Advocate November 2015

THE ADVOCATE Newsletter of The Baltimore County Bar Association VOLUME XXV, NO. 5

November 2015

PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE

by Hon. Vicki Ballou-Watts G I V I N G T H A N K S T O T H O S E WH O G I V E B A C K During a recent judicial conference, I had the opportunity to attend a presentation by Tina Frundt, a survivor of child sex trafficking. Ms. Frundt is the founder of the Washington, D.C.based “Courtney’s House,” which provides services for survivors of sex trafficking between the ages of 12 to 21. Through Courtney’s House, Ms. Frundt and others search for children forced into prostitution and offer them a safe, supportive environment. The program also helps raise awareness about the reality of child sex trafficking by providing training to members of law enforcement, lawyers, judges and other interested groups.

Ms. Frundt shared with the audience how her victimization (a word she doesn’t like to use) began at age nine, when she was placed in the Chicago foster care system. Her

testimony is heartbreaking.

However, her resilience is compelling.

What is it about the human spirit that enables some to overcome great adversity? And, why do those who’ve suffered the most often volunteer to help others?

Some describe it as a blessing or an example of God’s grace.

Others say the willingness to give back under such circumstances is because of mental/emotional toughness or simply a generous heart. Whatever the explanation, there are so many in our communities (like Ms. Frundt) who’ve faced significant challenges such as homelessness, physical harm, family dysfunction, addiction, disease and more. Yet, in spite of those experiences, or perhaps because of them, they’ve reached out to help others.

Inside This Edition Program Registrations Pg Cty Council Meet & Greet Pg Bench/Bar Committee Pg Calendar of Events Pg Civics & Law Academy Pg Civil Law Update Pg Classified Ads Pg Committee Programs Pg County Council Update Pg Court Notices Pg Criminal Law Update Pg Historical Perspectives Pg Judicial Portrait Fund Pg Lawyers Assistance Pg Memorial Service Pg New Members Pg Professionalism Award Pg Professional Lawyer Pg Ravens Tailgate Photos Pg Save the Date Flyer Pg Technology Tips Pg

19 10 7 3 8 24 42 34 13 4 30 16 36 28 5 6 19 20 14 22 18

Continued on page 2

Weyrich, Cronin & Sorra THE ADVOCATE

Page 1

Signature Sponsor November 2015

MVLS EXPUNGEMENT CLINIC

PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE Continued from page 1 Whether they are motivated by specific life experiences or not, many people decide to give back because a teacher, lawyer, coach, neighbor or other volunteer served as a positive role model during a critical stage of their lives.

The Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) website lists the many benefits of volunteer service. For the volunteer, a sense of pride, satisfaction and accomplishment are a few of the intangible benefits. Those same volunteers go on to help others through mentoring, tutoring, serving at shelters, fundraising, job training, counseling and much more. Many lawyers provide pro bono legal services, in addition to their involvement in traditional public service activities. They offer help, not because they must, but because they know it is the right thing to do.

According to CNCS, in Maryland, 28.5% of Marylanders volunteered giving 151.5 million hours of service at a value of 3.4 billion dollars in 2013.

Date & Time Monday, November 23, 2015 9:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. and 12:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.

Location Baltimore County Dept. of Economic & Workforce Development 3637 Offutt Road, Randallstown Clinic Hours Two 3.5 hour clinic sessions from 9 AM -12:30 PM and 12:30 - 4 PM. 10 attorneys are needed for each shift to provide brief advice on what items are expungable and to assist in preparing expungement petitions. Training and resources are available. **To volunteer and register, contact Susan Francis, Deputy Director, Maryland Volunteer Lawyers Services, sfrancis@mvlslaw.org or 443451-4084.

So, as we approach the holiday season, I am thankful for the opportunity to spend special time with family and friends. And, I am thankful to those who improve the quality of life for all of us by giving back to their communities each year.

Happy Thanksgiving.

Judges, Attorneys, Law Clerks and Law Students interested in participating as volunteer faculty on Friday, April 15, 2016 at CCBC Catonsville, please contact Lisa Y. Settles, Esquire, Pessin Katz Law, for more information. lsettles@pklaw.com; 410-339-5783.

Hon. Vicki Ballou-Watts, President, Baltimore County Bar Association November, 2015

THE ADVOCATE

Page 2

November 2015

C ALENDAR

2015-16 Officers President Pres-Elect Secretary Treasurer

Hon. Vicki Ballou-Watts Robert J. Thompson Adam T. Sampson Rebecca A. Fleming

T. Wray McCurdy, Immediate Past President Alexander C. Steeves, YL

Chair

The Advocate Laurie Wasserman, Committee Chair Doris D. Barnes Thomas S. Basham Associate Editors

Contributing Writers C. Theresa Beck Thomas H. Bostwick Catherine A. Dickinson Sondra M. Douglas Bruce E. Friedman Robert C. Lidston Gary Miles Margaret M. McKee Cecilia B. Paizs Jeffrey R. Scholnick Lisa Y. Settles Keith R. Truffer Laurie Wasserman Catherine F. Woods Matthew I. Wyman The Advocate is a monthly publication of the Baltimore County Bar Association informing its members about current events relating to law. Articles do not necessarily reflect the official position of the BCBA and publication does not constitute an endorsement of views expressed.

November 2015 3 4 9 10 10 10 11 12 12 12 12 13 14 17 18 18 19 20 20 21 24 26 27

Long-Range Planning Committee Meeting, 8 a.m., Mezzanine 08 Redevelopment of Urban Centers in Baltimore County, 5 p.m., Mezz 08 Paint Nite, 7-9 p.m., 7 West Bistro CLE: Understanding Standard Field Sobriety Tests, 8 a.m., Mezzanine 08 Executive Council Meeting, 8 a.m., Judicial Conference Room 363 Family Law Dinner: Direct & Cross Examinations of Child Custody Evaluators, Liberatore’s, 6 p.m.

Courts & Bar Office CLOSED, in observance of Veterans’ Day Bench/Bar Committee Meeting, 8 a.m., 4th Floor Judicial Conf Room UB Law Forum Symposium, 3-6 p.m., Angelos Law Center Moot Ctrm.

BCCWBA: Anatomy of a Trial: Discovery, 8:30 a.m., Cthse East, Balto City MDEC in Baltimore County, 5:15-6:45 p.m., Mezzanine 08 Civics & Law Academy, 9 a.m., CCBC Essex Pro Bono Resource Center’s 25th Anniversary Celebration, 7 p.m., Baltimore Museum of Art, 10 Art Museum Drive Real Property: Commercial Leasing: Current Trends, Noon, Mezzanine 08 Family Law & Professionalism: Adoptions: New Procedures Pitfalls & Practicalities, Noon Lawyer in the Lobby w/Volunteer Attorneys, 4:30 - 6:30 p.m.

Annual Memorial Service, 3:30 p.m., Ceremonial Courtroom No. 5 Immediately followed by a Reception at Café Troia, Towson Alternatives to Opening & Maintaining a Traditional Office, Noon, Mezz 08 ADR: When It’s All About The Money, Noon-2:30 p.m., Baltimore City National Adoption Day Ceremonies, 10 a.m., Ceremonial Courtroom No. 5 Recent Developments in Estate Administration, 5 p.m., Mezzanine 08 Courts & Bar Office CLOSED, in observance of Thanksgiving Courts & Bar Office CLOSED, in observance of Thanksgiving

December 2015 1 Family Law: The New DCM, 5-6:30 p.m., Mezzanine 08 2 Tech Comm: Getting Your Office Ready for E-Filing, Noon, Mezzanine 08 3 Annual Holiday Party, 6 p.m., Towson Tavern, York Road 9 Circuit Court Practice Tips/Concerns from the Bench, 5 p.m., Mezzanine 08 15 E&T: Special Needs Trusts and ABLE Accounts, 5 p.m., Mezzanine 08 16 Technology Tips for Attorneys 2.0, Noon, Mezzanine 08 17 Young Lawyers’ Holiday Lunch & Toy Drive, 12 p.m., Mezzanine 08 24-January 4, 2016 - BAR OFFICE CLOSED 25 COURTS CLOSED January 1 - COURTS CLOSED

The contents of advertisements are the responsibility of the advertisers and are not recommendations or endorsements by The Advocate.

Membership Renewal Invoices and Black-Tie Banquet Information will be mailed on November 15th

Publication deadline: 5th of the month preceding publication.

THE ADVOCATE

E VENTS

Program/Event Registration Form can be found on page 21 Individual flyers can be found with the online registration for each program on the website calendar.

Executive Council Keith R. Truffer Michael W. Siri Jay D. Miller Stanford G. Gann Jr. John G. Turnbull III Lisa Y. Settles

OF

Page 3

November 2015

COURT NOTICES From the Chambers of Ruth Ann Jakubowski NOTICE TO THE BAR CHRISTMAS VISITATION DISPUTES 2015 The Family Law Judges, Judges Norman, Stringer, Nagle, Alexander, King and Cavanaugh, will be available to consider Christmas visitation disputes from Monday, November 24, 2015 through Friday, December 18, 2015.

To obtain intervention of the Court, contact LaRue, in the office of Judge Ruth A. Jakubowski, at 410-8872628 to be assigned one of these Judges on a rotating basis. Once you are assigned a Judge, you may contact that Judge’s chambers. You will need to have the following information available: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Name of the Case Case Number What the last order, if any, states with regard to visitation Name and telephone number of attorney or party on the other side What efforts (stating facts) you have made to reach an agreement with the otherside The specifics of what you are requesting as relief The specifics of what the other side has offered, if anything

NOTICE TO THE FAMILY LAW BAR FINALIZING DIVORCES PRIOR TO YEAR END The Circuit Court has set aside docket time on December 21st and December 28th to set in hearings on divorces in uncontested matters where parties or counsel seek to have the matter finalized within the 2015 tax year. In order to have the case set for hearing, all matters must be resolved, the grounds for divorce must be ripe, and the case must be at issue (i.e. an answer filed or an order of default entered with the 30 days to move to vacate having run).

If you wish to have a case set in for hearing on one of these days, please contact Civil Assignment at 410-8872660. Cases are being set for hearing at 9:30 a.m., 11:00 a.m. and 1:30 p.m.

In order to ensure the case can be heard and the final Judgment can be docketed, please have the following when you appear:   

Proposed Final Judgment of Divorce “White Sheet” Payment for any open Court Costs

THE ADVOCATE

Page 4

November 2015

Memorial & Recognition Committee Annual Memorial Service November 19, 2015, 3:30 p.m.

Ceremonial Courtroom No. 5 Those who will be remembered include Gary D. Schenker C. Daniel Held William J. Blondell Jr. H. Thomas Howell John L. Calhoun Thaddeus J. Hense Lynn C. Golberg John E. Raine III Frederick Steinmann Fannie. Angelos William Leon Kirk J. Michael Recher John Wilmer Conrad III Emily Miller Rody Magistrate Jacqueline E. Dawson

If there is anyone else who should be included on this list, please notify Doris Barnes at the Bar Office immediately, thank you.

This year, we will adjourn to CafĂŠ Troia located at 28 Allegheny Avenue in Towson for an opportunity to spend additional time with the family, friends and colleagues of our fallen brethren. We are looking for sponsors to provide refreshments. If you are able to do so, it would be greatly appreciated. Individuals are certainly welcome to support this as well. Please make checks payable to the BCBA and mail or drop off checks to the Bar Office. In advance, thank you.

Any unspent funds will be set aside for the next service.

THE ADVOCATE

Page 5

November 2015

WELCOME NEW MEMBERS At the recommendation of Alaina L. Storie, Chairperson of the Membership & Admissions Committee, the following attorneys were approved for membership at the October 13, 2015 Executive Council meeting:

Law Students Zachary Hansen

“ANATOMY OF A TRIAL”

Robert Middleton

A six-part lecture series on trial practice

Natasha Myrie

Lecture 2: Discovery

Kush Patel Thomas Stowe

Featuring

First-Year Barred

Mary Koch, Esq.

Justin Hill

Murphy, Falcon & Murphy

Lavanya Jagadish

Gov’t/Non-Profit

Erin K. Voss, Esq.

Meghan Ashley

Nagle & Zaller, P.C.

Donna D’Alessio Sabrina Chase

The Honorable Althea M. Handy

Lauren Kemper

Circuit Court for Baltimore City

Lisa Phelps Kimberly Phillips McGee

Thursday, November 12, 2015

Beverly Schulterbrandt

8:30 a.m. – 9:30 a.m.

6+ Years Barred

Circuit Court for Baltimore City

William Bickel

Courthouse East

David Fishkin

Room 510

Rebecca Maumenee Kimberly Van Bavel

THE ADVOCATE

Please RSVP for the lecture to Magistrate Hope Tipton at hope.tipton@mdcourts.gov.

Page 6

November 2015

BENCH/BAR COMMITTEE RECAP

by Bruce E. Friedman The second meeting of the year was held on October 8th. Following the call to Order by Chairperson Mary Sanders, and the approval of minutes, The Honorable Kathleen G. Cox reported on the almost-completed improvements to the courthouse (front steps, walkway and boiler project). Tim Sheridan, the Court’s Administrator, added that a courtyard project is on the horizon.

The Honorable Vicki Ballou-Watts gave the President’s Report. New additions to The Advocate include monthly articles authored by a Technology Committee representative and by an at-large member of the Bench/ Bar Committee; as well as periodic articles written by Jeff Scholnick leading up to the BABC’s Centennial.

Judge Ballou-Watts reported that the Association’s kickoff event at the Greene Turtle and the renewed Crab Feast were quite successful, and invited everyone to the then-upcoming Raven’s tailgate party and Stated Meeting. Finally, Judge Ballou-Watts encouraged the Committee’s members to attend this year’s Memorial Service, honoring our 15 members who passed away this past year. It will be held on Thursday, November 19th, at 3:30 p.m., followed by a reception at Café Troia where it is hoped that family and friends of those honored will have an opportunity to reminisce about their loved ones with members of the Bar who fondly remember them. This year’s event is being laudably chaired by the Honorable Judith C. Ensor.

The Honorable Alexandra N. Williams reminded the Committee that new laws went into effect on October 1st. She highlighted the Maryland Second Chance Act (Criminal Procedure Article, §10-301, et seq.), and predicted that the Expungement Docket will increase at least two-fold in the upcoming year. With approximately 4,000 expungements having been processed in 2014, expect an already slow process to become even slower. The Honorable Stacy A. Mayer added that changes to domestic violence laws include the expansion of the definition of a “person eligible for relief.” Judge Williams also stated that criminal trials will be set no earlier than sixty (60) days from the date of an arraignment or appearance before a commissioner (up from the current 45-day period). Finally, Judge Williams reported that physical improvements are slated for the Towson and Catonsville courthouses.

Deputy County Attorney Gregory E. Gaskins reported that the notice provision of the Local Government Tort Claims Act has been expanded from six months to one year. Debra Schubert, the Harford County Liaison, advised that both the Circuit and District Courts have outgrown their respective facilities, and that the creation of a Veteran’s Docket, initially consisting of only criminal cases, is being considered.

The Honorable William J. Somerville, III advised that two of the seven ALJ vacancies have been filled.

Congratulations to Jennifer Nappier and Deborah Richardson, the new appointees. Kudos also to Catherine Woods, who Magistrate Wendy Z. Schenker announced was appointed as a full-time Magistrate.

Magistrate Schenker also commented on the new statutory ground for divorce – mutual consent.

On behalf of the Criminal Bar, Leonard Shapiro raised several concerns: 1) inefficiency with respect to trials following jury prayers; 2) problems with e-filing in Anne Arundel County that need major improvement before e-filing arrives in Baltimore County; and 3) the Public Defender’s representation of too many individuals who can afford to hire private counsel (a position contested by Donald E. Zaremba, Baltimore County’s District Public Defender).

Professional Office Space

Sondra Douglas of the Family Law Committee announced a program on November 10th at Liberatore’s in Lutherville on cross-examining custody evaluators, and an Adoption Brown Bag Lunch on November 18th with a panel including the Honorable Ruth Ann Jakubowski.

In heart of Towson, available for sublet.

Use of conference room, waiting area, internet, copier.

Contact ken@kenpragercpa.com

THE ADVOCATE

The next meeting of the Bench/Bar Committee is scheduled for November 12, 2015.

Page 7

November 2015

CIVICS & LAW ACADEMY: WHERE LAW AND CITIZENSHIP INTERSECT

by Lisa Y. Settles Merriam-Webster defines civics as “the study of the rights and duties of citizens and of how government works,” law as “a binding custom or practice of a community,” and academy as “a school that provides training in special subjects or skills.”

The Civics and Law Academy (CLA) hosted by the Baltimore County Bar Association in conjunction with the Baltimore County Public Schools and the Community College of Baltimore County (CCBC) might, then, be described as a school designed to provide specialized training to local high school students about the binding customs and practices of their communities and their rights and duties as citizens in those communities.

law and citizenship. Students were also invited to share their own experiences. After attending their initial workshop, students proceeded to their second CLA workshop. The Academy concluded with lunch and an interactive presentation and discussion on Miranda Rights.

To stimulate more robust participation from Academy attendees, “friendly competition” between the schools was encouraged throughout the day. In addition to schools earning points for having the highest number of registrants, individual students had opportunities throughout the day to earn additional points for their schools. During our first Academy, Franklin High School proved the winning team and departed with a generous gift card for which they may opt to have a pizza party to celebrate their victory. In addition to earning points for their schools, individual students also won Starbucks gift cards for their correct responses to questions relating to Academy topics. All in all, the first Academy was a great success. Students and presenters alike expressed their excitement and appreciation for having been part of our initial CLA.

Weathering the torrential morning downpour of Hurricane Joaquin, nearly 100 select juniors and seniors from Franklin, New Town, Pikesville and Randallstown High Schools journeyed by the bus and carloads to the Owings Mills campus of CCBC on Friday, October 2, 2015. There, they receive training from judges and practicing attorneys during what was the first of three CLAs to be held during the 2015-16 Bar Association year.

Whether they attended workshops on “Rights and Responsibilities,” “Law and Justice,” “Power and Empowerment,” “Free Speech, School Speech and Protected Speech,” or “Law in a Cyber-Age,” students heard first-hand from Baltimore County jurists and practitioners about the delicate balance that must be struck on a daily basis between their rights as citizens and the often illusive notion of the “Law.” Each Academy participant received their own pocket-sized copy of the U.S. Constitution along with a flash drive containing each of the five workshop presentations.

Without question, the success of the Academy was due in large part to the tireless behind-the-scenes efforts of Donna Mandl, Chair of the Legal Studies Department at CCBC, and her team of student ambassadors along with Bar Association Executive Director Doris Barnes and her staff. Additionally, the generous $3,500 grant from the CCBC Foundation and $3,000 grant from Venable provided much needed financial support to ensure the success of the Academy.

Following continental breakfast and an opening plenary session where students were personally greeted by the Honorable Vicki Ballou-Watts, President of the Baltimore County Bar Association, students attended the first of two workshops.

There, Baltimore County judges and practitioners alike brought the black-letter of the law to life, sharing practical applications and interjecting realworld experiences concerning the intersection of THE ADVOCATE

The Bar Association will host its next CLA at that Essex campus of CCBC on Friday, November 13, 2015. The final Academy will take place at the Catonsville campus of CCBC on Friday, April 15, 2016.

If you are interested in participating as faculty for any of the sessions, please contact Lisa Settles at lsettles@pklaw.com, or 410-339-5783.

Page 8

November 2015

CIVICS & LAW ACADEMY: WHERE LAW AND CITIZENSHIP INTERSECT

THE ADVOCATE

Page 9

November 2015

MEET & GREET WITH THE BALTIMORE COUNTY COUNCIL

by Thomas H. Bostwick The State, Local Laws and Zoning Committee held a reception at the Towson Office of Whiteford, Taylor & Preston on Tuesday, September 29, 2015. The Committee hosted the seven members of the Baltimore County Council in an informal “meet-and-greet” event.

The evening served mainly as a way for SLLZ members to get acquainted with some of the newer members of the County Council, while also providing a forum for some light conversation about the Comprehensive Zoning Map Process (“CZMP”) that is now underway. The program was hosted by the Chair of the Committee, Nancy West, and Vice-Chair Adam Rosenblatt, and special thanks to John Gontrum for having the festivities at his firm’s office on the third floor of the Towson Commons Building. Of course, the evening would not have been the great success it was without the great food provided by Bill’s Seafood & Catering Co., which included crab balls, shrimp salad sandwiches, and savory glazed meatballs, not to mention some particularly tasty dessert confections.

Okay, now that I’ve got your attention …

Tom Quirk represents the First District. Mr. Quirk is a Certified Financial Planner practitioner, Chartered Retirement Planning Counselor and small business owner in Catonsville. A graduate of Western Maryland (now McDaniel) College where he tripled majored in Economics, Business Administration, and Political Science, he has been active within his community and in politics since his early teens. Mr. Quirk was elected to the County Council in 2010 and 2014 and served as Chairman in 2013.

After some preliminary remarks by Nancy and Adam, they introduced the County Council members.

Vicki Almond represents the Second District.

Prior to serving as a Councilwoman, Mrs. Almond was employed as Chief of Staff for a State Senator.

She has served as Vice-President on the Police Community Relations Council, President of the Franklin Middle and High School PTAs from 1986 -1994, and the Reisterstown, Owings Mills, Glyndon Coordinating Council. She was appointed to the Rosewood Citizen’s Advisory Council and the Baltimore County Commission for Women.

Mrs. Almond was elected to the County Council in 2010 and 2014 and served as Chairwoman in 2012.

Wade Kach represents the Third District. Mr. Kach was born in West Baltimore and graduated from Baltimore Polytechnic Institute (Poly) and THE ADVOCATE

Page 10

November 2015

MEET & GREET WITH THE BALTIMORE COUNTY COUNCIL Continued from page 10 Western Maryland College (now McDaniel College), earning a B.A. in Mathematics in 1970. Mr. Kach taught middle school math in the Baltimore County Public Schools from 1970 to 1992 before moving into the Audit Office of the County School System after more than two decades in the classroom. He was first elected to the Maryland House of Delegates in 1975, continuously serving large portions of northern Baltimore County until 2014. Mr. Kach was elected to the County Council in 2014.

(high honors) from the University of Maryland, College Park and a Master of Arts in public policy from the Johns Hopkins University in 1997. Mr. Marks worked for 14 years in various positions at the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Maryland Department of Transportation, where he was Chief of Staff to the Secretary. He is a former nine-term President of the Perry Hall Improvement Association and served on the Executive Board for the Baltimore County Historical Trust. Mr. Marks was elected to the County Council in 2010 and 2014.

Julian E. Jones, Jr. represents the Fourth District.

Mr. Jones is a Division Chief in the Anne Arundel County Fire Department with 29 years of experience. He has attained the highest professional certifications in many disciplines including Fire, Hazardous Materials, Instruction, Management and Rescue. He led Maryland Fire and EMS forces on a rescue mission to New Orleans after the devastation of Hurricane Katrina.

Mr. Jones graduated from the University of Maryland, Baltimore County with a Bachelors of Science Degree in Information Systems Management. Mr. Jones was elected to the County Council in 2014.

Cathy Bevins represents the Sixth District. Mrs. Bevins was born and raised on the Eastside of Baltimore County and has served her community for over 25 years through her children’s PTA groups, church based outreach, homeless outreach and community advocacy. She previously served under former County Executive Jim Smith as a Constituent Services Coordinator, assisting the residents of the eastside of Baltimore County in resolving issues on the local, state and federal levels. She was recently appointed to serve as Liaison to the Maryland Association of Counties for Baltimore County. Mrs. Bevins was elected to the County Council in 2010 and 2014 and is serving as Chairwoman in 2014 and 2015.

David Marks represents the Fifth District. He earned a B.A. degree in government and politics

Todd Crandell represents the Seventh District. He was born and raised in Dundalk where he currently resides. The son, grandson, and nephew of steelworkers, Mr. Crandell attended Gilman School and was a Division I wrestler at Rider University.

As a consultant and entrepreneur, he has over twenty years of experience in the manufacturing, aerospace, and internet industries. He is a former high school wrestling coach, has led workshops for the Future Business Leaders of America and has served on advisory boards for Baltimore Healthcare for the Homeless, the MIT Enterprise Forum, and Content Clothing. Mr. Crandell was elected to the County Council in 2014.

Continued on page 12

THE ADVOCATE

Page 11

November 2015

MEET & GREET WITH THE BALTIMORE COUNTY COUNCIL Continued from page 11

The Comprehensive Zoning Map Process began this year with the Open Filing Period from September 1st to October 15th, in which any citizen could file an “Issue� to change the zoning of a particular property, followed by the Filing Period for the Planning Board and Planning Director from October 1st to October 30th, and the Filing Period for members of the County Council from November 1st to November 30th. The Planning Staff will make their formal review of Issues from December 1st to January 29th, followed by Planning Staff recommendations from February 1st to February 29th. The Planning Board will conduct public hearings on Issues during the month of March 2016 and the County Council will hold its public hearings during the month of June 2016. The County Council will conduct its review of the Issues during the months of July and August 2016, culminating with a vote on all the Zoning Issues in late August 2016.

If you have questions regarding the CZMP, please contact the Department of Planning at (410) 8873480. You can also contact the County Council Office at (410) 887-3196 if you have questions about a specific Issue in a particular Council

THE ADVOCATE

Page 12

November 2015

COUNTY COUNCIL UPDATE

by Thomas H. Bostwick

Greetings! The members of the Baltimore County Council are grateful for the opportunity to update the County Bar on the activities of our County’s legislative body. Your seven member County Council serves as the independent Legislative Branch of County government. The Council meets year-round, generally in bi-monthly Legislative Sessions (held at night) and bi-monthly Work Sessions (held during the day). All proceedings are open to the public, and the Legislative Session is broadcast on BCTV (Comcast & Verizon channel 25).

The Council’s Website at www.baltimorecountycouncil.org provides helpful information as well.

provide a means to regulate the development potential of land near or within neighborhoods inside the urban rural demarcation line (URDL) typically under-served by available community open space areas. Bill 66-15 removes the language in subsection (c) of the Regulation that exempts the County from the N.C. Overlay District’s provisions and requirements, so that certain county-owned land inside the URDL may be assigned the N.C. Overlay District designation.

Recent items of interest considered by the Council include the following: At its September 21, 2015 Legislative Session, the Council passed Resolution 73-15 – Expanding the Towson Revitalization District. Commercial revitalization districts provide incentives to property owners and businesses in the districts to improve the exterior of existing buildings and to develop and redevelop underused properties. Resolution 7315 is intended to spur the redevelopment of the Kenilworth Mall by including the mall property in the Towson Commercial Revitalization District.

Bill 67-15 – Zoning Regulations – Parking – The Bill modifies the vehicle parking requirements for certain apartment buildings in the C.T. (Commercial, Town Center Core) District of Towson. Specifically, Bill 67-15 provides that the minimum requirement in the C.T. District of Towson is 1 space per apartment with no separate bedroom, or with 1 bedroom or 2 bedrooms. This applies only to an apartment building with a pedestrian entrance located within 300 feet of an entrance to a structured parking facility open to the public.

At its October 5, 2015 Legislative Session, the Council passed the following Bills:

Bill 68-15 – Zoning Regulations – Manufacturing, Light (M.L.) Zone Use Regulations -- Currently, the Baltimore County Zoning Regulations permit a winery by right in certain Resource Conservation (R.C.) Zones as an agricultural support use. Bill 68-15 amends the Regulations to permit a winery, as that term is defined and licensed by the Comptroller, in the Manufacturing, Light (M.L.) Zone as a miscellaneous use, by special exception. This includes accessory retail and wholesale distribution of wine produced on the premises.

Bill 63-15 – Modification of Residential Solar Energy System Requirements – The Bill amends the County’s Building Code and the County’s Fire Prevention Code in order to modify the requirements for the construction and placement of solar energy systems on the roof of a building.

Bill 63-15 specifically adds the exception to permit a single pathway if a single 4-foot-wide clear pathway is installed in the center third of the roof length and is not located over a window or door opening and with no overhead obstructions such as tree limbs, wires or signs, and also requires a minimum of 3 feet clear space to be provided around all solid fuel-burning chimneys for emergency access.

Finally, at its October 19, 2015 Legislative Session, the Council passed Resolution 89-15 – Planning Board – Open Space Waiver Fees. This Resolution asks the Planning Board to review the recently updated Baltimore County Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan (Resolution 6-15), and to recommend to the County Council the manner in which open space waiver fees, or fees in lieu, may be utilized to meet the County’s local open space needs as those needs are identified in the Plan. In order to complete its review, the Planning Board is also requested to establish an advisory committee composed of certain county agencies and interested stakeholders. The Planning Board is requested to submit a report to the County Council on or before April 30, 2016.

Bill 64-15 – Micro-brewery and Farm Brewery – The Bill authorizes a micro-brewery or a farm brewery in certain Resource Conservation (R.C.) Zones, including in the R.C. 2 (Agricultural Protection), R.C. 4 (Watershed Protection), R.C. 6 (Rural Conservation and Residential), R.C. 7 (Resource Conservation), and R.C. 8 (Environmental Enhancement) Zones, by special exception.

Bill 66-15 – Neighborhood Commons Overlay District – In March 2012, the Council passed Bill 7-12, which created the Neighborhood Commons (N.C.) Overlay District to

THE ADVOCATE

Page 13

November 2015

R AV E N S T A I L G AT E - O C T O B E R 1 1 , 2 0 1 5

LOT H THE ADVOCATE

Page 14

November 2015

R AV E N S T A I L G AT E - O C T O B E R 1 1 , 2 0 1 5

THE ADVOCATE

Page 15

November 2015

HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES:

by Jeffrey R. Scholnick Meet Elmer J. Cook, the First President of the Baltimore County Bar Association The first meeting of the BCBA was held on May 21, 1920. At that meeting, Elmer J. Cook was elected the first President of the BCBA. Who was Elmer Cook?

According to the book “Distinguished Men of Baltimore and of Maryland,” published in 1914 by the Baltimore American Publisher (available on the web at https://ia902607.us.archive.org/18/items/ distinguishedmen00balt/ distinguishedmen00balt_bw.pdf), at page 82, Elmer Cook was born in Franklin County, Pennsylvania in 1868. He graduated from Princeton in 1892 and the University of Maryland Law School in 1896. Among his clients were the B&O Railroad and Second National Bank of Towson, (where he was also a vice president and director.) He was a director of the Commercial Bank of Maryland.

Elmer Cook was a powerful force in Annapolis. He was elected to the House of Delegates in 1912, where he was a member of the Ways and Means Committee and Rules Committee. Even more significantly, he was Chairman of the Judiciary Committee and Chairman of Baltimore County’s delegation to the House. That year, Elmer Cook served as the Speaker Pro Tempore of the House, per the Archives of Maryland, http://msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/speccol/ sc2900/sc2908/000001/000123/pdf/am123--230.pdf and http://msa.maryland.gov/msa/speccol/sc2600/sc2685/ house/html/bahouse.html

THE ADVOCATE

According to “Law Notes, Volume VI, April, 1902 through March, 1903,” Edward Thompson Company Law Publishers, 1903, p. 89, Elmer Cook was a Vice President of the Maryland State Bar Association in 1902. The American Association of Public Accountants Yearbook of 1912- 1913, p. 225 (William G. Hewitt Press,) lists Elmer Cook as one of four men on the Maryland State Board of Accountants that year, http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt? id=hvd.hb06ea;view=1up;seq=229 On July 12, 1922, the Baltimore Sun called Cook “the best-paid lobbyist” in Maryland for his fee from United Railway Company which totaled $2,805.58 that year, a considerable sum at the time.

He appeared before the Court of Appeals in cases as diverse as those involving: banking, Jenkins v.

National Bank of Baltimore, 106 A. 174 (1919); testamentary capacity, Harris v. Hipley, et al, 89 A. 852 (1914); a plaintiff’s wrongful death action, Stumpf v. Baltimore and B. Electric Railways, 105 A. 532 (1919); and enforcement of a real estate contract, Milburn v. Michel, 112 A. 581 (1921) .

Given his relationship with the Second National Bank, as mentioned above, it is not surprising that his office was in the Second National Bank Building in Towson, per “Baltimore County, Its History, Progress and Opportunity,” by Logie Bonnett, Jeffersonian Publishing Co, (1916), p. 81, http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=loc.ark:/13960/ t6h138237;view=1up;seq=81.

After serving a one-year term as President of the BCBA, Cook served on the Executive Council the next year. He served on countless special committees of the BCBA, which turned to him whenever a new or complex issue had to be tackled. He returned to the Executive Council in 1928. The Minutes from the Annual BCBA Meeting in 1931 reflect on the substantial effort that Cook gave to the BCBA committees that year.

Page 16

Continued on page 17

November 2015

HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES Continued from page 16

Elmer J. Cook died on May 30, 1933. However, his energy, passion and strength of personality live on to this day in the work of the BCBA. We all owe a debt of gratitude to the pioneering spirit of Elmer Cook in leading the creation of our Bar Association.

There is a sense of determination in his eyes that seems to reach across the generations. It was this kind of determination needed to chart the course of the BCBA.

By the way, some additional information about the Second National Bank of Towson is worth exploring.

According to the website, www.antiquemoney.com, the Second National Bank of Towson existed from 1906 until 1935 and during that time, printed over $1 million dollars of money, http://www.antiquemoney.com/national-banknotes/maryland/old-money-from-the-secondnational-bank-of-towson-8381/ From that website, below, is a photo of a $20 bill with the name of this bank stamped to the left of President Jackson.

Also, according to the aforementioned “Baltimore County, Its History, Progress and Opportunity,� by Logie Bonnett, the Second National Bank of Towson was located on Washington Avenue across from the Old Court House. An advertisement for the Bank in the Bonnett book, which shows the Second National Bank Building is also shown below, in all of its glory.

THE ADVOCATE

Page 17

November 2015

TECHNOLOGY TIPS HOW SOCIAL MEDIA IS AFFECTING THE LEGAL COMMUNITY

by Matthew I. Wyman

We live in an age where seemingly everyone is connected to some form of social media. You’re probably reading this article through a link on social media at this very moment. While it has become a huge part of our private lives, have we ever really stopped to think about how it can, and does impact our professional lives?

pocket part to be delivered.

I also highly recommend following reporters that cover courthouses, and Annapolis. Sometimes there may be some valuable, real time news that you may have otherwise missed.

Social Media is an increasingly valuable tool in law enforcement. Most police departments use various mediums to keep the public informed of crimes in their area, and have used tips to help catch some very dangerous criminals.

Social media can impact many areas of our practice, including advertising, networking and even researching. It can also sometimes be helpful in gathering evidence (or harmful if your client doesn’t know when to keep their mouth shut).

Often, something said on social media can become evidence in a court proceeding. There are entire seminars on how to effectively gather and use this information. Many times people will say and do things on Facebook that they’d never say in front of thousands of people in real life, or if they’d taken ten seconds to think of the potential consequences. Make sure you know how to gather this information, and most importantly, make it admissible in court.

Do you use social media to advertise your presence? Does your office have a Facebook page, a Twitter handle, or a Linkedin account? More and more firms of all sizes are using this media to reach out to both existing and potential clients. Social media is an effective and relatively inexpensive way to reach the community. If you haven’t done so already, consider starting these today. Even for those who aren’t tech savvy, there are companies who can manage your accounts to help you deliver your message.

That being said, as lawyers , we have an obligation to make sure our clients understand this, while also using our opponents carelessness to our advantage.

If your client is suing for a back injury, its probably not a good idea for them to post pictures of their latest adventures snowboarding adventures.

Getting a divorce? Try not to badmouth your spouse on Facebook unless you really want a judge reading your profanity laced tyrade sent at 2 am after a night of overindulgence. The newspapers are also filled with stories of criminals who have been caught by bragging and posting pictures and video online.

Following groups, and associations in the community can help keep you abreast of activities, and learning experiences you may have otherwise missed. For example, make sure to follow the Baltimore County Bar Association on Facebook and @BaltCoBar on Twitter to stay up to date on educational and networking opportunities.

Social Media is a powerful tool. It changes constantly, but its always been so popular for its relative ease of use and access. Try to think of more ways to use it to help your career, or risk being left behind.

Twitter can be an excellent resource for both research, and staying current on caselaw and trends in your particular field. @USSupremecourt and @marylandappeals offer instant access to appellate decisions as soon as they are published.

No more waiting (and paying) for next year’s THE ADVOCATE

Page 18

November 2015

J. E A R L E P LU M H O F F PROFESSIONALISM AWARD NOMINATIONS The Professionalism Committee requests nominations from Bar Association Members for the annual recipient of the J. Earle Plumhoff Professionalism Award, which will be presented at the Annual Black Tie Banquet in January.

Recipient of this award must be: A

Baltimore County Bar Association member at least 5 years; Have

made professional contributions to Baltimore County Bar Association activities; Have

made contributions of time and resources that have gone largely unnoticed; and High

marks for dignity, integrity and civility.

Nominations should be sent to the Bar Office.

Deadline for submission is December 1st .

Recipients of this award include:

The following items are needed by Itineris, this year’s BCBA-designated charity. Please feel free to drop your donations off at the Bar Office and they will be delivered. In advance, thank you for your generosity.

White paper 20 sets of noise cancelling Head phones (for music and for noise control) Fitness items (Balls, medicine Balls, light weights, bands, et.)

Calculators Cleaning supplies Art Supplies Batteries (All sizes) Cooking supplies (Measuring cups, Pans, pots, Baking sheets) Flour, sugar, salt, sprinkles (basic cooking supplies) Board games Extra Lap tops (2) Ipads (2) vacuum Video camera Karaoke machine Bikes/Adult tricycles Padding for resource room

THE ADVOCATE

Fake register and scanner Fake food (fruit, cans , etc.)

Stress balls Laminator (Industrial sized) Laminate Sheets Board Maker Velcro Index Cards Yellow Hi-liters Papermate Color Pens Large PECS Communication books Extra Sentence Strips Extra Insert Pages Small PECS Communication books Extra Insert Pages ASL computer program?

Single hole puncher Index cards Magic markers Colored pencils A large paper shredder

Page 19

1984

Myles F. Friedman

2003

Richard A. Reid

2005

Leon Berg

2006

Keith R. Truffer

2007

Carolyn H. Thaler

2008

Jennifer B. Aist

2009

Christopher W. Nicholson

2010

Kristine K. Howanski

2011

Harris J. “Bud” George

2012

Mary Roby Sanders

2013

Robert L. Hanley Jr.

2014

Judge Robert J. Steinberg

2015

Herbert R. O’Conor III

November 2015

THE PROFESSIONAL LAWYER Invest in Preparation and Reap a Rich Return

by Keith R. Truffer Example: Vera Organized, Esq. has a hectic practice with regular court appearances, depositions, and client and witness meetings. Despite the demands of this practice, Lawyer Organized is so completely prepared for every meeting, deposition and motion that she has never lost a client or a case. By dint of her thorough preparation, she has all the facts at her fingertips. She knows the law like the back of her hand. Her presentation is clear and concise. When the argument drifts into the far seas of conjecture and illogic, she is able to guide the discussion safely back to the port of unshakable reason.

IDEALS OF PROFESSIONALISM, approved by the Maryland Court of Appeals: Fairness, Civility, and Courtesy A lawyer should understand that: (4) Professionalism is enhanced by preparing scrupulously for meetings and court appearances …

Comment: “Give me six hours to chop down a tree and I will spend the first four sharpening the axe.”

Abraham Lincoln Few among us have a surplus of that precious commodity of time. Yet every minute we devote to preparation planning an agenda for an important meeting, going over the law one more time before a motion or trial, or rereading the deposition of a critical witness – enhances our professional credibility and our chance of success.

Remember that time spent in preparation is never poorly invested.

BANKRUPTCY—Chapters 7 and 13 1-800-BANKRUPT Law Office of Nicholas J. Del Pizzo, III, P.A. STOP

Foreclosures Wage Garnishments Vehicle Repossessions Creditors Calls Judgments Lawsuits Free Consultation – Payment Plans

We are a Debt Relief Agency servicing all areas of Baltimore County, Baltimore City and Harford County – Over 1,000 cases filed.

THE ADVOCATE

Page 20

November 2015

Circuit Court for Baltimore County Law Library News Good-bye Errin The Baltimore County Circuit Court Law Library said goodbye to Errin Roby, one of its Associate Law Librarians. Her last day with the Library was October 16, 2015. We wish her well in her new position with the Social Security Administration!

New Hours The Law Library’s hours are 8:30am to 4:30pm Monday through Friday as of October 19, 2015

New MICPEL! The Law Library added Document Drafting for the Elder Law Attorney 2015 to our collection in October.

Ask for new and current Micpels at the Reference Desk.

Other recent additions to the Law Libraries collection include: Elder Law & Medicaid Plans Crash Course in Maryland Accidents ABA’s Preparing for Trial Hein Online Also new or updated are several of our Law in a Nutshell series: Construction Law in a Nutshell Corporate Finance Law in a Nutshell Federal Jurisdiction in a Nutshell White Collar Crime in a Nutshell

The Library’s e-Journal provider Hein added a few new journals this past month. The most pertinent is Death Row Reporter, a statistical guide to death row inmates and cases.

For the more international minded, Hein also added Dublin University Law Journal and Indonesian Journal of International Law.

U p c o m ing Ev e n ts

COMMITTEE REPORTS All Committee Reports, Chair and ViceChair contact information, upcoming programs, and handouts from those programs already held this year, can be found the website at www.bcba.org.

THE ADVOCATE

December 3

Holiday Party

December 17

YL Holiday Luncheon

January 28

Black-Tie Banquet

Page 21

November 2015

AWESOME events! Hope you were able to be there! Register online for future events!

THE ADVOCATE

Page 22

November 2015

P R O G R A M & E V E N T R E G I S T R AT I O N F O R M Please return this form to the Baltimore County Bar Association, 100 County Courts Building, 401 Bosley Avenue, Towson, MD 21204 with a check or credit card info; fax to 410-823-3418, or REGISTER ONLINE at www.bcba.org.

PLEASE register me for the following programs/events: Registration Fee: Member Non-Member November 4, Redevelopment in Urban Centers

$50

$60

November 9, Paint Nite!

November 10, Understanding Field Sobriety Test

$40 $10

$50 $20

November 10, Family Law Dinner, Direct & Cross

$50

$60

November 12, MDEC in Baltimore County

FREE

$20

November 17, Commercial Leasing - Current Trends November 18, Adoption: New Procedures

FREE FREE

$20 $20

November 20, Alternatives to Opening a Traditional Office

FREE

$20

November 20, ADR: When It’s All About the Money November 24, Recent Developments in Estate Administration

FREE—Register w/BABC FREE $20

December 1, The New DCM

$10

$20

December 2, Getting Your Office Ready for E-Filing

FREE

$20

December 3, Annual Holiday Party December 9, Criminal Law Circuit Court Practice Tips

$55 FREE

$60 $20

December 15, Special Needs Trusts and ABLE Accounts

FREE

$20

December 16, Technology Tips for Attorneys 2.0

FREE

$20

December 17, Young Lawyers Holiday Lunch

$10/donation

$20

January 13, ADR, Mediation and Collaborative Law

$10

$20

January 20, Family Law: Crawford Credits

$10

$20

Name(s) Telephone Address City State Zip Email Amount Enclosed Menu Choice (if applicable) Name on C/C Today’s Date Billing Address City State Zip Email Amount authorized MC/Visa/Discover/American Express Card No. Expiration SEC# (on back of card) Signature____________________________________________________________________________ THE ADVOCATE

Page 23

November 2015

CIVIL LAW UPDATE

by Ceecee Paizs

Review of the Amicus Curiarum for August 2015 reveals the following civil cases:

Frank D. Scarfield, Sr,. et al. v. Peter A. Muntjan, et al., No. 82, September Term 2014, filed July 24, 2015. Opinion by Adkins, Sally D., Judge

COURT OF APPEALS Mr. Muntjan, representing himself, filed a complaint containing two counts: one for Trover and Conversion, and one for Invasion of Privacy.

Scarfield filed a motion to dismiss the Invasion of Privacy count on statute of limitations grounds, which was granted. He then filed an answer to the Trover and Conversion count and did not request a jury trial. Four months later, Muntjan filed a jury demand. Two months later, Muntjan had filed an Amended Complaint reasserting Counts I and II and adding a Count III for Abuse of Process, including a jury trial. The Circuit Court dismissed the Counts II and III based on a failure to state a claim, but found that the Amended Complaint constituted a pleading which provided a 15-day period in which a jury demand can be made under Rule 2-325. The Court of Special Appeals held that the Circuit Court correctly dismissed Count III but erred in dismissing Count II and in denying Muntjan's jury demand. The Court of Special Appeals held that because the Amended Complaint raised a new issue, Muntjan was entitled to remand for a jury trial.

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v.

Shauntese Curry Trye, Misc. Docket, AG No. 34, September Term 2014, file July 27, 2015, Opinion

by McDonald, Robert N., Judge Prior to a divorce action between Ms. Trye and her husband, Ms. Trye refinanced a mortgage against a property owned by her. She misrepresented to the loan company that the property was owner occupied when in fact it was rented, and during the divorce action she testified that she would continue to rent that property. During the divorce action, Ms. Trye failed to comply with the discovery rules, including failing to attend a courtordered deposition, and made false statements to the court regarding her actions in the discovery process. In addition, Ms. Trye altered a draft of a settlement agreement negotiated between the parties and represented to her husband the night before the agreement was to be signed, that the altered draft was the same as the one previously negotiated. She also made a misrepresentation in a military affidavit filed in another matter, and failed to file income tax returns for 2009, 2010, 2012 and 2013.

The Court of Appeals reversed. The Court affirmed that an amended complaint is a pleading.

However, the Court went on to say that where the new pleading contains only a defective new count, it is insufficient to revise a previously waived jury demand. Since Muntjan's only new count raised in his Amended Complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim, it did not present a clam triable of right. Therefore it was not sufficient to support a jury demand independently, much less provide a springboard to allow other counts to piggyback on its jury demand. To allow such a revival of a waived jury demand would strip Maryland Rule 2325 of any causal efficacy.

The Court of Appeals held that disbarment was the appropriate sanction. After considering each of Ms. Trye's claims related to the reasons why her actions were justified, the Court concluded that the actions of Ms. Trye violated MLRPC 8.4 (c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation) and 8.4 (d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), 3.2 (expediting litigation), 3.4 (fairness to opposing party and counsel), 4.1 (honesty in statements to others) and 4.2 (communication with person represented by counsel. The Court concluded that Ms. Trye's pattern of dishonesty and intentional misrepresentations warranted disbarment.

THE ADVOCATE

Continued on page 21

Page 24

November 2015

CIVIL LAW UPDATE Continued from page 20

COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS

jurisdiction in the State of Maryland for another proceeding or purpose solely by reason of having answered the custody action. The definition of a custody proceeding under the UCCJEA includes a proceeding for paternity. After review of the commentaries to the UCCJEA and cases from other jurisdictions, the Court concluded that the definition was intended to resolve confusion regarding the kinds of proceedings in which custody determinations may be made, rather than to extend limited immunity to parties involved in any of the proceedings listed in the definition simply because an issue of custody arose. The Court then looked at the actions taken by Father, that being the request for genetic testing and the discovery actions seeking information related to both custody and child support, as well as paternity, as to whether such actions invoked the court's jurisdiction by these affirmative relief requests satisfied the long arm provision of the UIFSA. The Court concluded that they did, and that court had personal jurisdiction over Father for the additional issues raised by Mother.

Claudia Friedetzky v. Roger Hsia, No. 1187, September Term 2014, filed July 6, 2015. Opinion

by Leahy, Andrea M., Judge Mother files a single-count custody action against Father, who resides in New York. Father responded denying paternity and requesting that the court order genetic testing to determine paternity. He then engaged in Discovery, seeking information related to paternity and child support.

Mother amended her complaint to add claims for paternity, child support and counsel's fees. Father moved to dismiss the added claims for lack of personal jurisdiction and the circuit court granted the motion.

The Court of Special Appeals reversed. The Court discussed the interrelationship between the Maryland Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act ("UCCJEA") and the Maryland Uniform Interstate Family Support Act ("UIFSA").

The court noted that the UCCJEA governs custody claims and the UIFSA governs claims of child support and paternity, but not custody. The Court explained that the UCCJEA contains a "limited immunity" provision, which does not subject a party to a child custody action to personal

Marvin Wilson, v. Sylvia Wilson, No. 497, September Term 2014, filed July 1, 2015. Opinion

by Woodward, Patrick L., Judge On July 21, 2009, the parties placed an agreement on the record which divided their marital property and included a statement that the parties would equally divide the marital portion of the parties' pension interests.

On August 6, 2009, Husband informed that he would be placed on temporary disability retirement by the Air Force on October 28, 2009. On January 21, 2010, the court entered a Marital Property Consent Order Continued on page 24

THE ADVOCATE

Page 25

November 2015

CIVIL LAW UPDATE Continued from page 21 which included that Wife shall receive 50% of Husband's "military pension fund." Husband was placed on permanent disability retirement on April 3, 2011. The Air Force informed Wife's attorney that under federal law it could not pay wife her portion of Husband's military pension as his "pension" was 100% disability retirement. The trial court held that Husband owed Wife her share of the disability payments received by Husband and order arrears.

which relief could be sought. The court granted the motion to dismiss.

The Court of Special Appeals affirmed. While Md. Code (2014 Supp.) § 10-117(b) of the Criminal Law Article (“CL”) makes it a criminal offense for an adult to knowingly or willfully allow an unrelated person under the age of 21 to consume alcohol for nonreligious purposes at a residence the adult owns or leases, it does not create a separate cause of action upon which a complaint for negligence can be based. Although CL § 117 (b) imposed a duty on Ms. Stapf, and the complaint sufficiently alleged a violation of this duty, the principle that a violation of a statute is evidence of negligence is a rule of evidence. The Court of Appeals has held, as a matter of law, that “the man who drank the liquor is liable” and the act of providing it is “too remote to be a proximate cause of an injury." Therefore the lower court properly dismissed the Complaint.

The Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that Husband's "military pension fund" included his disability payments based on Maryland contract law, which provides that a provision dividing retirement benefits includes disability benefits unless they are expressly excluded. Further, the parties' separation agreement was not preempted by federal law, citing Allen v. Allen, 178 Md. App. 145, cert denied, 405 Md. 63 (2008). While federal law may preclude state courts from treating disability retirement benefits as marital property, Husband's military retirement disability benefits replace the retirement benefits that the service member would otherwise have received. Further, at the time of the entry of the agreement related to the military pension benefits, such benefits were divisible and assignable at the time of the contract and therefore are enforceable. The fact that the Air Force would not pay Wife directly does not relieve Husband of the obligation to pay Wife her share of the benefits.

Review of the Amicus Curiarum from September 2015 reveals the following civil cases: COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS Stephen Sieglein v Laura Schmidt, No 2616, September Term 2013, filed August 25, 2015.

Opinion by Leahy, Andrea M., Judge During their marriage, the parties participated in in vitro fertilization which resulted in the birth of a child, using Mother's egg and donated sperm. At the time of their divorce, Father challenged paternity, claiming that he was not biologically related to the child. The Circuit Court found that father was the legal parent of the child, and that he had voluntarily impoverished himself, ordering payment of child support and arrearages, and granting Mother's request for a protective order.

Nancy Davis, et al. v. Linda Stapf, et al., No. 2533, September Term 2013, filed August 26, 2015.

Opinion by Graeff, J. Linda Stapf allowed a group of minors to drink at a party at her home. After the party, the son of Nancy Davis, who was intoxicated at the time, was a passenger in a truck driven by another party who was also intoxicated. The driver lost control of the truck and Ms. Davis' son died as a result of the accident. She filed a complaint against Ms. Stapf for negligence. Ms. Stapf filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failing to state a claim upon

The Court of Special Appeals affirmed, citing the Estates and Trusts Article Section 1-206, which

Continued on page 27

THE ADVOCATE

Page 26

November 2015

CIVIL LAW UPDATE Continued from page 26 creates a presumption of "legitimacy" for children born to a married mother which extends to a child conceived by artificial insemination with the consent of her husband. Therefore, because Mother and Father willingly and voluntarily agreed to conceive a child through assisted reproductive services during their marriage and that volitional action resulted in the birth of a child, ET Section 1-206(b) established that both spouses are the legal parents of the minor child.

Article Section 1-208(b), still had to show exceptional circumstances to demonstrate parental standing. None of the additional factors raised by Michelle supported a finding of exceptional circumstances warranting an award of access to Jaxon.

Michelle L. Conover v. Brittany D. Conover, No. 2099, September Term 2013, filed August 26, 2015. Opinion by Zarnoch, Robert A. Judge Michelle and Brittany began a relationship in 2002. They discussed having a child together and agreed that Brittany would be artificially inseminated by an anonymous donor. Jaxon was conceived in 2009 and born April 4, 2010, after the District of Columbia, where the parties resided at the time, began to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. No father was identified on the birth certificate. The parties were married in DC on September 28, 2010. The parties separated in September 2012 and Michelle visited with Jaxon on a regular basis until July 15, 2012.

Subsequently, Brittany denied Michelle access to Jaxon. Following the filing for divorce, the circuit court denied Michelle visitation, citing the fact that Michelle did not meet the paternity factors for "father" under the Maryland Code and therefore lacked standing. Michelle conceded that Brittany was a fit parent. The court concluded that she had not shown exceptional circumstances to justify a right of access to the child.

The Court of Special Appeals affirmed, finding that Michelle stood in the same stance as a step parent who had not adopted his/her step child.

Despite the parental involvement and relationship, Michelle was viewed as a third party in relation to a claim for access or custody of a minor child.

Citing Monroe v. Monroe, 329 Md. 758 (1993) which involved a step father who met three of the four criteria for paternity under Estates and Trusts THE ADVOCATE

Please see page 14 of this issue for a “Wish List� of items needed by Itineris. You may drop items off at the Bar Office. Thank you!

Page 27

November 2015

Don’t let this happen to your career. Reach out for help before it becomes a train wreck. Don’t wait for Bar Counsel to pay you a visit. Confidential help is available for any attorney, paralegal or support staff for drug, alcohol and/or mental health issues, among others.

ARE ALCOHOL AND DRUGS CAUSING PROBLEMS IN YOUR LIFE? There is a way up and a way out — for ABSOLUTELY CONFIDENTIAL help, call us today ...

BALTIMORE COUNTY LAWYER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM A CONFIDENTIAL resource for Baltimore County attorneys, assistants and judges.

Our services include help for a broad range of problems and personal concerns, such as: Depression Marital and Family Relationships Alcohol and Drug Abuse Stress and Burnout Prescription Drug Concerns Career Concerns

Gambling Internet Addiction Sexual Addiction Compulsive Spending Eating Disorders Balancing Work and Family

WE DO NOT KEEP RECORDS. Our sole purpose is to provide help. We can assist with providing access to treatment facilities and provide emergency practice management, as well as referrals to professional counselors.

GARY MILES, Chair RICHARD LYNAS, Vice-Chair STUART AXILBUND JIM BEACH MARY CHALAWSKY MARISSA JOELSON JAY MILLER JOSE MOLINA SAM MOXLEY JOE MURTHA JIM QUINN BILL SALTYSIAK JUDGE PHILIP N. TIRABASSI MARK VAN BAVEL

THE ADVOCATE

443-632-1760 410-288-1099 410-832-7579 410-241-8538 410-649-2000 917-226-6472 410-951-7165 443-851-7353 410-733-3306 410-583-6969 443-703-3041 410-583-8883 410-512-2053 410-337-5291

Page 28

November 2015

FREE, EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE FOR REAL PROBLEMS BCBA’S LAWYER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

by Gary Miles

The practice of law is very difficult. We encounter stresses from clients and other attorneys, and sometimes from the difficult process of trying cases as well. Everyone experiences personal or work related problems at some point. Often we are struggling for the next client and the next fee.

Those pressures which are intrinsic to our profession often lead to emotional stress and anxiety, and sometimes excessive resort to pills or alcohol. At times the anxiety and stress we feel can affect our effective daily functioning and cause feelings of worry, impending danger, sleep disturbances, heart palpitations, fatigue and other symptoms. These problems can hinder our ability to practice law and detrimentally affect our personal satisfaction, lifestyle and health.

The Lawyer Assistance Program can make a difference. Our services include help for a broad range of problems and personal concerns such as: Depression Marital and Family Relationships Alcohol and Drug Abuse Stress and Burnout Prescription Drug Concerns Career Concerns Gambling Internet Addiction Sexual Addiction Compulsive Spending Eating Disorders Balancing Work and Family Referring to the Lawyer Assistance Program. If you are concerned about another lawyer you can make a confidential referral to the Lawyer Assistance Program.

There is an answer!! What is important to know is that all of us have experienced personal or work related problems at some point. What is even more assuring is to understand that you are not alone.

The Baltimore County Bar Association has staffed a very effective and caring committee that is here to help. We have experienced some of the same problems that many of you, or other attorneys you know, face. If any of you know of an attorney who is struggling with addiction, substance abuse, depression or stress, the Baltimore County Lawyers Assistance Program is here to help.

Confidentiality. Federal and state law ensures the confidentiality of those who seek assistance through our program or those who have been referred to the Lawyers Assistance Program. In addition Rule 8.3 in The Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct protects the confidentiality of lawyers using the program.

Gary Miles, with the Law Offices of Huesman, Jones and Miles, is the new Chair of the Baltimore County Lawyer Assistance Program. Jay Miller, long-time chair, with the Law Offices of Peter G. Angelos, will continue to serve on the committee. Gary Miles can be reached at his direct line 443-632-1760; cell 410493-9798; or gary@lawhjm.com.

Early intervention is the key to resolving these concerns. Call the Baltimore County Lawyer Assistance Program for free, confidential counseling. The Lawyer Assistance Program is committed to providing assistance to lawyers, judges, law students, the legal community and their families. The dedicated service of the committee members and the relationship they have formed with the Maryland State Bar Association’s Lawyer Assistance Program have resulted in hundreds of lawyers getting the much needed assistance they deserve.

THE ADVOCATE

The Baltimore County Lawyer Assistance Program works very closely with the Maryland State Bar Lawyer Assistance Program, and with the written permission of the client, can assist in coordinating services. The Maryland State Bar can be reached by calling Jim Quinn, Director, at 443-703-3041; jquinn@msba.org or Lisa Caplan, Counselor, at 443 -703-3042; lcaplan@msba.org.

Page 29

November 2015

THE ADVOCATE

Page 30

November 2015

V O LU N T E E R S N E E D E D

J

oin Baltimore County’s finest members of the Judiciary and Bar on November 13, 2015 and/or April 15, 2016, as the Public Awareness & Speakers Committee embarks on the third year of bringing the ABA-initiated Civics & Law Academy to Baltimore County Public School students. Each Academy is held at one of the beautiful Community College of Baltimore County campuses, and serves students from five area high schools each, bringing more than 100 students together at each Academy to emphasize the importance of knowing and understanding their basic Constitutional Rights, in a format that is both engaging and entertaining. Volunteer faculty are provided the curriculum, as well as presentations and handouts. This is an inspiring way to reach out to the young people in our communities at this crucial stage of their lives.

Y

ou really can make a difference! To volunteer as faculty for one of these sessions, or for more information, please contact Lisa Y. Settles (410-339-5783; lsettles@pklaw.com), Chair of the BCBA Public Awareness & Speakers Committee.

Any Baltimore County high school student, or BCBA Members’ child(ren) (if in another jurisdiction) are eligible to submit an essay based on the ABA-designated theme, Miranda, More Than Words Details of the contest, criteria, and deadline can be found on our website under the Law Day Committee Report.

THE ADVOCATE

Page 31

November 2015

CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE

by Robert C. Lidston The October Amicus contains three Court of Appeals decisions which may be of interest to practitioners.

Baker v. State, No. 1397, September Term 2014, filed July 6, 2015 (opinion by Graeff, J.). Baker was charged with second degree rape and other offenses.

On the night of the crime, the victim was working as a prostitute. Baker telephoned her to arrange an encounter and when he arrived he forced her to engage in sexual acts with him without her consent.

Investigating police examined the victim’s phone and found the number of the person who had raped her. Police contacted AT&T to get call records for the phone number, which belonged to Baker, and the records showed that Baker had called the victim on the night of the crime.

During Baker’s trial, the prosecutor sought to enter into evidence the AT&T call records. Baker’s counsel objected, arguing that the records were inadmissible hearsay. The circuit court admitted the records. Baker appealed to the Court of Special Appeals, again arguing that the call records were inadmissible hearsay. The State argued that the records were not hearsay because they were not statements of a human being, but were generated in their entirety by AT&T’s computers. The State also argued that, even if the records were hearsay, they were created in the ordinary course of business and, therefore, came under a hearsay exception.

COSA reversed the trial court. It found that it had erred in admitting the call records in the absence of a sufficient basis which demonstrated that they were not hearsay or that they were records created in an ordinary course of business. Records generated by the internal operations of a computer do not implicate the hearsay rule because they do not constitute a statement of a "person." Thus, the AT&T records that were admitted would not be hearsay if they were computer generated. The prosecutor, however, had not produced evidence demonstrating how the call records were generated.

Additionally, the records that showed that the phone number that had called the victim’s phone on the night of the offense belonged to Baker were likely data entered by a person, which would constitute hearsay. The trial court record was not sufficient to support a conclusion that the call records were not hearsay.

The State had also failed to lay a proper foundation to establish that the records were admissible under the business record exception. There had been no testimony from an AT&T employee specifying the process by which the records were generated and the prosecutor had not provided a certification from the custodian of records at AT&T. Because no argument had been raised at the trial level or been briefed on appeal that there was an alternate way to satisfy the business records exception, COSA did not address this issue.

Continued on page 33

The BCBA-designated charity for 2015-2016

THE ADVOCATE

Page 32

November 2015

CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE Continued from page 32 State v. Hallihan, No. 886, September Term 2014, filed August 28, 2015 (opinion by Salmon, J.).

Hallihan was charged with nine crimes, including burglary and assault. Hallihan’s defense attorney filed a motion to dismiss four of the charges on the grounds that those counts in the Criminal Information failed to state an offense. At a hearing on the motion, a judge heard argument but no evidence was presented. Afterward, the court dismissed the counts in question. The State then entered a nolle pros to the remaining five counts and appealed the dismissal of the four counts.

In replying to the State’s appeal, Hallihan relied on Taylor v. State, 371 Md. 617 (2002) in contending that double jeopardy barred the State from filing the appeal. The State argued that Taylor was distinguishable. It also argued that the motion’s judge had erred in dismissing the four counts in question.

shot the store owner and a customer who later died.

The robbers found no money in the store. After the event, McGhie was overheard bragging that he could not be implicated in the crime because he had not actually entered the store, his fingerprints had not been left on anything, and no one had seen him at the location. He expressed sorrow that the customer had died but complained that he "didn’t get a damn dime." A witness testified that McGhie had fired a particular gun in the week before the robbery. An employee of the Maryland State Police Ballistics Laboratory testified as an expert in ballistics and firearms identification. He asserted that the gun McGhie had fired in the week before the robbery was the same gun used to shoot the owner and the customer. In giving his qualifications as an expert, the employee had testified that he held Continued on page 34

The Court of Special Appeals reversed the trial court. In deciding that double jeopardy did not bar the State’s appeal, COSA analyzed Taylor and found that it was distinguishable from the Hallihan matter. In Taylor, the circuit court had received evidence at the dismissal hearing and the dismissal granted by the trial court depended on the judge’s evaluation of the evidence before the court. In the Hallihan matter, no evidence was received and, therefore, the motion’s judge could not possibly have dismissed the case based on evidence. COSA also held that the four counts at issue clearly stated a cause of action and that the judge had erred in dismissing them.

McGhie v. State, No. 2469, September Term 2013, filed August 26, 2015 (opinion by Graeff, J.).

McGhie was charged with murder and related crimes from an attempted robbery where two people were shot. At trial, evidence showed that McGhie and three others plotted the robbery of a store.

McGhie had been overheard talking about his desire to commit the robbery and saying what he wanted to do with the money that he and his accomplices hoped to steal. During the robbery, a co-conspirator

THE ADVOCATE

Page 33

November 2015

CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE Continued from page 33 a bachelors degree, that he had worked in the State Police Ballistics Laboratory and with the Baltimore City Crime Lab, and that he had conducted more than 1,200 ballistics examinations each year. He said that there was no degree in "ballistics" and that "all knowledge of the field is done by way of on-the-job training."

McGhie was convicted of murder and other crimes and was sentenced to life imprisonment. After McGhie had been incarcerated for over a decade, the Public Defender’s office discovered that the State’s expert had lied about having a bachelor’s degree.

McGhie filed a Petition for Writ of Actual Innocence, alleging that the perjury discovery constituted newly discovered evidence that entitled him to a new trial. The hearing judge rejected the State’s argument that McGhie’s counsel could have discovered the employee’s perjury, noting that the

expert had testified in that capacity in a number of cases in which his falsified credentials were not exposed. Still, the motion’s judge concluded that there was not a substantial or significant possibility that the result of the trial would have been different if the expert’s untruthfulness as to his degree had been exposed. McGhie appealed to the Court of Special Appeals.

COSA affirmed the motion judge’s decision. In denying the Petition for Writ of Actual Innocence, the judge did not abuse the court’s discretion in finding that the State’s employee’s lying about his academic background could not have been discovered by defense counsel in time to file for a new trial. There had been no "red flags" raised that would "require a competent defense attorney to question" the expert’s credentials. In addition, a Petition for Writ of Actual Innocence will only be granted if newly discovered evidence creates a substantial or significant possibility that the result of the trial may have been different. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the newly discovered evidence, which was merely impeaching evidence, did not merit the granting of the Petition because a correct statement of the expert’s qualifications would not have changed the result of the trial. There was other compelling evidence of McGhie’s guilt which meant that there was not a substantial or significant possibility that the result of McGhie’s trial would have been different if the jury had known of the expert’s deceit and disregarded his testimony entirely.

Paul E. Alpert, Retired Judge Available for Mediation and Arbitration Former Judge of District Court, Circuit Court and Court of Special Appeals

410-484-2088

THE ADVOCATE

Page 34

November 2015

THE ADVOCATE

Page 35

November 2015

Committee Programs ADR Committee

Estates & Trusts Committee

Bar Library, Mitchell Courthouse, Baltimore  November 20, 2015, Noon-2:30 p.m.

When It’s All About the Money

Mezzanine 08, 5 p.m.  November 24, 2015, Recent Developments in Estate Administration  December 15, 2015, Special Needs Trusts Act

CLE Committee Mezzanine 08  November 10, 2015, 8 a.m.

Understanding Standard Field Sobriety Test & Other DUW Nuances  March 2, 2016, Noon Magical Mystery Tour - Behind the Scenes Tour of the Circuit Court  April 6, 2016, Noon Peace/Protective Orders  May 4, 2016, Common Mistakes: Avoiding Attorney Grievance  September 7, 2016 District Court Personal Injury Cases: Proving Damages

Criminal Law Committee Mezzanine 08, 5 - 6 p.m.  December 9, 2015  February 10, 2016  April 13, 2016  June 8, 2016

Entertainment Committee     

December 3, 2015, Holiday Party January 28, 2016, Black-Tie Banquet March 11, 2016, Bowling @ Mustang Alley April 26, 2016, Supreme Court Group Admission June 2, 2016, Golf Tournament

THE ADVOCATE

Family Law Committee Dinner Programs, 6 p.m.  November 10, 2015, Liberatore’s How to Perform Direct and Cross Examination of Child Custody Evaluators  March 24, 2016  April 7, 2016, Joint Program with BABC Brown Bag Lunch, Mezzanine 08, Noon-1:30 p.m.  November 18, 2015, Adoption: New Procedures - Pitfalls and Practicalities Informational Sessions Mezzanine 08, 5-6:30 p.m., followed by Happy Hour in Towson  December 1, 2015  January 13, 2016  January 20, 2016 Evening Series Mezzanine 08, 5-6:30 p.m.  March 16, 2016  April 20, 2016  May 18, 2016

Law Day 2016 Miranda, More Than Words To be celebrated on Monday, May 2, 2016 Student Essays are due by April 16, 2016. The flyer with criteria is available at http://www.bcba.org/ site/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/2016-Essay-student -flyer.pdf Page 36

November 2015

Committee Programs 

Memorial & Recognition Committee November 19, 2015, 3:30 p.m., Annual Memorial Service. Those who will be remembered include:

May 3, 2016, followed by a Happy Hour Medical Malpractice Matters

Professionalism Committee

Gary D. Schenker C. Daniel Held William J. Blondell Jr. H. Thomas Howell John L. Calhoun Thaddeus J. Hense Lynn C. Golberg John E. Raine III Frederick Steinmann Frances M. Angelos William Leon Kirk J. Michael Recher John Wilmer Conrad III Emily Miller Rody Magistrate Jacqueline E. Dawson

Mezzanine 08, Noon-1:30 p.m.  November 18, 2015, Adoption: New Procedures - Pitfalls and Practicalities

Public Awareness & Speakers Committee Civics & Law Academies  November 13, 2015 @ CCBC Essex  April 15, 2016 @ CCBC Catonsville If you are interested in volunteering as faculty, please contact Lisa Y. Settles.

Real Property Committee

This year, we will adjourn to Café Troia located at 28 Allegheny Avenue in Towson for an opportunity to spend additional time with the family, friends and colleagues of our fallen brethren. We are looking for sponsorships to provide a few cocktails and appetizers. If you are able to do so, at $100 per firm, it would be greatly appreciated. Individuals are certainly welcome to support this, as well, at any amount they are able to donate. Please make checks payable to the BCBA and mail or drop off to the Bar Office. In advance, thank you.

Mezzanine 08, 12 - 1:30 p.m.

Brown Bag Lunch  November 17, 2015 Commercial Leasing - Current Trends  March 8, 2016  May 10, 2016

Solo & Small Firm Committee Mezzanine 08  Friday, November 20, 2015, Noon Alternatives to Opening and Maintaining A Traditional Office

State, Local Laws & Zoning Committee Negligence, Insurance & Workers’ Comp Mezzanine 08, 5-6:30 p.m.  November 18, 2015 To be rescheduled Competency in the Courtroom  February 18, 2016 Workers’ Comp - Vocational Rehabilitation THE ADVOCATE

Dinner Programs, 6 p.m.  November 4, 2015, 5 p.m., Redevelopment of Urban Centers in Baltimore County  February 4, 2016  March 3, 2016  April 13, 2016 Page 37

November 2015

Committee Programs Technology Committee Courtroom 2, Circuit Court for Baltimore County  November 12, 2015, 5:15 p.m., Ctrm 2 MDEC in Baltimore County Mezzanine 08, Noon  December 2, 2015 Getting Your Office Ready For EFiling  December 16, 2015 Technology Tips for Attorneys 2.0  February 17, 2016 Technology in the Courtroom To be scheduled  Social Media for Marketing & Investigation  Cloud Computing Also look for monthly articles beginning next month on technology tips, apps, practice software, case management, etc. If you are interested in writing one of these columns, please contact Rob Erdman, 410296-3630.

Young Lawyers Committee December 17, 2015, Noon, Holiday Lunch

Not sure what benefits are available to you as a BCBA Member? Click the picture to the left to learn more, or call or email Doris Barnes or Maxine Morrow for more information.

THE ADVOCATE

Signature Sponsors The Baltimore County Bar Association continues its Signature Sponsor program, which enhances the opportunities for our sponsors, as well as our members. This singletier program provides more engagement between our sponsors and our members. Each Signature Sponsor will host one of teb signature events held throughout the year, thereby reducing the cost of the event for members, and many other added benefits.

Sponsorships help the Bar Association maintain its current dues level, despite the increasing costs of providing top-shelf legal education programs, social events, networking opportunities and Bar Office services available in the County Courts Building. If you know of a business that would be interested in one of these limited sponsorship opportunities, please contact Doris Barnes (doris@bcba.org or 410 -337-9103).

Please join us in welcoming these sponsors and consider their services when you need them. Their ads are throughout each issue of The Advocate, and can be located quickly using the index at the end of the issue, and by the gold ribbon that accompanies their ad. Please let them know you appreciate their support. Thank you!

Page 38

November 2015

MARYLAND LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION ANNOUNCES 2015 LEGAL SERVICES AWARDS The 2015 MLSC Legal Services Award recipients have been selected by the Maryland Legal Services Corporation’s (MLSC) Board of Directors, and will be honored at MLSC’s annual awards reception on Monday, December 7, 2015, 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. at the Lord Baltimore Hotel.

Lawrence D. Coppel, of Gordon Feinblatt LLC, will receive the Arthur W. Machen, Jr. Award for his leadership in helping low-income Marylanders access legal services for debtor assistance, bankruptcy protection and foreclosure matters. He has contributed pro bono services and client education and created a bankruptcy bar association and a law school clinical program over his 45-year career. This award is given annually to an attorney in private practice who has rendered extraordinary service by providing civil legal services to low-income Marylanders or by improving the civil legal services delivery system for such persons.

The Benjamin L. Cardin Distinguished Service Award recognizes outstanding public interest attorneys who are regularly involved in providing, promoting, or managing civil legal services. MLSC’s 2015 honorees are Pamela Cardullo Ortiz of the Access to Justice Department, Administrative Office of the Courts, and Maureen A. Sweeney of the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law. This year’s William L. Marbury Outstanding Advocate Award, for a non-attorney who has demonstrated outstanding service representing the rights and legal needs of low-income persons or by expanding access to justice for such persons, will be presented to D. Crystal Mack of the Women’s Law Center of Maryland.

Gore Brothers has been named as this year’s recipient of the Herbert S. Garten Public Citizen Award for supporting the legal services community with reporting and video conferencing services. The Garten Award honors an entity or organization not regularly engaged in the delivery of legal services to low-income persons that has demonstrated an extraordinary commitment to increase access to justice for such persons.

community, including bar associations, legal services programs and other interested persons and organizations. MLSC was established by the Maryland General Assembly in 1982 to receive and distribute funds to nonprofit organizations that provide civil legal assistance to low-income persons. From its inception, MLSC has made grants totaling almost $200 million to help provide services in over 2 million legal matters for Maryland’s families in areas of family, housing, consumer, employment, health care and other civil legal matters.

LAWYER IN THE LOBBY CLINIC The attorneys listed below have volunteered to staff the LAWYER IN THE LOBBY CLINIC, which is held the second Wednesday of each month, 4:30 to 6:30 p.m. This is an opportunity for citizens of Baltimore County to meet, free of charge, with an attorney for advice and/or referral or both (including self-referral) in the areas of collections, bankruptcy, landlord/tenant matters, contract, warranties and other consumer matters, wills, probate, advance directives, or small claims actions.

Jerry Blake Jessica Corace Keith Franz Bruce Friedman Valerie Ibe Michael Jeffers Fu-Mei Jiang Brady Locher

Lisa Magil Mala Malhotro-Ortiz Paul Mayhew James Nolan Larry Polen Michelle Valenti Jordan Watts

If you are interested in staffing the Clinic, please call Rachel M. Ruocco at 410-337-9100 or email rachel@bcba.org.

MLSC annually solicits nominations for its legal services awards throughout Maryland’s legal

THE ADVOCATE

Page 39

November 2015

HEAR YE, HEAR YE …

CALLING ALL LAW CLERKS, JACOBSON’S JESTERS & FRIENDS OF HON. LEONARD JACOBSON

Noted Portrait Artist Kathleen Meredith has been commissioned to render the portrait of the late Honorable Leonard Jacobson. Funds are being received by the Baltimore County Bar Foundation to support this endeavor.

Please make your check payable to the Baltimore County Bar Foundation (Memo: Jacobson Portrait Fund), and send or deliver to the Bar Office, 100 County Courts Building, 401 Bosley Avenue, Towson, MD 21204. Please include instruction on exactly how you would like your name printed on the program for the unveiling.

For those wishing to take a stroll down Memory Lane, and those who have no idea of the hidden theatrical talents of some of the now-senior members of the bar, you are encouraged to visit the Baltimore County Small and Solo Attorney’s Blog penned by Jeffrey R. Scholnick, which includes a couple clips from Justice—All that Jazz.

Baltimore County Bar Foundation, 100 County Courts Building, 401 Bosley Avenue, Towson, MD 21204 I have enclosed the sum of $

for the Jacobson Portrait Fund.

Please charge the following credit card, in the amount of $

.

Name on Card____________________________________Telephone Number Card No Exp Sec. No. BILLING Address City State Zip Name, as it is to appear in the program: I would like to be notified of the Unveiling Ceremony: via email THE ADVOCATE

Page 40

or telephone November 2015

THE ADVOCATE

Page 41

November 2015

The Baltimore County Bar Association 100 County Courts Building 401 Bosley Avenue Towson, MD 21204-4491 410-337-9103-Telephone 410-823-3418-Facsimile www.bcba.org

Annual Dues Invoice and Black-Tie Banquet information will be mailed on or about November 15, 2015. If you do not receive your statement by December 1, 2015, please contact the Bar Office to confirm your contact information. Thank you!

MEMBER ADVERTISEMENTS Towson. Small criminal defense law firm (Spencer Gordon) seeking subtenant for our office at Courthouse Commons, 222 Bosley Avenue, Suite B7. One block from Circuit Courthouse; 15’ x 13.5’ room. Administrative/legal assistant support available. Free parking. Seeking easy-going individual. Financial arrangements negotiable. Call 410-296-2555 or email sajlaw@gmail.com.

Historic Lutherville. Office space available in a small law firm, perfect for a solo practitioner. Office comes with a Partner’s desk, chairs and bookcase. Use of conference room, waiting room, receptionist, phone system, utilities and internet. Free parking. Close to Towson court houses, I695 and I83. Email randy@waselaw.com or call 410-828-8500.

Dundalk. Available office space in Dundalk. Call 410-288-2900.

Towson. For rent, Lawyer’s office in the business condominium of J. Michael Lawlor. Approx. 20x10 w/filing cabinet, small bookcase, desk, chairs and credenza w/three lamps. Young attorney who practices domestic law (not exclusively, necessarily) is desired. Spin-off work will be available. Rent $650/mo. Contact J. Michael Lawlor at 410-494-1800 or lawloresq@verizon.net.

THE ADVOCATE

Page 42

November 2015