation are justi ed via an unrealistic belief in meritocracy, a belief which has rationalized an ever-widening income and wealth divide. School districts that chose to use e 1619 Project can ponder challenges to the status quo. School districts that reject e 1619 Project hang on to beliefs in the biased meritocracy and discourage any consideration of reparations or UBI. Sadly, almost no school district confronts our economic system squarely and encourages consideration of changes that would address the roots of social and economic inequality.

Reparations, if paid, could cost trillions of dollars. Yet would even this address the fundamental problems with our economic system? Many fulltime workers earn so little that government intervention is needed to subsidize rent, food, transportation, and medical care. It is truly shocking that few attempts are made to hide this odious form of neo-slavery. Combine poverty wages with the

exclusion of ethnic minorities from wealth generating instruments such as fair housing mortgages, and it becomes clear that racism has become a proxy for slavery. White America deliberately oppresses people of color in order to control neighborhoods, jobs, politics, education and capital, while dividing a multi-racial working class against itself. e authors of e 1619 Project have o ered us a chance to understand the instituRACISM HAS NOT SUCCUMBED to civil tion of slavery and its descendants: segregation, Jim Crow, lynching and war, civil rights, fair wages or progressive taxation. The most recently neoliberalism. Racideology of racism as embodied in neoliberal capitalism ism has not succumbed to civil war, civil rights, fair wages or progressive justifi es defi cient healthcare, starvation wages, per- taxation. e ideology of racism as sistent unemployment, homelessness, regressive tax policies and a national divided along racial lines. embodied in neoliberal capitalism justi es de cient healthcare, starvation wages, persistent unemployment, homelessness, regressive tax policies and a nation divided along racial lines. Did slavery end in the United States with the passage of the 13th Amendment? In theory, slavery ended. But the slavery-induced desire to subjugate other people by whatever means possible did not end. Today it merely takes a monetary form. Among other things, the racial divide enables the neoliberal economic system to pit liberal communities against conservative ones. Is e 1619 Project the straw that breaks the back of structural racism? Probably not. But it deepens our understanding of why human groups sometimes desire to subjugate others, and it might help us squelch that desire and engineer a more egalitarian world. is opinion column does not necessarily re ect the views of Boulder Weekly.