Undercover officers file claims against city, LAPD over data release

By City News Service

Backlash delays board's effort to reduce LA County jail population

By City News Service

Aproposal to declare a humanitarian crisis in Los Angeles County's overcrowded jail system and begin efforts to dramatically pare down the inmate population was pulled Monday from this week's Board of Supervisors agenda amid opposition from some board members and law enforcement groups.

The motion to "depopulate and decarcerate" the jails — introduced by Supervisors Hilda Solis and Lindsey Horvath, and originally scheduled for a vote Tuesday — was met with backlash from law enforcement organizations when it was published late last week. Among those opposing the plan was the Los Angeles County Association of Deputy District Attorneys, which bashed it as "dangerous and reckless."

More than 300 Los AngelesPolice Department undercover officers whose personal information was released and posted on various websites — including one that allegedly listed bounties for the killing of officers — announced the filing of damages claims against the city and LAPD leadership Tuesday.

"This presents a significant threat to the safety of the citizens of Los Angeles," attorney Matthew McNicholas told reporters at a Westwood news conference announcing the claims, which are precursors to lawsuits.

"I can tell you without (revealing) detail that several undercover operations have had to stop and several undercover (officers) have been threatened with direct threat based on this release, requiring them and their families to move."

The claims, which seek unspecified damages, allege violations including negligence, negligent training and supervision, breach of contract, legal malpractice, violation of the right to privacy and public disclosure of private facts.

According to McNicholas, the claims were filed on behalf of 321 undercover officers whose personal information was released.

The Los Angeles Police Protective League, the union representing the department's rank-and-file officers, blasted the LAPD last week for releasing the pictures, names, work locations and other information of some 9,000 officers following a California Public Records Act request filed by the Stop LAPD Spying Coalition.

That included officers who work in sensitive and undercover operations — a release the department has dubbed a mistake and prompted an apology from Chief Michel Moore.

The Stop LAPD Spying Coalition had filed a public records lawsuit against the city, challenging what it called the LAPD's refusal to release basic personnel information on officers. The coalition also launched "Watch the Watchers," a website that publishes headshots and other information related to sworn personnel.

"Watch the Watchers" did not list bounties on officers -but the website killercop.com did, according to a lawsuit filed last week by the LAPPL on behalf of three officers.

In addition, attorneys for the LAPPL last week served a cease-and-desist notice on Twitter and Google, seeking the immediate removal of the "killer cop" website from the platforms. Twitter subsequently suspended the account for violating its rules and policies against inciting violence against police officers. The "killer cop" website, meanwhile, is now inactive.

Tom Saggau, a spokesman for LAPPL, said the union's lawsuit is not against the Stop LAPD Spying Coalition, but against the owner of the "killer cop" website and the Twitter account @killercops1984.

The lawsuit names Steven William Sutcliffe, described as "a user of the website Twitter, and utilizes the username KILLERCOP1984."

Sutcliffe told the Los Angeles Times the lawsuit is "malicious. It's retaliatory. It is vindictive and frivolous. Their motion is filled with lies. They are trying to silence my free speech. The truth cannot be retaliatory. It is 1st Amendment protected speech."

Meanwhile, Jamie McBride, the LAPPL director, told City News Service, "We're looking into all websites to see legally what we can do. However, the `killer cop' website was of the utmost importance to our membership and for officers' safety."

Last week, Moore said he was not initially aware of the release. He later issued an apology and started an investigation.

However, the Inspector General's office stepped in and began its own probe after the LAPPL filed an internal affairs misconduct complaint against Moore and city personnel involved in the release of police officers' information.

"He knew or should have known that this was occurring, and the same thing for (LAPD administrative officer) Liz Rhodes," McBride said of Moore. "If he acted alone, or if she notified the chief, both of them are responsible for the release of these photos.

"Once we find out exactly who was in charge, or who was reckless enough to release these photos, we're going to ask those individuals to be removed from office because they jeopardized a lot of people's safety, including families."

The Los Angeles County Police Chiefs Association, meanwhile, wrote in a letter to the board that the measure would "further erode community safety and quality of life." The association also said it received no advance notice of the motion, learning about it only on Friday, and called for more collaboration before the proposal advances.

Board of Supervisors Chair Janice Hahn issued a statement Monday morning saying she planned to oppose the motion, saying that while she agrees with the need to address jail overcrowding, "any plan to reduce the population of our jails needs to be decided in partnership with law enforcement, our deputy district attorneys and our courts."

Supervisor Kathryn Barger told the Daily News earlier that she also planned to oppose the motion.

Solis, in a statement Monday, said that since the motion was published late last week, her office "has received concerns from a variety of stakeholders — those who feel the motion is not doing enough and those who feel it is doing too much. To that end, I will be referring the motion back to my office so that I can continue to gather input from all stakeholders. We must help balance the needs of public safety while also getting into compliance with our federal obligations. And in that process, I ask that county departments and agencies help us with meeting the need of our most vulnerable."

The now-delayed motion is another step in a long-running effort by the Board of Supervisors to implement a "care first, jails last" agenda, which includes a long-fought effort to close the much-criticized Men's Central Jail without constructing a circulation in court case number ES016728 City of Burbank, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

The Glendale Independent has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number ES016579 City of Glendale, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

The Monterey Park Press has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number ES016580 City of Monterey Park, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

The West Covina Press has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number KS017304 City of West Covina, County